In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
December 4, 2014.
Resolved, That the House agree to the amendment of the Senate to the bill (H.R. 3979) entitled “An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that emergency services volunteers are not taken into account as employees under the shared responsibility requirements contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”, with the following
AMENDMENT:
(a) Short title.—This Act may be cited as the “Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015”.
(b) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) (A) Senator Carl Levin of Michigan was elected a member of the United States Senate on November 7, 1978, for a full term beginning January 3, 1979. He has served continuously in the Senate since that date, and was appointed as a member of the Committee on Armed Services in January 1979. He has served on the Committee on Armed Services since that date, a period of nearly 36 years.
(B) A graduate of Detroit Central High School, Senator Levin went on to Swarthmore College, and graduated from Harvard Law School in 1959, gaining admittance to the Michigan bar. He served his State as assistant attorney general and general counsel of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission from 1964–1967, and later served his hometown of Detroit as a member of the Detroit City Council from 1969–1973, and as the council’s president from 1974–1977.
(C) Senator Levin first served as chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the United States Senate for a period of the 107th Congress, and has remained chairman since the 110th Congress began in 2007. He has exercised extraordinary leadership as either the chairman or ranking minority member of the committee since the start of the 105th Congress in 1997.
(D) Each year, for the past 52 years, the Committee on Armed Services has reliably passed an annual defense authorization act, and this will be the 36th that Senator Levin has had a role in. In his capacity as member, ranking member, and chairman, he has been an advocate for a strong national defense, and has made lasting contributions to the security of our Nation.
(2) (A) Representative Howard P. “Buck” McKeon was elected to the House of Representatives in 1992 to represent California’s 25th Congressional District.
(B) Chairman McKeon was born in Los Angeles and grew up in Tujunga CA. He served a two and a half year mission for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and attended Brigham Young University. Prior to his election to Congress, he was a small business owner, and served both on the William S. Hart Union High School District Board of Trustees and as the first mayor of the City of Santa Clarita.
(C) In the 111th Congress, Chairman McKeon was selected by his peers as the Ranking Member of the House Armed Services Committee and has served as Chairman since in the 112th and 113th Congresses. Previously Chairman McKeon had served as the Chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
(D) Chairman McKeon is a champion of a strong national defense, the men and women of America's Armed Forces and their families, and returning fiscal discipline to the Department of Defense. His priority has been to ensure our troops deployed around the world have the equipment, resources, authorities, training and time they need to successfully complete their missions and return home.
(c) References.—Any reference in this or any other Act to the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015” shall be deemed to refer to the “Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015”.
(b) Table of contents.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
In this Act, the term “congressional defense committees” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled “Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation” for this Act, jointly submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Budget Committees, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage in the House acting first on the conference report or amendment between the Houses.
The explanatory statement regarding this Act, printed in the House section of the Congressional Record on or about December 3, 2014, by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, shall have the same effect with respect to the implementation of this Act as if it were a joint explanatory statement of a committee of conference.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101.
(a) Plan.—Not later than March 15, 2015, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a prioritized plan for modernizing the entire fleet of UH–60A aircraft of the Army National Guard.
(b) Additional elements.—The plan under subsection (a) shall set forth the following:
(1) A detailed timeline for the modernization of the entire fleet of UH–60A aircraft of the Army National Guard.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract beginning with the fiscal year 2015 program year for the procurement of one San Antonio class amphibious ship. The Secretary may employ incremental funding for such procurement.
(b) Condition on out-year contract payments.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under such contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such fiscal year.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the procurement of additional mission modules for the Littoral Combat Ship program may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Navy submits to the congressional defense committees each of the following:
Section 124(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 693) is amended by striking “this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2014” and inserting “this Act, the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, or otherwise made available for fiscal years 2014 or 2015”.
(a) In general.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the test evaluation master plan for the seaframes and mission modules for the Littoral Combat Ship program.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Navy shall ensure that the Navy retains the option of procuring more EA–18G aircraft in the event that the Secretary determines that further analysis of airborne electronic attack force structure indicates that the Navy should make such a procurement.
(b) Briefing.—Not later than March 2, 2015, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on—
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage U–2 aircraft.
(a) Prohibition on retirement.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any A–10 aircraft, except for such aircraft the Secretary of the Air Force, as of April 9, 2013, planned to retire.
(b) Limitation on manning levels.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under paragraph (2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons.
(2) EXCEPTION.—
(A) BACK UP FLYING STATUS.—The Secretary of Defense may authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to move up to 36 A–10 aircraft in the active component to backup flying status, and make conforming personnel adjustments, for the duration of fiscal year 2015 if—
(B) CERTIFICATION.—A certification described in this subparagraph is a certification that the Secretary of Defense has—
(c) Independent assessment.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall conduct an independent assessment of alternative ways to provide manpower during fiscal year 2015 to maintain the fighter fleet of the Air Force and to field F–35 aircraft. In conducting such assessment, the Director shall give consideration to the implementation approaches proposed by the Air Force and to other alternatives, including the retirement of other aircraft and the use of civilian or contractor maintainers on an interim basis for A–10 aircraft, F–35 aircraft, or other aircraft.
(d) Comptroller General study.—
(1) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an independent study of the platforms used to conduct the close air support mission in light of the recommendation of the Air Force to retire the A–10 fleet.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than March 30, 2015, the Comptroller General shall brief the congressional defense committees on the preliminary findings of the study under paragraph (1), with a report to follow as soon as practicable, that includes an assessment of—
(A) the alternatives considered by the Air Force that led to the recommendation to retire the A–10 fleet, including the relative costs, benefits, and assumptions associated with the alternatives to such retirement;
(a) Prohibition.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be used to—
(2) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition in paragraph (1)(B) if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that the program described in such subparagraph is required to operate C–130 aircraft in airspace controlled by the Federal Aviation Administration or airspace controlled by the government of a foreign country.
(b) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for operation and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary has obligated the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2015 for the avionics modernization program of record for C–130 aircraft.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any aircraft of the Air Force, except for such aircraft the Secretary of the Air Force planned to retire as of April 9, 2013, until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits the report under subsection (b)(1).
(b) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the appropriate contributions of the regular Air Force, the Air National Guard, and the Air Force Reserve to the total force structure of the Air Force.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make significant changes to manning levels with respect to any E–3 airborne warning and control systems aircraft, or to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage any such aircraft.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to transfer, divest, or prepare to divest any KC–10 aircraft until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the costs and benefits of the proposed divestment or transfer.
(b) Elements.—The assessment referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:
(2) Current and future air refueling and cargo transportation requirements, broken down by aircraft, needed to meet the global reach and global power objectives of the Department of Defense, including how such objectives relate to supporting the 2012 Defense Strategic Guidance.
(3) An operational risk assessment and mitigation strategy that evaluates the ability of the military to meet the requirements and objectives stipulated in the Guidance for Employment of the Force of the Department of Defense, the Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan, and all steady-state rotational and warfighting surge contingency operational planning documents of the commanders of the geographical combatant commands.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to transfer from one facility of the Department of Defense to another any C–130H or C–130J aircraft until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the costs and benefits of the proposed transfer.
(b) Elements.—The assessment referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:
(2) An identification of how such plan deviates from the total force structure proposal of the Secretary described in section 1059(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1939).
(4) An assessment of the national security benefits and any other expected benefits of the proposed transfers under subsection (a), including benefits for the facilities expected to receive the transferred aircraft.
(5) An assessment of the costs of the proposed transfers, including the impact of the proposed transfers on the facilities from which the aircraft will be transferred.
(c) Comptroller General report.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a sufficiency review of such report, including any findings and recommendations relating to such review.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to transfer from Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam to another facility of the Department of Defense any KC–135 aircraft until a period of 60 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the costs and benefits of the proposed transfer.
(b) Elements.—The assessment referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:
(2) An identification of how, and an explanation of why, such recommended basing alignment deviates, if in any detail, from the current basing plan.
(3) An assessment of the national security benefits and any other expected benefits of the proposed transfer under subsection (a), including benefits for the facilities expected to receive the transferred aircraft.
(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including a complete analysis and fielding plan for C–130 aircraft.
(b) Content.—The fielding plan submitted under subsection (a) shall include specific details of the plan of the Secretary to maintain intra-theater airlift capacity and capability within both the active and reserve components, including the modernization and recapitalization plan for C–130H and C–130J aircraft.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status and location, and any plans to change during the period of the future-years defense program the status or locations, of all F–16 aircraft in the inventory of the Air Force.
(a) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on options for the modernization or replacement of the T–1A aircraft capability.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The capability provided by the nuclear-capable, air-launched cruise missile is critical to maintaining a credible and effective air-delivery leg of the nuclear triad, preserving the ability to respond to geopolitical and technical surprise, and reassuring allies of the United States through credible extended deterrence.
(2) In the fiscal year 2015 budget request of the Air Force, the Secretary of the Air Force delayed development of the long-range standoff weapon, the follow-on for the air-launched cruise missile, by three years.
(3) The Secretary plans to sustain the current air-launched cruise missile, known as the AGM–86, until approximately 2030, with multiple service life-extension programs required to preserve but not enhance the existing capabilities of the air-launched cruise missile.
(b) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the current air-launched cruise missile and the development of the follow-on system, the long-range standoff weapon, in accordance with section 217 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 706).
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An assessment of the effectiveness and survivability of the air-launched cruise missile through 2030, including the impact of any degradation on the ability of the United States Strategic Command to meet deterrence requirements, including the number of targets held at risk by the air-launched cruise missile or the burdens placed on other legs of the nuclear triad.
(B) A description of age-related failure trends, an assessment of potential age-related fleet-wide reliability and supportability problems, and the estimated costs for sustaining the air-launched cruise missile.
(C) A detailed plan, including initial cost estimates, for the development and deployment of the follow-on system that will achieve initial operational capability before 2030.
(D) An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of alternative development strategies, including initial cost estimates, that would achieve full operational capability before 2030.
(E) An assessment of current testing requirements and the availability of test bodies to sustain the air-launched cruise missile over the long term.
(F) A description of the extent to which the airframe and other related components can be completed independent of the payload, as determined by the Nuclear Weapons Council established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code.
Section 144 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1325) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)—
(3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): “(c) Technology roadmap.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commander shall develop a plan consisting of a technology roadmap for undersea mobility capabilities that includes the following: “(A) A description of the current capabilities provided by covered elements as of the date of the plan. “(B) An identification and description of the requirements of the Commander for future undersea mobility platforms. “(C) An identification of resources necessary to fulfill the requirements identified in subparagraph (B). “(D) A description of the technology readiness levels of any covered element currently under development as of the date of the plan. “(2) SUBMISSION.—The Commander shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan under paragraph (1) at the same time as the Under Secretary submits the first report under subsection (a)(2) following the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.”.
(a) Plan required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the potential modernization or replacement of digital avionics equipment, including use of commercial-off-the-shelf digital avionics equipment, to meet the equipment requirements under the Next Generation Air Transportation System of the Federal Aviation Administration.
(b) Elements.—The plan required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A description of the requirements imposed on aircraft of the Department of Defense by the Federal Aviation Administration transition to the equipment requirements described in subsection (a), including—
(3) An evaluation of the ability of each option to meet future operational requirements and to meet the equipment requirements described in subsection (a).
(a) Annual report.—Not later than April 15, 2015, and each year thereafter until the F–35 aircraft acquisition program enters into full-rate production, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report reviewing such program.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as specified in the funding table in section 4201.
(a) Modification of limit on amount of awards.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 2374a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “The total amount” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: “No prize competition may result in the award of a cash prize of more than $10,000,000.”.
(b) Acceptance of funds.—Such section is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): “(e) Acceptance of funds.—In addition to such sums as may be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Secretary to award prizes under this section, the Secretary may accept funds from other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, and from State and local governments, to award prizes under this section.”.
(a) Modification of Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel reporting requirement.—Subsection (e)(5) of section 2521 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering” and inserting “one or more individuals designated by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics for purposes of this paragraph”.
Section 2364 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)—
(B) in paragraph (5), by striking “any position paper” and all that follows through the period and inserting the following: “any technological assessment made by a Defense research facility shall be provided to the Defense Technical Information Center repository to support acquisition decisions.”; and
(a) Review of proposed changes.—Subsection (c)(1)(B) of section 196 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “Base” the following: “, including with respect to the expansion, divestment, consolidation, or curtailment of activities,”.
(b) Elements of strategic plans.—Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended—
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following new subparagraph:
“(E) An assessment of plans and business case analyses supporting any significant modification of the test and evaluation facilities and resources of the Department projected, proposed, or recommended by the Secretary of a military department or the head of a Defense Agency for such period, including with respect to the expansion, divestment, consolidation, or curtailment of activities.”.
(c) Certification of budgets.—Subsection (e)(1) of such section is amended by inserting “and for the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title for that fiscal year” after “activities for a fiscal year”.
(d) Assessment of plans for facilities.—Such section is further amended—
(1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): “(f) Approval of certain modifications.— (1) The Secretary of a military department or the head of a Defense Agency with test and evaluation responsibilities may not implement a projected, proposed, or recommended significant modification of the test and evaluation facilities and resources of the Department, including with respect to the expansion, divestment, consolidation, or curtailment of activities, until—
Subparagraph (B) of section 2192a(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(B) in the case of a person not an employee of the Department of Defense, the person shall enter into a written agreement to accept and continue employment for the period of obligated service determined under paragraph (2)—
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for the armored multi-purpose vehicle program, not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b)(1).
(b) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the armored multi-purpose vehicle program.
(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An identification of the existing capability gaps of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned, as of the date of the report, to units outside of combat brigades.
(C) The estimated timeline and the rough order of magnitude of funding requirements associated with complete M–113 family of vehicles divestiture within the units outside of combat brigades and the risk associated with delaying the replacement of such vehicles.
(D) A description of the requirements for force protection, mobility, and size, weight, power, and cooling capacity for the mission roles of M–113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades.
(E) A discussion of the mission roles of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades that are comparable to the mission roles of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned to armor brigade combat teams.
(F) A discussion of whether a one-for-one replacement of the M–113 family of vehicles assigned to units outside of combat brigades is likely.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Navy, for the unmanned carrier-launched airborne surveillance and strike system may be obligated or expended to award a contract for air vehicle segment development until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report that—
(b) Additional report.—At the same time that the President submits to Congress the budget for fiscal year 2017 under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that—
(1) identifies the cost and performance trade-offs that the Navy made in arriving at the set of requirements for the air vehicle segments of the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system, including with respect to strike capability in an anti-access or area denial environment;
(2) addresses the derivation of requirements for the overall composition of the future carrier air wing, including any contribution made to the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities of carrier strike groups from non-carrier air wing forces, such as the MQ–4C Triton;
(3) specifies how the Navy derived the plan for achieving the best mix of capabilities for the carrier strike group air wing to conduct representative joint intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance strike campaigns in the 2030 timeframe, including how the unmanned carrier-launched surveillance and strike system, F–35C aircraft, EA–18G aircraft, and the aircraft that is proposed to replace the F/A–18E/F (FA-XX) would contribute to the overall capability, including in an anti-access or area denial threat environment;
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for imaging and targeting support of airborne reconnaissance systems, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the appropriate congressional committees—
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Air Force may be used to make any significant changes to manning levels with respect to any operational Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft or take any action to retire or to prepare to retire such aircraft until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees the report required by subsection (b).
(b) Report.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:
(1) An update of the results of the analysis of alternatives for recapitalizing the current Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems capability.
(2) An assessment of the cost and schedule of developing and fielding a new aircraft and radar system to replace the current Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft that would deliver two replacement aircraft to the Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft operating base by fiscal year 2019.
(a) In general.—Section 139b(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by striking “In general.—” and all that follows through “Each report” and inserting “Contents.— Each report submitted under paragraph (1) or (2)”;
(3) by inserting before paragraph (3), as so redesignated, the following new paragraphs (1) and (2):
“(1) ANNUAL REPORT BY DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TEST AND EVALUATION.—Not later than March 31 of each year, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities undertaken pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding year.
“(2) BIENNIAL REPORT BY DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.—Not later than March 31 of every other year, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities undertaken pursuant to subsection (b) during the preceding two-year period.”; and
(a) Independent assessment required.—The Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an entity that is not part of the Department of Defense to conduct an assessment of biodefense research and development activities at the National Interagency Biodefense Campus.
(b) Elements.—The assessment conducted under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) Identification and assessment of such legal, regulatory, management, and practice barriers as may reduce the effectiveness and efficiency of organizations on the Campus to perform designated missions, including such barriers as may exist with respect to the following:
(B) Sharing in efforts related to the construction, modernization, and maintenance of research facilities—
(c) Coordination.—The assessment conducted under subsection (a) shall be conducted in coordination with the following:
(d) Report.—Not later than 540 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the findings of the entity that conducted the assessment under subsection (a) with respect to such assessment.
(e) Defense Agency defined.—In this section, the term “Defense Agency” has the meaning given such term in section 101 of title 10, United States Code.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a briefing that provides—
(1) an update to the assessment, findings, and recommendations in the report submitted under section 1059 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2465); and
Section 243(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended in the matter following paragraph (2)—
(a) Pilot program authorized.—In accordance with the provisions of this section, the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency may carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of temporarily assigning covered individuals with significant technical expertise in research and development areas of critical importance to defense missions to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to lead research or development projects of the Agency.
(b) Assignment of covered individuals.—
(1) NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS ASSIGNED.—Under the pilot program, the Director may assign covered individuals to the Agency as described in subsection (a), but may not have more than five covered individuals so assigned at any given time.
(2) PERIOD OF ASSIGNMENT.—
(3) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF LAW.—
(A) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Director shall carry out the pilot program in accordance with the provisions of subchapter VI of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, except that, for purposes of the pilot program, the term “other organization”, as used in such subchapter, shall be deemed to include a covered entity.
(B) A covered individual employed by a covered entity who is assigned to the Agency under the pilot program is deemed to be an employee of the Department of Defense for purposes of the following provisions of law:
(i) Chapter 73 of title 5, United States Code.
(ii) Sections 201, 203, 205, 207, 208, 209, 603, 606, 607, 643, 654, 1905, and 1913 of title 18, United States Code.
(iv) Chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code (commonly known as the “Federal Tort Claims Act”), and any other Federal tort liability statute.
(vi) Section 1043 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(vii) Chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code.
(c) Conflicts of interest.—
(1) PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES REQUIRED.—The Director shall develop practices and procedures to manage conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts of interest that could arise through assignments under the pilot program.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The practices and procedures required by paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the requirement that each covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program shall sign an agreement that provides for the following:
(A) The nondisclosure of any trade secrets or other nonpublic or proprietary information which is of commercial value to the covered entity from which such covered individual is assigned.
(d) Prohibition on charges by covered entities.—A covered entity may not charge the Federal Government, as direct or indirect costs under a Federal contract, the costs of pay or benefits paid by the covered entity to a covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program.
(e) Annual report.—Not later than the first October 31 after the first fiscal year in which the Director carries out the pilot program and each October 31 thereafter that immediately follows a fiscal year in which the Director carries out the pilot program, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities carried out under the pilot program during the most recently completed fiscal year.
(f) Termination of authority.—The authority provided in this section shall expire on September 30, 2025, except that any covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program shall continue in such assignment until the terms of such assignment have been satisfied.
(g) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) The term “covered entity” means any non-Federal, nongovernmental entity that, as of the date on which a covered individual employed by the entity is assigned to the Agency under the pilot program, is a nontraditional defense contractor (as defined in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code).
(a) Pilot program.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of—
(b) Coordination.—In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall coordinate with the following:
(c) Activities.—Activities under the pilot program may include the following:
(1) Establishment of targeted internships and cooperative research opportunities at defense laboratories and other technical centers for covered students and teachers at covered schools.
(d) Metrics.—The Secretary shall establish outcome-based metrics and internal and external assessments to evaluate the merits and benefits of activities conducted under the pilot program with respect to the needs of the Department of Defense.
(e) Authorities.—In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make use of the authorities under chapter 111 and sections 2601, 2605, and 2374a of title 10, United States Code, section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), and such other authorities as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(f) Report.—Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on activities carried out under the pilot program.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301.
Section 2703(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Method of payments under cooperative agreements.—Subsection (b) of section 103A of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670c–1) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
(b) Availability of funds; agreement under other laws.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows:
“(c) Availability of funds; agreement under other laws.— (1) Cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered into under this section shall be subject to the availability of funds.
“(2) Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the United States Government.”.
(a) Review and report required.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the compliance of the military departments and combatant commands with Department of Defense Instruction 4715.19 and with section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2249; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) regarding the disposal of covered waste in burn pits. Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of such review. Such report shall address each of the following:
(1) The reporting of covered waste through environmental surveys and assessments, including environmental condition reports, of base camps supporting a contingency operation.
(2) How covered waste and non-covered waste is defined and identified in environmental surveys and assessments covered by paragraph (1), in policies, instructions, and guidance issued by the Department of Defense, the military departments, and the combatant commands, and in the oversight of contracts for, and the operation of, waste disposal facilities at base camps supporting contingency operations.
(3) Whether the two categories of waste are appropriately and clearly distinguished in such surveys and assessments.
(4) The current decision authority responsible for determinations regarding whether a base camp supporting a contingency operation is in compliance with the Department of Defense Instruction and section 317 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2249; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) and the chain of command by which such determinations are made and reported.
(5) The process through which a waiver of the prohibition on disposal of covered waste in a burn pit is requested and approved, and the process by which Congress is notified of such waiver, pursuant to the applicable provision of law, and how such processes could be improved.
(b) Comptroller General review.—Not later than 120 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the assessment of the Comptroller General of the methodology used by the Secretary of Defense in conducting the review under subsection (a), the adequacy of the report, compliance with Department of Defense Instruction and applicable law regarding the disposal of covered waste in burn pits by the military departments and combatant commands, and any additional findings or recommendations the Comptroller General determines are appropriate.
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “covered waste” has the meaning given that term in section 317(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2249; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note).
(2) The term “base camp supporting a contingency operation” means any base, location, site, cooperative security location, forward operating base, forward operating site, main operating base, patrol base, or other location as determined by the Secretary from which support is provided to a contingency operation that—
(3) The term “burn pit” means an area that—
(4) The term “contingency operation” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.
Not later than 30 days before entering into a contract for the planning, design, refurbishing, or construction of a biofuel refinery, or of any other facility or infrastructure used to refine biofuels, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned shall submit to the congressional defense committees a business case analysis for such planning, design, refurbishing, or construction.
(a) Environmental restoration project.—Notwithstanding the administrative jurisdiction of the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration over the Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia, the Secretary of Defense may undertake an environmental restoration project in a manner consistent with chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code, at the property constituting that facility in order to provide necessary response actions for contamination from a release of a hazardous substance or a pollutant or contaminant that is attributable to the activities of the Department of Defense at the time the property was under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy or used by the Navy pursuant to a permit or license issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the area formerly known as the Naval Air Station, Chincoteague, Virginia. Any such project may be undertaken jointly or in conjunction with an environmental restoration project of the Administrator.
(b) Interagency agreement.—The Secretary and the Administrator may enter into an agreement or agreements to provide for the effective and efficient performance of environmental restoration projects for purposes of subsection (a). Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10, United States Code, any such agreement may provide for environmental restoration projects conducted jointly or by one agency on behalf of the other or both agencies and for reimbursement of the agency conducting the project by the other agency for that portion of the project for which the reimbursing agency has authority to respond.
(c) Source of Department of Defense funds.—Pursuant to section 2703(c) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary may use funds available in the Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites, account of the Department of Defense for environmental restoration projects conducted for or by the Secretary under subsection (a) and for reimbursable agreements entered into under subsection (b).
(d) No effect on compliance with environmental laws.—Nothing in this section affects or limits the application of or obligation to comply with any environmental law, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et. seq) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.).
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to make a bulk purchase of a drop-in fuel for operational purposes unless the fully burdened cost of that drop-in fuel is cost-competitive with the fully burdened cost of a traditional fuel available for the same purpose.
(b) Waiver.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the requirements of paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation under subsection (a) with respect to a purchase.
(c) Notice of purchase required.—If the Secretary of Defense intends to purchase a drop-in fuel intended for operational use with a fully burdened cost in excess of 10 percent more than the fully burdened cost of a traditional fuel available for the same purpose, the Secretary shall provide notice of such intended purchase to the congressional defense committees by not later than 30 days before the date on which such purchase is intended to be made.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “drop-in fuel” means a neat or blended liquid hydrocarbon fuel designed as a direct replacement for a traditional fuel with comparable performance characteristics and compatible with existing infrastructure and equipment.
(3) The term “operational purposes” means for the purposes of conducting military operations, including training, exercises, large scale demonstrations, and moving and sustaining military forces and military platforms. The term does not include research, development, testing, evaluation, fuel certification, or other demonstrations.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that certain limited portions of the former bombardment area on the Island of Culebra should be available for safe public recreational use while the remainder of the area is most advantageously reserved as habitat for endangered and threatened species.
(b) Modification of restriction on decontamination limitation.—The first sentence of section 204(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 (Public Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668) shall not apply to the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos Rosario Trail.
(c) Modification of deed restrictions.—Notwithstanding paragraph 9 of the quitclaim deed, the Secretary of the Army may expend funds available in the Environmental Restoration Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, established pursuant to section 2703(a)(5) of title 10, United States Code, to decontaminate the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos Rosario Trail of unexploded ordnance.
(d) Precise boundaries.—The Secretary of the Army shall determine the exact boundaries of the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos Rosario Trail for purposes of this section.
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “beaches” means the portions of Carlos Rosario Beach, Flamenco Beach, and Tamarindo Beach identified in green in Figure 4 as Beach and located inside of the former bombardment area.
(2) The term “campgrounds” means the areas identified in blue in Figure 4 as Campgrounds in the former bombardment area.
(3) The term “Carlos Rosario Trail” means the trail identified in yellow in Figure 4 as the Carlos Rosario Trail and traversing the southern portion of the former bombardment area from the campground to the Carlos Rosario Beach.
(5) The term “former bombardment area” means that area on the Island of Culebra, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, consisting of approximately 408 acres, conveyed to the Commonwealth by the quitclaim deed, and subject to the first sentence of section 204(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 (Public Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668).
(6) The term “quitclaim deed” means the quitclaim deed from the United States of America to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico conveying the former bombardment area, signed by the Governor of Puerto Rico on December 20, 1982.
(7) The term “study” means the “Study Relating to the Presence of Unexploded Ordnance in a Portion of the Former Naval Bombardment Area of Culebra Island, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico”, dated April 20, 2012, prepared by the United States Army for the Department of Defense pursuant to section 2815 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4464).
(8) The term “unexploded ordnance” has the meaning given the term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Maximum fuel economy increase for alternative fuel automobiles.—Section 32906(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “(except an electric automobile)” and inserting “(except an electric automobile or, beginning with model year 2016, an alternative fueled automobile that uses a fuel described in subparagraph (E) of section 32901(a)(1))”.
(b) Minimum driving ranges for dual fueled passenger automobiles.—Section 32901(c)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting “, except that beginning with model year 2016, alternative fueled automobiles that use a fuel described in subparagraph (E) of subsection (a)(1) shall have a minimum driving range of 150 miles” after “at least 200 miles”; and
(2) in subparagraph (C), by adding at the end the following: “Beginning with model year 2016, if the Secretary prescribes a minimum driving range of 150 miles for alternative fueled automobiles that use a fuel described in subparagraph (E) of subsection (a)(1), subparagraph (A) shall not apply to dual fueled automobiles (except electric automobiles).”.
(c) Electric dual fueled automobiles.—Section 32905 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following: “(e) Electric dual fueled automobiles.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—At the request of the manufacturer, the Administrator may measure the fuel economy for any model of dual fueled automobile manufactured after model year 2015 that is capable of operating on electricity in addition to gasoline or diesel fuel, obtains its electricity from a source external to the vehicle, and meets the minimum driving range requirements established by the Secretary for dual fueled electric automobiles, by dividing 1.0 by the sum of— “(2) ALTERNATIVE CALCULATION.—If the manufacturer does not request that the Administrator calculate the manufacturing incentive for its electric dual fueled automobiles in accordance with paragraph (1), the Administrator shall calculate such incentive for such automobiles manufactured by such manufacturer after model year 2015 in accordance with subsection (b).”.
(d) Conforming amendment.—Section 32906(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 32905(e)” and inserting “section 32905(f)”.
Section 482 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): “(d) Prepositioned stocks.—Each report shall also include a military department-level or agency-level assessment of the readiness of prepositioned stocks, including—
(4) by redesignating subsections (g), (h), (i), (j), and (l) as subsections (e), (f), (g), (h), and (j) respectively;
(5) in subsection (e)(1), as redesignated by paragraph (4), by striking “National Response Plan” and inserting “National Response Framework”;
(6) in subsection (f), as so redesignated, by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) The assessment included in the report under paragraph (1) by the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall include a separate assessment prepared by the Commander of United States Cyber Command relating to the readiness of United States Cyber Command and the readiness of the cyber force of each of the military departments.”;
(7) in subsection (h), as so redesignated—
Section 2229(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “support for crisis response elements,” after “service requirements,”.
(a) In general.—Section 4532 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 321(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 732; 10 U.S.C. 2229 note) is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) PROGRESS REPORTS.—Not later than one year after submitting the report required under paragraph (1), and annually thereafter for two years, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the progress of the Department of Defense in implementing its strategic policy and plan for its prepositioned stocks and including any additional information related to the Department's management of its prepositioned stocks that the Comptroller General determines appropriate.”.
(a) In general.—Section 489 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
At the same time as the President transmits to Congress the budget for fiscal year 2016 under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of how the Army has—
(1) captured and incorporated lessons learned through the initial employment of the regionally aligned forces;
(2) identified, where appropriate, institutionalized and improved region-specific initial, sustaining, and predeployment training;
(3) improved the coordination of activities among special operations forces, Army regionally aligned forces, Department of State country teams, contractors of the Department of State and the Department of Defense, the geographic combatant commands, the Joint Staff, and international partners;
(4) identified and evaluated the various Department of Defense appropriations accounts at the subactivity group, project, program, and activity level and other sources of Federal resources used to fund activities of regionally aligned forces, including the amount of funds obligated or expended from each such account;
(5) identified and assessed the effects associated with activities of regionally aligned forces conducted to meet Department of Defense and geographic combatant command security cooperation requirements;
(6) identified and assessed the effect on the core mission readiness of regionally aligned forces while supporting geographic combatant commander requirements through regionally aligned force activities, and, in the case of any such effect that is assessed as degrading the core mission readiness of such forces, identified plans to mitigate such degradation;
The Secretary of the Air Force may not enter into a contract for the sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul of the F117 engine until the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary of the Air Force has obtained sufficient data to determine that the Secretary of the Air Force is paying a fair and reasonable price for F117 sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul as compared to the PW2000 commercial-derivative engine sustainment price for sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul in the private sector. The Secretary may waive the limitation in the preceding sentence to enter into a contract if the Secretary determines that such a waiver is in the interest of national security.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to establish Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers.
(a) Limitation.—Except as provided under subsection (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, may be obligated or expended for the transfer of MC–12 aircraft from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations Command before the date that is 60 days after the date of the delivery of the report required under subsection (b).
(b) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2015, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an analysis and justification for the transfer of MC–12 aircraft from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations Command.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) a description of the current platform requirements for manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft to support United States Special Operations Forces;
(B) an analysis of alternatives comparing various manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft, including U–28 aircraft, in meeting the platform requirements for manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft to support United States Special Operations Forces;
(C) an analysis of the remaining service life of the U–28 aircraft to be divested by the United States Special Operations Command and the MC–12 aircraft to be transferred from the Air Force;
(D) a description of the future manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platform requirements of the United States Special Operations Command for areas outside of Afghanistan, including range, payload, endurance, and other requirements, as defined by the Command's “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Road Map”;
(E) an analysis of the cost to convert MC–12 aircraft to provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities equal to or better than those provided by the U–28 aircraft;
(c) Exception.—Subsection (a) does not apply to up to 13 aircraft designated by the Secretary of the Air Force to be transferred from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations Command and flown by the Air National Guard in support of special operations aviation foreign internal defense and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements.
(a) Transfer of section 2336 to chapter 159.—
(1) TRANSFER AND REDESIGNATION.—Section 2336 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 159 of such title, inserted after section 2678, and redesignated as section 2679.
(b) Clarifying amendments.—Such section, as so transferred and redesignated, is further amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) in paragraph (1)—
(2) by adding at the end of subsection (e) the following new paragraph:
“(4) The term ‘intergovernmental support agreement’ means a legal instrument reflecting a relationship between the Secretary concerned and a State or local government that contains such terms and conditions as the Secretary concerned considers appropriate for the purposes of this section and necessary to protect the interests of the United States.”.
(a) Consolidation of data.—Not later than 240 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall issue Department-wide guidance designating an authoritative source of data for conventional ammunition. Not later than 10 days after issuing the guidance required by this subsection, the Under Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees on what source of data has been designated under this subsection.
(b) Annual report.—The Secretary of the Army shall include in the appropriate annual ammunition inventory reports, as determined by the Secretary, information on all available ammunition for use during the redistribution process, including any ammunition that was unclaimed and categorized for disposal by another military service during a year before the year during which the report is submitted.
(c) Briefing and report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing and a report on the management of the conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile of the Department of Defense.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The briefing and report required by paragraph (1) shall include each of the following:
(A) An assessment of the adequacy of Department of Defense policies and procedures governing the demilitarization of excess, obsolete, and unserviceable conventional ammunition.
(B) An assessment of the adequacy of the maintenance by the Department of information on the quantity, value, condition, and location of excess, obsolete, and unserviceable conventional ammunition for each of the Armed Forces.
(C) An assessment of whether the Department has conducted an analysis comparing the costs of storing and maintaining items in the conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile with the costs of the disposal of items in the stockpile.
The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2015, as follows:
Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs:
(a) In general.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2015, as follows:
(b) End strength reductions.—The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—
(c) End strength increases.—Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.
Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2015, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components:
The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2015 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following:
(a) Limitations.—
(1) NATIONAL GUARD.—Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed the following:
(b) Non-Dual status technicians defined.—In this section, the term “non-dual status technician” has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code.
During fiscal year 2015, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following:
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.
Section 581(d) of title 10, United State Code, is amended—
(3) in paragraph (2), as so designated—
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(B) with respect to a group of warrant officers designated under subparagraph (A) who are in a particular grade and competitive category, only those warrant officers in that grade and competitive category who are also in a particular year group or specialty, or any combination thereof determined by the Secretary concerned.”.
(a) Warrant officers.—Section 581(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) An officer recommended for early retirement under this section, if approved for deferral under paragraph (1), shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.”.
(b) Officers on the active-duty list.—Section 638(b) of such title is amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph:
“(1) (A) An officer in a grade below brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half) who is recommended for early retirement under this section or section 638a of this title and whose early retirement is approved by the Secretary concerned shall be retired, under any provision of law under which he is eligible to retire, on the date requested by him and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the seventh calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.
“(B) If an officer described in subparagraph (A) is not eligible for retirement under any provision of law, the officer shall be retained on active duty until the officer is qualified for retirement under section 3911, 6323, or 8911 of this title, and then be retired under that section, unless the officer is sooner retired or discharged under some other provision of law, with such retirement under that section occurring not later than the later of the following:
(2) in paragraph (3)—
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
“(B) An officer recommended for early retirement under paragraph (1)(A) or section 638a of this title, if approved for deferral under subparagraph (A), shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.
“(C) The Secretary concerned may defer the retirement of an officer otherwise approved for early retirement under paragraph (1)(B), but in no case later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.
“(D) An officer recommended for early retirement under paragraph (2), if approved for deferral under subparagraph (A), shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the thirteenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.”.
Section 638a(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Annual report on number of enlisted aides.—Section 981 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Not later than March 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report—
(b) Report on reduction in number of enlisted aides and authorization and assignment procedures and duties.—Not later than June 30, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the following:
(1) A list of the official military and official representational duties that each Secretary of a military department—
(2) Subject to the limitations in section 981 of title 10, United States Code, the procedures used for allocating authorized enlisted aides—
(c) Report objective.—In developing the report required by subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall have the objective of reducing the maximum number of enlisted aides authorized and allocated for general officers and flag offers by 40, subject to the validation of duties under subsection (b)(1) and the billet-by-billet justification of positions under subsection (b)(3).
(d) Comptroller General Review.—
(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the report submitted by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (b).
(2) ELEMENTS OF REVIEW.—The review under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(3) REPORT ON RESULTS OF REVIEW.—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report under subsection (b), the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the review conducted under paragraph (1).
(a) Repeal of annual reports.—
(1) JOINT OFFICER MANAGEMENT.—Section 667 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
Section 2154(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “consisting of a joint professional military education curriculum” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following:
““consisting of—Section 5942(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
The Secretary of a military department shall ensure that the performance appraisal of a commanding officer in an Armed Force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary indicates the extent to which the commanding officer has or has not established a command climate in which—
(a) Retention of certain first lieutenants and lieutenants (Junior grade) following nonselection for promotion.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 14701 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by striking “A reserve officer of” and inserting “(A) A reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps described in subparagraph (B) who is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list under section 14504 of this title, or a reserve officer of”;
(2) by striking “of this title may, subject to the needs of the service and to section 14509 of this title,” and inserting “of this title, may”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
(b) Retention of health professions officers.—Such section is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): “(b) Continuation of health professions officers.— (1) Notwithstanding subsection (a)(6), a health professions officer obligated to a period of service incurred under section 16201 of this title who is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list under section 14504, 14505, 14506, or 14507 of this title and who has not completed a service obligation incurred under section 16201 of this title shall be retained on the reserve active-status list until the completion of such service obligation and then discharged, unless sooner retired or discharged under another provision of law. “(2) The Secretary concerned may waive the applicability of paragraph (1) to any officer if the Secretary determines that completion of the service obligation of that officer is not in the best interest of the service. “(3) A health professions officer who is continued on the reserve active-status list under this subsection who is subsequently promoted or whose name is on a list of officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade is not required to be discharged or retired upon completion of the officer’s service obligation. Such officer may continue on the reserve active-status list as other officers of the same grade unless separated under another provision of law.”.
(a) Role of Chief of the National Guard Bureau.—Paragraph (1) of section 10506(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Clarifying amendment.—Paragraph (2) of such section is amended by striking “The officers so selected” and inserting “The Director and Deputy Director, Army National Guard, and the Director and Deputy Director, Air National Guard,”.
(d) Application of amendments.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to assignments to the National Guard Bureau under section 10506 of title 10, United States Code, that occur after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Centralized database required.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a centralized database of information on military technician positions that will contain and set forth current information on all military technician positions of the Armed Forces.
(b) Elements.—
(1) IDENTIFICATION OF POSITIONS.—The database required by subsection (a) shall identify each military technician position, whether dual-status or non-dual status.
(a) Report required.—Not later than December 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report regarding the management of personnel records of members of the Army National Guard of the United States and the Air Guard of the United States.
(b) Elements of report.—In preparing the report under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall assess the following:
(1) The roles and responsibilities of States and Federal agencies in the management of the records of members of the Army National Guard of the United States and the Air Guard of the United States.
(3) The extent to which States and Federal agencies have the capability to share digitized records of National Guard members.
(4) The measures required to correct deficiencies, if any, noted by the Secretary of Defense in the capability of Federal agencies to effectively manage the records of National Guard members.
(a) Boards for correction of military records.—Section 1552 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection (g): “(g) Any medical advisory opinion issued to a board established under subsection (a)(1) with respect to a member or former member of the armed forces who was diagnosed while serving in the armed forces as experiencing a mental health disorder shall include the opinion of a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist if the request for correction of records concerned relates to a mental health disorder.”.
(b) Boards for review of discharge or dismissal.—
(1) REVIEW FOR CERTAIN FORMER MEMBERS WITH PTSD OR TBI.—Subsection (d)(1) of section 1553 of such title is amended by striking “physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist” the second place it appears and inserting “clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with training on mental health issues connected with post traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury (as applicable)”.
(2) REVIEW FOR CERTAIN FORMER MEMBERS WITH MENTAL HEALTH DIAGNOSES.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(e) In the case of a former member of the armed forces (other than a former member covered by subsection (d)) who was diagnosed while serving in the armed forces as experiencing a mental health disorder, a board established under this section to review the former member's discharge or dismissal shall include a member who is a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with special training on mental health disorders.”.
(a) Extension of program authority.—Subsection (m) of section 533 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. prec. 701 note) is amended—
(b) Reporting requirements.—Subsection (k) of such section is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(4) ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS FOR FINAL REPORT.—In addition to the elements required by paragraph (3), the final report under this subsection shall include the following:
“(A) A description of the costs to each military department of each pilot program conducted under this section.
“(C) A description of the members who did not return to active duty at the conclusion of their inactivation from active duty under the pilot programs, and a statement of the reasons why the members did not return to active duty.
“(D) A statement whether members were required to perform inactive duty training as part of their participation in the pilot programs, and if so, a description of the members who were required to perform such inactive duty training, a statement of the reasons why the members were required to perform such inactive duty training, and a description of how often the members were required to perform such inactive duty training.”.
(a) Provision of information required.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall ensure that the information described in subsection (b) is provided—
(b) Required information.—The information required to be provided under subsection (a) shall include information on the applicability of the Department of Defense Instruction on Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information in DoD Health Care Programs and other regulations regarding privacy prescribed pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–191) to records regarding a member of the Armed Forces seeking and receiving mental health services.
(a) Role of Secretary of defense in development of gender-neutral occupational standards.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the gender-neutral occupational standards being developed by the Secretaries of the military departments pursuant to section 543 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), as amended by section 523 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 756)—
(b) Female personal protection gear.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct each Secretary of a military department to take immediate steps to ensure that combat equipment distributed to female members of the Armed Forces—
(c) Review of outreach and recruitment efforts focused on officers.—
(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Comptroller General of United States shall conduct a review of Services’ Outreach and Recruitment Efforts gauged toward women representation in the officer corps.
(2) ELEMENTS OF REVIEW.—In conducting the review under this subsection, the Comptroller General shall—
(A) identify and evaluate current initiatives the Armed Forces are using to increase accession of women into the officer corps;
(a) Revisions of article 32 and article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice.—
(1) EXPLICIT AUTHORITY FOR CONVENING AUTHORITY TO TAKE ACTION ON FINDINGS OF A COURT-MARTIAL WITH RESPECT TO A QUALIFYING OFFENSE.—Paragraph (3) of subsection (c) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 955), is amended—
(A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting “and may be taken only with respect to a qualifying offense” after “is not required”;
(2) CLARIFICATION OF APPLICABILITY OF REQUIREMENT FOR EXPLANATION IN WRITING FOR MODIFICATION TO FINDINGS OF A COURT-MARTIAL.—Paragraph (3)(C) of subsection (c) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 955), is amended by striking “(other than a qualifying offense)”.
(3) VICTIM SUBMISSION OF MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION BY CONVENING AUTHORITY DURING CLEMENCY PHASE OF COURTS-MARTIAL PROCESS.—Subsection (d) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 1706(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 960), is amended—
(4) RESTORATION OF WAIVER OF ARTICLE 32 HEARINGS BY THE ACCUSED.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 832(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code (article 32(a)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 954), is amended by inserting “, unless such hearing is waived by the accused” after “preliminary hearing”.
(B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 834(a)(2) of such title (article 34(a)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(c)(3)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 957), is amended by inserting “(if there is such a report)” after “a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32)”.
(5) NON-APPLICABILITY OF PROHIBITION ON PRE-TRIAL AGREEMENTS FOR CERTAIN OFFENSES WITH MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCES.—Section 860(c)(4)(C)(ii) of title 10, United States Code (article 60(c)(4)(C)(ii) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 955), is amended by inserting “pursuant to section 856(b) of this title (article 56(b))” after “applies”.
(b) Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related offense.—
(1) REQUESTS TO INTERVIEW VICTIM THROUGH COUNSEL.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 846 of title 10, United States Code (article 46(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 958), is amended by striking “through trial counsel” and inserting “through the Special Victims’ Counsel or other counsel for the victim, if applicable”.
(c) Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses.—Section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1716(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 966), is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(4), by striking “the Department of Defense” and inserting “the United States”;
(d) Repeal of offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.—
(1) CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF FORCIBLE SODOMY.—Section 925(a) of title 10, United States Code (article 125(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1707 of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 961), is amended by striking “force” and inserting “unlawful force”.
(e) Clarification of scope of prospective members of the Armed Forces for purposes of inappropriate and prohibited relationships.—Section 1741(e)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 977; 10 U.S.C. prec. 501 note) is amended by inserting “who is pursuing or has recently pursued becoming a member of the Armed Forces and” after “a person”.
(f) Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.—
(1) CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON DEFINITION OF VICTIM TO NATURAL PERSONS.—Subsection (b) of section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 1701 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 952), is amended by striking “a person” and inserting “an individual”.
(2) CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO APPOINT INDIVIDUALS TO ASSUME RIGHTS OF CERTAIN VICTIMS.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(A) in the heading, by striking “legal guardian” and inserting “appointment of individuals to assume rights”;
(g) Revision to effective dates to facilitate transition to revised rules for preliminary hearing requirements and convening authority action post-conviction.—
(1) EFFECTIVE DATE FOR AMENDMENTS RELATED TO ARTICLE 32.—Effective as of December 26, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, section 1702(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 958; 10 U.S.C. 802 note, 832 note) is amended by striking “one year after” and all that follows through the end of the sentence and inserting “on the later of December 26, 2014, or the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 and shall apply with respect to preliminary hearings conducted on or after that effective date.”.
(2) TRANSITION RULE FOR AMENDMENTS RELATED TO ARTICLE 60.—
(A) TRANSITION RULE.—Section 1702(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 958; 10 U.S.C. 860 note) is amended—
(i) by striking “The amendments” and inserting “(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amendments”; and
(ii) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(B) With respect to the findings and sentence of a court-martial that includes both a conviction for an offense committed before the effective date specified in subparagraph (A) and a conviction for an offense committed on or after that effective date, the convening authority shall have the same authority to take action on such findings and sentence as was in effect on the day before such effective date, except with respect to a mandatory minimum sentence under section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).”.
Subsection (a) of section 849 of title 10, United States Code (article 49 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“(a) (1) At any time after charges have been signed as provided in section 830 of this title (article 30), oral or written depositions may be ordered as follows:
“(2) An authority authorized to order a deposition under paragraph (1) may order the deposition at the request of any party, but only if the party demonstrates that, due to exceptional circumstances, it is in the interest of justice that the testimony of the prospective witness be taken and preserved for use at a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32) or a court-martial.
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Designation; purposes.— (1) The Secretary concerned shall designate legal counsel (to be known as ‘Special Victims’ Counsel’) for the purpose of providing legal assistance to an individual described in paragraph (2) who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, regardless of whether the report of that offense is restricted or unrestricted.
“(2) An individual described in this paragraph is any of the following:
“(A) An individual eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of this title.
(a) Representation by Special Victims' Counsel.—Section 1044e(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Accompanying the victim” and inserting “Representing the victim”.
(b) Consultation regarding victim’s preference in prosecution venue.—
(1) CONSULTATION PROCESS REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a process to ensure consultation with the victim of an alleged sex-related offense that occurs in the United States to solicit the victim's preference regarding whether the offense should be prosecuted by court-martial or in a civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense.
(2) CONVENING AUTHORITY CONSIDERATION OF PREFERENCE.—The preference expressed by the victim of an alleged sex-related offense under paragraph (1) regarding the prosecution of the offense, while not binding, should be considered by the convening authority in making the determination regarding whether to refer the charge or specification for the offense to a court-martial for trial.
(3) NOTICE TO APPROPRIATE JURISDICTION OF VICTIM’S PREFERENCE FOR CIVILIAN PROSECUTION.—If the victim of an alleged sex-related offense expresses a preference under paragraph (1) for prosecution of the offense in a civilian court, the convening authority described in paragraph (2) shall ensure that the civilian authority with jurisdiction over the offense is notified of the victim’s preference for civilian prosecution.
(4) NOTICE TO VICTIM OF STATUS OF CIVILIAN PROSECUTION WHEN VICTIM EXPRESSES PREFERENCE FOR CIVILIAN PROSECUTION.—Following notification of the civilian authority with jurisdiction over an alleged sex-related offense of the preference of the victim of the offense for prosecution of the offense in a civilian court, the convening authority shall be responsible for notifying the victim if the convening authority learns of any decision by the civilian authority to prosecute or not prosecute the offence in a civilian court.
(c) Modification of Manual for Courts-Martial.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Part III of the Manual for Courts-Martial shall be modified to provide that when a victim of an alleged sex-related offense has a right to be heard in connection with the prosecution of the alleged sex-related such offense, the victim may exercise that right through counsel, including through a Special Victims' Counsel under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (a)).
(d) Notice to counsel on scheduling of proceedings.—The Secretary concerned shall establish policies and procedures designed to ensure that any counsel of the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, including a Special Victims' Counsel under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (a)), is provided prompt and adequate notice of the scheduling of any hearing, trial, or other proceeding in connection with the prosecution of such offense in order to permit such counsel the opportunity to prepare for such proceeding.
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “alleged sex-related offense” has the meaning given that term in section 1044e(g) of title 10, United States Code.
Section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Enforcement by Court of Criminal Appeals.— (1) If the victim of an offense under this chapter believes that a court-martial ruling violates the victim’s rights afforded by a Military Rule of Evidence specified in paragraph (2), the victim may petition the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of mandamus to require the court-martial to comply with the Military Rule of Evidence.
(a) Modification required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 404(a) of the Military Rules of Evidence shall be amended to provide that the general military character of an accused is not admissible for the purpose of showing the probability of innocence of the accused for an offense specified in subsection (b).
(b) Covered Offenses.—Subsection (a) applies to the following offenses under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice):
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 513 of the Military Rules of Evidence shall be modified as follows:
(1) To include communications with other licensed mental health professionals within the communications covered by the privilege.
(3) To require a party seeking production or admission of records or communications protected by the privilege—
(A) to show a specific factual basis demonstrating a reasonable likelihood that the records or communications would yield evidence admissible under an exception to the privilege;
(B) to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the requested information meets one of the enumerated exceptions to the privilege;
(4) To authorize the military judge to conduct a review in camera of records or communications only when—
(5) To require that any production or disclosure permitted by the military judge be narrowly tailored to only the specific records or communications, or portions of such records or communications, that meet the requirements for one of the enumerated exceptions to the privilege and are included in the stated purpose for which the such records or communications are sought.
Section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1434; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(f) Return of personal property upon completion of related proceedings.—Notwithstanding subsection (c)(4)(A), personal property retained as evidence in connection with an incident of sexual assault involving a member of the Armed Forces may be returned to the rightful owner of such property after the conclusion of all legal, adverse action, and administrative proceedings related to such incident.”.
(a) Personnel eligible for assignment.—
(b) Training and certification.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain, and update when appropriate, a training and certification program for Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners. The training and certification programs shall apply uniformly to all Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners under the jurisdiction of the Secretaries of the military departments.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each training and certification program under this subsection shall include training in sexual assault forensic examinations by qualified personnel who possess—
(3) NATURE OF TRAINING.—The training provided under each training and certification program under this subsection shall incorporate and reflect current best practices and standards on sexual assault forensic examinations.
(4) APPLICABILITY OF TRAINING REQUIREMENTS.—Effective beginning one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, an individual may not be assigned to duty as a Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner for the Armed Forces unless the individual has completed, by the date of such assignment, all training required under the training and certification program under this subsection.
(c) Report on Training and Qualifications of Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall prepare a report on the adequacy of the training and qualifications of each member of the Armed Forces and civilian employee of the Department of Defense who is assigned responsibilities of a Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner.
(2) REPORT ELEMENTS.—The report shall include the following:
(A) An assessment of the adequacy of the training and certifications required for the members and employees described in paragraph (1).
(d) Conforming and Clerical amendments.—
(1) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Subsection (b) of section 1725 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 971) is amended—
(B) in paragraphs (1) and (2), by striking “sexual assault nurse examiner” each place it appears and inserting “Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner”;
(a) Modification of terms.—Section 942(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code (article 142(b)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended–
(b) Saving provision.—No person who is serving as a judge of the court on the date of the enactment of this Act, and no survivor of any such person, shall be deprived of any annuity provided by section 945 of title 10, United States Code, by the operation of the amendments made by subsection (a).
Section 1744(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 981; 10 U.S.C. 834 note) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) CASES NOT REFERRED BY CONVENING AUTHORITY UPON REQUEST FOR REVIEW BY CHIEF PROSECUTOR.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—In any case where a convening authority decides not to refer a charge of a sex-related offense to trial by court-martial, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall review the decision as a superior authority authorized to exercise general court-martial convening authority if the chief prosecutor of the Armed Force concerned, in response to a request by the detailed counsel for the Government, requests review of the decision by the Secretary.
“(B) CHIEF PROSECUTOR DEFINED.—In this paragraph, the term ‘chief prosecutor’ means the chief prosecutor or equivalent position of an Armed Force, or, if an Armed Force does not have a chief prosecutor or equivalent position, such other trial counsel as shall be designated by the Judge Advocate General of that Armed Force, or in the case of the Marine Corps, the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps.”.
(a) Submittal to Secretary of Defense of information on each Armed Force.—Subsection (b) of section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(11) An analysis of the disposition of the most serious offenses occurring during sexual assaults committed by members of the Armed Force during the year covered by the report, as identified in unrestricted reports of sexual assault by any members of the Armed Forces, including the numbers of reports identifying offenses that were disposed of by each of the following:
“(A) Conviction by court-martial, including a separate statement of the most serious charge preferred and the most serious charge for which convicted.
“(C) Non-judicial punishment under section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(b) Secretary of Defense assessment of information in reports to Congress.—Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
(c) Application of amendments.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply beginning with the report regarding sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces required to be submitted by March 1, 2015, under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.
(a) Plan required.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a plan that will allow an individual who files a restricted report on an incident of sexual assault to elect to permit a military criminal investigative organization, on a confidential basis and without affecting the restricted nature of the report, to access certain information in the report, including identifying information of the alleged perpetrator if available, for the purpose of identifying individuals who are suspected of perpetrating multiple sexual assaults.
(b) Plan elements.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An explanation of how the military criminal investigative organization would use, maintain, and protect information in the restricted report.
(a) Data reporting and collection improvements.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive management plan to address deficiencies in the reporting of information on incidents of domestic violence involving members of the Armed Forces for inclusion in the Department of Defense database on domestic violence incidents required by section 1562 of title 10, United States Code, to ensure that the database provides an accurate count of domestic violence incidents and any consequent disciplinary action.
(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 543(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1562 note) is amended—
(a) Additional duties imposed.—The independent panel established by the Secretary of Defense under section 576(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758), known as the “judicial proceedings panel”, shall perform the following additional duties:
(1) Conduct a review and assessment regarding the impact of the use of any mental health records of the victim of an offense under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), by the accused during the preliminary hearing conducted under section 832 of such title (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and during court-martial proceedings, as compared to the use of similar records in civilian criminal legal proceedings.
(b) Submission of results.—The judicial proceedings panel shall include the results of the reviews and assessments conducted under subsection (a) in one of the reports required by section 576(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1760).
(a) Establishment required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain within the Department of Defense an advisory committee to be known as the “Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces” (in this section referred to as the “Advisory Committee”).
(2) DEADLINE FOR ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall establish the Advisory Committee not later than 30 days before the termination date of the independent panel established by the Secretary under section 576(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1758), known as the “judicial proceedings panel”.
(b) Membership.—The Advisory Committee shall consist of not more than 20 members, to be appointed by the Secretary of Defense, who have experience with the investigation, prosecution, and defense of allegations of sexual assault offenses. Members of the Advisory Committee may include Federal and State prosecutors, judges, law professors, and private attorneys. Members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty may not serve as a member of the Advisory Committee.
(c) Duties.—
(d) Annual reports.—Not later than March 30 each year, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the Secretary of Defense and the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing the results of the activities of the Advisory Committee pursuant to this section during the preceding year.
(e) Termination.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Advisory Committee shall terminate on the date that is five years after the date of the establishment of the Advisory Committee pursuant to subsection (a).
(2) CONTINUATION.—The Secretary of Defense may continue the Advisory Committee after the termination date applicable under paragraph (1) if the Secretary determines that continuation of the Advisory Committee after that date is advisable and appropriate. If the Secretary determines to continue the Advisory Committee after that date, the Secretary shall submit to the President and the congressional committees specified in subsection (d) a report describing the reasons for that determination and specifying the new termination date for the Advisory Committee.
(f) Due date for annual report of judicial proceedings panel.—Section 576(c)(2)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1760) is amended by inserting “annually thereafter” after “reports”.
(a) Confidential review process through boards for correction of military records.—The Secretaries of the military departments shall each establish a confidential process, utilizing boards for the correction of military records of the military department concerned, by which an individual who was the victim of a sex-related offense during service in the Armed Forces may challenge the terms or characterization of the discharge or separation of the individual from the Armed Forces on the grounds that the terms or characterization were adversely affected by the individual being the victim of such an offense.
(b) Consideration of individual experiences in connection with offenses.—In deciding whether to modify the terms or characterization of the discharge or separation from the Armed Forces of an individual described in subsection (a), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall instruct boards for the correction of military records—
(c) Preservation of confidentiality.—Documents considered and decisions rendered pursuant to the process required by subsection (a) shall not be made available to the public, except with the consent of the individual concerned.
(d) Sex-related offense defined.—In this section, the term “sex-related offense” means any of the following:
(1) Rape or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of title 10, United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(a) In general.—Section 2015 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 2015. Program to assist members in obtaining professional credentials
“(a) Program required.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, shall carry out a program to enable members of the armed forces to obtain, while serving in the armed forces, professional credentials related to military training and skills that—
“(b) Payment of expenses.— (1) Under the program required by this section, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, shall provide for the payment of expenses of members for professional accreditation, Federal occupational licenses, State-imposed and professional licenses, professional certification, and related expenses.
“(c) Regulations.— (1) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2015 and inserting the following new item:
(a) Military service academies.—The Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that the provisions of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 950), including amendments made by that title, and the provisions of subtitle D, including amendments made by such subtitle, apply to the United States Military Academy, the Naval Academy, and the Air Force Academy, as applicable.
(b) Coast Guard Academy.—The Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall ensure that the provisions of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 950), including amendments made by that title, and the provisions of subtitle D, including amendments made by such subtitle, apply to the Coast Guard Academy.
(a) United States Military academy.—Section 4345a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “two weeks” and inserting “four weeks”.
Section 9362 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (e), (f), and (g) and inserting the following new subsections:
“(e) Acceptance of support.—
“(1) SUPPORT RECEIVED FROM THE CORPORATION.—Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the Secretary of the Air Force may accept from the corporation funds, supplies, equipment, and services for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy.
“(2) FUNDS RECEIVED FROM OTHER SOURCES.—The Secretary may charge fees for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy. The Secretary may accept and retain fees for services and other benefits provided incident to the operation of its athletic programs, including fees from the National Collegiate Athletic Association, fees from athletic conferences, game guarantees from other educational institutions, fees for ticketing or licensing, and other consideration provided incidental to the execution of the athletic programs of the Academy.
“(3) LIMITATIONS.—The Secretary shall ensure that contributions accepted under this subsection do not—
“(f) Leases and licenses.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force may, in accordance with section 2667 of this title, enter into leases or licenses with the corporation for the purpose of supporting the athletic programs of the Academy. Consideration provided under such a lease or license may be provided in the form of funds, supplies, equipment, and services for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy.
“(2) SUPPORT SERVICES.—The Secretary may provide support services to the corporation without charge while the corporation conducts its support activities at the Academy. In this paragraph, the term ‘support services’ includes utilities, office furnishings and equipment, communications services, records staging and archiving, audio and video support, and security systems in conjunction with the leasing or licensing of property. Any such support services may only be provided without any liability of the United States to the corporation.
“(g) Contracts and cooperative agreements.—The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with the corporation for the purpose of supporting the athletic programs of the Academy. Notwithstanding section 2304(k) of this title, the Secretary may enter such contracts or cooperative agreements on a sole source basis pursuant to section 2304(c)(5) of this title. Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property, services, or travel for the direct benefit or use of the athletic programs of the Academy.
“(h) Trademarks and service marks.—
“(1) LICENSING, MARKETING, AND SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENTS.—An agreement under subsection (g) may, consistent with section 2260 of this title (other than subsection (d) of such section), authorize the corporation to enter into licensing, marketing, and sponsorship agreements relating to trademarks and service marks identifying the Academy, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Air Force.
“(2) LIMITATIONS.—No licensing, marketing, or sponsorship agreement may be entered into under paragraph (1) if—
(a) Program authorized.—The Secretary of Defense may conduct the program described in subsection (c) to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services to eligible members of the Armed Forces described in subsection (b) for the purposes of—
(b) Eligible members.—Employment services provided under the program are limited to members of the Armed Forces, including members of the reserve components, who are being separated from the Armed Forces or released from active duty.
(c) Evaluation of use of civilian employment staffing agencies.—
(1) PROGRAM DESCRIBED.—The Secretary of Defense may execute a program to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of utilizing the services of civilian employment staffing agencies to assist eligible members of the Armed Forces in obtaining post-service employment.
(d) Eligible civilian employment staffing agencies.—In consultation with the program manager if utilized under subsection (c)(2), the Secretary of Defense shall establish the eligibility requirements to be used for the selection of civilian employment staffing agencies to participate in the program. In establishing the eligibility requirements for the selection of the civilian employment staffing agencies, the Secretary of Defense shall also take into account civilian employment staffing agencies that are willing to work and consult with State and county Veterans Affairs offices and State National Guard offices, when appropriate.
(e) Payment of staffing agency fees.—To encourage employers to employ an eligible member of the Armed Forces under the program if executed under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall pay a participating civilian employment staffing agency a portion of its agency fee (not to exceed 50 percent above the member's hourly wage). Payment of the agency fee will only be made after the member has been employed and paid by the private sector and the hours worked have been verified by the Secretary. The staffing agency shall be paid on a weekly basis only for hours the member worked, but not to exceed a total of 800 hours.
(f) Oversight requirements.—In conducting the program, the Secretary of Defense shall establish—
(2) reporting requirements, including the hourly wage for each eligible member of the Armed Forces obtaining employment under the program, the numbers of hours worked during the month, and the number of members who remained employed with the same employer after completing the first 800 hours of employment.
(g) Source and limitation on program obligations.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Defense for operation and maintenance for each fiscal year during which the program under this section is authorized, not more than $35,000,000 may be used to carry out the program.
(h) Reporting requirements.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—If the Secretary of Defense executes the program under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing the results of the program, particularly whether the program achieved the purposes specified in subsection (a). The report shall be submitted not later than January 15, 2019.
(2) COMPARISON WITH OTHER PROGRAMS.—The report shall include a comparison of the results of the program conducted under this section and the results of other employment assistant programs utilized by the Department of Defense. The comparison shall include the number of members of the Armed Forces obtaining employment through each program and the cost to the Department per member.
(3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.
(a) Plan required.—Not later than 360 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in cooperation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a plan for the education of officers and enlisted members of the Armed Forces relating to cyber security and cyber activities of the Department of Defense.
(a) Additional information required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enhance the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) of the Department of Defense by providing additional information that is more complete and accurate than the information provided as of the day before the date of the enactment of this Act to individuals who apply for educational assistance under chapter 30 or 33 of title 38, United States Code, to pursue a program of education at an institution of higher learning.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The additional information required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) Information provided by the Secretary of Education that is publically available and addresses—
(i) to the extent practicable, differences between types of institutions of higher learning in such matters as tuition and fees, admission requirements, accreditation, transferability of credits, credit for qualifying military training, time required to complete a degree, and retention and job placement rates; and
(ii) how Federal educational assistance provided under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) may be used in conjunction with educational assistance provided under chapters 30 and 33 of title 38, United States Code.
(B) Information about the Postsecondary Education Complaint System of the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Education, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
(D) Information about each of the Principles of Excellence established by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Secretary of Education pursuant to Executive Order 13607 of April 27, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 25861), including how to recognize whether an institution of higher learning may be violating any of such principles.
(b) Availability of higher education component online.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program is available to members of the Armed Forces on an Internet website of the Department of Defense so that members have an option to complete such component electronically and remotely.
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “institution of higher learning” has the meaning given such term in section 3452 of title 38, United States Code.
(2) The term “types of institutions of higher learning” means the following:
(A) An educational institution described in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)).
(B) An educational institution described in subsection (b) or (c) of section 102 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1002).
(a) Procedures required.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop procedures to share the information described in subsection (b) regarding members of the Armed Forces who are being separated from the Armed Forces with State veterans agencies in electronic data format as a means of facilitating the transition of such members from military service to civilian life.
(b) Covered information.—The information to be shared with State veterans agencies regarding a member shall include the following:
(c) Consent.—The procedures developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall require the consent of a member of the Armed Forces before any information described in subsection (b) regarding the member is shared with a State veterans agency.
(d) Use of information.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the information shared with State veterans agencies in accordance with the procedures developed pursuant to subsection (a) is only shared by such agencies with county government veterans service offices for such purposes as the Secretary shall specify for the administration and delivery of benefits.
(e) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the progress made by the Secretary—
(2) CONTENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(B) A description of the sharing activities carried out by the Secretary in accordance with such procedures.
(a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $25,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b) Local educational agency defined.—In this section, the term “local educational agency” has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $5,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–77; 20 U.S.C. 7703a).
Section 563(c) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1748; 20 U.S.C. 6301 note) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
Section 2(2)(A) of the Defense Department Overseas Teachers Pay and Personnel Practices Act (20 U.S.C. 901(2)(A)) is amended by inserting before the comma at the end the following: “or, in the case of a teaching position that involves instruction in the host-nation language, a local national when a citizen of the United States is not reasonably available to provide such instruction”.
(a) Expansion of functions.—Subsection (c) of section 1411 of the Defense Dependents’ Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 929) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting “, and of the domestic dependent elementary and secondary school system established under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code,” after “of the defense dependents’ education system”; and
(b) Membership of council.—Subsection (a)(1)(B) of such section is amended—
(1) by inserting “and the domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools established under section 2164 of title 10, United States Code” after “the defense dependents’ education system”; and
(a) Child custody protection.—Title II of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. App. 521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) Duration of temporary custody order based on certain deployments.—If a court renders a temporary order for custodial responsibility for a child based solely on a deployment or anticipated deployment of a parent who is a servicemember, the court shall require that the temporary order shall expire not later than the period justified by the deployment of the servicemember.
“(b) Limitation on consideration of member's deployment in determination of child's best interest.—If a motion or a petition is filed seeking a permanent order to modify the custody of the child of a servicemember, no court may consider the absence of the servicemember by reason of deployment, or the possibility of deployment, as the sole factor in determining the best interest of the child.
“(c) No Federal jurisdiction or right of action or removal.—Nothing in this section shall create a Federal right of action or otherwise give rise to Federal jurisdiction or create a right of removal.
“(d) Preemption.—In any case where State law applicable to a child custody proceeding involving a temporary order as contemplated in this section provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent who is a deploying servicemember than the rights provided under this section with respect to such temporary order, the appropriate court shall apply the higher State standard.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end of the items relating to title II the following new item:
(a) Policy for standard suicide data collection, reporting, and assessment.—
(1) POLICY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a policy for the development of a standard method for collecting, reporting, and assessing information regarding—
(2) PURPOSE OF POLICY.—The purpose of the policy required by this subsection is to improve the consistency and comprehensiveness of—
(A) the suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note); and
(B) the suicide prevention and resilience program for the National Guard and Reserves established pursuant to section 10219 of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Submission and implementation of policy.—
(c) Dependent defined.—In this section, the term “dependent”, with respect to a member of the Armed Forces, means a person described in section 1072(2) of title 10, United States Code, except that, in the case of a parent or parent-in-law of the member, the income requirements of subparagraph (E) of such section do not apply.
(a) Data collection efforts.—In addition to monitoring the number of spouses of members of the Armed Forces who obtain employment through military spouse employment programs, the Secretary of Defense shall collect data to evaluate the effectiveness of military spouse employment programs—
(a) Purple Heart.—
(1) AWARD.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1129 the following new section:
Ҥ 1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks by foreign terrorist organizations
“(a) In general.—For purposes of the award of the Purple Heart, the Secretary concerned shall treat a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b) in the same manner as a member who is killed or wounded as a result of an international terrorist attack against the United States.
“(b) Covered members.— (1) A member described in this subsection is a member on active duty who was killed or wounded in an attack by a foreign terrorist organization in circumstances where the death or wound is the result of an attack targeted on the member due to such member's status as a member of the armed forces, unless the death or wound is the result of willful misconduct of the member.
“(c) Foreign terrorist organization defined.—In this section, the term ‘foreign terrorist organization’ means an entity designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).”.
(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1129 the following new item:
(2) RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION.—
(A) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall take effect as of September 11, 2001.
(B) REVIEW OF CERTAIN PREVIOUS INCIDENTS.—The Secretary concerned shall undertake a review of each death or wounding of a member of the Armed Forces that occurred between September 11, 2001, and the date of the enactment of this Act under circumstances that could qualify as being the result of an attack described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)), to determine whether the death or wounding qualifies as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist organization for purposes of the award of the Purple Heart pursuant to such section (as so added).
(C) ACTIONS FOLLOWING REVIEW.—If the death or wounding of a member of the Armed Forces reviewed under subparagraph (B) is determined to qualify as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as so added), the Secretary concerned shall take appropriate action under such section to award the Purple Heart to the member.
(D) SECRETARY CONCERNED DEFINED.—In this paragraph, the term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom.—
(1) REVIEW OF THE NOVEMBER 5, 2009, ATTACK AT FORT HOOD, TEXAS.—If the Secretary concerned determines, after a review under subsection (a)(2)(B) regarding the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, that the death or wounding of any member of the Armed Forces in that attack qualified as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), the Secretary of Defense shall make a determination as to whether the death or wounding of any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor in the same attack meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom.
(2) AWARD.—If the Secretary of Defense determines under paragraph (1) that the death or wounding of any civilian employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor in the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, meets the eligibility criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom, the Secretary shall take appropriate action to award the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom to the employee or contractor.
(a) William Shemin.—
(1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to William Shemin for the acts of valor during World War I described in paragraph (1).
(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to in paragraph (1) are the actions of William Shemin while serving as a Rifleman with G Company, 2d Battalion, 47th Infantry Regiment, 4th Division, American Expeditionary Forces, in connection with combat operations against an armed enemy on the Vesle River, near Bazoches, France, from August 7 to August 9, 1918, during World War I for which he was originally awarded the Distinguished Service Cross.
(b) Henry Johnson.—
(1) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to Henry Johnson for the acts of valor during World War I described in paragraph (2).
(2) ACTS OF VALOR DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred to in paragraph (2) are the actions of Henry Johnson while serving as a member of Company C, 369th Infantry Regiment, 93rd Division, American Expeditionary Forces, during combat operations against the enemy on the front lines of the Western Front in France on May 15, 1918, during World War I for which he was previously awarded the Distinguished Service Cross.
(a) Review Required.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness and the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, shall conduct a review of Department of Defense efforts regarding the prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents.
(b) Consultation.—In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with, and consider the recommendations of, the Office of Suicide Prevention, the Secretaries of the military departments, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the United States Special Operations Command regarding the feasibility of implementing, for members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, particular elements of the Department of Defense suicide prevention policy developed pursuant to section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) and section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239. 10 U.S.C. 1071 note).
(c) Elements of review.—The review conducted under subsection (a) shall specifically include an assessment of each of the following:
(1) Current Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command policy guidelines on the prevention of suicide among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents.
(2) Current and directed Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command suicide prevention programs and activities for members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including programs provided by the Defense Health Program and the Office of Suicide Prevention and programs supporting family members.
(3) Current Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command strategies to reduce suicides among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including the cost of such strategies across the future-years defense program.
(4) Current Armed Forces and United States Special Operations Command standards of care for suicide prevention among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including training standards for behavioral health care providers to ensure that such providers receive training on clinical best practices and evidence-based treatments as information on such practices and treatments becomes available.
(5) The integration of mental health screenings and suicide risk and prevention efforts for members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents into the delivery of primary care for such members and dependents.
(6) The standards for responding to attempted or completed suicides among members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including guidance and training to assist commanders in addressing incidents of attempted or completed suicide within their units.
(7) The standards regarding data collection for individual members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents, including related factors such as domestic violence and child abuse.
(8) The means to ensure the protection of privacy of members of United States Special Operations Forces and their dependents who seek or receive treatment related to suicide prevention.
(a) Review required.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the feasibility of improving the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services directly to members in the National Guard and Reserves. In evaluating potential job placement programs, the Secretary shall consider—
(a) Report required.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report concerning—
(b) Consultation.—In preparing the report under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with, and consider the recommendations of, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
(c) Elements of report.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1) An assessment of how foreign language, regional expertise, and culture considerations, including gender-based considerations in the context of foreign cultural norms, affect overseas operations and missions of the Armed Forces, including lessons learned as a result of members of the Armed Forces engaging with female civilian populations in Iraq and Afghanistan and during other overseas operations and missions.
(2) An identification of how the Department of Defense addresses such considerations in its planning and execution of overseas operations and missions, including how it educates military commanders on foreign language, regional expertise, and culture considerations, including gender-based considerations in the context of foreign cultural norms.
(3) An evaluation of the adequacy of current programs and the need for additional or modified programs to train members of the Armed Forces regarding such considerations, including proposed changes in the length of training and curriculum.
(4) An evaluation of the need for advisors within the military commands and Armed Forces, including billet descriptions for such advisors, where to assign them within the military command and Armed Forces, and the desirability and feasibility of assigning such advisors in combatant command and joint task force staffs.
Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing the results of the review conducted pursuant to section 1735 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 976).
(a) Assessment Required.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for an independent assessment of—
(b) Entity conducting assessment.—To conduct the assessment required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall select a federally funded research and development center or another appropriate independent entity.
(c) Assessment elements.—The assessment required by subsection (a) shall specifically include the following:
(1) The factors contributing to the mental, behavioral, and psychological health challenges facing members of the Armed Forces assigned to special operations forces.
(2) The effectiveness of the Preservation of the Force and Families Program in addressing the mental, behavioral, and psychological health of members of the special operations forces, including the extent to which measurements of effectiveness are being utilized to assess progress—
(a) Report required.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the designated congressional committees a report on the policies to prevent hazing, and systems initiated to track incidents of hazing, in each of the Armed Forces.
(b) Elements of report.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(2) A description of the criteria used, and the methods implemented, in the systems to track incidents of hazing in the Armed Forces.
(3) The number of alleged and substantiated incidents of hazing, as reflected in the tracking systems, over the last two years for each Armed Force, the nature of these incidents, and actions taken to address such incidents through non-judicial and judicial action.
(4) An assessment of the following:
(B) The policies in place and the training on hazing provided to members throughout the course of their careers for each Armed Force.
(a) Report required.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the impact of mental and physical trauma relating to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), behavioral health matters not related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and other neurological combat traumas (in this section referred to as “covered traumas”) on the discharge of members of the Armed Forces from the Armed Forces for misconduct.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the extent to which the Armed Forces have in place processes for the consideration of the impact of mental and physical trauma relating to covered traumas on members of the Armed Forces who are being considered for discharge from the Armed Forces for misconduct, including the compliance of the Armed Forces with such processes and mechanisms in the Department of Defense for ensuring the compliance of the Armed Forces with such processes.
(2) An assessment of the extent to which the Armed Forces provide members of the Armed Forces, including commanding officers, junior officers, and noncommissioned officers, training on the symptoms of covered traumas and the identification of the presence of such conditions in members of the Armed Forces.
(3) An assessment of the extent to which members of the Armed Forces who receive treatment for a covered trauma before discharge from the Armed Forces are later discharged from the Armed Forces for misconduct.
(4) An identification of the number of members of the Armed Forces discharged as described in paragraph (3) who are ineligible for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs based on characterization of discharge.
(5) An assessment of the extent to which members of the Armed Forces who accept a discharge from the Armed Forces for misconduct in lieu of trial by court-martial are counseled on the potential for ineligibility for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs as a result of such discharge before acceptance of such discharge.
Section 1662(a) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended by striking “inspected on a semiannual basis for the first two years after the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter” and inserting “inspected at least once every two years”.
(a) Designation authority.—Subsection (a) of section 1566a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Report on closure of voter assistance office.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) The Secretary of a military department shall provide the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives with notice of any decision by the Secretary to close a voter assistance office that was designated on an installation before the date of the enactment of this paragraph. The notice shall include the rational for the closure, the timing of the closure, the number of covered individuals supported by the office, and the plan for providing the assistance available under subsection (a) to covered individuals after the closure of the office.”.
Section 1604 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 52 U.S.C. 20301 note) is repealed.
(a) Removal authority.—Section 1488 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Removal of remains of certain members with no known next of kin.— (1) The Secretary of the Army may authorize the removal of the remains of a covered member of the armed forces who is buried in an Army National Military Cemetery from the Army National Military Cemetery for transfer to any other cemetery.
“(2) The Secretary of the Army, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, may authorize the removal of the remains of a covered member of the armed forces who is buried in a cemetery of the National Cemetery System from that cemetery for transfer to any Army National Military Cemetery.
“(3) A removal of remains may not be authorized under this subsection unless the individual seeking the removal of the remains—
“(4) In this subsection:
“(A) The term ‘Army National Military Cemetery’ means a cemetery specified in section 4721(b) of this title.
It is the sense of Congress that the United States—
(2) has a responsibility to keep the promises made to members of the Armed Forces who risk their lives on a daily basis on behalf of the people of the United States; and
(3) while continuing to transition leadership roles in combat operations in Afghanistan to the people of Afghanistan, must continue to fulfill the promise of the United States Soldier’s Creed and the Warrior Ethos, which states that “I will never leave a fallen comrade”, with respect to any member of the Armed Forces who is in a missing status or captured as a result of service in Afghanistan now or in the future.
In the case of commissioned officers in the uniformed services in pay grades O–7 through O–10—
(1) section 203(a)(2) of title 37, United States Code, shall be applied for rates of basic pay payable for such officers during calendar year 2015 by using the rate of pay for level II of the Executive Schedule in effect during 2014; and
Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.
(a) Basic pay rate equal treatment of Chief of the National Guard Bureau and Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.—
(1) CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU.—The rate of basic pay for an officer while serving as the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall be the same as the rate of basic pay for the officers specified in Footnote 2 of the table entitled “commissioned officers” in section 601(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 37 U.S.C. 1009 note), regardless of cumulative years of service computed under section 205 of title 37, United States Code.
(2) SENIOR ENLISTED ADVISOR TO THE CHIEF OF THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 685 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 37 U.S.C. 205 note) is amended by inserting “or as Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” after “Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff”.
(b) Pay during terminal leave and while hospitalized.—Section 210 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(c) Personal money allowance.—Section 414 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(d) Retired base pay.—Section 1406(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the subsection heading, by inserting “Chief of the National Guard Bureau,” after “Chiefs of Service,”;
(a) In general.—Paragraph (3) of section 403(b) of title 37, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(3) (A) The monthly amount of the basic allowance for housing for an area of the United States for a member of a uniformed service shall be the amount equal to the difference between— “(i) the amount of the monthly cost of adequate housing in that area, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, for members of the uniformed services serving in the same pay grade and with the same dependency status as the member; and “(ii) the amount equal to a specified percentage (determined under subparagraph (B)) of the national average monthly cost of adequate housing in the United States, as determined by the Secretary, for members of the uniformed services serving in the same pay grade and with the same dependency status as the member.
(b) Special rule.—Any reduction authorized by paragraph (3) of subsection (b) of section 403 of title 37, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), shall not apply with respect to benefits paid by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under the laws administered by the Secretary, including pursuant to sections 3108 and 3313 of title 38, United States Code. Such benefits that are determined in accordance with such section 403 shall be subject to paragraph (3) of such section as such paragraph was in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”:
(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units.
(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(a) Title 10 authorities.—The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”:
(b) Title 37 authorities.—The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”:
(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”:
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”:
(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”:
(5) Section 316a(g), relating to incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency.
Section 1059(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “as of the date on which the individual described in subsection (b) is separated from active duty” and inserting “as of the date on which the separation action is initiated by a commander of the individual described in subsection (b)”.
(a) Reinstatement of earlier method of determination.—Section 1407a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 1407a. Retired pay base: officers retired in general or flag officer grades
“(a) Rates of Basic Pay to Be Used in Determination.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, in a case in which the determination under section 1406 or 1407 of this title of the retired pay base applicable to the computation of the retired pay of a covered general or flag officer involves a rate of basic pay payable to that officer for any period between October 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014, that was subject to a reduction under section 203(a)(2) of title 37 for such period, such retired-pay-base determination shall be made using the rate of basic pay for such period provided by law, without regard to the reduction under section 203(a)(2) of title 37.
“(b) Partial preservation of computation of retired pay base using uncapped rates of basic pay for covered officers who first became members before September 8, 1980, and whose retired pay commences after December 31, 2014.—
“(1) OFFICERS RETIRING AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2014.—In the case of a covered general or flag officer who first became a member of a uniformed service before September 8, 1980, and who is retired after December 31, 2014, under any provision of law other than chapter 1223 of this title or is transferred to the Retired Reserve after December 31, 2014, the retired pay base applicable to the computation of the retired pay of that officer shall be determined as provided in paragraph (2) if determination of such retired pay base as provided in that paragraph results in a higher retired pay base than determination of such retired pay base as otherwise provided by law (including the application of section 203(a)(2) of title 37).
“(2) ALTERNATIVE DETERMINATION OF RETIRED PAY BASE USING UNCAPPED RATES OF BASIC PAY AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2014.—For a determination in accordance with this paragraph, the amount of an officer’s retired pay base shall be determined by using the rate of basic pay provided as of December 31, 2014, for that officer’s grade as of that date for purposes of basic pay, with that officer’s years of service creditable as of that date for purposes of basic pay, and without regard to any reduction under section 203(a)(2) of title 37.
“(c) Preservation of computation of retired pay base using uncapped rates of basic pay for officers transferring to retired reserve during specified period.—In the case of a covered general or flag officer who is transferred to the Retired Reserve between October 1, 2006, and December 31, 2014, and who becomes entitled to receive retired pay under section 12731 of this title after December 31, 2014, the retired pay base applicable to the computation of the retired pay of that officer shall be determined using the rates of basic pay provided by law without regard to any reduction in rates of basic pay under section 203(a)(2) of title 37.
“(d) Covered General or Flag Officer defined.—In this section, the term ‘covered general or flag officer’ means a member or former member of a uniformed service who after September 30, 2006—
(b) Applicability.—Section 1407a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), shall be effective for retired pay that commences after December 31, 2014.
Subparagraph (G) of section 1401a(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, which shall take effect December 1, 2015, pursuant to section 403(a) of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–67; 127 Stat. 1186)), as amended by section 10001 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 (division C of Public Law 113–76; 128 Stat. 151) and section 2 of Public Law 113–82 (128 Stat. 1009), is amended by striking “January 1, 2014” and inserting “January 1, 2016”.
(a) Special needs trust as eligible beneficiary.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 1450 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(B) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4):
“(4) SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS FOR SOLE BENEFIT OF CERTAIN DEPENDENT CHILDREN.—Notwithstanding subsection (i), a supplemental or special needs trust established under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)) for the sole benefit of a dependent child considered disabled under section 1614(a)(3) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)) who is incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity.”.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—
(A) ANNUITIES EXEMPTION.—Subsection (i) of such section is amended by inserting “(a)(4) or” after “subsection”.
(B) PLAN REQUIREMENTS.—Section 1448 of such title is amended—
(i) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(6) SPECIAL NEEDS TRUSTS FOR SOLE BENEFIT OF CERTAIN DEPENDENT CHILDREN.—A person who has established a supplemental or special needs trust under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)) for the sole benefit of a dependent child considered disabled under section 1614(a)(3) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)) who is incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity may elect to provide an annuity to that supplemental or special needs trust.”;
(b) Regulations.—Section 1455(d) of such title is amended—
(1) in the subsection heading, by striking “and fiduciaries” and inserting “, fiduciaries, and special needs trusts”;
(2) in paragraph (1)—
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(C) a dependent child incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity for whom a supplemental or special needs trust has been established under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)).”;
(3) in paragraph (2)—
(C) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, by striking “subparagraphs (D) and (E)” and inserting “subparagraphs (E) and (F)”; and
Section 12731(f)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Subsection (f) of section 2484 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(f) Procurement of commercial items using procedures other than competitive procedures.—The Secretary of Defense may use the exception provided in section 2304(c)(5) of this title for the procurement of any commercial item (including brand-name and generic items) for resale in, at, or by commissary stores.”.
Section 2492 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Federal department, agency, or instrumentality” and all that follows through the period at the end of the section and inserting the following:
““Federal department, agency, or instrumentality—(a) Prohibition on banning sale of legal consumer tobacco products.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments may not take any action to implement any new policy that would ban the sale of any legal consumer tobacco product category sold as of January 1, 2014, within the defense retail systems or on any Department of Defense vessel at sea.
(b) Use of Prices comparable to local prices.—The Secretary of Defense shall issue regulations regarding the pricing of tobacco and tobacco-related products sold in an outlet of the defense retail systems inside the United States, including territories and possessions of the United States, to prohibit the sale of a product at a price below the most competitive price for that product in the local community.
(c) Application to overseas defense retail systems.—The regulations required by subsection (b) shall direct that the price of a tobacco or tobacco-related product sold in an outlet of the defense retail systems outside of the United States shall be within the range of prices established for that product in outlets of the defense retail systems inside the United States.
(d) Defense retail systems defined.—In this section, the term “defense retail systems” has the meaning given that term in section 2487(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Review required.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review, utilizing the services of an independent organization experienced in grocery retail analysis, of the defense commissary system to determine the qualitative and quantitative effects of—
(b) Additional elements of review.—The review required by this section also shall consider the following:
(1) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on commissary patrons, in particular junior enlisted members and junior officers and their dependents, that would result from—
(2) The sensitivity of commissary patrons, in particular junior enlisted members and junior officers and their dependents, to pricing changes that may result in reduced overall cost savings for patrons.
(4) The relationship of higher prices and reduced patron savings to patron usage and accompanying sales, both on a national and regional basis.
(5) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on industry support; such as vendor stocking, promotions, discounts, and merchandising activities and programs.
(6) The ability of the current commissary management and information technology systems to accommodate changes to the existing pricing and management structure.
(8) The impact of changes to the operation of the defense commissary system on military exchanges and other morale, welfare, and recreation programs for members of the Armed Forces.
(a) Annual mental health assessments.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074m the following new section:
Ҥ 1074n. Annual mental health assessments for members of the armed forces
“(a) Mental health assessments.—Subject to subsection (c), not less frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a person-to-person mental health assessment for—
“(b) Elements.—The mental health assessments provided pursuant to this section shall—
“(c) Sufficiency of other mental health assessments.— (1) The Secretary is not required to provide a mental health assessment pursuant to this section to an individual in a calendar year in which the individual has received a mental health assessment pursuant to section 1074m of this title.
“(2) The Secretary may treat periodic health assessments and other person-to-person assessments that are provided to members of the armed forces, including examinations under section 1074f of this title, as meeting the requirements for mental health assessments required under this section if the Secretary determines that such assessments and person-to-person assessments meet the requirements for mental health assessments established by this section.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1074m the following new item:
“1074n. Annual mental health assessments for members of the armed forces.”.
(3) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the issuance of the regulations prescribed under section 1074n(e) of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall implement such regulations.
(4) REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date on which the Secretary of Defense implements the regulations described in paragraph (3), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the annual mental health assessments of members of the Armed Forces conducted pursuant to section 1074n of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1).
(B) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under subparagraph (A) shall include the following:
(i) A description of the tools and processes used to provide the annual mental health assessments of members of the Armed Forces conducted pursuant to such section 1074n, including—
(a) Availability of pharmaceutical agents through national mail-order pharmacy program.—Paragraph (5) of section 1074g(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Modification of cost-sharing amounts.—Paragraph (6)(A) of such section 1074g(a) is amended—
(c) Refills of prescription maintenance medications through military treatment facility pharmacies or national mail order pharmacy program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(9) (A) Beginning on October 1, 2015, the pharmacy benefits program shall require eligible covered beneficiaries generally to refill non-generic prescription maintenance medications through military treatment facility pharmacies or the national mail-order pharmacy program.
“(B) The Secretary shall determine the maintenance medications subject to the requirement under subparagraph (A). The Secretary shall ensure that—
(2) TERMINATION OF PILOT PROGRAM.—Section 716(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 1074g note) is amended by striking “December 31, 2017” and inserting “September 30, 2015”.
(d) GAO report on pilot program.—Not later than July 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the satisfaction of beneficiaries participating in the pilot program under section 716 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 1074g note). Such report shall address the following:
(a) Inpatient day limits.—Section 1079 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Waiver of nonavailability statement or preauthorization.—Section 721(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking “(other than mental health services)”.
(c) Conforming amendments.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) In general.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1079b the following new section:
Ҥ 1079c. Provisional coverage for emerging services and supplies
“(a) Provisional coverage.—In carrying out the TRICARE program, including pursuant to section 1079(a)(12) of this title, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, may provide provisional coverage for the provision of a service or supply if the Secretary determines that such service or supply is widely recognized in the United States as being safe and effective.
“(b) Consideration of evidence.—In making a determination under subsection (a), the Secretary may consider—
“(c) Independent evaluation.—In making a determination under subsection (a), the Secretary may arrange for an evaluation from the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies or such other independent entity as the Secretary selects.
“(d) Duration and terms of coverage.— (1) Provisional coverage under subsection (a) for a service or supply may be in effect for not longer than a total of five years.
“(2) Prior to the expiration of provisional coverage of a service or supply, the Secretary shall determine the coverage, if any, that will follow such provisional coverage and take appropriate action to implement such determination. If the Secretary determines that the implementation of such determination regarding coverage requires legislative action, the Secretary shall make a timely recommendation to Congress regarding such legislative action.
Section 1078b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 1079(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) In general.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1097c the following new section:
Ҥ 1097d. TRICARE program: notice of change to benefits
“(a) Provision of notice.— (1) If the Secretary makes a significant change to any benefits provided by the TRICARE program to covered beneficiaries, the Secretary shall provide individuals described in paragraph (2) with notice explaining such changes.
“(b) Timing of notice.—The Secretary shall provide notice under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) by the earlier of the following dates:
“(1) The date that the Secretary determines would afford individuals described in paragraph (2) of such subsection adequate time to understand the change covered by the notification.
Section 711(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)—
(a) Limitation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may not restructure or realign a military medical treatment facility based on the modernization study until a 90-day period has elapsed following the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States is required to submit to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b)(3).
(2) REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:
(A) During the period from 2006 to 2012, for each military medical treatment facility considered under the modernization study—
(viii) whether the facility has a helipad capable of receiving medical evacuation airlift patients arriving on the primary evacuation aircraft platform for the military installation served;
(ix) a determination of whether the civilian hospital system in which the facility resides is a Federally-designated underserved medical community and the effect on such community from any reduction in staff or functions or downgrade of the facility;
(x) if the facility serves a training center—
(B) For each military medical treatment facility considered under the modernization study—
(iii) the distance in miles to the closest civilian inpatient hospital, listed by level of care and whether the facility is designated a sole community hospital;
(iv) the availability of ambulance service on the military installation and the distance in miles to the nearest civilian ambulance service, including the average response time to the military installation;
(C) The results of the modernization study with respect to the recommendations of the Secretary to restructure or realign military medical treatment facilities.
(D) An assessment of the analysis made by the Secretary to inform decisions regarding the modernization of the military health care system in the modernization study.
(E) An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary evaluated in the modernization study the impact on the access of eligible beneficiaries to quality health care, and satisfaction with such care, caused by the following changes proposed in the study:
(F) An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary evaluated in the modernization study how any reduced inpatient, ambulatory surgery, or specialty care capacity and capabilities at military medical treatment facilities covered by the study would impact timely access to care for eligible beneficiaries at local civilian community hospitals within reasonable driving distances of the catchment areas of such facilities.
(G) An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary consulted in conducting the modernization study with community hospitals in locations covered by the study to determine their capacities for additional inpatient and ambulatory surgery patients and their capabilities to meet additional demands for specialty care services.
(H) An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary considered in the modernization study the impact that the change in the structure or alignment of military medical treatment facilities covered by the study would have on timely access by local civilian populations to inpatient, ambulatory surgery, or specialty care services if additional eligible beneficiaries also sought access to such services from the same providers.
(a) Designation of senior medical advisor.—Subsection (a) of section 1513A of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 413a) is amended—
Section 1704(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2573) is amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2016”.
(a) Report required.—Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 1097a note) is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): “(b) Additional report.— “(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the status of reducing the availability of TRICARE Prime in regions described in subsection (d)(1)(B). “(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following: “(A) A description of the implementation of the transition for affected eligible beneficiaries under the TRICARE program who no longer have access to TRICARE Prime under TRICARE managed care contracts as of the date of the report, including— “(i) the number of eligible beneficiaries who have transitioned from TRICARE Prime to the TRICARE Standard option of the TRICARE program since October 1, 2013; “(ii) the number of eligible beneficiaries who transferred their TRICARE Prime enrollment to a more distant available Prime service area to remain in TRICARE Prime, by State; “(iii) the number of eligible beneficiaries who were eligible to transfer to a more distant available Prime service area, but chose to use TRICARE Standard; “(B) An estimate of the increased annual costs per affected eligible beneficiary incurred by such beneficiary for health care under the TRICARE program.
Section 1631(b)(2) of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.
(a) Acquisition strategy.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop and carry out an acquisition strategy with respect to entering into contracts for the services of health care professional staff at military medical treatment facilities.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The acquisition strategy under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) Identification of the responsibilities of the military departments and elements of the Department of Defense in carrying out such strategy.
(B) Methods to analyze, using reliable and detailed data covering the entire Department, the amount of funds expended on contracts for the services of health care professional staff.
(C) Methods to identify opportunities to consolidate requirements for such services and reduce cost.
(D) Methods to measure cost savings that are realized by using such contracts instead of purchased care.
(b) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of implementing the acquisition strategy under paragraph (1) of subsection (a), including how each element under subparagraphs (A) through (G) of paragraph (2) of such subsection is being carried out.
(a) Establishment.—In accordance with section 1092 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to evaluate the feasibility and desirability of including medication therapy management as part of the TRICARE program.
(b) Elements of pilot program.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure the following:
(2) Medication therapy management services provided under the pilot program are focused on improving patient use and outcomes of prescription medications.
(3) The design of the pilot program considers best commercial practices in providing medication therapy management services, including practices under the prescription drug program under part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–101 et seq.).
(c) Locations.—
(1) SELECTION.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) in not less than three locations.
(2) FIRST LOCATION CRITERIA.—Not less than one location selected under paragraph (1) shall meet the following criteria:
(d) Duration.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) for a period determined appropriate by the Secretary that is not less than two years.
(e) Report.—Not later than 30 months after the date on which the Secretary commences the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program that includes—
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “medication therapy management” means professional services provided by qualified pharmacists to patients to improve the effective use and outcomes of prescription medications provided to the patients.
(2) The term “TRICARE program” has the meaning given that term in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.
(a) In general.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall carry out an antimicrobial stewardship program at medical facilities of the Department of Defense.
(b) Collection and analysis of data.—In carrying out the antimicrobial stewardship program required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall develop a consistent manner in which to collect and analyze data on antibiotic usage, health issues related to antibiotic usage, and antimicrobial resistance trends at medical facilities of the Department.
(a) In general.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an evaluation of specific tools, processes, and best practices to improve the identification of and treatment by the Armed Forces of mental health conditions and traumatic brain injury among members of the Armed Forces.
(b) Elements.—The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An evaluation of existing peer-to-peer identification and intervention programs in each of the Armed Forces.
(2) An evaluation of programs that provide training and certification to health care providers that treat mental health conditions and traumatic brain injury in members of the Armed Forces.
(3) An evaluation of programs and services provided by the Armed Forces that provide training and certification to providers of cognitive rehabilitation and other rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury to members of the Armed Forces.
(4) An evaluation of programs and services provided by the Armed Forces that assist members of the Armed Forces and family members affected by suicides among members of the Armed Forces.
(5) An evaluation of tools and processes used by the Armed Forces to identify traumatic brain injury in members of the Armed Forces and to distinguish mental health conditions likely caused by traumatic brain injury from mental health conditions caused by other factors.
(6) An evaluation of the unified effort of the Armed Forces to promote mental health and prevent suicide through the integration of clinical and nonclinical programs of the Armed Forces.
(7) Recommendations with respect to improving, consolidating, expanding, and standardizing the programs, services, tools, processes, and efforts described in paragraphs (1) through (6).
(8) A description of existing efforts to reduce the time from development and testing of new mental health and traumatic brain injury tools and treatments for members of the Armed Forces to widespread dissemination of such tools and treatments among the Armed Forces.
(9) Recommendations as to the feasibility and advisability of conducting mental health assessments before the enlistment or commissioning of a member of the Armed Forces and again during the 90-day period preceding the date of discharge or release of the member from the Armed Forces, including the utility of using tools and processes in such mental health assessments that conform to those used in other mental health assessments provided to members of the Armed Forces.
(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the access of members of the Armed Forces and the dependents of such members to reproductive counseling and treatments for infertility.
(b) Matters included.—The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A description, by location, of the infertility treatment services available at military medical treatment facilities throughout the military health care system.
(2) An identification of factors that might disrupt treatment, including lack of timely access to treatment, change in duty station, or overseas deployments.
(3) The number of members of the Armed Forces who have received specific infertility treatment services during the five-year period preceding the date of the report.
(4) The number of dependents of members who have received specific infertility treatment services during the five-year period preceding the date of the report.
(5) The number of births resulting from infertility treatment services described in paragraphs (3) and (4).
(6) A comparison of infertility treatment services covered by health plans sponsored by the Federal Government and infertility treatment services provided by the military health care system.
(7) The current cost to the Department of Defense for providing infertility treatment services to members and dependents.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of implementing the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine regarding improvements to programs of the Department of Defense intended to strengthen mental, emotional, and behavioral abilities associated with managing adversity, adapting to change, recovering, and learning in connection with service in the Armed Forces.
(a) Report.—Not later than September 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report that assesses the transition of care for post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury.
(b) Matters included.—The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) The programs, policies, and regulations that affect the transition of care, particularly with respect to individuals who are taking or have been prescribed antidepressants, stimulants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, depressants, or hallucinogens.
(2) Upon transitioning to care furnished by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the extent to which the pharmaceutical treatment plan of an individual changes, and the factors determining such changes.
(3) The extent to which the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs have worked together to identify and apply best pharmaceutical treatment practices.
(4) A description of the off-formulary waiver process of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the extent to which the process is applied efficiently at the treatment level.
(a) In general.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a review of the policies, procedures, and programs of the Department of Defense to reduce the stigma associated with mental health treatment for members of the Armed Forces and deployed civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements.—The review under subsection (a) shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(1) An assessment of the availability and access to mental health treatment services for members of the Armed Forces and deployed civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
(a) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on women's health care services for members of the Armed Forces serving on active duty and other covered beneficiaries under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Elements.—The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A description and assessment of women's health care services for members of the Armed Forces and other covered beneficiaries, including with respect to access to care, scope of available care, and availability of speciality care, and with a particular emphasis on maternity care.
(2) An assessment of whether the quality measures used by the military health care system with respect to women's health care services for members of the Armed Forces and other covered beneficiaries facilitate expected outcomes, and an assessment of whether another, or additional, evidence-based quality measures would improve outcomes in the military health care system.
(a) Plan for modular open systems approach through development and adoption of standards and architectures.—Not later than January 1, 2016, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives detailing a plan to develop standards and define architectures necessary to enable open systems approaches in the key mission areas of the Department of Defense with respect to which the Under Secretary determines that such standards and architectures would be feasible and cost effective.
