write_parts.c-54 : failed to open = [/local/etc/httpd/cgi-lis/txt_templates/compr_reg_crumb.txt]

Committee Reports

107th Congress (2001-2002)

House Report 107-057

House Report 107-057 1 of 1

This Report: To Accompany H.R.1646     Printer Friendly: HTML  |  PDF




{link: 'http://www.congress.gov:80/cgi-bin/cpquery?',title: 'THOMAS - Committee Report - House Report 107-057' }

FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION ACT, FISCAL YEARS 2002 AND 2003

107TH CONGRESS

REPORT

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1st Session

107-57
FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION ACT, FISCAL YEARS 2002 AND 2003

MAY 4, 2001- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Mr. HYDE, from the Committee on International Relations, submitted the following
R E P O R T
together with
ADDITIONAL VIEWS
[To accompany H.R. 1646]
[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
The Amendment 2
Hearings 43
Committee Consideration 43
Votes of the Committee 43
Background and Need for the Legislation 44
Committee Oversight Findings 45
New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures 45
Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate 45
Performance Goals and Objectives 50
Constitutional Authority Statement 50
Section-by-Section Analysis 51
New Advisory Committees 87
Congressional Accountability Act 88
Federal Mandates 88
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported 88
Additional Views 131

THE AMENDMENT

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Table of contents.
Sec. 3. Definitions.
TITLE I--AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS
Subtitle A--Department of State
Sec. 101. Administration of foreign affairs.
Sec. 102. International commissions.
Sec. 103. United States educational and cultural programs.
Sec. 104. Contributions to international organizations.
Sec. 105. Contributions for international peacekeeping activities.
Sec. 106. Grants to the Asia Foundation.
Sec. 107. Voluntary contributions to international organizations.
Sec. 108. Migration and refugee assistance.
Subtitle B--United States International Broadcasting Activities
Sec. 121. Authorizations of appropriations.
Subtitle C--Global Democracy Promotion Act of 2001
Sec. 131. Short title.
Sec. 132. Findings.
Sec. 133. Assistance for foreign nongovernmental organizations under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.
TITLE II--AUTHORITIES AND ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Subtitle A--Basic Authorities and Activities
Sec. 201. Continuation of reporting requirements.
Sec. 202. Continuation of other reports.
Sec. 203. Royal Ulster Constabulary training.
Sec. 204. Report concerning elimination of Colombian opium.
Sec. 205. Repeal of provision regarding housing for foreign agricultural attache.
Sec. 206. Human rights monitoring.
Sec. 207. Correction of Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967.
Sec. 208. International litigation fund.
Sec. 209. Emergency evacuation services.
Sec. 210. Implementation of the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000.
Sec. 211. Report concerning the effect of Plan Colombia on Ecuador.
Sec. 212. Report concerning efforts to promote Israel's diplomatic relations with other countries.
Sec. 213. Reports on activities in the Republic of Colombia.
Subtitle B--Consular Authorities
Sec. 231. Machine readable visas.
Sec. 232. Establishment of a consular branch office in Lhasa, Tibet.
Sec. 233. Establishment of a diplomatic or consular post in Equatorial Guinea.
Sec. 234. Processing of visa applications.
Sec. 235. United States policy with respect to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Sec. 236. Denial of visas to supporters of Colombian illegal armed groups.
Subtitle C--Migration and Refugees
Sec. 251. United States policy regarding the involuntary return of refugees.
Sec. 252. Report on overseas refugee processing.
TITLE III--ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Subtitle A--Organizational Matters
Sec. 301. Comprehensive workforce plan.
Sec. 302. `Rightsizing' overseas posts.
Sec. 303. Qualifications of certain officers of the Department of State.
Sec. 304. United States Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues.
Sec. 305. United States Special Envoy for Sudan Issues.
Subtitle B--Personnel Matters
Sec. 331. Report concerning retired members of the Foreign Service and Civil Service who are registered agents of a government of a foreign country.
Sec. 332. Tibetan language training.
Sec. 333. Dependents on family visitation travel.
Sec. 334. Thomas Jefferson Star.
Sec. 335. Health education and disease prevention programs.
Sec. 336. Training authorities.
Sec. 337. Foreign national retirement plans.
Sec. 338. Presidential rank awards.
Sec. 339. Emergency medical advance payments.
Sec. 340. Unaccompanied air baggage.
Sec. 341. Special agent authorities.
Sec. 342. Report concerning minority employment.
Sec. 343. Use of funds authorized for minority recruitment.
TITLE IV--UNITED STATES EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Sec. 401. Extension of requirement for scholarships for Tibetans and Burmese.
Sec. 402. Nonprofit entities for cultural programs.
Sec. 403. Fulbright-Hays authorities.
Sec. 404. Ethical issues in international health research.
TITLE V--UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING ACTIVITIES
Sec. 501. Eliminating staff positions for the Advisory Board for Cuba Broadcasting.
Sec. 502. Reports on broadcasting personnel.
Sec. 503. Personal services contracting pilot program.
Sec. 504. Pay parity for senior executives of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty.
Sec. 505. Repeal of ban on United States transmitter in Kuwait.
TITLE VI--INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMISSIONS
Sec. 601. United Nations arrears payments and reform.
Sec. 602. Travel by advisory committee members to Great Lakes Fishery Commission annual meeting.
Sec. 603. United States policy on composition of the United Nations Human Rights Commission.
Sec. 604. United States membership in the International Organization for Migration.
Sec. 605. Report relating to Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.
Sec. 606. Reports to Congress on United Nations activities.
TITLE VII--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
Subtitle A--General Provisions
Sec. 701. Amendments to the Iran Nonproliferation Act of 2000.
Sec. 702. Amendments to the North Korea Threat Reduction Act of 1999.
Sec. 703. Amendments to the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998.
Sec. 704. Continuation of United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.
Sec. 705. Participation of South Asia countries in international law enforcment.
Subtitle B--Sense of Congress Provisions
Sec. 731. Sense of Congress relating to HIV/AIDs and United Nations peacekeeping operations.
Sec. 732. Sense of Congress relating to HIV/AIDS task force.
Sec. 733. Sense of Congress condemning the destruction of pre-Islamic statues in Afghanistan by the Taliban regime.
Sec. 734. Sense of Congress relating to resolution of the Taiwan Strait issue.
Sec. 735. Sense of Congress relating to arsenic contamination in drinking water in Bangladesh.
Sec. 736. Sense of Congress relating to display of the American flag at the American Institute in Taiwan.
Sec. 737. Sense of Congress regarding human rights violations in West Papua and Aceh, including the murder of Jafar Siddiq Hamzah, and escalating violence in Maluku and Central Kalimantan.
Sec. 738. Sense of Congress supporting properly conducted elections in Kosova during 2001.
Sec. 739. Sense of Congress relating to policy review of relations with the People's Republic of China.
Sec. 740. Sense of Congress relating to broadcasting in the Macedonian language by Radio Free Europe.
Sec. 741. Sense of Congress relating to Magen David Adom Society.
Sec. 742. Sense of Congress urging the return of portraits painted by Dina Babbitt during her internment at Auschwitz that are now in the possession of the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum.
Sec. 743. Sense of Congress regarding Vietnamese refugee families.
Sec. 744. Sense of Congress relating to membership of the United States in UNESCO.
Sec. 745. Sense of Congress relating to global warming.
Sec. 746. Sense of Congress regarding the ban on Sinn Fein ministers from the North-South Ministerial Council in Northern Ireland.
TITLE VIII--SECURITY ASSISTANCE
Sec. 801. Short title.
Subtitle A--Military and Related Assistance
Chapter 1--Foreign Military Sales and Related Authorities
Sec. 811. Quarterly report on price and availability estimates.
Sec. 812. Official reception and representation expenses.
Sec. 813. Treatment of Taiwan relating to transfers of defense articles and services.
Sec. 814. United States policy with regard to Taiwan.
Chapter 2--Excess Defense Article and Drawdown Authorities
Sec. 821. Excess defense articles for certain European and other countries.
Sec. 822. Leases of defense articles for foreign countries and international organizations.
Sec. 823. Priority with respect to transfer of excess defense articles.
Chapter 3--Nonproliferation And Export Control Assistance
Sec. 831. International counterproliferation education and training.
Sec. 832. Annual report on the proliferation of missiles and essential components of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.
Sec. 833. Five-year international arms control and nonproliferation strategy.
Subtitle B--Strengthening the Munitions Licensing Process
Sec. 841. License officer staffing.
Sec. 842. Funding for database automation.
Sec. 843. Information management priorities.
Sec. 844. Improvements to the automated export system.
Sec. 845. Congressional notification of removal of items from the munitions list.
Sec. 846. Congressional notification thresholds for allied countries.
Subtitle C--Authority to Transfer Naval Vessels
Sec. 851. Authority to transfer naval vessels to certain foreign countries.
Subtitle D--Miscellaneous Provisions
Sec. 861. Annual foreign military training reports.
Sec. 862. Report relating to international arms sales code of conduct.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

TITLE I--AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS

Subtitle A--Department of State

SEC. 101. ADMINISTRATION OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS.

SEC. 102. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONS.

SEC. 103. UNITED STATES EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS.

SEC. 104. CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 105. CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING ACTIVITIES.

SEC. 106. GRANTS TO THE ASIA FOUNDATION.

SEC. 107. VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 108. MIGRATION AND REFUGEE ASSISTANCE.

Subtitle B--United States International Broadcasting Activities

SEC. 121. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Subtitle C--Global Democracy Promotion Act of 2001

SEC. 131. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 132. FINDINGS.

SEC. 133. ASSISTANCE FOR FOREIGN NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS UNDER PART I OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961.

TITLE II--AUTHORITIES AND ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Subtitle A--Basic Authorities and Activities

SEC. 201. CONTINUATION OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

SEC. 202. CONTINUATION OF OTHER REPORTS.

SEC. 203. ROYAL ULSTER CONSTABULARY TRAINING.

SEC. 204. REPORT CONCERNING ELIMINATION OF COLOMBIAN OPIUM.

SEC. 205. REPEAL OF PROVISION REGARDING HOUSING FOR FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL ATTACHE.

SEC. 206. HUMAN RIGHTS MONITORING.

SEC. 207. CORRECTION OF FISHERMEN'S PROTECTIVE ACT OF 1967.

SEC. 208. INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION FUND.

SEC. 209. EMERGENCY EVACUATION SERVICES.

SEC. 210. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION ACT OF 2000.

SEC. 211. REPORT CONCERNING THE EFFECT OF PLAN COLOMBIA ON ECUADOR.

SEC. 212. REPORT CONCERNING EFFORTS TO PROMOTE ISRAEL'S DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES.

SEC. 213. REPORTS ON ACTIVITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA.

Subtitle B--Consular Authorities

SEC. 231. MACHINE READABLE VISAS.

SEC. 232. ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONSULAR BRANCH OFFICE IN LHASA, TIBET.

SEC. 233. ESTABLISHMENT OF A DIPLOMATIC OR CONSULAR POST IN EQUATORIAL GUINEA.

SEC. 234. PROCESSING OF VISA APPLICATIONS.

SEC. 235. UNITED STATES POLICY WITH RESPECT TO JERUSALEM AS THE CAPITAL OF ISRAEL.

SEC. 236. DENIAL OF VISAS TO SUPPORTERS OF COLOMBIAN ILLEGAL ARMED GROUPS.

Subtitle C--Migration and Refugees

SEC. 251. UNITED STATES POLICY REGARDING THE INVOLUNTARY RETURN OF REFUGEES.

SEC. 252. REPORT ON OVERSEAS REFUGEE PROCESSING.

TITLE III--ORGANIZATION AND PERSONNEL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Subtitle A--Organizational Matters

SEC. 301. COMPREHENSIVE WORKFORCE PLAN.

SEC. 302. `RIGHTSIZING' OVERSEAS POSTS.

SEC. 303. QUALIFICATIONS OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

SEC. 304. UNITED STATES SPECIAL COORDINATOR FOR TIBETAN ISSUES.

SEC. 305. UNITED STATES SPECIAL ENVOY FOR SUDAN ISSUES.

Subtitle B--Personnel Matters

SEC. 331. REPORT CONCERNING RETIRED MEMBERS OF THE FOREIGN SERVICE AND CIVIL SERVICE WHO ARE REGISTERED AGENTS OF A GOVERNMENT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY.

SEC. 332. TIBETAN LANGUAGE TRAINING.

SEC. 333. DEPENDENTS ON FAMILY VISITATION TRAVEL.

SEC. 334. THOMAS JEFFERSON STAR.

SEC. 335. HEALTH EDUCATION AND DISEASE PREVENTION PROGRAMS.

SEC. 336. TRAINING AUTHORITIES.

SEC. 337. FOREIGN NATIONAL RETIREMENT PLANS.

SEC. 338. PRESIDENTIAL RANK AWARDS.

SEC. 339. EMERGENCY MEDICAL ADVANCE PAYMENTS.

SEC. 340. UNACCOMPANIED AIR BAGGAGE.

SEC. 341. SPECIAL AGENT AUTHORITIES.

SEC. 342. REPORT CONCERNING MINORITY EMPLOYMENT.

SEC. 343. USE OF FUNDS AUTHORIZED FOR MINORITY RECRUITMENT.

TITLE IV--UNITED STATES EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

SEC. 401. EXTENSION OF REQUIREMENT FOR SCHOLARSHIPS FOR TIBETANS AND BURMESE.

SEC. 402. NONPROFIT ENTITIES FOR CULTURAL PROGRAMS.

SEC. 403. FULBRIGHT-HAYS AUTHORITIES.

SEC. 404. ETHICAL ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL HEALTH RESEARCH.

TITLE V--UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING ACTIVITIES

SEC. 501. ELIMINATING STAFF POSITIONS FOR THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR CUBA BROADCASTING.

SEC. 502. REPORTS ON BROADCASTING PERSONNEL.

SEC. 503. PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACTING PILOT PROGRAM.

SEC. 504. PAY PARITY FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVES OF RADIO FREE EUROPE AND RADIO LIBERTY.

SEC. 505. REPEAL OF BAN ON UNITED STATES TRANSMITTER IN KUWAIT.

TITLE VI--INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMISSIONS

SEC 601. UNITED NATIONS ARREARS PAYMENTS AND REFORM.

`SEC. 6. AGREEMENTS WITH SECURITY COUNCIL.

SEC. 602. TRAVEL BY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION ANNUAL MEETING.

SEC. 603. UNITED STATES POLICY ON COMPOSITION OF THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.

SEC. 604. UNITED STATES MEMBERSHIP IN THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION.

SEC. 605. REPORT RELATING TO COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE.

SEC. 606. REPORTS TO CONGRESS ON UNITED NATIONS ACTIVITIES.

TITLE VII--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--General Provisions

SEC. 701. AMENDMENTS TO THE IRAN NONPROLIFERATION ACT OF 2000.

SEC. 702. AMENDMENTS TO THE NORTH KOREA THREAT REDUCTION ACT OF 1999.

SEC. 703. AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT OF 1998.

SEC. 704. CONTINUATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.

SEC. 705. PARTICIPATION OF SOUTH ASIA COUNTRIES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW ENFORCMENT.

Subtitle B--Sense of Congress Provisions

SEC. 731. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO HIV/AIDS AND UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS.

SEC. 732. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO HIV/AIDS TASK FORCE.

SEC. 733. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONDEMNING THE DESTRUCTION OF PRE-ISLAMIC STATUES IN AFGHANISTAN BY THE TALIBAN REGIME.

SEC. 734. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO RESOLUTION OF THE TAIWAN STRAIT ISSUE.

SEC. 735. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO ARSENIC CONTAMINATION IN DRINKING WATER IN BANGLADESH.

SEC. 736. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO DISPLAY OF THE AMERICAN FLAG AT THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN.

SEC. 737. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN WEST PAPUA AND ACEH, INCLUDING THE MURDER OF JAFAR SIDDIQ HAMZAH, AND ESCALATING VIOLENCE IN MALUKU AND CENTRAL KALIMANTAN.

SEC. 738. SENSE OF CONGRESS SUPPORTING PROPERLY CONDUCTED ELECTIONS IN KOSOVA DURING 2001.

SEC. 739. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO POLICY REVIEW OF RELATIONS WITH THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

SEC. 740. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO BROADCASTING IN THE MACEDONIAN LANGUAGE BY RADIO FREE EUROPE.

SEC. 741. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO MAGEN DAVID ADOM SOCIETY.

SEC. 742. SENSE OF CONGRESS URGING THE RETURN OF PORTRAITS PAINTED BY DINA BABBITT DURING HER INTERNMENT AT AUSCHWITZ THAT ARE NOW IN THE POSSESSION OF THE AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU STATE MUSEUM.

SEC. 743. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING VIETNAMESE REFUGEE FAMILIES.

SEC. 744. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP OF THE UNITED STATES IN UNESCO.

SEC. 745. SENSE OF CONGRESS RELATING TO GLOBAL WARMING.

SEC. 746. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE BAN ON SINN FEIN MINISTERS FROM THE NORTH-SOUTH MINISTERIAL COUNCIL IN NORTHERN IRELAND.

TITLE VIII--SECURITY ASSISTANCE

SEC. 801. SHORT TITLE.

Subtitle A--Military and Related Assistance

CHAPTER 1--FOREIGN MILITARY SALES AND RELATED AUTHORITIES

SEC. 811. QUARTERLY REPORT ON PRICE AND AVAILABILITY ESTIMATES.

`SEC. 28. QUARTERLY REPORT ON PRICE AND AVAILABILITY ESTIMATES.

SEC. 812. OFFICIAL RECEPTION AND REPRESENTATION EXPENSES.

SEC. 813. TREATMENT OF TAIWAN RELATING TO TRANSFERS OF DEFENSE ARTICLES AND SERVICES.

SEC. 814. UNITED STATES POLICY WITH REGARD TO TAIWAN.

CHAPTER 2--EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLE AND DRAWDOWN AUTHORITIES

SEC. 821. EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLES FOR CERTAIN EUROPEAN AND OTHER COUNTRIES.

SEC. 822. LEASES OF DEFENSE ARTICLES FOR FOREIGN COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

SEC. 823. PRIORITY WITH RESPECT TO TRANSFER OF EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLES.

CHAPTER 3--NONPROLIFERATION AND EXPORT CONTROL ASSISTANCE

SEC. 831. INTERNATIONAL COUNTERPROLIFERATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING.

`SEC. 584. INTERNATIONAL COUNTER-PROLIFERATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING.

SEC. 832. ANNUAL REPORT ON THE PROLIFERATION OF MISSILES AND ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL, AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

SEC. 833. FIVE-YEAR INTERNATIONAL ARMS CONTROL AND NONPROLIFERATION STRATEGY.

Subtitle B--Strengthening the Munitions Licensing Process

SEC. 841. LICENSE OFFICER STAFFING.

SEC. 842. FUNDING FOR DATABASE AUTOMATION.

SEC. 843. INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PRIORITIES.

SEC. 844. IMPROVEMENTS TO THE AUTOMATED EXPORT SYSTEM.

