write_parts.c-54 : failed to open = [/local/etc/httpd/cgi-lis/txt_templates/compr_reg_crumb.txt]

Committee Reports

105th Congress (1997-1998)

House Report 105-399

House Report 105-399 1 of 1

This Report: To Accompany S.830     Printer Friendly: HTML  |  PDF




{link: 'http://www.congress.gov:80/cgi-bin/cpquery?',title: 'THOMAS - Committee Report - House Report 105-399' }

FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION MODERNIZATION ACT OF 1997

59-006

105TH CONGRESS

Report

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1st Session

105-399
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION MODERNIZATION ACT OF 1997

November 9, 1997- Ordered to be printed
Mr. BLILEY, from the committee of conference, submitted the following
CONFERENCE REPORT
[To accompany S. 830]

The committee of conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the amendments of the House to the bill (S. 830) to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act to improve the regulation of food, drugs, devices, and biological products, and for other purposes, having met, after full and free conference, have agreed to recommend and do recommend to their respective Houses as follows:

That the Senate recede from its disagreement to the amendment of the House to the text of the bill and agree to the same with an amendment as follows:

In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the House amendment, insert the following:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; REFERENCES; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Sec. 1. Short title; references; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definitions.
TITLE I--IMPROVING REGULATION OF DRUGS
Subtitle A--Fees Relating to Drugs
Sec. 101. Findings.
Sec. 102. Definitions.
Sec. 103. Authority to assess and use drug fees.
Sec. 104. Annual reports.
Sec. 105. Savings.
Sec. 106. Effective date.
Sec. 107. Termination of effectiveness.
Subtitle B--Other Improvements
Sec. 111. Pediatric studies of drugs.
Sec. 112. Expediting study and approval of fast track drugs.
Sec. 113. Information program on clinical trials for serious or life-threatening diseases.
Sec. 114. Health care economic information.
Sec. 115. Clinical investigations.
Sec. 116. Manufacturing changes for drugs.
Sec. 117. Streamlining clinical research on drugs.
Sec. 118. Data requirements for drugs and biologics.
Sec. 119. Content and review of applications.
Sec. 120. Scientific advisory panels.
Sec. 121. Positron emission tomography.
Sec. 122. Requirements for radiopharmaceuticals.
Sec. 123. Modernization of regulation.
Sec. 124. Pilot and small scale manufacture.
Sec. 125. Insulin and antibiotics.
Sec. 126. Elimination of certain labeling requirements.
Sec. 127. Application of Federal law to practice of pharmacy compounding.
Sec. 128. Reauthorization of clinical pharmacology program.
Sec. 129. Regulations for sunscreen products.
Sec. 130. Reports of postmarketing approval studies.
Sec. 131. Notification of discontinuance of a life saving product.
TITLE II--IMPROVING REGULATION OF DEVICES
Sec. 201. Investigational device exemptions.
Sec. 202. Special review for certain devices.
Sec. 203. Expanding humanitarian use of devices.
Sec. 204. Device standards.
Sec. 205. Scope of review; collaborative determinations of device data requirements.
Sec. 206. Premarket notification.
Sec. 207. Evaluation of automatic class III designation.
Sec. 208. Classification panels.
Sec. 209. Certainty of review timeframes; collaborative review process.
Sec. 210. Accreditation of persons for review of premarket notification reports.
Sec. 211. Device tracking.
Sec. 212. Postmarket surveillance.
Sec. 213. Reports.
Sec. 214. Practice of medicine.
Sec. 215. Noninvasive blood glucose meter.
Sec. 216. Use of data relating to premarket approval; product development protocol.
Sec. 217. Clarification of the number of required clinical investigations for approval.
TITLE III--IMPROVING REGULATION OF FOOD
Sec. 301. Flexibility for regulations regarding claims.
Sec. 302. Petitions for claims.
Sec. 303. Health claims for food products.
Sec. 304. Nutrient content claims.
Sec. 305. Referral statements.
Sec. 306. Disclosure of irradiation.
Sec. 307. Irradiation petition.
Sec. 308. Glass and ceramic ware.
Sec. 309. Food contact substances.
TITLE IV--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 401. Dissemination of information on new uses.
Sec. 402. Expanded access to investigational therapies and diagnostics.
Sec. 403. Approval of supplemental applications for approved products.
Sec. 404. Dispute resolution.
Sec. 405. Informal agency statements.
Sec. 406. Food and Drug Administration mission and annual report.
Sec. 407. Information system.
Sec. 408. Education and training.
Sec. 409. Centers for education and research on therapeutics.
Sec. 410. Mutual recognition agreements and global harmonization.
Sec. 411. Environmental impact review.
Sec. 412. National uniformity for nonprescription drugs and cosmetics.
Sec. 413. Food and Drug Administration study of mercury compounds in drugs and food.
Sec. 414. Interagency collaboration.
Sec. 415. Contracts for expert review.
Sec. 416. Product classification.
Sec. 417. Registration of foreign establishments.
Sec. 418. Clarification of seizure authority.
Sec. 419. Interstate commerce.
Sec. 420. Safety report disclaimers.
Sec. 421. Labeling and advertising regarding compliance with statutory requirements.
Sec. 422. Rule of construction.
TITLE V--EFFECTIVE DATE
Sec. 501. Effective date.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

TITLE I--IMPROVING REGULATION OF DRUGS

Subtitle A--Fees Relating to Drugs

SEC. 101. FINDINGS.

SEC. 102. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 103. AUTHORITY TO ASSESS AND USE DRUG FEES.

relisted. After such fee is paid for that fiscal year, such fee shall be payable on or before January 31 of each year. Such fee shall be paid only once for each product for a fiscal year in which the fee is payable.'; and

total amounts collected by application, supplement, establishment, and product fees.

SEC. 104. ANNUAL REPORTS.