(b) Consideration of modular open systems approaches.—
(1) REVIEW OF ACQUISITION GUIDANCE.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall review current acquisition guidance, and modify such guidance as necessary, to—
(2) ELEMENTS.—The review required in paragraph (1) shall—
(c) Treatment of ongoing and legacy programs.—
(1) REPORT REQUIREMENT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report covering the matters specified in paragraph (2).
(2) MATTERS COVERED.—Subject to paragraph (3), the report required in this subsection shall—
(A) identify all information technology systems that are in development, production, or deployed status as of the date of the enactment of this Act, that are or were major defense acquisition programs or major automated information systems, and that are not using an open systems approach;
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.—The term “information technology” has the meaning given the term in section 11101(6) of title 40, United States Code.
(2) OPEN SYSTEMS APPROACH.—The term “open systems approach” means, with respect to an information technology system, an integrated business and technical strategy that—
(A) employs a modular design and uses widely supported and consensus-based standards for key interfaces;
(B) is subjected to successful validation and verification tests to ensure key interfaces comply with widely supported and consensus-based standards; and
(a) Addition to covered determination of a significant change.—Subsection (c)(2) of section 2445c of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(D) the automated information system or information technology investment failed to achieve a full deployment decision within five years after the Milestone A decision for the program or, if there was no Milestone A decision, the date when the preferred alternative is selected for the program (excluding any time during which program activity is delayed as a result of a bid protest).”.
(a) Exclusion of certain information systems from definition of defense business system.—Subsection (j)(1) of section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of the acquisition process for information technology systems required by section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2402; 10 U.S.C. 2225 note).
(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall, at a minimum, include the following elements:
Section 819 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2409; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(a) Amendment relating to authority.—Section 845(a)(1) of Public Law 103–160 (10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended by striking “weapons or weapon systems proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of weapons or weapon systems in use by the Armed Forces” and inserting the following: “enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel and the supporting platforms, systems, components, or materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of platforms, systems, components, or materials in use by the Armed Forces”.
(b) Amendments relating to small business.—Section 845 of Public Law 103–160 (10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended—
(2) in subsection (f)—
(A) by striking “Nontraditional Defense Contractor Defined.—In this section, the” and inserting the following: “Definitions.—In this section:
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) The term ‘small business’ means a small business concern as defined under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).”.
Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1489), as amended by section 802 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 804) is further amended—
(5) by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(f) Use of other data.—For purposes of compliance with subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (c)(2), the Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the Defense Agencies may use other available sources of data, such as advisory and assistance services information collected for purposes of the annual budget submission of the Department of Defense, to corroborate data from the annual inventory of contractor services required in section 2330a of title 10, United States Code. Any discrepancy identified between the inventory data and the data from other available sources shall be resolved and reported to the congressional defense committees.”.
Section 2305a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence of subsection (d) and inserting the following: “If the contract value exceeds $4,000,000, the maximum number specified in the solicitation shall not exceed 5 unless the head of the contracting activity, delegable to a level no lower than the senior contracting official within the contracting activity, approves the contracting officer’s justification with respect to an individual solicitation that a number greater than 5 is in the Federal Government’s interest. The contracting officer shall provide written documentation of how a maximum number exceeding 5 is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the two-phase selection procedures.”.
Section 4202 of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (division D of Public Law 104–106; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking subsection (e).
(a) In general.—Subsection (i) of section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(i) Defense acquisitions specifically authorized by law.— (1) In the case of the Department of Defense, a multiyear contract in an amount equal to or greater than $500,000,000 may not be entered into under this section unless the contract is specifically authorized by law in an Act other than an appropriations Act.
“(2) In submitting a request for a specific authorization by law to carry out a defense acquisition program using multiyear contract authority under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall include in the request the following:
“(A) A report containing preliminary findings of the agency head required in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a), together with the basis for such findings.
“(B) Confirmation that the preliminary findings of the agency head under subparagraph (A) were made after the completion of a cost analysis performed by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation for the purpose of section 2334(e)(1) of this title, and that the analysis supports those preliminary findings.
“(3) A multiyear contract may not be entered into under this section for a defense acquisition program that has been specifically authorized by law to be carried out using multiyear contract authority unless the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing, not later than 30 days before entry into the contract, that each of the following conditions is satisfied:
“(A) The Secretary has determined that each of the requirements in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) will be met by such contract and has provided the basis for such determination to the congressional defense committees.
“(B) The Secretary’s determination under subparagraph (A) was made after completion of a cost analysis conducted on the basis of section 2334(e)(2) of this title, and the analysis supports the determination.
“(C) The system being acquired pursuant to such contract has not been determined to have experienced cost growth in excess of the critical cost growth threshold pursuant to section 2433(d) of this title within 5 years prior to the date the Secretary anticipates such contract (or a contract for advance procurement entered into consistent with the authorization for such contract) will be awarded.
“(D) A sufficient number of end items of the system being acquired under such contract have been delivered at or within the most current estimates of the program acquisition unit cost or procurement unit cost for such system to determine that current estimates of such unit costs are realistic.
“(4) If for any fiscal year a multiyear contract to be entered into under this section is authorized by law for a particular procurement program and that authorization is subject to certain conditions established by law (including a condition as to cost savings to be achieved under the multiyear contract in comparison to specified other contracts) and if it appears (after negotiations with contractors) that such savings cannot be achieved, but that substantial savings could nevertheless be achieved through the use of a multiyear contract rather than specified other contracts, the President may submit to Congress a request for relief from the specified cost savings that must be achieved through multiyear contracting for that program. Any such request by the President shall include details about the request for a multiyear contract, including details about the negotiated contract terms and conditions.
“(5) (A) The Secretary may obligate funds for procurement of an end item under a multiyear contract for the purchase of property only for procurement of a complete and usable end item.
“(B) The Secretary may obligate funds appropriated for any fiscal year for advance procurement under a contract for the purchase of property only for the procurement of those long-lead items necessary in order to meet a planned delivery schedule for complete major end items that are programmed under the contract to be acquired with funds appropriated for a subsequent fiscal year (including an economic order quantity of such long-lead items when authorized by law).
“(6) The Secretary may make the certification under paragraph (3) notwithstanding the fact that one or more of the conditions of such certification are not met, if the Secretary determines that, due to exceptional circumstances, proceeding with a multiyear contract under this section is in the best interest of the Department of Defense and the Secretary provides the basis for such determination with the certification.
(b) Conforming amendment.—Subsection (a)(7) of such section is amended by striking “subparagraphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (1) of subsection (i)” and inserting “subparagraphs (C) through (F) of subsection (i)(3)”.
(c) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to requests for specific authorization by law to carry out defense acquisition programs using multiyear contract authority that are made on or after that date.
Section 818(c)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1495; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A)—
(B) in clause (i)—
(C) in clause (ii), by striking “trusted suppliers;” and inserting “suppliers identified as trusted suppliers in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to subparagraph (C) or (D); and”; and
(a) Authority for secretaries of military departments to carry out pilot.—Section 1603(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 944; 10 U.S.C. 2359 note) is amended by inserting after “Engineering” the following: “and the Secretary of each military department”.
(b) Review board revisions.—
(c) Increase in amount of awards.—Section 1603(c)(5)(B)(i) of such Act is amended by striking “$500,000” and inserting “$1,000,000”.
(a) Extension.—Subsection (e) of section 834 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.
(b) Additional requirements for comprehensive subcontracting plans.—Subsection (b) of section 834 of such Act is amended—
(2) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4), and in that paragraph by striking “$5,000,000” and inserting “$100,000,000”; and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph (3):
“(3) Each comprehensive subcontracting plan of a contractor shall require that the contractor report to the Secretary of Defense on a semi-annual basis the following information:
“(A) The amount of first-tier subcontract dollars awarded during the six-month period covered by the report to covered small business concerns, with the information set forth separately—
“(ii) by major defense acquisition program, as defined in section 2430(a) of title 10, United States Code;
“(B) The total number of subcontracts active under the test program during the six-month period covered by the report that would have otherwise required a subcontracting plan under paragraph (4) or (5) of section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)).
(c) Additional consequence for failure to make good faith effort to comply.—
(2) REPEAL OF SUSPENSION OF SUBSECTION (D).—Section 402 of Public Law 101–574 (104 Stat. 2832; 15 U.S.C. 637 note) is repealed.
(d) Eligibility requirement.—Subsection (d) of section 834 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (15 U.S.C. 637 note) is further amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) Effective in fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year thereafter in which the test program is in effect, the Secretary of Defense may not negotiate a comprehensive subcontracting plan for a fiscal year with any contractor with which such a plan was negotiated in the prior fiscal year if the Secretary determines that the contractor did not meet the subcontracting goals negotiated in the plan for the prior fiscal year.”.
(e) Report by Comptroller General.—Subsection (f) of section 834 of such Act is amended to read as follows:
“(f) Report.—Not later than September 30, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report on the results of the test program to the Committees on Armed Services and on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Armed Services and on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate.”.
(f) Additional definitions.—
(1) COVERED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN.—Subsection (g) of section 834 of such Act is amended to read as follows: “(g) Definitions.—In this section, the term ‘covered small business concern’ includes each of the following: “(1) A small business concern, as that term is defined under section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)). “(2) A small business concern owned and controlled by veterans, as that term is defined in section 3(q)(3) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(3)). “(3) A small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, as that term is defined in section 3(q)(2) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(2)). “(4) A qualified HUBZone small business concern, as that term is defined under section 3(p)(5) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(5)). “(5) A small business concern owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, as that term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(C)). “(6) A small business concern owned and controlled by women, as that term is defined under section 3(n) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 632(n)).”.
(a) Plan required.—Section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(s) Data quality improvement plan.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than October 1, 2015, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, in consultation with the Small Business Procurement Advisory Council, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, and the Administrator of General Services, shall develop a plan to improve the quality of data reported on bundled or consolidated contracts in the Federal procurement data system (described in section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States Code).
“(2) PLAN REQUIREMENTS.—The plan shall—
“(A) describe the roles and responsibilities of the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, each Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, the Administrator of General Services, senior procurement executives, and Chief Acquisition Officers in—
“(B) recommend changes to policies and procedures, including training procedures of relevant personnel, to properly identify and mitigate the effects of bundled or consolidated contracts;
“(3) PLAN SUBMISSION.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall submit the plan to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate not later than December 1, 2016.
(b) Technical amendment.—Section 44(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657q(a)) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(B) by striking “section 16(a) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(a))” and inserting “section 1702(a) of title 41, United States Code”; and
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking “section 16(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(c))” and inserting “section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code”.
(a) Assistance at Small Business Development Centers.—Section 21(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(c)(1)) is amended by inserting at the end the following: “Applicants receiving grants under this section may also assist small businesses by providing, where appropriate, education on the requirements applicable to small businesses under the regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with those requirements.”.
(b) Procurement technical assistance.—Section 2418 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) An eligible entity assisted by the Department of Defense under this chapter also may furnish education on the requirements applicable to small businesses under the regulations issued under section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) and on compliance with those requirements.”.
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall clarify regulations on reverse auctions, as necessary, to ensure that—
(1) single bid contracts may not be entered into resulting from reverse auctions unless compliant with existing Federal regulations and Department of Defense memoranda providing guidance on single bid offers;
(2) all reverse auctions provide offerors with the ability to submit revised bids throughout the course of the auction;
(b) Training.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President of the Defense Acquisition University shall establish comprehensive training available for contract specialists in the Department of Defense on the use of reverse auctions.
(c) Design-build defined.—In this section, the term “design-build” means procedures used for the selection of a contractor on the basis of price and other evaluation criteria to perform, in accordance with the provisions of a firm fixed-price contract, both the design and construction of a facility using performance specifications supplied by the Secretary of Defense.
(a) Authority for sole source contracts for certain small business concerns owned and controlled by women.—Subsection (m) of section 8 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(m)) is amended—
(2) in paragraph (5), by striking “paragraph (2)(F)” each place such term appears and inserting “paragraph (2)(E)”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
“(7) AUTHORITY FOR SOLE SOURCE CONTRACTS FOR ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY WOMEN.—A contracting officer may award a sole source contract under this subsection to any small business concern owned and controlled by women described in paragraph (2)(A) and certified under paragraph (2)(E) if—
“(A) such concern is determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance of the contract opportunity and the contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that 2 or more businesses described in paragraph (2)(A) will submit offers;
“(8) AUTHORITY FOR SOLE SOURCE CONTRACTS FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY WOMEN IN SUBSTANTIALLY UNDERREPRESENTED INDUSTRIES.—A contracting officer may award a sole source contract under this subsection to any small business concern owned and controlled by women certified under paragraph (2)(E) that is in an industry in which small business concerns owned and controlled by women are substantially underrepresented (as determined by the Administrator under paragraph (3)) if—
“(A) such concern is determined to be a responsible contractor with respect to performance of the contract opportunity and the contracting officer does not have a reasonable expectation that 2 or more businesses in an industry that has received a waiver under paragraph (3) will submit offers;
(a) In general.—Subchapter II of chapter 113 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) Definitions.—In this section:
“(b) Additional authorities for Chief Information Officers.—
“(1) PLANNING, PROGRAMMING, BUDGETING, AND EXECUTION AUTHORITIES FOR CIOS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The head of each covered agency other than the Department of Defense shall ensure that the Chief Information Officer of the agency has a significant role in—
“(B) BUDGET FORMULATION.—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall require in the annual information technology capital planning guidance of the Office of Management and Budget the following:
“(i) That the Chief Information Officer of each covered agency other than the Department of Defense approve the information technology budget request of the covered agency, and that the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense review and provide recommendations to the Secretary of Defense on the information technology budget request of the Department.
“(C) REVIEW.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—A covered agency other than the Department of Defense—
“(I) may not enter into a contract or other agreement for information technology or information technology services, unless the contract or other agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Chief Information Officer of the agency;
“(ii) DELEGATION.—
“(I) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subclause (II), the duties of a Chief Information Officer under clause (i) are not delegable.
“(II) NON-MAJOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS.—For a contract or agreement for a non-major information technology investment, as defined in the annual information technology capital planning guidance of the Office of Management and Budget, the Chief Information Officer of a covered agency other than the Department of Defense may delegate the approval of the contract or agreement under clause (i) to an individual who reports directly to the Chief Information Officer.
“(2) PERSONNEL-RELATED AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for each covered agency other than the Department of Defense, the Chief Information Officer of the covered agency shall approve the appointment of any other employee with the title of Chief Information Officer, or who functions in the capacity of a Chief Information Officer, for any component organization within the covered agency.
“(c) Limitation.—None of the authorities provided in this section shall apply to telecommunications or information technology that is fully funded by amounts made available—
“(1) under the National Intelligence Program, defined by section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6));
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections for chapter 113 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 11318 the following new item:
Section 11302(c) of title 40, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph (1):
“(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
“(A) The term ‘covered agency’ means an agency listed in section 901(b)(1) or 901(b)(2) of title 31.
“(B) The term ‘major information technology investment’ means an investment within a covered agency information technology investment portfolio that is designated by the covered agency as major, in accordance with capital planning guidance issued by the Director.
“(C) The term ‘national security system’ has the meaning provided in section 3542 of title 44.”; and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraphs:
“(3) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Director shall make available to the public a list of each major information technology investment, without regard to whether the investments are for new information technology acquisitions or for operations and maintenance of existing information technology, including data on cost, schedule, and performance.
“(B) AGENCY INFORMATION.—
“(i) The Director shall issue guidance to each covered agency for reporting of data required by subparagraph (A) that provides a standardized data template that can be incorporated into existing, required data reporting formats and processes. Such guidance shall integrate the reporting process into current budget reporting that each covered agency provides to the Office of Management and Budget, to minimize additional workload. Such guidance shall also clearly specify that the investment evaluation required under subparagraph (C) adequately reflect the investment’s cost and schedule performance and employ incremental development approaches in appropriate cases.
“(C) INVESTMENT EVALUATION.—For each major information technology investment listed under subparagraph (A), the Chief Information Officer of the covered agency, in consultation with other appropriate agency officials, shall categorize the investment according to risk, in accordance with guidance issued by the Director.
“(D) CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.—If either the Director or the Chief Information Officer of a covered agency determines that the information made available from the agency’s existing data systems and processes as required by subparagraph (B) is not timely and reliable, the Chief Information Officer, in consultation with the Director and the head of the agency, shall establish a program for the improvement of such data systems and processes.
“(E) WAIVER OR LIMITATION AUTHORITY.—The applicability of subparagraph (A) may be waived or the extent of the information may be limited by the Director, if the Director determines that such a waiver or limitation is in the national security interests of the United States.
“(F) ADDITIONAL LIMITATION.—The requirements of subparagraph (A) shall not apply to national security systems or to telecommunications or information technology that is fully funded by amounts made available—
“(i) under the National Intelligence Program, defined by section 3(6) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(6));
“(4) RISK MANAGEMENT.—For each major information technology investment listed under paragraph (3)(A) that receives a high risk rating, as described in paragraph (3)(C), for 4 consecutive quarters—
“(A) the Chief Information Officer of the covered agency and the program manager of the investment within the covered agency, in consultation with the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government, shall conduct a review of the investment that shall identify—
“(B) the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government shall communicate the results of the review under subparagraph (A) to—
“(i) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
“(C) in the case of a major information technology investment of the Department of Defense, the assessment required by subparagraph (A) may be accomplished in accordance with section 2445c of title 10, provided that the results of the review are provided to the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government upon request and to the committees identified in subsection (B); and
“(D) for a covered agency other than the Department of Defense, if on the date that is one year after the date of completion of the review required under subsection (A), the investment is rated as high risk under paragraph (3)(C), the Director shall deny any request for additional development, modernization, or enhancement funding for the investment until the date on which the Chief Information Officer of the covered agency determines that the root causes of the high level of risk of the investment have been addressed, and there is sufficient capability to deliver the remaining planned increments within the planned cost and schedule.
Section 11319 of title 40, United States Code, as added by section 831, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(c) Information technology portfolio, program, and resource reviews.—
“(1) PROCESS.—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers of appropriate agencies, shall implement a process to assist covered agencies in reviewing their portfolio of information technology investments—
“(A) to identify or develop ways to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the information technology investments of the covered agency;
“(B) to identify or develop opportunities to consolidate the acquisition and management of information technology services, and increase the use of shared-service delivery models;
“(E) to develop plans for actions to optimize the information technology portfolio, programs, and resources of the covered agency;
“(F) to develop ways to better align the information technology portfolio, programs, and financial resources of the covered agency to any multi-year funding requirements or strategic plans required by law;
“(2) METRICS AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS.—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Chief Information Officers of appropriate agencies, shall develop standardized cost savings and cost avoidance metrics and performance indicators for use by agencies for the process implemented under paragraph (1).
“(3) ANNUAL REVIEW.—The Chief Information Officer of each covered agency, in conjunction with the Chief Operating Officer or Deputy Secretary (or equivalent) of the covered agency and the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government, shall conduct an annual review of the information technology portfolio of the covered agency.
“(4) APPLICABILITY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—In the case of the Department of Defense, processes established pursuant to this subsection shall apply only to the business systems information technology portfolio of the Department of Defense and not to national security systems as defined by section 11103(a) of this title. The annual review required by paragraph (3) shall be carried out by the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense (or any successor to such Officer), in consultation with the Chief Information Officer, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and other appropriate Department of Defense officials. The Secretary of Defense may designate an existing investment or management review process to fulfill the requirement for the annual review required by paragraph (3), in consultation with the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government.
“(5) QUARTERLY REPORTS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government shall submit a quarterly report on the cost savings and reductions in duplicative information technology investments identified through the review required by paragraph (3) to—
“(i) the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Office of Electronic Government established under section 3602 of title 44, United States Code (and also known as the Office of E-Government and Information Technology), within the Office of Management and Budget.
(2) COVERED AGENCY.—The term “covered agency” means the following (including all associated components of the agency):
(b) Federal data center consolidation inventories and strategies.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—
(A) ANNUAL REPORTING.—Except as provided in subparagraph (C), each year, beginning in the first fiscal year after the date of the enactment of this Act and each fiscal year thereafter, the head of each covered agency, assisted by the Chief Information Officer of the agency, shall submit to the Administrator—
(i) a comprehensive inventory of the data centers owned, operated, or maintained by or on behalf of the agency; and
(ii) a multi-year strategy to achieve the consolidation and optimization of the data centers inventoried under clause (i), that includes—
(I) performance metrics—
(II) a timeline for agency activities to be completed under the FDCCI, with an emphasis on benchmarks the agency can achieve by specific dates;
(III) year-by-year calculations of investment and cost savings for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date set forth in subsection (e), broken down by each year, including a description of any initial costs for data center consolidation and optimization and life cycle cost savings and other improvements, with an emphasis on—
(B) USE OF OTHER REPORTING STRUCTURES.—The Administrator may require a covered agency to include the information required to be submitted under this subsection through reporting structures determined by the Administrator to be appropriate.
(C) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REPORTING.—For any year that the Department of Defense is required to submit a performance plan for reduction of resources required for data servers and centers, as required under section 2867(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note), the Department of Defense—
(i) may submit to the Administrator, in lieu of the multi-year strategy required under subparagraph (A)(ii)—
(I) the defense-wide plan required under section 2867(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note); and
(II) the report on cost savings required under section 2867(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note); and
(ii) shall submit the comprehensive inventory required under subparagraph (A)(i), unless the defense-wide plan required under section 2867(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note)—
(D) STATEMENT.—Each year, beginning in the first fiscal year after the date of the enactment of this Act and each fiscal year thereafter, the head of each covered agency, acting through the Chief Information Officer of the agency, shall—
(E) AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGIES.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Each covered agency, under the direction of the Chief Information Officer of the agency, shall—
(ii) DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—For purposes of clause (i)(I), implementation of the defense-wide plan required under section 2867(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 2223a note) by the Department of Defense shall be considered implementation of the strategy required under subparagraph (A)(ii).
(2) ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBILITIES.—The Administrator shall—
(A) establish the deadline, on an annual basis, for covered agencies to submit information under this section;
(B) establish a list of requirements that the covered agencies must meet to be considered in compliance with paragraph (1);
(C) ensure that information relating to agency progress towards meeting the Government-wide data center consolidation and optimization metrics is made available in a timely manner to the general public;
(D) review the inventories and strategies submitted under paragraph (1) to determine whether they are comprehensive and complete;
(E) monitor the implementation of the data center strategy of each covered agency that is required under paragraph (1)(A)(ii);
(3) COST SAVING GOAL AND UPDATES FOR CONGRESS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall develop, and make publicly available, a goal, broken down by year, for the amount of planned cost savings and optimization improvements achieved through the FDCCI during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date set forth in subsection (e).
(B) ANNUAL UPDATE.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date on which the goal described in subparagraph (A) is made publicly available, and each year thereafter, the Administrator shall aggregate the reported cost savings of each covered agency and optimization improvements achieved to date through the FDCCI and compare the savings to the projected cost savings and optimization improvements developed under subparagraph (A).
(ii) UPDATE FOR CONGRESS.—The goal required to be developed under subparagraph (A) shall be submitted to Congress and shall be accompanied by a statement describing—
(4) GAO REVIEW.—
(c) Ensuring cybersecurity standards for data center consolidation and cloud computing.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In implementing a data center consolidation and optimization strategy under this section, a covered agency shall do so in a manner that is consistent with Federal guidelines on cloud computing security, including—
(d) Waiver of requirements.—The Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense, or their respective designee, may waive the applicability to any national security system, as defined in section 3542 of title 44, United States Code, of any provision of this section if the Director of National Intelligence or the Secretary of Defense, or their respective designee, determines that such waiver is in the interest of national security. Not later than 30 days after making a waiver under this subsection, the Director of National Intelligence or the Secretary of Defense, or their respective designee, shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives a statement describing the waiver and the reasons for the waiver.
(a) Purpose.—The purpose of this section is to ensure timely progress by Federal agencies toward developing, strengthening, and deploying information technology acquisition cadres consisting of personnel with highly specialized skills in information technology acquisition, including program and project managers.
(b) Strategic planning.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy, in consultation with the Administrator for E-Government and Information Technology, shall work with Federal agencies, other than the Department of Defense, to update their acquisition human capital plans that were developed pursuant to the October 27, 2009, guidance issued by the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy in furtherance of section 1704(g) of title 41, United States Code (originally enacted as section 869 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4553)), to address how the agencies are meeting their human capital requirements to support the timely and effective acquisition of information technology.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The updates required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted to the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy and shall address, at a minimum, each Federal agency’s consideration or use of the following procedures:
(A) Development of an information technology acquisition cadre within the agency or use of memoranda of understanding with other agencies that have such cadres or personnel with experience relevant to the agency’s information technology acquisition needs.
(B) Development of personnel assigned to information technology acquisitions, including cross-functional training of acquisition information technology and program personnel.
(c) Federal agency defined.—In this section, the term “Federal agency” means each agency listed in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy shall prescribe regulations providing that when the Federal Government makes a purchase of services and supplies offered under the Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative (managed by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy) but such Initiative is not used, the contract file for the purchase shall include a brief analysis of the comparative value, including price and nonprice factors, between the services and supplies offered under such Initiative and services and supplies offered under the source or sources used for the purchase.
(a) In general.—The Administrator of General Services shall identify and develop a strategic sourcing initiative to enhance Governmentwide acquisition, shared use, and dissemination of software, as well as compliance with end user license agreements.
(b) Governmentwide user license agreement.—The Administrator, in developing the initiative under subsection (a), shall allow for the purchase of a license agreement that is available for use by all Executive agencies (as defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code) as one user to the maximum extent practicable and as appropriate.
(a) Identification of persons and entities.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in conjunction with the Director of National Intelligence and in consultation with the Secretary of State, establish in each covered combatant command a program to identify persons and entities within the area of responsibility of such command that—
(b) Notice of identified persons and entities.—
(1) NOTICE.—Upon the identification of a person or entity as being described by subsection (a), the head of the executive agency concerned (or the designee of such head) and the commander of the covered combatant command concerned (or the specified deputies of the commander) shall be notified, in writing, of such identification of the person or entity.
(2) RESPONSIVE ACTIONS.—Upon receipt of a notice under paragraph (1), the head of the executive agency concerned (or the designee of such head) and the commander of the covered combatant command concerned (or the specified deputies of the commander) may notify the heads of contracting activities, or other appropriate officials of the agency or command, in writing of such identification.
(c) Authority to terminate or void contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements and to restrict future award.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, and the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards shall be revised to provide that, upon notice from the head of an executive agency (or the designee of such head) or the commander of a covered combatant command (or the specified deputies of the commander) pursuant to subsection (b), the head of contracting activity of an executive agency, or other appropriate official, may do the following:
(1) Restrict the award of contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements of the executive agency concerned upon a written determination by the head of contracting activity or other appropriate official that the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement would provide funds received under such contract, grant, or cooperative agreement directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(2) Terminate for default any contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of the executive agency concerned upon a written determination by the head of contracting activity or other appropriate official that the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, has failed to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds received under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(3) Void in whole or in part any contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of the executive agency concerned upon a written determination by the head of contracting activity or other appropriate official that the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement provides funds directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(d) Clause.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, and the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards shall be revised to require that—
(2) CLAUSE DESCRIBED.—The clause described in this paragraph is a clause that—
(A) requires the contractor, or the recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds, including goods and services, received under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity; and
(e) Requirements following contract actions.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, and the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards shall be revised as follows:
(1) To require that any head of contracting activity, or other appropriate official, taking an action under subsection (c) to terminate, void, or restrict a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement notify in writing the contractor or recipient of the grant or cooperative agreement, as applicable, of the action.
(2) To permit the contractor or recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement subject to an action taken under subsection (c) to terminate or void the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement, as the case may be, an opportunity to challenge the action by requesting an administrative review of the action under the procedures of the executive agency concerned not later than 30 days after receipt of notice of the action.
(f) Annual review; protection of classified information.—
(1) ANNUAL REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Director of National Intelligence and in consultation with the Secretary of State shall, on an annual basis, review the lists of persons and entities previously covered by a notice under subsection (b) as having been identified as described by subsection (a) in order to determine whether or not such persons and entities continue to warrant identification as described by subsection (a). If a determination is made pursuant to such a review that a person or entity no longer warrants identification as described by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall notify the head of the executive agency concerned (or the designee of such head) and the commander of the covered combatant command concerned (or the specified deputies of the commander) in writing of such determination.
(2) PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.—Classified information relied upon to make an identification in accordance with subsection (a) may not be disclosed to a contractor or a recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement with respect to which an action is taken pursuant to the authority provided in subsection (c), or to their representatives, in the absence of a protective order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction established under Article I or Article III of the Constitution of the United States that specifically addresses the conditions upon which such classified information may be so disclosed.
(g) Delegation of certain responsibilities.—
(1) COMBATANT COMMAND RESPONSIBILITIES.—The commander of a covered combatant command may delegate the responsibilities in this section to any deputies of the commander specified by the commander for purposes of this section. Any delegation of responsibilities under this paragraph shall be made in writing.
(2) NONDELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTIONS.—The authority provided by subsection (c) to terminate, void, or restrict contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements, in whole or in part, may not be delegated below the level of head of contracting activity, or equivalent official for purposes of grants or cooperative agreements.
(h) Additional responsibilities of executive agencies.—
(1) SHARING OF INFORMATION ON SUPPORTERS OF THE ENEMY.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, carry out a program through which agency components may provide information to heads of executive agencies (or the designees of such heads) and the commanders of the covered combatant commands (or the specified deputies of the commanders) relating to persons or entities who may be providing funds, including goods and services, received under contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements of the executive agencies directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity. The program shall be designed to facilitate and encourage the sharing of risk and threat information between executive agencies and the covered combatant commands.
(2) INCLUSION OF INFORMATION ON CONTRACT ACTIONS IN FAPIIS AND OTHER SYSTEMS.—Upon the termination, voiding, or restriction of a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of an executive agency under subsection (c), the head of contracting activity of the executive agency shall provide for the inclusion in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other formal system of records on contractors or entities, of appropriate information on the termination, voiding, or restriction, as the case may be, of the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement.
(3) REPORTS.—The head of contracting activity that receives a notice pursuant to subsection (b) shall submit to the head of the executive agency concerned (or the designee of such head) and the commander of the covered combatant command concerned (or specified deputies) a report on the action, if any, taken by the head of contracting activity pursuant to subsection (c), including a determination not to terminate, void, or restrict the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement as otherwise authorized by subsection (c).
(i) Reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 of 2016, 2017, and 2018, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of the authorities in this section in the preceding calendar year, including the following:
(A) For each instance in which an executive agency exercised the authority to terminate, void, or restrict a contract, grant, and cooperative agreement pursuant to subsection (c), based on a notification under subsection (b), the following:
(j) Inapplicability to certain contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements.—The provisions of this section do not apply to contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements that are performed entirely inside the United States.
(k) National security exception.—Nothing in this section shall apply to the authorized intelligence or law enforcement activities of the United States Government.
(l) Construction with other authorities.—Except as provided in subsection (m), the authorities in this section shall be in addition to, and not to the exclusion of, any other authorities available to executive agencies to implement policies and purposes similar to those set forth in this section.
(m) Coordination with current authorities.—
(1) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY RELATED TO CENTCOM.—Effective 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, section 841 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is repealed.
(2) REPEAL OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITY RELATED TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—Effective 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 810; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is repealed.
(3) USE OF SUPERSEDED AUTHORITIES IN IMPLEMENTATION OF REQUIREMENTS.—In providing for the implementation of the requirements of this section by the Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense may use and modify for that purpose the regulations and procedures established for purposes of the implementation of the requirements of section 841 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 and section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
(a) Contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, applicable regulations shall be revised to provide that, except as provided under subsection (c)(1), the clause described in paragraph (2) may, as appropriate, be included in each covered contract, grant, and cooperative agreement of an executive agency that is awarded on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) CLAUSE.—The clause described in this paragraph is a clause authorizing the head of the executive agency concerned, upon a written determination pursuant to paragraph (3), to examine any records of the contractor, the recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement, or any subcontractor or subgrantee under such contract, grant, or cooperative agreement to the extent necessary to ensure that funds, including goods and services, available under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement are not provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(3) WRITTEN DETERMINATION.—The authority to examine records pursuant to the contract clause described in paragraph (2) may be exercised only upon a written determination by the contracting officer, or comparable official responsible for a grant or cooperative agreement, upon a finding by the commander of a covered combatant command (or the specified deputies of the commander) or the head of an executive agency (or the designee of such head) that there is reason to believe that funds, including goods and services, available under the contract, grant, or cooperative agreement concerned may have been provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
(b) Reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1 of 2016, 2017, and 2018, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of the authority provided by this section in the preceding calendar year.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under this subsection shall identify, for the calendar year covered by such report, each instance in which an executive agency exercised the authority provided under this section to examine records, explain the basis for the action taken, and summarize the results of any examination of records so undertaken.
(c) Relationship to existing authorities applicable to CENTCOM.—
(1) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall not apply to contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements covered under section 842 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1513; 10 U.S.C. 2313 note).
(2) EXTENSION OF CURRENT AUTHORITIES APPLICABLE TO CENTCOM.—Section 842(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1514; 10 U.S.C. 2313 note) is amended by striking “date of the enactment of this Act” and inserting “date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015”.
In this subtitle:
(1) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(2) CONTINGENCY OPERATION.—The term “contingency operation” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.
(3) CONTRACT.—The term “contract” includes a contract for commercial items but is not limited to a contract for commercial items.
(5) COVERED CONTRACT, GRANT, OR COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT DEFINED.—The term “covered contract, grant, or cooperative agreement” means a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement with an estimated value in excess of $50,000 that is performed outside the United States, including its possessions and territories, in support of a contingency operation in which members of the Armed Forces are actively engaged in hostilities.
(6) COVERED PERSON OR ENTITY.—The term “covered person or entity” means a person or entity that is actively opposing United States or coalition forces involved in a contingency operation in which members of the Armed Forces are actively engaged in hostilities.
(7) EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term “executive agency” has the meaning given that term in section 133 of title 41, United States Code.
(8) HEAD OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY.—The term “head of contracting activity” has the meaning described in section 1.601 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
(9) UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS.—The term “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards” means the guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget in part 200 of chapter II of title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
(a) Authority to establish procedures.—The Secretary may prescribe procedures for the rapid acquisition and deployment of items for the United States Special Operations Command that are currently under development by the Department of Defense or available from the commercial sector and are—
(b) Issues to be addressed.—The procedures prescribed under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A process for streamlined communication between the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command and the acquisition and research and development communities, including—
(c) Testing requirement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The process for demonstrating performance and evaluating for current operational purposes the existing capability of an item prescribed under subsection (b)(2)(A) shall include—
(d) Limitation.—The quantity of items of a system procured using the procedures prescribed pursuant to this section may not exceed the number established for low-rate initial production for the system. Any such items shall be counted for purposes of the number of items of the system that may be procured through low-rate initial production.
(e) Annual funding limitation.—Of the funds available to the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command in any given fiscal year, not more than $50,000,000 may be used to procure items under this section.
(f) Relationship to other rapid acquisition authority.—The Commander of the United States Special Operations Command may not use the authority under this section at the same time the Commander uses the authority under section 806 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note).
The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall ensure that Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02 and other applicable guidance require full consideration, during preliminary design review for a product, of metals, materials, and technologies that effectively prevent or control corrosion over the life cycle of the product.
(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on enhancing the role of Department of Defense civilian and military program managers in developing and carrying out defense acquisition programs.
(b) Matters to be addressed.—The report required by this section shall address, at a minimum, recommendations for—
(2) increasing emphasis on the mentoring of current and future program managers by experienced senior executives and program managers within the Department;
(4) creating additional incentives for the recruitment and retention of highly qualified individuals to serve as program managers;
(5) improving required resource levels and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating expertise, and software development expertise) for program managers;
(6) improving means of collecting and disseminating best practices and lessons learned to enhance program management across the Department;
(7) creating common templates and tools to support improved data gathering and analysis for program management and oversight purposes;
(9) enhancing monetary and nonmonetary awards for successful accomplishment of program objectives by program managers; and
(10) improving program manager tenure with the goal of maintaining both civilian and military program managers in their positions for a sufficient period of time to ensure program stability and consistency of leadership, including consideration of tying program manager tenure to milestone decision points for major defense acquisition programs and major automated information system programs.
(a) Guidance.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall issue guidance for measuring the operational effectiveness and efficiency of the Joint Information Environment within the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commands. The guidance shall include a definition of specific metrics for data collection, and a requirement for each military department, Defense Agency, and combatant command to regularly collect and assess data on such operational effectiveness and efficiency and report the results to such Chief Information Officer on a regular basis.
(b) Baseline architecture.—The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall identify a baseline architecture for the Joint Information Environment by identifying and reporting to the Secretary of Defense any information technology programs or other investments that support that architecture.
Section 847(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 243; 10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by inserting after “repository” the following: “maintained by the General Counsel of the Department”.
(a) Addition of reference to grantee.—Section 2409(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “or subcontractor” and inserting “, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee”.
Section 2324(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
(a) Contract requirement.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered contract includes a provision requiring that any photovoltaic device installed under the contract be manufactured in the United States substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States, unless the head of the department or independent establishment concerned determines, on a case-by-case basis, that the inclusion of such requirement is inconsistent with the public interest or involves unreasonable costs, subject to exceptions provided in the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) or otherwise provided by law.
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(a) In general.—Subchapter II of chapter 134 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2264. Reimbursement for assistance provided to nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producers
“(a) In general.—There shall be credited to the applicable appropriations account or fund from which the expenses described in subsection (b) were charged any amounts received by the Department of Defense as reimbursement for such expenses.
“(b) Description of expenses.—The expenses referred to in subsection (a) are any expenses—
“(1) incurred by the Department of Defense as a result of providing assistance to a nongovernmental entertainment-oriented media producer;
“(2) for which the Department of Defense requires reimbursement under section 9701 of title 31 or any other provision of law; and
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
Section 2216a(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2018”.
(a) Conversion of position of deputy chief management officer to position of under secretary of defense for business management and information.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Effective on February 1, 2017, section 132a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 132a. Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information
“(a) There is an Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
“(c) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the role of the Deputy Secretary as the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information shall perform such duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary of Defense may prescribe, including the following:
“(1) Assisting the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy Secretary’s role as the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense under section 132(c) of this title.
“(2) Supervising the management of the business operations of the Department of Defense and adjudicating issues and conflicts in functional domain business policies.
“(3) Establishing business strategic planning and performance management policies and measures and developing the Department of Defense Strategic Management Plan.
“(4) Establishing business information technology portfolio policies and overseeing investment management of that portfolio for the Department of Defense.
(b) Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.—
(1) STATUTORY ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION.—Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 141 the following new section:
Ҥ 142. Chief Information Officer
“(b) (1) The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense— “(A) is the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense for the purposes of sections 3506(a)(2) and 3544(a)(3) of title 44; “(B) has the responsibilities and duties specified in section 11315 of title 40;
“(c) The Chief Information Officer takes precedence in the Department of Defense with the officials serving in positions specified in section 131(b)(4) of this title. The officials serving in positions specified in section 131(b)(4) and the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense take precedence among themselves in the order prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.”.
(c) Repeal of requirement for defense business system management committee.—Section 186 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(d) Assignment of responsibility for defense business systems.—Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking “Defense Business Systems Management Committee” and inserting “investment review board established under subsection (g)”; and
(e) Deadline for establishment of investment review board and investment management process.—The investment review board and investment management process required by section 2222(g) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (d)(3), shall be established not later than March 15, 2015.
(f) Redesignation of assistant secretary of defense for operational energy plans and programs To reflect merger with deputy under secretary of defense for installations and environment.—Paragraph (9) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(9) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment. The Assistant Secretary—
(g) Clarification of policy and responsibilities of assistant secretary of defense for energy, installations, and environment.—
(1) TRANSFER OF POLICY PROVISIONS FROM SECTION 138C.—Chapter 173 of such title is amended—
(B) by transferring paragraph (3) of section 138c(c) of such title to section 2926, as added by subparagraph (A), inserting such paragraph after the section heading, and redesignating such paragraph as subsection (a);
(C) in subsection (a) (as so inserted and redesignated)—
(D) by transferring subsections (d), (e), and (f) of section 138c of such title to section 2926, as added by subparagraph (A), inserting those subsections after subsection (a) (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph (B)), and redesignating those subsections as subsections (b), (c), and (d), respectively;
(E) in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraphs (B) and (D)), by inserting “of Defense for Installations, Energy, and Environment” after “Assistant Secretary” the first place it appears in each such subsection;
(F) in subsection (b) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph (D)), by striking “provide guidance to, and consult with, the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Secretaries of the military departments,” and inserting “make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and Deputy Secretary of Defense and provide guidance to the Secretaries of the military departments”; and
(G) in subsection (c) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph (D)), by amending paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) to read as follows:
“(4) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the proposed budgets for that fiscal year that were reviewed by the Assistant Secretary under paragraph (3).
“(5) For each proposed budget covered by a report under paragraph (4) for which the certification of the Assistant Secretary under paragraph (3) is that the budget is not adequate for implementation of the strategy, the report shall include the following:
“(B) A discussion of the actions that the Secretary proposes to take, together with any recommended legislation that the Secretary considers appropriate, to address the inadequacy of the proposed budget.
“(C) An appendix prepared by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff describing—
“(D) An appendix prepared by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics certifying that and describing how the acquisition system is addressing operational energy in the procurement process, including long-term sustainment considerations, and how programs are extending combat capability as a result of these considerations.
“(6) For each proposed budget covered by a report under paragraph (4) for which the certification of the Assistant Secretary under paragraph (3) is that the budget is adequate for implementation of the strategy, the report shall include the items set forth in subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E) of paragraph (5).”.
(h) Amendments relating to certain prescribed assistant secretary of defense positions.—Chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows:
(1) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR LOGISTICS AND MATERIEL READINESS.—Paragraph (7) of section 138(b) is amended—
(A) in the first sentence, by inserting after “Readiness” the following: “, who shall be appointed from among persons with an extensive background in the sustainment of major weapons systems and combat support equipment”;
(C) by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraph (B)) the text of subsection (b) of section 138a;
(2) ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING.—Paragraph (8) of such section is amended—
(B) by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the following: “The Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation, shall—”;
(C) by transferring paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) of section 138b to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraphs (A) and (B)), indenting those paragraphs 2 ems from the left margin, and redesignating those paragraphs as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;
(i) Codification of restrictions on use of the deputy under secretary of defense title.—
(1) CODIFICATION.—Effective on January 1, 2015, section 137a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(2) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Effective on the effective date specified in paragraph (1), section 906(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2426; 10 U.S.C. 137a note) is repealed.
(j) Clarification of orders of precedence.—
(1) CLARIFICATION RELATING TO CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER.—Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1)—
(A) section 131(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) CLARIFICATION RELATING TO OTHER POSITIONS.—Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1)—
(A) section 133(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “and the Deputy Secretary of Defense” and inserting “, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information”;
(B) section 134(c) of such title is amended by inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information,” after “the Deputy Secretary of Defense,”;
(k) Technical and conforming amendments.—Title 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows:
(1) In paragraph (8) of section 131(b) (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2))—
(2) In section 132(b), by striking “is disabled or there is no Secretary of Defense” and inserting “dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office”.
(3) In section 137a(b), by striking “is absent or disabled” and inserting “dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office”.
(3) Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1), in section 2222—
(A) by striking “the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense” each place it appears in subsections (c)(2)(E), (f)(1)(D), (f)(1)(E), (f)(2)(E), and (g)(1) and inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information”; and
(l) Clerical amendments.—
(1) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(m) Executive schedule matters.—
(1) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE LEVEL II.—Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1), section 5313 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting above the item relating to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics the following:
(2) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE LEVEL III.—Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1), section 5314 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.”.
(n) References.—
(1) DCMO.—After February 1, 2017, any reference to the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense in any provision of law or in any rule, regulation, or other record, document, or paper of the United States shall be deemed to refer to the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information.
(2) ASDEIE.—Any reference to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs or to the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment in any provision of law or in any rule, regulation, or other paper of the United State shall be deemed to refer to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment.
(a) Single Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs.—
(1) REDESIGNATION OF POSITION.—The position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs is hereby redesignated as the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. The individual serving in that position on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act may continue in office after that date without further appointment.
(2) STATUTORY DUTIES.—Paragraph (2) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(2) One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph (1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs shall have as the principal duty of such Assistant Secretary the overall supervision of manpower and reserve affairs of the Department of Defense.”.
(b) Conforming amendments.—
(1) CROSS REFERENCE IN SUBTITLE E.—Section 10201 of such title is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 10201. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs
“As provided in section 138(b)(2) of this title, the official in the Department of Defense with responsibility for overall supervision of reserve affairs of the Department of Defense is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs.”.
(a) Assessment required.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment of the feasibility, advisability, and recommendations, if any, for reducing or increasing the number or consolidating the common staff functions and infrastructure of the combatant commands by the end of fiscal year 2020.
(b) Matters covered.—The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An analysis of alternative versions of the Unified Command Plan for distribution and assignment of the following:
(2) A detailed analysis of each alternative that reduces or increases the number or consolidates the common staff functions of the combatant commands in terms of assigned personnel, resources, and infrastructure, set forth separately by fiscal year, by the end of fiscal year 2020.
(3) A description of the changes to the Unified Command Plan necessary to implement such reductions, increases, or consolidations.
(4) An assessment of the feasibility, advisability, risks, and estimated costs associated with such reductions, increases, or consolidations.
(5) An assessment of efficiencies, potential savings from such efficiencies, and operational risk, if any, that could be realized by—
(A) combining or otherwise sharing common staff or support functions between two or more combatant command headquarters;
(c) Use of previous studies and outside experts.—In conducting the assessment required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff may—
(d) Report.—
(1) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the findings and recommendations of the assessment required by subsection (a). The report shall include the views of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
(a) Independent office required.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain an independent organization within the Department of Defense to develop and coordinate net assessments of the standing, trends, and future prospects of the military capabilities and potential of the United States in comparison with the military capabilities and potential of other countries or groups of countries, so as to identify emerging or future threats or opportunities for the United States.
(b) Direct report to the secretary of defense.—The head of the office established and maintained pursuant to subsection (a) shall report directly to the Secretary of Defense without intervening authority and may communicate views on matters within the responsibility of the office directly to the Secretary without obtaining the approval or concurrence of any other official within the Department of Defense.
(a) Plan required.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for implementing a periodic review and analysis of the Department of Defense personnel requirements for management headquarters.
(b) Elements of plan.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following for each covered organization:
(1) A description of how current management headquarters are sized and structured to execute Department of Defense assigned mission requirements, including a list of the reference documents and instructions that explain the mission requirements of the management headquarters and how the management headquarters are sized and structured.
(2) A description of the critical capabilities and skillsets required by management headquarters to execute Department of Defense strategic guidance in order to fulfill mission objectives.
(3) An identification and analysis of the factors that directly or indirectly influence or contribute to the expense of Department of Defense management headquarters.
(4) An assessment of the effectiveness of current systems in use to track how military, civilian, and contract personnel are identified, managed, and tracked at the management headquarters.
(5) A description of the proposed timeline, required resources necessary, and Department of Defense documents, instructions, and regulations that need to be updated in order to implement a permanent periodic review and analysis of Department of Defense personnel requirements for management headquarters.
(c) Covered Organization Defined.—In this section, the term “covered organization” includes each of the following:
(6) Headquarters, Department of the Army, including the Secretary of the Army, the Office of the Chief of Staff of the Army, and the Army Staff.
(8) The Office of the Secretary of the Navy, the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, and the Headquarters, United States Marine Corps.
(d) Report.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan required by subsection (a).
(e) Amendments.—Section 904(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 816; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended—
(4) in subparagraph (E), by inserting “, including the risks of, and capabilities gained or lost by implementing, such modifications” before the period; and
(5) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
(a) Senior management workforce.—Subsection (c) of section 115b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Highly qualified experts.—Such section is further amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking “subsection (f)(1)” in subparagraphs (D) and (E) and inserting “subsection (h)(1) or (h)(2)”;
(3) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): “(f) Highly qualified experts.— (1) Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the workforce of the Department of Defense comprising highly qualified experts appointed pursuant to section 9903 of title 5 (in this subsection referred to as the ‘HQE workforce’). “(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall include, with respect to the HQE workforce— “(A) an assessment of the critical skills and competencies of the existing HQE workforce and projected trends in that workforce based on expected losses due to retirement and other attrition; “(B) specific strategies for attracting, compensating, and motivating the HQE workforce of the Department, including the program objectives of the Department to be achieved through such strategies and the funding needed to implement such strategies;
(c) Definitions.—Subsection (h) of such section (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
“(h) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘senior management workforce of the Department of Defense’ includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:
“(A) Appointees in the Senior Executive Service under section 3131 of title 5.
“(2) The term ‘senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense’ includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:
“(A) Persons serving in positions described in section 5376(a) of title 5.
“(B) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), as amended by section 1114 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398 (114 Stat. 1654A–315)).
“(C) Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note).
Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2402), as amended by section 951(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 839), is amended by striking “2013, 2014, and 2015” and inserting “and 2013”.
Section 941(b)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 184 note) is amended by striking “through 2014” and inserting “through 2019”.
(a) Authority.—Notwithstanding the provisions of section 5911 of title 5, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense may, for the period of time described in subsection (b), establish and carry out a Government lodging program to provide Government or commercial lodging for employees of the Department of Defense or members of the uniformed services under the Secretary’s jurisdiction performing duty on official travel, and may require such travelers to occupy adequate quarters on a rental basis when available.
(b) Program duration.—The authority to establish and execute a Government lodging program under this section expires on December 31, 2019.
(c) Limitation.—A Government lodging program developed under the authority in subsection (a), and a requirement under subsection (a) with respect to an employee of the Department of Defense, may not be construed to be subject to a duty to negotiate under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code.
(d) Reports.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the exercise of authority provided by subsection (a). The report shall include a detailed description of the facets of the Government lodging program, a description of how the program will increase travel efficiencies within the Department, a description of how the program will increase the safety of authorized travelers of the Department of Defense, and an estimate of the savings expected to be achieved by the program.
(2) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Each year, the Secretary shall include with the materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary in support of the budget submitted by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a report that provides actual savings achieved (or costs incurred) under the Government lodging program to date and a description of estimated savings for the fiscal year budget being submitted, any changes to program rules made since the prior report, and an overall assessment to date of the program’s effectiveness in increasing efficiency of travel and safety of Department employees.
(3) FINAL REPORT.—With the budget materials submitted to Congress by the Secretary in support of the budget submitted by the President for fiscal year 2019, the Secretary shall include a final report providing the Secretary’s overall assessment of the effectiveness of the Government lodging program established under subsection (a), including a statement of savings achieved (or costs incurred) as of that date, and a recommendation for whether the program shall be made permanent. The Secretary may, in consultation with the heads of other Federal agencies, make a recommendation on whether the program should be expanded and made permanent with respect to those other Federal agencies.
(a) In general.—Section 5704(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended in the last sentence by striking all that follows “the rate per mile” and inserting “shall be the single standard mileage rate established by the Internal Revenue Service.”.
(b) Regulations and reports.—
(1) PROVISIONS RELATING TO PRIVATELY OWNED AIRPLANES AND MOTORCYCLES.—Paragraph (1)(A) of section 5707(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(1) (A) The Administrator of General Services shall conduct periodic investigations of the cost of travel and the operation of privately owned airplanes and privately owned motorcycles by employees while engaged on official business, and shall report the results of such investigations to Congress at least once a year.”.
(2) PROVISIONS RELATING TO PRIVATELY OWNED AUTOMOBILES.—Clause (i) of section 5707(b)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) Designation of agency and director.—Subsection (a) of section 1501 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Responsibility for Missing Persons.— (1) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall designate a single organization within the Department of Defense to have responsibility for Department matters relating to missing persons, including accounting for missing persons and persons whose remains have not been recovered from the conflict in which they were lost.
“(2) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the responsibilities of the designated Agency Director shall include the following:
“(A) Policy, control, and oversight within the Department of Defense of the entire process for investigation and recovery related to missing persons, including matters related to search, rescue, escape, and evasion.
“(B) Policy, control, and oversight of the program established under section 1509 of this title.
“(C) Responsibility for accounting for missing persons, including locating, recovering, and identifying missing persons or their remains after hostilities have ceased.
“(D) Coordination for the Department of Defense with other departments and agencies of the United States on all matters concerning missing persons.
“(E) Dissemination of appropriate information on the status of missing persons to authorized family members.
“(F) Establishment of a means for communication between officials of the designated Defense Agency and family members of missing persons, veterans service organizations, concerned citizens, and the public on the Department’s efforts to account for missing persons, including a readily available means for communication of their views and recommendations to the designated Agency Director.
“(3) In carrying out the responsibilities established under this subsection, the designated Agency Director shall be responsible for the coordination for such purposes within the Department of Defense among the military departments, the Joint Staff, and the commanders of the combatant commands.
“(4) The designated Agency Director shall establish policies, which shall apply uniformly throughout the Department of Defense, for personnel recovery (including search, rescue, escape, and evasion) and for personnel accounting (including locating, recovering, and identifying missing persons or their remains after hostilities have ceased).
(b) Public-private partnerships and other forms of support.—Chapter 76 of such title is amended by inserting after section 1501 the following new section:
Ҥ 1501a. Public-private partnerships; other forms of support
“(a) Public-private partnerships.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into arrangements known as public-private partnerships with appropriate entities outside the Government for the purposes of facilitating the activities of the designated Defense Agency. The Secretary may only partner with foreign governments or foreign entities with the concurrence of the Secretary of State. Any such arrangement shall be entered into in accordance with authorities provided under this section or any other authority otherwise available to the Secretary. Regulations prescribed under subsection (e)(1) shall include provisions for the establishment and implementation of such partnerships.
“(b) Acceptance of voluntary personal services.—The Secretary of Defense may accept voluntary services to facilitate accounting for missing persons in the same manner as the Secretary of a military department may accept such services under section 1588(a)(9) of this title.
“(c) Cooperative agreements and grants.—
“(d) Use of department of defense personal property.—The Secretary may allow a private entity to use, at no cost, personal property of the Department of Defense to assist the entity in supporting the activities of the designated Defense Agency.
“(e) Regulations.—
“(2) LIMITATION.—Such regulations shall provide that acceptance of a gift (including a gift of services) or use of a gift under this section may not occur if the nature or circumstances of the acceptance or use would compromise the integrity, or the appearance of integrity, of any program of the Department of Defense or any individual involved in such program.
“(f) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT.—The term ‘cooperative agreement’ means an authorized cooperative agreement as described in section 6305 of title 31.
“(2) GRANT.—The term ‘grant’ means an authorized grant as described in section 6304 of title 31.”.
(c) Section 1505 conforming amendments.—Section 1505(c) of such title is amended—
(d) Section 1509 amendments.—Section 1509 of such title is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)—
(B) in paragraph (1), by striking “POW/MIA accounting community” and inserting “through the designated Agency Director”;
(C) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph (2):
“(2) (A) The Secretary shall assign or detail to the designated Defense Agency on a full-time basis a senior medical examiner from the personnel of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System. The primary duties of the medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall include the identification of remains in support of the function of the designated Agency Director to account for unaccounted for persons covered by subsection (a).
“(B) In carrying out functions under this chapter, the medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall report to the designated Agency Director.
(2) in subsection (d)—
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(4) The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a single centralized database and case management system containing information on all missing persons for whom a file has been established under this subsection. The database and case management system shall be accessible to all elements of the Department of Defense involved in the search, recovery, identification, and communications phases of the program established by this section.”; and
(e) Report on POW/MIA policies.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on policies and proposals for providing access to information and documents to the next of kin of missing service personnel, including under chapter 76 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by this section
(2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A) A description of information and documents to be provided to the next of kin, including the status of recovery efforts and service records.
(f) Clerical amendments.—
(a) Authority to transfer authorizations.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2015 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(b) Limitations.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—
(a) Transfer authorized.—If the amount authorized to be appropriated for the weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration under section 3101 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 is less than $8,700,000,000 (the amount projected to be required for such activities in fiscal year 2015 as specified in the report under section 1251 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2549)), the Secretary of Defense may transfer, from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to this Act, to the Secretary of Energy an amount, not to exceed $150,000,000, to be available only for naval reactors or weapons activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(b) Notice to congress.—In the event of a transfer under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall promptly notify Congress of the transfer, and shall include in such notice the Department of Defense account or accounts from which funds are transferred.
Not later March 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, and make publicly available on the Internet website of the Department of Defense, the following information:
(1) The total dollar amount, by account, of all balances carried forward by the Department of Defense at the end of the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year during which such information is submitted.
(a) Extension.—Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1011 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 126 Stat. 843), is amended—
(b) Notice to Congress on assistance.—Not later than 15 days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by subsection (a)) using funds available for fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the types of such assistance, the budget for such assistance, and the anticipated completion date and duration of the provision of such assistance.
(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 374 note) is amended by striking “2014” and inserting “2017”.
(b) Expansion of authority To include activities To counter transnational organized crime.—Such section is further amended—
(1) by inserting “or activities to counter transnational organized crime” after “counter-drug activities” each place it appears;
(c) Notice to Congress on facilities projects.—Subsection (h)(2) of such section is amended by striking “$500,000” and inserting “$250,000”.
(d) Definition of transnational organized crime.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(j) Definition of transnational organized crime.—In this section, the term ‘transnational organized crime’ means self-perpetuating associations of individuals who operate transnationally for the purpose of obtaining power, influence, monetary, or commercial gains, wholly or in part by illegal means, while protecting their activities through a pattern of corruption or violence or through a transnational organization structure and the exploitation of transnational commerce or communication mechanisms.”.
Subsection (e) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1013(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 844), is amended to read as follows:
“(e) Availability of funds.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 in which the authority under this section is in effect for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, an amount not to exceed $125,000,000 shall be available in such fiscal year for the provision of support under this section.”.
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (10 U.S.C. 371 note) is amended by inserting “or counter-transnational organized crime activities” after “counter-terrorism activities”.
(c) Reports.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(2) in paragraph (1)—
(d) Conditions.—Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A) by inserting “or counter-transnational organized crime” after “counter-terrorism”;
(e) Support for counter-transnational organized crime.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Definitions.— (1) In this section, the term ‘transnational organized crime’ has the meaning given such term in section 1004(j) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 374 note).
“(2) For purposes of applying the definition of transnational organized crime under paragraph (1) to this section, the term ‘illegal means’, as it appears in such definition, includes the trafficking of money, human trafficking, illicit financial flows, illegal trade in natural resources and wildlife, trade in illegal drugs and weapons, and other forms of illegal means determined by the Secretary of Defense.”.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The stability and security of the Western Hemisphere has a direct impact on the security interests of the United States.
(2) Over the past decade, there has been a marked increase in violence and instability in the region as a result of weak governance and increasingly capable transnational criminal organizations. These criminal organizations operate global, multi-billion dollar networks that traffic narcotics, humans, weapons, and bulk cash.
(3) Conflict between the various transnational criminal organizations for smuggling routes and territory has resulted in skyrocketing violence. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Honduras has the highest murder rate in the world with 90 murders per 100,000 people.
(4) United States Northern Command and United States Southern Command are the lead combatant commands for Department of Defense efforts to combat illicit trafficking in the Western Hemisphere.
(5) To combat these destabilizing threats, through a variety of authorities, the Department of Defense advises, trains, educates, and equips vetted troops in the region to enhance their military and police forces, with an emphasis on human rights and the rule of law.
(6) As a result of decades of instability and violence, tens of thousands of unaccompanied alien children and their families have fled to the border between the United States and Mexico. In fiscal year 2014, approximately 66,000 such children were apprehended crossing into the United States from Mexico.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Department of Defense should continue its efforts to combat transnational criminal organizations in the Western Hemisphere;
Section 231(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(4) The term ‘combatant and support vessel’ means any commissioned ship built or armed for naval combat or any naval ship designed to provide support to combatant ships and other naval operations. Such term does not include patrol coastal ships, non-commissioned combatant craft specifically designed for combat roles, or ships that are designated for potential mobilization.”.
(a) Establishment of Fund.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 131 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2218 the following new section:
“(a) Establishment.—There is established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the ‘National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund’.
“(b) Administration of fund.—The Secretary of Defense shall administer the Fund consistent with the provisions of this section.
“(c) Fund purposes.— (1) Funds in the Fund shall be available for obligation and expenditure only for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels.
“(d) Deposits.—There shall be deposited in the Fund all funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels.
“(e) Expiration of funds after 5 years.—No part of an appropriation that is deposited in the Fund pursuant to subsection (d) shall remain available for obligation more than five years after the end of fiscal year for which appropriated except to the extent specifically provided by law.
“(f) Budget requests.—Budget requests submitted to Congress for the Fund shall separately identify the amount requested for programs, projects, and activities for construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national sea-based deterrence vessels.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2218 the following new item:
“2218a. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund.”.
(b) Transfer authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), and to the extent provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of Defense may transfer to the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund established by section 2218a of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), amounts not to exceed $3,500,000,000 from unobligated funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 2014, 2015, or 2016 for the Navy for the Ohio Replacement Program. The transfer authority provided under this paragraph is in addition to any other transfer authority provided to the Secretary of Defense by law.
No funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Navy may be obligated or expended to conduct tasks connected to the inactivation of the U.S.S. George Washington (CVN–73) unless such tasks are identical to tasks that would be necessary to conduct a refueling and complex overhaul of the vessel.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(2) U.S.S. Thresher departed Portsmouth Naval Shipyard for her final voyage on April 9, 1963, with a crew of 16 officers, 96 sailors, and 17 civilians.
(3) The mix of that crew reflects the unity of the naval submarine service, military and civilian, in the protection of the United States.
(4) At approximately 7:47 a.m. on April 10, 1963, while in communication with the surface ship U.S.S. Skylark, and approximately 220 miles off the coast of New England, U.S.S. Thresher began her final descent.
(6) In response to the loss of U.S.S. Thresher, the United States Navy instituted new regulations to ensure the health of the submariners and the safety of the submarines of the United States.
(7) Those regulations led to the establishment of the Submarine Safety and Quality Assurance program (SUBSAFE), now one of the most comprehensive military safety programs in the world.
(8) SUBSAFE has kept the submariners of the United States safe at sea ever since as the strongest, safest submarine force in history.
(9) Since the establishment of SUBSAFE, no SUBSAFE-certified submarine has been lost at sea, which is a legacy owed to the brave individuals who perished aboard U.S.S. Thresher.
(a) Authority.—Notwithstanding subsection (a) of section 7310 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may establish a pilot program for the sustainment of Littoral Combat Ships when operating on extended deployment as follows:
(1) The pilot program shall be limited to no more than three Littoral Combat Ships at any one time operating in extended deployment status.
(2) Sustainment authorized under the pilot program is limited to corrective and preventive maintenance or repair (whether intermediate- or depot-level) and facilities maintenance. Such maintenance or repair may be performed—
(b) Report required.—Not later than 120 days after the conclusion of the pilot program authorized under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program. Such report shall include each of the following:
(1) Lessons learned from the pilot program regarding sustainment of Littoral Combat Ships while operating on extended deployments, including the extent to which shipboard personnel were involved in performing maintenance.
(2) A comprehensive sustainment strategy, including maintenance requirements, concepts, and costs, intended to support Littoral Combat Ships operating on extended deployments.
(3) Observations and recommendations regarding limited exceptions to existing authorities required to support Littoral Combat Ships operating on extended deployments.
(5) Whether overseas maintenance periodicities undertaken during the pilot program were accomplished in the scheduled or allotted timeframes throughout the pilot program.
(6) The total cost to sustain the three Littoral Combat Ships selected for the pilot program during the program, including all costs for Federal and contractor employees performing corrective and preventive maintenance, and all facilitization costs, both ashore and shipboard.
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “corrective and preventive maintenance or repair” means—
(a) Limitation on availability of funds.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense by this Act or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or dock landing ship.
(2) USE OF SMOSF FUNDS.—As provided by section 8107 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76), funds in the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment Fund may be used only for 11 Ticonderoga-class cruisers (CG 63 through CG 73) and 3 dock landing ships (LSD 41, LSD 42, and LSD 46).
(b) Modernization of Ticonderoga class cruisers and dock landing ships.—The Secretary of the Navy shall begin the upgrade of two cruisers specified in (a)(2) during fiscal year 2015, including—
(c) Requirements and limitations on modernization.—
(1) REQUIREMENTS.—During the period of modernization under subsection (b) of the vessels specified in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of the Navy shall—
(A) continue to maintain the vessels in a manner that will ensure the ability of the vessels to reenter the operational fleet;
(d) Reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—At the same time as the submittal to Congress of the budget of the President under section 1105 of title 31, United States, for each fiscal year during which activities under the modernization of vessels will be carried out under this section, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written report on the status of the modernization of vessels under this section.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under this subsection shall include the following:
(A) The status of modernization efforts, including availability schedules, equipment procurement schedules, and by-fiscal year funding requirements.
(B) The readiness and operational and manning status of each vessel to be undergoing modernization under this section during the fiscal year covered by such report.
(D) A list of rotatable pool equipment that is identified across the whole class of cruisers to support operations on a continuing basis.
(E) A list of equipment, other than rotatable pool equipment and components incidental to performing maintenance, removed from each such vessel, including a justification for the removal, the disposition of the equipment, and plan for restoration of the equipment.
(e) Repeal of superseded limitation.—Section 1023 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 846) is repealed.
Section 127b(c)(3)(C) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2015”.
Section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 850) is amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.
Section 1034 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 851) is amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.
(a) Inclusion of information about insufficient funding in annual report.—Subsection (d)(3) of section 407 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or insufficient funding” after “such activities”.
(a) In general.—Chapter 931 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) Interstate Transportation.— (1) Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, the transportation of passengers or property by CRAF-eligible aircraft in interstate air transportation obtained by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department through a contract for airlift service in the United States may be provided only by an air carrier that—
“(B) holds a certificate issued under section 41102 of title 49.
“(2) The Secretary of Transportation shall act as expeditiously as possible on an application for a certificate under section 41102 of title 49 to provide airlift service.
“(b) Transportation Between the United States and Foreign Locations.—Except as provided in subsection (d), the transportation of passengers or property by CRAF-eligible aircraft between a place in the United States and a place outside the United States obtained by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department through a contract for airlift service shall be provided by an air carrier referred to in subsection (a).
“(c) Transportation Between Foreign Locations.—The transportation of passengers or property by CRAF-eligible aircraft between two places outside the United States obtained by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department through a contract for airlift service shall be provided by an air carrier referred to in subsection (a) whenever transportation by such an air carrier is reasonably available.
“(d) Exception.—When the Secretary of Defense decides that no air carrier holding a certificate under section 41102 of title 49 is capable of providing, and willing to provide, the airlift service, the Secretary of Defense may make a contract to provide the service with an air carrier not having a certificate.
Section 1588(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) Eligible categories of transportation.—Subsection (a) of section 2642 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “The Secretary” and inserting “Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary”;
(2) in paragraph (3)—
(b) Termination of authority for certain categories of transportation.—Such section is further amended—
(c) Clerical amendments.—
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such title is amended to read as follows:
“2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense agencies and entities: use of Department of Defense reimbursement rate.”.
(a) Repeal.—Section 9513 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(a) Inclusion.—Subsection (a) of section 1074 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 330) is amended—
(a) Inclusion of regional organizations in authority.—Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively, and inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): “(c) Congressional notice.—Not later than 15 days before assigning a civilian employee of the Department of Defense as an advisor to a regional organization with a security mission under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a notification of such assignment. Such a notification shall include each of the following: “(1) A statement of the intent of the Secretary to assign the employee as an advisor to the regional organization. “(3) A description of the assignment, including a description of the training or assistance proposed to be provided to the regional organization, the justification for the assignment, a description of the unique capabilities the employee can provide to the regional organization, and a description of how the assignment serves the national security interests of the United States.
(b) Update of policy guidance on authority.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall issue an update of the policy of the Department of Defense for assignment of civilian employees of the Department as advisors to foreign ministries of defense and regional organizations under the authority in section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1599; 10 U.S.C. 168 note), as amended by this section.
(a) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the aviation foreign internal defense program. Such report shall include each of the following:
(A) An overall description of the program, including validated requirements from each of the geographic combatant commands and the Joint Staff, and of the statutory authorities used to support fixed and rotary wing aviation foreign internal defense programs within the Department of Defense.
(B) Program goals, proposed metrics of performance success, and anticipated procurement and operation and maintenance costs across the Future Years Defense Program.
(C) A comprehensive strategy outlining and justifying contributing commands and units for program execution, including the use of the Air Force, the Special Operations Command, the reserve components of the Armed Forces, and the National Guard.
(D) The results of any analysis of alternatives and efficiencies reviews for any contracts awarded to support the aviation foreign internal defense program.
(b) Limitation.—Not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for Procurement, Defense-wide, for the fixed-wing aviation foreign internal defense program, may be obligated or expended until the date that is 45 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense provides to the congressional defense committees the certification required under subsection (a).
(a) In general.—Notwithstanding section 2244a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may modify OH–58D Kiowa Warrior aircraft of the Army that the Secretary determines will not be retired and will remain in the aircraft fleet of the Army.
(a) Report required.—Not later than June 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on whether top-tier defense-critical infrastructure requiring electromagnetic pulse protection that receives its power supply from commercial or other non-military sources is protected from the adverse effects of man-made or naturally occurring electromagnetic pulse. In the case of any of such infrastructure that the Secretary determines is not protected from such adverse effects, the Secretary shall include in the report a description of the actions that would be required to provide for the protection of such infrastructure from such adverse effects.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Compromises of classified information cause indiscriminate and long-lasting damage to United States national security and often have a direct impact on the safety of warfighters.
(2) In 2010, hundreds of thousands of classified documents were illegally copied and disclosed across the Internet.
(3) Classified information has been disclosed in numerous public writings and manuscripts endangering current operations.
(4) In 2013, nearly 1,700,000 files were downloaded from United States Government information systems, threatening the national security of the United States and placing the lives of United States personnel at extreme risk. The majority of the information compromised relates to the capabilities, operations, tactics, techniques, and procedures of the Armed Forces of the United States, and is the single greatest quantitative compromise in the history of the United States.
(b) Reports required.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on actions taken by the Secretary in response to significant compromises of classified information. Such report shall include each of the following:
(A) A description of any changes made to Department of Defense policies or guidance relating to significant compromises of classified information, including regarding security clearances for employees of the Department, information technology, and personnel actions.
(B) An overview of the efforts made by any task force responsible for the mitigation of such compromises of classified information.
(C) A description of the resources of the Department that have been dedicated to efforts relating to such compromises.
(2) UPDATES TO REPORT.—During calendar years 2015 and 2016, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees quarterly updates to the report required by paragraph (1). Each such update shall include information regarding any changes or progress with respect to the matters covered by such report.
(a) Independent assessment.—The Secretary of Defense shall commission an appropriate entity outside the Department of Defense to conduct an independent assessment of the joint analytic capabilities of the Department of Defense to support strategy, plans, and force development and their link to resource decisions.
(b) Elements.—The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(c) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity that conducts the assessment required by subsection (a) shall provide to the Secretary an unclassified report, with a classified annex (if appropriate), containing its findings as a result of the assessment. Not later than 90 days after the date of the receipt of the report, the Secretary shall transmit the report to the congressional defense committees, together with such comments on the report as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(a) Business case analysis.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall conduct a business case analysis of the creation of a 4–PAA (Personnel-Only) KC–135R active association with the 168th Air Refueling Wing. Such analysis shall include consideration of—
(1) any efficiencies or cost savings achieved assuming the 168th Air Refueling Wing meets 100 percent of current air refueling requirements after the active association is in place;
(a) Reports.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the submittal to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the budget of the President for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2019, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the response of the Air Force to the 42 specific recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force in the report of the Commission pursuant to section 363(b) of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force Act of 2012 (subtitle G of title III of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1704).
(b) Elements of initial report.—The initial report of the Secretary under subsection (a) shall set forth the following:
(c) Elements of subsequent reports.—Each report of the Secretary under subsection (a) after the initial report shall set forth the following:
(1) An implementation plan for each of the recommendations of the Commission described in subsection (a), and not previously covered by a report under this section, that do not require further review by the Air Force as of the date of such report for implementation.
(2) A description of the accomplishments of the Air Force in implementing the recommendations of the Commission previously identified as not requiring further review by the Air Force for implementation in an earlier report under this section, including a description of any such recommendation that is fully implemented as of the date of such report.
(d) Deviation from Commission recommendations.—If any implementation plan under this section includes a proposal to deviate in a material manner from a recommendation of the Commission described in subsection (a), the report setting forth such implementation plan shall—
(e) Allocation of savings.—Each report of the Secretary under subsection (a) shall—
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall submit to Congress a report on the protection of military installations. Such report shall include each of the following:
(1) An identification of specific issues, shortfalls, and gaps related to the authorities providing for the protection of military installations by the agencies concerned and risks associated with such gaps.
(a) Briefing and report.—
(1) BRIEFING.—Not later than March 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written briefing on the assessment of the Comptroller General of the Aviation Restructuring Initiative of the Army and of any proposals submitted by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau or the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Office of the Department of Defense that could serve as alternatives to the Army’s proposal for adjusting the structure and mix of its combat aviation forces among regular Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard units.
(b) Elements.—The briefing and report of the Comptroller General required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, each of the following:
(1) A comparison of the assumptions on strategy, current demands, historical readiness rates, anticipated combat requirements, and the constraints and limitations associated with mobilization, utilization, and rotation policies underlying the Aviation Restructuring Initiative and any alternatives proposed by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau and the Department of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation Office.
(2) An assessment of the models used to estimate future costs and cost savings associated with each proposal for allocating Army aviation platforms among the regular Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard units.
(3) A comparison of the military and civilian personnel requirements for supporting combat aviation brigades under each proposal, including a description of the anticipated requirements and funding allocated for active Guard Reserve and full-time military technicians supporting the Army National Guard AH-64 “Apache” units.
(c) Sense of Congress regarding additional funding for the Army.—Congress is concerned with the planned reductions and realignments the Army has proposed for the regular Army, the Army National Guard, and the Army Reserves in order to comply with the funding constraints under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–25). Concerns are particularly associated with proposed reductions in end strength for all components that will result in additional reductions in the number of regular Army and National Guard brigade combat teams as well as reductions and realignments of combat aircraft within and between the regular Army and the Army National Guard. Sufficient funding should be provided to retain the force structure and sustain the readiness of as much Total Army combat capability as possible.
(a) Guidance.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review and issue or revise guidance to components of the Department of Defense to improve the application of operations research and systems analysis to—
(a) Independent review.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall commission an independent review of the United States Asia-Pacific rebalance, with a focus on issues expected to be critical during the ten-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, including the national security interests and military strategy of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region.
(2) CONDUCT OF REVIEW.—The review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be conducted by an independent organization that has—
(3) ELEMENTS.—The review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A) An assessment of the risks to United States national security interests in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility during the ten-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act as a result of changes in the security environment.
(B) An assessment of the current and planned United States force posture adjustments and the impact of such adjustments on the strategy to rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region.
(C) An assessment of the current and planned force posture and adjustments of United States allies and partners in the region and the impact of such adjustments on the strategy to rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region.
(D) An evaluation of the key capability gaps and shortfalls of the United States and its allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific region, including undersea warfare (including submarines), naval and maritime, ballistic missile defense, cyber, munitions, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities.
(E) An analysis of the willingness and capacity of allies, partners, and regional organizations to contribute to the security and stability of the Asia-Pacific region, including potential required adjustments to United States military strategy based on that analysis.
(F) An appraisal of the Arctic ambitions of actors in the Asia-Pacific region in the context of current and projected capabilities, including an analysis of the adequacy and relevance of the Arctic Roadmap prepared by the Navy.
(b) Report.—
(1) SUBMISSION TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the independent organization that conducted the review pursuant to subsection (a)(1) shall submit to the Secretary of Defense a report containing the findings of the review. The report shall be submitted in classified form, but may contain an unclassified annex.
(a) Title 10, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(b) Display of annual budget requirements for air sovereignty alert mission under Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009.—Section 354 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4426; 10 U.S.C. 221 note) is hereby repealed.
Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–81; 122 Stat. 335) is amended by striking subsection (d).
(a) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to Congress a report on the matters specified in subsection (b) with respect to the report of the Secretary on the force structure of the United States Army submitted under section 1066 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1943).
(b) Matters.—The matters specified in this subsection with respect to the report referred to in subsection (a) are the following:
(1) An update of the planning assumptions and scenarios used to determine the size and force structure of the Army, including the reserve components, for the future-years defense program for fiscal years 2016 through 2020.
(2) An updated evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed force structure for meeting the goals of the national military strategy of the United States.
(3) A description of any new alternative force structures considered, if any, including the assessed advantages and disadvantages of each and a brief explanation of why those not selected were rejected.
(4) The estimated resource requirements of each of the new alternative force structures referred to in paragraph (3).
(5) An updated independent risk assessment of the proposed Army force structure, to be conducted by the Chief of Staff of the Army.
(6) A description of plans and actions taken to implement and apply the recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States regarding force reduction analysis and decision process improvements in the report entitled “Defense Infrastructure: Army Brigade Combat Team Inactivations Informed by Analysis but Actions Needed to Improve Stationing Process” (GAO–14–76, December 2013) used in the Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Assessment of the Army.
Prior to taking any action to realign forces at Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, the Secretary of Defense shall certify to the congressional defense committees that—
(1) the action is supported by a European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment initiated by the Secretary of Defense on January 25, 2013, including a specific assessment of the efficacy of Lajes Air Force Base, Azores, in support of the United States overseas force posture; and
(2) the Secretary of Defense has determined, based on an analysis of operational requirements, that Lajes Air Force Base is not an optimal location for United States Special Operations Command or for United States Africa Command. The certification shall include a discussion of the basis for such determination.
(a) Amendments To title 10, United States Code, to reflect enactment of title 41, united states code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) Section 2013(a)(1) is amended by striking “section 6101(b)–(d) of title 41” and inserting “section 6101 of title 41”.
(2) Section 2302 is amended—
(B) in paragraph (9)(A)—
(i) by striking “section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)” and inserting “chapter 15 of title 41”; and
(3) Section 2306a(b)(3)(B) is amended by striking “section 4(12)(C)(i) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(C)(i))” and inserting “section 103(3)(A) of title 41”.
(5) Section 2321(f)(2) is amended by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41”.
(6) Section 2359b(k)(4)(A) is amended by striking “section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “section 110 of title 41”.
(7) Section 2379 is amended—
(A) in subsections (a)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A), and (c)(1)(B)(i), by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “section 103 of title 41”; and
(B) in subsections (b) and (c)(1), by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41”.
(8) Section 2410m(b)(1) is amended—
(9) Section 2533(a) is amended by striking “such Act” in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting “chapter 83 of such title”.
(10) Section 2533b is amended—
(A) in subsection (h)—
(i) in paragraph (1), by striking “sections 34 and 35 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430 and 431)” and inserting “sections 1906 and 1907 of title 41”; and
(ii) in paragraph (2), by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41”; and
(B) in subsection (m)—
(i) in paragraph (2), by striking “section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “section 105 of title 41”;
(ii) in paragraph (3), by striking “section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “section 131 of title 41”; and
(iii) in paragraph (5), by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41”.
(11) Section 2545(1) is amended by striking “section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16))” and inserting “section 131 of title 41”.
(12) Section 7312(f) is amended by striking “Section 3709 of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 5)” and inserting “Section 6101 of title 41”.
(b) Amendments to other defense-related statutes to reflect enactment of title 41, united states code.—
(1) The Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) is amended as follows:
(A) Section 846(a) (10 U.S.C. 2534 note) is amended—
(i) by striking “the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a et seq.)” and inserting “chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(B) Section 866 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(i) in subsection (b)(4)(A), by striking “section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)” and inserting “chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking “section 4(13) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(13))” and inserting “section 110 of title 41, United States Code”.
(C) Section 893(f)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)” and inserting “chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code”.
(2) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended as follows:
(A) Section 805(c)(1) (10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended—
(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking “section 4(12)(E) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(E))” and inserting “section 103(5) of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking “section 4(12)(F) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(F))” and inserting “section 103(6) of title 41, United States Code”.
(B) Section 821(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code”.
(C) Section 847 (10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended—
(i) in subsection (a)(5), by striking “section 27(e) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423(e))” and inserting “section 2105 of title 41, United States Code”;
(ii) in subsection (c)(1), by striking “section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act” and inserting “section 131 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(iii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking “section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)” and inserting “chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code”.
(D) Section 862 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(i) in subsection (b)(1), by striking “section 25 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421)” and inserting “section 1303 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii) in subsection (d)(1), by striking “section 6(j) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(j))” and inserting “section 1126 of title 41, United States Code”.
(3) The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) is amended as follows:
(A) Section 832(d)(3) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “section 8(b) of the Service Contract Act of 1965 (41 U.S.C. 357(b))” and inserting “section 6701(3) of title 41, United States Code”.
(B) Section 852(b)(2)(A)(ii) (10 U.S.C. 2324 note) is amended by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code”.
(4) Section 8118 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–287; 10 U.S.C. 2533a note) is amended by striking “section 34 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430)” and inserting “section 1906 of title 41, United States Code”.
(5) The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136) is amended as follows:
(A) Section 812(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2501 note) is amended by striking “section 6(d)(4)(A) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(d)(4)(A))” and inserting “section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States Code”.
(B) Section 1601(c) (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended—
(i) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking “section 32A of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as added by section 1443 of this Act” and inserting “section 1903 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking “Subsections (a) and (b) of section 7 of the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 (41 U.S.C. 57(a) and (b))” and inserting “Section 8703(a) of title 41, United States Code”.
(6) Section 8025(c) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108–87; 10 U.S.C. 2410d note), is amended by striking “the Javits-Wagner-O’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48)” and inserting “chapter 85 of title 41, United States Code”.
(7) Section 817(e)(1)(B) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking “section 26(f)(5)(B) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422(f)(5)(B))” and inserting “section 1502(b)(3)(B) of title 41, United States Code”.
(8) Section 801(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended by striking “section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))” and inserting “section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code”.
(9) Section 803(d) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking “subsection (b)(1)(B) of section 304A of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 254b)” and inserting “section 3503(a)(2) of title 41, United States Code”.
(10) Section 848(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking “section 32 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 428)” and inserting “section 1902 of title 41, United States Code”.
(11) Section 722(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking “section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c))” and inserting “section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code”.
(12) Section 3412(k) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106, 10 U.S.C. 7420 note) is amended by striking “section 303(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 253(c))” and inserting “section 3304(a) of title 41, United States Code”.
(13) Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended—
(A) in subsection (a)(2)(A), by striking “section 16(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(c))” and inserting “section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code,”;
(B) in subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii), by striking “section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))” and inserting “section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code”;
(C) in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(D) in subsection (h), by striking “section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)” and inserting “chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code”.
(14) Section 326(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking “section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c))” and inserting “section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code”.
(15) Section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (Public Law 102–190; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(A) in subsection (b), by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code”; and
(B) in subsection (c)—
(i) by striking “section 25(a) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act” and inserting “section 1302(a) of title 41, United States Code”; and
(ii) by striking “section 25(c)(1) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c)(1))” and inserting “section 1303(a)(1) of such title 41”.
(16) Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(A) by designating the subsection after subsection (k), relating to definitions, as subsection (l); and
(B) in paragraph (8) of that subsection, by striking “the first section of the Act of June 25, 1938 (41 U.S.C. 46; popularly known as the ‘Wagner-O’Day Act’)” and inserting “section 8502 of title 41, United States Code”.
(c) Amendments to title 10, United States Code, To reflect reclassification of provisions of law codified in title 50, united states code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) Sections 113(b), 125(a), and 155(d) are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 401)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3002)”.
(2) Sections 113(e)(2), 117(a)(1), 118(b)(1), 118a(b)(1), 153(b)(1)(C)(i), 231(b)(1), 231a(c)(1), and 2501(a)(1)(A) are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 404a)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3043)”.
(3) Sections 167(g), 421(c), and 2557(c) are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 413 et seq.)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.)”.
(4) Section 201(b)(1) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 403–6(b))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3041(b))”.
(5) Section 429 is amended—
(A) in subsection (a), by striking “Section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 403–1)” and inserting “section 102A of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3024)”; and
(B) in subsection (e), by striking “(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3003(4))”.
(6) Section 442(d) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 404e(a))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3045(a))”.
(7) Section 444 is amended—
(A) in subsection (b)(2), by striking “(50 U.S.C. 403o)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3515)”; and
(B) in subsection (e)(2)(B), by striking “(50 U.S.C. 403a et seq.)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)”.
(8) Section 457 is amended—
(A) in subsection (a), by striking “(50 U.S.C. 431)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3141)”; and
(B) in subsection (c), by striking “(50 U.S.C. 431(b))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3141(b))”.
(9) Sections 462, 1599a(a), and 1623(a) are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 402 note)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3614)”.
(10) Sections 491(c)(3), 494(d)(1), 496(a)(1), 2409(e)(1) are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3003(4))”.
(11) Section 1605(a)(2) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 403r)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3518)”.
(12) Section 2723(d)(2) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 413)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3091)”.
(d) Amendments to other defense-Related statutes To reflect reclassification of provisions of law codified in title 50, united states code.—
(1) The following provisions of law are amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 401a(4))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3003(4))”:
(A) Section 911(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note).
(B) Sections 801(b)(3) and 911(e)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note; 2271 note).
(C) Section 812(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 10 U.S.C. 2501 note).
(2) Section 901(d) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 137 note) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. 401 et seq.)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.)”.
(e) Date of enactment references.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) Section 1218(d)(3) is amended by striking “on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010” and inserting “on October 28, 2014”.
(2) Section 1566a(a) is amended by striking “Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 and under” and inserting “Under”.
(3) Section 2275(d) is amended—
(f) Other technical corrections to title 10, united states code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is amended—
(3) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is amended by inserting a period at the end of the item relating to section 189.
(13) Section 1074m(a)(2) is amended by striking “subparagraph” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting “subparagraphs”.
(15) Section 1513(1) is amended in the last sentence by striking “subsection (b)” and inserting “subsection (c)”.
(18) Section 2430(c)(2) is amended by striking “section 2366a(a)(4)” and inserting “section 2366a(a)(6)”.
(21) The item relating to section 2642 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 is amended by striking “rates” and inserting “rate”.
(g) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.—Effective as of December 26, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) is amended as follows:
(1) Section 314 (127 Stat. 729) is amended by striking “Section 317(c)(2)” and inserting “Section 317(d)(2)”.
(2) Section 812(a)(3)(B) (127 Stat. 807) is amended by inserting “the first place it appears” before the semicolon.
(3) Section 905(b) (127 Stat. 818) is amended by striking “training, and education” and inserting “Training, and Education”.
(5) Section 1709(b)(1)(B) (127 Stat. 962; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking “of” after “such”.
(7) Section 2809(a) (127 Stat. 1013) is amended by striking “subjection” and inserting “subsection”.
(8) Section 2966 (127 Stat. 1042) is amended in the section heading by striking “title” and inserting “administrative jurisdiction”.
(h) National defense authorization act for fiscal year 2013.—Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, section 604(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1774) is amended by striking “on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013” and inserting “on January 2, 2013,”.
(i) Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.—Section 1631(b)(6) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by striking “section 596(b) of such Act” and inserting “section 596(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note)”.
(j) Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act.—Section 11(b)(2) of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98h–2(b)(2)) is amended by striking “under section 9(b)(2)(G)” and inserting “under section 9(b)(2)(H)”.
(a) In general.—
(1) REFORM.—Section 118 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 118. Defense Strategy Review
“(a) Defense Strategy Review.—
“(1) REVIEW REQUIRED.—Every four years, during a year following a year evenly divisible by four, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comprehensive examination (to be known as a ‘Defense Strategy Review’) of the national defense strategy, force structure, modernization plans, posture, infrastructure, budget plan, and other elements of the defense program and policies of the United States with a view toward determining and expressing the defense strategy of the United States and establishing a defense program. Each such Defense Strategy Review shall be conducted in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
“(2) CONDUCT OF REVIEW.—Each Defense Strategy Review shall be conducted so as to—
“(A) delineate a national defense strategy in support of the most recent National Security Strategy prescribed by the President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043);
“(B) provide a mechanism for—
“(i) setting priorities for sizing and shaping the force, guiding the development and sustainment of capabilities, allocating resources, and adjusting the organization of the Department of Defense to respond to changes in the strategic environment;
“(ii) monitoring, assessing, and holding accountable agencies within the Department of Defense for the development of policies and programs that support the national defense strategy;
“(C) consider three general timeframes of the near-term (associated with the future-years defense program), mid-term (10 to 15 years), and far-term (20 years);
“(D) address the security environment, threats, trends, opportunities, and challenges, and define the nature and magnitude of the strategic and military risks associated with executing the national defense strategy by using the most recent net assessment submitted by the Secretary of Defense under section 113 of this title, the risk assessment submitted by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under section 153 of this title, and, as determined necessary or useful by the Secretary, any other Department of Defense, Government, or non-government strategic or intelligence estimate, assessment, study, or review;
“(E) define the force size and structure, capabilities, modernization plans, posture, infrastructure, readiness, organization, and other elements of the defense program of the Department of Defense that would be required to execute missions called for in such national defense strategy;
“(F) to the extent practical, estimate the budget plan sufficient to execute the missions called for in such national defense strategy;
“(3) SUBMISSION OF REPORT ON DEFENSE STRATEGY REVIEW TO CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The Secretary shall submit a report on each Defense Strategy Review to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each such report shall be submitted by not later than March 1 of the year following the year in which the review is conducted. If the year in which the review is conducted is in the second term of a President, the Secretary may submit an update to the Defense Strategy Review report submitted during the first term of that President.
“(4) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (3) shall provide a comprehensive discussion of the Review, including each of the following:
“(B) The assumed or defined prioritized national security interests of the United States that inform the national defense strategy defined in the Review.
“(C) The assumed strategic environment, including the threats, developments, trends, opportunities, and challenges that affect the assumed or defined national security interests of the United States.
“(D) The assumed steady state activities, crisis and conflict scenarios, military end states, and force planning construct examined in the review.
“(E) The prioritized missions of the armed forces under the strategy and a discussion of the roles and missions of the components of the armed forces to carry out those missions.
“(F) The assumed roles and capabilities provided by other United States Government agencies and by allies and international partners.
“(G) The force size and structure, capabilities, posture, infrastructure, readiness, organization, and other elements of the defense program that would be required to execute the missions called for in the strategy.
“(H) An assessment of the significant gaps and shortfalls between the force size and structure, capabilities, and additional elements as required by subparagraph (G) and the current elements in the Department’s existing program of record, a prioritization of those gaps and shortfalls, and an understanding of the relationships and tradeoffs between missions, risks, and resources.
“(5) CJCS REVIEW.— (A) Upon the completion of each Review under this subsection, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall prepare and submit to the Secretary of Defense the Chairman’s assessment of risks under the defense strategy developed by the Review and a description of the capabilities needed to address such risks.
“(b) National Defense Panel.—
“(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than February 1 of a year following a year evenly divisible by four, there shall be established an independent panel to be known as the National Defense Panel (in this subsection referred to as the ‘Panel’). The Panel shall have the duties set forth in this subsection.
“(2) MEMBERSHIP.—The Panel shall be composed of ten members from private civilian life who are recognized experts in matters relating to the national security of the United States. Eight of the members shall be appointed as follows:
“(3) CO-CHAIRS OF THE PANEL.—In addition to the members appointed under paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall appoint two members from private civilian life to serve as co-chairs of the panel.
“(4) PERIOD OF APPOINTMENT; VACANCIES.—Members shall be appointed for the life of the Panel. Any vacancy in the Panel shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
“(5) DUTIES.—The Panel shall have the following duties with respect to a Defense Strategy Review conducted under subsection (a):
“(A) Assessing the current and future security environment, including threats, trends, developments, opportunities, challenges, and risks, by using the most recent net assessment submitted by the Secretary of Defense under section 113 of this title, the risk assessment submitted by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs under section 153 of this title, and, as determined necessary or useful by the Panel, any other Department of Defense, Government, or non-government strategic or intelligence estimate, assessment, study, review, or expert.
“(C) Based upon the assessment under subparagraph (A), identifying and discussing the national security interests of the United States and the role of the armed forces and the Department of Defense related to the protection or promotion of those interests.
“(D) Assessing the report on the Defense Strategy Review submitted by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(3).
“(E) Assessing the assumptions, strategy, findings, and risks of the report on the Defense Strategy Review submitted under subsection (a)(3).
“(G) Assessing the force structure and capabilities, posture, infrastructure, readiness, organization, budget plans, and other elements of the defense program of the United States to execute the missions called for in the Defense Strategy Review and in the alternative strategies considered under subparagraph (F).
“(6) FIRST MEETING.—If the Secretary of Defense has not made the Secretary’s appointments to the Panel under paragraph (3) by March 1 of a year in which the Panel is established, the Panel shall convene for its first meeting with the remaining members.
“(7) REPORTS.—Not later than three months after the date on which the report on a Defense Strategy Review is submitted under paragraph (3) of subsection (a) to the committees of Congress referred to in such paragraph, the Panel shall submit to such committees a report on the Panel’s assessment of such Defense Strategy Review, as required by paragraph (5).
“(8) ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.—The following administrative provisions apply to a Panel established under paragraph (1):
“(A) The Panel may request directly from the Department of Defense and any of its components such information as the Panel considers necessary to carry out its duties under this subsection. The head of the department or agency concerned shall cooperate with the Panel to ensure that information requested by the Panel under this paragraph is promptly provided to the maximum extent practical.
“(B) Upon the request of the co-chairs, the Secretary of Defense shall make available to the Panel the services of any federally funded research and development center that is covered by a sponsoring agreement of the Department of Defense.
“(C) The Panel shall have the authorities provided in section 3161 of title 5 and shall be subject to the conditions set forth in such section.
(c) Effective date.—Section 118 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), and the amendments made by this section, shall take effect on October 1, 2015.
(d) Additional requirement for next Defense Strategy Review.—The first Defense Strategy Review required by subsection (a)(1) of section 118 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a) of this section, shall include an analysis of enduring mission requirements for equipping, training, sustainment, and other operation and maintenance activities of the Department of Defense, including the Defense Agencies and military departments, that are financed by amounts authorized to be appropriated for overseas contingency operations.
(a) Surveys required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 23 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 481 the following new section:
Ҥ 481a. Workplace and gender relations issues: surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees
“(a) In general.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall carry out every other fiscal year a survey of civilian employees of the Department of Defense to solicit information on gender issues, including issues relating to gender-based assault, harassment, and discrimination, and the climate in the Department for forming professional relationships between male and female civilian employees of the Department.
“(b) Elements.—Each survey conducted under this section shall be conducted so as to solicit information on the following:
“(1) Indicators of positive and negative trends for professional and personal relationships between male and female civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
“(2) The specific types of assault on civilian employees of the Department by other personnel of the Department (including contractor personnel) that have occurred, and the number of times each respondent has been so assaulted during the preceding fiscal year.
“(3) The effectiveness of Department policies designed to improve professional relationships between male and female civilian employees of the Department.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 481 the following new item:
“481a. Workplace and gender relations issues: surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees.”.
(3) INITIAL SURVEY.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the first survey required by section 481a of title 10, United States Code (as added by this subsection), during fiscal year 2016.
(b) Report on feasibility of similar surveys of military dependents and Department of Defense contractors.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth an assessment by the Secretary of the feasibility of conducting recurring surveys of each population specified in paragraph (2) on issues relating to gender-based assault, harassment, and discrimination.
(a) In general.—Section 44309 of title 49, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “A civil action shall not be instituted against the United States under this chapter unless the claimant first presents the claim to the Secretary of Transportation and such claim is finally denied by the Secretary in writing and notice of the denial of such claim is sent by certified or registered mail.”; and
(2) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection (c): “(c) Time requirements.— (1) Except as provided under paragraph (2), an insurance claim made under this chapter against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation within two years after the date on which the loss event occurred. Any civil action arising out of the denial of such a claim shall be filed by not later than six months after the date of the mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final denial of the claim by the Secretary. “(2) (A) For claims based on liability to persons with whom the insured has no privity of contract, an insurance claim made under the authority of this chapter against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the Secretary of Transportation by not later than the earlier of—
“(3) A claim made under this chapter shall be deemed to be administratively denied if the Secretary fails to make a final disposition of the claim before the date that is 6 months after the date on which the claim is presented to the Secretary, unless the Secretary makes a different agreement with the claimant when there is good cause for an agreement.”.
(a) Pilot program required.—The Secretary of the Army may carry out a pilot program under which the Secretary utilizes Human Terrain System assets in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility to support phase 0 shaping operations and the theater security cooperation plans of the Commander of the United States Pacific Command.
(b) Reports.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the status of the pilot program under this section. Such report shall include the independent analysis and recommendations of the Commander of the United States Pacific Command regarding the effectiveness of the program and how it could be improved.
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than December 1, 2016, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a final report on the pilot program. Such report shall include an analysis of the comparative value of human terrain information relative to other analytic tools and techniques, recommendations regarding expanding the program to include other combatant commands, and any improvements to the program and necessary resources that would enable expanding the program.
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report setting forth such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for modifications of the policies of the Department of Defense on the involvement of non-Federal entities in Department community outreach events (including air shows, parades, open houses, and performances by military musical units) that feature any unit, aircraft, vessel, equipment, or members of the Armed Forces in order to increase the involvement of non-Federal entities in such events.
(b) Consultation.—The Secretary shall prepare the report required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Director of the Office of Government Ethics.
(c) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A description of current Department of Defense policies and regulations on the acceptance and use of voluntary gifts, donations, sponsorships, and other forms of support from non-Federal entities and persons for Department community outreach events described in subsection (a), including the authorities or requirements of the Department to accept fees for such air shows, parades, open houses, and performances by military musical units.
(2) Recommendations for modifications of such policies and regulations in order to permit additional voluntary support and funding from non-Federal entities for such events, including recommendations on matters such as increased recognition of donors, authority for military units to endorse the fundraising efforts of certain donors, and authority for the Armed Forces to charge fees or solicit and accept donations for parking and admission to such events.
(a) Notification required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the Secretary of Defense determines, through the use of open source information or the use of existing authorities (including section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4260; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note)), that there is evidence of a national security threat described in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notification of such threat.
(2) NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT.—A national security threat described in this paragraph is a threat to an information technology or telecommunications component or network by an agent of a foreign power in which the compromise of such technology, component, or network poses a significant risk to the programs and operations of the Department of Defense, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
(b) Action plan required.—In the event that a notification is submitted pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall work with the head of any department or agency affected by the national security threat to develop a plan of action for responding to the concerns leading to the notification.
(c) Agent of a foreign power.—In this section, the term “agent of a foreign power” has the meaning given such term in section 101(b) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801(b)).
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) DISABLED.—The term “disabled” means an individual with a disability, as defined by section 12102 of title 42, United States Code.
(3) ENERGY EFFICIENT FEATURES OR EQUIPMENT.—The term “energy efficient features or equipment” means features of, or equipment in, a primary residence that help reduce the amount of electricity used to heat, cool, or ventilate such residence, including insulation, weatherstripping, air sealing, heating system repairs, duct sealing, or other measures.
(4) LOW-INCOME VETERAN.—The term “low-income veteran” means a veteran whose income does not exceed 80 percent of the median income for an area, as determined by the Secretary.
(6) PRIMARY RESIDENCE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The term “primary residence” means a single family house, a duplex, or a unit within a multiple-dwelling structure that is the principal dwelling of an eligible veteran and is owned by such veteran or a family member of such veteran.