`(b) Any person, other that a person described in subsection (a), required to submit export information, shall file such information in accordance with any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to this chapter. In the event any such information or reports are not filed within such prescribed period, the Secretary of Commerce (and officers and employees of the Department of Commerce designated by the Secretary) may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each day's delinquency beyond the prescribed period, but not more than $10,000 per violation.'.

`Sec. 305. Penalties for unlawful export information activities

`305. Penalties for unlawful export information activities.'.

SEC. 845. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION OF REMOVAL OF ITEMS FROM THE MUNITIONS LIST.

SEC. 846. CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION THRESHOLDS FOR ALLIED COUNTRIES.

Subtitle C--Authority to Transfer Naval Vessels

SEC. 851. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER NAVAL VESSELS TO CERTAIN FOREIGN COUNTRIES.

Subtitle D--Miscellaneous Provisions

SEC. 861. ANNUAL FOREIGN MILITARY TRAINING REPORTS.

SEC. 862. REPORT RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL ARMS SALES CODE OF CONDUCT.

HEARINGS

The Committee's Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights held two hearings on issues related to the State Department Authorization bill for FY 02 and 03. The first hearing, entitled `International Broadcasting: Its Mission, Budget and Future,' was held on February 28, 2001. Testimony was received from the Chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, Marc B. Nathanson. On March 7, 2001, the Subcommittee held a hearing on the State Department's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, and Structures for Promoting Human Rights in U.S. Foreign Policy. Testimony was received from Mr. Carlos Salinas, Acting Director for Government Relations, Amnesty International; Ms. Elisa Massimino, Washington Director, Lawyers Committee for Human Rights; Mr. Paul Marshall, Senior Fellow, Center for Religious Freedom, Freedom House; Mr. William D. Hartung, President's Fellow, World Policy Institute; Mr. Steven Rickard, Director, Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Center for Human Rights; and Ms. Catherine del Pino, Deputy Director, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies of The Brookings Institution.

The Committee on International Relations held three hearings related to the State Department Authorization Bill. The first, entitled, `State Department: In the Lead on Foreign Policy?' was held on February 14, 2001. Testimony was received from: Rep. Harold Rogers, former Chairman, Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State, and the Judiciary; Hon. Frank Carlucci, Chairman, Report of an Independent Task Force: `State Department Reform'; and Mr. Lewis B. Kaden, Chairman, Overseas Presence Advisory Panel. On March 1, 2001, the Committee held a hearing entitled, `Conducting Diplomacy in a Global Age,' and heard testimony from: Hon. Marc Grossman, Director General of the Foreign Service, and Director of Human Resources; Mr. Marshall Adair, President, American Foreign Service Association; and Mr. Gary R. Galloway, Vice President, American Federal Government Employees. Secretary of State Colin L. Powell testified before the Committee on March 7, 2001, at a hearing entitled, `Reinvigorating U.S. Foreign Policy.'

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

On May 2, 2001, the International Relations Committee marked up the bill, pursuant to notice, in open session. The Committee agreed to a motion offered by Chairman Hyde to favorably report the bill to the House of Representatives, by a voice vote, a quorum being present.

VOTES OF THE COMMITTEE

Clause (3)(b) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires that the results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with the names of those voting for or against, be printed in the Committee report.

1. Ms. Lee offered an amendment adding a subtitle on `Global Democracy Promotion Act of 2001.' The amendment was agreed to by a rollcall vote of 26 ayes to 22 noes.

Voting yes: Gilman, Leach, Houghton, Lantos, Berman, Ackerman, Faleomavaega, Payne, Menendez, Brown, McKinney, Hastings, Hilliard, Sherman, Wexler, Davis (FL), Engel, Delahunt, Meeks, Lee, Crowley, Hoeffel, Blumenauer, Berkley, Napolitano, and Schiff.

Voting no: Bereuter, Smith (NJ), Burton, Gallegly, Ros-Lehtinen, Ballenger, Rohrabacher, Royce, King, Chabot, Burr, Cooksey, Tancredo, Paul, Smith(MI), Pitts, Issa, Cantor, Flake, Kerns, Davis (VA) and Hyde.

2. Mr. Flake offered an en bloc amendment which would delete funding for the North-South Center and the Asia Foundation. The amendment was defeated by a rollcall vote of 6 ayes to 30 noes.

Voting yes: Chabot, Tancredo, Paul, Cantor, Flake, and Kerns

Voting no: Gilman, Leach, Smith (NJ), Burton, Ros-Lehtinen, Houghton, Pitts, Issa, Davis (VA), Lantos, Berman, Ackerman, Faleomavaega, Menendez, McKinney, Hastings, Hilliard, Wexler, Davis (FL), Engel, Delahunt, Meeks, Lee, Crowley, Hoeffel, Blumenauer, Berkley, Napolitano, Schiff, and Hyde.

3. Mr. Leach offered an en bloc amendment calling for a renewal of U.S. participation in the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The amendment was agreed to by a rollcall vote of 23 ayes to 14 noes.

Voting yes: Leach, Houghton, Lantos, Berman, Ackerman, Faleomavaega, Payne, Menendez, McKinney, Hastings, Hilliard, Sherman, Wexler, Engel, Delahunt, Meeks, Lee, Crowley, Hoeffel, Blumenauer, Berkley, Napolitano, and Schiff.

Voting no: Gilman, Smith (NJ), Ros-Lehtinen, King, Chabot, Tancredo, Paul, Pitts, Issa, Cantor, Flake, Kerns, Davis (VA), and Hyde.

4. Mr. Menendez offered an amendment regarding global warming and the Kyoto Protocol. The amendment was agreed to by a rollcall vote of 23 ayes to 20 noes.

Voting yes: Smith (NJ), Lantos, Berman, Ackerman, Faleomavaega, Payne, Menendez, Brown, McKinney, Hilliard, Sherman, Wexler, Davis (FL), Engel, Delahunt, Meeks, Lee, Crowley, Hoeffel, Blumenauer, Berkley, Napolitano, and Schiff.

Voting no: Gilman, Burton, Gallegly, Ros-Lehtinen, Ballenger, Rohrabacher, Royce, King, Chabot, McHugh, Cooksey, Tancredo, Paul, Pitts, Issa, Cantor, Flake, Kerns, Davis (VA), and Hyde.

BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR THE LEGISLATION

H.R. 1646 the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, represents a bipartisan measure to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the Department of State and for the Broadcasting Board of Governors which is responsible for non-military U.S. international broadcasting.

It authorizes to be appropriated $8.3 billion in fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for the operations of the State Department, and $584 million in fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for 2003 for the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

The President has requested and the Committee is recommending a substantial increase in the amounts authorized for the State Department's operating accounts, particularly with respect to embassy security, personnel, and improvements in its computer platform. The Committee received ample testimony that, for example, additional personnel to create a training pool is necessary to promote a more stable assignment process, and that the exercise of diplomatic power in the 21st century requires a rapid and robust modernization of the Department's computer platform. The Committee's recommendations and the modest improvement in the quality of life for the nation's diplomats contained in this bill are a down payment towards a more efficient and modern Department of State that is able to project U.S. diplomatic power around the globe.

COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS

In compliance with clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee reports that the findings and recommendations of the Committee, based on oversight activities under clause 2(b)(1) of rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives, are incorporated in the descriptive portions of this report.

NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY AND TAX EXPENDITURES

Clause 3(c)(2) of House Rule XIII is inapplicable because this legislation does not provide new budgetary authority or increased tax expenditures.

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST ESTIMATE

In compliance with clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee sets forth, with respect to the resolution, H.R. 1646, the following estimate and comparison prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974:

U.S. Congress,

Congressional Budget Office,

Washington, DC, May 4, 2001.

Hon. HENRY J. HYDE, CHAIRMAN,
Committee on International Relations,
House of Representatives, Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 1646, the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003.

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Sunita D'Monte, who can be reached at 226-2840.

Sincerely,

Dan L. Crippen, Director.

H.R. 1646--Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003.

SUMMARY

The bill would authorize appropriations for the Department of State and related agencies for 2002 and 2003. CBO estimates that appropriation of the authorized amounts would result in additional discretionary spending of $16.2 billion over the 2002-2006 period. The legislation also would increase direct spending by $582 million in 2001 and by $244 million over the 2002-2006 period, and would result in receipts from asset sales totaling an estimated $100 million. CBO estimates that H.R. 1646 would increase governmental receipts (revenues) by an insignificant amount each year by increasing the amount of existing civil penalties and creating new criminal penalties related to export controls. Because the bill would affect direct spending and revenues, pay-as-you-go procedures would apply.

H.R. 1646 contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) and would not affect the budgets of state, local, or tribal governments. The bill would impose a private-sector mandate, but CBO estimates that the direct cost of the mandate would fall well below the annual threshold established by UMRA ($113 million in 2001, adjusted annually for inflation).

ESTIMATED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 1646 is shown in the following table. CBO assumes that the authorized amounts would be appropriated by the start of each fiscal year and that outlays would follow historical spending patterns. The costs of this legislation fall within budget functions 050 (national defense), 150 (international affairs), 300 (natural resources and environment), and 750 (administration of justice).

By fiscal year, in millions of dollars
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 2001  2002  2003  2004 2005 2006 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION                                                 
Spending Under Current Law Budget Authority 1   7,915     0     0     0    0    0 
 Estimated Outlays                              7,225 1,745   999   620  285  122 
Proposed Changes Authorization Level 2              0 8,251 8,299     1    1    1 
 Estimated Outlays                                  0 6,321 7,456 1,555  631  228 
Spending Under H.R. 1646 Authorization Level1,2 7,915 8,251 8,299     1    1    1 
 Estimated Outlays                              7,225 8,066 8,455 2,175  916  350 
CHANGES IN DIRECT SPENDING                                                        
Estimated Budget Authority                          *     *     *     *    *    * 
Estimated Outlays                                 582   244     *     *    *    * 
ASSET SALES                                                                       
Estimated Budget Authority                          0   -18   -82     0    0    0 
Estimated Outlays                                   0   -18   -82     0    0    0 
CHANGES IN REVENUES                                                               
Estimated Revenues                                  *     *     *     *    *    * 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BASIS OF ESTIMATE

Spending Subject to Appropriation

CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 1646 would cost $16.2 billion over the 2002-2006 period, assuming appropriation of the authorized amounts. The bill would authorize appropriations of $8.2 billion for fiscal year 2002. For 2003, it would specify authorizations totaling $954 million and would authorize such sums as may be necessary for a number of programs and activities. Assuming that the latter are funded at the 2002 level adjusted for inflation, CBO estimates that the 2003 authorizations would total $8.3 billion. (If the indefinite authorizations for 2003 were assumed to be funded at the 2002 level, the 2003 authorizations would total $8.1 billion.) In addition, the bill contains other provisions with potential budgetary impacts.

Indefinite Authorizations for Currency Fluctuations. Section 104(c) would authorize such sums as may be necessary in 2002 and 2003 to compensate for adverse fluctuations in exchange rates that might affect contributions to international organizations. Any funds appropriated for this purpose would be obligated and expended subject to certification by the Office of Management and Budget. Currency fluctuations are extremely difficult to estimate in advance, and they could result in spending either higher or lower than the amounts specifically authorized in the bill for contributions to international organizations and programs. Therefore, this estimate includes no costs associated with currency fluctuations.

Miscellaneous Provisions. Section 821 would authorize the use of Department of Defense (DoD) funds to pack and transport excess defense articles to certain East European and Central Asian countries in 2002 and 2003. This authority has been used infrequently in the past. Based on information provided by the Department of Defense, CBO estimates that enacting the provision could add $1 million to defense spending in each of the fiscal years 2002 and 2003, assuming the appropriation of the necessary funds.

The bill includes several provisions that would expand or introduce new reporting requirements. Combined, these provisions would raise spending subject to appropriation by about $1 million annually, but each provision would probably cost less than $500,000 a year.

Direct Spending, Asset Sales, and Revenues

CBO estimates that the bill would increase direct spending by $582 million in 2001 and $244 million in 2002, result in receipts from asset sales totaling $100 million, and increase revenues by less than $500,000 annually.

Payment of United Nations Arrears. Section 601 would amend current law to permit the release of arrearage payments to the United Nations. CBO estimates that under the bill, the State Department would release $582 million in 2001 and $244 million in 2002 that cannot be released under current law. In 1999, Public Law 105-277 appropriated $475 million for arrearage payments. An additional $351 million was provided in 2000 in Public Law 106-113. Under current law, however, those funds cannot be disbursed until certain conditions have been met. One of those conditions--which has not been met and cannot be waived--is that the United Nations lower the United States' assessment rate for peacekeeping activities from 31 percent to 25 percent. The bill would drop this requirement and would also ease other conditions attached to the funds appropriated in 2000. These changes would permit disbursement of the $826 million that has already been appropriated. Because this provision would affect outlays from funds already appropriated and would not depend on future appropriation action, the additional outlays are considered direct spending for scorekeeping purposes.

Fees for Machine Readable Visas. The bill would extend, through 2003, the Secretary of State's authority to charge a fee for machine readable visas and to spend the collections on consular activities. Authority to collect and spend these fees through 2002 was provided in Public Law 106-553. Based on information from the Department of State, CBO estimates the department would collect and spend $368 million in 2003 under this authority.

Authority to Transfer Naval Vessels. H.R. 1646 would authorize the transfer of 14 naval vessels to foreign countries. It would authorize the sale of seven vessels; the other seven would be given away. Information from DoD indicates that the asking price for the seven ships would be approximately $175 million. There is significant uncertainty as to whether all seven vessels would be sold and what the sale price might be. Reflecting this uncertainty, CBO estimates that receipts from these sales would total $18 million in 2002 and $82 million in 2003.

Miscellaneous Provisions. Several provisions in the bill would have little or no effect on direct spending or revenues.

Reimbursements for International Litigation Fund. The bill would allow the State Department to retain, as reimbursement for preparing or prosecuting a claim against a foreign government or entity, a portion of awards received. Based on information from the Department of State, CBO estimates the department would collect and spend less than $1 million a year.

Export Controls. H.R. 1646 would raise governmental receipts (revenues) by increasing the amount of existing civil penalties and establishing new criminal penalties that would be assessed against exporters who fail to submit accurate information to the Department of Commerce (DOC). Based on information from that department, CBO estimates that the increase in revenues would not be significant in any year. Collections of criminal fines are deposited in the Crime Victims Fund and are spent in subsequent years. Based on information from the DOC, CBO estimates that the criminal penalties that would be created under H.R.1646 would increase direct spending from the Crime Victims Fund by less than $500,000 per year.

Reimbursements for Emergency Overseas Evacuation. H.R. 1646 would allow the State Department to seek reimbursements for the emergency evacuation of employees of the U.S. government, their dependents, private U.S. citizens, and foreign nationals. According to the Department of State, this section of the bill codifies existing practice and would have no impact on the budget.

Foreign National Retirement Plans. The bill would amend section 3968 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-465), which provides for the compensation and benefits of foreign nationals who work for the United States abroad. Under the Foreign Service Act, the Department of State is authorized to set aside funds on the behalf of employees for the purpose of paying them a lump-sum payment once they retire or terminate employment. Although such deposits are not being made at the present time, current law allows the State Department to retain a private financial institution for the purpose of holding and investing those funds. The bill would give the State Department the option of depositing these monies into a fund established by the U.S. Treasury Department. The funds would be the property of the federal government regardless of where they are held. Thus, CBO estimates that this provision would have no budgetary impact.

Official Reception and Representation Expenses. Section 811 would increase the amount that the DoD can spend on official reception and representation expenses from foreign military sales receipts by $14,000 each year.

PAY-AS-YOU-GO CONSIDERATIONS

The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act sets up pay-as-you-go procedures for legislation affecting direct spending or receipts. The net changes in outlays and governmental receipts that are subject to pay-as-you-go procedures are shown in the following table. For the purposes of enforcing pay-as-you-go procedures, only the effects in the current year, the budget year, and the succeeding four years are counted.

By fiscal year, in millions of dollars
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes in outlays   582  226  -82    0    0    0    0    0    0    0 
Changes in receipts    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0    0 
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ESTIMATED IMPACT ON STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS

H.R. 1646 contains no intergovernmental mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) and would not affect the budgets of state, local, or tribal governments.

ESTIMATED IMPACT ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR

H.R. 1646 would impose a private-sector mandate by requiring exporters or their agents, not covered under current regulations, to file Shippers Export Declarations through the Automated Export System (AES). Based on information provided by the Bureau of the Census, CBO estimates that the cost of filing through the AES would be minimal as the system is a free, on-line, electronic reporting system. Most exporters are currently required to file their reports through the AES. The cost for the remaining exporters to shift from their current filing process to the electronic system required in the bill would be small. Thus, the direct cost of the mandate in the bill would fall well below the annual threshold established by UMRA ($113 million in 2001, adjusted annually for inflation).

PREVIOUS CBO ESTIMATE

On February 13, 2001, CBO prepared a cost estimate for S. 248 as passed by the Senate. That act would release arrearage payments of $582 million in 2001. Section 601 of H.R. 1646 is similar to S. 248, but it would, in addition, authorize the release of $244 million in 2002.

ESTIMATE PREPARED BY:

Federal Costs:

State Department: Sunita D'Monte (226-2840)

Security Assistance: Joseph Whitehill (226-2840)

Export Controls: Ken Johnson (226-2860) and Erin Whitaker (226-2680)

Foreign National Retirement Plan: Geoffrey Gerhardt (226-2820)

Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Leo Lex (225-3220)

Impact on the Private Sector: Paige Piper/Bach (226-2940)

ESTIMATE APPROVED BY:

Robert A. Sunshine

Assistant Director for Budget Analysis

PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The goals and objectives of this legislation are to provide authorization for the activities of the Department of State for fiscal years 2002 and 2003.

CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

The Committee finds the authority for this legislation in Article I, section 8, clause 18 of the Constitution.

FY 2002 International Affairs Function 150 Summary Commerce, Justice, State Appropriations
$ in Thousands
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 FY 2001 Auth. FY 2001 Approp. FY 2002 Auth. H.R. 1646 FY 2002 Request 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diplomatic & Consular Programs                       3,263,438       3,167,174               3,705,140       3,705,140 
 Worldwide Security Upgrades                           315,000         409,098                 487,735         487,735 
Capital Investment Fund                                150,000          96,787                 210,000         210,000 
Embassy Security Construction & Maint.                                                                                 
 Ongoing Operations                                    445,000         416,059                 475,046         475,046 
 Security (Construction)                               900,000         513,867                *900,000         815,960 
Educational & Cultural Exchange Programs               225,000         231,576                 242,000         242,000 
Office of the Inspector General                         30,054          28,427                  29,264          29,264 
Other State Department Programs                                                                                        
 Representation Allowances                               5,850           6,485                   9,000           9,000 
 Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials            9,490          15,433                  10,000          10,000 
 Emergencies in Diplomatic & Consular Service           17,000           5,465                  15,500          15,500 
 Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan            15,918          16,309                  17,044          17,044 
 Repatriation Loans                                      1,200           1,192                   1,219           1,219 
International Organizations:                                                                                           
 Contributions for International Peacekeeping        such sums         844,139                 844,139         844,139 
 Contributions to International Organizations          940,000         868,917                 944,067         878,767 
 Voluntary Contributions to Inter. Organizations       293,000         186,000                 306,000         186,000 
International Commissions (non-Function 150):                                                                          
 Int'l Boundary & Water Commission-S&E                  20,413           7,126                   7,452           7,452 
 Int'l Boundary & Water Commission-Construction          8,435          22,900                  25,654          25,654 
 International Fisheries Commission                     16,702          19,349                  19,780          19,780 
 International Boundary Commission                         859             968                     989             989 
 International Joint Commission                          3,819           3,763                   7,282           7,282 
 Refugees                                              750,000         698,460                 817,000         715,000 
Related Appropriations:                                                                                                
 The Asia Foundation                                    15,000           9,230                  15,000           9,250 
 National Endowment for Democracy                       32,000          30,931                  36,000          31,000 
 East-West Center                                       12,500          13,470                  13,500          13,500 
 North-South Center**                                    2,500            ----                   4,000            ---- 
Related Agency-Broadcasting Board of Governors         467,229         450,431                                 470,000 
    TOTAL                                            7,940,407       8,063,556               8,242,811       9,226,721 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

Foreign Relations Authorization for Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003

TITLE I--AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

Section 101--Authorization of Appropriations--Administration of Foreign Affairs.

