write_parts.c-54 : failed to open = [/local/etc/httpd/cgi-lis/txt_templates/compr_reg_crumb.txt]

Committee Reports

106th Congress (1999-2000)

Senate Report 106-390

Senate Report 106-390 1 of 1

This Report: To Accompany S.2697     Printer Friendly: HTML  |  PDF




{link: 'http://www.congress.gov:80/cgi-bin/cpquery?',title: 'THOMAS - Committee Report - Senate Report 106-390' }

COMMODITY FUTURES MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2000

79-010

Calendar No. 766

106TH CONGRESS

Report

SENATE

2d Session

106-390

COMMODITY FUTURES MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2000

August 25, 2000- Ordered to be printed
Mr. LUGAR, from the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, submitted the following
REPORT

The Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, having considered an original bill to reauthorize and amend the Commodity Exchange Act to promote legal certainty, enhance competition, and reduce systemic risk in markets for futures and over-the-counter derivatives; and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass.

CONTENTS Page
I. Purpose, need and background 1
II. Section-by-section analysis 5
III. Legislative history and votes in the Committee 13
IV. Regulatory impact statement 16
V. Budgetary impact of the bill 17
VI. Changes in existing law 20

I. PURPOSE, NEED AND BACKGROUND

Signed into law in 1974, the modern Commodity Exchange Act (`CEA' or `the Act') is the body of law that governs the futures industry in the United States. Enforced by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (`CFTC'), this Act attempts to ensure that futures market participants are not defrauded and that the markets remain efficient, transparent and free from manipulation. Authorization for the funding of the CFTC expires on September 30th of this year.

The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 would reauthorize appropriations for the CFTC for five additional years and would reform the CEA in three primary ways. First, it would incorporate the unanimous recommendations of the President's Working Group (`Working Group' or `PWG'), consisting of the principals from the U.S. Treasury Department (`Treasury'), the Federal Reserve System (`Fed'), the Securities and Exchange Commission (`SEC') and the CFTC on the proper legal and regulatory treatment of over-the-counter (`OTC') derivatives. Second, it would codify the regulatory relief proposal of the CFTC to ensure that futures exchanges are appropriately regulated and remain competitive. Third, this legislation would reform the Shad-Johnson jurisdictional accord, which sought to establish jurisdictional boundaries between the agencies and banned the trading of single stock futures 18 years ago.

Derivative instruments, both exchange-traded and those traded over-the-counter, have played a significant role in our economy's current economic expansion due to their innovative nature and their risk-transferring attributes. According to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, the global derivatives market has a notional value that exceeds $58 trillion. Identified by Alan Greenspan as the `most significant event in finance of the past decade,' the development of the derivatives marketplace has substantially added to the productivity and wealth of our nation.

Derivatives enable companies to unbundle and transfer risk to those entities who are willing and able to accept it. By doing so, efficiency is enhanced as firms are able to concentrate on their core business objectives. A farmer can purchase a futures contract, one type of derivative, in order to lock in a price for a crop at harvest. Automobile manufacturers, whose profits earned overseas can fluctuate with changes in currency values, can minimize this uncertainty through derivatives, allowing them to focus on the business of building cars. Banks significantly lessen their exposure to interest rate movements by entering into derivatives contracts known as interest rate swaps, which enable these institutions to hedge their risk by exchanging variable and fixed rates of interest.

The CEA primarily governs one class of derivative transaction--futures contracts. The Act requires that these contracts be traded on a CFTC-regulated futures exchange. If a futures contract is being traded off of an exchange, a court of law could rule the contract to be illegal and unenforceable. When Congress enacted the CEA and created the CFTC to enforce it, the meanings of `futures contract' and `exchange' were relatively apparent and the OTC derivatives business was in its infancy. However, in the 26 years since the statute's creation, the growth of the OTC derivatives market has significantly outpaced the exchange-traded futures market. Along with this expansion, the boundaries between exchanges and OTC markets and between futures and swaps began to blur both practically and in legal status and treatment.

CFTC CONCEPT RELEASE

In 1998, the CFTC issued its concept release on OTC derivatives, which was perceived by many as foreshadowing possible regulation of these instruments as futures. The possibility of regulatory action had considerable ramifications, given the size and importance of the OTC market. This action significantly magnified the longstanding legal uncertainty surrounding these instruments, raising concerns in the OTC market, including suggestions it would cause portions of the business to move overseas.

This prospect led the Treasury, the Fed and the SEC to oppose the concept release and request that Congress enact a moratorium on the CFTC's ability to regulate these instruments until after the Working Group could complete a study on the issue. As a result, Congress passed a six-month moratorium on the CFTC's ability to regulate OTC derivatives. In November 1999, the Working Group completed its unanimous recommendations on OTC derivatives and presented Congress with these findings.

ADOPTION OF PRESIDENT'S WORKING GROUP REPORT

This legislation adopts many of the recommendations of the PWG report. The bill contains several mechanisms for ensuring that legal certainty is attained and that certain transactions remain outside the CEA. The electronic trading facility exclusion would exclude transactions in certain financial and other intangible commodities from the Act if conducted: (1) on a principal to principal basis; (2) between institutions or persons with high net worth; and (3) on an electronic trading facility. A second exclusion would exclude certain transactions from the CEA if (1) conducted between institutions or persons with high net worth; and (2) not traded on a trading facility. A third exclusion confirms and clarifies the Treasury Amendment language already contained in the CEA by excluding all transactions in foreign currency and government securities from the Act unless those transactions are futures contracts and traded on an organized exchange. As recommended by the Working Group, the bill would clarify the CFTC's jurisdiction over off-exchange retail futures transactions in foreign currency that are not effected with a regulated entity. A fourth exclusion for hybrid securities and depository instruments clarifies circumstances under which structured securities and depository instruments with embedded futures- and commodity option-like payments are excluded from regulations under the CEA. Another important recommendation of the PWG was to authorize clearing organizations, including futures clearinghouses, to clear OTC derivatives in an effort to lessen systemic risk. This bill incorporates this recommendation and establishes a regulatory framework for this activity.

ADOPTION OF THE CFTC'S REGULATORY MODERNIZATION PROPOSAL

The second major portion of this legislation addresses regulatory modernization and reform for the futures industry. When the CEA was enacted in 1974, the futures industry was primarily agricultural in nature. Farmers, agri-businesses and speculators traded futures contracts in open-outcry pits on futures exchanges in an effort to transfer volatile price risk. Realizing that futures trading was an effective way to transfer all types of risks, the financial sector began to develop and trade financial futures, and this market has flourished. Today non-agricultural futures comprise approximately 85 percent of the volume on U.S. futures exchanges. With the widespread adoption of computer technology, electronic exchanges began to compete head-to-head with open-outcry futures exchanges at a fraction of the cost. Last year witnessed the Swiss-German electronic futures exchange, Eurex, overtaking the Chicago Board of Trade as the global leader in futures trading volume. Many industry observers believe that the regulatory structure of the CEA has had a significant competitive impact on the U.S. futures exchanges and has inhibited the development of the OTC markets.

In February of 2000, the CFTC issued a proposal that would provide regulatory reform to futures exchanges and their customers. Instead of listing specific requirements for complying with the CEA, the proposal would require exchanges to meet internationally agreed-upon core principles. The CFTC proposal creates tiers of regulation for exchanges based on whether the underlying commodities being traded are susceptible to manipulation or whether the users of the exchange are limited to institutional customers.

The legislation incorporates a similar framework and provides for three levels of regulation. A board of trade that is designated as a contract market would receive the highest level of oversight due to the fact that products offered on a contract market are susceptible to manipulation or are offered to retail customers. The bill provides for a second level of regulation under which, in lieu of contract market designation, a board of trade may register as a derivatives transaction execution facility (`DTEF') if the products being offered by the board of trade are not susceptible to manipulation and are traded among institutional customers or retail customers who utilize large futures commission merchants (`FCMs'). A third option provided in the bill allows a board of trade to choose to be an exempt board of trade (`XBOT') and not be subject to the Act (except for the CFTC's anti-manipulation authority) if the products being offered are traded among institutions or high net worth persons and the instruments are not susceptible to manipulation. This bill would allow a board of trade that is a DTEF or an XBOT to opt to trade derivatives that are otherwise excluded from the Act. To the extent that these products are traded on these facilities, the CFTC would have exclusive jurisdiction over them. With this provision, it was the intent of the Committee to provide these facilities that trade certain specified derivatives with a choice--if regulation is beneficial, the facility may choose to be regulated. If not, the facility may choose to be excluded or exempted from the Act.

REFORM OF THE SHAD-JOHNSON JURISDICTIONAL ACCORD

The third portion of the bill addresses the Shad-Johnson jurisdictional accord. In 1982, SEC Chairman John Shad and CFTC Chairman Phillip Johnson reached an agreement on allocating between the agencies jurisdiction over futures on securities. Known as the Shad-Johnson Accord, this agreement prohibited the trading of futures on non-exempt securities and narrow-based indices of non-exempt securities (as defined by the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), allocated to the SEC jurisdiction over options on securities and securities indices, and allocated to the CFTC jurisdiction over futures on exempt securities and broad-based indices of securities.

Many have suggested that the Shad-Johnson accord, meant as a temporary agreement, should now be repealed. The Working Group unanimously agreed that the Accord can be repealed if regulatory disparities are resolved between the regulation of futures and securities. In April 2000, the General Accounting Office (`GAO') found no legitimate policy reason for maintaining the ban on single stock futures. The GAO noted in its report that these products are already being traded in foreign markets, synthetically in the options markets, and that economically equivalent transactions are being conducted in the OTC market.

Despite an eight month effort to get the two agencies to reach an agreement on lifting the ban on single stock futures, the SEC and the CFTC were unable to come to any agreement before this bill was introduced. Furthermore, they were unable to reach agreement before the bill was reported out of the Committee despite continued urging from the Chairmen of the Senate Agriculture and Banking Committees.

This legislation would repeal the prohibition on single stock futures and narrow-based stock index futures. It would allow these products, termed designated futures on securities, to trade on either a CFTC-regulated contract market or a SEC-regulated national securities exchange or association. The SEC would maintain its insider trading and anti-fraud enforcement authority over these products even though traded on a futures exchange and the CFTC would maintain its anti-manipulation authority, including the ability to enforce its large trader reporting requirements, over these products even though traded on a national securities exchange or association. Each agency would be required to provide the other regulator with notice before exercising these

authorities affecting markets outside their primary jurisdictions. Under the bill, margin levels on these products would be required to be harmonized with the options markets. The bill allows for the creation of an Intermarket Margin Board, consisting of members from the Fed, the CFTC and the SEC, to set and maintain margin levels for these products. The bill provides a one year period before the repeal of Shad-Johnson is effective in order to provide the regulators adequate time to implement the regulatory safeguards contained in the bill.

The various sections of this legislation have support from a broad spectrum of regulators and industry participants. Input has been solicited and received throughout the drafting process from numerous groups, including the CFTC, the Treasury, the Fed, the Chicago Board of Trade, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the New York Mercantile Exchange, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, the National Futures Association, the Coalition of Commercial and Investment Banks, the Securities Industry Association, the Coalition of Commercial and Investment Banks, the American Farm Bureau Federation, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, the American Bankers Association, the New York Stock Exchange, the U.S. Securities Markets Coalition, the Bond Market Association, the Foreign Exchange Committee, the Futures Industry Association, and the Financial Services Roundtable.

II. SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Sec. 1. Short Title and Table of Contents. The Act is entitled the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000.

Sec. 2. Purposes. The section lists 8 purposes for the bill including reauthorizing and streamlining the CEA; eliminating unnecessary regulation for the futures exchanges; clarifying the jurisdiction of the CFTC over certain retail foreign currency transactions; transforming the role of the CFTC; providing a legislative and regulatory framework for the trading of futures on securities; promoting innovation and reducing systemic risk for futures and OTC derivatives; allowing clearing of OTC derivatives; and enhancing the competitive position of the U.S. financial institutions and markets.

Sec. 3. Definitions. The section adds definitions to section 1(a) of the CEA for the following terms: derivatives clearing organization; designated future on a security; electronic trading facility; eligible commercial participant; eligible contract participant; exclusion-eligible commodity; exempted security; financial commodity; financial institution; hybrid instrument; national securities exchange; option; organized exchange; registered entity; security and trading facility.