(7) QUALIFIED ORGANIZATION.—The term “qualified organization” means a nonprofit organization that provides nationwide or statewide programs that primarily serve veterans or low-income individuals.
(9) VETERAN.—The term “veteran” has the meaning given the term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.
(10) VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATION.—The term “veterans service organization” means any organization recognized by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the representation of veterans under section 5902 of title 38, United States Code.
(b) Establishment of a pilot program.—
(1) GRANT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish a pilot program to award grants to qualified organizations to rehabilitate and modify the primary residence of eligible veterans.
(2) APPLICATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Each qualified organization that desires a grant under the pilot program shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and, in addition to the information required under subparagraph (B), accompanied by such information as the Secretary may reasonably require.
(B) CONTENTS.—Each application submitted under subparagraph (A) shall include—
(ii) the approximate number of veterans the qualified organization intends to serve using grant funds;
(iii) a description of the type of work that will be conducted, such as interior home modifications, energy efficiency improvements, and other similar categories of work; and
(iv) a plan for working with the Department of Veterans Affairs and veterans service organizations to identify veterans who are not eligible for programs under chapter 21 of title 38, United States Code, and meet their needs.
(3) USE OF FUNDS.—A grant award under the pilot program shall be used—
(A) to modify and rehabilitate the primary residence of an eligible veteran, and may include—
(i) installing wheelchair ramps, widening exterior and interior doors, reconfigurating and re-equipping bathrooms (which includes installing new fixtures and grab bars), removing doorway thresholds, installing special lighting, adding additional electrical outlets and electrical service, and installing appropriate floor coverings to—
(4) LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.—Funds may be expended under the pilot program only for the benefit of an eligible veteran who the Secretary determines is residing in and reasonably intends to continue residing in a primary residence owned by such veteran or by a member of such veteran's family. The Secretary shall make this determination on the basis of a certification by the veteran or a member of the veteran’s family that the veteran intends to continue residing in the primary residence for a sufficient period of time to be determined by the Secretary.
(5) OVERSIGHT.—The Secretary shall direct the oversight of the grant funds for the pilot program so that such funds are used efficiently until expended to fulfill the purpose of addressing the adaptive housing needs of eligible veterans.
(6) MATCHING FUNDS.—
(7) LIMITATION COST TO THE VETERANS.—A qualified organization receiving a grant under the pilot program shall modify or rehabilitate the primary residence of an eligible veteran at no cost to such veteran (including application fees) or at a cost such that such veteran pays no more than 30 percent of his or her income in housing costs during any month.
(8) REPORTS.—
(A) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Secretary shall submit to Congress, on an annual basis, a report that provides, with respect to the year for which such report is written—
(ii) the socioeconomic characteristics of such veterans, including their gender, age, race, and ethnicity;
(iii) the total number, types, and locations of entities contracted under such program to administer the grant funding;
(v) a description of the housing rehabilitation and modification services provided, costs saved, and actions taken under such program;
(vi) a description of the outreach initiatives implemented by the Secretary to educate the general public and eligible entities about such program;
(vii) a description of the outreach initiatives instituted by grant recipients to engage eligible veterans and veteran service organizations in projects utilizing grant funds under such program;
(B) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 6 months after the completion of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that provides such information that the Secretary considers relevant in assessing the pilot program.
(C) INSPECTOR GENERAL REPORT.—Not later than March 31, 2019, the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development shall submit to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report containing a review of—
Effective January 1, 2015, section 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section 1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is further amended by striking “through 2014” and inserting “through 2015”.
Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4616) and most recently amended by section 1102 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is further amended by striking “2015” and inserting “2016”.
Section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2487; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(a) Positions covered by authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended—
Section 1107 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
“(3) STUDENTS ENROLLED IN SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING PROGRAMS.—The director of any STRL may appoint qualified candidates enrolled in a program of undergraduate or graduate instruction leading to a bachelor's or an advanced degree in a scientific, technical, engineering or mathematical course of study at an institution of higher education (as that term is defined in section 101 and 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) to positions described in paragraph (3) of subsection (b) as an employee in a laboratory described in that paragraph without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code (other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title).”;
(2) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:
“(3) CANDIDATES ENROLLED IN SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING PROGRAMS.—The positions described in this paragraph are scientific and engineering positions that may be temporary or term in any laboratory designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) as a Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratory.”; and
(3) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the following:
“(3) In the case of a laboratory described in subsection (b)(3), with respect to appointment authority under subsection (a)(3), the number equal to 3 percent of the total number of scientific and engineering positions in such laboratory that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending before the start of such calendar year.”.
(a) In general.—Subparagraph (B) of section 5542(a)(6) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “2014” and inserting “2015”.
(b) Limitation on overtime pay.—Notwithstanding the authority provided by such section (as amended by subsection (a)), during fiscal year 2015 the Secretary of the Navy may not pay more than $250,000 in overtime pay under such section until the Director of the Office of Personnel Management submits a report containing the information described in section 1105(b)(2) of Public Law 111–383, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.
(a) CSRS.—Section 8344(l)(7) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “5 years after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010” and inserting “on December 31, 2019”.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor to the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1) identify improvements to be made to the employment, compensation, and promotion authorities of the Department of Defense to meet the needs of the United States Cyber Command and the cyber component headquarters of the military departments for obtaining and retaining civilian personnel with the skills and experience required to support the missions and responsibilities of those organizations;
(2) identify the additional employment, compensation, and promotion authorities necessary to ensure that the United States Cyber Command and the cyber component headquarters of the military departments have a civilian workforce able to support the missions and responsibilities of those organizations; and
(3) submit to the Secretary recommendations for administrative and legislative actions, including actions in connection with authorities identified pursuant to paragraph (2), to ensure that the United States Cyber Command and the cyber component headquarters of the military departments have a civilian workforce able to support the missions and responsibilities of those organizations.
(a) Revisions to Global Security Contingency Fund.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1625; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended by striking “the provision of equipment, supplies, and training.” and inserting the following:“the provision of the following:
(b) Availability of funds.—Subsection (i) of such section is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following:
“(2) EXCEPTION.—Amounts appropriated and transferred to the Fund before the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 shall remain available for obligation and expenditure after September 30, 2015, only for activities under programs commenced under subsection (b) before September 30, 2015.”.
(c) Expiration.—Subsection (p) of such section, as amended by section 1202(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 894), is further amended—
Section 1204(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 896; 10 U.S.C. 401 note) is amended by inserting after “congressional defense committees” the following: “and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives”.
(a) Eligibility.—Subsection (a) of section 1051a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—
(b) Travel, subsistence, and medical care expenses.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(c) Terms of reimbursement.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(d) Limitation and oversight.—Such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(e) Secretary of state coordination.—Such section, as so amended, is further amended by inserting after subsection (d), as added by subsection (d)(2) of this section, the following new subsection (e):
“(e) Secretary of state coordination.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense to provide administrative services and support under subsection (a) for the performance of duties by a liaison officer of another nation may be exercised only with respect to a liaison officer of another nation whose assignment as described in that subsection is accepted by the Secretary of Defense with the coordination of the Secretary of State.”.
(a) Prohibition.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 134 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2249e. Prohibition on use of funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces that have committed a gross violation of human rights
“(a) In general.— (1) Of the amounts made available to the Department of Defense, none may be used for any training, equipment, or other assistance for a unit of a foreign security force if the Secretary of Defense has credible information that the unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.
“(2) The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, ensure that prior to a decision to provide any training, equipment, or other assistance to a unit of a foreign security force full consideration is given to any credible information available to the Department of State relating to human rights violations by such unit.
“(b) Exception.—The prohibition in subsection (a)(1) shall not apply if the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, determines that the government of such country has taken all necessary corrective steps, or if the equipment or other assistance is necessary to assist in disaster relief operations or other humanitarian or national security emergencies.
“(c) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, may waive the prohibition in subsection (a)(1) if the Secretary determines that the waiver is required by extraordinary circumstances.
“(d) Procedures.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish, and periodically update, procedures to ensure that any information in the possession of the Department of Defense about gross violations of human rights by units of foreign security forces is shared on a timely basis with the Department of State.
“(e) Report.—Not later than 15 days after the application of any exception under subsection (b) or the exercise of any waiver under subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report—
“(1) in the case of an exception under subsection (b), providing notice of the use of the exception and stating the grounds for the exception; and
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 134 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“2249e. Prohibition on use of funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces that have committed a gross violation of human rights.”.
(b) Annual reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 31, 2015, and every March 31 thereafter through 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth for the preceding fiscal year the following:
(A) The total number of cases submitted for vetting for purposes of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), and the total number of such cases approved, or suspended or rejected for human rights reasons, non-human rights reasons, or administrative reasons.
(B) In the case of units rejected for non-human rights reasons, a detailed description of the reasons relating to the rejection.
(C) A description of the interagency processes that were used to evaluate compliance with requirements to conduct vetting.
(D) An addendum that includes any comments by the commanders of the combatant commands about the impact of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as so added), on their theater security cooperation plan.
(E) Such other matters with respect to the administration of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as so added), as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(2) FORM.—Each report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(3) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” has the meaning given that term in subsection (f) of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as so added).
(a) Codification, extension, and enhancement of authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 136 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2282. Authority to build the capacity of foreign security forces
“(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized to conduct or support a program or programs as follows:
“(1) To build the capacity of a foreign country's national military forces in order for that country to—
“(b) Types of capacity building.—
“(c) Limitations.—
“(1) ANNUAL FUNDING LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may use amounts specifically authorized and appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out programs under this section on an annual basis to carry out programs authorized by subsection (a).
“(2) ASSISTANCE OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of assistance described in subsection (b) that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law.
“(3) LIMITATION ON ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide assistance described in subsection (b) to any foreign country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of assistance under any other provision of law.
“(4) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ACTIVITIES ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Amounts made available in a fiscal year to carry out the authority in subsection (a) may be used for programs under that authority that begin in the fiscal year such amounts are made available but end in the next fiscal year.
“(B) ACHIEVEMENT OF FULL OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY.—If, in accordance with subparagraph (A), equipment is delivered under a program under the authority in subsection (a) in the fiscal year after the fiscal year in which the program begins, amounts for supplies, training, defense services, and small-scale military construction associated with such equipment and necessary to ensure that the recipient unit achieves full operational capability for such equipment may be used in the fiscal year in which the foreign country takes receipt of such equipment and in the next fiscal year.
“(5) LIMITATIONS ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR SMALL-SCALE MILITARY CONSTRUCTION.—
“(A) ACTIVITIES UNDER PARTICULAR PROGRAMS.—The amount that may be obligated or expended for small-scale military construction activities under any particular program authorized under subsection (a) may not exceed $750,000.
“(B) ACTIVITIES UNDER ALL PROGRAMS.—The amount that may be obligated or expended for small-scale military construction activities during a fiscal year for all programs authorized under subsection (a) during that fiscal year may not exceed up to five percent of the amount made available in such fiscal year to carry out the authority in subsection (a).
“(d) Formulation and execution of program.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly formulate any program under subsection (a). The Secretary of Defense shall coordinate with the Secretary of State in the implementation of any program under subsection (a).
“(e) Congressional notification.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not less than 15 days before initiating activities under a program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice of the following:
“(A) The country whose capacity to engage in activities in subsection (a) will be built under the program.
“(B) The budget, implementation timeline with milestones, anticipated delivery schedule for assistance, military department responsible for management and associated program executive office, and completion date for the program.
“(D) A description of the arrangements, if any, for the sustainment of the program and the source of funds to support sustainment of the capabilities and performance outcomes achieved under the program beyond its completion date, if applicable.
“(E) A description of the program objectives and assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics associated with operational outcomes for the recipient unit.
“(F) Information, including the amount, type, and purpose, on the assistance provided the country during the three preceding fiscal years under each of the following programs, accounts, or activities:
“(iv) The International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) program under section 481 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291).
“(vi) Counterdrug activities authorized by section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note) and section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998.
“(f) Assessments of programs.—Amounts available to conduct or support programs under subsection (a) shall be available to the Secretary of Defense to conduct assessments and determine the effectiveness of such programs in building the operational capacity and performance of the recipient units concerned.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 136 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
“2282. Authority to build the capacity of foreign security forces.”.
(b) Conforming amendments.—
(1) Section 943(g)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578), as most recently amended by section 1205(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624), is further amended by striking “sections 1206 and 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456 and 3458)” and inserting “section 2282 of title 10, United States Code, and section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3458)”.
(2) Section 1209(b)(1)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 368), as most recently amended by section 1203(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2512), is further amended by striking “section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456)” and inserting “section 2282 of title 10, United States Code”.
(c) Repeal of superseded authority.—Section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163) is repealed.
(d) Funding.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance as specified in the funding table in section 4301, up to $350,000,000 may be used for programs under subsection (a) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a) of this section).
(2) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT FOR BUILDING CAPACITY TO PARTICIPATE IN ALLIED OR COALITION MILITARY OR STABILITY OPERATIONS.—Of the amount available under paragraph (1) for fiscal year 2015, not more than $150,000,000 may be used in such fiscal year for purposes described in subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added).
(e) Annual Secretary of Defense reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the end of each of fiscal years 2015 through 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report summarizing the findings of the assessments of programs carried out under subsection (f) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added), during such fiscal year.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, for each program assessed under such subsection (f) during the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:
(A) A description of the nature and the extent of the potential or actual terrorist threat, if any, that the program is intended to address.
(B) A description of the program, including the objectives of the program, the types of recipient country units receiving assistance under the program, and the baseline operational capability and performance of the units receiving assistance under the program before the commencement of receipt of assistance under the program.
(C) A description of the extent to which the program is implemented by United States Government personnel or contractors.
(f) Biennial Comptroller General of the United States audits.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 31 of each of 2016, 2018 and 2020, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an audit of such program or programs conducted or supported pursuant to section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added), during the preceding two fiscal years as the Comptroller General shall select for purposes of such report.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report should, to the extent information is available, include, for the program or programs covered by such report, the following:
(B) An assessment of the capacity of each recipient country to absorb assistance under the program or programs.
(C) An assessment of the arrangements, if any, for the sustainment of the program or programs, including any source of funds to support sustainment of the capabilities and performance outcomes achieved under the program or program beyond completion date, if applicable.
(g) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In subsections (e) and (f), the term “appropriate committees of Congress” has the meaning given that term in subsection (g) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as so added).
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized to conduct human rights training of security forces and associated security ministries of foreign countries.
(b) Construction with limitation on use of funds.—Human rights training authorized by this section may be conducted for security forces otherwise prohibited from receiving such training under any provision of law only if—
(2) such training is withheld from any individual of a unit when there is credible information that such individual has committed a gross violation of human rights or has commanded a unit that has committed a gross violation of human rights;
(3) such training may be considered a corrective step, but is not sufficient for meeting the accountability requirement under the exception established in subsection (b) of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1204(a) of this Act); and
(c) Role of the Secretary of State.—
(d) Authorized activities.—Human rights training authorized by this section may include associated activities and expenses necessary for the conduct of training and assessments designed to further the purposes of this section, including technical assistance or other types of support for accountability.
(e) Annual reports.—Not later than March 31 each year through 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the use of the authority in this section during the preceding fiscal year. Each report shall include information on any human rights training (as defined in subsection (f)) or other assistance that was provided during the fiscal year to foreign security forces.
(f) Definitions.—In this section
(1) The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(2) The term “human rights training” means training for the purpose of directly improving the conduct of foreign security forces to—
(B) strengthen compliance with the laws of armed conflict and respect for civilian control over the military;
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, enter into an arrangement, under an agreement concluded pursuant to section 2342 of title 10, United States Code, under which the United States agrees to loan personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment for the use of such equipment by military forces of a nation participating in the following:
(b) Limitations.—
(1) LOAN ONLY OF EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH US FORCES HAVE NO UNFULFILLED REQUIREMENTS.—Equipment may be loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section only upon a determination by the Secretary of Defense that the United States forces in the coalition operation concerned have no unfulfilled requirements for such equipment.
(2) SCOPE OF USE OF LOANED EQUIPMENT.—Equipment loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section may be used by those forces only for personnel protection or to aid in the personnel survivability of those forces and only in—
(3) DURATION OF USE OF LOANED EQUIPMENT.—Equipment loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section may be used by the military forces of that nation not longer than the duration of that country’s participation in the coalition operation concerned.
(4) NOTICE AND WAIT ON LOAN OF EQUIPMENT FOR TRAINING.—Equipment may not be loaned under subsection (a) in connection with training described in paragraph (3) of that subsection until 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate committees of Congress written notice on the loan of such equipment for such purpose.
(c) Waiver of reimbursement in case of loss of equipment in combat.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of equipment loaned under the authority of this section that is damaged or destroyed as a result of combat operations during coalition operations while held by forces to which loaned under this section, the Secretary of Defense may, with respect to such equipment, waive any other requirement under applicable law for—
(d) Reports to Congress.—If the authority provided under this section is exercised during a fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the exercise of such authority by not later than October 30 of the year in which such fiscal year ends. Each report on the exercise of such authority shall specify the recipient country of the equipment loaned, the type of equipment loaned, and the duration of the loan of such equipment.
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) The term “personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment” means items enumerated in categories I, II, III, VII, and X of the United States Munitions List under section 38(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778(a)(1) that the Secretary of Defense designates as available for loan under this section.
(a) Amount available for support.—Subsection (a) of section 1208 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section 1203(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1621), is further amended by striking “$50,000,000” and inserting “$75,000,000”.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to provide assistance, including training, equipment, supplies, stipends, construction of training and associated facilities, and sustainment, to appropriately vetted elements of the Syrian opposition and other appropriately vetted Syrian groups and individuals, through December 31, 2016, for the following purposes:
(1) Defending the Syrian people from attacks by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), and securing territory controlled by the Syrian opposition.
(b) Notice before provision of assistance.—Not later than 15 days prior to the provision of assistance authorized under subsection (a) to appropriately vetted recipients for the first time—
(1) the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and Senate a report, in unclassified form with a classified annex as appropriate, that contains a description of—
(C) the mechanisms and procedures that will be used to monitor and report to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and Senate on unauthorized end-use of provided training and equipment and other violations of relevant law by appropriately vetted recipients; and
(c) Plan elements.—The plan required in subsection (b)(1) shall include, at a minimum, a description of—
(d) Quarterly progress report.—Not later than 90 days after the Secretary of Defense submits the report required in subsection (b)(1), and every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and the Senate a progress report. Such progress report shall, based on the most recent quarterly information, include—
(1) any updates to or changes in the plan, strategy, vetting requirements and process, and end-use monitoring mechanisms and procedures, as required in subsection (b)(1);
(2) a description of how the threat of attacks against United States or coalition personnel is being mitigated, statistics on any such attacks, including green-on-blue attacks, and how such attacks are being mitigated;
(3) a description of the appropriately vetted recipients receiving assistance authorized under subsection (a);
(4) the recruitment, throughput, and retention rates of appropriately vetted recipients and equipment;
(5) any misuse or loss of provided training and equipment and how such misuse or loss is being mitigated;
(7) an assessment of the operational effectiveness of the appropriately vetted recipients in meeting the purposes specified in subsection (a);
(8) a description of sustainment support provided to appropriately vetted recipients pursuant to subsection (a);
(10) a statement of the amount of funds expended during the period for which the report is submitted, and in aggregate since September 19, 2014, to provide assistance by authorized category pursuant to subsection (a) and section 149 of the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015 (Public Law 113–164); and
(e) Definitions.—For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) The term “appropriately vetted” means, with respect to elements of the Syrian opposition and other Syrian groups and individuals, at a minimum—
(A) assessments of such elements, groups, and individuals for associations with terrorist groups, Shia militias aligned with or supporting the Government of Syria, and groups associated with the Government of Iran. Such groups include, but are not limited to, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Jabhat al Nusrah, Ahrar al Sham, other al-Qaeda related groups, and Hezbollah; and
(f) Reprogramming requirement.—The Secretary of Defense may submit a reprogramming or transfer request of funds made available for Overseas Contingency Operations beginning on October 1, 2014, and ending on December 31, 2016, to the congressional defense committees to carry out activities authorized under this section.
(g) Authority to accept contributions.—The Secretary of Defense may accept and retain contributions, including assistance in-kind, from foreign governments to provide assistance as authorized by this section. Any funds so accepted by the Secretary shall be credited to appropriations for the appropriate operation and maintenance accounts, except that any funds so accepted by the Secretary shall not be available for obligation until a reprogramming request is submitted to the congressional defense committees.
(h) Construction of authorization.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a specific statutory authorization for the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein hostilities are clearly indicated by the circumstances.
(i) War Powers Resolution matters.—Nothing in this section supersedes or alters the continuing obligations of the President to report to Congress pursuant to section 4 of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1543) regarding the use of United States Armed Forces abroad.
(j) Waiver authority.—For purposes of the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a), the President may waive any provision of law if the President determines that such provision of law would (but for the waiver) impede national security objectives of the United States by prohibiting, restricting, delaying, or otherwise limiting the provision of such assistance. Such waiver shall not take effect until 30 days after the date on which the President notifies the appropriate congressional committees of such determination and the provision of law to be waived.
(a) In general.—During fiscal years 2015 and 2016, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to provide logistic support for the conveyance of certain defense articles in Afghanistan to the armed forces of a country with which the Armed Forces of the United States plan to conduct bilateral or multilateral training overseas during fiscal years 2015 and 2016.
(b) Limitations.—The Secretary may provide logistic support under subsection (a) only—
(1) in accordance with the Arms Export Control Act and other relevant export control laws of the United States;
(2) in accordance with section 516(c)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j); and
(c) Limitation.—The total value of logistic support provided under subsection (a) for a fiscal year may not exceed $10,000,000.
(d) Source of funds.—To provide logistic support under subsection (a), the Secretary may use funds available for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, for fiscal years 2015 and 2016.
(e) Report.—Not later than 30 days after the last day of a fiscal year during which the Secretary of Defense exercises the authority under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the exercise of authority under this section during that fiscal year. Such report shall include a description of the types of defense articles provided, the amount of funds expended, and the countries that received defense articles.
(a) Biennial report required.—Not later than February 1 of each of 2016, 2018, and 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that sets forth, on a country-by-country basis, a description of each program carried out by the Department of Defense to provide training, equipment, or other security assistance or reimbursement during the two fiscal years ending in the year before the year in which such report is submitted under the authorities specified in subsection (c).
(b) Elements of report.—Each report required under subsection (a) shall provide for each program covered by such report, and for the reporting period covered by such report, the following:
(1) A description of the purpose and type of the training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement provided, including how the training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement provided advances the theater security cooperation strategy of the combatant command, as appropriate.
(c) Specified authorities.—The authorities specified in this subsection are the following authorities (or any successor authorities):
(1) Section 127d of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to provide logistic support, supplies, and services to allied forces participating in a combined operation with the Armed Forces.
(2) Section 166a(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, relating to humanitarian and civic assistance by the commanders of the combatant commands.
(3) Section 168 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority—
(4) Section 2010 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to reimburse foreign troops for participation in combined exercises.
(5) Section 2011 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to reimburse foreign troops for participation in Joint Combined Exercise Training.
(6) Section 2249c of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to use appropriated funds for costs associated with education and training of foreign officials under the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program.
(7) Section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1205 of this Act), relating to authority to build the capacity of foreign military forces, or the predecessor authority to such section in section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456).
(8) Section 2561 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to provide humanitarian assistance.
(10) Section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (32 U.S.C. 107 note), relating to authority for National Guard State Partnership program.
(11) Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 168 note), relating to the Ministry of Defense Advisors program.
(12) Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note), relating to the Global Security Contingency Fund.
(13) Section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), relating to authority to reimburse certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.
(14) Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 394), relating to authorization for logistical support for coalition forces supporting certain United States military operations.
(15) Section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), relating to authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of Peru and Colombia.
(16) Section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note), relating to additional support for counter-drug activities.
(d) Nonduplication of effort.—If any information required under subsection (a) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress by law, the Secretary of Defense may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required by subsection (a) in lieu of including such information in the report required by subsection (a).
(a) One-year extension.—Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 904), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2014” each place it appears and inserting “fiscal year 2015”.
(c) Funds available during fiscal year 2015.—Subsection (a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking “$60,000,000” and inserting “$10,000,000”.
(d) Restriction on amount of payments.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended by striking “$20,000,000” and inserting “$2,000,000”.
(e) Notification on certain projects.—Subsection (g) of such section is amended—
(f) Submittal of revised guidance.—Not later than 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the guidance issued by the Secretary to the Armed Forces concerning the Commanders' Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan as revised to take into account the amendments made by this section.
(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 905), is further amended—
(b) Other support.—Subsection (b) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by inserting “Iraq or in” before “Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan”.
(c) Limitation on amounts available.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(d) Extension of notice requirement relating to reimbursement of Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan.—Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1213(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2015”.
(e) Extension of limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan.—Section 1227(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2001), as amended by section 1213(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 906), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2014” and inserting “fiscal year 2015”.
(f) Additional limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan.—Of the total amount of reimbursements and support authorized for Pakistan during fiscal year 2015 pursuant to the third sentence of section 1233(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (as amended by subsection (b)(2)), $300,000,000 shall not be eligible for the waiver under section 1227(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2001) unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(a) Extension.—Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 394), as most recently amended by section 1217(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 909), is further amended—
(a) Plan required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a detailed plan for sustaining the Afghanistan National Army (ANA) and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) of the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) through the end of fiscal year 2017, with the objective of ensuring that the ANSF will be able to independently and effectively conduct operations and maintain security and stability in Afghanistan.
(b) Matters To be included.—The plan contained in the report required under subsection (a) shall include a description of the following matters:
(1) A comprehensive sustainment strategy, including target end-strengths, budget, and defined objectives.
(2) The commitments for funding contributions from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and non-NATO nations for sustaining the ANSF through the end of fiscal year 2017, any shortfalls in funding for such purposes, and the plan for achieving such commitments as necessary to sustain the ANSF.
(3) A mechanism for tracking funding, equipment, training, and services provided to the ANSF by the United States, countries participating in NATO’s Operation Resolute Support, and other members of the international community contributing to the sustainment of the ANSF.
(4) Plans for assisting the Government of Afghanistan to achieve the following goals:
(A) Improve and sustain effective Afghan security institutions with fully capable senior leadership and staff, including logistics, intelligence, medical, and recruiting units.
(B) Train and equip key enabling capabilities, including for the Afghan Special Operations Forces, the Afghan Air Force, and Afghan Special Mission Wing, such that these entities are fully-capable of conducting operations independently and in sufficient numbers.
(E) Enhance strong ANSF communication and control between central command and regions, provinces, and districts.
(a) Reports required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress on a semiannual basis a report on building and sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) and enhancing security and stability in Afghanistan.
(2) SUBMITTAL.—A report under paragraph (1) shall be submitted not later than June 15 each year, for the 6-month period ending on May 31 of such year, and not later than December 15 each year, for the 6-month period ending on November 30 of such year. No report is required to be submitted under paragraph (1) after the report required to be submitted on December 15, 2017.
(b) Matters To be included.—Each report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) STRATEGY AND OBJECTIVES OF UNITED STATES AND NATO MISSIONS IN AFGHANISTAN AFTER 2014.—A detailed description of—
(A) the strategy and objectives of any post-2014 United States mission and any mission agreed by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), to train, advise, and assist the ANSF or to conduct counterterrorism operations; and
(B) indicators of effectiveness as developed by the Secretary or NATO, as appropriate, in the assessment of any such United States train, advise, and assist mission and of any such train, advise, and assist mission agreed by NATO, including efforts to build the counterterrorism capabilities of the ANSF.
(2) THREAT ASSESSMENT.—An assessment of the current security conditions in Afghanistan and the security conditions anticipated in Afghanistan during the 24-month period beginning on the date of the submittal of such report, including with respect to threats from terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and the Haqqani Network.
(3) DESCRIPTION OF SIZE AND STRUCTURE AND STRATEGY AND BUDGET OF ANSF.—A description of—
(A) the size and force structure of the ANSF, including the Afghanistan National Army (ANA), the Afghanistan National Police (ANP), the Afghan Border Police, the Afghan Local Police, and such other major force components of the ANSF as the Secretary considers appropriate;
(B) the rationale for any changes in the overall end strength or the mix of force structure for the ANSF during the period covered by such report;
(C) levels of recruitment, retention, and attrition within the ANSF, in the aggregate and by force component;
(4) ASSESSMENT OF SIZE, STRUCTURE, CAPABILITIES, AND STRATEGY OF ANSF.—An assessment whether the size, structure, capabilities, and strategy of the ANSF are sufficient to provide security in light of the current security conditions in Afghanistan and the security conditions anticipated in Afghanistan during the 24-month period beginning on the date of the submittal of such report. Such assessment should describe the risks and trade-offs the ANSF are making and any gaps in the capacity and capabilities of the ANSF.
(5) BUILDING KEY CAPABILITIES AND ENABLING FORCES WITHIN ANSF.—
(6) FINANCING THE ANSF.—A description of—
(A) any plan agreed by the United States, the international community, and the Government of Afghanistan to fund and sustain the ANSF that serves as current guidance on such matters during the period covered by such report, including a description of whether such plan differs from—
(C) contributions by the international community to sustaining the ANSF during the period covered by such report;
(c) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(d) Repeal of superseded authority.—Section 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is repealed.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) a top national security priority for the United States continues to be to support the stability and sovereignty of Afghanistan and to help Afghanistan ensure that its territory is not used by al Qaeda, the Haqqani Network, or other violent extremist groups to launch attacks against the United States or its interests;
(2) the presence of United States military forces in Afghanistan after 2014 to train, advise, and assist the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF) and conduct counterterrorism operations is a key step to maintaining the significant gains achieved in Afghanistan and should be executed consistent with the security conditions on the ground;
Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2)(A)—
(A) by amending clause (ii) to read as follows:
“(ii) was or is employed in Afghanistan on or after October 7, 2001, for not less than 1 year—
“(II) by the International Security Assistance Force in a capacity that required the alien—
(2) by adding at the end of paragraph (3) the following:
“(F) FISCAL YEARS 2015 AND 2016.—In addition to any unused balance under subparagraph (D), for the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this subparagraph and ending on September 30, 2016, the total number of principal aliens who may be provided special immigrant status under this section shall not exceed 4,000. For purposes of status provided under this subparagraph—
“(i) the period during which an alien must have been employed in accordance with paragraph (2)(A)(ii) must terminate on or before September 30, 2015;
(3) by adding at the end the following:
“(14) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit a report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives containing the following information:
“(B) The number of appeals submitted under paragraph (2)(D)(ii)(I)(bb) from application denials by the Chief of Mission and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.
“(C) The number of applications denied by the Chief of Mission on the basis of derogatory information that were appealed and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.
“(D) The number of applications denied by the Chief of Mission on the basis that the applicant did not establish faithful and valuable service to the United States Government that were appealed and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.
“(E) The number of applications denied by the Chief of Mission for failure to establish the one-year period of employment required that were appealed and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.
“(F) The number of applications denied by the Chief of Mission for failure to establish employment by or on behalf of the United States Government that were appealed and the number of those applications that were approved pursuant to the appeal.
(a) Independent assessment.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall provide for the conduct of an independent assessment of the effectiveness of the United States efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al-Qaeda, including its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents since September 11, 2001.
(b) Elements.—The assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of al-Qaeda core’s current relationship with affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents, and how it has changed over time.
(2) An assessment of the current objectives, capabilities, and overall strategy of al-Qaeda core, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents, and how they have changed over time.
(3) An assessment of the operational and organizational structure of al-Qaeda core, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents, and how it has changed over time.
(4) An analysis of the activities that have proven to be most effective and least effective at disrupting and dismantling al Qaeda, its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents.
(c) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the entity selected for the conduct of the assessment required by subsection (a) shall provide to the Secretary of Defense and the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing its findings as a result of the assessment.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States Government should continue to work with the Government of Afghanistan and Afghan civil society to promote the rights of women in Afghanistan and their inclusion in the political, economic, and security transition process; and
(2) the United States Government should continue to support and encourage efforts by the Government of Afghanistan to recruit, integrate, train, and retain women in the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF), including through the use of not less than $25,000,000 as specified in section 1531(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 938) for programs and activities for such purposes, which may include—
(A) assistance in prioritizing efforts to increase the number of women serving in the ANSF, taking into account the Master Ministerial Development Plan for Afghanistan National Army (ANA) Gender Integration;
(B) further development of training for the ANA and the Afghanistan National Police (ANP) to increase awareness and responsiveness among ANA and ANP personnel regarding the unique security challenges women confront when serving in those forces;
(C) assistance in the development of a plan to increase the number of female security officers specifically trained to address gender-based violence, such as the Family Response Units of the ANP, and to ensure that such units are appropriately resourced;
(D) assistance in the development of accountability mechanisms for ANA and ANP personnel relating to the treatment of women and girls, including female members of the ANSF;
(E) assistance in the implementation of a plan, developed in coordination with the Government of Afghanistan, to promote the equal treatment of female members of the ANA and ANP through such steps as providing appropriate equipment, modifying facilities, and ensuring literacy and gender awareness training for female recruits and male counterparts; and
(a) Prohibition.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be obligated or expended for a construction project in Afghanistan in excess of $1,000,000 that cannot be audited and physically inspected by authorized United States Government personnel or their designated representatives, in accordance with generally-accepted auditing guidelines.
(b) Waiver.—The prohibition in subsection (a) may be waived with respect to a project otherwise covered by that subsection if not later than 15 days prior to the initial obligation of funds for the project the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report that contains the following:
(1) A determination of the Secretary of Defense that—
(a) Extension.—Subsection (h) of section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992) is amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.
Section 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4392), as most recently amended by section 1212 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 905), is further amended—
(a) Authority to conduct clearance.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may, using funds specified in subsection (c), conduct surface and sub-surface clearance of unexploded ordnance at closed training ranges used by the Armed Forces of the United States in Afghanistan.
(b) Conditions on authority.—
(1) LIMITATION TO RANGES NOT TRANSFERRED TO AFGHANISTAN.—The surface and sub-surface clearance of unexploded ordnance authorized under subsection (a) may only take place on training ranges managed and operated by the Armed Forces of the United States that have not been transferred to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan for use by its armed forces.
(c) Funds.—The surface and sub-surface clearance of unexploded ordnance authorized by subsection (a) shall be paid for using amounts as follows:
(d) Unexploded ordnance defined.—In this section, the term “unexploded ordnance” has the meaning given that term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth an assessment of the impact, if any, of the end of major combat operations in Afghanistan on the authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to use military force, including the authority to detain, with regard to al Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces, pursuant to—
(1) the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40); and
(b) Form.—The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every six months thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the nature and extent of bilateral security cooperation between the United States and Pakistan.
(b) Elements.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) A description of any strategic security objectives that the United States and Pakistan have agreed to pursue in cooperation.
(2) A description of programs or activities that the United States and Pakistan have jointly undertaken to pursue mutually agreed security cooperation objectives.
(3) A description and assessment of the effectiveness of efforts by Pakistan, unilaterally or jointly with the United States, to disrupt operations and eliminate safe havens of al Qaeda, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, and other militant extremist groups such as the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban located in Pakistan.
(4) A description and assessment of efforts by Pakistan, unilaterally or jointly with the United States, to counter the threat of improvised explosive devices and the networks involved in the acquisition, production, and delivery of such devices and their precursors and components.
(c) Form.—The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(e) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(f) Repeal of obsolete and superseded requirements.—Section 1232 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended by striking subsections (a) and (c).
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to provide assistance, including training, equipment, logistics support, supplies, and services, stipends, facility and infrastructure repair and renovation, and sustainment, to military and other security forces of or associated with the Government of Iraq, including Kurdish and tribal security forces or other local security forces, with a national security mission, through December 31, 2016, for the following purposes:
(b) Notice before provision of assistance.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this section, not more than 25 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until not later than 15 days after—
(c) Plan elements.—The plan required in subsection (a)(1) shall include, at a minimum, a description of—
(d) Quarterly progress report.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required in subsection (b)(1), and every 30 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall provide the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and the Senate with a progress report. Such progress report shall, based on the most recent quarterly information, include a description of the following:
(1) Any updates to or changes in the plan, strategy, process, vetting requirements and process as described in subsection (e), and end-use monitoring mechanisms and procedures.
(2) A description of how attacks against United States or coalition personnel are being mitigated, statistics on any such attacks, including “green-on-blue” attacks.
(5) A description of any misuse or loss of provided equipment and how such misuse or loss is being mitigated.
(6) An assessment of the operational effectiveness of the forces receiving assistance authorized under subsection (a).
(e) Vetting.—The Secretary of Defense should ensure that prior to providing assistance to elements of any forces described in subsection (a) such elements are appropriately vetted, including at a minimum, by—
(f) Definition.—In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(g) Funding.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this Act for Overseas Contingency Operations in title XV for fiscal year 2015, there are authorized to be appropriated $1,618,000,000 to carry out this section. Amounts authorized to be appropriated under this subsection are authorized to remain available until September 30, 2016.
(h) Authority to accept contributions.—The Secretary of Defense may accept and retain contributions, including assistance in-kind, from foreign governments, including the Government of Iraq, to provide assistance authorized under subsection (a). Any funds accepted by the Secretary may be credited to the account from which funds are made available for the provision of assistance authorized under subsection (a) and may be used for such purpose until expended.
(i) Construction of authorization.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a specific statutory authorization for the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein hostilities are clearly indicated by the circumstances.
(j) Waiver authority.—
(1) BY SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may waive any provision of law described in subparagraph (B) if the Secretary—
(2) BY PRESIDENT.—For purposes of the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a), the President may waive any provision of law other than a provision of law described in paragraph (1)(B) if the President determines that it is vital to the national security interests of the United States to waive such provision of law. Such waiver shall not take effect until 15 days after the date on which the President notifies the appropriate congressional committees of such determination and the provision of law to be waived.
(3) REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act the President shall transmit to the congressional defense committees a report that provides a specific list of provisions of law that need to be waived under this subsection for purposes of the provision of assistance pursuant to subsection (a) and a justification for each such waiver.
(k) Cost-sharing requirement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this subsection, not more than 60 percent of such funds may be obligated or expended until not later than 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense certifies to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership of the House of Representatives and the Senate that an amount equal to not less than 40 percent of the amount authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section has been contributed by other countries and entities for the purposes described in subsection (a), which may include contributions of in-kind support for forces described in subsection (a), as determined from October 1, 2014, of which not less than 50 percent of such amount contributed by other countries and entities has been contributed by the Government of Iraq.
(2) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in paragraph (1) shall not apply if the Secretary of Defense determines, in writing, that the national security objectives of the United States will be compromised by the application of the limitation to any such assistance, and notifies the appropriate congressional committees not less than 15 days in advance of the exemption taking effect, including a justification for the Secretary’s determination and a description of the assistance to be exempted from the application of such limitation.
(a) Extension.—Subsection (f)(1) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1631; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), as most recently amended by section 1214 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 906; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), is further amended—
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be used for any bilateral military-to-military cooperation between the Governments of the United States and the Russian Federation until the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(b) Nonapplicability.—The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to—
(c) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if—
(1) the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State—
(d) Exception for certain military bases.—The certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the Russian Federation in Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula operating in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory of Ukraine.
(a) Notification.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Russian Federation submits to the States Parties to the Open Skies Treaty a proposal to modify or introduce a new aircraft or sensor for flight by the Russian Federation under the Open Skies Treaty, the President shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress of such proposal and the relevant details thereof.
(b) Assessment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days prior to the date on which the United States intends to agree to a proposal described in subsection (a), the Director of National Intelligence, jointly with the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an assessment of such proposal on the national security of the United States.
Section 1246(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 923) is amended—
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) It was the object and purpose of the INF Treaty to eliminate the production or deployment of ground launched ballistic and cruise missiles with a range of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers, which was accomplished in 1992.
(2) The July 2014 Department of State annual report on “Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments” stated that “The United States has determined that the Russian Federation is in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty not to possess, produce, or flight-test a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) with a range capability of 500km to 5,500km, or to possess or produce launchers of such missiles.”.
(3) In a letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee dated October 23, 2014, General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, wrote “these violations are a serious challenge to the security of the United States and our allies. These actions, particularly when placed in the broader context of Russian regional aggression, must be met with a strategic response.”.
(b) Sense of congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Russian Federation’s actions in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty adversely affect the national security of the United States and its allies, including the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and those in East Asia;
(2) the Government of the Russian Federation is responsible for this violation and also for returning to compliance with the INF Treaty;
(3) it is in the national security interests of the United States and its allies for the INF Treaty to remain in effect and for the Russian Federation to return to full and verifiable compliance with all its obligations under the INF Treaty; and
(4) as identified in section 1061 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 865), the President should take appropriate actions to resolve the issues relating to noncompliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations under the INF Treaty.
(c) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on noncompliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations under the INF Treaty.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An assessment of the effect of Russian noncompliance on the national security interests of the United States and its allies, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and those in East Asia.
(B) A description of the President’s plan to resolve issues related to Russian noncompliance, including—
(i) actions that have been taken, and what further actions are planned or warranted by the United States;
(ii) plans to address Russian noncompliance diplomatically with the Russian Federation to resolve concerns about such noncompliance and bring Russia back into full compliance with the INF Treaty;
(d) Briefings required.—At the time of the submission of the report required under subsection (c), and every six months thereafter until the date on which the Russian Federation is in compliance with its obligations under the INF Treaty, the Secretary of State, jointly with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of such other departments or agencies as appropriate, shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the status of United States efforts to resolve its concerns relating to noncompliance by the Russian Federation with its obligations under the INF Treaty.
(e) Notification.—In the event the President determines that the Russian Federation has deployed, or intends to deploy, systems that violate the INF Treaty, the President shall promptly notify the appropriate congressional committees of such determination and any plans to respond to such deployments.
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) INF TREATY.—The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
(a) Report required.—Not later than June 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report, in both classified and unclassified form, on the security and military strategies and capabilities of the Russian Federation (in this section referred to as “Russia”).
(b) Matters To be included.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of the security priorities and objectives of Russia, including those priorities and objectives that would affect the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the Middle East, and the People’s Republic of China.
(2) A description of the goals and factors shaping Russian security strategy and military strategy, including military spending and investment priorities and their alignment with the security priorities and objectives described in paragraph (1).
(4) A description of Russia’s current missile defense strategy and capabilities, including efforts to develop missile defense capabilities.
(6) An assessment of the tactics, techniques, and procedures used by Russia in operations in Ukraine.
(7) An assessment of the proliferation activities of Russia and Russian entities, as a supplier of materials, technologies, or expertise relating to nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction or missile systems.
(8) A description of Russia’s asymmetric capabilities, including its strategy and efforts to develop and deploy electronic warfare, space and counterspace, and cyber warfare capabilities, including details on the number of malicious cyber incidents and associated activities against Department of Defense networks that are known or suspected to have been conducted or directed by the Government of the Russian Federation.
(9) A description of Russia’s nuclear strategy and associated doctrines and nuclear capabilities, including the size and state of Russia’s nuclear weapons stockpile, its nuclear weapons production capacities, and plans for developing its nuclear capabilities.
(11) A description of Russia’s modernization program for its command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance program and its applications for Russia’s precision guided weapons.
(12) In consultation with the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of State, developments regarding United States-Russian engagement and cooperation on security matters.
(13) The current state of United States military-to-military cooperation with Russia’s armed forces, which shall include the following:
(B) A summary of all such military-to-military cooperation during the one-year period ending on the day before the date of submission of the report, including a summary of topics discussed.
(C) A description of such military-to-military cooperation planned for the 12-month period beginning on the date of submission of the report.
(D) An assessment by the Secretary of Defense of the benefits that Russia expects to gain from such military-to-military cooperation.
(c) Nonduplication.—If any information required under subsection (b) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress as required by law, the Secretary of Defense may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required by subsection (a) in lieu of including such information in the report required by subsection (a).
(d) Appropriate congressional committees defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(e) Repeal of superseded authority.—Section 10 of the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–95) is repealed.
(a) Prohibition.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2015 may be used to enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding, or cooperative agreement with, to make a grant to, or to provide a loan or loan guarantee to Rosoboronexport or a subsidiary that is publicly known to be controlled by Rosoboronexport.
(b) Waiver.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense may waive the application of subsection (a) with respect to a contract or other agreement for the supply of spare parts for, or conduct of any other activity related to, the maintenance of helicopters operated by the Afghan National Security Forces or otherwise purchased by the Department of Defense only if, prior to issuing the waiver, the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a certification described in paragraph (2).
(2) CERTIFICATION.—A certification referred to in paragraph (1) is a certification that contains the following:
(A) A determination of the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan that—
(3) INITIAL LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may exercise the authority of paragraph (1) beginning on or after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required by the matter relating to section 1531 in the Joint Explanatory Statement to accompany the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (H.R. 3304, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress) regarding the potential to incorporate United States-manufactured rotary wing aircraft into the Afghan National Security Forces after the current program of record is completed.
(c) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the following:
(1) A list of known transfers of lethal military equipment by Rosoboronexport to the Government of the Syria since March 15, 2011.
(2) A list of known contracts, if any, that Rosoboronexport has signed with the Government of the Syria since March 15, 2011.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) There have been significant changes in the geopolitical environment during 2014, including developments that pose a challenge to the national security interests of the United States.
(2) The July 2014 Department of State annual report on “Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments” stated that “The United States has determined that the Russian Federation is in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty not to possess, produce, or flight-test a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) with a range capability of 500km to 5,500km, or to possess or produce launchers of such missiles.”.
(b) Report Required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report stating the reasons continued implementation of the New START Treaty is in the national security interests of the United States.
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) INF TREATY.—The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
(a) Required report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains the strategy of the Department of Defense to prioritize United States defense interests in the Asia-Pacific region.
(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall address the following:
(B) The security environment, including threats to global and regional United States national security interests emanating from the Asia-Pacific region, including efforts by the People’s Republic of China to advance their national interests in the Asia-Pacific region.
(D) Bilateral security cooperation relationships, including military-to-military engagements and security assistance.
(E) United States military presence, posture, and capabilities supporting the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region.
(b) Resources.—The report required by subsection (a)(1) shall be informed by the results of the integrated, multi-year planning and budget strategy for a rebalancing of United States policy in Asia submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7043(a) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2014 (division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Public Law 113–76; 128 Stat. 533)).
(c) Annual budget.—The President, acting through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall ensure that the annual budget submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, clearly highlights programs and projects that are being funded in the annual budget of the United States Government that relate to the strategy required by subsection (a)(1) and the integrated strategy referred to in subsection (b).
(a) Matters To be included.—Subsection (b)(14) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 781; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking “their response” and inserting “their capabilities, organizational affiliations, roles within China’s overall maritime strategy, activities affecting United States allies and partners, and responses”.
(a) Authorization.—The Department of Defense is authorized to provide the Government of Burma the following:
(1) Consultation, education, and training on human rights, the laws of armed conflict, civilian control of the military, rule of law, and other legal matters.
(2) Consultation, education, and training on English-language, humanitarian and disaster relief, and improvements to medical and health standards.
(b) Annual reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and each March 1 thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on military-to-military engagement between the United States Armed Forces and the Burmese military.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description of the military-to-military activities between the United States and Burma, and how engagement with the Burmese military supports the United States national security strategy and promotes reform in Burma.
(B) A description of the objectives of the United States for developing the military-to-military relationship with the Burmese military, how the United States measures progress toward such objectives, and the implications of failing to achieve such objectives.
(C) A description and assessment of the political, military, economic, and civil society reforms being undertaken by the Government of Burma, including those affecting—
(i) individual freedoms and human rights of the Burmese people, including those of ethnic and religious minorities and internally displaced populations;
(ii) the peaceful settlement of armed conflicts between the Government of Burma and ethnic minority groups in Burma;
(c) Rule of construction.—No Department of Defense assistance to the Government of Burma is authorized by this Act except as provided in this section.
(a) Report required.—Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the munitions strategy of the United States Pacific Command to address deficiencies in the ability of the United States Pacific Command to execute major operational plans.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An identification of current and projected critical munitions requirements, including as identified in the most-recent future-years defense program submitted to Congress by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
(3) A description of current and planned munitions programs to address munitions gaps and deficiencies identified in paragraph (2), including with respect to—
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that increased cooperation on missile defense among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea would enhance the security of allies of the United States in Northeast Asia, increase the defense of forward-based forces of the United States, and enhance the protection of the United States with regard to threats from the Korean Peninsula.
(b) Assessment Required.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment to identify opportunities for increasing missile defense cooperation among the United States, Japan, and the Republic of Korea, and to evaluate options for enhanced short-range missile, rocket, and artillery defense capabilities to address threats from the Korean Peninsula.
(c) Elements.—The assessment under subsection (b) shall include the following:
(1) Candidate areas for increasing missile defense cooperation, including greater information sharing, systems integration, and joint operations.
(2) Potential challenges and limitations to enabling such cooperation and options for mitigating such challenges and limitations.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the United States reaffirms its security commitments under the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8) as the cornerstone of United States relations with Taiwan and as a key instrument of peace, security, and stability in the Taiwan Strait since the enactment of such Act in 1979.
(b) Report required.—Not later than December 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the self-defense capabilities of Taiwan.
(c) Elements.—The report required by subsection (b) shall contain the following:
(1) A description of the key assumptions made regarding the impact of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army on the maritime or territorial security of Taiwan, including the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s—
(2) An assessment of the force posture, capabilities, and readiness of the armed forces of Taiwan for maintaining the maritime or territorial security of Taiwan, including an assessment of Taiwan’s—
(d) Form.—The report required by subsection (b) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form.
(e) Nonduplication of efforts.—If any information required under subsection (c) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress as required by law, the Secretary of Defense may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required by subsection (b) in lieu of including such information.
(a) Assessment required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with an independent entity to conduct an assessment of the ability of the Department of Defense to counter anti-access and area-denial strategies, capabilities, and other key technologies of potential adversaries.
(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An assessment of anti-access and area-denial strategies, capabilities, and other key technologies of potential adversaries during each of the fiscal year periods described in paragraph (3) that would represent a significant challenge to deployed forces and systems of the United States military, including an assessment of the extent to which such strategies, capabilities, and other key technologies could affect United States military operations.
(B) An assessment of gaps and deficiencies in the ability of the Department of Defense to address anti-access and area-denial strategies, capabilities, and other key technologies described in subparagraph (A), including an assessment of the adequacy of current strategies, programs, and investments of the Department of Defense.
(C) Recommendations for adjustments in United States policy and strategy, force posture, investments in capabilities, systems and technologies, and changes in business and management processes, or other novel approaches to address gaps and deficiencies described in subparagraph (B), or to restore, maintain, or expand United States military technological advantages, particularly in those areas in which potential adversaries are closing gaps or have achieved technological superiority with respect to the United States.
(b) Report required.—
(c) Department of defense support.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide the independent entity described in subsection (a) with timely access to appropriate information, data, resources, and analysis so that the entity may conduct a thorough and independent assessment as required under subsection (a).
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States values its alliances with the Governments of Japan and the Republic of Korea as cornerstones of peace and security in the region, based on shared values of democracy, the rule of law, free and open markets, and respect for human rights;
(2) the United States welcomes Japan’s new policy of collective self-defense, which will enable Japan to contribute more proactively to regional and global peace and security, as well as Japan’s recent increases in defense funding, adoption of a National Security Strategy, and formation of security institutions such as the Japanese National Security Council;
(3) the United States reaffirms its commitment to the Government of Japan under Article V of the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States of America and Japan that “[e]ach Party recognizes that an armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional provisions and processes”;
(4) the United States welcomes the Republic of Korea’s ratification of a new five-year Special Measures Agreement, which establishes the framework for Republic of Korea contributions to offset costs associated with the stationing of United States forces in the Republic of Korea, as well as efforts by the Republic of Korea to enhance its defense capabilities, including its recent decision to acquire surveillance and strike capabilities;
(5) the United States and the Republic of Korea share deep concerns that the nuclear and ballistic missiles programs of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and its repeated provocations pose grave threats to peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and to Northeast Asia, that the United States and the Republic of Korea and will work together to achieve the peaceful denuclearization of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and that the United States and the Republic of Korea remain fully committed to continuing close cooperation on the full range of issues related to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea; and
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report that outlines the strategy of the Department of Defense with regard to maritime security in the Asia-Pacific region, with particular emphasis on the South China Sea and the East China Sea.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall outline the strategy described in that subsection and include the following:
(1) An assessment of how the actions of the People’s Republic of China in the South China Sea and the East China Sea have affected the status quo with regard to competing territorial and maritime claims and United States security interests in those seas.
(2) An assessment of how the naval and other maritime strategies and capabilities of the People’s Republic of China, including military and law enforcement capabilities, affect the strategy in the Asia-Pacific region.
(3) An assessment of how anti-access and area denial strategies and capabilities of the People’s Republic of China in the Asia-Pacific region, including weapons and technologies, affect the strategy.
(4) A description of any ongoing or planned changes in United States military capabilities, operations, and posture in the Asia-Pacific region to support the strategy.
(5) A description of any current or planned bilateral or regional naval or maritime capacity-building initiatives in the Asia-Pacific region.
(6) An assessment of how the strategy leverages military-to-military engagements between the United States and the People’s Republic of China to reduce the potential for miscalculation and tensions in the South China Sea and the East China Sea, including a specific description of the effects of such engagements on particular incidents or interactions involving the People’s Republic of China in those seas.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States should consider opportunities to help enhance the maritime capabilities and nautical skills of the Taiwanese navy that may contribute to Taiwan’s self-defense and to regional peace and stability; and
(2) the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan should be afforded opportunities to participate in the humanitarian assistance and disaster relief portions of future multilateral exercises, such as the Pacific Partnership, Pacific Angel, and Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, to increase their respective capacities to conduct these types of operations.
(a) Matters for discussion.—Section 1238(c)(2) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C. 7002(c)(2)) is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) through (J) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:
“(A) The role of the People’s Republic of China in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and other weapon systems (including systems and technologies of a dual use nature), including actions the United States might take to encourage the People’s Republic of China to cease such practices.
“(B) The qualitative and quantitative nature of the transfer of United States production activities to the People’s Republic of China, including the relocation of manufacturing, advanced technology and intellectual property, and research and development facilities, the impact of such transfers on the national security of the United States (including the dependence of the national security industrial base of the United States on imports from China), the economic security of the United States, and employment in the United States, and the adequacy of United States export control laws in relation to the People's Republic of China.
“(C) The effects of the need for energy and natural resources in the People’s Republic of China on the foreign and military policies of the People's Republic of China, the impact of the large and growing economy of the People’s Republic of China on world energy and natural resource supplies, prices, and the environment, and the role the United States can play (including through joint research and development efforts and technological assistance) in influencing the energy and natural resource policies of the People’s Republic of China.
“(D) Foreign investment by the United States in the People’s Republic of China and by the People’s Republic of China in the United States, including an assessment of its economic and security implications, the challenges to market access confronting potential United States investment in the People’s Republic of China, and foreign activities by financial institutions in the People's Republic of China.
“(E) The military plans, strategy and doctrine of the People’s Republic of China, the structure and organization of the People's Republic of China military, the decision-making process of the People's Republic of China military, the interaction between the civilian and military leadership in the People's Republic of China, the development and promotion process for leaders in the People's Republic of China military, deployments of the People's Republic of China military, resources available to the People's Republic of China military (including the development and execution of budgets and the allocation of funds), force modernization objectives and trends for the People's Republic of China military, and the implications of such objectives and trends for the national security of the United States.
“(F) The strategic economic and security implications of the cyber capabilities and operations of the People’s Republic of China.
“(G) The national budget, fiscal policy, monetary policy, capital controls, and currency management practices of the People's Republic of China, their impact on internal stability in the People’s Republic of China, and their implications for the United States.
“(H) The drivers, nature, and implications of the growing economic, technological, political, cultural, people-to-people, and security relations of the People’s Republic of China’s with other countries, regions, and international and regional entities (including multilateral organizations), including the relationship among the United States, Taiwan, and the People’s Republic of China.
“(I) The compliance of the People’s Republic of China with its commitments to the World Trade Organization, other multilateral commitments, bilateral agreements signed with the United States, commitments made to bilateral science and technology programs, and any other commitments and agreements strategic to the United States (including agreements on intellectual property rights and prison labor imports), and United States enforcement policies with respect to such agreements.
“(J) The implications of restrictions on speech and access to information in the People’s Republic of China for its relations with the United States in economic and security policy, as well as any potential impact of media control by the People's Republic of China on United States economic interests.
“(K) The safety of food, drug, and other products imported from China, the measures used by the People's Republic of China Government and the United States Government to monitor and enforce product safety, and the role the United States can play (including through technical assistance) to improve product safety in the People’s Republic of China.”.
(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to annual reports submitted under section 1238(c) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 after such date of enactment.
(a) Extension.—Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4579), as most recently amended by section 1241 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 920), is further amended by striking “2015” and inserting “2016”.
(a) Modification.—Section 1032(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2)—
(A) by redesignating subparagraph (C), (D), and (E) as subparagraph (D), (E), and (F), respectively;
(b) Report.—Section 1032(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1571; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended—
(2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
“(4) REPORT.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains a detailed summary of the national security planning guidance required under paragraph (1), including any updates thereto.
(a) Sense of congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States forces should continue to be forward postured in Africa and in the Middle East;
(2) Djibouti is in a strategic location to support United States vital national security interests in the region;
(3) the United States should take definitive steps to maintain its basing access and agreements with the Government of Djibouti to support United States vital national security interests in the region;
(b) Authority.—In the case of a good or service to be acquired in direct support of covered activities for which the Secretary of Defense makes a determination described in subsection (c), the Secretary may conduct a procurement in which—
(c) Determination.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—A determination described in this subsection is a determination by the Secretary of either of the following:
(2) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT.—A determination under paragraph (1)(B) shall not be effective for purposes of a limitation or preference under subsection (b) unless the Secretary also determines that the limitation or preference will not adversely affect—
(d) Reporting and oversight.—In exercising the authority under subsection (b) to procure goods or services in support of covered activities, the Secretary of Defense—
(1) in the case of the procurement of services, shall ensure that the procurement is conducted in accordance with the management structure implemented pursuant to section 2330(a) of title 10, United States Code;
(2) shall ensure that such goods or services are identified and reported under a single, joint Department of Defense-wide system for the management and accountability of contractors accompanying United States forces operating overseas or in contingency operations (such as the synchronized predeployment and operational tracker (SPOT) system); and
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) COVERED ACTIVITIES.—The term “covered activities” means Department of Defense activities in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility.
(2) GOOD OF DJIBOUTI.—The term “good of Djibouti” means a good wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of Djibouti.
(a) Removal of the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan from treatment as terrorist organizations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan shall be excluded from the definition of terrorist organization (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III))) for purposes of such section 212(a)(3)(B).
(2) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary of State, after consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security, after consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, may suspend the application of paragraph (1) for either or both of the groups referred to in paragraph (1) in such Secretary’s sole and unreviewable discretion. Prior to or contemporaneous with such suspension, the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security shall report their reasons for suspension to the Committees on Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate, the Committees on Appropriations in the House of Representatives and of the Senate, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate.
(b) Relief regarding admissibility of nonimmigrant aliens associated with the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan.—
(1) FOR ACTIVITIES OPPOSING THE BA’ATH REGIME.—Paragraph (3)(B) of section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)) shall not apply to an alien with respect to activities undertaken in association with the Kurdistan Democratic Party or the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan in opposition to the regime of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party and the autocratic dictatorship of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
(2) FOR MEMBERSHIP IN THE KURDISTAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND PATRIOTIC UNION OF KURDISTAN.—Paragraph (3)(B) of section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)) shall not apply to an alien applying for a nonimmigrant visa, who presents themselves for inspection to an immigration officer at a port of entry as a nonimmigrant, or who is applying in the United States for nonimmigrant status, and who is a member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party or the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and currently serves or has previously served as a senior official (such as Prime Minister, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister, Deputy Minister, President, Vice-President, Member of Parliament, provincial Governor or member of the National Security Council) of the Kurdistan Regional Government or the federal government of the Republic of Iraq.
(3) EXCEPTION.—Neither paragraph (1) nor paragraph (2) shall apply if the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security (or a designee of one of such Secretaries) determine in their sole unreviewable discretion that such alien poses a threat to the safety and security of the United States, or does not warrant a visa, admission to the United States, or a grant of an immigration benefit or protection, in the totality of the circumstances. This provision shall be implemented by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security in consultation with the Attorney General.
(c) Prohibition on judicial review.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law (whether statutory or nonstatutory), section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1252), sections 1361 and 1651 of title 28, United States Code, section 2241 of such title, and any other habeas corpus provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination made pursuant to this section.
(a) Prohibition.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to integrate a missile defense system of the People’s Republic of China into any missile defense system of the United States.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that missile defense systems of the Russian Federation should not be integrated into the missile defense systems of the United States or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) if such integration undermines the security of the United States or NATO, respectively.
(a) In general.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, or to make any change to existing programs, projects, or activities as approved by Congress in furtherance of, pursuant to, or otherwise to implement the Arms Trade Treaty, unless the Arms Trade Treaty has received the advice and consent of the Senate and has been the subject of implementing legislation, as required, by Congress.
(a) Notice to President.—If the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, has substantial reason to believe that there is a case of foreign activity that would pose a significant threat to United States national security interests and that may be inconsistent with an arms control treaty to which the United States is a party, and such case is not included in, or is significantly different from a case included in, the most-recent annual report submitted to Congress pursuant to section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), the Secretary of Defense shall notify the President of such belief of the Secretary.
(b) Referral to Secretary of State.—If the President receives a notification from the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a), the President shall promptly refer the matter to the Secretary of State to arrange for an inter-agency review of the case in order to provide for an assessment of whether the case constitutes a significant case of non-compliance with an arms control treaty to which the United States is a party.
(c) Notice to Congress.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the President makes a referral under subsection (b), the Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress the results of the assessment of the case with respect to which the referral was made under subsection (b).
(a) Operation.—The Secretary of the Air Force may operate the Air Force education and training facility known as the Inter-European Air Forces Academy (in this section referred to as the “Academy”).
(b) Purpose.—The purpose of the Academy shall be to provide military education and training to military personnel of countries that are members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or signatories to the Partnership for Peace Framework Documents.
(c) Limitations.—
(d) Supplies and clothing.—The Secretary of the Air Force may, under such conditions as the Secretary may prescribe, provide to a person receiving education and training under this section the following:
(e) Living allowance.—The Secretary of the Air Force may pay to a person receiving education and training under this section a living allowance at a rate to be prescribed by the Secretary, taking into account the rates of living allowances authorized for a member of the Armed Forces under similar circumstances.
(f) Funding.—Amounts for the operations and maintenance of the Academy, and for the provision of education and training through the Academy, may be paid from funds available for the Air Force for operation and maintenance.
(g) Annual reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the Secretary of the Air Force operates the Academy pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the operations of the Academy during such fiscal year.
(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under this subsection shall set forth, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the following:
(A) A description of the operations of the Academy, including a description of the education and training courses provided under this section.
(B) A summary of the number of individuals receiving education and training through the Academy, set forth by country of origin and education or training provided.
(a) Marine corps security guard program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall—
(A) develop and implement a plan to incorporate the additional Marine Corps Security Guard personnel authorized under section 404 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 10 U.S.C. 5983 note) at United States embassies, consulates, and other facilities;
(B) conduct an annual review of the Marine Corps Security Guard Program, including—
(i) an evaluation of whether the size and composition of the Marine Corps Security Guard Program is adequate to meet global diplomatic security requirements;
(2) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an unclassified report, with a classified annex as necessary, that addresses the requirements set forth in paragraph (1).
(b) Report on “new normal” and general mission requirements of united states africa command.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on what changes, if any, have been made to the force posture and structure of the United States Africa Command or adjacent combatant commands to respond, if requested, to a diplomatic facility’s security requirements (so-called “new normal” requirements) and general mission of United States Africa Command.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A) A detailed description of the “new normal” requirements in the area of responsibility of the United States Africa Command.
(B) A description of any changes required for the United States Africa Command or adjacent combatant commands to meet the “new normal” and general mission requirements in the United States Africa Command area of responsibility, including the gaps in capability, size, posture, agreements, basing, and enabler support of crisis response forces and associated assets to respond to requests for support from the Secretary of State.
Section 2313(c) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(8) Whether the person is included on any of the following lists maintained by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury:
“(A) The specially designated nationals and blocked persons list (commonly known as the ‘SDN list’).
“(D) The list of persons sanctioned under the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–172; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) that do not appear on the SDN list (commonly known as the ‘Non-SDN Iranian Sanctions Act list’).
(a) In general.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the interim agreement relating to the nuclear program of Iran. Such report shall include—
(b) Additional reports.—If the interim agreement described in subsection (a) is renewed or if a comprehensive and final agreement is entered into regarding the nuclear program of Iran, by not later than 90 days after such renewal or final agreement being entered into, and every 180 days thereafter, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on such renewed or final agreement. Such report shall include the matters described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a).
(a) Findings.—Congress findings the following:
(1) At the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in Wales in September 2014, NATO members made important commitments to reverse the decline in their defense budgets and to aim to move toward the NATO guideline to spend a minimum of two percent of each member’s Gross Domestic Product on defense within a decade.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States should work with other NATO members as they seek to modernize their defense capabilities to encourage such members to procure defense systems, including air and missile defense systems, that are interoperable with NATO defense systems and help fill critical NATO shortfalls;
(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on efforts of the Department of Defense to protect cultural property abroad, including activities undertaken pursuant to the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.
(b) Elements of report.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A description of Department of Defense policies, directives, and regulations for the protection of cultural property abroad at risk of destruction due to armed conflict.
(2) A description of actions the Armed Forces have taken to protect cultural property abroad, including efforts to avoid damage to cultural property during military construction activities and efforts made to inform military personnel about the identification and protection of cultural property as part of the law of war.
(a) Review.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of United States forces and the forces of other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the area of responsibility of the United States European Command, and of contingency plans for such United States forces, with the objective of ensuring that the posture, readiness, and responsiveness of such forces are appropriate to meet the obligations of collective self-defense under Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty. The review shall include an assessment of the capabilities and capacities needed by the Armed Forces of the United States to respond to unconventional or hybrid warfare tactics like those used by the Russian Federation in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.
(b) United States strategy and plans.—
(1) REPORT ON STRATEGY AND PLANS REQUIRED.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on a strategy and plans for enhancing security and stability in Europe.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by this subsection shall include the following:
(B) A description of any initiatives or recommendations of the Secretary of Defense for enhancing the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of United States forces in the area of responsibility of the United States European Command as a result of the review.
(C) A description of any initiatives of other members of NATO for enhancing the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of their forces within the area of responsibility of NATO.
(D) A plan for reassuring Central European and Eastern European members of NATO regarding the commitment of the United States and other members of NATO to their obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty, including collective defense under Article V, including the following:
(i) A description of measures to be undertaken by the United States to reassure members of NATO regarding the commitment of the United States to its obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty.
(ii) A description of measures undertaken or to be undertaken by other members of NATO to provide assurances of their commitment to meet their obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty.
(E) A plan for enhancing bilateral and multilateral security cooperation with appropriate countries participating in the NATO Partnership for Peace program using the authorities for enhancing security cooperation specified in subsection (c), which plan shall include the following:
(c) Authorities for enhancing security cooperation.—The authorities for enhancing security cooperation specified in this subsection include the following:
(1) Section 168 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the Warsaw Initiative Fund.
(2) Section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1205 of this Act), relating to authority to build the capacity of foreign military forces.
(3) Section 1206 of this Act, relating to training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries to promote respect for the rule of law and human rights.
(4) Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 168 note), relating to the Ministry of Defense Advisors program.
(5) Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note), relating to the Global Security Contingency Fund.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the United States should provide lethal and nonlethal military assistance to the Government of Ukraine to defend its territory and sovereignty from further aggressive actions designed to undermine regional peace and stability to the extent such assistance is defensive and non-provocative in nature.
(b) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment and submit to the congressional defense committees a report related to military assistance to Ukraine.
(c) Elements.—At a minimum, the report required under subsection (b) should provide a detailed explanation of the following matters:
(1) Military equipment, supplies, and defense services, including type, quantity, and prioritization of such items, requested by the Government of Ukraine.
(2) Military equipment, supplies, and defense services, including type, quantity, and actual or estimated delivery date, that the United States Government has provided, is providing, and plans to provide to the Government of Ukraine.
(3) An assessment of what United States military assistance to the Government of Ukraine, including type and quantity, would most effectively improve the military readiness and capabilities of the Ukrainian military, including a discussion of those defensive, lethal capabilities that could be provided by the United States that would enable the Government of Ukraine to better ensure the territorial integrity of Ukraine.
(4) An assessment of the need for, appropriateness of, and force protection concerns of any United States military advisors that may be made available to the armed forces of Ukraine.
Consistent with the provisions of the Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–172), it is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the ongoing United States advise and assist operation in support of regional governments in Central Africa and the African Union to remove Joseph Kony and his top commanders from the battlefield and end atrocities perpetuated by the Lord’s Resistance Army, also known as Operation Observant Compass, has made significant progress in achieving its objectives;
(2) the Department of Defense should continue its support of Operation Observant Compass, particularly through the provision of key enablers, such as mobility assets and targeted intelligence collection and analytical support, to enable regional partners to effectively conduct operations against Joseph Kony and the Lord’s Resistance Army;
Section 1245(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2544) is amended by striking “December 31 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.
(a) Report.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with other appropriate Federal officials, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains an assessment of the actions taken by the Department of Defense and other Federal agencies to identify, locate, and bring to justice those persons and organizations that planned, authorized, or committed the attacks against the United States facilities in Benghazi, Libya that occurred on September 11 and 12, 2012, and the legal authorities available for such purposes.
(b) Strategy.—
(1) TIMING AND CONTENT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy to counter the growing threat posed by radical Islamist terrorist groups in North Africa, West Africa, and the Sahel, which shall include, among other things—
(A) a description of the radical Islamist terrorist groups active in the region, including an assessment of their origins, strategic aims, tactical methods, funding sources, leadership, and relationships with other terrorist groups or state actors;
(B) a strategy to stem the movement of foreign fighters from North Africa, West Africa, and the Sahel to other areas, including Syria and Iraq;
(C) a description of steps the United States is taking to stabilize the political and security situation in North Africa, West Africa, and the Sahel and support counterterrorism and stability efforts in the region;
Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use of force against Iran.
(a) In general.—Notwithstanding the provisions for congressional consideration of a proposed agreement for cooperation in subsection d. of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the amendments to the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes, done at Washington, July 22, 2014, and transmitted to Congress on July 24, 2014, including all portions thereof (hereinafter in this section referred to as the “Amendment”), may be brought into effect on or after the date of the enactment of this Act as if all the requirements in such section 123 for consideration of the Amendment had been satisfied, subject to subsection (b) of this section.
(b) Applicability of Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and other provisions of law.—Upon coming into effect, the Amendment shall be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and any other applicable United States law as if the Amendment had come into effect in accordance with the requirements of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
(a) Fiscal year 2015 cooperative threat reduction funds defined.—As used in this subtitle, the term “fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds” means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321.
(b) Availability of funds.—Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
Of the $365,108,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321, the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:
This subtitle may be cited as the “Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act”.
In this subtitle:
(1) The term “congressional defense committees” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a program, referred to as the “Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program”, with respect to foreign countries to do the following:
(1) Facilitate the elimination and the safe and secure transportation and storage of chemical, biological, or other weapons, weapons components, weapons-related materials, and associated delivery vehicles.
(2) Facilitate—
(3) Prevent the proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons, weapons components, and weapons-related materials, technology, and expertise.
(4) Prevent the proliferation of biological weapons, weapons components, and weapons-related materials, technology, and expertise, which may include activities that facilitate detection and reporting of highly pathogenic diseases or other diseases that are associated with or that could be used as an early warning mechanism for disease outbreaks that could affect the Armed Forces of the United States or allies of the United States, regardless of whether such diseases are caused by biological weapons.
(b) Concurrence of Secretary of State.—The authority under subsection (a) to carry out the Program is subject to any concurrence of the Secretary of State or other appropriate agency head required under section 1322 or 1323 (unless such concurrence is otherwise exempted pursuant to section 1352 with respect to activities or determinations carried out or made before the date of the enactment of this Act).
(c) Scope of authority.—The authority to carry out the Program in subsection (a) includes authority to provide equipment, goods, and services, but does not include authority to provide funds directly for a project or activity carried out under the Program.
(d) Type of program.—The Program carried out under subsection (a) may involve assistance in planning and in resolving technical problems associated with weapons destruction and proliferation. The Program may also involve the funding of critical short-term requirements relating to weapons destruction.
(e) Reimbursement of other agencies.—The Secretary of Defense may reimburse heads of other departments and agencies of the Federal Government under this section for costs of the participation of the respective departments and agencies in the Program.
(f) Military-to-military and defense contacts.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the military-to-military and defense contacts carried out under subsection (a)(6)—
(g) Prior notice to congress of obligation of funds.—
(1) ANNUAL REQUIREMENT.—Not less than 15 days before any obligation of any Cooperative Threat Reduction funds, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on that proposed obligation of such funds for that fiscal year.
(3) EXCEPTION FOR NOTIFICATIONS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a proposed obligation of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds that is covered by a notification previously submitted by the Secretary to the congressional defense committees that includes the matters described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (2).
(a) Authority.—For purposes of the Program, the Secretary of Defense may obligate and expend Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a fiscal year, and any Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a prior fiscal year that remain available for obligation, for a proliferation threat reduction project or activity if the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, determines each of the following:
(b) Congressional notification.—At the time at which the Secretary obligates funds under subsection (a) for a project or activity, the Secretary of Defense shall notify, in writing, the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of State shall notify, in writing, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate of the determinations made under such subsection with respect to such project or activity, together with—
(c) Non-defense agency partner-nation contacts.—With respect to military-to-military and defense contacts carried out under subsection (a)(6) of section 1321, as further described in subsection (f) of such section, concurrence of the Secretary of State under subsection (a) is required only for participation in such contacts by personnel from non-defense agencies of foreign countries.
(a) Limitation on use of funds for urgent threat reduction activities.—Subject to subsections (b) and (c), not more than 15 percent of the total amount of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for any fiscal year may be obligated or expended, notwithstanding any other provision of law, for covered activities.
(b) Secretary of defense determination and notice for urgent threat reduction activities in governed areas.—With respect to an area not covered by subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense may obligate or expend funds pursuant to subsection (a) for covered activities if—
(1) the Secretary determines, in writing, that—
(A) a threat arising in such area from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons or weapons-related materials, technologies, or expertise must be addressed urgently;
(3) at the time at which the Secretary of Defense first obligates such funds, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate—
(c) Presidential determination and notice for urgent threat reduction activities in ungoverned areas.—With respect to an ungoverned area or an area that is not controlled by an effective governmental authority, as determined by the Secretary of State, the President may obligate or expend funds pursuant to subsection (a) for covered activities if—
(1) the President determines, in writing, that—
(2) at the time at which the President first obligates such funds, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate—
(a) Notice to Congress of intent to use funds for unspecified purposes.—
(1) REPORT.—For any fiscal year for which Cooperative Threat Reduction funds are specifically authorized in an Act other than an appropriations Act for specific purposes within the Program, the Secretary of Defense may obligate or expend such funds, or other funds otherwise made available for the Program for that fiscal year, for purposes other than such specified purposes if—
(A) the Secretary determines that such obligation or expenditure is necessary in the national interests of the United States;
(2) CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER LAWS.—Paragraph (1) may not be construed to authorize the obligation or expenditure of Cooperative Threat Reduction Program funds for a purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is specifically prohibited under section 1331 or any other provision of law.
(b) Limited authority to vary individual amounts provided for any fiscal year for specified purposes.—For any fiscal year for which Cooperative Threat Reduction funds are specifically authorized in an Act other than an appropriations Act for specific purposes within the Program, the Secretary may obligate or expend such funds, or other funds otherwise made available for the Program for that fiscal year, in excess of the specific amount so authorized for that purpose if—
(1) the Secretary determines that such obligation or expenditure is necessary in the national interests of the United States;
(a) Authority to enter into agreements.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more agreements with any person (including a foreign government, international organization, multinational entity, or any other entity) that the Secretary considers appropriate under which the person contributes funds for activities conducted under the Program.
(b) Retention and use of funds.—Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, United States Code, and subject to subsections (c) and (d), the Secretary of Defense may retain and obligate or expend funds contributed pursuant to subsection (a) for purposes of the Program. Funds so contributed shall be retained in a separate fund established in the Treasury for such purposes and shall be available to be obligated or expended without further appropriation.
(c) Return of funds not obligated or expended within three years.—If the Secretary does not obligate or expend funds contributed pursuant to subsection (a) by the date that is three years after the date on which the contribution was made, the Secretary shall return the amount to the person who made the contribution.
(d) Notice.—
(e) Annual report.—Not later than the first Monday in February of each year, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on amounts contributed pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year. Each such report shall include, for the fiscal year covered by the report, the following:
(1) A statement of any funds contributed pursuant to subsection (a), including, for each such contribution, the value of the contribution and the identity of the person who made the contribution.
(f) Implementation plan.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees—
(a) In general.—Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may not be obligated or expended for any of the following purposes:
(a) On-site manager requirement.—Before obligating any Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a project described in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall appoint one on-site manager for that project. The manager shall be appointed from among employees of the Federal Government.
(b) Projects covered.—Subsection (a) applies to a project—
(c) Duties of on-site manager.—The on-site manager appointed under subsection (a) shall—
(1) develop, in cooperation with representatives from governments of states participating in the project, a list of those steps or activities critical to achieving the disarmament or nonproliferation goals of the project;
(d) Authority to manage more than one project.—
(e) Steps or activities.—Steps or activities referred to in subsection (c)(1) are those steps or activities that, if not completed, will prevent a project from achieving its disarmament or nonproliferation goals, including, at a minimum, the following:
(f) Notification to congress.—In any case in which the Secretary directs an on-site manager to resume the participation of the United States in a project under subsection (c)(4), the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of such direction by not later than 30 days after the date of such direction.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall seek to obtain all the permits required to complete each phase of construction of a project under the Program in a state of the former Soviet Union before obligating more than 40 percent of the total costs of that phase of the project.
(b) Use of funds for new construction projects.—Except as provided in subsection (c), with respect to a new construction project to be carried out by the Program, not more than 40 percent of the total costs of the project may be obligated from Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for any fiscal year until the Secretary—
(c) Exception to limitations on use of funds.—The limitation in subsection (b) on the obligation of funds for a construction project otherwise covered by such subsection shall not apply with respect to the obligation of funds for a particular project if the Secretary—
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States should carry out activities under the Program in the Russian Federation only if those activities are consistent with and in support of the security interests of the United States; and
(b) Completion of Cooperation Threat Reduction activities in Russian Federation.—Cooperative Threat Reduction funds made available for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2015 may not be obligated or expended for activities in the Russian Federation unless such activities in Russia are specifically authorized by law.
Not later than the first Monday in February each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a certification for each facility of a project or activity of the Program for which construction occurred during the preceding fiscal year on matters as follows:
(1) Whether or not such facility will be used for its intended purpose by the government of the foreign country in which the facility is constructed.
(a) Summary required.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees in the materials and manner specified in subsection (c)—
(b) Description of purpose and intent.—The descriptive summary required under subsection (a) shall include a narrative description of each program and project category under each program element that explains the purpose and intent of the funds requested.
(c) Inclusion in certain materials submitted to congress.—The summary required to be submitted in a fiscal year under subsection (a) shall be set forth by project category, and by amounts specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of such subsection in connection with such project category, in each of the following:
(1) The annual report on activities and assistance under the Program required in such fiscal year under section 1343.
(2) The budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense budget for the fiscal year succeeding such fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code).
(a) Annual report.—In any year in which the President submits to Congress, under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the budget for a fiscal year that requests funds for the Department of Defense for activities or assistance under the Program, the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report on the activities and assistance carried out under the Program.
(b) Deadline.—Each report under subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than the first Monday in February of a year.
(c) Matters included.—Each report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An estimate of the total amount that will be required to be expended by the United States during the fiscal year covered by the budget described in subsection (a) in order to achieve the objectives of the Program.
(2) A five-year plan setting forth the amount of funds and other resources proposed to be provided by the United States for the Program during the period covered by the plan, including the purpose for which such funds and resources will be used.
(3) A description of the activities and assistance carried out under the Program during the fiscal year preceding the submission of the report, including—
(A) the funds notified, obligated, and expended for such activities and assistance and the purposes for which such funds were notified, obligated, and expended for such fiscal year and cumulatively for the Program;
(B) a description of the participation, if any, of each department and agency of the Federal Government in such activities and assistance;
(D) a description of the United States private sector participation in the portion of such activities and assistance that were supported by the obligation and expenditure of funds for the Program; and
(E) such other information as the Secretary considers appropriate to fully inform Congress of the operation of activities and assistance carried out under the Program, including, with respect to proposed demilitarization or conversion projects, information on the progress toward demilitarization of facilities and the conversion of the demilitarized facilities to civilian activities.
(4) A description of the means (including program management, audits, examinations, and other means) used by the United States during the fiscal year preceding the submission of the report to ensure that assistance provided under the Program is fully accounted for, that such assistance is being used for its intended purpose, and that such assistance is being used efficiently and effectively, including—
(A) if such assistance consisted of equipment, a description of the current location of such equipment and the current condition of such equipment;
(B) if such assistance consisted of contracts or other services, a description of the status of such contracts or services and the methods used to ensure that such contracts and services are being used for their intended purpose;
(5) A description of the defense and military activities carried out under section 1321(a)(6) during the fiscal year preceding the submission of the report, including—
(C) a description of the activities carried out, including the forms of assistance provided, and the justification for each form of assistance provided;
The Secretary of Defense shall implement metrics to measure the impact and effectiveness of activities of the Program to address threats arising from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, and biological weapons and weapons-related materials, technologies, and expertise.
The following provisions of law are repealed:
(1) Sections 212, 221, 222, and 231 of the Soviet Nuclear Threat Reduction Act of 1991 (title II of Public Law 102–228; 22 U.S.C. 2551 note).
(2) Sections 1412 and 1431 of the Former Soviet Union Demilitarization Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 5902 and 5921).
(3) Sections 1203, 1204, 1206, and 1208 of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 1993 (22 U.S.C. 5952, 5953, 5955, and 5957).
(4) Section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106; 22 U.S.C. 5955 note).
(5) Section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 50 U.S.C. 2362 note).
(6) Section 1307 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(7) Section 1303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(8) (A) Sections 1303 and 1304 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(B) Section 1306 of such Act (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–340).
(C) Section 1308 of such Act (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C. 5959).
(9) Section 1304 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(10) Sections 1305 and 1306 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2673; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(11) Sections 1303, 1305, 1307, and 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (22 U.S.C. 5960, 5961, 5962, and 5963).
(12) (A) Section 1303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(C) Section 1306 of such Act (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2560; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
(a) Determinations relating to certain proliferation threat reduction projects and activities.—Any determination made before the date of the enactment of this Act under section 1308(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (22 U.S.C. 5963(a)) shall be treated as a determination under section 1322(a).
(b) Determinations relating to urgent threat reduction activities.—Any determination made before the date of the enactment of this Act under section 1305(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (22 U.S.C. 5965(b)) shall be treated as a determination under section 1323(b).
(c) Funds available for Cooperative Threat Reduction program.—Funds made available for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1632) or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 672) that remain available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act shall be available for the Program.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b) Use.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries.
(a) Authority for transfer of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for section 1405 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $146,857,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.
(b) Use of transferred funds.—For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).
There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $63,400,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the submittal to Congress by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of the evaluation report on the joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility demonstration project known as the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, North Chicago, Illinois, that is required to be submitted in March 2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on that demonstration project.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment by the Comptroller General of the following:
(1) The evaluation measures, standards, and criteria used by the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to measure the overall effectiveness and success of the medical facility referred to in subsection (a).
(c) Availability of certain documents.—For purposes of the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall make available to the Comptroller General any documents related to the medical facility demonstration project referred to in such subsection, including any evaluation plans, task summaries, in-process reviews, interim reports, and draft final report.
The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 to provide additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the Armed Forces.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4102.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4202.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4302.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4402.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act.
(a) Authority to transfer authorizations.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2015 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
No amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be available for, or used for purposes of, the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund.
(a) Continuation of existing limitation on the use of amounts in Fund.—Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2015 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424).
(b) Equipment disposition.—
(1) ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT.—Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may accept equipment that is procured using amounts in the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund authorized under this Act and is intended for transfer to the security forces of Afghanistan, but is not accepted by such security forces.
(2) CONDITIONS ON ACCEPTANCE OF EQUIPMENT.—Before accepting any equipment under the authority provided by paragraph (1)—
(A) the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees the report required by subsection (c); and
(B) the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall make a determination that the equipment was procured for the purpose of meeting requirements of the security forces of Afghanistan, as agreed to by both the Government of Afghanistan and the United States, but is no longer required by such security forces or was damaged before transfer to such security forces.
(3) ELEMENTS OF DETERMINATION.—In making a determination under paragraph (2)(B) regarding equipment, the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan shall consider alternatives to Secretary of Defense acceptance of the equipment. An explanation of each determination, including the basis for the determination and the alternatives considered, shall be included in the relevant quarterly report required under paragraph (5).
(4) TREATMENT AS DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE STOCKS.—Equipment accepted under the authority provided by paragraph (1) may be treated as stocks of the Department of Defense upon notification to the congressional defense committees of such treatment.
(5) QUARTERLY REPORTS ON EQUIPMENT DISPOSITION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 90-day period thereafter during which the authority provided by paragraph (1) is exercised, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the equipment accepted under this subsection or section 1531(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 938; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) during the period covered by the report. Each report shall include a list of all equipment that was accepted during the period covered by the report and treated as stocks of the Department and copies of the determinations made under paragraph (2)(B), as required by paragraph (3).
(c) Report on Afghanistan equipment procurement process.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commander of United States forces in Afghanistan, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing in detail—
(d) Conforming amendments.—Section 1531(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 938; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note)—
(a) Use and transfer of funds.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), but as amended by subsection (b) of this section, shall apply to the funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2015.
(b) Plan for Consolidation and Alignment of Rapid Acquisition Organizations.—
(1) PLAN REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to consolidate and align all of the rapid acquisition or quick reaction capability organizations, including, at a minimum, the following—
(2) PLAN ELEMENTS.—The plan required by this subsection shall include the following elements:
(A) A review, and if necessary, recommended modifications to the current arrangements for oversight of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization within the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
(c) Extension of interdiction of improvised explosive device precursor chemicals authority.—Section 1532(c)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2057), as amended by section 1532(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 939), is amended by striking “December 31, 2014” and inserting “December 31, 2015”.
(d) Prohibition on use of funds.—
(1) PROHIBITION; EXCEPTIONS.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization may be used for the purposes of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization assigning personnel or contractors on a permanent or temporary basis, or as a detail, to the combatant commands or associated military components unless such personnel or contractors are supporting—
(2) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—If the Secretary of Defense makes a determination pursuant to paragraph (1)(C) that an operation requires the direct support of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice of the determination and the reasons for the determination.
(a) Availability of funds.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by this title for the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund shall be available for the following purposes:
(1) To provide support and assistance to foreign security forces or other groups or individuals to conduct, support, or facilitate counterterrorism and crisis response activities under authority provided the Department of Defense by any other provision of law (in this section referred to as an “underlying Department of Defense authority”).
(b) Geographic limitation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Activities using amounts available pursuant to subsection (a) may be conducted only in the area of responsibility of the United States Central Command or the United States Africa Command, but may not include activities for the provision of assistance or other support for the Government of Iraq.
(2) ADDITIONAL AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY.—Activities using amounts available pursuant to subsection (a) may be conducted in an area of responsibility of a geographic combatant command not specified in paragraph (1) if the Secretary of Defense determines that—
(3) NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF ADDITIONAL AREAS.—The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notification of any determination made pursuant to paragraph (2) not later than 15 days before transferring amounts from the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund for activities in the area of responsibility covered by such determination.
(c) Contract authority.—Activities using amounts available pursuant to subsection (a) may be conducted by contract, including contractor-operated capabilities, if the Secretary of Defense typically acquires services or equipment by contract in conducting a similar activity for the Department of Defense.
(d) Transfer requirement and authorities.—
(1) USE OF FUNDS ONLY PURSUANT TO TRANSFER.—Amounts in the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund may be used for the purposes specified in subsection (a) only pursuant to transfers authorized by this subsection.
(2) TRANSFERS AUTHORIZED.—Amounts in the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund may be transferred from the Fund to any accounts of the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance for the purposes specified in subsection (a).
(3) REPROGRAMMING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit a reprogramming or transfer request from amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 1510 to the congressional defense committees to carry out activities supported under this section. Each such request shall set forth the following:
(A) A detailed description of the activities to be supported by the reprogramming or transfer, including the request of the commander of the combatant command concerned for support, urgent operational need, or emergent operational need.
(4) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—The transfer of an amount to an account under the authority in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for such account by an amount equal to the amount transferred.
(e) Construction with other limitations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), nothing in this section may be construed to terminate, alter, or override any requirement or limitation applicable to activities funded with amounts in the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund under the underlying Department of Defense authority that authorizes such activities.
(2) INAPPLICABILITY OF LIMITATIONS ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—A limitation on the amount that may be used for activities in a fiscal year under the underlying Department of Defense authority that authorizes such activities shall not apply to amounts made available for such activities in such fiscal year pursuant to this section.
(f) Plan.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the intended management and use of the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund. The plan shall include the following:
(1) An identification of the underlying Department of Defense authorities that the Secretary has identified as available for use pursuant to subsection (a).
(g) Semi-Annual reports.—Not later than 60 days after the end of the first half of fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017, and the second half of fiscal years 2015 and 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth, for the preceding fiscal half-year, the following:
(1) A description of the underlying Department of Defense authorities that authorized activities supported by the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund.
(3) A description of any obligations and expenditures of amounts transferred from the Fund, including recipients of amounts, set forth by country (where applicable).
(a) Total amount and Authorized purposes of ERI.—The $1,000,000,000 authorized to be appropriated in sections 1502, 1504, 1505, 1511, and 2904 for fiscal year 2015 for the European Reassurance Initiative, as specified in the funding tables in sections 4102, 4302, 4402, 4502, and 4602, may be used by the Secretary of Defense solely for the following purposes:
(2) Bilateral and multilateral military exercises and training with allies and partner nations in Europe.
(3) Activities to improve infrastructure in Europe to enhance the responsiveness of the United States Armed Forces.
(b) Activities to build defense and security capacity of allies and partner nations.—Of the funds made available for the European Reassurance Initiative that will be used for the purpose specified in subsection (a)(5)—
(1) not less than $75,000,000 shall be available to be used for programs, activities, and assistance to support the Government of Ukraine;
(c) Transfer requirements related to certain funds.—
(1) USE OF FUNDS ONLY PURSUANT TO TRANSFER.—In the case of the funds authorized to be appropriated in section 1511 for the European Reassurance Initiative Fund, as specified in the funding tables in section 4502, the funds may be used for the purposes specified in subsection (a) only pursuant to a transfer of the funds to either or both of the following accounts of the Department of Defense:
(2) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—During fiscal years 2015 and 2016, the transfer of an amount made available for the European Reassurance Initiative to an account under the authority provided by paragraph (1) or subsection (b)(3) shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for such account by an amount equal to the amount transferred.
(d) Notification requirements.—Not later than 15 days before that date on which a transfer of funds under subsection (b)(3) or (c)(1) takes effect, the Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees in writing of the planned transfer. Each notice of a transfer of funds shall include the following:
At the same time the budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to maintain critical and enduring special operations capabilities for the United States Special Operations Command by fully transitioning funding for the United States Special Operations Command from funds available for overseas contingency operations to funds available for the Department of Defense on a recurring basis for purposes of future-years defense programs.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) critical United States national security space systems are facing a serious growing foreign threat;
(b) Report on ability of the United States to deter and defeat adversary space aggression.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing an assessment of the ability of the Department of Defense to deter and defeat any act of space aggression by an adversary.
(c) Study on alternative defense and deterrence strategies in response to foreign counterspace capabilities.—
(1) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Office of Net Assessment, shall conduct a study of potential alternative defense and deterrent strategies in response to the existing and projected counterspace capabilities of China and Russia. Such study shall include an assessment of the congruence of such strategies with the current United States defense strategy and defense programs of record, and the associated implications of pursuing such strategies.
(a) Notification.—At the same time as the President submits the budget required under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal years 2016 and 2017, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees notice of each change to the evolved expendable launch vehicle acquisition plan and schedule from the plan and schedule included in the budget submitted by the President under such section 1105 for fiscal year 2015. Such notification shall include—
(b) Inapplicability of notification requirement if no changes.—No notification under subsection (a) is required if at the time such notification would be required no change described in subsection (a) has occurred.
The Secretary of Defense shall, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, revise Department of Defense directives and guidance to require the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space to ensure that in developing space strategies, architectures, and programs for satellite communications, the Executive Agent shall—
(1) conduct strategic planning to ensure the Department of Defense is effectively and efficiently meeting the satellite communications requirements of the military departments and commanders of the combatant commands;
(2) coordinate with the secretaries of the military departments, the commanders of the combatant commands, and the heads of Defense Agencies to eliminate duplication of effort and to ensure that resources are used to achieve the maximum effort in related satellite communication science and technology; research, development, test and evaluation; production; and operations and sustainment;
(3) coordinate with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Chief Information Officer of the Department to ensure that effective and efficient acquisition approaches are being used to acquire military and commercial satellite communications for the Department, including space, ground, and user terminal integration; and
(a) Development.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a next-generation rocket propulsion system that enables the effective, efficient, and expedient transition from the use of non-allied space launch engines to a domestic alternative for national security space launches.
(b) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes—
(a) Pilot program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may develop and carry out a pilot program to determine the feasibility and advisability of expanding the use of working capital funds by the Secretary to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial satellite communications services to meet the requirements of the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commanders.
(b) Goals.—In developing and carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall ensure that the pilot program—
(1) provides a cost-effective and strategic method to acquire commercial satellite communications services;
(2) incentivizes private-sector participation and investment in technologies to meet future requirements of the Department of Defense with respect to commercial satellite communications services;
(d) Reports.—
(1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(B) if the Secretary finds that carrying out the pilot program authorized under subsection (a)(1) is not an appropriate method to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial satellite communications services, a description of how the Secretary will achieve the goals described in subsection (b) without carrying out such pilot program.
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than December 1, 2020, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program under subsection (a)(1). The report shall include—
(A) an assessment of expanding the use of working capital funds to effectively and efficiently acquire commercial satellite communications services to meet the requirements of the military departments, Defense Agencies, and combatant commanders; and
(B) a description of—
(i) any contract entered into under the pilot program, the funding used under such contract, and the efficiencies realized under such contract;
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, update the National Security Space Strategy to include a strategy relating to space control and space superiority for the protection of national security space assets.
(b) Elements.—The strategy relating to space control and space superiority required by subsection (a) shall address the following:
(6) Projected resources required over the period covered by the current future-years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
(c) Consistency with Space Protection Strategy.—The Secretary shall, in consultation with the Director, ensure that the strategy relating to space control and space superiority required by subsection (a) is consistent with the Space Protection Strategy developed under section 911 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note).
(d) Report.—
(e) Space protection strategy.—Section 911(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) Allocation of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or any other Act and made available for the Space Security and Defense Program, a majority of such funds shall be allocated to the development of offensive space control and active defensive strategies and capabilities.
(b) Statement with respect to allocation.—The Secretary of Defense shall include, in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the Department of Defense for a fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code), a statement with respect to whether the budget of the Department allocates funds for the Space Security and Defense Program as required by subsection (a).
(a) In general.—Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c), beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not award or renew a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities under the evolved expendable launch vehicle program if such contract carries out such space launch activities using rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation.
(b) Waiver.—The Secretary may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) with respect to a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities if the Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days before the waiver takes effect, that—
(c) Exception.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to either—
(A) the placement of orders or the exercise of options under the contract numbered FA8811–13–C–0003 and awarded on December 18, 2013; or
(B) subject to paragraph (2), a contract awarded for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities that includes the use of rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation that prior to February 1, 2014, were either fully paid for by the contractor or covered by a legally binding commitment of the contractor to fully pay for such rocket engines.
(2) CERTIFICATION.—The Secretary may not award or renew a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities described in paragraph (1)(B) unless the Secretary, upon the advice of the General Counsel of the Department of Defense, certifies to the congressional defense committees that the offeror has provided to the Secretary sufficient documentation to conclusively demonstrate that prior to February 1, 2014, the offeror had either fully paid for the rocket engines described in such paragraph or made a legally binding commitment to fully pay for such rocket engines.
Not later than June 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the evolved expendable launch vehicle program that includes an assessment of the advisability of the Secretary of Defense requiring, when selecting launch providers for the program using competitive procedures as described in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code, that new entrant launch providers or incumbent launch providers establish or maintain business systems that comply with the data requirements and cost accounting standards of the Department of Defense, including certified cost or price data.
(a) In general.—In awarding a contract for the launch of the payload for mission number five of the Operationally Responsive Space Program, the Secretary of the Air Force shall use competitive procedures described in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code, and ensure that the policies of the Department of Defense concerning competitive space launch opportunities are followed.
(a) In general.—Relative to the number of rocket cores for which space launch providers certified under the evolved expendable launch vehicle program may submit bids or competitive proposals under competitive procedures pursuant to the National Security Space Launch Procurement Forecast, as of the date on which the President submitted the budget for fiscal year 2015 to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1) during fiscal year 2015, increase by one the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals; and
(2) for fiscal years 2015 through 2017, increase by one (in addition to the core referred to in paragraph (1)) the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals, unless the Secretary—
(A) determines that there is no practicable way to increase the number of such cores for which such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals and remain in compliance with the requirements of the firm fixed price contract for 36 rocket engine cores during the five fiscal years beginning with fiscal year 2013; and
(b) Competitive procedures defined.—In this section, the term “competitive procedures” means procedures as described in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Weather satellite follow-on system.—
(1) LIMITATION.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the weather satellite follow-on system, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the plan under paragraph (2).
(2) PLAN REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to meet the meteorological and oceanographic collection requirements of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, including the requirements of the combatant commands, the military departments, and the Defense Agencies (as defined in section 101(a)(11) of title 10, United States Code). The plan shall include the following:
(A) How the Secretary will use existing assets of the defense meteorological satellite program, including an identification of the extent to which requirements can be addressed by the Defense Meteorological Satellite program.
(3) GAO REVIEW.—
(A) The Comptroller General of the United States shall review the analysis of alternatives for the weather satellite follow-on system, or space based environmental monitoring, to determine—
(b) Defense Meteorological Satellite program.—
(1) LIMITATION.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program may be obligated or expended for the storage of a satellite of such program until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(2) REQUIREMENTS IN THE EVENT OF NO LAUNCH.—
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for data exploitation under the space-based infrared systems, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force, acting as the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space, submits to the congressional defense committees certification that—
(a) Phased limitations.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the hosted payload and wide field of view testbed of the space-based infrared systems program—
(1) not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record of such program until the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the appropriate congressional committees a copy of the analysis of alternatives for such program of record; and
(2) following the date on which the Secretary submits such analysis of alternatives, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record of such program until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing on the findings and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander under such analysis of alternatives, including the cost evaluation of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.
(b) Exception.—The limitations in subsection (a) shall not apply to efforts to examine and develop technology insertion opportunities for the program of record specified in subsection (a).
(a) Phased limitations.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the protected tactical demonstration and protected military satellite communications testbed of the advanced extremely high frequency program—
(1) not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record for such program until the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees a copy of the analysis of alternatives for such program of record; and
(2) following the date on which the Secretary submits such analysis of alternatives, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended on alternative approaches to the program of record for such program until a period of 30 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command jointly provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the findings and recommendations of the Secretary and Commander under such analysis of alternatives, including the cost evaluation of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Science Board to conduct a study of the effectiveness of the ground and space sensor system architecture for space situational awareness.