SEC. 105. SAVINGS.

supplement accepted for filing prior to October 1, 1997, and to assess and collect any product or establishment fee required by such Act for a fiscal year prior to fiscal year 1998.

SEC. 106. EFFECTIVE DATE.

SEC. 107. TERMINATION OF EFFECTIVENESS.

Subtitle B--Other Improvements

SEC. 111. PEDIATRIC STUDIES OF DRUGS.

`SEC. 505A. PEDIATRIC STUDIES OF DRUGS.

enactment of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997, the Secretary, after consultation with experts in pediatric research shall develop, prioritize, and publish an initial list of approved drugs for which additional pediatric information may produce health benefits in the pediatric population. The Secretary shall annually update the list.

SEC. 112. EXPEDITING STUDY AND APPROVAL OF FAST TRACK DRUGS.

`SEC. 506. FAST TRACK PRODUCTS.

SEC. 113. INFORMATION PROGRAM ON CLINICAL TRIALS FOR SERIOUS OR LIFE-THREATENING DISEASES.

effects associated with the use or administration of such experimental treatments.

SEC. 114. HEALTH CARE ECONOMIC INFORMATION.

to Congress a report containing the findings of the study.

SEC. 115. CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS.

SEC. 116. MANUFACTURING CHANGES FOR DRUGS.

`SEC. 506A. MANUFACTURING CHANGES.

the specifications in the approved application or license referred to in subsection (a) for the drug (unless exempted by the Secretary by regulation or guidance from the requirements of this subsection);

SEC. 117. STREAMLINING CLINICAL RESEARCH ON DRUGS.

experts using such drugs for investigational purposes certify to such manufacturer or sponsor that they will inform any human beings to whom such drugs, or any controls used in connection therewith, are being administered, or their representatives, that such drugs are being used for investigational purposes and will obtain the consent of such human beings or their representatives, except where it is not feasible or it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require any clinical investigator to submit directly to the Secretary reports on the investigational use of drugs.'.

SEC. 118. DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR DRUGS AND BIOLOGICS.

SEC. 119. CONTENT AND REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS.

of interest, and knowledge of regulatory and scientific standards, and which shall apply equally to all individuals who review such applications.

SEC. 120. SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANELS.

SEC. 121. POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY.

published in the Federal Register on February 27, 1995, 60 Fed. Reg. 10593.

SEC. 122. REQUIREMENTS FOR RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS.

SEC. 123. MODERNIZATION OF REGULATION.

(d)' and inserting `biologics license application under subsection (a)'.

SEC. 124. PILOT AND SMALL SCALE MANUFACTURE.

SEC. 125. INSULIN AND ANTIBIOTICS.

SEC. 126. ELIMINATION OF CERTAIN LABELING REQUIREMENTS.

SEC. 127. APPLICATION OF FEDERAL LAW TO PRACTICE OF PHARMACY COMPOUNDING.

`SEC. 503A. PHARMACY COMPOUNDING.

SEC. 128. REAUTHORIZATION OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY PROGRAM.

SEC. 129. REGULATIONS FOR SUNSCREEN PRODUCTS.

SEC. 130. REPORTS OF POSTMARKETING APPROVAL STUDIES.

`SEC. 506B. REPORTS OF POSTMARKETING STUDIES.

SEC. 131. NOTIFICATION OF DISCONTINUANCE OF A LIFE SAVING PRODUCT.

`SEC. 506C. DISCONTINUANCE OF A LIFE SAVING PRODUCT.

TITLE II--IMPROVING REGULATION OF DEVICES

SEC. 201. INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTIONS.

SEC. 202. SPECIAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN DEVICES.

SEC. 203. EXPANDING HUMANITARIAN USE OF DEVICES.

SEC. 204. DEVICE STANDARDS.

`RECOGNITION OF A STANDARD

SEC. 205. SCOPE OF REVIEW; COLLABORATIVE DETERMINATIONS OF DEVICE DATA REQUIREMENTS.

SEC. 206. PREMARKET NOTIFICATION.

SEC. 207. EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC CLASS III DESIGNATION.

SEC. 208. CLASSIFICATION PANELS.

SEC. 209. CERTAINTY OF REVIEW TIMEFRAMES; COLLABORATIVE REVIEW PROCESS.

SEC. 210. ACCREDITATION OF PERSONS FOR REVIEW OF PREMARKET NOTIFICATION REPORTS.

`SEC. 523. ACCREDITED PERSONS.

made by the person, and the procedures used by the person to identify and avoid conflicts of interest. Upon the request of an officer or employee designated by the Secretary, the person shall permit the officer or employee, at all reasonable times, to have access to, to copy, and to verify, the records.

SEC. 211. DEVICE TRACKING.

`DEVICE TRACKING

SEC. 212. POSTMARKET SURVEILLANCE.

`POSTMARKET SURVEILLANCE

the completion of a dispute resolution process as described in section 562.'.

SEC. 213. REPORTS.

SEC. 214. PRACTICE OF MEDICINE.

`SEC. 906. PRACTICE OF MEDICINE.

SEC. 215. NONINVASIVE BLOOD GLUCOSE METER.

SEC. 216. USE OF DATA RELATING TO PREMARKET APPROVAL; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROTOCOL.

`he shall' and all that follows and inserting the following: `the Secretary--

SEC. 217. CLARIFICATION OF THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS FOR APPROVAL.

TITLE III--IMPROVING REGULATION OF FOOD

SEC. 301. FLEXIBILITY FOR REGULATIONS REGARDING CLAIMS.

SEC. 302. PETITIONS FOR CLAIMS.

SEC. 303. HEALTH CLAIMS FOR FOOD PRODUCTS.

SEC. 304. NUTRIENT CONTENT CLAIMS.

protection or research directly relating to human nutrition (such as the National Institutes of Health or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) or the National Academy of Sciences or any of its subdivisions has published an authoritative statement, which is currently in effect, which identifies the nutrient level to which the claim refers;

SEC. 305. REFERRAL STATEMENTS.