Sec. 4. Agreements, Contracts, and Transactions in Foreign Currency, Government Securities and Certain Other Commodities. The section strikes clause (ii) of subparagraph 2(a)(1)(A) (the current law Treasury Amendment) and replaces it with a new subsection 2(c), which states that nothing in the CEA applies to transactions in foreign currency, government securities and other similar instruments unless these instruments are futures or commodity options traded on an organized exchange. The bill defines `organized exchange' as a trading facility that either serves retail customers, permits brokered or similar agency trades, or performs a self regulatory role. New section 2(c)(2) also excludes from CFTC regulation foreign currency transactions (other than those conducted on an organized exchange) between specified regulated entities and persons who are not eligible contract participants (i.e. retail customers). These excluded transactions include transactions executed on an electronic facility on which only a single firm is entitled to act as a market-maker and on which non-market maker counterparties may not accept bids and offers of other non-market-maker counterparties (either directly or through the market-maker running a matched book in which non-market-maker counterparties' bids and offers become bids and offers of the market-maker).

The Committee intends that new section 2(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act codify the decision in Dunn v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 519 U.S. 465 (1997). Accordingly, the meaning of the phrase `transactions in' that is referenced in section 2(c) should be interpreted in a manner consistent with the holding of that decision. In making these clarifications, the Committee does not intend to draw any distinction between the use of the words `in' or `involving' contained elsewhere in the CEA.

Sec. 5. Legal Certainty for Over-the-Counter Transactions. The section amends section 2 of the CEA to create a new subsection 2(d), which provides two exclusions from the CEA for OTC derivatives. Paragraph (1) of subsection 2(d) provides that nothing in the CEA applies to transactions in an exclusion-eligible commodity if the transaction: (1) is between eligible contract participants (institutions or high net worth persons) and (2) is not executed on a trading facility. The second exclusion in paragraph 2(d)(2) provides that nothing in the CEA shall apply to a transaction in an exclusion-eligible commodity if the transaction: (1) is entered into on a principal to principal basis between parties trading for their own accounts; (2) is between eligible contract participants (large, institutional entities) and (3) is executed on an electronic trading facility.

The exclusion for transactions conducted on a trading facility only applies to principal to principal transactions. The exclusion does not apply if an eligible contract participant: (1) acts as broker or in an equivalent agency capacity for any other party; or (2) trades in its own name for the economic risk and benefit of any other party. This limitation does not preclude an eligible contract participant from transacting with a counterparty and contemporaneously entering into an economically identical hedging transaction, for the eligible contract participant's own account and risk, on a trading facility. The limitation also does not preclude certain regulated eligible contract participants from acting in a discretionary investment management or equivalent fiduciary capacity for another eligible contract participant as contemplated under the definition of eligible contract participant.

Finally, transactions between participants that are otherwise conducted on a principal to principal basis are not ineligible for the exclusion merely because the trading facility itself or its sponsor acts in the capacity of an inter-participant broker by bringing buyers and sellers together.

Sec. 6. Excluded Electronic Trading Facilities. The section amends section 2 of the CEA to create a new subsection 2(e) that clarifies that trading instruments that are otherwise excluded from the CEA on an electronic trading facility does not subject the transactions to regulation under the CEA. Paragraph (2) of subsection 2(e) states that nothing in the CEA shall prohibit a contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility from establishing and operating an excluded electronic trading facility.

Sec. 7. Hybrid Instruments. The section amends section 2 of the CEA to create a new subsection 2(f) that provides that nothing in the CEA applies to a hybrid instrument that is predominantly a security or depository instrument. Paragraph (2) of subsection 2(f) defines

predominant in terms of any hybrid instrument in which (1) the issuer of the instrument receives payment in full of the purchase price at the time the instrument is delivered; (2) the purchaser is not required to make additional payments; (3) the issuer of the instrument is not subject to mark-to-market margining requirements; and (4) the instrument is not marketed as a futures contract. Paragraph (3) of subsection 2(f) clarifies that mark-to-marketing requirements do not include the obligation of an issuer of a secured debt instrument to increase the amount of collateral securing its obligations under the instrument.

New section 2(f)(2)(C) refers to mark-to-market margining requirements between the purchaser and the issuer of the hybrid instrument, and it is not intended to preclude a hybrid instrument from qualifying for the exclusion based on the issuer being subject to mark-to-market margining requirements when hedging the initial transaction on a regulated futures exchange or in another market.

Sec. 8. Futures on Securities. Subsection (a) amends section 2 of the CEA by adding a new subsection 2(g) that repeals the Shad Johnson jurisdictional accord. The new paragraph 2(g)(1) is a savings clause to ensure that excluded OTC equity derivatives remain outside the CEA and the jurisdiction of the CFTC. This paragraph also prohibits the CFTC from designating a board of trade as a contract market in options on securities (as in current law).

Paragraph (2) allows the trading of futures on security indexes on contract markets and gives the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction in regulating these futures. In order for these products to be designated as a contract market, the contracts must be cash settled and must not be susceptible to manipulation (applies to both the price of the contract or the underlying securities (or an option on such securities)).

Paragraph (3) allows the trading of designated futures on securities (defined in the bill as a contract for future delivery on a single non-exempted security, an index based on fewer than 5 non-exempted securities or any index in which a single stock predominates by its value accounting for more than 30 percent of the index's total value). The Act authorizes these products to be traded on designated contract markets and national securities exchanges or associations.

Paragraph (4) provides criteria for contract market designation of these products including: cash settlement; real-time audit trails; insusceptibility to price manipulation (both of the contract and the underlying stock or an option on that stock); eligibility for listing on a national securities exchange; margin requirements; conflict of interest rules; and making information available to the regulators.

Paragraph (5) authorizes the SEC to enforce the securities laws related to insider trading and fraud with respect to designated futures on securities listed on a contract market after providing the CFTC with notice. This paragraph also requires the SEC and the CFTC, beginning three years from the date of enactment, to jointly compile a report on the implementation of this new authority and, four years after the date of enactment, to submit the report to Congress.

Paragraph (6) authorizes the CFTC to enforce its large trader reporting and other anti-fraud and anti-manipulation authorities for designated futures on securities listed on a national securities exchange after providing the SEC with notice. It requires national securities exchanges to provide the CFTC with information to enforce these provisions.

Paragraph (7) provides the process for listing a designated future on a security on either a futures exchange or a national securities exchange.

As in current law, paragraph (8) provides the Federal Reserve with the authority to set margin requirements and delegate this authority. The paragraph would allow the Fed to create a three member board consisting of principals of the CFTC, SEC and the Fed, or their confirmed designees to set and maintain margin levels on designated futures on securities. Paragraph (9) would allow futures commission merchants to offer to U.S. customers futures on foreign stock or foreign stock indices listed on foreign boards of trade as long as the U.S. is not the primary market for such products. New section 2(g)(9) of the Act confirms the scope of the Commission's interest in futures contracts on foreign securities or foreign securities indices listed for trading on a foreign exchange. Except as set forth in this section, the Commission, consistent with existing law, will have no authority to review or approve any futures contract (or option thereon) on a foreign security or foreign security index listed for trading on a foreign exchange.

Paragraph (10) mandates that a registered futures association adopt customer suitability rules for the trading of designated futures on securities.

Subsection (b) of section 8 of the bill contains a sense of the Senate that Congress, to the extent necessary, should harmonize the tax treatment of equity options and designated futures on securities and the transaction fees for equity options and designated futures on securities prior to section 8 of the bill taking effect.

Sec. 9. Exempted Transactions. The section adds a new section that would allow for an exemption for transactions other than agricultural products that are traded between institutional entities on a bilateral basis. The CFTC would retain its anti-fraud, anti-manipulation authorities over these transactions.

Although this exemption is limited to transactions between eligible contract participants that occur off of a trading facility, the CFTC is encouraged to use its current exemptive authority, as appropriate and consistent with the public interest, under section 4(c) of the CEA to exempt transactions between eligible contract participants that occur on an electronic trading facility.

Sec. 10. Protection of the Public Interest. Replaces section 3 of the CEA with a new section listing the responsibilities of the CFTC in protecting the public interest.

Sec. 11. Prohibited Transactions. Re-writes the current section 4c for clarity.

Sec. 12. Designation of Boards of Trade as Contract Markets. Strikes current law sections 5 and 5a and adds a new section 5 providing for the designation of boards of trade as contract markets. Subsection (b) contains criteria that boards of trade must meet in order to be designated as a contract market. These include establishing and enforcing rules preventing market manipulation; ensuring fair and equitable trading; specifying how the trade execution facility operates--including any electronic matching systems; ensuring the financial integrity of transactions; disciplining members or market participants who violate the rules; allowing for public access to the board of trade rules and enabling the board of trade to obtain information in order to enforce its rules. Existing contract markets would be automatically designated `contract markets' under this section.

Subsection (d) sets out the 17 core principles that must be met to maintain designation as a contract market. This subsection provides that a board of trade must: monitor and enforce compliance with the contract market rules; list only contracts that are not susceptible to manipulation; monitor trading to prevent manipulation, price distortion and delivery or settlement disruptions; adopt position limits for speculators; adopt rules to provide for the exercise of

emergency authority, including the authority to liquidate or transfer open positions, suspend trading and make margin calls; make available the terms and conditions of the contracts and the mechanisms for executing transactions; publish daily information on prices, bids, offers, volume, open interest, and opening and closing ranges; provide a competitive, open and efficient market and mechanism for executing transactions; provide for the safe storage of all trade information in a readily usable manner to assist in fraud prevention; provide for the financial integrity of the contracts, the futures commission merchants and customer funds; protect market participants from abusive practices; provide for alternative dispute resolutions for market participants and intermediaries; establish and enforce rules regarding fitness standards for those involved in market governance; ensure that the composition of the governing board represents the market participants and a diversity of interests (in the case of mutually owned exchanges); maintain records and make them available at any time for inspection by the Attorney General; and avoid taking any action that restrains trade or imposes anticompetitive burdens on the markets.

Sec. 13. Derivatives Transaction Execution Facilities. The section amends the CEA by adding a new section 5a authorizing a new trading designation, the derivatives transaction execution facility (DTEF). Under subsection (b), a board of trade may elect to operate as a DTEF rather than a contract market if it meets the DTEF designation requirements. A registered DTEF may trade any non-designated futures contract if the commodity underlying the contract: (1) has a nearly inexhaustible supply; (2) is not susceptible to manipulation; (3) does not have a cash market in commercial practice; or (4) is determined by the CFTC (based on market characteristics and the facility's surveillance history, capacity, and self-regulatory role) to be unlikely to be susceptible to manipulation. This subsection allows eligible commercial participants to trade on a DTEF contracts in non-agricultural commodities. In order to be eligible to trade on a DTEF, a person must (1) be authorized to trade on the DTEF by the exchange and (2) be either an eligible contract participant or a person trading through a registered FCM that has capital of at least $20,000,000. For purposes of this section, the term `authorized' should not be construed to require a board of trade to approve individually every customer trading through a qualified FCM on a DTEF.

Boards of trade that have been designated as contract markets may operate DTEFs if they provide a separate location for DTEF trading or, in the case of an electronic system, identify whether the trading is on a DTEF or contract market.

Subsection (c) provides requirements for boards of trade that wish to register as DTEFs, including: establishing and enforcing trading rules that will deter abuses and provide market participants impartial access to the markets and capture information that may be used in rule enforcement; define trading procedures to be used; and provide for the financial integrity of DTEF transactions.

To maintain registration as a DTEF, the board of trade must comply with 8 core principles listed in subsection (d): maintain and enforce rules; ensure orderly trading and provide trading information to the CFTC; publicly disclose information regarding contract terms, trading practices, and financial integrity protections; provide information on prices, bids and offers to market participants as well as daily information in volume and open interest for the actively traded contracts; establish and enforce rules regarding fitness standards for those involved in DTEF governance; maintain records and make them available at any time for inspection by the Attorney General; and avoid taking any action that restrains trade or imposes anticompetitive burdens on the markets.

Subsection (e) allows a broker-dealer or a bank in good standing to act as an intermediary on behalf of its customers and to receive customer funds serving as margin or security for the customer's transactions. If the broker-dealer holds the DTEF customer funds or accounts for more than 1 business day, the broker-dealer must be a registered FCM and a member of a registered futures association. The CFTC and SEC are to coordinate in adopting rules to implement this subsection.

