113 S2410 PCS: Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015
U.S. Senate
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
1.(a)This Act may be cited as the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015
.(b)Congress makes the following findings:(1)Senator Carl Levin of Michigan was elected a member of the United States Senate on November 7,
1978, for a full term beginning January 3, 1979. He has served
continuously in the Senate since that date, and was appointed as a member
of the Committee on Armed Services in January 1979. He has served on the
Committee on Armed Services since that date, a period of nearly 36 years.(2)A graduate of Detroit Central High School, Senator Levin went on to Swarthmore College, and
graduated from Harvard Law School in 1959, gaining admittance to the
Michigan bar. He served his State as assistant attorney general and
general counsel of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission from 1964–1967,
and later served his hometown of Detroit as a member of the Detroit City
Council from 1969–1973, and as the council’s president from 1974–1977.(3)Senator Levin first served as chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the United States
Senate for a period of the 107th Congress, and has remained chairman since
the 110th Congress began in 2007. He has exercised extraordinary
leadership as either the chairman or ranking minority member of the
committee since the start of the 105th Congress in 1997.(4)Each year, for the past 52 years, the Committee on Armed Services has reliably passed an annual
defense authorization act, and this will be the 36th that Senator Levin
has had a role in. In his capacity as member, ranking member, and
chairman, he has been an advocate for a strong national defense, and has
made lasting contributions to the security of our Nation.(5)It is altogether fitting and proper that this Act, the last annual authorization act for the
national defense that Senator Levin manages in and for the United States
Senate as chairman of the Committee on Armed Services, be named in his
honor, as provided in subsection (a).2.Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents(a)This
Act is organized into four divisions as follows:
(1)Division
A–Department of Defense Authorizations.
(2)Division
B–Military Construction Authorizations.
(3)Division
C–Department of Energy National Security Authorizations and Other
Authorizations.
(4)Division
D–Funding Tables.(b)The table of contents for this Act is as follows:Sec. 1. Short title; findings.
Sec. 2. Organization of Act into divisions; table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.
Sec. 4. Budgetary effects of this Act.DIVISION A—Department of Defense Authorizations
TITLE I—Procurement
Subtitle A—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 101. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle C—Navy Programs
Sec. 121. Airborne electronic attack capabilities.
Sec. 122. Report on test evaluation master plan for Littoral Combat Ship seaframes and mission
modules.
Sec. 123. Authority to transfer certain funds for refueling of aircraft carrier and construction of
amphibious ship.
Subtitle D—Air Force Programs
Sec. 131. Prohibition on retirement of MQ–1 Predator aircraft.
Sec. 132. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of Air Force aircraft.
Sec. 133. Temporary limitation on availability of funds for transfer of Air Force C–130H and C–130J
aircraft.
Sec. 134. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft.
Sec. 135. Limitation on transfer of KC–135 tankers.
Sec. 136. Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of Airborne Warning and Control System
(AWACS) aircraft.
Sec. 137. Report on status of air-launched cruise missile capabilities.
Sec. 138. Report on C–130 aircraft.
Sec. 139. Report on status of F–16 aircraft.
Sec. 140. Report on options to modernize or replace the T–1A aircraft.TITLE II—Research, development, test, and evaluation
Subtitle A—Authorization of appropriations
Sec. 201. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B—Program requirements, restrictions, and limitations
Sec. 211. Modification of authority for prizes for advanced technology achievements.
Sec. 212. Modification of Manufacturing Technology Program.
Sec. 213. Limitation on retirement of Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft.
Sec. 214. Limitation on significant modifications of Army test and evaluation capabilities.
Subtitle C—Reports
Sec. 221. Study and reports on the technological superiority of the United States military.
Sec. 222. Reduction in frequency of reporting by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems
Engineering.
Subtitle D—Other matters
Sec. 231. Pilot program on assignment to Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of private
sector personnel with critical research and development expertise.
Sec. 232. Pilot program on enhancement of preparation of dependents of members of Armed Forces for
careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
Sec. 233. Modification to requirement for contractor cost-sharing in pilot program to include
technology protection features during research and development of certain
defense systems.TITLE III—Operation and maintenance
Subtitle A—Authorization of appropriations
Sec. 301. Authorization of appropriations.
Subtitle B—Energy and the environment
Sec. 311. Method of funding for cooperative agreements under the Sikes Act.
Sec. 312. Environmental restoration at former Naval Air Station Chincoteague, Virginia.
Sec. 313. Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in fuels.
Sec. 314. Study on implementation of requirements for consideration of fuel logistics support
requirements in planning, requirements development, and acquisition
processes.
Sec. 315. Comptroller General study of Department of Defense research and development projects and
investments to increase energy security and meet energy goals
requirements.
Sec. 316. Decontamination of a portion of former bombardment area on island of Culebra, Puerto
Rico.
Subtitle C—Logistics and sustainment
Sec. 321. Modification of annual reporting requirement related to prepositioning of materiel and
equipment.
Sec. 322. Modification of quarterly readiness reporting requirement.
Sec. 323. Elimination of authority to abolish arsenals.
Subtitle D—Reports
Sec. 331. Repeal of annual report on Department of Defense operation and financial support for
military museums.
Subtitle E—Limitations and extensions of authority
Sec. 341. Limitation on MC–12 aircraft transfer to United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 342. Limitation on establishment of regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers.
Subtitle F—Other matters
Sec. 351. Repeal of authority relating to use of military installations by Civil Reserve Air Fleet
contractors.
Sec. 352. Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniforms.
Sec. 353. Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas.TITLE IV—Military Personnel Authorizations
Subtitle A—Active Forces
Sec. 401. End strengths for active forces.
Subtitle B—Reserve Forces
Sec. 411. End strengths for Selected Reserve.
Sec. 412. End strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reserves.
Sec. 413. End strengths for military technicians (dual status).
Sec. 414. Fiscal year 2015 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians.
Sec. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational
support.
Subtitle C—Authorization of Appropriations
Sec. 421. Military personnel.TITLE V—Military Personnel Policy
Subtitle A—Officer Personnel Policy
Sec. 501. Authority for three-month deferral of retirement for officers selected for selective
early retirement.
Sec. 502. Repeal of limits on percentage of officers who may be recommended for discharge during a
fiscal year under enhanced selective discharge authority.
Sec. 503. Elimination of requirement that a qualified aviator or naval flight officer be in command
of an inactivated nuclear-powered aircraft carrier before decommissioning.
Sec. 504. Authority to limit consideration for early retirement by selective retirement boards to
particular warrant officer year groups and specialties.
Sec. 505. Repeal of requirement for submittal to Congress of annual reports on joint officer
management and promotion policy objectives for joint officers.
Subtitle B—Reserve Component Management
Sec. 511. Retention on reserve active-status list following nonselection for promotion of certain
health professions officers and first lieutenants and lieutenants (junior
grade) pursuing baccalaureate degrees.
Sec. 512. Database on military technician positions.
Sec. 513. Improved consistency in suicide prevention and resilience program for the reserve
components of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 514. Office of Employer Support for the Guard and Reserve.
Subtitle C—General Service Authorities
Sec. 521. Enhancement of participation of mental health professionals in boards for correction of
military records and boards for review of discharge or dismissal of
members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 522. Extension of authority to conduct programs on career flexibility to enhance retention of
members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 523. Sense of Senate on validated gender-neutral occupational standards for all military
occupations.
Sec. 524. Comptroller General of the United States report on impact of certain mental and physical
trauma on discharges from military service for misconduct.
Sec. 525. Sense of Senate on upgrade of characterization of discharge of certain Vietnam era
members of the Armed Forces.
Subtitle D—Member Education and Training
Sec. 531. Enhancement of authority for members of the Armed Forces to obtain professional
credentials.
Sec. 532. Authority for Joint Special Operations University to award degrees.
Sec. 533. Enhancement of information provided to members of the Armed Forces and veterans regarding
use of Post-9/11 Educational Assistance and Federal financial aid through
Transition Assistance Program.
Sec. 534. Duration of foreign and cultural exchange activities at military service academies.
Subtitle E—Military Justice and Legal Matters
Sec. 541. Ordering of depositions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Sec. 542. Modification of Rule 513 of the Military Rules of Evidence, relating to the privilege
against disclosure of communications between psychotherapists and
patients.
Sec. 543. Enhancement of victims' rights to be heard through counsel in connection with prosecution
of certain sex-related offenses.
Sec. 544. Eligibility of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces for assistance of
Special Victims' Counsel.
Sec. 545. Additional enhancements of military department actions on sexual assault prevention and
response.
Sec. 546. Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related offenses for trial by
court-martial if requested by chief prosecutor.
Sec. 547. Modification of Department of Defense policy on retention of evidence in a sexual assault
case to permit return of personal property upon completion of related
proceedings.
Sec. 548. Inclusion of information on assaults in the Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database.
Sec. 549. Technical revisions and clarifications of certain provisions in the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 relating to the military justice
system.
Sec. 550. Applicability of sexual assault prevention and response and related military justice
enhancements to military service academies.
Sec. 551. Analysis and assessment of disposition of most serious offenses identified in
unrestricted reports on sexual assaults in annual reports on sexual
assaults in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 552. Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault
in the Armed Forces.
Sec. 553. Collaboration between the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice in efforts
to prevent and respond to sexual assault.
Sec. 554. Modification of term of judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed
Forces.
Sec. 555. Report on review of Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual
harassment cases.
Sec. 556. Repeal of obsolete requirement to develop comprehensive management plan to address
deficiencies in data captured in the Defense Incident-Based Reporting
System.
Subtitle F—Decorations and Award
Sec. 561. Medals for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of
Defense who were killed or wounded in an attack by a foreign terrorist
organization.
Subtitle G—Defense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness Matters
Sec. 571. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of
members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.
Sec. 572. Impact aid for children with severe disabilities.
Sec. 573. Amendments to the Impact Aid Improvement Act of 2012.
Sec. 574. Authority to employ non-United States citizens as teachers in Department of Defense
Overseas Dependents’ School system.
Sec. 575. Inclusion of domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools among functions of
Advisory Council on Dependents' Education.
Sec. 576. Department of Defense suicide prevention programs for military dependents.
Subtitle H—Other Matters
Sec. 581. Enhancement of authority to accept support for Air Force Academy athletic programs.TITLE VI—Compensation and Other Personnel Benefits
Subtitle A—Pay and Allowances
Sec. 601. Fiscal year 2015 increase in military basic pay.
Sec. 602. Inclusion of Chief of the National Guard Bureau and Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief
of the National Guard Bureau among senior members of the Armed Forces for
purposes of pay and allowances.
Sec. 603. Modification of computation of basic allowance for housing inside the United States.
Sec. 604. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for
housing under certain circumstances.
Subtitle B—Bonuses and Special and Incentive Pays
Sec. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces.
Sec. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care
professionals.
Sec. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers.
Sec. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay,
incentive pay, and bonus authorities.
Sec. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and
special pays.
Subtitle C—Disability Pay, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits
Sec. 621. Inapplicability of reduced annual adjustment of retired pay for members of the Armed
Forces under the age of 62 under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 who
first become members prior to January 1, 2016.
Sec. 622. Modification of determination of retired pay base for officers retired in general and
flag officer grades.
Sec. 623. Modification of per-fiscal year calculation of days of certain active duty or active
service to reduce eligibility age for retirement for non-regular service.
Sec. 624. Earlier determination of dependent status with respect to transitional compensation for
dependents of certain members separated for dependent abuse.
Sec. 625. Survivor Benefit Plan annuities for special needs trusts established for the benefit of
dependent children incapable of self-support.
Subtitle D—Commissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations
Sec. 631. Procurement of brand-name and other commercial items for resale by commissary stores.TITLE VII—Health Care Provisions
Subtitle A—TRICARE Program
Sec. 701. Annual mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 702. Modifications of cost-sharing and other requirements for the TRICARE Pharmacy Benefits
Program.
Sec. 703. Parity in provision of inpatient mental health services with other inpatient medical
services.
Sec. 704. Availability of breastfeeding support, supplies, and counseling under the TRICARE
program.
Sec. 705. Authority for provisional TRICARE coverage for emerging health care products and
services.
Sec. 706. Report on status of reductions in TRICARE Prime service areas.
Sec. 707. Repeal of requirement for ongoing Comptroller General of the United States reviews of
viability of TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra.
Subtitle B—Health Care Administration
Sec. 721. Department of Defense Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care Fund matters.
Sec. 722. Extension of authority for Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs
Medical Facility Demonstration Fund.
Sec. 723. Department of Defense-wide strategy for contracting for health care professionals for the
Department of Defense.
Sec. 724. Program on medication management in the Department of Defense.
Subtitle C—Reports and Other Matters
Sec. 731. Report on military family planning programs of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 732. Interagency working group on the provision of mental health services to members of the
National Guard and the Reserves.
Sec. 733. Report on improvements in the identification and treatment of mental health conditions
and traumatic brain injury among members of the Armed Forces.
Sec. 734. Report on implementation of recommendations of Institute of Medicine on improvements to
certain resilience and prevention programs of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 735. Report on Department of Defense support of members of the Armed Forces who experience
traumatic injury as a result of vaccinations required by the Department.
Sec. 736. Comptroller General of the United States report on Military Health System Modernization
Study of the Department of Defense.TITLE VIII—Acquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related matters
Subtitle A—Acquisition policy and management
Sec. 801. Open systems approach to acquisition of systems containing information technology.
Sec. 802. Recharacterization of changes to Major Automated Information System programs.
Sec. 803. Process map requirement for milestone approval of defense business system programs.
Sec. 804. Governance of Joint Information Environment.
Sec. 805. Report on implementation of acquisition process for information technology systems.
Sec. 806. Revision of requirement for acquisition programs to maintain defense research facility
records.
Sec. 807. Rapid acquisition and deployment procedures for United States Special Operations Command.
Sec. 808. Consideration of corrosion control in preliminary design review.
Sec. 809. Repeal of extension of Comptroller General report on inventory.
Subtitle B—Amendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations
Sec. 821. Restatement and revision of requirements applicable to multiyear defense acquisitions to
be specifically authorized by law.
Sec. 822. Extension and modification of contract authority for advanced component development and
prototype units and modification of authority.
Sec. 823. Conditional temporary extension of comprehensive subcontracting plans.
Sec. 824. Sourcing requirements related to avoiding counterfeit electronic parts.
Sec. 825. Authority for Defense Contract Audit Agency to interview contractor employees in
connection with examination of contractor records.
Sec. 826. Enhancement of whistleblower protection for employees of grantees.
Sec. 827. Prohibition on reimbursement of contractors for congressional investigations and
inquiries.
Sec. 828. Enhanced authority to acquire certain products and services produced in Africa.
Sec. 829. Requirement to provide photovoltaic devices from United States sources.
Subtitle C—Provisions relating to major defense acquisition programs
Sec. 841. Program manager development strategy.
Sec. 842. Tenure and accountability of program managers for program development periods.
Sec. 843. Tenure and accountability of program managers for program execution periods.
Sec. 844. Removal of requirements related to waiver of preliminary design review and
post-preliminary design review before Milestone B.
Sec. 845. Comptroller General of the United States report on operational testing programs for major
defense acquisition programs.
Subtitle D—Other matters
Sec. 861. Extension to United States Transportation Command of authorities relating to prohibition
on contracting with the enemy.
Sec. 862. Reimbursement of Department of Defense for assistance provided to nongovernmental
entertainment-oriented media producers.
Sec. 863. Three-year extension of authority for Joint Urgent Operational Needs Fund.TITLE IX—Department of Defense Organization and Management
Subtitle A—Department of Defense Management
Sec. 901. Reorganization of the Office of the Secretary of Defense and related matters.
Sec. 902. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs.
Subtitle B—Other Matters
Sec. 911. Modifications to requirements for accounting for members of the Armed Forces and
Department of Defense civilian employees listed as missing.TITLE X—General Provisions
Subtitle A—Financial Matters
Sec. 1001. General transfer authority.
Sec. 1002. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund.
Sec. 1003. Sense of Senate on sequestration.
Subtitle B—Counter-Drug Activities
Sec. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in
Colombia.
Sec. 1012. Extension and modification of authority for joint task forces supporting law enforcement
agencies conducting activities to counter transnational organized crime to
support law enforcement agencies conducting counter-terrorism activities.
Sec. 1013. Extension of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of
certain foreign governments.
Sec. 1014. Extension and modification of authority of Department of Defense to provide additional
support for counterdrug activities of other governmental agencies.
Subtitle C—Naval Vessels and Shipyards
Sec. 1021. Limitation on use of funds for inactivation of U.S.S. George Washington.
Sec. 1022. Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class cruisers or
dock landing ships.
Sec. 1023. Operational readiness of Littoral Combat Ships on extended deployments.
Sec. 1024. Authority for limited coastwise trade for certain vessels providing transportation
services under a shipbuilding or ship repair contract with the Secretary
of the Navy.
Subtitle D—Counterterrorism
Sec. 1031. Limitation on the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1032. Report on facilitation of transfer overseas of certain individuals detained at United
States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1033. Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States for emergency or critical
medical treatment.
Sec. 1034. Prohibition on transfer or release to Yemen of individuals detained at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Subtitle E—Miscellaneous Authorities and Limitations
Sec. 1041. Reduction in Department of Defense civilian personnel and review of certain headquarters
spending.
Sec. 1042. Protection of Department of Defense installations.
Sec. 1043. Authority to accept certain voluntary legal support services.
Sec. 1044. Inclusion of Chief of the National Guard Bureau among leadership of the Department of
Defense provided physical protection and personal security.
Sec. 1045. Inclusion of regional organizations in authority for assignment of civilian employees of
the Department of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense.
Sec. 1046. Extension of authority to waive reimbursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental
personnel at Department of Defense regional centers for security studies.
Subtitle F—Studies and Reports
Sec. 1061. Reports on recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force.
Sec. 1062. Review of operation of certain ships during the Vietnam era.
Sec. 1063. Assessment of the operations research tools, processes, and capabilities in support of
requirements analysis for major defense acquisition programs and
allocation of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets.
Sec. 1064. Review of United States military strategy and the force posture of allies and partners
in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility.
Sec. 1065. Department of Defense policies on community involvement in Department community outreach
events.
Sec. 1066. Comptroller General of the United States briefing and report on management of the
conventional ammunition demilitarization stockpile of the Department of
Defense.
Sec. 1067. Repeal and modification of reporting requirements.
Sec. 1068. Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General of the United States annual reviews and
report on pilot program on commercial fee-for-service air refueling
support for the Air Force.
Subtitle G—Uniformed Services Voting
PART I—Provision of voter assistance to members of the Armed Forces
Sec. 1071. Provision of annual voter assistance.
Sec. 1072. Designation of voter assistance offices.
PART II—Electronic voting systems
Sec. 1076. Repeal of electronic voting demonstration project.
Subtitle H—Other Matters
Sec. 1081. Biennial surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees on workplace and gender
relations matters.
Sec. 1082. Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory Panel from Department of the Navy
to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Sec. 1083. Authority to require employees of the Department of Defense and members of the Army,
Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps to occupy quarters on a rental basis
while performing official travel.
Sec. 1084. Expansion of authority for Secretary of Defense to use the Department of Defense
reimbursement rate for transportation services provided to certain
non-Department of Defense entities.
Sec. 1085. Pilot program to rehabilitate and modify homes of disabled and low-income veterans.
Sec. 1086. Technical and clerical amendments.TITLE XI—Civilian Personnel Matters
Sec. 1101. Extension and modification of experimental program for scientific and technical
personnel.
Sec. 1102. Modifications of biennial strategic workforce plan relating to senior management,
functional, and technical workforces of the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1103. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate
limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas.
Sec. 1104. Personnel authorities for civilian personnel for the United States Cyber Command.TITLE XII—Matters Relating to Foreign Nations
Subtitle A—Assistance and Training
Sec. 1201. Modification of Department of Defense authority for humanitarian stockpiled conventional
munitions assistance programs.
Sec. 1202. Codification of recurring limitations on the use of funds for assistance for units of
foreign security forces that have committed a gross violation of human
rights.
Sec. 1203. Codification and enhancement of authority to build the capacity of foreign security
forces.
Sec. 1204. Training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries to promote
respect for the rule of law and human rights.
Sec. 1205. Modification and extension of Global Security Contingency Fund authority.
Sec. 1206. Use of acquisition and cross-servicing agreements to lend certain military equipment to
certain foreign forces for personnel protection and survivability.
Sec. 1207. Cross servicing agreements for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability
equipment in coalition operations.
Sec. 1208. Extension and modification of authority for support of special operations to combat
terrorism.
Sec. 1209. Assistance to foster a negotiated settlement to the conflict in Syria.
Sec. 1210. Limitations on security assistance for the Government of Burma.
Sec. 1211. Biennial report on programs carried out by the Department of Defense to provide
training, equipment, or other assistance or reimbursement to foreign
security forces.
Sec. 1212. Sense of the Senate on multilateral humanitarian assistance and disaster relief
exercises.
Subtitle B—Matters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq
Sec. 1221. Commanders' Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan.
Sec. 1222. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the
military and security forces of Afghanistan.
Sec. 1223. One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in
Afghanistan.
Sec. 1224. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations
for support provided to United States military operations.
Sec. 1225. One-year extension of logistical support for coalition forces supporting certain United
States military operations.
Sec. 1226. Prohibition on use of funds for certain programs and projects of the Department of
Defense in Afghanistan that cannot be safely accessed by United States
Government personnel.
Sec. 1227. Semiannual report on enhancing the strategic partnership between the United States and
Afghanistan.
Sec. 1228. Report on bilateral security cooperation with Pakistan.
Sec. 1229. Surface clearance of unexploded ordnance on former United States training ranges in
Afghanistan.
Sec. 1230. Afghan Special Immigrant Visa Program.
Sec. 1231. Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the
Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.
Subtitle C—Reports
Sec. 1241. Report on impact of end of major combat operations in Afghanistan on authority to use
military force.
Sec. 1242. United States strategy for enhancing security and stability in Europe.
Sec. 1243. Report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation.
Sec. 1244. Modification of matters for discussion in annual reports of United States-China Economic
and Security Review Commission.
Sec. 1245. Report on maritime security strategy and annual briefing on military to military
engagement with the People’s Republic of China.
Sec. 1246. Report on military assistance to Ukraine.
Subtitle D—Other Matters
Sec. 1261. Treatment of Kurdistan Democratic Party and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan under the
Immigration and Nationality Act.
Sec. 1262. Notification on potentially significant arms control noncompliance.
Sec. 1263. Enhanced authority for provision of support to foreign military liaison officers of
foreign countries while assigned to the Department of Defense.
Sec. 1264. One-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities.
Sec. 1265. Inter-European Air Forces Academy.
Sec. 1266. Extension of limitations on providing certain missile defense information to the Russian
Federation.
Sec. 1267. Prohibition on direct or indirect use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements
with Rosoboronexport.TITLE XIII—COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION
Subtitle A—Funding allocations
Sec. 1301. Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds.
Sec. 1302. Funding allocations.
Subtitle B—Consolidation and modernization of statutes relating to the Department of Defense
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program
Sec. 1311. Short title.
PART I—Program authorities
Sec. 1321. Authority to carry out the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.
Sec. 1322. Use of Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for certain emergent
threats or opportunities.
Sec. 1323. Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program authority for urgent threat
reduction activities.
Sec. 1324. Use of funds for other purposes or for increased amounts.
Sec. 1325. Use of contributions to the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.
PART II—Restrictions and limitations
Sec. 1331. Prohibition on use of funds for specified purposes.
Sec. 1332. Requirement for on-site managers.
Sec. 1333. Limitation on use of funds until certain permits obtained.
PART III—Recurring certifications and reports
Sec. 1341. Annual certifications on use of facilities being constructed for Department of Defense
Cooperative Threat Reduction projects or activities.
Sec. 1342. Requirement to submit summary of amounts requested by project category.
Sec. 1343. Reports on activities and assistance under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program.
Sec. 1344. Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.
PART IV—Repeals and transition provisions
Sec. 1351. Repeals.
Sec. 1352. Transition provisions.TITLE XIV—Other Authorizations
Subtitle A—Military Programs
Sec. 1401. Working capital funds.
Sec. 1402. Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense.
Sec. 1403. Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide.
Sec. 1404. Defense Inspector General.
Sec. 1405. Defense Health Program.
Subtitle B—National Defense Stockpile and Related Matters
Sec. 1411. Report on development of secure supply of rare earth materials.
Subtitle C—Other Matters
Sec. 1421. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans
Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell
Federal Health Care Center, Illinois.
Sec. 1422. Comptroller General of the United States report on Captain James A. Lovell Federal
Health Care Center, North Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 1423. Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement Home.
Sec. 1424. Designation and responsibilities of Senior Medical Advisor for the Armed Forces
Retirement Home.TITLE XV—Authorization of Additional Appropriations for Overseas Contingency Operations
Subtitle A—Authorization of Additional Appropriations
Sec. 1501. Purpose.
Sec. 1502. Overseas contingency operations.
Subtitle B—Financial Matters
Sec. 1511. Treatment as additional authorizations.