(b) Elements.—The study required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the following:
(1) Projected needs, based on current and future threats, for the ground and space sensor system during the five-, 10-, and 20-year periods beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) Capabilities of the ground and space sensor system to conduct defensive and offensive operations.
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the requirements and investments needed to modernize Department of Defense space launch facilities and supporting infrastructure.
(b) Elements.—The briefing required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1) The results of the investigation into the failure of the radar system supporting the Eastern range in March 2014, including the causes for the failure.
(2) An assessment of each current radar and other system as well as supporting infrastructure required to support the mission requirement of the range, including back-up systems.
(3) An estimate of the annual level of dedicated funding required to maintain and modernize the range infrastructure in adequate condition to meet national security requirements.
(a) Establishment.—Subchapter I of chapter 21 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 430. Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive Agent
“(a) Designation.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall designate a civilian employee of the Department or a member of the armed forces to serve as the Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities Executive Agent.
“(b) Duties.—The Executive Agent designated under subsection (a) shall—
“(2) work with the combatant commands, military departments, and the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)) to—
(b) Briefings.—At the same time as the President submits to Congress the budget pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020, the Executive Agent designated under subsection (a) of section 430 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection (a) of this section), in consultation with the commanders of the combatant commands, the Secretaries of the military departments, and the heads of the Department of Defense intelligence agencies and offices (including the Directors of the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, and the National Reconnaissance Office), shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives a briefing on the investments, activities, challenges, and opportunities of the Executive Agent in carrying out the responsibilities under subsection (b) of such section 430.
Section 921(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1878) is amended by striking “2014 and 2015” and inserting “2014 through 2016”.
Section 431(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended, in the second sentence, by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.
Section 926(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1541) is amended, in the matter before paragraph (1)—
(a) Assessment.—
(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress and the Comptroller General of the United States an assessment of the intelligence activities and programs of United States Special Operations Command and special operations forces.
(2) INCLUSIONS.—The assessment under paragraph (1) shall include each of the following elements:
(A) An overall strategy defining such intelligence activities and programs, including definitions of intelligence activities and programs carried out by special operations forces and how such activities and programs relate to conventional military intelligence and the capabilities of the Armed Forces.
(B) The oversight roles and responsibilities of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Oversight with respect to the employment of special operations forces for intelligence activities and programs, including an analysis of any oversight limitations or gaps.
(C) A strategy and roadmap of United States Special Operations Command intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance programs and requirements, including enabling capabilities provided by the Armed Forces, for special operations across the future years defense program.
(D) A comprehensive description of Joint Staff-validated current and anticipated future requirements for the intelligence activities and programs of each geographic combatant commander that are likely to be fulfilled by special operations forces, including those that can only be addressed by special operations forces, programs, or capabilities.
(E) Validated current and expected future United States Special Operations Command force structure requirements necessary to meet near-, mid-, and long-term special operations intelligence activities and programs of the geographic combatant commanders.
(F) A comprehensive review and assessment of statutory authorities, and Department and interagency policies, including limitations, for special operations forces intelligence activities and programs.
(G) A cost estimate of special operations intelligence activities and programs, including an estimate of the costs of the period of the current future years defense program, including a description of all rules and assumptions used to develop the cost estimates.
(H) A copy of any memoranda of understanding or memoranda of agreement between the Department of Defense and other departments or agencies of the United States Government, or between components of the Department of Defense that are required to implement objectives of special operations intelligence activities and programs.
(3) FORM.—The assessment required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(4) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the assessment required under paragraph (1) is submitted, the Comptroller General shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a review of such assessment. Such review shall include an assessment of—
(A) the extent to which the assessment required under paragraph (1) addressed the elements required under paragraph (2);
(B) the sufficiency of oversight of the intelligence activities and programs of special operations forces by the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict, and the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Oversight;
(b) Limitations.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), not more than 50 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for procurement, Defense-wide, for intelligence systems, and for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for intelligence systems development may be obligated until the assessment required under subsection (a) is submitted.
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS.—The term “appropriate committees of Congress” means the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(2) FUTURE YEARS DEFENSE PROGRAM.—The term “future years defense program” means the future years defense program under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
(3) GEOGRAPHIC COMBATANT COMMANDER.—The term “geographic combatant commander” means a commander of a combatant command (as defined in section 161(c) of title 10, United States Code) with a geographic area of responsibility.
At the same time that the President’s budget is submitted pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2020—
(1) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on—
(A) the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance requirements, by specific intelligence capability type, of each of the combatant commands;
(2) the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence shall provide to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a briefing on short-term, mid-term, and long-term strategies to address the critical intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance requirements of the combatant commands.
(a) Prohibition.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2015, to execute—
(1) the separation of the National Intelligence Program budget from the Department of Defense budget;
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM.—The term “National Intelligence Program” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).
(a) Report required.—Not later than March 30, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the plans of the Department to address—
(1) the adoption of an interim capability to continuously evaluate the security status of the employees and contractors of the Department who have been determined eligible for and granted access to classified information by the Department of Defense Central Adjudication Facilities;
(2) the use of an interim system to assist in developing requirements, lessons learned, business rules, privacy standards, and operational concepts applicable to the objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability required by the strategy for modernizing personnel security;
(3) the engineering for an interim system and the objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability for initial investigations and reinvestigations required by the strategy for modernizing personnel security to support automation-assisted insider threat analyses conducted across the law enforcement, personnel security, human resources, counterintelligence, physical security, network behavior monitoring, and cybersecurity activities of all the components of the Department of Defense, pursuant to Executive Order 13587;
(4) how competitive processes and open systems designs will be used to acquire advanced commercial technologies throughout the life cycle of the objective continuous evaluation capability required by the strategy for modernizing personnel security;
(5) how the senior agency official in the Department of Defense for insider threat detection and prevention will be supported by experts in counterintelligence, personnel security, law enforcement, human resources, physical security, network monitoring, cybersecurity, and privacy and civil liberties from relevant components of the Department and experts in information technology, large-scale data analysis, systems engineering, and program acquisition;
(b) Inclusion of gaps.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include specific gaps in policy and statute to address the requirements placed on the Department by section 907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) and Executive Order 13587.
(c) Strategy for modernizing personnel security defined.—In this section, the term “strategy for modernizing personnel security” means the strategy developed under section 907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66).
(a) Migration required.—Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall migrate the Distributed Common Ground System of the Department of the Army, including the Red Disk initiative under development at the Intelligence and Security Command, to an open system architecture to enable—
(b) Compliance with open system architecture standards.—In carrying out the migration required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure that the Distributed Common Ground System—
(c) Open system architecture defined.—In this section, the term “open system architecture” means, with respect to an information technology system, an integrated business and technical strategy that—
(1) employs a modular design and uses widely supported and consensus-based standards for key interfaces;
(2) is subjected to successful validation and verification tests to ensure key interfaces comply with widely supported and consensus-based standards; and
(a) Budgeting.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 9 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 238. Cyber mission forces: program elements
“(a) Budget justification display.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a part of the defense budget materials for fiscal year 2017 and each fiscal year thereafter, a budget justification display that includes—
(b) Assessment of transfer account for cyber activities.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall assess the feasibility and advisability of establishing a transfer account to execute the funds contained in the major force program category required by subsection (a).
(a) Reporting.—Part I of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 18 the following new chapter:
Ҥ 391. Reporting on cyber incidents with respect to networks and information systems of operationally critical contractors and certain other contractors
“(a) Designation of Department component to receive reports.—The Secretary of Defense shall designate a component of the Department of Defense to receive reports of cyber incidents from contractors in accordance with this section and with section 941 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2224 note) or from other governmental entities.
“(b) Procedures for reporting cyber incidents.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures that require an operationally critical contractor to report in a timely manner to component designated under subsection (a) each time a cyber incident occurs with respect to a network or information system of such operationally critical contractor.
“(c) Procedure requirements.—
“(1) DESIGNATION AND NOTIFICATION.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall include a process for—
“(2) RAPID REPORTING.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall require each operationally critical contractor to rapidly report to the component of the Department designated pursuant to subsection (d)(2)(A) on each cyber incident with respect to any network or information systems of such contractor. Each such report shall include the following:
“(A) An assessment by the contractor of the effect of the cyber incident on the ability of the contractor to meet the contractual requirements of the Department.
“(3) DEPARTMENT ASSISTANCE AND ACCESS TO EQUIPMENT AND INFORMATION BY DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
“(A) include mechanisms for Department personnel to, if requested, assist operationally critical contractors in detecting and mitigating penetrations; and
“(B) provide that an operationally critical contractor is only required to provide access to equipment or information as described in subparagraph (A) to determine whether information created by or for the Department in connection with any Department program was successfully exfiltrated from a network or information system of such contractor and, if so, what information was exfiltrated.
“(4) PROTECTION OF TRADE SECRETS AND OTHER INFORMATION.—The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall provide for the reasonable protection of trade secrets, commercial or financial information, and information that can be used to identify a specific person.
“(d) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) CYBER INCIDENT.—The term ‘cyber incident’ means actions taken through the use of computer networks that result in an actual or potentially adverse effect on an information system or the information residing therein.
“(2) OPERATIONALLY CRITICAL CONTRACTOR.—The term ‘operationally critical contractor’ means a contractor designated by the Secretary for purposes of this section as a critical source of supply for airlift, sealift, intermodal transportation services, or logistical support that is essential to the mobilization, deployment, or sustainment of the Armed Forces in a contingency operation.”.
(b) Issuance of procedures.—The Secretary shall establish the procedures required by subsection (b) of section 391 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section, not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(c) Assessment of Department policies.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary of Defense shall complete an assessment of—
(A) requirements that were in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act for contractors to share information with Department components regarding cyber incidents (as defined in subsection (d) of such section 391) with respect to networks or information systems of contractors; and
(2) ACTIONS FOLLOWING ASSESSMENT.—Upon completion of the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(B) issue or revise guidance applicable to Department components that ensures the rapid sharing by the component designated pursuant to such section 391 or section 941 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (10 U.S.C. 2224 note) of information relating to cyber incidents with respect to networks or information systems of contractors with other appropriate Department components.
(a) Executive agent.—Chapter 19 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1632 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 392. Executive agents for cyber test and training ranges
“(a) Executive agent.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Principal Cyber Advisor, shall—
“(b) Roles, responsibilities, and authorities.—
“(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agents designated under subsection (a). Such roles, responsibilities, and authorities shall include the development of a biennial integrated plan for cyber and information technology test and training resources.
“(2) BIENNIAL INTEGRATED PLAN.—The biennial integrated plan required under paragraph (1) shall include plans for the following:
“(A) Developing and maintaining a comprehensive list of cyber and information technology ranges, test facilities, test beds, and other means of testing, training, and developing software, personnel, and tools for accommodating the mission of the Department. Such list shall include resources from both governmental and nongovernmental entities.
“(B) Organizing and managing designated cyber and information technology test ranges, including—
“(i) establishing the priorities for cyber and information technology ranges to meet Department objectives;
“(ii) enforcing standards to meet requirements specified by the United States Cyber Command, the training community, and the research, development, testing, and evaluation community;
“(iii) identifying and offering guidance on the opportunities for integration amongst the designated cyber and information technology ranges regarding test, training, and development functions;
“(iv) finding opportunities for cost reduction, integration, and coordination improvements for the appropriate cyber and information technology ranges;
“(v) adding or consolidating cyber and information technology ranges in the future to better meet the evolving needs of the cyber strategy and resource requirements of the Department;
“(C) Defining a cyber range architecture that—
“(i) may add or consolidate cyber and information technology ranges in the future to better meet the evolving needs of the cyber strategy and resource requirements of the Department;
“(ii) coordinates with interagency and industry partners on cyber and information technology range issues;
“(3) STANDARD FOR CYBER EVENT DATA.—The executive agents designated under subsection (a), in consultation with the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, shall jointly select a standard language from open-source candidates for representing and communicating cyber event and threat data. Such language shall be machine-readable for the Joint Information Environment and associated test and training ranges.
“(c) Support within Department of Defense.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the military departments, Defense Agencies, and other components of the Department of Defense provide the executive agents designated under subsection (a) with the appropriate support and resources needed to perform the roles, responsibilities, and authorities of the executive agents.
“(d) Compliance with existing directive.—The Secretary shall carry out this section in compliance with Directive 5101.1.
“(e) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘designated cyber and information technology range’ includes the National Cyber Range, the Joint Information Operations Range, the Defense Information Assurance Range, and the C4 Assessments Division of J6 of the Joint Staff.
(b) Designation and roles and responsibilities.—The Secretary of Defense shall—
(1) not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, designate the executive agents required under subsection (a) of section 392 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section; and
(c) Selection of standard language.—Not later than June 1, 2015, the executive agents designated under subsection (a) of section 392 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section, shall select the standard language under subsection (b)(3) of such section 392.
(d) Table of sections amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 19 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1632 of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(a) Designation of network.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to use a controlled laboratory environment or an existing network or network segment within the Department of Defense to identify network mapping capabilities to meet requirements of the United States Cyber Command.
(a) Review of policy.—The Secretary of Defense shall review the policies and guidance of the Department of Defense concerning the procurement, approval, and use of cross domain solutions by the Department of Defense.
(b) Strategy for cross domain solutions.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a strategy for procurement, approval, and use of cross domain solutions by the Department.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) Identification and assessment of the current cross domain solutions in use throughout the Department of Defense, including the relative capabilities of such solutions and any gaps in current capabilities.
(B) A determination of the requirements for cross domain solutions for enterprise applications as well as deployed warfighting operations, including operations with coalition partners.
(C) A plan to enable verification of compliance with Department of Defense policies regarding the use of cross domain solutions.
(a) Strategy required.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy to develop and deploy a decryption service that enables the efficient decryption and re-encryption of encrypted communications within the Joint Information Environment and through the Internet access points of the Joint Information Environment in a manner that allows the Secretary to inspect the content of such communications to detect cyber threats and insider threat activity.
(b) Elements.—The strategy required developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following:
(c) Congressional briefing.—Not later than October 1, 2015, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) on the strategy developed under subsection (a).
(a) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through 2020, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on foreign economic and industrial espionage in cyberspace during the 12-month period preceding the submission of the report that—
(A) identifies—
(i) foreign countries that engage in economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace with respect to trade secrets or proprietary information owned by United States persons;
(ii) foreign countries identified under clause (i) that the President determines engage in the most egregious economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace with respect to such trade secrets or proprietary information (to be known as “priority foreign countries”);
(iii) categories of technologies or proprietary information developed by United States persons that—
(2) DETERMINATION OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES ENGAGING IN ECONOMIC OR INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE IN CYBERSPACE.—For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (1)(A), the President shall identify a foreign country as a foreign country that engages in economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace with respect to trade secrets or proprietary information owned by United States persons if the government of the foreign country—
(A) engages in economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace with respect to trade secrets or proprietary information owned by United States persons; or
(b) Imposition of sanctions.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The President may, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), block and prohibit all transactions in all property and interests in property of each person described in paragraph (2), if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person.
(2) PERSONS DESCRIBED.—A person described in this paragraph is a foreign person the President determines knowingly requests, engages in, supports, facilitates, or benefits from the significant appropriation, through economic or industrial espionage in cyberspace, of technologies or proprietary information developed by United States persons.
(3) EXCEPTION.—The authority to impose sanctions under paragraph (1) shall not include the authority to impose sanctions on the importation of goods.
(4) IMPLEMENTATION; PENALTIES.—
(A) IMPLEMENTATION.—The President may exercise all authorities provided under sections 203 and 205 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 1704) to carry out this subsection.
(B) PENALTIES.—The penalties provided for in subsections (b) and (c) of section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) shall apply to a person that violates, attempts to violate, or conspires to violate, or causes a violation of, this subsection or a regulation prescribed under this subsection to the same extent that such penalties apply to a person that commits an unlawful act described in section 206(a) of that Act.
(c) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the application of any penalty or the exercise of any authority provided for under any other provision of law.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Committee on Finance, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
(3) ECONOMIC OR INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE.—The term “economic or industrial espionage” means—
(A) stealing a trade secret or proprietary information or appropriating, taking, carrying away, or concealing, or by fraud, artifice, or deception obtaining, a trade secret or proprietary information without the authorization of the owner of the trade secret or proprietary information;
(4) KNOWINGLY.—The term “knowingly”, with respect to conduct, a circumstance, or a result, means that a person has actual knowledge, or should have known, of the conduct, the circumstance, or the result.
(5) OWN.—The term “own”, with respect to a trade secret or proprietary information, means to hold rightful legal or equitable title to, or license in, the trade secret or proprietary information.
(7) PROPRIETARY INFORMATION.—The term “proprietary information” means competitive bid preparations, negotiating strategies, executive emails, internal financial data, strategic business plans, technical designs, manufacturing processes, source code, data derived from research and development investments, and other commercially valuable information that a person has developed or obtained if—
(8) TECHNOLOGY.—The term “technology” has the meaning given that term in section 16 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2415) (as in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)).
(9) TRADE SECRET.—The term “trade secret” has the meaning given that term in section 1839 of title 18, United States Code.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) members of the reserve components may possess knowledge of critical infrastructure in the States in which the members serve that may be of value for purposes of defending such infrastructure against cyber threats;
(2) traditional members of the reserve components and reserve component technicians may have experience in both the private and public sector that could benefit the readiness of the Department of Defense’s cyber force and the development of cyber capabilities;
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should—
(1) work within the existing interagency process underway as of the date of the enactment of this Act regarding the transfer of the remaining role of the United States Government in the functions of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority to a global multi-stakeholder community and support transferring this role only if—
(A) assurances are provided for the protection of the current status of legacy top-level domain names and Internet Protocol address numbers, particularly those used by the Department of Defense and the components of the United States Government for national security purposes;
Section 179(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
“(3) (A) With respect to the preparation of a budget for a fiscal year to be submitted by the President to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Secretary of Defense may not agree to a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority unless the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report described in subparagraph (B).
“(B) A report described in this subparagraph is a report that includes the following:
“(i) Except as provided by subparagraph (C), certification that, during the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year covered by the budget for which the report is submitted, the Secretary of Energy obligated or expended any amounts covered by a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority made for such prior fiscal year in a manner consistent with a memorandum of agreement that was developed by the Nuclear Weapons Council and entered into by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy.
“(ii) A detailed assessment by the Nuclear Weapons Council regarding how the Administrator for Nuclear Security implemented any agreements and decisions of the Council made during such prior fiscal year.
“(iii) An assessment from each of the Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command regarding any effects to the military during such prior fiscal year that were caused by the delay or failure of the Administrator to implement any agreements or decisions described in clause (ii).
“(C) With respect to a report described in subparagraph (B), the Secretary may waive the requirement to include the certification described in clause (i) of such subparagraph if the Secretary—
“(ii) instead of the certification described in such clause (i), includes as part of such report—
“(I) a copy of the agreement that the Secretary has entered into with the Secretary of Energy regarding the manner and the purpose for which the Secretary of Energy will obligate or expend any amounts covered by a proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority for the fiscal year covered by the budget for which such report is submitted; and
“(4) The Secretary of Defense shall include with the defense budget materials for a fiscal year the memorandum of agreement described in subparagraph (B)(i) of paragraph (3), or the agreement described in subparagraph (C) of such paragraph, as the case may be, that covers such fiscal year.
“(5) (A) Not later than 30 days after the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff an assessment of—
“(6) In this subsection:
“(A) The term ‘budget’ has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title.
“(B) The term ‘defense budget materials’ has the meaning given that term in section 231(f) of this title.
“(C) The term ‘proposed transfer of estimated nuclear budget request authority’ means, in preparing a budget, a request for the Secretary of Defense to transfer an estimated amount of the proposed budget authority of the Secretary to the Secretary of Energy for purposes relating to nuclear weapons.”.
Section 492(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “, and the ability to meet operational availability requirements for,” after “military effectiveness of”.
Section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576), as most recently amended by section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 861), is further amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new subsection (b):
“(b) Estimate of costs by Congressional Budget Office.—
“(1) BUDGETS FOR ODD-NUMBERED FISCAL YEARS.—Not later than July 1 of each year in which the President transmits a covered odd-numbered fiscal year report, the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
“(A) an estimate of the costs during the 10-year period beginning on the date of such covered odd-numbered fiscal year report associated with fielding and maintaining the current nuclear weapons and nuclear weapon delivery systems of the United States;
“(2) BUDGETS FOR EVEN-NUMBERED FISCAL YEARS.—If the Director determines that a covered even-numbered fiscal year report contains a significant change that affects the estimates of the Director included in the report submitted under paragraph (1) in the year prior to the year in which such covered even-numbered fiscal year report is submitted, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a letter describing such significant changes.
(a) Requirement.—During the period in which the New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of title 10, United States Code) is in effect, the Secretary of Defense shall preserve each intercontinental ballistic missile silo that contains a deployed missile as of the date of the enactment of this Act in, at minimum, a warm status that enables such silo to—
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts for the life-of-type procurement of covered parts of the intercontinental ballistic missile fuze.
(b) Availability of funds.—Notwithstanding section 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 101 and available for Missile Procurement, Air Force as specified in the funding table in section 4101, $4,700,000 shall be available for the procurement of covered parts pursuant to contracts entered into under subsection (a).
(c) Covered parts defined.—In this section, the term “covered parts” means commercially available off-the-shelf items as defined in section 104 of title 41, United States Code.
(a) Assessment.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall assess the annual secondary production requirement needed to sustain a safe, secure, reliable, and effective nuclear deterrent.
(b) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Energy and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding the assessment conducted under subsection (a).
(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An explanation of the rationale and assumptions that led to the current 50 to 80 secondaries per year production requirement, including the factors considered in determining such requirement.
(B) An analysis of whether there are any changes to such 50 to 80 secondaries per year production requirement, including the reasons for any such changes.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall certify to the congressional defense committees that the plan for implementation of the New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of title 10, United States Code) announced on April 8, 2014, will enable the United States to meet its obligations under such treaty in a manner that ensures the nuclear forces of the United States—
(a) Notification and reports.—Not later than 30 days before any decision is made to reduce the number of final production units for the B61 life extension program below the total number of such units planned in the stockpile stewardship and management plan required by section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523) for fiscal year 2015—
(1) the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(2) the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(a) Notification and report.—Not later than 90 days before the date on which the Secretary of Defense removes or consolidates dual-capable aircraft of the United States from the area of responsibility of the United States European Command, the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of such proposed removal or consolidation. Such notification shall include a report explaining—
(1) how such removal or consolidation is in the national security interests of the United States and the allies of the United States, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Alliance; and
(2) whether, and in what respects, such proposed removal or consolidation is affected by—
(B) the Russian Federation deploying or preparing to deploy its nuclear weapons to Ukrainian territory;
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “CFE Treaty” means the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, signed at Paris, November 19, 1990, and entered into force July 17, 1992.
(2) The “dual-capable aircraft” means tactical fighter aircraft that can perform both conventional and nuclear missions.
(3) The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington, December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
(a) In general.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget of the President for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the installation and operation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems associated with the construction of the headquarters of the United States Strategic Command.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall address, with respect to the installation and operation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems associated with the construction of the headquarters of the United States Strategic Command, the following:
(3) An assessment of progress on the upgrade of systems that existed before the date of the enactment of this Act, such as the Strategic Automated Command and Control System and the MILSTAR satellite communications system, for compatibility with such nuclear command, control, and communications systems.
(c) Termination.—The Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall not be required to submit a report under subsection (a) with the budget of the President for any fiscal year after the date on which the Commander certifies to the congressional defense committees that all milestones relating to the installation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems associated with the construction of the headquarters of the United States Strategic Command have been completed and such systems are fully operational.
(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing a detailed description of any steps being taken or planned to be taken by the Secretary in response to actions of the Government of the Russian Federation in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty in order to reduce the negative impact of such actions on the national security of the United States.
(b) Elements.—The report under subsection (a) shall include a description of any plans to conduct activities relating to the research, development, testing, or deployment of potential future military capabilities of the United States, including with respect to activities to modify, test, or deploy existing military systems, to deter or defend against the threat of intermediate-range nuclear force systems of Russia if Russia deploys such systems.
(c) Form.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d) INF Treaty defined.—In this section, the term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
It is the policy of the United States—
(1) to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems consisting of—
(2) to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace a capability to forward-deploy nuclear weapons and dual-capable fighter-bomber aircraft;
It is the sense of Congress that the United States reaffirms and remains committed to the policies enumerated by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in the Deterrence and Defense Posture Review, dated May 20, 2012, and the Wales Summit Declaration of September 2014, including the following statements:
(1) As stated in the Deterrence and Defense Posture Review:
(A) “The greatest responsibility of the Alliance is to protect and defend our territory and our populations against attack, as set out in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty. The Alliance does not consider any country to be its adversary. However, no one should doubt NATO’s resolve if the security of any of its members were to be threatened. NATO will ensure that it maintains the full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against any threat to the safety and security of our populations, wherever it should arise. Allies’ goal is to bolster deterrence as a core element of our collective defense and contribute to the indivisible security of the Alliance.”.
(B) “Nuclear weapons are a core component of NATO’s overall capabilities for deterrence and defense alongside conventional and missile defense forces. The review has shown that the Alliance’s nuclear force posture currently meets the criteria for an effective deterrence and defense posture.”.
(C) “The circumstances in which any use of nuclear weapons might have to be contemplated are extremely remote. As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance. The supreme guarantee of the security of the Allies is provided by the strategic nuclear forces of the Alliance, particularly those of the United States; the independent strategic forces of the United Kingdom and France, which have a deterrent role of their own, contribute to the overall deterrence and security of the Allies.”.
(D) “NATO must have the full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against threats to the safety of its populations and the security of its territory, which is the Alliance’s greatest responsibility.”.
(E) “NATO is committed to maintaining an appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional, and missile defense capabilities for deterrence and defense to fulfill its commitments as set out in the Strategic Concept. These capabilities, underpinned by NATO’s Integrated Command Structure, offer the strongest guarantee of the Alliance’s security and will ensure that it is able to respond to a variety of challenges and unpredictable contingencies in a highly complex and evolving international security environment.”.
(2) As stated in the Wales Summit Declaration:
(A) “Deterrence, based on an appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional, and missile defence capabilities, remains a core element of our overall strategy.”.
(B) “Arms control, disarmament, and non-proliferation continue to play an important role in the achievement of the Alliance's security objectives. Both the success and failure of these efforts can have a direct impact on the threat environment of NATO. In this context, it is of paramount importance that disarmament and non-proliferation commitments under existing treaties are honoured, including the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which is a crucial element of Euro-Atlantic security. In that regard, Allies call on Russia to preserve the viability of the INF Treaty through ensuring full and verifiable compliance.”.
(a) Availability of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1502 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $350,972,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system as specified in the funding table in section 4102, including for co-production of Iron Dome parts and components in the United States by industry of the United States.
(b) Conditions.—
(1) AGREEMENT.—Funds described in subsection (a) to produce the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms, conditions, and co-production targets specified for fiscal year 2015 in the “Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement,” signed on March 5, 2014.
(2) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days prior to the initial obligation of funds described in subsection (a), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees—
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) it is a high priority of the United States that the ballistic missile defense system should work in an operationally effective and cost-effective manner;
(2) prior to making final production decisions for such systems, and prior to the operational deployment of such systems, the United States should conduct operationally realistic intercept flight testing that should create sufficiently challenging operational conditions to establish confidence that such systems will work in an operationally effective and cost-effective manner when needed; and
(3) in order to achieve these objectives, and to avoid post-production and post-deployment problems, it is essential for the Department of Defense to follow a “fly before you buy” approach to adequately test and assess the elements of the ballistic missile defense system before final production decisions or operational deployment.
(b) Successful testing required prior to final production or operational deployment.—The Secretary of Defense may not make a final production decision for, or operationally deploy, a covered system unless—
(1) the Secretary ensures that—
(c) Assessment by Director of Operational Test and Evaluation.—The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall—
(1) provide to the Secretary the assessment of the Director, based on the available test data, of the sufficiency, adequacy, and results of the testing of each covered system, including an assessment of whether the covered system will be sufficiently effective, suitable, and survivable when needed; and
(d) Assessment by Commander of United States Strategic Command.—The Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall—
(e) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter, modify, or otherwise affect a determination of the Secretary with respect to the participation of the Missile Defense Agency in the Joint Capabilities Integration Development System or the acquisition reporting process under the Department of Defense Directive 5000 series.
(a) Sense of congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the existing models of the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle of the ground-based midcourse defense system are prototype designs that were developed and deployed without using traditional acquisition practices in order to provide an initial defensive capability for an emerging ballistic missile threat;
(2) consequently, while the deployed models of the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle have demonstrated an initial level of capability against a limited threat, such models do not have the degree of reliability, robustness, cost effectiveness, and performance that are desirable;
(b) Acquisition plan required.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop an acquisition plan for the re-design of the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle of the ground-based midcourse defense system that includes rigorous elements for system engineering, design, integration, development, testing, and evaluation.
(c) Objectives.—The objectives of the acquisition plan under subsection (b) shall be to ensure that the re-designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle is operationally effective, reliable, producible, cost effective, maintainable, and testable.
(d) Approval of acquisition plan required.—The acquisition plan under subsection (b) shall be subject to approval by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.
(e) Testing required.—Prior to operational deployment of the re-designed exo-atmospheric kill vehicle, the Secretary shall ensure that the re-designed kill vehicle has demonstrated, through successful, operationally realistic flight testing—
(f) Report required.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics approves the acquisition plan under subsection (d), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the acquisition plan and the manner in which the plan will meet the objectives described in subsection (c).
(a) Study.— Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study on the testing program of the ground-based midcourse missile defense system.
(b) Elements.—The study under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An assessment of whether the testing program described in subsection (a) has established, as of the date of the study, that the ground-based midcourse missile defense system has a high probability of performing reliably and effectively against limited missile threats from North Korea and Iran under realistic operational conditions, including an explanation of the degree of confidence supporting such assessment.
(2) An assessment of whether the currently planned testing program, if implemented, is sufficient to establish reasonable confidence that the ground-based midcourse missile defense system has a high probability of performing reliably and effectively under realistic operational conditions against current and plausible near- and medium-term limited ballistic missile threats from North Korea and Iran.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) it is a national priority to defend the United States homeland against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate);
(2) although the currently deployed ground-based midcourse defense system provides a level of protection of the entire United States homeland, including the East Coast, against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran, this capability needs to be improved to meet evolving ballistic missile threats;
(3) the initial step in this process of improvement is to correct the problems that caused the flight test failures with the current kill vehicles, and to improve the reliability of the deployed ground-based interceptor fleet;
(4) as indicated by senior officials of the Department of Defense, continued investments to enhance homeland defense sensor and discrimination capabilities are essential to improve the operational effectiveness and shot doctrine of the ground-based midcourse defense system;
(5) given limitations with the currently deployed exo-atmospheric kill vehicles, it is important to re-design the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle using a rigorous acquisition approach, including realistic testing, that can achieve a demonstrated capability as soon as practicable using sound acquisition principles and practices; and
(6) in order to stay ahead of evolving ballistic missile threats, the Department should design the next generation exo-atmospheric kill vehicle to take full advantage of improvements in sensors, discrimination, kill assessment, battle management, and command and control, including the potential to engage multiple objects.
(b) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Northern Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the status of current and planned efforts to improve the homeland ballistic missile defense capability of the United States.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A detailed description of the current assessment of the threat to the United Sates from limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate), particularly from countries such as North Korea and Iran, and an assessment of the projected future threat through 2023, including a discussion of confidence levels and uncertainties in such threat assessment.
(B) A detailed description of the status of efforts to correct the problems that caused the flight test failures of the capability enhancement-I and capability enhancement-II exo-atmospheric kill vehicles.
(C) A detailed description of the status of efforts to field the additional 14 ground-based interceptors planned for deployment at Fort Greely, Alaska, including the status of the refurbishment of Missile Field 1 at Fort Greely, and the operational impact of the additional interceptors.
(D) A detailed description of the plans and progress toward improving the capability, reliability, and availability of fielded ground-based interceptors, including progress toward improving the capabilities of ground-based interceptors deployed with upgraded capability enhancement-I and capability enhancement-II exo-atmospheric kill vehicles.
(E) A detailed description of the planned improvements to homeland ballistic missile defense sensor and discrimination capabilities, including through the use of additional sensor systems of the United States, and an assessment of the expected operational benefits of such improvements to homeland ballistic missile defense.
(F) A detailed description of the plans and efforts to redesign, develop, test, and field the exo-atmospheric kill vehicle for the ground-based midcourse defense system, and an explanation of the expected improvements of such kill vehicle with respect to capability, cost effectiveness, reliability, maintainability, and producibility.
(G) A detailed description of the plans for developing, testing, and fielding the next generation exo-atmospheric kill vehicle, and an explanation of how the anticipated capabilities are intended to remain ahead of evolving ballistic missile threats.
(H) A status of efforts on, and goals for, a common kill vehicle with multiple object kill capability, and an explanation of how such capability could keep the missile defense capability of the United States paced ahead of evolving ballistic missile threats.
(I) A detailed description of the options to improve the homeland ballistic missile defense capability that would respond to the emergence of a long-range ballistic missile threat from Iran, including an evaluation of the potential benefits and drawbacks of—
(ii) the deployment of a missile defense interceptor site in another location in the United States other than on the East Coast;
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the regional ballistic missile capabilities of countries such as Iran and North Korea pose a serious and growing threat to forward deployed forces of the United States, allies, and partner countries;
(2) given this growing threat, it is a high priority for the United States to develop, test, and deploy effective regional missile defense capabilities to provide the commanders of the geographic combatant commands with capabilities to meet the operational requirements of the commanders, and for allies and partners of the United States to improve their regional missile defense capabilities;
(3) the United States and its North Atlantic Treaty Organization partners should continue the development, testing, and implementation of phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach to defend forward deployed forces of the United States, allies, and partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Europe against the growing regional missile capability of Iran;
(4) the United States should continue efforts to improve regional missile defense capabilities in the Middle East, including its close cooperation with Israel and its efforts with countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council, in order to improve regional security against the growing regional missile capabilities of Iran; and
(b) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report setting forth the status and progress of efforts to improve the regional missile defense capabilities of the United States in Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region, including efforts and cooperation by allies and partner countries.
(c) Elements.—The report under subsection (b) shall include the following:
(1) A detailed description of the status of implementation (including on the basis of technical development and acquisition of systems and capabilities) of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, including—
(A) the status of efforts to develop, test, and deploy the capabilities planned for phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach;
(B) a detailed description of the current and projected defended area of each phase of the European Phased Adaptive Approach and the missile defense requirement for the capability provided under each such phase;
(C) a detailed description of current force structure plans of the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization associated with the different phases of the European Phased Adaptive Approach at various alert conditions and readiness levels;
(D) a detailed explanation of the current concept of operations for phase 1 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach and information on phase 2, including—
(i) the arrangements for allocating the command of assets assigned to the missile defense of Europe between the Commander of the United States European Command and the Supreme Allied Commander, Europe;
(E) an explanation of the concept for the defense of assets of the European Phased Adaptive Approach in the event such assets are targeted by adversaries; and
(F) an explanation of the development and acquisition of the active layered theater ballistic missile defense system of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, including the interoperability of such system with the ballistic missile defense system and other command and control systems of the United States.
(2) A detailed description of the status of efforts to improve the regional missile defense capabilities of the United States and the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council in the Middle East against regional missile threats from Iran, including the progress made toward, and benefits of, multilateral cooperation and data sharing among the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council with respect to multilateral integrated air and missile defense against threats from Iran.
(3) A detailed description of the progress of the United States and the allies of the United States in the Asia-Pacific region, particularly Japan, South Korea, and Australia, to improve regional ballistic missile defense capabilities and an assessment of the value of increasing cooperation, information sharing, and opportunities for additional interoperability on a bilateral and multilateral basis.
(4) A description of how the missile defense acquisitions of allies and partners of the United States, including the acquisition of missile defense technology of the United States, could be optimized to contribute to integrated and networked regional missile defense, including a description of any steps being taken to carry out such optimization.
(5) A detailed description of—
(6) A detailed description of the phased and adaptive elements of the regional missile defense approaches of the United States tailored to the specific regional requirements in the areas of responsibility of the United States Central Command and the United States Pacific Command, including the role of missile defense capabilities of allies and partners of the United States in each region.
(7) A detailed description of the regional missile defense risk assessment and priorities of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands and a detailed description of the assessed ballistic missile threat facing each geographic combatant command through 2024.
This subtitle may be cited as the “National Commission on the Future of the Army Act of 2014”.
(a) Establishment.—There is established the National Commission on the Future of the Army (in this subtitle referred to as the “Commission”).
(b) Membership.—
(1) COMPOSITION.—The Commission shall be composed of eight members, of whom—
(2) APPOINTMENT DATE.—The appointments of the members of the Commission shall be made not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3) EFFECT OF LACK OF APPOINTMENT BY APPOINTMENT DATE.—If one or more appointments under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to make such appointment or appointments shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number of appointments so not made. If an appointment under subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to make an appointment under such subparagraph shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by the number equal to the number otherwise appointable under such subparagraph.
(c) Period of appointment; vacancies.—Members shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. Any vacancy in the Commission shall not affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
(d) Chair and vice chair.—The Commission shall select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.
(a) Study on structure of the Army.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall undertake a comprehensive study of the structure of the Army, and policy assumptions related to the size and force mixture of the Army, in order—
(2) CONSIDERATIONS.—In undertaking the study required by subsection (a), the Commission shall give particular consideration to the following:
(A) An evaluation and identification of a structure for the Army that—
(i) has the depth and scalability to meet current and anticipated requirements of the combatant commands;
(ii) achieves cost-efficiency between the regular and reserve components of the Army, manages military risk, takes advantage of the strengths and capabilities of each, and considers fully burdened lifecycle costs;
(iii) ensures that the regular and reserve components of the Army have the capacity needed to support current and anticipated homeland defense and disaster assistance missions in the United States;
(iv) provides for sufficient numbers of regular members of the Army to provide a base of trained personnel from which the personnel of the reserve components of the Army could be recruited;
(B) An evaluation and identification of force generation policies for the Army with respect to size and force mixture in order to fulfill current and anticipated mission requirements for the Army in a manner consistent with available resources and anticipated future resources, including policies in connection with—
(b) Study on transfer of certain aircraft.—
(c) Report.—Not later than February 1, 2016, the Commission shall submit to the President and the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a detailed statement of the findings and conclusions of the Commission as a result of the studies required by subsections (a) and (b), together with its recommendations for such legislative and administrative actions as the Commission considers appropriate in light of the results of the studies.
(a) Hearings.—The Commission may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable to carry out its duties under this subtitle.
(b) Information from federal agencies.—The Commission may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such information as the Commission considers necessary to carry out its duties under this subtitle. Upon request of the Chair of the Commission, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.
(a) Compensation of members.—Each member of the Commission who is not an officer or employee of the Federal Government may be compensated at a rate not to exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of $155,400 for each day (including travel time) during which such member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission. All members of the Commission who are officers or employees of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for their services as officers or employees of the United States.
(b) Travel expenses.—The members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission.
(c) Staff.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Chair of the Commission may, without regard to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint and terminate an executive director and such other additional personnel as may be necessary to enable the Commission to perform its duties. The employment of an executive director shall be subject to confirmation by the Commission.
(2) COMPENSATION.—The Chair of the Commission may fix the compensation of the executive director and other personnel without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, relating to classification of positions and General Schedule pay rates, except that the rate of pay for the executive director and other personnel may not exceed the rate payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.
(d) Detail of government employees.—Any Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Commission without reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil service status or privilege.
(e) Procurement of temporary and intermittent services.—The Chair of the Commission may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.
The Commission shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the Commission submits its report under this subtitle.
Amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4301 may be available for the activities of the Commission under this subtitle.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Army may be used to reduce Army personnel below the end strength authorizations for personnel of the Army specified in section 401(1) for active duty personnel and section 411 for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components of the Army.
(a) Prohibition on Transfers during fiscal year 2015.—During fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may not transfer any AH–64 Apache helicopters from the Army National Guard to the regular Army.
(b) Additional limitation on aircraft or personnel transfers and related activities.—In addition to the prohibition on transfers imposed by subsection (a), but subject to the exceptions provided in subsection (e), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the Army may not, before March 31, 2016—
(c) Continued readiness of aircraft and personnel.—The Secretary of the Army shall ensure the continuing readiness of AH–64 Apache helicopters during fiscal year 2015 as necessary to meet the requirements of combatant commanders.
(d) Effect on personnel actions and training.—Notwithstanding the prohibition imposed by subsection (a), the limitation imposed by subsection (b), and the duty imposed by subsection (c), the Secretary of the Army may—
(1) carry out any personnel action, as determined to be appropriate by the Secretary, necessary to support Army aviation readiness and operations;
(e) Exceptions.—Subject to the Secretary of Defense certification required by subsection (f), the Secretary of the Army may—
(f) Certification required.—The certification referred to in subsection (e) is a certification by the Secretary of Defense in writing to the congressional defense committees that the commencement of preparations to transfer AH–64 Apache helicopters pursuant to the exception provided by subsection (e)(1) or a transfer of AH–64 Apache helicopters pursuant to the exception provided by subsection (e)(2) would not create unacceptable risk—
This division may be cited as the “Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015”.
(a) Expiration of authorizations after three years.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX of this division for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—
(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of—
(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| California | Concord | $15,200,000 |
| Fort Irwin | $45,000,000 | |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $89,000,000 |
| Hawaii | Fort Shafter | $311,400,000 |
| Kentucky | Blue Grass Army Depot | $15,000,000 |
| Fort Campbell | $23,000,000 | |
| New York | Fort Drum | $27,000,000 |
| Pennsylvania | Letterkenny Army Depot | $16,000,000 |
| South Carolina | Fort Jackson | $52,000,000 |
| Texas | Fort Hood | $46,000,000 |
| Virginia | Fort Lee | $86,000,000 |
| Joint Base Langley-Eustis | $7,700,000 |
(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Guantanamo Bay | Guantanamo Bay | $23,800,000 |
| Japan | Kadena Air Base | $10,600,000 |
(a) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
| State/Country | Installation | Units | Amount |
| Illinois | Rock Island | Family Housing New Construction | $19,500,000 |
| Korea | Camp Walker | Family Housing New Construction | $57,800,000 |
(b) Planning and design.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $1,309,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(2) $226,400,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) for a Command and Control Facility at Fort Shafter, Hawaii).
(3) $46,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) for a Simulations Center at Fort Hood, Texas).
(4) $86,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) for an Advanced Individual Training Barracks Complex, Ph 3, at Fort Lee, Virginia).
(5) $6,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for cadet barracks at the United States Military Academy, New York).
(6) $78,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), as amended by section 2105(d) of this Act, for a Secure Administration/Operations Facility at Fort Belvoir, Virginia).
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for construction of an Explosives Research and Development Loading Facility at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may use available unobligated balances of amounts appropriated for military construction for the Army to complete work on the project within the scope specified for the project in the justification data provided to Congress as part of the request for authorization of the project.
(a) Fort Drum.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In executing the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Drum, New York, for construction of an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may provide a capital contribution to a public or private utility company in order for the utility company to extend the utility company’s gas line to the installation boundary.
(2) NO CHANGE IN SCOPE.—The capital contribution under subsection (a) shall not be construed as a change in the scope of work under section 2853 of title 10, United States Code.
(b) Fort Leonard Wood.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, for construction of Battalion Complex Facilities at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct the Battalion Headquarters with classrooms for a unit other than a Global Defense Posture Realignment unit.
(c) Fort McNair.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort McNair, District of Columbia, for construction of a Vehicle Storage Building at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 20,227 square feet of vehicle storage.
(d) Fort Belvoir.—The table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) is amended in the item relating to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, by striking “$94,000,000” in the amount column and inserting “$172,000,000”.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (124 Stat. 4437) and extended by section 2109 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 988), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (125 Stat. 1661), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) as follows:
| State | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Georgia | Fort Benning | Land Acquisition | $5,100,000 |
| Fort Benning | Land Acquisition | $25,000,000 | |
| North Carolina | Fort Bragg | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hanger | $54,000,000 |
| Texas | Fort Bliss | Applied Instruction Building | $8,300,000 |
| Fort Bliss | Vehicle Maintenance Facility | $19,000,000 | |
| Fort Hood | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hanger | $47,000,000 | |
| Virginia | Fort Belvoir | Road and Infrastructure Improvements | $25,000,000 |
No amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction of increment 3 of the Cadet Barracks at the United States Military Academy, New York, as authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), until the Secretary of the Army certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Secretary intends to award a contract for the renovation of the MacArthur Long Barracks at the United States Military Academy concurrent with assuming beneficial occupancy of the renovated MacArthur Short Barracks at the United States Military Academy.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for construction of military family housing units at Camp Walker, Republic of Korea, may be obligated or expended until 30 days following the delivery of the report required under subsection (b).
(b) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the Commander, U.S. Forces-Korea, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on future military family housing requirements in the Republic of Korea and potential courses of action for meeting those requirements.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall, at a minimum—
(A) identify the number of authorized Command Sponsored Families, by location, in the Republic of Korea;
(B) validate that the number of authorized Command Sponsored Families identified pursuant to subparagraph (A) is necessary for operational effectiveness;
(C) identify and validate each key and essential Command Sponsored Family billet requiring on-post housing in the Republic of Korea;
(D) identify and validate the number of authorized Command Sponsored Families in excess of key and essential requiring on-post housing in the Republic of Korea;
(E) identify the number and estimated cost of on-post family housing units required to support the validated requirements;
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Arizona | Yuma | $16,608,000 |
| California | Bridgeport | $16,180,000 |
| Lemoore | $38,985,000 | |
| San Diego | $47,110,000 | |
| District of Columbia | Naval Support Activity Washington | $31,735,000 |
| Florida | Jacksonville | $30,235,000 |
| Mayport | $20,520,000 | |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $50,651,000 |
| Hawaii | Kaneohe Bay | $53,382,000 |
| Pearl Harbor | $9,698,000 | |
| Maryland | Annapolis | $120,112,000 |
| Indian Head | $15,346,000 | |
| Patuxent River | $9,860,000 | |
| Nevada | Fallon | $31,262,000 |
| North Carolina | Camp Lejeune | $50,706,000 |
| Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station | $41,588,000 | |
| Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | $23,985,000 |
| South Carolina | Charleston | $35,716,000 |
| Virginia | Dahlgren | $27,313,000 |
| Norfolk | $39,274,000 | |
| Portsmouth | $9,743,000 | |
| Quantico | $12,613,000 | |
| Yorktown | $26,988,000 | |
| Washington | Bangor | $13,833,000 |
| Bremerton | $16,401,000 | |
| Port Angeles | $20,638,000 | |
| Whidbey Island | $24,390,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Bahrain Island | Southwest Asia | $27,826,000 |
| Djibouti | Camp Lemonier | $9,923,000 |
| Japan | Iwakuni | $6,415,000 |
| Kadena Air Base | $19,411,000 | |
| Marine Corps Air Station Futenma | $4,639,000 | |
| Okinawa | $35,685,000 | |
| Spain | Rota | $20,233,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $472,000.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $15,940,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(2) $90,112,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(a) for a Center for Cyber Security Studies Building at Annapolis, Maryland).
(3) $274,099,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) for an explosive handling wharf at Kitsap, Washington).
(4) $68,196,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2633) for ramp parking at Joint Region Marianas, Guam.
(a) Yuma.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Yuma, Arizona, for construction of a Double Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, the Secretary of the Navy may construct up to approximately 70,000 square feet of additional apron to be utilized as a taxi-lane using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).
(b) Camp Pendelton.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Camp Pendelton, California, for construction of an Infantry Squad Defense Range, the Secretary of the Navy may construct up to 9,000 square feet of vehicular bridge using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).
(c) Kings bay.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Kings Bay, Georgia, for construction of a Crab Island Security Enclave, the Secretary of the Navy may expand the enclave fencing system to three layers of fencing and construct two elevated fixed fighting positions with associated supporting facilities using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 989), for Yorktown, Virginia, for construction of Small Arms Ranges, the Secretary of the Navy may construct 240 square meters of armory, 48 square meters of Safety Officer/Target Storage Building, and 667 square meters of Range Operations Building using appropriations available for the project pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (127 Stat. 990).
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (124 Stat. 4441) and extended by section 2207 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 991), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Bahrain | South West Asia | Navy Central Command Ammunition Magazines | $89,280,000 |
| Guam | Naval Activities, Guam | Defense Access Roads Improvements | $66,730,000 |
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (125 Stat. 1666), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| California | Camp Pendelton | North Area Waste Water Conveyance | $78,271,000 |
| Camp Pendelton | Infantry Squad Defense Range | $29,187,000 | |
| Twentynine Palms | Land Expansion | $8,665,000 | |
| Florida | Jacksonville | P–8A Hangar Upgrades | $6,085,000 |
| Georgia | Kings Bay | Crab Island Security Enclave | $52,913,000 |
| Kings Bay | WRA Land/Water Interface | $33,150,000 | |
| Maryland | Patuxent River | Aircraft Prototype Facility Phase 2 | $45,844,000 |
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2302(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alaska | Clear Air Force Station | $11,500,000 |
| Arizona | Luke Air Force Base | $26,800,000 |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $47,800,000 |
| Kansas | McConnell Air Force Base | $34,400,000 |
| Massachusetts | Hanscom Air Force Base | $13,500,000 |
| Nevada | Nellis Air Force Base | $53,900,000 |
| New Jersey | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | $5,900,000 |
| Oklahoma | Tinker Air Force Base | $111,000,000 |
| Texas | Joint Base San Antonio | $5,800,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2302(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| United Kingdom | Royal Air Force Croughton | $92,223,000 |
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(2) $107,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 992) for the CYBERCOM Joint Operations Center at Fort Meade, Maryland).
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 515), for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, for base infrastructure at that location, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire fee or lesser real property interests in approximately 11.5 acres of land contiguous to Shaw Air Force Base for the project using funds appropriated to the Department of the Air Force for construction in years prior to fiscal year 2015.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (124 Stat. 4444) and extended by section 2307 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 994), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 Stat. 1670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Arizona | Fort Huachuca | $1,871,000 |
| California | Camp Pendelton | $11,841,000 |
| Coronado | $70,340,000 | |
| Lemoore | $52,500,000 | |
| Colorado | Peterson Air Force Base | $15,200,000 |
| Georgia | Hunter Army Airfield | $7,692,000 |
| Robins Air Force Base | $19,900,000 | |
| Hawaii | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | $52,900,000 |
| Kentucky | Fort Campbell | $18,000,000 |
| Maryland | Fort Meade | $54,207,000 |
| Joint Base Andrews | $18,300,000 | |
| Michigan | Selfridge Air National Guard Base | $35,100,000 |
| Mississippi | Stennis | $27,547,000 |
| Nevada | Fallon | $20,241,000 |
| New Mexico | Cannon Air Force Base | $23,333,000 |
| North Carolina | Camp Lejeune | $52,748,000 |
| Fort Bragg | $93,136,000 | |
| Seymour Johnson AFB | $8,500,000 | |
| South Carolina | Beaufort | $40,600,000 |
| South Dakota | Ellsworth Air Force Base | $8,000,000 |
| Texas | Joint Base San Antonio | $38,300,000 |
| Virginia | Craney Island | $36,500,000 |
| Defense Distribution Depot Richmond | $5,700,000 | |
| Fort Belvoir | $7,239,000 | |
| Joint Base Langley-Eustis | $41,200,000 | |
| Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story | $39,588,000 | |
| Pentagon | $15,100,000 | |
| CONUS Classified | Classified Location | $53,073,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Australia | Geraldton | $9,600,000 |
| Belgium | Brussels | $79,544,000 |
| Guantanamo Bay | Guantanamo Bay | $76,290,000 |
| Japan | Misawa Air Base | $37,775,000 |
| Okinawa | $170,901,000 | |
| Sasebo | $37,681,000 |
(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| California | Edwards Air Force Base | $4,500,000 |
| Fort Hunter Liggett | $13,500,000 | |
| Vandenberg Air Force Base | $2,965,000 | |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $3,000,000 |
| Florida | Eglin Air Force Base | $3,850,000 |
| Georgia | Moody Air Force Base | $3,600,000 |
| Hawaii | Marine Corps Base Hawaii | $8,460,000 |
| Illinois | Great Lakes Naval Station | $2,190,000 |
| Maine | Portsmouth Naval Shipyard | $2,740,000 |
| Maryland | Fort Detrick | $2,100,000 |
| Nebraska | Offutt Air Force Base | $2,869,000 |
| Oklahoma | Tinker Air Force Base | $3,609,000 |
| Oregon | Oregon City Armory | $9,400,000 |
| Utah | Dugway Proving Ground | $15,400,000 |
| Virginia | Naval Station Norfolk | $11,360,000 |
| Pentagon | $2,120,000 | |
| Various Locations | Various Locations | $25,112,000 |
(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Diego Garcia | Naval Support Facility | $14,620,000 |
| Japan | Fleet Activities Yokosuka | $8,030,000 |
| Germany | Spangdahlem | $4,800,000 |
| Various Locations | Various Locations | $5,776,000 |
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments) as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(2) $79,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2128) for NSAW Recapitalize Building #1 at Fort Meade, Maryland).
(3) $20,800,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2129) for the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System Complex at Deveselu, Romania).
(4) $141,039,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672), as amended by section 2404(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2130), for a data center at Fort Meade, Maryland).
(5) $50,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland).
(6) $54,300,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base San Antonio, Texas).
(7) $526,168,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1673) for a hospital at the Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany).
(8) $281,325,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2640) for a hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas).
(9) $123,827,000 (the balance of the amount authorized as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide project by title X of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1888) for a data center at Camp Williams, Utah).
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (124 Stat. 4446), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| District of Columbia | Bolling Air Force Base | Cooling Tower Expansion | $2,070,000 |
| DIAC Parking Garage | $13,586,000 | ||
| Electrical Upgrades | $1,080,000 |
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (125 Stat. 1672), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| California | Coronado | SOF Support Activity Operations Facility | $42,000,000 |
| Germany | USAG Baumholder | Wetzel-Smith Elementary School | $59,419,000 |
| Italy | USAG Vicenza | Vicenza High School | $41,864,000 |
| Japan | Yokota Air Base | Yokota High School | $49,606,000 |
| Virginia | Pentagon Reservation | Heliport Control Tower and Fire Station | $6,457,000 |
| Pedestrian Plaza | $2,285,000 |
(a) Limitation.—No amounts may be obligated or expended for the military construction projects described in subsection (b) and otherwise authorized by section 2401(a) until the report described in subsection (c) has been submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for military construction and land acquisition for chemical demilitarization, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under subsection (a) and the project described in paragraph (2) of this subsection may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(2) $2,049,000 (the balance of the amount authorized for ammunition demilitarization at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as most recently amended by section 2412 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450) and section 2412 of this Act.
(a) Modification.—The table in section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as amended by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), is amended—
(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 2405(b)(3) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 839), as amended by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), is further amended by striking “$723,200,000” and inserting “$757,200,000”.
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Delaware | Dagsboro | $10,800,000 |
| Maine | Augusta | $32,000,000 |
| Maryland | Havre De Grace | $12,400,000 |
| Montana | Helena | $38,000,000 |
| New Mexico | Alamogordo | $5,000,000 |
| North Dakota | Valley City | $10,800,000 |
| Vermont | North Hyde Park | $4,400,000 |
| Washington | Yakima | $19,000,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| California | Fresno | $22,000,000 |
| March Air Force Base | $25,000,000 | |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $5,000,000 |
| Illinois | Arlington Heights | $26,000,000 |
| Mississippi | Starkville | $9,300,000 |
| New Jersey | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | $26,000,000 |
| New York | Mattydale | $23,000,000 |
| Virginia | Fort Lee | $16,000,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Pennsylvania | Pittsburgh | $17,650,000 |
| Washington | Naval Station Everett | $47,869,000 |
| Whidbey Island | $27,755,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Arkansas | Fort Smith Municipal Airport | $13,200,000 |
| Connecticut | Bradley International Airport | $16,306,000 |
| Iowa | Des Moines Municipal Airport | $8,993,000 |
| Michigan | W.K. Kellog Regional Airport | $6,000,000 |
| New Hampshire | Pease International Trade Port | $41,902,000 |
| Pennsylvania | Horsham Air Guard Station (Willow Grove) | $5,662,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(a) and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Arizona | Davis-Monthan Air Force Base | $14,500,000 |
| Georgia | Robins Air Force Base | $27,700,000 |
| North Carolina | Seymour Johnson Air Force Base | $9,800,000 |
| Texas | Forth Worth | $3,700,000 |
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under sections 2601 through 2605 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(2) $10,800,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2601 for a National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop at Dagsboro, Delaware).
(3) $19,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2601 for an Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training at Yakima, Washington).
(a) Kansas city.—
(1) MODIFICATION.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1678), for Kansas City, Kansas, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may, instead of constructing a new facility in Kansas City, construct a new facility in the vicinity of Kansas City, Kansas.
(2) DURATION OF AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(b) Attleboro.—
(1) MODIFICATION.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1678), for Attleboro, Massachusetts, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may, instead of constructing a new facility in Attleboro, construct a new facility in the vicinity of Attleboro, Massachusetts.
(2) DURATION OF AUTHORITY.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
(a) Stormville.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2601 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2133) for Stormville, New York, for construction of a Combined Support Maintenance Shop Phase I, the Secretary of the Army may instead construct the facility at Camp Smith, New York, and build a 53,760 square foot maintenance facility in lieu of a 75,156 square foot maintenance facility.
(b) Tustin.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2135) for Tustin, California, for construction of an Army Reserve Center, the Secretary of the Army may construct the facility in the vicinity of Tustin instead of constructing the facility in Tustin.
The table in section 2604 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1002) is amended in the item relating to Martin State Airport, Maryland, for construction of a CYBER/ISR Facility by striking “$8,000,000” in the amount column and inserting “$12,900,000”.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601 and 2602 of that Act (124 Stat. 4452, 4453) and extended by section 2612 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1003), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round.
(a) Report on excess property.—Section 2905 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection:
“(f) Report on designation of property as excess instead of surplus.— (1) Not later than 180 days after the date on which real property located at a military installation closed or realigned under this part is declared excess, but not surplus, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report identifying the property and including the information required by paragraph (2). The Secretary shall update the report every 180 days thereafter until the property is either declared surplus or transferred to another Federal agency.
(b) Effect of lack of recognized redevelopment authority.—Section 2910(9) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) is amended—
Section 2802 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) (1) If a construction project, land acquisition, or defense access road project described in paragraph (2) will be carried out pursuant to a provision of law other than a Military Construction Authorization Act, the Secretary concerned shall— “(A) comply with the congressional notification requirement contained in the provision of law under which the construction project, land acquisition, or defense access road project will be carried out; or “(B) in the absence of such a congressional notification requirement, submit to the congressional defense committees, in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title, a report describing the construction project, land acquisition, or defense access road project at least 15 days before commencing the construction project, land acquisition, or defense access road project.
“(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), a construction project, land acquisition, or defense access road project subject to the notification requirement imposed by paragraph (1) is a construction project, land acquisition, or defense access road project that—
“(3) This subsection does not apply to a construction project, land acquisition, or defense access road project described in paragraph (2) whose cost is less than or equal to the threshold amount specified in section 2805(b) of this title.”.
(a) Unspecified minor military construction project described.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Payments-in-kind and in-kind contributions.—Subsection (f) of section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(f) Authorized Use of Payments-In-Kind and In-Kind Contributions.— (1) A military construction project, as defined in chapter 159 of this title, may be accepted as payment-in-kind or as an in-kind contribution required by a bilateral agreement with a host country only if that military construction project is authorized by law.
“(2) Operations of United States forces may be funded through payment-in-kind or an in-kind contribution required by a bilateral agreement with a host country under this section only if the costs covered by such payment or contribution are included in the budget justification documents for the Department of Defense submitted to Congress in connection with the budget submitted under 1105 of title 31.
“(3) If funds previously appropriated for a military construction project or operating costs are subsequently addressed in an agreement for payment-in-kind or by an in-kind contribution required by a bilateral agreement with a host country, the Secretary of Defense shall return to the Treasury funds in the amount equal to the value of the appropriated funds.
“(4) This subsection does not apply to a military construction project that—
“(A) was specified in a bilateral agreement with a host country that was entered into before December 26, 2013;
“(B) was the subject of negotiation between the United States and a host country as of the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015;
“(C) was accepted as payment-in-kind for the residual value of improvements made by the United States at military installations released to the host country under section 2921 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) before December 26, 2013; or
“(D) subject to paragraph (6), will cost less than the cost specified in subsection (a)(2) of section 2805 of this title for certain unspecified minor military construction projects.
“(5) This subsection does not apply to an in-kind contribution toward operating costs that—
“(A) was specified in a bilateral agreement with a host country that was entered into before December 26, 2013;
“(B) was the subject of negotiation between the United States and a host country as of the date of the enactment of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015; or
“(C) was accepted as an in-kind contribution for the residual value of improvements made by the United States at military installations released to the host country under section 2921 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (division B of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) before December 26, 2013.
“(6) In the case of a military construction project excluded pursuant to paragraph (4)(D) whose cost will exceed the cost specified in subsection (b) of section 2805 of this title for certain unspecified minor military construction projects, the congressional notification requirements and waiting period specified in paragraph (2) of such subsection shall apply.”.
(b) Conforming amendments.—Section 2802(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “payment-in-kind contributions” and inserting “payments-in-kind or in-kind contributions”;
(c) Congressional notification.—
(1) NOTIFICATION REQUIRED.—During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the effective date specified in subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notification, at least 30 days before the initiation date for any military construction project to be built for Department of Defense personnel outside the United States using payments-in-kind or in-kind contributions.
Section 2862 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 2862. Turn-key selection procedures
“(a) Authority to use for certain purposes.—The Secretary concerned may use one-step turn-key selection procedures for the purpose of entering into a contract for any of the following purposes:
“(2) A repair project (as defined in section 2811(e) of this title) with an approved cost equal to or less than $4,000,000.
“(b) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘one-step turn-key selection procedures’ means procedures used for the selection of a contractor on the basis of price and other evaluation criteria to perform, in accordance with the provisions of a firm fixed-price contract, both the design and construction of a facility using performance specifications supplied by the Secretary concerned.
“(2) The term ‘security assistance activity’ means—
“(A) humanitarian and civic assistance authorized by sections 401 and 2561 of this title;
“(B) foreign disaster assistance authorized by section 404 of this title;
“(C) foreign military construction sales authorized by section 29 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2769);
“(D) foreign assistance authorized under sections 607 and 632 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2357, 2392); and
(a) Extension of current limitation on construction projects.—Section 2809 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1013) is amended—
(b) Limitation related to European Reassurance Initiative.—The Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department shall not award any contract in connection with a construction project authorized in title XXIX of this division to be carried out at an installation operated in the European Command area of responsibility until—
(1) the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a project notification that—
(2) subject to subsection (c), the expiration of the 21-day period beginning on the date the notification is received by the committees or, if earlier, the 14-day period beginning on the date on which a copy of the notification is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of title 10, United States Code.
(c) Relation to current limitation on construction projects.—The limitation imposed by subsection (b) is in addition to the limitation on construction projects carried out in the European Command area of responsibility imposed by section 2809 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1013), as amended by subsection (a).
Section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 127 Stat. 1012), is further amended—
(1) in subsection (c)(1), by striking “shall not exceed” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “shall not exceed $100,000,000 between October 1, 2014, and the earlier of December 31, 2015, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military activities of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016.”; and
If a residential building project (including repair or remodeling project) is authorized by this Act or will be carried out using amounts appropriated pursuant to an authorization of appropriations in this Act and the project will be designed and constructed to meet an above code green building standard or rating system, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned may use the ICC 700 National Green Building Standard, the LEED Green Building Standard System, the Green Globes Green Building Certification System, or an equivalent protocol developed using a voluntary consensus standard, as defined in Office of Management and Budget Circular Number A–119.
(a) Limitation.—None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be used to construct new facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that any new construction of facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has enduring military value independent of a high value detention mission.
Section 2667(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(4) (A) Paragraph (1) does not apply to a renewal, extension, or succeeding lease by the Secretary concerned with a financial institution selected in accordance with the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation providing for the selection of financial institutions to operate on military installations if each of the following applies:
(a) Authority to credit reimbursed funds to accounts currently available.—Section 2695(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Prospective applicability.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall not apply to administrative expenses related to a real property transaction referred to in section 2695(b) of title 10, United States Code, that were covered by the Secretary of a military department using amounts appropriated to the Secretary before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Limitation based on cost estimates.—
(1) LIMITATION AMOUNT.—Pursuant to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the “Guam and Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Military Relocation (2012 Roadmap Adjustments)”, the total amount obligated or expended from funds appropriated or otherwise made available for military construction for implementation of the Record of Decision for the relocation of Marine Corps forces to Guam associated with such Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement may not exceed $8,725,000,000, subject to such adjustment as may be made under paragraph (2).
(2) ADJUSTMENT OF LIMITATION AMOUNT.—The Secretary of the Navy may adjust the amount specified in paragraph (1) by the following:
(3) WRITTEN NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENT.—At the same time that the budget for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notice of any adjustment to the amount specified in paragraph (1) made by the Secretary during the preceding fiscal year pursuant to the authority provided by paragraph (2).
(b) Restriction on Development of Public Infrastructure.—
(1) RESTRICTION.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to another Federal agency, or supplement of funds available under Federal programs administered by agencies other than the Department of Defense will result in the development (including repair, replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition, or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the Secretary of Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding unless such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or supplemental funding—
(B) will be used to carry out a public infrastructure project included in the report prepared by the Secretary of Defense under section 2822(d)(2) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1017), as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “public infrastructure” means any utility, method of transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the control of a public entity or State or local government that is used by, or constructed for the benefit of, the general public.
(c) Repeal of Superseded Law.—Section 2822 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1016) is repealed. The repeal of such section does not affect the validity of the amendment made by subsection (f) of such section or the responsibilities of the Economic Adjustment Committee and the Secretary of Defense under subsection (d) of such section, as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Agreement to establish.—In order to accommodate the operation of a live-fire training range complex on Andersen Air Force Base-Northwest Field and the management of the adjacent Ritidian Unit of the Guam National Wildlife Refuge, the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Interior, notwithstanding the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), may enter into an agreement providing for the establishment and operation of a surface danger zone which overlays the Ritidian Unit or such portion thereof as the Secretaries consider necessary.
(b) Elements of agreement.—The agreement to establish a surface danger zone over all or a portion of the Ritidian Unit of the Guam National Wildlife Refuge shall include—
(2) as appropriate, measures, funded by the Secretary of the Navy from funds appropriated after the date of enactment of this Act and otherwise available to the Secretary, for the following purposes:
(A) Relocation and reconstruction of structures and facilities of the Refuge in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(B) Mitigation of impacts to wildlife species present on the Refuge or to be reintroduced in the future in accordance with applicable laws.
(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Army may convey, without consideration, to the town of Gordo, Alabama (in this section referred to as the “Town”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 3.79 acres and containing the Gordo Army Reserve Center located at 25226 Highway 82 in Gordo, Alabama, for the purpose of permitting the Town to use the parcel for municipal government purposes, including use by municipal utilities management, the municipal police department, and municipal officials and use as a community center and polling place.
(b) Reversionary interest.—If the Secretary of the Army determines at any time that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a), all right, title, and interest in and to such real property, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto such real property. A determination by the Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(c) Alternative consideration option.—
(1) CONSIDERATION OPTION.—In lieu of exercising the reversionary interest under subsection (b), if the Secretary of the Army determines that the property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance, the Secretary may require the Town to pay to the United States an amount equal to the fair market value of the property, excluding the value of any improvements on the property constructed by the Town, as determined by the Secretary.
(2) TREATMENT OF CONSIDERATION RECEIVED.—Consideration received by the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established for the Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, and shall be available to the Secretary for the same uses and subject to the same limitations as provided in that section.
(d) Payment of cost of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall require the Town to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation related to the conveyance, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Town in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Town.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance or, if the period of availability for obligations for that appropriation has expired, to the appropriations or fund that is currently available to the Secretary for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convey, without consideration, to the City of Nome, Alaska (in this section referred to as the “City”) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property consisting of approximately seven acres, including improvements thereon, known as the USAF West Nome Tank Farm, and located adjacent to the City's port facilities along Port Road in Nome, Alaska, for the purpose of permitting the City to use the property for municipal purposes, including municipal office space, port development, fuel storage for the municipal power plant, and municipal public utility facilities.
(b) Interim lease.—Until such time as the real property described in subsection (a) may be conveyed to the City by deed, the Secretary of the Air Force may lease, without consideration, all or part of the real property to the City for municipal purposes, as described in such subsection.
(c) Reversionary interest and alternative consideration option.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of the Air Force determines at any time that the real property conveyed or leased to the City under this section is not being used for municipal purposes, then, at the option of the Secretary—
(2) DETERMINATION PROCESS.—A determination by the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(3) TREATMENT OF CASH PAYMENTS RECEIVED.—Any cash payment received by the Secretary under paragraph (1)(B) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established for the Secretary under section 2667(e) of title 10, United State Code, and shall be available to the Secretary for the same uses and subject to the same limitations as provided in that section.
(d) Payment of costs.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall require the City to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out a conveyance or lease under this section, including survey costs, cost for environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the conveyance or lease. If amount are collected from the City in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance or lease, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance or lease or, if the period of availability for obligations for that appropriation has expired, to the appropriations or fund that is currently available to the Secretary for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convey, without consideration, to the City of Norwalk, California (in this section referred to as the “City”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 15 acres at the former Norwalk Defense Fuel Supply Point for the purpose of permitting the City to use the property for public purposes.
(b) Payment of cost of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall require the City to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation related to the conveyance, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the City in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance or, if the period of availability for obligations for that appropriation has expired, to the appropriations or fund that is currently available to the Secretary for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(a) Transfer of jurisdiction authorized.—
(1) TRANSFER AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Army may transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of State a parcel of real property at former Walter Reed Army Hospital in the District of Columbia consisting of approximately 43.53 acres for the purpose of permitting the Secretary of State to develop a Foreign Missions Center on the property.
(b) Alternative conveyance authority.—
(1) CONVEYANCE FOR PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH, INCLUDING RESEARCH.—If the transfer of administrative jurisdiction authorized by subsection (a) does not occur, the Secretary of the Army may convey, without consideration, to an authorized recipient described in paragraph (2) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and a parcel of real property at former Walter Reed Army Hospital consisting of approximately 13.25 acres and containing of the buildings specified in subparagraphs (A), (G), (H), and (I) of subsection (a) for the purpose of permitting the recipient to use the parcel for the protection of public health, including research.
(2) AUTHORIZED RECIPIENTS.—The conveyance authorized by this subsection may be made to the District of Columbia, a political subdivision or instrumentality of the District of Columbia, a tax-supported medical institution, or a hospital or similar institution not operated for profit that has been exempt from taxation under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(3) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If the Secretary of the Army determines at any time that real property conveyed under this subsection is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in paragraph (1), all right, title, and interest in and to such real property, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto such real property. A determination by the Secretary under this paragraph shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(4) PAYMENT OF COSTS OF CONVEYANCE.—
(A) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall require the recipient of the property under this subsection to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under this subsection, including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the recipient of the property.
(B) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as reimbursement under subparagraph (A) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(5) RELATION TO OTHER LAWS.—Section 2905(b) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply with respect to real property conveyed under this subsection.
(a) Conveyance authorized.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convey to the City of Lynn Haven, Florida (in this section referred to as the “City”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 144 acres at the former Lynn Haven Fuel Depot in Bay County, Florida.
(2) EXCLUDED PROPERTY.—The real property to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall not include the portion of the former Lynn Haven Fuel Depot authorized to be conveyed by the Secretary to Florida State University by section 2843 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 553).
(b) Consideration.—
(1) CONSIDERATION REQUIRED.—As consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a)(1), the City shall pay to the United States an amount equal to the fair market value of the real property to be conveyed, as determined by the Secretary of the Air Force.
(2) TREATMENT OF CONSIDERATION RECEIVED.—Consideration received by the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established for the Secretary under subsection (e) of section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, and shall be available to the Secretary for the same uses and subject to the same limitations as provided in that section.
(a) Transfers required.—
(1) CAMP FRANK D. MERRILL.—Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary of Agriculture shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army for required Army force protection measures certain Federal land administered as part of the Chattahoochee National Forest, but permitted to the Secretary of the Army for Camp Frank D. Merrill in Dahlonega, Georgia, consisting of approximately 282 acres identified in the permit numbers 0018–01.
(2) LAKE LANIER PROPERTY.—In exchange for the land transferred under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Army (acting through the Chief of Engineers) shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture certain Federal land administered by the Army Corps of Engineers and consisting of approximately 10 acres adjacent to Lake Lanier at 372 Dunlap Landing Road, Gainesville, Georgia.
(b) Use of transferred land.—
(1) CAMP FRANK D. MERRILL.—
(2) LAKE LANIER PROPERTY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of the land under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Agriculture shall use the land for administrative purposes.
(B) SALE OF LAND.—The Secretary of Agriculture may—
(ii) deposit the proceeds of a sale or exchange under clause (i) in the fund established under Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the Sisk Act; 16 U.S.C. 484a); and
(c) Use and occupancy of National Forest System Land.—Use and occupancy of National Forest System land by the Department of the Army, other than land transferred pursuant to this Act, shall continue to be subject to all laws (including regulations) applicable to the National Forest System.
(d) Endangered species.—
(1) CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR DARTERS.—Nothing in the transfer required by subsection (a)(1) shall affect the prior designation of land within the Chattahoochee National Forest as critical habitat for the Etowah darter (Etheostoma etowahae) and the Holiday darter (Etheostoma brevistrum).
(2) FUTURE CRITICAL HABITAT LISTINGS AND DESIGNATIONS.—Nothing in the transfer required by subsection (a)(1) shall affect the operation of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) for future listing or designations of critical habitat.
(e) Legal description and map.—
(f) Reimbursement of costs.—The Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary of Agriculture for all costs related to the transfer required by subsection (a), including, at a minimum, any costs incurred by the Secretary of Agriculture to assist in the preparation of the legal description and maps required by subsection (e).
(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Navy may convey, without consideration, to the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (in this section referred to as the “Honolulu Authority”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 1.2 acres at or in the nearby vicinity of Radford Drive and the Makalapa Gate of Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, for the purpose of permitting the Honolulu Authority to use the property as the location for a rail platform for the public benefit.
(b) Condition on use of revenues.—If the property conveyed under subsection (a) is used, consistent with such subsection, for a public purpose that results in the generation of revenue for the Honolulu Authority, the Honolulu Authority shall agree to use the generated revenue only for passenger rail transit purposes by depositing the revenue in a fund designated for passenger rail transit use.
(c) Payment of costs of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Navy shall require the Honolulu Authority to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Honolulu Authority in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Honolulu Authority.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
Section 2922(c)(2) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (division B of Public Law 104–106; 110 Stat. 605), as added by section 2842 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 863), is amended in the second sentence by striking “23 years of operation” and inserting “38 years of operation”.
(a) Transfer authorized.—Upon a determination by the Secretary of the Army that the parcel of property at Camp Gruber, Oklahoma, conveyed by the war asset deed dated June 29, 1949, between the United States of America and the State of Oklahoma, or any portion thereof, is needed for national defense purposes, including military training, and that the transfer of the parcel is in the best interest of the Department of the Army, the Administrator of General Services shall execute the reversionary clause in the deed and immediately transfer administrative jurisdiction to the Department of the Army.
(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convey to the City of Hanahan (in this section referred to as the “City”) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 53 total acres at Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina, for the purpose of accommodating the City's recreation needs.
(b) Consideration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—As consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a), the City shall provide the United States with consideration in an amount that is acceptable to the Secretary, whether by cash payment, in-kind consideration as described under paragraph (2), or a combination thereof.
(2) IN-KIND CONSIDERATION.—In-kind consideration provided by the City under paragraph (1) may include the acquisition, construction, provision, improvement, maintenance, repair, or restoration (including environmental restoration), or combination thereof, of any facilities or infrastructure relating to the needs of Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina, that the Secretary considers acceptable.
(c) Payment of costs of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force may require the City to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(a) Exchanges authorized.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may convey—
(A) to Arlington County, Virginia (in this section referred to as the “County”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to one or more parcels of real property, together with any improvements thereon, located south of Columbia Pike and west of South Joyce Street in Arlington County, Virginia; and
(B) to the Commonwealth of Virginia (in this section referred to as the “Commonwealth”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to one or more parcels of property east of Joyce Street in Arlington County, Virginia, necessary for the realignment of Columbia Pike and the Washington Boulevard-Columbia Pike interchange, as well as for future improvements to Interstate 395 ramps.
(b) Consideration.—As consideration for the conveyances of real property under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall receive—
(c) Selection of property for conveyance.—The Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Army and Arlington County signed in January 2013 shall be used as a guide in determining the properties to be exchanged under this section. After consultation with the Commonwealth and the County, the Secretary of Defense shall determine the exact parcels to be exchanged, and such determination shall be final. In selecting the properties to be exchanged under subsections (a) and (b), the parties shall, within their respective authorities, seek—
(1) to remove existing barriers to contiguous expansion of Arlington National Cemetery north of Columbia Pike through a realignment of Southgate Road to the western boundary of the former Navy Annex site;
(d) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the real property to be conveyed under this section shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commonwealth and the County.
(e) Terms and conditions.—The conveyances of real property authorized under this section shall be accomplished by one or more exchange agreements upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary of Defense, the Commonwealth, and the County.
(f) Repeal of obsolete authority.—Section 2881 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2153) is repealed. The repeal of such section does not affect the amendments made by subsections (g) and (h) of such section.
Section 4772(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “accept funds from the Army Historical Foundation” and insert “accept funds and in-kind gifts, including services, construction materials, and equipment used in construction, from the Army Historical Foundation and other persons”.
(a) Requirement to convey Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial.—Subject to subsections (b) and (d), the Secretary of Defense shall convey all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in San Diego, California, to the Mount Soledad Memorial Association, Inc.
(b) Contingencies.—The requirement under subsection (a) to convey the Memorial to the Association is contingent upon—
(c) Consideration.—
(1) DETERMINATION OF CONSIDERATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall convey the Memorial to the Association for consideration that, as determined by the Secretary, reasonably reflects—
(A) the price paid by the United States to purchase the Memorial pursuant to Public Law 109–272 (16 U.S.C. 431 note);
(2) TIME FOR PAYMENT.—The amount of consideration determined under paragraph (1) need not be received by the United States in full before conveyance of the Memorial. The consideration may be paid over a period of time or through installments, or such other financial instruments or arrangements, as may be reasonably convenient for the Secretary and the Association.
(d) Conditions of conveyance.—The conveyance of the Memorial under subsection (a) shall be subject to the following conditions:
(1) The Memorial shall be accepted in its condition at the time of the conveyance, commonly known as conveyance “as is”.
(2) The Association, and any successive owner of the Memorial, shall maintain and use the Memorial as a veterans memorial in perpetuity.
(3) If the Secretary of Defense determines that the Memorial is ever put to a use other than as a veterans memorial, the United States shall have the right, at its election, to reacquire all right, title, and interest in and to the Memorial without any right of compensation to the owner or any other person. Any election to reacquire the Memorial under the authority of this paragraph shall be temporary and solely for the purpose of conveying, as expeditiously as practicable, the Memorial to another entity subject to the same conditions in this subsection.
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) The terms “Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial” and “Memorial” mean the memorial in San Diego, California, acquired by the United States pursuant to Public Law 109–272 (16 U.S.C. 431 note).
(a) Memorial authorized.—The Secretary of the Navy may permit a third party to establish and maintain a memorial dedicated to the victims of the shooting attack at the Washington Navy Yard that occurred on September 16, 2013.
(b) Location of memorial.—The Secretary of the Navy may permit the memorial authorized by subsection (a) to be established at the Washington Navy Yard.
(c) Establishment of account.—An account shall be established on the books of the Treasury for the purpose of managing contributions received pursuant to paragraph (d).
(d) Acceptance of contributions.—The Secretary of the Navy may establish procedures under which the Secretary may solicit and accept monetary contributions or gifts of property for the purpose of the activities described in subsection (a).
(e) Deposit of contributions.—Without regard to the limitations set forth under section 2601(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, amounts collected by the Secretary of the Navy under subsection (d) shall be—
(f) Use of federal funds prohibited.—Federal funds may not be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the memorial authorized by subsection (a).
(a) Redesignation.—The Department of Defense regional center for security studies known as the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies is hereby renamed the “Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies”.
(b) Conforming amendments.—
(1) REFERENCE TO REGIONAL CENTERS FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES.—Section 184(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies” and inserting “Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies”.
(a) Report required.—Not later than April 30, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a summary of the actions taken by the Department of Defense to respond to recommendations resulting from the reviews of security standards following the November 2009 shootings at Fort Hood, Texas, and the September 2013 shootings at the Washington Navy Yard, District of Columbia, which included an assessment of the ability of the Department to detect, prevent, and respond to future incidents of violence at Department facilities.
(b) Elements of report.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A summary of the recommendations resulting from the security standards reviews referred to in subsection (a).
(3) An assessment of current and planned physical security capabilities at Department facilities, and their ability to meet Department physical security requirements.
The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Amount |
| Romania | Mihail Kogalniceanu | $37,000,000 |
The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Amount |
| Bulgaria | Graf Ignatievo | $3,200,000 |
| Estonia | Amari | $24,780,000 |
| Italy | Camp Darby | $44,450,000 |
| Latvia | Lielvarde | $10,710,000 |
| Lithuania | Siauliai | $13,120,000 |
| Poland | Lask | $22,400,000 |
| Romania | Camp Turzii | $2,900,000 |
The Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installation outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Installation | Defense Agency | Amount |
| Worldwide Classified | National Security Agency | $46,000,000 |
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014, for the military construction projects outside the United States authorized by this title as specified in the funding table in section 4602.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) CORPORATION.—The term “Corporation” means the Olgoonik Corporation, an Alaska Native Corporation established under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).
(b) Conveyance.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act and after the date of completion of the appraisal required under subsection (d)(1)(B), the Secretary shall convey to the Corporation by quitclaim deed, for the amount of consideration determined under subsection (d)(1), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property described in subsection (c).
(c) Description of property.—The parcel to be conveyed under subsection (b) consists of approximately 1,518 acres and improvements comprising a former Distant Early Warning Line site in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska near Wainwright, Alaska, and described as United States Survey Number 5252 located within the Umiat Meridian.
(d) Terms and conditions.—
(1) CONSIDERATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As consideration for the conveyance of the property under subsection (b), the Corporation shall pay to the Secretary an amount equal to not less than the fair market value of the conveyed property, to be determined as provided in subparagraph (B).
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) MAPS.—The term “maps” means the maps entitled “Sealaska Land Entitlement Finalization”, numbered 1 through 18, and dated June 14, 2013.
(2) SEALASKA.—The term “Sealaska” means the Sealaska Corporation, a Regional Native Corporation established under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).
(b) Finalization of entitlement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—If, not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary receives a corporate resolution adopted by the board of directors of Sealaska agreeing to accept the conveyance of land described in paragraph (2) in accordance with this section as full and final satisfaction of the remaining land entitlement of Sealaska under section 14(h) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)), the Secretary shall—
(B) charge the entitlement pool under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)) 70,075 acres, reduced by the number of acres deducted under paragraph (2)(B), in fulfillment of the remaining land entitlement for Sealaska under that Act, notwithstanding whether the surveyed acreage of the 18 parcels of land generally depicted on the maps as “Sealaska Selections” and patented under subsection (c) is less than or more than 69,585 acres, reduced by the number of acres deducted under paragraph (2)(B).
(2) FINAL ENTITLEMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the 70,075 acres of land described in paragraph (1) shall consist of—
(B) DEDUCTION.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall deduct from the number of acres of Federal land described in subparagraph (A)(i) the number of acres of Federal land for which the Secretary has issued a conveyance under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)) during the period beginning on August 1, 2012, and ending on the date of receipt of the resolution under paragraph (1).
(3) EFFECT OF ACCEPTANCE.—The resolution filed by Sealaska in accordance with paragraph (1) shall—
(B) without any further administrative action by the Secretary, result in—
(i) the relinquishment of all existing selections made by Sealaska under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)); and
(ii) the termination of all withdrawals by section 16 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1615), except to the extent a selection by a Village Corporation under subsections (b) and (d) of section 16 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1615) remains pending, until the date on which those selections are resolved.
(4) FAILURE TO ACCEPT.—If Sealaska fails to file the resolution in accordance with paragraph (1)—
(A) the provisions of this section shall cease to be effective, except as otherwise provided in this subsection;
(B) the Secretary shall, not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, complete the interim conveyance of the remaining land entitlement to Sealaska under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)) from prioritized selections on file with the Secretary on the date of enactment of this Act; and
(C) (i) the remaining land entitlement of Sealaska under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)) shall be 70,075 acres, provided that the Secretary shall deduct the number of acres of Federal land for which the Secretary has issued a conveyance under section 14(h)(8) of that Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)) during the period beginning on August 1, 2012, and ending 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act; and
(ii) if the Governor of the State does not approve the prioritized selections of Sealaska in the Saxman or Yakutat withdrawal areas as required by section 14(h)(8)(B) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)(B)) by the date that is 42 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall reject those selections and fulfill the remaining land entitlement of Sealaska from the remaining prioritized selections on file with the Secretary on the date of enactment of this Act.
(5) SCOPE OF LAW.—Except as provided in paragraphs (4) and (6), this section provides the exclusive authority under which the remaining land entitlement of Sealaska under section 14(h) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)) may be fulfilled.
(6) EFFECT.—Nothing in this section affects any land that is—
(A) the subject of an application under subsection (h)(1) of section 14 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613) that is pending on the date of enactment of this Act; and
(c) Conveyances to Sealaska.—
(1) INTERIM CONVEYANCE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), subsection (b)(2), and subsection (e)(1), the Secretary shall complete the interim conveyance of the 18 parcels of Federal land comprising approximately 69,585 acres generally depicted on the maps by the date that is 60 days after the date of receipt of the resolution under subsection (b)(1), subject to the Secretary identifying and reserving, by the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, any easement under section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1616(b)) that could have been reserved prior to the interim conveyance.
(2) WITHDRAWAL.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, the Federal land described in paragraph (1) is withdrawn from—
(3) TREATMENT OF LAND CONVEYED.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, any land conveyed to Sealaska under paragraph (1) shall be—
(A) considered to be land conveyed by the Secretary under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)); and
(B) subject to all laws (including regulations) applicable to entitlements under section 14(h)(8) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(8)), including section 907(d) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (43 U.S.C. 1636(d)).
(4) EASEMENTS.—
(A) PUBLIC EASEMENTS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The interim conveyance and patents for the land under paragraph (1) shall be subject to the reservation of public easements under section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1616(b)).
(ii) TERMINATION.—No public easement reserved on land conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be terminated without publication of notice of the proposed termination in the Federal Register.
(iii) RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS.—In the interim conveyance and patents for the land under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall reserve the right of the Secretary to amend the interim conveyance and patents to include reservations of public easements under section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1616(b)) until the completion of the easement reservation process.
(B) CONSERVATION EASEMENTS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—In the interim conveyance and patents for the land under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall reserve a conservation easement to protect the aquatic and riparian habitat extending 100 feet on each side of the anadromous water bodies depicted as “100 Foot Conservation Easement” on the maps numbered 3, 4, and 6.
(ii) PROHIBITION.—The commercial harvest of timber within the conservation easements described in clause (i) shall be prohibited, except that Sealaska may, for the purpose of harvesting timber outside of the conservation easement—
(C) RESEARCH EASEMENT.—In the interim conveyance and patent for the land generally depicted on the map numbered 7, the Secretary shall reserve an easement—
(D) KOSCUISKO ISLAND ROAD EASEMENT.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Concurrently with the conveyance of land under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall grant to Sealaska an easement on Koscuisko Island providing access to and use by Sealaska of the sort yard and all other upland facilities at the sort yard that are associated with the transfer of logs to the marine environment, subject to—
(ii) SCOPE OF THE EASEMENT.—The easement under clause (i) shall enable Sealaska—
(I) to construct, use, and maintain a road connecting the National Forest System Road known as “Cape Pole Road” to the National Forest System Road known as “South Shipley Bay Road” within the corridor depicted on the map numbered 3;
(5) HUNTING, FISHING, AND RECREATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Any land conveyed under paragraph (1) that is located outside a withdrawal area designated under section 16(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1615(a)) shall remain open and available to subsistence uses, noncommercial recreational hunting and fishing, and other noncommercial recreational uses by the public under applicable law—
(i) without liability on the part of Sealaska, except for willful acts, to any user as a result of the use; and
(d) Cemetery sites and historical places.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 14(h)(1)(E) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(1)(E)), Sealaska may submit applications for the conveyance under section 14(h)(1)(A) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(1)(A)) of not more than 76 cemetery sites and historical places—
(A) that are listed in the document entitled “Sealaska Cemetery Sites and Historical Places” and dated October 17, 2012;
(B) that are cemetery sites and historical places included in the report by Wilsey and Ham, Inc., entitled “1975 Native Cemetery and Historic Sites of Southeast Alaska (Preliminary Report)” and dated October 1975;
(D) that are not located within a conservation system unit (as defined in section 102 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3102)).
(2) PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING APPLICATIONS.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the Secretary shall consider all applications submitted under this subsection in accordance with the criteria and procedures set forth in applicable regulations in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act.
(3) CONVEYANCE.—If approved under the procedures described in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall convey cemetery sites and historical places that result in the conveyance of a total of approximately 490 acres of Federal land comprised of parcels that are—
(4) TIMELINE.—No application for a cemetery site or historical place may be submitted under paragraph (1) after the date that is 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
(5) CONSULTATION WITH RECOGNIZED TRIBAL ENTITY.—Sealaska shall—
(6) SELECTION OF ADDITIONAL CEMETERY SITES.—If Sealaska submits timely applications to the Secretary in accordance with paragraphs (1), (4), and (5), for all 76 sites listed under paragraph (1)(A), and the Secretary rejects any of those applications in whole or in part—
(A) not later than 2 years after the date on which the Secretary completes the conveyance of eligible cemetery sites and historical places applied for under paragraph (1), and subject to paragraph (5), Sealaska may submit applications for the conveyance under section 14 (h)(1)(A) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(1)(A)) of additional cemetery sites that are not located in a conservation system unit described in paragraph (1)(D), the total acreage of which, together with the cemetery sites and historical places previously conveyed by the Secretary under paragraph (3), shall not exceed 490 acres; and
(7) PUBLIC ACCESS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), any land conveyed under this subsection shall be subject to—
(i) the reservation of public easements under section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1616(b));
(ii) public access across the conveyed land in cases in which no reasonable alternative access around the land is available, without liability to Sealaska, except for willful acts, to any user by reason of the use; and
(iii) public access to and along any Class I stream described in section 705(e) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 539d(e)) for noncommercial recreational and subsistence fishing, without liability to Sealaska, except for willful acts, to any user by reason of the use.
(B) LIMITATIONS.—The public access and use under clauses (ii) and (iii) of subparagraph (A) shall be subject to—
(i) any reasonable restrictions that may be imposed by Sealaska on the public access and use—
(8) PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR LOSS.—
(A) PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, Sealaska shall not—
(B) PROHIBITION ON LOSS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any cemetery site or historical place conveyed to Sealaska under this subsection shall be exempt from—
(ii) title 11 of the United States Code or a successor law, any other insolvency or moratorium law, or any other law generally affecting creditors’ rights;
(9) TREATMENT OF LAND CONVEYED.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, any land conveyed to Sealaska under this subsection shall be—
(A) considered land conveyed by the Secretary under section 14(h)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(1)); and
(B) subject to all laws (including regulations) applicable to conveyances under section 14(h)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(h)(1)), including section 907(d) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (43 U.S.C. 1636(d)).
(e) Miscellaneous.—
(1) SPECIAL USE AUTHORIZATIONS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—On the conveyance of land to Sealaska under subsection (c)(1)—
(i) any guiding or outfitting special use authorization issued by the Forest Service for the use of the conveyed land shall terminate; and
(ii) as a condition of the conveyance and consistent with section 14(g) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1613(g)), Sealaska shall issue the holder of the special use authorization terminated under clause (i) an authorization to continue the authorized use, subject to the terms and conditions that were in the special use authorization issued by the Forest Service, for—
(B) NOTICE OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES.—Sealaska and any holder of a guiding or outfitting authorization under this paragraph shall have a mutual obligation, subject to the guiding or outfitting authorization, to inform the other party of any commercial activities prior to engaging in the activities on the land conveyed to Sealaska under subsection (c)(1).
(2) ROADS AND FACILITIES.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture and Sealaska shall negotiate in good faith to develop a binding agreement—
(3) TRADITIONAL TRADE AND MIGRATION ROUTES.—
(A) IDENTIFICATION OF ROUTES.—
(i) THE INSIDE PASSAGE.—The route from Yakutat to Dry Bay, as generally depicted on the map entitled “Traditional Trade and Migration Route, Neix naax aan náx—The Inside Passage” and dated April 22, 2013, shall be known as “Neix naax aan náx” (“The Inside Passage”).
(B) ACCESS TO TRADITIONAL TRADE AND MIGRATION ROUTES.—The culturally and historically significant trade and migration routes described in subparagraph (A) shall be open to travel by Sealaska and the public in accordance with applicable law, subject to such terms, conditions, and special use authorizations as the Secretary of Agriculture may require.
(4) TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST YOUNG GROWTH MANAGEMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection (m) of section 6 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1604) and in addition to the authority provided under that subsection and the terms of section 705(a) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 539d(a)), the Secretary of Agriculture may allow the harvest of trees prior to the culmination of mean annual increment of growth in areas that are available for commercial timber harvest under the Tongass National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan to facilitate the transition from commercial timber harvest of old growth stands.
(B) LIMITATION.—Any sale of trees pursuant to the authority granted under subparagraph (A) shall not—
(i) exceed 15,000 acres during the 10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, with an annual maximum of 3,000 acres sold;
(ii) exceed a total of 50,000 acres, with an annual maximum of 5,000 acres sold after the first 10-year period;
(C) APPLICABLE LAW.—Nothing in this section affects the requirement under section 705(a) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 539d(a)) that the Forest Service seek to meet demand for timber from the Tongass National Forest.
(5) EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section delays the duty of the Secretary to convey land to—
(i) the State under the Act of July 7, 1958 (commonly known as the “Alaska Statehood Act”) (48 U.S.C. note prec. 21; Public Law 85–508); or
(ii) a Native Corporation under—
(I) the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.); or
(II) the Alaska Land Transfer Acceleration Act (43 U.S.C. 1611 note; Public Law 108–452).
(B) CONVEYANCES.—The Secretary shall promptly proceed with the conveyance of all land necessary to fulfill the final entitlement of all Native Corporations in accordance with—
(i) the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.); and
(ii) the Alaska Land Transfer Acceleration Act (43 U.S.C. 1611 note; Public Law 108–452).
(6) ESCROW FUNDS.—If Sealaska files the resolution in accordance with subsection (b)(1)—
(A) the escrow requirements of section 2 of Public Law 94–204 (43 U.S.C. 1613 note) shall apply to proceeds (including interest) derived from the land withdrawn under subsection (c)(2) from the date of receipt of the resolution; and
(B) Sealaska shall have no right to any proceeds (including interest) held pursuant to the escrow requirements of section 2 of Public Law 94–204 (43 U.S.C. 1613 note) that were derived from land originally withdrawn for selection by section 16 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1615), but not conveyed.
(f) Conservation areas.—
(1) LUD II MANAGEMENT AREAS.—If Sealaska files a resolution in accordance with subsection (b)(1), section 508 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (Public Law 96–487; 104 Stat. 4428) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(13) BAY OF PILLARS.—Certain land which comprises approximately 20,863 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Bay of Pillars LUD II Management Area—Proposed’ and dated June 14, 2013.
“(14) KUSHNEAHIN CREEK.—Certain land which comprises approximately 33,613 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Kushneahin Creek LUD II Management Area—Proposed’ and dated June 14, 2013.
“(15) NORTHERN PRINCE OF WALES.—Certain land which comprises approximately 8,728 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Northern Prince of Wales LUD II Management Area—Proposed’ and dated June 14, 2013.
“(16) WESTERN KOSCIUSKO.—Certain land which comprises approximately 8,012 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Western Kosciusko LUD II Management Area—Proposed’ and dated June 14, 2013.
“(17) EASTERN KOSCIUSKO.—Certain land which comprises approximately 1,664 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Eastern Kosciusko LUD II Management Area—Proposed’ and dated June 14, 2013.
“(18) SARKAR LAKES.—Certain land which comprises approximately 24,509 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Sarkar Lakes LUD II Management Area—Proposed’ and dated June 14, 2013.
(2) NO BUFFER ZONES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The designation of the conservation areas by paragraphs (13) through (20) of section 508 of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (Public Law 96–487; 104 Stat. 4428) (as added by paragraph (1)) (referred to in this subsection as the “conservation areas”) is not intended to lead to the creation of protective perimeters or buffer zones around the conservation areas.
(g) Reinstatement to Sealaska Corporation.—
(1) DEFINITION OF AFFECTED INDIVIDUAL.—In this subsection, the term “affected individual” means Michael G. Faber, who—
(2) REVOCATION OF MEMBERSHIP IN METLAKATLA INDIAN COMMUNITY.—Effective on the date on which the affected individual submits written notice to the Metlakatla Indian Community revoking the membership of the affected individual in the Metlakatla Indian Community, the membership of the affected individual in the Metlakatla Indian Community shall be considered to be revoked.
(3) REINSTATEMENT.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, pursuant to section 5 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1604), the Secretary shall, immediately after the affected individual submits the notice under paragraph (2), update the shareholder roll of Sealaska to include the affected individual.
(a) Purpose.—The purpose of this section is to authorize, direct, facilitate, and expedite the exchange of land between Resolution Copper and the United States.
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) APACHE LEAP.—The term “Apache Leap” means the approximately 807 acres of land depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Apache Leap” and dated March 2011.
(2) FEDERAL LAND.—The term “Federal land” means the approximately 2,422 acres of land located in Pinal County, Arizona, depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Federal Parcel–Oak Flat” and dated March 2011.
(3) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term “Indian tribe” has the meaning given the term in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b).
(4) NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The term “non-Federal land” means the parcels of land owned by Resolution Copper that are described in subsection (d)(1) and, if necessary to equalize the land exchange under subsection (c), subsection (c)(5)(B)(i)(I).
(5) OAK FLAT CAMPGROUND.—The term “Oak Flat Campground” means the approximately 50 acres of land comprising approximately 16 developed campsites depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Oak Flat Campground” and dated March 2011.
(6) OAK FLAT WITHDRAWAL AREA.—The term “Oak Flat Withdrawal Area” means the approximately 760 acres of land depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Oak Flat Withdrawal Area” and dated March 2011.
(c) Land exchange.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this section, if Resolution Copper offers to convey to the United States all right, title, and interest of Resolution Copper in and to the non-Federal land, the Secretary is authorized and directed to convey to Resolution Copper, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Federal land.
(2) CONDITIONS ON ACCEPTANCE.—Title to any non-Federal land conveyed by Resolution Copper to the United States under this section shall be in a form that—
(3) CONSULTATION WITH INDIAN TRIBES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall engage in government-to-government consultation with affected Indian tribes concerning issues of concern to the affected Indian tribes related to the land exchange.
(4) APPRAISALS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary and Resolution Copper shall select an appraiser to conduct appraisals of the Federal land and non-Federal land in compliance with the requirements of section 254.9 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations.