In complying with the implementation of this subsection, the Commission, in coordination with the SEC, shall endeavor to subject broker-dealers and financial institutions trading on a DTEF to record-keeping and reporting requirements that are comparable to and consistent with the requirements faced by futures commission merchants trading on a DTEF.

Under (f), the CFTC may adopt regulations to allow FCMs to provide their customers with the right to opt out of segregating customer funds for purposes of trading on the DTEF.

Subsection (g) clarifies that a DTEF may trade derivatives that otherwise would be excluded from the CEA. The CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction over these instruments to the extent that these instruments are traded on a DTEF.

Sec. 14. Derivatives Clearing Organizations. The section amends the CEA to create a new section 5b regarding derivatives clearing organizations. Under subsection (a), these clearing entities, which are allowed to clear derivatives (that are not a security), must register with the CFTC and meet a set of 13 core principles set out in subsection (d), including principles on financial resources of the clearing facility, participant eligibility, risk management systems, settlement procedures, treatment of client funds, default rules, rule enforcement, system safeguards, reporting, record keeping, public information disclosure, information sharing, and minimizing competitive restraints.

Under subsection (b), a derivatives clearing organization will not have to register with the CFTC if it is registered with another federal financial regulator and it does not clear futures. This is intended to encompass those clearing facilities registered with other financial regulators as well as those clearing facilities that have previously received an exemption from registration from these financial regulators. Under subsection (c), a derivatives clearing organization that is exempt from registration may opt to register with the CFTC. Subsection (e) provides that an existing clearing entity that clears futures contracts on a designated contract market will automatically be deemed a derivatives clearing organization for purposes of this section.

Sec. 15. Common Provisions Applicable to Registered Entities. The section amends the CEA to create a new section 5c that contains provisions affecting all registered entities (contract markets, derivatives transaction execution facilities and derivatives clearing organizations).

Subsection (a) would allow the CFTC to issue or approve interpretations to describe what would constitute an acceptable business practice under the core principles for registered entities.

Subsection (b) would allow a registered entity to delegate its self regulatory functions to a registered futures association, while specifying that responsibility for carrying out these functions remain with the registered entity.

Subsection (c) would enable the registered entity to trade new products or adopt or amend rules by providing the CFTC (and the Treasury Department for contracts in government

securities) a written certification that the new contract or new rule or amendment complies with the CEA. This subsection would allow a registered entity to request that the CFTC grant prior approval of a new contract, new rule or rule amendment. This subsection would require the CFTC to pre-approve any rule changes with regard to open interest agricultural contracts.

Subsection (d) grants the CFTC the authority to informally resolve potential violations of the core principles for registered entities.

Subsection (e) provides that nothing in this section limits or affects the emergency authorities of the CFTC.

Subsection (f) directs the CFTC to implement core principles for intermediaries. In carrying out this subsection, the Commission shall conduct a study of the Act and the Commission's rules, regulations and orders governing the conduct of persons required to be registered with the Commission. Within one year after the date of the enactment of the bill, the Commission would file a report with the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry and the House Committee on Agriculture. The report would identify: (1) the core principles and interpretations of acceptable business practices that the Commission has adopted as substitutes for the provisions of the Act and the Commission's rules and regulations thereunder; (2) the rules and regulations that the Commission has determined must be retained and the reasons therefor; (3) the extent to which the Commission believes that it can effect the changes identified in paragraph (1) through its exemptive authority under section 4(c) of the Act; and (4) the regulatory functions that the Commission currently performs that can be delegated to a registered futures association and the regulatory functions that the Commission has determined must be retained and the reasons therefor.

Subsection (g) adds a new provision (sec. 4c(a)(3)(B)) to allow futures commission merchants to trade futures off the floor of a futures exchange as long as the board of trade allows such transactions and the FCMs report, record and clear the transactions in accordance with the rules of the contract market or derivatives trading execution facility.

Sec. 16. Exempt Boards of Trade. The section amends the CEA to create a new section 5d regarding exempt boards of trade. Under subsections (a) and (b), futures contracts traded on an exempt board of trade would be exempt from the CEA if (1) participants are eligible contract participants (large institutional investors) and (2) the commodity underlying the futures contract is not a security, has an inexhaustible deliverable supply, is not subject to manipulation, or has no cash market. Subsection (c) subjects futures contracts traded on an exempt board of trade to the anti-manipulation provisions of the CEA. Under subsection (d), if the CFTC finds that an exempt board of trade is a significant source of price discovery for the underlying commodity, the board of trade shall disseminate publicly on a daily basis trading volume, opening and closing price ranges, open interest, and other trading data as appropriate to the market.

Sec. 17. Suspension or Revocation of Designation as Registered Entity. The section designates current section 5b as 5e and amends it to authorize the CFTC to suspend the registration of a registered entity for 180 days for any violation of the CEA.

Sec. 18. Authorization of Appropriations. The section amends section 12(d) of the CEA by striking 2000 and reauthorizing appropriations through fiscal year 2005.

Sec. 19. Preemption. The section rewrites paragraph 12(e)(2) of the CEA for clarity and to conform with changes made in the bill. Re-states the current provisions that the CEA supersedes and preempts other laws in the case of transactions conducted on a registered entity or subject to regulation by the CFTC (even if outside the United States), and adds that in the case of excluded electronic trading facilities, and any agreements, contracts or transactions that are excluded or covered by a section 4(c) exemption, the CEA supersedes and preempts state gaming and bucket shop laws (except for the anti-fraud provisions of those laws that are generally applicable). It is not a requirement that the underlying transaction be a futures contract or commodity option in order to be eligible for the preemption from these state law provisions.

Sec. 20. Predispute Resolution Agreements for Institutional Customers. The section amends section 14 of the CEA to clarify that futures commission merchants, as a condition of doing business, may require customers that are eligible contract participants to waive their right to file a reparations claim with the CFTC.

Sec. 21. Consideration of Costs and Benefits. The section amends section 15 of the CEA to add a new subsection (a) requiring the CFTC, before promulgating regulations and issuing orders, to consider the costs and benefits of their action. This does not apply to orders associated with an adjudicatory or investigative process, emergency actions or findings of fact regarding compliance with CFTC rules.

Sec. 22. Contract Enforcement Between Eligible Counterparties. The section amends section 22 of the CEA to provide a safe harbor so that transactions will not be voidable based solely on the failure of the transaction to comply with the terms or conditions of an exclusion or exemption from the Act or CFTC regulations.

Sec. 23. Legal Certainty for Swaps. The section provides that nothing in the bill gives the SEC or CFTC jurisdiction over swap agreements. It requires the President's Working Group to conduct a study on the regulatory treatment of swaps in relation to the securities laws.

Sec. 24. Repeal of Deficiency Orders. The section repeals section 8e of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Sec. 25. Technical and Conforming Amendments. The section makes technical and conforming amendments throughout the CEA to reflect changes made by the bill.

Sec. 26. Effective Date. The Act takes effect on the date of enactment, except section 8 (dealing with futures on securities), which takes effect one year after enactment.

III. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND COMMITTEE VOTES

On July 30,1998, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry held a hearing on the CFTC's concept release on OTC derivatives. Many industry observers believed that this document was the first step leading to regulating these transactions as futures. If these transactions were found to be off-exchange futures, a court of law could rule them to be illegal and unenforceable. This possibility posed the risk of this trillion dollar industry moving off-shore. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, Deputy Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers and SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt testified in opposition to the CFTC's stance and urged Congress to adopt a regulatory moratorium on the CFTC until the President's Working Group could study and report to Congress on this issue. CFTC Chair Brooksley Born testified in support of the concept release and urged the Committee to refrain from taking this action. Tom Jasper, managing

director of Salomon Smith Barney and William Miller, president of the End Users of Derivatives Association also testified regarding this subject.

In October 1998, Congress agreed to impose a six month regulatory moratorium on the CFTC with regard to OTC derivatives. This moratorium was contained in the annual agricultural appropriations bill.

On December 16, 1998, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry held a hearing regarding the status of the CFTC concept release on OTC derivatives and the near collapse of Long Term Capital Management hedge fund. All five CFTC commissioners testified, including Chair Brooksley Born, Commissioner David Spears, Commissioner John Tull, Commissioner Barbara Holum, and Commissioner James Newsome. Testifying on a second panel were Roger Anderson, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Federal Finance of the Treasury, Patrick Parkinson, Director of the Division of Research and Statistics of the Fed, Richard Lindsay, Director of the Division of Market Regulation of the SEC and Dan Waldman, General Counsel of the CFTC. A third panel, consisting of former CFTC chairs, included Susan Philips, Dean of the George Washington School of Business and Public Management; Wendy Gramm, James Buchanan Center of George Mason University; William Albrecht, Professor of Economics at the University of Iowa; and Martin Mayer, Guest Scholar at the Brookings Institute. The Committee also released for public comment 48 public policy questions regarding CEA reauthorization.

On February 25 and 26, 1999, the Senate and House Agriculture Committees held a joint Roundtable on Futures, Derivatives and Public Policy. Hosted by former CFTC chair Phillip Johnson and National Futures Association President Bob Wilmouth, this roundtable assembled a diverse group of eighteen individuals from the industry and academia to discuss derivatives policy and possible legislative solutions. These participants included Jack Coffee, Columbia University; George Crapple, Millburn Ridgefield Corp.; David Downey, Timber Hill LLC; Jerry Gulke, Strategic Marketing Services and farmer; Robert Kohlmeyer, World Perspectives; Howard Kramer, Schiff, Hardin & Waite; Robert Mackay, National Economic Research Associates Assoc.; Leo Melamed, Sakura Dellsher, INC.; Merton Miller, University of Chicago; Ernest T. Patrikis, American International Group; Todd Petzel, Common Fund; David Pryde, JP Morgan Futures; Thomas Russo, Lehman Brothers; Rich Sandor, Environmental Financial Products; Charles Smithson, CIBC World Markets; Steven Spence, Merrill Lynch; and Jack Wing, Illinois Institute of Technology.

On May 5, 1999, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry held a hearing regarding agricultural trade options and how these instruments might benefit producers in managing the risks of farming. In 1997, the CFTC began a pilot program to allow these products to trade on a conditional basis. As of the hearing date, no one in the industry had signed up to participate in the program. The Committee heard from Commissioner David Spears regarding the CFTC's pilot program on agricultural trade options and whether additional rulemaking or legislation was necessary to fix it. Other witnesses included Jerry Slocum, President, North Mississippi Grain Company; Dan Dye, Vice President, Cargill; Scott Stewart, National Introducing Brokers Association; Steve Manaster, Director, Financial Risk Management Pamplin College of Business, Virginia Tech; Kenneth Ackerman, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of Agriculture; and Dave Rempe, Extension Assistant, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University.

On September 23, 1999, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry held a hearing to explore the impact of electronic trading on the derivatives industry and its regulation. Specifically, the Committee heard testimony regarding how this industry will look in the near- and long-term as a result of technological advances; what types of electronic trading activity should be regulated under the CEA; and whether electronic exchanges should be regulated differently than open outcry exchanges. The first panel, consisting of representatives from the futures exchanges and electronic OTC trading facilities, addressed the policies that should drive whether transactions are regulated. These witnesses included Roger Barton, BrokerTec; David P. Brennan and Thomas Donovan, Chicago Board of Trade; Shawn Dorsch, Derivatives Net, Inc. (Blackbird); Howard Lutnick, Cantor Fitzgerald; Leo Melamed, Chicago Mercantile Exchange; and Edward J. Rosen, Coalition of Commercial and Investment Banks. The second panel provided the Committee with demonstrations on electronic trading and commentary on the future of the industry. These witnesses included Phillip McBride Johnson, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; David Downey, InterActive Brokers; and Matt Andresen, Island ECN.

On February 10, 2000, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry held a hearing on the release of the President's Working Group report on OTC derivatives and the CEA. Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Richard Lugar and House Agriculture Committee Chairman Bob Smith had requested this report subsequent to the regulatory moratorium that Congress placed on the CFTC regarding OTC derivatives. This unanimous report made recommendations to Congress on the proper regulatory treatment for over-the-counter derivatives. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, CFTC Chairman William Rainer, and Annette Nazareth, Director of the Division of Market Regulation of the SEC, testified in support of the report's recommendations. Also providing testimony were Chairman David Brennan, Chicago Board of Trade; Chairman Daniel Rappaport, New York Mercantile Exchange; Jerry Salzman, counsel for the Chicago Mercantile Exchange; Richard Grove, CEO and President of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA); and Edward J. Rosen, counsel for the Coalition of Commercial and Investment Banks.