SEC. 306. DISCLOSURE OF IRRADIATION.

`DISCLOSURE

SEC. 307. IRRADIATION PETITION.

SEC. 308. GLASS AND CERAMIC WARE.

SEC. 309. FOOD CONTACT SUBSTANCES.

`NOTIFICATION RELATING TO A FOOD CONTACT SUBSTANCE

for the six-month period involved for carrying out the notification program in fiscal year 1999, whichever is less.

TITLE IV--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 401. DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION ON NEW USES.

`SUBCHAPTER D--DISSEMINATION OF TREATMENT INFORMATION

`SEC. 551. REQUIREMENTS FOR DISSEMINATION OF TREATMENT INFORMATION ON DRUGS OR DEVICES.

or any other information that the Secretary has authority to make available to the public; and

`SEC. 552. INFORMATION AUTHORIZED TO BE DISSEMINATED.

`SEC. 553. ESTABLISHMENT OF LIST OF ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS DISSEMINATED AND LIST OF PROVIDERS THAT RECEIVED ARTICLES AND REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS.

555, such manufacturer is required to take corrective action and shall be made available to the Secretary, upon request, for purposes of ensuring or taking corrective action pursuant to such section. Such records, at the Secretary's discretion, may identify the recipient of information provided pursuant to section 551 or the categories of such recipients.

`SEC. 554. REQUIREMENT REGARDING SUBMISSION OF SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FOR NEW USE; EXEMPTION FROM REQUIREMENT.

conduct the studies in a timely manner, except that an extension under this subparagraph may not be provided for more than 24 additional months.

`SEC. 555. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; CESSATION OF DISSEMINATION.

`SEC. 556. DEFINITIONS.

`SEC. 557. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.

useful scientific information to health care practitioners;

SEC. 402. EXPANDED ACCESS TO INVESTIGATIONAL THERAPIES AND DIAGNOSTICS.

`SUBCHAPTER E--GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO DRUGS AND DEVICES

`SEC. 561. EXPANDED ACCESS TO UNAPPROVED THERAPIES AND DIAGNOSTICS.

authorize the shipment of investigational drugs or investigational devices for the diagnosis, monitoring, or treatment of a serious disease or condition in emergency situations.

SEC. 403. APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATIONS FOR APPROVED PRODUCTS.

SEC. 404. DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

`SEC. 562. DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

SEC. 405. INFORMAL AGENCY STATEMENTS.

SEC. 406. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION MISSION AND ANNUAL REPORT.

users, manufacturers, importers, packers, distributors, and retailers of regulated products.'.

SEC. 407. INFORMATION SYSTEM.

`SUBCHAPTER D--INFORMATION AND EDUCATION

`SEC. 741. INFORMATION SYSTEM.

SEC. 408. EDUCATION AND TRAINING.

`SEC. 742. EDUCATION.

`SEC. 317G. FELLOWSHIP AND TRAINING PROGRAMS.

SEC. 409. CENTERS FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ON THERAPEUTICS.

`SEC. 905. DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM REGARDING CENTERS FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ON THERAPEUTICS.

SEC. 410. MUTUAL RECOGNITION AGREEMENTS AND GLOBAL HARMONIZATION.

SEC. 411. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW.

`SUBCHAPTER E--ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW

`SEC. 746. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT.

SEC. 412. NATIONAL UNIFORMITY FOR NONPRESCRIPTION DRUGS AND COSMETICS.

`SUBCHAPTER F--NATIONAL UNIFORMITY FOR NONPRESCRIPTION DRUGS AND PREEMPTION FOR LABELING OR PACKAGING OF COSMETICS

`SEC. 751. NATIONAL UNIFORMITY FOR NONPRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

name and quantity or if determined to be appropriate by the Secretary, the proportion of any bromides, ether, chloroform, acetanilide, acetophenetidin, amidopyrine, antipyrine, atropine, hyoscine, hyoscyamine, arsenic, digitalis, digitalis glucosides, mercury, ouabain, strophanthin, strychnine, thyroid, or any derivative or preparation of any such substances, contained therein, except that the requirement for stating the quantity of the active ingredients, other than the quantity of those specifically named in this subclause, shall not apply to nonprescription drugs not intended for human use; and

`SEC. 752. PREEMPTION FOR LABELING OR PACKAGING OF COSMETICS.

or the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (15 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.).

SEC. 413. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION STUDY OF MERCURY COMPOUNDS IN DRUGS AND FOOD.

and, to the extent the Secretary believes necessary or appropriate, with any other Federal or private entity.

SEC. 414. INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION.

SEC. 415. CONTRACTS FOR EXPERT REVIEW.

`SEC. 907. CONTRACTS FOR EXPERT REVIEW.

SEC. 416. PRODUCT CLASSIFICATION.

`SEC. 563. CLASSIFICATION OF PRODUCTS.

SEC. 417. REGISTRATION OF FOREIGN ESTABLISHMENTS.

SEC. 418. CLARIFICATION OF SEIZURE AUTHORITY.

SEC. 419. INTERSTATE COMMERCE.

SEC. 420. SAFETY REPORT DISCLAIMERS.

`SUBCHAPTER G--SAFETY REPORTS

`SEC. 756. SAFETY REPORT DISCLAIMERS.

SEC. 421. LABELING AND ADVERTISING REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS.

SEC. 422. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

TITLE V--EFFECTIVE DATE

SEC. 501. EFFECTIVE DATE.

And the House agree to the same.

That the House recede from its amendment to the title of the bill.
Tom Bliley,
Michael Bilirakis,
Joe Barton,
James Greenwood,
Richard Burr,
Ed Whitfield,
John D. Dingell,
Sherrod Brown,
Henry A. Waxman,
Ron Klink,

Managers on the Part of the House.
Jim Jeffords,
Dan Coats,
Judd Gregg,
Bill Frist,
Mike DeWine,
Edward M. Kennedy,
Christopher Dodd,
Tom Harkin,
Barbara A. Mikulski,

Managers on the Part of the Senate.

JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE

The managers on the part of the House and the Senate at the conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the amendments of the House to the bill (S. 830) to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act to improve the regulation of food, drugs, devices, and biological products, and for other purposes, submit the following joint statement to the House and the Senate in explanation of the effect of the action agreed upon by the managers and recommended in the accompanying conference report:

The House amendment to the text of the bill struck all of the Senate bill after the enacting clause and inserted a substitute text.

The Senate recedes from its disagreement to the amendment of the House with an amendment that is substitute for the Senate bill and the House amendment. The differences between the Senate bill, the House amendment, and the substitute agreed to in conference are noted below, except for clerical corrections, conforming changes made necessary by agreements reached by the conferees, and minor drafting and clerical changes.

The conference agreement on S. 830, the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997, provides for (1) the reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992; (2) the improvement of regulation of drugs through such reforms as those pertaining to pediatric studies of drugs, procedures relating to fast track drugs, health care economic information, national uniformity for over-the-counter drugs and cosmetics, and data requirements for drugs and biological products; (3) the improvement of regulation of medical devices through such reforms as those pertaining to device standards and data requirements, procedures relating to humanitarian and breakthrough devices, tracking and postmarket surveillance, and accredited party review; (4) the improvement of regulation of food through such reforms as those pertaining to the timetable and regulatory authority of the Secretary in processing health and nutrient content claims, food contact substance notifications, and information relating to irradiation treatment; and (5) general provisions pertaining to the dissemination of information, expanded access to investigational therapies, and consumer access to information about clinical trials of investigational therapies.

Certain matters agreed to in conference are noted below:

TITLE I--IMPROVING REGULATION OF DRUGS

Prescription Drug User Fee Act (Subtitle A)

The conferees believe it is important to place the PDUFA reauthorization provisions of the Act in the overall context of the budgetary agreements which have been put into place by the 1997 Balanced Budget Agreements (BBA). This Act preserves the original PDUFA adjustment factor and therefore the basic understanding behind the 1992 enactment of this provision: that is, the industry willingness to pay user fees for enhanced performance in the drug approval process. Nevertheless the conferees acknowledge that the 1997 BBA places tight constraints on the appropriations process, particularly in the out years. The conferees expect the appropriators will make every effort to meet the trigger so that FDA is allowed to collect and expend user fees. However, it must be acknowledged that particularly in the fifth year of BBA, budgetary

pressures on all discretionary spending will be great.

Breakdowns of the actual spending levels at FDA have not traditionally been provided to the appropriators, making it difficult to conduct oversight. Beginning in Fiscal Year 1998, appropriators will require FDA to submit a directed operating budget as part of the annual budget request. This will serve as a functional breakdown of how appropriated dollars are spent, similar to the report FDA submits annually to show how the agency spent collected PDUFA user fees.

The conferees expect the President's budgetary request for FDA for salaries and expenses to meet the PDUFA levels specified for each of these years and not be based on any assumption of the enactment of new substitutive user fees on other FDA regulated industries.

Pediatric studies of drugs (Sec. 111)

The conference agreement provides that if the Secretary determines that information about a drug may produce health benefits in a pediatric population and makes a written request for pediatric studies (including a time frame for completing the studies), and the studies are completed and are accepted by the Secretary, then the sponsor or manufacturer will qualify for 6 months of extra market exclusivity. The agreement authorizes the Secretary to determine the time frame for completing the studies, but the conferees emphasize that such studies should be sought, conducted, and completed at the earliest possible opportunity. The conferees do not intend that such studies be artificially timed for market advantage.

The agreement provides that no new market exclusivity may be applied to any new drug for which a new drug application is submitted after January 1, 2002. However, the agreement provides a continuation of the program for certain drugs already on the market on the date of enactment. The purpose of this limited extension is to ensure that, with respect to such already marketed drugs, exclusivity remains available if the Secretary determines there is a continuing need for additional information relating to the use of such drugs that may promote health benefits in the pediatric population. This is applicable only to drugs already included on the list under subsection (b) as of January 1, 2002. The Secretary will not list any additional drugs under Section 505A(b) after January 1, 2002. These drugs will be eligible for the applicable 6-month time extension if the requested studies satisfy all requirements of the section.

The conferees expect the Secretary to consult with experts in pediatric research to develop the list of drugs under subsection (b), and to set priorities for studies on these drugs. Such experts should include representatives from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit (PPRU) Network, and the U.S. Pharmacopeia. The conferees note particularly the excellent efforts of NIH, especially through the PPRU Network, which will contribute significantly to this effort.

The conference agreement also requires that a study be conducted on the program, by January 1, 2001, that reviews all aspects of the program, including its impact on the price and availability of drugs and the availability of generic drugs.

With respect to any requested studies under this provision, the conferees intend that data collected prior to a request or requirement by the Secretary may be used, in addition to data collected after such request or requirement in satisfying the provisions of this section.

Clinical investigations (Sec. 115)

The conferees note that the requirement for the Secretary to review existing guidance and develop additional guidance, as appropriate, on the inclusion of women and minorities in clinical trials does not require participation of women and minorities in any particular trial. Furthermore, FDA is required to consult with the National Institutes of Health, which has developed inclusion guidelines for subjects in federally funded clinical research, and with representatives of the drug manufacturing industry, to ensure that ethical, scientific, and legal issues specific to privately funded clinical research are considered. The conferees expect FDA to set forth its general policy regarding: the inclusion of women and minorities in drug development research; population-specific analyses of clinical data and assessment of potential pharmacokinetic differences; and the conduct of specific additional studies in women or minorities, where appropriate.