This section authorizes the State Department's FY 2002 and 2003 operating budget at $4,714,167,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003.

101(1)--Diplomatic and Consular Programs. This section authorizes $3,705,140,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for diplomatic and consular programs.

Of the total amount, $487,735,000 is specifically authorized for worldwide security upgrades for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003; for the salaries and expenses of the Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, $16,000,000 is authorized for fiscal year 2002 and $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2003; for the recruitment of members of minority groups for careers in the Foreign Service and international affairs $2,000,000 is authorized for fiscal years 2002 and 2003; and $70,000 is authorized for a mobile library at the U.S. Interests Section in Cuba for fiscal years 2002 and 2003.

101(b)(ii) This section provides an increase in the funding for the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, from $12 million in FY2000 and 2001 to $16 million in FY2002 and $20 million in FY2003. The Committee believes that these issues should be core values in U.S. foreign policy, and that this function should be enhanced within the Department. In particular, promotion of democracy abroad advances this country's values, international stability and economic freedom. The increase in the Bureau's budget should also be viewed in the context of section 205, regarding positions abroad that are primarily responsible for following human rights developments in foreign countries.

Public Diplomacy. The Committee supported the reorganization of foreign affairs agencies in 1999, and has followed with interest the progress of merging the former USIA and its public diplomacy activities into the Department of State. One of the organizational consequences of the merger is that the former USIS overseas posts, now the public diplomacy sections in our embassies, report to the State Department's regional bureaus, and are less related to the Washington units which provide exchange and international information programs and the funding for them. Given the many competing and urgent priorities the regional bureaus must confront, this arrangement could lead over time to a diminution of focus and staff resources for public diplomacy in the field. The Committee encourages the Department to ensure that the overseas public diplomacy sections have a clear mandate to carry out these activities as their first priority, as well as adequate staff and other resources for these important tasks. Moreover, the Committee continues to monitor the implementation of section 1333 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, providing that funds budgeted for public diplomacy may only be used for that purpose.

The African Growth and Opportunity Act. The African Growth and Opportunity Act (P.L. 106-200) requires the public diplomacy operation to disseminate regularly in Africa through various media outlets economic information in support of the free market economic reform it is designed to promote. The Committee notes with approval such efforts being undertaken by the State Department's public diplomacy offices, particularly the Africa bureau's Office of Public Diplomacy. These activities have proven helpful in enhancing U.S.-Africa commercial ties.

Increased Resources for African Bureau. The Committee is concerned regarding the decline in U.S. diplomatic presence in Africa over the last 10 years. This decline has come at a critical time when U.S. economic, political, security, humanitarian, and cultural interests in Africa require more attention than ever before. Today, the United States is at its weakest diplomatic position in several decades. In 1991, we employed 1,956 individuals. In 1999, this number dropped to 792. As noted above, last year, Congress passed the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) that created opportunities for new trade relations between African countries and the U.S. Yet, without an effective diplomatic presence in Africa we cannot strengthen and facilitate stronger commercial relationships between the United States and the African continent.

Our interests in Africa are not just commercial. We also have a major interest in monitoring and promoting human rights. Stable and transparent democracies in Africa will create strong, dynamic governments and economies with which we can establish strong bilateral relations. Moreover, 75 percent of HIV infections are in Africa where resources to confront the epidemic are most scarce. This epidemic has the potential to devastate African populations and deny both the United States and Africa opportunities to develop future economic and political relations. Our presence in Africa is vital to promote attention to the epidemic and help with education, treatment, and research to stem the tide of HIV/AIDS. Finally, it is within our national self-interest to work bilaterally and with multilateral institutions to make sure African security crises do not create opportunities for hostile governmental and nongovernmental forces to exploit tragedy and produce rogue forces hostile to the United States.

Given the significant new resources the Committee is recommending for State Department operating expenses, particularly personnel, the Committee recommends the Department make a significant increase in personnel addressing Africa issues, both in the Bureau of African Affairs and at diplomatic posts in Africa.

101(2)--Capital Investment Fund. Authorizes $210,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 to modernize the Department's computer systems.

101(3)--Security and Maintenance of United States Missions. Authorizes $475,046,000 for fiscal years 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for the security and maintenance of U.S. missions abroad. Separately authorized in P.L. 106-113 is $900,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2002, 2003, and 2004 for embassy security construction. These funds were specifically authorized for security upgrades, to cover the costs of the relocation and construction necessary to rectify security deficiencies at posts abroad. Therefore, embassy security construction is not authorized in this bill. The total authorization available in fiscal year 2002 is $1,375,046,000.

101(4)--Representation Allowances. Authorizes $9,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 to be used for the reimbursement of the costs incurred by Department officials for official representation overseas.

101(5)--Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Service. Authorizes $15,500,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for emergencies, such as evacuations of American citizens abroad, and for the payment of rewards, such as for information regarding international terrorism and narcoterrorism. In addition, certain representational expenses of certain senior Department officials are authorized in this account.

101(6)--Office of the Inspector General. Authorizes $29,264,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for the Office of the Inspector General.

101(7)--American Institute in Taiwan. Authorizes $17,044,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for the operations of the American Institute in Taiwan.

101(8)--Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials. Authorizes $10,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the protection of foreign missions and officials.

101(9)--Repatriation Loans. Authorizes $1,219,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for repatriation loans provided to Americans in need of assistance overseas.

Section 102--International Commissions.

Authorizes $61,157,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for salaries and expenses and for construction of the International Boundary and Water Commission; for the International Boundary Commission, United States and Canada; for the International Joint Commission and; for the International Fisheries Commission. These organizations are responsible for boundary, water, and resource issues along U.S. borders and adjacent waters.

Section 103--Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs.

103(1) This section authorizes a total of $242,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for educational and cultural exchange programs. The total is divided as follows: $125,000,000 in fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary in fiscal year 2003 for the Fulbright exchange program and $117,000,000 in fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for `Other Exchange Programs.' Within the Fulbright program, $500,000 is available for each year for Tibetan Exchanges. Within the `Other Exchange Programs,' spending is directed for each fiscal year for South Pacific Exchanges ($750,000), East Timorese Scholarships ($500,000), Sudanese scholarships ($500,000), African exchanges ($500,000), and for the Israel-Arab Peace Partners program ($750,000).

The Committee recognizes the importance of international academic and cultural exchange programs. Organizations like International Partners in Education can help governments and nongovernmental organizations promote the education of students. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the State Department work with International Partners in Education as the Department develops and carries out its international academic and cultural exchange programs.

The Committee also recommends that the State Department strongly consider a unique student exchange program hosted at the New Jersey and Jerusalem college campuses of the Beth Madrash Govoha of America. Students from all over the world participate in this program, which specializes in Judaic heritage, culture, ethics and law and in related democratic values and ideals. Students are specifically recruited from third world and poor countries; countries where democratic values are under attack; and countries whose people are suffering from internal and external conflict. The program is currently funded through private donations, but in order to meet a sharp increase in demand, the school is seeking Federal assistance to allow more students to participate. The Committee believes the program makes unique contributions to U.S./foreign educational partnerships and is a worthy candidate for a grant under this section.

103(2)--National Endowment for Democracy (NED). This section authorizes $36,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 and $40,000,000 for fiscal year 2003 for the NED.

103(3)--Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows. This section authorizes $1,000,000 for both fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the Reagan-Fascell Democracy Fellows for international democracy activists and scholars to study and exchange views with other activists and scholars.

103(4)--Dante B. Fascell North-South Center. This section authorizes $4,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the Dante B. Fascell North-South Center.

103(5)--Center for Cultural and Technical Interchange between East and West. This section authorizes $13,500,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the East-West Center. These funds are for operations and expansion of programs of constructive involvement with nations in Asia and the Pacific through education, research and outreach.

Section 104--International Organizations.

104(a)(1)--Assessed Contributions to International Organizations. Authorizes $944,067,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for assessed contributions to international organizations. As introduced, the bill funded this account at the President's request level for fiscal year 2002 . An amendment was adopted during Committee consideration to increase the account by $65,300,000 for purposes of authorizing the amounts necessary to cover the costs of rejoining UNESCO.

104(b)(2)--Civil Budget of NATO. Provides such sums as may be necessary and a permanent authority for the State Department to pay for the U.S. assessment of the civil budget of NATO. This section also provides for permanent authorization of the U.S. assessment for the civil budget of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. NATO remains a cornerstone of our security relationship in Europe and beyond. The permanent authorization ensures that whatever amounts are requested by the Administration in any future fiscal year is authorized.

104(c)--Prohibition on Funding Framework Treaty-Based Organizations. This section continues a prohibition on using funds from the CIO account for the assessments for certain framework treaty organizations.

104(d)--Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. This section provides such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 to offset adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

104(e)--Refund of Excess Contributions. This section reaffirms the policy that the U.N. and its specialized agencies shall credit the next year's assessment or refund member states if funds exceed the budgeted expenditures. An example of when there might be extra money is if there are exchange rate gains. The purpose of the provision is not to increase spending above what is budgeted for a given year if there are excess funds.

Section 105--Assessed Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities.

Authorizes $844,139,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for assessed contributions for international peacekeeping activities.

Section 106--Grants to the Asia Foundation.

Authorizes $15,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for grants to the Asia Foundation.

Section 107--Voluntary Contributions to International Organizations.

This section authorizes a total of $306,000,000 for U.S. voluntary contributions to international organizations. Of the total, spending is directed as follows: $5,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the World Food Program; $5,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the U.N. Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture; and $240,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for the Organizations of American States for the purpose of conducting investigations and dissemination of information on violations of freedom of expression by the Government of Cuba, Colombia, and Haiti.

The Committee welcomes the focus of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) on critical areas such as democratic governance, HIV/AIDS, conflict prevention and post-conflict reconstruction in developing and transition countries, as well as its work to coordinate UN development agencies at country level. The UNDP's headquarters remains based in the United States. Accordingly, the Committee recommends a U.S. contribution of $100 million for UNDP in fiscal year 2002.

107(c)--Restrictions on U.S. voluntary contributions to UNDP. This section carries over a provision of existing law that requires the withholding from U.S. voluntary contributions to the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) of an amount equal to the amount UNDP intends to spend in Burma during each of the fiscal years 2002 and 2003, unless the President certifies to Congress that UNDP programs in Burma are focused on eliminating human suffering and addressing the needs of the poor; are undertaken only through international or private voluntary organizations that have been deemed independent of Burma's military dictatorship, the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC), formerly the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC); provide no financial, political, or military benefit to the SPDC; and are carried out only after consultations with the leadership of the principal Burmese pro-democracy organizations, the National League for Democracy (NLD) and the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma (NCGUB).

The Committee remains concerned about UNDP programs in Burma. UNDP and Administration officials have assured the Committee that such programs do not benefit the SPDC. Committee members, however, continue to receive reports that UNDP officials regularly consult with the SPDC on Burma programs, that they consult only peremptorily with pro-democracy organizations, and that UNDP programs in Burma have the effect of enhancing the international prestige and domestic power of the SPDC. The certification requirement is intended to provide additional assurances that UNDP programs are truly independent of the SPDC, to make clear to UNDP officials that their activities in Burma should be limited to addressing the basic human needs of the poor and disadvantaged people of Burma, and that they should do so only after full and genuine consultation with the NLD and NCGUB, the duly elected political leadership of the people of Burma.

The Committee expects that in determining whether UNDP programs in Burma meet the conditions set forth in this subsection, the Department shall rely on assessments by experts and nongovernmental organizations independent of UNDP. It would be helpful for the Department to consult with the Committee in the selection of such experts and organizations.

107(d)--UNICEF. This section provides additional authorization of $120,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 for UNICEF from an appropriate account.

107(e)--Organizations and Programs That Support Coercive Abortion or Involuntary Sterilization. This section prohibits funding under this act to any organization which supports, or which participates in the management of, a program of forced abortion or involuntary sterilization.

Section 108--Migration and Refugee Assistance.

This provision provides $817,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 for refugee and migration programs.

This is the amount necessary to keep the amount available for worldwide refugee protection level in constant dollars over the last 6 years. The refugee account is the only major State Department account which has not received sufficient annual increases since fiscal year 1995 to compensate for the effects of inflation. Yet the number of refugees and other persons in need of protection, such as internally displaced persons and refugees who have repatriated but not yet been fully reintegrated in their home countries, is at least as great as it was 6 years ago, and the per capita cost of providing such protection has increased substantially. The resulting shortfalls in the protection budgets of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and other international and nongovernmental organizations devoted to providing food, shelter, and other basic necessities to refugees have contributed to increased instability, to involuntary and unsafe repatriation, and in some cases to dramatic increases in infant and child mortality.

Refugee protection is particularly jeopardized in Africa, where UNHCR's protection capacity is historically weak and understaffed despite the needs of more than 6 million refugees and other persons of concern. Among other needs that are not being met, the United States Committee for Refugees estimates that there is an immediate need for 100 additional UNHCR Protection Officers in Africa, at an estimated cost of $15 million. Yet the new High Commissioner, Ruud Lubbers, recently announced the need for further UNHCR budget cuts in light of a 20% shortfall in anticipated commitments from donor nations.

The Committee remains deeply concerned about the fate of East Timorese refugees in militia-controlled camps in Indonesian West Timor. The Committee deplores the failure of the Indonesian government and security forces to disarm and disband militia groups which have enjoyed close relationships with elements of these forces, and which continue to intimidate refugees, spread misinformation, prevent safe and full access to refugees by international and local humanitarian workers, and threaten the peace and security of East Timor. The Committee is troubled by worsening humanitarian conditions for East Timorese refugees in the camps and elsewhere, particularly widespread malnutrition and disease; reports of sexual enslavement of women and girls; and the separation of East Timorese children from their refugee parents. The Committee urges the Department of State to monitor closely the refugee situation in West Timor and, insofar as is possible, to provide funding to improve health, food, and other humanitarian conditions for refugees in West Timor and to assist in refugee repatriation and resettlement. Due to the current inability of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and other international organizations to operate in West Timor, the Committee recommends the Department explore alternative means of providing humanitarian support, including funding for West Timorese nongovernmental organizations and humanitarian agencies of the West Timor provincial government.

Afghanistan. The Committee is concerned about the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian conditions inside Afghanistan as a result of continued fighting and the extreme drought that is affecting much of the country. There are credible reports of perilous increases in malnutrition rates--particularly with women, children and the elderly. The Committee is also concerned that the expected migration of Afghan refugees to Pakistan and Iran due to the worsening situation inside Afghanistan will create a humanitarian tragedy as both of those countries have closed their borders to additional refugees. The Committee urges the State Department to continue its efforts, working with the U.S. Agency for International Development, to coordinate with the United Nations Office of Coordination for Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA), the World Food Program (WFP), United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and other international donors to step up international relief efforts inside Afghanistan as well as to increase assistance for refugees in neighboring countries. The Committee also calls on the State Department to exert all its influence with the neighboring countries to implore them to continue providing safe harbor to the refugees from Afghanistan fleeing conflict, persecution or famine.

Section 121--International Broadcasting Operations.

This section authorizes a total of $584,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for the Broadcasting Board of Governors to carry out certain international broadcasting activities. Included in the total authorization are the following:

121(a)(1)(B)(i)--Belize. Authorizes $750,000 is to be used solely for the enhancements of transmission facilities in Belize and the cost of transmissions in Belize. An integral part of U.S. broadcasting in the Western Hemisphere is the need to reach the people in the Andean region who are deprived of factual information about developments within and outside their countries, and about U.S. efforts to assist them in their struggle to reclaim their lives from the narcotraffickers and guerrillas. Another high priority for the U.S. is the use of Radio and TV Marti to lift the veil of silence that the Castro dictatorship has imposed on the Cuban people. Through broadcasting to Cuba, we are able to inform and educate the growing dissident and political opposition movement to provide them with the necessary tools and support to continue their efforts to bring freedom and democracy to their island nation. The Cuban regime has intensified its jamming of U.S. broadcasts with the assistance and guidance of an expert in this field--the People's Republic of China. Enhancements to the Belize facility will help increase the capacity of the Office of Cuba Broadcasting to evade the jamming by the Cuban regime and will help ensure that our programs and transmission are heard by the people in the targeted areas of the Hemisphere

121(a)(1)(B)(ii)--Radio Free Asia. Authorizes $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 and $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2003 for Radio Free Asia.

121(a)(2)--Broadcasting Capital Improvements. This section authorizes $16,900,000 for fiscal year 2002 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2003 for broadcasting capital projects.

121(a)(3)--Broadcasting to Cuba. Authorizes $25,000,000 fiscal years 2002 and year 2003 for Cuba broadcasting.

121(b)--Continuation of Additional Authorization. This section updates P.L. 106-286, concerning Permanent Normal Trade Relations for the People's Republic of China, to extend the authorization for additional Radio Free Asia and Voice of America broadcasts to China and neighboring countries, in the total amount of $99,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 and $34,000,000 in fiscal year 2003.

121(c)--Middle East Radio Network. This section authorizes $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 for Enhanced Voice of America broadcast services to the Middle East.

TITLE I, SUBTITLE C

SUBTITLE C IS THE GLOBAL DEMOCRACY PROMOTION ACT OF 2001

Section 131. Short title.

This section provides that the short title for this subtitle is the Global Democracy Promotion Act of 2001.

Section 132. Findings.

This section provides the Committee's findings regarding certain issues raised by the `Mexico City policy' recently reinstated by President Bush. The section finds that an open and honest relationship between health care providers and patients is a fundamental principle of medical ethics and practice, free speech is a fundamental American value, and promotion of democracy is a principal goal of U.S. foreign policy. It also finds that denying U.S. foreign assistance funds to foreign nongovernmental organizations that use funds from sources other than the U.S. government to take actions or engage in medical practices that are legal in their own country and that would be constitutionally protected if conducted in the United States undermines these principles, is an unjustifiable interference with the ability of independent organizations to serve the critical health needs of their fellow citizens and demonstrates a disregard and disrespect for the laws of sovereign nations as well as for the laws of the United States.