On June 8, 2000, Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Richard Lugar, along with Senate Banking Committee Chairman Phil Gramm and Senator Peter Fitzgerald, introduced S. 2967, The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, legislation to reauthorize and amend the Commodity Exchange Act.

On June 21, 2000, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry and the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs held a joint hearing to consider S. 2697, the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000. Witnesses included members of the President's Working Group on Financial Markets consisting of Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, CFTC Chairman William Rainer and SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt.

COMMITTEE VOTE

In compliance with paragraph 7 of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the following statements are made concerning the votes of the Committee in its consideration of the bill:

The Committee met in open session on Thursday, June 29, 2000, to mark up this bill. The bill was agreed to unanimously by voice vote. The Committee then ordered that the bill be favorably reported by a voice vote.

IV. REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT

In compliance with paragraph 11(b) of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the following evaluation is made concerning the regulatory impact of enacting this legislation:

The number of individuals and businesses who would be impacted by regulations issued under this bill is substantial. The entire futures industry in the United States would be directly affected by this legislation. Its impact would be one of lower cost both to the businesses and to individuals in the futures markets due to the expanded market opportunities opened under the bill and the decrease in the cost of implementing the regulations under the legislation. As for the record keeping requirements under the bill, the records that futures exchanges are required to keep are less circumscribed and therefore the cost will be lower for the futures exchanges. This cost savings will result in lower transaction costs to individuals and businesses trading on the exchanges.

The securities industry would likewise be affected as they would have new business opportunities opened to them with the repeal of the ban on single stock futures. Firms in the financial services business would experience a growth in opportunities as would individuals trading futures on these markets. Individuals and businesses in the securities markets would be better situated to manage their risk.

With the legislation's language to provide legal certainty for OTC derivatives transactions, firms and banks would experience decreased legal and paperwork costs associated with these transactions.

This bill would not affect the personal privacy of the individuals affected by the changes. The amount of additional paperwork that will result from the regulations to be promulgated pursuant to the bill, is moderate. The futures exchanges would be the most impacted as they would have new levels of regulations under which they could choose to operate. During the transition period when new regulations are being implemented, the paperwork burden on the futures exchanges might be relatively high. But as the shift to the new structures is accomplished, the paperwork burden will decrease resulting in less paper work for the regulated industry.

The National Futures Association (`NFA') and its members will be impacted as well by the bill. Section 8 of the bill mandates that the NFA adopt rules requiring its members who recommend purchase or sales of futures on securities to ascertain the suitability of the recommendation for that customer. This cost would be small because the NFA has had a substantially similar rule in effect since 1985. The bill also allows futures exchanges to delegate their self regulatory functions to a registered futures association, thus potentially increasing the NFA's responsibilities under the Act.

V. BUDGETARY IMPACT OF THE BILL

In accordance with paragraph 11(a) of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the following letter has been received from the Congressional Budget Office regarding the budgetary impact of the bill:

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE

S. 2697--Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000

Summary: S. 2697 would reauthorize funding for the activities of the Commodity futures Trading Commission (CFTC) during the 2001-2005 period. The bill would also allow the trading of single stock futures under certain conditions, with oversight being shared by the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In addition, S. 2697 would clarify that certain over-the-counter derivative transactions are outside of the jurisdiction of the CFTC. The bill also would authorize the CFTC to designate boards of trade as contract markets or execution facilities for derivatives transactions.

Assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts, CBO estimates that implementing this legislation would cost $363 million over the 2001-2005 period. Although most of this cost would be incurred by the CFTC, CBO estimates that the SEC would spend about $3 million a year to regulate single stock futures. S. 2697 also would increase governmental receipts, because the bill would make single stock futures subject to fees charged by the SEC. Although CBO estimates that this increase in fee collections would not be significant, pay-as-you-go procedures would apply.

S. 2697 contains an intergovernmental mandate as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), but CBO estimates that the costs, if any, would not exceed the threshold established in the act ($55 million in 2000, adjusted annually for inflation). The bill also contains a new private-sector mandate as defined by UMRA, but CBO estimates the costs of this mandate would not exceed the threshold established in the act ($109 million in 2000, adjusted annually for inflation).

Estimated Cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of S. 2697 is shown in the following table. The costs of this legislation fall within budget function 370 (commerce and housing credit).


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                By fiscal year, in millions of dollars--                     
                                                                                    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION 1                                                               
Proposed changes to CFTC spending:                                                                           
Estimated authorization level                                                         67   69   72   74   77 
Estimated outlays                                                                     60   68   71   73   76 
Proposed changes to SEC spending:                                                                            
Estimated authorization level                                                          3    3    3    3    3 
Estimated outlays                                                                      3    3    3    3    3 
Total changes in spending:                                                                                   
Estimated authorization level                                                         70   72   75   77   80 
Estimated outlays                                                                     63   71   74   76   79 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basis of estimate: For this estimate, CBO assumes that the bill will be enacted by the end of fiscal year 2000 and that the necessary amounts will be appropriated by the start of each fiscal year. Provisions related to the regulation of single stock futures would take effect one year after enactment. CBO estimates that S. 2697 would cost $363 million over the 2001-2005 period, and would have a negligible effect on revenues.

Spending subject to appropriation

S. 2697 would reauthorize funding for the activities of the CFTC during the 2001-2005 period. For 2000, the agency received an appropriation of $63 million. Based on the agency's current budget and adjusting for anticipated inflation, this reauthorization would cost about $59 million in 2001 and a total of $343 million over the five-year period.

The bill also would make several changes to the Commodity Exchange Act that would increase the administrative costs of the CFTC. Based on information from the CFTC, CBO estimates that these changes to the CFTC's administrative responsibilities would cost $1 million a year over the 2001-2005 period. The CFTC would share oversight of single stock futures transactions with the SEC. The bill also clarifies that the CFTC does not have jurisdiction over certain over-the-counter derivatives transactions. The CFTC also would be authorized to designate boards of trade as contract markets or execution facilities for derivatives transactions with the SEC. CBO estimates that these changes to the CFTC's regulatory responsibilities would require the agency to hire new staff.

S. 2697 also would require that the SEC play a significant role in overseeing the market for single stock futures. Based on information from the SEC, CBO estimates that the SEC would have to hire additional staff to handle these new responsibilities. These new personnel would cost about $3 million a year during the 2001-2005 period.

Finally, CBO estimates that S. 2697 would increase the amount of offsetting collections received by the SEC, although the increase would not be significant. The bill would allow single stock futures to be traded on a national securities association and would therefore make them subject to transaction fees collected by the SEC. Under current law, fees on transactions conducted on national securities associations are recorded as offsetting collections, which are credited as an offset to discretionary spending. However, based on information from the CFTC, the SEC, and private groups, CBO does not expect that the volume of transactions of single stock futures that would be conducted on national securities associations would be large enough to generate a significant increase in offsetting collections.

Revenues

Under current law, transactions conducted on national securities exchanges are also subject to certain SEC fees that are accounted for as governmental receipts (revenues). These fees are equal to 1/300 of a percent of the aggregate dollar amount of securities sales.

S. 2697 would allow the trading of single stock futures on national securities exchanges. By creating a new category of financial transactions that would be subject to SEC fees, this bill would increase revenues collected by the SEC. However, based on information provided by the CFTC, the SEC, and by private groups, CBO estimates that any increase in revenues would not be significant.

Pay-as-you-go considerations: The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act sets up pay-as-you-go procedures for legislation affecting receipts or direct spending. S. 2697 would affect receipts by adding a new set of financial transactions that would be subject to fees collected by the SEC. However, CBO estimates that the amount of additional receipts would not be significant.

Estimated impact on State, local, and tribal governments: S. 2697 would preempt state laws affecting certain commodities transactions that are conducted in markets regulated by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission. Such a preemption would be a mandate as defined by UMRA. CBO estimates that the costs of this mandate, if any, would not exceed the threshold in that act ($55 million in 2000, adjusted annually for inflation). The bill would impose no other costs on state, local, or tribal governments.

Estimated impact on the private sector: Section 8 of the bill would require a registered futures association to adopt rules requiring a futures commission merchant, a commodity trading advisor, or an introducing broker that recommends a purchase or sale of a futures on a security, to ascertain the suitability of that recommendation for that customer. The national futures association already adopted a `know your customer' rule in 1985. According to industry sources, the requirements of that rule are very similar to the requirements of a suitability rule. Thus, CBO estimates that the direct costs of complying with this mandate would be negligible.

Previous CBO estimate: On June 29, 2000, CBO transmitted a cost estimate for H.R. 4541, the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, as ordered reported by the House Committee on Agriculture on June 27, 2000. Assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts, CBO estimates that H.R. 4541 would cost $353 million over the 2001-2005 period. In comparison, CBO estimates that the costs of S. 2697 would total $363 million during that time period. Although the two bills are similar in many respects, CBO estimates that the costs of S. 2697 would be higher because the SEC would require additional staff to regulate the trading of single stock futures on national securities exchanges and associations. S. 2697 also would increase the revenues and offsetting collections received by the SEC, although we estimate that these increases would not be significant.

Estimate prepared by: Federal Costs: Kenneth Johnson. Impact on the State, Local and Tribal Governments: Susan Sieg Tompkins. Impact on the Private Sector: Judith Ruud.

Estimate approved by: Peter H. Fontaine, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis.

VI. CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW

In compliance with paragraph 12 of rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, changes in existing law made in the bill, as reported are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new material is printed in italic, existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman):

COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT

SEC. 1a. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Act:

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

(aa) has a net worth exceeding $1,000,000; and

(bb) enters into an agreement, contract, or transaction in connection with the conduct of the entity's business or to manage the risk associated with an asset or liability owned or incurred or reasonably likely to be owned or incurred by the entity in the conduct of the entity's business;

(aa) an investment adviser subject to regulation under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-1 et seq.) or a commodity trading advisor subject to regulation under this Act;

(bb) a foreign person performing a role or function similar to that of such an investment adviser or commodity trading advisor subject to foreign regulation in the performance of that role or function;

(cc) a financial institution; or

(dd) an insurance company (as defined in section 2 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841));

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF COMMISSION; LIABILITY OF PRINCIPAL FOR ACT OF AGENT. ][<-Struck out]

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF COMMISSION; LIABILITY OF PRINCIPAL FOR ACT OF AGENT; COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION; TRANSACTION IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE.

[Struck out->][ (a)(1)(A)(i) The ][<-Struck out]

(a) JURISDICTION OF COMMISSION; COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION-

* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ (ii) Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to govern or in any way be applicable to transactions in foreign currency, security warrants, security rights, resales of installment loan contracts, repurchase options, government securities, or mortgages and mortgage purchase commitments, unless such transactions involve the sale thereof for future delivery conducted on a board of trade. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (iii) The ][<-Struck out] (B) Liability of principal for act of agent- The act, omission, or failure of any official, agent, or other person acting for any individual, association, partnership, corporation, or trust within the scope of his employment or office shall be deemed the act, omission, or failure of such individual, association, partnership, corporation, or trust, as well as of such official, agent, or other person.

[Struck out->][ (B) Notwithstanding any other provision of law-- ][<-Struck out]

hearing, to be transcribed, before the Commission, and shall give appropriate weight to the views of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such oral hearing shall be held after the public comment period, prior to Commission action upon such designation, and not less than thirty nor more than forty-five days after the close of the public comment period, unless both the Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission otherwise agree. If such an oral hearing is held, the Securities and Exchange Commission fails to withdraw its objections, and the Commission issues an order designating a board of trade as a contract market with respect to any such contract (or option on such contract), the Securities and Exchange Commission shall have the right of judicial review of such order in accordance with the standards of section 6(c) of this Act. If, pursuant to section 6 of this Act, there is a hearing on the record with respect to such application for designation, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall have the right to participate in that hearing as an interested party.