(B) REQUIREMENTS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in clause (ii), an appraisal prepared under this paragraph shall be conducted in accordance with nationally recognized appraisal standards, including—
(ii) FINAL APPRAISED VALUE.—After the final appraised values of the Federal land and non-Federal land are determined and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary shall not be required to reappraise or update the final appraised value—
(C) APPRAISAL INFORMATION.—The appraisal prepared under this paragraph shall include a detailed income capitalization approach analysis of the market value of the Federal land which may be utilized, as appropriate, to determine the value of the Federal land, and shall be the basis for calculation of any payment under subsection (e).
(5) EQUAL VALUE LAND EXCHANGE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The value of the Federal land and non-Federal land to be exchanged under this section shall be equal or shall be equalized in accordance with this paragraph.
(B) SURPLUS OF FEDERAL LAND VALUE.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—If the final appraised value of the Federal land exceeds the value of the non-Federal land, Resolution Copper shall—
(ii) AMOUNT OF PAYMENT.—The Secretary may accept a payment in excess of 25 percent of the total value of the land or interests conveyed, notwithstanding section 206(b) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716(b)).
(iii) DISPOSITION AND USE OF PROCEEDS.—Any amounts received by the United States under this subparagraph shall be deposited in the fund established under Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the “Sisk Act”; 16 U.S.C. 484a) and shall be made available to the Secretary for the acquisition of land or interests in land in Region 3 of the Forest Service.
(6) OAK FLAT WITHDRAWAL AREA.—
(A) PERMITS.—Subject to the provisions of this paragraph and notwithstanding any withdrawal of the Oak Flat Withdrawal Area from the mining, mineral leasing, or public land laws, the Secretary, upon enactment of this Act, shall issue to Resolution Copper—
(i) if so requested by Resolution Copper, within 30 days of such request, a special use permit to carry out mineral exploration activities under the Oak Flat Withdrawal Area from existing drill pads located outside the Area, if the activities would not disturb the surface of the Area; and
(ii) if so requested by Resolution Copper, within 90 days of such request, a special use permit to carry out mineral exploration activities within the Oak Flat Withdrawal Area (but not within the Oak Flat Campground), if the activities are conducted from a single exploratory drill pad which is located to reasonably minimize visual and noise impacts on the Campground.
(7) COSTS.—As a condition of the land exchange under this section, Resolution Copper shall agree to pay, without compensation, all costs that are—
(8) USE OF FEDERAL LAND.—The Federal land to be conveyed to Resolution Copper under this section shall be available to Resolution Copper for mining and related activities subject to and in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws pertaining to mining and related activities on land in private ownership.
(9) ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Secretary shall carry out the land exchange in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
(B) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.—Prior to conveying Federal land under this section, the Secretary shall prepare a single environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), which shall be used as the basis for all decisions under Federal law related to the proposed mine and the Resolution mine plan of operations and any related major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, including the granting of any permits, rights-of-way, or approvals for the construction of associated power, water, transportation, processing, tailings, waste disposal, or other ancillary facilities.
(C) IMPACTS ON CULTURAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES.—The environmental impact statement prepared under subparagraph (B) shall—
(D) EFFECT.—Nothing in this paragraph precludes the Secretary from using separate environmental review documents prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) or other applicable laws for exploration or other activities not involving—
(d) Conveyance and management of non-Federal land.—
(1) CONVEYANCE.—On receipt of title to the Federal land, Resolution Copper shall simultaneously convey—
(A) to the Secretary, all right, title, and interest that the Secretary determines to be acceptable in and to—
(i) the approximately 147 acres of land located in Gila County, Arizona, depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Non-Federal Parcel–Turkey Creek” and dated March 2011;
(ii) the approximately 148 acres of land located in Yavapai County, Arizona, depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Non-Federal Parcel–Tangle Creek” and dated March 2011;
(iii) the approximately 149 acres of land located in Maricopa County, Arizona, depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Non-Federal Parcel–Cave Creek” and dated March 2011;
(B) to the Secretary of the Interior, all right, title, and interest that the Secretary of the Interior determines to be acceptable in and to—
(i) the approximately 3,050 acres of land located in Pinal County, Arizona, identified as “Lands to DOI” as generally depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Non-Federal Parcel–Lower San Pedro River” and dated July 6, 2011;
(2) MANAGEMENT OF ACQUIRED LAND.—
(A) LAND ACQUIRED BY THE SECRETARY.—
(ii) BOUNDARY REVISION.—On the acquisition of land by the Secretary under this section, the boundaries of the national forest shall be modified to reflect the inclusion of the acquired land.
(iii) LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND.—For purposes of section 7 of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 4601–9), the boundaries of a national forest in which land acquired by the Secretary is located shall be deemed to be the boundaries of that forest as in existence on January 1, 1965.
(B) LAND ACQUIRED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.—
(i) SAN PEDRO NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA.—
(ii) DRIPPING SPRINGS.—Land acquired by the Secretary of the Interior under paragraph (1)(B)(ii) shall be managed in accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and applicable land use plans.
(iii) LAS CIENEGAS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA.—Land acquired by the Secretary of the Interior under paragraph (1)(B)(iii) shall be added to, and administered as part of, the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area in accordance with the laws (including regulations) applicable to the Conservation Area.
(e) Value adjustment payment to United States.—
(1) ANNUAL PRODUCTION REPORTING.—
(A) REPORT REQUIRED.—As a condition of the land exchange under this section, Resolution Copper shall submit to the Secretary of the Interior an annual report indicating the quantity of locatable minerals produced during the preceding calendar year in commercial quantities from the Federal land conveyed to Resolution Copper under subsection (c). The first report is required to be submitted not later than February 15 of the first calendar year beginning after the date of commencement of production of valuable locatable minerals in commercial quantities from such Federal land. The reports shall be submitted February 15 of each calendar year thereafter.
(2) PAYMENT ON PRODUCTION.—If the cumulative production of valuable locatable minerals produced in commercial quantities from the Federal land conveyed to Resolution Copper under subsection (c) exceeds the quantity of production of locatable minerals from the Federal land used in the income capitalization approach analysis prepared under subsection (c)(4)(C), Resolution Copper shall pay to the United States, by not later than March 15 of each applicable calendar year, a value adjustment payment for the quantity of excess production at the same rate assumed for the income capitalization approach analysis prepared under subsection (c)(4)(C).
(3) STATE LAW UNAFFECTED.—Nothing in this subsection modifies, expands, diminishes, amends, or otherwise affects any State law relating to the imposition, application, timing, or collection of a State excise or severance tax.
(4) USE OF FUNDS.—
(A) SEPARATE FUND.—All funds paid to the United States under this subsection shall be deposited in a special fund established in the Treasury and shall be available, in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts, to the Secretary and the Secretary of the Interior only for the purposes authorized by subparagraph (B).
(f) Withdrawal.—Subject to valid existing rights, Apache Leap and any land acquired by the United States under this section are withdrawn from all forms of—
(g) Apache leap special management area.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—To further the purpose of this section, the Secretary shall establish a special management area consisting of Apache Leap, which shall be known as the “Apache Leap Special Management Area” (referred to in this subsection as the “special management area”).
(3) SURRENDER OF MINING AND EXTRACTION RIGHTS.—As a condition of the land exchange under subsection (c), Resolution Copper shall surrender to the United States, without compensation, all rights held under the mining laws and any other law to commercially extract minerals under Apache Leap.
(4) MANAGEMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall manage the special management area in a manner that furthers the purposes described in paragraph (2).
(B) AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES.—The activities that are authorized in the special management area are—
(i) installation of seismic monitoring equipment on the surface and subsurface to protect the resources located within the special management area;
(5) PLAN.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with affected Indian tribes, the Town, Resolution Copper, and other interested members of the public, shall prepare a management plan for the Apache Leap Special Management Area.
(B) CONSIDERATIONS.—In preparing the plan under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall consider whether additional measures are necessary to—
(6) MINING ACTIVITIES.—The provisions of this subsection shall not impose additional restrictions on mining activities carried out by Resolution Copper adjacent to, or outside of, the Apache Leap area beyond those otherwise applicable to mining activities on privately owned land under Federal, State, and local laws, rules and regulations.
(h) Conveyances to town of Superior, Arizona.—
(1) CONVEYANCES.—On request from the Town and subject to the provisions of this subsection, the Secretary shall convey to the Town the following:
(A) Approximately 30 acres of land as depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Federal Parcel–Fairview Cemetery” and dated March 2011.
(B) The reversionary interest and any reserved mineral interest of the United States in the approximately 265 acres of land located in Pinal County, Arizona, as depicted on the map entitled “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2011–Federal Reversionary Interest–Superior Airport” and dated March 2011.
(2) PAYMENT.—The Town shall pay to the Secretary the market value for each parcel of land or interest in land acquired under this subsection, as determined by appraisals conducted in accordance with subsection (c)(4).
(3) SISK ACT.—Any payment received by the Secretary from the Town under this subsection shall be deposited in the fund established under Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the “Sisk Act”) (16 U.S.C. 484a) and shall be made available to the Secretary for the acquisition of land or interests in land in Region 3 of the Forest Service.
(i) Miscellaneous provisions.—
(1) REVOCATION OF ORDERS; WITHDRAWAL.—
(A) REVOCATION OF ORDERS.—Any public land order that withdraws the Federal land from appropriation or disposal under a public land law shall be revoked to the extent necessary to permit disposal of the land.
(B) WITHDRAWAL.—On the date of enactment of this Act, if the Federal land or any Federal interest in the non-Federal land to be exchanged under subsection (c) is not withdrawn or segregated from entry and appropriation under a public land law (including mining and mineral leasing laws and the Geothermal Steam Act of 1970 (30 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.)), the land or interest shall be withdrawn, without further action required by the Secretary concerned, from entry and appropriation. The withdrawal shall be terminated—
(ii) if Resolution Copper notifies the Secretary in writing that it has elected to withdraw from the land exchange pursuant to section 206(d) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended (43 U.S.C. 1716(d)).
(C) RIGHTS OF RESOLUTION COPPER.—Nothing in this section shall interfere with, limit, or otherwise impair, the unpatented mining claims or rights currently held by Resolution Copper on the Federal land, nor in any way change, diminish, qualify, or otherwise impact Resolution Copper’s rights and ability to conduct activities on the Federal land under such unpatented mining claims and the general mining laws of the United States, including the permitting or authorization of such activities.
(2) MAPS, ESTIMATES, AND DESCRIPTIONS.—
(A) MINOR ERRORS.—The Secretary concerned and Resolution Copper may correct, by mutual agreement, any minor errors in any map, acreage estimate, or description of any land conveyed or exchanged under this section.
(3) PUBLIC ACCESS IN AND AROUND OAK FLAT CAMPGROUND.—As a condition of conveyance of the Federal land, Resolution Copper shall agree to provide access to the surface of the Oak Flat Campground to members of the public, including Indian tribes, to the maximum extent practicable, consistent with health and safety requirements, until such time as the operation of the mine precludes continued public access for safety reasons, as determined by Resolution Copper.
(a) Definitions.—In this section—
(b) Land exchange.—
(1) CONVEYANCE OF BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND.—In exchange for the land described in paragraph (2), the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to River Bottom Farms of La Paz County, Arizona, all right, title and interest of the United States in and to certain Federal land administered by the Secretary through the Bureau of Land Management consisting of a total of approximately 80 acres in Riverside County, California, identified as “Parcel A” on Map 1. The conveyed land shall be subject to valid existing rights, including easements, rights-of-way, utility lines, and any other valid encumbrances on the land as of the date of the conveyance under this section.
(2) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the conveyance of the Federal land under paragraph (1), River Bottom Farms shall convey to the United States all right, title, and interest of River Bottom Farms in and to two parcels of land contiguous to the Cibola National Wildlife Refuge in La Paz County, Arizona, consisting of a total of approximately 40 acres in La Paz County, Arizona, identified as “Parcel 301–05–005B–9” and “Parcel 301–05–008–0” on Map 2.
(3) EQUAL VALUE EXCHANGE.—The values of the Federal land and non-Federal land to be exchanged under this section shall be equal or equalized by the payment of cash to the Secretary by River Bottom Farms, if appropriate, pursuant to section 206(b) of the Federal Land Policy Management Act (43 U.S.C. 1716(b)). The value of the land shall be determined by the Secretary through an appraisal performed by a qualified appraiser mutually agreed to by the Secretary and River Bottom Farms and performed in conformance with the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (U.S. Department of Justice, December 2000). If the final appraised value of the non-Federal land (“Parcel 301–05–005B–9” and “Parcel 301–05–008–0” on Map 2) exceeds the value of the Federal land (“Parcel A” on Map 1), the surplus value of the non-Federal land shall be considered to be a donation by River Bottom Farms to the United States.
(4) EXCHANGE TIMETABLE.—The Secretary shall complete the land exchange under this section not later than 1 year after the date of the expiration of any existing Bureau of Land Management lease agreement or agreements affecting the Federal land (“Parcel A” on Map 1) to be exchanged under this section, unless the Secretary and River Bottom Farms mutually agree to extend such deadline.
(a) Authority To accept lands outside boundaries of Inyo National Forest.—In any land exchange involving the conveyance of certain National Forest System land located within the boundaries of Inyo National Forest in California, as shown on the map titled “Federal Parcel Mammoth Base Facility” and dated June 29, 2011, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept for acquisition in the exchange certain non-Federal lands in California lying outside the boundaries of Inyo National Forest, as shown on the maps titled “DWP Parcel – Interagency Visitor Center Parcel” and “DWP Parcel – Town of Bishop Parcel” and dated June 29, 2011, if the Secretary determines that acquisition of the non-Federal lands is desirable for National Forest System purposes.
(b) Cash equalization payment; use.—In an exchange described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Agriculture may accept a cash equalization payment in excess of 25 percent. Any such cash equalization payment shall be deposited into the account in the Treasury of the United States established by Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the Sisk Act; 16 U.S.C. 484a) and shall be made available to the Secretary for the acquisition of land for addition to the National Forest System.
(a) Land exchange required.—If not later than three years after enactment of this Act, the Utilities District conveys to the Secretary of the Interior all right, title, and interest of the Utilities District in and to Parcel A, subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary of the Interior may require, the Secretary of Agriculture shall convey Parcel B to the Utilities District, subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary of Agriculture may require, including the reservation of easements for all roads and trails considered to be necessary for administrative purposes and to ensure public access to National Forest System lands.
(b) Availability of maps and legal descriptions.—Maps are entitled “Trinity County Land Exchange Act of 2014 – Parcel A” and “Trinity County Land Exchange Act of 2014 – Parcel B”, both dated March 24, 2014. The maps shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Chief of the Forest Service and the appropriate office of the Bureau of Land Management. With the agreement of the parties to the conveyances under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture may make technical corrections to the maps and legal descriptions.
(c) Equal value exchange.—
(1) LAND EXCHANGE PROCESS.—The land exchange under this section shall be an equal value exchange. Except as provided in paragraph (3), the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall carry out the land exchange in accordance with section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716).
(2) APPRAISAL OF PARCELS.—The values of Parcel A and Parcel B shall by determined by appraisals performed by a qualified appraiser mutually agreed to by the parties to the conveyances under subsection (a). The appraisals shall be approved by the Secretary of Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture and conducted in conformity with the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land.
(3) CASH EQUALIZATION.—If the values of Parcel A and Parcel B are not equal, the values may be equalized through the use of a cash equalization payment, however, if the final appraised value of Parcel A exceeds the value of Parcel B, the surplus value of Parcel A shall be considered to be a donation by the Utilities District. Notwithstanding section 206(b) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716(b)), a cash equalization payment may be made in excess of 25 percent of the appraised value of the Parcel B.
(d) Disposition of proceeds.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Any cash equalization payment received by the United States under subsection (c) shall be deposited in the fund established under Public Law 90–171 (16 U.S.C. 484a; commonly known as the Sisk Act).
(e) Survey.—The exact acreage and legal description of Parcel A and Parcel B shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture.
(f) Costs.—As a condition of the land exchange under subsection (a), the Utilities District shall pay the costs associated with—
(g) Management of acquired land.—Upon the acquisition of Parcel A, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Redding Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management, shall administer Parcel A as public land in accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and the laws and regulations applicable to public land administered by the Bureau of Land Management, except that public recreation and public access to and for recreation shall be the highest and best use of Parcel A.
(h) Completion of land exchange.—Once the Utilities District offers to convey Parcel A to the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture shall complete the conveyance of Parcel B not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act.
(i) Definitions.—For the purposes of this section:
(1) PARCEL A.—The term “Parcel A” means the approximately 47 acres of land, known as the “Sky Ranch parcel”, adjacent to public land administered by the Redding Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management as depicted on the map entitled “Trinity County Land Exchange Act of 2014 – Parcel A”, dated March 24, 2014, more particularly described as a portion of Mineral Survey 178, south Highway 299, generally located in the S1/2 of the S1/2 of Section 7 and the N1/2 of the N1/2 of Section 8, Township 33 North, Range 10 West, Mount Diablo Meridian.
(2) PARCEL B.—The term “Parcel B” means the approximately 100 acres land in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest in the State of California near the Weaverville Airport in Trinity County as depicted on the map entitled “Trinity County Land Exchange Act of 2014 – Parcel B” dated March 24, 2014, more particularly described as Lot 8, SW1/4 SE1/4, and S1/2 N1/2 SE, Section 31, Township 34 North, Range 9 West, Mount Diablo Meridian.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Conveyance of land to Idaho County.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after notification by the County and subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary shall convey to the County, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the land described in paragraph (2).
(2) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in paragraph (1) consists of approximately 31 acres of land managed by the Bureau of Land Management and generally depicted on the map as “Conveyance_Area”.
(3) MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall finalize the legal description of the parcel to be conveyed under this section.
(4) USE OF CONVEYED LAND.—The land conveyed under this section shall be used only—
(B) for any other public purpose consistent with uses allowed under the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.).
(5) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—The Secretary shall require the County to pay all survey costs and other administrative costs necessary for the preparation and completion of any patents for, and transfers of title to, the land described in paragraph (2).
(6) CONDITIONS.—As a condition of the conveyance under paragraph (1), the County shall agree—
(A) to pay any administrative costs associated with the conveyance including the costs of any environmental, wildlife, cultural, or historical resources studies;
(a) Purposes.—The purposes of this section are—
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) DISTRICT.—The term “District” means Minnesota Independent School District number 318 in Grand Rapids, Minnesota.
(2) FEDERAL LAND.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The term “Federal land” means the parcel of approximately 1.3 acres of United States Geological Survey land identified as USGS Parcel 91-016-4111 on the map, which was transferred to the Department of the Interior by the General Services Administration by a letter dated July 22, 1965.
(3) MAP.—The term “map” means each of the maps entitled “USGS and School Parcel Locations ” and dated January 15, 2014.
(c) Authorization of exchange.—If the District offers to convey to the United States all right, title, and interest of the District in and to the non-Federal land, the Secretary shall—
(d) Valuation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The value of the Federal land and non-Federal land to be exchanged under subsection (c) shall be determined—
(2) APPROVAL.—Appraisals conducted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted to the Secretary for approval.
(a) Land conveyance to Yerington, Nevada.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(B) FEDERAL LAND.—The term “Federal land” means the land located in Lyon County and Mineral County, Nevada, that is identified on the map as “City of Yerington Sustainable Development Conveyance Lands”.
(2) CONVEYANCES OF LAND TO CITY OF YERINGTON, NEVADA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, subject to valid existing rights and to such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines to be necessary and notwithstanding the land use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712, 1713), the Secretary shall convey to the City, subject to the agreement of the City, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Federal land identified on the map.
(B) APPRAISAL TO DETERMINE FAIR MARKET VALUE.—The Secretary shall determine the fair market value of the Federal land to be conveyed—
(i) in accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); and
(C) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management.
(D) APPLICABLE LAW.—Beginning on the date on which the Federal land is conveyed to the City, the development of and conduct of activities on the Federal land shall be subject to all applicable Federal laws (including regulations).
(b) Conveyance of certain Federal land to City of Carlin, Nevada.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(B) FEDERAL LAND.—The term “Federal land” means the approximately 1,329 acres of land located in the City of Carlin, Nevada, that is identified on the map as “Carlin Selected Parcels”.
(2) CONVEYANCE.—Subject to valid existing rights and notwithstanding the land use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712, 1713), the Secretary shall convey to the City all right, title, and interest of the United States to and in the Federal land.
(3) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the conveyance authorized under paragraph (2), the City shall pay to the Secretary an amount equal to the appraised value of the Federal land, as determined under paragraph (4).
(5) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management.
(6) COSTS.—At closing for the conveyance authorized under paragraph (2) the City shall pay or reimburse the Secretary, as appropriate, for the reasonable transaction and administrative personnel costs associated with the conveyance authorized under such paragraph, including the costs of title searches, maps, and boundary and cadastral surveys.
(7) RELEASE OF UNITED STATES.—Upon making the conveyance under paragraph (2), notwithstanding any other provision of law, the United States is released from any and all liabilities or claims of any kind or nature arising from the presence, release, or threat of release of any hazardous substance, pollutant, contaminant, petroleum product (or derivative of a petroleum product of any kind), solid waste, mine materials or mining related features (including tailings, overburden, waste rock, mill remnants, pits, or other hazards resulting from the presence of mining related features) on the Federal land in existence on or before the date of the conveyance.
(c) Conveyance to the City of Fernley, Nevada.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(B) FEDERAL LAND.—The term “Federal land” means the land located in the City that is identified as “Proposed Sale Parcels” on the map.
(2) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Subject to valid existing rights and notwithstanding the land use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712, 1713), not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary receives a request from the City for the conveyance of the Federal land, the Secretary shall convey to the City, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States to and in the Federal land.
(3) USE OF CONVEYED LAND.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Federal land conveyed under paragraph (2)—
(i) may be used by the City for any public purposes consistent with the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.); and
(4) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management.
(5) RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY.—The City and the Commissioner of Reclamation may retain easements or rights-of-way on the Federal land to be conveyed, including easements or rights-of-way that the Commissioner of Reclamation determines are necessary to carry out—
(6) COSTS.—At closing for the conveyance authorized under paragraph (2), the City shall pay or reimburse the Secretary, as appropriate, for the reasonable transaction and administrative personnel costs associated with the conveyance authorized under that paragraph, including the costs of title searches, maps, and boundary and cadastral surveys.
(7) RELEASE OF UNITED STATES.—On conveyance of the Federal land under paragraph (2), notwithstanding any other provision of law, the United States is released from any and all liabilities or claims of any kind or nature arising from the presence, release, or threat of release of any hazardous substance, pollutant, contaminant, petroleum product (or derivative of a petroleum product of any kind), solid waste, mine materials, or mining related features (including tailings, overburden, waste rock, mill remnants, pits, or other hazards resulting from the presence of mining related features) on the Federal land in existence before or on the date of the conveyance.
(8) ACQUISITION OF FEDERAL REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—
(A) REQUEST.—After the date of conveyance of the Federal land under paragraph (2), the City may submit to the Secretary a request to acquire the Federal reversionary interest in all or any portion of the Federal land.
(B) APPRAISAL.—
(C) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—If, by the date that is 1 year after the date of completion of the appraisal under subparagraph (B), the City submits to the Secretary an offer to acquire the Federal reversionary requested under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall, not later than the date that is 30 days after the date on which the offer is submitted, convey to the City the reversionary interest covered by the offer.
(d) Conveyance of Federal land, Storey County, Nevada.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(B) FEDERAL LAND.—The term “Federal land” means the approximately 1,745 acres of Federal land identified on the map as “BLM Owned–County Request Transfer”.
(C) MAP.—The term “map” means the map entitled “Restoring Storey County Act” and dated November 20, 2012.
(2) MINING CLAIM VALIDITY REVIEW.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall carry out an expedited program to examine each unpatented mining claim (including each unpatented mining claim for which a patent application has been filed) within the mining townsite.
(B) DETERMINATION OF VALIDITY.—With respect to a mining claim described in subparagraph (A), if the Secretary determines that the elements of a contest are present, the Secretary shall immediately determine the validity of the mining claim.
(C) DECLARATION BY SECRETARY.—If the Secretary determines a mining claim to be invalid under subparagraph (B), as soon as practicable after the date of the determination, the Secretary shall declare the mining claim to be null and void.
(D) TREATMENT OF VALID MINING CLAIMS.—
(3) CONVEYANCE TO COUNTY.—
(A) CONVEYANCE.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights and notwithstanding the land use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712, 1713), after completing the mining claim validity review under paragraph (2)(B), if requested by the County, the Secretary shall convey to the County, by quitclaim deed, all surface rights of the United States in and to the Federal land, including any improvements on the Federal land, in accordance with this paragraph.
(B) VALID MINING CLAIMS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—With respect to each parcel of land located in a mining townsite subject to a valid mining claim, the Secretary shall—
(ii) PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS.—Each valid mining claim shall be subject to each procedure and requirement described in section 9 of the Act of December 29, 1916 (43 U.S.C. 299) (commonly known as the “Stockraising Homestead Act of 1916”) (including regulations).
(4) RECIPIENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a mining townsite conveyed under paragraph (3)(B)(i)(II) for which a valid interest is proven by 1 or more individuals in accordance with chapter 244.2825 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the County shall reconvey the property to the 1 or more individuals by appropriate deed or other legal conveyance in accordance with that chapter.
(5) VALID EXISTING RIGHTS.—The conveyance of a mining townsite under paragraph (3) shall be subject to valid existing rights, including any easement or other right-of-way or lease in existence as of the date of the conveyance.
(6) WITHDRAWALS.—Subject to valid rights in existence on the date of enactment of this Act, and except as otherwise provided in this Act, the mining townsite is withdrawn from—
(7) SURVEY.—A mining townsite to be conveyed by the United States under paragraph (3) shall be sufficiently surveyed as a whole to legally describe the land for patent conveyance.
(8) CONVEYANCE OF TERMINATED MINING CLAIMS.—If a mining claim determined by the Secretary to be valid under paragraph (2)(B) is abandoned, invalidated, or otherwise returned to the Bureau of Land Management, the mining claim shall be—
(e) Elko Motocross land conveyance.—
(2) AUTHORIZATION OF CONVEYANCE.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, subject to valid existing rights and the provisions of this subsection, if requested by the county the Secretary shall convey to the county, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the land described in paragraph (3).
(3) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in paragraph (2) consists of approximately 275 acres of land managed by the Bureau of Land Management, Elko District, Nevada, as generally depicted on the map as “Elko Motocross Park”.
(4) MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—
(5) USE OF CONVEYED LAND.—The land conveyed under this subsection shall be used only as a motocross, bicycle, off-highway vehicle, or stock car racing area, or for any other public purpose consistent with uses allowed under the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.).
(f) Land to be held in trust for the Te-moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada (Elko Band).—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(A) MAP.—The term “map” means the map entitled “Te-moak Tribal Land Expansion” and dated April 19, 2013.
(2) LAND TO BE HELD IN TRUST.—Subject to valid existing rights, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the land described in paragraph (3)—
(3) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in paragraph (2) is the approximately 373 acres of land administered by the Bureau of Land Management, as generally depicted on the map as “Expansion Area”.
(4) MAP.—The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management.
(5) SURVEY.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete a survey of the boundary lines to establish the boundaries of the land taken into trust under paragraph (2).
(6) USE OF TRUST LAND.—
(A) GAMING.—Land taken into trust under paragraph (2) shall not be eligible, or considered to have been taken into trust, for class II gaming or class III gaming (as those terms are defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2703)).
(B) GENERAL USES.—
(ii) OTHER USES.—If the Tribe uses any portion of the land taken into trust under paragraph (2) for a purpose other than a purpose described in clause (i), the Tribe shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is equal to the fair market value of the portion of the land, as determined by an appraisal.
(C) THINNING; LANDSCAPE RESTORATION.—With respect to the land taken into trust under paragraph (2), the Secretary, in consultation and coordination with the Tribe, may carry out any fuels reduction and other landscape restoration activities on the land that is beneficial to the Tribe and the Bureau of Land Management.
(g) Naval Air Station Fallon land conveyance.—
(1) TRANSFER OF DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR LAND.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the Secretary of the Navy, without reimbursement, the Federal land described in subparagraph (B).
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) FEDERAL LAND.—The term “Federal land” means the approximately 19 acres of Federal surface estate generally depicted as “Lands Authorized for Conveyance” on the map.
(2) LANDOWNER.—The term “landowner” means the plaintiffs in the case styled Blancett v. United States Department of the Interior, et al., No. 10–cv–00254–JAP–KBM, United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.
(b) Conveyance of certain Federal land in San Juan County, New Mexico.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—On request of the landowner, the Secretary shall, under such terms and conditions as the Secretary may prescribe and subject to valid existing rights, convey to the landowner all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to any portion of the Federal land (including any improvements or appurtenances to the Federal land) by sale.
(2) SURVEY; ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—
(3) CONSIDERATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As consideration for the conveyance of the Federal land under paragraph (1), the landowner shall pay to the Secretary an amount equal to the fair market value of the Federal land conveyed, as determined under subparagraph (B).
(4) DISPOSITION AND USE OF PROCEEDS.—
(a) Conveyance required.—On the request of Brigham Young University submitted to the Secretary of Agriculture not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey, not later than one year after receiving the request, to Brigham Young University all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to an approximately 80-acre parcel of National Forest System land in the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest in the State of Utah, as generally depicted on the map entitled “Upper Y Mountain Trail and Y Conveyance Act” and dated June 6, 2013, subject to valid existing rights and by quitclaim deed.
(b) Consideration.—
(1) CONSIDERATION REQUIRED.—As consideration for the land conveyed under subsection (a), Brigham Young University shall pay to the Secretary an amount equal to the fair market value of the land, as determined by an appraisal approved by the Secretary and conducted in conformity with the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions and section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716).
(c) public access to Y mountain trail.—After the conveyance under subsection (a), Brigham Young University will—
(d) Survey and Administrative Costs.—The exact acreage and legal description of the land to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. Brigham Young University shall pay the reasonable costs of survey, appraisal, and any administrative analyses required by law.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) MAP.—The term “map” means the map entitled “Proposed Fruit Heights City Conveyance” and dated September 13, 2012.
(b) In general.—The Secretary shall convey to the City, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the National Forest System land.
(c) Survey.—
(d) Easement.—As a condition of the conveyance under subsection (b), the Secretary shall reserve an easement to the National Forest System land for the Bonneville Shoreline Trail.
(e) Use of national forest system land.—As a condition of the conveyance under subsection (b), the City shall use the National Forest System land only for public purposes.
(f) Reversionary Interest.—In the quitclaim deed to the City for the National Forest System land, the Secretary shall provide that the National Forest System land shall revert to the Secretary, at the election of the Secretary, if the National Forest System land is used for other than a public purpose.
(a) Conveyance required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary of Energy shall convey to the Community Reuse Organization of the Hanford Site (in this section referred to as the “Organization”) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to two parcels of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 1,341 acres and 300 acres, respectively, of the Hanford Reservation, as requested by the Organization on May 31, 2011, and October 13, 2011, and as depicted within the proposed boundaries on the map titled “Attachment 2–Revised Map” included in the October 13, 2011, letter.
(b) Consideration.—As consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a), the Organization shall pay to the United States an amount equal to the estimated fair market value of the conveyed real property, as determined by the Secretary of Energy, except that the Secretary may convey the property without consideration or for consideration below the estimated fair market value of the property if the Organization—
(c) Expedited Notification to Congress.—Except as provided in subsection (d)(2), the enactment of this section shall be construed to satisfy any notice to Congress otherwise required for the land conveyance required by this section.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Conveyance.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Upon the request of the State submitted to the Secretary not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey to the State, without consideration and by quitclaim deed, all right, title and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of National Forest System land described in paragraph (2).
(2) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land referred to in paragraph (1) is approximately 10 acres of National Forest System land located on the Black Hills National Forest, in Crook County, State of Wyoming more specifically described as the E½ NE¼ NW¼ SE¼ less the south 50 feet, W½ NW¼ NE¼ SE¼ less the south 50 feet, Section 24, Township 52 North, Range 61 West Sixth P.M.
(3) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The conveyance under paragraph (1) shall be—
(B) made notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (a) of section 1 of Public Law 104–276.
(c) Amendments.—Section 1 of the Act of October 9, 1996 (Public Law 104–276) is amended—
(a) Program to improve Federal permit coordination.—Section 365 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15924) is amended—
(3) in subsection (b)(2), by striking “Wyoming, Montana, Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico” and inserting “the States in which Project offices are located”;
(5) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following: “(e) Report to Congress.—Not later than February 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 and each February 1 thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the Chairman and ranking minority Member of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, which shall include—
(b) BLM oil and gas permit processing fee.—Section 35 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 191) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(d) BLM oil and gas permit processing fee.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2026, the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, shall collect a fee for each new application for a permit to drill that is submitted to the Secretary.
“(2) AMOUNT.—The amount of the fee shall be $9,500 for each new application, as indexed for United States dollar inflation from October 1, 2015 (as measured by the Consumer Price Index).
“(3) USE.—Of the fees collected under this subsection for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall transfer—
(c) BLM Permit Processing Improvement Fund.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 35(c) of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 191(c)) is amended by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:
“(3) USE OF FUND.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Fund shall be available to the Secretary of the Interior for expenditure, without further appropriation and without fiscal year limitation, for the coordination and processing of oil and gas use authorizations on onshore Federal and Indian trust mineral estate land.
“(4) RENTAL ACCOUNT.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall use the Rental Account for—
“(i) the coordination and processing of oil and gas use authorizations on onshore Federal and Indian trust mineral estate land under the jurisdiction of the Project offices identified under section 365(d) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15924(d)); and
“(B) ALLOCATION.—In determining the allocation of the Rental Account among Project offices for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall consider—
“(i) the number of applications for permit to drill received in a Project office during the previous fiscal year;
(2) INTEREST ON OVERPAYMENT ADJUSTMENT.—Section 111(h) of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act of 1982 (30 U.S.C. 1721(h)) is amended in the first sentence by striking “the rate” and all that follows through the period at the end of the sentence and inserting “a rate equal to the sum of the Federal short-term rate determined under section 6621(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 plus 1 percentage point.”.
(a) Authorization.—Section 17(b)(1) of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 226(b)(1)) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A), in the third sentence, by inserting “, except as provided in subparagraph (C)” after “by oral bidding”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
“(C) In order to diversify and expand the Nation’s onshore leasing program to ensure the best return to the Federal taxpayer, reduce fraud, and secure the leasing process, the Secretary may conduct onshore lease sales through Internet-based bidding methods. Each individual Internet-based lease sale shall conclude within 7 days.”.
(b) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the tenth Internet-based lease sale conducted under the amendment made by subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall analyze the first 10 such lease sales and report to Congress the findings of the analysis. The report shall include—
(1) estimates on increases or decreases in such lease sales, compared to sales conducted by oral bidding, in—
(2) an estimate on the total cost or savings to the Department of the Interior as a result of such sales, compared to sales conducted by oral bidding; and
(3) an evaluation of the demonstrated or expected effectiveness of different structures for lease sales which may provide an opportunity to better maximize bidder participation, ensure the highest return to the Federal taxpayers, minimize opportunities for fraud or collusion, and ensure the security and integrity of the leasing process.
Section 402 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1752) is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)—
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(2) CONTINUATION OF TERMS UNDER NEW PERMIT OR LEASE.—The terms and conditions in a grazing permit or lease that has expired, or was terminated due to a grazing preference transfer, shall be continued under a new permit or lease until the date on which the Secretary concerned completes any environmental analysis and documentation for the permit or lease required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and other applicable laws.
“(3) COMPLETION OF PROCESSING.—As of the date on which the Secretary concerned completes the processing of a grazing permit or lease in accordance with paragraph (2), the permit or lease may be canceled, suspended, or modified, in whole or in part.
“(4) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS.—The Secretary concerned shall seek to conduct environmental reviews on an allotment or multiple allotment basis, to the extent practicable, if the allotments share similar ecological conditions, for purposes of compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and other applicable laws.”;
(3) by inserting after subsection (g) the following: “(h) National environmental policy act of 1969.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—The issuance of a grazing permit or lease by the Secretary concerned may be categorically excluded from the requirement to prepare an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) if— “(B) the Secretary concerned— “(2) TRAILING AND CROSSING.—The trailing and crossing of livestock across public land and National Forest System land and the implementation of trailing and crossing practices by the Secretary concerned may be categorically excluded from the requirement to prepare an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this section as the “Secretary”) shall establish a fee in accordance with this section for the issuance of a special use permit for the use and occupancy of National Forest System land for recreational residence purposes.
(b) Interim fee.—During the period beginning on January 1, 2014, and ending on the last day of the calendar year during which the current appraisal cycle is completed under subsection (c), the Secretary shall assess an interim annual fee for recreational residences on National Forest System land that is an amount equal to the lesser of—
(1) the fee determined under the Cabin User Fee Fairness Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.), subject to the requirement that any increase over the fee assessed during the previous year shall be limited to not more than 25 percent; or
(c) Completion of current appraisal cycle.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete the current appraisal cycle, including receipt of timely second appraisals, for recreational residences on National Forest System land in accordance with the Cabin User Fee Fairness Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.) (referred to in this section as the “current appraisal cycle”).
(d) Lot value.—Only appraisals conducted and approved by the Secretary in accordance with the Cabin User Fee Fairness Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.) during the current appraisal cycle shall be used to establish the base value assigned to the lot, subject to the adjustment in subsection (e). If a second appraisal—
(e) Adjustment.—On the date of completion of the current appraisal cycle, and before assessing a fee under subsection (f), the Secretary shall make a 1-time adjustment to the value of each appraised lot on which a recreational residence is located to reflect any change in value occurring after the date of the most recent appraisal for the lot, in accordance with the 4th quarter of 2012 National Association of Homebuilders/Wells Fargo Housing Opportunity Index.
(f) Annual fee.—
(1) BASE.—After the date on which appraised lot values have been adjusted in accordance with subsection (e), the annual fee assessed prospectively by the Secretary for recreational residences on National Forest System land shall be in accordance with the following tiered fee structure:
| Fee Tier | Approximate Percent of Permits Nationally | Fee Amount |
| Tier 1 | 6 percent | $650 |
| Tier 2 | 16 percent | $1,150 |
| Tier 3 | 26 percent | $1,650 |
| Tier 4 | 22 percent | $2,150 |
| Tier 5 | 10 percent | $2,650 |
| Tier 6 | 5 percent | $3,150 |
| Tier 7 | 5 percent | $3,650 |
| Tier 8 | 3 percent | $4,150 |
| Tier 9 | 3 percent | $4,650 |
| Tier 10 | 3 percent | $5,150 |
| Tier 11 | 1 percent | $5,650. |
(2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—The Secretary shall increase or decrease the annual fees set forth in the table under paragraph (1) to reflect changes in the Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce, applied on a 5-year rolling average.
(3) ACCESS AND OCCUPANCY ADJUSTMENT.—
(g) Periodic review.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date that is 10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report that—
(A) analyzes the annual fees set forth in the table under subsection (f) to ensure that the fees reflect fair value for the use of the land for recreational residence purposes, taking into account all use limitations and restrictions (including any limitations and restrictions imposed by the Secretary); and
(h) Cabin transfer fees.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall establish a fee in the amount of $1,200 for the issuance of a new recreational residence permit due to a change of ownership of the recreational residence.
(2) ADJUSTMENTS.—The Secretary shall annually increase or decrease the transfer fee established under paragraph (1) to reflect changes in the Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce, applied on a 5-year rolling average.
(i) Effect.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section limits or restricts any right, title, or interest of the United States in or to any land or resource in the National Forest System.
(2) ALASKA.—The Secretary shall not establish or impose a fee or condition under this section for permits in the State of Alaska that is inconsistent with section 1303(d) of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3193(d)).
(j) Retention of fees.—
(k) Repeal of Cabin User Fee Fairness Act of 2000.—Effective on the date of the assessment of annual permit fees in accordance with subsection (f) (as certified to Congress by the Secretary), the Cabin User Fee Fairness Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.) is repealed.
Public Law 91–424 (16 U.S.C. 460w et seq.) is amended as follows:
(1) In the first section as follows:
(D) By inserting after “1985.” the following:
(2) In section 6 as follows:
(C) By adding after subsection (a) the following:
“(b) Federal use.—Notwithstanding subsection (c) of the first section—
“(1) the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating may operate, maintain, keep, locate, inspect, repair, and replace any Federal aid to navigation located at the Ashland Harbor Breakwater Light for as long as such aid is needed for navigational purposes; and
“(2) in carrying out the activities described in paragraph (1), such Secretary may enter, at any time, the Ashland Harbor Breakwater Light or any Federal aid to navigation at the Ashland Harbor Breakwater Light, for as long as such aid is needed for navigational purposes, without notice to the extent that it is not possible to provide advance notice.
(a) Purpose.—The purpose of this section is to establish the Blackstone River Valley National Historical Park—
(1) to help preserve, protect, and interpret the nationally significant resources that exemplify the industrial heritage of the Blackstone River Valley for the benefit and inspiration of future generations;
(2) to support the preservation, protection, and interpretation of the urban, rural, and agricultural landscape features (including the Blackstone River and Canal) of the region that provide an overarching context for the industrial heritage of the Blackstone River Valley;
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR.—The term “National Heritage Corridor” means the John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor.
(c) Blackstone river valley national historical park.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established in the States a unit of the National Park System, to be known as the “Blackstone River Valley National Historical Park”.
(2) HISTORIC SITES AND DISTRICTS.—The Park shall include—
(3) ACQUISITION OF LAND; PARK BOUNDARY.—
(A) LAND ACQUISITION.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may acquire land or interests in land that are considered contributing historic resources in the historic sites and districts described in paragraph (2)(B) for inclusion in the Park boundary by donation, purchase from a willing seller with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange.
(B) PARK BOUNDARY.—On a determination by the Secretary that a sufficient quantity of land or interests in land has been acquired to constitute a manageable park unit, the Secretary shall establish a boundary for the Park by publishing a boundary map in the Federal Register.
(C) OTHER RESOURCES.—The Secretary may include in the Park boundary any resources that are the subject of an agreement with the States or a subdivision of the States entered into under paragraph (4)(D).
(D) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—On the acquisition of additional land or interests in land under subparagraph (A), or on entering an agreement under subparagraph (C), the boundary of the Park shall be adjusted to reflect the acquisition or agreement by publishing a Park boundary map in the Federal Register.
(E) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The maps referred to in this paragraph shall be available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.
(4) ADMINISTRATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall administer land within the boundary of the Park in accordance with—
(ii) the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including—
(I) the National Park Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); and
(II) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.).
(B) GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this subsection, the Secretary shall prepare a general management plan for the Park—
(II) in accordance with section 12(b) of the National Park System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)).
(ii) REQUIREMENTS.—The plan shall consider ways to use preexisting or planned visitor facilities and recreational opportunities developed in the National Heritage Corridor, including—
(C) RELATED SITES.—The Secretary may provide technical assistance, visitor services, interpretive tours, and educational programs to sites and resources in the National Heritage Corridor that are located outside the boundary of the Park and associated with the purposes for which the Park is established.
(D) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—To further the purposes of this subsection and notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with the States, political subdivisions of the States, nonprofit organizations (including the local coordinating entity for the National Heritage Corridor), and other interested parties—
(ii) MATCHING REQUIREMENT.—As a condition of the receipt of funds under clause (i)(II), the Secretary shall require that any Federal funds made available under a cooperative agreement entered into under this paragraph are to be matched on a 1-to-1 basis by non-Federal funds.
(iii) REIMBURSEMENT.—Any payment made by the Secretary under clause (i)(ii) shall be subject to an agreement that the conversion, use, or disposal of the project for purposes that are inconsistent with the purposes of this subsection, as determined by the Secretary, shall result in a right of the United States to reimbursement of the greater of—
(5) DEDICATION; MEMORIAL.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Congress dedicates the Park to John H. Chafee, the former United States Senator from Rhode Island, in recognition of—
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) COMMISSION.—The term “Commission” means the Coltsville National Historical Park Advisory Commission established by subsection (k)(1).
(4) MAP.—The term “map” means the map entitled “Coltsville National Historical Park—Proposed Boundary”, numbered T25/102087, and dated May 11, 2010.
(b) Establishment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), there is established in the State a unit of the National Park System to be known as the “Coltsville National Historical Park”.
(2) CONDITIONS FOR ESTABLISHMENT.—The park shall not be established until the date on which the Secretary determines that—
(A) the Secretary has acquired by donation sufficient land or an interest in land within the boundary of the park to constitute a manageable unit;
(c) Boundaries.—The park shall include and provide appropriate interpretation and viewing of the following sites, as generally depicted on the map:
(d) Availability of map.—The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in appropriate offices of the National Park Service.
(e) Collections.—The Secretary may enter into a written agreement with the State of Connecticut State Library, Wadsworth Atheneum, and the Colt Trust, or other public entities, as appropriate, to gain appropriate access to Colt-related artifacts for the purposes of having items routinely on display in the East Armory or within other areas of the park to enhance the visitor experience.
(f) Administration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall administer the park in accordance with—
(B) the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including—
(i) the National Park Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); and
(ii) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.).
(g) Cooperative agreements.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—As the Secretary determines to be appropriate to carry out this section, the Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements to carry out this section, under which the Secretary may identify, interpret, restore, rehabilitate, and provide technical assistance for the preservation of nationally significant properties within the boundary of the park.
(2) RIGHT OF ACCESS.—A cooperative agreement entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that the Secretary, acting through the Director of the National Park Service, shall have the right of access at all reasonable times to all public portions of the property covered by the agreement for the purposes of—
(3) CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS.—No changes or alterations shall be made to any properties covered by a cooperative agreement entered into under paragraph (1) unless the Secretary and the other party to the agreement agree to the changes or alterations.
(4) CONVERSION, USE, OR DISPOSAL.—Any payment by the Secretary under this subsection shall be subject to an agreement that the conversion, use, or disposal of a project for purposes contrary to the purposes of this section, as determined by the Secretary, shall entitle the United States to reimbursement in an amount equal to the greater of—
(h) Acquisition of land.—
(i) Technical assistance and public interpretation.—The Secretary may provide technical assistance and public interpretation of related historic and cultural resources within the boundary of the historic district.
(j) Management plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 fiscal years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this section, the Secretary, in consultation with the Commission, shall complete a management plan for the park in accordance with—
(A) section 12(b) of Public Law 91–383 (commonly known as the “National Park Service General Authorities Act”) (16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)); and
(k) Coltsville National Historical Park Advisory Commission.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established a Commission to be known as the “Coltsville National Historical Park Advisory Commission”.
(2) DUTY.—The Commission shall advise the Secretary in the development and implementation of the management plan.
(3) MEMBERSHIP.—
(A) COMPOSITION.—The Commission shall be composed of 11 members, to be appointed by the Secretary, of whom—
(i) 2 members shall be appointed after consideration of recommendations submitted by the Governor of the State;
(ii) 1 member shall be appointed after consideration of recommendations submitted by the State Senate President;
(iii) 1 member shall be appointed after consideration of recommendations submitted by the Speaker of the State House of Representatives;
(iv) 2 members shall be appointed after consideration of recommendations submitted by the Mayor of Hartford, Connecticut;
(v) 2 members shall be appointed after consideration of recommendations submitted by Connecticut’s 2 United States Senators;
(vi) 1 member shall be appointed after consideration of recommendations submitted by Connecticut's First Congressional District Representative;
(7) CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall select a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson from among the members of the Commission.
(8) COMMISSION PERSONNEL MATTERS.—
(A) COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS.—
(ii) TRAVEL EXPENSES.—Members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for an employee of an agency under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from the home or regular place of business of the member in the performance of the duty of the Commission.
(9) FACA NONAPPLICABILITY.—Section 14(b) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Commission.
(10) TERMINATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Unless extended under subparagraph (B), the Commission shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Establishment.—
(1) REDESIGNATION OF FIRST STATE NATIONAL MONUMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The First State National Monument is redesignated as the First State National Historical Park, as generally depicted on the map.
(2) PURPOSES.—The purposes of the historical park are to preserve, protect, and interpret the nationally significant cultural and historic resources that are associated with—
(3) INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL HISTORIC SITES.—In addition to sites included in the historical park (as redesignated by paragraph (1)(A)) as of the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary may include the following sites within the boundary of the historical park, as generally depicted on the map:
(A) Fort Christina National Historic Landmark in New Castle County, Delaware, as depicted on page 3 of 6 of the map.
(B) Old Swedes Church National Historic Landmark in New Castle County, Delaware, as depicted on page 3 of 6 of the map.
(c) Administration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall administer the historical park in accordance with—
(B) the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including—
(i) the National Park System Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); and
(ii) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.).
(2) LAND ACQUISITION.—
(A) METHODS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in clause (ii), the Secretary may acquire all or a portion of any of the sites described in subsection (b)(3), including easements or other interests in land, by purchase from a willing seller, donation, or exchange.
(3) INTERPRETIVE TOURS.—The Secretary may provide interpretive tours to sites and resources in the State that are located outside the boundary of the historical park and associated with the purposes for which the historical park is established, including—
(4) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement with the State of Delaware, political subdivisions of the State of Delaware, institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations, and individuals to mark, interpret, and restore nationally significant historic or cultural resources within the boundaries of the historical park, if the cooperative agreement provides for reasonable public access to the resources.
(5) MANAGEMENT PLAN.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 fiscal years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this paragraph, the Secretary shall complete a management plan for the historical park.
(B) APPLICABLE LAW.—The management plan shall be prepared in accordance with section 12(b) of the National Park System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)) and other applicable laws.
(d) National landmark study.—
(e) Offset.—Section 7302(f) of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 469n(f)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, except that the amount authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section not appropriated as of the date of enactment of the First State National Historical Park Act shall be reduced by $6,500,000”.
(a) Boundary revision.—Section 1(b) of Public Law 101–377 (16 U.S.C. 430g–4(b)) is amended—
(2) at the end of paragraph (1) (as designated by paragraph (1)), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(b) Acquisition of land.—Section 2(a) of Public Law 101–377 (16 U.S.C. 430g–5(a)) is amended—
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) HISTORICAL PARK.—The term “historical park” means the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Historical Park established by subsection (b)(1)(A).
(b) Harriet tubman underground railroad national historical park.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—There is established as a unit of the National Park System the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Historical Park in the State, consisting of the area depicted on the map as “Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Historical Park Boundary”.
(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the historical park is to preserve and interpret for the benefit of present and future generations the historical, cultural, and natural resources associated with the life of Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad.
(3) LAND ACQUISITION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may acquire land and interests in land within the areas depicted on the map as “Authorized Acquisition Areas for the National Historical Park” only by purchase from willing sellers, donation, or exchange.
(c) Administration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall administer the historical park and the portion of the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Monument administered by the National Park Service as a single unit of the National Park System, which shall be known as the “Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Historical Park”.
(2) APPLICABLE LAW.—The Secretary shall administer the historical park in accordance with this section, Presidential Proclamation Number 8943 (78 Fed. Reg. 18763), and the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including—
(A) the National Park System Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); and
(B) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.).
(3) INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the National Park Service and the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall enter into an agreement to allow the National Park Service to provide for archeological research and the public interpretation of historic resources located within the boundary of the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge that are associated with the life of Harriet Tubman, consistent with the management requirements of the Refuge.
(4) INTERPRETIVE TOURS.—The Secretary may provide interpretive tours to sites and resources located outside the boundary of the historical park in Caroline, Dorchester, and Talbot Counties, Maryland, relating to the life of Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad.
(5) LAND USES AND AGREEMENTS.—Nothing in this section affects—
(B) agreements between the Secretary and private landowners regarding hunting, fishing, farming, or other activities; or
(C) land use rights of private property owners within or adjacent to the historical park or the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Monument, including activities or uses on private land that can be seen or heard within the historical park or the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Monument.
(6) AGREEMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter into an agreement with the State, political subdivisions of the State, colleges and universities, non-profit organizations, and individuals—
(B) VISITOR CENTER.—The Secretary may enter into an agreement to design, construct, operate, and maintain a joint visitor center on land owned by the State—
(d) General management plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall prepare a general management plan for the historical park in accordance with section 12(b) of the National Park Service General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)).
(2) CONSULTATION.—The general management plan shall be prepared in consultation with the State (including political subdivisions of the State).
(3) PUBLIC COMMENT.—The Secretary shall—
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) HISTORICAL PARK.—The term “historical park” means the Harriet Tubman National Historical Park established by subsection (b)(1)(A).
(b) Harriet tubman national historical park.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), there is established the Harriet Tubman National Historical Park in Auburn, New York, as a unit of the National Park System.
(B) DETERMINATION BY SECRETARY.—The historical park shall not be established until the date on which the Secretary determines that a sufficient quantity of land, or interests in land, has been acquired to constitute a manageable park unit.
(2) BOUNDARY.—The historical park shall include the Harriet Tubman Home, the Tubman Home for the Aged, the Thompson Memorial AME Zion Church and Rectory, and associated land, as identified in the area entitled “National Historical Park Proposed Boundary” on the map.
(3) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the historical park is to preserve and interpret for the benefit of present and future generations the historical, cultural, and natural resources associated with the life of Harriet Tubman.
(c) Administration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall administer the historical park in accordance with this section and the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including—
(A) the National Park System Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); and
(B) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.).
(2) INTERPRETIVE TOURS.—The Secretary may provide interpretive tours to sites and resources located outside the boundary of the historical park in Auburn, New York, relating to the life of Harriet Tubman.
(3) AGREEMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter into an agreement with the owner of any land within the historical park to mark, interpret, or restore nationally significant historic or cultural resources relating to the life of Harriet Tubman, if the agreement provides that—
(B) RESEARCH.—The Secretary may enter into an agreement with the State, political subdivisions of the State, institutions of higher education, the Home and other nonprofit organizations, and individuals to conduct research relating to the life of Harriet Tubman.
(C) COST-SHARING REQUIREMENT.—
(d) General management plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall prepare a general management plan for the historical park in accordance with section 12(b) of the National Park Service General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)).
(e) Offset.—Section 101(b)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–303; 110 Stat. 3667) is amended by striking “$53,852,000” and inserting “$29,852,000”.
(a) Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park boundary adjustment.—Section 7001 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 410lll) is amended as follows:
(1) In subsection (b)(3)—
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(B) In addition to the lands described in subparagraph (A), the Park shall include the approximately 6 acres of land containing Hinchliffe Stadium and generally depicted as the ‘Boundary Modification Area’ on the map entitled ‘Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park, Proposed Boundary Modification’, numbered T03/120,155, and dated April 2014, which shall be administered as part of the Park in accordance with subsection (c)(1) and section 3 of the Hinchliffe Stadium Heritage Act.”.
(2) In subsection (b)(4), by striking “The Map” and inserting “The Map and the map referred to in paragraph (3)(B)”.
(b) Additional considerations for hinchliffe stadium.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In administering the approximately 6 acres of land containing Hinchliffe Stadium and generally depicted as the “Boundary Modification Area” on the map entitled “Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park, Proposed Boundary Modification”, numbered T03/120,155, and dated April 2014, the Secretary of the Interior—
(A) may not include non-Federal property within the approximately 6 acres of land as part of Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park without the written consent of the owner;
Public Law 105–378 is amended—
(1) in section 101(a)—
(2) in section 102—
(a) Purposes.—The purposes of this section are—
(1) to preserve and protect for the benefit of present and future generations the nationally significant historic resources associated with the Manhattan Project;
(2) to improve public understanding of the Manhattan Project and the legacy of the Manhattan Project through interpretation of the historic resources associated with the Manhattan Project;
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) HISTORICAL PARK.—The term “Historical Park” means the Manhattan Project National Historical Park established under subsection (c).
(c) Establishment of manhattan project national historical park.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(A) DATE.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, there shall be established as a unit of the National Park System the Manhattan Project National Historical Park.
(B) AREAS INCLUDED.—The Historical Park shall consist of facilities and areas listed under paragraph (2) as determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy. The Secretary shall include the area referred to in paragraph (2)(C)(i), the B Reactor National Historic Landmark, in the Historical Park.
(2) ELIGIBLE AREAS.—The Historical Park may only be comprised of one or more of the following areas, or portions of the areas, as generally depicted in the map titled “Manhattan Project National Historical Park Sites”, numbered 540/108,834–C, and dated September 2012:
(A) OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE.—Facilities, land, or interests in land that are—
(v) at other sites in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, that are not depicted on the map but are determined by the Secretary to be suitable and appropriate for inclusion in the Historical Park, except that sites administered by the Secretary of Energy may be included only with the concurrence of the Secretary of Energy.
(B) LOS ALAMOS, NEW MEXICO.—Facilities, land, or interests in land that are—
(i) within the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory National Historic Landmark District, or any addition to the Landmark District proposed in the National Historic Landmark Nomination—Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (LASL) NHL District (Working Draft of NHL Revision), Los Alamos National Laboratory document LA–UR 12–00387 (January 26, 2012);
(d) Agreement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary and the Secretary of Energy (acting through the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, and Richland site offices) shall enter into an agreement governing the respective roles of the Secretary and the Secretary of Energy in administering the facilities, land, or interests in land under the administrative jurisdiction of the Department of Energy that is to be included in the Historical Park under subsection (c)(2), including provisions for enhanced public access, management, interpretation, and historic preservation.
(2) RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SECRETARY.—Any agreement under paragraph (1) shall provide that the Secretary shall—
(3) RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY.—Any agreement under paragraph (1) shall provide that the Secretary of Energy—
(A) shall ensure that the agreement appropriately protects public safety, national security, and other aspects of the ongoing mission of the Department of Energy at the Oak Ridge Reservation, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Hanford Site;
(B) may consult with and provide historical information to the Secretary concerning the Manhattan Project;
(e) Public participation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall consult with interested State, county, and local officials, organizations, and interested members of the public—
(2) NOTICE OF DETERMINATION.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which an agreement under subsection (d) is entered into, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register notice of the establishment of the Historical Park, including an official boundary map.
(3) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The official boundary map published under paragraph (2) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service. The map shall be updated to reflect any additions to the Historical Park from eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2).
(f) Administration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall administer the Historical Park in accordance with—
(B) the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including—
(i) the National Park System Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); and
(ii) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.).
(2) GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this subsection, the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Secretary of Energy, with respect to land administered by the Secretary of Energy, and in consultation and collaboration with the Oak Ridge, Los Alamos and Richland Department of Energy site offices, shall complete a general management plan for the Historical Park in accordance with section 12(b) of Public Law 91–383 (commonly known as the National Park Service General Authorities Act; 16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)).
(3) INTERPRETIVE TOURS.—The Secretary may, subject to applicable law, provide interpretive tours of historically significant Manhattan Project sites and resources in the States of Tennessee, New Mexico, and Washington that are located outside the boundary of the Historical Park.
(4) LAND ACQUISITION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may acquire land and interests in land within the eligible areas described in subsection (c)(2) by—
(5) DONATIONS; COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—
(A) FEDERAL FACILITIES.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter into one or more agreements with the head of a Federal agency to provide public access to, and management, interpretation, and historic preservation of, historically significant Manhattan Project resources under the jurisdiction or control of the Federal agency.
(ii) DONATIONS; COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary may accept donations from, and enter into cooperative agreements with, State governments, units of local government, tribal governments, organizations, or individuals to further the purpose of an interagency agreement entered into under clause (i) or to provide visitor services and administrative facilities within reasonable proximity to the Historical Park.
(B) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary may provide technical assistance to State, local, or tribal governments, organizations, or individuals for the management, interpretation, and historic preservation of historically significant Manhattan Project resources not included within the Historical Park.
(C) DONATIONS TO DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY.—For the purposes of this section, or for the purpose of preserving and providing access to historically significant Manhattan Project resources, the Secretary of Energy may accept, hold, administer, and use gifts, bequests, and devises (including labor and services).
Title II of the Washington Park Wilderness Act of 1988 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; Public Law 100–668) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 207. Boundary adjustments for road.
“(a) In general.—The Secretary may adjust the boundaries of the North Cascades National Park and the Stephen Mather Wilderness in order to provide a 100-foot-wide corridor along which the Stehekin Valley Road may be rebuilt—
“(b) No net loss of lands.—The boundary adjustments made under this section shall be such that equal acreage amounts are exchanged between the Stephen Mather Wilderness and the North Cascades National Park, resulting in no net loss of acreage to either the Stephen Mather Wilderness or the North Cascades National Park.”.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) MAP.—The term “map” means the map entitled “Oregon Caves National Monument and Preserve”, numbered 150/80,023, and dated May 2010.
(2) MONUMENT.—The term “Monument” means the Oregon Caves National Monument established by Presidential Proclamation Number 876 (36 Stat. 2497), dated July 12, 1909.
(3) NATIONAL MONUMENT AND PRESERVE.—The term “National Monument and Preserve” means the Oregon Caves National Monument and Preserve designated by subsection (b)(1)(A).
(4) NATIONAL PRESERVE.—The term “National Preserve” means the National Preserve designated by subsection (b)(1)(B).
(b) Designations; land transfer; boundary adjustment.—
(1) DESIGNATIONS.—
(2) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION.—
(3) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The boundary of the National Monument and Preserve is modified to exclude approximately 4 acres of land—
(c) Administration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall administer the National Monument and Preserve in accordance with—
(C) any law (including regulations) generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including the National Park Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).
(2) FIRE MANAGEMENT.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, in accordance with paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—
(3) EXISTING FOREST SERVICE CONTRACTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall—
(4) GRAZING.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subparagraph (B), the Secretary may allow the grazing of livestock within the National Preserve to continue as authorized under permits or leases in existence as of the date of enactment of this Act.
(5) FISH AND WILDLIFE.—The Secretary shall permit hunting and fishing on land and waters within the National Preserve in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws, except that the Secretary may, in consultation with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, designate zones in which, and establish periods during which, no hunting or fishing shall be permitted for reasons of public safety, administration, or compliance by the Secretary with any applicable law (including regulations).
(d) Voluntary grazing lease or permit donation program.—
(1) DONATION OF LEASE OR PERMIT.—
(2) EFFECT OF DONATION.—A lessee or permittee that donates a grazing lease or grazing permit (or a portion of a grazing lease or grazing permit) under this section shall be considered to have waived any claim to any range improvement on the associated grazing allotment or portion of the associated grazing allotment, as applicable.
(e) Wild and scenic river designations.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(2) POTENTIAL ADDITIONS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(141) OREGON CAVES NATIONAL MONUMENT AND PRESERVE, OREGON.—
“(A) CAVE CREEK, OREGON.—The 2.6-mile segment of Cave Creek from the headwaters at the River Styx to the boundary of the Rogue River Siskiyou National Forest.
“(B) LAKE CREEK, OREGON.—The 3.6-mile segment of Lake Creek from the headwaters at Bigelow Lakes to the confluence with Cave Creek.
“(C) NO NAME CREEK, OREGON.—The 0.6-mile segment of No Name Creek from the headwaters to the confluence with Cave Creek.
(B) STUDY; REPORT.—Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(20) OREGON CAVES NATIONAL MONUMENT AND PRESERVE, OREGON.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this paragraph, the Secretary shall—
Section 201 of Public Law 95–629 (16 U.S.C. 410ee) is amended—
(2) in subsection (a)—
(C) by inserting after paragraph (2) (as designated by subparagraph (A)) the following:
“(3) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the park is modified to include approximately 137 acres, as depicted on the map entitled ‘San Antonio Missions National Historical Park Proposed Boundary Addition’, numbered 472/113,006A, and dated June 2012.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEE.—The term “eligible employee” means a person who was a full-time or part-time employee of the Trust during the 180-day period immediately preceding the date of enactment of this Act.
(2) FUND.—The term “Fund” means the Valles Caldera Fund established by section 106(h)(2) of the Valles Caldera Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 698v–4(h)(2)).
(6) TRUST.—The term “Trust” means the Valles Caldera Trust established by section 106(a) of the Valles Caldera Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 698v–4(a)).
(b) Designation of Valles caldera national preserve as a unit of the national park system.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—To protect, preserve, and restore the fish, wildlife, watershed, natural, scientific, scenic, geologic, historic, cultural, archaeological, and recreational values of the area, the Valles Caldera National Preserve is designated as a unit of the National Park System.
(2) BOUNDARY.—
(3) MANAGEMENT.—
(A) APPLICABLE LAW.—The Secretary shall administer the Preserve in accordance with—
(ii) the laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System, including—
(I) the National Park Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); and
(II) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 461 et seq.).
(B) MANAGEMENT COORDINATION.—The Secretary may coordinate the management and operations of the Preserve with the Bandelier National Monument.
(C) MANAGEMENT PLAN.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 fiscal years after the date on which funds are made available to implement this subparagraph, the Secretary shall prepare a management plan for the Preserve.
(ii) APPLICABLE LAW.—The management plan shall be prepared in accordance with—
(I) section 12(b) of Public Law 91–383 (commonly known as the “National Park Service General Authorities Act”) (16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)); and
(4) ACQUISITION OF LAND.—
(A) iN GENERAL.—The Secretary may acquire land and interests in land within the boundaries of the Preserve by—
(5) SCIENCE AND EDUCATION PROGRAM.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall—
(i) until the date on which a management plan is completed in accordance with paragraph (3)(C), carry out the science and education program for the Preserve established by the Trust; and
(ii) beginning on the date on which a management plan is completed in accordance with paragraph (3)(C), establish a science and education program for the Preserve that—
(I) allows for research and interpretation of the natural, historic, cultural, geologic and other scientific features of the Preserve;
(6) GRAZING.—The Secretary shall allow the grazing of livestock within the Preserve to continue—
(7) HUNTING, FISHING, AND TRAPPING.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall permit hunting, fishing, and trapping on land and water within the Preserve in accordance with applicable Federal and State law.
(B) ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTIONS.—The Secretary may designate areas in which, and establish limited periods during which, no hunting, fishing, or trapping shall be permitted under subparagraph (A) for reasons of public safety, administration, or compliance with applicable law.
(8) ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall undertake activities to improve the health of forest, grassland, and riparian areas within the Preserve, including any activities carried out in accordance with title IV of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 7301 et seq.).
(9) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, all land and interests in land within the boundaries of the Preserve are withdrawn from—
(10) VOLCANIC DOMES AND OTHER PEAKS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph (C), for the purposes of preserving the natural, cultural, religious, archaeological, and historic resources of the volcanic domes and other peaks in the Preserve described in subparagraph (B) within the area of the domes and peaks above 9,600 feet in elevation or 250 feet below the top of the dome, whichever is lower—
(11) TRADITIONAL CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS SITES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation with Indian tribes and pueblos, shall ensure the protection of traditional cultural and religious sites in the Preserve.
(B) ACCESS.—The Secretary, in accordance with Public Law 95–341 (commonly known as the “American Indian Religious Freedom Act”) (42 U.S.C. 1996)—
(12) CALDERA RIM TRAIL.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, affected Indian tribes and pueblos, and the public, shall study the feasibility of establishing a hiking trail along the rim of the Valles Caldera on—
(c) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Administrative jurisdiction over the Preserve is transferred from the Secretary of Agriculture and the Trust to the Secretary, to be administered as a unit of the National Park System, in accordance with subsection (b).
(2) EXCLUSION FROM SANTA FE NATIONAL FOREST.—The boundaries of the Santa Fe National Forest are modified to exclude the Preserve.
(3) INTERIM MANAGEMENT.—
(A) MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Trust shall enter into a memorandum of agreement to facilitate the orderly transfer to the Secretary of the administration of the Preserve.
(B) EXISTING MANAGEMENT PLANS.—Notwithstanding the repeal made by subsection (d)(1), until the date on which the Secretary completes a management plan for the Preserve in accordance with subsection (b)(3)(C), the Secretary may administer the Preserve in accordance with any management activities or plans adopted by the Trust under the Valles Caldera Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 698v et seq.), to the extent the activities or plans are consistent with subsection (b)(3)(A).
(4) VALLES CALDERA TRUST.—
(A) TERMINATION.—The Trust shall terminate 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act unless the Secretary determines that the termination date should be extended to facilitate the transitional management of the Preserve.
(B) ASSETS AND LIABILITIES.—
(ii) ASSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS.—
(I) IN GENERAL.—On termination of the Trust, the Secretary shall assume all contracts, obligations, and other liabilities of the Trust.
(C) PERSONNEL.—
(i) HIRING.—The Secretary and the Secretary of Agriculture may hire employees of the Trust on a noncompetitive basis for comparable positions at the Preserve or other areas or offices under the jurisdiction of the Secretary or the Secretary of Agriculture.
(ii) SALARY.—Any employees hired from the Trust under clause (i) shall be subject to the provisions of chapter 51, and subchapter III of chapter 53, title 5, United States Code, relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates.
(D) RECORDS.—The Secretary shall have access to all records of the Trust pertaining to the management of the Preserve.
(d) Repeal of valles caldera preservation act.—
(1) REPEAL.—On the termination of the Trust, the Valles Caldera Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 698v et seq.) is repealed.
(2) EFFECT OF REPEAL.—Notwithstanding the repeal made by paragraph (1)—
(A) the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture to acquire mineral interests under section 104(e) of the Valles Caldera Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 698v–2(e)) is transferred to the Secretary and any proceeding for the condemnation of, or payment of compensation for, an outstanding mineral interest pursuant to the transferred authority shall continue;
(B) the provisions in section 104(g) of the Valles Caldera Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 698v–2(g)) relating to the Pueblo of Santa Clara shall remain in effect; and
(3) BOUNDARIES.—The repeal of the Valles Caldera Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 698v et seq.) shall not affect the boundaries as of the date of enactment of this Act (including maps and legal descriptions) of—
(a) Acquisition of land.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this section as the “Secretary”) may acquire the land or any interests in land within the area identified as “Modified Core Battlefield” for the Port Gibson Unit, the Champion Hill Unit, and the Raymond Unit as generally depicted on the map entitled “Vicksburg National Military Park—Proposed Battlefield Additions”, numbered 306/100986A (4 sheets), and dated July 2012.
(b) Availability of map.—The map described in subsection (a)(1) shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.
Section 7301(c) of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11) is amended as follows:
(1) In paragraph (1)—
(7) By inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraphs:
“(6) WILLING SELLERS.—Acquisition of land or interests in land under this subsection shall be from willing sellers only.
“(7) REPORT.—Not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the activities carried out under this subsection, including a description of—
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this section as the “Secretary”) shall conduct a special resource study regarding each area, site, and issue identified in subsection (b) to evaluate—
(b) Studies.—The areas, sites, and issues referred to in subsection (a) are the following:
(1) LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, LOUISIANA.—Sites along the lower Mississippi River in the State of Louisiana, including Fort St. Philip, Fort Jackson, the Head of Passes, and any related and supporting historical, cultural, or recreational resource located in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.
(2) BUFFALO SOLDIERS.—The role of the Buffalo Soldiers in the early years of the National Park System, including an evaluation of appropriate ways to enhance historical research, education, interpretation, and public awareness of the story of the stewardship role of the Buffalo Soldiers in the National Parks, including ways to link the story to the development of National Parks and the story of African-American military service following the Civil War.
(3) ROTA, COMMONWEALTH OF NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS.—Prehistoric, historic, and limestone forest sites on the island of Rota, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(4) PRISON SHIP MONUMENT, NEW YORK.—The Prison Ship Martyrs' Monument in Fort Greene Park, Brooklyn, New York.
(5) FLUSHING REMONSTRANCE, NEW YORK.—The John Bowne House, located at 3701 Bowne Street, Queens, New York, the Friends Meeting House located at 137-17 Northern Boulevard, Queens, New York, and other resources in the vicinity of Flushing, New York, relating to the history of religious freedom during the era of the signing of the Flushing Remonstrance.
(6) WEST HUNTER STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, GEORGIA.—The historic West Hunter Street Baptist Church, located at 775 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, SW, Atlanta, Georgia, and the block on which the church is located.
(c) Criteria.—In conducting a study under this section, the Secretary shall use the criteria for the study of areas for potential inclusion in the National Park System described in section 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (commonly known as the “National Park System General Authorities Act”) (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)).
(d) Contents.—Each study authorized by this section shall—
(1) determine the suitability and feasibility of designating the applicable area or site as a unit of the National Park System;
(2) include cost estimates for any necessary acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of the applicable area or site;
(3) include an analysis of the effect of the applicable area or site on—
(4) include an identification of any authorities, including condemnation, that will compel or permit the Secretary to influence or participate in local land use decisions (such as zoning) or place restrictions on non-Federal land if the applicable area or site is designated as a unit of the National Park System; and
(e) Report.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out a study authorized by this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report the describes—
(a) Extension of national heritage area authorities.—
(1) EXTENSIONS.—
(A) Section 12 of Public Law 100–692 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 102 Stat. 4558; 112 Stat. 3258; 123 Stat. 1292; 127 Stat. 420; 128 Stat. 314) is amended—
(B) Division II of Public Law 104–333 (16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking “2015” each place it appears in the following sections and inserting “2021”:
(C) Section 109 of Public Law 105–355 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 112 Stat. 3252) is amended by striking “September 30, 2014” and inserting “September 30, 2021”.
(D) Public Law 106–278 (16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended—
(E) Section 157(i) of Public Law 106–291 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 114 Stat. 967) is amended by striking “2015” and inserting “2021”.
(F) Section 7 of Public Law 106–319 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 114 Stat. 1284) is amended by striking “2015” and inserting “2021”.
(G) Title VIII of division B of H.R. 5666 (Appendix D) as enacted into law by section 1(a)(4) of Public Law 106–554 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A-295; 123 Stat. 1294) is amended—
(H) Section 106(b) of Public Law 103–449 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 108 Stat. 4755; 113 Stat. 1726; 123 Stat. 1291) is amended, by striking “2015” and inserting “2021”.
(2) CONDITIONAL EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by paragraph (1) (other than the amendments made by clauses (iii) and (iv) of paragraph (1)(B)), shall apply only through September 30, 2020, unless the Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this section as the “Secretary”)—
(B) EVALUATION.—An evaluation conducted under subparagraph (A)(i) shall—
(C) REPORT.—Based on the evaluation conducted under subparagraph (A)(i), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report that includes recommendations for the future role of the National Park Service with respect to the national heritage area.
(b) John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor amendments.—Public Law 99–647 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; 100 Stat. 3625) is amended—
(1) in the first sentence of section 2 (110 Stat. 4202), by striking “the map entitled ‘Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Boundary Map’, numbered BRV–80–80,011, and dated May 2, 1993” and inserting “the map entitled ‘John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor—Proposed Boundary’, numbered 022/111530, and dated November 10, 2011”;
(2) in section 7 (120 Stat. 1858; 125 Stat. 155)—
(A) in the section heading, by striking “termination of commission” and inserting “termination of commission; designation of local coordinating entity”;
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(b) Local coordinating entity.—
“(c) Use of funds.—For the purposes of carrying out the management plan, the local coordinating entity may use amounts made available under this Act—
“(1) to make grants to the States of Massachusetts and Rhode Island (referred to in this section as the ‘States’), political subdivisions of the States, nonprofit organizations, and other persons;
“(2) to enter into cooperative agreements with or provide technical assistance to the States, political subdivisions of the States, nonprofit organizations, Federal agencies, and other interested parties;
(3) in section 8 (120 Stat. 1858)—
(A) in subsection (b)—
(ii) by adding at the end the following:
“(2) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with the local coordinating entity selected under paragraph (1) and other public or private entities for the purpose of—
(B) by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following:
(c) National heritage area redesignations.—
(1) REDESIGNATION OF THE LAST GREEN VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE CORRIDOR.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Quinebaug and Shetucket Rivers Valley National Heritage Corridor Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 103–449) is amended—
(2) REDESIGNATION OF MOTORCITIES NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Automobile National Heritage Area Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 105–355) is amended—
(i) in section 102—
(ii) in section 103—
(a) Improvement.—The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National Park Service (referred to in this section as the “Secretary”), may make improvements to a support facility, including a visitor center, for a National Historic Site operated by the National Park Service if the project—
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) DONOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT.—The term “donor acknowledgment” means an appropriate statement or credit acknowledging a donation.
(b) Donor acknowledgments in units of National Park System.—
(2) RESTRICTIONS.—A donor acknowledgment shall not be used to state or imply—
(3) REQUIREMENTS.—
(4) PLACEMENT.—
(A) VISITOR AND ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES.—A donor acknowledgment may be located on or inside a visitor center or administrative facility of the National Park System (including in a specific room or section) or any other appropriate location, such as on a donor recognition wall or plaque.
(B) OUTSIDE.—A donor acknowledgment may be located in an area outside of a visitor or administrative facility described in subparagraph (A), including a bench, brick, pathway, area of landscaping, or plaza.
(C) PROJECTS.—A donor acknowledgment may be located near a park construction or restoration project, if the donation directly relates to the project.
(c) Commemorative works act amendments.—Section 8905 of title 40, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following: “(c) Donor contributions.— “(1) ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF DONOR CONTRIBUTION.—Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior or Administrator of General Services, as applicable, may permit a sponsor to acknowledge donor contributions at the commemorative work. “(3) LIMITATIONS.—An acknowledgment under paragraph (1) shall— “(B) be displayed in a form in accordance with National Park Service and General Services Administration guidelines;
(d) Effect of section.—Nothing in this section or an amendment made by this section—
(2) modifies section 145 of Public Law 108–108 (16 U.S.C. 1a–1 note; 117 Stat. 1280).
(a) Coin specifications.—
(1) DENOMINATIONS.—The Secretary of the Treasury (in this section referred to as the “Secretary”) shall mint and issue the following coins:
(C) HALF DOLLAR CLAD COINS.—Not more than 750,000 half dollar coins, which shall—
(iii) be minted to the specifications for half dollar coins, contained in section 5112(b) of title 31, United States Code.
(2) LEGAL TENDER.—The coins minted under this section shall be legal tender, as provided in section 5103 of title 31, United States Code.
(b) Design of coins.—
(c) Issuance of coins.—
(d) Sale of coins.—
(1) SALE PRICE.—The coins issued under this section shall be sold by the Secretary at a price equal to the sum of—
(e) Surcharges.—
(2) DISTRIBUTION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to section 5134(f) of title 31, United States Code, all surcharges which are received by the Secretary from the sale of coins issued under this section shall be promptly paid by the Secretary to the National Park Foundation for projects and programs that help preserve and protect resources under the stewardship of the National Park Service and promote public enjoyment and appreciation of those resources.
(3) AUDITS.—The National Park Foundation shall be subject to the audit requirements of section 5134(f)(2) of title 31, United States Code, with regard to the amounts received by the Foundation under paragraph (2).
(4) LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), no surcharge may be included with respect to the issuance under this section of any coin during a calendar year if, as of the time of such issuance, the issuance of such coin would result in the number of commemorative coin programs issued during such year to exceed the annual 2 commemorative coin program issuance limitation under section 5112(m)(1) of title 31, United States Code (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act). The Secretary of the Treasury may issue guidance to carry out this paragraph.
(f) Financial assurances.—The Secretary shall take such actions as may be necessary to ensure that—
(1) minting and issuing coins under this section will not result in any net cost to the United States Government; and
(2) no funds, including applicable surcharges, shall be disbursed to any recipient designated in subsection (e) until the total cost of designing and issuing all of the coins authorized by this section (including labor, materials, dies, use of machinery, overhead expenses, marketing, and shipping) is recovered by the United States Treasury, consistent with sections 5112(m) and 5134(f) of title 31, United States Code.
(g) Budget compliance.—The budgetary effects of this section, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled “Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation” for this section, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Establishment of Commission.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is established the Commission to Study the Potential Creation of a National Women’s History Museum.
(3) QUALIFICATIONS.—Members of the Commission shall be appointed to the Commission from among individuals, or representatives of institutions or entities, who possess—
(A) (i) a demonstrated commitment to the research, study, or promotion of women's history, art, political or economic status, or culture; and
(5) DEADLINE FOR INITIAL APPOINTMENT.—The initial members of the Commission shall be appointed not later than the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
(c) Duties of the Commission.—
(1) REPORTS.—
(A) PLAN OF ACTION.—The Commission shall submit to the President and Congress a report containing the recommendations of the Commission with respect to a plan of action for the establishment and maintenance of a National Women’s History Museum in Washington, DC.
(2) FUNDRAISING PLAN.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall develop a fundraising plan to support the establishment, operation, and maintenance of the Museum through contributions from the public.
(B) CONSIDERATIONS.—In developing the fundraising plan under subparagraph (A), the Commission shall consider—
(i) the role of the National Women’s History Museum (a nonprofit, educational organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that was incorporated in 1996 in Washington, DC, and dedicated for the purpose of establishing a women’s history museum) in raising funds for the construction of the Museum; and
(C) INDEPENDENT REVIEW.—The Commission shall obtain an independent review of the viability of the plan developed under subparagraph (A) and such review shall include an analysis as to whether the plan is likely to achieve the level of resources necessary to fund the construction of the Museum and the operations and maintenance of the Museum in perpetuity without reliance on appropriations of Federal funds.
(D) SUBMISSION.—The Commission shall submit the plan developed under subparagraph (A) and the review conducted under subparagraph (C) to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, House Administration, Natural Resources, and Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Rules and Administration, Energy and Natural Resources, and Appropriations of the Senate.
(3) LEGISLATION TO CARRY OUT PLAN OF ACTION.—Based on the recommendations contained in the report submitted under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1), the Commission shall submit for consideration to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, House Administration, Natural Resources, and Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Rules and Administration, Energy and Natural Resources, and Appropriations of the Senate recommendations for a legislative plan of action to establish and construct the Museum.
(4) NATIONAL CONFERENCE.—Not later than 18 months after the date on which the initial members of the Commission are appointed under subsection (b), the Commission may, in carrying out the duties of the Commission under this subsection, convene a national conference relating to the Museum, to be comprised of individuals committed to the advancement of the life, art, history, and culture of women.
(d) Director and staff of Commission.—
(1) DIRECTOR AND STAFF.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commission may employ and compensate an executive director and any other additional personnel that are necessary to enable the Commission to perform the duties of the Commission.
(B) RATES OF PAY.—Rates of pay for persons employed under subparagraph (A) shall be consistent with the rates of pay allowed for employees of a temporary organization under section 3161 of title 5, United States Code.
(e) Administrative provisions.—
(1) COMPENSATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—A member of the Commission—
(B) TRAVEL EXPENSES.—A member of the Commission shall be allowed a per diem allowance for travel expenses, at rates consistent with those authorized under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) FINAL RULE.—The term “Final Rule” means the final rule entitled “Special Regulations, Areas of the National Park System, Cape Hatteras National Seashore—Off-Road Vehicle Management” (77 Fed. Reg. 3123 (January 23, 2012)).
(b) Review and adjustment of wildlife protection buffers.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall review and modify wildlife buffers in the National Seashore in accordance with this subsection and any other applicable law.
(2) BUFFER MODIFICATIONS.—In modifying wildlife buffers under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, using adaptive management practices—
(3) COORDINATION WITH STATE.—The Secretary, after coordinating with the State, shall determine appropriate buffer protections for species that are not listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), but that are identified for protection under State law.
(c) Modifications to final rule.—The Secretary shall undertake a public process to consider, consistent with management requirements at the National Seashore, the following changes to the Final Rule:
(1) Opening beaches at the National Seashore that are closed to night driving restrictions, by opening beach segments each morning on a rolling basis as daily management reviews are completed.
(a) Expansion of Alpine Lakes Wilderness.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is designated as wilderness and as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System certain Federal land in the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest in the State of Washington comprising approximately 22,173 acres that is within the Proposed Alpine Lakes Wilderness Additions Boundary, as generally depicted on the map entitled “Proposed Alpine Lakes Wilderness Additions” and dated December 3, 2009, which is incorporated in and shall be considered to be a part of the Alpine Lakes Wilderness.
(2) ADMINISTRATION.—
(A) MANAGEMENT.—Subject to valid existing rights, the land designated as wilderness by paragraph (1) shall be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this section as the “Secretary”), in accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), except that any reference in that Act to the effective date of that Act shall be considered to be a reference to the date of enactment of this Act.
(B) MAP AND DESCRIPTION.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall file a map and a legal description of the land designated as wilderness by paragraph (1) with—
(3) INCORPORATION OF ACQUIRED LAND AND INTERESTS IN LAND.—Any land or interests in land within the Proposed Alpine Lakes Wilderness Additions Boundary, as generally depicted on the map entitled “Proposed Alpine Lakes Wilderness Additions” and dated December 3, 2009, that is acquired by the United States shall—
(b) Wild and Scenic River Designations.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (208), as added by section 3040(e), the following:
“(209) MIDDLE FORK SNOQUALMIE, WASHINGTON.—The 27.4-mile segment from the headwaters of the Middle Fork Snoqualmie River near La Bohn Gap in NE 1⁄4 sec. 20, T. 24 N., R. 13 E., to the northern boundary of sec. 11, T. 23 N., R. 9 E., to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture in the following classifications:
(2) NO CONDEMNATION.—No land or interest in land within the boundary of the river segment designated by paragraph (209) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) may be acquired by condemnation.
(3) ADJACENT MANAGEMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in paragraph (209) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) creates a protective perimeter or buffer zone outside the designated boundary of the river segment designated by that paragraph.
(B) OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES.—The fact that an activity or use can be seen or heard within the boundary of the river segment designated by paragraph (209) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) shall not preclude the activity or use outside the boundary of the river segment.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) RED RIVER CONVEYANCE MAP.—The term “Red River Conveyance Map” means the map entitled “Town of Red River Town Site Act Proposal” and dated April 19, 2012.
(b) Addition to the National Wilderness Preservation System.—
(1) DESIGNATION OF THE COLUMBINE-HONDO WILDERNESS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the approximately 45,000 acres of land in the Carson National Forest in the State, as generally depicted on the Wilderness Map, is designated as wilderness and as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System, which shall be known as the “Columbine-Hondo Wilderness”.
(B) MANAGEMENT.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, the Wilderness shall be administered by the Secretary in accordance with this section and the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), except that any reference in that Act to the effective date of that Act shall be considered to be a reference to the date of enactment of this Act.
(C) INCORPORATION OF ACQUIRED LAND AND INTERESTS IN LAND.—Any land or interest in land that is within the boundary of the Wilderness that is acquired by the United States shall—
(D) GRAZING.—Grazing of livestock in the Wilderness, where established before the date of enactment of this Act, shall be allowed to continue in accordance with—
(i) section 4(d)(4) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(4)); and
(E) COLUMBINE-HONDO WILDERNESS STUDY AREA.—
(i) FINDING.—Congress finds that, for purposes of section 103(a)(2) of Public Law 96–550 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 94 Stat. 3223), any Federal land in the Columbine-Hondo Wilderness Study Area administered by the Forest Service that is not designated as wilderness by subparagraph (A) has been adequately reviewed for wilderness designation.
(ii) APPLICABILITY.—The Federal land described in clause (i) is no longer subject to subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section 103 of Public Law 96–550 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 94 Stat. 3223).
(F) MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare maps and legal descriptions of the Wilderness.
(G) FISH AND WILDLIFE.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section affects the jurisdiction of the State with respect to fish and wildlife located on public land in the State, except that the Secretary may designate areas in which, and establish periods during which, for reasons of public safety, administration, or compliance with applicable laws, no hunting, fishing, or trapping will be permitted in the Wilderness.
(2) WHEELER PEAK WILDERNESS BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The boundary of the Wheeler Peak Wilderness in the State is modified as generally depicted in the Wilderness Map.
(c) Land conveyances and sales.—
(1) TOWN OF RED RIVER LAND CONVEYANCE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this paragraph, the Secretary shall convey to the Town, without consideration and by quitclaim deed, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the one or more parcels of Federal land described in subparagraph (B) for which the Town submits a request to the Secretary by the date that is not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.
(B) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcels of Federal land referred to in subparagraph (A) are the parcels of National Forest System land (including any improvements to the land) in Taos County, New Mexico, that are identified as “Parcel 1”, “Parcel 2”, “Parcel 3”, and “Parcel 4” on the Red River Conveyance Map.
(E) REVERSION.—In the quitclaim deed to the Town under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall provide that any parcel of Federal land conveyed to the Town under subparagraph (A) shall revert to the Secretary, at the election of the Secretary, if the parcel of Federal land is used for a purpose other than the purpose for which the parcel was conveyed, as required under subparagraph (D).
(2) VILLAGE OF TAOS SKI VALLEY LAND CONVEYANCE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this paragraph, the Secretary shall convey to the Village, without consideration and by quitclaim deed, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of Federal land described in subparagraph (B) for which the Village submits a request to the Secretary by the date that is not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.
(B) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of Federal land referred to in subparagraph (A) is the parcel comprising approximately 4.6 acres of National Forest System land (including any improvements to the land) in Taos County generally depicted as “Parcel 1” on the map entitled “Village of Taos Ski Valley Town Site Act Proposal” and dated April 19, 2012.
(C) CONDITIONS.—The conveyance under subparagraph (A) shall be subject to—
(D) USE OF LAND.—As a condition of the conveyance under subparagraph (A), the Village shall use the parcel of Federal land described in subparagraph (B) for a wastewater treatment plant.
(E) REVERSION.—In the quitclaim deed to the Village, the Secretary shall provide that the parcel of Federal land conveyed to the Village under subparagraph (A) shall revert to the Secretary, at the election of the Secretary, if the parcel of Federal land is used for a purpose other than the purpose for which the parcel was conveyed, as described in subparagraph (D).
(3) AUTHORIZATION OF SALE OF CERTAIN NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LAND.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this paragraph and in exchange for consideration in an amount that is equal to the fair market value of the applicable parcel of National Forest System land, the Secretary may convey—
(B) DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS.—Any amounts received by the Secretary as consideration for a conveyance under subparagraph (A) shall be—
(i) deposited in the fund established under Public Law 90–171 (commonly known as the “Sisk Act”) (16 U.S.C. 484a); and
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Designation of Hermosa Creek Special Management Area.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—Subject to valid existing rights, certain Federal land in the San Juan National Forest comprising approximately 70,650 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled “Proposed Hermosa Creek Special Management Area and Proposed Hermosa Creek Wilderness Area” and dated November 12, 2014, is designated as the “Hermosa Creek Special Management Area”.
(2) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Special Management Area is to conserve and protect for the benefit of present and future generations the watershed, geological, cultural, natural, scientific, recreational, wildlife, riparian, historical, educational, and scenic resources of the Special Management Area.
(3) ADMINISTRATION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall administer the Special Management Area—
(i) in a manner that conserves, protects, and manages the resources of the Special Management Area described in paragraph (2); and
(B) USES.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall allow only such uses of the Special Management Area as the Secretary determines would further the purposes described in paragraph (2).
(ii) MOTORIZED AND MECHANIZED VEHICLES.—
(iii) GRAZING.—The Secretary shall permit grazing within the Special Management Area, if established before the date of enactment of this Act, subject to all applicable laws (including regulations) and Executive orders.
(iv) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—Within the area of the Special Management Area identified as “East Hermosa Area” on the map entitled “Proposed Hermosa Creek Special Management Area and Proposed Hermosa Creek Wilderness Area” and dated November 12, 2014, the following activities shall be prohibited:
(4) STATE AND FEDERAL WATER MANAGEMENT.—Nothing in this subsection affects the potential for development, operation, or maintenance of a water storage reservoir at the site in the Special Management Area that is identified in—
(5) WITHDRAWAL.—
(7) VEGETATION MANAGEMENT.—Nothing in this subsection prevents the Secretary from conducting vegetation management projects within the Special Management Area—
(8) WILDFIRE, INSECT, AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT.—In accordance with this subsection, the Secretary may—
(9) MANAGEMENT PLAN.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a management plan for the long-term protection and management of the Special Management Area that—
(c) Hermosa Creek Wilderness.—
(1) DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS.—Section 2(a) of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 107 Stat. 756; 114 Stat. 1955; 116 Stat. 1055) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(22) Certain land within the San Juan National Forest that comprises approximately 37,236 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Proposed Hermosa Creek Special Management Area and Proposed Hermosa Creek Wilderness Area’ and dated November 12, 2014, which shall be known as the ‘Hermosa Creek Wilderness’.”.
(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Any reference contained in the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.) to the effective date of that Act shall be considered to be a reference to the date of enactment of this Act for purposes of administering the wilderness area designated by section 2(a)(22) of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 107 Stat. 756; 114 Stat. 1955; 116 Stat. 1055) (as added by paragraph (1)).
(3) FIRE, INSECTS, AND DISEASES.—In accordance with section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)), within the wilderness areas designated by section 2(a)(22) of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 107 Stat. 756; 114 Stat. 1955; 116 Stat. 1055) (as added by paragraph (1)), the Secretary may carry out any measure that the Secretary determines to be necessary to control fire, insects, and diseases, subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
(d) Durango area mineral withdrawal.—
(1) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, the land and mineral interests described in paragraph (2) are withdrawn from all forms of—
(2) DESCRIPTION OF LAND AND MINERAL INTERESTS.—The land and mineral interests referred to in paragraph (1) are the Federal land and mineral interests generally depicted within the areas designated as “Withdrawal Areas” on the map entitled “Perins Peak & Animas City Mountain, Horse Gulch and Lake Nighthorse Mineral Withdrawal” and dated April 5, 2013.
(3) PUBLIC PURPOSE CONVEYANCE.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Interior may convey any portion of the land described in paragraph (2) that is administered by the Bureau of Land Management to the City, the County, or the State—
(A) pursuant to the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.); or
(e) Conveyance of Bureau of Land Management land to County.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—On the expiration of the permit numbered COC 64651 (09) and dated February 24, 2009, on request and agreement of the County, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to the County, without consideration and subject to valid existing rights, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the land described in paragraph (2), subject to—
(2) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in paragraph (1) consists of approximately 82 acres of land managed by the Bureau of Land Management, Tres Rios District, Colorado, as generally depicted on the map entitled “La Plata County Grandview Conveyance” and dated May 5, 2014.
(3) USE OF CONVEYED LAND.—The Federal land conveyed pursuant to this subsection may be used by the County for any public purpose, in accordance with the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.).
(f) Molas Pass Recreation Area; wilderness study area release; wilderness study area transfer of administrative jurisdiction.—
(1) MOLAS PASS RECREATION AREA.—
(A) DESIGNATION.—The approximately 461 acres of land in San Juan County, Colorado, that is generally depicted as “Molas Pass Recreation Area” on the map entitled “Molas Pass Recreation Area and Molas Pass Wilderness Study Area” and dated November 13, 2014, is designated as the “Molas Pass Recreation Area”.
(B) USE OF SNOWMOBILES.—The use of snowmobiles shall be authorized in the Molas Pass Recreation Area—
(ii) in accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) and other applicable laws (including regulations);
(2) MOLAS PASS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA.—
(A) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION.—Administrative jurisdiction over the Federal land generally depicted as “Molas Pass Wilderness Study Area” on the map entitled “Molas Pass Recreation Area and Molas Pass Wilderness Study Area”, and dated November 13, 2014, is transferred from the Bureau of Land Management to the Forest Service.
(3) RELEASE.—
(A) FINDING.—Congress finds that the land described in subparagraph (C) has been adequately studied for wilderness designation under section 603 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782).
(B) RELEASE.—Effective beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the land described in subparagraph (C)—
(i) shall not be subject to section 603(c) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782(c));
(ii) shall be managed in accordance with land management plans adopted under section 202 of that Act (43 U.S.C. 1712); and
(C) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in subparagraphs (A) and (B) is the approximately 461 acres located in the West Needles Contiguous Wilderness Study Area of San Juan County, Colorado, that is generally depicted as “Molas Pass Recreation Area” on the map entitled “Molas Pass Recreation Area and Molas Pass Wilderness Study Area” and dated November 13, 2014.
(g) General provisions.—
(1) FISH AND WILDLIFE.—Nothing in this section affects the jurisdiction or responsibility of the State with regard to fish and wildlife in the State.
(2) MAPS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary or the Secretary of the Interior, as appropriate, shall prepare maps and legal descriptions of—
(3) ADJACENT MANAGEMENT.—
(B) NONWILDERNESS ACTIVITIES.—The fact that a nonwilderness activity or use can be seen or heard from areas within the wilderness area designated by an amendment made by subsection (c)(1) or the wilderness study area designated by subsection (f)(2)(B)(i) shall not preclude the conduct of the activity or use outside the boundary of the wilderness area or wilderness study area.
(4) MILITARY OVERFLIGHTS.—Nothing in this section restricts or precludes—
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(c) Availability of map.—Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Map shall be made available to the public at each appropriate office of the Bureau of Land Management.
(d) Effect of section.—Nothing in this section prohibits the Secretary of the Interior from taking any action necessary to complete any requirement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) or the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) required for permitting surface-disturbing activity to occur on any lease issued before the date of enactment of this Act.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Addition to National Wilderness Preservation System.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—In furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the approximately 26,000 acres of Federal land managed by the Bureau of Land Management, as generally depicted on the Map, is designated as wilderness and as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to be known as the “Pine Forest Range Wilderness”.
(2) BOUNDARY.—
(A) ROAD ACCESS.—The boundary of any portion of the Wilderness that is bordered by a road shall be 100 feet from the edge of the road.
(B) ROAD ADJUSTMENTS.—The Secretary shall—
(i) reroute the road running through Long Meadow to the west to remove the road from the riparian area;
(ii) reroute the road currently running through Rodeo Flat/Corral Meadow to the east to remove the road from the riparian area;
(3) MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare a map and legal description of the Wilderness.
(c) Administration.—
(1) MANAGEMENT.—Subject to valid existing rights, the Wilderness shall be administered by the Secretary in accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), except that—
(2) LIVESTOCK.—The grazing of livestock in the Wilderness, if established before the date of enactment of this Act, shall be allowed to continue, subject to such reasonable regulations, policies, and practices as the Secretary considers to be necessary in accordance with—
(A) section 4(d)(4) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(4)); and
(3) ADJACENT MANAGEMENT.—
(4) MILITARY OVERFLIGHTS.—Nothing in this section restricts or precludes—
(5) WILDFIRE, INSECT, AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT.—In accordance with section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)), the Secretary may take such measures in the Wilderness as are necessary for the control of fire, insects, and diseases (including, as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, the coordination of the activities with a State or local agency).
(6) WILDFIRE MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS.—Nothing in this section precludes a Federal, State, or local agency from conducting wildfire management operations (including operations using aircraft or mechanized equipment).
(7) WATER RIGHTS.—
(A) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this paragraph is to protect the wilderness values of the land designated as wilderness by this section by means other than a federally reserved water right.
(B) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section—
(i) constitutes an express or implied reservation by the United States of any water or water rights with respect to the Wilderness;
(C) NEVADA WATER LAW.—The Secretary shall follow the procedural and substantive requirements of State law in order to obtain and hold any water rights not in existence on the date of enactment of this Act with respect to the Wilderness.
(D) NEW PROJECTS.—
(i) DEFINITION OF WATER RESOURCE FACILITY.—
(I) IN GENERAL.—In this subparagraph, the term “water resource facility” means irrigation and pumping facilities, reservoirs, water conservation works, aqueducts, canals, ditches, pipelines, wells, hydropower projects, transmission and other ancillary facilities, and other water diversion, storage, and carriage structures.
(ii) RESTRICTION ON NEW WATER RESOURCE FACILITIES.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, on or after the date of enactment of this Act, neither the President nor any other officer, employee, or agent of the United States shall fund, assist, authorize, or issue a license or permit for the development of any new water resource facility within a wilderness area, any portion of which is located in the County.
(d) Release of wilderness study areas.—
(1) FINDING.—Congress finds that, for the purposes of section 603(c) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782(c)), the land described in paragraph (3) has been adequately studied for wilderness designation.
(2) RELEASE.—Any public land described in paragraph (3) that is not designated as wilderness by this section—
(A) is no longer subject to—
(i) section 603(c) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782(c)); or
(B) shall be managed in accordance with the applicable land use plans adopted under section 202 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712).