Sec. 1512. Special transfer authority.
Subtitle C—Limitations, Reports, and Other Matters
Sec. 1521. Plan for transition of funding of United States Special Operations Command from
supplemental funding for overseas contingency operations to recurring
funding for future-years defense programs.
Sec. 1522. Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund.
Sec. 1523. Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.
Sec. 1524. Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund.
Sec. 1525. Sense of Congress regarding counter-improvised explosive devices.TITLE XVI—Strategic Programs, Cyber, and Intelligence Matters
Subtitle A—Nuclear Forces
Sec. 1601. Procurement authority for certain parts of intercontinental ballistic missile fuzes.
Sec. 1602. Form of and cost estimates relating to annual reports on plan for the nuclear weapons
stockpile, nuclear weapons complex, nuclear weapons delivery systems, and
nuclear weapons command and control system.
Sec. 1603. Reports on installation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems at the
United States Strategic Command headquarters.
Sec. 1604. Reports on potential reductions to B61 life extension program.
Sec. 1605. Sense of Congress on deterrence and defense posture of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization.
Subtitle B—Missile defense programs
Sec. 1611. Homeland ballistic missile defense.
Sec. 1612. Regional ballistic missile defense.
Sec. 1613. Availability of funds for missile defense programs of Israel.
Sec. 1614. Acquisition plan for re-designed Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle.
Sec. 1615. Testing and assessment of missile defense systems prior to production and deployment.
Subtitle C—Space Activities
Sec. 1621. Update of National Security Space Strategy to include space control and space
superiority strategy.
Sec. 1622. Allocation of funds for the Space Security and Defense Program; report on space control.
Sec. 1623. Prohibition on contracting with Russian suppliers of critical space launch supplies for
the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program.
Sec. 1624. Assessment of Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program.
Sec. 1625. Report on reliance of Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program on foreign
manufacturers.
Sec. 1626. Availability of additional rocket cores pursuant to competitive procedures.
Sec. 1627. Competitive procedures required to launch payload for mission number five of the
Operationally Responsive Space Program.
Sec. 1628. Limitation on funding for storage of Defense Meteorological Satellite Program
satellites.
Sec. 1629. Plan for development of liquid rocket engine for medium or heavy lift launch vehicle;
transfer of certain funds.
Sec. 1630. Study of space situational awareness architecture.
Sec. 1631. Sense of the Senate on resolution limits on commercial space imagery.
Subtitle D—Cyber warfare, cyber security, and related matters
Sec. 1641. Cyberspace mapping.
Sec. 1642. Review of cross domain solution policy and requirement for cross domain solution
strategy.
Sec. 1643. Budgeting and accounting for cyber mission forces.
Sec. 1644. Requirement for strategy to develop and deploy decryption service for the Joint
Information Environment.
Sec. 1645. Reporting on penetrations into networks and information systems of operationally
critical contractors.
Sec. 1646. Sense of Congress on the future of the Internet and the .MIL top-level domain.
Subtitle E—Intelligence-Related matters
Sec. 1651. Extension of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as
security for intelligence collection activities.
Sec. 1652. Authority for Secretary of Defense to engage in commercial activities as security for
military operations abroad.
Sec. 1653. Extension of authority relating to jurisdiction over Department of Defense facilities
for intelligence collection or special operations activities abroad.
Sec. 1654. Personnel security and insider threat.
Sec. 1655. Migration of Distributed Common Ground System of Department of the Army to an open
system architecture.TITLE XVII—National Commission on the Future of the Army
Sec. 1701. Short title.
Sec. 1702. Prohibition on use of fiscal year 2015 funds to reduce strengths of Army personnel.
Sec. 1703. Limitation on use of fiscal year 2015 funds for transfer or divestment of certain
aircraft assigned to the Army National Guard.
Sec. 1704. National Commission on the Future of the Army.
Sec. 1705. Duties of the Commission.
Sec. 1706. Powers of the Commission.
Sec. 1707. Commission personnel matters.
Sec. 1708. Termination of the Commission.
Sec. 1709. Funding.DIVISION B—Military construction authorizations
Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law.
TITLE XXI—Army military construction
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2104. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 project.
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 projects.
Sec. 2106. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 project.
Sec. 2107. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects.
Sec. 2108. Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military Academy, New
York.
Sec. 2109. Limitation on funding for family housing construction at Camp Walker, Republic of Korea.
TITLE XXII—Navy military construction
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects.
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project.
Sec. 2207. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects.
Sec. 2208. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects.
TITLE XXIII—Air Force military construction
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2302. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2303. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 project.
Sec. 2304. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project.
Sec. 2305. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects.
TITLE XXIV—Defense agencies military construction
Subtitle A—Defense agency authorizations
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Authorized energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Sec. 2404. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 project.
Sec. 2405. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects.
Subtitle B—Chemical demilitarization authorizations
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide.
Sec. 2412. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project.
TITLE XXV—North atlantic treaty organization security investment program
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
TITLE XXVI—Guard and Reserve forces facilities
Subtitle A—Project authorizations and authorization of appropriations
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.
Subtitle B—Other matters
Sec. 2611. Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects.
Sec. 2612. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project.
Sec. 2613. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project.
TITLE XXVII—Base realignment and closure activities
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded
through Department of Defense Base Closure Account.
Sec. 2702. Prohibition on conducting additional base realignment and closure (BRAC) round.
Sec. 2703. HUBZones.
TITLE XXVIII—Military Construction General Provisions
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes
Sec. 2801. Clarification of authorized use of in-kind payments and in-kind contributions.
Sec. 2802. Residential building construction standards.
Sec. 2803. Modification of minor military construction authority for projects to correct
deficiencies that are life-, health-, or safety-threatening.
Sec. 2804. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for
construction projects in certain areas outside the United States.
Sec. 2805. Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of responsibility.
Sec. 2806. Limitation on construction of new facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration
Sec. 2811. Deposit of reimbursed funds to cover administrative expenses relating to certain real
property transactions.
Sec. 2812. Renewals, extensions, and succeeding leases for financial institutions operating on
Department of Defense installations.
Subtitle C—Provisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment
Sec. 2821. Realignment of Marines Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region.
Subtitle D—Land Conveyances
Sec. 2831. Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.
Sec. 2832. Land exchange, Arlington County, Virginia.
Sec. 2833. Transfers of administrative jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill and Lake Lanier,
Georgia.
Sec. 2834. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma.
Subtitle E—Other Matters
Sec. 2841. Establishment of memorial to the victims of the shooting at the Washington Navy Yard on
September 16, 2013.DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
Subtitle A—National security programs authorizations
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.
Subtitle B—Program authorizations, restrictions, and limitations
Sec. 3111. Life-cycle cost estimates of certain atomic energy defense capital assets.
Sec. 3112. Expansion of requirement for independent cost estimates on life extension programs and
new nuclear facilities.
Sec. 3113. Implementation of Phase I of Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project.
Sec. 3114. Establishment of the Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health.
Sec. 3115. Comments of Administrator for Nuclear Security on reports of Congressional Advisory
Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise.
Sec. 3116. Identification of amounts required for uranium technology sustainment in budget
materials for fiscal year 2016.
TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
Sec. 3201. Authorization.
TITLE XXXV—MARITIME ADMINISTRATION
Sec. 3501. Maritime Administration.DIVISION D—Funding Tables
Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.
TITLE XLI—Procurement
Sec. 4101. Procurement.
TITLE XLII—Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
Sec. 4201. Research, development, test, and evaluation.
TITLE XLIII—Operation and Maintenance
Sec. 4301. Operation and maintenance.
TITLE XLIV—Military Personnel
Sec. 4401. Military personnel.
TITLE XLV—Other Authorizations
Sec. 4501. Other authorizations.
TITLE XLVI—Military Construction
Sec. 4601. Military construction.
TITLE XLVII—Department of Energy National Security Programs
Sec. 4701. Department of Energy national security programs.3.Congressional
defense committeesFor
purposes of this Act, the term congressional defense committees
has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United
States Code.
4.Budgetary effects of this ActThe budgetary effects of this Act, for the
purposes of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be
determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects
of PAYGO Legislation
for this Act, jointly submitted for printing in
the Congressional Record by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Budget
Committees, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote
on passage in the House acting first on the conference report or amendment
between the Houses.ADepartment of Defense AuthorizationsIAAuthorization of Appropriations101.Authorization
of appropriationsFunds are
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for procurement for
the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide
activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101.
C121.Airborne electronic attack capabilities(a)The Secretary of the Navy shall take whatever steps the Secretary deems appropriate and are
available to the Navy to ensure that the Navy retains the option of buying
more EA–18G aircraft if further analysis of airborne electronic attack
(AEA) force structure indicates the Navy should buy more EA–18G aircraft.(b)To the extent provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of the Navy may transfer from fiscal
year 2014 Aircraft Procurement, Navy funds, $75,000,000 to support Navy
efforts to ensure that the Navy is not prevented from deciding to buy more
EA–18G aircraft by the closure of the EA–18G production line if Navy
analysis indicates that buying more EA–18G aircraft is required to meet
airborne electronic warfare requirements.(c)For purposes of this section, the term fiscal year 2014 Aircraft Procurement, Navy funds means amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2014 by section 101 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127
Stat. 690) and available for Aircraft Procurement, Navy as specified in
the funding table in section 4101 of that Act (127 Stat. 1093).(d)Effect on authorization amountsA transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to
increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is
transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.(e)Construction of authorityThe transfer authority in this section is in addition to any other transfer authority provided in
this Act.(f)Not later than September 1, 2014, the Secretary of the Navy shall provide briefings to the
congressional defense committees on—(1)the options available to the Navy for ensuring that the Navy will not be precluded from buying more
EA–18G aircraft if that is what the Navy analysis concludes should be
done; and(2)an update on the Navy’s progress in conducting its analysis of emerging requirements for airborne
electronic attack.122.Report on test evaluation master plan for Littoral Combat Ship seaframes and mission modules(a)Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of Operational
Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report on the test evaluation master plan for the seaframes and mission
modules for the Littoral Combat Ship program.(b)The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:(1)A description of the Navy's progress with respect to the test evaluation master plan.(2)An assessment of whether or not completion of the test evaluation master plan will demonstrate
operational effectiveness and operational suitability for both
seaframes and each mission module.123.Authority to transfer certain funds for refueling of aircraft carrier and construction of
amphibious ship(a)To the extent provided in appropriations Acts, upon a determination described in subsection (b),
the Secretary of the Navy is authorized to transfer funds available in
Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy or any other Navy procurement account
for either or both of the following purposes:(1)Up to $650,000,000 to conduct a refueling and complex overhaul of the U.S.S. George Washington
(CVN–73).(2)Up to $650,000,000 for the ship construction of a San Antonio class amphibious ship.(b)A determination described in this subsection is a determination by the Secretary of the Navy that—(1)unobligated balances are available in the program or programs from which funds will be
transferred pursuant to subsection (a) due to slower than expected program
execution; and(2)the transfer of funds will fill a high priority military need and is in the best interest of the
Department of the Navy.(c)The Secretary of the Navy is authorized to enter into a contract for the procurement of one San
Antonio class amphibious ship beginning in fiscal year 2015, and to use
incremental funding for the procurement of that ship, if additional funds
are made available for such purpose in fiscal year 2015 and the Secretary
determines that such procurement will fill a high priority military need
and is in the best interests of the Department of the Navy.(d)Effect on authorization amountsA transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to
increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is
transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.(e)Construction of authorityThe transfer authority under this section is in addition to any other transfer authority provided
in this Act.D131.Prohibition on retirement of MQ–1 Predator aircraftNone of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2015 for the Air Force may be used to retire any MQ–1 Predator
aircraft.132.Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of Air Force aircraft(a)None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire,
prepare to retire, or place in storage any aircraft of the Air
Force, except
for such aircraft the Secretary of the Air Force planned to retire as of
April 9, 2013, until 60 days after submittal of the report as described
in subsection (b) of the report required by that subsection.(b)(1)The Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a report on the appropriate contributions of the regular Air Force, the
Air National Guard, and the Air Force Reserve to the total force structure
of the Air Force.(2)The report shall include the following:(A)A separate presentation of mix of forces for each mission and aircraft platform of the Air Force.(B)An analysis and recommendations for not less than 80 percent of the missions and aircraft platforms
described in
subparagraph (A).133.Temporary limitation on availability of funds for transfer of Air Force C–130H and C–130J aircraft(a)None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the
Air Force may be obligated or expended to transfer from
one Department of Defense facility to another any C–130H or C–130J
aircraft until 60 days after
the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense
committees an
assessment of the costs and benefits of the proposed transfer.(b)The assessment referred to in subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following
elements:(1)A recommended basing alignment of C–130H2, C–130H3, and C–130J aircraft.(2)An identification of how that plan deviates from the basing plan approved by the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239).(3)An explanation of why that plan deviates, if in any detail, from the plan approved by that Act.(4)An assessment of the national security benefits and any other expected benefits of the proposed
transfers, including benefits for the facility or facilities expected to
receive the transferred aircraft.(5)An assessment of the costs of the proposed transfers, including the impact of the proposed
transfers on the facility or facilities from which the aircraft will be
transferred.(6)An analysis of the recommended basing alignment that demonstrates that the recommendation is the
most
effective and efficient alternative for such basing alignment.(7)For units equipped with special capabilities, such the modular airborne firefighting system
capability, an analysis of the impact of the proposed transfers on the
ability to satisfy missions that utilize those capabilities.(c)Comptroller General reportNot later than 45 days after the Secretary of the Air Force submits the report required under
subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a sufficiency review of that
report, including any findings and recommendations relating to such
review.134.
Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of A–10 aircraft(a)None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2015 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to make
significant changes to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft
squadrons, or to retire,
prepare to retire, or place in storage any A–10 aircraft, except for such
aircraft the Secretary of the Air Force, as of April 9, 2013, planned to
retire.(b)Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect the requirement to maintain
the operational capability of the A–10 aircraft.135.Limitation on transfer of KC–135 tankersThe Secretary of the Air Force may not transfer KC–135 aircraft from Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam
until the Secretary submits a report to the congressional defense
committees on the cost and benefits of such transfer compared to the costs
and benefits of keeping the aircraft where they are.136.
Limitation on availability of funds for retirement of Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS)
aircraft(a)None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to
make significant changes to manning levels with respect to any Airborne
Warning and Control Systems (AWACS) aircraft, or to retire, prepare to
retire, or place in storage any AWACS aircraft.(b)Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or otherwise affect the requirement to maintain
the operational capability of the E–3 AWACS.137.Report on status of air-launched cruise missile capabilities(a)Congress makes the following findings:(1)The capability provided by the nuclear-capable, air launched cruise missile (ALCM) is critical to
maintaining a credible and effective air-delivery leg of the triad,
preserving the ability to respond to geopolitical and technical surprise,
and reassuring United States allies through credible extended deterrence.(2)In its fiscal year 2015 budget request, the Air Force delayed development of the Long Range
Standoff Weapon (LRSO), the follow-on for the ALCM, by three years.(3)The Air Force plans to sustain the current ALCM, known as the AGM–86, until approximately 2030,
with
multiple service life extension programs required to preserve but not
enhance existing ALCM capabilities.(4)The AGM–86 was initially developed in the 1970s and deployed in the 1980s.(5)The average age of the ALCM inventory is over 30 years old.(6)The operating environment, particularly the sophistication of integrated air defenses, has evolved
substantially since the ALCM’s inception.(7)The AGM–86 is no longer in production and the inventory of spare bodies for required annual testing
continues to diminish, posing serious challenges for long-term
sustainment.(b)(1)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air
Force, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic
Command, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
the status of the current air-launched cruise missile and the development
of the follow-on system, the long-range standoff weapon.(2)The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:(A)An assessment of the current system’s effectiveness and survivability through 2030, including the
impact of any degradation on the ability of the United States Strategic
Command to
meet deterrence requirements, such as the number of targets held at risk
by the air-launched cruise missile or the burdens placed on other legs of
the triad.(B)A description of age-related failure trends, and assessment of potential age-related fleet-wide
reliability and supportability problems, as well as the estimated costs
for sustaining the existing system.(C)A detailed plan, including initial cost estimates, for the development and deployment of the
follow-on system that will achieve initial operational capability before
2030.(D)An assessment of the feasibility and advisability of alternative development strategies, including
initial cost estimates, that would achieve full operational capability
before 2030.(E)An assessment of current testing requirements and the availability of test bodies to sustain the
current system over the long term.(F)A description of the extent to which the airframe and other related components can be completed
independent of the payload, as determined by the Nuclear Weapons Council.(G)A statement of the risks assumed by not fielding an operational replacement for the existing
air-launched cruise missile by 2030.(3)The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form, but may include an
unclassified summary.138.(a)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including a
complete analysis and fielding plan for C–130 aircraft.(b)The fielding plan submitted under subsection (a) shall also include specific details of the Air
Force’s plan to maintain intra-theater airlift capacity
and capability within both the active and reserve components, including
its modernization and recapitalization plan for C–130H and C–130J
aircraft.139.Report on status of F–16 aircraftNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the
status and location, and any plans to change during
the period of the future years defense program the status or locations,
of all F–16 aircraft in
the United Air Force inventory.140.
Report on options to modernize or replace the T–1A aircraft(a)Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on options
for the modernization or replacement of the T–1A aircraft capability.(b)The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:(1)A description of options for—(A)new procurement;(B)conducting a service life extension program on existing aircraft;(C)replacing organic aircraft with leased aircraft or services for the longer term; and(D)replacing organic aircraft with leased aircraft or services while the Air Force executes a new
procurement or service life extension program.(2)An evaluation of the ability of each alternative to meet future training requirements.(3)Estimates of life cycle costs.(4)A description of potential cost savings from merging a T–1A capability replacement program with
other Air Force programs, such as the Companion Trainer Program.
IIResearch, development, test, and evaluationAAuthorization of appropriations201.Authorization
of appropriationsFunds are
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the
Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation as
specified in the funding table in section 4201.BProgram requirements, restrictions, and limitations211.Modification of authority for prizes for advanced technology achievements(a)Modification of limit on amount of awardsSubsection (c)(1) of section 2374a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking The total amount
and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting the following: No prize competition may result in the award of a cash prize of more than $10,000,000.
.(b)Such section is amended—(1)by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and(2)by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (f):(f)In addition to such sums as may be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Secretary to
award prizes under this section, the Secretary may accept funds from other
Federal departments and agencies, and from State and local governments, to
award prizes under this section..(c)Subsection (e) of such section is amended—(1)in paragraph (1)—(A)by striking each year
and inserting every other year
; and(B)by striking fiscal year
and inserting two fiscal years
;(2)in paragraph (2), in the matter before subparagraph (A), by striking a fiscal year
and inserting a period of two fiscal years
; and(3)in the subsection heading by striking annual
and inserting biennial
.212.Modification of Manufacturing Technology Program(a)Modification of Joint Defense Manufacturing Technology Panel reporting requirementSubsection (e)(5) of section 2521 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
and inserting one or more individuals designated by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology,
and Logistics for purposes of this paragraph
.(b)Decreased frequency of update of five-year strategic planSubsection (f)(3) of such section is amended by striking on a biennial basis
and inserting not less frequently than once every four years
.213.Limitation on retirement of Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft(a)The Secretary of the Air Force may not make any significant changes to manning levels with respect
to any operational Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems
(JSTARS) aircraft or take any action to retire or to prepare to retire
such aircraft until the date that is 60 days after the date on which the
Secretary submits
to the congressional defense committees the report required by subsection
(b).(b)The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that
includes the following:(1)An update on the results of the analysis of alternatives for recapitalizing the current Joint
Surveillance and Target Attack Radar Systems capability.(2)An analysis of life cycle supports costs of maintaining the current fleet of Joint Surveillance and
Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft and the costs of replacing such fleet
with a new aircraft and radar system employing mature technology.(3)An assessment of the cost and schedule of developing and fielding a new aircraft and radar system
employing mature technology to replace the current Joint Surveillance and
Target Attack Radar Systems aircraft.214.Limitation on significant modifications of Army test and evaluation capabilities(a)The Secretary of the Army may not undertake actions which will result in a significant modification
of the test and evaluation capabilities of the Army Test and Evaluation
Command within the Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) until 30
days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional
defense committees a report setting forth the following:(1)A business case analysis of the proposed consolidation.(2)An estimate of the savings to be achieved or costs to be incurred through the proposed
consolidation.(3)The written assessment of the Director of the Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) of the
Department of Defense of the proposed consolidation.(b)The requirements in this section shall end on September 30, 2015.C221.Study and reports on the technological superiority of the United States military(a)(1)The Secretary of Defense shall, using the Defense Science Board or such other independent entity as
the Secretary selects for purposes of this subsection, provide for a study
of the technological superiority of the United States military and
efforts to address challenges to the maintenance of such technological
superiority.(2)The study required pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following:(A)An assessment of current and anticipated foreign technological capabilities that will be deployed
and will represent a significant challenge to deployed forces and systems
of the United States military within 10 years of the date of the enactment
of this Act.(B)An assessment of current threats facing deployed forces and systems of the United States military
that cannot be adequately addressed by systems currently being acquired or
by current requirements in current acquisition programs.(C)An assessment of the adequacy of current developmental programs and resources to address the
threats described in subparagraph (B).(D)An identification of authorities, policies, and procedures that could be adopted or adapted to
enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the Department of Defense in
addressing challenges to the technological superiority of the United
States military that are identified in the study.(E)Such other matters relating to the technological superiority of the United States military, and
current and anticipated challenges to the maintenance of such technology
superiority, as the Secretary shall specify for purposes of the study.(3)The Secretary shall ensure that entity conducting the study required by paragraph (1) has
appropriate access to all data, information, personnel, and records
(whether classified or unclassified) necessary to conduct the study.(4)The entity conducting the study required by paragraph (1) shall submit to the Secretary, and to
Congress, a report on the study by not later than February 1, 2016.(b)Secretary of Defense reportNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to Congress a report setting forth the following:(1)A list and description of current funded programs of the Department of Defense intended to achieve
the deployment of capabilities to address challenges to the technological
superiority of deployed forces and systems of the United States during
the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act,
including the funding currently programmed for such programs.(2)A description of the processes being used by the Department to identify challenges to the
technological superiority of forces and systems described in paragraph
(1), including challenges not being addressed by current requirements in
current acquisition programs.(3)A description of any authorities, policies, or procedures currently under development to improve
the effectiveness and efficiency of the Department in addressing
challenges to the technological superiority of the United States military.(c)The reports submitted to Congress under subsections (a)(4) and (b) shall be submitted in
unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.222.Reduction in frequency of reporting by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems
Engineering(a)Section 139b(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4);(2)in paragraph (1), in the second sentence of the matter before subparagraph (A), by striking Each report
and inserting the following:(3)Each report submitted under paragraph (1) or (2); and(3)by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraphs (1) and (2):(1)Annual report by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and EvaluationNot later than March 31 of each year, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental
Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report on the activities undertaken pursuant to subsections (a) during the
preceding year.(2)Biennial report by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems EngineeringNot later than March 31 of every other year, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems
Engineering shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
on the activities undertaken pursuant to subsection (b) during the
preceding two-year period..(b)The heading for such section is amended by striking annual report
and inserting annual and biennial reports
.(c)The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and
the first report submitted under paragraph (2) of section 139b(d) of such
title, as added by subsection (a)(3), shall be submitted not later than
March 31, 2015.D231.Pilot program on assignment to Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of private sector
personnel with critical research and development expertise(a)In accordance with the provisions of this section, the Director of the Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency may carry out a pilot program to
assess the feasibility and advisability of temporarily assigning covered
individuals with significant technical expertise in research and
development areas of critical importance to defense missions
to the Agency to lead research or development projects of the Agency.(b)For purposes of the pilot program, a covered individual is any individual who is employed by a
covered entity.(c)For purposes of the pilot program, a covered entity is any non-Federal, nongovernmental entity
that—(1)is not a defense contractor; or(2)is a nontraditional defense contractor.(d)Assignment of covered individuals(1)Number of individuals assignedUnder the pilot program, the Director may assign covered individuals to the Agency as described in
subsection (a), but may not have more than five covered individuals so
assigned at any given time.(2)(A)Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Director may, under the pilot program, assign a covered
individual described in subsection (a) to lead research and development
projects of the Agency for a
period of not more than two years.(B)The Director may extend the assignment of a covered individual for an additional two years as the
Director considers appropriate.(3)Application of certain provisions of title 5Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Director shall carry out the pilot program in
accordance with the provisions of subchapter VI
of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, except that, for purposes of
the pilot program, the term other organization
, as used in such subchapter, shall be deemed to include a covered entity.(4)A covered individual employed by a covered entity who is assigned to the Agency under the pilot
program—(A)may continue to receive pay and benefits from such covered entity with or without reimbursement by
the Agency;(B)is not entitled to pay from the Agency; and(C)shall be subject to supervision by the Director in all duties performed for the Agency under the
pilot program.(e)(1)Practices and procedures requiredThe Director shall develop practices and procedures to manage conflicts of interest and the
appearance of conflicts of interest that could arise through assignments
under the pilot program.(2)The practices and procedures required by paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the requirement
that each covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot
program shall sign an agreement that provides for the following:(A)The non-disclosure of any trade secrets or other nonpublic or proprietary information which is of
commercial value to the covered entity from which such covered individual
is assigned.(B)The assignment of rights to intellectual property developed in the course of any research or
development project under the pilot program—(i)to the Agency and its contracting partners in accordance with applicable provisions of law
regarding intellectual property rights; and(ii)not to the covered individual or the covered entity from which such covered individual is assigned.(C)Such additional measures as the Director considers necessary to prevent the covered individual or
the employer of the covered individual from gaining unfair advantage over
competitors as result of the assignment.(f)Prohibition on charges by covered entitiesA covered entity may not charge the Federal Government, as direct or indirect costs under a Federal
contract, the costs of pay or benefits paid by the covered entity to a
covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program.(g)Not later than the first October 31 after the first fiscal year in which the Director carries out
the pilot program and each October 31 thereafter that immediately follows
a fiscal year in which the Director carries out the pilot program, the
Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on
the activities carried out under the pilot program during the most
recently completed fiscal year.(h)The authority provided in this section shall expire on September 30, 2020, except that any
covered individual assigned to the Agency under the pilot program shall
continue
in such assignment until the terms of such assignment have been satisfied.(i)Nontraditional defense contractor definedIn this section, the term nontraditional defense contractor has the meaning given the term in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code.232.Pilot program on enhancement of preparation of dependents of members of Armed Forces for careers in
science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(a)The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and
advisability of—(1)enhancing the preparation of covered students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics; and(2)providing assistance to the teachers of such students to enhance preparation described in paragraph
(1).(b)For purposes of the pilot program, covered students are dependents of members of the Armed Forces
who are enrolled in an
elementary or secondary school at which the Secretary determines a
significant number of such dependents are enrolled.(c)In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall coordinate with the following:(1)The Secretaries of the military departments.(2)The Secretary of Education.(3)The National Science Foundation.(4)The heads of such other Federal, State, and local government and private sector organizations as
the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate.(d)Activities under the pilot program may include the following:(1)Establishment of targeted internships and cooperative research opportunities at defense
laboratories and other technical centers for covered students and their
teachers.(2)Efforts and activities that improve the quality of science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics educational and training opportunities for covered students
and their teachers.(3)Development of travel opportunities, demonstrations, mentoring programs, and informal science
education for covered students and their teachers.(e)The Secretary shall establish outcome-based metrics and internal and external assessments to
evaluate the merits and benefits of activities conducted under the pilot
program with respect to the needs of the Department of Defense.(f)In carrying out the pilot program, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, make use
of the authorities under chapter 111 and sections 2601, 2605, and 2374a of
title
10, United States Code, section 219 of the Duncan
Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C.
