Bill Summary & Status
102nd Congress (1991 - 1992)
H.CON.RES.287
All Congressional Actions with Amendments


NEW SEARCH | HOME | HELP |

Back to BSS Back to Bill Summary and Status

{link: 'http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d102:H.CON.RES.287:@@@S',title: 'THOMAS - BSS - H.CON.RES.287 - All Congressional Actions with Amendments' }


H.CON.RES.287
Latest Title: Setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.
Sponsor: Rep Panetta, Leon [CA-16] (introduced 3/2/1992)      Cosponsors (None)
Related Bills: H.RES.386, H.RES.463, H.J.RES.494, S.CON.RES.104, S.CON.RES.106
Latest Major Action: 5/21/1992 Conference report agreed to in Senate. Status: Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 52-41. Record Vote No: 110.
Latest Action: 5/22/1992 Message on Senate action sent to the House.
ALL ACTIONS: (Floor Actions/Congressional Record Page References)
3/2/1992 7:58pm:
The House Committee on The Budget reported an original measure, H. Rept. 102-450, by Mr. Panetta.
3/2/1992 7:58pm:
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 269.
3/3/1992 5:54pm:
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 386 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H. Con. Res. 287 with 3 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions. All points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution, except for section 606(b) of the Budget Act shall be waived. Specified amendments are in order. No amendment to the concurrent resolution shall be in order except those amendments printed in the report accompanying this resolution, to be considered and debated in the order, manner and for the time specified in the report. Said amendments shall not be subject to further amendment. If more than one amendment in the nature of a substitute is adopted, only the last amendment adopted shall be considered as finally adopted. All points of order against consideration of amendments shall be waived. At the conclusion of the consideration of the concurrent res...
3/4/1992 4:27pm:
Rule H. Res. 386 passed House.
3/4/1992 4:33pm:
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 386.
3/4/1992 4:33pm:
Rule provides for consideration of H. Con. Res. 287 with 3 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions. All points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution, except for section 606(b) of the Budget Act shall be waived. Specified amendments are in order. No amendment to the concurrent resolution shall be in order except those amendments printed in the report accompanying this resolution, to be considered and debated in the order, manner and for the time specified in the report. Said amendments shall not be subject to further amendment. If more than one amendment in the nature of a substitute is adopted, only the last amendment adopted shall be considered as finally adopted. All points of order against consideration of amendments shall be waived. At the conclusion of the consideration of the concurrent res...
3/4/1992 4:34pm:
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 386 and Rule XXIII.
3/4/1992 4:34pm:
The Speaker designated the Honorable Jose Serrano to act as Chairman of the Committee.
3/4/1992 4:34pm:
GENERAL DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 386, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with three hours of general debate on the concurrent resolution.
3/4/1992 7:30pm:
H.AMDT.444 Amendment (A001) in the nature of a substitute offered by Mr. Dannemeyer.
Amendment sought to provide fiscal year 1993 new budget authority of $1,221 billion; budget outlays of $1,182 billion; budget revenues of $845 billion; and a budget deficit of $337 billion. It also sought to freeze domestic discretionary spending at the 1992 level with a 2 percent annual growth thereafter; and added language calling on the Department of the Treasury to initiate a program to issue Treasury obligations (zero-coupon and gold-backed bonds) that have an annual investment yield not exceeding 2 per centum.
3/4/1992 7:31pm:
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 386, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with thirty minutes of debate.
3/4/1992 8:17pm:
H.AMDT.444 On agreeing to the Dannemeyer amendment (A001) Failed by recorded vote: 60 - 344 (Roll no. 38).
3/4/1992 8:18pm:
H.AMDT.445 Amendment (A002) in the nature of a substitute offered by Mr. Gradison.
Amendment was the President's recommended budget and sought to provide fiscal year 1993 new budget authority of $1,232.5 billion; budget outlays of $1,232.2 billion; budget revenues of $839.6 billion; and a budget deficit of $392.6 billion.
3/4/1992 8:18pm:
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 386, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate.
3/4/1992 9:48pm:
H.AMDT.445 On agreeing to the Gradison amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 42 - 370 (Roll no. 39).
3/4/1992 9:48pm:
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H. Con. Res. 287 as unfinished business.
3/5/1992 10:28am:
Considered as unfinished business.
3/5/1992 10:28am:
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