(e) Wildlife management.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with section 4(d)(7) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(7)), nothing in this section affects or diminishes the jurisdiction of the State with respect to fish and wildlife management, including the regulation of hunting, fishing, and trapping, in the Wilderness.
(2) MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES.—In furtherance of the purposes and principles of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the Secretary may conduct any management activities in the Wilderness that are necessary to maintain or restore fish and wildlife populations and the habitats to support the populations, if the activities are carried out—
(B) in accordance with—
(i) the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.); and
(ii) the guidelines set forth in Appendix B of the report of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives accompanying H.R. 2570 of the 101st Congress (House Report 101–405), including the occasional and temporary use of motorized vehicles if the use, as determined by the Secretary, would promote healthy, viable, and more naturally distributed wildlife populations that would enhance wilderness values with the minimal impact necessary to reasonably accomplish those tasks.
(3) EXISTING ACTIVITIES.—Consistent with section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)) and in accordance with the guidelines set forth in Appendix B of the report of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives accompanying H.R. 2570 of the 101st Congress (House Report 101–405), the State may continue to use aircraft, including helicopters, to survey, capture, transplant, monitor, and provide water for wildlife populations in the Wilderness.
(4) HUNTING, FISHING, AND TRAPPING.—
(5) AGREEMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The State, including a designee of the State, may conduct wildlife management activities in the Wilderness—
(i) in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the agreement between the Secretary and the State entitled “Memorandum of Understanding between the Bureau of Land Management and the Nevada Department of Wildlife Supplement No. 9” and signed November and December 2003, including any amendments to the agreement agreed to by the Secretary and the State; and
(f) Land exchanges.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(2) ACQUISITION OF LAND AND INTERESTS IN LAND.—Consistent with applicable law and subject to paragraph (3), the Secretary may exchange the Federal land for non-Federal land.
(3) CONDITIONS.—Each land exchange under paragraph (1) shall be subject to—
(4) INCORPORATION OF ACQUIRED LAND AND INTERESTS IN LAND.—Any non-Federal land or interest in the non-Federal land within the boundary of the Wilderness that is acquired by the United States under this subsection after the date of enactment of this Act shall be added to and administered as part of the Wilderness.
(g) Native American cultural and religious uses.—Nothing in this section alters or diminishes the treaty rights of any Indian tribe (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)).
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT AREA.—The term “Conservation Management Area” means the Rocky Mountain Front Conservation Management Area established by subsection (b)(1)(A).
(3) DISTRICT.—The term “district” means the Rocky Mountain Ranger District of the Lewis and Clark National Forest.
(4) MAP.—The term “map” means the map entitled “Rocky Mountain Front Heritage Act” and dated October 27, 2011.
(5) NONMOTORIZED RECREATION TRAIL.—The term “nonmotorized recreation trail” means a trail designed for hiking, bicycling, or equestrian use.
(b) Rocky Mountain Front Conservation Management Area.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, there is established the Rocky Mountain Front Conservation Management Area in the State.
(B) AREA INCLUDED.—The Conservation Management Area shall consist of approximately 195,073 acres of Federal land managed by the Forest Service and 13,087 acres of Federal land managed by the Bureau of Land Management in the State, as generally depicted on the map.
(C) INCORPORATION OF ACQUIRED LAND AND INTERESTS.—Any land or interest in land that is located in the Conservation Management Area and is acquired by the United States from a willing seller shall—
(ii) be managed in accordance with—
(I) in the case of land managed by the Forest Service—
(aa) the Act of March 1, 1911 (commonly known as the “Weeks Law”) (16 U.S.C. 552 et seq.); and
(II) in the case of land managed, by the Bureau of Land Management, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.);
(2) PURPOSES.—The purposes of the Conservation Management Area are to conserve, protect, and enhance for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations the recreational, scenic, historical, cultural, fish, wildlife, roadless, and ecological values of the Conservation Management Area.
(3) MANAGEMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall manage the Conservation Management Area—
(i) in a manner that conserves, protects, and enhances the resources of the Conservation Management Area; and
(ii) in accordance with—
(I) the laws (including regulations) and rules applicable to the National Forest System for land managed by the Forest Service;
(II) the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) for land managed by the Bureau of Land Management;
(B) USES.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall only allow such uses of the Conservation Management Area that the Secretary determines would further the purposes described in paragraph (2).
(ii) MOTORIZED VEHICLES.—
(I) IN GENERAL.—The use of motorized vehicles in the Conservation Management Area shall be permitted only on existing roads, trails, and areas designated for use by such vehicles as of the date of enactment of this Act.
(II) NEW OR TEMPORARY ROADS.—Except as provided in subclause (III), no new or temporary roads shall be constructed within the Conservation Management Area.
(III) EXCEPTIONS.—Nothing in subclause (I) or (II) prevents the Secretary from—
(aa) rerouting or closing an existing road or trail to protect natural resources from degradation, as determined to be appropriate by the Secretary;
(bb) constructing a temporary road on which motorized vehicles are permitted as part of a vegetation management project in any portion of the Conservation Management Area located not more than 1⁄4 mile from the Teton Road, South Teton Road, Sun River Road, Beaver Willow Road, or Benchmark Road;
(iii) GRAZING.—The Secretary shall permit grazing within the Conservation Management Area, if established on the date of enactment of this Act—
(c) Designation of wilderness additions.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the following Federal land in the State is designated as wilderness and as additions to existing components of the National Wilderness Preservation System:
(A) BOB MARSHALL WILDERNESS.—Certain land in the Lewis and Clark National Forest, comprising approximately 50,401 acres, as generally depicted on the map, which shall be added to and administered as part of the Bob Marshall Wilderness designated under section 3 of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1132).
(B) SCAPEGOAT WILDERNESS.—Certain land in the Lewis and Clark National Forest, comprising approximately 16,711 acres, as generally depicted on the map, which shall be added to and administered as part of the Scapegoat Wilderness designated by the first section of Public Law 92–395 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note).
(2) MANAGEMENT OF WILDERNESS ADDITIONS.—Subject to valid existing rights, the land designated as wilderness additions by paragraph (1) shall be administered by the Secretary in accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), except that any reference in that Act to the effective date of that Act shall be deemed to be a reference to the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3) LIVESTOCK.—The grazing of livestock and the maintenance of existing facilities relating to grazing in the wilderness additions designated by this subsection, if established before the date of enactment of this Act, shall be permitted to continue in accordance with—
(A) section 4(d)(4) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(4)); and
(4) WILDFIRE, INSECT, AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT.—In accordance with section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)), within the wilderness additions designated by this subsection, the Secretary may take any measures that the Secretary determines to be necessary to control fire, insects, and diseases, including, as the Secretary determines appropriate, the coordination of those activities with a State or local agency.
(d) Maps and legal descriptions.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare maps and legal descriptions of the Conservation Management Area and the wilderness additions designated by subsections (b) and (c), respectively.
(e) Noxious weed management.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall prepare a comprehensive management strategy for preventing, controlling, and eradicating noxious weeds in the district.
(2) CONTENTS.—The management strategy shall—
(A) include recommendations to protect wildlife, forage, and other natural resources in the district from noxious weeds;
(B) identify opportunities to coordinate noxious weed prevention, control, and eradication efforts in the district with State and local agencies, Indian tribes, nonprofit organizations, and others;
(C) identify existing resources for preventing, controlling, and eradicating noxious weeds in the district;
(D) identify additional resources that are appropriate to effectively prevent, control, or eradicate noxious weeds in the district; and
(E) identify opportunities to coordinate with county weed districts in Glacier, Pondera, Teton, and Lewis and Clark Counties in the State to apply for grants and enter into agreements for noxious weed control and eradication projects under the Noxious Weed Control and Eradication Act of 2004 (7 U.S.C. 7781 et seq.).
(f) Nonmotorized recreation opportunities.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with interested parties, shall conduct a study to improve nonmotorized recreation trail opportunities (including mountain bicycling) on land not designated as wilderness within the district.
(g) Management of fish and wildlife; hunting and fishing.—Nothing in this section affects the jurisdiction of the State with respect to fish and wildlife management (including the regulation of hunting and fishing) on public land in the State.
(h) Overflights.—
(i) Release of wilderness study areas.—
(1) FINDING.—Congress finds that, for the purposes of section 603(c) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782(c)), the Zook Creek and Buffalo Creek wilderness study areas in the State have been adequately studied for wilderness designation.
(2) RELEASE.—The Zook Creek and Buffalo Creek wilderness study areas—
(A) are no longer subject to—
(i) section 603(c) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782(c)); or
(B) shall be managed in accordance with the applicable land use plans adopted under section 202 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712).
(j) Assessment update.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall review and update the assessment for oil and gas potential for the following wilderness study areas in the State:
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the review is completed under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report that describes the oil and gas potential for the wilderness study areas.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(b) Wovoka wilderness.—
(1) DESIGNATION.—In furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the Federal land managed by the Forest Service, as generally depicted on the Map, is designated as wilderness and as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to be known as the “Wovoka Wilderness”.
(2) BOUNDARY.—The boundary of any portion of the Wilderness that is bordered by a road shall be 150 feet from the centerline of the road.
(3) MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare a map and legal description of the Wilderness.
(c) Administration.—
(1) MANAGEMENT.—Subject to valid existing rights, the Wilderness shall be administered by the Secretary in accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), except that any reference in that Act to the effective date shall be considered to be a reference to the date of enactment of this Act.
(2) LIVESTOCK.—The grazing of livestock in the Wilderness, if established before the date of enactment of this Act, shall be allowed to continue, subject to such reasonable regulations, policies, and practices as the Secretary considers to be necessary, in accordance with—
(A) section 4(d)(4) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(4)); and
(3) INCORPORATION OF ACQUIRED LAND AND INTERESTS.—Any land or interest in land within the boundary of the Wilderness that is acquired by the United States after the date of enactment of this Act shall be added to and administered as part of the Wilderness.
(4) ADJACENT MANAGEMENT.—
(5) OVERFLIGHTS.—
(6) WILDFIRE, INSECT, AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT.—In accordance with section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)), the Secretary may take any measures in the Wilderness that the Secretary determines to be necessary for the control of fire, insects, and diseases, including, as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, the coordination of the activities with a State or local agency.
(7) WATER RIGHTS.—
(A) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that—
(i) the Wilderness is located—
(B) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this paragraph is to protect the wilderness values of the Wilderness by means other than a federally reserved water right.
(C) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this paragraph—
(i) constitutes an express or implied reservation by the United States of any water or water rights with respect to the Wilderness;
(D) NEVADA WATER LAW.—The Secretary shall follow the procedural and substantive requirements of State law in order to obtain and hold any water rights not in existence on the date of enactment of this Act with respect to the Wilderness.
(E) NEW PROJECTS.—
(i) DEFINITION OF WATER RESOURCE FACILITY.—
(I) IN GENERAL.—In this subparagraph, the term “water resource facility” means irrigation and pumping facilities, reservoirs, water conservation works, aqueducts, canals, ditches, pipelines, wells, hydropower projects, transmission and other ancillary facilities, and other water diversion, storage, and carriage structures.
(ii) RESTRICTION ON NEW WATER RESOURCE FACILITIES.—
(I) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, on or after the date of enactment of this Act, no officer, employee, or agent of the United States shall fund, assist, authorize, or issue a license or permit for the development of any new water resource facility within the Wilderness, any portion of which is located in the County.
(II) EXCEPTION.—If a permittee within the Bald Mountain grazing allotment submits an application for the development of water resources for the purpose of livestock watering by the date that is 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a water development permit within the non-wilderness boundaries of the Bald Mountain grazing allotment for the purposes of carrying out activities under paragraph (2).
(d) Wildlife management.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with section 4(d)(7) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(7)), nothing in this section affects or diminishes the jurisdiction of the State with respect to fish and wildlife management, including the regulation of hunting, fishing, and trapping, in the Wilderness.
(2) MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES.—In furtherance of the purposes and principles of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the Secretary may conduct any management activities in the Wilderness that are necessary to maintain or restore fish and wildlife populations and the habitats to support the populations, if the activities are carried out—
(B) in accordance with—
(i) the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.); and
(ii) the guidelines set forth in Appendix B of the report of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives accompanying H.R. 2570 of the 101st Congress (House Report 101–405), including the occasional and temporary use of motorized vehicles and aircraft, if the use, as determined by the Secretary, would promote healthy, viable, and more naturally distributed wildlife populations that would enhance wilderness values with the minimal impact necessary to reasonably accomplish those tasks.
(3) EXISTING ACTIVITIES.—Consistent with section 4(d)(1) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(1)) and in accordance with the guidelines set forth in Appendix B of House Report 101–405, the State may continue to use aircraft, including helicopters, to survey, capture, transplant, monitor, and provide water for wildlife populations in the Wilderness.
(4) HUNTING, FISHING, AND TRAPPING.—
(5) AGREEMENT.—The State, including a designee of the State, may conduct wildlife management activities in the Wilderness—
(A) in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the agreement between the Secretary and the State entitled “Memorandum of Understanding: Intermountain Region USDA Forest Service and the Nevada Department of Wildlife State of Nevada” and signed by the designee of the State on February 6, 1984, and by the designee of the Secretary on January 24, 1984, including any amendments, appendices, or additions to the agreement agreed to by the Secretary and the State or a designee; and
(e) Wildlife water development projects.—Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary shall authorize structures and facilities, including existing structures and facilities, for wildlife water development projects (including guzzlers) in the Wilderness if—
(a) Definition of withdrawal area.—In this section, the term “Withdrawal Area” means the land administered by the Forest Service and identified as “Withdrawal Area” on the map entitled “Wovoka Wilderness Area” and dated December 18, 2012.
(b) Withdrawal.—Subject to valid existing rights, all Federal land within the Withdrawal Area is withdrawn from all forms of—
(a) In general.—Section 2971(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1044) is amended—
(1) by striking “subsection (a) is the Federal land” and inserting the following: “subsection (a) is—
(2) by striking “section 2912.” and inserting the following: “section 2912;
“(2) approximately 7,556 acres of public land described at Public Law 88–46 and commonly known as the Cuddeback Lake Air Force Range; and
“(3) approximately 4,480 acres comprised of all the public lands within: Sections 31 and 32 of Township 29S, Range 43E; Sections 12, 13, 24, and 25 of Township 30S, Range 42E; and Section 5 and the northern half of Section 6 of Township 31S, Range 43E, Mount Diablo Meridian, in the county of San Bernardino in the State of California, (but excluding the parcel identified as ‘AF Fee Simple’) as depicted on the map entitled: ‘Cuddeback Area of the Golden Valley Proposed Wilderness Additions, June 2014’.”.
(b) Expirational repeal.—The Act entitled “An Act to provide for the withdrawal and reservation for the use of the Department of the Air Force of certain public lands of the United States at Cuddeback Lake Air Force Range, California, for defense purposes”, as approved June 21, 1963 (Public Law 88–46; 77 Stat. 69), is repealed.
(a) Designation.—Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (210), as added by section 3060(b), the following:
“(211) ILLABOT CREEK, WASHINGTON.—
“(A) The 14.3-mile segment from the headwaters of Illabot Creek to the northern terminus as generally depicted on the map titled ‘Illabot Creek Proposed WSR–Northern Terminus’, dated September 15, 2009, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture as follows:
(b) No condemnation.—No land or interest in land within the boundary of the river segment designated by paragraph (211) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) may be acquired by condemnation.
(c) Adjacent management.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in paragraph (211) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) creates a protective perimeter or buffer zone outside the designated boundary of the river segment designated by that paragraph.
(2) OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES.—The fact that an activity or use can be seen or heard within the boundary of the river segment designated by paragraph (211) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) shall not preclude the activity or use outside the boundary of the river segment.
(a) Designation of Wild and Scenic River Segments.—Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (211), as added by section 3071(a), the following:
“(212) MISSISQUOI RIVER AND TROUT RIVER, VERMONT.—The following segments in the State of Vermont, to be administered by the Secretary of the Interior as a recreational river:
“(A) The 20.5-mile segment of the Missisquoi River from the Lowell/Westfield town line to the Canadian border in North Troy, excluding the property and project boundary of the Troy and North Troy hydroelectric facilities.
(b) Management.—
(1) MANAGEMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The river segments designated by paragraph (212) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) shall be managed in accordance with—
(i) the Upper Missisquoi and Trout Rivers Management Plan developed during the study described in section 5(b)(19) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(b)(19)) (referred to in this subsection as the “management plan”); and
(B) COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN.—The management plan, as finalized in March 2013, and as amended, shall be considered to satisfy the requirements for a comprehensive management plan pursuant to section 3(d) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(d)).
(C) ADJACENT MANAGEMENT.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in paragraph (212) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) creates a protective perimeter or buffer zone outside the designated boundary of the river segments designated by that paragraph.
(ii) OUTSIDE ACTIVITIES.—The fact that an activity or use can be seen or heard within the boundary of the river segments designated by paragraph (212) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) shall not preclude the activity or use outside the boundary of the river segments.
(2) COMMITTEE.—The Secretary shall coordinate management responsibility of the Secretary of the Interior under this section with the Committee, as specified in the management plan.
(3) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—In order to provide for the long-term protection, preservation, and enhancement of the river segments designated by paragraph (212) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)), the Secretary of the Interior may enter into cooperative agreements pursuant to sections 10(e) and 11(b)(1) (16 U.S.C. 1281(e), 1282(b)(1)) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act with—
(4) EFFECT ON EXISTING HYDROELECTRIC FACILITIES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The designation of the river segments by paragraph (212) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)), does not—
(i) preclude the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from licensing, relicensing, or otherwise authorizing the operation or continued operation of the Troy Hydroelectric, North Troy, or Enosburg Falls hydroelectric project under the terms of licenses or exemptions in effect on the date of enactment of this Act; or
(B) HYDROPOWER PROCEEDINGS.—Resource protection, mitigation, or enhancement measures required by Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hydropower proceedings—
(ii) may be located within the river segments designated by paragraph (212) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)), subject to a written determination by the Secretary that the measures are consistent with the purposes of the designation.
(5) LAND MANAGEMENT.—
(A) ZONING ORDINANCES.—For the purpose of the segments designated by paragraph (212) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)), the zoning ordinances adopted by the towns of Berkshire, Enosburg Falls, Enosburgh, Montgomery, North Troy, Richford, Troy, and Westfield in the State of Vermont, including provisions for conservation of floodplains, wetlands, and watercourses associated with the segments, shall be considered to satisfy the standards and requirements of section 6(c) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1277(c)).
(B) ACQUISITIONS OF LAND.—The authority of the Secretary to acquire land for the purposes of the segments designated by paragraph (212) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) shall be—
(C) NO CONDEMNATION.—No land or interest in land within the boundary of the river segments designated by paragraph (212) of section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1274(a)) may be acquired by condemnation.
(6) RELATION TO NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM.—Notwithstanding section 10(c) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1281(c)), the Missisquoi and Trout Rivers shall not be administered as part of the National Park System or be subject to regulations that govern the National Park System.
(a) Designation of segments of White Clay Creek, as scenic and recreational rivers.—Section 3(a)(163) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S. C. 1274(a)(163)) is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)—
(B) by striking “the recommended designation and classification maps (dated June 2000)” and inserting “the map entitled ‘White Clay Creek Wild and Scenic River Designated Area Map’ and dated July 2008, the map entitled ‘White Clay Creek Wild and Scenic River Classification Map’ and dated July 2008, and the map entitled ‘White Clay Creek National Wild and Scenic River Proposed Additional Designated Segments-July 2008’”;
(3) by striking subparagraph (H) and inserting the following:
“(H) 14.3 miles of the main stem, including Lamborn Run, that flow through the boundaries of the White Clay Creek Preserve, Pennsylvania and Delaware, and White Clay Creek State Park, Delaware, beginning at the confluence of the east and middle branches in London Britain Township, Pennsylvania, downstream to the northern boundary line of the City of Newark, Delaware, as a scenic river.”.
(b) Administration of White Clay Creek.—Sections 4 through 8 of Public Law 106–357 (16 U.S.C. 1274 note; 114 Stat. 1393), shall be applicable to the additional segments of White Clay Creek designated by the amendments made by subsection (a).
(c) No condemnation.—No land or interest in land within the boundary of the additional segments of White Clay Creek designated by the amendments made by subsection (a) may be acquired by condemnation.
(a) Designation for study.—Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (141), as added by section 3041(e), the following:
“(142) BEAVER, CHIPUXET, QUEEN, WOOD, AND PAWCATUCK RIVERS, RHODE ISLAND AND CONNECTICUT.—The following segments:
“(A) The approximately 10-mile segment of the Beaver River from the headwaters in Exeter, Rhode Island, to the confluence with the Pawcatuck River.
“(B) The approximately 5-mile segment of the Chipuxet River from Hundred Acre Pond to the outlet into Worden Pond.
“(C) The approximately 10-mile segment of the upper Queen River from the headwaters to the Usquepaugh Dam in South Kingstown, Rhode Island, including all tributaries of the upper Queen River.
“(D) The approximately 5-mile segment of the lower Queen (Usquepaugh) River from the Usquepaugh Dam to the confluence with the Pawcatuck River.
“(E) The approximately 11-mile segment of the upper Wood River from the headwaters to Skunk Hill Road in Richmond and Hopkinton, Rhode Island, including all tributaries of the upper Wood River.
“(F) The approximately 10-mile segment of the lower Wood River from Skunk Hill Road to the confluence with the Pawcatuck River.
“(143) NASHUA RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.—The following segments:
“(A) The approximately 19-mile segment of the mainstem of the Nashua River from the confluence with the North and South Nashua Rivers in Lancaster, Massachusetts, north to the Massachusetts-New Hampshire State line, excluding the approximately 4.8-mile segment of the mainstem of the Nashua River from the Route 119 bridge in Groton, Massachusetts, downstream to the confluence with the Nissitissit River in Pepperell, Massachusetts.
(b) Study and report.—Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (20), as added by section 3041(e), the following:
“(21) BEAVER, CHIPUXET, QUEEN, WOOD, AND PAWCATUCK RIVERS, RHODE ISLAND AND CONNECTICUT; NASHUA RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS; YORK RIVER, MAINE.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior shall—
“(B) REPORT REQUIREMENTS.—In assessing the potential additions to the wild and scenic river system, the report submitted under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall—
“(i) determine the effect of the designation on—
“(I) existing commercial and recreational activities, such as hunting, fishing, trapping, recreational shooting, motor boat use, and bridge construction;
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) FUND.—The term “Fund” means the Northern Cheyenne Trust Fund identified in the June 7, 1999 Agreement Settling Certain Issues Relating to the Tongue River Dam Project, which was entered into by the Tribe, the State, and delegates of the Secretary, and managed by the Office of Special Trustee in the Department of the Interior.
(2) GREAT NORTHERN PROPERTIES.—The term “Great Northern Properties” means the Great Northern Properties Limited Partnership, which is a Delaware limited partnership.
(b) Tribal fee land to be taken into trust.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall take into trust for the benefit of the Tribe the approximately 932 acres of land depicted on—
(c) Mineral rights to be taken into trust.—
(1) COMPLETION OF MINERAL CONVEYANCES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary receives the notification described in paragraph (3), in a single transaction—
(i) Great Northern Properties shall convey to the Tribe all right, title, and interest of Great Northern Properties, consisting of coal and iron ore mineral interests, underlying the land on the Reservation generally depicted as “Great Northern Properties” on the map entitled “Northern Cheyenne Land Act – Coal Tracts” and dated April 22, 2014; and
(ii) subject to subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall convey to Great Northern Properties all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the coal mineral interests underlying the land generally depicted as “Bull Mountains” and “East Fork” on the map entitled “Northern Cheyenne Federal Tracts” and dated April 22, 2014.
(B) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall ensure that the deed for the conveyance authorized by subparagraph (A)(ii) shall include a covenant running with the land that—
(i) precludes the coal conveyed from being mined by any method other than underground mining techniques until any surface owner (as defined in section 714(e) of Public Law 95–87 (30 U.S.C. 1304(e))) for a specific tract has provided to Great Northern Properties written consent to enter the specific tract and commence surface mining;
(ii) shall not create any property interest in the United States or any surface owner (as defined in section 714(e) of Public Law 95–87 (30 U.S.C. 1304(e))); and
(2) TREATMENT OF LAND TRANSFERRED TO TRIBE.—
(3) REVENUE SHARING AGREEMENT.—The Tribe shall notify the Secretary, in writing, that—
(4) WAIVER OF LEGAL CLAIMS.—As a condition of the conveyances of mineral interests under paragraph (1)(A)—
(5) RESCISSION OF MINERAL CONVEYANCES.—If any portion of the mineral interests conveyed under paragraph (1)(A) is invalidated by final judgment of a court of the United States—
(d) Transfer of Northern Cheyenne Trust Fund to Tribe.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, all amounts in the Fund shall be deposited in the Permanent Fund.
(e) Land consolidation and fractionation reporting.—
(1) INVENTORY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Tribe, shall prepare an inventory of fractionated land interests held by the United States in trust for the benefit of—
(2) REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Tribe, shall prepare periodic reports regarding obstacles to consolidating trust land ownership on the Reservation.
(B) CONTENTS.—The reports under this paragraph shall include—
(i) a description of existing obstacles to consolidating trust land ownership, including the extent of fractionation;
(ii) a description of progress achieved by the Tribe toward reducing fractionation and increasing trust land ownership;
(iii) an analysis of progress achieved by the Tribe toward making agricultural use economical on trust land; and
(iv) any applicable outcomes and lessons learned from land consolidation activities undertaken pursuant to the Indian Land Consolidation Act (25 U.S.C. 2201 et seq.).
(C) SUBMISSION.—The Secretary shall submit the reports under this paragraph to the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives not less frequently than once each calendar year for the 5-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
(a) Definition.—In this section, the term “Property” means approximately 1,553 acres, including federally owned structures thereon, located within the boundary of the former Badger Army Ammunition Plant near Baraboo, Wisconsin.
(b) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Administrative jurisdiction over the Property is hereby transferred from the Secretary of the Army to the Secretary of the Interior.
(2) STRUCTURES.—Upon receipt by the Secretary of the Interior of a resolution from the Ho-Chunk Nation accepting title to the structures, all federally owned structures on the Property are hereby transferred to the Ho-Chunk Nation in fee.
(c) Retention of environmental response responsibilities by the army.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the transfer of the Property by subsection (b), the Secretary of the Army shall be responsible—
(A) for obtaining final case closure and no-action-required remedial determinations for the Property from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; and
(B) for any additional remedial actions, with respect to any hazardous substance remaining on the Property, found to be necessary to protect human health and the environment to support the recreational and grazing land reuse (including agricultural activities necessary to sustain such reuse) considered for the final case closure and no-action-required determinations of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
(2) LIMITATION.—The responsibility described in paragraph (1) is limited to the remediation of releases of hazardous substances resulting from the activities of the Department of Defense that occurred before the date on which administrative jurisdiction of the Property is transferred under this section.
(3) OTHER USES OF THE PROPERTY BY THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR OR THE HO-CHUNK NATION.—The Secretary of the Interior shall not take any action to authorize, nor shall the Ho-Chunk Nation undertake or allow, any activity on or use of the Property inconsistent with the case closure conditions required by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources except as provided in this paragraph. Nothing in this section shall preclude the Ho-Chunk Nation from undertaking, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and without any cost to the Department of Defense or the Department of the Interior, such additional action necessary to allow for uses of the Property other than uses that are consistent with the case closure conditions required by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
(4) ACCESS BY THE UNITED STATES.— (A) The United States retains and reserves a perpetual and assignable easement and right of access on, over, and through the Property, to enter upon the Property in any case in which an environmental response or corrective action is found to be necessary on the part of the United States, without regard to whether such environmental response or corrective action is on the Property or on adjoining or nearby lands. Such easement and right of access includes, without limitation, the right to perform any environmental investigation, survey, monitoring, sampling, testing, drilling, boring, coring, testpitting, installing monitoring or pumping wells or other treatment facilities, response action, corrective action, or any other action necessary for the United States to meet its responsibilities under applicable laws and as provided for in this section.
(B) In exercising such easement and right of access, the United States shall provide the property holder or owner and their successors or assigns, as the case may be, with reasonable notice of its intent to enter upon the Property and exercise its rights under this clause, which notice may be severely curtailed or even eliminated in emergency situations. The United States shall use reasonable means to avoid and to minimize interference with the property holder’s or owner’s and their successors’ and assigns’, as the case may be, quiet enjoyment of the Property. At the completion of work, the work site shall be reasonably restored. Such easement and right of access includes the right to obtain and use utility services, including water, gas, electricity, sewer, and communications services available on the Property at a reasonable charge to the United States. Excluding the reasonable charges for such utility services, no fee, charge, or compensation will be due the property holder or owner, their successors and assigns, for the exercise of the easement and right of access hereby retained and reserved by the United States.
(C) In exercising such easement and right of access, neither the Ho-Chunk Nation nor its successors and assigns, as the case may be, shall have any claim at law or equity against the United States or any officer, employee, agent, contractor of any tier, or servant of the United States based on actions taken by the United States or its officers, employees, agents, contractors of any tier, or servants pursuant to and in accordance with this clause: Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be considered as a waiver by the Ho-Chunk Nation, its successors and assigns, of any remedy available to them under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
(d) Treatment of existing easements, permit rights, and rights-of-way.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under this section recognizes and preserves, in perpetuity and without the right of revocation except as provided in paragraph (2), easements, permit rights, and rights-of-way and access to such easements and rights-of-way of any applicable utility service provider in existence at the time of the conveyance prior to the date of enactment of this Act. The rights recognized and preserved include the right to upgrade applicable utility services.
(2) TERMINATION.—An easement, permit right, or right-of-way recognized and preserved under paragraph (1) shall terminate only—
(3) ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS.—The Secretary of the Interior shall grant to a utility service provider, without consideration, such additional easements across the property transferred under this section as the Secretary considers necessary to accommodate the relocation or reconnection of a utility service existing prior to the date of enactment of this section on property held by the Secretary of the Interior in trust for the Ho-Chunk Nation.
(e) Prohibition on gaming.—Any real property taken into trust under this section shall not be eligible, or used, for any gaming activity carried out under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Interior shall provide public access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain in the Hanford Reach National Monument for educational, recreational, historical, scientific, cultural, and other purposes, including—
(b) Cooperative agreements.—The Secretary of the Interior may enter into cooperative agreements to facilitate access to the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain—
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The term “non-Federal land” means certain parcels of land located in the City and owned by the City, which are more particularly described as follows:
(A) Block 42, Original Townsite of Anchorage, Anchorage Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska, consisting of approximately 1.93 acres, commonly known as the Egan Center, Petrovich Park, and Old City Hall.
(b) Conveyance of reversionary interests, Anchorage, Alaska.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall convey to the City, without consideration, the reversionary interests of the United States in and to the non-Federal land for the purpose of unencumbering the title to the non-Federal land to enable economic development of the non-Federal land.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) MAP.—The term “Map” means the map entitled “Hermiston Agricultural Research and Extension Center” and dated April 7, 2014.
(b) Release of retained interests.—
(c) Conveyance of orphan parcel.—Notwithstanding the land use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712, 1713), not later than 180 days after the date on which the Secretary receives a request from the State, the Secretary shall convey to the State, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States to and in the approximately 6 acres identified on the Map as “Bureau of Land Management Administered Land”.
Section 9 of the Act of August 11, 1939 (commonly known as the “Water Conservation and Utilization Act”) (16 U.S.C. 590z–7) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following: “(b) Certain leases authorized.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary— “(2) PROCESS.—In entering into a lease of power privileges under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall use the processes, terms, and conditions applicable to a lease under section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c)). “(3) FINDINGS NOT REQUIRED.—No findings under section 3 shall be required for a lease under paragraph (1). “(4) RIGHTS RETAINED BY LESSEE.—Except as otherwise provided under paragraph (5), all right, title, and interest in and to installed power facilities constructed by non-Federal entities pursuant to a lease under paragraph (1), and any direct revenues derived from that lease, shall remain with the lessee.
Notwithstanding section 3(2) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 796(2)), Federal land within the Sabine National Forest or the Indian Mounds Wilderness Area occupied by the Toledo Bend Hydroelectric Project numbered 2305 shall not be considered to be—
(1) a reservation, for purposes of section 4(e) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 797(e));
(2) land or other property of the United States for purposes of recompensing the United States for the use, occupancy, or enjoyment of the land under section 10(e)(1) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 803(e)(1)); or
(3) land of the United States, for purposes of section 24 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 818).
Section 2(1) of the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract Extension Act (Public Law 112–139; 126 Stat. 390) is amended by striking “4 years” and inserting “10 years”.
(a) Liberty Memorial as World War I Museum and Memorial.—
(b) Pershing Park as World War I Memorial.—
(1) REDESIGNATION OF PERSHING PARK.—Pershing Park in the District of Columbia is hereby redesignated as a “World War I Memorial”.
(2) CEREMONIES.—The Commission may plan, develop, and execute ceremonies for the rededication of Pershing Park, as it approaches its 50th anniversary, as a World War I Memorial and for the enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work as authorized by paragraph (3).
(3) AUTHORITY TO ENHANCE COMMEMORATIVE WORK.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Commission may enhance the General Pershing Commemorative Work by constructing on the land designated by paragraph (1) as a World War I Memorial appropriate sculptural and other commemorative elements, including landscaping, to further honor the service of members of the United States Armed Forces in World War I.
(B) GENERAL PERSHING COMMEMORATIVE WORK DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “General Pershing Commemorative Work” means the memorial to the late John J. Pershing, General of the Armies of the United States, who commanded the American Expeditionary Forces in World War I, and to the officers and men under his command, as authorized by Public Law 89–786 (80 Stat. 1377).
(4) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMORATIVE WORKS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code, applies to the enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work under this subsection.
(5) NO INFRINGEMENT UPON EXISTING MEMORIAL.—The World War I Memorial designated by paragraph (1) may not interfere with or encroach on the District of Columbia War Memorial.
(6) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.—
(A) USE FOR OTHER WORLD WAR I COMMEMORATIVE ACTIVITIES.—If, upon payment of all expenses for the enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work under this subsection (including the maintenance and preservation amount required by section 8906(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code), there remains a balance of funds received for such purpose, the Commission may use the amount of the balance for other commemorative activities authorized under the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2448).
(B) USE FOR OTHER COMMEMORATIVE WORKS.—If the authority for enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work and the authority of the Commission to plan and conduct commemorative activities under the World War I Centennial Commission Act have expired and there remains a balance of funds received for the enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work, the Commission shall transmit the amount of the balance to a separate account with the National Park Foundation, to be available to the Secretary of the Interior following the process provided in section 8906(b)(4) of title 40, United States Code, for accounts established under section 8906(b)(3) of such title, except that funds in such account may only be obligated subject to appropriation.
(7) AUTHORIZATION TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION AFTER TERMINATION OF COMMISSION.—Section 8 of the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272) is amended—
(A) in subsection (a), by striking “The Centennial Commission” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (c), the Centennial Commission”; and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Exception for completion of World War I Memorial.—The Centennial Commission may perform such work as is necessary to complete the rededication of a World War I Memorial and enhancement of the General Pershing Commemorative Work under section 3091(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, subject to section 8903 of title 40, United States Code.”.
(c) Additional amendments to World War I Centennial Commission Act.—
(1) EX OFFICIO AND OTHER ADVISORY MEMBERS.—Section 4 of the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2449) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(e) Ex officio and other advisory members.— “(1) POWERS.—The individuals listed in paragraphs (2) and (3), or their designated representative, shall serve on the Centennial Commission solely to provide advice and information to the members of the Centennial Commission appointed pursuant to subsection (b)(1), and shall not be considered members for purposes of any other provision of this Act. “(3) OTHER ADVISORY MEMBERS.—The following individuals shall serve as other advisory members: “(A) Four members appointed by the Secretary of Defense in the following manner: One from the Navy, one from the Marine Corps, one from the Army, and one from the Air Force.
(2) PAYABLE RATE OF STAFF.—Section 7(c)(2) of the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2451) is amended—
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the end and inserting “, without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates.”; and
(3) LIMITATION ON OBLIGATION OF FEDERAL FUNDS.—
(A) LIMITATION.—Section 9 of the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2453) is amended to read as follows:
(B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 7(f) of the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2452) is repealed.
(C) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to section 9 in the table of contents of the World War I Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 112–272; 126 Stat. 2448) is amended to read as follows:
“Sec. 9. Limitation on obligation of Federal funds.”.(a) Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(A) COUNCIL.—The term “Council” means the Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument Advisory Council established by paragraph (6)(A).
(C) LOCAL GOVERNMENT.—The term “local government” means the City of Las Vegas, City of North Las Vegas, or the County.
(D) MANAGEMENT PLAN.—The term “management plan” means the management plan for the Monument developed under paragraph (3)(E).
(E) MAP.—The term “Map” means the map entitled “Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument Proposed Boundary”, numbered 963/123,142, and dated December 2013.
(F) MONUMENT.—The term “Monument” means the Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument established by paragraph (2)(A).
(G) PUBLIC LAND.—The term “public land” has the meaning given the term “public lands” in section 103 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1702).
(H) PUBLIC WATER AGENCY.—The term “public water agency” means a regional wholesale water provider that is engaged in the acquisition of water on behalf of, or the delivery of water to, water purveyors who are member agencies of the public water agency.
(2) ESTABLISHMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—In order to conserve, protect, interpret, and enhance for the benefit of present and future generations the unique and nationally important paleontological, scientific, educational, and recreational resources and values of the land described in this paragraph, there is established in the State, subject to valid existing rights, the Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument.
(B) BOUNDARIES.—The Monument shall consist of approximately 22,650 acres of public land in the County identified as “Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument”, as generally depicted on the Map.
(C) MAP; LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall prepare an official map and legal description of the boundaries of the Monument.
(D) ACQUISITION OF LAND.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Subject to clause (ii), the Secretary may acquire land or interests in land within the boundaries of the Monument by donation, purchase from a willing seller with donated or appropriated funds, exchange, or transfer from another Federal agency.
(E) WITHDRAWALS.—Subject to valid existing rights and paragraphs (4) and (5), any land within the Monument or any land or interest in land that is acquired by the United States for inclusion in the Monument after the date of enactment of this section is withdrawn from—
(F) RELATIONSHIP TO CLARK COUNTY MULTI-SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN.—
(i) AMENDMENT TO PLAN.—The Secretary shall credit, on an acre-for-acre basis, approximately 22,650 acres of the land conserved for the Monument under this section toward the development of additional non-Federal land within the County through an amendment to the Clark County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan.
(G) TERMINATION OF UPPER LAS VEGAS WASH CONSERVATION TRANSFER AREA.—The Upper Las Vegas Wash Conservation Transfer Area established by the Record of Decision dated October 21, 2011, for the Upper Las Vegas Wash Conservation Transfer Area Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, is terminated.
(3) ADMINISTRATION OF MONUMENT.—
(A) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION.—Administrative jurisdiction over the approximately 22,650 acres of public land depicted on the Map as “Tule Springs Fossil Bed National Monument” is transferred from the Bureau of Land Management to the National Park Service.
(B) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary shall administer the Monument—
(i) in a manner that conserves, protects, interprets, and enhances the resources and values of the Monument; and
(ii) in accordance with—
(II) the provisions of laws generally applicable to units of the National Park System (including the National Park Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)); and
(C) BUFFER ZONES.—The establishment of the Monument shall not—
(i) lead to the creation of express or implied protective perimeters or buffer zones around or over the Monument;
(D) AIR AND WATER QUALITY.—Nothing in this section alters the standards governing air or water quality outside the boundary of the Monument.
(E) MANAGEMENT PLAN.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available to carry out this subparagraph, the Secretary shall develop a management plan that provides for the long-term protection and management of the Monument.
(ii) COMPONENTS.—The management plan—
(I) shall—
(aa) be prepared in accordance with section 12(b) of the National Park System General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a–7(b)); and
(iii) PUBLIC PROCESS.—In preparing the management plan, the Secretary shall—
(II) provide an opportunity for public involvement in the preparation and review of the management plan, including holding public meetings;
(F) INTERPRETATION, EDUCATION, AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.—
(4) RENEWABLE ENERGY TRANSMISSION FACILITIES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of a complete application from a qualified electric utility, the Secretary, in accordance with applicable laws (including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and title V of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1761 et seq.)), shall issue to the qualified electric utility a 400-foot-wide right-of-way for the construction and maintenance of high-voltage transmission facilities depicted on the map entitled “North Las Vegas Valley Overview” and dated November 5, 2013, as “Renewable Energy Transmission Corridor” if the high-voltage transmission facilities do not conflict with other previously authorized rights-of-way within the corridor.
(B) REQUIREMENTS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The high-voltage transmission facilities shall—
(II) employ best management practices identified as part of the compliance of the Secretary with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) to limit impacts on the Monument.
(C) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The issuance of a notice to proceed on the construction of the high-voltage transmission facilities within the right-of-way under subparagraph (A) shall be subject to terms and conditions that the Secretary (in consultation with the qualified electric utility), as part of the compliance of the Secretary with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), determines appropriate to protect and conserve the resources for which the Monument is managed.
(D) EXPIRATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY.—The right-of-way issued under subparagraph (A) shall expire on the date that is 15 years after the date of enactment of this section if construction of the high-voltage transmission facilities described in subparagraph (A) has not been initiated by that date, unless the Secretary determines that it is in the public interest to continue the right-of-way.
(5) WATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES.—
(A) WATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES CORRIDOR.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of 1 or more complete applications from a public water agency and except as provided in clause (ii), the Secretary, in accordance with applicable laws (including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and title V of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1761 et seq.)), shall issue to the public water agency a 100-foot-wide right-of-way for the construction, maintenance, repair, and replacement of a buried water conveyance pipeline and associated facilities within the “Water Conveyance Facilities Corridor” and the “Renewable Energy Transmission Corridor” depicted on the map entitled “North Las Vegas Valley Overview” and dated November 5, 2013.
(B) BURIED WATER CONVEYANCE PIPELINE.—On receipt of 1 or more complete applications from a unit of local government or public water agency, the Secretary, in accordance with applicable laws (including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and title V of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1761 et seq.)), shall issue to the unit of local government or public water agency a 100-foot-wide right-of-way for the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of a buried water conveyance pipeline to access the existing buried water pipeline turnout facility and surge tank located in the NE1⁄4 sec. 16 of T. 19 S. and R. 61 E.
(C) REQUIREMENTS.—
(i) BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.—The water conveyance facilities shall employ best management practices identified as part of the compliance of the Secretary with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) to limit the impacts of the water conveyance facilities on the Monument.
(D) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The issuance of a notice to proceed on the construction of the water conveyance facilities within the right-of-way under subparagraph (A) shall be subject to any terms and conditions that the Secretary, in consultation with the public water agency, as part of the compliance of the Secretary with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), determines appropriate to protect and conserve the resources for which the Monument is managed.
(6) TULE SPRINGS FOSSIL BEDS NATIONAL MONUMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL.—
(A) ESTABLISHMENT.—To provide guidance for the management of the Monument, there is established the Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument Advisory Council.
(B) MEMBERSHIP.—
(i) COMPOSITION.—The Council shall consist of 10 members, to be appointed by the Secretary, of whom—
(III) 1 member shall be a member of, or be nominated by, the city council of North Las Vegas, Nevada;
(IV) 1 member shall be a member of, or be nominated by, the tribal council of the Las Vegas Paiute Tribe;
(C) DUTIES OF COUNCIL.—The Council shall advise the Secretary with respect to the preparation and implementation of the management plan.
(E) CHAIRPERSON.—
(b) Addition of land to Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(A) CONSERVATION AREA.—The term “Conservation Area” means the Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area established by the Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area Establishment Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 460ccc et seq.).
(2) ADDITION OF LAND TO CONSERVATION AREA.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Conservation Area is expanded to include the land depicted on the Map as “Additions to Red Rock NCA”.
(B) MANAGEMENT PLAN.—Not later than 2 years after the date on which the land is acquired, the Secretary shall update the management plan for the Conservation Area to reflect the management requirements of the acquired land.
(c) Conveyance of Bureau of Land Management land to North Las Vegas.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(2) CONVEYANCE.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this section and subject to valid existing rights, upon the request of North Las Vegas, the Secretary shall convey to North Las Vegas, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the land described in paragraph (3).
(3) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in paragraph (2) consists of the land managed by the Bureau of Land Management described on the Map as the “North Las Vegas Job Creation Zone” (including the interests in the land).
(4) MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall finalize the legal description of the parcel to be conveyed under this subsection.
(5) USE OF LAND FOR NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—North Las Vegas may sell any portion of the land described in paragraph (3) for nonresidential development.
(C) FAIR MARKET VALUE.—The Secretary shall determine the fair market value of the land under subparagraph (B)(ii) based on an appraisal that is performed in accordance with—
(D) DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS.—The gross proceeds from the sale of land under subparagraph (A) shall be distributed in accordance with section 4(e) of the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–263; 112 Stat. 2345; 116 Stat. 2007; 117 Stat. 1317; 118 Stat. 2414; 120 Stat. 3045).
(6) USE OF LAND FOR RECREATION OR OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—North Las Vegas may retain a portion of the land described in paragraph (3) for public recreation or other public purposes consistent with the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.) by providing written notice of the election to the Secretary.
(7) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—North Las Vegas shall pay all appraisal costs, survey costs, and other administrative costs necessary for the preparation and completion of any patents for, and transfers of title to, the land described in paragraph (3).
(8) REVERSION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—If any parcel of land described in paragraph (3) is not conveyed for nonresidential development under this subsection or reserved for recreation or other public purposes under paragraph (6) by the date that is 30 years after the date of enactment of this section, the parcel of land shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, revert to the United States.
(d) Conveyance of Bureau of Land Management land to Las Vegas.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(2) CONVEYANCE.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this section, subject to valid existing rights, and notwithstanding the land use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712, 1713), the Secretary shall convey to Las Vegas, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the land described in paragraph (3).
(3) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in paragraph (2) consists of land managed by the Bureau of Land Management described on the Map as “Las Vegas Job Creation Zone” (including interests in the land).
(4) MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall finalize the legal description of the parcel to be conveyed under this subsection.
(5) USE OF LAND.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Las Vegas may sell any portion of the land described in paragraph (3) for nonresidential development.
(B) METHOD OF SALE.—The sale of land under subparagraph (A) shall be carried out, after consultation with the Las Vegas Paiute Tribe—
(C) FAIR MARKET VALUE.—The Secretary shall determine the fair market value of the land under subparagraph (B)(ii) based on an appraisal that is performed in accordance with—
(D) DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS.—The gross proceeds from the sale of land under subparagraph (A) shall be distributed in accordance with section 4(e) of the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–263; 112 Stat. 2345; 116 Stat. 2007; 117 Stat. 1317; 118 Stat. 2414; 120 Stat. 3045).
(6) USE OF LAND FOR RECREATION OR OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Las Vegas may retain a portion of the land described in paragraph (3) for public recreation or other public purposes consistent with the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.) by providing written notice of the election to the Secretary.
(7) ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.—Las Vegas shall pay all appraisal costs, survey costs, and other administrative costs necessary for the preparation and completion of any patents for, and transfers of title to, the land described in paragraph (3).
(8) REVERSION.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—If any parcel of land described in paragraph (3) is not conveyed for nonresidential development under this subsection or reserved for recreation or other public purposes under paragraph (6) by the date that is 30 years after the date of enactment of this section, the parcel of land shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, revert to the United States.
(e) Expansion of conveyance to Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.—Section 703 of the Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Natural Resources Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–282; 116 Stat. 2013) is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “and, subject to valid existing rights, the parcel of land identified as ‘Las Vegas Police Shooting Range’ on the map entitled ‘North Las Vegas Valley Overview’ and dated November 5, 2013”.
(f) Spring Mountains National Recreation Area withdrawal.—Section 8 of the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Act (16 U.S.C. 460hhh–6) is amended—
(2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following: “(b) Exceptions.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), W1⁄2 E1⁄2 and W1⁄2 sec. 27, T. 23 S., R. 58 E., Mt. Diablo Meridian is not subject to withdrawal under that subsection. “(2) EFFECT OF ENTRY UNDER PUBLIC LAND LAWS.—Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of subsection (a), the following are not subject to withdrawal under that paragraph: “(A) Any Federal land in the Recreation Area that qualifies for conveyance under Public Law 97–465 (commonly known as the ‘Small Tracts Act’) (16 U.S.C. 521c et seq.), which, notwithstanding section 7 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 521i), may be conveyed under that Act.
(g) Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 amendments.—Section 4 of the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–263; 112 Stat. 2344; 116 Stat. 2007) is amended—
(1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by striking “dated October 1, 2002” and inserting “dated September 17, 2012”; and
(2) in subsection (g), by adding at the end the following:
“(5) Notwithstanding paragraph (4), subject to paragraphs (1) through (3), Clark County may convey to a unit of local government or regional governmental entity, without consideration, land located within the Airport Environs Overlay District, as identified in the Cooperative Management Agreement described in section 3(3) of the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–263; 112 Stat. 2343), if the land is used for a water or wastewater treatment facility or any other public purpose consistent with uses allowed under the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the ‘Recreation and Public Purposes Act’) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.).”.
(h) Conveyance of land to the Nevada System of Higher Education.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(A) BOARD OF REGENTS.—The term “Board of Regents” means the Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education.
(B) CAMPUSES.—The term “Campuses” means the Great Basin College, College of Southern Nevada, and University of Las Vegas, Nevada, campuses.
(C) FEDERAL LAND.—The term “Federal land” means—
(i) the approximately 40 acres to be conveyed for the College of Southern Nevada, identified as “Parcel to be Conveyed”, as generally depicted on the map entitled “College of Southern Nevada Land Conveyance” and dated June 26, 2012;
(2) CONVEYANCES OF FEDERAL LAND TO SYSTEM.—
(A) CONVEYANCES.—Notwithstanding section 202 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712) and section 1(c) of the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869(c)), and subject to all valid existing rights and such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines to be necessary, the Secretary shall—
(i) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section, convey to the System, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to—
(I) the Federal land identified on the map entitled “Great Basin College Land Conveyance” and dated June 26, 2012, for the Great Basin College; and
(II) the Federal land identified on the map entitled “College of Southern Nevada Land Conveyance” and dated June 26, 2012, for the College of Southern Nevada, subject to the requirement that, as a precondition of the conveyance, the Board of Regents shall, by mutual assent, enter into a binding development agreement with the City of Las Vegas that—
(ii) convey to the System, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Federal land identified on the map entitled “North Las Vegas Valley Overview” and dated November 5, 2013, for the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, if the area identified as “Potential Utility Schedule” on the map is reserved for use for a potential 400-foot-wide utility corridor of certain rights-of-way for transportation and public utilities.
(B) CONDITIONS.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—As a condition of the conveyance under subparagraph (A), the Board of Regents shall agree in writing—
(ii) AGREEMENT WITH NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE.—
(I) IN GENERAL.—The Federal land conveyed to the System under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall be used in accordance with the agreement entitled the “Cooperative Interlocal Agreement between the Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education, on Behalf of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and the 99th Air Base Wing, Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada” and dated June 19, 2009.
(C) USE OF FEDERAL LAND.—The System may use the Federal land conveyed under subparagraph (A) for any public purposes consistent with uses allowed under the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.).
(D) REVERSION.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—If the Federal land or any portion of the Federal land conveyed under subparagraph (A) ceases to be used for the System, the Federal land, or any portion of the Federal land shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, revert to the United States.
(ii) UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS.—If the System fails to complete the first building or show progression toward development of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas campus on the applicable parcels of Federal land by the date that is 50 years after the date of receipt of certification of acceptable remediation of environmental conditions, the parcels of the Federal land described in paragraph (1)(C)(ii) shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, revert to the United States.
(iii) COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA.—If the System fails to complete the first building or show progression toward development of the College of Southern Nevada campus on the applicable parcels of Federal land by the date that is 12 years after the date of conveyance of the applicable parcels of Federal land to the College of Southern Nevada, the parcels of the Federal land described in paragraph (1)(C)(i) shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, revert to the United States.
(i) Land Conveyance for Southern Nevada Supplemental Airport.—
(1) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that—
(A) flood mitigation infrastructure is critical to the safe and uninterrupted operation of the proposed Southern Nevada Supplemental Airport authorized by the Ivanpah Valley Airport Public Lands Transfer Act (Public Law 106–362; 114 Stat. 1404); and
(2) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(3) LAND CONVEYANCE.—
(A) AUTHORIZATION OF CONVEYANCE.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date described in subparagraph (B), subject to valid existing rights and subparagraph (C), and notwithstanding the land use planning requirements of sections 202 and 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712, 1713), the Secretary shall convey to the County, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the land described in paragraph (4), subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines to be necessary.
(B) DATE ON WHICH CONVEYANCE MAY BE MADE.—The Secretary shall not make the conveyance described in subparagraph (A) until the later of the date on which the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration has—
(ii) with respect to the construction and operation of an airport on the site conveyed to the County pursuant to section 2(a) of the Ivanpah Valley Airport Public Lands Transfer Act (Public Law 106–362; 114 Stat. 1404), issued a record of decision after the preparation of an environmental impact statement or similar analysis required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
(C) RESERVATION OF MINERAL RIGHTS.—In conveying the public land under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall reserve the mineral estate, except for purposes related to flood mitigation (including removal from aggregate flood events).
(D) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, the public land to be conveyed under subparagraph (A) is withdrawn from—
(E) USE.—The public land conveyed under subparagraph (A) shall be used for the development of flood mitigation infrastructure for the Southern Nevada Supplemental Airport.
(F) REVERSION AND REENTRY.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—If the land conveyed to the County under the Ivanpah Valley Airport Public Lands Transfer Act (Public Law 106–362; 114 Stat. 1404) reverts to the United States, the land conveyed to the County under this subsection shall revert, at the option of the Secretary, to the United States.
(4) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in paragraph (3) consists of the approximately 2,320 acres of land managed by the Bureau of Land Management and described on the Map as the “Conveyance Area”.
(j) Nellis Dunes Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Area.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(B) CLARK COUNTY OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE RECREATION PARK.—The term “Clark County Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Park” means the approximately 960 acres of land identified on the Map as “Clark County Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Park”.
(D) MAP.—The term “Map” means the map entitled “Nellis Dunes OHV Recreation Area” and dated December 17, 2013.
(2) CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL LAND TO COUNTY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall convey to the County, subject to valid existing rights and subparagraph (B), without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the Clark County Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation Park.
(B) RESERVATION OF MINERAL ESTATE.—In conveying the parcels of Federal land under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall reserve the mineral estate, except for purposes related to flood mitigation (including removal from aggregate flood events).
(C) USE OF CONVEYED LAND.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—The parcels of land conveyed under subparagraph (A) may be used by the County for any public purposes described in clause (ii), consistent with the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly known as the “Recreation and Public Purposes Act”) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.).
(ii) AUTHORIZED USES.—The land conveyed under subparagraph (A)—
(I) shall be used by the County—
(aa) to provide a suitable location for the establishment of a centralized off-road vehicle recreation park in the County;
(iii) REVERSION.—If the County ceases to use any parcel of land conveyed under subparagraph (A) for the purposes described in clause (ii)—
(iv) MANAGEMENT PLAN.—The Secretary of the Air Force and the County, may develop a special management plan for the land conveyed under subparagraph (A)—
(I) to enhance public safety and safe off-highway vehicle recreation use in the Nellis Dunes Recreation Area;
(D) AGREEMENT WITH NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE.—
(k) Withdrawal and reservation of land for Nellis Air Force Base expansion.—
(1) WITHDRAWALS.—Section 3011(b) of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 886) is amended—
(A) in paragraph (4)—
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3022 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 897) is amended by striking “section 3011(b)(5)(B)” and inserting “paragraphs (5)(B) and (6) of section 3011(b)”.
(l) Military overflights.—
(1) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that military aircraft testing and training activities in the State of Nevada—
(2) OVERFLIGHTS.—Nothing in this section restricts or precludes any military overflight, including—
(C) the designation or creation of new units of special airspace, or the use or establishment of military flight training routes, over—
(ii) the Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area established by the Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area Establishment Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 460ccc et seq.) (as modified by subsection (b)).
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) ASSOCIATION.—The term “Association” means the National Desert Storm Memorial Association, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas and described in section 501(c)(3) and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(b) Memorial to commemorate.—
(1) AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH COMMEMORATIVE WORK.—The Association may establish the National Desert Storm and Desert Shield Memorial as a commemorative work, on Federal land in the District of Columbia to commemorate and honor those who, as a member of the Armed Forces, served on active duty in support of Operation Desert Storm or Operation Desert Shield.
(2) COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FOR COMMEMORATIVE WORKS ACT.—The establishment of the commemorative work shall be in accordance with chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the “Commemorative Works Act”).
(3) USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS PROHIBITED.—Federal funds may not be used to pay any expense of the establishment of the memorial. The Association shall be solely responsible for acceptance of contributions for, and payment of the expenses of, the establishment of the memorial.
(4) DEPOSIT OF EXCESS FUNDS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—If upon payment of all expenses for the establishment of the memorial (including the maintenance and preservation amount required by section 8906(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code), there remains a balance of funds received for the establishment of the commemorative work, the Association shall transmit the amount of the balance to the Secretary of the Interior for deposit in the account provided for in section 8906(b)(3) of title 40, United States Code.
(B) ON EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—If upon expiration of the authority for the commemorative work under section 8903(e) of title 40, United States Code, there remains a balance of funds received for the establishment of the commemorative work, the Association shall transmit the balance to a separate account with the National Park Foundation for memorials, to be available to the Secretary of the Interior or the Administrator (as appropriate) following the process provided in section 8906(b)(4) of title 40, United States Code, for accounts established under section 8906(b)(2) or (3) of title 40, United States Code.
Section 1 of Public Law 107–62 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note), as amended by Public Law 111–169, is amended—
(2) by amending subsection (e) to read as follows: “(e) Deposit of Excess Funds for Established Memorial.— “(1) If upon payment of all expenses for the establishment of the memorial (including the maintenance and preservation amount required by section 8906(b)(1) of title 40, United States Code), there remains a balance of funds received for the establishment of the commemorative work, the Adams Memorial Foundation shall transmit the amount of the balance to the account provided for in section 8906(b)(3) of title 40, United States Code. “(2) If upon expiration of the authority for the commemorative work under section 8903(e) of title 40, United States Code, there remains a balance of funds received for the establishment of the commemorative work, the Adams Memorial Foundation shall transmit the amount of the balance to a separate account with the National Park Foundation for memorials, to be available to the Secretary of the Interior or the Administrator (as appropriate) following the process provided for in section 8906(b)(4) of title 40, United States Code, for accounts established under section 8906(b)(2) or (3) of title 40, United States Code.”.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Commerce, upon receipt of such assurances as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States, shall issue a loan to refinance the existing debt obligation funding the fishing capacity reduction program for the West Coast groundfish fishery implemented under section 212 of the Department of Commerce and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2003 (title II of division B of Public Law 108–7; 117 Stat. 80).
(b) Applicable law.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Secretary shall issue the loan under this section in accordance with subsections (b) through (e) of section 312 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a) and sections 53702 and 53735 of title 46, United States Code.
(c) Loan term.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 53735(c)(4) of title 46, United States Code, a loan under this section shall have a maturity that expires at the end of the 45-year period beginning on the date of issuance of the loan.
(d) Limitation on fee amount.—Notwithstanding section 312(d)(2)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a(d)(2)(B)), the fee established by the Secretary with respect to a loan under this section shall not exceed 3 percent of the ex-vessel value of the harvest from each fishery for where the loan is issued.
(e) Interest rate.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 53702(b)(2) of title 46, United States Code, the annual rate of interest an obligor shall pay on a direct loan obligation under this section is the percent the Secretary must pay as interest to borrow from the Treasury the funds to make the loan.
(f) Ex-Vessel landing fee.—
(g) Authorization.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Commerce to carry out this section an amount equal to 1 percent of the amount of the loan authorized under this section for purposes of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
For payments in lieu of taxes under chapter 69 of title 31, United States Code, which shall be available without further appropriation to the Secretary of the Interior—
Funds available for obligation and payment under paragraph (2) shall be paid in October 2015.(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows:
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out, for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following new plant projects:
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 4509 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2660) is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Prototypes.— (1) Not later than the date on which the President submits to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the budget for fiscal year 2016, the directors of the national security laboratories shall jointly develop a multiyear plan to design and build prototypes of nuclear weapons to further intelligence estimates with respect to foreign nuclear weapons activities and capabilities.
“(2) Not later than the date on which the President submits to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, the budget for an even-numbered fiscal year occurring after fiscal year 2017, the directors shall jointly develop an update to the plan developed under paragraph (1).
“(3) (A) The directors shall jointly submit to the Secretary of Energy and the Director of National Intelligence the plan and each update developed under paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively.
“(4) (A) The Secretary, in coordination with the directors, shall carry out the plan developed under paragraph (1), including the updates to the plan developed under paragraph (2).
(b) Matters included.—Such section is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): “(b) Matters included.— (1) The directors shall ensure that the plan developed and updated under subsection (a) provides increased information upon which to base intelligence assessments and emphasizes the competencies of the national security laboratories with respect to designing and building prototypes of nuclear weapons. “(2) To carry out paragraph (1), the plan developed and updated under subsection (a) shall include the following: “(A) Design and system engineering activities of full-scale engineering prototypes (using surrogate special nuclear materials), including weaponization features as required.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the requirement to create a modern, responsive nuclear infrastructure that includes the capability and capacity to produce, at minimum, 50 to 80 pits per year, is a national security priority;
(b) Pit production.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“SEC. 4219. Plutonium pit production capacity.
“(a) Requirement.—Consistent with the requirements of the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the nuclear security enterprise—
“(b) Authorization of two-year delay of demonstration requirement.—The Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Defense may jointly delay, for not more than two years, the requirement under subsection (a)(5) if—
“(1) the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing—
“(c) Annual certification.—Not later than March 1, 2015, and each year thereafter through 2027 (or, if the authority under subsection (b) is exercised, 2029), the Secretary of Energy shall certify to the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of Defense that the programs and budget of the Secretary of Energy will enable the nuclear security enterprise to meet the requirements under subsection (a).
“(d) Plan.—If the Secretary of Energy does not make a certification under subsection (c) by March 1 of any year in which a certification is required under that subsection, by not later than May 1 of such year, the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to enable the nuclear security enterprise to meet the requirements under subsection (a). Such plan shall include identification of the resources of the Department of Energy that the Chairman determines should be redirected to support the plan to meet such requirements.”.
(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLVII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2741 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“SEC. 4714. Life-cycle cost estimates of certain atomic energy defense capital assets.
“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that an independent life-cycle cost estimate under Department of Energy Order 413.3 (relating to program management and project management for the acquisition of capital assets) of each capital asset described in subsection (b) is conducted before the asset achieves critical decision 2 in the acquisition process.
“(b) Capital assets described.—A capital asset described in this subsection is an atomic energy defense capital asset—
“(c) Independent defined.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term ‘independent’, with respect to a life-cycle cost estimate of a capital asset, means that the life-cycle cost estimate is prepared by an organization independent of the project sponsor, using the same detailed technical and procurement information as the sponsor, to determine if the life-cycle cost estimate of the sponsor is accurate and reasonable.”.
(a) In general.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 4217 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537) is amended—
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively, and by moving such clauses, as so redesignated, two ems to the right;
(2) in clause (iii), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by striking “critical decision 2” and inserting “critical decision 1 and before such facility achieves critical decision 2”;
(3) in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated, by striking “an independent cost estimate of”;
Section 4713 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2753) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by adding after the period the following new sentence: “In addition to the requirement under subparagraph (B), the cost and schedule baseline of a nuclear stockpile life extension project established under this subparagraph shall be the cost and schedule as described in the first Selected Acquisition Report submitted under section 4217(a) for the project.”; and
(a) Full-time equivalent personnel levels.—Subsection (a) of section 3241A of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441a) is amended—
Section 3221(h) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2411(h)) is amended—
Section 3123 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2177), as amended by section 3126 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1063), is further amended—
(3) by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following new subsections: “(d) Cost of Phase I.— “(1) LIMITATION.—The total cost of Phase I under subsection (a) of the project referred to in that subsection may not exceed $4,200,000,000. “(2) ADJUSTMENT.—If the Secretary determines the total cost of Phase I under subsection (a) of the project referred to in that subsection will exceed the amount set forth in paragraph (1), the Secretary may adjust that amount if, by not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a detailed justification for the adjustment, including— “(B) a detailed justification for the adjustment, including a description of the changes to the project that would be required for Phase I to not exceed the total cost set forth in paragraph (1); “(C) a detailed description of the actions taken to hold appropriate contractors, employees of contractors, and employees of the Federal Government accountable for the repeated failures within the project; “(3) ANNUAL CERTIFICATION.—Not later than March 1 of each year through 2025, the Secretary shall certify in writing to the congressional defense committees and the Secretary of Defense that Phase I under subsection (a) of the project referred to in that subsection will— “(4) REPORT.—If the Secretary of Energy does not make a certification under paragraph (3) by March 1 of any year in which a certification is required under that paragraph, by not later than May 1 of that year, the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that identifies the resources of the Department of Energy that the Chairman determines should be redirected to enable the Department of Energy to meet the total cost and schedule requirements described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of that paragraph. “(e) Technology readiness levels during Phase I.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—Critical decision 3 in the acquisition process may not be approved for Phase I under subsection (a) of the project referred to in that subsection until all processes (or substitute processes) that require Category I and II special nuclear material protection and are actively used to support the stockpile in building 9212—
(4) in subsection (f), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of the Navy shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the implementation of paragraphs (1) and (2), including—
(a) First production unit.—The Secretary of Energy shall deliver a first production unit for a nuclear warhead for the long-range standoff weapon by not later than September 30, 2025.
(b) Authorization of one-year delay.—The Secretary may delay the requirement under subsection (a) by not more than one year if the Commander of the United States Strategic Command certifies to the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council (established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code) and the congressional defense committees that the delay—
(c) Plan.—
(d) Notification and assessment.—
(1) NOTIFICATION.—If at any time the Secretary of Energy determines that the Secretary will not deliver a first production unit for a nuclear warhead for the long-range standoff weapon by not later than September 30, 2025 (or, if the authority under subsection (b) is exercised, September 30, 2026), the Secretary shall—
(e) Briefing.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the justification for the long-range standoff weapon, including—
(a) Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Using funds described in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Energy shall carry out construction and project support activities relating to the MOX facility.
(b) Study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study to assess and validate the analysis of the Secretary with respect to surplus weapon-grade plutonium options.
(c) Report.—
(1) PLAN.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under subsection (b)(1).
(2) ELEMENTS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) The report of the federally funded research and development center under subsection (b)(2), without change.
(B) Identification of the alternatives to the MOX facility considered by the Secretary, including a life-cycle cost analysis for each such alternative.
(C) Identification of the portions of such life cycle cost analyses that are common to all such alternatives.
(D) Discussion on continuation of the MOX facility, including a future funding profile or a detailed discussion of selected alternatives determined appropriate by the Secretary for such discussion.
(E) Discussion of the issues regarding implementation of such selected alternatives, including all regulatory and public acceptance issues, including interactions with affected States.
(F) Explanation of how the alternatives to the MOX facility conform with the Plutonium Disposition Agreement, and if an alternative does not so conform, what measures must be taken to ensure conformance.
(d) Exclusion of certain options.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The study under subsection (b)(1) and the report under subsection (c)(1) shall not include any assessment or discussion of options that involve moving plutonium to a State where the Federal Government—
(A) is not meeting all legally binding deadlines and milestones required under the Tri-Party Agreement and the Consent Decree;
(e) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “MOX facility” means the mixed-oxide fuel fabrication facility at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina.
(2) The term “Plutonium Disposition Agreement” means the Agreement Concerning the Management and Disposition of Plutonium Designated As No Longer Required for Defense Purposes and Related Cooperation, signed at Moscow and Washington August 29 and September 1, 2000, and entered into force July 13, 2011 (TIAS 11–713.1), between the United States and the Russian Federation.
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 3101 and available for the Office of the Administrator as specified in the funding table in section 4701, or otherwise made available for that Office for that fiscal year, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until—
(1) the President transmits to Congress the matters required to be transmitted during 2015 under section 4205(f)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(f)(2));
(2) the President transmits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives the matters—
(A) required to be transmitted during 2015 under section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576), as most recently amended by section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 861); and
(3) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives the report required to be submitted during 2015 under section 3122(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1710); and
(4) the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees the detailed report on the stockpile stewardship, management, and infrastructure plan required to be submitted during 2015 under section 4203(b)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)(2)).
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States should carry out nuclear nonproliferation activities in the Russian Federation only if those activities are consistent with and in support of the security interests of the United States; and
(b) Completion of material protection, control, and accounting activities in the Russian Federation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2) or specifically authorized by Congress, international material protection, control, and accounting activities in the Russian Federation shall be completed not later than fiscal year 2018.
(2) EXCEPTION.—The limitation in paragraph (1) shall not apply to international material protection, control, and accounting activities in the Russian Federation associated with the Agreement Concerning the Management and Disposition of Plutonium Designated as No Longer Required for Defense Purposes and Related Cooperation, signed at Moscow and Washington August 29 and September 1, 2000, and entered into force July 13, 2011 (TIAS 11–713.1), between the United States and the Russian Federation.
(c) Limitation on transfer of MILES technology.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the National Nuclear Security Administration may be used for the transfer of Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System technology between the United States and the Russian Federation.
The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall include, in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code), specific identification, as a budgetary line item, of the amounts required for uranium technology sustainment in support of the nuclear weapons stockpile in a manner that minimizes the use of plant-directed research and development funds for full-scale technology development past a technology readiness level of 5 (as defined in Department of Energy Guide 413.3–4A (relating to technology readiness assessment)).
(a) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy, the Administrator for Nuclear Security, and the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council (established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code) shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the W88 Alt 370 program that contains analyses of the costs, benefits, risks, and feasibility of each of the following options:
(b) Matters included.—The report under subsection (a) shall include, for each option described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), an analysis of the following:
(1) Near-term and lifecycle cost estimates, including costs to both the Navy and the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(3) Operational effects to the Navy and to the capacity and throughput of the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501)) of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
(a) Analysis required.—The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall include, as part of the Administrator's planned analysis of alternatives to support the plutonium strategy of the National Nuclear Security Administration, an analysis of using or modifying existing facilities of the nuclear security enterprise (as defined in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501)) to support that strategy, as part of critical decision 1 in the acquisition process for the design and construction of modular structures associated with operations of the PF–4 facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.
(b) Matters included.—The analysis required by subsection (a) shall include an analysis of the following:
(c) Submission.—The Administrator shall submit the analysis required by subsection (a) to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days after completing the analysis.
(d) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the requirement to create a modern, responsive plutonium infrastructure is a national security priority, and that the Administrator must fulfill the obligations of the Administrator under section 3114(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (50 U.S.C. 2535 note), as well as the commitment made by the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council (established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code) in the letter of the Chairman, dated July 25, 2014, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, to carry out a modular building strategy for plutonium capabilities that—
(a) Plan.—The President, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall develop an interagency plan for verification and monitoring relating to the potential proliferation of nuclear weapons, components of such weapons, and fissile material.
(b) Elements.—The plan developed under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) An interagency plan and road map for verification and monitoring, with respect to policy, operations, and research, development, testing, and evaluation, including—
(2) An engagement plan for building cooperation and transparency to improve inspections and monitoring.
(c) Submission.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 1, 2015, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the plan developed under subsection (a).
(2) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(B) The Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(C) The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security and the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council (established by section 179 of title 10, United States Code) shall each submit to the congressional defense committees the comments of the Administrator or the Chairman, as the case may be, with respect to the findings, conclusions, and recommendations included in the final report of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise under section 3166(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2209), as amended by section 3142 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1069).
(a) Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health.—Subtitle E of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7385o et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 3687. Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health.
“(a) Establishment.— (1) Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the President shall establish and appoint an Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health (in this section referred to as the ‘Board’).
“(b) Duties.—The Board shall—
“(c) Staff and powers.— (1) The President shall appoint a staff to facilitate the work of the Board. The staff of the Board shall be headed by a Director, who shall be appointed under subchapter VIII of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code.
“(d) Conflicts of interest.—No member, employee, or contractor of the Board shall have any financial interest, employment, or contractual relationship (other than a routine consumer transaction) with any person that has provided, or sought to provide during the two years preceding the appointment or during the service of the member, employee, or contractor under this section, goods or services related to medical benefits under this title.
“(e) Expenses.—Members of the Board, other than full-time employees of the United States, while attending meetings of the Board or while otherwise serving at the request of the President, and while serving away from their homes or regular places of business, shall be allowed travel and meal expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence (as authorized by section 5703 of title 5, United States Code) for individuals in the Federal Government serving without pay.
“(f) Security clearances.— (1) The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the members and staff of the Board, and the contractors performing work in support of the Board, are afforded the opportunity to apply for a security clearance for any matter for which such a clearance is appropriate.
“(2) The Secretary of Energy should, not later than 180 days after receiving a completed application for a security clearance for an individual under this subsection, make a determination of whether or not the individual is eligible for the clearance.
“(3) For fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Energy shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Energy budget for that fiscal year (as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code) a report specifying the number of applications for security clearances under this subsection, the number of such applications granted, and the number of such applications denied.
“(g) Information.—The Secretary of Energy shall, in accordance with law, provide to the Board and the contractors of the Board, access to any information that the Board considers relevant to carry out its responsibilities under this section, including information such as Restricted Data (as defined in section 11 y. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014(y))) and information covered by section 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the ‘Privacy Act’).
“(h) Authorization of appropriations.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
“(2) TREATMENT AS DISCRETIONARY SPENDING.—Amounts appropriated to carry out this section—
“(A) shall not be appropriated to the account established under subsection (a) of section 151 of title I of division B of Appendix D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–554; 114 Stat. 2763A–251); and
(b) Department of Labor response to the Office of the Ombudsman annual report; extension of authority.—Section 3686 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7385s–15) is amended—
(1) in subsection (e)—
(B) by adding at the end the following:
“(4) Not later than 180 days after the submission to Congress of the annual report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to Congress in writing, and post on the public Internet website of the Department of Labor, a response to the report that—
“(A) includes a statement of whether the Secretary agrees or disagrees with the specific issues raised by the Ombudsman in the report;
(a) Definitions.—Section 4002(3) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501(3)) is amended by striking “Executive Order No. 12333 of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C. 401 note), Executive Order No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50 U.S.C. 435 note),” and inserting “Executive Order No. 12333 of December 4, 1981 (50 U.S.C. 3001 note), Executive Order No. 12958 of April 17, 1995 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note), Executive Order No. 13526 of December 29, 2009 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note),”.
(b) Management structure.—Section 4102(b)(3) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2512(b)(3)) is amended—
(c) Stockpile stewardship.—Section 4203(d)(4)(A)(i) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(d)(4)(A)(i)) is amended by striking “50 U.S.C. 404a” and inserting “50 U.S.C. 3043”.
(d) Reports on stockpile.—Section 4205(b)(2) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2525(b)(2)) is amended by striking “commander” and inserting “Commander”.
(e) Advice on reliability of stockpile.—Section 4218 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2538) is amended—
(f) Disposition of certain plutonium.—Section 4306 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2566) is amended—
(g) Defense environmental cleanup technology program.—Section 4406(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2586(a)) is amended—
(h) Report on Hanford tank safety.—Section 4441 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2621) is amended by striking subsection (d).
(i) Limitation on use of funds in relation to F–Canyon Facility.—Section 4454 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2638) is amended in paragraphs (1) and (2) by inserting “of” after “assessment”.
(j) Inspections of certain facilities.—Section 4501(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2651(a)) is amended by striking “nuclear weapons facility” and inserting “national security laboratory or nuclear weapons production facility”.
(k) Notice relating to certain failures.—Section 4505 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2656) is amended—
(l) Review of certain documents before declassification and release.—Section 4521(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2671(b)) is amended by striking “Executive Order 12958” and inserting “Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)”.
(m) Protection against release of Restricted Data.—Section 4522 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking “Executive Order No. 12958 (50 U.S.C. 435 note)” and inserting “Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)”;
(n) Identification of declassification activities in budget materials.—Section 4525(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2675(a)) is amended by striking “Executive Order No. 12958 (50 U.S.C. 435 note)” and inserting “Executive Order No. 13526 (50 U.S.C. 3161 note)”.
(o) Workforce restructuring plan.—Section 4604(f)(3) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2704(f)(3)) is amended by striking “Nevada and” and inserting “Nevada, and”.
(p) Availability of funds.—Section 4709(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2749(b)) is amended by striking “athorization” and inserting “authorization”.
(q) Transfer of defense environmental cleanup funds.—Section 4710(b)(3)(B) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2750(b)(3)(B)) is amended by striking “management” and inserting “cleanup”.
(r) Restriction on use of funds to pay certain penalties.—Section 4722 of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2762) is amended—
(s) Enhanced procurement authority.—Section 4806(g)(1) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2786(g)(1)) is amended by striking “the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014” and inserting “June 24, 2014”.
(t) Critical technology partnerships.—Section 4813(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2794(a)) is amended by striking “that atomic energy defense activities research on, and development of, any dual-use critical technology” and inserting “that research on and development of dual-use critical technology carried out through atomic energy defense activities”.
(u) Research and development by certain facilities.—Section 4832(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2812(a)) is amended by striking “for Nuclear Security”.
(a) Status of certain personnel.—Section 3220(c) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2410(c)) is amended—
(b) Congressional oversight of certain programs.—Section 3236(a)(2)(B)(iv) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2426(a)(2)(B)(iv)) is amended—
Section 1001(e) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16391(e)) is amended by inserting “based on future planned activities and the amount of the appropriations for the fiscal year” after “fiscal year”.
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015, $29,150,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).
Subsection (a) of section 322 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286k(a)) is amended to read as follows:
(a) In general.—Section 313(b)(1)(A) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286b(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking “150 full-time employees” and inserting “130 full-time employees”.
(a) Amount.—There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy $19,950,000 for fiscal year 2015 for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration programs associated with maintaining national security aspects of the merchant marine, as follows:
(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United States Merchant Marine Academy, $79,790,000, of which—
(2) For expenses necessary to support the State maritime academies, $17,650,000, of which—
(4) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $4,800,000, to remain available until expended.
(5) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, $186,000,000.
(6) For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)) of loan guarantees under the program authorized by chapter 537 of title 46, United States Code, $73,100,000, of which $3,100,000 shall remain available until expended for administrative expenses of the program.
(a) In general.—Chapter 551 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) In general.—Section 55102 of this title does not apply to the movement of a floating dry dock if—
“(1) the floating dry dock—
“(A) is being used to launch or raise a vessel in connection with the construction, maintenance, or repair of that vessel;
(b) Clerical amendment.—The analysis for chapter 551 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
(a) Findings.—Congress finds that—
(1) the United States domestic maritime industry carries hundreds of million of tons of cargo annually, supports nearly 500,000 jobs, and provides nearly 100 billion in annual economic output;
(2) the Nation’s military sealift capacity will benefit from one of the fastest growing segments of the domestic trades, 14 domestic trade tankers that are on order to be constructed at United States shipyards as of February 1, 2014;
(3) the domestic trades’ vessel innovations that transformed worldwide maritime commerce include the development of containerships, self-unloading vessels, articulated tug-barges, trailer barges, chemical parcel tankers, railroad-on-barge carfloats, and river flotilla towing systems;
(4) the national security benefits of the domestic maritime industry are unquestioned as the Department of Defense depends on United States domestic trades’ fleet of container ships, roll-on/roll-off ships, and product tankers to carry military cargoes;
(a) In general.—Section 51312 of title 46, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(a) In general.—There shall be a Board of Visitors to the United States Merchant Marine Academy (referred to in this section as the ‘Board’ and the ‘Academy’, respectively) to provide independent advice and recommendations on matters relating to the United States Merchant Marine Academy.
“(b) Membership.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Board shall be composed of—
“(A) 2 Senators appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate in consultation with the ranking member of such Committee;
“(B) 3 Members of the House of Representatives appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives in consultation with the ranking member of such Committee;
“(C) 1 Senator appointed by the Vice President, who shall be a member of the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;
“(D) 2 Members of the House of Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, in consultation with the Minority Leader, at least 1 of whom shall be a member of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives;
“(2) PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTEES.—Of the individuals appointed by the President under paragraph (1)(E)—
“(B) at least 1 shall be a senior corporate officer from a United States maritime shipping company that participates in the Maritime Security Program, or in any Maritime Administration program providing incentives for companies to register their vessels in the United States, and this appointment shall rotate biennially among such companies; and
“(C) 1 or more may be a Senate-confirmed Presidential appointee, a member of the Senior Executive Service, or an officer of flag-rank who from the Coast Guard, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or any of the military services that commission graduates of the Academy, other than the individuals who are members of the Board under clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (1)(F).
“(3) TERM OF SERVICE.—
“(4) VACANCIES.—If a member of the Board is no longer able to serve on the Board or resigns, the Designated Federal Officer selected under subsection (g)(2) shall immediately notify the person who appointed such member. Not later than 60 days after that notification, such person shall designate a replacement to serve the remainder of such member’s term.
“(5) DESIGNATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF SUBSTITUTE BOARD MEMBERS.—
“(A) AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE.—A member of the Board under clause (i) or (ii) of paragraph (1)(F) or appointed under subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph (2) may, if unable to attend or participate in an activity described in subsection (d), (e), or (f), designate another individual to serve as a substitute member of the Board, on a temporary basis, to attend or participate in such activity.
“(B) REQUIREMENTS.—A substitute member of the Board designated under subparagraph (A) shall be—
“(C) PARTICIPATION.—A substitute member of the Board designated under subparagraph (A)—
“(i) shall be permitted by the Board to fully participate in the proceedings and activities of the Board;
“(c) Chairperson.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—On a biennial basis and subject to paragraph (2), the Board shall select from among its members a Member of the House of Representatives or a Senator to serve as the Chairperson.
“(d) Meetings.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Board shall meet as provided for in the Charter adopted under paragraph (2)(B), including at least 1 meeting held at the Academy.
“(e) Visiting the Academy.—
“(1) ANNUAL VISIT.—The Board shall visit the Academy annually on a date selected by the Board, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation and the Superintendent of the Academy.
“(f) Responsibility.—The Board shall inquire into the state of morale and discipline, the curriculum, instruction, physical equipment, fiscal affairs, and academic methods of the Academy, and other matters relating to the Academy that the Board decides to consider.
“(h) Staff.—Each of the chairman of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives may designate staff members of such Committee to serve, without additional reimbursement (except as provided in subsection (i)), as staff for the Board.
“(i) Travel expenses.—While serving away from his or her home or regular place of business, a member of the Board or a staff member designated under subsection (h) shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized under section 5703 of title 5, United States Code.
“(j) Reports.—
“(1) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after each annual visit required under subsection (e)(1), the Board shall submit to the President a written report of its actions, views, and recommendations pertaining to the Academy.
“(2) OTHER REPORTS.—If the members of the Board visit the Academy under subsection (e)(2), the Board may—
“(3) ADVISORS.—The Board may call in advisers—
(b) Deadlines.—
(1) SELECTION OF DESIGNATED FEDERAL OFFICER.—The Secretary of Transportation shall select a Designated Federal Officer under subsection (g)(2) of section 51312 of title 46, United States Code, as amended by this Act, by not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) In general.—Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
(b) Merit-based decisions.—A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
(c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority.—An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts.
| SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | ||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| FIXED WING | |||||||
| 002 | UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT | 13,617 | 13,617 | ||||
| 003 | AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) | 185,090 | 136,290 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–48,800] | ||||||
| 004 | MQ–1 UAV | 190,581 | 239,581 | ||||
| Extended range modifications Per Army UFR | [49,000] | ||||||
| 005 | RQ–11 (RAVEN) | 3,964 | 3,964 | ||||
| ROTARY | |||||||
| 006 | HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) | 416,617 | 416,617 | ||||
| 007 | AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN | 494,009 | 494,009 | ||||
| 008 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 157,338 | 157,338 | ||||
| 012 | UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) | 1,237,001 | 1,340,027 | ||||
| ARNG Modernization–6 additional UH–60M aircraft | [103,026] | ||||||
| 013 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 132,138 | 132,138 | ||||
| 014 | CH–47 HELICOPTER | 892,504 | 892,504 | ||||
| 015 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 102,361 | 102,361 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 016 | MQ–1 PAYLOAD (MIP) | 26,913 | 26,913 | ||||
| 018 | GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP) | 14,182 | 14,182 | ||||
| 019 | MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) | 131,892 | 131,892 | ||||
| 020 | AH–64 MODS | 181,869 | 181,869 | ||||
| 021 | CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) | 32,092 | 32,092 | ||||
| 022 | UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS | 15,029 | 15,029 | ||||
| 023 | UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS | 76,515 | 76,515 | ||||
| 025 | NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN | 114,182 | 114,182 | ||||
| 026 | COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE | 115,795 | 115,795 | ||||
| 027 | GATM ROLLUP | 54,277 | 54,277 | ||||
| 028 | RQ–7 UAV MODS | 125,380 | 125,380 | ||||
| GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS | |||||||
| 029 | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT | 66,450 | 98,850 | ||||
| Army requested realignment | [32,400] | ||||||
| 030 | SURVIVABILITY CM | 7,800 | |||||
| Army requested realignment | [7,800] | ||||||
| 031 | CMWS | 107,364 | 60,364 | ||||
| Army requested reduction | [–47,000] | ||||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 032 | AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 6,847 | 6,847 | ||||
| 033 | COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT | 29,231 | 29,231 | ||||
| 034 | AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS | 48,081 | 48,081 | ||||
| 035 | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL | 127,232 | 127,232 | ||||
| 036 | INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 1,203 | 1,203 | ||||
| 037 | LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET | 2,931 | 2,931 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 5,102,685 | 5,199,111 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 002 | LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) | 110,300 | 110,300 | ||||
| 003 | MSE MISSILE | 384,605 | 384,605 | ||||
| AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 004 | HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY | 4,452 | 4,452 | ||||
| ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS | |||||||
| 005 | JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY | 77,668 | 77,668 | ||||
| 006 | TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY | 50,368 | 50,368 | ||||
| 007 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 19,984 | 19,984 | ||||
| 008 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 127,145 | 127,145 | ||||
| 009 | MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) | 21,274 | 21,274 | ||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 012 | PATRIOT MODS | 131,838 | 131,838 | ||||
| 013 | STINGER MODS | 1,355 | 1,355 | ||||
| 014 | AVENGER MODS | 5,611 | 5,611 | ||||
| 015 | ITAS/TOW MODS | 19,676 | 19,676 | ||||
| 016 | MLRS MODS | 10,380 | 10,380 | ||||
| 017 | HIMARS MODIFICATIONS | 6,008 | 6,008 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 018 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 36,930 | 36,930 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 019 | AIR DEFENSE TARGETS | 3,657 | 3,657 | ||||
| 020 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES) | 1,522 | 1,522 | ||||
| 021 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT | 4,710 | 4,710 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 1,017,483 | 1,017,483 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | |||||||
| TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | STRYKER VEHICLE | 385,110 | 435,110 | ||||
| Unfunded requirement—fourth DVH brigade set | [50,000] | ||||||
| MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 002 | STRYKER (MOD) | 39,683 | 39,683 | ||||
| 003 | FIST VEHICLE (MOD) | 26,759 | 26,759 | ||||
| 004 | BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) | 107,506 | 144,506 | ||||
| Army unfunded priority and industrial base risk mitigation | [37,000] | ||||||
| 005 | HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) | 45,411 | 45,411 | ||||
| 006 | PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) | 247,400 | 247,400 | ||||
| 007 | IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) | 50,451 | 126,364 | ||||
| Army unfunded priority and industrial base risk mitigation | [75,913] | ||||||
| 008 | ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) | 2,473 | 2,473 | ||||
| 009 | ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE | 36,583 | 36,583 | ||||
| 010 | M88 FOV MODS | 1,975 | 1,975 | ||||
| 011 | JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE | 49,462 | 34,362 | ||||
| Early to need | [–15,100] | ||||||
| 012 | M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) | 237,023 | 237,023 | ||||
| 013 | ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM | 120,000 | |||||
| Industrial Base initiative | [120,000] | ||||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 014 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV) | 6,478 | 6,478 | ||||
| WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 016 | MORTAR SYSTEMS | 5,012 | 5,012 | ||||
| 017 | XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) | 28,390 | 28,390 | ||||
| 018 | COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM | 148 | 148 | ||||
| 019 | CARBINE | 29,366 | 20,616 | ||||
| Army requested realignment | [–8,750] | ||||||
| 021 | COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION | 8,409 | 8,409 | ||||
| 022 | HANDGUN | 3,957 | 3,957 | ||||
| MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH | |||||||
| 024 | M777 MODS | 18,166 | 18,166 | ||||
| 025 | M4 CARBINE MODS | 3,446 | 6,446 | ||||
| Army requested realignment | [3,000] | ||||||
| 026 | M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS | 25,296 | 25,296 | ||||
| 027 | M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS | 5,546 | 5,546 | ||||
| 028 | M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS | 4,635 | 2,635 | ||||
| Army requested realignment | [–2,000] | ||||||
| 029 | SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS | 4,079 | 4,079 | ||||
| 030 | M119 MODIFICATIONS | 72,718 | 72,718 | ||||
| 031 | M16 RIFLE MODS | 1,952 | 0 | ||||
| At Army request transfer to WTCV 31 and RDTEA 70 and 86 | [–1,952] | ||||||
| 032 | MORTAR MODIFICATION | 8,903 | 8,903 | ||||
| 033 | MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) | 2,089 | 2,089 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 034 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) | 2,005 | 2,005 | ||||
| 035 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV) | 8,911 | 8,911 | ||||
| 036 | INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | 414 | 414 | ||||
| 037 | SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) | 1,682 | 1,682 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | 1,471,438 | 1,729,549 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | |||||||
| SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES | 34,943 | 34,943 | ||||
| 002 | CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES | 12,418 | 12,418 | ||||
| 003 | CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES | 9,655 | 9,655 | ||||
| 004 | CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES | 29,304 | 29,304 | ||||
| 006 | CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES | 8,181 | 8,181 | ||||
| 007 | CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES | 52,667 | 52,667 | ||||
| 008 | CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES | 40,904 | 40,904 | ||||
| MORTAR AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 009 | 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 41,742 | 41,742 | ||||
| 010 | 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 42,433 | 42,433 | ||||
| 011 | 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 39,365 | 39,365 | ||||
| TANK AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 012 | CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES | 101,900 | 101,900 | ||||
| ARTILLERY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 013 | ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES | 37,455 | 37,455 | ||||
| 014 | ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES | 47,023 | 47,023 | ||||
| 015 | PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 | 35,672 | 35,672 | ||||
| 016 | ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL | 94,010 | 74,010 | ||||
| Precision Guided Kits Schedule Delay | [–20,000] | ||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 019 | SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 945 | 945 | ||||
| 020 | ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES | 27,286 | 27,286 | ||||
| OTHER AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 021 | DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 22,899 | 22,899 | ||||
| 022 | GRENADES, ALL TYPES | 22,751 | 22,751 | ||||
| 023 | SIGNALS, ALL TYPES | 7,082 | 7,082 | ||||
| 024 | SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES | 11,638 | 11,638 | ||||
| MISCELLANEOUS | |||||||
| 025 | AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES | 3,594 | 3,594 | ||||
| 027 | CAD/PAD ALL TYPES | 5,430 | 5,430 | ||||
| 028 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) | 8,337 | 8,337 | ||||
| 029 | AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT | 14,906 | 14,906 | ||||
| 030 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) | 14,349 | 14,349 | ||||
| 031 | CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES | 111 | 111 | ||||
| PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 032 | PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 148,092 | 148,092 | ||||
| 033 | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION | 113,881 | 113,881 | ||||
| 034 | ARMS INITIATIVE | 2,504 | 2,504 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | 1,031,477 | 1,011,477 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS | 7,987 | 7,987 | ||||
| 002 | SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: | 160 | 160 | ||||
| 004 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 164,615 | 164,615 | ||||
| 005 | FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) | 50,000 | |||||
| Additional FMTVs – Industrial Base initiative | [50,000] | ||||||
| 006 | FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP | 8,415 | 8,415 | ||||
| 007 | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) | 28,425 | 78,425 | ||||
| Additional HEMTT ESP Vehicles-Industrial Base initiative | [50,000] | ||||||
| 008 | PLS ESP | 89,263 | 89,263 | ||||
| 013 | TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS | 38,226 | 38,226 | ||||
| 014 | MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP | 91,173 | 83,173 | ||||
| Early to need | [–8,000] | ||||||
| 015 | MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS | 14,731 | 14,731 | ||||
| NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 016 | HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN | 175 | 175 | ||||
| 017 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 1,338 | 1,338 | ||||
| 018 | NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER | 11,101 | 11,101 | ||||
| COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 019 | WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK | 763,087 | 638,087 | ||||
| Point of Presence (POP) and Soldier Network Extension (SNE) delay | [–125,000] | ||||||
| 020 | SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 21,157 | 21,157 | ||||
| 021 | JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY | 7,915 | 7,915 | ||||
| 022 | JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) | 5,440 | 5,440 | ||||
| COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 023 | DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS | 118,085 | 118,085 | ||||
| 024 | TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS | 13,999 | 13,999 | ||||
| 025 | SHF TERM | 6,494 | 6,494 | ||||
| 026 | NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE) | 1,635 | 1,635 | ||||
| 027 | SMART-T (SPACE) | 13,554 | 13,554 | ||||
| 028 | GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS | 18,899 | 18,899 | ||||
| 029 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT) | 2,849 | 2,849 | ||||
| 030 | ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND (EMC) | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||
| COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 033 | JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM | 175,711 | 125,711 | ||||
| Unobligated balances | [–50,000] | ||||||
| 034 | MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) | 9,692 | 4,692 | ||||
| Unobligated balances | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 035 | RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) | 17,136 | 17,136 | ||||
| 037 | AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2 | 22,099 | 22,099 | ||||
| 038 | TRACTOR DESK | 3,724 | 3,724 | ||||
| 039 | SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT | 969 | 969 | ||||
| 040 | SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS | 294 | 294 | ||||
| 041 | TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM | 24,354 | 24,354 | ||||
| 042 | UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE | 17,445 | 17,445 | ||||
| 043 | RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY | 1,028 | 1,028 | ||||
| 044 | FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE | 22,614 | 22,614 | ||||
| COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM | |||||||
| 046 | CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE | 1,519 | 1,519 | ||||
| 047 | ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT | 12,478 | 12,478 | ||||
| INFORMATION SECURITY | |||||||
| 050 | INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP | 2,113 | 2,113 | ||||
| 051 | COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) | 69,646 | 69,646 | ||||
| COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 052 | BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS | 28,913 | 28,913 | ||||
| COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 053 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 97,091 | 97,091 | ||||
| 054 | DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS) | 246 | 246 | ||||
| 055 | EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 5,362 | 5,362 | ||||
| 056 | INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM | 79,965 | 79,965 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) | |||||||
| 060 | JTT/CIBS-M | 870 | 870 | ||||
| 061 | PROPHET GROUND | 55,896 | 55,896 | ||||
| 063 | DCGS-A (MIP) | 128,207 | 128,207 | ||||
| 064 | JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) | 5,286 | 5,286 | ||||
| 065 | TROJAN (MIP) | 12,614 | 12,614 | ||||
| 066 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) | 3,901 | 3,901 | ||||
| 067 | CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) | 7,392 | 7,392 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) | |||||||
| 068 | LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR | 24,828 | 24,828 | ||||
| 070 | AIR VIGILANCE (AV) | 7,000 | 7,000 | ||||
| 072 | COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES | 1,285 | 1,285 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) | |||||||
| 075 | SENTINEL MODS | 44,305 | 44,305 | ||||
| 076 | NIGHT VISION DEVICES | 160,901 | 160,901 | ||||
| 078 | SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF | 18,520 | 18,520 | ||||
| 080 | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS | 68,296 | 68,296 | ||||
| 081 | FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS) | 49,205 | 34,205 | ||||
| Early to need | [–15,000] | ||||||
| 082 | ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP | 4,896 | 4,896 | ||||
| 083 | PROFILER | 3,115 | 3,115 | ||||
| 084 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS) | 4,186 | 4,186 | ||||
| 085 | JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) | 97,892 | 87,892 | ||||
| Schedule delay | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 086 | JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS) | 27,450 | 27,450 | ||||
| 087 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) | 14,085 | 14,085 | ||||
| 088 | MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM | 29,040 | 29,040 | ||||
| 089 | COUNTERFIRE RADARS | 209,050 | 159,050 | ||||
| Excessive LRIP/concurrency costs | [–50,000] | ||||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 092 | FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY | 13,823 | 13,823 | ||||
| 095 | AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS | 27,374 | 27,374 | ||||
| 097 | LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) | 2,508 | 2,508 | ||||
| 099 | NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE | 21,524 | 21,524 | ||||
| 100 | MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) | 95,455 | 95,455 | ||||
| 101 | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) | 118,600 | 118,600 | ||||
| 102 | INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP | 32,970 | 32,970 | ||||
| 104 | RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET | 10,113 | 10,113 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION | |||||||
| 105 | ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION | 9,015 | 9,015 | ||||
| 106 | AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP | 155,223 | 152,282 | ||||
| Reduce IT procurement | [–2,941] | ||||||
| 107 | GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM | 16,581 | 16,581 | ||||
| 108 | HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) | 65,252 | 65,252 | ||||
| 110 | RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) | 17,631 | 17,631 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) | |||||||
| 112 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) | 5,437 | 5,437 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT | |||||||
| 113 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) | 426 | 426 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 114A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,707 | 3,707 | ||||
| CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 115 | FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) | 937 | 937 | ||||
| 116 | BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS) | 1,930 | 1,930 | ||||
| 117 | CBRN DEFENSE | 17,468 | 17,468 | ||||
| BRIDGING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 119 | TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON | 5,442 | 5,442 | ||||
| 120 | COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP | 11,013 | 11,013 | ||||
| ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 121 | GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) | 37,649 | 33,249 | ||||
| Early to need | [–4,400] | ||||||
| 122 | HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS) | 18,545 | 18,545 | ||||
| 123 | ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) | 4,701 | 4,701 | ||||
| 124 | EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION | 6,346 | 6,346 | ||||
| 125 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) | 15,856 | 15,856 | ||||
| 126 | REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS | 4,485 | 4,485 | ||||
| 127 | < $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT | 4,938 | 4,938 | ||||
| COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 128 | HEATERS AND ECU'S | 9,235 | 9,235 | ||||
| 130 | SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT | 1,677 | 1,677 | ||||
| 131 | PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) | 16,728 | 16,728 | ||||
| 132 | GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM | 84,761 | 84,761 | ||||
| 134 | FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT | 15,179 | 15,179 | ||||
| 135 | CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM | 28,194 | 28,194 | ||||
| 137 | FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS | 41,967 | 41,967 | ||||
| 138 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) | 20,090 | 20,090 | ||||
| PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 139 | QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT | 1,435 | 1,435 | ||||
| 140 | DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER | 40,692 | 40,692 | ||||
| MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 141 | COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL | 46,957 | 46,957 | ||||
| MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 142 | MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS | 23,758 | 23,758 | ||||
| 143 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) | 2,789 | 2,789 | ||||
| CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 144 | GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) | 5,827 | 5,827 | ||||
| 145 | SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING | 14,926 | 14,926 | ||||
| 147 | COMPACTOR | 4,348 | 4,348 | ||||
| 148 | HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR | 4,938 | 4,938 | ||||
| 149 | TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED | 34,071 | 34,071 | ||||
| 150 | ALL TERRAIN CRANES | 4,938 | 4,938 | ||||
| 151 | PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING | 667 | 667 | ||||
| 153 | ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP | 14,924 | 14,924 | ||||
| 154 | CONST EQUIP ESP | 15,933 | 15,933 | ||||
| 155 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) | 6,749 | 6,749 | ||||
| RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 156 | ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP | 10,509 | 10,509 | ||||
| 157 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) | 2,166 | 2,166 | ||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 158 | GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP | 115,190 | 105,190 | ||||
| Cost savings from new contract | [–10,000] | ||||||
| MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 160 | FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS | 14,327 | 14,327 | ||||
| TRAINING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 161 | COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT | 65,062 | 65,062 | ||||
| 162 | TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM | 101,295 | 101,295 | ||||
| 163 | CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER | 13,406 | 13,406 | ||||
| 164 | AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER | 14,440 | 14,440 | ||||
| 165 | GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING | 10,165 | 10,165 | ||||
| TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) | |||||||
| 166 | CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT | 5,726 | 5,726 | ||||
| 167 | INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) | 37,482 | 37,482 | ||||
| 168 | TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) | 16,061 | 16,061 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 170 | RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 2,380 | 2,380 | ||||
| 171 | PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) | 30,686 | 30,686 | ||||
| 172 | BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT | 1,008 | 1,008 | ||||
| 173 | MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) | 98,559 | 83,559 | ||||
| Early to need—watercraft C4ISR | [–15,000] | ||||||
| 174 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) | 1,697 | 1,697 | ||||
| 175 | SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING | 25,394 | 25,394 | ||||
| 176 | AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA3 | 12,975 | 12,975 | ||||
| OPA2 | |||||||
| 180 | INITIAL SPARES—C&E | 50,032 | 50,032 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 4,893,634 | 4,698,293 | |||||
| JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND | |||||||
| STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE | |||||||
| 004 | OPERATIONS | 115,058 | 0 | ||||
| Transfer of JIEDDO to Overseas Contingency Operations | [–65,463] | ||||||
| Unjustified request | [–49,595] | ||||||
| TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND | 115,058 | <bold>0</bold> | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| COMBAT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 001 | EA–18G | 43,547 | 493,547 | ||||
| Additional EA–18G aircraft | [450,000] | ||||||
| 005 | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV | 610,652 | 610,652 | ||||
| 006 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 29,400 | 29,400 | ||||
| 007 | JSF STOVL | 1,200,410 | 1,200,410 | ||||
| 008 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 143,885 | 143,885 | ||||
| 009 | V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) | 1,487,000 | 1,487,000 | ||||
| 010 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 45,920 | 45,920 | ||||
| 011 | H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) | 778,757 | 778,757 | ||||
| 012 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 80,926 | 75,626 | ||||
| Advance procurement efficiencies | [–5,300] | ||||||
| 013 | MH–60S (MYP) | 210,209 | 210,209 | ||||
| 015 | MH–60R (MYP) | 933,882 | 878,882 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [–53,400] | ||||||
| Shutdown funding ahead of need | [–1,600] | ||||||
| 016 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 106,686 | 106,686 | ||||
| 017 | P–8A POSEIDON | 2,003,327 | 1,985,927 | ||||
| Anticipated unit price savings | [–11,300] | ||||||
| Unjustified growth--production engineering support | [–6,100] | ||||||
| 018 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 48,457 | 48,457 | ||||
| 019 | E–2D ADV HAWKEYE | 819,870 | 819,870 | ||||
| 020 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 225,765 | 225,765 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 023 | KC–130J | 92,290 | 92,290 | ||||
| 026 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 37,445 | 37,445 | ||||
| 027 | MQ–8 UAV | 40,663 | 40,663 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 029 | EA–6 SERIES | 10,993 | 10,993 | ||||
| 030 | AEA SYSTEMS | 34,768 | 34,768 | ||||
| 031 | AV–8 SERIES | 65,472 | 65,472 | ||||
| 032 | ADVERSARY | 8,418 | 8,418 | ||||
| 033 | F–18 SERIES | 679,177 | 679,177 | ||||
| 034 | H–46 SERIES | 480 | 480 | ||||
| 036 | H–53 SERIES | 38,159 | 38,159 | ||||
| 037 | SH–60 SERIES | 108,850 | 108,850 | ||||
| 038 | H–1 SERIES | 45,033 | 45,033 | ||||
| 039 | EP–3 SERIES | 32,890 | 32,890 | ||||
| 040 | P–3 SERIES | 2,823 | 2,823 | ||||
| 041 | E–2 SERIES | 21,208 | 21,208 | ||||
| 042 | TRAINER A/C SERIES | 12,608 | 12,608 | ||||
| 044 | C–130 SERIES | 40,378 | 40,378 | ||||
| 045 | FEWSG | 640 | 640 | ||||
| 046 | CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES | 4,635 | 4,635 | ||||
| 047 | E–6 SERIES | 212,876 | 212,876 | ||||
| 048 | EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES | 71,328 | 71,328 | ||||
| 049 | SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT | 21,317 | 21,317 | ||||
| 050 | T–45 SERIES | 90,052 | 90,052 | ||||
| 051 | POWER PLANT CHANGES | 19,094 | 19,094 | ||||
| 052 | JPATS SERIES | 1,085 | 1,085 | ||||
| 054 | COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT | 155,644 | 155,644 | ||||
| 055 | COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES | 157,531 | 157,531 | ||||
| 056 | COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM | 1,958 | 1,958 | ||||
| 057 | ID SYSTEMS | 38,880 | 38,880 | ||||
| 058 | P–8 SERIES | 29,797 | 29,797 | ||||
| 059 | MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION | 14,770 | 14,770 | ||||
| 060 | MQ–8 SERIES | 8,741 | 8,741 | ||||
| 061 | RQ–7 SERIES | 2,542 | 2,542 | ||||
| 062 | V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY | 135,584 | 135,584 | ||||
| 063 | F–35 STOVL SERIES | 285,968 | 285,968 | ||||
| 064 | F–35 CV SERIES | 20,502 | 20,502 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 065 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 1,229,651 | 1,107,506 | ||||
| Reduce rate of growth in replenishment spares | [–122,145] | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 066 | COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT | 418,355 | 398,488 | ||||
| Unobligated balances | [–19,867] | ||||||
| 067 | AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 23,843 | 23,843 | ||||
| 068 | WAR CONSUMABLES | 15,939 | 15,939 | ||||
| 069 | OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | 5,630 | 5,630 | ||||
| 070 | SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 65,839 | 65,839 | ||||
| 071 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 1,768 | 1,768 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 13,074,317 | 13,304,605 | |||||
| WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| MODIFICATION OF MISSILES | |||||||
| 001 | TRIDENT II MODS | 1,190,455 | 1,185,455 | ||||
| Guidance hardware cost growth | [–5,000] | ||||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 002 | MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 5,671 | 5,671 | ||||
| STRATEGIC MISSILES | |||||||
| 003 | TOMAHAWK | 194,258 | 276,258 | ||||
| Minimum sustaining rate increase | [82,000] | ||||||
| TACTICAL MISSILES | |||||||
| 004 | AMRAAM | 32,165 | 22,165 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 005 | SIDEWINDER | 73,928 | 71,948 | ||||
| Block II AUR cost growth | [–1,980] | ||||||
| 006 | JSOW | 130,759 | 128,200 | ||||
| AUR cost growth | [–2,559] | ||||||
| 007 | STANDARD MISSILE | 445,836 | 444,836 | ||||
| Installation, checkout, and training growth | [–1,000] | ||||||
| 008 | RAM | 80,792 | 80,792 | ||||
| 011 | STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) | 1,810 | 1,810 | ||||
| 012 | AERIAL TARGETS | 48,046 | 48,046 | ||||
| 013 | OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT | 3,295 | 3,295 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF MISSILES | |||||||
| 014 | ESSM | 119,434 | 119,434 | ||||
| 015 | HARM MODS | 111,739 | 106,489 | ||||
| AUR kit cost growth | [–3,250] | ||||||
| Tooling and test equipment growth | [–2,000] | ||||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 016 | WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 2,531 | 2,531 | ||||
| 017 | FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON | 208,700 | 206,700 | ||||
| Excess to need | [–2,000] | ||||||
| ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 018 | ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 73,211 | 73,211 | ||||
| TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP | |||||||
| 019 | SSTD | 6,562 | 6,562 | ||||
| 020 | MK–48 TORPEDO | 14,153 | 14,153 | ||||
| 021 | ASW TARGETS | 2,515 | 2,515 | ||||
| MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP | |||||||
| 022 | MK–54 TORPEDO MODS | 98,928 | 98,928 | ||||
| 023 | MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS | 46,893 | 46,893 | ||||
| 024 | QUICKSTRIKE MINE | 6,966 | 6,966 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 025 | TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 52,670 | 52,670 | ||||
| 026 | ASW RANGE SUPPORT | 3,795 | 3,795 | ||||
| DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | |||||||
| 027 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 3,692 | 3,692 | ||||
| GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS | |||||||
| 028 | SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS | 13,240 | 13,240 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS | |||||||
| 029 | CIWS MODS | 75,108 | 75,108 | ||||
| 030 | COAST GUARD WEAPONS | 18,948 | 18,948 | ||||
| 031 | GUN MOUNT MODS | 62,651 | 62,651 | ||||
| 033 | AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS | 15,006 | 15,006 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 035 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 74,188 | 74,188 | ||||
| TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 3,217,945 | 3,272,156 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | |||||||
| NAVY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 107,069 | 107,069 | ||||
| 002 | AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 70,396 | 70,396 | ||||
| 003 | MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION | 20,284 | 20,284 | ||||
| 004 | PRACTICE BOMBS | 26,701 | 26,701 | ||||
| 005 | CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES | 53,866 | 53,866 | ||||
| 006 | AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES | 59,294 | 59,294 | ||||
| 007 | JATOS | 2,766 | 2,766 | ||||
| 008 | LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE | 113,092 | 113,092 | ||||
| 009 | 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION | 35,702 | 35,702 | ||||
| 010 | INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION | 36,475 | 26,837 | ||||
| MK–296 57MM contract delay | [–9,638] | ||||||
| 011 | OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION | 43,906 | 43,906 | ||||
| 012 | SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO | 51,535 | 51,535 | ||||
| 013 | PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION | 11,652 | 11,652 | ||||
| 014 | AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 4,473 | 4,473 | ||||
| MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 015 | SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION | 31,708 | 31,708 | ||||
| 016 | LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES | 692 | 692 | ||||
| 017 | 40 MM, ALL TYPES | 13,630 | 13,630 | ||||
| 018 | 60MM, ALL TYPES | 2,261 | 2,261 | ||||
| 019 | 81MM, ALL TYPES | 1,496 | 1,496 | ||||
| 020 | 120MM, ALL TYPES | 14,855 | 14,855 | ||||
| 022 | GRENADES, ALL TYPES | 4,000 | 4,000 | ||||
| 023 | ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 16,853 | 16,853 | ||||
| 024 | ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES | 14,772 | 14,772 | ||||
| 026 | FUZE, ALL TYPES | 9,972 | 9,972 | ||||
| 027 | NON LETHALS | 998 | 998 | ||||
| 028 | AMMO MODERNIZATION | 12,319 | 12,319 | ||||
| 029 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 11,178 | 11,178 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | 771,945 | 762,307 | |||||
| SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY | |||||||
| OTHER WARSHIPS | |||||||
| 001 | CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM | 1,300,000 | 1,300,000 | ||||
| 002 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE | 3,553,254 | 3,553,254 | ||||
| 003 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 2,330,325 | 2,330,325 | ||||
| 004 | CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS | 483,600 | |||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [483,600] | ||||||
| 006 | DDG 1000 | 419,532 | 419,532 | ||||
| 007 | DDG–51 | 2,671,415 | 2,671,415 | ||||
| 008 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 134,039 | 134,039 | ||||
| 009 | LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP | 1,427,049 | 1,427,049 | ||||
| AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS | |||||||
| 010 | LPD–17 | 12,565 | 812,565 | ||||
| Incremental funding for LPD–28 | [800,000] | ||||||
| 014 | LHA REPLACEMENT ADVANCE PROCURMENT (CY) | 29,093 | 29,093 | ||||
| 015 | JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL | 4,590 | 0 | ||||
| Program closeout ahead of need | [–4,590] | ||||||
| AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST | |||||||
| 016 | MOORED TRAINING SHIP | 737,268 | 737,268 | ||||
| 017 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 64,388 | 64,388 | ||||
| 018 | OUTFITTING | 546,104 | 521,104 | ||||
| Early to need | [–25,000] | ||||||
| 019 | SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR | 123,233 | 123,233 | ||||
| 020 | LCAC SLEP | 40,485 | 40,485 | ||||
| 021 | COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS | 1,007,285 | 1,007,285 | ||||
| TOTAL SHIPBUILDING & CONVERSION, NAVY | 14,400,625 | 15,654,635 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 001 | LM–2500 GAS TURBINE | 7,822 | 7,822 | ||||
| 002 | ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE | 2,155 | 2,155 | ||||
| 003 | HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) | 22,704 | 19,278 | ||||
| Excess installation funding | [–1,926] | ||||||
| Modification funding ahead of need | [–1,500] | ||||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 004 | SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E | 29,120 | 26,664 | ||||
| Surface Combatant HM&E | [–2,456] | ||||||
| NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 005 | OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT | 45,431 | 44,894 | ||||
| AN/WSN–9 procurement ahead of need | [–537] | ||||||
| PERISCOPES | |||||||
| 006 | SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP | 60,970 | 57,221 | ||||
| Excess installation funding | [–649] | ||||||
| Interim contractor support carryover | [–3,100] | ||||||
| OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 007 | DDG MOD | 338,569 | 338,569 | ||||
| 008 | FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 15,486 | 15,486 | ||||
| 009 | COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD | 2,219 | 2,219 | ||||
| 010 | LHA/LHD MIDLIFE | 17,928 | 17,928 | ||||
| 011 | LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM | 22,025 | 22,025 | ||||
| 012 | POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | 12,607 | 12,607 | ||||
| 013 | SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 16,492 | 16,492 | ||||
| 014 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 74,129 | 74,129 | ||||
| 015 | LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 36,206 | 36,206 | ||||
| 016 | SUBMARINE BATTERIES | 37,352 | 37,352 | ||||
| 017 | LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 49,095 | 44,562 | ||||
| HM&E mechanical modifications ahead of need | [–2,778] | ||||||
| SWAN CANES procurement ahead of need | [–1,755] | ||||||
| 018 | ELECTRONIC DRY AIR | 2,996 | 2,996 | ||||
| 019 | STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP | 11,558 | 11,558 | ||||
| 020 | DSSP EQUIPMENT | 5,518 | 5,518 | ||||
| 022 | LCAC | 7,158 | 7,158 | ||||
| 023 | UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS | 58,783 | 53,783 | ||||
| MK–18 UUV retrofit kits and ancilliary equipment contract delay | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 024 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 68,748 | 68,748 | ||||
| 025 | CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS | 2,937 | 2,937 | ||||
| 026 | SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 8,385 | 8,385 | ||||
| REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 027 | REACTOR POWER UNITS | 298,200 | |||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [298,200] | ||||||
| 028 | REACTOR COMPONENTS | 288,822 | 288,822 | ||||
| OCEAN ENGINEERING | |||||||
| 029 | DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT | 10,572 | 10,572 | ||||
| SMALL BOATS | |||||||
| 030 | STANDARD BOATS | 129,784 | 126,445 | ||||
| 7M RIB contract delay | [–772] | ||||||
| Large force protection boat contract delay | [–791] | ||||||
| Medium workboat contract delay | [–1,776] | ||||||
| TRAINING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 031 | OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT | 17,152 | 17,152 | ||||
| PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 032 | OPERATING FORCES IPE | 39,409 | 39,409 | ||||
| OTHER SHIP SUPPORT | |||||||
| 033 | NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS | 118,129 | 118,129 | ||||
| 034 | LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT | 37,413 | 33,817 | ||||
| MPCE cost growth | [–1,026] | ||||||
| SUW support and shipping container cost growth | [–2,570] | ||||||
| 035 | LCS MCM MISSION MODULES | 15,270 | 15,270 | ||||
| 036 | LCS ASW MISSION MODULES | 2,729 | 2,729 | ||||
| 037 | LCS SUW MISSION MODULES | 44,208 | 39,697 | ||||
| Gun module cost growth | [–3,080] | ||||||
| Maritime security module cost growth | [–1,431] | ||||||
| 038 | REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS) | 42,276 | 42,276 | ||||
| SHIP SONARS | |||||||
| 040 | SPQ–9B RADAR | 28,007 | 28,007 | ||||
| 041 | AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM | 79,802 | 79,802 | ||||
| 042 | SSN ACOUSTICS | 165,655 | 165,655 | ||||
| 043 | UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 9,487 | 9,487 | ||||
| 044 | SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS | 11,621 | 11,621 | ||||
| ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 046 | SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM | 24,221 | 24,221 | ||||
| 047 | SSTD | 12,051 | 12,051 | ||||
| 048 | FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 170,831 | 170,831 | ||||
| 049 | SURTASS | 9,619 | 9,619 | ||||
| 050 | MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE | 14,390 | 14,390 | ||||
| ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 051 | AN/SLQ–32 | 214,582 | 214,582 | ||||
| RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 052 | SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT | 124,862 | 124,862 | ||||
| 053 | AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) | 164 | 164 | ||||
| SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 054 | SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG | 45,362 | 45,362 | ||||
| OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 055 | COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY | 33,939 | 33,939 | ||||
| 056 | TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS) | 324 | 324 | ||||
| 057 | NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) | 18,192 | 18,192 | ||||
| 058 | ATDLS | 16,768 | 16,768 | ||||
| 059 | NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) | 5,219 | 5,219 | ||||
| 060 | MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT | 42,108 | 41,499 | ||||
| AN/SQQ–32 integration cost growth | [–609] | ||||||
| 062 | NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) | 15,232 | 15,232 | ||||
| 063 | AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE | 4,524 | 4,524 | ||||
| 064 | STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP | 6,382 | 6,382 | ||||
| TRAINING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 065 | OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT | 46,122 | 44,058 | ||||
| BFTT installation kit cost growth | [–2,064] | ||||||
| AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 066 | MATCALS | 16,999 | 16,999 | ||||
| 067 | SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL | 9,366 | 9,366 | ||||
| 068 | AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM | 21,357 | 21,357 | ||||
| 069 | NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM | 26,639 | 26,639 | ||||
| 070 | FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS | 9,214 | 9,214 | ||||
| 071 | LANDING SYSTEMS | 13,902 | 13,902 | ||||
| 072 | ID SYSTEMS | 34,901 | 34,901 | ||||
| 073 | NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 13,950 | 13,950 | ||||
| OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 074 | DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL | 1,205 | 1,205 | ||||
| 075 | MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM | 3,447 | 3,447 | ||||
| 076 | TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS | 16,766 | 16,766 | ||||
| 077 | DCGS-N | 23,649 | 23,649 | ||||
| 078 | CANES | 357,589 | 357,589 | ||||
| 079 | RADIAC | 8,343 | 8,343 | ||||
| 080 | CANES-INTELL | 65,015 | 65,015 | ||||
| 081 | GPETE | 6,284 | 6,284 | ||||
| 082 | INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY | 4,016 | 4,016 | ||||
| 083 | EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION | 4,113 | 4,113 | ||||
| 084 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 45,053 | 45,053 | ||||
| SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 085 | SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS | 14,410 | 14,410 | ||||
| 086 | SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION | 20,830 | 20,830 | ||||
| 088 | COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M | 14,145 | 14,145 | ||||
| SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 089 | SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT | 11,057 | 11,057 | ||||
| 090 | SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT | 67,852 | 67,852 | ||||
| SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 091 | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 13,218 | 13,218 | ||||
| 092 | NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) | 272,076 | 272,076 | ||||
| SHORE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 093 | JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT | 4,369 | 4,369 | ||||
| 094 | ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS | 1,402 | 1,402 | ||||
| CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 095 | INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) | 110,766 | 110,766 | ||||
| 096 | MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM | 979 | 979 | ||||
| CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 097 | CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP | 11,502 | 11,502 | ||||
| OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT | |||||||
| 098 | COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT | 2,967 | 2,967 | ||||
| SONOBUOYS | |||||||
| 100 | SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES | 182,946 | 182,946 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 101 | WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 47,944 | 47,944 | ||||
| 103 | AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 76,683 | 76,683 | ||||
| 106 | METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT | 12,575 | 12,875 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [300] | ||||||
| 107 | DCRS/DPL | 1,415 | 1,415 | ||||
| 109 | AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES | 23,152 | 23,152 | ||||
| 114 | AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 52,555 | 52,555 | ||||
| SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 115 | SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT | 5,572 | 5,572 | ||||
| SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 118 | SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 165,769 | 165,769 | ||||
| 123 | TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 61,462 | 61,462 | ||||
| FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 126 | STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP | 229,832 | 229,832 | ||||
| ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 127 | SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS | 66,020 | 60,804 | ||||
| 688 TI04 installation cost growth | [–5,216] | ||||||
| 128 | ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 7,559 | 7,559 | ||||
| OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 132 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP | 20,619 | 20,619 | ||||
| 133 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 11,251 | 11,251 | ||||
| OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE | |||||||
| 137 | TRAINING DEVICE MODS | 84,080 | 84,080 | ||||
| CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 138 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 2,282 | 2,282 | ||||
| 139 | GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS | 547 | 547 | ||||
| 140 | CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP | 8,949 | 8,949 | ||||
| 141 | FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 14,621 | 14,621 | ||||
| 142 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 957 | 957 | ||||
| 143 | AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT | 8,187 | 8,187 | ||||
| 144 | POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | 2,942 | 2,942 | ||||
| 145 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION | 17,592 | 16,143 | ||||
| Emergency response truck cost growth | [–1,449] | ||||||
| 146 | PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES | 1,177 | 1,177 | ||||
| SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 147 | MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | 10,937 | 10,937 | ||||
| 148 | OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 10,374 | 10,374 | ||||
| 149 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 5,668 | 5,668 | ||||
| 150 | SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS | 90,921 | 90,921 | ||||
| TRAINING DEVICES | |||||||
| 151 | TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 22,046 | 22,046 | ||||
| COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 152 | COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 24,208 | 24,208 | ||||
| 153 | EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 874 | 874 | ||||
| 154 | MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 2,634 | 2,634 | ||||
| 156 | NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 3,573 | 3,573 | ||||
| 157 | OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 3,997 | 3,997 | ||||
| 158 | C4ISR EQUIPMENT | 9,638 | 9,638 | ||||
| 159 | ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 21,001 | 21,001 | ||||
| 160 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 94,957 | 94,957 | ||||
| 161 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 87,214 | 87,214 | ||||
| OTHER | |||||||
| 164 | NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE | 116,165 | 116,165 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 164A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 10,847 | 10,847 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 165 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 325,084 | 325,084 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 5,975,828 | 6,233,843 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | AAV7A1 PIP | 16,756 | 16,756 | ||||
| 002 | LAV PIP | 77,736 | 77,736 | ||||
| ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS | |||||||
| 003 | EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 5,742 | 642 | ||||
| Per Marine Corps excess to need | [–5,100] | ||||||
| 004 | 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER | 4,532 | 4,532 | ||||
| 005 | HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM | 19,474 | 19,474 | ||||
| 006 | WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION | 7,250 | 7,250 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 007 | MODIFICATION KITS | 21,909 | 21,909 | ||||
| 008 | WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM | 3,208 | 3,208 | ||||
| GUIDED MISSILES | |||||||
| 009 | GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE | 31,439 | 31,439 | ||||
| 010 | JAVELIN | 343 | 343 | ||||
| 011 | FOLLOW ON TO SMAW | 4,995 | 4,995 | ||||
| 012 | ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H) | 1,589 | 1,589 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 013 | MODIFICATION KITS | 5,134 | 5,134 | ||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 014 | UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER | 9,178 | 9,178 | ||||
| 015 | COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C | 12,272 | 12,272 | ||||
| REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 016 | REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | 30,591 | 30,591 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) | |||||||
| 017 | COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 2,385 | 2,385 | ||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 019 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) | 4,205 | 4,205 | ||||
| 020 | AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS | 8,002 | 8,002 | ||||
| RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 021 | RADAR SYSTEMS | 19,595 | 19,375 | ||||
| Sustainment—unjustified growth | [–220] | ||||||
| 022 | GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) | 89,230 | 89,230 | ||||
| 023 | RQ–21 UAS | 70,565 | 70,565 | ||||
| INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 024 | FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 11,860 | 11,860 | ||||
| 025 | INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 44,340 | 42,550 | ||||
| Unjustified program growth | [–1,790] | ||||||
| 028 | RQ–11 UAV | 2,737 | 2,737 | ||||
| 030 | DCGS-MC | 20,620 | 20,620 | ||||
| OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 031 | NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT | 9,798 | 9,798 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 032 | NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN) | 2,073 | 2,073 | ||||
| 033 | COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES | 33,570 | 33,570 | ||||
| 034 | COMMAND POST SYSTEMS | 38,186 | 38,186 | ||||
| 035 | RADIO SYSTEMS | 64,494 | 64,494 | ||||
| 036 | COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS | 72,956 | 64,325 | ||||
| Unjustified program growth | [–8,631] | ||||||
| 037 | COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT | 43,317 | 43,317 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 037A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 2,498 | 2,498 | ||||
| ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 038 | COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES | 332 | 332 | ||||
| 039 | COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES | 11,035 | 11,035 | ||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 040 | 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP) | 57,255 | 37,255 | ||||
| Early to need | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 041 | MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS | 938 | 938 | ||||
| 044 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 7,500 | 7,500 | ||||
| 045 | FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS | 10,179 | 10,179 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 046 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 11,023 | 11,023 | ||||
| ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 047 | ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT | 994 | 994 | ||||
| 048 | BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT | 1,256 | 1,256 | ||||
| 049 | TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS | 3,750 | 3,750 | ||||
| 050 | POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED | 8,985 | 8,985 | ||||
| 051 | AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 4,418 | 4,418 | ||||
| 052 | EOD SYSTEMS | 6,528 | 6,528 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 053 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 26,510 | 26,510 | ||||
| 054 | GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE) | 1,910 | 1,910 | ||||
| 055 | MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP | 8,807 | 8,807 | ||||
| 056 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 128 | 128 | ||||
| GENERAL PROPERTY | |||||||
| 058 | TRAINING DEVICES | 3,412 | 3,412 | ||||
| 059 | CONTAINER FAMILY | 1,662 | 1,662 | ||||
| 060 | FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | 3,669 | 3,669 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 062 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 4,272 | 4,272 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 063 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 16,210 | 16,210 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | 983,352 | 947,611 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL FORCES | |||||||
| 001 | F–35 | 3,553,046 | 3,553,046 | ||||
| 002 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 291,880 | 291,880 | ||||
| TACTICAL AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 003 | KC–46A TANKER | 1,582,685 | 1,582,685 | ||||
| OTHER AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 004 | C–130J | 482,396 | 482,396 | ||||
| 005 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 140,000 | 140,000 | ||||
| 006 | HC–130J | 332,024 | 332,024 | ||||
| 007 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||||
| 008 | MC–130J | 190,971 | 190,971 | ||||
| 009 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 80,000 | 80,000 | ||||
| MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 012 | CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C | 2,562 | 2,562 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 013 | TARGET DRONES | 98,576 | 98,576 | ||||
| 016 | RQ–4 | 54,475 | 44,475 | ||||
| MPRTIP Sensor Trainer reduction | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 017 | AC–130J | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 018 | MQ–9 | 240,218 | 338,218 | ||||
| Program increase | [120,000] | ||||||
| Use available prior year funds for FY 15 requirements | [–22,000] | ||||||
| STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 020 | B–2A | 23,865 | 23,865 | ||||
| 021 | B–1B | 140,252 | 140,252 | ||||
| 022 | B–52 | 180,148 | 180,148 | ||||
| 023 | LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES | 13,159 | 13,159 | ||||
| TACTICAL AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 025 | F–15 | 387,314 | 387,314 | ||||
| 026 | F–16 | 12,336 | 12,336 | ||||
| 027 | F–22A | 180,207 | 180,207 | ||||
| 028 | F–35 MODIFICATIONS | 187,646 | 187,646 | ||||
| 029 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 28,500 | 28,500 | ||||
| AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 030 | C–5 | 14,731 | 14,731 | ||||
| 031 | C–5M | 331,466 | 281,466 | ||||
| Program execution delay | [–50,000] | ||||||
| 033 | C–17A | 127,494 | 127,494 | ||||
| 034 | C–21 | 264 | 264 | ||||
| 035 | C–32A | 8,767 | 8,767 | ||||
| 036 | C–37A | 18,457 | 18,457 | ||||
| TRAINER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 038 | GLIDER MODS | 132 | 132 | ||||
| 039 | T–6 | 14,486 | 14,486 | ||||
| 040 | T–1 | 7,650 | 7,650 | ||||
| 041 | T–38 | 34,845 | 34,845 | ||||
| 044 | KC–10A (ATCA) | 34,313 | 34,313 | ||||
| 045 | C–12 | 1,960 | 1,960 | ||||
| 048 | VC–25A MOD | 1,072 | 1,072 | ||||
| 049 | C–40 | 7,292 | 7,292 | ||||
| 050 | C–130 | 35,869 | 124,269 | ||||
| C–130 8–Bladed Propeller upgrade | [30,000] | ||||||
| C–130 AMP | [35,800] | ||||||
| T–56 3.5 Engine Mod | [22,600] | ||||||
| 051 | C–130J MODS | 7,919 | 7,919 | ||||
| 052 | C–135 | 63,568 | 63,568 | ||||
| 053 | COMPASS CALL MODS | 57,828 | 57,828 | ||||
| 054 | RC–135 | 152,746 | 152,746 | ||||
| 055 | E–3 | 16,491 | 16,491 | ||||
| 056 | E–4 | 22,341 | 22,341 | ||||
| 058 | AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 160,284 | 160,284 | ||||
| 059 | FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS | 32,026 | 32,026 | ||||
| 060 | H–1 | 8,237 | 8,237 | ||||
| 061 | H–60 | 60,110 | 60,110 | ||||
| 062 | RQ–4 MODS | 21,354 | 21,354 | ||||
| 063 | HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS | 1,902 | 1,902 | ||||
| 064 | OTHER AIRCRAFT | 32,106 | 32,106 | ||||
| 065 | MQ–1 MODS | 4,755 | 4,755 | ||||
| 066 | MQ–9 MODS | 155,445 | 155,445 | ||||
| 069 | CV–22 MODS | 74,874 | 74,874 | ||||
| 069A | EJECTION SEAT RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 2,500 | |||||
| Initial aircraft installation | [2,500] | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 070 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 466,562 | 466,562 | ||||
| COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 071 | AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP | 22,470 | 22,470 | ||||
| POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT | |||||||
| 074 | B–2A | 44,793 | 44,793 | ||||
| 075 | B–52 | 5,249 | 5,249 | ||||
| 077 | C–17A | 20,110 | 20,110 | ||||
| 078 | CV–22 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT | 16,931 | 16,931 | ||||
| 080 | C–135 | 4,414 | 4,414 | ||||
| 081 | F–15 | 1,122 | 1,122 | ||||
| 082 | F–16 | 10,994 | 10,994 | ||||
| 083 | F–22A | 5,929 | 5,929 | ||||
| 084 | OTHER AIRCRAFT | 27 | 27 | ||||
| INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | |||||||
| 085 | INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS | 21,363 | 21,363 | ||||
| WAR CONSUMABLES | |||||||
| 086 | WAR CONSUMABLES | 82,906 | 82,906 | ||||
| OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | |||||||
| 087 | OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | 1,007,276 | 1,007,276 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 087A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 69,380 | 69,380 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 11,542,571 | 11,671,471 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC | |||||||
| 001 | MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC | 80,187 | 80,187 | ||||
| TACTICAL | |||||||
| 003 | JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE | 337,438 | 337,438 | ||||
| 004 | SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) | 132,995 | 132,995 | ||||
| 005 | AMRAAM | 329,600 | 329,600 | ||||
| 006 | PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE | 33,878 | 33,878 | ||||
| 007 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB | 70,578 | 50,578 | ||||
| Delay in Milestone C and contract award | [–20,000] | ||||||
| INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | |||||||
| 008 | INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION | 749 | 749 | ||||
| CLASS IV | |||||||
| 009 | MM III MODIFICATIONS | 28,477 | 28,477 | ||||
| 010 | AGM–65D MAVERICK | 276 | 276 | ||||
| 011 | AGM–88A HARM | 297 | 297 | ||||
| 012 | AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) | 16,083 | 16,083 | ||||
| 013 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB | 6,924 | 6,924 | ||||
| MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 014 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 87,366 | 87,366 | ||||
| SPACE PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 015 | ADVANCED EHF | 298,890 | 298,890 | ||||
| 016 | WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE) | 38,971 | 36,071 | ||||
| Unjustified growth | [–2,900] | ||||||
| 017 | GPS III SPACE SEGMENT | 235,397 | 235,397 | ||||
| 018 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 57,000 | 57,000 | ||||
| 019 | SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) | 16,201 | 16,201 | ||||
| 020 | GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) | 52,090 | 52,090 | ||||
| 021 | DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE) | 87,000 | 87,000 | ||||
| 022 | EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (INFRAST.) | 750,143 | 715,143 | ||||
| Excess growth | [–35,000] | ||||||
| 023 | EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) | 630,903 | 630,903 | ||||
| 024 | SBIR HIGH (SPACE) | 450,884 | 450,884 | ||||
| SPECIAL PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 028 | SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS | 60,179 | 60,179 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 028A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 888,000 | 888,000 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 4,690,506 | 4,632,606 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 001 | ROCKETS | 4,696 | 4,696 | ||||
| CARTRIDGES | |||||||
| 002 | CARTRIDGES | 133,271 | 133,271 | ||||
| BOMBS | |||||||
| 003 | PRACTICE BOMBS | 31,998 | 31,998 | ||||
| 004 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 148,614 | 148,614 | ||||
| 005 | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 101,400 | 101,400 | ||||
| OTHER ITEMS | |||||||
| 006 | CAD/PAD | 29,989 | 29,989 | ||||
| 007 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) | 6,925 | 6,925 | ||||
| 008 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 494 | 494 | ||||
| 009 | MODIFICATIONS | 1,610 | 1,610 | ||||
| 010 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 4,237 | 4,237 | ||||
| FLARES | |||||||
| 011 | FLARES | 86,101 | 86,101 | ||||
| FUZES | |||||||
| 012 | FUZES | 103,417 | 103,417 | ||||
| SMALL ARMS | |||||||
| 013 | SMALL ARMS | 24,648 | 24,648 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | 677,400 | 677,400 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 6,528 | 6,528 | ||||
| CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | |||||||
| 002 | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE | 7,639 | 7,639 | ||||
| 003 | CAP VEHICLES | 961 | 961 | ||||
| 004 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 11,027 | 11,027 | ||||
| SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 005 | SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES | 4,447 | 4,447 | ||||
| 006 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 693 | 693 | ||||
| FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 007 | FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES | 10,152 | 10,152 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 008 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 15,108 | 15,108 | ||||
| BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 009 | RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP | 10,212 | 10,212 | ||||
| 010 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 57,049 | 57,049 | ||||
| COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) | |||||||
| 011 | COMSEC EQUIPMENT | 106,182 | 104,093 | ||||
| VACM modernization devices unit cost growth | [–2,089] | ||||||
| 012 | MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC) | 1,363 | 1,363 | ||||
| INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 013 | INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT | 2,832 | 2,832 | ||||
| 014 | INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT | 32,329 | 32,329 | ||||
| 016 | MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 15,649 | 15,649 | ||||
| ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 017 | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS | 42,200 | 30,000 | ||||
| D-ILS program restructure funds early to need | [–12,200] | ||||||
| 018 | NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM | 6,333 | 6,333 | ||||
| 019 | BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED | 2,708 | 2,708 | ||||
| 020 | THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS | 50,033 | 50,033 | ||||
| 021 | WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST | 16,348 | 16,348 | ||||
| 022 | STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL | 139,984 | 139,984 | ||||
| 023 | CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX | 20,101 | 20,101 | ||||
| 026 | INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN) | 9,060 | 9,060 | ||||
| SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS | |||||||
| 027 | GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 39,100 | 39,100 | ||||
| 028 | AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS | 19,010 | 19,010 | ||||
| 029 | MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL | 11,462 | 11,462 | ||||
| 030 | AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM | 37,426 | 37,426 | ||||
| 031 | COMBAT TRAINING RANGES | 26,634 | 26,634 | ||||
| 032 | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N | 1,289 | 1,289 | ||||
| 033 | C3 COUNTERMEASURES | 11,508 | 11,508 | ||||
| 034 | GCSS-AF FOS | 3,670 | 3,670 | ||||
| 035 | DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING AND MGMT SYSTEM | 15,298 | 15,298 | ||||
| 036 | THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM | 9,565 | 9,565 | ||||
| 037 | AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS | 25,772 | 25,772 | ||||
| AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 038 | INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS | 81,286 | 112,586 | ||||
| Air Force requested program transfer from AFNET | [31,300] | ||||||
| 039 | AFNET | 122,228 | 90,928 | ||||
| Air Force requested program transfer to BITI | [–31,300] | ||||||
| 041 | USCENTCOM | 16,342 | 16,342 | ||||
| SPACE PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 042 | FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS | 60,230 | 60,230 | ||||
| 043 | SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE | 26,100 | 26,100 | ||||
| 044 | NAVSTAR GPS SPACE | 2,075 | 2,075 | ||||
| 045 | NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE | 4,656 | 4,656 | ||||
| 046 | AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE | 54,630 | 54,630 | ||||
| 047 | SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE | 69,713 | 69,713 | ||||
| 048 | MILSATCOM SPACE | 41,355 | 41,355 | ||||
| 049 | SPACE MODS SPACE | 31,722 | 31,722 | ||||
| 050 | COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM | 61,603 | 61,603 | ||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BASE | |||||||
| 051 | TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT | 50,335 | 50,335 | ||||
| 053 | RADIO EQUIPMENT | 14,846 | 14,846 | ||||
| 054 | CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT | 3,635 | 3,635 | ||||
| 055 | BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE | 79,607 | 79,607 | ||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 056 | COMM ELECT MODS | 105,398 | 105,398 | ||||
| PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP | |||||||
| 057 | NIGHT VISION GOGGLES | 12,577 | 12,577 | ||||
| 058 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 31,209 | 31,209 | ||||
| DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ | |||||||
| 059 | MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP | 7,670 | 7,670 | ||||
| BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 060 | BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT | 14,125 | 14,125 | ||||
| 061 | CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS | 16,744 | 16,744 | ||||
| 062 | PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT | 2,495 | 2,495 | ||||
| 063 | MOBILITY EQUIPMENT | 10,573 | 10,573 | ||||
| 064 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 5,462 | 5,462 | ||||
| SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS | |||||||
| 066 | DARP RC135 | 24,710 | 24,710 | ||||
| 067 | DCGS-AF | 206,743 | 206,743 | ||||
| 069 | SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM | 537,370 | 537,370 | ||||
| 070 | DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. | 77,898 | 77,898 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 070A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 13,990,196 | 13,990,196 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 072 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 32,813 | 32,813 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 16,566,018 | 16,551,729 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA | |||||||
| 001 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 1,594 | 1,594 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA | |||||||
| 002 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 4,325 | 4,325 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA | |||||||
| 003 | PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION | 17,268 | 17,268 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA | |||||||
| 008 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY | 10,491 | 10,491 | ||||
| 010 | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 80,622 | 80,622 | ||||
| 011 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 14,147 | 14,147 | ||||
| 012 | NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) | 1,921 | 1,921 | ||||
| 013 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK | 80,144 | 80,144 | ||||
| 015 | CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE | 8,755 | 8,755 | ||||
| 016 | WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY | 33,737 | 33,737 | ||||
| 017 | SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE | 32,544 | 32,544 | ||||
| 018 | JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT | 13,300 | 13,300 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA | |||||||
| 020 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 7,436 | 7,436 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT | |||||||
| 021 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 11,640 | 11,640 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA | |||||||
| 022 | AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS | 1,269 | 1,269 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS | |||||||
| 024 | VEHICLES | 1,500 | 1,500 | ||||
| 025 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 1,039 | 1,039 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | |||||||
| 026 | VEHICLES | 50 | 50 | ||||
| 027 | OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 7,639 | 7,639 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY | |||||||
| 028 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 68,880 | 0 | ||||
| Transfer to line 30 for All Up Round procurement | [–68,880] | ||||||
| 029 | THAAD | 464,424 | 464,424 | ||||
| 030 | AEGIS BMD | 435,430 | 534,430 | ||||
| Program increase | [99,000] | ||||||
| 031 | BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS | 48,140 | 48,140 | ||||
| 032 | AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III | 225,774 | 225,774 | ||||
| 034 | IRON DOME | 175,972 | 0 | ||||
| Program increase for Iron Dome | [175,000] | ||||||
| Realignment of Iron Dome to Overseas Contingency Operations | [–350,972] | ||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA | |||||||
| 041 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) | 3,448 | 3,448 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD | |||||||
| 042 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD | 43,708 | 43,708 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS | |||||||
| 044 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS | 10,783 | 10,783 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS | |||||||
| 046 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS | 29,599 | 29,599 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 046A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 540,894 | 540,894 | ||||
| AVIATION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 047 | MC–12 | 40,500 | 0 | ||||
| Unjustified Request | [–40,500] | ||||||
| 048 | ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT | 112,226 | 112,226 | ||||
| 049 | MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 3,021 | 3,021 | ||||
| 050 | NON-STANDARD AVIATION | 48,200 | 48,200 | ||||
| 052 | MH–47 CHINOOK | 22,230 | 22,230 | ||||
| 053 | RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE | 6,397 | 6,397 | ||||
| 054 | CV–22 MODIFICATION | 25,578 | 25,578 | ||||
| 056 | MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE | 15,651 | 15,651 | ||||
| 057 | STUASL0 | 1,500 | 1,500 | ||||
| 058 | PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE | 145,929 | 145,929 | ||||
| 059 | AC/MC–130J | 65,130 | 65,130 | ||||
| 061 | C–130 MODIFICATIONS | 39,563 | 39,563 | ||||
| SHIPBUILDING | |||||||
| 063 | UNDERWATER SYSTEMS | 25,459 | 25,459 | ||||
| AMMUNITION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 065 | ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M | 144,336 | 144,336 | ||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 068 | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | 81,001 | 81,001 | ||||
| 070 | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 17,323 | 17,323 | ||||
| 071 | OTHER ITEMS <$5M | 84,852 | 84,852 | ||||
| 072 | COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS | 51,937 | 51,937 | ||||
| 074 | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 31,017 | 31,017 | ||||
| 075 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 63,134 | 63,134 | ||||
| 076 | WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M | 192,448 | 192,448 | ||||
| 078 | COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS | 19,984 | 19,984 | ||||
| 081 | GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES | 5,044 | 5,044 | ||||
| 082 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 38,126 | 38,126 | ||||
| 088 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 243,849 | 243,849 | ||||
| CBDP | |||||||
| 095 | CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS | 170,137 | 170,137 | ||||
| 096 | CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION | 150,392 | 150,392 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | 4,221,437 | 4,035,085 | |||||
| JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | |||||||
| JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | |||||||
| 001 | JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | 20,000 | 0 | ||||
| Unjustified request | [–20,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | 20,000 | <bold>0</bold> | |||||
| PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS | |||||||
| PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS | |||||||
| 010 | PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS | –265,685 | 0 | ||||
| Denied Prior Year Rescission request | [265,685] | ||||||
| TOTAL PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS | –265,685 | <bold>0</bold> | |||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT | 89,508,034 | 91,399,361 | |||||
| SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | ||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| FIXED WING | |||||||
| 003 | AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP) | 36,000 | 36,000 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 36,000 | 36,000 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 004 | HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY | 32,136 | 32,136 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 32,136 | 32,136 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | |||||||
| SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 007 | CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES | 35,000 | 35,000 | ||||
| MORTAR AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 009 | 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| ARTILLERY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 013 | ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||
| 014 | ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 020 | ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES | 66,905 | 66,905 | ||||
| OTHER AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 021 | DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||
| 022 | GRENADES, ALL TYPES | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||
| 023 | SIGNALS, ALL TYPES | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | 140,905 | 140,905 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 005 | FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) | 95,624 | 95,624 | ||||
| 008 | PLS ESP | 60,300 | 60,300 | ||||
| 010 | HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV | 192,620 | 192,620 | ||||
| 015 | MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS | 197,000 | 197,000 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) | |||||||
| 063 | DCGS-A (MIP) | 63,831 | 63,831 | ||||
| 065A | TROJAN SPIRIT—TERMINALS (TIARA) | 2,600 | 2,600 | ||||
| 067 | CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) | 6,910 | 6,910 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) | |||||||
| 071 | FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE | 32,083 | 32,083 | ||||
| 072 | COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES | 47,535 | 47,535 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 114A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||
| COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 133 | FORCE PROVIDER | 51,500 | 51,500 | ||||
| 135 | CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM | 2,580 | 2,580 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 170 | RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 778,583 | 778,583 | |||||
| JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND | |||||||
| NETWORK ATTACK | |||||||
| 001 | ATTACK THE NETWORK | 189,700 | 189,700 | ||||
| JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT | |||||||
| 002 | DEFEAT THE DEVICE | 94,600 | 94,600 | ||||
| FORCE TRAINING | |||||||
| 003 | TRAIN THE FORCE | 15,700 | 15,700 | ||||
| STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE | |||||||
| 004 | OPERATIONS | 79,000 | 144,463 | ||||
| Transfer from Base | [65,463] | ||||||
| TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND | 379,000 | 444,463 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| COMBAT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 011 | H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) | 30,000 | 30,000 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 027 | MQ–8 UAV | 40,888 | 40,888 | ||||
| 028A | STUASL0 UAV | 55,000 | 55,000 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 039 | EP–3 SERIES | 34,955 | 34,955 | ||||
| 049 | SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT | 2,548 | 2,548 | ||||
| 054 | COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT | 31,920 | 31,920 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 067 | AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 936 | 936 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 196,247 | 196,247 | |||||
| WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| STRATEGIC MISSILES | |||||||
| 003 | TOMAHAWK | 45,500 | 45,500 | ||||
| TACTICAL MISSILES | |||||||
| 010 | LASER MAVERICK | 16,485 | 16,485 | ||||
| 011 | STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) | 4,800 | 4,800 | ||||
| TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 66,785 | 66,785 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | |||||||
| NAVY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 7,596 | 7,596 | ||||
| 002 | AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 8,862 | 8,862 | ||||
| 003 | MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION | 3,473 | 3,473 | ||||
| 006 | AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES | 29,376 | 29,376 | ||||
| 011 | OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION | 3,919 | 3,919 | ||||
| 012 | SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO | 3,561 | 3,561 | ||||
| 013 | PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION | 2,913 | 2,913 | ||||
| 014 | AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 2,764 | 2,764 | ||||
| MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 015 | SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION | 9,475 | 9,475 | ||||
| 016 | LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES | 8,843 | 8,843 | ||||
| 017 | 40 MM, ALL TYPES | 7,098 | 7,098 | ||||
| 018 | 60MM, ALL TYPES | 5,935 | 5,935 | ||||
| 019 | 81MM, ALL TYPES | 9,318 | 9,318 | ||||
| 020 | 120MM, ALL TYPES | 6,921 | 6,921 | ||||
| 022 | GRENADES, ALL TYPES | 3,218 | 3,218 | ||||
| 023 | ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 7,642 | 7,642 | ||||
| 024 | ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES | 30,289 | 30,289 | ||||
| 025 | DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 1,255 | 1,255 | ||||
| 026 | FUZE, ALL TYPES | 2,061 | 2,061 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | 154,519 | 154,519 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 023 | UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS | 8,210 | 8,210 | ||||
| OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 078 | CANES | 400 | |||||
| ERI: Information Sharing with Coalition Partners | [400] | ||||||
| 084 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 5,870 | 5,870 | ||||
| SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 088 | COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M | 1,100 | 1,100 | ||||
| OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 132 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP | 207,860 | 207,860 | ||||
| CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 138 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 1,063 | 1,063 | ||||
| 139 | GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS | 152 | 152 | ||||
| 142 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 26,300 | 26,300 | ||||
| 145 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION | 3,300 | 3,300 | ||||
| COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 152 | COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 10,745 | 10,745 | ||||
| 157 | OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 3,331 | 3,331 | ||||
| 158 | C4ISR EQUIPMENT | 35,923 | 36,073 | ||||
| ERI: Black Sea Information Sharing Initiatives | [150] | ||||||
| 159 | ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 514 | 514 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 164A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 2,400 | 2,400 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 306,768 | 307,318 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 007 | MODIFICATION KITS | 3,190 | 3,190 | ||||
| GUIDED MISSILES | |||||||
| 010 | JAVELIN | 17,100 | 17,100 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 013 | MODIFICATION KITS | 13,500 | 13,500 | ||||
| REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 016 | REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | 980 | 980 | ||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 019 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) | 996 | 996 | ||||
| INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 025 | INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 1,450 | 1,450 | ||||
| 028 | RQ–11 UAV | 1,740 | 1,740 | ||||
| OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 031 | NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT | 134 | 134 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 036 | COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS | 3,119 | 3,119 | ||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 042 | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT | 584 | 584 | ||||
| ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 052 | EOD SYSTEMS | 5,566 | 5,566 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 055 | MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP | 3,230 | 3,230 | ||||
| GENERAL PROPERTY | |||||||
| 058 | TRAINING DEVICES | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | 53,589 | 53,589 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| OTHER AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 004 | C–130J | 70,000 | 70,000 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 018 | MQ–9 | 192,000 | 192,000 | ||||
| STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 021 | B–1B | 91,879 | 91,879 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 050 | C–130 | 47,840 | 47,840 | ||||
| 051 | C–130J MODS | 18,000 | 18,000 | ||||
| 053 | COMPASS CALL MODS | 24,800 | 24,800 | ||||
| 063 | HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS | 44,300 | 44,300 | ||||
| 064 | OTHER AIRCRAFT | 111,990 | 111,990 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 070 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 45,410 | 45,410 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 646,219 | 646,219 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL | |||||||
| 006 | PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE | 125,469 | 125,469 | ||||
| 007 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB | 10,720 | 10,720 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 136,189 | 136,189 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| CARTRIDGES | |||||||
| 002 | CARTRIDGES | 2,469 | 2,469 | ||||
| BOMBS | |||||||
| 004 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 56,293 | 56,293 | ||||
| 005 | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 117,039 | 117,039 | ||||
| FLARES | |||||||
| 011 | FLARES | 19,136 | 19,136 | ||||
| FUZES | |||||||
| 012 | FUZES | 24,848 | 24,848 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | 219,785 | 219,785 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | |||||||
| 004 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||
| SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 006 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 1,878 | 1,878 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 008 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 5,131 | 5,131 | ||||
| BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 009 | RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP | 1,734 | 1,734 | ||||
| 010 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 22,000 | 22,000 | ||||
| SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS | |||||||
| 027 | GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 3,857 | 3,857 | ||||
| 033 | C3 COUNTERMEASURES | 900 | 900 | ||||
| SPACE PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 048 | MILSATCOM SPACE | 19,547 | 19,547 | ||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BASE | |||||||
| 055 | BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE | 1,970 | 1,970 | ||||
| PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP | |||||||
| 057 | NIGHT VISION GOGGLES | 765 | 765 | ||||
| BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 060 | BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT | 2,030 | 2,030 | ||||
| 061 | CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS | 99,590 | 99,590 | ||||
| 063 | MOBILITY EQUIPMENT | 107,361 | 107,361 | ||||
| 064 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 10,975 | 10,975 | ||||
| SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS | |||||||
| 070 | DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG. | 6,100 | 6,100 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 070A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,143,936 | 3,143,936 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 3,430,774 | 3,430,774 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA | |||||||
| 010 | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 4,330 | 4,330 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY | |||||||
| 034 | IRON DOME | 350,972 | |||||
| Realignment of Iron Dome to Overseas Contingency Operations | [350,972] | ||||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 046A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 65,829 | 65,829 | ||||
| AVIATION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 056 | MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE | 5,700 | |||||
| MQ–9 Capability Enhancements | [5,700] | ||||||
| AMMUNITION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 065 | ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M | 28,873 | 28,873 | ||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 068 | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | 13,549 | 13,549 | ||||
| 071 | OTHER ITEMS <$5M | 32,773 | 32,773 | ||||
| 076 | WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M | 78,357 | 78,357 | ||||
| 088 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 4,175 | 4,175 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | 227,886 | 584,558 | |||||
| JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | |||||||
| JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | |||||||
| 001 | JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | 50,000 | 0 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–50,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | 50,000 | <bold>0</bold> | |||||
| NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 007 | MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT | 1,250,000 | |||||
| Program increase | [1,250,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD & RESERVE EQUIPMENT | 1,250,000 | ||||||
| PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS | |||||||
| PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS | |||||||
| 010 | PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS | –117,000 | 0 | ||||
| Denied Prior Year Rescission request | [117,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS | –117,000 | <bold>0</bold> | |||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT | 6,738,385 | 8,478,070 | |||||
| SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | ProgramElement | Item | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | |||||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||||
| 001 | 0601101A | IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH | 13,464 | 13,464 | |||
| 002 | 0601102A | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 238,167 | 238,167 | |||
| 003 | 0601103A | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 69,808 | 89,808 | |||
| Basic research program increase | [20,000] | ||||||
| 004 | 0601104A | UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS | 102,737 | 102,737 | |||
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 424,176 | 444,176 | |||||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||||
| 005 | 0602105A | MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY | 28,006 | 28,006 | |||
| 006 | 0602120A | SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY | 33,515 | 33,515 | |||
| 007 | 0602122A | TRACTOR HIP | 16,358 | 16,358 | |||
| 008 | 0602211A | AVIATION TECHNOLOGY | 63,433 | 63,433 | |||
| 009 | 0602270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY | 18,502 | 18,502 | |||
| 010 | 0602303A | MISSILE TECHNOLOGY | 46,194 | 46,194 | |||
| 011 | 0602307A | ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 28,528 | 28,528 | |||
| 012 | 0602308A | ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION | 27,435 | 27,435 | |||
| 013 | 0602601A | COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY | 72,883 | 72,883 | |||
| 014 | 0602618A | BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY | 85,597 | 85,597 | |||
| 015 | 0602622A | CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY | 3,971 | 3,971 | |||
| 016 | 0602623A | JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM | 6,853 | 6,853 | |||
| 017 | 0602624A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY | 38,069 | 38,069 | |||
| 018 | 0602705A | ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES | 56,435 | 56,435 | |||
| 019 | 0602709A | NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY | 38,445 | 38,445 | |||
| 020 | 0602712A | COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS | 25,939 | 25,939 | |||
| 021 | 0602716A | HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY | 23,783 | 23,783 | |||
| 022 | 0602720A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY | 15,659 | 15,659 | |||
| 023 | 0602782A | COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY | 33,817 | 33,817 | |||
| 024 | 0602783A | COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY | 10,764 | 10,764 | |||
| 025 | 0602784A | MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY | 63,311 | 63,311 | |||
| 026 | 0602785A | MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY | 23,295 | 23,295 | |||
| 027 | 0602786A | WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY | 25,751 | 28,330 | |||
| Joint Service Combat Feeding Technology | [2,579] | ||||||
| 028 | 0602787A | MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 76,068 | 76,068 | |||
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 862,611 | 865,190 | |||||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 029 | 0603001A | WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 65,139 | 65,813 | |||
| Joint Service Combat Feeding Tech Demo | [674] | ||||||
| 030 | 0603002A | MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 67,291 | 67,291 | |||
| 031 | 0603003A | AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 88,990 | 88,990 | |||
| 032 | 0603004A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 57,931 | 57,931 | |||
| 033 | 0603005A | COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 110,031 | 110,031 | |||
| 034 | 0603006A | SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 6,883 | 6,883 | |||
| 035 | 0603007A | MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 13,580 | 13,580 | |||
| 036 | 0603008A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 44,871 | 44,871 | |||
| 037 | 0603009A | TRACTOR HIKE | 7,492 | 7,492 | |||
| 038 | 0603015A | NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS | 16,749 | 16,749 | |||
| 039 | 0603020A | TRACTOR ROSE | 14,483 | 14,483 | |||
| 041 | 0603125A | COMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 24,270 | 24,270 | |||
| 042 | 0603130A | TRACTOR NAIL | 3,440 | 3,440 | |||
| 043 | 0603131A | TRACTOR EGGS | 2,406 | 2,406 | |||
| 044 | 0603270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY | 26,057 | 26,057 | |||
| 045 | 0603313A | MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 44,957 | 44,957 | |||
| 046 | 0603322A | TRACTOR CAGE | 11,105 | 11,105 | |||
| 047 | 0603461A | HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 181,609 | 181,609 | |||
| 048 | 0603606A | LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 13,074 | 13,074 | |||
| 049 | 0603607A | JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM | 7,321 | 7,321 | |||
| 050 | 0603710A | NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 44,138 | 44,138 | |||
| 051 | 0603728A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 9,197 | 9,197 | |||
| 052 | 0603734A | MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 17,613 | 17,613 | |||
| 053 | 0603772A | ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY | 39,164 | 39,164 | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 917,791 | 918,465 | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||||
| 054 | 0603305A | ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 12,797 | 12,797 | |||
| 055 | 0603308A | ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 13,999 | 13,999 | |||
| 058 | 0603639A | TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION | 29,334 | 29,334 | |||
| 060 | 0603747A | SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY | 9,602 | 11,002 | |||
| Food Advanced Development | [1,400] | ||||||
| 061 | 0603766A | TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV | 8,953 | 8,953 | |||
| 062 | 0603774A | NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 3,052 | 3,052 | |||
| 063 | 0603779A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL | 7,830 | 7,830 | |||
| 065 | 0603790A | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2,954 | 2,954 | |||
| 067 | 0603804A | LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV | 13,386 | 13,386 | |||
| 069 | 0603807A | MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV | 23,659 | 23,659 | |||
| 070 | 0603827A | SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 6,830 | 9,830 | |||
| Army requested realignment—Caliber Config Study | [3,000] | ||||||
| 072 | 0604100A | ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES | 9,913 | 9,913 | |||
| 073 | 0604115A | TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES | 74,740 | 74,740 | |||
| 074 | 0604120A | ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) | 9,930 | 9,930 | |||
| 076 | 0604319A | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2) | 96,177 | 71,177 | |||
| Program delay and funds requested early to need | [–25,000] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 323,156 | 302,556 | |||||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||||
| 079 | 0604201A | AIRCRAFT AVIONICS | 37,246 | 37,246 | |||
| 081 | 0604270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 6,002 | 6,002 | |||
| 082 | 0604280A | JOINT TACTICAL RADIO | 9,832 | 9,832 | |||
| 083 | 0604290A | MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) | 9,730 | 9,730 | |||
| 084 | 0604321A | ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM | 5,532 | 5,532 | |||
| 085 | 0604328A | TRACTOR CAGE | 19,929 | 19,929 | |||
| 086 | 0604601A | INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS | 27,884 | 34,586 | |||
| Army requested realignment | [6,702] | ||||||
| 087 | 0604604A | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES | 210 | 210 | |||
| 088 | 0604611A | JAVELIN | 4,166 | 4,166 | |||
| 089 | 0604622A | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES | 12,913 | 12,913 | |||
| 090 | 0604633A | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL | 16,764 | 16,764 | |||
| 091 | 0604641A | TACTICAL UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE (TUGV) | 6,770 | 6,770 | |||
| 092 | 0604710A | NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 65,333 | 65,333 | |||
| 093 | 0604713A | COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT | 1,335 | 1,897 | |||
| Military Subsistence Systems | [562] | ||||||
| 094 | 0604715A | NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV | 8,945 | 8,945 | |||
| 096 | 0604741A | AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV | 15,906 | 15,906 | |||
| 097 | 0604742A | CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 4,394 | 4,394 | |||
| 098 | 0604746A | AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT | 11,084 | 11,084 | |||
| 099 | 0604760A | DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV | 10,027 | 10,027 | |||
| 100 | 0604780A | COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE | 42,430 | 42,430 | |||
| 101 | 0604798A | BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION | 105,279 | 105,279 | |||
| 102 | 0604802A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV | 15,006 | 15,006 | |||
| 103 | 0604804A | LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV | 24,581 | 24,581 | |||
| 104 | 0604805A | COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 4,433 | 4,433 | |||
| 105 | 0604807A | MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV | 30,397 | 30,397 | |||
| 106 | 0604808A | LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV | 57,705 | 57,705 | |||
| 108 | 0604818A | ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE | 29,683 | 29,683 | |||
| 109 | 0604820A | RADAR DEVELOPMENT | 5,224 | 5,224 | |||
| 111 | 0604823A | FIREFINDER | 37,492 | 37,492 | |||
| 112 | 0604827A | SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL | 6,157 | 6,157 | |||
| 113 | 0604854A | ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD | 1,912 | 1,912 | |||
| 116 | 0605013A | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 69,761 | 69,761 | |||
| 117 | 0605018A | INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A) | 138,465 | 138,465 | |||
| 118 | 0605028A | ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) | 92,353 | 92,353 | |||
| 119 | 0605030A | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) | 8,440 | 8,440 | |||
| 120 | 0605031A | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN) | 17,999 | 17,999 | |||
| 121 | 0605035A | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 145,409 | 145,409 | |||
| 122 | 0605350A | WIN-T INCREMENT 3—FULL NETWORKING | 113,210 | 113,210 | |||
| 123 | 0605380A | AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS) | 6,882 | 6,882 | |||
| 124 | 0605450A | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 83,838 | 83,838 | |||
| 125 | 0605456A | PAC–3/MSE MISSILE | 35,009 | 35,009 | |||
| 126 | 0605457A | ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) | 142,584 | 142,584 | |||
| 127 | 0605625A | MANNED GROUND VEHICLE | 49,160 | 49,160 | |||
| 128 | 0605626A | AERIAL COMMON SENSOR | 17,748 | 17,748 | |||
| 129 | 0605766A | NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) | 15,212 | 15,212 | |||
| 130 | 0605812A | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH | 45,718 | 45,718 | |||
| 131 | 0605830A | AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 10,041 | 10,041 | |||
| 132 | 0210609A | PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) | 83,300 | 83,300 | |||
| 133 | 0303032A | TROJAN—RH12 | 983 | 983 | |||
| 134 | 0304270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 8,961 | 8,961 | |||
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 1,719,374 | 1,726,638 | |||||
| RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||||
| 135 | 0604256A | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 18,062 | 18,062 | |||
| 136 | 0604258A | TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 10,040 | 10,040 | |||
| 137 | 0604759A | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 60,317 | 60,317 | |||
| 138 | 0605103A | RAND ARROYO CENTER | 20,612 | 20,612 | |||
| 139 | 0605301A | ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL | 176,041 | 176,041 | |||
| 140 | 0605326A | CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM | 19,439 | 19,439 | |||
| 142 | 0605601A | ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES | 275,025 | 275,025 | |||
| 143 | 0605602A | ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS | 45,596 | 45,596 | |||
| 144 | 0605604A | SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS | 33,295 | 33,295 | |||
| 145 | 0605606A | AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION | 4,700 | 4,700 | |||
| 146 | 0605702A | METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES | 6,413 | 6,413 | |||
| 147 | 0605706A | MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS | 20,746 | 20,746 | |||
| 148 | 0605709A | EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS | 7,015 | 7,015 | |||
| 149 | 0605712A | SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING | 49,221 | 49,221 | |||
| 150 | 0605716A | ARMY EVALUATION CENTER | 55,039 | 55,039 | |||
| 151 | 0605718A | ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG | 1,125 | 1,125 | |||
| 152 | 0605801A | PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES | 64,169 | 64,169 | |||
| 153 | 0605803A | TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES | 32,319 | 32,319 | |||
| 154 | 0605805A | MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY | 49,052 | 49,052 | |||
| 155 | 0605857A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT | 2,612 | 2,612 | |||
| 156 | 0605898A | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 49,592 | 49,592 | |||
| SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 1,000,430 | 1,000,430 | |||||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 158 | 0603778A | MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 17,112 | 17,112 | |||
| 159 | 0607141A | LOGISTICS AUTOMATION | 3,654 | 3,654 | |||
| 160 | 0607664A | BIOMETRIC ENABLING CAPABILITY (BEC) | 1,332 | 1,332 | |||
| 161 | 0607865A | PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT | 152,991 | 152,991 | |||
| 162 | 0102419A | AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE | 54,076 | 41,576 | |||
| Funding ahead of need | [–12,500] | ||||||
| 163 | 0203726A | ADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM | 22,374 | 22,374 | |||
| 164 | 0203728A | JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS) | 24,371 | 24,371 | |||
| 165 | 0203735A | COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 295,177 | 321,177 | |||
| Stryker ECP risk mitigation | [26,000] | ||||||
| 166 | 0203740A | MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM | 45,092 | 45,092 | |||
| 167 | 0203744A | AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 264,887 | 264,887 | |||
| 168 | 0203752A | AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 381 | 381 | |||
| 169 | 0203758A | DIGITIZATION | 10,912 | 10,912 | |||
| 170 | 0203801A | MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 5,115 | 5,115 | |||
| 171 | 0203802A | OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 49,848 | 44,848 | |||
| Contract delay for ATACMS | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 172 | 0203808A | TRACTOR CARD | 22,691 | 22,691 | |||
| 173 | 0205402A | INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV | 4,364 | 4,364 | |||
| 174 | 0205410A | MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | 834 | 834 | |||
| 175 | 0205412A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV | 280 | 280 | |||
| 176 | 0205456A | LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM | 78,758 | 78,758 | |||
| 177 | 0205778A | GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS) | 45,377 | 45,377 | |||
| 178 | 0208053A | JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM | 10,209 | 10,209 | |||
| 181 | 0303028A | SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES | 12,525 | 12,525 | |||
| 182 | 0303140A | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 14,175 | 14,175 | |||
| 183 | 0303141A | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 4,527 | 4,527 | |||
| 184 | 0303142A | SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) | 11,011 | 11,011 | |||
| 185 | 0303150A | WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 2,151 | 2,151 | |||
| 187 | 0305204A | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 22,870 | 22,870 | |||
| 188 | 0305208A | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 20,155 | 20,155 | |||
| 189 | 0305219A | MQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS | 46,472 | 46,472 | |||
| 191 | 0305233A | RQ–7 UAV | 16,389 | 16,389 | |||
| 192 | 0307665A | BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE | 1,974 | 1,974 | |||
| 193 | 0310349A | WIN-T INCREMENT 2—INITIAL NETWORKING | 3,249 | 3,249 | |||
| 194 | 0708045A | END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES | 76,225 | 76,225 | |||
| 194A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 4,802 | 4,802 | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 1,346,360 | 1,354,860 | |||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | 6,593,898 | 6,612,315 | |||||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | |||||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||||
| 001 | 0601103N | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 113,908 | 133,908 | |||
| Basic research program increase | [20,000] | ||||||
| 002 | 0601152N | IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH | 18,734 | 18,734 | |||
| 003 | 0601153N | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 443,697 | 443,697 | |||
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 576,339 | 596,339 | |||||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||||
| 004 | 0602114N | POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 95,753 | 95,753 | |||
| 005 | 0602123N | FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 139,496 | 139,496 | |||
| 006 | 0602131M | MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY | 45,831 | 45,831 | |||
| 007 | 0602235N | COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH | 43,541 | 43,541 | |||
| 008 | 0602236N | WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH | 46,923 | 46,923 | |||
| 009 | 0602271N | ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH | 107,872 | 107,872 | |||
| 010 | 0602435N | OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH | 45,388 | 65,388 | |||
| Service Life extension for the AGOR ships | [20,000] | ||||||
| 011 | 0602651M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH | 5,887 | 5,887 | |||
| 012 | 0602747N | UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH | 86,880 | 86,880 | |||
| 013 | 0602750N | FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH | 170,786 | 170,786 | |||
| 014 | 0602782N | MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH | 32,526 | 32,526 | |||
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 820,883 | 840,883 | |||||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 015 | 0603114N | POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 37,734 | 37,734 | |||
| 016 | 0603123N | FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 25,831 | 25,831 | |||
| 017 | 0603271N | ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 64,623 | 64,623 | |||
| 018 | 0603640M | USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) | 128,397 | 128,397 | |||
| 019 | 0603651M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 11,506 | 11,506 | |||
| 020 | 0603673N | FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 256,144 | 256,144 | |||
| 021 | 0603729N | WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 4,838 | 4,838 | |||
| 022 | 0603747N | UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 9,985 | 9,985 | |||
| 023 | 0603758N | NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS | 53,956 | 53,956 | |||
| 024 | 0603782N | MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 2,000 | 2,000 | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 595,014 | 595,014 | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||||
| 025 | 0603207N | AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS | 40,429 | 40,429 | |||
| 026 | 0603216N | AVIATION SURVIVABILITY | 4,325 | 4,325 | |||
| 027 | 0603237N | DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL | 2,991 | 2,991 | |||
| 028 | 0603251N | AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS | 12,651 | 12,651 | |||
| 029 | 0603254N | ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 7,782 | 7,782 | |||
| 030 | 0603261N | TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE | 5,275 | 5,275 | |||
| 031 | 0603382N | ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY | 1,646 | 1,646 | |||
| 032 | 0603502N | SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES | 100,349 | 100,349 | |||
| 033 | 0603506N | SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE | 52,781 | 52,781 | |||
| 034 | 0603512N | CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 5,959 | 5,959 | |||
| 035 | 0603525N | PILOT FISH | 148,865 | 148,865 | |||
| 036 | 0603527N | RETRACT LARCH | 25,365 | 25,365 | |||
| 037 | 0603536N | RETRACT JUNIPER | 80,477 | 80,477 | |||
| 038 | 0603542N | RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL | 669 | 669 | |||
| 039 | 0603553N | SURFACE ASW | 1,060 | 1,060 | |||
| 040 | 0603561N | ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 70,551 | 70,551 | |||
| 041 | 0603562N | SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS | 8,044 | 8,044 | |||
| 042 | 0603563N | SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN | 17,864 | 17,864 | |||
| 043 | 0603564N | SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES | 23,716 | 20,411 | |||
| CSC contract award delay | [–3,305] | ||||||
| 044 | 0603570N | ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS | 499,961 | 499,961 | |||
| 045 | 0603573N | ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS | 21,026 | 21,026 | |||
| 046 | 0603576N | CHALK EAGLE | 542,700 | 542,700 | |||
| 047 | 0603581N | LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) | 88,734 | 88,734 | |||
| 048 | 0603582N | COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION | 20,881 | 20,881 | |||
| 049 | 0603595N | OHIO REPLACEMENT | 849,277 | 849,277 | |||
| 050 | 0603596N | LCS MISSION MODULES | 196,948 | 173,348 | |||
| Program execution | [–23,600] | ||||||
| 051 | 0603597N | AUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST (ATRT) | 8,115 | 8,115 | |||
| 052 | 0603609N | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS | 7,603 | 7,603 | |||
| 053 | 0603611M | MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES | 105,749 | 105,749 | |||
| 054 | 0603635M | MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM | 1,342 | 1,342 | |||
| 055 | 0603654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 21,399 | 21,399 | |||
| 056 | 0603658N | COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT | 43,578 | 42,578 | |||
| Common array block antenna program growth | [–1,000] | ||||||
| 057 | 0603713N | OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 7,764 | 7,764 | |||
| 058 | 0603721N | ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION | 13,200 | 13,200 | |||
| 059 | 0603724N | NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM | 69,415 | 69,415 | |||
| 060 | 0603725N | FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT | 2,588 | 2,588 | |||
| 061 | 0603734N | CHALK CORAL | 176,301 | 176,301 | |||
| 062 | 0603739N | NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY | 3,873 | 3,873 | |||
| 063 | 0603746N | RETRACT MAPLE | 376,028 | 376,028 | |||
| 064 | 0603748N | LINK PLUMERIA | 272,096 | 272,096 | |||
| 065 | 0603751N | RETRACT ELM | 42,233 | 42,233 | |||
| 066 | 0603764N | LINK EVERGREEN | 46,504 | 46,504 | |||
| 067 | 0603787N | SPECIAL PROCESSES | 25,109 | 25,109 | |||
| 068 | 0603790N | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 9,659 | 9,659 | |||
| 069 | 0603795N | LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY | 318 | 318 | |||
| 070 | 0603851M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING | 40,912 | 40,912 | |||
| 071 | 0603860N | JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL | 54,896 | 41,896 | |||
| Program delay | [–13,000] | ||||||
| 073 | 0603925N | DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS | 58,696 | 58,696 | |||
| 074 | 0604112N | GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80) | 43,613 | 43,613 | |||
| 075 | 0604122N | REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS) | 21,110 | 21,110 | |||
| 076 | 0604272N | TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) | 5,657 | 5,657 | |||
| 077 | 0604279N | ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION | 8,033 | 5,923 | |||
| Unjustified request for test assets | [–2,110] | ||||||
| 078 | 0604454N | LX (R) | 36,859 | 36,859 | |||
| 079 | 0604653N | JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW) | 15,227 | 15,227 | |||
| 081 | 0604707N | SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT | 22,393 | 22,393 | |||
| 082 | 0604786N | OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT | 202,939 | 202,939 | |||
| 083 | 0605812M | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH | 11,450 | 11,450 | |||
| 084 | 0303354N | ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP | 6,495 | 6,495 | |||
| 085 | 0304270N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP | 332 | 332 | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 4,591,812 | 4,548,797 | |||||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||||
| 086 | 0603208N | TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT | 25,153 | 25,153 | |||
| 087 | 0604212N | OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT | 46,154 | 46,154 | |||
| 088 | 0604214N | AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV | 25,372 | 25,372 | |||
| 089 | 0604215N | STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT | 53,712 | 53,712 | |||
| 090 | 0604216N | MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT | 11,434 | 11,434 | |||
| 091 | 0604218N | AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING | 2,164 | 2,164 | |||
| 092 | 0604221N | P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 1,710 | 1,710 | |||
| 093 | 0604230N | WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 9,094 | 9,094 | |||
| 094 | 0604231N | TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM | 70,248 | 62,140 | |||
| 64–bit architecture phasing | [–3,000] | ||||||
| Program execution | [–5,108] | ||||||
| 095 | 0604234N | ADVANCED HAWKEYE | 193,200 | 193,200 | |||
| 096 | 0604245N | H–1 UPGRADES | 44,115 | 44,115 | |||
| 097 | 0604261N | ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS | 23,227 | 23,227 | |||
| 098 | 0604262N | V–22A | 61,249 | 61,249 | |||
| 099 | 0604264N | AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 15,014 | 15,014 | |||
| 100 | 0604269N | EA–18 | 18,730 | 18,730 | |||
| 101 | 0604270N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 28,742 | 28,742 | |||
| 102 | 0604273N | EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT | 388,086 | 388,086 | |||
| 103 | 0604274N | NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) | 246,856 | 246,856 | |||
| 104 | 0604280N | JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) | 7,106 | 7,106 | |||
| 105 | 0604307N | SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING | 189,112 | 189,112 | |||
| 106 | 0604311N | LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 376 | 376 | |||
| 107 | 0604329N | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) | 71,849 | 61,849 | |||
| Small diameter bomb II integration program growth | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 108 | 0604366N | STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS | 53,198 | 53,198 | |||
| 109 | 0604373N | AIRBORNE MCM | 38,941 | 38,941 | |||
| 110 | 0604376M | MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) FOR AVIATION | 7,832 | 7,832 | |||
| 111 | 0604378N | NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 15,263 | 15,263 | |||
| 112 | 0604404N | UNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE (UCLASS) SYSTEM | 403,017 | 403,017 | |||
| 113 | 0604501N | ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS | 20,409 | 20,409 | |||
| 114 | 0604503N | SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION | 71,565 | 71,565 | |||
| 115 | 0604504N | AIR CONTROL | 29,037 | 29,037 | |||
| 116 | 0604512N | SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS | 122,083 | 122,083 | |||
| 118 | 0604522N | ADVANCED MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM | 144,706 | 144,706 | |||
| 119 | 0604558N | NEW DESIGN SSN | 72,695 | 72,695 | |||
| 120 | 0604562N | SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM | 38,985 | 38,985 | |||
| 121 | 0604567N | SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E | 48,470 | 48,470 | |||
| 122 | 0604574N | NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES | 3,935 | 3,935 | |||
| 123 | 0604580N | VIRGINIA PAYLOAD MODULE (VPM) | 132,602 | 132,602 | |||
| 124 | 0604601N | MINE DEVELOPMENT | 19,067 | 14,067 | |||
| Mine Development program growth | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 125 | 0604610N | LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT | 25,280 | 25,280 | |||
| 126 | 0604654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 8,985 | 8,985 | |||
| 127 | 0604703N | PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS | 7,669 | 7,669 | |||
| 128 | 0604727N | JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS | 4,400 | 4,400 | |||
| 129 | 0604755N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) | 56,889 | 56,889 | |||
| 130 | 0604756N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) | 96,937 | 96,937 | |||
| 131 | 0604757N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) | 134,564 | 121,339 | |||
| SEWIP block 3 preliminary design contract delay | [–13,225] | ||||||
| 132 | 0604761N | INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING | 200 | 200 | |||
| 133 | 0604771N | MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT | 8,287 | 8,287 | |||
| 134 | 0604777N | NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM | 29,504 | 29,504 | |||
| 135 | 0604800M | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD | 513,021 | 513,021 | |||
| 136 | 0604800N | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD | 516,456 | 516,456 | |||
| 137 | 0605013M | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 2,887 | 2,887 | |||
| 138 | 0605013N | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 66,317 | 66,317 | |||
| 139 | 0605212N | CH–53K RDTE | 573,187 | 573,187 | |||
| 140 | 0605220N | SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC) | 67,815 | 67,815 | |||
| 141 | 0605450N | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 6,300 | 6,300 | |||
| 142 | 0605500N | MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) | 308,037 | 319,037 | |||
| Spiral 2 government systems engineering program growth | [–4,000] | ||||||
| Wideband Communication Development | [15,000] | ||||||
| 143 | 0204202N | DDG–1000 | 202,522 | 202,522 | |||
| 144 | 0304231N | TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP | 1,011 | 1,011 | |||
| 145 | 0304785N | TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS | 10,357 | 10,357 | |||
| 146 | 0305124N | SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM | 23,975 | 23,975 | |||
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 5,419,108 | 5,393,775 | |||||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||||
| 147 | 0604256N | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 45,272 | 45,272 | |||
| 148 | 0604258N | TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 79,718 | 69,718 | |||
| GQM–173A program delay | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 149 | 0604759N | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 123,993 | 123,993 | |||
| 150 | 0605126N | JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION | 4,960 | 4,960 | |||
| 151 | 0605152N | STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY | 8,296 | 8,296 | |||
| 152 | 0605154N | CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES | 45,752 | 45,752 | |||
| 154 | 0605804N | TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES | 876 | 876 | |||
| 155 | 0605853N | MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 72,070 | 72,070 | |||
| 156 | 0605856N | STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT | 3,237 | 3,237 | |||
| 157 | 0605861N | RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT | 73,033 | 73,033 | |||
| 158 | 0605863N | RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT | 138,304 | 138,304 | |||
| 159 | 0605864N | TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 336,286 | 336,286 | |||
| 160 | 0605865N | OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY | 16,658 | 16,658 | |||
| 161 | 0605866N | NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT | 2,505 | 2,505 | |||
| 162 | 0605867N | SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT | 8,325 | 8,325 | |||
| 163 | 0605873M | MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT | 17,866 | 17,866 | |||
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 977,151 | 967,151 | |||||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 168 | 0604402N | UNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT | 35,949 | 35,949 | |||
| 169 | 0604766M | MARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS | 215 | 215 | |||
| 170 | 0605525N | CARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON | 8,873 | 8,873 | |||
| 172 | 0101221N | STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT | 96,943 | 96,943 | |||
| 173 | 0101224N | SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 30,057 | 30,057 | |||
| 174 | 0101226N | SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 4,509 | 4,509 | |||
| 175 | 0101402N | NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS | 13,676 | 13,676 | |||
| 176 | 0203761N | RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT) | 12,480 | 12,480 | |||
| 177 | 0204136N | F/A–18 SQUADRONS | 76,216 | 76,216 | |||
| 179 | 0204163N | FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) | 27,281 | 27,281 | |||
| 180 | 0204228N | SURFACE SUPPORT | 2,878 | 2,878 | |||
| 181 | 0204229N | TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) | 32,385 | 32,385 | |||
| 182 | 0204311N | INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 39,371 | 39,371 | |||
| 183 | 0204413N | AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) | 4,609 | 4,609 | |||
| 184 | 0204460M | GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) | 99,106 | 92,106 | |||
| Unjustified cost growth | [–7,000] | ||||||
| 185 | 0204571N | CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 39,922 | 39,922 | |||
| 186 | 0204574N | CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT | 1,157 | 1,157 | |||
| 187 | 0204575N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT | 22,067 | 22,067 | |||
| 188 | 0205601N | HARM IMPROVEMENT | 17,420 | 17,420 | |||
| 189 | 0205604N | TACTICAL DATA LINKS | 151,208 | 151,208 | |||
| 190 | 0205620N | SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION | 26,366 | 26,366 | |||
| 191 | 0205632N | MK–48 ADCAP | 25,952 | 25,952 | |||
| 192 | 0205633N | AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS | 106,936 | 106,936 | |||
| 194 | 0205675N | OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS | 104,023 | 104,023 | |||
| 195 | 0206313M | MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 77,398 | 77,398 | |||
| 196 | 0206335M | COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S) | 32,495 | 32,495 | |||
| 197 | 0206623M | MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS | 156,626 | 156,626 | |||
| 198 | 0206624M | MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT | 20,999 | 20,999 | |||
| 199 | 0206625M | USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) | 14,179 | 14,179 | |||
| 200 | 0207161N | TACTICAL AIM MISSILES | 47,258 | 47,258 | |||
| 201 | 0207163N | ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) | 10,210 | 10,210 | |||
| 206 | 0303109N | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) | 41,829 | 41,829 | |||
| 207 | 0303138N | CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES) | 22,780 | 22,780 | |||
| 208 | 0303140N | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 23,053 | 23,053 | |||
| 209 | 0303150M | WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 296 | 296 | |||
| 212 | 0305160N | NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC) | 359 | 359 | |||
| 213 | 0305192N | MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES | 6,166 | 6,166 | |||
| 214 | 0305204N | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 8,505 | 8,505 | |||
| 216 | 0305208M | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 11,613 | 11,613 | |||
| 217 | 0305208N | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 18,146 | 18,146 | |||
| 218 | 0305220N | RQ–4 UAV | 498,003 | 463,003 | |||
| Milestone C delay | [–35,000] | ||||||
| 219 | 0305231N | MQ–8 UAV | 47,294 | 47,294 | |||
| 220 | 0305232M | RQ–11 UAV | 718 | 718 | |||
| 221 | 0305233N | RQ–7 UAV | 851 | 851 | |||
| 222 | 0305234N | SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) | 4,813 | 4,813 | |||
| 223 | 0305239M | RQ–21A | 8,192 | 8,192 | |||
| 224 | 0305241N | MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT | 22,559 | 18,664 | |||
| Program execution | [–3,895] | ||||||
| 225 | 0305242M | UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP) | 2,000 | 2,000 | |||
| 226 | 0308601N | MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT | 4,719 | 4,719 | |||
| 227 | 0702207N | DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) | 21,168 | 21,168 | |||
| 228 | 0708011N | INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | 37,169 | 37,169 | |||
| 229 | 0708730N | MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) | 4,347 | 4,347 | |||
| 229A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,162,684 | 1,162,684 | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 3,286,028 | 3,240,133 | |||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | 16,266,335 | 16,182,092 | |||||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | |||||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||||
| 001 | 0601102F | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 314,482 | 314,482 | |||
| 002 | 0601103F | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 127,079 | 147,079 | |||
| Basic research program increase | [20,000] | ||||||
| 003 | 0601108F | HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 12,929 | 12,929 | |||
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 454,490 | 474,490 | |||||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||||
| 004 | 0602102F | MATERIALS | 105,680 | 105,680 | |||
| 005 | 0602201F | AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES | 105,747 | 105,747 | |||
| 006 | 0602202F | HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH | 81,957 | 81,957 | |||
| 007 | 0602203F | AEROSPACE PROPULSION | 172,550 | 172,550 | |||
| 008 | 0602204F | AEROSPACE SENSORS | 118,343 | 118,343 | |||
| 009 | 0602601F | SPACE TECHNOLOGY | 98,229 | 98,229 | |||
| 010 | 0602602F | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS | 87,387 | 87,387 | |||
| 011 | 0602605F | DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY | 125,955 | 125,955 | |||
| 012 | 0602788F | DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS | 147,789 | 147,789 | |||
| 013 | 0602890F | HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH | 37,496 | 37,496 | |||
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 1,081,133 | 1,081,133 | |||||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 014 | 0603112F | ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS | 32,177 | 42,177 | |||
| Metals Affordability Initiative | [10,000] | ||||||
| 015 | 0603199F | SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) | 15,800 | 15,800 | |||
| 016 | 0603203F | ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS | 34,420 | 34,420 | |||
| 017 | 0603211F | AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO | 91,062 | 91,062 | |||
| 018 | 0603216F | AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY | 124,236 | 124,236 | |||
| 019 | 0603270F | ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY | 47,602 | 47,602 | |||
| 020 | 0603401F | ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY | 69,026 | 69,026 | |||
| 021 | 0603444F | MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) | 14,031 | 14,031 | |||
| 022 | 0603456F | HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 21,788 | 21,788 | |||
| 023 | 0603601F | CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 42,046 | 42,046 | |||
| 024 | 0603605F | ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 23,542 | 23,542 | |||
| 025 | 0603680F | MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 42,772 | 42,772 | |||
| 026 | 0603788F | BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 35,315 | 35,315 | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 593,817 | 603,817 | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||||
| 027 | 0603260F | INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 5,408 | 5,408 | |||
| 031 | 0603438F | SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY | 6,075 | 6,075 | |||
| 032 | 0603742F | COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY | 10,980 | 10,980 | |||
| 033 | 0603790F | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2,392 | 2,392 | |||
| 034 | 0603791F | INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D | 833 | 833 | |||
| 035 | 0603830F | SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM | 32,313 | 32,313 | |||
| 037 | 0603851F | INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL | 30,885 | 30,885 | |||
| 039 | 0603859F | POLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL | 1,798 | 1,798 | |||
| 040 | 0604015F | LONG RANGE STRIKE | 913,728 | 913,728 | |||
| 042 | 0604317F | TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 2,669 | 2,669 | |||
| 045 | 0604422F | WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON | 39,901 | 39,901 | |||
| 049 | 0604800F | F–35—EMD | 4,976 | 0 | |||
| Transfer F–35 EMD: Air Force requested to line #75 | [–4,976] | ||||||
| 050 | 0604857F | OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE | 20,000 | ||||
| Program Increase | [20,000] | ||||||
| 051 | 0604858F | TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM | 59,004 | 59,004 | |||
| 054 | 0207110F | NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE | 15,722 | 15,722 | |||
| 055 | 0207455F | THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) | 88,825 | 88,825 | |||
| 056 | 0305164F | NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) | 156,659 | 156,659 | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 1,372,168 | 1,387,192 | |||||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||||
| 059 | 0604233F | SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING | 13,324 | 13,324 | |||
| 060 | 0604270F | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 1,965 | 1,965 | |||
| 061 | 0604281F | TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE | 39,110 | 39,110 | |||
| 062 | 0604287F | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 3,926 | 3,926 | |||
| 063 | 0604329F | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD | 68,759 | 68,759 | |||
| 064 | 0604421F | COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS | 23,746 | 23,746 | |||
| 065 | 0604425F | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS | 9,462 | 9,462 | |||
| 066 | 0604426F | SPACE FENCE | 214,131 | 200,131 | |||
| Program delay | [–14,000] | ||||||
| 067 | 0604429F | AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK | 30,687 | 30,687 | |||
| 068 | 0604441F | SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD | 319,501 | 311,501 | |||
| Wide field of view test bed | [–8,000] | ||||||
| 069 | 0604602F | ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 31,112 | 31,112 | |||
| 070 | 0604604F | SUBMUNITIONS | 2,543 | 2,543 | |||
| 071 | 0604617F | AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT | 46,340 | 46,340 | |||
| 072 | 0604706F | LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS | 8,854 | 8,854 | |||
| 073 | 0604735F | COMBAT TRAINING RANGES | 10,129 | 10,129 | |||
| 075 | 0604800F | F–35—EMD | 563,037 | 568,013 | |||
| Transfer F–35 EMD: Air Force requested from line #49 | [4,976] | ||||||
| 077 | 0604853F | EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD | 220,000 | ||||
| Rocket propulsion system | [220,000] | ||||||
| 078 | 0604932F | LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON | 4,938 | 3,438 | |||
| Execution adjustment | [–1,500] | ||||||
| 079 | 0604933F | ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION | 59,826 | 59,826 | |||
| 080 | 0605030F | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) | 78 | 78 | |||
| 081 | 0605213F | F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B | 173,647 | 173,647 | |||
| 082 | 0605214F | GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT | 5,332 | 5,332 | |||
| 083 | 0605221F | KC–46 | 776,937 | 776,937 | |||
| 084 | 0605223F | ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING | 8,201 | 8,201 | |||
| 086 | 0605278F | HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E | 7,497 | 7,497 | |||
| 087 | 0605431F | ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) | 314,378 | 314,378 | |||