* * * * * * *

(7) No Commissioner or employee of the Commission shall accept employment or compensation from any person, exchange, or clearinghouse subject to regulation by the Commission under this Act during his term of office, nor shall he participate, directly or indirectly, in any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity operations or transactions of a character subject to regulation by the Commission * * *

(8)(B)(ii) When a board of trade applies for [Struck out->][ designation as a contract market ][<-Struck out] designation or registration as a contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility involving transactions for future delivery of any security issued or guaranteed by the United States or any agency thereof, the Commission shall promptly deliver a copy of such application to the Department of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Commission may not [Struck out->][ designate a board of trade as a contract market ][<-Struck out] designate or register a board of trade as a contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility based on such application until forty-five days after the date the Commission delivers the application to such agencies or until the Commission receives comments from each of such agencies on the

application, whichever period is shorter. Any comments received by the Commission from such agencies shall be included as part of the public record of the Commission's designation proceeding. In [Struck out->][ designating, or refusing, suspending, or revoking the designation of, a board of trade as a contract market involving transactions for future delivery referred to in this clause or in considering possible emergency action under section 8a(9) of this Act ][<-Struck out] designating, registering, or refusing, suspending, or revoking the designation or registration of, a board of trade as a contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility involving transactions for future delivery referred to in this clause or in considering any action under this Act (including emergency action under section 8a(9)) with respect to such transactions, the Commission shall take into consideration all comments it receives from the Department of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and shall consider the effect that any such [Struck out->][ designation, suspension, revocation, or emergency action ][<-Struck out] designation, registration, suspension, revocation, or other action may have on the debt financing requirements of the United States Government and the continued efficiency and integrity of the underlying market for government securities

* * * * * * *

(b) For the purposes of this Act (but not in any wise limiting the foregoing definition of interstate commerce) a transaction in respect to any article shall be considered to be in interstate commerce if such article is part of that current of commerce usual in the commodity trade whereby commodities and commodity products and by-products thereof are sent from one State with the expectation that they will end their transit, after purchase, in another, including, in addition to cases within the above general description, all cases where purchase or sale is either for shipment to another State, or for manufacture within the State and the shipment outside the State of the products resulting from such manufacture. Articles normally in such current of commerce shall not be considered out of such commerce through resort being had to any means or device intended to remove transactions in respect thereto from the provisions of this Act. For the purpose of this paragraph the word `State' includes Territory, the District of Columbia, possession of the United States, and foreign nation.

(c) AGREEMENTS, CONTRACTS, AND TRANSACTIONS IN FOREIGN CURRENCY, GOVERNMENT SECURITIES, AND CERTAIN OTHER COMMODITIES-

(d) EXCLUDED DERIVATIVE TRANSACTIONS-

(e) ELECTRONIC TRADING FACILITIES-

(f) EXCLUSION FOR QUALIFYING HYBRID INSTRUMENTS-

purchaser of the secured debt instrument to secure the repayment obligations of the issuer under the secured debt instrument.

(g) FUTURES ON SECURITIES-

(aa) the price volatility of the contracts;

(bb) the frequency with which compliance with margin requirements is assessed;

(cc) the length of time permitted to cure any margin deficiency; and

(dd) the degree of leverage permitted by the margin.

(h) EXEMPTED TRANSACTIONS-

[Struck out->][ SEC. 3. Transactions in commodities involving the sale thereof for future delivery as commonly conducted on boards of trade and known as `futures' are affected with a national public interest. Such futures transactions are carried on in large volume by the public generally and by persons engaged in the business of buying and selling commodities and the products and byproducts thereof in interstate commerce. The prices involved in such transactions are generally quoted and disseminated throughout the United States and in foreign countries as a basis for determining the prices to the producer and the consumer of commodities and the products and byproducts thereof and to facilitate the movements thereof in interstate commerce. Such transactions are utilized by shippers, dealers, millers, and others engaged in handling commodities and the products and byproducts thereof in interstate commerce as a means of hedging themselves against possible loss through fluctuations in price. The transactions and prices of commodities on such boards of trade are susceptible to excessive speculation and can be manipulated, controlled, cornered or squeezed, to the detriment of the producer or the consumer and the persons handling commodities and the products and byproducts thereof in interstate commerce, rendering regulation imperative for the protection of such commerce and the national public interest therein. Furthermore, transactions which are of the character of, or are commonly known to the trade as, `options' are or may be utilized by commercial and other entities for risk shifting and other purposes. Options transactions are in interstate commerce or affect such commerce and the national economy, rendering regulation of such transactions imperative for the protection of such commerce and the national public interest. ][<-Struck out]

SEC. 3. FINDING AND PURPOSES.

(a) FINDING- Congress finds that the futures contracts and options contracts that are subject to this Act are entered into regularly in interstate and international commerce and are affected with a national public interest, in that such futures contracts and options contracts provide a means for managing and assuming price risks, discovering prices, and disseminating pricing information through trading in liquid, fair, and financially secure trading facilities.

(b) PURPOSES- The purposes of this Act are--

SEC. 4. (a) Unless exempted by operation of section 5d or unless exempted by the Commission * * *

* * * * * * *

(c)(1) In order to promote responsible economic or financial innovation and fair competition, the Commission by rule, regulation, or order, after notice and opportunity for hearing, may (on its own initiative or on application of any person, including any board of trade [Struck out->][ designated as a contract market ][<-Struck out] designated or registered as a contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility for transactions for future delivery in any commodity under section 5 of this Act) exempt any agreement, contract, or transaction (or class thereof) that is otherwise subject to subsection (a) (including any person or class of persons offering, entering into, rendering advice or rendering other services with respect to, the agreement, contract, or transaction), either unconditionally or on stated terms or conditions or for stated periods and either retroactively or prospectively, or both, from any of the requirements of subsection (a), or from any other provision of this Act (except [Struck out->][ section 2(a)(1)(B) ][<-Struck out] section 2(g)), if the Commission determines that the exemption would be consistent with the public interest.

* * * * * * *

(2)(B) the agreement, contract, or transaction--

* * * * * * *

SEC. 4a. EXCESSIVE SPECULATION AS BURDEN ON INTERSTATE COMMERCE.

(a) Excessive speculation in any commodity under contracts of sale of such commodity for future delivery made on or subject to the rules of contract markets or derivatives transaction execution facilities causing sudden or unreasonable fluctuations or unwarranted changes in the price of such commodity, is an undue and unnecessary burden on interstate commerce in such commodity. For the purpose of diminishing, eliminating, or preventing such burden, the Commission shall, from time to time, after due notice and opportunity for hearing, by rule, regulation, or order, proclaim and fix such limits on the amounts of trading which may be done or positions which may be held by any person under contracts of sale of such commodity for future delivery on or subject to the rules of any contract market or derivatives transaction execution facilities as the Commission

* * * * * * *

(b) The Commission shall, in such rule, regulation, or order, fix a reasonable time (not to exceed ten days) after the promulgation of the rule, regulation, or order; after which, and until such rule, regulation, or order is suspended, modified, or revoked, it shall be unlawful for any person--

* * * * * * *

(e) Nothing in this section shall prohibit or impair the adoption by any [Struck out->][ contract market or ][<-Struck out] contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility, or by any other board of trade [Struck out->][ licensed or designated ][<-Struck out] licensed, designated, or registered by the Commission of any bylaw, rule, regulation, or resolution fixing limits on the amount of trading which may be done or positions which may be held by any person under contracts of sale of any commodity for future delivery traded on or subject to the rules of such [Struck out->][ contract market, or ][<-Struck out] contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility, or under options on such contracts or commodities traded on or subject to the rules of such [Struck out->][ contract market or ][<-Struck out] contract market, derivatives transaction

execution facility, or such board of trade: Provided, That if the Commission shall have fixed limits under this section for any contract or under section 4c of this Act for any commodity option, then the limits fixed by the bylaws, rules, regulations, and resolutions adopted by such [Struck out->][ contract market or ][<-Struck out] contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility, or such board of trade shall not be higher than the limits fixed by the Commission. It shall be a violation of this Act for any person to violate any bylaw, rule, regulation, or resolution of any [Struck out->][ contract market or ][<-Struck out] contract market, derivatives transaction execution facility, or other board of trade [Struck out->][ licensed or designated ][<-Struck out] licensed, designated, or registered by the Commission fixing limits on the amount of trading which may be done or positions which may be held by any person under contracts of sale of any commodity for future delivery or under options on such contracts or commodities, if such bylaw, rule, regulation, or resolution has been approved by the Commission: Provided, That the provisions of section 9(c) of this Act shall apply only to those who knowingly violate such limits.

SEC. 4b. CONTACTS DESIGNED TO DEFRAUD OR MISLEAD.

(a) It shall be unlawful (1) for any member of a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, or for any correspondent, agent, or employee of any member, in or in connection with any order to make, or the making of, any contract of sale of any commodity in interstate commerce, made, or to be made, on or subject to the rules of any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, for or on behalf of any other person, or

* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ SEC. 4c PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (a) It shall be unlawful * * * for any person to offer to enter into, enter into, or confirm the execution of, any transaction involving any commodity, which is or may be used for (1) hedging any transaction in interstate commerce in such commodity or the products or byproducts thereof, or (2) determining the price basis of any such transaction in interstate commerce in such commodity, or (3) delivering any such commodity sold, shipped, or received in interstate commerce for the fulfillment thereof-- ][<-Struck out]

SEC. 4c. PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL-

(b) No person shall offer to enter into, * * *

* * * * * * *

(g) The Commission shall adopt rules requiring that a contemporaneous written record be made, as practicable, of all orders for execution on the floor or subject to the rules of each contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility placed by a member of the contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility who is present on the floor at the time such order is placed.

SEC. 4d. DEALING BY UNREGISTERED FUTURES COMMISSION MERCHANTS OR INTRODUCING MERCHANTS PROHIBITED.

It shall be unlawful for any person to engage as futures commission merchant or introducing broker in soliciting orders or accepting orders for the purchase or sale of any commodity for future delivery, or involving any contracts of sale of any commodity for future

delivery, on or subject to the rules of any contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility unless--

* * * * * * *

SEC. 4e. REQUIRED REGISTRATION OF FLOOR TRADERS AND FLOOR BROKERS.

It shall be unlawful for any person to act as floor trader in executing purchases and sales, or as floor broker in executing any orders for the purchase or sale, of any commodity for future delivery, or involving any contracts of sale of any commodity for future delivery, on or subject to the rules of any contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility unless such person shall have registered, under this Act, with the Commission as such floor trader or floor broker and such registration shall not have expired nor been suspended nor revoked.

SEC. 4f. REGISTRATION OF FUTURES COMMISSION MERCHANTS, INTRODUCING BROKERS, AND FLOOR BROKERS.

(a) Any person desiring to register as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, floor broker, or floor trader hereunder shall be registered upon application to the Commission. The application shall be made in such form and manner as prescribed by the Commission, giving such information and facts as the Commission may deem necessary concerning the business in which the applicant is or will be engaged, including in the case of an application of a futures commission merchant or an introducing broker, the names and addresses of the managers of all branch offices, and the names of such officers and partners, if a partnership, and of such officers, directors, and stockholders, if a corporation, as the Commission may direct. Such person, when registered hereunder, shall likewise continue to report and furnish to the Commission the above-mentioned information and such other information pertaining to such person's business as the Commission may require. Each registration shall expire on December 31 of the year for which issued or at such other time, not less than one year from the date of issuance, as the Commission may by rule, regulation, or order prescribe, and shall be renewed upon application therefor unless the registration has been suspended (and the period of such suspension has not expired) or revoked pursuant to the provisions of this Act.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Act, no person desiring to register as futures commission merchant or as introducing broker shall be so registered unless he meets such minimum financial requirements as the Commission may by regulation prescribe as necessary to insure his meeting his obligations as a registrant, and each person so registered shall at all times continue to meet such prescribed minimum financial requirements: Provided, That such minimum financial requirements will be considered met if the applicant for registration or registrant is a member of a contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility and conforms to minimum financial standards and related reporting requirements set by such contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility in its bylaws, rules, regulations, or resolutions and approved by the Commission as adequate to effectuate the purposes of this subsection * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 4g. REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING.

* * * * * * *

(b) Every [Struck out->][ clearinghouse and contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity shall maintain daily trading records. The daily trading records shall include such information as the Commission shall prescribe by rule* * *

* * * * * * *

(f) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Commission from making separate determinations for different [Struck out->][ clearinghouses, contract markets, and exchanges ][<-Struck out] registered entity when such determinations are warranted in the judgment of the Commission.

SEC. 4h. FALSE SELF-REPRESENTATION AS [Struck out->][ CONTRACT MARKET ][<-Struck out] REGISTERED ENTITY MEMBER PROHIBITED.