2358 note), and such other authorities as the Secretary
considers appropriate.(g)Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on activities carried out under the pilot
program.(h)The pilot program required by subsection (a) shall terminate on September 30, 2020.233.Modification to requirement for contractor cost-sharing in pilot program to include technology
protection features during research and development of certain defense
systemsSection 243(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public
Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended, in the matter following
paragraph (2)—(1)by striking at least one-half
and inserting half
; and(2)by inserting , or such other portion of such cost as the Secretary considers appropriate upon showing of good
cause
after such activities
.
IIIOperation and maintenanceAAuthorization of appropriations301.Authorization of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces
and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for
expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as
specified in the funding table in section 4301.
BEnergy and the environment311.Method of funding for cooperative agreements under the Sikes Act(a)Method of payments under cooperative agreementsSubsection (b) of section 103a of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670c–1) is amended—(1)by inserting (1)
before Funds
; and(2)by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:(2)In the case of a cooperative agreement under subsection (a)(2), such funds—(A)may be paid in a lump sum and include an amount intended to cover the future costs of the natural
resource maintenance and improvement activities provided for under the
agreement; and(B)may be placed by the recipient in an interest-bearing or other investment account, and any interest
or income shall be applied for the same purposes as the principal.(3)If any funds are placed by a recipient in an interest-bearing or other investment account under
paragraph (2)(B), the Secretary of Defense shall report biennially to the
congressional defense committees on the disposition of such funds..(b)Availability of funds; agreement under other lawsSubsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows:(c)Availability of funds; agreement under other laws(1)Cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered into under this section shall be subject
to the availability of funds.(2)Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, a cooperative agreement under this
section may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit
or use of the United States Government..312.Environmental restoration at former Naval Air Station Chincoteague, Virginia(a)Environmental restoration projectNotwithstanding the administrative jurisdiction of the Administrator of the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration over the Wallops Flight Facility, Virginia, the
Secretary of Defense may undertake an environmental restoration project in
a manner consistent with chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code, at
the property constituting that facility in order to provide necessary
response actions for contamination from a release of a hazardous substance
or a pollutant or contaminant that is attributable to the
activities of the Department of Defense at the time the property was under
the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy or used by
the Navy pursuant to a permit or license issued by the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration in the area formerly known as the
Naval Air Station Chincoteague, Virginia (including Naval Aviation
Ordnance Test
Station, Virginia). Any such project may be
undertaken jointly or in conjunction with an environmental restoration
project of the Administrator.(b)The Secretary and the Administrator may enter into an agreement or agreements to provide for the
effective and efficient performance of environmental restoration projects
for purposes of subsection (a). Notwithstanding section 2215 of title 10,
United States Code, any such agreement may provide for environmental
restoration projects conducted jointly or by one agency on behalf of the
other or both agencies and for reimbursement of the agency conducting the
project by the other agency for that portion of the project for which the
reimbursing agency has authority to respond.(c)Source of Department of Defense fundsPursuant to section 2703(c) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary may use funds available
in the Environmental Restoration, Formerly Used Defense Sites, account of
the Department of Defense for environmental restoration projects conducted
for or by the Secretary under subsection (a) and for reimbursable
agreements entered into under subsection (b).(d)No effect on compliance with environmental lawsNothing in this section affects or limits the application of or obligation to comply with any
environmental law, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et. seq) and the Solid Waste
Disposal
Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.).313.Limitation on availability of funds for procurement of drop-in fuels(a)None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to
make a bulk purchase of a drop-in fuel for operational purposes unless the
cost of that drop-in fuel is cost-competitive with the cost of a
traditional fuel available for the same purpose.(b)(1)Subject to the requirements of paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation
under subsection (a) with respect to a purchase.(2)Not later than 30 days after issuing a waiver under this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to
the congressional defense committees notice of the waiver. Any such notice
shall include each of the following:(A)The rationale of the Secretary for issuing the waiver.(B)A certification that the waiver is in the national security interest of the United States.(C)The expected cost of the purchase for which the waiver is issued.(c)In this section:(1)The term drop-in fuel means a neat or blended liquid hydrocarbon fuel designed as a direct replacement for a traditional
fuel with comparable performance characteristics and compatible with
existing infrastructure and equipment.(2)The term traditional fuel means a liquid hydrocarbon fuel derived or refined from petroleum.(3)The term operational purposes means for the purposes of conducting military operations, including training, exercises, large
scale demonstrations, and moving and sustaining military forces and
military platforms. The term does not include research, development,
testing, evaluation, fuel certification, or other demonstrations.314.Study on implementation of requirements for consideration of fuel logistics support requirements in
planning, requirements development, and acquisition processes(a)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the
congressional defense committees a report regarding the implementation of
section 332 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4420; 10 U.S.C. 2911 note)
(in this section referred to as section 332
). The report shall describe the implementation to date of the requirements for consideration of
fuel logistics
support requirements in the planning, requirements development, and
acquisition processes, including the following elements:(1)A list of acquisition solicitations that incorporate analysis established and developed
pursuant to section 332.(2)An analysis of the extent to which Department of Defense planning, requirements development, and
acquisition processes incorporate or rely on the fully burdened cost of
energy and energy key performance parameter in relation to other metrics.(3)An estimate of the total fuel costs avoided as a result of inclusion of the fully burdened cost of
energy and energy key performance parameter in acquisitions, including an
estimate of monetary savings and fuel volume savings.(4)An analysis of the extent to which the energy security requirements of the Department of Defense
are enhanced by
incorporation of section 332 requirements in the acquisition process, and
recommendations for further improving section 332 requirements to further
enhance energy security and mission capability requirements.(b)In this section, the term energy security has the meaning given the term in section 2924(3) of title 10, United States Code.315.Comptroller General study of Department of Defense research and development projects and
investments to increase energy security and meet energy goals requirements(a)(1)The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of Department of Defense
projects, strategy, resourcing, and research, development,
and investment in pursuit of increasing energy security, decreasing energy
consumption and logistical burdens, reducing tactical and strategic
vulnerabilities, and meeting the renewable energy goals set forth in
section 2911(e) of title 10, United States Code, including by Executive
Order and
through related legislative mandates.(2)The review conducted under paragraph (1) shall specify—(A)specific
programs, costs, and estimated and expected savings of the programs, and
the
methodology and accuracy of cost savings projections, including the cost
of
construction, maintenance, and modernization of facilities,
infrastructure,
and equipment relative to the costs of using traditional energy sources;
and(B)any benefits related to increased energy security, the availability of on-site
renewable and hybrid energy systems when using a micro-grid, reduced
energy consumption and logistical burdens, reduced tactical and strategic
vulnerabilities, and assured access for the Department to
reliable supplies of energy required to meet all the needs and combatant
capabilities of the Armed Forces.(b)Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review
conducted under subsection (a), including the following elements:(1)A description of all current Department of Defense energy research, development, and investment
initiatives throughout the Department of Defense, by military service,
including—(A)the use of any renewable energy source as
specified in section 2911(e)(2) of title 10, United States Code;(B)the total dollars spent to date compared to the
total dollars spent to date on the lifecycle costs of conventional energy
sources;(C)the estimated total cost projected duration
of each project, if implemented; and(D)any potential benefits related to meeting Department of Defense technology development goals,
increasing energy
security, the availability of on-site renewable and hybrid energy systems
when
using a micro-grid, reduced energy consumption and logistical burdens,
reduced tactical and strategic vulnerabilities, and assured access for the
Department to reliable supplies of energy required to meet all
the needs and combatant capabilities of the Armed Forces.(2)A description of—(A)the estimated and expected savings or cost increases of each of the projects;(B)the
methodology and accuracy of cost savings projections, including the cost
of
construction, maintenance, modernization of facilities, infrastructure,
and equipment relative to the costs of using traditional energy sources;(C)any potential benefits related to meeting Department of Defense technology
development goals, increasing energy security, the availability of
on-site renewable
and hybrid energy systems when using a micro-grid, reduced energy
consumption and logistical burdens, reduced tactical and strategic
vulnerabilities, and assured access for the Department to
reliable supplies of energy required to meet all the needs and combatant
capabilities of the Armed Forces as described in paragraph (1), including
a comparison of the lifecycle costs and benefits of renewable power to
the lifecycle costs and benefits of conventional energy sources projected
over future periods of 10, 20, and 30 years with reasonable consideration
given to utility rate structures, costs associated with ancillary
services, and
anticipated transmission or other construction costs incurred or avoided
by a particular type of energy project.(3)An assessment of—(A)the adequacy of the coordination by the Department of Defense among the service
branches and the Department of Defense as a whole, and whether or not the
Department of Defense has an effective, combat capabilities-based, and
coordinated energy research, development, and investment strategy for
energy projects with consideration for savings realized for dollars
invested and the capitalization costs of such investments; and(B)any potential
benefits related to meeting Department of Defense technology development
goals, increasing energy security, the availability of on-site renewable
and hybrid
energy systems when using a micro-grid, reduced energy consumption,
reduced logistical burdens, reduced tactical and strategic
vulnerabilities, and assured access for the Department to
reliable supplies of energy required to meet all the needs and combatant
capabilities of the Armed Forces.(4)An assessment of any challenges and gaps faced by the Department of Defense between its goals and
its current research, development, and investment in energy initiatives.(5)Recommendations whether a need exists for a new energy strategy for the Department of Defense that
provides the Department with assured access to reliable supplies of energy
required to meet all the needs and combat capabilities of the Armed
Forces.316.Decontamination of a portion of former bombardment area on island of Culebra, Puerto Rico(a)It is the sense of Congress that certain limited portions of the former bombardment area on the
Island of Culebra should be
available for safe public recreational use while the remainder of the area
is most advantageously reserved as habitat for endangered and threatened
species.(b)Modification of restriction on decontamination limitationThe first sentence of section 204(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1974 (Public
Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668) shall not apply to the beaches, the campgrounds,
and the Carlos Rosario Trail.(c)Modification of deed restrictionsNotwithstanding paragraph 9 of the quitclaim deed, the Secretary of the Army may expend funds
available in the Environmental Restoration Account, Formerly Used Defense
Sites, established pursuant to section 2703(a)(5) of title 10, United
States Code, to decontaminate the beaches, the campgrounds, and the Carlos
Rosario Trail of unexploded ordnance.(d)The Secretary of the Army shall determine the exact boundaries of the beaches, the campgrounds, and
the Carlos Rosario Trail for purposes of this section.(e)In this section:(1)The term beaches means the portions of Carlos Rosario Beach, Flamenco Beach, and Tamarindo Beach identified in
green in Figure 4 as Beach and located inside of the former bombardment
area.(2)The term campgrounds means the areas identified in blue in Figure 4 as Campgrounds in the former bombardment area.(3)The term Carlos Rosario Trail means the trail identified in yellow in Figure 4 as the Carlos Rosario Trail and traversing the
southern portion of the former bombardment area from the campground to the
Carlos Rosario Beach.(4)The term Figure 4 means Figure 4, located on page 8 of the study.(5)The term former bombardment area means that area on the Island of Culebra, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, consisting of approximately
408 acres, conveyed to the Commonwealth by the quitclaim deed, and subject
to the first sentence of section 204(c) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act, 1974 (Public Law 93–166; 87 Stat. 668).(6)The term quitclaim deed means the quitclaim deed from the United States of America to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
conveying the former bombardment area, signed by the Governor of Puerto
Rico on December 20, 1982.(7)The term study means the Study Relating to the Presence of Unexploded Ordnance in a Portion of the Former Naval Bombardment
Area of Culebra Island, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
, dated April 20, 2012, prepared by the United States Army for the Department of Defense pursuant
to section 2815 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4464).(8)The term unexploded ordnance has the meaning given the term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code.CLogistics and sustainment321.
Modification of annual reporting requirement related to prepositioning of materiel and equipmentSection 321(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66;
127 Stat. 732; 10 U.S.C. 2229 note) is amended—(1)by striking Not later than
and inserting the following:(1)Not later than; (2)by striking , and annually thereafter
; and(3)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(2)Not later than one year after submitting the report required under paragraph (1), and annually
thereafter for two years, the Comptroller General shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report assessing the progress of the
Department of Defense in implementing its strategic policy and plan for
its prepositioned stocks and including any additional information related
to the Department's management of its prepositioned stocks that the
Comptroller General determines appropriate..322.
Modification of quarterly readiness reporting requirementSection 482 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in subsection (a)—(A)by inserting active and reserve
before military readiness
; and(B)by striking subsections (b), (d), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k)
and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting subsections (b), (d), (e), (f), and (g).
;(2)by striking subsections (d), (e), (f), and (k);(3)by redesignating subsections (g), (h), (i), (j), and (l) as subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), and
(h), respectively;(4)in subsection (d)(1), as redesignated by paragraph (3), by striking National Response Plan
and inserting National Response Framework (NRF)
;(5)in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:(3)The assessment included in the report under paragraph (1) by the Commander of the United States
Strategic Command shall include a separate assessment prepared by the
Commander of United States Cyber Command relating to the United States
Cyber Command.; and(6)in subsection (g), as so redesignated—(A)by striking subparagraph (G); and(B)by redesignating subparagraphs (H) and (I) as subparagraphs (G) and (H), respectively.323.
Elimination of authority to abolish arsenals(a)Section 4532 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the section heading, by striking ; abolition of
; and(2)by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:(b)It shall be the objective to the Secretary of the Army, in managing the workload of the arsenals,
to maintain the critical capabilities identified in the Army Organic
Industrial Base Strategy Report, and ensure cost efficiency and technical
competence in peacetime, while preserving the ability to provide an
effective and timely response to mobilizations, national defense
contingency situations, and other emergent requirements..(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 433 of such title is amended by striking the item
relating to section 4532 and inserting the following new item:4532. Factories and arsenals: manufacture at..D331.
Repeal of annual report on Department of Defense operation and financial support for military
museums(a)Section 489 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by striking the item
relating to section 489.
ELimitations and extensions of authority341.
Limitation on MC–12 aircraft transfer to United States Special Operations Command(a)Except as provided under subsection (c), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this
Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of
Defense for operation and maintenance,
Defense-wide, may be obligated or expended for the transfer of MC–12
aircraft from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations
Command
until 60 days after the delivery of the report required under
subsection (b).(b)(1)Not later than March 1, 2015, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and
Low-Intensity Conflict, in coordination with the Commander of the United
States Special Operations Command, shall submit to the congressional
defense
committees a report with an analysis and justification for the transfer
of MC–12
aircraft from the Air Force to the United States Special Operations
Command.(2)The report required under paragraph (1) shall outline, at a minimum—(A)the current platform requirements for manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
aircraft to support United States Special Operations Forces;(B)an analysis of alternatives comparing various manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
aircraft, including U–28 aircraft, in meeting the platform requirements
for manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft to
support United States Special Operations Forces;(C)an analysis of the remaining service life of the U–28 aircraft to be divested by the United States
Special Operations Command and the MC–12 aircraft to be transferred from
the Air Force;(D)the future manned intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platform requirements of the
United
States Special Operations Command for areas outside of Afghanistan,
including range, payload, endurance, and other requirements, as defined by
the Command's Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Road Map
;(E)an analysis of the cost to convert MC–12 aircraft to provide intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance capabilities equal to or better than those provided by the
U–28 aircraft;(F)a description of the engineering and integration needed to convert MC–12 aircraft to provide
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities equal to or
better than those provided by the U–28 aircraft; and(G)the expected annual cost to operate 16 U–28 aircraft as a government-owned, contractor operated
program.(c)Subsection (a) does not apply to aircraft transferred from the Air Force to the United States
Special
Operations Command to support Aviation Foreign Internal Defense
requirements.342.Limitation on establishment of regional Special Operations Forces Coordination CentersNone of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal
year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to
establish Regional Special Operations Forces Coordination Centers (RSCCs).F351.Repeal of authority relating to use of military installations by Civil Reserve Air Fleet
contractors(a)Section 9513 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 931 of such title is amended by striking the item
relating to section 9513.352.
Revised policy on ground combat and camouflage utility uniformsSection 352(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66;
127 Stat. 742) is amended—(1)in paragraph (4), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting ; or
;(2)by striking paragraph (5); and(3)by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (5).353.Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas(a)Establishment of military readiness areas(1)Chapter 631 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:7235.Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas(a)The Secretary of the Navy shall establish areas, to be known as Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas
, for national defense purposes. Such areas shall include each of the following:(1)The area that includes Naval Base Ventura County, San Nicolas Island, and Begg Rock and the
adjacent and surrounding waters within the following coordinates:N. Latitude/W. Longitude
33°27.8′/119°34.3′
33°20.5′/119°15.5′
33°13.5′/119°11.8′
33°06.5′/119°15.3′
33°02.8′/119°26.8′
33°08.8′/119°46.3′
33°17.2′/119°56.9′
33°30.9′/119°54.2′.
(2)The area that includes Naval Base Coronado, San Clemente Island and the adjacent and surrounding
waters running parallel to shore to 3 nautical miles from the high tide
line designated by part 165 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, on
May 20, 2010, as the San Clemente Island 3NM Safety Zone.(b)Activities within military readiness areas(1)Incidental takings under endangered species act of 1973Sections 4 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) shall not apply with
respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern
Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting a military
readiness activity.(2)Incidental takings under marine mammal protection act of 1972Sections 101 and 102 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372) shall not
apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in
the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of
conducting a military readiness activity.(3)Treatment as species proposed to be listedFor purposes of conducting a military readiness activity, any southern sea otter while within the
Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas shall be treated for the
purposes of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C.
1536) as a member of a species that is proposed to be listed as an
endangered species or a threatened species under section 4 of that Act
(16 U.S.C. 1533).(c)Nothing in this section or any other Federal law shall be construed to require that any southern
sea otter located within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas
be removed from the Areas.(d)Revision or termination of exceptionsThe Secretary of the Interior may revise or terminate the application of subsection (b) if the
Secretary of the Interior determines, in consultation with the Secretary
of the Navy and the Marine Mammal Commission,
that military activities occurring in the Southern Sea Otter
Military Readiness Areas are impeding the southern sea otter conservation
or the return of southern sea otters to optimum sustainable population
levels.(e)(1)The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct monitoring and research within the Southern Sea Otter
Military Readiness Areas to determine the effects of military readiness
activities on the growth or decline of the southern sea otter population
and on the near-shore ecosystem. Monitoring and research parameters and
methods shall be determined in consultation with the Service and the
Marine Mammal Commission.(2)Not later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2015 and every three years
thereafter, the Secretary of the Navy shall report to Congress and the
public on monitoring undertaken pursuant to paragraph (1).(f)In this section:(1)The term southern sea otter means any member of the subspecies Enhydra lutris nereis.(2)The term take—(A)when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), shall have the meaning given such term in that
Act; and(B)when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of
1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) shall have the meaning given such term in
that Act.(3)The term incidental taking means any take of a southern sea otter that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying
out of an otherwise lawful activity.(4)Military readiness activityThe term military readiness activity has the meaning given that term in section 315(f) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (16 U.S.C. 703 note) and includes all training
and operations of the armed forces that relate to combat and the adequate
and realistic testing of military equipment, vehicles, weapons, and
sensors for proper operation and suitability for combat use.(5)Optimum sustainable populationThe term optimum sustainable population means, with respect to any population stock, the number of animals that will result in the maximum
productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the
carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of which
they form a constituent element..(2)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 631 of such title is amended by adding at the end
the
following new item:7235. Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas..(b)Section 1 of Public Law 99–625 (16 U.S.C. 1536 note) is repealed.IVMilitary Personnel AuthorizationsA401.End
strengths for active forcesThe Armed Forces are authorized strengths
for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2015, as follows:
(1)The
Army, 490,000.
(2)The
Navy, 323,600.
(3)The
Marine Corps, 184,100.
(4)The
Air Force, 310,900.
B411.End
strengths for Selected Reserve
(a)The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected
Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2015, as
follows:
(1)The
Army National Guard of the United States, 350,200.
(2)The
Army Reserve, 202,000.
(3)The
Navy Reserve, 57,300.
(4)The
Marine Corps Reserve, 39,200.
(5)The
Air National Guard of the United States, 105,000.
(6)The
Air Force Reserve, 67,100.
(7)The
Coast Guard Reserve, 9,000.
(b)The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the
Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced
by—
(1)the
total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected
Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at
the end of the fiscal year; and
(2)the
total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of
the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for
training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent
at the end of the fiscal year.
(c)Whenever units or individual members of the Selected
Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any
fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected
Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the
total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such
individual members.412.End
strengths for Reserves on active duty in support of the reservesWithin the end strengths prescribed in
section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as
of September 30, 2015, the following number of Reserves to be serving on
full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National
Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing,
or training the reserve components:
(1)The
Army National Guard of the United States, 31,385.
(2)The
Army Reserve, 16,261.
(3)The
Navy Reserve, 9,973.
(4)The
Marine Corps Reserve, 2,261.
(5)The
Air National Guard of the United States, 14,704.
(6)The
Air Force Reserve, 2,830.413.End
strengths for military technicians (dual status)The minimum number of military technicians
(dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2015 for the reserve components
of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United
States Code) shall be the following:
(1)For
the Army National Guard of the United States, 27,210.
(2)For
the Army Reserve, 7,895.
(3)For
the Air National Guard of the United States, 21,792.
(4)For
the Air Force Reserve, 9,789.414.Fiscal year
2015 limitation on number of non-dual status technicians
(a)
(1)Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of
title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians
employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed the
following:
(A)For the Army
National Guard of the United States, 1,600.
(B)For the Air
National Guard of the United States, 350.
(2)The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the
Army Reserve as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed 595.
(3)The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the
Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2015, may not exceed 90.
(b)Non-dual status
technicians definedIn this section, the term non-dual
status technician has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of
title 10, United States Code.415.Maximum number
of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational
supportDuring fiscal year
2015, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed
Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty
under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following:
(1)The
Army National Guard of the United States, 17,000.
(2)The
Army Reserve, 13,000.
(3)The
Navy Reserve, 6,200.
(4)The
Marine Corps Reserve, 3,000.
(5)The
Air National Guard of the United States, 16,000.
(6)The
Air Force Reserve, 14,000.CAuthorization of Appropriations421.
(a)Authorization
of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated
for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and
agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for,
for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section
4401.
(b)Construction of
authorizationThe authorization of appropriations in subsection
(a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or
indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2015.