Content and review of applications (Sec. 119)

The Secretary is required to meet with an applicant if the applicant makes a reasonable written request for a meeting for the purpose of reaching agreement on the design and size of studies, if the sponsor provides the information necessary to discuss and reach agreement on the design and size of such studies. The Secretary may refuse to meet if the sponsor does not provide such information or if the Secretary determines that such meeting is premature or would not be useful.

Positron emission tomography (Sec. 121)

The conference agreement provides for regulation of positron emission tomography (PET) drugs and replaces earlier industry guidance and regulatory standards for PET products promulgated by the FDA. The agreement provides that,

until the Secretary establishes procedures under subsection (c)(1) described below, neither a New Drug Application (NDA) nor an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) is required by a licensed practitioner to produce a compounded PET product in accordance with United States Pharmacopiea (USP) standards.

The agreement requires the Secretary, in two years, to establish procedures for approving PET products, including compounded PET products, and good manufacturing practices for such products, taking account of relevant differences between commercial manufacturers and non-profit organizations and in consultation with patient groups, physicians, and others. The Secretary may not require NDAs or ANDAs for these products for four years (or two years after the procedures mentioned above are established).

A compounded PET drug, by definition, must be compounded pursuant to a valid prescription order and in accordance with state law, among other requirements. A PET drug that fails to meet these requirements is not a `compounded PET drug' and therefore is not exempt from section 501(a)(2)(B) (21 USC 351(a)(2)(B)) or from subsections (b) and (j) of section 505 (21 USC 355). PET drugs that fail to meet the definition of a `compounded PET drug' shall be subject to the procedures and requirements established by the Secretary under subsection (c)(1).

Application of Federal law to practice of pharmacy compounding (Sec. 127)

The conference report includes provisions on pharmacy compounding that reflect the conferees' extensive work with the Food and Drug Administration and other interested parties to reach consensus. It is the intent of the conferees to ensure continued availability of compounded drug products as a component of individualized therapy, while limiting the scope of compounding so as to prevent manufacturing under the guise of compounding. Section 503A establishes parameters under which compounding is appropriate and lawful. The conditions set forth in Section 503A should be used by the state boards of pharmacy and medicine for proper regulation of pharmacy compounding in addition to existing state-specific regulations.

The conferees intend that, as defined in subparagraph (b)(2), copies of commercially available drug products do not include drug products in which the change from the commercially available drug product produces a `significant difference' for the particular patient. For example, the removal of a dye from a commercially available drug product for a particular patient who is allergic to such dye shall be presumed to be a `significant difference.' The conferees expect that FDA and the courts will accord great deference to the licensed prescriber's judgement in determining whether the change produces a `significant difference.' However, where it is readily apparent, based on the circumstances, the `significant difference' is a mere pretext to allow compounding of products that are essentially copies of commercially available products, such compounding would be considered copying of commercially available products and would not qualify for the compounding exemptions if it is done regularly or in inordinate amounts. Such circumstances may include, for example, instances in which minor changes in strength (such as from .08% to .09%) are made that are not known to be significant or instances in which the prescribing physician is receiving financial remuneration or other financial incentives to write prescriptions for compounded products.

The conferees also expect that the Secretary will develop the list of bulk drug substances described in subsection (b)(1)(A)(i)(III) within one year from the date of enactment. It is the intent of the conferees that the criteria used to develop the list of bulk drug substances and the list itself are to be developed in consultation with the United States Pharmacopeia. The conferees further intend that where evidence relating to an approval under Section 505 does not exist, the Secretary shall consider other criteria. Finally, the conferees intend that after this list is published, organizations may petition the FDA for inclusion of additional substances on the aforementioned list.

The memorandum of understanding described in Paragraph (b)(3)(B)(i) shall provide guidance on the meaning of inordinate amounts, including any circumstances under which the compounding of drug products for interstate shipment in excess of 5 percent of total prescription orders would be included in a `safe harbor' of interstate shipments of compounded products that shall not be deemed inordinate.

As stated in paragraph (e), nothing in Section 503A is intended to change or otherwise affect current law with respect to radiopharmaceuticals, including PET drugs. Further, as stated in paragraph (f), the term compounding does not include mixing reconstituting or other such acts that are performed in accordance with directions contained in approved labeling provided by the product's manufacturer and other manufacturer directions consistent with that labeling. Nothing in this provision is intended to change or otherwise affect the Act with respect to reconstitution or other similar processing that is done pursuant to a manufacturer's approved labeling, and other directions from such manufacturer that are consistent with that labeling. In general, such practices, as performed by a licensed practitioner for an identified individual patient, are appropriately regulated by state boards of pharmacy. The conferees intend that facilities required to register with the FDA, including those which are engaged in non-patient specific compounding and reconstitution activities, are appropriately regulated under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Finally, with regard to the effective date described in paragraph (b), the conferees expect the FDA to work diligently to consult with necessary parties to promulgate the required regulations and lists. Nothing in paragraph (b) is intended to abrogate the

Secretary's responsibility to promulgate such regulations through the notice and comment rulemaking process.

Reauthorization of the Clinical Pharmacology Program (Sec. 128)

The conference agreement extends through fiscal year 2002 the authorization of appropriations of the Clinical Pharmacology Training Program, a program originally authorized under section 2(b) of P.L. 102-222. Nothing in this section of the agreement prohibits the Secretary from continuing the awarding of grants to the original and current grantees. The conferees strongly recommend that the Secretary continue the development of the clinical pharmacology programs at the colleges and universities originally selected to participate in the program.

Regulations for sunscreen products (Sec. 129)

The conference agreement includes a provision requiring FDA to continue diligently with its work to complete its rulemaking process on sunscreen products and to issue regulations within 18 months. The conferees recognize that various technical and scientific issues may take longer to resolve than other aspects of the rulemaking. The conferees do not intend that all regulation in this area be complete or comprehensive by a specified date.