3/5/1992 10:29am:
H.AMDT.446 Amendment (A003) in the nature of a substitute offered by Mr. Towns.
Amendment sought to provide fiscal year 1993 new budget authority of $1,203.1 billion; budget outlays of $1,198.4 billion; budget revenues of $1,168.2 billion; and a budget deficit of $322.3 billion. It would have reduced defense budget authority by $49 billion in fiscal year 1993 and a total of $400 billion over 5 years.
3/5/1992 10:30am:
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 386, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with eight hours of debate on the Towns amendment in the nature of a substitute.
3/5/1992 5:53pm:
H.AMDT.446 On agreeing to the Towns amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 77 - 342 (Roll no. 40).
3/5/1992 5:54pm:
GENERAL DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 386, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with the remaining one hour of general debate made in order by the rule.
3/5/1992 6:48pm:
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H. Con. Res. 287.
3/5/1992 6:49pm:
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
3/5/1992 6:51pm:
The House moved toward putting the question on agreeing to the concurrent resolution.
3/5/1992 6:52pm:
Mr. Gradison demanded that the question be divided.
3/5/1992 6:53pm:
The Speaker announced that the question was divisible and put the question on sections 1, 2, and 4 of the resolution.
3/5/1992 7:10pm:
Secs. 1, 2, and 4 agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 215-201 (Roll no. 41).
3/5/1992 7:26pm:
Sec. 3 agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 191 (Roll no. 42).
3/5/1992 7:28pm:
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H. Con. Res. 287.
3/10/1992:
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Budget.
4/1/1992:
Senate Committee on Budget discharged. Pursuant to Section 300 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, as amended.
4/1/1992:
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 435.
4/10/1992:
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
4/10/1992:
Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S.CON.RES. 106 amended. By Yea-Nay vote 54-35. Record Vote No: 80.
4/10/1992:
Resolution agreed to in Senate in lieu of S.CON.RES. 106 with an amendment by Voice Vote.
4/10/1992:
Senate insisted on its amendment, requested a conference.
4/28/1992:
Senate appointed conferees Sasser; Johnston; Riegle; Exon; Domenici; Symms; Bond.
4/28/1992:
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
5/6/1992 6:45pm:
Mr. Panetta asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.
5/6/1992 6:46pm:
On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection.
5/6/1992 6:46pm:
Mr. Gradison moved that the House instruct conferees.
5/6/1992 6:47pm:
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Gradison motion to instruct conferees. The motion contains instructions which require the House conferees to include in the conference report the provision in section 14 of the Senate amendment which relates to the adoption of a balanced budget amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
5/6/1992 6:52pm:
The previous question was ordered without objection.
5/6/1992 7:17pm:
On motion that the House instruct conferees Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 322 - 66 (Roll no. 107).
5/6/1992 7:17pm:
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
5/6/1992 7:17pm:
The Speaker appointed conferees: Panetta, Gephardt, Oberstar, Guarini, Durbin, Espy, Kildee, Beilenson, Huckaby, Sabo, Gradison, McMillan (NC), Thomas (CA), Rogers, Houghton, and McCrery.
5/6/1992 7:17pm:
Without objection, the Speaker reserved the right to make future appointments of conferees.
5/7/1992:
Message on House action received in Senate.
5/7/1992:
Conference held.
5/20/1992:
Conferees agreed to file conference report.
5/20/1992:
Conference papers: Senate report and managers' statement held at the desk in Senate.
5/20/1992 6:40pm:
Conference report H. Rept. 102-529 filed.
5/20/1992 10:15pm:
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 463 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H. Con. Res. 287. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report will be considered as read and debate on the conference report will be limited to one hour, equally divided and controlled.
5/21/1992 12:32pm:
Rule H. Res. 463 passed House.
5/21/1992 12:33pm:
Mr. Panetta brought up conference report H. Rept. 102-529 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 463.
5/21/1992 12:33pm:
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report.
5/21/1992 1:19pm:
The previous question was ordered without objection.
5/21/1992 1:42pm:
On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 207 (Roll no. 139).
5/21/1992 1:42pm:
Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
5/21/1992:
Conference papers: message on House action held at the desk in Senate.
5/21/1992:
Senate agreed to conference report by Yea-Nay Vote. 52-41. Record Vote No: 110.
5/21/1992:
Conference report considered in Senate.
5/22/1992:
Message on Senate action sent to the House.