VMilitary Personnel PolicyA501.Authority for three-month deferral of retirement for officers selected for selective early
retirement(a)Section 581(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by striking 90 days
and inserting three months
; and(2)by inserting after the first sentence the following new sentence: An officer recommended for early retirement under this section, if approved for deferral, shall be
retired on the date requested by the officer, and approved by the
Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of
the tenth calendar month beginning after the month in which the Secretary
concerned approves the report of the board which recommended the officer
for early retirement.
.(b)Officers on the active-duty listSection 638(b) of such title is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by inserting before the period at the end of subparagraph (B) the following: , with such retirement under that section to be not later than the first day of the month beginning
after the month in which the officer becomes qualified for retirement
under that section, or on the first day of the seventh calendar month
beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the
report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement,
whichever is later
; and(2)in paragraph (3)—(A)by striking 90 days
and inserting three months
; and(B)by inserting after the first sentence the following new sentences: An officer recommended for early retirement under paragraph (1)(A) or section 638a of
this title, if approved for deferral, shall be retired on the date
requested by the officer, and approved by the Secretary concerned, which
date shall be not later than the first day of the tenth calendar month
beginning after the month in which the Secretary concerned approves the
report of the board which recommended the officer for early retirement.
The Secretary concerned may defer the retirement of an officer otherwise
approved for early retirement under paragraph (1)(B), but in no case
later than the first day of the tenth calendar month beginning after the
month in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board
which recommended the officer for early retirement. An officer
recommended for early retirement under paragraph (2), if approved
for deferral, shall be retired on the date requested by the officer, and
approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than
the first day of the thirteenth calendar month beginning after the month
in which the Secretary concerned approves the report of the board which
recommended the officer for early retirement.
.502.Repeal of limits on percentage of officers who may be recommended for discharge during a
fiscal year under enhanced selective discharge authoritySection 638a(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by striking paragraph (3); and(2)by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively.503.Elimination of requirement that a qualified aviator or naval flight officer be in command of an
inactivated nuclear-powered aircraft carrier before decommissioningSection 5942(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by inserting (1)
after (a)
; and(2)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(2)Paragraph (1) does not apply to command of a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that has been
inactivated for the purpose of permanent decommissioning and disposal..504.Authority to limit consideration for early retirement by selective retirement boards to particular
warrant officer year groups and specialtiesSection 581(d) of title 10, United State Code, is amended—(1)by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);(2)by designating the second sentence of paragraph (1) as paragraph (2); and(3)in paragraph (2), as so designated—(A)by striking the list shall include each
and inserting “the list shall include—(A)the name of each;(B)by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or
; and(C)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:(B)with respect to a group of warrant officers designated under subparagraph (A) who are in a
particular grade and competitive category, only those warrant officers in
that grade and competitive category who are also in a particular year
group or specialty, or any combination thereof determined by the
Secretary concerned..505.Repeal of requirement for submittal to Congress of annual reports on joint officer management and
promotion policy objectives for joint officers(a)(1)Section 667 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.(2)Promotion policy objectives for joint officersSection 662 of such title is amended —(A)by striking (a) Qualifications.—
; and(B)by striking subsection (b).(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 38 of such title is amended by striking the item
relating to section 667.BReserve Component Management511.Retention on reserve active-status list following nonselection for promotion of certain health
professions officers and first lieutenants and lieutenants (junior grade)
pursuing baccalaureate degrees(a)Retention of first lieutenants and lieutenants (junior grade) following nonselection for
promotionSubsection (a)(1) of section 14701 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by inserting (A)
after (1)
;(2)in subparagraph (A), as so designated—(A)by striking A reserve officer of
and inserting A reserve officer of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps described in subparagraph (B) who
is required to be removed from the reserve active-status list under
section 14504 of this title, or a reserve officer of
; and(B)by inserting a comma after 14507 of this title
; and(3)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:(B)A reserve officer described in this subparagraph is a reserve officer of the Army, Air Force, or
Marine Corps who holds the grade of first lieutenant, or a reserve officer
of the Navy who holds the grade of lieutenant (junior grade), who—(i)is a health professions officer; or(ii)is actively pursuing an undergraduate program of education leading to a baccalaureate degree..(b)Retention of health professions officersSuch section is further amended—(1)by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and(2)by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b):(b)Continuation of health professions officers(1)Notwithstanding subsection (a)(6), a health professions officer obligated to a period of service
incurred under section 16201 of this title who is required to be removed
from the reserve active-status list under section 14504, 14505, 14506, or
14507 of this title and who has not completed a service obligation
incurred under section 16201 shall be retained on the reserve
active-status list until the completion of such service obligation and
then discharged, unless sooner retired or discharged under another
provision of law.(2)The Secretary concerned may waive the applicability of paragraph (1) to any officer if the
Secretary determines that completion of the service obligation of that
officer is not in the best interest of the service.(3)A health professions officer who is continued on the reserve active-status list under this
subsection who is subsequently promoted or whose name is on a list of
officers recommended for promotion to the next higher grade is not
required to be discharged or retired upon completion of the officer’s
service obligation. Such officer may continue on the reserve
active-status list as other officers of the same grade unless separated
under another provision of law..512.Database on military technician positions(a)Centralized database requiredThe Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments,
establish and maintain a centralized database of information on the
military technician positions of the Department of Defense. The database
shall contain and set forth current information on all military technician
positions of the Armed Forces.(b)The database under subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)An identification of each military technician position, whether dual-status or non-dual status.(2)For each position identified pursuant to paragraph (1)—(A)a description of the functions of such position;(B)a statement of the military necessity for such position; and(C)a statement whether such position—(i)is a general administration, clerical, or office service occupation; or(ii)is tied directly to the maintenance of military readiness.513.Improved consistency in suicide prevention and resilience program for the reserve components of the
Armed Forces(a)Policy for standard suicide data collection, reporting and assessmentTo improve consistency in and oversight of the suicide prevention and resilience program for the
National Guard and Reserves established pursuant to section 10219 of title
10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe a policy
for the development of a standard method for collecting, reporting, and
assessing suicide data and suicide-attempt data involving members of the
National Guard and Reserves.(b)The Secretary of Defense shall develop the policy required by subsection (a) in consultation with
the Secretaries of the military departments and the Chief of the National
Guard Bureau.(c)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit the
policy developed under subsection (a) to the Committees on Armed Services
of the Senate and the House of Representatives.(d)The Secretaries of the military departments shall implement the policy developed under subsection
(a) by not later than 180 days after the date of the submittal of the
policy pursuant to subsection (c).514.Office of Employer Support for the Guard and ReserveThe Office of Employer Support for the Guard and Reserve (ESGR) shall, using funds available to the
Office under this Act, take appropriate actions to increase the number of
program support specialists in the States in order to reduce the number of
unemployed and underemployed members of the National Guard and to educate
employers on requirements of chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code
(commonly referred to as USERRA
).CGeneral Service Authorities521.Enhancement of participation of mental health professionals in boards for correction of military
records and boards for review of discharge or
dismissal of members of the Armed Forces(a)Boards for correction of military recordsSection 1552 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and(2)by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection (g):(g)Any medical advisory opinion issued to a board established under subsection (a)(1) with respect to
a member or former member of the armed forces who was diagnosed while
serving in the armed forces as
experiencing a mental health disorder shall include the opinion of a
clinical psychologist or psychiatrist if the request for correction of
records concerned relates to a mental health disorder..(b)Boards for review of discharge or dismissal(1)Review for certain former members with PTSD or TBISubsection (d)(1) of section 1553 of such title is amended by striking physician, clinical psychologist, or psychiatrist
the second place it appears and inserting clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with additional training and experience
specified by the
Secretary concerned to provide advice on specialized medical or
psychological matters relating to post-traumatic stress disorder and
traumatic brain injuries
.(2)Review for certain former members with mental health diagnosesSuch section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:(e)In the case of a former member of the armed forces (other than a former member covered by
subsection (d)) who was diagnosed while serving in the armed forces as
experiencing a mental health disorder, a board established under this
section to review the former
member's discharge or dismissal shall include a member who is
a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist, or a physician with additional
training and experience specified by the Secretary
concerned to provide advice on specialized medical or psychological
matters relating to mental health disorders..522.Extension of authority to conduct programs on career flexibility to enhance retention of members of
the Armed Forces(a)Extension of program authoritySubsection (l) of section 533 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10
U.S.C. 701 prec. note) is amended—(1)by inserting (1)
before No member
;(2)in paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by striking December 31, 2015
and inserting December 31, 2018
; and(3)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(2)A member may not be reactivated to active duty in the Armed Forces under a pilot program conducted
under this section after December 31, 2021..(b)Subsection (k) of such section is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by striking and 2017
and inserting 2017, and 2019
;(2)in paragraph (2), by striking March 1, 2019
and inserting March 1, 2022
; and(3)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(4)Additional elements for final reportsEach final report under this subsection shall, in addition to the elements required by paragraph
(3), include the following:(A)A description of the costs to the military department concerned of each pilot program conducted by
such military department under this section(B)A description of the reasons why members choose to participate in the pilot programs conducted by
the military department concerned.(C)A description of the members who did not return to the active duty in the Armed Forces at the
conclusion of their inactivation from active duty under the pilot programs
conducted by the military department concerned, and a statement of the
reasons why.(D)A statement whether the military department concerned required members to perform inactive duty
training as part of participation in any pilot program conducted by such
military department, and if so, a description of the members so required,
a statement of the reasons why, and a description of how often..523.Sense of Senate on validated gender-neutral occupational standards for all military occupationsIt is the sense of the Senate that the Secretaries of the military departments should—(1)eliminate all unnecessary gender-based barriers to service and integrate women into occupational
fields and units currently closed to them to the maximum extent possible;(2)by not later than September 1, 2015, validate gender-neutral occupational standards for every
military occupation, with such standards for each military occupation to
be based solely on the necessary and required specific tasks associated
with the qualifications and duties performed while serving in or assigned
to such military occupation;(3)ensure that such gender-neutral occupational standards enable the operational capability and combat
effectiveness required for the military to meet national defense
objectives;(4)ensure that such validated gender-neutral occupational standards are considered in determining
whether positions and occupations currently closed to service
by women are opened;(5)ensure that the surgeon general of the Armed Force concerned has evaluated the medical requirements
and has determined that resources to meet such requirements will be
adequate for female members for the military occupations or units to which
they will be assigned;(6)ensure that the Chief of Service of the Armed Force concerned has evaluated the table of equipment
for the unit or position for the military occupations or units to which
they will be assigned and has determined that all required equipment for
female members meets required standards for wear and survivability; and(7)by not later than January 1, 2016, open all military occupations to service by women who can meet
such validated gender-neutral occupational standards for the military
occupations to which they will be assigned, if determined to be in the
best interests of the national defense of the United States, and ensure
that all members of the Armed Forces, regardless of gender, are assigned
to units on the basis of their ability to meet the occupational standards
required by such assignment.524.Comptroller General of the United States report on impact of certain mental and physical trauma on
discharges from military service for misconduct(a)The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the impact of
mental and physical trauma relating to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
(PTSD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), behavioral health matters not
related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and other neurological combat
traumas (in this section referred to as covered traumas
) on the discharge of members of the Armed Forces from the Armed Forces for misconduct.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)An assessment of the extent to which the Armed Forces have in place processes for the consideration
of the impact of mental and physical trauma relating to covered traumas
on members of the Armed Forces who are being considered for discharge
from the Armed Forces for misconduct, including the compliance of the
Armed Forces with such processes and mechanisms in the Department of
Defense for ensuring the compliance of the Armed Forces with such
processes.(2)An assessment of the extent to which the Armed Forces provide members of the Armed Forces,
including commanding officers, junior officers, and noncommissioned
officers, training on the symptoms of covered traumas and the
identification of the presence of such conditions in members of the Armed
Forces.(3)An assessment of the extent to which members of the Armed Forces who receive treatment for a
covered trauma before discharge from the Armed Forces are later discharged
from the Armed Forces for misconduct.(4)An identification of the number of members of the Armed Forces discharged as described in paragraph
(3) who are ineligible for benefits from the Department of Veterans
Affairs based on characterization of discharge.(5)An assessment of the extent to which members of the Armed Forces who accept a discharge from the
Armed Forces for misconduct in lieu of trial by court-martial are
counseled on the potential for ineligibility for benefits from the
Department of Veterans Affairs as a result of such discharge before
acceptance of such discharge.525.Sense
of Senate on upgrade of characterization of discharge of certain Vietnam era
members of the Armed Forces(a)It is the sense of the Senate that, when considering a
request for correction of a less-than-honorable discharge issued to a member of
the Armed Forces during the Vietnam era, the Boards for Correction of Military
Records—(1)should take into
account whether the veteran—(A)served in the
Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam era; and(B)following such
service, was diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder as a result of such
service after Post-Traumatic
Stress Disorder was included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association; and(2)if
the veteran meets the criteria specified in paragraph (1), should give all due
consideration to an upgrade of characterization of discharge.(b)In this section, the term Vietnam era has
the meaning given that term in section 101(29) of title 38, United States
Code.DMember Education and Training531.Enhancement of authority for members of the Armed Forces to obtain professional credentials(a)
Section 2015 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:2015.Professional credentials: program to assist members in obtaining credentials(a)(1)Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with
respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the
Navy, shall carry out a program to enable members of the armed forces to
obtain, while serving in the armed forces, professional credentials that
relate to training and
skills that are acquired during their service in the armed forces and
translate into
civilian occupations.(2)The program shall provide for the payment of
expenses of members for professional accreditation, Federal occupational
licenses, State-imposed and professional licenses, professional
certification, and related expenses.(b)The authority under subsection (a) may not be used to pay the expenses of a member to obtain
professional credentials that are a prerequisite for appointment in the
armed forces.(c)(1)The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall prescribe regulations to
carry out this section.(2)The regulations shall apply uniformly to the armed forces to the extent practicable.(3)The regulations shall include
the following:(A)Requirements for eligibility for participation in the program under this section.(B)A description of the professional credentials and occupations covered by the program.(C)Mechanisms for oversight of the payment of expenses and the provision of other benefits under the
program.(D)Such other matters in connection with the payment of expenses and the provision of other benefits
under the program as the Secretaries consider appropriate.(d)In this section, the term expenses means expenses for class room instruction, hands-on training (and associated materials), manuals,
study guides and materials, text books, processing fees, and test fees and
related fees..(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 of such title is amended by striking the item
relating to section 2015 and inserting the following new item:2015. Professional credentials: program to assist members in obtaining credentials..532.Authority for Joint Special Operations University to award degrees(a)Chapter 108 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2163 the
following new section:2163a.Degree granting authority for Joint Special Operations University(a)Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the President of the Joint Special
Operations University may, upon the recommendation of the faculty of the
Joint Special Operations University, confer appropriate degrees upon
graduates who meet the degree requirements.(b)A degree may not be conferred under this section unless—(1)the Secretary of Education has recommended approval of the degree in accordance with the Federal
Policy Governing Granting of Academic Degrees by Federal Agencies; and(2)the Joint Special Operations University is accredited by the appropriate civilian academic
accrediting agency or organization to award the degree, as determined by
the Secretary of Education..(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 108 of such title is amended by inserting after
the item
relating to section 2163 the following new item:2163a. Degree granting authority for Joint Special Operations University..533.Enhancement of information provided to members of the Armed Forces and veterans regarding use of
Post-9/11 Educational Assistance and Federal financial aid through
Transition Assistance Program(a)Additional information required(1)Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
enhance the higher education component of the Transition
Assistance Program (TAP) of the
Department of Defense by providing additional information that is more
complete and accurate than the information provided as of the day before
the date of the enactment of this Act to individuals who
apply for educational
assistance under chapter 30 or 33 of title 38, United States Code, to
pursue of
a program of education at an institution of higher learning.(2)The additional information required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:(A)Information provided by the
Secretary of Education that addresses—(i)to the extent practicable, differences between types of institutions of higher learning in such
matters as
tuition
and fees, admission requirements, accreditation, transferability of
credits,
credit for qualifying military training, time required to complete a
degree, and retention and job placement rates; and(ii)how Federal educational assistance provided under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) should be used in conjunction with educational
assistance provided under chapters 30 and 33 of title 38, United States
Code, for
pursuit of a program of education at an institution of higher learning
before using private student loans whenever possible.(B)Information from the Federal Trade Commission that addresses important questions that veterans
should
consider when choosing an institution of higher learning at which to
pursue a program of education.(C)Information about the Postsecondary Education Complaint System of the Department of Defense, the
Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Education, and the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.(D)Information about the GI Bill Comparison Tool of the Department of Veterans Affairs.(E)Information about each of the Principles of Excellence established by the
Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Secretary
of Education pursuant to Executive Order 13607 of April 27, 2012 (77 Fed.
Reg. 25861), including how to recognize whether an educational institution
may be
violating any of such principles.(F)Such other information as the Secretary of Education considers appropriate.(3)(A)In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with individuals who are
experts on the presentation of complex information in formats and manners
that are engaging to members of the Armed Forces and veterans.(B)In carrying out this subsection and presenting information to members of the Armed Forces or
veterans, the Secretary of Defense shall avoid using abstract terms and
shall focus on the practical effects of relevant factors relating to
attending educational institutions.(4)In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs and the Director of the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau.(b)Availability of higher education component onlineNot later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
ensure that the higher education component of
the Transition Assistance Program is available to members of the Armed
Forces on an Internet
website of the Department of Defense so that members have an
option to
complete such
component electronically and remotely.(c)Notice of availability of higher education component upon request for certificate of entitlement to
Tuition Assistance(1)Whenever a member of the Armed Forces requests a certificate from the Secretary of Defense to prove
entitlement to educational assistance under section 2007 of title
10,
United States Code, the Secretary shall notify the member of the
availability of the higher education component of the Transition
Assistance Program online pursuant to subsection (b)(1).(2)The Secretary of Defense shall carry out this subsection with such guidance as the
Secretary considers
appropriate.(d)In this section:(1)The term institution of higher learning has the meaning given such term in section 3452 of title 38, United States Code.(2)The term type of institution of higher learning means the following types of institutions of higher learning:(A)An educational institution described in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 1001(a)).(B)An educational institution described in subsection (b) of section 102 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1002).(C)An educational institution described in subsection (c) of such section.534.Duration of foreign and cultural exchange activities at military service academies(a)Section 4345a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking two weeks
and inserting four weeks
.(b)Section 6957b(a) of such title is amended by striking two weeks
and inserting four weeks
.(c)Section 9345a(a) of such title is amended by striking two weeks
and inserting four weeks
.