| 088 | 0605432F | POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) | 103,552 | 103,552 | |||
| 089 | 0605433F | WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) | 31,425 | 31,425 | |||
| 090 | 0605458F | AIR & SPACE OPS CENTER 10.2 RDT&E | 85,938 | 85,938 | |||
| 091 | 0605931F | B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | 98,768 | 98,768 | |||
| 092 | 0101125F | NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION | 198,357 | 198,357 | |||
| 094 | 0207701F | FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING | 8,831 | 8,831 | |||
| 095 | 0307581F | NEXTGEN JSTARS | 73,088 | 73,088 | |||
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 3,337,419 | 3,538,895 | |||||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||||
| 097 | 0604256F | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 24,418 | 24,418 | |||
| 098 | 0604759F | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 47,232 | 47,232 | |||
| 099 | 0605101F | RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE | 30,443 | 30,443 | |||
| 101 | 0605712F | INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION | 12,266 | 12,266 | |||
| 102 | 0605807F | TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 689,509 | 689,509 | |||
| 103 | 0605860F | ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) | 34,364 | 34,364 | |||
| 104 | 0605864F | SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) | 21,161 | 21,161 | |||
| 105 | 0605976F | FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 46,955 | 46,955 | |||
| 106 | 0605978F | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 32,965 | 32,965 | |||
| 107 | 0606017F | REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION | 13,850 | 13,850 | |||
| 108 | 0606116F | SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT | 19,512 | 19,512 | |||
| 110 | 0606392F | SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE | 181,727 | 177,800 | |||
| Personnel costs excess to need | [–3,927] | ||||||
| 111 | 0308602F | ENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS) | 4,938 | 4,938 | |||
| 112 | 0702806F | ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 18,644 | 18,644 | |||
| 113 | 0804731F | GENERAL SKILL TRAINING | 1,425 | 1,425 | |||
| 114 | 1001004F | INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES | 3,790 | 3,790 | |||
| 114A | XXXXXXXF | EJECTION SEAT RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 3,500 | ||||
| Initial Aircraft Qualification | [3,500] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 1,183,199 | 1,182,772 | |||||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 115 | 0603423F | GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT | 299,760 | 299,760 | |||
| 116 | 0604445F | WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE | 2,000 | ||||
| Implementation of the Secretary’s Cruise Missile Defense Program | [2,000] | ||||||
| 118 | 0604618F | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 2,469 | 2,469 | |||
| 119 | 0605018F | AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) | 90,218 | 60,218 | |||
| Delayed contract award | [–30,000] | ||||||
| 120 | 0605024F | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY | 34,815 | 34,815 | |||
| 122 | 0101113F | B–52 SQUADRONS | 55,457 | 55,457 | |||
| 123 | 0101122F | AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) | 450 | 450 | |||
| 124 | 0101126F | B–1B SQUADRONS | 5,353 | 4,353 | |||
| Execution adjustment | [–1,000] | ||||||
| 125 | 0101127F | B–2 SQUADRONS | 131,580 | 111,580 | |||
| Flexible Strike execution delay | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 126 | 0101213F | MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS | 139,109 | 139,109 | |||
| 127 | 0101313F | STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM | 35,603 | 35,603 | |||
| 128 | 0101314F | NIGHT FIST—USSTRATCOM | 32 | 32 | |||
| 130 | 0102326F | REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 1,522 | 1,522 | |||
| 131 | 0105921F | SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES | 3,134 | 3,134 | |||
| 133 | 0205219F | MQ–9 UAV | 170,396 | 170,396 | |||
| 136 | 0207133F | F–16 SQUADRONS | 133,105 | 133,105 | |||
| 137 | 0207134F | F–15E SQUADRONS | 261,969 | 251,969 | |||
| Execution adjustment | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 138 | 0207136F | MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION | 14,831 | 14,831 | |||
| 139 | 0207138F | F–22A SQUADRONS | 156,962 | 151,962 | |||
| Unjustified increase— laboratory test and operations | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 140 | 0207142F | F–35 SQUADRONS | 43,666 | 43,666 | |||
| 141 | 0207161F | TACTICAL AIM MISSILES | 29,739 | 29,739 | |||
| 142 | 0207163F | ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) | 82,195 | 82,195 | |||
| 144 | 0207171F | F–15 EPAWSS | 68,944 | 53,444 | |||
| Delays in pre-EMD phase | [–15,500] | ||||||
| 145 | 0207224F | COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY | 5,095 | 5,095 | |||
| 146 | 0207227F | COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE | 883 | 883 | |||
| 147 | 0207247F | AF TENCAP | 5,812 | 5,812 | |||
| 148 | 0207249F | PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT | 1,081 | 1,081 | |||
| 149 | 0207253F | COMPASS CALL | 14,411 | 14,411 | |||
| 150 | 0207268F | AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 109,664 | 109,664 | |||
| 151 | 0207325F | JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) | 15,897 | 15,897 | |||
| 152 | 0207410F | AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) | 41,066 | 41,066 | |||
| 153 | 0207412F | CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) | 552 | 552 | |||
| 154 | 0207417F | AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) | 180,804 | 180,804 | |||
| 155 | 0207418F | TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 3,754 | 3,754 | |||
| 157 | 0207431F | COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES | 7,891 | 7,891 | |||
| 158 | 0207444F | TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD | 5,891 | 5,891 | |||
| 159 | 0207448F | C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK | 1,782 | 1,782 | |||
| 161 | 0207452F | DCAPES | 821 | 821 | |||
| 163 | 0207590F | SEEK EAGLE | 23,844 | 23,844 | |||
| 164 | 0207601F | USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION | 16,723 | 16,723 | |||
| 165 | 0207605F | WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS | 5,956 | 5,956 | |||
| 166 | 0207697F | DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES | 4,457 | 4,457 | |||
| 167 | 0208006F | MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 60,679 | 60,679 | |||
| 169 | 0208059F | CYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES | 67,057 | 67,057 | |||
| 170 | 0208087F | AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 13,355 | 13,355 | |||
| 171 | 0208088F | AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 5,576 | 5,576 | |||
| 179 | 0301400F | SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE | 12,218 | 12,218 | |||
| 180 | 0302015F | E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) | 28,778 | 22,978 | |||
| Low Frequency Transmit System—delay to contract award | [–5,800] | ||||||
| 181 | 0303131F | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) | 81,035 | 81,035 | |||
| 182 | 0303140F | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 70,497 | 70,497 | |||
| 183 | 0303141F | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 692 | 692 | |||
| 185 | 0303601F | MILSATCOM TERMINALS | 55,208 | 55,208 | |||
| 187 | 0304260F | AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE | 106,786 | 106,786 | |||
| 190 | 0305099F | GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) | 4,157 | 4,157 | |||
| 193 | 0305110F | SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) | 20,806 | 20,806 | |||
| 194 | 0305111F | WEATHER SERVICE | 25,102 | 25,102 | |||
| 195 | 0305114F | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) | 23,516 | 23,516 | |||
| 196 | 0305116F | AERIAL TARGETS | 8,639 | 8,639 | |||
| 199 | 0305128F | SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES | 498 | 498 | |||
| 200 | 0305145F | ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION | 13,222 | 13,222 | |||
| 201 | 0305146F | DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES | 360 | 360 | |||
| 206 | 0305173F | SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER | 3,674 | 3,674 | |||
| 207 | 0305174F | SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 2,480 | 2,480 | |||
| 208 | 0305179F | INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) | 8,592 | 8,592 | |||
| 209 | 0305182F | SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) | 13,462 | 13,462 | |||
| 210 | 0305202F | DRAGON U–2 | 5,511 | 5,511 | |||
| 212 | 0305206F | AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 28,113 | 38,113 | |||
| Per Air Force UFR | [10,000] | ||||||
| 213 | 0305207F | MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 13,516 | 13,516 | |||
| 214 | 0305208F | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 27,265 | 27,265 | |||
| 215 | 0305219F | MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV | 1,378 | 1,378 | |||
| 216 | 0305220F | RQ–4 UAV | 244,514 | 244,514 | |||
| 217 | 0305221F | NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING | 11,096 | 11,096 | |||
| 218 | 0305236F | COMMON DATA LINK (CDL) | 36,137 | 36,137 | |||
| 219 | 0305238F | NATO AGS | 232,851 | 232,851 | |||
| 220 | 0305240F | SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE | 20,218 | 20,218 | |||
| 221 | 0305265F | GPS III SPACE SEGMENT | 212,571 | 212,571 | |||
| 222 | 0305614F | JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM | 73,779 | 73,779 | |||
| 223 | 0305881F | RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION | 4,102 | 4,102 | |||
| 225 | 0305913F | NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) | 20,468 | 20,468 | |||
| 226 | 0305940F | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS | 11,596 | 11,596 | |||
| 227 | 0306250F | CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 4,938 | 4,938 | |||
| 228 | 0308699F | SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) | 1,212 | 1,212 | |||
| 230 | 0401119F | C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) | 38,773 | 38,773 | |||
| 231 | 0401130F | C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) | 83,773 | 83,773 | |||
| 232 | 0401132F | C–130J PROGRAM | 26,715 | 26,715 | |||
| 233 | 0401134F | LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) | 5,172 | 5,172 | |||
| 234 | 0401219F | KC–10S | 2,714 | 2,714 | |||
| 235 | 0401314F | OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT | 27,784 | 27,784 | |||
| 236 | 0401318F | CV–22 | 38,719 | 38,719 | |||
| 237 | 0401319F | PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT (PAR) | 11,006 | 11,006 | |||
| 238 | 0408011F | SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL | 8,405 | 8,405 | |||
| 239 | 0702207F | DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) | 1,407 | 1,407 | |||
| 241 | 0708610F | LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) | 109,685 | 109,685 | |||
| 242 | 0708611F | SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 16,209 | 16,209 | |||
| 243 | 0804743F | OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING | 987 | 987 | |||
| 244 | 0808716F | OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES | 126 | 126 | |||
| 245 | 0901202F | JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY | 2,603 | 2,603 | |||
| 246 | 0901218F | CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM | 1,589 | 1,589 | |||
| 247 | 0901220F | PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION | 5,026 | 5,026 | |||
| 248 | 0901226F | AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY | 1,394 | 1,394 | |||
| 249 | 0901279F | FACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE | 3,798 | 3,798 | |||
| 250 | 0901538F | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 107,314 | 102,685 | |||
| Defense Enterprise Accounting Management System Increment 2 | [–4,629] | ||||||
| 250A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 11,441,120 | 11,412,120 | |||
| Classified program reduction | [–29,000] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 15,717,666 | 15,608,737 | |||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | 23,739,892 | 23,877,036 | |||||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | |||||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||||
| 001 | 0601000BR | DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE | 37,778 | 37,778 | |||
| 002 | 0601101E | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 312,146 | 332,146 | |||
| Basic research program increase | [20,000] | ||||||
| 003 | 0601110D8Z | BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 44,564 | 34,564 | |||
| National Security Science and Engineering Faculty Fellowship program | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 004 | 0601117E | BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE | 49,848 | 49,848 | |||
| 005 | 0601120D8Z | NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM | 45,488 | 55,488 | |||
| Military Child STEM Education programs | [10,000] | ||||||
| 006 | 0601228D8Z | HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS | 24,412 | 34,412 | |||
| Program increase | [10,000] | ||||||
| 007 | 0601384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 48,261 | 48,261 | |||
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 562,497 | 592,497 | |||||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||||
| 008 | 0602000D8Z | JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY | 20,065 | 20,065 | |||
| 009 | 0602115E | BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 112,242 | 112,242 | |||
| 011 | 0602234D8Z | LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM | 51,875 | 51,875 | |||
| 012 | 0602251D8Z | APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES | 41,965 | 41,965 | |||
| 013 | 0602303E | INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY | 334,407 | 334,407 | |||
| 015 | 0602383E | BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE | 44,825 | 44,825 | |||
| 016 | 0602384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 226,317 | 226,317 | |||
| 018 | 0602668D8Z | CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH | 15,000 | 15,000 | |||
| 020 | 0602702E | TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY | 305,484 | 305,484 | |||
| 021 | 0602715E | MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY | 160,389 | 160,389 | |||
| 022 | 0602716E | ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY | 179,203 | 179,203 | |||
| 023 | 0602718BR | WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES | 151,737 | 151,737 | |||
| 024 | 0602751D8Z | SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH | 9,156 | 9,156 | |||
| 025 | 1160401BB | SOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 39,750 | 39,750 | |||
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 1,692,415 | 1,692,415 | |||||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 026 | 0603000D8Z | JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 26,688 | 26,688 | |||
| 027 | 0603121D8Z | SO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 8,682 | 8,682 | |||
| 028 | 0603122D8Z | COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 69,675 | 89,675 | |||
| Program emphasis for CT and Irregular Warfare Programs | [20,000] | ||||||
| 029 | 0603133D8Z | FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING | 30,000 | 24,000 | |||
| Program decrease | [–6,000] | ||||||
| 030 | 0603160BR | COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT | 283,694 | 283,694 | |||
| 032 | 0603176C | ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT | 8,470 | 8,470 | |||
| 033 | 0603177C | DISCRIMINATION SENSOR TECHNOLOGY | 45,110 | 43,110 | |||
| Unjustified growth | [–2,000] | ||||||
| 034 | 0603178C | WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 14,068 | 14,068 | |||
| 035 | 0603179C | ADVANCED C4ISR | 15,329 | 15,329 | |||
| 036 | 0603180C | ADVANCED RESEARCH | 16,584 | 16,584 | |||
| 037 | 0603225D8Z | JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 19,335 | 19,335 | |||
| 038 | 0603264S | AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY | 2,544 | 2,544 | |||
| 039 | 0603274C | SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY | 51,033 | 51,033 | |||
| 040 | 0603286E | ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS | 129,723 | 129,723 | |||
| 041 | 0603287E | SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY | 179,883 | 179,883 | |||
| 042 | 0603288D8Z | ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS | 12,000 | 12,000 | |||
| 043 | 0603289D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS | 60,000 | 50,000 | |||
| Program reduction | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 044 | 0603294C | COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY | 25,639 | 25,639 | |||
| 045 | 0603384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 132,674 | 132,674 | |||
| 046 | 0603618D8Z | JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 10,965 | 10,965 | |||
| 047 | 0603648D8Z | JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 131,960 | 121,960 | |||
| Program reduction | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 052 | 0603680D8Z | DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 91,095 | 91,095 | |||
| 053 | 0603699D8Z | EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 33,706 | 33,706 | |||
| 054 | 0603712S | GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 16,836 | 16,836 | |||
| 055 | 0603713S | DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY | 29,683 | 29,683 | |||
| 056 | 0603716D8Z | STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM | 57,796 | 57,796 | |||
| 057 | 0603720S | MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT | 72,144 | 72,144 | |||
| 058 | 0603727D8Z | JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM | 7,405 | 7,405 | |||
| 059 | 0603739E | ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES | 92,246 | 92,246 | |||
| 060 | 0603760E | COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 243,265 | 243,265 | |||
| 062 | 0603766E | NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY | 386,926 | 386,926 | |||
| 063 | 0603767E | SENSOR TECHNOLOGY | 312,821 | 312,821 | |||
| 064 | 0603769SE | DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 10,692 | 10,692 | |||
| 065 | 0603781D8Z | SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE | 15,776 | 15,776 | |||
| 066 | 0603826D8Z | QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS | 69,319 | 64,319 | |||
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 068 | 0603832D8Z | DOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE | 3,000 | 3,000 | |||
| 071 | 0603941D8Z | TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 81,148 | 81,148 | |||
| 072 | 0604055D8Z | OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT | 31,800 | 31,800 | |||
| 073 | 0303310D8Z | CWMD SYSTEMS | 46,066 | 46,066 | |||
| 074 | 1160402BB | SOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 57,622 | 57,622 | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 2,933,402 | 2,920,402 | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | |||||||
| 077 | 0603161D8Z | NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P | 41,072 | 41,072 | |||
| 079 | 0603600D8Z | WALKOFF | 90,558 | 90,558 | |||
| 080 | 0603714D8Z | ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM | 15,518 | 19,518 | |||
| Continue important test programs | [4,000] | ||||||
| 081 | 0603851D8Z | ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM | 51,462 | 51,462 | |||
| 082 | 0603881C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT | 299,598 | 292,798 | |||
| THAAD 2.0 early to need | [–6,800] | ||||||
| 083 | 0603882C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT | 1,003,768 | 1,043,768 | |||
| GMD reliability and maintenance improvements | [40,000] | ||||||
| 084 | 0603884BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL | 179,236 | 179,236 | |||
| 085 | 0603884C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS | 392,893 | 392,893 | |||
| 086 | 0603890C | BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS | 410,863 | 410,863 | |||
| 087 | 0603891C | SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA | 310,261 | 310,261 | |||
| 088 | 0603892C | AEGIS BMD | 929,208 | 929,208 | |||
| 089 | 0603893C | SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 31,346 | 31,346 | |||
| 090 | 0603895C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS | 6,389 | 6,389 | |||
| 091 | 0603896C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI | 443,484 | 431,484 | |||
| Spiral 8.2–3—unjustified growth without baseline | [–12,000] | ||||||
| 092 | 0603898C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT | 46,387 | 46,387 | |||
| 093 | 0603904C | MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) | 58,530 | 58,530 | |||
| 094 | 0603906C | REGARDING TRENCH | 16,199 | 16,199 | |||
| 095 | 0603907C | SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) | 64,409 | 64,409 | |||
| 096 | 0603913C | ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS | 96,803 | 270,603 | |||
| Program increase for Israeli Cooperative Programs | [173,800] | ||||||
| 097 | 0603914C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST | 386,482 | 366,482 | |||
| Test efficiencies | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 098 | 0603915C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS | 485,294 | 485,294 | |||
| 099 | 0603920D8Z | HUMANITARIAN DEMINING | 10,194 | 10,194 | |||
| 100 | 0603923D8Z | COALITION WARFARE | 10,139 | 10,139 | |||
| 101 | 0604016D8Z | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM | 2,907 | 7,907 | |||
| Program increase | [5,000] | ||||||
| 102 | 0604250D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES | 190,000 | 170,000 | |||
| Program decrease | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 103 | 0604400D8Z | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT | 3,702 | 3,702 | |||
| 104 | 0604445J | WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE | 53,000 | 53,000 | |||
| 106 | 0604775D8Z | DEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM | 75,000 | ||||
| Program increase | [75,000] | ||||||
| 107 | 0604787J | JOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 7,002 | 7,002 | |||
| 108 | 0604828J | JOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM | 7,102 | 7,102 | |||
| 109 | 0604880C | LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) | 123,444 | 123,444 | |||
| 110 | 0604881C | AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT | 263,695 | 263,695 | |||
| 113 | 0605170D8Z | SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION | 12,500 | 12,500 | |||
| 114 | 0303191D8Z | JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM | 2,656 | 2,656 | |||
| 115 | 0305103C | CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE | 961 | 961 | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | 6,047,062 | 6,286,062 | |||||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | |||||||
| 116 | 0604161D8Z | NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD | 7,936 | 7,936 | |||
| 117 | 0604165D8Z | PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 70,762 | 70,762 | |||
| 118 | 0604384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD | 345,883 | 345,883 | |||
| 119 | 0604764K | ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO) | 25,459 | 25,459 | |||
| 120 | 0604771D8Z | JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) | 17,562 | 17,562 | |||
| 121 | 0605000BR | WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES | 6,887 | 6,887 | |||
| 122 | 0605013BL | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 12,530 | 12,530 | |||
| 123 | 0605021SE | HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE | 286 | 286 | |||
| 124 | 0605022D8Z | DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM | 3,244 | 3,244 | |||
| 125 | 0605027D8Z | OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES | 6,500 | 6,500 | |||
| 126 | 0605070S | DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 15,326 | 15,326 | |||
| 127 | 0605075D8Z | DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION | 19,351 | 19,351 | |||
| 128 | 0605080S | DEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM | 41,465 | 41,465 | |||
| 129 | 0605090S | DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS) | 10,135 | 10,135 | |||
| 130 | 0605210D8Z | DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES | 9,546 | 9,546 | |||
| 131 | 0303141K | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 14,241 | 14,241 | |||
| 132 | 0305304D8Z | DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) | 3,660 | 3,660 | |||
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 610,773 | 610,773 | |||||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||||
| 133 | 0604774D8Z | DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) | 5,616 | 5,616 | |||
| 134 | 0604875D8Z | JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT | 3,092 | 3,092 | |||
| 135 | 0604940D8Z | CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) | 254,503 | 254,503 | |||
| 136 | 0604942D8Z | ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS | 21,661 | 21,661 | |||
| 138 | 0605100D8Z | JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) | 27,162 | 27,162 | |||
| 139 | 0605104D8Z | TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS | 24,501 | 24,501 | |||
| 142 | 0605126J | JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) | 43,176 | 43,176 | |||
| 145 | 0605142D8Z | SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 44,246 | 44,246 | |||
| 146 | 0605151D8Z | STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD | 2,665 | 2,665 | |||
| 147 | 0605161D8Z | NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY | 4,366 | 4,366 | |||
| 148 | 0605170D8Z | SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION | 27,901 | 27,901 | |||
| 149 | 0605200D8Z | GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) | 2,855 | 2,855 | |||
| 150 | 0605384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 105,944 | 105,944 | |||
| 156 | 0605502KA | SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH | 400 | 400 | |||
| 159 | 0605790D8Z | SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 1,634 | 1,634 | |||
| 160 | 0605798D8Z | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS | 12,105 | 12,105 | |||
| 161 | 0605801KA | DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) | 50,389 | 50,389 | |||
| 162 | 0605803SE | R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION | 8,452 | 8,452 | |||
| 163 | 0605804D8Z | DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION | 15,187 | 19,187 | |||
| Program increase | [4,000] | ||||||
| 164 | 0605898E | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 71,362 | 71,362 | |||
| 165 | 0606100D8Z | BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS | 4,100 | 4,100 | |||
| 166 | 0203345D8Z | DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI) | 1,956 | 1,956 | |||
| 167 | 0204571J | JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT | 10,321 | 10,321 | |||
| 170 | 0303166J | SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES | 11,552 | 11,552 | |||
| 172 | 0305193D8Z | CYBER INTELLIGENCE | 6,748 | 6,748 | |||
| 174 | 0804767D8Z | COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2) | 44,005 | 44,005 | |||
| 175 | 0901598C | MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA | 36,998 | 36,998 | |||
| 176 | 0901598D8W | MANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS | 612 | 612 | |||
| 177A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 44,367 | 44,367 | |||
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 887,876 | 891,876 | |||||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 178 | 0604130V | ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) | 3,988 | 3,988 | |||
| 179 | 0605127T | REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA | 1,750 | 1,750 | |||
| 180 | 0605147T | OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS) | 286 | 286 | |||
| 181 | 0607210D8Z | INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT | 14,778 | 14,778 | |||
| 182 | 0607310D8Z | OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 2,953 | 2,953 | |||
| 183 | 0607327T | GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS) | 10,350 | 10,350 | |||
| 184 | 0607384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT) | 28,496 | 28,496 | |||
| 185 | 0607828J | JOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY | 11,968 | 11,968 | |||
| 186 | 0208043J | PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) | 1,842 | 1,842 | |||
| 187 | 0208045K | C4I INTEROPERABILITY | 63,558 | 63,558 | |||
| 189 | 0301144K | JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING | 3,931 | 3,931 | |||
| 193 | 0302016K | NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT | 924 | 924 | |||
| 194 | 0302019K | DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION | 9,657 | 9,657 | |||
| 195 | 0303126K | LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS | 25,355 | 25,355 | |||
| 196 | 0303131K | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) | 12,671 | 12,671 | |||
| 197 | 0303135G | PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) | 222 | 222 | |||
| 198 | 0303136G | KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) | 32,698 | 32,698 | |||
| 199 | 0303140D8Z | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 11,304 | 11,304 | |||
| 200 | 0303140G | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 125,854 | 155,854 | |||
| Accelerate SHARKSEER deployment | [30,000] | ||||||
| 202 | 0303150K | GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 33,793 | 33,793 | |||
| 203 | 0303153K | DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION | 13,423 | 13,423 | |||
| 204 | 0303170K | NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) | 3,774 | 3,774 | |||
| 205 | 0303260D8Z | DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO) | 951 | 951 | |||
| 206 | 0303610K | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 2,697 | 2,697 | |||
| 208 | 0304210BB | SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES | 19,294 | 19,294 | |||
| 212 | 0305103K | CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE | 3,234 | 3,234 | |||
| 213 | 0305125D8Z | CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP) | 8,846 | 8,846 | |||
| 217 | 0305186D8Z | POLICY R&D PROGRAMS | 7,065 | 7,065 | |||
| 218 | 0305199D8Z | NET CENTRICITY | 23,984 | 23,984 | |||
| 221 | 0305208BB | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 5,286 | 5,286 | |||
| 224 | 0305208K | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 3,400 | 3,400 | |||
| 229 | 0305327V | INSIDER THREAT | 8,670 | 8,670 | |||
| 230 | 0305387D8Z | HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM | 2,110 | 2,110 | |||
| 239 | 0708011S | INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | 22,366 | 22,366 | |||
| 240 | 0708012S | LOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 1,574 | 1,574 | |||
| 241 | 0902298J | MANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS | 4,409 | 4,409 | |||
| 242 | 1105219BB | MQ–9 UAV | 9,702 | 9,702 | |||
| 243 | 1105232BB | RQ–11 UAV | 259 | 259 | |||
| 245 | 1160403BB | AVIATION SYSTEMS | 164,233 | 164,233 | |||
| 247 | 1160405BB | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 9,490 | 9,490 | |||
| 248 | 1160408BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 75,253 | 75,253 | |||
| 252 | 1160431BB | WARRIOR SYSTEMS | 24,661 | 24,661 | |||
| 253 | 1160432BB | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 20,908 | 20,908 | |||
| 259 | 1160480BB | SO F TACTICAL VEHICLES | 3,672 | 3,672 | |||
| 262 | 1160483BB | MARITIME SYSTEMS | 57,905 | 57,905 | |||
| 264 | 1160489BB | GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES | 3,788 | 3,788 | |||
| 265 | 1160490BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 16,225 | 16,225 | |||
| 265A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,118,502 | 3,118,502 | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 4,032,059 | 4,062,059 | |||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 266 | 9999999999 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –69,000 | ||||
| DARPA undistributed reduction | [–69,000] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –69,000 | ||||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | 16,766,084 | 16,987,084 | |||||
| OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE | |||||||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||||
| 001 | 0605118OTE | OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION | 74,583 | 74,583 | |||
| 002 | 0605131OTE | LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION | 45,142 | 45,142 | |||
| 003 | 0605814OTE | OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES | 48,013 | 48,013 | |||
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 167,738 | 167,738 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE | 167,738 | 167,738 | |||||
| TOTAL RDT&E | 63,533,947 | 63,826,265 | |||||
| SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | ProgramElement | Item | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | |||||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||||
| 060 | 0603747A | SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY | 4,500 | 4,500 | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 4,500 | 4,500 | |||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | 4,500 | 4,500 | |||||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | |||||||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 225 | 0305242M | UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP) | 940 | 940 | |||
| 229A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 35,080 | 35,080 | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 36,020 | 36,020 | |||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | 36,020 | 36,020 | |||||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | |||||||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 250A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 14,706 | 14,706 | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 14,706 | 14,706 | |||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | 14,706 | 14,706 | |||||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | |||||||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||||
| 009 | 0602115E | BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 112,000 | 112,000 | |||
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 112,000 | 112,000 | |||||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | |||||||
| 242 | 1105219BB | MQ–9 UAV | 5,200 | ||||
| MQ–9 enhancements | [5,200] | ||||||
| 248 | 1160408BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 6,000 | 6,000 | |||
| 265A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 163,447 | 163,447 | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 169,447 | 174,647 | |||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | 281,447 | 286,647 | |||||
| TOTAL RDT&E | 336,673 | 341,873 | |||||
| SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | ||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 969,281 | 969,281 | ||||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 61,990 | 61,990 | ||||
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 450,987 | 450,987 | ||||
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 545,773 | 545,773 | ||||
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,057,453 | 1,057,453 | ||||
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 1,409,347 | 1,409,347 | ||||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 3,592,334 | 3,524,334 | ||||
| Fully fund two Combat Training Center rotations—Army requested transfer to OM,ARNG and MP,ARNG | [–68,000] | ||||||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 411,388 | 411,388 | ||||
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,001,232 | 1,001,232 | ||||
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 7,428,972 | 7,428,972 | ||||
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 2,066,434 | 2,154,434 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [18,750] | ||||||
| Readiness funding increase—fully funds 6% CIP | [94,250] | ||||||
| Transfer to Arlington National Cemetery | [–25,000] | ||||||
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 411,863 | 411,863 | ||||
| 130 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS | 179,399 | 179,399 | ||||
| 170 | COMBATANT COMMANDS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 432,281 | 432,281 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 20,018,734 | 20,038,734 | |||||
| MOBILIZATION | |||||||
| 180 | STRATEGIC MOBILITY | 316,776 | 316,776 | ||||
| 190 | ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS | 187,609 | 187,609 | ||||
| 200 | INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | 6,463 | 86,463 | ||||
| Industrial Base Intiative-Body Armor | [80,000] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 510,848 | 590,848 | |||||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | |||||||
| 210 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 124,766 | 124,766 | ||||
| 220 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 51,968 | 51,968 | ||||
| 230 | ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING | 43,735 | 43,735 | ||||
| 240 | SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS | 456,563 | 456,563 | ||||
| 250 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 886,529 | 886,529 | ||||
| 260 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 890,070 | 890,070 | ||||
| 270 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 193,291 | 193,291 | ||||
| 280 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 552,359 | 552,359 | ||||
| 290 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 466,927 | 466,927 | ||||
| 300 | EXAMINING | 194,588 | 194,588 | ||||
| 310 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 205,782 | 205,782 | ||||
| 320 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 150,571 | 150,571 | ||||
| 330 | JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS | 169,784 | 169,784 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 4,386,933 | 4,386,933 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 350 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 541,877 | 541,877 | ||||
| 360 | CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES | 722,291 | 722,291 | ||||
| 370 | LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 602,034 | 602,034 | ||||
| 380 | AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT | 422,277 | 422,277 | ||||
| 390 | ADMINISTRATION | 405,442 | 405,442 | ||||
| 400 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 1,624,742 | 1,624,742 | ||||
| 410 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 289,771 | 289,771 | ||||
| 420 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 390,924 | 390,924 | ||||
| 430 | OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT | 1,118,540 | 1,118,540 | ||||
| 440 | ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES | 241,234 | 241,234 | ||||
| 450 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 243,509 | 243,509 | ||||
| 460 | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS | 200,615 | 200,615 | ||||
| 470 | INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS | 462,591 | 462,591 | ||||
| 480 | MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS | 27,375 | 27,375 | ||||
| 520A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,030,411 | 1,030,411 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 8,323,633 | 8,323,633 | |||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 530 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –296,400 | |||||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–48,900] | ||||||
| Program decrease—overestimate of civilian personnel | [–247,500] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –296,400 | ||||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | 33,240,148 | 33,043,748 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 15,200 | 15,200 | ||||
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 502,664 | 502,664 | ||||
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 107,489 | 107,489 | ||||
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 543,989 | 543,989 | ||||
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 72,963 | 72,963 | ||||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 360,082 | 360,082 | ||||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 72,491 | 72,491 | ||||
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 58,873 | 58,873 | ||||
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 388,961 | 388,961 | ||||
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 228,597 | 233,597 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [5,000] | ||||||
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 39,590 | 39,590 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 2,390,899 | 2,395,899 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 130 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 10,608 | 10,608 | ||||
| 140 | ADMINISTRATION | 18,587 | 18,587 | ||||
| 150 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 6,681 | 6,681 | ||||
| 160 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 9,192 | 9,192 | ||||
| 170 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 54,602 | 54,602 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 99,670 | 99,670 | |||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 180 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –13,800 | |||||
| Overestimation of civilian FTE targets | [–13,800] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –13,800 | ||||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | 2,490,569 | 2,481,769 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 660,648 | 683,648 | ||||
| Transfer funding for 2 CTC rotations | [23,000] | ||||||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 165,942 | 165,942 | ||||
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 733,800 | 733,800 | ||||
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 83,084 | 83,084 | ||||
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 22,005 | 22,005 | ||||
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 920,085 | 920,085 | ||||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 680,887 | 680,887 | ||||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 69,726 | 69,726 | ||||
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 138,263 | 138,263 | ||||
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 804,517 | 794,517 | ||||
| Remove one-time fiscal year 2014 funding increase | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 490,205 | 495,205 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [5,000] | ||||||
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 872,140 | 872,140 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 5,641,302 | 5,659,302 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 130 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 6,690 | 6,690 | ||||
| 140 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 1,765 | 1,765 | ||||
| 150 | ADMINISTRATION | 63,075 | 63,075 | ||||
| 160 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 37,372 | 37,372 | ||||
| 170 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 6,484 | 6,484 | ||||
| 180 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 274,085 | 260,285 | ||||
| Program decrease for advertising | [–13,800] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 389,471 | 375,671 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | 6,030,773 | 6,034,973 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 4,947,202 | 4,947,202 | ||||
| 020 | FLEET AIR TRAINING | 1,647,943 | 1,647,943 | ||||
| 030 | AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES | 37,050 | 37,050 | ||||
| 040 | AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT | 96,139 | 96,139 | ||||
| 050 | AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 363,763 | 363,763 | ||||
| 060 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 814,770 | 824,870 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [10,100] | ||||||
| 070 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 36,494 | 36,494 | ||||
| 080 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 350,641 | 350,641 | ||||
| 090 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 3,865,379 | 3,865,379 | ||||
| 100 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 711,243 | 711,243 | ||||
| 110 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 5,296,408 | 5,330,108 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [33,700] | ||||||
| 120 | SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,339,077 | 1,339,377 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [300] | ||||||
| 130 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | 708,634 | 708,634 | ||||
| 140 | ELECTRONIC WARFARE | 91,599 | 91,599 | ||||
| 150 | SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE | 207,038 | 207,038 | ||||
| 160 | WARFARE TACTICS | 432,715 | 432,715 | ||||
| 170 | OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | 338,116 | 338,116 | ||||
| 180 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 892,316 | 892,316 | ||||
| 190 | EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 128,486 | 128,486 | ||||
| 200 | DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 2,472 | 2,472 | ||||
| 210 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS | 101,200 | 101,200 | ||||
| 220 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 188,920 | 188,920 | ||||
| 230 | CRUISE MISSILE | 109,911 | 109,911 | ||||
| 240 | FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE | 1,172,823 | 1,172,823 | ||||
| 250 | IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 104,139 | 104,139 | ||||
| 260 | WEAPONS MAINTENANCE | 490,911 | 490,911 | ||||
| 270 | OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 324,861 | 324,861 | ||||
| 290 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION | 936,743 | 936,743 | ||||
| 300 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 1,483,495 | 1,587,495 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [18,750] | ||||||
| Readiness funding increase—fully funds 6% CIP | [85,250] | ||||||
| 310 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 4,398,667 | 4,398,667 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 31,619,155 | 31,767,255 | |||||
| MOBILIZATION | |||||||
| 320 | SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE | 526,926 | 526,926 | ||||
| 330 | READY RESERVE FORCE | 195 | 195 | ||||
| 340 | AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS | 6,704 | 6,704 | ||||
| 350 | SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS | 251,538 | 205,538 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [–46,000] | ||||||
| 360 | EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS | 124,323 | 124,323 | ||||
| 370 | INDUSTRIAL READINESS | 2,323 | 2,323 | ||||
| 380 | COAST GUARD SUPPORT | 20,333 | 20,333 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 932,342 | 886,342 | |||||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | |||||||
| 390 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 156,214 | 156,214 | ||||
| 400 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 8,863 | 8,963 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [100] | ||||||
| 410 | RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS | 148,150 | 148,150 | ||||
| 420 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 601,501 | 608,701 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [7,200] | ||||||
| 430 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 8,239 | 8,239 | ||||
| 440 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 164,214 | 165,214 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [1,000] | ||||||
| 450 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 182,619 | 183,519 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [900] | ||||||
| 460 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 230,589 | 231,737 | ||||
| Naval Sea Cadet Corps | [1,148] | ||||||
| 470 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 115,595 | 115,595 | ||||
| 480 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 79,606 | 79,606 | ||||
| 490 | JUNIOR ROTC | 41,664 | 41,664 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 1,737,254 | 1,747,602 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 500 | ADMINISTRATION | 858,871 | 858,871 | ||||
| 510 | EXTERNAL RELATIONS | 12,807 | 12,807 | ||||
| 520 | CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 119,863 | 119,863 | ||||
| 530 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 356,113 | 357,013 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [900] | ||||||
| 540 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 255,605 | 255,605 | ||||
| 550 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 339,802 | 339,802 | ||||
| 570 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 172,203 | 172,203 | ||||
| 590 | PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN | 283,621 | 283,621 | ||||
| 600 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 1,111,464 | 1,111,464 | ||||
| 610 | HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT | 43,232 | 43,232 | ||||
| 620 | COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS | 25,689 | 25,689 | ||||
| 630 | SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS | 73,159 | 73,159 | ||||
| 640 | NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE | 548,640 | 548,640 | ||||
| 700 | INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES | 4,713 | 4,713 | ||||
| 720A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 531,324 | 531,324 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 4,737,106 | 4,738,006 | |||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 730 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –154,200 | |||||
| Civilian personnel underexecution | [–80,000] | ||||||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–74,200] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –154,200 | ||||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | 39,025,857 | 38,985,005 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | OPERATIONAL FORCES | 905,744 | 939,544 | ||||
| Crisis Response Operations Unfunded Requirement | [33,800] | ||||||
| 020 | FIELD LOGISTICS | 921,543 | 921,543 | ||||
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 229,058 | 229,058 | ||||
| 040 | MARITIME PREPOSITIONING | 87,660 | 87,660 | ||||
| 050 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 573,926 | 592,676 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [18,750] | ||||||
| 060 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 1,983,118 | 1,983,118 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 4,701,049 | 4,753,599 | |||||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | |||||||
| 070 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 18,227 | 18,227 | ||||
| 080 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 948 | 948 | ||||
| 090 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 98,448 | 98,448 | ||||
| 100 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 42,305 | 42,305 | ||||
| 110 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 330,156 | 330,156 | ||||
| 120 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 161,752 | 161,752 | ||||
| 130 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 19,137 | 19,137 | ||||
| 140 | JUNIOR ROTC | 23,277 | 23,277 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 694,250 | 694,250 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 150 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 36,359 | 36,359 | ||||
| 160 | ADMINISTRATION | 362,608 | 353,508 | ||||
| Marine Museum Unjustified Growth | [–9,100] | ||||||
| 180 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 70,515 | 70,515 | ||||
| 180A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 44,706 | 44,706 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 514,188 | 505,088 | |||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 190 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –28,400 | |||||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–28,400] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –28,400 | ||||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | 5,909,487 | 5,924,537 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 565,842 | 573,742 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [7,900] | ||||||
| 020 | INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE | 5,948 | 5,948 | ||||
| 040 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 82,636 | 84,936 | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [2,300] | ||||||
| 050 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 353 | 353 | ||||
| 060 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 7,007 | 7,007 | ||||
| 070 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 8,190 | 8,190 | ||||
| 080 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 556 | 556 | ||||
| 090 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 4,571 | 4,571 | ||||
| 100 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | 14,472 | 14,472 | ||||
| 110 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 119,056 | 119,056 | ||||
| 120 | WEAPONS MAINTENANCE | 1,852 | 1,852 | ||||
| 130 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION | 25,354 | 25,354 | ||||
| 140 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 48,271 | 53,098 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [4,827] | ||||||
| 150 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 101,921 | 101,921 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 986,029 | 1,001,056 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 160 | ADMINISTRATION | 1,520 | 1,520 | ||||
| 170 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 12,998 | 12,998 | ||||
| 180 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 3,395 | 3,395 | ||||
| 190 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 3,158 | 3,158 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 21,071 | 21,071 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | 1,007,100 | 1,022,127 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | OPERATING FORCES | 93,093 | 93,093 | ||||
| 020 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 18,377 | 18,377 | ||||
| 030 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 29,232 | 33,132 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [3,900] | ||||||
| 040 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 106,447 | 106,447 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 247,149 | 251,049 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 050 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 914 | 914 | ||||
| 060 | ADMINISTRATION | 11,831 | 11,831 | ||||
| 070 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 8,688 | 8,688 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 21,433 | 21,433 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | 268,582 | 272,482 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 3,163,457 | 3,172,057 | ||||
| Nuclear Force Improvement Program—Security Forces | [8,600] | ||||||
| 020 | COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES | 1,694,339 | 1,694,339 | ||||
| 030 | AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) | 1,579,178 | 1,579,178 | ||||
| 040 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 6,119,522 | 6,028,400 | ||||
| RC/OC–135 Contractor Logistics Support Unjustified Growth | [–8,000] | ||||||
| Unjustified program growth | [–83,122] | ||||||
| 050 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 1,453,589 | 1,475,739 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [18,750] | ||||||
| Nuclear Force Improvement Program—Installation Surety | [3,400] | ||||||
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 2,599,419 | 2,589,419 | ||||
| Remove one-time fiscal year 2014 funding increase | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 070 | GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING | 908,790 | 908,790 | ||||
| 080 | OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS | 856,306 | 865,906 | ||||
| Nuclear Force Improvement Program—ICBM Training Hardware | [9,600] | ||||||
| 090 | TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES | 800,689 | 800,689 | ||||
| 100 | LAUNCH FACILITIES | 282,710 | 282,710 | ||||
| 110 | SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 397,818 | 397,818 | ||||
| 120 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 871,840 | 860,840 | ||||
| Program decrease—classified program | [–11,000] | ||||||
| 130 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS | 237,348 | 237,348 | ||||
| 130A | AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 34,600 | |||||
| Retain current AWACS fleet | [34,600] | ||||||
| 130B | A–10 FLYING HOURS | 188,400 | |||||
| Retain current A–10 fleet | [188,400] | ||||||
| 130C | A–10 WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUSTAINMENT | 68,100 | |||||
| Retain current A–10 fleet | [68,100] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 20,965,005 | 21,184,333 | |||||
| MOBILIZATION | |||||||
| 140 | AIRLIFT OPERATIONS | 1,968,810 | 1,968,810 | ||||
| 150 | MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS | 139,743 | 125,670 | ||||
| Inflation pricing requested as program growth | [–14,073] | ||||||
| 160 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,534,560 | 1,534,560 | ||||
| 170 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 173,627 | 173,627 | ||||
| 180 | BASE SUPPORT | 688,801 | 688,801 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 4,505,541 | 4,491,468 | |||||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | |||||||
| 190 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 82,396 | 82,396 | ||||
| 200 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 19,852 | 19,852 | ||||
| 210 | RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) | 76,134 | 76,134 | ||||
| 220 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 212,226 | 212,226 | ||||
| 230 | BASE SUPPORT | 759,809 | 759,809 | ||||
| 240 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 356,157 | 356,157 | ||||
| 250 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 697,594 | 697,594 | ||||
| 260 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 219,441 | 219,441 | ||||
| 270 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 91,001 | 91,001 | ||||
| 280 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 316,688 | 316,688 | ||||
| 290 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 73,920 | 73,920 | ||||
| 300 | EXAMINING | 3,121 | 3,121 | ||||
| 310 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 181,718 | 181,718 | ||||
| 320 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 147,667 | 147,667 | ||||
| 330 | JUNIOR ROTC | 63,250 | 63,250 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 3,300,974 | 3,300,974 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 340 | LOGISTICS OPERATIONS | 1,003,513 | 997,379 | ||||
| Inflation pricing requested as program growth | [–6,134] | ||||||
| 350 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 843,449 | 836,210 | ||||
| Defense Finance and Accounting Services rate adjustment requested as program growth | [–7,239] | ||||||
| 360 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 78,126 | 78,126 | ||||
| 370 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 247,677 | 247,677 | ||||
| 380 | BASE SUPPORT | 1,103,442 | 1,103,442 | ||||
| 390 | ADMINISTRATION | 597,234 | 597,234 | ||||
| 400 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 506,840 | 506,840 | ||||
| 410 | OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 892,256 | 892,256 | ||||
| 420 | CIVIL AIR PATROL | 24,981 | 24,981 | ||||
| 450 | INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 92,419 | 92,419 | ||||
| 450A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,169,736 | 1,164,376 | ||||
| Classified adjustment | [–5,360] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 6,559,673 | 6,540,940 | |||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 460 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –131,900 | |||||
| Civilian personnel underexecution | [–80,000] | ||||||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–51,900] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –131,900 | ||||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | 35,331,193 | 35,385,815 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 1,719,467 | 1,719,467 | ||||
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 211,132 | 211,132 | ||||
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 530,301 | 530,301 | ||||
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 85,672 | 90,672 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [5,000] | ||||||
| 050 | BASE SUPPORT | 367,966 | 367,966 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 2,914,538 | 2,919,538 | |||||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 060 | ADMINISTRATION | 59,899 | 59,899 | ||||
| 070 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 14,509 | 14,509 | ||||
| 080 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) | 20,345 | 20,345 | ||||
| 090 | OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) | 6,551 | 6,551 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 101,304 | 101,304 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | 3,015,842 | 3,020,842 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS | 3,367,729 | 3,367,729 | ||||
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 718,295 | 718,295 | ||||
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,528,695 | 1,528,695 | ||||
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 137,604 | 142,604 | ||||
| Facilities Sustainment | [5,000] | ||||||
| 050 | BASE SUPPORT | 581,536 | 581,536 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 6,333,859 | 6,338,859 | |||||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 060 | ADMINISTRATION | 27,812 | 27,812 | ||||
| 070 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 31,188 | 31,188 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | 59,000 | 59,000 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | 6,392,859 | 6,397,859 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 462,107 | 462,107 | ||||
| 020 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES | 4,762,245 | 4,770,947 | ||||
| MSV—USSOCOM Maritime Support Vessel | [–20,298] | ||||||
| NCR—USSOCOM National Capitol Region Office | [–5,000] | ||||||
| POTFF—transfer to DHP | [–14,800] | ||||||
| POTFF—transfer to DHRA for Office Suicide Provention | [–4,000] | ||||||
| RSCC—Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers | [–3,600] | ||||||
| UFR Flying Hours | [36,400] | ||||||
| UFR Unit Readiness Training | [20,000] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 5,224,352 | 5,233,054 | |||||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | |||||||
| 030 | DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY | 135,437 | 135,437 | ||||
| 040 | NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY | 80,082 | 80,082 | ||||
| 050 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 371,620 | 371,620 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 587,139 | 587,139 | |||||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 060 | CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS | 119,888 | 175,888 | ||||
| STARBASE | [25,000] | ||||||
| Youth Challenge | [31,000] | ||||||
| 080 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY | 556,493 | 556,493 | ||||
| 090 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY | 1,340,374 | 1,299,874 | ||||
| Civilian personnel compensation—justification does not match summary of price and program changes | [–20,500] | ||||||
| Civilian personnel compensation hiring lag | [–20,000] | ||||||
| 100 | DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY | 633,300 | 636,070 | ||||
| Civilian personnel compensation hiring lag | [–1,230] | ||||||
| Suicide Prevention—transfer from SOCOM | [4,000] | ||||||
| 110 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY | 1,263,678 | 1,263,678 | ||||
| 130 | DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY | 26,710 | 26,710 | ||||
| 140 | DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY | 381,470 | 394,170 | ||||
| PTAP funding increase | [12,700] | ||||||
| 150 | DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY | 194,520 | 194,520 | ||||
| 160 | DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE | 21,485 | 21,485 | ||||
| 170 | DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | 544,786 | 552,386 | ||||
| Program decrease—Combatting terrorism fellowship | [–2,400] | ||||||
| Warsaw Initiative Fund/Partnership For Peace | [10,000] | ||||||
| 180 | DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE | 527,812 | 527,812 | ||||
| 200 | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | 32,787 | 32,787 | ||||
| 230 | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY | 2,566,424 | 2,566,424 | ||||
| 240 | MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY | 416,644 | 416,644 | ||||
| 260 | OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT | 186,987 | 106,391 | ||||
| Office of Economic Adjustment | [–80,596] | ||||||
| 265 | OFFICE OF NET ASSESSMENT | 18,944 | |||||
| Program increase | [10,000] | ||||||
| Transfer from line 270 | [8,944] | ||||||
| 270 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | 1,891,163 | 1,873,419 | ||||
| BRAC 2015 Round Planning and Analyses | [–4,800] | ||||||
| DOD Rewards Program Underexecution | [–4,000] | ||||||
| Transfer funding for Office of Net Assessment to line 265 | [–8,944] | ||||||
| 280 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/ADMIN & SVC-WIDE ACTIVITIES | 87,915 | 87,915 | ||||
| 290 | WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES | 610,982 | 608,462 | ||||
| Civilian personnel compensation hiring lag | [–2,520] | ||||||
| 290A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 13,983,323 | 13,983,323 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 25,386,741 | 25,343,395 | |||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 300 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 12,500 | |||||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–17,500] | ||||||
| Impact Aid | [25,000] | ||||||
| Impact Aid for Childern with Severe Disabilities | [5,000] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 12,500 | ||||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | 31,198,232 | 31,176,088 | |||||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | |||||||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | |||||||
| 010 | US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE | 13,723 | 13,723 | ||||
| 020 | OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID | 100,000 | 100,000 | ||||
| 030 | COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION | 365,108 | 365,108 | ||||
| 040 | ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD | 212,875 | 83,034 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–129,841] | ||||||
| 050 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY | 201,560 | 201,560 | ||||
| 060 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY | 277,294 | 277,294 | ||||
| 070 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE | 408,716 | 408,716 | ||||
| 080 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE | 8,547 | 8,547 | ||||
| 090 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES | 208,353 | 208,353 | ||||
| 100 | OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND | 5,000 | 0 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 110 | SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL SPORTING COMPETITIONS, DEFENSE | 10,000 | 5,700 | ||||
| Unjustified program increase | [–4,300] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 1,811,176 | 1,672,035 | |||||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 1,811,176 | 1,672,035 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 165,721,818 | 165,417,280 | |||||
| SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | ||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 77,419 | 187,419 | ||||
| ERI: Armored Brigade Combat Team Presence | [110,000] | ||||||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 3,827 | 3,827 | ||||
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 22,353 | 22,353 | ||||
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 1,405,102 | 1,405,102 | ||||
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 452,332 | 467,332 | ||||
| ERI: Increased Global Response Force Exercises | [15,000] | ||||||
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 47,522 | 47,522 | ||||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,050,683 | 1,147,183 | ||||
| ERI: Increase Range Capacities and Operation, and Upgrade Training Sites | [96,500] | ||||||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 166,725 | 166,725 | ||||
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 87,636 | 273,236 | ||||
| Restore Critical Depot Maintenance | [185,600] | ||||||
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 291,977 | 291,977 | ||||
| 140 | ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES | 7,316,967 | 7,407,261 | ||||
| ERI: NATO Exercises | [13,100] | ||||||
| ERI: Strengthen the Capacity of NATO and NATO Partners | [3,000] | ||||||
| Replenishment of source funds in FY15–02 reprogramming | [74,194] | ||||||
| 150 | COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||
| 160 | RESET | 2,861,655 | 2,861,655 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 13,794,198 | 14,291,592 | |||||
| MOBILIZATION | |||||||
| 190 | ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS | 59,000 | |||||
| ERI: Armored Brigade Combat Team presence | [40,000] | ||||||
| ERI: Army Prepo Infrastructure Projects | [19,000] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 59,000 | ||||||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 350 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 1,806,267 | 1,806,267 | ||||
| 380 | AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT | 45,537 | 45,537 | ||||
| 400 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 32,264 | 32,264 | ||||
| 420 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 98,171 | 98,171 | ||||
| 430 | OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT | 99,694 | 99,694 | ||||
| 450 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 137,053 | 137,053 | ||||
| 520A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,122,092 | 1,106,192 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–15,900] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 3,341,078 | 3,325,178 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | 17,135,276 | 17,675,770 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 4,285 | 4,285 | ||||
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,428 | 1,428 | ||||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 699 | 699 | ||||
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 35,120 | 35,120 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 41,532 | 41,532 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | 41,532 | 41,532 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 12,593 | 13,793 | ||||
| ERI: Leverage State Partnership Program | [1,200] | ||||||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 647 | 647 | ||||
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 6,670 | 6,670 | ||||
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 664 | 664 | ||||
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 22,485 | 22,485 | ||||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 14,560 | 14,560 | ||||
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 49,600 | |||||
| Restore Critical Depot Maintenance | [49,600] | ||||||
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 13,923 | 13,923 | ||||
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 4,601 | 4,601 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 76,143 | 126,943 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 150 | ADMINISTRATION | 318 | 318 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 318 | 318 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | 76,461 | 127,261 | |||||
| AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND | |||||||
| MINISTRY OF DEFENSE | |||||||
| 010 | AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND | 2,915,747 | 2,915,747 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE | 2,915,747 | 2,915,747 | |||||
| MINISTRY OF INTERIOR | |||||||
| 020 | MINISTRY OF INTERIOR | 1,161,733 | 1,161,733 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR | 1,161,733 | 1,161,733 | |||||
| DETAINEE OPS | |||||||
| 030 | IRAQ TRAINING FACILITY | 31,853 | 31,853 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL DETAINEE OPS | 31,853 | 31,853 | |||||
| TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND | 4,109,333 | 4,109,333 | |||||
| IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | |||||||
| IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | |||||||
| 010 | IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | 1,618,000 | 1,618,000 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | 1,618,000 | 1,618,000 | |||||
| TOTAL IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | 1,618,000 | 1,618,000 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 573,123 | 576,123 | ||||
| ERI: Seabreeze and European Multinational Exercises | [3,000] | ||||||
| 040 | AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT | 2,600 | 2,600 | ||||
| 050 | AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 22,035 | 22,035 | ||||
| 060 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 192,411 | 303,411 | ||||
| Aviation Depot Maintenance | [111,000] | ||||||
| 070 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,116 | 1,116 | ||||
| 080 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 33,900 | 33,900 | ||||
| 090 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 1,153,500 | 1,158,450 | ||||
| ERI: Black Sea Multinational Exercises | [4,950] | ||||||
| 100 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 20,068 | 20,068 | ||||
| 110 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,922,829 | 2,072,829 | ||||
| Restore Critical Depot Maintenance | [150,000] | ||||||
| 130 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | 31,303 | 31,303 | ||||
| 160 | WARFARE TACTICS | 26,229 | 26,229 | ||||
| 170 | OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | 20,398 | 20,398 | ||||
| 180 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 676,555 | 685,675 | ||||
| ERI: BALTOPS Multinational Exercises | [500] | ||||||
| ERI: Black Sea Information Sharing Initiatives | [620] | ||||||
| ERI: EUCOM Information Sharing Initiatives | [8,000] | ||||||
| 190 | EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 10,662 | 10,662 | ||||
| 250 | IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 90,684 | 90,684 | ||||
| 260 | WEAPONS MAINTENANCE | 233,696 | 233,696 | ||||
| 300 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 16,220 | 16,420 | ||||
| ERI: European Multinational Exercise Infrastructure Support | [200] | ||||||
| 310 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 88,688 | 88,688 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 5,116,017 | 5,394,287 | |||||
| MOBILIZATION | |||||||
| 360 | EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS | 5,307 | 5,307 | ||||
| 380 | COAST GUARD SUPPORT | 213,319 | 213,319 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 218,626 | 218,626 | |||||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | |||||||
| 420 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 48,270 | 48,270 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 48,270 | 48,270 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 500 | ADMINISTRATION | 2,464 | 2,464 | ||||
| 510 | EXTERNAL RELATIONS | 520 | 520 | ||||
| 530 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 5,205 | 5,205 | ||||
| 540 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 1,439 | 1,439 | ||||
| 570 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 186,318 | 186,318 | ||||
| 590 | PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN | 1,350 | 1,350 | ||||
| 600 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 11,811 | 11,811 | ||||
| 640 | NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE | 1,468 | 1,468 | ||||
| 720A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 6,380 | 6,380 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 216,955 | 216,955 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | 5,599,868 | 5,878,138 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | OPERATIONAL FORCES | 477,406 | 490,616 | ||||
| ERI: BALTOPS Multinational Exercises | [1,500] | ||||||
| ERI: Black Sea Rotational Force Increased Presence | [8,910] | ||||||
| ERI: Cold Response Multinational Exercises | [800] | ||||||
| ERI: NATO Multinational Exercises | [2,000] | ||||||
| 020 | FIELD LOGISTICS | 353,334 | 353,334 | ||||
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 426,720 | 436,720 | ||||
| Restore Critical Depot Maintenance | [10,000] | ||||||
| 060 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 12,036 | 12,036 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 1,269,496 | 1,292,706 | |||||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | |||||||
| 110 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 52,106 | 52,106 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 52,106 | 52,106 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 150 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 162,980 | 162,980 | ||||
| 160 | ADMINISTRATION | 1,322 | 1,322 | ||||
| 180A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,870 | 1,870 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 166,172 | 166,172 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | 1,487,774 | 1,510,984 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 16,133 | 16,133 | ||||
| 040 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 6,150 | 6,150 | ||||
| 070 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 12,475 | 12,475 | ||||
| 090 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 2,700 | 2,700 | ||||
| 110 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 8,418 | 8,418 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 45,876 | 45,876 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | 45,876 | 45,876 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | OPERATING FORCES | 9,740 | 9,740 | ||||
| 040 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 800 | 800 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 10,540 | 10,540 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | 10,540 | 10,540 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 1,352,604 | 1,419,934 | ||||
| ERI: Baltic Air Policing | [10,000] | ||||||
| ERI: Eastern European Countries Exercise Support | [2,300] | ||||||
| ERI: Retain Air Superiority Presence | [55,000] | ||||||
| Replenishment of source funds in FY15–02 reprogramming | [30] | ||||||
| 020 | COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES | 893,939 | 898,339 | ||||
| ERI: Baltic Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance | [4,400] | ||||||
| 030 | AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) | 8,785 | 8,785 | ||||
| 040 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,146,099 | 1,146,099 | ||||
| 050 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 78,000 | 105,890 | ||||
| ERI: Improve Airfield Infrastructure | [9,890] | ||||||
| ERI: Improve Support Infrastructure | [400] | ||||||
| ERI: Improve Weapons Storage Facilities | [17,600] | ||||||
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 1,226,834 | 1,226,834 | ||||
| 070 | GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING | 92,109 | 92,109 | ||||
| 080 | OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS | 168,269 | 168,269 | ||||
| 090 | TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES | 26,337 | 26,337 | ||||
| 100 | LAUNCH FACILITIES | 852 | 852 | ||||
| 110 | SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 4,942 | 4,942 | ||||
| 120 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 99,400 | 99,568 | ||||
| Replenishment of source funds in FY15–02 reprogramming | [168] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 5,098,170 | 5,197,958 | |||||
| MOBILIZATION | |||||||
| 140 | AIRLIFT OPERATIONS | 2,894,280 | 2,896,880 | ||||
| ERI: Persistent MAF Capability | [2,000] | ||||||
| Replenishment of source funds in FY15–02 reprogramming | [600] | ||||||
| 150 | MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS | 138,043 | 138,043 | ||||
| 160 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 437,279 | 597,279 | ||||
| Restore Critical Depot Maintenance | [160,000] | ||||||
| 170 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 2,801 | 2,801 | ||||
| 180 | BASE SUPPORT | 15,370 | 15,370 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 3,487,773 | 3,650,373 | |||||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | |||||||
| 190 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 39 | 39 | ||||
| 200 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 432 | 432 | ||||
| 230 | BASE SUPPORT | 1,617 | 1,617 | ||||
| 240 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 2,145 | 2,145 | ||||
| 310 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 163 | 163 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 4,396 | 4,396 | |||||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 340 | LOGISTICS OPERATIONS | 85,016 | 85,016 | ||||
| 350 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 934 | 934 | ||||
| 380 | BASE SUPPORT | 6,923 | 6,923 | ||||
| 390 | ADMINISTRATION | 151 | 151 | ||||
| 400 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 162,106 | 164,356 | ||||
| Replenishment of source funds in FY15–02 reprogramming | [2,250] | ||||||
| 410 | OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 246,256 | 246,256 | ||||
| 450 | INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 60 | 60 | ||||
| 450A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 17,408 | 5,910 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–11,498] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 518,854 | 509,606 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | 9,109,193 | 9,362,333 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 72,575 | 72,575 | ||||
| 050 | BASE SUPPORT | 5,219 | 5,219 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 77,794 | 77,794 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | 77,794 | 77,794 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS | 2,300 | |||||
| ERI: Eastern European Countries Exercise Support | [2,000] | ||||||
| ERI: Leverage State Partnership Program | [300] | ||||||
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 20,300 | 20,300 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 20,300 | 22,600 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | 20,300 | 22,600 | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| OPERATING FORCES | |||||||
| 010 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 100 | |||||
| ERI: EUCOM Support to NATO Exercises in Chairman's Joint Exercise Program | [100] | ||||||
| 020 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES | 2,490,648 | 2,648,963 | ||||
| ERI: Increased Partnership Activities in Central and Eastern Europe | [10,557] | ||||||
| Replenishment of source funds in FY15–02 reprogramming | [147,758] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 2,490,648 | 2,649,063 | |||||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | |||||||
| 080 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY | 22,847 | 22,847 | ||||
| 090 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY | 21,516 | 21,516 | ||||
| 110 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY | 36,416 | 36,416 | ||||
| 130 | DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY | 105,000 | 105,000 | ||||
| 150 | DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY | 6,251 | 6,251 | ||||
| 170 | DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | 1,660,000 | 1,660,000 | ||||
| 230 | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY | 93,000 | 93,000 | ||||
| 270 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | 115,664 | 125,664 | ||||
| ERI: Intelligence and Warning | [10,000] | ||||||
| 290 | WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES | 2,424 | 2,424 | ||||
| 290A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,617,659 | 1,613,059 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–4,600] | ||||||
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 3,680,777 | 3,686,177 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | 6,171,425 | 6,335,240 | |||||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 45,503,372 | 46,815,401 | |||||
| SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Item | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | |||
| Military Personnel Appropriations | 128,957,593 | 128,479,608 | |||
| AGR Pay and Allowance—projected underexecution | [–84,500] | ||||
| CVN 73 Refueling and Complex Overhaul (RCOH) | [48,000] | ||||
| Inactive Duty Training—projected underexecution | [–79,000] | ||||
| Individual Clothing and Uniform Allowance—excess to requirement | [–10,000] | ||||
| Lower than budgeted average strength levels | [–66,500] | ||||
| Military Personnel Historical Underexecution | [–628,000] | ||||
| Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus—excess to requirement | [–4,000] | ||||
| Operational training excess to requirement | [–3,000] | ||||
| Operational travel excess to requirement | [–10,800] | ||||
| Recalculation from CPI–1 to CPI | [215,300] | ||||
| Retain current A–10 fleet | [74,615] | ||||
| Retain current AWACS fleet | [24,900] | ||||
| Transfer funding for 2 CTC rotations: Army-requested from line 121, O&M Army | [45,000] | ||||
| Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions | 6,236,092 | 6,236,092 | |||
| Total, Military Personnel | 135,193,685 | 134,715,700 | |||
| SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Item | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | |||
| Military Personnel Appropriations | 5,536,340 | 5,537,840 | |||
| ERI: Strengthen the Capacity of NATO and NATO Partners | [1,500] | ||||
| Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions | 58,728 | 58,728 | |||
| Total, Military Personnel Appropriations | 5,595,068 | 5,596,568 | |||
| SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Program Title | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | |||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | |||||
| PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS | 13,727 | 13,727 | |||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | 13,727 | 13,727 | |||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | |||||
| SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL) | 61,717 | 61,717 | |||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | 61,717 | 61,717 | |||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||
| DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) | 44,293 | 44,293 | |||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | 44,293 | 44,293 | |||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | |||||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | 1,114,731 | 1,214,731 | |||
| Restore Commissary Reduction | [100,000] | ||||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | 1,114,731 | 1,214,731 | |||
| CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION | |||||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 222,728 | 222,728 | |||
| RDT&E | 595,913 | 595,913 | |||
| PROCUREMENT | 10,227 | 10,227 | |||
| TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION | 828,868 | 828,868 | |||
| DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | |||||
| DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE | 719,096 | 719,096 | |||
| DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM | 101,591 | 101,591 | |||
| TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | 820,687 | 820,687 | |||
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | |||||
| OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE | 310,830 | 310,830 | |||
| PROCUREMENT | 1,000 | 1,000 | |||
| TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 311,830 | 311,830 | |||
| DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | |||||
| IN-HOUSE CARE | 8,799,086 | 8,849,171 | |||
| Implementation of Benefit Reform Proposal | [–56,715] | ||||
| Restoration of MHS Modernization | [92,000] | ||||
| USSOCOM Behavioral Health and Warrior Care Management Program | [14,800] | ||||
| PRIVATE SECTOR CARE | 15,412,599 | 14,317,599 | |||
| Historical underexecution | [–855,000] | ||||
| Implementation of Benefit Reform Proposal | [–58,000] | ||||
| Pharmaceutical drugs—excess growth | [–182,000] | ||||
| CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT | 2,462,096 | 2,358,396 | |||
| Historical underexecution | [–100,000] | ||||
| Travel excess growth | [–3,700] | ||||
| INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | 1,557,347 | 1,557,347 | |||
| MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES | 366,223 | 366,223 | |||
| EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 750,866 | 750,866 | |||
| BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS | 1,683,694 | 1,683,694 | |||
| R&D UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||
| R&D RESEARCH | 10,317 | 10,317 | |||
| R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT | 49,015 | 49,015 | |||
| R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 226,410 | 226,410 | |||
| R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION | 97,787 | 97,787 | |||
| R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | 217,898 | 217,898 | |||
| R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT | 38,075 | 38,075 | |||
| R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT | 15,092 | 15,092 | |||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||
| PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING | 13,057 | 13,057 | |||
| PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION | 283,030 | 283,030 | |||
| PROC THEATER MEDICAL INFORMATION PROGRAM | 3,145 | 3,145 | |||
| PROC IEHR | 9,181 | 9,181 | |||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | –161,857 | –161,857 | |||
| TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | 31,833,061 | 30,684,446 | |||
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 35,028,914 | 33,980,299 | |||
| SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Program Title | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | |||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | |||||
| C–17 CLS ENGINE COST INCREASE | |||||
| FUEL | 5,000 | 5,000 | |||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | 5,000 | 5,000 | |||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||
| DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) | 86,350 | 86,350 | |||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | 86,350 | 86,350 | |||
| DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | |||||
| DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE | 189,000 | 209,000 | |||
| SOUTHCOM ISR | [20,000] | ||||
| TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | 189,000 | 209,000 | |||
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | |||||
| OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE | 7,968 | 7,968 | |||
| TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 7,968 | 7,968 | |||
| DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | |||||
| IN-HOUSE CARE | 65,902 | 65,902 | |||
| PRIVATE SECTOR CARE | 214,259 | 214,259 | |||
| CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT | 15,311 | 15,311 | |||
| EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 5,059 | 5,059 | |||
| TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | 300,531 | 300,531 | |||
| EUROPEAN REASSURANCE INITIATIVE | |||||
| EUROPEAN REASSURANCE INITIATIVE | 925,000 | 370,713 | |||
| ERI: Military Assistance and Support for Ukraine | [75,000] | ||||
| ERI: Transfer out to appropriations for proper execution | [–629,287] | ||||
| TOTAL EUROPEAN REASSURANCE INITIATIVE | 925,000 | 370,713 | |||
| COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND | |||||
| COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND | 4,000,000 | 1,300,000 | |||
| Funding ahead of need | [–2,700,000] | ||||
| TOTAL COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND | 4,000,000 | 1,300,000 | |||
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 5,513,849 | 2,279,562 | |||
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 5,513,849 | 2,279,562 | |||
| SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||
| Account | State/Country and Installation | Project Title | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | ||||
| California | ||||||||
| Army | Concord | Access Control Point | 9,900 | 9,900 | ||||
| Army | Concord | General Purpose Maintenance Shop | 5,300 | 5,300 | ||||
| Army | Fort Irwin | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar | 45,000 | 45,000 | ||||
| Colorado | ||||||||
| Army | Fort Carson | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar | 60,000 | 60,000 | ||||
| Army | Fort Carson | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar | 29,000 | 29,000 | ||||
| Guantanamo Bay, Cuba | ||||||||
| Army | Guantanamo Bay | Dining Facility | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||||
| Army | Guantanamo Bay | Health Clinic | 11,800 | 11,800 | ||||
| Army | Guantanamo Bay | High Value Detainee Complex | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Hawaii | ||||||||
| Army | Fort Shafter | Command and Control Facility Complex | 96,000 | 85,000 | ||||
| Japan | ||||||||
| Army | Kadena AB | Missile Magazine | 10,600 | 10,600 | ||||
| Kentucky | ||||||||
| Army | Blue Grass Army Depot | Shipping and Receiving Building | 0 | 15,000 | ||||
| Army | Fort Campbell | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar | 23,000 | 23,000 | ||||
| New York | ||||||||
| Army | Fort Drum | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar | 27,000 | 27,000 | ||||
| Army | U.S. Military Academy | Cadet Barracks, Incr 3 | 58,000 | 58,000 | ||||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||||
| Army | Letterkenny Army Depot | Rebuild Shop | 16,000 | 16,000 | ||||
| South Carolina | ||||||||
| Army | Fort Jackson | Trainee Barracks Complex 3, Ph1 | 52,000 | 52,000 | ||||
| Texas | ||||||||
| Army | Fort Hood | Simulations Center | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Virginia | ||||||||
| Army | Fort Lee | Adv. Individual Training Barracks Complex, Phase 3 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Army | Joint Base Langley-Eustis | Tactical Vehicle Hardstand | 7,700 | 7,700 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Host Nation Support FY15 | 33,000 | 33,000 | ||||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Minor Construction FY15 | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design FY15 | 18,127 | 18,127 | ||||
| Military Construction, Army Total | 539,427 | 543,427 | ||||||
| Arizona | ||||||||
| Navy | Yuma | Aviation Maintenance and Support Complex | 16,608 | 16,608 | ||||
| Bahrain Island | ||||||||
| Navy | SW Asia | P–8A Hangar | 27,826 | 27,826 | ||||
| California | ||||||||
| Navy | Bridgeport | E-LMR Communications Towers | 16,180 | 16,180 | ||||
| Navy | Lemoore | F–35C Facility Addition and Modification | 0 | 16,594 | ||||
| Navy | Lemoore | F–35C Operational Training Facility | 0 | 22,391 | ||||
| Navy | San Diego | Steam Distribution System Decentralization | 47,110 | 47,110 | ||||
| District of Columbia | ||||||||
| Navy | District of Columbia | Electronics Science and Technology Laboratory | 31,735 | 31,735 | ||||
| Djibouti | ||||||||
| Navy | Camp Lemonier | Entry Control Point | 9,923 | 9,923 | ||||
| Florida | ||||||||
| Navy | Jacksonville | MH60 Parking Apron | 8,583 | 8,583 | ||||
| Navy | Jacksonville | P–8A Runway Thresholds and Taxiways | 21,652 | 21,652 | ||||
| Navy | Mayport | LCS Operational Training Facility | 20,520 | 20,520 | ||||
| Guam | ||||||||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | GSE Shops at North Ramp | 21,880 | 21,880 | ||||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | MWSS Facilities at North Ramp | 28,771 | 28,771 | ||||
| Hawaii | ||||||||
| Navy | Kaneohe Bay | Facility Modifications for VMU, MWSD, & CH53E | 51,182 | 51,182 | ||||
| Navy | Kaneohe Bay | Road and Infrastructure Improvements | 2,200 | 2,200 | ||||
| Navy | Pearl Harbor | Submarine Maneuvering Room Trainer Facility | 9,698 | 9,698 | ||||
| Japan | ||||||||
| Navy | Iwakuni | Security Mods DPRI MC167–T (CVW–5 E2D EA–18G) | 6,415 | 6,415 | ||||
| Navy | Kadena AB | Aircraft Maint Hangar Alterations and SAP-F | 19,411 | 19,411 | ||||
| Navy | MCAS Futenma | Hangar & Rinse Facility Modernizations | 4,639 | 4,639 | ||||
| Navy | Okinawa | LHD Practice Site Improvements | 35,685 | 35,685 | ||||
| Maryland | ||||||||
| Navy | Annapolis | Center for Cyber Security Studies Building | 120,112 | 30,000 | ||||
| Navy | Indian Head | Advanced Energetics Research Lab Complex Ph 2 | 15,346 | 15,346 | ||||
| Navy | Patuxent River | Atlantic Test Range Facility | 9,860 | 9,860 | ||||
| Nevada | ||||||||
| Navy | Fallon | Air Wing Training Facility | 27,763 | 27,763 | ||||
| Navy | Fallon | Facility Alteration for F–35 Training Mission | 3,499 | 3,499 | ||||
| North Carolina | ||||||||
| Navy | Camp Lejeune | 2nd Radio BN Complex Phase 1 | 0 | 50,706 | ||||
| Navy | Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station | Water Treatment Plant Replacement | 41,588 | 41,588 | ||||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||||
| Navy | Philadelphia | Ohio Replacement Power & Propulsion Facility | 23,985 | 23,985 | ||||
| South Carolina | ||||||||
| Navy | Charleston | Nuclear Power Operational Support Facility | 35,716 | 35,716 | ||||
| Spain | ||||||||
| Navy | Rota | Ship Berthing Power Upgrades | 20,233 | 20,233 | ||||
| Virginia | ||||||||
| Navy | Dahlgren | Missile Support Facility | 27,313 | 27,313 | ||||
| Navy | Norfolk | EOD Consolidated Ops & Logistics Facilities | 39,274 | 39,274 | ||||
| Navy | Portsmouth | Submarine Maintenance Facility | 9,743 | 9,743 | ||||
| Navy | Quantico | Ammunition Supply Point Expansion | 12,613 | 12,613 | ||||
| Navy | Yorktown | Bachelor Enlisted Quarters | 19,152 | 19,152 | ||||
| Navy | Yorktown | Fast Company Training Facility | 7,836 | 7,836 | ||||
| Washington | ||||||||
| Navy | Bangor | Regional Ship Maintenance Support Facility | 0 | 13,833 | ||||
| Navy | Bremerton | Integrated Water Treatment Syst. Dd 1, 2, & 5 | 16,401 | 16,401 | ||||
| Navy | Kitsap | Explosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc) | 83,778 | 83,778 | ||||
| Navy | Port Angeles | TPS Port Angeles Forward Operating Location | 20,638 | 20,638 | ||||
| Navy | Whidbey Island | P–8A Aircraft Apron and Supporting Facilities | 24,390 | 24,390 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | F–35C Facility Addition and Modification | 16,594 | 0 | ||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | F–35C Operational Training Facility | 22,391 | 0 | ||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | MCON Design Funds | 33,366 | 33,366 | ||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 7,163 | 7,163 | ||||
| Military Construction, Navy Total | 1,018,772 | 993,199 | ||||||
| Alaska | ||||||||
| AF | Clear AFS | Emergency Power Plant Fuel Storage | 11,500 | 11,500 | ||||
| Arizona | ||||||||
| AF | Luke AFB | F–35 Aircraft Mx Hangar—Sqdn #2 | 11,200 | 11,200 | ||||
| AF | Luke AFB | F–35 Flightline Fillstands | 15,600 | 15,600 | ||||
| Guam | ||||||||
| AF | Joint Region Marianas | Guam Strike Fuel Systems Maint. Hangar Inc 2 | 64,000 | 64,000 | ||||
| AF | Joint Region Marianas | PAR Low Observable/Corrosion Control/Composite Repair Shop | 0 | 34,400 | ||||
| AF | Joint Region Marianas | PRTC—Combat Comm Infrastr Facility | 3,750 | 3,750 | ||||
| AF | Joint Region Marianas | PRTC—Red Horse Logistics Facility | 3,150 | 3,150 | ||||
| AF | Joint Region Marianas | PRTC—Satellite Fire Station | 6,500 | 6,500 | ||||
| Kansas | ||||||||
| AF | McConnell AFB | KC–46A Adal Mobility Bag Strg Expansion | 2,300 | 2,300 | ||||
| AF | McConnell AFB | KC–46A Adal Regional Mx Tng Facility | 16,100 | 16,100 | ||||
| AF | McConnell AFB | KC–46A Alter Composite Mx Shop | 4,100 | 4,100 | ||||
| AF | McConnell AFB | KC–46A Alter Taxiway Foxtrot | 5,500 | 5,500 | ||||
| AF | McConnell AFB | KC–46A Fuselage Trainer | 6,400 | 6,400 | ||||
| Maryland | ||||||||
| AF | Fort Meade | Cybercom Joint Operations Center, Increment 2 | 166,000 | 166,000 | ||||
| Massachusetts | ||||||||
| AF | Hanscom AFB | Dormitory (72 Rm) | 13,500 | 13,500 | ||||
| Nebraska | ||||||||
| AF | Offutt AFB | Usstratcom Replacement Facility- Incr 4 | 180,000 | 180,000 | ||||
| Nevada | ||||||||
| AF | Nellis AFB | F–22 Flight Simulator Facility | 14,000 | 14,000 | ||||
| AF | Nellis AFB | F–35 Aircraft Mx Unit—4 Bay Hangar | 31,000 | 31,000 | ||||
| AF | Nellis AFB | F–35 Weapons School Facility | 8,900 | 8,900 | ||||
| New Jersey | ||||||||
| AF | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | Fire Station | 5,900 | 5,900 | ||||
| Oklahoma | ||||||||
| AF | Tinker AFB | KC–46A Depot Maint Complex Spt Infrastr | 48,000 | 48,000 | ||||
| AF | Tinker AFB | KC–46A Two-Bay Depot Mx Hangar | 63,000 | 63,000 | ||||
| Texas | ||||||||
| AF | Joint Base San Antonio | Fire Station | 5,800 | 5,800 | ||||
| United Kingdom | ||||||||
| AF | RAF Croughton | JIAC Consolidation—Phase 1 | 92,223 | 92,223 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| AF | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 10,738 | 10,738 | ||||
| AF | Various Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Military Construction | 22,613 | 22,613 | ||||
| Military Construction, Air Force Total | 811,774 | 846,174 | ||||||
| Arizona | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Huachuca | JITC Building 52120 Renovation | 1,871 | 1,871 | ||||
| Australia | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Geraldton | Combined Communications Gateway Geraldton | 9,600 | 9,600 | ||||
| Belgium | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Brussels | Brussells Elementary/High School Replacement | 41,626 | 41,626 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Brussels | NATO Headquarters Facility | 37,918 | 37,918 | ||||
| California | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Camp Pendleton | SOF Comm/Elec Maintenance Facility | 11,841 | 11,841 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Coronado | SOF Logistics Support Unit 1 Ops Facility #1 | 41,740 | 41,740 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Coronado | SOF Support Activity Ops Facility #2 | 28,600 | 28,600 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Lemoore | Replace Fuel Storage & Distribution Fac. | 52,500 | 52,500 | ||||
| Colorado | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Peterson AFB | Dental Clinic Replacement | 15,200 | 15,200 | ||||
| Conus | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Various Locations | East Coast Missile Site Planning and Design | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Conus Classified | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Classified Location | SOF Skills Training Facility | 53,073 | 53,073 | ||||
| Georgia | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Hunter Army Airfield | SOF Company Operations Facility | 7,692 | 7,692 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Robins AFB | Replace Hydrant Fuel System | 19,900 | 19,900 | ||||
| Germany | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Rhine Ordnance Barracks | Medical Center Replacement Incr 4 | 259,695 | 189,695 | ||||
| Guantanamo Bay, Cuba | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Guantanamo Bay | Replace Fuel Tank | 11,100 | 11,100 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Guantanamo Bay | W.T. Sampson E/M and HS Consolid./Replacement | 65,190 | 65,190 | ||||
| Hawaii | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | Replace Fuel Tanks | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | Upgrade Fire Supression & Ventilation Sys. | 49,900 | 49,900 | ||||
| Japan | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Misawa AB | Edgren High School Renovation | 37,775 | 37,775 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Okinawa | Killin Elementary Replacement/Renovation | 71,481 | 71,481 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Okinawa | Kubasaki High School Replacement/Renovation | 99,420 | 99,420 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Sasebo | E.J. King High School Replacement/Renovation | 37,681 | 37,681 | ||||
| Kentucky | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Campbell | SOF System Integration Maintenance Office Fac | 18,000 | 18,000 | ||||
| Maryland | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Meade | NSAW Campus Feeders Phase 1 | 54,207 | 54,207 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Meade | NSAW Recapitalize Building #1/Site M Inc 3 | 45,521 | 45,521 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base Andrews | Construct Hydrant Fuel System | 18,300 | 18,300 | ||||
| Michigan | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Selfridge ANGB | Replace Fuel Distribution Facilities | 35,100 | 35,100 | ||||
| Mississippi | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Stennis | SOF Applied Instruction Facility | 10,323 | 10,323 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Stennis | SOF Land Acquisition Western Maneuver Area | 17,224 | 17,224 | ||||
| Nevada | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Fallon | SOF Tactical Ground Mob. Vehicle Maint Fac. | 20,241 | 20,241 | ||||
| New Mexico | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Cannon AFB | SOF Squadron Operations Facility (STS) | 23,333 | 23,333 | ||||
| North Carolina | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Camp Lejeune | Lejeune High School Addition/Renovation | 41,306 | 41,306 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Camp Lejeune | SOF Intel/Ops Expansion | 11,442 | 11,442 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Battalion Operations Facility | 37,074 | 37,074 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility | 8,000 | 8,000 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Training Command Building | 48,062 | 48,062 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Seymour Johnson AFB | Replace Hydrant Fuel System | 8,500 | 8,500 | ||||
| South Carolina | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Beaufort | Replace Fuel Distibution Facilities | 40,600 | 40,600 | ||||
| South Dakota | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Ellsworth AFB | Construct Hydrant System | 8,000 | 8,000 | ||||
| Texas | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bliss | Hospital Replacement Incr 6 | 131,500 | 131,500 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base San Antonio | Medical Clinic Replacement | 38,300 | 38,300 | ||||
| Virginia | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Craney Island | Replace & Alter Fuel Distibution Facilities | 36,500 | 36,500 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Def Distribution Depot Richmond | Replace Access Control Point | 5,700 | 5,700 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Belvoir | Parking Lot | 7,239 | 7,239 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base Langley-Eustis | Hopsital Addition/Cup Replacement | 41,200 | 41,200 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story | SOF Human Performance Center | 11,200 | 11,200 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story | SOF Indoor Dynamic Range | 14,888 | 14,888 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story | SOF Mobile Comm Det Support Facility | 13,500 | 13,500 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Pentagon | Redundant Chilled Water Loop | 15,100 | 15,100 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Contingency Construction | 9,000 | 0 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | ECIP Design | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Energy Conservation Investment Program | 150,000 | 150,000 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Exercise Related Minor Construction | 8,581 | 8,581 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 599 | 599 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 38,704 | 38,704 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 42,387 | 42,387 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 745 | 745 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 24,425 | 4,425 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 1,183 | 1,183 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 5,932 | 5,932 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 10,334 | 10,334 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 6,846 | 6,846 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 4,100 | 4,100 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 2,700 | 2,700 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Milcon | 2,994 | 2,994 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 24,197 | 24,197 | ||||
| Military Construction, Defense-Wide Total | 2,061,890 | 1,962,890 | ||||||
| Kentucky | ||||||||
| Chem Demil | Blue Grass Army Depot | Ammunition Demilitarization Ph XV | 38,715 | 38,715 | ||||
| Chemical Demilitarization Construction, Defense Total | 38,715 | 38,715 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| NATO | NATO Security Investment Program | NATO Security Investment Program | 199,700 | 174,700 | ||||
| NATO Security Investment Program Total | 199,700 | 174,700 | ||||||
| Delaware | ||||||||
| Army NG | Dagsboro | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Maine | ||||||||
| Army NG | Augusta | National Guard Reserve Center | 30,000 | 32,000 | ||||
| Maryland | ||||||||
| Army NG | Havre de Grace | National Guard Readiness Center | 12,400 | 12,400 | ||||
| Montana | ||||||||
| Army NG | Helena | National Guard Readiness Center Add/Alt | 38,000 | 38,000 | ||||
| New Mexico | ||||||||
| Army NG | Alamogordo | Readiness Center Add/Alt | 0 | 5,000 | ||||
| Army NG | Alamogordo | National Guard Readiness Center | 0 | 0 | ||||
| North Dakota | ||||||||
| Army NG | Valley City | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 10,800 | 10,800 | ||||
| Vermont | ||||||||
| Army NG | North Hyde Park | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 4,400 | 4,400 | ||||
| Washington | ||||||||
| Army NG | Yakima | Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| Army NG | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 17,600 | 17,600 | ||||
| Army NG | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 13,720 | 13,720 | ||||
| Military Construction, Army National Guard Total | 126,920 | 133,920 | ||||||
| California | ||||||||
| Army Res | Fresno | Army Reserve Center/AMSA | 22,000 | 22,000 | ||||
| Army Res | March (Riverside) | Army Reserve Center | 0 | 25,000 | ||||
| Colorado | ||||||||
| Army Res | Fort Carson | Training Building Addition | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| Illinois | ||||||||
| Army Res | Arlington Heights | Army Reserve Center | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Mississippi | ||||||||
| Army Res | Starkville | Army Reserve Center | 0 | 0 | ||||
| New Jersey | ||||||||
| Army Res | Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst | Army Reserve Center | 26,000 | 26,000 | ||||
| New York | ||||||||
| Army Res | Mattydale | Army Reserve Center/AMSA | 23,000 | 23,000 | ||||
| Virginia | ||||||||
| Army Res | Fort Lee | Tass Training Center | 16,000 | 16,000 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| Army Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 8,337 | 8,337 | ||||
| Army Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 3,609 | 3,609 | ||||
| Military Construction, Army Reserve Total | 103,946 | 128,946 | ||||||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||||
| N/MC Res | Pittsburgh | Reserve Training Center—Pittsburgh, PA | 17,650 | 17,650 | ||||
| Washington | ||||||||
| N/MC Res | Everett | Joint Reserve Intelligence Center | 0 | 47,869 | ||||
| N/MC Res | Whidbey Island | C–40 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar | 27,755 | 27,755 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| N/MC Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | MCNR Planning & Design | 2,123 | 2,123 | ||||
| N/MC Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | MCNR Unspecified Minor Construction | 4,000 | 4,000 | ||||
| Military Construction, Naval Reserve Total | 51,528 | 99,397 | ||||||
| Arkansas | ||||||||
| Air NG | Fort Smith Municipal Airport | Consolidated SCIF | 0 | 13,200 | ||||
| Connecticut | ||||||||
| Air NG | Bradley IAP | Construct C–130 Fuel Cell and Corrosion Contr | 16,306 | 16,306 | ||||
| Iowa | ||||||||
| Air NG | Des Moines MAP | Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Targeting Group | 8,993 | 8,993 | ||||
| Michigan | ||||||||
| Air NG | W. K. Kellog Regional Airport | RPA Beddown | 6,000 | 6,000 | ||||
| New Hampshire | ||||||||
| Air NG | Pease International Trade Port | KC–46A Adal Airfield Pavements & Hydrant Syst | 7,100 | 7,100 | ||||
| Air NG | Pease International Trade Port | KC–46A Adal Fuel Cell Building 253 | 16,800 | 16,800 | ||||
| Air NG | Pease International Trade Port | KC–46A Adal Maint Hangar Building 254 | 18,002 | 18,002 | ||||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||||
| Air NG | Willow Grove ARF | RPA Operations Center | 5,662 | 5,662 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| Air NG | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 7,700 | 7,700 | ||||
| Air NG | Various Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 8,100 | 6,100 | ||||
| Military Construction, Air National Guard Total | 94,663 | 105,863 | ||||||
| Arizona | ||||||||
| AF Res | Davis-Monthan AFB | Guardian Angel Operations | 0 | 14,500 | ||||
| Georgia | ||||||||
| AF Res | Robins AFB | AFRC Consolidated Mission Complex, Ph I | 27,700 | 27,700 | ||||
| North Carolina | ||||||||
| AF Res | Seymour Johnson AFB | KC–135 Tanker Parking Apron Expansion | 9,800 | 9,800 | ||||
| Texas | ||||||||
| AF Res | Fort Worth | EOD Facility | 3,700 | 3,700 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| AF Res | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 6,892 | 6,892 | ||||
| AF Res | Various Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Military Construction | 1,400 | 1,400 | ||||
| Military Construction, Air Force Reserve Total | 49,492 | 63,992 | ||||||
| Illinois | ||||||||
| FH Con Army | Rock Island | Family Housing New Construction | 19,500 | 19,500 | ||||
| Korea | ||||||||
| FH Con Army | Camp Walker | Family Housing New Construction | 57,800 | 57,800 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| FH Con Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Family Housing P & D | 1,309 | 1,309 | ||||
| Family Housing Construction, Army Total | 78,609 | 78,609 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 14,136 | 14,136 | ||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leased Housing | 112,504 | 112,504 | ||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance of Real Property Facilities | 65,245 | 65,245 | ||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management Account | 3,117 | 3,117 | ||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management Account | 43,480 | 43,480 | ||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Military Housing Privitization Initiative | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 700 | 700 | ||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 9,108 | 9,108 | ||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 82,686 | 82,686 | ||||
| Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Army Total | 350,976 | 350,976 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings Account | 38,543 | 38,543 | ||||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privatization | 40,761 | 40,761 | ||||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 43,651 | 43,651 | ||||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 99,934 | 99,934 | ||||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management Account | 47,834 | 47,834 | ||||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous Account | 1,993 | 1,993 | ||||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services Account | 12,709 | 12,709 | ||||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities Account | 42,322 | 42,322 | ||||
| Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Air Force Total | 327,747 | 327,747 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| FH Con Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Design | 472 | 472 | ||||
| FH Con Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Improvements | 15,940 | 15,940 | ||||
| Family Housing Construction, Navy And Marine Corps Total | 16,412 | 16,412 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings Account | 17,881 | 17,881 | ||||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 65,999 | 65,999 | ||||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance of Real Property | 97,612 | 97,612 | ||||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management Account | 55,124 | 55,124 | ||||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous Account | 366 | 366 | ||||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Privatization Support Costs | 27,876 | 27,876 | ||||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services Account | 18,079 | 18,079 | ||||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities Account | 71,092 | 71,092 | ||||
| Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Navy And Marine Corps Total | 354,029 | 354,029 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings Account | 3,362 | 3,362 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings Account | 20 | 20 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings Account | 746 | 746 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 42,083 | 42,083 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 11,179 | 11,179 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance of Real Property | 344 | 344 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance of Real Property | 2,128 | 2,128 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management Account | 378 | 378 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services Account | 31 | 31 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities Account | 170 | 170 | ||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities Account | 659 | 659 | ||||
| Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Defense-Wide Total | 61,100 | 61,100 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| FHIF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Family Housing Improvement Fund | 1,662 | 1,662 | ||||
| DOD Family Housing Improvement Fund Total | 1,662 | 1,662 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| BRAC | Base Realignment & Closure, Army | Base Realignment and Closure | 84,417 | 84,417 | ||||
| Base Realignment and Closure—Army Total | 84,417 | 84,417 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| BRAC | Base Realignment & Closure, Navy | Base Realignment & Closure | 57,406 | 57,406 | ||||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–100: Planing, Design and Management | 7,682 | 7,682 | ||||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–101: Various Locations | 21,416 | 21,416 | ||||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–138: NAS Brunswick, ME | 904 | 904 | ||||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–157: Mcsa Kansas City, MO | 40 | 40 | ||||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA | 6,066 | 6,066 | ||||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria Reg Ap | 1,178 | 1,178 | ||||
| Base Realignment and Closure—Navy Total | 94,692 | 94,692 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DoD BRAC Activities—Air Force | 90,976 | 90,976 | ||||
| Base Realignment and Closure—Air Force Total | 90,976 | 90,976 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| PYS | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | 42 USC 3374 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| PYS | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Army | 0 | 0 | ||||
| PYS | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | NATO Security Investment Program | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Prior Year Savings Total | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||||
| GR | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | General Reductions | 0 | 0 | ||||
| General Reductions Total | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Total Military Construction | 6,557,447 | 6,551,843 | ||||||
| SEC. 4602. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTIGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||||
| Service | Country and Location | Project | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | ||||
| Army | Mihail Kogalniceanu | ERI: Fuel Storage Capacity | 0 | 15,000 | ||||
| Army | Mihail Kogalniceanu | ERI: Hazardous Cargo Ramp | 0 | 5,000 | ||||
| Army | Mihail Kogalniceanu | ERI: Multi Modal Improvements | 0 | 17,000 | ||||
| Military Construction, Army Total | 0 | 37,000 | ||||||
| AF | Graf Ignatievo | ERI: Improve Airfield Infrastructure | 0 | 3,200 | ||||
| AF | Amari | ERI: Improve Airfield Infrastructure | 0 | 24,780 | ||||
| AF | Camp Darby | ERI: Improve Weapons Storage Facility | 0 | 44,450 | ||||
| AF | Lielvarde | ERI: Improve Airfield Infrastructure | 0 | 10,710 | ||||
| AF | Siauliai | ERI: Improve Airfield Infrastructure | 0 | 13,120 | ||||
| AF | Lask | ERI: Improve Support Infrastructure | 0 | 22,400 | ||||
| AF | Camp Turzii | ERI: Improve Airfield Infrastructure | 0 | 2,900 | ||||
| AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | ERI: Planning and Design | 0 | 11,500 | ||||
| Military Construction, Air Force Total | 0 | 133,060 | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Classified Location | Classified Project | 46,000 | 46,000 | ||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | ERI: Unspecified Minor Construction | 0 | 4,350 | ||||
| Military Construction, Defense-Wide Total | 46,000 | 50,350 | ||||||
| Total, Military Construction, OCO Funding | 46,000 | 220,410 | ||||||
| SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Program | FY 2015 Request | Agreement Authorized | ||
| Discretionary Summary By Appropriation | ||||
| Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies | ||||
| Appropriation Summary: | ||||
| Energy Programs | ||||
| Nuclear Energy | 104,000 | 104,000 | ||
| Advisory Board | ||||
| Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health | 0 | 2,000 | ||
| Atomic Energy Defense Activities | ||||
| National nuclear security administration: | ||||
| Weapons activities | 8,314,902 | 8,210,560 | ||
| Defense nuclear nonproliferation | 1,555,156 | 1,774,758 | ||
| Naval reactors | 1,377,100 | 1,377,100 | ||
| Federal salaries and expenses | 410,842 | 386,863 | ||
| Total, National nuclear security administration | 11,658,000 | 11,749,281 | ||
| Environmental and other defense activities: | ||||
| Defense environmental cleanup | 5,327,538 | 4,884,538 | ||
| Other defense activities | 753,000 | 754,000 | ||
| Total, Environmental & other defense activities | 6,080,538 | 5,638,538 | ||
| Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities | 17,738,538 | 17,387,819 | ||
| Total, Discretionary Funding | 17,842,538 | 17,493,819 | ||
| Nuclear Energy | ||||
| Idaho sitewide safeguards and security | 104,000 | 104,000 | ||
| Advisory Board | ||||
| Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health | 0 | 2,000 | ||
| Weapons Activities | ||||
| Directed stockpile work | ||||
| Life extension programs | ||||
| B61 Life extension program | 643,000 | 643,000 | ||
| W76 Life extension program | 259,168 | 259,168 | ||
| W88 Alt 370 | 165,400 | 165,400 | ||
| Cruise missile warhead life extension program | 9,418 | 17,018 | ||
| Total, Life extension programs | 1,076,986 | 1,084,586 | ||
| Stockpile systems | ||||
| B61 Stockpile systems | 109,615 | 109,615 | ||
| W76 Stockpile systems | 45,728 | 45,728 | ||
| W78 Stockpile systems | 62,703 | 62,703 | ||
| W80 Stockpile systems | 70,610 | 70,610 | ||
| B83 Stockpile systems | 63,136 | 63,136 | ||
| W87 Stockpile systems | 91,255 | 91,255 | ||
| W88 Stockpile systems | 88,060 | 88,060 | ||
| Total, Stockpile systems | 531,107 | 531,107 | ||
| Weapons dismantlement and disposition | ||||
| Operations and maintenance | 30,008 | 40,008 | ||
| Stockpile services | ||||
| Production support | 350,942 | 350,942 | ||
| Research and development support | 29,649 | 25,500 | ||
| R&D certification and safety | 201,479 | 160,000 | ||
| Management, technology, and production | 241,805 | 226,000 | ||
| Plutonium sustainment | 144,575 | 144,575 | ||
| Tritium readiness | 140,053 | 140,053 | ||
| Total, Stockpile services | 1,108,503 | 1,047,070 | ||
| Total, Directed stockpile work | 2,746,604 | 2,702,771 | ||
| Campaigns: | ||||
| Science campaign | ||||
| Advanced certification | 58,747 | 58,747 | ||
| Primary assessment technologies | 112,000 | 112,000 | ||
| Dynamic materials properties | 117,999 | 110,000 | ||
| Advanced radiography | 79,340 | 79,340 | ||
| Secondary assessment technologies | 88,344 | 88,344 | ||
| Total, Science campaign | 456,430 | 448,431 | ||
| Engineering campaign | ||||
| Enhanced surety | 52,003 | 52,003 | ||
| Weapon systems engineering assessment technology | 20,832 | 20,832 | ||
| Nuclear survivability | 25,371 | 25,371 | ||
| Enhanced surveillance | 37,799 | 37,799 | ||
| Total, Engineering campaign | 136,005 | 136,005 | ||
| Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign | ||||
| Ignition | 77,994 | 77,994 | ||
| Support of other stockpile programs | 23,598 | 23,598 | ||
| Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support | 61,297 | 61,297 | ||
| Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion | 5,024 | 5,024 | ||
| Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas | 9,100 | 9,100 | ||
| Facility operations and target production | 335,882 | 335,882 | ||
| Undistributed | 0 | 0 | ||
| Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield campaign | 512,895 | 512,895 | ||
| Advanced simulation and computing campaign | 610,108 | 610,108 | ||
| Nonnuclear Readiness Campaign | 125,909 | 70,000 | ||
| Total, Campaigns | 1,841,347 | 1,777,439 | ||
| Readiness in technical base and facilities (RTBF) | ||||
| Operations of facilities | ||||
| Kansas City Plant | 125,000 | 125,000 | ||
| Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | 71,000 | 71,000 | ||
| Los Alamos National Laboratory | 198,000 | 198,000 | ||
| Nevada National Security Site | 89,000 | 89,000 | ||
| Pantex | 75,000 | 75,000 | ||
| Sandia National Laboratory | 106,000 | 106,000 | ||
| Savannah River Site | 81,000 | 81,000 | ||
| Y–12 National security complex | 151,000 | 151,000 | ||
| Total, Operations of facilities | 896,000 | 896,000 | ||
| Program readiness | 136,700 | 101,000 | ||
| Material recycle and recovery | 138,900 | 138,900 | ||
| Containers | 26,000 | 26,000 | ||
| Storage | 40,800 | 40,800 | ||
| Maintenance and repair of facilities | 205,000 | 220,000 | ||
| Recapitalization | 209,321 | 231,321 | ||
| Subtotal, Readiness in technical base and facilities | 756,721 | 758,021 | ||
| Construction: | ||||
| 15–D–613 Emergency Operations Center, Y–12 | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||
| 15–D–612 Emergency Operations Center, LLNL | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||
| 15–D–611 Emergency Operations Center, SNL | 4,000 | 4,000 | ||
| 15–D–301 HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX | 11,800 | 11,800 | ||
| 15–D–302, TA–55 Reinvestment project, Phase 3, LANL | 16,062 | 16,062 | ||
| 12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL | 6,938 | 6,938 | ||
| 11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, LANL | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||
| 07–D–220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility upgrade project, LANL | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||
| 06–D–141 PED/Construction, Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project Y–12 | 335,000 | 335,000 | ||
| Total, Construction | 402,800 | 402,800 | ||
| Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities | 2,055,521 | 2,056,821 | ||
| Secure transportation asset | ||||
| Operations and equipment | 132,851 | 132,851 | ||
| Program direction | 100,962 | 100,962 | ||
| Total, Secure transportation asset | 233,813 | 233,813 | ||
| Nuclear counterterrorism incident response | 173,440 | 182,440 | ||
| Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation Programs | 76,901 | 70,000 | ||
| Site stewardship | ||||
| Environmental projects and operations | 53,000 | 53,000 | ||
| Nuclear materials integration | 16,218 | 16,218 | ||
| Minority serving institution partnerships program | 13,231 | 13,231 | ||
| Total, Site stewardship | 82,449 | 82,449 | ||
| Defense nuclear security | ||||
| Operations and maintenance | 618,123 | 618,123 | ||
| Total, Defense nuclear security | 618,123 | 618,123 | ||
| Information technology and cybersecurity | 179,646 | 179,646 | ||
| Legacy contractor pensions | 307,058 | 307,058 | ||
| Total, Weapons Activities | 8,314,902 | 8,210,560 | ||
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | ||||
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs | ||||
| Global threat reduction initiative | 333,488 | 383,488 | ||
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D | ||||
| Operations and maintenance | ||||
| Nonproliferation and verification | 360,808 | 393,401 | ||
| Total, Operations and Maintenance | 360,808 | 393,401 | ||
| Nonproliferation and international security | 141,359 | 144,246 | ||
| International material protection and cooperation | 305,467 | 294,589 | ||
| Fissile materials disposition | ||||
| U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition | ||||
| Operations and maintenance | ||||
| U.S. plutonium disposition | 85,000 | 85,000 | ||
| U.S. uranium disposition | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||
| Total, Operations and maintenance | 110,000 | 110,000 | ||
| Construction: | ||||
| 99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC | 196,000 | 341,000 | ||
| 99–D–141–02 Waste Solidification Building, Savannah River, SC | 5,125 | 5,125 | ||
| Total, Construction | 201,125 | 346,125 | ||
| Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition | 311,125 | 456,125 | ||
| Total, Fissile materials disposition | 311,125 | 456,125 | ||
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs | 1,452,247 | 1,671,849 | ||
| Legacy contractor pensions | 102,909 | 102,909 | ||
| Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | 1,555,156 | 1,774,758 | ||
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | 1,555,156 | 1,774,758 | ||
| Naval Reactors | ||||
| Naval reactors operations and infrastructure | 412,380 | 412,380 | ||
| Naval reactors development | 425,700 | 425,700 | ||
| Ohio replacement reactor systems development | 156,100 | 156,100 | ||
| S8G Prototype refueling | 126,400 | 126,400 | ||
| Program direction | 46,600 | 46,600 | ||
| Construction: | ||||
| 15–D–904 NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3 | 400 | 400 | ||
| 15–D–903 KL Fire System Upgrade | 600 | 600 | ||
| 15–D–902 KS Engineroom team trainer facility | 1,500 | 1,500 | ||
| 15–D–901 KS Central office building and prototype staff facility | 24,000 | 24,000 | ||
| 14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF | 141,100 | 141,100 | ||
| 13–D–905 Remote-handled low-level waste facility, INL | 14,420 | 14,420 | ||
| 13–D–904 KS Radiological work and storage building, KSO | 20,100 | 20,100 | ||
| 10-D–903, Security upgrades, KAPL | 7,400 | 7,400 | ||
| 08–D–190 Expended Core Facility M–290 receiving/discharge station, | ||||
| Naval Reactor Facility, ID | 400 | 400 | ||
| Total, Construction | 209,920 | 209,920 | ||
| Total, Naval Reactors | 1,377,100 | 1,377,100 | ||
| Federal Salaries And Expenses | ||||
| Program direction | 410,842 | 386,863 | ||
| Total, Office Of The Administrator | 410,842 | 386,863 | ||
| Defense Environmental Cleanup | ||||
| Closure sites: | ||||
| Closure sites administration | 4,889 | 4,889 | ||
| Hanford site: | ||||
| River corridor and other cleanup operations | 332,788 | 352,788 | ||
| Central plateau remediation | 474,292 | 474,292 | ||
| Construction: | ||||
| 15–D–401 Containerized sludge (Rl-0012) | 26,290 | 26,290 | ||
| Total, Central plateau remediation | 833,370 | 853,370 | ||
| Richland community and regulatory support | 14,701 | 14,701 | ||
| Total, Hanford site | 848,071 | 868,071 | ||
| Idaho National Laboratory: | ||||
| Idaho cleanup and waste disposition | 364,293 | 364,293 | ||
| Idaho community and regulatory support | 2,910 | 2,910 | ||
| Total, Idaho National Laboratory | 367,203 | 367,203 | ||
| NNSA sites | ||||
| Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | 1,366 | 1,366 | ||
| Nevada | 64,851 | 64,851 | ||
| Sandia National Laboratories | 2,801 | 2,801 | ||
| Los Alamos National Laboratory | 196,017 | 196,017 | ||
| Construction: | ||||
| 15–D–406 Hexavalent chromium D & D (Vl-Lanl-0030) | 28,600 | 28,600 | ||
| Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites | 293,635 | 293,635 | ||
| Oak Ridge Reservation: | ||||
| OR Nuclear facility D & D | ||||
| OR Nuclear facility D & D | 73,155 | 73,155 | ||
| Construction: | ||||
| 14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility | 9,400 | 9,400 | ||
| Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D | 82,555 | 82,555 | ||
| U233 Disposition Program | 41,626 | 41,626 | ||
| OR cleanup and disposition: | ||||
| OR cleanup and disposition | 71,137 | 71,137 | ||
| Construction: | ||||
| 15–D–405—Sludge Buildout | 4,200 | 4,200 | ||
| Total, OR cleanup and disposition | 75,337 | 75,337 | ||
| OR reservation community and regulatory support | 4,365 | 4,365 | ||
| Solid waste stabilization and disposition, | ||||
| Oak Ridge technology development | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| Total, Oak Ridge Reservation | 206,883 | 206,883 | ||
| Office of River Protection: | ||||
| Waste treatment and immobilization plant | ||||
| 01–D–416 A-D/ORP-0060 / Major construction | 575,000 | 575,000 | ||
| 01–D–16E Pretreatment facility | 115,000 | 115,000 | ||
| Total, Waste treatment and immobilization plant | 690,000 | 690,000 | ||
| Tank farm activities | ||||
| Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 522,000 | 522,000 | ||
| Construction: | ||||
| 15–D–409 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Hanford | 23,000 | 23,000 | ||
| Total, Tank farm activities | 545,000 | 545,000 | ||
| Total, Office of River protection | 1,235,000 | 1,235,000 | ||
| Savannah River sites: | ||||
| Savannah River risk management operations | 416,276 | 416,276 | ||
| SR community and regulatory support | 11,013 | 11,013 | ||
| Radioactive liquid tank waste: | ||||
| Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 553,175 | 553,175 | ||
| Construction: | ||||
| 15–D–402—Saltstone Disposal Unit #6 | 34,642 | 34,642 | ||
| 05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River | 135,000 | 135,000 | ||
| Total, Construction | 169,642 | 169,642 | ||
| Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste | 722,817 | 722,817 | ||
| Total, Savannah River site | 1,150,106 | 1,150,106 | ||
| Waste isolation pilot plant | 216,020 | 216,020 | ||
| Program direction | 280,784 | 280,784 | ||
| Program support | 14,979 | 14,979 | ||
| Safeguards and Security: | ||||
| Oak Ridge Reservation | 16,382 | 16,382 | ||
| Paducah | 7,297 | 7,297 | ||
| Portsmouth | 8,492 | 8,492 | ||
| Richland/Hanford Site | 63,668 | 63,668 | ||
| Savannah River Site | 132,196 | 132,196 | ||
| Waste Isolation Pilot Project | 4,455 | 4,455 | ||
| West Valley | 1,471 | 1,471 | ||
| Technology development | 13,007 | 13,007 | ||
| Use of prior-year balances | 0 | 0 | ||
| Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup | 4,864,538 | 4,884,538 | ||
| Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution | 463,000 | 0 | ||
| Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup | 5,327,538 | 4,884,538 | ||
| Other Defense Activities | ||||
| Specialized security activities | 202,152 | 203,152 | ||
| Environment, health, safety and security | ||||
| Environment, health, safety and security | 118,763 | 118,763 | ||
| Program direction | 62,235 | 62,235 | ||
| Total, Environment, Health, safety and security | 180,998 | 180,998 | ||
| Independent enterprise assessments | ||||
| Independent enterprise assessments | 24,068 | 24,068 | ||
| Program direction | 49,466 | 49,466 | ||
| Total, Independent enterprise assessments | 73,534 | 73,534 | ||
| Office of Legacy Management | ||||
| Legacy management | 158,639 | 158,639 | ||
| Program direction | 13,341 | 13,341 | ||
| Total, Office of Legacy Management | 171,980 | 171,980 | ||
| Defense-related activities | ||||
| Defense related administrative support | ||||
| Chief financial officer | 46,877 | 46,877 | ||
| Chief information officer | 71,959 | 71,959 | ||
| Total, Defense related administrative support | 118,836 | 118,836 | ||
| Office of hearings and appeals | 5,500 | 5,500 | ||
| Subtotal, Other defense activities | 753,000 | 754,000 | ||
| Total, Other Defense Activities | 753,000 | 754,000 | ||
Clerk.
| |||||
AMENDMENT | |||||