TITLE II--IMPROVING REGULATION OF DEVICES

Scope of review (Sec. 205)

The conference agreement addresses the issue of regulatory burden by ensuring that the impact of the Secretary's necessary review, approval, and oversight functions is not inappropriate. This assurance is achieved by requiring the Secretary to consider, in consultation with an applicant for device approval, the method for evaluating the device's effectiveness that would be appropriate, least burdensome, and reasonably likely to result in the device's approval. The conferees believe that this language is necessary to and consistent with improving communications between the FDA and regulated persons, increasing regulatory efficiency, and decreasing the length of product review and approval.

Premature notification (Sec. 206)

The conference agreement exempts class I devices from premarket notification under section 510(k), except those types that present a potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury, or that are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health. The agreement also requires the Secretary to publish a notice listing the types of class II devices that are exempt from premarket notification. The Secretary must publish this initial list within 60 days. Thereafter, class II devices may be exempted by the Secretary on the Secretary's own initiative or through a petition process. the agreement provides that the Secretary must respond to any such petition within 180 days or the petition will be deemed granted.

The conferees do not intend by this provision that the Secretary should up-classify low-risk class I device in order to avoid exempting them. The conferees believe the appropriate exemption of class I and certain class II devices will allow the Secretary to expend limited premarket review resources on potentially risky and technologically advanced devices. Focusing resources in this manner will ensure the public continues to be adequately protected and will still benefit from the earlier availability of new products.

Accredited party review (Sec. 210)

The conference agreement makes modifications to the House and Senate provisions establishing the process by which the Secretary will accredit persons to review and initially classify 510(k) devices. The agreement's provisions relating to the scope and the duration of the pilot program specify that an accredited person may not review a class III device, a class II device that is permanently implantable, life-sustaining or life-supporting, or a class II device for which clinical data are required. The latter category is limited in size to not more than six percent of all 510(k) submissions. In addition, the agreement provides for the termination of the pilot program after the Secretary has met specified targets for inclusion of eligible devices.

Reports (Sec. 213)

The conference agreement amends Section 519 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to reduce the reporting requirements for device distributors. Manufacturers and importers, however, are required to comply with the existing requirements for medical device reporting. The amendment to section 519(a)(9) requires distributors to keep records and make them available to the Secretary on request. Because distributors will no longer be submitting reports to the Secretary, copies of reports would also not be sent to the manufacturers. This is not intended to provide the FDA with any new statutory authority to require distributors to keep additional records; it merely clarifies that existing record keeping requirements of section 519(a) continue to apply. This provision also removes the registration, listing, and reporting requirements for distributors under section 510. Since user facilities and manufacturers submit medical device reports to the FDA, there is no need for additional reporting by distributors. The FDA is urged to allow all record keeping, including

distributor record keeping, to be accomplished through either electronic means or written documentation. The FDA is also urged to revise its current regulations on distributor record keeping (21 C.F.R. Sec. 804.35(b)) to provide that distributors need only keep records of complaints for six years from the date a complaint is received by the distributor, consistent with the longest statutes of limitations under State tort laws. Currently, FDA regulations require distributors to keep records for two years from the date of the record of complaint or the expected life of the device, whichever is greater. It is the intent of the conferees to simplify these requirements, since distributors, unlike manufacturers, are not able to determine the expected life of a device. Since these records will be kept by manufacturers as well, it is unnecessarily burdensome for distributors to keep these records for other than a fixed period of time.

The conferees expect the FDA to modify its regulations under Sec. 519(f) to ensure that the reports under this section are not required from any manufacturer, importer, or distributor who also is regulated and required to make such reports under the Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968 (21 U.S.C. 36011).

Practice of medicine (Sec. 214)

The conference agreement includes a provision intended by the conferees to emphasize that the FDA should not interfere in the practice of medicine. Specifically, the conferees note that the off-label use of a medical device by a physician using his or her best medical judgment in determining how and when to use the medical product for the care of a particular patient is not the province of the FDA. It is the intent of the conferees that this provision not be construed to affect medical professional liability.

TITLE III--IMPROVING REGULATION OF FOOD

Flexibility for regulations regarding claims (Sec. 301)

The conference agreement clarifies the parameters within which the Secretary may use the interim final rulemaking authority established under this section. This authority enables the Secretary to make proposed regulations on claims effective upon publication, pending consideration of public comment and publication of a final regulation. The conferees' clarifying language emphasizes that this authority may be used when the Secretary determines that it is necessary to enable the Secretary to improve consumer access to important dietary information and to ban or modify a claim in a prompt fashion. The conferees' intent in creating this expedited rulemaking authority for health and nutrient content claims is that it be used primarily to expedite the review of petitions for health and nutrient content claims based on authoritative statements.

Health and nutrient content claims (Secs. 303, 304)

The conference agreement makes streamlined procedures available for the Secretary to permit more scientifically sound nutrition information to be provided to consumers through health and nutrient content claims. This process is triggered by authoritative statements of entities such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Although the provision specifically permits claims to be made on the basis of a statement produced by subsidiaries of NAS, the conferees intend that the lack of similar language with respect to entities such as NIH and CDC be interpreted as a reflection of the desire of the conferees that statements issued by entities such as NIH and CDC reflect consensus within those institutions. The agreement makes minor modifications to the House provisions on health and nutrient content claims to expedite the process by which such claims are processed. As part of the submissions to the Secretary for health claims based on authoritative statements, a balanced representation of the scientific literature may include a bibliography of such literature.

Disclosure of irradiation (Sec. 306)

The conference agreement ensures that no existing provision of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act will be considered to require a separate radiation disclosure statement that is more prominent than the declaration of ingredients on the food label. To ensure the intended effect of this provision, the conferees direct the Secretary promptly to publish for public comment proposed amendments to current regulations relating to the labeling of foods treated with ionizing radiation. The conferees expect final regulations to be issued not more than 12 months after the date of enactment of this measure. The public comment process should be utilized by the Secretary to provide an opportunity to comment on whether the regulations should be amended to revise the prescribed nomenclature for the labeling of irradiated foods and on whether such labeling requirements should expire at a specified date in the future. The conferees intend for any required disclosure to be of a type and character such that it would not be perceived to be a warning or give rise to inappropriate consumer anxiety.