EMilitary Justice and Legal Matters541.Ordering of depositions under the Uniform Code of Military JusticeSubsection (a) of section 849 of title 10, United States Code (article 49 of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:(a)(1)At any time after charges have been signed as provided in section 830 of this title (article 30),
oral or written depositions may be ordered as follows:(A)Before referral of such charges for trial, by the convening authority who has such charges for
disposition.(B)After referral of such charges for trial, by the convening authority or the military judge hearing
the case.(2)An authority authorized to order a deposition under paragraph (1) may order the deposition at the
request of any party, but only if the party
demonstrates that, due to exceptional circumstances, it is in the interest
of justice that the testimony of the prospective witness be taken and
preserved for use at a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this
title
(article 32) or a court-martial.(3)If a deposition is to be taken before charges are referred for trial, the authority under paragraph
(1)(A) may
designate commissioned officers as counsel for the Government and counsel
for the accused, and may authorize those officers to take the deposition
of any
witness..542.Modification of Rule 513 of the Military Rules of Evidence, relating to the privilege against
disclosure of communications between psychotherapists and patientsNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 513 of the Military Rules
of Evidence shall be modified as follows:(1)To include within the communications covered by the privilege communications with other licensed
mental health professionals.(2)To clarify or eliminate the current exception to the privilege when the admission or disclosure of
a communication is constitutionally required.(3)To require that a party seeking production or admission of records or communications protected by
the privilege—(A)show a specific factual basis demonstrating a reasonable likelihood that the records or
communications would yield evidence admissible under an exception to the
privilege;(B)demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the requested information meets one of the
enumerated exceptions to the privilege;(C)show that the information sought is not merely cumulative of other information available; and(D)show that the party made reasonable efforts to obtain the same or substantially similar information
through non-privileged sources.(4)To authorize the military judge to conduct a review in camera of records or communications only when—(A)the moving party has met its burden as established pursuant to paragraph (3); and(B)an examination of the information is necessary to rule on the production or admissibility of
protected records or communications.(5)To require that any production or disclosure permitted by the military judge be narrowly tailored
to only the specific records or
communications, or portions of such records or communications, that meet
the requirements for one of the enumerated exceptions to the privilege and
are included in the stated purpose for which the such records or
communications are sought.543.Enhancement of victims' rights to be heard through counsel in connection with prosecution of
certain sex-related offenses(a)Representation by Special Victims' CounselsSection 1044e(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking Accompanying the victim
and inserting Representing the victim
.(b)Manual for Courts-MartialNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Manual for Courts-Martial
shall be modified to provide that when a victim of an alleged
sex-related offense has a right to be heard in connection with the
prosecution of such offense, the victim may exercise that
right through counsel, including through a Special Victims' Counsel
under section 1044e of title 10, United States Code (as amended by
subsection (a)).(c)Notice to counsel on scheduling of proceedingsEach Secretary concerned shall establish policies and procedures designed to ensure that any
counsel of the victim of an alleged sex-related offense, including a
Special Victims' Counsel under section 1044e of title 10, United States
Code (as so amended), is provided prompt and adequate notice of the
scheduling of any hearing, trial, or other proceeding in connection with
the prosecution of such offense in order to permit such counsel the
opportunity to prepare for such proceeding.(d)In this section:(1)The term alleged sex-related offense has the meaning given that term in section 1044e(g) of title 10, United States Code.(2)The term Secretary concerned has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.544.Eligibility of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces for assistance of Special
Victims' CounselSection 1044e(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:(3)A member of a reserve component who is the victim of an alleged sex-related offense and who is not
otherwise eligible for military legal assistance under section 1044 of
this title shall be deemed to be eligible for the assistance of a Special
Victims’ Counsel under this section..545.Additional
enhancements of military department actions on sexual assault prevention and
response(a)Additional duty
of Special Victims' CounselsIn addition to any duties authorized by section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, a Special
Victims’ Counsel designated under subsection (a) of such
section shall provide advice to victims of sexual assault on the
advantages and
disadvantages of prosecution of the offense concerned by court-martial or by a
civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense before such victims express
their preference as to the prosecution of the offense under subsection
(b).(b)Consultation
with victims regarding preference in prosecution of certain sexual
offenses(1)The Secretaries of the military departments shall each
establish a process to ensure consultation with the victim of a covered sexual
offense that occurs in the United States with respect to the victim's
preference as to whether the offense should be prosecuted by court-martial or
by a civilian court with jurisdiction over the offense.(2)Consideration of
preferenceThe preference expressed by a victim under paragraph
(1) with respect to the prosecution of an offense, while not binding, should be
considered in the determination whether to prosecute the offense by
court-martial or by a civilian court.(3)Notice to
victim of lack of civilian criminal prosecution after preference for such
prosecutionIn the event a victim expresses a preference under
paragraph (1) in favor of prosecution of an offense by civilian court and the
civilian authorities determine to decline prosecution, or defer to prosecution
by court-martial, the victim shall be promptly notified of that
determination.(c)Performance
appraisals of members of the Armed Forces(1)Appraisals of
all members on compliance with sexual assault prevention and response
programsThe Secretaries of the military departments shall each
ensure that the written performance appraisals of members of the Armed Forces
(whether officers or enlisted members) under the jurisdiction of such Secretary
include an assessment of the extent to which each such member supports the sexual
assault
prevention and response program of the Armed Force concerned.(2)Performance
appraisals of commanding officersThe Secretaries of the military
departments shall each ensure that the performance appraisals of commanding
officers under the jurisdiction of such Secretary indicate the extent to which each
such
commanding officer has or has not established a command climate in which—(A)allegations of
sexual assault would be properly managed and fairly evaluated; and(B)a
victim can report criminal activity, including sexual assault, without fear of
retaliation, including ostracism and group pressure from other members of the
command.(d)Review of command climate assessments following incidents of certain sexual offensesSection 1743(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113–66; 127 Stat. 979; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by inserting at the
end the
following new subparagraph:(F)A review of the most recent climate assessment conducted pursuant to section 572(a)(3) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112–239; 126 Stat. 1754) for the command or unit of the suspect and the
command or unit of the victim, and an assessment of whether another such
climate assessment
should be conducted..(e)Confidential
review of characterization of terms of discharge of victims of sexual
offenses(1)The Secretaries of the military departments shall each
establish a confidential process, through boards for the correction of military
records of the military department concerned, by which an individual who was
the victim of a covered sexual offense during service in the Armed Forces may
challenge, on the basis of being the victim of such an offense, the terms or
characterization of the individual's discharge or separation from the Armed
Forces.(2)Consideration
of individual experiences in connection with offensesIn deciding
whether to modify the terms or characterization of an individual's discharge or
separation pursuant to the process required by paragraph (1), the Secretary of
the military department concerned shall instruct boards to give due
consideration to the psychological and physical aspects of the individual’s
experience in connection with the offense concerned, and to determine what bearing
such
experience may have had on the circumstances surrounding the individual's
discharge or separation from the Armed Forces.(3)Preservation of
confidentialityDocuments considered and decisions rendered
pursuant to the process required by paragraph (1) shall not be made available
to the public, except with the consent of the individual concerned.(f)Covered sexual
offense definedIn subsections (a) through (e), the term
covered sexual offense means any of the following:(1)Rape
or sexual assault under subsection (a) or (b) of section 920 of title 10,
United States Code (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice).(2)Forcible sodomy
under section 925 of such title (article 125 of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice).(3)An
attempt to commit an offense specified in paragraph (1) or (2) as punishable
under section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice).(g)Modification of military rules of evidence relating to admissibility of general military character
toward probability of innocence(1)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Rule 404(a) of the Military
Rules of Evidence shall be amended to provide that the general military
character of an accused is not admissible for the purpose of showing the
probability of innocence of the accused for an offense specified in
paragraph (2).(2)An offense specified in this paragraph is an offense as follows:(A)An offense under sections 920 through 923a of title 10, United States Code (articles 120 through
123a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).(B)An offense under sections 925 through 927 of such title (articles 125 through 127 of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice).(C)An offense under sections 929 through 932 of such title (articles 129 through 132 of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice).(D)Any other offense under chapter 47 of such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) in which
evidence of the general military character of the accused is not relevant
to an element of an offense for which the accused has been charged.(E)An attempt to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) as punishable
under
section 880 of such title (article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice).(F)A conspiracy to commit an offense specified in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D) as
punishable under
section 881 of such title (article 81 of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice).546.Review of decisions not to refer charges of certain sex-related offenses for trial by court-martial
if requested by chief prosecutorSection 1744(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66;
127 Stat. 981; 10 U.S.C. 834 note) is amended—(1)by striking (c)
and all that follows through In any case where
and inserting the following:(c)Review of certain cases not referred to court-martial(1)Cases not referred following staff judge advocate recommendation for referral for trialIn any case where; and(2)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(2)Cases not referred by convening authority upon request for review by chief prosecutor(A)In any case where a convening authority decides not to refer a charge of a sex-related offense to
trial by
court-martial and the chief prosecutor of the Armed Force concerned
requests review of the decision, the Secretary of the military department
concerned shall review the decision as a superior authority authorized to
exercise general court-martial convening authority.(B)In this paragraph, the term chief prosecutor means the chief prosecutor or equivalent position of an Armed Force, or, if an Armed Force does
not have a chief prosecutor or equivalent position, such
other trial counsel as shall be designated by the Judge Advocate General
of that Armed Force, or in the case of the Marine Corps, the Staff
Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps..547.Modification of Department of Defense policy on retention of evidence in a
sexual assault case to permit return of personal property upon completion
of related proceedingsSection 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125
Stat. 1435; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the
following new subsection:(f)Return of personal property upon completion of related proceedingsNotwithstanding subsection (c)(4)(A), personal property retained as evidence in connection with an
incident of sexual assault involving a member of the Armed Forces may be
returned to the rightful owner of such property after the conclusion of
all legal, adverse action, and administrative proceedings related to such
incident..548.Inclusion of information on assaults in the Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database(a)The Secretary of Defense shall issue policies and procedures for the inclusion of information about
assaults in the Defense Sexual Assault Incident Database, or an alternate
database selected by the Secretary, as identified in restricted reports
and unrestricted reports of sexual assault by members of the Armed Forces.(b)The information required by subsection (a) to be included in the database described in that
subsection shall include the following:(1)The name of the alleged assailant, if known.(2)Identifying features of the alleged assailant.(3)The date of the assault.(4)The location of the assault.(5)Information on the means or method used by the alleged assailant to commit the assault.(c)(1)The policies and procedures issued under subsection (a) shall specify the categories of
individuals who shall have access to information including pursuant to
that subsection in the database described in that subsection.(2)Information derived from restricted reportsWith respect to information so included is derived from restricted reports, the policies
and procedures shall—(A)restrict access to such information to military criminal investigators; and(B)prohibit any disclosure of such information to the public.549.Technical revisions and clarifications of certain provisions in the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 relating to the military justice
system(a)Revisions of article 32 and article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice(1)Explicit authority for convening authority to take action on findings of a court-martial with
respect to a qualifying offenseParagraph (3) of subsection (c) of section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of
the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of
the National Defense Authorization Act of 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127
Stat. 955), is
amended—(A)in subparagraph (A), by inserting and may be taken only with respect to a qualifying offense
after is not required
; and(B)in subparagraph (B)—(i)by striking not
in clauses (i) and (ii); and(ii)by striking , other than a charge or specification for a qualifying offense,
and inserting for a qualifying offense
in clauses (i) and (ii).(2)Clarification of applicability of requirement for explanation in writing for modification to
findings of a court-martialSubparagraph (C) of such paragraph is amended by striking (other than a qualifying offense)
.(3)Victim submission of matters for consideration by convening authority during clemency phase of
courts-martial process(A)Clarification of deadlineParagraph (2)(A) of subsection (d) of such section (article), as added by section
1706(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014
(127 Stat. 960), is amended—(i)in clause (i), by inserting , if applicable
after (article 54(e))
; and(ii)in clause (ii), by striking if applicable,
.(B)Conforming definition of victim with other definitions of victim in NDAA for Fiscal Year 2014Paragraph (5) of such subsection, as added by section 1706(a) of the National
Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014, is amended by striking loss
and inserting harm
.(4)Restoration of waiver of article 32 hearings by the accused(A)Section 832(a)(1) of such title (article 32(a)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as
amended by section 1702(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 954), is amended by inserting , unless such hearing is waived by the accused
after preliminary hearing
.(B)Section 834(a)(2) of such title (article 34(a)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as
amended by section 1702(c)(3)(B) of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 957), is amended by inserting (if there is such a report)
after a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32)
.(5)Non-applicability of prohibition on pre-trial agreements for certain offenses with mandatory
minimum sentencesSection 860(c)(4)(C)(ii) of such title (article 60(c)(4)(C)(ii) of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), as amended by section 1702(b) of
the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 955),
is amended by inserting pursuant to section 856(b) of this title (article 56(b))
after applies
.(6)(A)Article 32 amendments and related amendmentsThe amendments made paragraph (4) shall take effect on the later of—(i)the date of the enactment of this Act; or(ii)December 26, 2014, in which case the amendment made by paragraph (4)(A) shall be made immediately
after the amendment made by section 1702(a)(1) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 954).(B)(i)The amendments made by paragraph (3) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.(ii)The amendments made by paragraphs (1), (2), and (5) shall take effect on the later of—(I)the date of the enactment of this Act; or(II)June 26, 2014, in which case such amendments shall be made immediately after the amendment made by
section 1702(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014 (127 Stat. 955).(b)Defense counsel interview of victim of an alleged sex-related offense(1)Requests to interview victim through counselParagraph (1) of section 846(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 46(b) of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 1704 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 958), is
amended by striking through trial counsel
and inserting through the Special Victims’ Counsel or other counsel for the victim, if applicable
.(2)Correction of references to trial counselSuch section is further amended by striking trial counsel
each place it appears and inserting counsel for the Government
.(3)Correction of references to defense counselSuch section is further amended—(A)in the heading, by striking Defense counsel
and inserting Counsel for accused
; and(B)by striking defense counsel
each place it appears and inserting counsel for the accused
.(c)Special Victims’ Counsel for victims of sex-related offenses(1)Clarification of legal assistance authorized with regard to potential civil litigation against the
United StatesSubsection (b)(4) of section 1044e of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1716(a) of
the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (127 Stat. 966), is
amended by striking the Department of Defense
and inserting the United States
.(2)Addition of omitted reference to Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine CorpsSubsection (d)(2) of such section is amended by inserting , and within the Marine Corps, by the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps
after employed
.(3)Correction of incorrect reference to Secretary of DefenseSubsection (e)(1) of such section is amended by inserting concerned
after jurisdiction of the Secretary
.(d)Repeal of offense of consensual sodomy under the Uniform Code of Military Justice(1)Clarification of definition of forcible sodomySection 925(a) of title 10, United States Code (article 125(a) of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice), as amended
by section 1707 of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year
2014 (127 Stat. 961), is amended by striking force
and inserting unlawful force
.(2)(A)Section 843(b)(2)(B) of such title (article 43(b)(2)(B) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is
amended—(i)in clause (iii), by striking Sodomy
and inserting Forcible sodomy
; and(ii)in clause (v), by striking sodomy
and inserting forcible sodomy
.(B)Section 918(4) of such title (article 118(4) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is amended by
striking sodomy
and inserting forcible sodomy
.(e)Clarification of scope of prospective members of the Armed Forces for purposes of inappropriate and
prohibited relationshipsSection 1741(e)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 977;
10 U.S.C. prec. 501 note) is amended by inserting who is pursing or has recently pursued becoming a member of the Armed Forces and
after a person
.(f)Extension of crime victims’ rights to victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice(1)Clarification of limitation on definition of victim to natural personsSubsection (b) of section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code
of Military Justice), as added by section 1701 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 952), is amended by
striking a person
and inserting an individual
.(2)Clarification of authority to appoint individuals to assume rights of certain victimsSubsection (c) of such section is amended—(A)in the heading, by striking legal guardian
and inserting appointment of individuals to assume rights
;(B)by inserting (who is not a member of the armed forces)
after under 18 years of age
;(C)by striking designate a legal guardian from among the representatives
and inserting designate a representative
;(D)by striking other suitable person
and inserting another suitable individual
; and(E)by striking the person
and inserting the individual
.
550.Applicability
of sexual assault prevention and response and related military justice
enhancements to military service academies(a)Military
service academiesThe
Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that the provisions
of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 950), as amended by the provisions of this
subtitle, and the provisions and amendments of this subtitle, apply to the
United
States Military Academy, the Naval Academy, and the Air Force Academy, as
applicable.(b)The Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that the
provisions of title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014, as amended by the provisions of this subtitle, and the provisions
and amendments of this subtitle, apply to
the Coast Guard Academy.551.Analysis and assessment of disposition of most serious offenses identified in unrestricted reports
on sexual
assaults in annual reports on sexual assaults in the Armed Forces(a)Submittal to Secretary of Defense of information on each Armed ForceSubsection (b) of section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2011 (10
U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:(11)An analysis of the disposition of the most serious offenses occurring during sexual assaults
committed by members of the Armed Force during the year covered by the
report, as identified in unrestricted reports of sexual assault by any
members of the Armed Forces, including the numbers of reports identifying
offenses that were disposed of by each of the following:(A)Conviction by court-martial, including a separate statement of the most serious charge preferred
and the most serious charge for which convicted.(B)Acquittal of all charges at court-martial.(C)Non-judicial punishment under section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice).(D)Administrative action, including by each type of administrative action imposed.(E)Dismissal of all charges, including by reason for dismissal and by stage of proceedings in which
dismissal occurred..(b)Secretary of Defense assessment of information in reports to CongressSubsection (d) of such section is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by striking and
at the end;(2)by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);(3)by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2):(2)an assessment of the information submitted to the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b)(11); and; and(4)in paragraph (3), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this subsection, by inserting other
before assessments
.(c)Application of amendmentsThe amendments made by this section shall apply beginning with the report regarding sexual
assaults involving members of the Armed Forces required to be submitted by
March 1, 2015, under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.552.Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the
Armed
Forces(a)The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain within the Department of Defense an advisory
committee to be known as the Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the
Armed
Forces
(in this section referred to as the Advisory Committee
).(b)The Advisory Committee shall consist of not more than 20 members, appointed by the President from
among individuals (other than members of the Armed Forces) who have
experience with the investigation, prosecution,
and defense of allegations of sexual assault
offenses (such as Federal and State prosecutors, judges, law professors,
and private attorneys).(c)(1)The Advisory Committee shall advise the Secretary of Defense on the investigation, prosecution, and
defense
of allegations of rape, forcible sodomy, sexual assault, and other
sexual misconduct in the Armed Forces.(2)Basis for provision of adviceFor purposes of providing advice to the Secretary pursuant to this subsection, the Advisory
Committee shall, on an ongoing basis—(A)select a representative sample of cases involving allegations of rape, forcible sodomy, sexual
assault, and other sexual misconduct in the Armed Forces; and(B)for each case so selected, review the following:(i)The criminal investigation reports (including reports of investigations that did not substantiate
the alleged offense).(ii)The report on the preliminary hearing conducted pursuant to section 832 of title 10, United States
Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).(iii)Any recommendations of Staff Judge Advocates and the initial disposition authority on the
disposition of such case.(iv)The findings and sentences of the court-martial, if any, or any non-judicial punishment imposed
pursuant to section 815 of title 10, United States Code (article 15 of the
Uniform Code of Military Justice).(v)Any legal reviews that recommended that such case not be referred for prosecution.(d)Not later than January 31 each year, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the Secretary of
Defense, and to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the
House of Representatives, a report on the results of the activities of the
Advisory Committee pursuant to this section during the preceding year.
(e)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Advisory Committee shall terminate on the date that is
five years after the date of the establishment of the Advisory Committee
pursuant to subsection (a).(2)The Secretary of Defense may continue the Advisory Committee after the date otherwise provided for
the termination of the Advisory Committee under paragraph (1) if the
Secretary determines that continuation of the Advisory Committee after
that date is advisable and appropriate. If the Secretary determines to
continue the Advisory Committee, the Secretary shall submit to the
President, and to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the
House of Representatives, a report on that determination, together with
the date through which the Secretary will continue the Advisory Committee.553.Collaboration between the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice in efforts to prevent
and respond to sexual assault(a)Strategic framework on collaboration requiredNot later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and
the Attorney General shall jointly develop a strategic framework for
ongoing collaboration between the Department of Defense and the Department
of Justice in their efforts to prevent and respond to sexual assault. The
framework shall be based on and include the following:(1)An assessment of the role of the Department of Justice in investigations and prosecutions of sexual
assault cases in which the Department of Defense and the Department of
Justice have concurrent jurisdiction, with the assessment to include a
review of and list of recommended revisions to relevant Memoranda of
Understanding and related documents between the Department of Justice and
the Department of Defense.(2)An assessment of the need for, and if a need exists the feasibility of, establishing the position
of advisor on military sexual
assaults within the Department of Justice (using existing Department
resources and personnel) to assist in the activities required under
paragraph (1) and provide to the Department of Defense investigative and
other assistance in sexual assault cases occurring on domestic and
overseas military installations over which the Department of Defense has
primary jurisdiction, with the assessment to address the necessity and
feasibility of
maintaining representatives or designees of the advisor at military
installations for the purpose of reviewing cases of sexual assault and
providing assistance with the investigation and prosecution of sexual
assaults.(3)An assessment of the number of sexual assault cases that have occurred on military
installations in which no perpetrator has been identified, and a plan,
with appropriate benchmarks, to review those
cases using currently available civilian and military law enforcement
resources, such as new technology and forensics information.(4)A strategy to leverage efforts by the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice—(A)to improve the quality of investigations, prosecutions, specialized training, services to victims,
awareness, and prevention regarding sexual assault; and(B)to identify and address social conditions that relate to sexual assault.(5)Mechanisms to promote sharing of information and best practices between the Department of Defense
and
the Department of Justice on prevention and response to sexual assault,
including victim assistance through the Violence against Women Act and
Office for Victims of Crime programs of the Department of Justice.(b)The Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General shall jointly submit to the appropriate
committees of Congress a report on the framework required by subsection
(a). The report shall—(1)describe the manner in which the Department of Defense and Department of Justice will collaborate
on an ongoing basis under the framework;(2)explain obstacles to implementing the framework; and(3)identify changes in laws necessary to achieve the purpose of this section.(c)Appropriate committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—(1)the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.554.Modification of term of judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces(a)Section 942(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended–(1)in subparagraph (A)—(A)by striking March 31
and inserting January 31
;(B)by striking October 1
and inserting July 31
; and(C)by striking September 30
and inserting July 31
; and(2)in subparagraph (B)—(A)by striking September 30
each place it appears and inserting July 31
; and(B)by striking April 1
and inserting February 1
.(b)No person who is serving as a judge of the court on the date of the enactment of this Act, and no
survivor of any such person, shall be deprived of any annuity provided by
section 945 of title 10, United States Code, by the operation of the
amendments made by
subsection (a).555.Report on review of Office of Diversity Management and Equal Opportunity role in sexual harassment
casesSection 1735 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127
Stat. 976) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:(d)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report setting forth the results of the review conducted
under subsection (a)..556.Repeal of obsolete requirement to develop comprehensive management plan to address deficiencies in
data captured in the Defense Incident-Based Reporting SystemSection 543(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public
Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4218; 10 U.S.C. 1562 note) is amended—(1)by striking paragraph (1); and(2)by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (1) through (3), respectively.F561.Medals for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense
who were killed or wounded in an attack by a foreign
terrorist
organization(a)(1)(A)Chapter 57 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1129 the
following new section:1129a.Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks by foreign terrorist
organizations(a)For purposes of the award of the Purple Heart, the Secretary concerned shall treat a member of the
armed forces described in subsection (b) in the same manner as a member
who is killed or wounded as a result of an international terrorist attack
against the United States.(b)(1)A member described in this subsection is a member on active duty who was killed or wounded in an
attack by a foreign terrorist organization
in circumstances where the death or wound is the result of an attack
targeted on the member due to such member's status as a member of the
armed forces, unless the death or wound is the result of willful
misconduct of the member.(2)For purposes of this section, an attack by an individual or entity shall be considered to be
an attack by a foreign terrorist organization if—(A)the individual or entity was in communication with the foreign terrorist organization before the
attack; and(B)the attack was inspired or motivated by the foreign terrorist organization.(c)Foreign terrorist organization definedIn this section, the term foreign terrorist organization means an entity designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the Secretary of State pursuant
to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189)..(B)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 57 of such title is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 1129 the following new item:1129a. Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in attacks by foreign
terrorist organizations..(2)Retroactive effective date and application(A)The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall take effect as of September 11, 2001.(B)Review of certain previous incidentsThe Secretaries concerned shall undertake a review of each death or wounding of a member of the
Armed Forces that occurred between September 11, 2001, and the date of the
enactment of this Act under circumstances that could qualify as being the
result of an attack described in
section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by paragraph (1)),
to determine whether the death or wounding qualifies as a death or
wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign terrorist
organization for purposes of the award of
the Purple Heart pursuant to such section (as so added).(C)If the death or wounding of a member of the Armed Forces reviewed under subparagraph (B) is
determined to qualify as a death or wounding resulting from an attack
by a foreign terrorist
organization as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code
(as so added), the Secretary concerned shall take appropriate action under
such section to award the Purple Heart to the member.(D)Secretary concerned definedIn this paragraph, the term Secretary concerned has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.(b)Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom(1)Review of the November 5, 2009, attack at Fort Hood, TexasIf the Secretary concerned determines, after a review under subsection (a)(2)(B) regarding the
attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, that the
death or wounding of any member of the Armed Forces in that attack
qualified as a death or wounding resulting from an attack by a foreign
terrorist organization
as described in section 1129a of title 10, United States Code (as added by
subsection (a)), the Secretary of Defense shall make a determination as to
whether the death or wounding of any civilian employee of the Department
of Defense or civilian contractor in the same attack meets the eligibility
criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense
of Freedom.(2)If the Secretary of Defense determines under paragraph (1) that the death or wounding of any
civilian employee of the Department of Defense or civilian contractor in
the attack that occurred at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009, meets
the eligibility criteria for the award of the Secretary of Defense Medal
for the Defense of Freedom, the Secretary shall take appropriate action to
award the Secretary of Defense Medal for the Defense of Freedom to the
employee or contractor.GDefense Dependents' Education and Military Family Readiness Matters571.Continuation
of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of
members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian
employees
(a)Assistance to
schools with significant numbers of military dependent
studentsOf the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for
Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301,
$25,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to
local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C.
7703b).
(b)Local
educational agency definedIn this section, the term local
educational agency has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).572.Impact aid for
children with severe disabilitiesOf the amount authorized to be appropriated
for fiscal year 2015 pursuant to section 301 and available for operation and
maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in
section 4301, $5,000,000 shall be available for payments under section 363 of
the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (as
enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–77; 20 U.S.C.
7703a).573.Amendments to the Impact Aid Improvement Act of 2012Section 563(c) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126
Stat. 1748; 20 U.S.C. 6301 note) is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by striking 2-year
and inserting 5-year
; and(2)in paragraph (4), by striking 2-year
and inserting 5-year
.574.Authority to employ non-United States citizens as teachers in Department of Defense Overseas
Dependents’ School systemSection 2(2)(A) of the Defense Department Overseas Teachers Pay and Personnel Practices Act (20
U.S.C. 901(2)(A)) is amended by inserting or a local national who teaches a host nation language course
after who is a citizen of the United States
.575.Inclusion of domestic
dependent elementary and secondary schools among functions of Advisory
Council on Dependents' Education(a)Subsection (c) of section 1411 of the Defense Dependents’ Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 929) is
amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by inserting , and of the domestic dependent elementary and secondary school system established under section
2164 of title 10, United States Code,
after of the defense dependents’ education system
; and(2)in paragraph (2), by inserting and in the domestic dependent elementary and secondary school system
before the comma at the end.(b)Subsection (a)(1)(B) of such section is amended—(1)by inserting and the domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools established under section 2164 of title
10, United States Code
after the defense dependents’ education system
; and(2)by inserting either
before such system
.576.Department of Defense suicide prevention programs for military dependents(a)As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
direct the Secretary of each military department to develop and implement
a program to track, retain, and analyze information on deaths that
are reported as suicides
involving dependents of members of the regular and reserve components of
the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary.(b)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on the programs developed and implemented by the
Secretaries of the military departments pursuant to subsection (a). The
report shall include a description of each such program and the assessment
of the Secretary of the Defense of such program.(c)In this section, the term dependent
means a person described in section 1072(2) of title 10, United States Code.H581.Enhancement of authority to accept support for Air Force Academy athletic programsSection 9362 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (e), (f), and (g)
and inserting the following new subsections:(e)(1)Support received from the corporationNotwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the Secretary of the Air Force may accept from the
corporation funds, supplies, equipment, and services for the support of
the athletic programs of the Academy.(2)Funds received from other sourcesThe Secretary may charge fees for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy. The
Secretary may accept and retain fees for services and other benefits
provided incident to the operation of its athletic programs, including
fees from the National Collegiate Athletic Association, fees from athletic
conferences, game guarantees from other educational institutions, fees for
ticketing or licensing, and other consideration provided incidental to the
execution of the athletic programs of the Academy.(3)The Secretary shall ensure that contributions accepted under this subsection do not—(A)reflect
unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Air Force, any of its
employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any
responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner; or(B)compromise the
integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of
the Air Force, or any individual involved in such a program.(f)(1)The Secretary of the Air Force may, in accordance with section 2667 of this title, enter into
leases or licenses
with the corporation for the purpose of supporting the athletic programs
of the Academy. Consideration provided under such a lease or license
may be provided in the form of funds, supplies, equipment, and services
for the support of the athletic programs of the Academy.(2)The Secretary may provide support services to the corporation without charge while the corporation
conducts its support activities at the Academy. In this paragraph, the
term support services includes utilities, office furnishings and equipment, communications services,
records staging and archiving, audio and video support, and security
systems in conjunction with the leasing or licensing of property. Any
such support services may only be provided without any liability of the
United States to the corporation.(g)Contracts and cooperative agreementsThe Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with the
corporation for the
purpose of supporting the athletic programs of the Academy.