Section 133--Assistance for Foreign Nongovernmental Organizations under Part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.

This section requires that notwithstanding any other provision of law, regulation or policy, foreign nongovernmental organizations shall not be determined to be ineligible to receive funds authorized under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 solely on the basis of health or medical services, including counseling and referral services, provided by non-United States government funds as long as those services do not violate the laws of the country in which they are being provided and would not violate United States Federal law if they were being provided in the United States. It also requires that foreign nongovernmental organizations shall not be subject to any restrictions or requirements on the use of non-United States government funds for advocacy or lobbying activities as a condition of receiving funds authorized under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 other than those requirements that also apply to United States nongovernmental organizations receiving such funds.

This statute supersedes any provision of law, regulation or policy currently in effect.

TITLE II--AUTHORITIES AND ACTIVITIES

Section 201--Continuation of Reporting Requirements.

This section extends reporting requirements contained in the Foreign Relations Authorization Act as follows:

Section 201(a)--Saudi Arabia. This section requires periodic reports on outstanding claims by United States firms against the Government of Saudi Arabia. This amendment is necessary to help U.S. firms which have completed extensive work for the Saudi Government but have had no success in getting their due compensation. For example, Gibbs and Hill, Inc., of New Jersey has outstanding claims for $55 million for work on a desalinization plant completed in 1984.

Section 201(b)--LIBERTAD Act. This section continues the report under title IV of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act. It requires the Secretary of State to make periodic reports to the Committee describing the ongoing reviews pursuant to title IV of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C. 6091) and any determinations and findings under that title of that act. Title IV of the LIBERTAD Act requires the Secretary of State to exclude from the U.S. persons `trafficking' in property confiscated from U.S. nationals in Cuba. The Committee intends to use these reports to monitor the implementation of this `exclusion' provision of the LIBERTAD Act.

Section 201(c)--Vietnam. This section continues a report requiring the Secretary of State to report on the extent to which the Government of Vietnam: (1) is cooperating with the U.S. on the fullest possible accounting of POW/MIA's; (2) has made progress on the release of political and religious prisoners; (3) is cooperating on requests by the U.S. to obtain full and free access to persons for interviews under the Orderly Departure and Resettlement Opportunities for Vietnamese Refugees programs; 4) has taken action to end corrupt practices in connections with exit visas; and 5) is making efforts to interview and resettle former reeducation camp victims and other persons.

Section 201(d)--Missle Defense This section continues a reporting requirement with respect to cooperative projects with Russia in the area of ballistic missile defense, including in the area of early warning.

Section 202--Continuation of Other Reports.

202(a)--Semi-Annual Reports. This section requires semi-annual reports, with a classified annex, from the Secretary of State on the US government's efforts to boost efforts toward Taiwan's appropriate membership or participation in international organizations.

202(b)--Terrorist Activity. This section requires reporting on terrorists attacks in the territory of Israel or territories administered by Israel or the Palestinian Authority in which U.S. citizens were killed.

Section 203--Royal Ulster Constabulary Training.

This section updates and modifies a provision of current law that bans Federal funds from being used to support any training or exchange programs conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation or any other Federal law enforcement agency for the Royal Ulster Constabulary until the President certifies that vetting procedures have been established in all appropriate Federal agencies to ensure that the training programs will not include RUC members who are believed to have committed or condoned human rights violations including any role in the murder of Patrick Finucane or Rosemary Nelson or other violence or threat of violence against defense attorneys. This section requires a report, within 60 days of enactment, on the scope of previous training programs. The section requires a second report that outlines the extent to which the British government has implemented the 175 recommendations listed in the Patten Commission report on policing reforms in Northern Ireland including those recommendations that emphasize the integration of respect for human rights and emphasize efforts to recruit Catholics for the new police force. (The RUC has had proportionally far fewer Catholics than the population of Northern Ireland.) This report should also provide information on the integration of members of the Garda Siochana (the national police force of the Republic of Ireland) or other experienced police force applicants into the senior ranks of the RUC by both the British and Irish governments, as envisioned by the Patten report. The section requires that the report also include information on the status of the murder investigations of defense attorneys Rosemary Nelson and Patrick Finucane and the murder of Robert Hamill. In April 1999, the House of Representatives passed a resolution condemning the murder of Rosemary Nelson, who had testified before the International Relations Subcommittee on Human Rights, and calling for independent judicial inquiries into the Finucane and Nelson murders. The report is designed to provide Congress with up-to-date information on these matters.

Section 204--Report concerning Elimination of Colombia Opium.

This section requires a report which outlines a comprehensive strategy to address the crisis with respect to heroin in the U.S. due to opium originating from Colombia. The report should also include a discussion of efforts to control precursor chemicals, many of which come primarily from Europe and are not manufactured in Colombia.

Section 205--Repeal of Provision Regarding Housing for Foreign Agricultural Attache.

This section repeals section 736 of the FY 2001 Agricultural Appropriations Act (P.L. 106-387), which requires the State Department to receive the approval of the Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) before the sale of any foreign property occupied by the agricultural attache. It further provides that sales proceeds must be used to acquire appropriate housing for the use of the agricultural attache.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (`USDA') obtained enactment of section 736 without consultation with or the concurrence of the Department of State or its authorization and appropriation committees. Section 736 directly conflicts with the unified, efficient management of real property under a Single Real Property Manager and directly impinges on State authorities.

The State Department has identified 18 residences that are occupied by agricultural attaches. Although some may have been historically and consistently assigned to agricultural attaches, others were assigned to the attaches in accordance with the established program of assigning government-owned dedicated housing to the heads of foreign affairs agencies. Like other agencies, USDA agreed to pool such housing as part of the 1992 agreement to adopt the current housing policy. If section 736 were to continue, the State Department would be obliged to limit housing assignments of agricultural attaches to only those units that are owned by the USDA; and to begin, as permitted under statute, to charge USDA for maintenance. Decentralized real property management could create separate and unequal housing policies, which would conflict with the current rights of all Foreign Affairs agencies to government-owned housing.

Section 206--Human Rights Monitoring.

Section 206 provides that funds authorized to be available only for the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL) pursuant to section 101(B)(ii) are authorized to be available to fund positions at United States posts abroad that are primarily responsible for following human rights developments in foreign countries and that are assigned at the recommendation of the DRL bureau in conjunction with the relevant regional bureau. The purpose of this is to encourage greater attention at overseas posts to the monitoring of human rights by making funds available for such positions. As indicated previously, the Committee believes that the issues addressed by this Bureau need to be at the core of U.S. foreign policy. While the Committee wants to provide some flexibility to the Department in how to administer its increase, the Committee believes that one way to strengthen these functions is to provide the DRL bureau with the ability to assign some officers to U.S. posts abroad. It is clear that DRL will be strengthened both in the officers it can attract to serve in the Bureau and in the way it is viewed by the rest of the Department if it has the primary responsibility for such assignments. While the Committee recognizes that it is traditionally the role of the regional bureaus to make assignments of officers to posts, the Committee intends that in the future DRL be able to make the assignments, although it would have to consult with the regional bureau. The Committee does not believe that this approach would be satisfied by merely designating certain officers assigned abroad as primarily human rights officers, without clearly providing DRL the key role in making decisions regarding assignments. Moreover, the Committee is not trying to create a `human rights cone.' The Committee recognizes that in certain countries, designating a particular officer as a `human rights officer' would inhibit rather than increase an officer's ability to follow human rights developments in such country. Rather, the Committee expects that certain officers in the political section of a particular mission would be responsible for human rights issues, along with other issues. The key issue is that the assignment would be primarily the responsibility of the DRL bureau.

Section 207--Correction of Fishermen's Protective Act.

This section makes a technical correction to section 7 of the Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967 (FPA), as amended, which was enacted to deter foreign governments from seizing U.S. commercial fishing vessels based on claims to a fisheries jurisdiction not recognized by the United States. One of the State Department's primary responsibilities under the FPA is to administer funds from which reimbursement could be sought by U.S. vessel owners. The FPA amendments last year erroneously transferred certain responsibilities from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of Commerce, rather than to the Secretary of State. The Department of Commerce has expressed concurrence in this change.

Section 208--International Litigation Fund.

This section allows the State Department to be reimbursed for costs associated with representing American citizens or companies in international claims. The section would allow the Department to deduct and retain 1.5% of payments of at least $100,000 up to $5 million, and 1% of payments above $5 million received by the Department from foreign governments or foreign entities as a result of the Department's pursuit of claims on behalf of U.S. citizens or others. The funds so retained would be placed into the International Litigation Fund, which was established by Congress in 1994 (at 22 U.S.C. 2710) to provide a dependable and flexible source of funds for expenses relating to preparing or prosecuting a proceeding before an international tribunal, or a claim by or against a foreign government or other foreign entity. The Fund has no dedicated source of money; rather, it depends for funding on voluntary contributions, transfers from other agencies, or reprogrammings.

Similar deductions are taken from Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal awards, and 5 percent is deducted from awards of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission.

Section 209--Emergency Evacuation Services.

This provision clarifies that the State Department has the authority to seek reimbursement from private American citizens, and third country nationals for the cost of an emergency evacuation when their lives are threatened by war, civil unrest or a natural disaster, affirming the Department's longstanding practice in this regard.

Section 210--Implementation of the Intercountry Adoption Act.

This section requires the State Department's Bureau of Consular Affairs to consult with the appropriate Congressional Committees on the implementation of the Intercountry Adoption Act (PL 106-279).

This act was the subject of significant controversy in the 106th Congress. A wide range of adoption agencies from around the country that are involved in international adoptions were in frequent contact with the Committee and the Executive branch regarding issues that arose in the context of the Intercountry Adoption Act. In response, the Committee ensured that, unlike many regulations in the foreign policy area, the Department would have to go through normal comment periods required by the Administrative Procedures Act as the Department moved forward in implementation of the act. At the same time, the Committee has repeatedly asked for briefings regarding the implementation of the act and requested to be kept informed of important developments. Regrettably, the Department has not honored these requests in an appropriate way. Briefings have been sketchy, with the Department reluctant to provide fulsome responses to the Committee's inquiries. Specific requests to be kept informed of developments have been ignored, with the Committee learning of major developments in implementation only after the fact. The Committee regards this as unfortunate because the Committee believes that exchanges that have taken place have ended up improving the Department's approach to the implementation of the act. The Committee intends that this provision will usher in a better dialogue between the Department and the Committee, and that the Department will provide information on an ongoing basis and on latest developments in implementation, including notice before major developments occur.

Section 211--Report Concerning the Effect of Plan Colombia on Ecuador.

This section requires a report which outlines a comprehensive strategy to address the spillover effect of Plan Colombia on Ecuador.

Section 212--Report Concerning Efforts to Promote Israel's Diplomatic Relations With Other Countries.

This section requires an annual report by the Secretary of State regarding actions taken by representatives of the U.S. to encourage other countries to establish full diplomatic relations with Israel.

Section 213--Reports on Activities in Republic of Colombia.

This section requires two separate reports by the Secretary of State on Plan Colombia. The first report is required every 6 months and will include a summary of U.S. funded activities in the Republic of Colombia. The second report is an annual report on the activities of the U.S. businesses that have entered into agreements with the Department of State to carry out counternarcotics programs in the Republic of Colombia.

SUBTITLE B--CONSULAR AUTHORITIES

Section 231--Machine Readable Visas.

This section extends the Department's authority to collect and retain the machine readable visa (MRV) fees for fiscal years 2002 and 2003. It provides $414,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 and $422,000,000 for fiscal year 2003 to fund consular services activities and border security operations.

Section 232--Establishment of a Consular Branch Office in Lhasa, Tibet.

Requires the Secretary of State to make best efforts to establish a branch consular office in Tibet.

Section 233--Establishment of a Diplomatic Post in Equatorial Guinea.

Requires the Secretary of State to establish a post in Equatorial Guinea for the purposes of providing assistance to the American interests present in the country.

Section 234--Processing of Visa Applications.

The provision states that it shall be the policy of the State Department: (a) to process visa applications of immediate relatives and fiances of U.S. citizens within 30 days of receiving all necessary documents; and (b) to process applications sponsored by someone other than an immediate relative within 60 days.

Section 235--U.S. Policy with respect to Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel.

This provision includes a statement of policy that Congress is committed to relocating the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. In addition it states that: 1) none of the funds authorized may be expended for the operation of a U.S. consulate in Jerusalem unless such consulate is under the supervision of the U.S. Ambassador to Israel; 2) none of the funds authorized may be available for the publication of any official government document which lists countries and their capital cities unless the publication identifies Jerusalem as the capital of Israel; and 3) for purposes of the registration of birth, certificates of nationality, or issuance of a passport of a U.S. citizen born in the city of Jerusalem, the Secretary of State shall upon request record the place of birth as Israel.

Section 236--Denial of Visas to Supporters of Colombian Illegal Armed Groups.

This section would require the Secretary of State to deny a U.S. visa to any alien who the Secretary determines, based on credible evidence, has willfully supported any of the three major illegal armed groups in Colombia's conflict (the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the National Liberation Army (ELN), or the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)). The Committee does not intend that `willful support' be interpreted to include payments or supplies given as a result of coercion, such as ransom for the release of kidnap victims, or monies or services extorted under threat of violence. All three illegal groups engage in these activities, and the Committee does not intend for this section to punish their victims.

SUBTITLE C--MIGRATION AND REFUGEES

Section 251--U.S. Policy Regarding the Involuntary Return of Refugees.

This provision carries over a provision of the FY 98-99 Foreign Relations Authorization Act prohibiting the use of funds for the involuntary return of any person to a country in which that person has a well-founded fear of persecution, and requiring notification to Congress when such funds are used for involuntary repatriation of persons deemed to be non-refugees.

Section 252--Report on Overseas Refugee Processing.

This section requires a report on overseas processing of refugees for admission to the United States. In particular, the report should assess the needs of refugees who do not currently have access to U.S. resettlement programs, despite the dramatic decline in U.S. refugee admissions over the last decade.

Refugees in Urgent Need of Resettlement. Although United States Embassy officials have legal authority to identify `priority one' refugees--individuals who are particularly vulnerable or otherwise in urgent need of resettlement--in practice this authority is exercised far more rarely than it might be. Instead, in a number of countries around the world the Department of State currently insists on a referral from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) before making its own judgment on whether an asylum seeker should be interviewed for possible resettlement in the United States as a priority one refugee. Unfortunately, in many locations UNHCR lacks sufficient staff to perform this function. The practical result is that many particularly vulnerable refugees are left without access to the United States program. Subsection (b)(1) of the bill seeks information on the extent of this problem and on possible solutions, including the development of formal partnerships with field-based nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that permit the NGOs to assist in refugee identification and referral.

Refugees of Special Concern to the United States. Refugee advocates have argued that the dramatic decline in U.S. refugee admissions in recent years have been partly due to the Department's reluctance to make generous use of the priority two resettlement category (groups of refugees who are of special concern to the United States). Among groups who are not currently considered of special concern, but who are similarly situated to other groups that are so designated, are Afghan women-at-risk and their dependents in Pakistan; Afghan and Algerian victims of non-state persecutors in Germany and France who are in danger of deportation; Sudanese `lost boy' refugee minors in Ethiopia; Iraqis who have suffered torture or are associated with the United States; and non-Albanians from Kosovo, including Roma, Muslim Slavs, Gorani, Ashkaeli and Turks, as well as people in mixed marriages who cannot integrate with major, established nationality groups in the region. Subsection (b)(2) of this section requests information on this issue and on how more generous use might be made of the priority two category.

Refugees in Need of Family Reunification. In recent years the Department of State has drastically reduced its use of the family reunification processing priorities to such a level that in FY 2001 only six countries are designated for priority three processing (refugees who are the spouses, parents, or unmarried children of U.S. citizens or lawful residents) and no countries are designated for priorities four and five (refugees who are close relatives of U.S. citizens or lawful residents, other than spouses, parents, and children). This has occurred at the same time that refugee admissions have declined dramatically, and that even reduced annual ceilings have gone unmet. For example, there were 12,500 unused refugee admission slots in FY 2000. Subsection (b)(3) seeks information on this phenomenon and on alterntatives for making family reunification processing more broadly available. Such alternatives should include broader use not only of priority three but also of priorities four and five, particularly in circumstances where refugees have spent extensive periods of time in refugee camps with no immediate prospect of safe and voluntary repatriation.

Urban Refugees. At present, UNHCR reports that more than 25% of the world's refugees can be found in urban areas. Many of these refugees are denied legal employment, education, the most basic social services or protection from local persecution. In many countries that are signatories to the Refugee Convention, as well as in those that are not, local integration is seldom a viable option. Subsection (b)(4) seeks more information on this problem and on alternatives for expanding resettlement opportunities for urban refugees and others outside refugee camps, particularly those who are in urgent need of resettlement, who are members of groups of refugees of special concern to the United States, or who have family ties to the United States.

Possible creation of a new priority six category for certain `long-stayers' in refugee camps. While striving to find durable solutions for refugees, including safe and voluntary repatriation and local integration in countries of first asylum, institutions charged with refugee protection have come to recognize that these solutions are unavailable to many refugees. They may therefore spend years or even decades in refugee camps, under conditions that are always uncertain and often quite harsh. At a time when refugee admissions have declined, the United States should assess the possibility of admitting those `long stayers' whose circumstances clearly suggest no durable solution other than resettlement. Subsection (b)(5) seeks the Department's assessment of this possibility.

Private voluntary agencies. Section (b)(6) seeks information on the extent to which the Department uses private voluntary agencies to assist in the identification of refugees for possible admission to the United States. For decades, private voluntary agencies contracted to the State Department have played a central role in U.S. refugee processing overseas--promoting refugee protection, preparing cases for INS adjudicating officers, offering cultural orientation programs, and working with domestic resettlement agencies to direct refugees to the areas of the country best suited to meet their health, employment and other needs. This process has been essential in galvanizing public support for the refugee program. While private voluntary agencies are still used in some instances, recent practice raises concerns that this mode of processing refugees abroad is no longer the preferred approach. Instead, the Department has increasingly turned to international organizations to perform the functions traditionally performed by the voluntary agencies. This subsection requests the Department's assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of private voluntary agencies, the reasons for any decline in their use, and alternatives for the expanded use of such agencies.

Reception and Placement Grants. Subsection (b)(7) seeks information on the extent to which the reception and placement grant to agencies assisting in resettlement of refugees (currently $740 per refugee) has kept up with the cost of providing such services.

Estimates of Cost and Impact on Refugee Ceilings. Subsection (b)(8) makes clear that the report should include an assessment of the cost of each change in current practice or procedure discussed in the report, as well as an estimate of any likely increase in the annual refugee admission ceiling.

TITLE III--ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

SUBTITLE A--ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS

Section 301--Comprehensive Workforce Plan.

Requires the State Department to submit to Congress a comprehensive workforce plan within 6 months of the date of enactment. It also requires that the Department develop within 1 year of the date of enactment a domestic staffing model to assist in determining workforce needs in future years. The Committee has been disappointed with the lack of progress on workforce planning and in particular the Department's inability to match staffing requirements to meet the policy needs of overseas posts and Washington. This requires dramatically improved coordination between the post mission plans, the regional bureaus policy priorities, and the Bureau of Personnel.