It shall be unlawful for any person falsely to represent such person to be a member of a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity or the representative or agent of such member, or to be a registrant under this Act or the representative or agent of any registrant, in soliciting or handling any order or contract for the purchase or sale of any commodity in interstate commerce or for future delivery, or falsely to represent in connection with the handling of any such order or contract that the same is to be or has been executed on, or by or through a member of, any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity.

SEC. 4i. REPORTS OF DEALS EQUAL TO OR IN EXCESS OF TRADING LIMIT.

It shall be unlawful for any person to make any contract for the purchase or sale of any commodity for future delivery on or subject to the rules of any contract market or derivatives transaction execution facility--

* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ SEC. 4j. TRADES AND EXECUTIONS BY FLOOR BROKERS. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (a)(1) The Commission shall issue regulations to prohibit the privilege of dual trading on each contract market which has not been exempted from such regulations under paragraph (3). The regulations issued by the Commission under this paragraph-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (2) As used in this section, the term `dual trading' means the execution of customer orders by a floor broker during any trading session in which the floor broker executes any trade in the same contract market for-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (3) The Commission shall exempt a contract market from the regulations issued under paragraph (1), either unconditionally or on stated conditions (including stated periods of time) relevant to the attainment or maintenance of compliance with the standards in subparagraphs (A) and (B), upon finding that-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (4)(A) The regulations issued by the Commission under paragraph (1) shall not apply to any contract market in which the Commission determines that the average daily trading volume is less than the threshold trading level established for the contract market under this paragraph. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (B) The threshold trading level shall be set initially at eight thousand contracts. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (C) The Commission may, by rule or order-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (D) The Commission shall provide the affected contract market with adequate notice of any such increase or decrease. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (5) Before the Commission denies an application for an exemption under paragraph (3) or exempts a contract market subject to conditions, it shall-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (6) Violation of an order issued under this subsection shall be considered a violation of an order of the Commission for purposes of-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (7) Any board of trade which has applied to the Commission to exempt a contract market from the regulations issued under paragraph (1) may obtain judicial review of any final action of the Commission to deny such application, to issue an exemption subject to conditions, or to revoke an exemption, only in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the party seeking review resides or has its principal place of business, or in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, under the standards applicable to rulemaking proceedings under section 553 of title 5, United States Code. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (8)(A) The Commission shall issue the regulations required under paragraph (1) not later than two hundred and seventy days after the enactment of this section. If, prior to the effective date of the prohibition on dual trading under such regulations, a board of trade submits to the Commission an application for an exemption for a contract market under paragraph (3), the Commission shall not apply the prohibition against dual trading under paragraph (1) to the contract market until the Commission has approved or denied the application. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (B) The Commission shall approve or deny any application for an exemption under paragraph (3) within seventy-five days after receipt of the application, or as soon as practicable. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (b) If, in addition to the regulations issued pursuant to subsection (a), the Commission has reason to believe that dual trading-related or facilitated abuses are not being or cannot be effectively addressed by subsection (a), the Commission shall make a determination, after notice and opportunity for hearing, whether or not a floor broker may trade for his own account or any account in which such broker has trading discretion, and also execute a customer's order for future delivery and, if the Commission determines that such trades and such executions shall be permitted, the Commission shall further determine the terms, conditions, and circumstances under which such trades and such executions shall be conducted: Provided, That any such determination shall, at a minimum, take into account the effect upon the liquidity of trading of each market: And provided further, That nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit the Commission from making separate determinations for different contract markets when such are warranted in the judgment of the Commission, or to prohibit contract markets from setting terms and conditions more restrictive than those set by the Commission. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (c) The Commission shall within nine months after the effective date of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Act of 1974, and subsequently when it determines that changes are required, make a determination, after notice and opportunity for hearing, whether or not a futures commission merchant may trade for its own account or any proprietary account, as defined by the Commission, and if the Commission determines that such trades shall be permitted, the Commission shall further determine the terms, conditions, and circumstances under which such trades shall be conducted: Provided, That any such determination, at a minimum, shall take into account the effect upon the liquidity of trading of each market: And provided further, That nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit the Commission from making separate determinations for different contract markets when such are warranted in the judgment of the Commission, or to prohibit contract markets from setting terms and conditions more restrictive than those set by the Commission. ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (d)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a floor broker may not execute an order of a customer if such floor broker knows the opposite party to the transaction to be a floor broker or floor trader with whom such trader or broker has a relationship involving trading on such contract market as-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply-- ][<-Struck out]

SEC. 4 [Struck out->][ k ][<-Struck out] j. REGISTRATION OF ASSOCIATES OF FUTURES COMMISSION MERCHANTS, COMMODITY POOL OPERATORS, AND COMMODITY TRADING ADVISORS.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 4 [Struck out->][ l ][<-Struck out] k. COMMODITY TRADING ADVISORS AND COMMODITY POOL OPERATORS.

It is hereby found that the activities of commodity trading advisors and commodity pool operators are affected with a national public interest in that, among other things--

* * * * * * *

SEC. 4 [Struck out->][ m ][<-Struck out] l. USE OF MAILS OR OTHER MEANS OR INSTRUMENTALITIES OF INTERSTATE COMMERCE BY COMMODITY TRADING ADVISORS AND COMMODITY POOL OPERATORS.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 4 [Struck out->][ n ][<-Struck out] m. REGISTRATION OF COMMODITY TRADING ADVISORS AND COMMODITY POOL OPERATORS.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 4 [Struck out->][ o ][<-Struck out] n. FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION BY COMMODITY TRADING ADVISORS, COMMODITY POOL OPERATORS, AND ASSOCIATED PERSONS.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 4 [Struck out->][ p ][<-Struck out] o. STANDARDS AND EXAMINATIONS.

(a) * * * The Commission may further prescribe by rules and regulations that, in lieu of examinations administered by the Commission, futures associations registered under section 17 of this [Struck out->][ Act or contract markets ][<-Struck out] Act, contract markets, or derivatives transaction execution facilities may adopt written proficiency examinations.

* * * * * * *

(b) The Commission shall issue regulations to require new registrants, within six months after receiving such registration, to attend a training session, and all other registrants to attend periodic training sessions, to ensure that registrants understand their responsibilities to the public under this Act, including responsibilities to observe just and equitable principles of trade, any rule or regulation of the Commission, any rule of any appropriate contract market derivatives transaction execution facility, registered futures association, or other self-regulatory organization, or any other applicable Federal or state law, rule or regulation.

[Struck out->][ SEC. 5. DESIGNATION OF BOARD OF TRADE AS `CONTRACT MARKET' ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ The Commission is hereby authorized and directed to designate any board of trade as a `contract market' when, and only when, such board of trade complies with and carries out the following conditions and requirements: ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ SEC. 5a. DUTIES OF CONTRACT MARKETS ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (a) Each contract market shall-- ][<-Struck out]

such ten-day period was not practicable. A determination by the Commission to suspend the effect of a rule under this subparagraph shall be subject to judicial review on the same basis as an emergency determination under section 8a(9). Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the authority of the Commission under section 8a(9);

[Struck out->][ (b)(1) Each contract market shall maintain and utilize a system to monitor trading to detect and deter violations of the contract market's rules and regulations committed in the making of trades and the execution of customer orders on the floor or subject to the rules of such contract market. The system shall include-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (2) The audit trail system of the contract market shall, consistent with Commission regulations, accurately record-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (3) Beginning three years after the date of enactment of this subsection, the audit trail system of each contract market, except as provided in paragraph (5) and except to the extent the Commission determines that circumstances beyond the control of the contract market prevent compliance despite the contract market's affirmative good faith efforts to comply, shall-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (4) The Commission may, by rule, establish standards under which the audit trail systems required under paragraph (3) shall record, to the extent practicable-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (5)(A) The Commission shall, by rule or order, make exemptions from the requirements of paragraph (3)-- ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A)(i)(I) the Commission shall find that the volume of trading at an exchange is relatively small if, among other things, the Commission determines that the average daily trading volume for each contract market for which the board of trade is designated is less than the threshold trading level established for the contract market under section 4j(a)(4). ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ (6) Any rule or order adopted by the Commission under paragraphs (4) and (5) shall become effective thirty legislative days or ninety calendar days, whichever is later, after submission of such rule or order to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate. For purposes of this paragraph, the term `legislative day' means any day on which either House of Congress is in session. ][<-Struck out]

SEC. 5. DESIGNATION OF BOARDS OF TRADE AS CONTRACT MARKETS.

(a) APPLICATIONS- A board of trade applying to the Commission for designation as a contract market shall submit an application to the Commission that includes any relevant materials and records the Commission may require consistent with this Act.

(b) CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION-

(c) EXISTING CONTRACT MARKETS- A designated contract market on the effective date of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 shall be considered to be a designated contract market under this section.

(d) CORE PRINCIPLES FOR CONTRACT MARKETS-

SEC. 5a. DERIVATIVES TRANSACTION EXECUTION FACILITIES.

(a) IN GENERAL- In lieu of compliance with the contract market designation requirements of section 5, a board of trade may elect to operate as a registered derivatives transaction execution facility if the facility is--

(b) REQUIREMENTS FOR TRADING FUTURES CONTRACTS OR OTHER DERIVATIVES TRANSACTIONS-

(c) CRITERIA FOR REGISTRATION-

(d) CORE PRINCIPLES FOR REGISTERED DERIVATIVES TRANSACTION EXECUTION FACILITIES-

(e) USE OF BROKER-DEALERS AND DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS AND FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSTITUTIONS AS INTERMEDIARIES-

(f) SEGREGATION OF CUSTOMER FUNDS- Not later than 180 days after the effective date of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, consistent with regulations adopted by the Commission, a registered derivatives transaction execution facility may authorize a futures commission merchant to offer any customer of the futures commission merchant that is an eligible contract participant the right to not segregate the customer funds of the futures commission merchant for purposes of trading on or through the facilities of the registered derivatives transaction execution facility.

(g) ELECTION TO TRADE EXCLUDED TRANSACTIONS-

SEC. 5b. DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT- Except as provided in subsection (b), it shall be unlawful for a derivatives clearing organization, unless registered with the Commission, directly or indirectly to make use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to perform the functions of a derivatives clearing organization described in section 1a(8).

(b) EXCLUSION OF DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS SUBJECT TO OTHER REGULATORY AUTHORITIES- A derivatives clearing organization shall not be required to register with the Commission, and the Commission shall have no jurisdiction with respect to the derivatives clearing organization, if the derivatives clearing organization--

(c) VOLUNTARY REGISTRATION- A derivatives clearing organization that is exempt from registration under subsection (b) may register with the Commission as a derivatives clearing organization.

(d) REGISTRATION OF DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS-

participants become insolvent or otherwise default on their obligations to the derivatives clearing organization.

(e) EXISTING DERIVATIVES CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS- A derivatives clearing organization shall be deemed to be registered under this section to the extent that--

(f) APPOINTMENT OF TRUSTEE-

(g) Linking Of Regulated Clearing Facilities-

SEC. 5c. COMMON PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO REGISTERED ENTITIES.

(a) ACCEPTABLE BUSINESS PRACTICES UNDER CORE PRINCIPLES-

(b) DELEGATION OF FUNCTIONS UNDER CORE PRINCIPLES-

(c) NEW CONTRACTS, NEW RULES, AND RULE AMENDMENTS-

(d) VIOLATION OF CORE PRINCIPLES-

(e) RESERVATION OF EMERGENCY AUTHORITY- Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the Commission shall retain the full scope of its emergency powers under section 8a(9) to direct any contract market to take emergency action in compliance with the provisions and standards of section 8a(9).

(f) CORE PRINCIPLES FOR INTERMEDIARIES- The Commission shall--

(g) EFFECT OF ACT- Nothing in this Act--

SEC. 5d. EXEMPT BOARDS OF TRADE.

(a) IN GENERAL- Except as otherwise provided in this section, a contract of sale (or option on such a contract) of a commodity for future delivery traded on or through the facilities of an exempt board of trade shall be exempt from all provisions of this Act, other than section 2(g).

(b) CRITERIA FOR EXEMPTION- To qualify for an exemption under subsection (a), a board of trade shall limit trading on or through the facilities of the board of trade to contracts of sale of a commodity for future delivery (or options on such contracts)--

(c) ANTI-MANIPULATION REQUIREMENTS- A party to a futures contract or related option that is traded on an exempt board of trade shall be subject to sections 4b, 4o, 6(c), and 9(a)(2), and the Commission shall enforce those provisions with respect to any such trading.

