[Congressional Bills 106th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] [H. Res. 224 Introduced in House (IH)] 106th CONGRESS 1st Session H. RES. 224 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on agricultural trade negotiations. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 25, 1999 Mr. Ewing (for himself and Mr. Dooley of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means _______________________________________________________________________ RESOLUTION Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on agricultural trade negotiations. Whereas the United States is the world's largest exporter of agricultural commodities and products; Whereas 96 percent of the world's consumers live outside the United States; Whereas the profitability of the United States agricultural sector is dependent on a healthy export market; and Whereas the next round of multilateral trade negotiations is scheduled to begin on November 30, 1999: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports and strongly encourages the President to adopt the following trade negotiating objectives: (1) The initiation of a comprehensive round of multilateral trade negotiations that-- (A) covers all goods and services; (B) continues to reform agricultural and food trade policy; (C) promotes global food security through open trade; and (D) increases trade liberalization in agriculture and food. (2) The simultaneous conclusion of the negotiations for all sectors. (3) The adoption of the framework established under the Uruguay Round Agreements for the agricultural negotiations conducted in 1999 to ensure that there are no product or policy exceptions. (4) The establishment of a 3-year goal for the conclusion of the negotiations by December 2002. (5) The elimination of all export subsidies and tightening of rules for circumvention of export subsidies. (6) The elimination of all nontariff barriers to trade. (7) The transition of domestic agricultural support programs to a form decoupled from agricultural production, as the United States has already done under the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.). (8) The commercially meaningful reduction or elimination of bound and applied tariffs, and the mutual elimination of restrictive tariff barriers, on an accelerated basis. (9) The improved administration of tariff rate quotas. (10)(A) The elimination of state trading enterprises; or (B) the adoption of policies that ensure operational transparency, the end of discriminatory pricing practices, and competition for state trading enterprises. (11) The maintenance of sound science and risk assessment for sanitary and phytosanitary measures. (12) The assurance of market access for biotechnology products, with the regulation of the products based solely on sound science. (13) The accelerated resolution of trade disputes and prompt enforcement of dispute panels of the World Trade Organization. (14) The provision of food security for importing nations by ensuring access to supplies through a commitment by World Trade Organization member countries not to restrict or prohibit the export of agricultural products. (15) The resolution of labor and environmental issues in a manner that facilitates, rather than restricts, agricultural trade. (16) The establishment of World Trade Organization rules that will allow developing countries to graduate, using objective economic criteria, to full participation in, and obligations under, the World Trade Organization. <all>