Notwithstanding section 2304(k) of this title, the Secretary may enter
such contracts or cooperative agreements on a sole source basis pursuant
to section 2304(c)(5) of this title. Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title
31, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire
property, services, or travel for the direct benefit or use of the
athletic programs of the Academy.(h)Trademarks and service marks(1)Licensing, marketing, and sponsorship agreementsAn agreement under subsection (g) may, consistent with section 2260 (other than subsection (d)) of
this title, authorize the corporation to enter into licensing, marketing,
and sponsorship agreements relating to trademarks and service marks
identifying the Academy, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the
Air Force.(2)No licensing, marketing, or sponsorship agreement may be entered into under paragraph (1) if—(A)such agreement would reflect
unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Air Force, any of its
employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any
responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner; or(B)the Secretary
determines that the use of the trademark or service mark would compromise
the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department
of the Air Force, or any individual involved in such a program.(i)Retention and use of fundsAny funds received under this section may be retained for use in support of the athletic programs
of the Academy and shall remain available until expended..VICompensation and Other Personnel BenefitsA601.Fiscal year 2015 increase in military basic pay(a)Waiver of section 1009 adjustmentThe adjustment to become effective during fiscal year 2015 required by section 1009 of title 37,
United States Code, in the rates of monthly basic pay authorized members
of the uniformed services shall not be made.(b)Effective on January 1, 2015, the rates of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services
are increased by 1 percent for enlisted member pay grades, warrant officer
pay grades, and commissioned officer pay grades below pay grade O–7.(c)Application of Executive Schedule Level II ceiling on payable rates for general and flag officersSection 203(a)(2) of title 37, United States Code, shall be applied for rates of basic pay payable
for commissioned officers in pay grades O–7 through O–10 during calendar
year 2015 by using the rate of pay for level II of the Executive Schedule
in effect during 2014.602.Inclusion of Chief of the National Guard Bureau and Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the
National Guard Bureau among senior members of the Armed Forces for
purposes of pay and allowances(a)Basic pay rate equal treatment of Chief of the National Guard Bureau and Senior Enlisted Advisor to
the Chief of the National Guard Bureau(1)Chief of the National Guard BureauThe rate of basic pay for an officer while serving as the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall
be the same as the rate of basic pay for the officers specified in
Footnote 2 of the table entitled commissioned officers
in section 601(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law
108–136; 37 U.S.C. 1009 note), regardless of cumulative years of service
computed under section 205 of title 37, United States Code.(2)Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau(A)Subsection (a)(1) of section 685 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (37
U.S.C. 205 note) is amended by inserting or as Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau
after Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
.(B)The heading of such section is amended by inserting and for the Chief of the National Guard Bureau
after Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
.(b)Pay during terminal leave and while hospitalizedSection 210 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—(1)in subsection (a), by inserting or the senior enlisted advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the Chief of the
National Guard Bureau
after that armed force
the first place it appears; and(2)in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (6).(c)Section 414 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—(1)in subsection (a)(5), by striking or Commandant of the Coast Guard
and inserting Commandant of the Coast Guard, or Chief of the National Guard Bureau
; and(2)in subsection (c), by striking or the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
and inserting the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or the Senior Enlisted
Advisor to the Chief of the National Guard Bureau
.(d)Section 1406(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the subsection heading, by inserting Chief of the National Guard Bureau,
after Chiefs of Service,
;(2)in paragraph (1)—(A)by inserting as Chief of the National Guard Bureau,
after Chief of Service,
; and(B)by inserting or the senior enlisted advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or the Chief of the
National Guard Bureau
after of an armed force
; and(3)in paragraph (3)(B), by striking clause (vi).(e)This section and the amendments made by this section
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall
apply with respect to months of service that begin on or after that date.603.Modification of computation of basic allowance for housing inside the United StatesParagraph (3) of section 403(b) of title 37, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:(3)(A)The monthly amount of the basic allowance for housing for an area of the United States for a member
of a uniformed service shall be the amount equal to the difference
between—(i)the amount of the monthly cost of adequate housing in that area, as determined by the Secretary of
Defense, for members of the uniformed services serving in the same pay
grade and with the same dependency status as the member; and(ii)the amount equal to a specified percentage (determined under subparagraph (B)) of the national
average monthly cost of adequate housing in the United States, as
determined by the Secretary, for members of the uniformed services serving
in the same pay grade and with the same dependency status as the member.(B)The percentage to be used for purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii) shall be determined by the Secretary
of Defense and may not exceed 5 percent..604.Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing under
certain circumstancesSection 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31, 2015
.BBonuses and Special and Incentive Pays611.One-year
extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve
forcesThe following sections
of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking December 31,
2014
and inserting December 31, 2015
:
(1)Section 308b(g),
relating to Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus.
(2)Section 308c(i),
relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus.
(3)Section 308d(c),
relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority
units.
(4)Section
308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without
prior service.
(5)Section 308h(e),
relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with
prior service.
(6)Section 308i(f),
relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with
prior service.(7)Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior
Reserve Officers' Training Corps.(8)Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of
normal commuting distance.(9)Section 910(g),
relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members
experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service.612.One-year
extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care
professionals
(a)The following sections of title 10, United States
Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting
December 31, 2015
:
(1)Section
2130a(a)(1), relating to nurse officer candidate accession program.
(2)Section 16302(d),
relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who
serve in the Selected Reserve.
(b)The following sections of title 37, United States
Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting
December 31, 2015
:
(1)Section
302c-1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for
psychologists.
(2)Section
302d(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for registered nurses.
(3)Section
302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists.
(4)Section 302g(e),
relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically
short wartime specialties.
(5)Section
302h(a)(1), relating to accession bonus for dental officers.
(6)Section 302j(a),
relating to accession bonus for pharmacy officers.
(7)Section 302k(f),
relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime
specialties.
(8)Section 302l(g),
relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short
wartime specialties.613.One-year
extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear
officersThe following
sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking
December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31,
2015
:
(1)Section 312(f),
relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of
active service.
(2)Section 312b(c),
relating to nuclear career accession bonus.
(3)Section 312c(d),
relating to nuclear career annual incentive bonus.614.One-year
extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay,
incentive pay, and bonus authoritiesThe following sections of title 37, United
States Code, are amended by striking December 31, 2014
and
inserting December 31, 2015
:
(1)Section 331(h),
relating to general bonus authority for enlisted members.
(2)Section 332(g),
relating to general bonus authority for officers.
(3)Section 333(i),
relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear
officers.
(4)Section 334(i),
relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for
officers.
(5)Section 335(k),
relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health
professions.
(6)Section 351(h),
relating to hazardous duty pay.
(7)Section 352(g),
relating to assignment pay or special duty pay.
(8)Section 353(i),
relating to skill incentive pay or proficiency bonus.
(9)Section 355(h),
relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military
skills or assigned to high priority units.615.One-year
extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and
special paysThe following
sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking
December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31,
2015
:
(1)Section 301b(a),
relating to aviation officer retention bonus.
(2)Section 307a(g),
relating to assignment incentive pay.
(3)Section 308(g),
relating to reenlistment bonus for active members.
(4)Section 309(e),
relating to enlistment bonus.
(5)Section 316a(g), relating to foreign language proficiency incentive pay.(6)Section 324(g),
relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills.
(7)Section 326(g),
relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty
to ease personnel shortage.
(8)Section 327(h),
relating to incentive bonus for transfer between Armed Forces.
(9)Section 330(f),
relating to accession bonus for officer candidates.CDisability Pay, Retired Pay, and Survivor Benefits621.Inapplicability of reduced annual adjustment of retired pay for members of the Armed Forces under
the age of 62 under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 who first become
members prior to January 1, 2016Subparagraph (G) of section 1401a(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 403(a)
of the Bipartisan
Budget Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–67; 127 Stat. 1186)) and amended by
section 10001 of the
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 (division C of Public Law
113–76; 128 Stat. 151) and section 2 of Public Law 113–82 (128 Stat.
1009), is
further amended by striking January 1, 2014
and inserting January 1, 2016
.622.Modification of determination of retired pay base for officers retired in general and flag officer
gradesSection 1407a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in subsection (a)—(A)by striking In a case
and inserting Except as otherwise provided in this section, in a case
; and(B)by inserting during the period described in subsection (b)
after for any period
;(2)by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (d); and(3)by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections:(b)Period covered by determination using rates of basic payThe period described in this subsection is the period beginning on October 1, 2006, and ending on
the last day of the first month beginning on or after the date of the
enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015.(c)Retired pay base for officers retiring after December 31, 2014, who first became members before
September 8, 1980In the case of a covered general or flag officer who first became a member of the armed forces
before September 8, 1980, and retires from the armed forces after December
31, 2014, the retired pay base
shall be whichever is greater of the
following:(1)The retired pay base determined by applicable law at the time of the member's retirement (including
the inapplicability of subsection (a) to the determination of the retired
pay base by reason of subsection (b)).(2)A retired pay base determined as if—(A)the monthly basic pay of the member was the rate of monthly basic provided by law for the member's
permanent grade as of December 31, 2014 (without reduction under section
203(a)(2) of title 37); and(B)the member's retired grade was the member's permanent grade as of December 31, 2014..623.Modification of
per-fiscal year calculation of days of certain active duty or active service to
reduce eligibility age for retirement for non-regular serviceSection 12731(f)(2)(A) of title 10, United
States Code, is amended by inserting or in any two consecutive fiscal
years after the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense
Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2015,
after in any fiscal year after such
date,
.624.Earlier determination of dependent status with respect to transitional compensation for dependents
of certain members separated for dependent abuseSection 1059(d)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking as of the date on which the individual described in subsection (b) is separated from active duty
and inserting as of the date on which the separation action is initiated by a commander of the individual
described in subsection (b)
.625.Survivor
Benefit Plan annuities for special needs trusts established for the benefit of
dependent children incapable of self-support
(a)Special needs
trust as eligible beneficiary
(1)Subsection (a) of section 1450 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended—
(A)by redesignating
paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
(B)by inserting
after paragraph (3) the following new paragraph (4):
(4)Special needs
trusts for sole benefit of certain dependent
childrenNotwithstanding subsection (i), a supplemental or
special needs trust established under subparagraph (A) or (C) of section
1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)) for the sole
benefit of a dependent child considered disabled under section 1614(a)(3) of
that Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)) who is incapable of self-support because of
mental or physical incapacity.
.
(2)(A)Subsection (i) of such section is amended by inserting
(a)(4) or
after subsection
.
(B)Section 1448 of such title is amended—(i)in subsection (d)(2)—(I)in subparagraph (A), by striking section 1450(a)(2)
and inserting subsection (a)(2) or (a)(4) of section 1450
; and(II)in subparagraph (B), by striking section 1450(a)(3)
and inserting subsection (a)(3) or (a)(4) of section 1450
; and(ii)in subsection (f)(2), by inserting , or to special needs trust pursuant to section 1450(a)(4) of this title,
after dependent child
.(b)Section
1455(d) of such title is amended—
(1)in
the subsection caption, by striking and fiduciaries
and inserting
, fiduciaries, and
special needs trusts
;
(2)in
paragraph (1)—
(A)in subparagraph
(A), by striking and
at the end;
(B)in subparagraph
(B), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and
;
and
(C)by adding at the
end the following new subparagraph:
(C)a dependent child
incapable of self-support because of mental or physical incapacity for whom a
supplemental or special needs trust has been established under subparagraph (A)
or (C) of section 1917(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396p(d)(4)).
;
(3)in
paragraph (2)—
(A)by redesignating
subparagraphs (C) through (H) as subparagraphs (D) through (I),
respectively;
(B)by inserting
after subparagraph (B) the following new subparagraph (C):
(C)In the case of an
annuitant referred to in paragraph (1)(C), payment of the annuity to the
supplemental or special needs trust established for the
annuitant.
;
(C)in subparagraph
(D), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, by striking
subparagraphs (D) and (E)
and inserting subparagraphs (E)
and (F)
; and
(D)in subparagraph
(H), as so redesignated—
(i)by
inserting or (1)(C)
after paragraph (1)(B)
in the
matter preceding clause (i);
(ii)in
clause (i), by striking and
at the end;
(iii)in
clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting ;
and
; and
(iv)by
adding at the end the following new clause:
(iii)procedures for
determining when annuity payments to a supplemental or special needs trust
shall end based on the death or marriage of the dependent child for which the
trust was established.
; and
(4)in
paragraph (3), by striking or fiduciary
in the paragraph caption and
inserting , fiduciary, or
trust
.DCommissary and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality Benefits and Operations631.Procurement of brand-name and other commercial items for resale by commissary storesSection 2484(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the subsection heading by striking brand-Name
;(2)by striking may not use
and inserting may use
; and(3)by striking regarding the procurement
and all that follows and inserting for the procurement of any commercial item (including brand-name and generic items) for resale in,
at, or by commissary stores.
.VIIA701.Annual mental health assessments for members of the Armed Forces(a)Mental health assessments(1)Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074m the
following new section:1074n.Annual mental health assessments for members of the armed forces(a)Mental health assessmentsSubject to subsection (d), not less frequently than once each calendar year, the Secretary of
Defense shall provide a person-to-person mental health assessment for—(1)each member of a regular component of the armed forces; and(2)each
member
of the Selected Reserve of an armed force.(b)The purpose of a mental health assessment provided pursuant to this section shall be to identify
mental health conditions among members of the armed forces in order to
determine which such members are in need of additional care, treatment, or
other services for such
health conditions.(c)The mental health assessments provided pursuant to this section shall—(1)be conducted in accordance with the requirements of subsection (c)(1) of section 1074m of this
title with respect to a mental health assessment provided pursuant to such
section; and(2)include a review of the health records of the member that are related to each previous health
assessment or other relevant activities of the member while serving in the
armed forces, as determined by the Secretary.(d)Sufficiency of other mental health assessments(1)The Secretary is not required to provide a mental health assessment pursuant to this section to an
individual in a calendar year in which the individual has received a
mental health assessment pursuant to section 1074m of this title.(2)The Secretary may treat periodic health assessments and other person-to-person assessments that are
provided to members of the armed forces, including
examinations under
section 1074f of this title, as meeting the requirements for mental health
assessments required under this section if the Secretary determines that
such assessments and person-to-person assessments meet the requirements
for mental health assessments established by this section.(e)(1)Not less frequently than once each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on
Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the
House of Representatives
a report on the annual mental health assessments of members of the armed
forces conducted pursuant to this section.(2)Each report required by paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to assessments conducted pursuant
to this section during the one-year period preceding the date of the
submittal of such
report, the following:(A)A description of the tools and processes used to provide such assessments, including—(i)whether such tools and processes are evidenced-based; and(ii)the process by which such tools and processes have been approved for use in providing mental
health assessments.(B)Such recommendations for improving the tools and processes used to conduct such assessments,
including tools that may address the underreporting of mental
health conditions, as the Secretary considers appropriate.(C)Such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for improving the monitoring and
reporting of the number of members of the armed forces—(i)who
receive such assessments;(ii)who are referred for care based on such assessments; and(iii)who receive care based on such referrals.(3)No personally identifiable information may be included in any report under paragraph (1).(f)Any medical or other personal information obtained under this
section shall be protected from disclosure or misuse in accordance with
the laws on privacy
applicable to such information.(g)The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the other administering Secretaries, prescribe
regulations for the administration of this section..(2)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 1074m the following new item:1074n. Annual mental health assessments for members of the armed forces..(3)Not later than 180 days after the date of the issuance of the regulations prescribed under
section 1074n(g) of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph
(1) of this subsection, the Secretary of Defense shall implement such
regulations.(b)Section 1074m(e)(1) of such title is amended by inserting and section 1074n of this title
after pursuant to this section
.702.Modifications of cost-sharing and other requirements for the TRICARE Pharmacy Benefits
Program(a)Availability of pharmaceutical agents through national mail-order pharmacy programParagraph (5) of section 1074g(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by striking at least one of the means described in paragraph (2)(E)
and inserting the national mail-order pharmacy program
; and(2)by striking may include
and all that follows through the end of the paragraph and inserting shall include cost-sharing by the eligible covered beneficiary as specified in paragraph (6).
.(b)Paragraph (6) of such section is amended to read as follows:(6)(A)In the case of any of the years 2015 through 2024, the cost-sharing amounts under this subsection
shall be determined in accordance with the following table:For:The cost-sharing amount for 30-day supply of a retail generic is:The cost-sharing amount for 30-day supply of a retail formulary is:The cost-sharing amount for a 90-day supply of a mail order generic is:The cost-sharing amount for a 90-day supply of a mail order formulary is:The cost-sharing amount for a 90-day supply of a mail order non-formulary is:
2015$5$26$0$26$51
2016$6$28$0$28$54
2017$7$30$0$30$58
2018$8$32$0$32$62
2019$9$34$9$34$66
2020$10$36$10$36$70
2021$11$38$11$38$75
2022$12$40$12$40$80
2023$13$43$13$43$85
2024$14$45$14$45$90
(B)There shall be no cost-sharing amounts under this subsection for prescription medications filled by
military treatment facility pharmacies.(C)For any year after 2024, the cost-sharing amounts under this subsection shall be equal to
the cost-sharing amounts for the previous year adjusted by an amount, if
any, determined by the Secretary to reflect changes in the costs of
pharmaceutical agents and prescription dispensing, rounded to the nearest
dollar.(D)Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (C), the cost-sharing amounts under this subsection for any
year for a dependent of a member of the uniformed services who
dies while on active duty, a member retired under chapter 61 of this
title, or a dependent of such a member shall be equal to the cost-sharing
amounts, if any, for 2014..(c)Refills of prescription maintenance medications through military treatment facility pharmacies or
national mail order pharmacy programSuch section is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(9)(A)The pharmacy benefits program shall require eligible covered beneficiaries generally to refill
non-generic prescription maintenance medications through military
treatment facility pharmacies or the national mail-order pharmacy program.(B)The Secretary shall determine the maintenance medications subject to the requirement under
subparagraph (A). The Secretary shall ensure that—(i)such medications are generally available to eligible covered beneficiaries through retail
pharmacies only for an initial filling of a 30-day or less supply; and(ii)any refills of such medications are obtained through a military treatment facility pharmacy or the
national mail-order pharmacy program.(C)The Secretary may exempt the following prescription maintenance medications from the requirement of
subparagraph (A):(i)Medications that are for acute care needs.(ii)Such other medications as the Secretary determines appropriate..703.Parity in provision of inpatient mental health services with other inpatient medical services(a)Termination of inpatient day limits in provision of mental health servicesSection 1079 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (6); and(2)by striking subsection (i).(b)Waiver of nonavailability statement for mental health servicesSection 721(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (10
U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking (other than mental health services)
.704.Availability of breastfeeding support, supplies, and counseling under the TRICARE programSection 1079(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:(18)Breastfeeding support, supplies (including breast pumps and associated equipment), and counseling
shall be provided as appropriate during pregnancy and the postpartum
period..705.Authority for provisional TRICARE coverage for emerging health care products and servicesSection 1073 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding after subsection (b) the
following new subsection:(c)Provisional coverage for emerging products and services(1)The Secretary of Defense is authorized to provide provisional coverage or authorization of coverage
under this
chapter for health care products and services that have not been
demonstrated to be safe and effective under this chapter as medically or
psychologically necessary to prevent, diagnose, or treat a mental or
physical illness, injury, or bodily malfunction but have been demonstrated
to the satisfaction of the Secretary to be likely safe and effective
health care products or services.(2)In making a determination authorized by paragraph (1), the Secretary may consider—(A)clinical trials published in refereed medical literature;(B)formal technology assessments;(C)national medical policy organization positions;(D)national professional associations;(E)national expert opinion organizations; and(F)such other trustworthy evidence as the Secretary considers appropriate.(3)In making a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary may arrange for an evaluation from the
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies of Sciences or such other
independent entity as the Secretary shall select.(4)(A)Provisional coverage under paragraph (1) for a product or service may be in effect not
longer than five years, but may be terminated at any time before that
time.(B)Prior to the expiration of provisional coverage or authorization of coverage of a product or
service pursuant to subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall determine the
coverage or authorization of coverage, if any, that will follow coverage
or authorization of coverage of such product or service, and take
appropriate action to
implement such determination. If implementation of such determinations
requires legislative action, the Secretary shall make a timely
recommendation to Congress regarding such legislative action.(5)Prompt public notice shall be provided for each product or service that receives an affirmative
provisional coverage or authorization of coverage determination under
paragraph (1)
along with all terms and conditions associated with the determination.
The public notice shall be through the website of the TRICARE program
accessible by the public.(6)All determinations under this subsection to provide, decline to provide, terminate, establish or
disestablish terms and conditions, or take any other action shall be
approved by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs based on
professional medical judgment. Such determinations and actions are
committed to agency discretion and are conclusive..706.Report on status of reductions in TRICARE Prime service areas(a)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on the status of the reduction of TRICARE Prime
service areas conducted by the Department of
Defense.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)A description of the implementation of the transition for eligible beneficiaries under the TRICARE
program (other than eligible beneficiaries on active duty in the Armed
Forces) who no longer have access to TRICARE Prime under TRICARE
managed care contracts as of the date of the report, including the
following:(A)The number of eligible beneficiaries who have transitioned from TRICARE Prime to the TRICARE
Standard option of the TRICARE program since October 1, 2013.(B)The number of eligible beneficiaries who transferred their TRICARE Prime enrollment to a
more distant available Prime service area to remain in TRICARE Prime, by
State.(C)The number of eligible beneficiaries who were eligible to transfer to a more distant available
Prime service
area, but chose to use TRICARE Standard.(D)The number of eligible beneficiaries who elected to return to TRICARE Prime.(2)An estimate of the increased annual costs per eligible beneficiary described in paragraph (1)
incurred by such beneficiary for healthcare under the TRICARE
program.(3)A description of the plans of the Department to assess the impact on access to healthcare and
beneficiary satisfaction for eligible beneficiaries described in
paragraph (1).707.Repeal of requirement for ongoing Comptroller General of the United States reviews of viability of
TRICARE Standard and TRICARE ExtraSection 711 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is
amended—(1)by striking subsection (b); and(2)by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b).BHealth Care Administration721.Department of Defense Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care Fund matters(a)Reenactment and modification of superseded authorities and requirements on payments into FundSection 1116 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:1116.(a)The Secretary of Defense shall pay into the Fund at the end of each month as the Department of
Defense contribution to the Fund for that month the amount that, subject
to subsections (b) and (c), is the
sum of the following:(1)The product of—(A)the monthly dollar amount determined using all the methods and assumptions approved for the most
recent (as of the first day of the current fiscal year) actuarial
valuation under section 1115(c)(1)(A) of this title (except that any
statutory change in the uniformed services retiree health care
programs for medicare-eligible beneficiaries that is effective after the
date of that valuation and on or before the first day of the current
fiscal year shall be used in such determination); and(B)the total end strength for that month for members of the uniformed services under the jurisdiction
of the Secretary of Defense on active duty (other
than active duty for training) and full-time National Guard duty (other
than full-time National Guard duty for training only).(2)The product of—(A)the level monthly dollar amount determined using all the methods and assumptions approved for the
most recent (as of the first day of the current fiscal year) actuarial
valuation under section 1115(c)(1)(B) of this title (except that any
statutory change in the uniformed services retiree health care programs
for medicare-eligible beneficiaries that is effective after the date of
that valuation and on or before the first day of the current fiscal year
shall be used in such determination); and(B)the total end strength for that month for members of the Selected Reserve of the uniformed services
under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense other than members on
full-time National Guard duty (other than for
training) who are not otherwise described in paragraph (1)(B).(b)(1)If during a month a statute is enacted that will have a significant effect on the amounts
calculated for purposes of subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may
recalculate the amount payable under subsection (a) for months in the
fiscal year of such enactment that begin after such enactment taking into
account the effect of such change on the calculation of amounts so
payable. Any such recalculation in a fiscal year shall apply to amounts
payable under subsection (a) for months in such fiscal year beginning
after the change triggering the recalculation.(2)The Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on any recalculation
carried out by the Secretary under this subsection, including the effect
of such recalculation on amounts payable under subsection (a) for months
in the fiscal year concerned beginning after such recalculation.(c)If an actuarial valuation referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a) has been calculated
as a separate single level dollar amount for a participating uniformed
service under section 1115(c)(1) of this title, the administering
Secretary for the department in which such uniformed service is operating
shall calculate the amount under such paragraph separately for such
uniformed service. If the administering Secretary is not the Secretary of
Defense, the administering Secretary shall notify the Secretary of Defense
of the amount so calculated. To determine a single amount for the purpose
of paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (a), as the case may be, the
Secretary of Defense shall aggregate the amount calculated under this
subsection for a uniformed service for the purpose of such paragraph with
the amount or amounts calculated (whether separately or otherwise) for the
other uniformed services for the purpose of such paragraph.(d)(1)At the beginning of each fiscal year the Secretary of the Treasury shall promptly pay into the Fund
from the General Fund of the Treasury the amount certified to the
Secretary by the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (3). Such payment
shall be the contribution to the Fund for that fiscal year required by
sections 1115(a) and 1115(c) of this title.(2)At the beginning of each fiscal year the Secretary of Defense shall determine the sum of the
following:(A)The amount of the payment for that year under the amortization schedule determined by the Board of
Actuaries under section 1115(a) of this title for the amortization of the
original unfunded liability of the Fund.(B)The amount (including any negative amount) for that year under the most recent amortization
schedule determined by the Secretary of Defense under section 1115(c)(2)
of this title for the amortization of any cumulative unfunded liability
(or any gain) to the Fund resulting from changes in benefits.(C)The amount (including any negative amount) for that year under the most recent amortization
schedule determined by the Secretary of Defense under section 1115(c)(3)
of this title for the amortization of any cumulative actuarial gain or
loss to the Fund resulting from actuarial assumption changes.(D)The amount (including any negative amount) for that year under the most recent amortization
schedule determined by the Secretary of Defense under section 1115(c)(4)
of this title for the amortization of any cumulative actuarial gain or
loss to the Fund resulting from actuarial experience.(3)The Secretary of Defense shall promptly certify the amount determined under paragraph (2) each
year to the Secretary of the Treasury.(e)Amounts paid into the Fund under subsection (a) shall be paid from funds available for the pay of
members of the participating uniformed services under the jurisdiction of
the respective administering Secretaries..(b)Such title is further amended as follows:
(1)In section 1111(c), by striking under section 1115(b)
and all that follows and inserting under section 1116 of this title, and such administering Secretary may make such contributions.