Section 302--Rightsizing Overseas Posts.

Requires the Department to establish both an internal and an interagency task force to review issues of overseas staffing presence. This follows through on numerous reports including the Overseas Presence Advisory Panel report that details the need to `right size' the overseas posts--which means staffing the post to the mission. Reports on the progress of each of these task forces are required.

Section 303--Qualifications of Certain Officers of the Department of State.

Following previous statutory models for requiring certain qualifications for assistant secretary level positions at the State Department, this section requires any assistant secretary having primary responsibility for international narcotics and law enforcement to have substantial professional qualifications in the fields of management and Federal law enforcement.

Section 304--U.S. Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues.

This section requires the establishment of a Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues, and enumerates the duties and responsibilities of such position.

Section 305--U.S. Special Envoy for Sudan Issues.

This section requires the State Department to appoint a special envoy for Sudan Issues. The provision requires the duties of such envoy to include working for a peaceful resolution of the conflict in Sudan and an end to abuses of human rights, including religious freedom in Sudan.

SUBTITLE B--PERSONNEL MATTERS

Section 331--Report Concerning Retired Foreign Service Officers.

This section requires an annual report of all retired civil service and foreign service officers who are also registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act as an agent of a government of a foreign country who may have access to State Department facilities.

Section 332--Tibetan Language Training.

This section requires the Secretary of State to make Tibetan language training available to foreign service officers assigned to the consulate with responsibility for Tibet.

Section 333--Travel for Dependents on Family Visitation.

This section provides foreign service families who are separated because of an assignment to an unaccompanied post greater flexibility in arranging authorized family visits. Currently only the foreign service officer may travel to visit family within a certain dollar limitation. This provision would allow within that same cap for other family members to be authorized to travel in order to meet on authorized family visits.

Specifically, this provision amends section 901 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 to extend eligibility for Family Visitation Travel (FVT) to family members of Foreign Service members. Currently, section 901 authorizes FVT only for members of the Foreign Service. This amendment would allow members traveling on FVT to visit their children at locations other than their home leave addresses.

Section 334--Thomas Jefferson Star.

This section changes the name of the `Foreign Service Star' to the `Thomas Jefferson Star' in order to properly reflect the inclusive nature of the award, which can be presented to State Department Foreign and Civil Service employees who are injured or gave their lives while assigned abroad.

The `Foreign Service Star Award' was established by section 321 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 2000 and 2001, adding to section 36(A) `Award of the Foreign Service Star' to the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2708a). When that legislation was presented to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House on March 22, 1999, the Foreign Service Star Award was proposed to `remedy [a] deficiency by establishing a Foreign Service Star for Foreign Service, Civil Service, or other civilian employees assigned permanently or temporarily to an official mission overseas or traveling abroad on official business who . . . are killed or wounded in the service of diplomacy.'

The legislation makes clear that this award covers members of the Foreign Service or Civil Service, persons hired pursuant to personal services contracts or other agreements, Foreign Service Nationals, or other civilian employees. The proposed change from the `Foreign Service Star Award' to the `Thomas Jefferson Star Award' does not affect the nature of the award, but instead corrects the misperception that the award was intended only for members of the Foreign Service.

Section 335--Health Education and Disease Prevention Programs.

This section amends section 904(b) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980, as amended (22 U.S.C. 4084) so that the Department of State may better allow its medical professionals to provide counseling and educational materials to locally engaged staff for diseases to which they are exposed but that may not be attributable to the workplace. The Department of State Office of Medical Services (MED) currently provides on-the-job illness and injury services for locally engaged staff. The added legislation would clarify that when it is in the interest of the U.S. Government, U.S. Government medical professionals can provide health information and counseling.

Section 336--Training Authority.

This section repeals the scheduled termination of certain Departmental authorities with respect to training at the Foreign Service Institute. Section 701 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 4021), as recently amended, authorizes the Secretary to provide, on a reimbursable or advance-of-funds basis, appropriate training and related services at the institute to employees of United States companies that do business abroad, and to family members of such employees, when such training is in the U.S. national interest, and further authorizes the Secretary to provide, on a reimbursable basis, training programs to Members of Congress or the Judiciary and employees of the legislative and judicial branches. This provision makes the pilot program permanent.

Section 337--Foreign National Retirement Plans.

This section amends section 408 of the Foreign Service Act (22 U.S.C. 3968) to explicitly authorize the Department of the Treasury to hold foreign national retirement funds and accumulated interest. Section 408 provides that the employees hired by the Department and other agencies overseas are compensated based on prevailing wage rates and compensation practices to the extent consistent with public interest. In particular, section 408 explicitly provides the authority for such agencies and their locally engaged staff to make payments to a trust or other fund in a financial institution in order to finance future benefits for such staff.

The Department believes that having the Department of Treasury act as a financial institution to hold the funds contributed by the agencies and their locally engaged staff (i.e., the funds contributed based on prevailing practice or the funds voluntarily contributed by the locally engaged staff) would provide a safe and secure means of ensuring the overseas staff's retirement needs are adequately met.

The State Department has been working on this proposal with the Department of Treasury, and, in order to hold these funds, the Department of the Treasury requires specific statutory authority clarifying that Treasury can hold the funds, that the Secretary of State may administer these funds on behalf of the persons compensated under section 408 (including persons hired pursuant to personal service contracts or agreements and persons hired by other agencies) and that the funds may be invested in public debt obligations. The amendment provides the explicit authority to retain dividends, as well as interest, in a fund to be established for voluntary contributions by locally-engaged staff world-wide. It also permits the Department the possibility of offering locally engaged staff a voluntary savings plan with a greater range of investment opportunities to mirror, to the extent practicable, the Thrift Savings Plan.

Section 338--Presidential Rank Awards.

This section amends section 405(b)(3) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980, as amended (22 U.S.C. 3965 (b)(3)). Recently, the civil service Senior Executive Service award program was changed to permit the top cash awards to be determined by a percentage of base pay. The top Senior Foreign Service awards currently are capped at $10,000 and $20,000 levels. This section would change the Foreign Service Presidential rank awards caps to match the similar Senior Executive Service percentages of 20% and 35%.

Section 339--Emergency Medical Advance Payments.

This section amends section 5927 of title 5, U.S.C. to extend current authority to give salary advances for medical emergencies to persons hired locally under personal service contracts or agreements and foreign national employees of non-foreign affairs agencies.

In the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, FY 2000 and 2001, the Department and other agencies received the authority to advance up to 3 months' pay to an employee assigned or located outside of the United States on Government authorization (i.e., on temporary duty), when the employee or family member must undergo certain medical treatments abroad. The authorization language, however, unintentionally excluded certain categories of employees, including persons hired pursuant to personal service agreements or contracts as well as foreign nationals employed by non-foreign affairs agencies appointed under authority of title 5. This section extends to foreign national employees and non-family member United States citizen employees hired abroad when such individuals need medical care while they are located outside their country of employment on U.S. Government authorization.

Section 340--Unaccompanied Air Baggage.

This section amends current law which authorizes the educational travel benefit in regard to unaccompanied air baggage. It would allow dependent children of Foreign Service members who attend school in the United States the option of leaving their belongings in short-term commercial storage in the United States, if there is no additional cost, instead of shipping their baggage to post.

Section 341--Special Agent Authorities.

Expands protective function of the Diplomatic Security Service to cover not only the Secretary of State and a person who is designated to be Secretary of State by the President, but also the designee of a President-elect who has not yet taken office.

Section 342--Report Concerning Minority Employment.

This section requires a report on the status of minority recruitment and promotion efforts in the Department of State for both the Civil and Foreign Service. It is similar to a provision adopted in the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1998 and 1999, and adds information regarding recruitment and promotion of the Civil Service to the preexisting provision. The Committee also believes that data must be made available on the promotion of qualified incumbent minority professionals.

Section 343--Use of Funds Authorized for Minority Recruitment.

This section addresses questions regarding minority recruitment but in the context of how funds specifically designated by this act for such recruitment should be used.

343(a)--Conducting Recuritment Activities. This section provides that amounts authorized for minority recruitment under section 101(1)(B)(iii) shall be used only for activities directly related to minority recruitment. Salaries of employees involved in recruitment efforts are not to be counted toward that amount.

343(b)--Recruitment Activities at Academic Institutions. This section provides that the State Department must expand its recruitment efforts to 25 percent of Historically Black Colleges and Universities and 25 percent of Hispanic-serving institutions, as defined by law.

343(c)--Evaluation of Recruitment Efforts. This section requires the Secretary to establish a database relating to efforts to recruit members of minority groups into the Foreign and Civil Service and to report on the evaluation of efforts to recruit such individuals.

The Committee continues to be very concerned with regard to progress at the Department in recruiting and promoting members of minority groups to serve in the Foreign and Civil Service. Diversity in the work place can only help enhance the diplomatic power of the United States by bringing a broader range of viewpoints and cultural backgrounds into the Department. The Department has not made enough progress in this area, and the Committee wishes to underscore that the Department has one of the worst records among Federal agencies in terms of Hispanic recruitment and promotion. This provision is intended to enhance the Department's ability to recruit members of minority groups by dedicating funds allocated for minority recruitment to activities directly related to such recruitment. Moreover, the Committee believes that the Department should enhance its recruiting efforts at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Hispanic-serving institutions. While the Committee understands that the Department is recruiting at some of these institutions, the Committee believes that these efforts should be expanded, with the goal of reaching out to a much greater percentage of such institutions.

In addition, the Committee is concerned that the Department does not keep track of its recruitment efforts to determine their effectiveness. This failure sends a disturbing signal that the Department may not be taking its current efforts seriously. The Committee therefore believes that the Department should keep records, to the extent practicable, regarding the members of minority groups it has recruited or tried to persuade to join the Department's work force during its recruiting activities, and endeavor to determine whether such persons applied to or became employed by the Department. Improved results can be established only through reasonable and systematic record keeping that clearly and definitively measures the performance and outcomes of recruitment efforts. While the Department is to be lauded for programs in place that are minority-focused, the results of these programs have yet to be measured. The Department must be able to report to Congress concrete outcomes of its recruitment efforts. For example, the Department must find a way to show how many candidates were recruited who passed the written or oral exams, and, of those, how many ultimately were hired by the Department. The Department should be precise in establishing which activities have obtained results in terms of recruitment and promotion of minorities. Mere participation of minority individuals in a program does not constitute an adequate measure of that program's effectiveness.

The Committee understands, however, that while recruitment must focus on such institutions as Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Hispanic-serving institutions and other similarly-designated institutions, the Department must also recruit members of minority groups at other institutions of higher learning throughout the United States.

TITLE IV--U.S. EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS

Section 401--Extension of Requirement for Scholarships for Tibetans and Burmese.

This section extends the authorization for the exchange and scholarship programs for Tibetan and Burmese exiles (contained in Public Law 104-319, the Human Rights, Refugee, and Other Foreign Relations Provisions Act of 1996) through fiscal years 2002 and 2003.

Section 402--Nonprofit Entities for Cultural Programs.

This provision provides a mechanism for the private sector to provide funds for international education and arts programs of the State Department. The purpose of this provision is to encourage private donations for such programs to make up for the decline of almost 70% in appropriated funds for arts programs since 1990. These activities have the strong support of ambassadors and the American international arts community. Cultural diplomacy, especially the presentation abroad of the finest of America's creative, performing and visual arts can advance U.S. interests.

The Department already has authority under section 105(f) of the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, as amended, to accept private donations of funds, property, and services. This section would amend section 105(f), 22 U.S.C. 2255(f), to expressly authorize the establishment of private, nonprofit entities which could accept such donations and better encourage participation and support by the U.S. private sector for cultural programs abroad. The Secretary of State would be authorized to make such arrangements as would be necessary to carry out the purposes of these entities, including the solicitation and receipt of funds and designation of members of boards.

Section 403--Fulbright-Hays Authorities.

This provision amends subsection 112(d) of the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, as amended (`Fulbright-Hays Act'), to affirm the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs longstanding practice of administering programs that promote the purposes of Fulbright-Hays but operate under other statutory authorities.

Section 112(d) of the Fulbright-Hays Act provides that the Bureau shall administer no programs except those operating under the authority of this act and consistent with its purposes. However, the Bureau administers programs authorized and appropriated pursuant to statutes other than Fulbright-Hays, such as the Freedom Support Act, the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (Economic Support Funds), and the SEED Act. While certain of these statutes reference the Fulbright-Hays Act, others do not. This provision makes clear that such programs are lawful so long as they promote the purposes of the Fulbright-Hays Act.

Section 404--Ethical Issues in International Health Research.

This section provides that the Secretary shall make available funds for public diplomacy and exchanges for activities to provide opportunities to researchers in developing countries to obtain scholarships and otherwise participate in activities related to ethical issues in human subject research. In December 2000 a series of articles in the press described violations of ethical standards of clinical research in overseas human subjects research. In virtually all world regions, researchers documented instances where drugs too risky for trials in the U.S. were tested on uninformed human subjects. In other examples, patients were not properly informed and had not given consent to participate in the studies.

While the boom in pharmaceutical research has resulted in enormous strides bringing new prevention and treatment medicines to millions of individuals, the ethical morass surrounding overseas research is far too troubling to ignore. In January 2001, the Department of Health and Human Services established a new office to oversee U.S.-funded medical research on foreign patients and address ethical problems raised by conducting research in developing countries. Other governmental, academic, and public organizations are developing ways to manage the burgeoning industry of research-related companies that do nothing but profiteer from patient recruitment. Recently, the National Advisory Committee on Bioethics issued a draft report on ethical and policy issues involving human participants, including internationally, and will be seeking public comment shortly.

Effective mechanisms do not exist to oversee the vast number of studies emerging as a result of the globalization of drug testing and will require many years to develop. In the meantime, it is imperative that researchers in poor countries are trained in international ethical standards governing clinical research. This provision will allow these researchers opportunities to participate in forums, conferences, and seminars where ethical issues in international health research are shared with participants from all world regions.

TITLE V--U. S. INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING ACTIVITIES

Section 501--Eliminating Staff Positions for the Advisory Board for Cuba Broadcasting.

This section eliminates the position of Staff Director for the Advisory Board for Cuba Broadcasting and allows for any savings from the elimination of this position to be available for broadcasting to Cuba.

Section 502--Reports on Broadcasting Personnel.

Requires not later than 3 months after enactment, and every 3 months thereafter for fiscal years 2002 and 2003 the Broadcasting Board of Governors shall submit a report on its efforts to diversify the workforce at the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

Section 503--Personal Services Contracting Pilot Program.

This section provides the Broadcasting Board of Governors the authority to implement a 4-year pilot program to use personal services contracts in the U.S. to employ individuals in the International Broadcasting Bureau and the Voice of America. This authority will provide greater flexibility to the Board in its employment practices. Recent international events have required the broadcast services to quickly increase the hours of broadcasts. Since these demands are episodic, it would be useful to be able to respond with personnel who are employed for a fixed period of time and on an `as needed' basis. This limited authority to hire up to 50 personal services contractors as broadcasters, producers or writers would enhance the agency's responsiveness to crises and support existing broadcasts while there is a limited authority to grant extensions to existing contracts past the termination of the authority on December 31, 2005, it should be used sparingly for essential employees and should not grant extensions past July 31, 2006.

Section 504--Pay Parity For Senior Executives of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

This section addresses an issue of pay parity of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty managers when compared to their civil service counterparts. Section 308(h)(1)(A) of the International Broadcasting Act provides that RFE/RL grant funds may not be used `to pay any salary or compensation in excess of the rate of pay payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code.' This provision has been interpreted as placing a cap on the salaries of senior managers at the rate of pay for Executive Level IV, exclusive of locality pay. RFE/RL senior managers are not Federal employees and are not covered under the Federal Employee Pay Comparability Act of 1990 which provides for locality adjustments in certain high-cost areas. This amendment makes up to two senior managers eligible to receive a salary benefit equivalent to the comparable Senior Executive Service salary with locality pay.

Section 505--Repeal of Ban on U.S. Transmitter in Kuwait.

This section repeals section 226 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (P.L. 103-236) that prohibits the expenditure of funds for the design, development, or construction of a U.S. transmitter in Kuwait. The Kuwait Transmitting Station is an ideal location from which to broadcast to China, Southeast Asia, Russia, Central and South Asia, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Africa. The current station provides VOA with medium wave transmission to Iraq, Iran and the Gulf Region of the Middle East. This repeal would allow the building of a short-wave transmission facility at this site.

TITLE VI--INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMISSIONS

Section 601--United Nations Arrears Payments and Reform.

The provision makes changes to the United Nations Reform Act of 1999 authorizing the payment of U.S. arrearages to the United Nations. The principal effect of the amendment is to allow a second arrearage payment of $582 million to be made to the United Nations immediately. The provision also makes other changes to existing law that are necessary to release the arrearage payments authorized by the United Nations Reform Act. The rationale for making these changes is that Ambassador Holbrooke succeeded last year in negotiating a reduction in the percentage of the regular United Nations budget paid by the United States (from 25% to 22%), and as part of this bargain the United States is obligated to release the arrearage payments authorized by the United Nations Reform Act. Specific changes to the United Nations Reform Act made by this provision include:

This subsection amends section 6 of the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 to eliminate any suggestion in that provision of law that Congress encourages the President to negotiate an agreement with the United Nations Security Council in accordance with Article 43 of the Charter of the United Nations. Such an agreement would provide for making specific elements of the United States Armed Forces available to the Security Council on its call for peace enforcement operations. The revised section 6 retains the requirement contained in the existing section 6 that any such agreement negotiated by the President with the Security Council must be approved by Congress by appropriate act or joint resolution before it may take effect.

Section 602--Travel by Advisory Committee Members to Great Lakes Fishery Commission Annual Meeting.

This section makes a change to the Great Lakes Fishery Act of 1956 to increase the number of government officials permitted to travel to the annual meeting from 5 to 10.

This section is needed to reflect a change in the meeting structure for the Great Lakes Fisheries Commission (GLFC), which promotes environmental protection and economic development among the Great Lakes member states and Canada. When section 4 of the Great Lakes Fisheries Act of 1956 was originally enacted, the GLFC held two annual meetings per year with five members of the Great Lakes Fisheries Advisory Committee attending each meeting. The GLFC now holds only one annual meeting. This provision will permit the State Department to fund the travel of up to 10 members of the advisory committee to the one annual meeting.

Section 603--U.S. Policy on Composition of U.N. Human Rights Commission.

This section addresses a vital concern regarding the U.N. Commission on Human Rights. The Commission has important debates on critical human rights issues, and has been a useful forum for both governments and nongovernmental organizations to express their views regarding human rights concerns. However, if this forum is to be taken seriously, it cannot be a forum for human rights violators to manipulate the debate and voting process in their favor. At a minimum any country that serves on the Commission should be open to any visit from a U.N. official or rapporteur or from representatives of nongovernmental human rights organizations. In future selections for the Commission, the Committee believes that the United States should work to ensure that this principle is a key consideration for all countries.

Section 604--U.S. Membership in the International Organization for Migration.

This provision gives United States assent to several recent amendments to the charter of the International Organization for Migration (IOM). According to the IOM charter, such amendments cannot go into effect without the assent of a two-thirds majority of member states. One of the amendments to which this provision gives assent will permit minor amendments to be made by the IOM governing body, but will continue to require the assent of member states to fundamental amendments.