(d) PRICE DISCOVERY- If the Commission finds that an exempt board of trade is a significant source of price discovery for any underlying commodity in any transaction traded on or through the facilities of the board of trade, the board of trade shall disseminate publicly on a daily basis trading volume, opening and closing price ranges, open interest, and other trading data as appropriate to the market.

(e) JURISDICTION- The Commission shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any account, agreement, or transaction involving a contract of sale of a commodity for future delivery, or related option, to the extent that such an account, agreement, or transaction is traded on an exempt board of trade.

(f) SUBSIDIARIES- A board of trade that is designated as a contract market or registered as a derivatives transaction execution facility may operate an exempt board of trade by establishing

a separate subsidiary or other legal entity and otherwise satisfying the requirements of this section.

[Struck out->][ SEC. 5b. SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF DESIGNATION AS `CONTRACT MARKET' ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ The failure or refusal of any board of trade to comply with any of the provisions of this Act, or any of the rules, regulations, or orders of the Commission or the commission5b-1 thereunder, shall be cause for suspending for a period not to exceed six months or revoking the designation of such board of trade as a `contract market' in accordance with the procedure and subject to the judicial review provided in section 6(b) of this Act. ][<-Struck out]

SEC. 5e. SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION OF DESIGNATION AS REGISTERED ENTITY.

The failure of a registered entity to comply with any provision of this Act, or any regulation or order of the Commission under this Act, shall be cause for the suspension of the registered entity for a period not to exceed 180 days, or revocation of designation as a registered entity in accordance with the procedures and subject to the judicial review provided in section 6(b).

SEC. 6. APPLICATION FOR DESIGNATION AS ` [Struck out->][ CONTRACT MARKET ][<-Struck out] REGISTERED ENTITY'.

(a) Any [Struck out->][ board of trade desiring to be designated a `contract market' shall make application to the Commission for such designation ][<-Struck out] person desiring to be designated or registered as a registered entity shall make application to the Commission for such designation or registration and accompany the same with a showing that it complies with the [Struck out->][ above conditions ][<-Struck out] conditions set forth in this Act, and with a sufficient assurance that it will continue to comply with the [Struck out->][ above requirements ][<-Struck out] the requirements of this Act. The Commission shall approve or deny an application for [Struck out->][ designation as a contract market within one year ][<-Struck out] designation or registration as a registered entity within 180 days of the filing of the application. If the Commission notifies the [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] person that its application is materially incomplete and specifies the deficiencies in the application, the running of the [Struck out->][ one-year period ][<-Struck out] 180-day period shall be stayed from the time of such notification until the application is resubmitted in completed form: Provided, That the Commission shall have not less than sixty days to approve or deny the application from the time the application is resubmitted in completed form. If the Commission denies an application, it shall specify the grounds for the denial. In the event of a refusal to [Struck out->][ designate as a `contract market' any board of trade that has made application therefore, such board of trade ][<-Struck out] designate or register as a registered entity any person that has made application therefore, such person shall be afforded an opportunity for a hearing on the record before the Commission, with the right to appeal an adverse decision after such hearing to the court of appeals as provided for in other cases in subsection (b) of this section.

(b) The Commission is authorized to suspend for a period not to exceed six months or to revoke the [Struck out->][ designation of any board of trade as a `contract market' upon ][<-Struck out] designation or registration of any registered entity on a showing that such [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] registered entity is not enforcing or has not enforced its rules of government made a condition of its [Struck out->][ designation as set forth in section 5 of this Act ][<-Struck out] designation or registration as set forth in sections 5 through 5c or that such [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] registered entity, or any director, officer, agent, or employee thereof, otherwise is violating or has violated any of the provisions of this Act or any of the rules, regulations, or orders of the Commission or the Commission thereunder. Such suspension or revocation shall only be after a notice to the officers of the [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] registered entity affected and upon a hearing on the record: Provided, That such suspension or revocation shall be final and conclusive, unless within fifteen days after such suspension or revocation by the Commission such [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] person appeals to the court of appeals for the circuit in which it has its principal place of business, by filing with the clerk of such court a written petition praying that the order of the Commission be set aside or modified in the manner stated in the petition, together with a bond in such sum as the court may determine, conditioned that such [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] person will pay the costs of the proceedings if the court so directs. The clerk of the court in which such a petition is filed shall immediately cause a copy thereof to be delivered to the Commission and file in the court the record in such proceedings, as provided in section 2112 of title 28, United States Code. The testimony and evidence taken or submitted before the Commission, duly filed as aforesaid as a part of the record, shall be considered by the court of appeals as the evidence in the case. Such a court may affirm or set aside the order of the Commission or may direct it to modify its order. No such order of the Commission shall be modified or set aside by the court of appeals unless it is shown by the [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] person that the order is unsupported by the weight of the evidence or was issued without due notice and a reasonable opportunity having been afforded to such [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] person for a hearing, or infringes the Constitution of the United States, or is beyond the jurisdiction of the Commission.

(c) EXCLUSION OF PERSONS FROM PRIVILEGE OF ` [Struck out->][ CONTRACT MARKETS ][<-Struck out] REGISTERED ENTITY; ENFORCEMENT POWERS OF COMMISSION- If the Commission has reason to believe that any person (other than a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity) is manipulating or attempting to manipulate or has manipulated or attempted to manipulate the market price of any commodity, in interstate commerce, or for future delivery on or subject to the rules of any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, or has willfully made any false or misleading statement of a material fact in any registration application or any report filed with the Commission under this Act, or willfully omitted to state in any such application or report any material fact which is required to be stated therein, or otherwise is violating or has violated any of the provisions of this Act or of the rules, regulations, or orders of the Commission or the Commission thereunder, it may serve upon such person a complaint stating its charges in that respect, which complaint shall have attached or shall contain therein a notice of hearing, specifying a day and place not less than three days after the service thereof, requiring such person to show cause why an order should not be made prohibiting him from trading on or subject to the rules of any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, and directing that all [Struck out->][ contract markets ][<-Struck out]

registered entities refuse all [Struck out->][ trading privileges ][<-Struck out] privileges to such person, until further notice of the Commission and to show cause why the registration of such person, if registered with the Commission in any capacity, should not be suspended or revoked. Said hearing may be held in Washington, District of Columbia, or elsewhere, before the Commission or before an Administrative Law Judge designated by the Commission, which Administrative Law Judge shall cause all evidence to be reduced to writing and forthwith transmit the same to the Commission. For the purpose of securing effective enforcement of the provisions of this Act, for the purpose of any investigation or proceeding under this Act, and for the purpose of any action taken under section 12(f), any member of the Commission or any Administrative Law Judge or other officer designated by the Commission (except as provided in the fifth sentence of this subsection) may administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena witnesses, compel their attendance, take evidence, and require the production of any books, papers, correspondence, memoranda, or other records that the Commission deems relevant or material to the inquiry. The attendance of witnesses and the production of any such records may be required from any place in the United States, any State or any foreign country or jurisdiction at any designated place of hearing. A subpoena issued under this section may be served upon any person who is not to be found within the territorial jurisdiction of any court of the United States in such manner as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure prescribe for service of process in a foreign country, except that a subpoena to be served on a person who is not to be found within the territorial jurisdiction of any court of the United States may be issued only on the prior approval of the Commission. In case of contumacy by, or refusal to obey a subpoena issued to, any person, the Commission may invoke the aid of any court of the United States within the jurisdiction in which the investigation or proceeding is conducted, or where such person resides or transacts business, in requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books, papers, correspondence, memoranda, and other records. Such court may issue an order requiring such person to appear before the Commission or member or Administrative Law Judge or other officer designated by the Commission, there to produce records, if so ordered, or to give testimony touching the matter under investigation or in question. Any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by the court as a contempt thereof. All process in any such case may be served in the judicial district wherein such person is an inhabitant or transacts business or wherever such person may be found. Upon evidence received, the Commission may (1) prohibit such person from trading on or subject to the rules of any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity and require all [Struck out->][ contract markets ][<-Struck out] registered entities to refuse such person all [Struck out->][ trading privileges ][<-Struck out] privileges thereon for such period as may be specified in the order, (2) if such person is registered with the Commission in any capacity, suspend, for a period not to exceed six months, or revoke, the registration of such person, (3) assess such person a civil penalty of not more than the higher of $100,000 or triple the monetary gain to such person for each such violation and (4) require restitution to customers of damages proximately caused by violations of such persons. Notice of such order shall be sent forthwith by registered mail or by certified mail or delivered to the offending person and to the governing boards of said [Struck out->][ contract markets ][<-Struck out] registered entities. After the issuance of the order by the Commission, as aforesaid, the person against whom it is issued may obtain a review of such order or such other equitable relief as to the court may seem just by filing in the United States court of appeals of the circuit in which the petitioner is doing business, or in the case of an order denying registration, the circuit in which the petitioner's principal place of business listed on petitioner's application for registration is located, a written petition, within fifteen days after the notice of such order is given to the offending person praying that the order of the Commission be set aside. A copy of such petition shall be forthwith transmitted by the clerk of the court to the Commission and thereupon the Commission shall file in the court the record theretofore made, as provided in section 2112 of title 28, United States Code. Upon the filing of the petition the court shall have jurisdiction to affirm, to set aside, or modify the order of the Commission, and the findings of the Commission as to the facts, if supported by the weight of evidence, shall in like manner be conclusive.

The first, second, and tenth sentences through the end of section 6(c) are classified to 7 U.S.C. 9. The third through the ninth sentence of section 6(c) are classified to 7 U.S.C. 15.

(d) MANIPULATIONS OR OTHER VIOLATIONS- If any person (other than a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity) is manipulating or attempting to manipulate or has manipulated or attempted to manipulate the market price of any commodity, in interstate commerce, or for future delivery on or subject to the rules of any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, or otherwise is violating or has violated any of the provisions of this Act or of the rules, regulations, * * *

* * * * * * *

(e) ASSESSMENT OF MONEY PENALTIES-

satisfaction of the Commission that payment of the full amount of the penalty then due has been made by the end of thirty days from the date of entry of judgment on the appeal--

SEC. 6a. COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS AND CORPORATIONS, EXCLUSION FROM BOARD OF TRADE.

(a) No board of trade which has been designated as a [Struck out->][ `contract market' ][<-Struck out] designated or registered as a contract market or a derivatives transaction execution facility shall exclude from membership in, and all privileges on, such board of trade, any association or corporation

* * * * * * *

(b) No rule of any board of trade [Struck out->][ designated as a contract market ][<-Struck out] designated or registered as a contract market or a derivatives transaction execution facility shall forbid or be construed to forbid the payment of compensation on a commodity-unit basis, or otherwise

* * * * * * *

SEC. 6b. NONENFORCEMENT OF RULES OF GOVERNMENT OR OTHER VIOLATIONS.

If any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity is not enforcing or has not enforced its rules of government made a condition of its [Struck out->][ designation as set forth in section 5 of this Act ][<-Struck out] designation or registration as set forth in sections 5 through 5c, or if any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, or any director, officer, agent, or employee of any contract market otherwise is violating or has violated any of the provisions of this Act or any of the rules, regulations, or orders of the Commission thereunder, the Commission may, upon notice and hearing on the record and subject to appeal as in other cases provided for in section 6(b) of this Act, make and enter an order directing that such [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, director, officer, agent, or employee shall cease and desist from such violation, and assess a civil penalty of not more than $500,000 for each such violation. If such [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, director, officer, agent, or employee, after the entry of such a cease and desist order and the lapse of the period allowed for appeal of such order or after the affirmance of such order, shall fail or refuse to obey or comply with such order, such [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, director, officer, agent, or employee shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned for not less than six months nor more than one year, or both. Each day during which such failure or refusal to obey such cease and desist order continues shall be deemed a separate offense. If the offending [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity or other person upon whom such penalty is imposed, after the lapse of the period allowed for appeal or after the affirmance of such penalty, shall fail to pay such penalty, the Commission shall refer the matter to the Attorney General who shall recover such penalty by action in the appropriate United States district court. In determining the amount of the money penalty assessed under this section, the Commission shall consider the gravity of the offense, and in the case of a contract market shall further consider whether the amount of the penalty will materially impair the [Struck out->][ contract market's ability ][<-Struck out] the ability of the registered entity to carry on its operations and duties.

SEC. 6c. ACTION TO ENJOIN OR RESTRAIN VIOLATIONS.