.(2)In section 1113(f), by inserting of this title
after section 1111(c)
.(3)In section 1115—(A)in subsection (a), by striking section 1116 of this title
and inserting section 1116(d) of this title
;(B)by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new subsection (b):(b)(1)The Secretary of Defense shall determine each year, in sufficient time for inclusion in budget
requests for the following fiscal year, the total amount of Department of
Defense contributions to be made to the Fund during that fiscal year under
section 1116(a) of this title. That amount shall be the sum of the
following:(A)The product of—(i)the current estimate of the value of the single level dollar amount to be determined under
subsection (c)(1)(A) at the time of the next actuarial valuation under
subsection (c); and(ii)the expected average force strength during that fiscal year for members of the uniformed services
under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense on active duty and
full-time National Guard duty, but excluding any member who would be
excluded for active-duty end strength purposes by section 115(i) of this
title.(B)The product of—(i)the current estimate of the value of the single level dollar amount to be determined under
subsection (c)(1)(B) at the time of the next actuarial valuation under
subsection (c); and(ii)the expected average force strength during that fiscal year for members of the Selected Reserve of
the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense
who are not otherwise described in subparagraph (A)(ii).(2)The amount determined under paragraph (1) for any fiscal year is the amount needed to be
appropriated to the Department of Defense (or to the other executive
department having jurisdiction over the participating uniformed service)
for that fiscal year for payments to be made to the Fund during that year
under section 1116(a) of this title. The President shall include not less
than the full amount so determined in the budget transmitted to Congress
for that fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31. The President may
comment and make recommendations concerning any such amount.; and(C)in subsection (c)—(i)in the flush matter following paragraph (1), by inserting and section 1116(a) of this title
after subsection (b)
; and(ii)in paragraph (5), by striking section 1116
and inserting section 1116(d)
.(c)Effective date and applicabilityThe amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and
shall apply with respect to payments made into the Department of Defense
Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care Fund under chapter 56 of title 10,
United States Code (as so amended), for fiscal years beginning after
fiscal year 2015.722.Extension of authority for Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical
Facility Demonstration FundSection 1704(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2573) is amended by striking September 30, 2015
and inserting September 30, 2016
.723.Department of Defense-wide strategy for contracting for health care professionals for the
Department of Defense(a)The Secretary of Defense shall develop a Department of Defense-wide strategy for contracting for
health care professionals for the Department of Defense.(b)The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)A statement of the responsibilities of each military department and the Defense Health Agency under
the strategy.(2)Mechanisms to consolidate requirements in order to create efficiencies and reduce costs.(3)Metrics to evaluate the success of the strategy in achieving its objectives, including metrics to
assess the effects of the strategy on the timeliness of beneficiary access
to professional health care services in military medical treatment
facilities.(4)Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate.(c)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report on the strategy developed under subsection (a).
The report shall set forth the strategy and include such other matters
with respect to the strategy as the Secretary considers appropriate.724.Program on medication management in the Department of Defense(a)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall commence carrying out a program of comprehensive, uniform medication
management
in military medical treatment facilities.(b)The program required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)An identification of the risks associated with administration and management of medications
(including prescription opioid medications), including
accidental and intentional overdoses, under-medication and
over-medication, and
adverse interactions among multiple medications.(2)Evidence-based best practices for medication management in military medical
treatment facilities, including integration of comprehensive medication
management best practices in patient-centered medical homes.(3)Evidence-based best practices to mitigate medication management risks and to
ensure patient compliance with medication regimens.(4)Evidence-based best practices for medication reconciliation to reduce medication
errors.(5)Various mechanisms for safe and effective collection and disposal of unwanted and
unnecessary prescription medications.(c)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to
the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report setting forth a description of the program
commenced under subsection (a).CReports and Other Matters731.Report on military family planning programs of the Department of Defense(a)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report setting forth the results of a comprehensive
study
of access to methods of contraception approved by the Food and
Drug Administration, contraception
counseling, and related education for all members of the Armed Forces and
military dependents provided healthcare through the Department of
Defense.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)A description and assessment of the extent to which all approved methods of contraception are
available to members of the Armed Forces and
military dependents provided healthcare through the Department of Defense.(2)A list of current Department programs, including programs of the Armed Forces, that provide
comprehensive contraception counseling and education to members
of the Armed Forces and military dependents, including for each such
program, the following:(A)A detailed description of such program, including its intended audience.(B)Any current evaluations of such program.(3)A description and assessment of current Department programs, including programs of the Armed
Forces, that provide contraception counseling and education to members of
the Armed
Forces and military dependents, including an assessment of the following:(A)The extent to which contraception counseling and education is available for members of the Armed
Forces and
military dependents under such programs during annual healthcare exams,
before deployment, during deployment, and on return from
deployment.(B)The extent to which confidential contraception counseling and education is available for members of
the Armed
Forces and military dependents under such programs, including the
locations at which such counseling and education is offered, the
healthcare
professionals responsible for providing such counseling and education, and
the frequency
with which members and dependents may access such counseling and
education.(C)The extent to which contraception counseling and education for members of the Armed Forces and
military
dependents under such programs includes discussions of the unique
physical environment in which a member of the Armed Forces serves and the
impact of
such environment on decisions related to contraception.(D)The extent to which healthcare providers (including general practitioners) who provide healthcare
for female members of the Armed Forces and military dependents through the
Department provide the most current evidence-based standards of care with
respect to methods of
contraception.(4)A description and assessment of the manner and extent to which the Department disseminates to
healthcare providers who provide healthcare for female members of the
Armed Forces and military dependents through the Department clinical
decision support tools that reflect the most current evidence-based
standards of care with respect to methods of
contraception and counseling on methods of contraception, as established
by health agencies and professional organizations such as the following:(A)The United States Preventive Services Task Force within the Department of Health and Human
Services.(B)The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the Department of Health and Human Services.(C)The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.(D)The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.(E)The Association of Reproductive Health Professionals.(F)The American Academy of Pediatrics.(G)The American Academy of Family Physicians.(5)Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Secretary considers
appropriate to improve the availability of, access to, and quality of
methods of contraception, contraception
counseling, and related education for all members of the Armed Forces and
military dependents provided healthcare through the Department of
Defense.(c)In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the Secretary may consult with experts on
women’s
health and family planning from both within and outside the Armed Forces,
including the following:(1)The Health Resources and Services Administration of the Department of Health and Human Services.(2)The Centers for Disease Control.(3)The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.732.Interagency working group on the provision of mental health services to members of the National
Guard and the Reserves(a)Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall, in
consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs, the Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, the Chief of the National Guard
Bureau, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Secretary
of Health and Human Services, convene an interagency working group
to review and recommend collaborative approaches to improving the
provision of mental health services to members of the National Guard and
the Reserves.(b)The duties of the interagency working group convened pursuant to subsection (a) are as follows:(1)To review existing programs that can be used to improve the provision of accessible, timely, and
high-quality
mental health services to members of the National Guard and the Reserves.(2)To recommend new interagency programs and partnerships to improve the provision of such mental
health services to such members.(3)To recommend best practices for partnerships among the
Armed Forces, the National Guard, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the
Department of Health and Human
Services, States, and
private and academic entities to improve the provision of mental health
care to members of the members of the National Guard and the Reserves.(c)In carrying out the duties under subsection (b), the interagency working group may consult with
representatives of academia, industry, and such other relevant
agencies,
organizations, and institutions as the interagency working group considers
appropriate.(d)(1)Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes
the findings and recommendations of the interagency
working group.(2)Appropriate committees of CongressIn this subsection, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—(A)the congressional defense committees;(B)the Committee on Veterans' Affairs and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of
the Senate; and(C)the Committee on Veterans' Affairs and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of
Representatives.(e)(1)Any medical or other personal information obtained pursuant to any provision of this
section shall be protected from disclosure or misuse in accordance with
the
laws on privacy
applicable to such information.(2)Exclusion of personally identifiable information from reportsNo personally identifiable information may be included in any report required by subsection (d).733.Report on improvements in the identification and treatment of mental health conditions and
traumatic brain injury among members of the Armed
Forces(a)Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report
setting forth an evaluation of specific tools, processes, and best
practices to improve the
identification of and treatment by the Armed Forces of mental health
conditions and traumatic brain injury among
members of the Armed Forces.(b)The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)An evaluation of existing peer-to-peer identification and intervention programs in each of the
Armed Forces.(2)An evaluation of the Star Behavioral Health Providers program and similar programs that provide
training and certification to health care providers that treat mental
health conditions and traumatic brain injury in members of
the Armed Forces.(3)An evaluation of programs and services provided by the Armed Forces that provide
training and certification to providers of cognitive rehabilitation and
other rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury to members of the Armed
Forces.(4)An evaluation of programs and services provided by the Armed Forces that assist members of the
Armed Forces
and family members affected by
suicides among members of the Armed Forces.(5)An evaluation of tools and processes used by the Armed Forces to identify traumatic brain injury in
members of the Armed Forces and to distinguish
mental health conditions likely caused by traumatic brain injury from
mental health conditions caused by other factors.(6)An evaluation of the unified effort of the Armed Forces to promote mental health and prevent
suicide through the integration of clinical and non-clinical programs of
the Armed Forces.(7)Recommendations with respect to improving, consolidating,
expanding, and standardizing the programs, services, tools, processes, and
efforts described in
paragraphs (1) through (6).(8)A description of existing efforts to reduce the time from development and testing of new mental
health and traumatic brain injury tools and treatments for members of the
Armed Forces to widespread
dissemination of such tools and treatments among the Armed Forces.(9)Recommendations as to the feasibility and advisability of establishing preliminary mental health
assessments and pre-discharge mental health
assessments for members of the Armed Forces, including the utility of
using tools and processes in such mental health assessments that conform
to those used in other mental health assessments provided to members of
the Armed Forces.(10)Recommendations on how to track changes in the mental health assessment of a member of the Armed
Forces
relating to traumatic brain injury,
post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, and other conditions.(11)A description of the methodology used by the Secretary in preparing the report required by this
section, including a description of the input provided by the entity and
individuals consulted pursuant to subsection (c).(c)In carrying out this section, the Secretary of Defense may consult with the following:(1)An advisory council composed of—(A)behavioral health officers of the Public Health Service; and(B)mental health and other health providers who serve members of the regular and reserve components of
each Armed Force.(2)The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs.(3)The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs.(4)The Secretaries of the military departments.(5)The Chief of the National Guard Bureau.(6)The Secretary of Veterans Affairs.(7)The Secretary of Health and Human Services.(8)The Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.(9)The Administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.(10)The Director of the National Institutes of Health.(11)The President of the Institute of Medicine.(d)(1)Any medical or other personal information obtained pursuant to any provision of this
section shall be protected from disclosure or misuse in accordance with
the
laws on privacy
applicable to such information.(2)Exclusion of personally identifiable information from reportsNo personally identifiable information may be included in any report required by subsection (a).(e)In this section:(1)Preliminary mental health assessmentThe term preliminary mental health assessment means a mental health assessment conducted with respect to an individual before the
individual enlists in the Armed Forces or is commissioned as an officer in
the Armed Forces.(2)Pre-discharge mental health assessmentThe term pre-discharge mental health assessment means a mental health assessment conducted with respect to an individual during
the 90-day period preceding the date of discharge or release of the
individual from the Armed Forces.734.Report on implementation of recommendations of Institute of Medicine on improvements to certain
resilience and prevention programs of the Department of Defense(a)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report setting forth an
assessment of the feasibility and advisability of implementing the
recommendations of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) regarding improvements
to programs of the Department of Defense intended to strengthen mental,
emotional, and behavioral abilities associated with managing
adversity, adapting to change, recovering, and learning in connection with
service in the Armed Forces.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)The Department’s assessment of the report’s findings and recommendations.(2)The Department’s actions taken to implement recommendations in the report.(3)For any recommendations not implemented, the rationale for not implementing those recommendations
in the
report.735.Report on Department of
Defense support of members of the Armed Forces who experience traumatic injury
as a result of vaccinations required by the Department
(a)Not
later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military
departments, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the
House of Representatives a report setting forth the results of a comprehensive
review (conducted for purposes of the report) of the adequacy and effectiveness
of the policies, procedures, and systems of the Department of Defense in
providing support to members of the Armed Forces who experience traumatic
injury as a result of a vaccination required by the Department.
(b)The
report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1)The
number and nature of traumatic injuries incurred by members of the Armed Forces
as a result of a vaccination required by the Department of Defense each year
since January 1, 2001, set forth by aggregate in each year and by military
department in each year.
(2)Such
recommendations as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate for
improvements to the policies, procedures, and systems (including tracking
systems) of the Department to identify members of the Armed Forces who
experience traumatic injury as a result of a vaccination required by the
Department.
(3)Such
recommendations as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate for
improvements to the policies, procedures, and systems of the Department to
support members of the Armed Forces who experience traumatic injury as a result
of the administration of a vaccination required by the Department.736.Comptroller General of the United States report on Military Health System Modernization Study of
the Department of Defense(a)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the
United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the
Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the Military Health
System Modernization
Study of the Department of Defense.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following with respect to the Military
Health System Modernization Study:(1)An assessment of the methodology used by the Secretary of Defense to conduct the study.(2)An assessment of the analysis made by the Secretary to inform decisions regarding
the modernization of the military health system in the study.(3)An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary evaluated in the study the impact on the access
of eligible beneficiaries to quality health care, and satisfaction with
such care, of the following changes in the study in military medical
treatment facilities:(A)Changes in facility infrastructure.(B)Changes in staffing levels of professionals.(C)Changes in inpatient, ambulatory surgery, and specialty care capacity and capabilities.(4)An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary evaluated in the study how any reduced
inpatient,
ambulatory surgery, or specialty care capacity and capabilities at
military
medical facilities covered by the study would impact timely access to care
for
eligible beneficiaries at local civilian community
hospitals within reasonable
driving distances of the catchment areas of such facilities.(5)An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary consulted in conducting the study with community
hospitals in locations covered by the study to determine their capacities
for additional inpatient
and ambulatory surgery patients and their capabilities to meet additional
demands for specialty care services.(6)An assessment of the extent to which the Secretary considered in the study the impact the change in
the structure or alignment of military medical treatment facilities
covered by the study would have
on timely access by local civilian populations to inpatient, ambulatory
surgery, or
specialty care services if additional eligible beneficiaries
also sought access to such services from the same providers.(7)An assessment of the impact of the elimination of health care services at military medical
treatment
facilities covered by the study on civilians employed at such facilities.
(c)Eligible beneficiaries definedIn this section, the term eligible beneficiaries means individuals who are eligible for health care and services through the military health care
system.VIIIAcquisition Policy, Acquisition Management, and Related mattersAAcquisition policy and management801.
Open systems approach to acquisition of systems containing information technology(a)Open systems approach requirement(1)Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), each Major Defense Acquisition Program and Major
Automated Information System, and each other acquisition program the
primary purpose of which is the acquisition of an information technology
system, that enters concept development
after
January 1, 2016, shall use an open systems approach in development to
achieve agility, rapid
capability enhancement, interoperability, increased competition, and lower
costs over the life cycle of the program.(2)Case-by-case exception based on costs and practicalityThe requirement under paragraph (1) shall not apply to an acquisition program if a business case
analysis conducted at a point in development where there is sufficient
design information to conduct an independent life-cycle cost estimate
demonstrates that an open systems approach is more expensive or is not
practically achievable.(3)(A)Commercial off-the-shelf items and systemsThe requirement under paragraph (1) does not apply to acquisition programs that consist primarily
of commercial off-the-shelf
(COTS) end items and systems or modified COTS systems.(B)Urgent or emergent operational need statementsSystems acquired pursuant to urgent or emergent operational need statements
shall not be subject to the requirement in paragraph (1) unless a decision
is made to transition the program to a program of record. In
the event of such a transition, a business case analysis shall be
conducted to consider the life-cycle costs of the program and
determine whether to migrate the system to an open
systems architecture.(b)Not later than January 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall take the following actions:(1)Identify computing environments within the Department of Defense that are sufficiently distinct
to justify the development of specific Technical Reference Architectures
and associated standards necessary to support an open systems approach to
the development of systems utilizing those computing environments.(2)Identify each mission and functional domain within the Department of Defense that is sufficiently
distinct to justify the development of domain-specific services and
associated standards necessary to support an open systems approach to the
development of systems that will operate in that mission or functional
domain.(3)Pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–113; 110 Stat. 783; 15 U.S.C. 272 note) and Office of Management
and Budget Circular Number A–119, form or use voluntary, consensus-based
standards bodies to establish the standards required for each of the
Technical Reference Architectures and each set of domain-specific services
to support open systems approaches.(4)Ensure, in carrying out the actions set forth in paragraphs (1) through (3), that there are not
duplicative or competing Technical Reference Architectures,
domain-specific services, or standards or standards bodies related to such
architectures and services across the Department of Defense.(c)Guidelines for business case analysesNot later than July 1, 2015, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall issue
guidelines for business case
analyses as they apply to decisions regarding the adoption of an open
systems approach, including requirements for comparative life-cycle costs
and opportunities for competition and capability upgrades.(d)Treatment of ongoing and legacy programsNot later than November 1, 2015, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report—(1)identifying all closed systems that are in development, production, or deployed
status as of January 1, 2016, that are or were Major Defense Acquisition
Programs or Major Automated
Information Systems;(2)outlining a process for establishing the priority of
migrating each such system and program to an open system; and(3)including a schedule to review the top half of the prioritized list, conduct a business case
analysis on each program, and develop plans where appropriate to migrate
such programs to an open system within 10 years.(e)In this section:(1)The term domain-specific services means the decomposition of functions and operations in specific mission domains into common
services that systems
operating in those domains would utilize.(2)The term information technology has the meaning given the term in section 11101(6) of title 40, United States Code.(3)The term open systems approach means an integrated business and technical strategy that—(A)employs a modular design, and uses widely supported and consensus-based standards for its key
interfaces;(B)is subjected to successful validation and verification tests to ensure the openness of its key
interfaces; and(C)uses an open system architecture allowing components to be added, modified, replaced, removed, or
supported by different vendors throughout a program's life-cycle in order
to afford opportunities for enhanced competition and innovation while
yielding significant cost and schedule savings and increased
interoperability.(4)Technical Reference ArchitectureThe term Technical Reference Architecture means a system architecture template for a particular computing environment that provides a common
vocabulary for implementations to promote consistency and commonality of
interfaces and interactions between architectural layers.
802.
Recharacterization of changes to Major Automated Information System programs(a)Addition to covered determination of a significant changeSubsection (c)(2) of section 2445c of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in subparagraph (B), by striking ; or
and inserting a semicolon;(2)in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or
; and(3)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:(D)the automated information system or information technology investment failed to achieve a full
deployment decision within five years after the Milestone A decision for
the program or, if there was no Milestone A decision, the date when the
preferred alternative is selected for the program (excluding any time
during which program activity is delayed as a result of a bid protest)..(b)Removal of covered determination of a critical changeSubsection (d)(3) of such section is amended—(1)by striking subparagraph (A); and(2)by redesignating subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C),
respectively.803.Process map requirement for milestone approval of defense business system programsNot later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, Department of Defense guidance
implementing section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, shall be
modified to ensure that in the case of any Major Automated Information
System program subject to such section, the business process
re-engineering efforts required by subsection (a)(1)(A) of such section
provide for defined process maps of the current process using legacy
systems and the new business process supported by the new defense business
system.804.Governance of Joint Information Environment(a)(1)Assignment of Coordinator(A)The Secretary of Defense shall assign a senior military or civilian official to serve as the
assistant to the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense
and Coordinator
of the Joint Information Environment of the
Department (in this section referred to as the Coordinator
).(B)In assigning an individual to serve as the assistant to the Chief Information Officer and as the
Coordinator, the Secretary shall select from among individuals who have
significant expertise
in the following:(i)Information technology planning and program management.(ii)Command and control at the Joint Force level.(iii)The United States Cyber Command’s concept of operations for operating and defending information
systems and networks.(C)The Chief Information Officer shall assign the Coordinator with lead responsibility for the
following:(i)Balancing priorities and risks between efficient network acquisition and operation, effective
execution of military missions through a network, and effective network
defense.(ii)Defining the elements and aspects of the current information architecture in the Department of
Defense that are critical for the transition to the desired Joint
Information Environment end state.(iii)Developing the desired architecture for the Joint Information Environment to an appropriate level
of
detail.(iv)Developing and updating an integrated master schedule for migrating to the Joint Information
Environment, with milestones and critical dependencies.(v)In conjunction with the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, developing and updating
cost estimates and performance measures for the Joint Information
Environment.(vi)Tracking compliance with, and deviations from, objectives, schedule, and costs of the Joint
Information Environment.(vii)Identifying gaps in plans and budgets of components of the Department of Defense that relate to the
Joint Information Environment and
identifying requirements for development and procurement to address those
gaps.(viii)Developing and verifying achievement of open systems architectures for major warfighting missions
of the Department similar to the Defense Intelligence Information
Environment architecture developed under the auspices of the Under
Secretary of Defense for Intelligence for the intelligence mission of the
Department.(2)Establishment of team of experts(A)The Coordinator shall establish a team
of experts to provide advice and assistance to the Coordinator in carrying
out the responsibilities of the Coordinator.(B)The Chief Information Officer, the commanders of the combatant commands, and the heads of the cyber
components of the military departments shall assist the Coordinator by
making available to the Coordinator experts who have operational
experience in or with the following:(i)The office of the Chief Information Officer of the Department or an office of a chief
information officer of a military department.(ii)Joint planning and operations at a combatant command.(iii)The United States Cyber Command or a cyber component of a military department.(iv)Technical aspects of information technology acquisition and cloud computing.(3)Expansion of Executive Committee(A)The Executive Committee of the Joint Information Environment shall include the Director for
Operations (commonly referred to as the J3
) of the Joint
Staff and the Director for Operations of the United States Cyber Command.(B)The Executive Committee of the Joint Information Environment shall ensure that working
groups within the Executive Committee include representatives from the
operational communities responsible for executing military missions.(4)Support by military departments and agenciesThe head of each military department and defense agency shall assign an official to support the
Coordinator and to align component plans and budgets with the objectives
and schedules of the Joint Information Environment.(b)Selection of standard language for representing and communicating cyber event and threat dataNot later than June 1, 2015, the Chief Information Officer shall
select a standard language for representing and communicating cyber event
and threat data that is machine-readable for the Joint Information
Environment from among open source candidates.(c)Assessment of applications used by Department of Defense and estimate of time-phased cloud
computing workload of Department of Defense(1)Assessment of applicationsAs part of the Department's cloud computing migration strategy under the Joint Information
Environment, the Chief Information Officer of the Department shall
identify and prioritize the applications in use in the Department that
should be considered for migration to a cloud computing environment and
determine the following:(A)Whether each of the applications used by the Department can be readily ported to a cloud computing
environment.(B)If an application used by the Department cannot be readily ported to a cloud computing
environment, the cost and time required to enable, either by modification
or replacement, the operation of the application in a cloud computing
environment.(C)Whether it would be cost-effective to enable, either by modification or replacement, the operation
of an application described in subparagraph (B) in a cloud computing
environment.(D)A list of applications used by the Department that should be enabled, either by modification or
replacement, to operate in a cloud computing environment, listed in the
order of priority by which they should be enabled, and a schedule for such
modification or replacement.(2)The Chief Information Officer shall use the assessment conducted under paragraph (1) to develop an
estimate of the time-phased cloud computing workload of the Department for
the purpose of—(A)informing the Department’s cloud computing strategy under the Joint Information Environment
initiative; and(B)to assist commercial cloud computing providers to develop business proposals for the Department.805.Report on implementation of acquisition process for information technology systems(a)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense
for
Acquisition, Technology and Logistics shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a report on the implementation of the acquisition
process for information technology systems required by section 804 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law
111–84; 123 Stat. 2402; 10 U.S.C. 2225 note).(b)The report required under subsection (a) shall, at a minimum, include the following elements:(1)The applicable regulations, instructions, or policies implementing the acquisition process.(2)An explanation for any criteria not yet implemented.(3)A schedule for the implementation of any criteria not yet implemented.(4)An explanation for any proposed deviation from the criteria.(5)Identification of any categories of information technology acquisitions to which this acquisition
process will not apply.(6)Recommendations for any legislation that may be required to implement the remaining criteria of
this acquisition process.806.
Revision of requirement for acquisition programs to maintain defense research facility recordsSection 2364 of title 10, United State Code, is amended—(1)in subsection (b)—(A)in paragraph (3), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting ; and
;(B)in paragraph (4)—(i)by striking prepared by Defense research facilities are readily available to all combatant commands
and inserting prepared by Defense research facilities, including technology issue papers and technological
assessments relating to major weapon systems, are readily available to
Department of Defense components
; and(ii)by striking ; and
and inserting a period; and(C)by striking paragraph (5); and(2)in subsection (c)—(A)by striking this section:
and all that follows through (1) The term
and inserting this section, the term
;(B)by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and moving such
paragraphs, as so redesignated, 2 ems to the left; and(C)by striking paragraph (2).807.