Section 605--Report Relating to Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.

This section rewrites and updates a current reporting requirement of the Department of State to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.

Section 606--Reports to Congress on United Nations Activities.

This section makes technical changes to several existing reporting requirements relating to the United Nations. The section deletes a requirement that the Secretary of State transmit United Nations Security Council resolutions to Congress within 3 days of their adoption, in recognition of the fact that these resolutions are now immediately available to the public on the internet. The section also consolidates two separate reporting requirements on United States assistance to international organizations into one annual reporting requirement. Finally, the section streamlines an existing reporting requirement regarding United States assistance to United Nations peacekeeping operations.

TITLE VII--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISONS

Section 701--Amendments to the Iran Nonproliferation Act of 2000.

This section makes two technical amendments to the Iran Nonproliferation Act of 2000. The first amendment revises section 2 of such act to require that reports submitted to Congress pursuant to section 2(a) of the act contain, in addition to the other matters specified in section 2, a brief description of certain relevant facts and circumstances surrounding each transfer that results in a person being identified in a report pursuant to section 2(a).

The Committee anticipates that this amendment will increase the usefulness of the reports submitted to Congress pursuant to the act by making them more comprehensible to readers in both the Executive branch and in Congress.

The second amendment eliminates a technical error in section 5(a)(2) of the act. This error has resulted in certain persons being exempted from application of the act because, even though they transferred conventional weapons to Iran that made a material contribution to Iran's conventional weapons capability, the transfer did not also make a material contribution to Iran's ability to produce or deliver weapons of mass destruction. The amendment ensures that persons making such conventional weapons transfers to Iran cannot be exempted from application of the measures in the act pursuant to section 5 of the act unless one of the other grounds for exemption set forth in section 5 is satisfied.

Section 702--Amendments to the North Korea Threat Reduction Act of 1999.

This section makes a technical change at two places in the North Korea Threat Reduction Act of 1999. The effect of the amendments is to clarify the intent of Congress that no nuclear goods or technology controlled on the Export Trigger List of the Nuclear Suppliers Group may be transferred to North Korea from the United States unless a determination and report to Congress pursuant to such act has been submitted, and all other applicable requirements of United States law have been satisfied. The Committee understands that the transfer from the United States of goods and technology on the Export Trigger List is already subject to the requirements of the Atomic Energy Act relating to the negotiation and implementation of an agreement for cooperation with the government of a country to which such goods or technology are to be transferred.

Section 703--Amendments to the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998.

This provision includes several technical and substantive amendments to sections of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (IRFA) dealing with the United States Commission on Religious Freedom. The provision reflects the Committee's deep appreciation of the work of the Commission and the need for such work to continue in the future.

703(a)--Repeal of Termination of Commission. This section repeals section 209 of the IRFA, which provides for a `sunset' of the Commission.

703(b)--Authorization of Appropriations. This section authorizes an appropriation of $3,000,000 for the Commission in each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003.

703(c)--Election of Chair of Commission. This section provides that the Commission shall elect its chair at the first meeting after May 30 of each calendar year, rather than at the first meeting of each year, in order to correspond with the issuance of the Commission's annual report in June of each year.

703(d)--Procurement of Nongovernmental Services. This section amends an unduly burdensome restriction on Commission procurement procedures to apply such restriction only to procurements in excess of $75,000. The current provision, which restricts all procurement to government sources, effectively prohibits the Commission from procuring some goods and services that are essential to its work. For instance, under the current provision the Commission could not pay a nongovernment expert on Buddhism to prepare for the Commission an analysis of the various schools of Buddhism in Southeast Asia and why one is favored over another in Burma). There is value in using government sources when possible, but it is not practical in all cases. The $75,000 cap will provide the necessary flexibility while retaining the benefits of government sources for major .

703(e)--Donation of Services. This section will allow the Commission to accept donations of services, such as analysis by a foreign policy or religion experts, which could be extremely helpful to its work.

703(f)--Establishment of Staggered Terms. This section provides for staggered terms for Commissioners, so as to guarantee a measure of continuity and the preservation of institutional memory on the Commission.

Section 704--Continuation of U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

This section authorizes the U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy for 4 years, through fiscal year 2005. Sec. 404 of PL 106-113 terminated the Commission at the end of fiscal year 2001. The Committee appreciates the work of the Commission and has decided to extend its authorities.

Section 705. Participation of South Asia Countries in International Law Enforcement Academies.

This section provides that the Secretary of State shall ensure, where practicable, that appropriate government officials from countries in the South Asia region shall be eligible to attend courses at the International Law Enforcement Academies located in Bangkok, Thailand, and Budapest, Hungary, consistent with other provisions of law, with the goal of enhancing regional cooperation in the fight against transnational crime.

The Committee is aware of the limitations on space and openings for training at the ILEAs, as well as the capacity to translate training lectures into additional languages. However, in light of the growing threat posed by transnational crime in South Asia, particularly involving narcotics, sex trafficking and international terrorism, and considering the growing importance of South Asia to U.S. national security and economic interests, the Committee hopes that the South Asian nations of Pakistan and India will be given primary consideration for these ILEAs where it could serve to enhance regional cooperation in areas such as terrorism and drug trafficking. In addition, secondary consideration should be given to including Nepal, to the extent practicable, in light of that country's increased role as a transit point for narcotics and its continuing problems with trafficking in human beings.

SUBTITLE B--SENSE OF CONGRESS PROVISIONS

Section 731--Sense of Congress Relating to HIV/AIDS and U.N. Peacekeeping Operations.

Expresses a sense of Congress that the President should direct the Secretary of State and the U.S. Representative to the U.N. to urge the U.N. to adopt an HIV/AIDS mitigation strategy as a component of U.N. peacekeeping operations.

Section 732--Sense of Congress Relating to HIV/AIDS Task Force.

Expresses a sense of Congress that the State Department should create an interagency task force to coordinate government agency international activities on HIV/AIDS.

Section 733--Sense of Congress Condemning the Destruction of Statues in Afghanistan.

Expresses a sense of Congress that condemns the Taliban's destruction of the pre-Islamic statues and calls upon the Taliban to allow U.N. organizations access to Afghanistan to survey the damage and facilitate restoration and preservation of remaining statues.

Section 734--Sense of Congress Relating to the Taiwan Strait Issue.

Expresses a sense of Congress that Taiwan is a democracy and it is the policy of the U.S. that a resolution of the Taiwan Strait issue must be peaceful and include the assent of the people of Taiwan.

Section 735--Sense of Congress Relating to Drinking Water in Bangladesh.

Expresses a sense of Congress that the Secretary of State should work with appropriate U.S. government agencies to identify a long term solution to the arsenic-contaminated drinking water problem in Bangladesh.

Section 736--Sense of Congress Relating to Display of the American Flag at AIT.

Expresses a sense of Congress that the American Institute in Taiwan should display the American flag.

Section 737--Sense of Congress Regarding Human Rights Violations in West Papua and Aceh.

Expresses a sense of Congress expressing a deep concern over ongoing human rights violations committed by the Indonesian military and police forces against civilians in West Papua and Aceh, as well as over violence by militias and other in Maluku, Central Kalimantan, and elsewhere in Indonesia.

Section 738--Sense of Congress Supporting Properly Conducted Elections in Kosova During 2001.

Expresses a sense of Congress that the U.N. Mission in Kosova should hold properly conducted elections throughout Kosova during 2001.

Section 739--Sense of Congress Relating to Policy Review of Relations with the People's Republic of China.

Expresses a sense of Congress that the President of the U.S. and his advisors should be commended for their success in negotiating the return of the 24 American crew members of the U.S. Navy reconnaissance aircraft that made an emergency landing on the Chinese island of Hainan on April 1, 2001 and that the U.S. should review its policy with respect to China in light of this and other recent events.

Section 740--Sense of Congress Relating to Broadcasting in the Macedonian Language by Radio Free Europe.

Expresses a sense of Congress that Radio Free Europe should broadcast in the Macedonian language to Macedonian-speaking areas of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

Section 741--Sense of Congress Relating to Magen David Adom Society.

Expresses a sense of Congress that the International Committee of the Red Cross should immediately recognize the Magen David Adom Society.

Section 742--Sense of Congress Urging the Return of Portraits Painted by Dina Babbitt.

Expresses a sense of Congress urging the President and the Secretary of State to make all efforts necessary to retrieve the seven watercolor portraits painted by Dina Babbitt that are held by the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum.

Section 743--Sense of Congress Regarding Vietnamese Refugee Families.

Expresses a sense of Congress that Vietnamese refugees who served substantial sentences in re-education camps on account of their wartime associations with the United States should be permitted to bring their unmarried sons and daughters when resettled in the United States. These family members are the subject of the `McCain Amendment,' most recently re-enacted as section 255 of the Admiral James W. Nance and Meg Donovan Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001. Unfortunately, this amendment has not yet been fully implemented and has been interpreted to exclude certain unmarried sons and daughters whose parents were accepted for admission to the United States prior to April 1, 1995. The Committee believes a further extension and expansion of the McCain amendment will be necessary in order to complete the important work of reunifying these refugee families.

Section 744--Sense of Congress Relating to Membership of the U.S. in UNESCO.

Expresses a sense of Congress that the President should take all necessary steps to renew the membership of the U.S. in the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Section 745--Sense of Congress Relating to Global Warming.

Expresses a sense of Congress that the U.S. should: take action to ensure significant and meaningful reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from all sectors and continue negotiations to complete the rules and guidelines for the Kyoto Protocol in a manner that ensures the environmental integrity of the protocol.

This section makes a series of findings regarding global warming which discuss the nature and pace of global climate change, the contribution of human activities to global climate change and its scientific basis, the impact of global climate change on the world economy and environmental situation, the provisions of the United Nations Framework on Climate Change, and the role of American businesses in responding to global climate change and producing more efficient and renewable energy sources. The section also expresses the sense of Congress that the United States should demonstrate international leadership in mitigating the health, environmental and economic threats posed by global warming. Specifically, the U.S. should (1) take responsible action to ensure significant and meaningful reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from all sectors; and (2) continue to participate in international negotiations with the objective of completing the rules and guidelines for the Kyoto Protocol in a manner that is consistent with the interests of the United States and that ensures that environmental integrity of the protocol.

Section 746--Sense of Congress Regarding the Ban on Sinn Fein Ministers from the North-South Ministerial Council in Northern Ireland.

Expresses a sense of Congress which calls upon First Minister David Trimble to adhere to the terms of the Good Friday Agreement and lift the ban on Sinn Fein Ministers from participating in the North-South Ministerial Council.

TITLE VIII--SECURITY ASSISTANCE

SUBTITLE A--MILITARY AND RELATED ASSISTANCE

CHAPTER 1--FOREIGN MILITARY SALES AND RELATED AUTHORITIES

Section 811--Quarterly Report on Price and Availability Estimates.

This section amends chapter 2 of the Arms Export Control Act to require quarterly reports to the Congress which provide price and availability information on possible arms sales to foreign countries. The furnishing of this additional information through this report will assist the Committee in its statutory role of providing oversight of arms transfers.

Section 812--Official Reception and Representation Expenses.

This section amends section 43(c) of the Arms Export Control Act to increase the annual limit on the amount of funds that may be expended for official reception and representation expenses under the AECA from $72,500 to $86,500. Reception and representational expenses are an important part of successfully conducting security assistance programs. Since 1993, the amount authorized for these expenses has remained at the same ceiling--$72,500. Since 1993, an additional 33 Security Assistance Offices have been opened. These new offices are in countries where the primary relationship with the U.S. government for any aid is through the Foreign Military Financing Program, the International Military Education and Training Program, or through the transfer of excess defense articles.

Section 813--Treatment of Taiwan Relating to Transfers of Defense Articles and Services.

This section requires that Taiwan shall be treated as the equivalent of a major non-NATO ally for the purposes of the transfer or potential transfer of defense articles or defense services under the Arms Export Control Act, the Foreign Assistance Act or any other provision of law.

Section 814--United States Policy with Regard to Taiwan.

This section requires the President, or his designee, to consult at least once each calendar year with representatives of the armed forces of Taiwan, at not less than the level of Vice Chief of the General Staff, concerning the nature and quantity of defense articles and services to be made available to Taiwan in accordance with section 3(b) of the Taiwan Relations Act. These consultations shall take place in Washington, DC. This section also requires the President to consult, on a classified basis, with the Congress at least 30 days prior to his, or his designees', consultations with Taiwan regarding the availability of defense articles and services for Taiwan. The consultations with Congress shall include the following matters: (1) the request by Taiwan to the United States for the purchase of defense articles and services; (2) the President's assessment of the legitimate defense needs of Taiwan taking into account Taiwan's request for defense articles and services; and (3) the decision-making process used by the President to consider such request.

CHAPTER 2--EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLE AND DEFENSE DRAWDOWN AUTHORITIES

Section 821--Excess Defense Articles for Certain European and Other Countries.

This section authorizes that funds of the Department of Defense may be expended for the provision of excess defense articles under section 516 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, the Former Yugoslavia Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mongolia, the Philippines, Slovakia, and Uzbekistan. Most Central and Southern European and Newly Independent States countries urgently seek excess defense articles to replace former Soviet equipment as both a political statement and as a way to enhance interoperability with NATO. In addition, certain countries, such as Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, continue to require excess defense articles as they build their defense forces from very low levels. Unfortunately, most of these countries cannot afford packing, crating, handling and transportation costs associated with excess defense article transfers as they convert to market economies. Without the authority of this section, the excess defense article program becomes virtually unavailable to these countries.

Section 823--Leases of Defense Articles for Foreign Countries and International Organizations.

This section modifies section 61(b) of the Arms Export Control Act to provide authority to the President to enter into leases for defense articles from the stocks of the Department of Defense for fixed periods of time longer than years in instances where the defense articles require major refurbishment work prior to delivery to the lessor foreign country or international organization. The intent of this section is to allow the recipient of the leased defense article to have 5 years of actual use of the leased article. This section is necessary because over the past few years several NATO allies have sought to use leases of U.S. military fighter aircraft, ships and tanks that need major refurbishment as an economical and expeditious way to acquire modern defense capabilities to meet their defense requirements. Such major refurbishment work may take 18 months or more. It is the Committee's expectation, however, that no matter how long the requirement for such work, the length of the lease is not to exceed 5 years once the defense article is put to beneficial use by the recipient.

Section 823--Priority with Respect to Transfer of Excess Defense Articles.

This section amends section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act to require that the Philippines, along with other eligible countries pursuant to the section, receive priority with respect to the delivery of excess defense articles.

CHAPTER 3--NONPROLIFERATION AND EXPORT CONTROL ASSISTANCE

Section 831--International Counterproliferation Education and Training.

This section amends chapter 9 of the Foreign Assistance Act to authorize the President to provide education and training to foreign governmental and military personnel for the purpose of enhancing the nonproliferation and export control capabilities of such personnel through their attendance in special courses of instruction in the U.S. This section is modeled on the authorities under which international military education and training is provided. It is the Committee's intention to work with the Administration and other interested Committees in the Congress as this legislation moves through the legislative process to ensure that this authority is complementary to programs currently being run by the Departments of Defense and Commerce.

Section 832--Annual Report on the Proliferation of Missiles and Essential Components of Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Weapons.

This section consolidates four existing reporting requirements into one annual report on the proliferation of missiles and nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.

Section 833--Five-Year International Arms Control and Nonproliferation Strategy.

This section requires the Secretary of State to prepare and submit to the Congress a strategy that outlines a 5-year plan for curtailing the international proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and ballistic missiles along with the goals and objectives of U.S. arms control and nonproliferation policy, including the specific programs and activities the Department of State intends to utilize to accomplish such objectives.

SUBTITLE B--STRENGTHENING THE MUNITIONS LICENSING PROCESS

Section 841--License Officer Staffing.

This section requires that not less than $10,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003 be made available for the Office of Defense Trade Controls (ODTC) of the Department of State for salaries and expenses. Furthermore, this section also requires the Secretary of State to assign to ODTC a sufficient number of license review officers to ensure that the average weekly caseload for each officer does not exceed 40 cases. Further this section states that the Secretary of Defense should ensure that 10 military officers are continuously detailed to ODTC on a nonreimbursable basis.

Section 842--Funding for Database Automation.

This section requires that not less than $4,000,000 in each of fiscal year 2002 and 2003 be made available to ODTC for the modernization of information management systems.

Section 843--Information Management Priorities.

This section requires that not less than $3,000,000 of the funds made available for each fiscal year in Sec. 842 shall be used to fully automate the Defense Trade Application System in order to establish a secure, Internet-based system for the filing and review of applications for munitions list items. The Committee provides this funding with the expectation that ODTC should provide a date certain for establishing such an automated system.

Section 844--Improvements to the Automated Export System.

This section requires the Secretary of Commerce, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and Secretary of Treasury, to publish regulations in the Federal Register which require mandatory filing through the Automated Export System (AES) the remainder of exports that were not covered by regulations issued pursuant to section 1252(b) of the Security Assistance Act of 1999 (as enacted into law by section 1000(a)(7) of Public Law 106-113). This section also requires the Secretary of State to conclude an information sharing arrangement with the United States Custom Service and the Census Bureau to adjust the AES to parallel information currently collected by the Department of State. Further this section amends the appropriate sections of U.S. Code to provide for civil and criminal penalties for failure to file export information. The Committee understands that the Census Bureau requires sufficient funding to implement these requirements and accordingly, when the Committee considers the Export Administration Act it will provide $6.7 million for fiscal year 2002 for these purposes. The Committee urges the Secretary of Commerce, Secretary of Treasury and the Director of National Institute of Standards and Technology to provide the certification required under section 1252(c) of the Security Assistance Act of 1999 (as enacted into law by section 1000(a)(7) of Public Law 106-113) in order that regulations may be published pursuant to section 1252 to require Shippers' Export Declarations to be filed through the AES with respect to exports of items on the U.S. Munitions List or the Commerce Control List. The Committee urges the Department of Commerce, as it works to promulgate those regulations, to prepare such regulations to include the requirements of this section, i.e., mandatory filing through AES for the remainder of exports.

Section 845--Congressional Notification of Removal of Items from the Munitions List.

This section requires the President to provide 30 day's notice to the Congress pursuant to section 634A(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 of any items proposed to be removed from the munitions list. The Defense Trade Security Initiative calls for a review of the munitions list every 4 years. The Committee understands that the Administration is currently reviewing a portion of the list to determine if items warrant removal from the list. Given past instances of notifying the Congress pursuant to current statute when the Congress was not in session or otherwise unable to review appropriately the proposed list revisions, the Committee believes it is warranted to institute this new practice of making such proposals subject to reprogramming and hold authorities.

Section 846--Congressional Notification Thresholds for Allied Countries.

This section modifies authorities in the Arms Export Control Act by increasing monetary thresholds which trigger congressional notifications for arms transfers (retransfers, government-to-government, commercial and leases) to countries which are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or Australia, Japan, or New Zealand. The monetary thresholds triggering congressional notifications have not been modified since 1981 and accordingly, the Committee believes these adjustments are warranted.