(a) Whenever it shall appear to the Commission that any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity or other person has engaged, is engaging, or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision of this Act or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder, or is restraining trading in any commodity for future delivery,

* * * * * * *

SEC. 6d. JURISDICTION OF STATES.

(1) Whenever it shall appear to the attorney general of any State, the administrator of the securities laws of any State, or such other official as a State may designate, that the interests of the residents of that State have been, are being, or may be threatened or adversely affected because any person (other than a [Struck out->][ contract market, ][<-Struck out] derivatives transaction execution facility, clearinghouse, floor broker, or floor trader) has engaged in

* * * * * * *

SEC. 7. VACATION OF REQUEST OF DESIGNATION AS ` [Struck out->][ CONTRACT MARKET ][<-Struck out] REGISTERED ENTITY.

Any [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] person that has been designated or registered a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity in the manner herein provided may have such designation or registration vacated and set aside by giving notice in writing to the Commission requesting that its designation or registration as a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity be vacated, which notice shall be served at least ninety days prior to the date named therein as the date when the vacation of designation or registration shall take effect. Upon receipt of such notice the Commission shall forthwith order the vacation of the [Struck out->][ designation of such board of trade as a contract market ][<-Struck out] designation or registration of the registered entity, effective upon the day named in the notice, and shall forthwith send a copy of the notice and its order to all other [Struck out->][ contract markets ][<-Struck out] registered entities. From and after the date upon which the vacation became effective the said [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] person can thereafter be [Struck out->][ designated again a contract market ][<-Struck out] designated or registered again a registered entity by making application to the Commission in the manner herein provided for an original application.

SEC. 8. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.

* * * * * * *

(c) The Commission may make or issue such reports as it deems necessary, or such opinions or orders as may be required under other provisions of law, relative to the conduct of any [Struck out->][ board of trade ][<-Struck out] registered entity or to the transactions

* * * * * * *

SEC. 8a. THE COMMISSION IS AUTHORIZED.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 8b. TRADING BAN VIOLATIONS.

It shall be unlawful for any person, against whom there is outstanding any order of the Commission prohibiting him from trading on or subject to the rules of any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, to make or cause to be made in contravention of such order, any contract for future delivery of any commodity, on or subject to the rules of any contract market.

SEC. 8c. DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS.

(a)(1) Any exchange or the Commission if the exchange fails to act, may suspend, expel, or otherwise discipline any person who is a member of that exchange, or deny any person access to the exchange. Any such action shall be taken solely in accordance with the rules of that exchange.

(2) Any suspension, expulsion, disciplinary, or access denial procedure established by an exchange rule shall provide for written notice to the Commission and to the person who is suspended, expelled, or disciplined, or denied access, within thirty days, which includes the reasons for the exchange action in the form and manner the Commission prescribes. An exchange shall make public its findings and the reasons for the exchange action in any such proceeding, including the action taken or the penalty imposed, but shall not disclose the evidence therefor, except to the person who is suspended, expelled, or disciplined, or denied access, and to the Commission.

(b) The Commission may, in its discretion and in accordance with such standards and procedures as it deems appropriate, review any decision by an exchange whereby a person is suspended, expelled, otherwise disciplined, or denied access to the exchange. In addition, the Commission may, in its discretion and upon application of any person who is adversely affected by any other exchange action, review such action.

(c) The Commission may affirm, modify, set aside, or remand any exchange decision it reviews pursuant to subsection (b), after a determination on the record whether the action of the

exchange was in accordance with the policies of this Act. Subject to judicial review, any order of the Commission entered pursuant to subsection (b) shall govern the exchange in its further treatment of the matter.

(d) The Commission, in its discretion, may order a stay of any action taken pursuant to subsection (a) pending review thereof.

(e)(1) The Commission shall issue regulations requiring each [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity to establish and make available to the public a schedule of major violations of any rule within the disciplinary jurisdiction of such [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity.

(2) The regulations issued by the Commission pursuant to this subsection shall prohibit, for a period of time to be determined by the Commission, any individual who is found to have committed any major violation from service on the governing board of any [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity or registered futures association, or on any disciplinary committee thereof

* * * * * * *

SEC. 9. VIOLATIONS GENERALLY.

(a) It shall be a felony punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000,000 (or $500,000 in the case of a person who is an individual) or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution, for:

* * * * * * *

(f) It shall be a felony for any person--

* * * * * * *

SEC. 12. COMMISSION OPERATIONS.

* * * * * * *

(d) There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act for each of fiscal years 1995 through [Struck out->][ 2000 ][<-Struck out] 2005.

(e) Nothing in this Act shall supersede or preempt--

possessions, or (C) that is not subject to regulation by the Commission under section 4c or 19 of this Act; or

* * * * * * *

SEC. 14. COMPLAINTS AGAINST REGISTERED PERSONS.

(a)(1) Any person complaining of any violation * * *

* * * * * * *

(f) Unless the party against whom a reparation order has been issued shows to the satisfaction of the Commission within fifteen days from the expiration of the period allowed for compliance with such order that either an appeal as herein authorized has been taken or payment of the full amount of the order (or any agreed settlement thereof) has been made, such party shall be prohibited automatically from trading on all [Struck out->][ contract markets ][<-Struck out] registered entities and, if the party is registered with the Commission, such registration shall be suspended automatically at the expiration of such fifteen-day period until such party shows to the satisfaction of the Commission that payment of such amount with interest thereon to date of payment has been made: Provided, That if on appeal the appellee prevails or if the appeal is dismissed, the automatic prohibition against trading and suspension of registration shall become effective at the expiration of thirty days from the date of judgment on the appeal, but if the judgment is stayed by a court of competent jurisdiction, the suspension shall become effective ten days after the expiration of such stay, unless prior thereto the judgment of the court has been satisfied.

[Struck out->][ (g) The provisions of this section shall not become effective until fifteen months after the date of its enactment: Provided, That claims which arise within one year immediately prior to the effective date of this section may be heard by the Commission after such 15-month period. ][<-Struck out]

(g) PREDISPUTE RESOLUTION AGREEMENTS FOR INSTITUTIONAL CUSTOMERS- Nothing in this Act prohibits a registered futures commission merchant from requiring a customer that is an eligible contract participant, as a condition to the commission merchant's conducting a transaction for the customer, to enter into an agreement--

[Struck out->][ SEC. 15. THE COMMISSION ][<-Struck out] SEC. 15. CONSIDERATION OF COSTS AND BENEFITS AND ANTITRUST LAWS.

(a) COSTS AND BENEFITS-

(b) ANTITRUST LAWS- The Commission shall take into consideration the public interest to be protected by the antitrust laws and endeavor to take the least anticompetitive means of achieving the objectives of this Act, as well as the policies and purposes of this Act, in issuing any order or adopting any Commission rule or regulation (including any exemption under section 4(c) or 4c(b)), or in requiring or approving any bylaw, rule, or regulation of a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity or registered futures association established pursuant to section 17 of this Act.

SEC. 15. ANTITRUST LAWS.

The Commission shall take into consideration the public interest to be protected by the antitrust laws and endeavor to take the least anticompetitive means of achieving the objectives of this Act, as well as the policies and purposes of this Act, in issuing any order or adopting any Commission rule or regulation (including any exemption under section 4(c) or 4c(b)), or in requiring or approving any bylaw, rule, or regulation of a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entities or registered futures association established pursuant to section 17 of this Act.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 17. REGISTERED FUTURES ASSOCIATIONS

* * * * * * *

(b) An applicant association shall not be registered as a futures association unless the Commission finds, under standards established by the Commission, that

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

(o)(1) The Commission may require any futures association registered pursuant to this section to perform any portion of the registration functions under this Act with respect to each member of the association other than a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entities and with respect to each associated person of such member, in accordance with rules, notwithstanding any other provision of law, adopted by such futures association and submitted to the Commission pursuant to section 17(j) of this Act, and subject to the provisions of this Act applicable to registrations granted by the Commission * * *

* * * * * * *

(q)(2) The regulations issued by the Commission pursuant to this subsection shall prohibit, for a period of time to be determined by the Commission, any member of a registered futures association who is found to have committed any major violation from service on the governing board of any registered futures association or [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entities, or on any disciplinary committee thereof * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 22. PRIVATE RIGHTS OF ACTION.

(a)(1) Any person (other than a contract market, clearing organization of a [Struck out->][ contract market, licensed board of trade ][<-Struck out] registered entity, or registered futures association) who violates this Act or who willfully aids, abets, counsels, induces, or procures the commission of a violation of this Act shall be liable for actual damages resulting from one or more of the transactions referred to in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of this paragraph and caused by such violation to any other person * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

(2) Except as provided in subsection (b), the rights of action authorized by this subsection and by [Struck out->][ sections 5a(11) ][<-Struck out] `sections 5(d)(13), 5b(d)(2)(H)(i),', 14, and 17(b)(10) of this Act shall be the exclusive remedies under this Act available to any person who sustains loss as a result of any alleged violation of this Act * * *

(3) In any action arising from a violation in the execution of an order on the floor of a [Struck out->][ contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity, the person referred to in paragraph (1) shall be liable for--

* * * * * * *

(4) CONTRACT ENFORCEMENT BETWEEN ELIGIBLE COUNTERPARTIES- No agreement, contract, or transaction between eligible contract participants shall be void, voidable, or unenforceable, and no such eligible contract participant shall be entitled to rescind, or recover any payment made with respect to, such an agreement, contract, or transaction, under this section based solely on the failure of the agreement, contract, or transaction to comply with the terms or conditions of an exemption or exclusion from any provision of this Act or regulations of the Commission.

(b)(1)(A) A [Struck out->][ contract market or clearing organization of a contract market ][<-Struck out] registered entity that fails to enforce any bylaw, rule, regulation, or resolution that it is required to enforce by [Struck out->][ section 5a(8) and section 5a(9) ][<-Struck out] sections 5 through 5c of this Act, (B) a licensed board of trade that fails to enforce any bylaw, rule, regulation, or resolution that it is required to enforce by the Commission, or (C) any [Struck out->][ contract market, clearing organization of a contract market, or licensed board of trade ][<-Struck out] registered entity that in enforcing any such bylaw, rule, regulation, or resolution violates this Act or any Commission rule, regulation, or order, shall be liable for actual damages sustained by a person who engaged in any transaction on or subject to the rules of such [Struck out->][ contract market or licensed board of trade ][<-Struck out] registered entity to the extent of such person's actual losses that resulted from such transaction and were caused by such failure to enforce or enforcement of such bylaws, rules, regulations, or resolutions

* * * * * * *

(3) Any individual who, in the capacity as an officer, director, governor, committee member, or employee of a [Struck out->][ contract market, clearing organization, licensed board of trade ][<-Struck out] registered entity, or a registered futures association willfully aids, abets, counsels, induces, or procures any failure by any such entity to enforce (or any violation of the Act in enforcing) any bylaw, rule, regulation, or resolution referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of this subsection, shall be liable for actual damages sustained by a person who engaged in any transaction specified in subsection (a) of this section on, or subject to the rules of, such [Struck out->][ contract market, licensed board of trade ][<-Struck out] registered entity or, in the case of an officer, director, governor, committee member, or employee of a registered futures association, any transaction specified in subsection (a) of this section, in either case to the extent of such person's actual losses that resulted from such transaction and were caused by such failure or violation.

(4) A person seeking to enforce liability under this section must establish that the [Struck out->][ contract market, licensed board of trade, clearing organization ][<-Struck out] registered entity, registered futures association, officer, director, governor, committee member, or employee acted in bad faith in failing to take action or in taking such action as was taken, and that such failure or action caused the loss.

(5) The rights of action authorized by this subsection shall be the exclusive remedy under this Act available to any person who sustains a loss as a result of (A) the alleged failure by a [Struck out->][ contract market, licensed board of trade, clearing organization ][<-Struck out] registered entity, or registered futures association or by any officer, director, governor, committee member, or employee to enforce any bylaw, rule, regulation, or resolution referred to inparagraph (1) or (2) of this subsection, or (B) the taking of action in enforcing any bylaw, rule, regulation, or resolution referred to in this subsection that is alleged to have violated this Act, or any Commission rule, regulation, or order

* * * * * * *

-

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991.

Section 402(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (12 U.S.C. 4402(2)) is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:



This Report:     Printer Friendly: HTML  |  PDF
1 of 1