Food contact substances (Sec. 309)

The conference agreement establishes a notification process for the regulation of components of food packaging, known as food contact substances, which is intended to expedite authorization of the marketing of a food contact substance except where the Secretary determines that submission and review of a food additive petition is necessary to provide adequate determination of safety. The agreement also authorizes appropriations to finance the costs of the new notification process. To protect the Agency from having to reallocate resources within CFSAN to meet the costs of

implementation, the agreement provides that implementation is to be triggered only when the FDA receives an appropriation sufficient to fund the program. The conferees strongly encourage the House and Senate to appropriate the funds authorized. The conferees also urge the Committees of jurisdiction, when reauthorizing the notification program, to reevaluate fully its operational effectiveness, the appropriateness of its timeframes, the adequacy of funding, and its protection of the public health.

On the subject of food contact substances, the conferees wish to commend the FDA and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for developing an Administration policy on the question of returning from EPA to FDA regulatory authority over antimicrobials used as food contact substances. This policy addresses the uncertainty unintentionally created by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) over the authority for regulating antimicrobials used as food contact substances. Although the legislative language effecting this policy was considered by the conferees to be outside the scope of this conference, the conferees acknowledge the significant need for this change and urge FDA and EPA to continue to work with the Congress to identify and develop an appropriate and expeditious vehicle for action on this matter. In the interim, the conferees urge the agencies not to delay active review of pending petitions and the pursuit of the most immediate means to achieve resolution of this jurisdictional issue.

TITLE IV--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Dissemination of treatment information (Sec. 401)

The conference agreement's inclusion of this section is intended to provide that health care practitioners can obtain important scientific information about uses that are not included in the approved labeling of drugs, biological products, and devices. The conferees also wish to encourage that these new uses be included on the product label. Therefore, the agreement includes strong incentives to conduct the research needed and file a supplemental application for such uses. A manufacturer who seeks to disseminate information about a new use must either certify that it will file a supplemental application or must submit a proposed protocol and schedule for conducting the necessary studies and a certification that a supplemental application will be filed.

Although the conferees intend to ensure that the research is undertaken to get new uses on product labels, the conferees also recognize that there may be limited circumstances when it is appropriate to exempt a manufacturer from the requirement to file a supplemental application. In making the determination of whether to grant an exemption pursuant to subsection (d)(2), the Secretary may consider, among other factors, whether: the new use meets the requirements of section 186(t)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act; a medical specialty society that is represented in or recognized by the Council of Medical Specialty Societies (or is a subspecialty of such society) or is recognized by the American Osteopathic Association, has found that the new use is consistent with sound medical practice; the new use is described in a recommendation or medical practice guideline of a Federal health agency, including the National Institutes of Health, the Agency for Health Care Policy Research, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the Department of Health and Human Services; the new use is described in one of three compendia: The U.S. Pharmacopeia-Drug Information, the American Medical Association Drug Evaluation, or the American Hospital Association Formulary Service Drug Information; the new use involves a combination of products of more than one sponsor of a new drug application, a biological license application, a device premarket notification, or a device premarket approval application; or the patent status of the product.

The conferees recognize that there may be cases where the size of the patient population may be cause for the Secretary to determine that a supplemental application should not be filed. However, this is intended to be the exception, rather than the rule, in the case of populations suffering from orphan or rare disorders. For many years, this Congress has sought to encourage research into orphan diseases and the approval of innovative drugs for their treatment. The Secretary should examine very carefully whether an exemption from filing a supplemental application might hinder such research and recognize the vital importance of encouraging application for new drugs and new drug uses intended to treat rare disorders.

Expanded access to investigational therapies and diagnostics (Sec. 402)

The conference report provides statutory direction to expand access programs and emphasizes that opportunities to participate in expanded access programs are available to every individual with a life-threatening or seriously debilitating illness for which there is not an effective, approved therapy. The conferees note that they purposely used broad language in this section relating to `serious' conditions, without attempting to define them, in order to permit wide flexibility in implementation. Illnesses that do not cause death, or imminent death, can nonetheless destroy the lives of both patients and their families. The conferees therefore intend that the seriousness of an illness be given broad consideration, to take into account all of the circumstances involved.

Currently, Federal law allows drug companies to make experimental drugs available, under specific circumstances, to seriously and terminally ill patients. However, companies are often reluctant to do so because they fear that inclusion of data on such very ill patients will jeopardize the approval of their product because these patients' medical progress on any therapy may conflict with or be inconsistent with data from patients in the clinical studies. The conferees request that the FDA evaluate ways to

address this problem, particularly for terminal patients who have failed existing approved therapies.

Information system (Sec. 407)

The conferees intend that the information system shall provide access to the information by the applicant under conditions set by the Secretary, except that access shall not be provided under any particular form of information system to any applicant until appropriate safeguards are in place to ensure that integrity and confidentiality of the information for which access is provided.