SUBTITLE C--AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER NAVAL VESSELS

Section 851--Authority to Transfer Naval Vessels to Certain Foreign Countries.

This section authorizes the transfer of 14 ships: Brazil (1 `Newport' class tank landing ship by sale), Poland (1 `Oliver Hazard Perry' class guided missile frigate by grant), Taiwan (4 `Kidd' class guided missile destroyers by sale), and Turkey (2 `Oliver Hazard Perry' class guided missile frigates by sale and 6 `Knox' class frigates by grant). This section requires that any expenses incurred with the transfer authorized on a grant basis shall be charged to the recipient; that, to the maximum extent practicable, repair and refurbishment of these ships be performed at U.S. Navy shipyards or other shipyards located in the U.S.; and that the authority to transfer these ships expires after 2 years.

SUBTITLE D--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Section 861--Annual Foreign Military Reports.

This section modifies section 656(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to require that the Chairman or Ranking Member of the International Relations Committee or the Foreign Relations Committee must request the annual foreign military report (including the list of countries to be covered by such report) in order for the report to be compiled.

Section 862--Report Relating to International Arms Sales Code of Conduct.

This section modifies current law to require that the Secretary of State report to the Congress on progress made to begin negotiations on establishing an international arms sales code of conduct and makes a further technical amendment to that law.

NEW ADVISORY COMMITTEES

H.R. 1646 does not establish or authorize any new advisory committees.

CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT

H.R. 1646 does not apply to the legislative branch.

FEDERAL MANDATES

H.R. 1646 provides no Federal mandates.

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

SECTION 404 OF THE ASIA FOUNDATION ACT

-

SECTION 701 OF U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS ACT OF 2000

Public Law 106-286

SEC. 701. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR BROADCASTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING OPERATIONS.

* * * * * * *

-

FOREIGN AFFAIRS REFORM AND RESTRUCTURING ACT OF 1998

DIVISION G--FOREIGN AFFAIRS REFORM AND RESTRUCTURING ACT OF 1998

* * * * * * *

SUBDIVISION A--CONSOLIDATION OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AGENCIES

* * * * * * *

TITLE XIII--UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 4--CONFORMING AMENDMENTS

* * * * * * *

SEC. 1334. SUNSET OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.

* * * * * * *

SUBDIVISION B--FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION

* * * * * * *

TITLE XXII--DEPARTMENT OF STATE AUTHORITIES AND ACTIVITIES

CHAPTER 1--AUTHORITIES AND ACTIVITIES

* * * * * * *

SEC. 2205. PILOT PROGRAM FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS REIMBURSEMENT.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

TITLE XXVII--EUROPEAN SECURITY ACT OF 1998

* * * * * * *

SEC. 2705. RESTRICTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

TITLE XXVIII--OTHER FOREIGN POLICY PROVISIONS

SEC. 2801. REPORTS ON CLAIMS BY UNITED STATES FIRMS AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT OF SAUDI ARABIA.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 2802. REPORTS ON DETERMINATIONS UNDER TITLE IV OF THE LIBERTAD ACT.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 2805. REPORT ON RELATIONS WITH VIETNAM.

* * * * * * *

-

ADMIRAL JAMES W. NANCE AND MEG DONOVAN FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION ACT, FISCAL YEARS 2000 AND 2001

* * * * * * *

DIVISION A--DEPARTMENT OF STATE PROVISIONS

* * * * * * *

TITLE IV--UNITED STATES INFORMATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS

Subtitle A--Authorities and Activities

* * * * * * *

SEC. 404. SUNSET OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 405. ROYAL ULSTER CONSTABULARY TRAINING.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

TITLE VII--INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND COMMISSIONS

Subtitle A--International Organizations Other than the United

* * * * * * *

SEC. 704. SEMIANNUAL REPORTS ON UNITED STATES SUPPORT FOR MEMBERSHIP OR PARTICIPATION OF TAIWAN IN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

* * * * * * *

TITLE VIII--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--General Provisions

* * * * * * *

SEC. 805. REPORT ON TERRORIST ACTIVITY IN WHICH UNITED STATES CITIZENS WERE KILLED AND RELATED MATTERS.

* * * * * * *

DIVISION B--ARMS CONTROL, NONPROLIFERATION, AND SECURITY ASSISTANCE PROVISIONS

* * * * * * *

TITLE XII--SECURITY ASSISTANCE

* * * * * * *

Subtitle F--International Arms Sales Code of Conduct Act of 1999

* * * * * * *

SEC. 1262. INTERNATIONAL ARMS SALES CODE OF CONDUCT.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 738 OF THE AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

-

SECTION 7 OF THE FISHERMEN'S PROTECTIVE ACT OF 1967

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

STATE DEPARTMENT BASIC AUTHORITIES ACT OF 1956

TITLE I--BASIC AUTHORITIES GENERALLY

ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 36A. AWARD OF [Struck out->][ FOREIGN SERVICE ][<-Struck out] THOMAS JEFFERSON STAR.

SPECIAL AGENTS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

EXPENSES RELATING TO PARTICIPATION IN ARBITRATIONS OF CERTAIN DISPUTES

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION ACT, FISCAL YEARS 1994 AND 1995

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995'.

SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

The table of contents for this Act is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title.
* * * * * * *
TITLE II--UNITED STATES INFORMATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS
* * * * * * *
Part B--USIA and Related Agencies Authorities and Activities
Sec. 221. USIA office in Lhasa, Tibet.
* * * * * * *
[Struck out->][ Sec. 226. United States transmitter in Kuwait. ][<-Struck out]
* * * * * * *

TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND RELATED AGENCIES

* * * * * * *

PART B--AUTHORITIES AND ACTIVITIES

* * * * * * *

SEC. 140. VISAS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

TITLE II--UNITED STATES INFORMATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS

* * * * * * *

PART B--USIA AND RELATED AGENCIES AUTHORITIES AND ACTIVITIES

* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ SEC. 226. UNITED STATES TRANSMITTER IN KUWAIT. ][<-Struck out]

* * * * * * *

TITLE IV--INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

PART A--UNITED NATIONS REFORM AND PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS

* * * * * * *

SEC. 404. ASSESSED CONTRIBUTIONS FOR UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 409. REFORM IN BUDGET DECISIONMAKING PROCEDURES OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND ITS SPECIALIZED AGENCIES.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

FOREIGN SERVICE ACT OF 1980

TITLE I--THE FOREIGN SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 4--COMPENSATION

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 9--TRAVEL, LEAVE, AND OTHER BENEFITS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

CHAPTER 59 OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE

* * * * * * *

SUBCHAPTER III--OVERSEAS DIFFERENTIALS AND ALLOWANCES

* * * * * * *

Sec. 5924. Cost-of-living allowances

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

Sec. 5927. Advances of pay

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 103 OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS, REFUGEE, AND OTHER FOREIGN RELATIONS PROVISIONS ACT OF 1996

SEC. 103. EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL EXCHANGES AND SCHOLARSHIPS FOR TIBETANS AND BURMESE.

* * * * * * *

-

MUTUAL EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL EXCHANGE ACT OF 1961

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 245 OF THE TELEVISION BROADCASTING TO CUBA ACT

SEC. 245. AMENDMENTS TO THE RADIO BROADCASTING TO CUBA ACT.

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 308 OF THE UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING ACT OF 1994

SEC. 308. LIMITS ON GRANTS FOR RADIO FREE EUROPE AND RADIO LIBERTY.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

UNITED NATIONS REFORM ACT OF 1999

* * * * * * *

Subtitle B--Arrearages to the United Nations

CHAPTER 1--AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS; OBLIGATION AND EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS

* * * * * * *

SEC. 912. OBLIGATION AND EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 3--REFORM OF ASSESSMENTS AND UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS

SEC. 931. CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.

CHAPTER 4--BUDGET AND PERSONNEL REFORM

SEC. 941. CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

UNITED NATIONS PARTICIPATION ACT OF 1945

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 6. AGREEMENTS WITH SECURITY COUNCIL.

-

DEPARTMENTS OF STATE, JUSTICE, AND COMMERCE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 1973

Public Law 92-544

TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF STATE

* * * * * * *

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND CONFERENCES

CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

* * * * * * *

-

DEPARTMENTS OF COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 1999

* * * * * * *

TITLE IV--DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND RELATED AGENCIES

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

* * * * * * *

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND CONFERENCES

* * * * * * *

ARREARAGE PAYMENTS

* * * * * * *

-

DEPARTMENTS OF COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2000

TITLE IV--DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND RELATED AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

* * * * * * *

ARREARAGE PAYMENTS

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 4 OF THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY ACT OF 1956

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 5 OF THE ACT OF JUNE 3, 1976

Public Law 94-304

AN ACT To establish a Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.

-

SECTION 2 OF THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1950

Public Law 81-806

JOINT RESOLUTION To amend certain laws providing for membership and participation by the United States in certain international organizations.

-

IRAN NONPROLIFERATION ACT OF 2000

* * * * * * *

SEC. 2. REPORTS ON PROLIFERATION TO IRAN.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 5. DETERMINATION EXEMPTING FOREIGN PERSON FROM SECTIONS 3 AND 4.

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 822 OF THE NORTH KOREA THREAT REDUCTION ACT OF 1999

SEC. 822. RESTRICTIONS ON NUCLEAR COOPERATION WITH NORTH KOREA.

* * * * * * *

-

INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM ACT OF 1998

* * * * * * *

TITLE II--COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

* * * * * * *

SEC. 201. ESTABLISHMENT AND COMPOSITION.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

SEC. 207. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

* * * * * * *

SEC. 208. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT AND DISCLOSURE.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ SEC. 209. TERMINATION. ][<-Struck out]

* * * * * * *

-

ARMS EXPORT CONTROL ACT

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 1- FOREIGN AND NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY OBJECTIVES AND RESTRAINTS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 2- FOREIGN MILITARY SALES AUTHORIZATIONS

* * * * * * *

SEC. 28. QUARTERLY REPORT ON PRICE AND AVAILABILITY ESTIMATES.

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 3- MILITARY EXPORT CONTROLS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 4- GENERAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 6--LEASES OF DEFENSE ARTICLES AND LOAN AUTHORITY FOR COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 105 OF THE ACT OF JULY 21, 1996

Public Law 104-164

AN ACT To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act to make improvements to certain defense and security assistance provisions under those Acts, to authorize the transfer of naval vessels to certain foreign countries, and for other purposes.

SEC. 105. EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLES FOR CERTAIN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES.

-

FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961

* * * * * * *

PART II

CHAPTER 1--POLICY

* * * * * * *

SEC. 516. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLES.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 9--NONPROLIFERATION AND EXPORT CONTROL ASSISTANCE

* * * * * * *

SEC. 584. INTERNATIONAL COUNTER-PROLIFERATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING.

SEC. [Struck out->][ 584 ][<-Struck out] 585. LIMITATIONS.

SEC. [Struck out->][ 585 ][<-Struck out] 586. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

* * * * * * *

PART III

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 3--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

* * * * * * *

SEC. 656. ANNUAL FOREIGN MILITARY TRAINING REPORT.

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 1097 OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEARS 1992 AND 1993

[Struck out->][ SEC. 1097. ANNUAL REPORT ON THE PROLIFERATION OF MISSILES AND ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL, AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS. ][<-Struck out]

-

SECTION 308 OF THE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS CONTROL AND WARFARE ELIMINATION ACT OF 1991

[Struck out->][ SEC. 308. PRESIDENTIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. ][<-Struck out]

-

SECTION 1607 OF THE IRAN-IRAQ ARMS NON-PROLIFERATION ACT OF 1992

SEC. 1607. REPORTING REQUIREMENT.

* * * * * * *

-

SECTION 585 OF THE FOREIGN OPERATIONS, EXPORT FINANCING, AND RELATED PROGRAMS APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 1997

NORTH KOREA

SEC. 585. Ninety days after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall provide a report in a classified or unclassified form to the Committee on Appropriations including the following information:

-

TITLE 13, UNITED STATES CODE

* * * * * * *

CHAPTER 9--COLLECTION AND PUBLICATION OF FOREIGN COMMERCE AND TRADE STATISTICS

Sec.

301. Collection and publication.

* * * * * * *

[Struck out->][ 305. Violations, penalties. ][<-Struck out]

305. Penalties for unlawful export information activities.

* * * * * * *

Sec. 303. Secretary of Treasury functions

To assist the Secretary to carry out the provisions of this chapter, the Secretary of the Treasury shall collect information in the form and manner prescribed by the regulations issued pursuant to this chapter from persons engaged in foreign commerce or trade [Struck out->][ , other than by mail, ][<-Struck out] and from the owners or operators of carriers.

Sec. 304. Filing export information, delayed filings, penalties for failure to file

(a) The information or reports in connection with the exportation or transportation of cargo required to be filed by carriers with the Secretary of the Treasury under any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to this chapter may be filed after the departure of such carrier from the port or place of exportation or transportation, whether such departing carrier is destined directly to a foreign port or place or to a noncontiguous area, or proceeds by way of other ports or places of the United States, provided that a bond in an approved form in [Struck out->][ the penal sum of $1,000 ][<-Struck out] a penal sum of $10,000 is filed with the Secretary of the Treasury. The Secretary of Commerce may, by a rule, regulation, or order issued in conformity herewith, prescribe a maximum period after such departure during which the required information or reports may be filed. In the event any such information or report is not filed within such prescribed period, [Struck out->][ a penalty not to exceed $100 for each day's delinquency beyond the prescribed period, but not more than $1,000, shall be exacted ][<-Struck out] the Secretary of Commerce (and officers and employees of the Department of Commerce designated by the Secretary) may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each day's delinquency beyond the prescribed period, but not more than $10,000 per violation. Civil suit may be instituted in the name of the United States against the principal and surety for the recovery of any penalties that may accrue and be exacted in accordance with the terms of the bond.

(b) Any person, other that a person described in subsection (a), required to submit export information, shall file such information in accordance with any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to this chapter. In the event any such information or reports are not filed within such prescribed period, the Secretary of Commerce (and officers and employees of the Department of Commerce designated by the Secretary) may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each day's delinquency beyond the prescribed period, but not more than $10,000 per violation.

[Struck out->][ (b) ][<-Struck out] (c) The Secretary may remit or mitigate any penalty incurred for violations of this section and regulations issued pursuant thereto if, in his opinion, they were incurred without willful negligence or fraud, or other circumstances justify a remission or mitigation.

[Struck out->][ Sec. 305. Violations, penalties ][<-Struck out]

[Struck out->][ Any person, including the owners or operators of carriers, violating the provisions of this chapter, or any rule, regulation, or order issued thereunder, except as provided in section 304 above, shall be liable to a penalty not to exceed $1,000 in addition to any other penalty imposed by law. The amount of any such penalty shall be payable into the Treasury of the United States and shall be recoverable in a civil suit in the name of the United States. ][<-Struck out]

Sec. 305. Penalties for unlawful export information activities

* * * * * * *

ADDITIONAL VIEWS ON SECTIONS 131-33 (REGARDING FOREIGN ORGANIZATIONS THAT PERFORM AND PROMOTE ABORTIONS)

We strongly support this legislation, which will provide the necessary resources and authorities for a strong United States foreign policy for the 21st century. However, we strongly oppose sections 131-33, which are misnamed the `Global Democracy Promotion Act,' and which were inserted into the bill by a close vote at the Committee markup. These provisions would sharply restrict the President's authority to set reasonable terms and conditions on the distribution of United States foreign assistance. They are specifically designed to overturn the pro-life `Mexico City Policy,' which erects a wall of separation between United States family planning programs and the international abortion industry.

In the first place, we observe that general provisions on foreign assistance have no place in this legislation. This is a foreign relations authorization act, not a foreign aid bill. Moreover, even aside from their irrelevance to the subject matter of the bill into which it has been inserted, these provisions are profoundly objectionable.

Abortion advocates assert that the Mexico City Policy is a `gag rule' that violates the right to free speech. But even if U.S. constitutional provisions applied to foreign organizations doing business on foreign soil, the first amendment right to free speech would not give these organizations a right to receive Federal tax dollars.

Organizations that represent the United States in foreign countries are analogous to our ambassadors. Their advocacy in these countries on issues closely related to the U.S. programs they administer (as well as their other activities, such as the actual performance of abortions) is highly relevant to whether they can effectively administer these programs.

Specifically, among the most important stated purposes of U.S. family planning programs overseas is to reduce the number of abortions by providing contraception instead. The U.S. has no obligation to administer these programs through agents who fundamentally disagree with this goal. For the same reasons that we would not hire casino lobbyists to run an international anti-gambling campaign, or a distillery to run an anti-alcohol campaign, it makes no sense to hire abortionists or abortion lobbyists to run programs that are aimed at reducing abortions.

Opponents of the Mexico City Policy also argue that U.S. family planning grantees should be allowed to perform and promote abortion so long their abortion-related activities were carried out with `their own' money rather than the U.S. grant money. But this is nothing more than a bookkeeping trick. It ignores the fact that money is fungible, and that when we subsidize an organization we inevitably enrich and empower all of its activities. We also enhance the domestic and international prestige of the organization by giving it an official U.S. seal of approval.

Proponents of these provisions also claim that the Mexico City policy is not just anti-abortion, but also anti-family planning. But let us be clear on this: the Mexico City Policy does not weaken international family planning programs. It does not take a penny away from the $425 million the Administration has requested for population assistance around the world. On the contrary, it strengthens these programs, by ensuring that U.S. funds are directed to those groups that provide family planning--which is something entirely distinct from abortion--but do not perform or promote abortion as a method of birth control.

Finally, the most outrageous claim made by proponents of these provisions is that the Mexico City Policy will somehow interfere with efforts to address the HIV/AIDS epidemic. On the contrary, the United States currently spends over a half-billion dollars per year on fighting AIDS ($482.5 million in direct U.S. expenditures in FY 2001, plus many millions more in contributions to organizations such as the World Health Organization and the United Nations Development Program, which conduct their own anti-AIDS programs). The Mexico City Policy has absolutely no application to this half-billion dollars. It applies only to international population assistance. The proponents of the anti-Mexico City Policy provisions contend that this population assistance has an incidental effect of reducing exposure to the HIV virus, because certain contraceptive devices provide some protection from infection. Again, however, this argument misses the whole point of the Mexico City Policy. The policy does not reduce population assistance by one penny. With or without the Mexico City Policy, the same amount of money may lawfully be spent on contraceptive devices, and the same number of devices distributed. The only difference is whether we fund abortionists or non-abortionists to distribute them. Throughout our government's long experience with implementation of the Mexico City Policy (1984 through January 1993, and again in fiscal year 2001) there have always been hundreds of highly qualified non-governmental organizations around the world willing and able to administer U.S. programs. These organizations are in the business of family planning, not abortion. So the claim that requiring the President to fund abortionists is necessary to eradicate AIDS is demonstrably false.

For all these reasons, we intend to offer an amendment during floor consideration of this bill that will strike these misleading provisions and thereby preserve the President's authority to impose reasonable terms and conditions on the distribution of United States population assistance. The adoption of such an amendment will greatly strengthen the legislation.
Henry J. Hyde.
Christopher H. Smith.
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.
Peter T. King.
Richard Burr.
Thomas G. Tancredo.
Joseph R. Pitts.
Eric Cantor.
Jeff Flake.
Jo Ann Davis.

ADDITIONAL VIEWS IN OPPOSITION TO KYOTO AMENDMENT, SECTION 738 OF TITLE VII

We strongly support H.R. 1646 and the resources and authorities to carry out a strong foreign policy of the United States. However, we strongly oppose section 738 of title VII which was inserted into this legislation by a close vote of the Committee on International Relations.

In the 1970's, the Eighth Annual Report of the Council on Environmental Quality stated that the `Global CO2 problem is an issue which must be addressed in terms of its relevance to national energy policies.' That statement is as true today as it was then. Yet until this year, no Administration has sought to address the issue of global climate change in the context of its relevance to U.S. energy policy. Our 43rd President, George W. Bush, to his credit, recognized this important connection and his Administration is engaged in a two-pronged effort to develop a viable energy policy and to seek ways to address climate change. We support that approach and look forward to the results of that effort later this year.

For the Congress, climate change is hardly a new issue. In 1978, Congress enacted the National Climate Program Act, which said that our country `lacks a well-defined and coordinated program in climate-related research, monitoring, and assessment of effects and information utilization.' Nearly a decade later the Global Climate Protection Act of 1987 was passed that set `Goals of United States Policy,' which included increasing `worldwide understanding of the greenhouse effect and its environmental and health consequences' and fostering `cooperation among nations to develop more extensive and coordinated scientific research efforts with respect to the greenhouse effect.' Under that law, a joint Environmental Protection Agency-State Department report was sent in the early 1990's to Congress that stressed the global nature of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions and called for `international consensus' and a `comprehensive' approach to `addressing potential climate change.'

Internationally, the United Nations and the World Meteorological Organization in 1988 convened a new organization called the `Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change' (IPCC). The IPCC is composed of government representatives, who have established working groups composed of scientists, engineers, analysts and other experts. They do not do original research. Rather, they author 1,000 page and longer assessment reports on climate science, impacts and mitigation based on published and unpublished literature, not all of which is peer reviewed.

Those reports include a shorter `Summary for Policymakers' (SPMs) that is really a political document negotiated and adopted by government representatives line-by-line pursuant to IPCC procedures that were revised in 1999 by the IPCC, not the scientists. In short, it is the experts that `own' the Assessment Reports and the government representatives--many of whom are also negotiating the Protocol--and the Chairman of the IPCC who `own' the SPMs. Also, internationally, the U.S. ratified in 1992 the Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC), which set forth in Article 4 an `aim,' not a mandate, to stabilize greenhouse gas emissions by 2000 in industrialized countries, such as the U.S. As we all know, 2000 has come and gone and, except for the U.K. and Germany which have special, one-time circumstances, no industrialized Party to the Convention could achieve that `aim' by 2000.

The Constitution gives the Senate both a `consent' and `advice' role in treaty matters, although the Executive Branch rarely seeks such advice. Nevertheless, in early 1997 Senators Byrd and Hagel introduced S. Res. 98 with over 60 bipartisan co-sponsors, remembering that when the Convention was before the Senate in 1992, the Administration agreed that any further instrument for targets and timetables would have to receive advice and consent to ratification from the Senate. The resolution forewarned the Administration not to sign an agreement that would (1) cause serious harm to the U.S. economy, or (2) that did not include all countries that were Parties to the Convention.

Despite the fact that Byrd-Hagel resolution passed the Senate in July 1997 by a vote of 95-0, the Clinton Administration did not heed that unanimous Senate advice. Instead, Vice President Gore went to Kyoto during the third U.N. conference and instructed the U.S. delegation to `show increased flexibility.' Thereafter, in the wee hours of the morning of the eleventh day, the Kyoto Protocol was born and about a year later it was signed by the Clinton Administration.

As to the first principle of S. Res. 98, the Protocol `scheduled' commitments to reduce greenhouse gases applies only to the U.S. and other developed countries and not as we have noted, now or in the future to greenhouse gas emissions of developing countries, like Brazil, India, South Korea, and China. In the case of the second principle `do no serious economic harm in the U.S.,' the U.S. delegation agreed to a target and schedule for achieving it that will require the U.S. to reduce emissions of over 30 percent by 2012 from 1990 levels, which was a recession year in this country. Worst of all, the Convention Parties left all the details on flexibility in achieving the target at least cost to future sessions of the Parties to negotiate.

How harmful would this Protocol be? We can look at a very current and relevant example. This year and last Americans are facing very high oil and gasoline prices, as well as higher natural gas and heating oil prices.

The high gas prices last year caused such a consumer outrage that they have led to Federal investigations amid congressional inquires. But they are nothing compared to what Americans would endure under the Kyoto Protocol.

The Clinton Administration's own Energy Information Agency estimated that implementing the Kyoto Protocol would give us an increase in gasoline prices of over 70 cents per gallon. But unlike the current price fluctuations, the Kyoto fuel price increases would be permanent and would continue to grow.

High energy prices don't just effect American consumers. They would drive many American agricultural producers, manufacturing and transportation companies right out of business or out of the country.

Independent economic studies placed the job losses caused by the Kyoto Protocol in the millions.

And for what? The Kyoto Protocol has no hope of achieving its stated goal. How can it reduce global greenhouse gas emissions when it excludes more than 130 nations? Nations such as China, India, Mexico, South Korea--all of whom are already among the world's largest producers of man-made greenhouse gases.

Now nearly 4 years later and less than 7 years before the start of the first commitment period, only 34 countries have ratified the Protocol of which only one, Romania, is a developed country. Most importantly, the details still remain unresolved.

They include a package of issues on implementation not only of the unfinished Protocol, but also the Convention. Included in them is a proposal for an annual $1 billion contribution, beginning 2005 by developed nations to a fund for developing nations, with the U.S. paying half under an April draft paper by the Convention's current President, Jan Pronk of the Netherlands. That proposal, to our knowledge, has never been considered by the International Relations Committee or other Committees of jurisdiction in Congress.

President Bush has made his intention clear that the U.S. will not become a party to the Protocol as it now stands. In a March 13 letter to several Senators, he wrote:

As you know, I oppose the Kyoto Protocol because it exempts 80 percent of the world, including major population centers such as China and India, from compliance, and would cause serious harm to the U.S. economy. The Senate's vote, 95-0, shows that there is a clear consensus that the Kyoto Protocol is an unfair and ineffective means of addressing global climate change concerns.

At the same time, the President said that he takes the climate change issue seriously and is working on how to address the issue in a `better way.'

We realize, of course, that some of our friends in other countries are not happy with the President's position and some have suggested that the U.S. should not participate in the resumed COP-6 process. However, that process, as we said, includes implementation of proposals for money contributions under provisions of Article 4 of the Convention, not the Protocol. All of the COP and subsidiary body sessions are under the Convention. As a Party, the U.S. has a vital interest and a vote. It must participate and to the extent that the Menendez resolution calls for such participation there is no disagreement.

As we examine the proposed `Sense of Congress' subsection (b) of section 788, we find nothing in it that is inconsistent with the above two principles of S. Res. 98 or with the President's letter of March 13 to several Senators. It does not expressly support the Protocol or even suggest that the President should not oppose it for the reasons he stated.

As we understand it, subsection (b) is really in two parts. The first appears to be aimed at not the Convention or Protocol activities, but at what the United States might do domestically regarding greenhouse gas emissions in this country, which is really not appropriate for a State Department authorization bill. It calls for `responsible action' regarding such gases, without explaining what that `action' should be, what it will cost, what its impact will have on energy supply and price, how or when it will be carried out, who should undertake such action, whether it should be voluntary or regulatory, or what, if any, benefit it will have from the standpoint of `global climate,' as that term is defined in the Convention.

The second merely states that the U.S. `should' continue to `participate in international negotiations,' which, as we understand President Bush's recent interview with the Washington Post in the Oval Office (see p. A22, Washington Post edition of 4/25/01), is what he intends when the sixth session of the Conference of the Parties (COP-6) reconvenes in July in Germany. He said we should `work together to come up with a better protocol, a better way, and we will.'

This part of the subsection goes on to say that such participation will have an `objective of `completing the rules and guidelines of the Kyoto Protocol in a manner that is consistent with the interests of the United States and that ensures the environment integrity of the protocol.' Presumably, the authors are not suggesting that objective is the only one involved in the negotiations, because the COP-6 agenda calls for implementation of the Buenos Aires Plan of Action. That FCCC document calls for completion of a `package' of issues involving the Protocol and the Convention and all Parties, including the Clinton Administration, want to resolve the entire package, not just the Protocol issues.

As to the `interests of the United States,' they are encompassed in the two principles of S. Res. 98 and the Protocol is not `consistent' with either.

As to the issue of environmental integrity, the Protocol has none because, contrary to S. Res. 98, it is not global. The developing countries, i.e., China, have no commitments and the issue is not even on the agenda for discussion at COP-6.

This sense of Congress section of H.R. 1646 which, unlike S. Res. 98, was adopted by a bare majority of the Committee (23-20), is vague, unnecessary and inappropriate. We presume that the President will not pay attention to it and he should not. Instead, he should follow the course he started and we support him. It should not be adopted by the House. Accordingly, we intend to offer an amendment during floor consideration of this bill that will strike section 738 of title VII.

HENRY J. HYDE.

THOMAS G. TANCREDO.

DAN BURTON.

RON PAUL.

ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN.

NICK SMITH.

CASS BALLENGER.

JOSEPH R. PITTS.

DANA ROHRABACHER.

DARRELL E. ISSA.

PETER T. KING.

ERIC CANTOR.

RICHARD BURR.

JEFF FLAKE.

JOHN COOKSEY.

JO ANN DAVIS.

ADDITIONAL VIEWS IN OPPOSITION TO U.S. EFFORTS TO REJOIN UNESCO

The adoption of the Leach amendment by a vote 23 to 14 authorizing $60 million in each of the Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003 for the U.S. to rejoin the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is, in our view, unwise and unwarranted. In addition to serious funding restraints on our ability to rejoin UNESCO, several policies and priorities of this organization appear to be at variance with our foreign policy objectives.

While the Director General of UNESCO, Mr. Koichiro Matsuura, has instituted a number of policy reforms and measures leading to staff reductions and greater accountability, he has admitted that our concerns over continued bad management are legitimate. There are a number of critics who question whether the organization has yet to put in place clear objectives or priorities. David Malone, the former president of the International Peace Academy in New York and a former Canadian Foreign Ministry official in charge of his country's relations with international organizations, is skeptical about the prospects for reform by the new Director General. In his view, Mr. Matsuura faces an uphill battle in turning around an organization which is deeply scarred.

`The problem of UNESCO is that successive heads have turned it into a personal patronage machine, neglecting programs and bloating the staffing,' Mr. Malone said. `We used to all know what the UNESCO objectives were. Now nobody knows what UNESCO does beyond the World Heritage sites . . . and whoever consults UNESCO on science now?'

An article from the New York Times from March of last year reported that the new Director-General plans to use millions of dollars of his organization's funds to help restore colonial Havana. It is not at all clear why we should be rejoining an organization which is promoting tourism in Cuba and in the process helping to provide hard currency to one of the worst human rights violators in the world.

According to an independent audit by the Canadian government, UNESCO rarely evaluates the cost effectiveness of its programs or sets specific objectives. With an annual budget of close to $400 million, its new age program includes initiatives such as `Presenting and Revitalizing our Intangible Heritage' and `Planet Society, a Worldwide Exchange Network for a New Art of Living on Earth.'

One of the salient arguments from the proponents of this amendment appears to be based on the principle that the U.S. should be a member of every major organization of the United Nations. But why should this be the case? If we really had an extra $60-$65 million in additional resources to spend on international organizations, why not direct it to organizations such as the UNICEF or the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees?

Finally, the U.S. now gives $2-$3 million annually to UNESCO in voluntary contributions to cover projects we believe to be worthwhile. If we were to rejoin, we would be obliged to fund the good and the bad projects alike.

We would urge all our colleagues in the House to reconsider this decision and to ensure that our contributions to international organizations are spent in ways that clearly advance our national interests and promote our foreign policy objectives.
Henry J. Hyde.
Benjamin A. Gilman.
Christopher H. Smith.
Dan Burton.
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen.
Peter T. King.
Steve Chabot.
Thomas G. Tancredo.
Joseph R. Pitts.
Eric Cantor.
Jeff Flake.
Brian D. Kerns.
Jo Ann Davis.

ADDITIONAL VIEWS ON SECTIONS 131-133 (THE GLOBAL DEMOCRACY PROMOTION ACT OF 2001)

We commend the Chairman and my colleagues on the Committee for their work on this bill.

The Global Democracy Promotion Act of 2001 overturns the President's January Executive Memorandum reimposing the Mexico City Policy or the global gag rule. This memorandum strips foreign NGOs that implement U.S. population program overseas of their autonomy and their rights to free speech. The President's memorandum prohibits foreign NGO's from using their own non-U.S. monies to offer abortion services in countries where abortion is legal, to counsel women regarding all of their legal options and provide referrals for those services, or to advocate in their own countries for more humane abortion laws. If a similar prohibition were applied to U.S. citizens, it would be unconstitutional.

U.S. Does Not Fund Abortion

Let us be clear: U.S. tax payers' dollars do not pay for abortion. It is prohibited by law and has been since 1973. We find it disturbing that the proponents of the Mexico City Policy continue to misstate this fact: The United States does not fund abortions overseas nor does it fund abortion-related advocacy.

Family Planning Programs Overseas Deserve Our Steadfast Support.

Promoting democracy and nurturing economic growth are the fundamental building blocks of U.S. foreign policy. Key to achieving either of those is reducing poverty. And key to reducing poverty is working with women to make choices about their own physical, emotional, and economic well being, and to ensure that women have the option of taking full advantage of the political, educational, economic opportunities available to them. In short, the key is to enable women to make decisions about the course of their own lives and resources.

Few development programs have made as significant an impact on poverty reduction as family planning. Access to voluntary and quality family planning changes everything because the benefits of family planning programs reach all levels of society--the individual, the family, the community, the nation.

A mother's well being has a direct impact on her children's well being. If a mother suffers from ill health, her infant will have a difficult start. Every year millions of women and children die as a result of births that are too close together, too early, or too late in a woman's life. Access to family planning can prevent early, high risk pregnancies, avoid unintended pregnancies and unsafe pregnancies, allow women to space their children, and stop bearing children when they have reached their reproductive goals. With access to family planning women, their children, and entire families can enjoy improved health and take advantage of opportunities to improve their overall quality of life.

In addition, in many developing countries, population growth contributes to intensified environmental problems including air pollution, water quality and quantity, deforestation, the loss of wildlife habitat, and further stresses our already finite natural resources. By helping women to plan the size of their families, international family planning programs advance many vital U.S. foreign policy interests: improving the health and status of women, protecting the global environment, and promoting sustainable development which stabilizes communities in nations.

Reality In the Developing World

Reproductive health here in the U.S. is hygienic, readily available, and taken for granted. In developing countries it is more often a matter of life and death. For a woman in some developing countries, pregnancy can be a death sentence. Local clinics are often the only source of health care available and can be several hours walk away. Unfortunately, even today services and supplies are often limited at these clinics. The reality is that in the developing world, 600,000 women a year die due to maternal mortality. Sixty percent of those pregnancies are unintended. Many of these deaths are due to unsafe abortions.

Prevention Of Abortion

The memorandum was reissued with the proposed intention of prevention abortions, but Gag Rule and other similar restrictions do nothing to reduce the incidence of abortion. In fact, while the Global Gag Rule was in place in the 1980's and early 1990's there is absolutely no evidence that it ever had its intended effect of reducing abortion.

Family planning, not restrictive policies, is the most reasonable, economical, and successful means of reducing the frequency of abortion anywhere. The Global Gag rule will do nothing to make abortions more rare. In fact, it will only make abortions less safe.

When these restrictions were first imposed in the 1980's, medical personnel around the world were not informed about what services they could provide. Fears of losing desperately needed family-planning funds, or simply running awry of the U.S. government, led some providers to refuse to treat women with severe complications or infection resulting from unsafe abortions. While President Bush's statements were clear that post abortion care is still permissible, the same fears from a decade ago are reappearing. Women's health and lives will again be in jeopardy.

Democracy

The Mexico City policy imposes new restrictions on free speech. It denies the right of foreign non-governmental organizations to simply talk about abortion, whether it is to provide counseling or referral services or to lobby or advocate on behalf of abortion rights even when it is legal in that country to do so. (Interestingly, President Bush's Mexico City Policy does not contain a restriction for organizations that lobby against abortion.)

In effect, the Global Gag Rule makes democracy off limits for our foreign partners involved in the provision of family planning services by denying them vital resources for family planning. Freedom of speech is a cherished right in this country, one of the cornerstones of our democracy and is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. It is a fundamental liberty which is essential to our identity as Americans.

We would not stand for someone imposing such restrictions on speech in our own country. In fact, a similar law would be deemed unconstitutional in the United States if applied to US organizations.

We cannot talk about promotion of democracy and human rights as the core values of our nation and the cornerstone of our foreign policy on the one hand and undermine these very principles with the policies we implement.

A Violation of Medical Ethics

The Global Gag Rule also interferes in the provider/patient relationship by undermining a health care provider's ability to provide patients with the full range of reproductive health care options available to them. Under the restrictions it is only allowed in cases of threats to the life of the woman, rape, or incest. And then only if four very specific and outrageous conditions are met. This is particularly offensive in countries where abortion is permitted more broadly. The US government is ensuring that women in developing countries whose only access to health care is through USAID funded clinics will almost never be able to receive the full information entitled to them by their own country laws. This restriction further undermines trust between health care providers around the world and their clients. For these reasons, a similar policy was vigorously opposed--and ultimately defeated--by a unified medical professional community led by the American Medical Association and American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists in 1991.

HIV/AIDS and Other Infectious Diseases

Due to lack of adequate infrastructure and lack of access to health services in many developing countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, family planning clinics often double as primary health care facilities and provide multiple services including HIV/AIDS education, testing and treatment. For many women in developing countries, these clinics serve as the only point of contact with the health system. By restricting funds to these clinics, the Mexico City Policy also hinders the fight against HIV/AIDS.

Global Democracy Promotion Act

The Global Democracy Promotion Act of 2001, by contrast, reflects and promotes what we as Americans broadly support and defend here at home as well as abroad. This Act, based on H.R. 755, introduced by Representative Lowey earlier this year, is very simple. It promotes democratic values by getting out of the way of the desire and ability of foreign NGOs to use their own funds to communicate with their own governments about their own laws. It does not penalize them, as the global gag rule does, for doing so.

It also does not disqualify overseas groups from eligibility for U.S. family planning aid just because they comply with standard medical ethical practice of providing pregnant women with full and accurate information about their pregnancy options. Further, it does not disqualify them from U.S. assistance because they provide legal medical services, including abortion services, with their own funds.

We believe that this is the right approach for international family planning, not the misguided Mexico City Policy.
Tom Lantos.
Howard L. Berman.
Gary Ackerman.
Barbara Lee.
Joseph Crowley.



This Report:     Printer Friendly: HTML  |  PDF
1 of 1