Education and training (Sec. 408)

The conference agreement authorizes the Centers of the FDA that conduct intramural research to provide fellowships and training to appropriate undergraduate, pre-doctoral, and/or post-doctoral candidates. In the past, FDA's Centers provided for a limited number of scientific training positions through Full Time Equivalent programs or interagency agreements with other federal agencies which have the statutory authority to hire trainees through third parties. However, many of the benefits of the training program have been reduced because FDA has not had specific direct authority to conduct and support them. In light of the additional overhead costs, reduced training flexibility, increased paperwork, and hiring delays that have resulted, it is increasingly difficult and impractical for FDA to hire trainees as FTE Service Fellows. As a result, the Intramural Research and Training Authority authorized here is intended to provide the FDA the authority to conduct and support directly the selection and training of fellows, allow more efficient use of appropriated funds by reducing overhead and other costs, and permit the training of such candidates as non-FTE positions. The conference agreement also provides similar authority for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Centers for education and research on therapeutics (Sec. 409)

The conference agreement establishes a demonstration program to conduct research and increase awareness of new products and ways to improve their effective use, and to increase awareness of risks of both new uses and combinations of therapies. In carrying out this demonstration program, the Secretary is directed to act through the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) in consultation with the FDA Commissioner. The conferees designated AHCPR as the lead agency because of its expertise in the evaluation of the effectiveness of clinical care, its non-regulatory role, and its close working relationship with the health care community in the improvement of the quality of care. Accordingly, this section establishes a new Section 928 in Title IX of the Public Health Service Act, the authorizing statute for AHCPR.

To ensure appropriate coordination and to avoid unnecessary duplication, AHCPR is required to consult closely with the FDA in the development and operation of this demonstration program. The conferees expanded the focus of this demonstration to include ways to improve the effective use of drugs, biological products, and devices as well as risks of new combinations of such products and directed that the clinical information gained in the project would be provided to consumers as well as health care practitioners and insurers. Finally, the conferees direct AHCPR also to consider the appropriate use of products in meeting the purposes of this section.

Environmental impact review (Sec. 411)

The conferees believe that FDA's new procedures implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) appropriately eliminate unnecessary paperwork and delays associated with prior agency practices. Section 411 makes clear that an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared in accordance with those regulations will meet the requirements of NEPA. The conferees do not intend this section to preclude judicial review of EISs. The conferees understand that the FDA may modify its regulations periodically, in consultation with the Council on Environmental Quality and the FDA's authorizing committees, as new circumstances or information warrants.

Because the Clean Air Act authorizes production of limited quantities of Class I and Class II substances for use in medical devices, there will be a continuing, but limited, supply of these substances. The EPA shall not dictate, promote or otherwise encourage a policy preference for disposal by incineration of the contents of metered-dose inhalers, but instead allow such contents to be recaptured, recycled or reused consistent with section 608(a)(3) of the Clean Air Act until such time that Congress conducts oversight hearings into the issue.

National uniformity for nonprescription drugs and cosmetics (Sec. 412)

Confidentiality of OTC company self-audits

Public policy should encourage drug manufacturers to conduct audits of their activities to candidly alert management to potential problems so that they can be addressed quickly and effectively. If FDA were to assert routine access to these audits, it would create serious disincentives to conducting appropriate audits and preparing thorough reports of the results. FDA already has a policy of not ordinarily requesting audit reports, which is set forth in compliance policy guide (#7151.02, Sec. 130.300) that applies to prescription drug firms. It is expected that OTC drug firms would be subject to the same compliance policy guide. Thus, during routine inspections of OTC drug establishments, FDA would not be expected to request or to review or copy reports and records that result from the firm's own audits and inspections of its operations to

assure compliance with applicable FDA requirements such as good manufacturing practice (GMP) regulations. FDA would reserve the right to review such audits in certain limited circumstances as outlined in the compliance guide.

OTC and cosmetics inspection

The conferees intend that FDA exercise its new records inspection authority fairly and carefully, especially with regard to inspections at facilities that manufacture products that are both cosmetics and over-the-counter drugs. Cosmetic products that are also OTC drugs will, under the provisions of this bill, benefit from full national uniformity relating to all regulatory requirements, including those associated with ingredients, labeling, and packaging. Therefore, under these provisions, manufacturers of such OTC products will be subject to records inspection by FDA. The conferees want to make clear that any such records inspection applies only to those products for which there is full national uniformity. This new records inspection authority applies only to products determined to be over-the-counter drugs. It does not apply to products that are solely cosmetics.

In the case of an inspection at a facility which deals both with cosmetic products that are OTC drugs and those that are not, FDA inspectors do not have access to any records relating to the cosmetic products. Further, the conferees want to make clear that there is no records inspection authority under these provisions for facilities dealing exclusively with cosmetics.

Finally, the conferees expect that FDA will provide sufficient time and guidance to the over-the-counter drug industry prior to initiating any program of records inspection and in the early stages of implementing this new requirement.

Effect of national uniformity on state enforcement `little FTC' laws

All states have laws prohibiting false and misleading advertising, modeled on the Federal Trade Commission Act. These laws have been applied to prohibit unsubstantiated claims for nonprescription drugs and cosmetics, and to require corrective advertising. This provision is not intended to preempt the application of these laws under such circumstances.

The Conference Committee intends to make clear that `Little FTC' laws, as they have historically been written and applied, are not preempted. The scope of national uniformity is modified to only apply to state requirements that relate to labeling and packaging or, if they go beyond labeling and packaging, to requirements relating to warnings. Thus, advertising issues relating to claims substantiation, fair balance, and misleading or deceptive claims are outside the scope of preemption.

Effect of national uniformity on state food labeling laws

This provision is not intended to pre-empt or prohibit States from regulating the labeling of food which derives from animals treated with non-prescription drugs. Nor are these provisions intended to void State regulations on the use of these drugs.

Product classification (Sec. 416)

Subsections (b) and (c) have been amended to make clear that FDA may only modify product classifications for public health reasons based on scientific information.
Tom Bliley,
Michael Bilirakis,
Joe Barton,
James Greenwood,
Richard Burr,
Ed Whitfield,
John D. Dingell,
Sherrod Brown,
Henry A. Waxman,
Ron Klink,

Managers on the Part of the House.
Jim Jeffords,
Dan Coats,
Judd Gregg,
Bill Frist,
Mike DeWine,
Edward M. Kennedy,
Christopher Dodd,
Tom Harkin,
Barbara A. Mikulski,

Managers on the Part of the Senate.



This Report:     Printer Friendly: HTML  |  PDF
1 of 1