Rapid acquisition and deployment procedures for United States Special Operations Command(a)Requirement to establish proceduresNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
prescribe procedures for the rapid acquisition and deployment of items for
the United States Special Operations Command that are currently under
development by the Department of Defense or available from the commercial
sector and are—(1)urgently needed to react to an enemy threat or to respond to significant and urgent safety
situations;(2)needed to avoid significant risk of loss of life or mission failure; or(3)needed to avoid collateral damage risk where the absence of collateral damage is a requirement for
mission
success.(b)The procedures prescribed under subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)A process for streamlined communication between the Commander of the United States Special
Operations
Command, and the acquisition and research and
development communities, including—(A)a process for the Commander to communicate needs to the
acquisition community and the research and development community; and(B)a process for the acquisition community and the research and development community to propose items
that meet the needs communicated by the Commander.(2)Procedures for demonstrating, rapidly acquiring, and deploying items proposed pursuant to paragraph
(1)(B), including—(A)a process for demonstrating performance and evaluation for current operational purposes the
existing capability of an item;(B)a process for developing an acquisition and funding strategy for the deployment of an item; and(C)a process for making deployment determinations based on information obtained pursuant to
subparagraphs (A) and (B).(c)(1)The process for demonstrating performance and evaluating for current operational purposes the
existing capability of an item prescribed under subsection (b)(2)(A) shall
include—(A)an operational assessment in accordance with expedited procedures prescribed by the Director of
Operational Testing and Evaluation; and(B)a requirement to provide information to the deployment decision-making authority about any
deficiency of the item in meeting the original
requirements for the item (as stated in an operational requirements
document or similar document).(2)Deficiency not a determining factorThe process may not include a requirement for any deficiency of an item to be the determining
factor in deciding whether to deploy the item.(d)The quantity of items of a system procured using the procedures prescribed pursuant to this section
may not exceed the number established for low-rate initial production for
the system. Any such items shall be counted for purposes of the number of
items of the system that may be procured through low-rate initial
production.(e)Annual funding limitationOf the funds available to the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command in any
given fiscal year, not more than $50,000,000 may be used to procure items
under this section.808.
Consideration of corrosion control in preliminary design reviewThe Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall ensure that
Department of Defense Instruction 5000.02 and other applicable guidance
require full consideration during preliminary design review of metals,
materials, and technologies that effectively prevent or control corrosion
over the life cycle of the product.809.Repeal of extension of Comptroller General report on inventorySection 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84;
123 Stat. 2402), as amended by section 951(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 839),
is further amended by striking 2013, 2014, and 2015
and inserting and 2013
.BAmendments to General Contracting Authorities, Procedures, and Limitations821.Restatement
and revision of requirements applicable to multiyear defense acquisitions to be
specifically authorized by law(a)Subsection (i) of section 2306b of title 10, United
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(i)Defense
acquisitions specifically authorized by law(1)In the case of the
Department of Defense, a multiyear contract in amount equal to or greater than
$500,000,000 may not be entered into under this section unless the contract is
specifically authorized by law in an Act other than an appropriations
Act.
(2)In submitting a request for a
specific authorization by law to carry out a defense acquisition program using
multiyear contract authority under this section, the Secretary shall include in
the request a report containing preliminary findings of the agency head
required in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) together with the
basis for such findings.
(3)A multiyear contract may not be
entered into under this section for a defense acquisition program that has been
specifically authorized by law to be carried out using multiyear contract
authority unless the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing, not later than
30 days before entry into the contract, that each of the following conditions
is satisfied:
(A)The Secretary has determined that each
of the requirements in paragraphs (1) through (6) of subsection (a) will be met
by such contract and has provided the basis for such determination to the
congressional defense committees.
(B)The Secretary's determination under
subparagraph (A) was made after the completion of a cost analysis performed by
the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Analysis and such analysis supports
the findings.
(C)The system being acquired pursuant to
such contract has not been determined to have experienced cost growth in excess
of the critical cost growth threshold pursuant to section 2433(d) of this title
within 5 years prior to the date the Secretary anticipates such contract (or a
contract for advance procurement entered into consistent with the authorization
for such contract) will be awarded.
(D)A sufficient number of end items of
the system being acquired under such contract have been delivered at or within
the most current estimates of the program acquisition unit cost or procurement
unit cost for such system to determine that current estimates of such unit
costs are realistic.
(E)During the fiscal year in which such
contract is to be awarded, sufficient funds will be available to perform the
contract in such fiscal year, and the future-years defense program for such
fiscal year will include the funding required to execute the program without
cancellation.
(F)The contract is a fixed price type
contract.
(G)The proposed multiyear contract
provides for production at not less than minimum economic rates given the
existing tooling and facilities.
(4)If for any fiscal year a multiyear
contract to be entered into under this section is authorized by law for a
particular procurement program and that authorization is subject to certain
conditions established by law (including a condition as to cost savings to be
achieved under the multiyear contract in comparison to specified other
contracts) and if it appears (after negotiations with contractors) that such
savings cannot be achieved, but that substantial savings could nevertheless be
achieved through the use of a multiyear contract rather than specified other
contracts, the President may submit to Congress a request for relief from the
specified cost savings that must be achieved through multiyear contracting for
that program. Any such request by the President shall include details about the
request for a multiyear contract, including details about the negotiated
contract terms and conditions.
(5)(A)The Secretary may
obligate funds for procurement of an end item under a multiyear contract for
the purchase of property only for procurement of a complete and usable end
item.
(B)The Secretary may obligate funds
appropriated for any fiscal year for advance procurement under a contract for
the purchase of property only for the procurement of those long-lead items
necessary in order to meet a planned delivery schedule for complete major end
items that are programmed under the contract to be acquired with funds
appropriated for a subsequent fiscal year (including an economic order quantity
of such long-lead items when authorized by law).
(6)The Secretary may make the
certification under paragraph (3) notwithstanding the fact that one or more of
the conditions of such certification are not met, if the Secretary determines
that, due to exceptional circumstances, proceeding with a multiyear contract
under this section is in the best interest of the Department of Defense and the
Secretary provides the basis for such determination with the
certification.
(7)The Secretary may not delegate the
authority to make the certification under paragraph (3) or the determination
under paragraph (6) to an official below the level of Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics.
.
(b)Subsection (a)(7) of such section is amended by
striking subparagraphs (C) through (F) of paragraph (1) of subsection
(i)
and inserting subparagraphs (C) through (F) of subsection
(i)(3)
.
(c)The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the
date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to requests for
specific authorization by law to carry out defense acquisition programs using
multiyear contract authority that are made on or after that date.822.
Extension and modification of contract authority for advanced component development and prototype
units
and modification of authoritySection 819 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2409; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—(1)in subsection (a)—(A)in paragraph (1), by striking advanced component development or prototype of technology
and inserting advanced component development, prototype, or initial production of technology
; and(B)in paragraph (2), by striking delivery of initial or additional prototype items
and inserting delivery of initial or additional items
; and(2)in subsection (b)(4), by striking September 30, 2014
and inserting September 30, 2019
.823.
Conditional temporary extension of comprehensive subcontracting plansNotwithstanding the termination date specified in subsection (e) of section 834 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 (Public Law
101–189; 15 U.S.C. 637 note), the test program authority provided under
such section shall terminate on September 30, 2015, if the Under Secretary
for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics certifies to the congressional
defense committees not later than December 31, 2014, that—(1)the Department of Defense will not be able to transition all participants in the test program to
individual small business subcontracting plans that meet all relevant
requirements contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulation before
December 31, 2014; or(2)participants transitioned to individual small business subcontracting plans do not enhance
subcontracting opportunities for small business concerns.824.
Sourcing requirements related to avoiding counterfeit electronic partsSection 818(c)(3) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law
112–81; 125 Stat. 1495; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—(1)in subparagraph (A)—(A)by striking , whenever possible,
;(B)in clause (i)—(i)by striking trusted suppliers
and inserting suppliers identified as trusted suppliers in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to
subparagraphs (C) and (D)
; and(ii)by striking ; and
and inserting a semicolon;(C)in clause (ii), by striking trusted suppliers;
and inserting suppliers identified as trusted suppliers in accordance with the regulations issued pursuant to
subparagraphs (C) and (D); and
; and(D)by adding at the end the following new clause:(iii)obtain electronic parts from alternate suppliers when such parts are not available from original
manufacturers, their authorized dealers, or trusted suppliers;;(2)in subparagraph (B)—(A)by inserting for
before inspection
; and(B)by striking subparagraph (A)
and inserting clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A), when obtaining the electronic parts in accordance with such
clauses is not possible
;(3)in subparagraph (C), by striking identify trusted suppliers that have appropriate policies
and inserting identify as trusted suppliers those that have appropriate policies
; and(4)in subparagraph (D), by striking additional trusted suppliers
and inserting their own identified trusted suppliers
.825.
Authority for Defense Contract Audit Agency to interview contractor employees in connection with
examination of contractor records(a)Section 2313(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting , interview employees,
after is authorized to inspect the plant
.(b)The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered into after the
date of the enactment of this Act.(c)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
revise the Department of Defense Supplement to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation to implement the amendment made by subsection (a).826.Enhancement of whistleblower protection for employees of granteesSection 2409(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking or subcontractor
and inserting , subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee
.827.Prohibition on reimbursement of contractors for congressional investigations and inquiriesSection 2324(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following
new subparagraph:(Q)Costs incurred by a contractor in connection with a congressional investigation or inquiry into an
issue that is the subject matter of a proceeding resulting in a
disposition as described in subsection (k)(2)..828.
Enhanced authority to acquire certain products and services produced in Africa(a)In the case of a product or service to be acquired in support of Department of Defense activities
in a covered African country for which the
Secretary of Defense makes a determination described in subsection (b),
the Secretary may conduct a procurement in which—(1)competition is limited to products or services that are from that country; or(2)a preference is provided for products or services that are from that country.(b)(1)A determination described in this subsection is a determination by the Secretary of either of the
following:(A)That the product or service concerned is to be used only in support of activities described in
subsection (a).(B)That it is in the national security interest of the United States to limit competition or provide a
preference as described in subsection (a) because such limitation or
preference is necessary—(i)to reduce—(I)United States transportation costs; or(II)delivery times in support of activities described in subsection (a); or(ii)to promote regional security, stability, and economic prosperity in Africa.(2)A determination under paragraph (1)(B) shall not be effective for purposes of a limitation or
preference under subsection (a) unless the Secretary also determines that
the limitation or preference will not adversely affect—(A)United States military operations or stability operations in the United States Africa Command area
of responsibility; or(B)the United States industrial base.(c)Limitation on cost preferencesPreferences provided under subsection (a)(2) shall, to the maximum extent practicable, be other
than cost evaluation factors. No cost preference provided under such
subsection may be more than 15 percent.(d)Products and services from a covered African countryFor the purpose of this section:(1)A product is from a covered African country if it is mined, produced, or manufactured in that
country.(2)A service is from a covered African country if it is performed in that country by citizens or
residents of that country.(e)Covered African country definedIn this section, the term covered African country means a country in Africa that has signed a long-term agreement with the United States related to
basing or operational needs of the United States Armed Forces, as
determined by the Secretary of Defense.829.
Requirement to provide photovoltaic devices from United States sources(a)The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered contract includes
a provision requiring that any photovoltaic devices installed under the
contract
be manufactured in the United States substantially all from
articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured in the
United States, unless the head of the department or independent
establishment concerned determines, on a case-by-case basis, that the
inclusion of such requirement is inconsistent
with the public interest or involves unreasonable costs, subject to
exceptions provided in the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501 et
seq.) or otherwise provided by law.(b)In this section:(1)The term covered contract means a contract awarded by the Department of Defense that provides for a photovoltaic device to
be—(A)installed inside the United States on Department of Defense property or in a facility owned by the
Department of Defense; or(B)reserved for the exclusive use of the Department of Defense in the United States for the full
economic life of the device.(2)The term photovoltaic device means devices that convert light directly into electricity through a solid-stats, semiconductor
process.CProvisions relating to major defense acquisition programs841.Program manager development strategy(a)The Secretary of Defense shall develop a comprehensive strategy for enhancing the role of
Department of Defense program managers in developing and carrying out
defense acquisition programs.(b)The strategy required by this section shall address, at a minimum—(1)enhanced training and educational opportunities for program managers;(2)increased emphasis on the mentoring of current and future program managers by experienced senior
executives and program managers within the Department;(3)improved career paths and career opportunities for program managers;(4)additional incentives for the recruitment and retention of highly qualified individuals to serve as
program managers;(5)improved resources and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating expertise,
and software development expertise) for program managers;(6)improved means of collecting and disseminating best practices and lessons learned to enhance
program management across the Department;(7)common templates and tools to support improved data gathering and analysis for program management
and oversight purposes;(8)increased accountability of program managers for the results of defense acquisition programs; and(9)enhanced monetary and nonmonetary awards for successful accomplishment of program objectives by
program managers.(c)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the strategy developed
under subsection (a).842.Tenure and accountability of program managers for program development periods(a)Revised guidance requiredNot later than 180 days after date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
revise Department of Defense guidance for defense acquisition programs to
address the tenure and accountability of program managers for the program
development period of defense acquisition programs.(b)Program development periodFor the purpose of this section, the term program development period refers to the period before a decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval
in the case of a space program).(c)The revised guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide that the program manager for the
program development period of a defense acquisition program is responsible
for—(1)bringing to maturity the technologies and manufacturing processes that will be needed to carry out
the program;(2)ensuring continuing focus during program development on meeting stated mission requirements and
other requirements of the Department of Defense;(3)making trade-offs between program cost, schedule, and performance for the life-cycle of the
program;(4)developing a business case for the program; and(5)ensuring that appropriate information is available to the milestone decision authority to make a
decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the
case of a space program), including information necessary to make the
certification required by section 2366a of title 10, United States Code.(d)Qualifications, resources, and tenureThe Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each program manager for the program development period
of a
defense acquisition program—(1)has the appropriate management, engineering, technical, and financial expertise needed to meet the
responsibilities assigned pursuant to subsection (c);(2)is provided the resources and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating
expertise, and software development expertise) needed to meet such
responsibilities; and(3)is assigned to the program manager position for such program until such time as such program is
ready for a decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B
approval in the case of a space program).843.
Tenure and accountability of program managers for program execution periods(a)Revised guidance requiredNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
revise Department of Defense guidance for defense acquisition programs to
address the tenure and accountability of program managers for the program
execution period of defense acquisition programs.(b)For purposes of this section, the term program execution period refers to the period after Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a
space program).(c)The revised guidance required by subsection (a) shall—(1)require the program manager for the program execution period of a defense acquisition program to
enter into a performance agreement with the milestone decision authority
for such program within six months of assignment, that—(A)establishes expected parameters for the cost, schedule, and performance of the program consistent
with the business case for the program;(B)provides the commitment of the milestone decision authority to provide the level of funding and
resources required to meet such parameters; and(C)provides the assurance of the program manager that such parameters are achievable and that the
program manager will be accountable for meeting such parameters; and(2)provide the program manager with the authority to—(A)veto the addition of new program requirements that would be inconsistent with the parameters
established in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to
paragraph
(1), subject to the authority of the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics to override the veto based on
critical national security reasons;(B)make trade-offs between cost, schedule, and performance, provided that such trade-offs are
consistent with the parameters established in the performance agreement
entered into pursuant to paragraph (1);(C)redirect funding within such program, to the extent necessary to achieve the parameters established
in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1);(D)develop such interim goals and milestones as may be required to achieve the parameters established
in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1); and(E)use program funds to recruit and hire such technical experts as may be required to carry out the
program, if necessary expertise is not otherwise provided by the
Department of Defense.(d)Qualifications, resources, and tenureThe Secretary shall ensure that each program manager for the program execution period of a defense
acquisition program—(1)has the appropriate management, engineering, technical, and financial expertise needed to meet the
responsibilities assigned pursuant to subsection (c);(2)is provided the resources and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating
expertise, and software development expertise) needed to meet such
responsibilities; and(3)is assigned to the program manager position for such program at the time of Milestone B approval
(or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program) and
continues in such position until the delivery of the first production
units of the program.(e)The Secretary may waive the requirement in paragraph (3) of subsection (d) that a program manager
for the program
execution period of a defense acquisition program serve in that position
until the delivery of the first production units of such program upon
submitting to the congressional defense committees a written determination
that—(1)the program is so complex, and the delivery of the first production units will take so long, that
it would not be feasible for a single individual to serve as program
manager for the entire period covered by such paragraph; and(2)the complexity of the program, and length of time that will be required to deliver the first
production units, are not the result of a failure to meet the
certification requirements under section 2366a of title 10,
United States Code.844.Removal of requirements related to waiver of preliminary design review and post-preliminary design
review before Milestone BSection 2366b(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
adding before the semicolon the following: , or certifies that the program is based on mature technology for which no risk reduction phase
activities are needed prior to Milestone B and provides an explanation of
how design reviews will be accomplished in an appropriate manner
.845.Comptroller General of the United States report on operational testing programs for major defense
acquisition programs(a)Not later than March 31, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on disputes between the Office
of the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation and the acquisition
community over testing requirements for major weapon systems.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall address, at a minimum, the following matters:(1)The extent, if any, to which the disputes described in subsection (a) have been the result of
efforts that require that major weapon systems conduct operational testing
in excess of levels necessary to demonstrate—(A)compliance with program requirements validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council; and(B)effectiveness and suitability for combat, as required by section 2399 of title 10, United States
Code.(2)The extent, if any, to which such disputes have been the result of efforts to reduce potential
testing for major weapon systems below levels necessary to demonstrate—(A)compliance with program requirements validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council; and(B)effectiveness and suitability for combat, as required by section 2399 of title 10, United States
Code.(3)The extent, if any, to which testing requirements or standards established for major weapons
systems as described in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) that were
incompatible or inconsistent with testing requirements or standards as
described in subparagraph (B) of such paragraph, and the impact of any
such incompatibility
or inconsistency.(c)In this section:(1)The term major defense acquisition program has the meaning given that term in section 2430 of title 10, United States Code.
(2)The term major weapon system means a major system within the meaning of section 2302d(a) of title 10, United States Code.D861.Extension to United States Transportation Command of authorities relating to prohibition on
contracting with the enemySection 831(i)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113–66; 127 Stat. 813; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—(1)by striking means United States Central Command
and inserting the following: “means—(A)United States Central Command; and(2)by striking Pacific Command.
and inserting the following: “Pacific Command; and(B)United States Transportation Command, except that the provisions of this section do not apply to
contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements awarded or entered into by
United States Transportation Command that are performed entirely inside
the Untied States..862.
Reimbursement of Department
of Defense for assistance provided to nongovernmental
entertainment-oriented
media producers(a)Subchapter II of chapter 134 of title 10, United States
Code, is amended by inserting after section 2263 the following new
section:2264.Reimbursement
for assistance provided to nongovernmental entertainment-oriented
media
producers(a)There shall be credited to the applicable appropriations
account or fund from which the expenses described in subsection (b)
were
charged any amounts received by the Department of Defense as
reimbursement for
such expenses.(b)The expenses referred to in subsection (a) are any
expenses—(1)incurred by the
Department of Defense as a result of providing assistance to a
nongovernmental
entertainment-oriented media producer;(2)for which the
Department of Defense requires reimbursement under section 9701 of
title 31 or any other provision of law; and(3)for which the
Department of Defense received reimbursement after the date of the
enactment of
the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2015..(b)The table of sections at the beginning of such
subchapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 2263
the
following new item:2264. Reimbursement for assistance provided to nongovernmental
entertainment-oriented media
producers..863.
Three-year extension of authority for Joint Urgent Operational Needs FundSection 2216a(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking September 30, 2015
and inserting September 30, 2018
.IXDepartment of Defense Organization and ManagementADepartment of Defense Management901.Reorganization of the Office of the Secretary of Defense and related matters(a)Conversion of
position of Deputy Chief Management Officer to position of Chief Management Officer
(1)Chapter 4 of title
10, United States Code, is amended by inserting
after section 133 the following new section:
133a.
(a)There
is a Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, appointed from
civilian life by
the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
(b)Responsibility
for discharge of certain statutory position requirementsIn
addition to the responsibilities specified in subsection (c), the Chief
Management Officer
is also the following:(1)The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense.(2)The Performance Improvement Officer of the Department
of Defense.
(c)The Chief Management Officer is
responsible, subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary
of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the role of the Deputy
Secretary as Chief Operating Officer of the Department of Defense, for the
following:(1)Assisting the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Deputy Secretary’s role as the Chief Operating
Officer of the Department of Defense under section 132(c) of this title.(2)Supervising the management of the business operations of the Department of Defense and adjudicating
issues and conflicts in functional domain business policies.(3)Establishing business strategic planning and performance management policies and measures and
developing the Department of
Defense Strategic Management Plan.(4)Establishing business information technology portfolio policies and overseeing investment
management of that portfolio for the Department of Defense.(5)Establishing end-to-end business process and policies for establishing, eliminating, and
implementing business standards, and the Business Enterprise Architecture.(6)Exercising authority, direction, and control over the Information Assurance Directorate of the
National Security Agency.(7)Discharging the responsibilities provided for in chapter 35 of title 44 and section 11315 of title
40 for chief information officers of executive agencies.(8)In addition to discharging the responsibilities specified in paragraph (7)—(A)reviewing and providing recommendations to the Secretary of Defense on Department of Defense budget
requests for information technology and national security systems;(B)ensuring the interoperability of information technology and national security systems throughout
the Department of Defense;(C)ensuring that information technology and national security systems standards that will apply
throughout the Department of Defense are prescribed;(D)providing for the elimination of duplicate information technology and national security systems
within and between the military departments and the Defense Agencies; and(E)maintaining a consolidated inventory of Department of Defense mission critical and mission
essential information systems, identifying interfaces between such
information systems and other information systems, and developing and
maintaining contingency plans for responding to a disruption in the
operation of any of such information systems.(d)The
Chief Management Officer takes precedence in the Department of
Defense after the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics and the Secretaries of the military departments.
.
(2)Conforming
repeal of superseded authoritySection 132a of such title is
repealed.
(3)Section 131(b) of such title is amended—(A)by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) and inserting the following new paragraph (2):(2)(A)The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.(B)The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.(C)The other Under Secretaries of Defense, as follows:(i)The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy.(ii)The Under Secretary of Defense for (Comptroller)(iii)The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness.(iv)The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence.; and(B)by redesignated paragraphs (4) through (8) as paragraphs (3) through (7), respectively.(4)Continuation of incumbent in positionThe individual appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to
serve as the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense
as of the date of enactment of this Act shall serve as the Chief
Management Officer of the Department of Defense under section 133a of
title 10, United States Code (as amended by paragraph (1)), after that
date.(b)Designation of
Deputy Secretary of Defense as Chief Operating Officer of Department of
DefenseSubsection (c) of section 132 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to
read as follows:
(c)(1)The Deputy Secretary serves as the Chief
Operating Officer of the Department of
Defense.
(2)In the Deputy Secretary's role as Chief Operating Officer of the Department of Defense, the Deputy
Secretary shall exercise authority, direction, and control of the Chief
Management Officer of the Department of Defense under section 133a of this
title..(c)Deputy Under Secretary of Defense matters(1)Increase in number of pdusParagraph (1) of subsection (a) of section 137a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking five
and inserting seven
.(2)Codification of restriction on use of Deputy Under Secretary of Defense title(A)Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:(3)The officials authorized under this section shall be the only Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense..(B)Section 906(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (10 U.S.C. 137a
note) is repealed.(3)Conforming amendment for the Vacancy Reform Act of 1998Subsection (b) of section 137a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking is absent or disabled
and inserting dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office
.(4)Amendments in connection with conversion to position of Chief Management Officer(A)Subsection (b) of such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: For purposes of the preceding sentence and paragraphs (6) and (7) of subsection (c), the Chief
Management Officer of the Department of Defense shall be treated as an
Under Secretary of Defense.
(B)Subsection (c) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:(6)One of the Principal Deputy Under Secretaries is the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
for Management.(7)One of the Principal Deputy Under Secretaries is the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
for Information..(d)Redesignation of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs to
reflect merger with Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for installations
and environmentParagraph (9) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:(9)(A)One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations,
and Environment. The Assistant Secretary—(i)is the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics on matters relating to energy,
installations, and environment; and(ii)is the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense regarding
operational energy plans and programs.(B)In the capacity specified in subparagraph (A)(ii), the Assistant
Secretary may communicate views on matters related to operational energy
plans and programs and the operational energy strategy directly to the
Secretary of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of Defense without obtaining
the approval or concurrence of any other official within the Department of
Defense..(e)Elimination and integration of separate statutory sections for certain prescribed Assistant
Secretary of Defense positionsChapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows:(1)Assistant Secretary of Defense for logistics and materiel readinessParagraph (7) of section 138(b) is amended—(A)in the first sentence, by inserting after Readiness
the following: , who shall be appointed from among persons with an extensive background in the sustainment of
major
weapons systems and combat support equipment
;(B)by striking the second sentence;(C)by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraph (B)) the text of
subsection (b) of section 138a;(D)by transferring to the end of that paragraph (as amended by subparagraph (C)) the text of
subsection (c) of section 138a; and(E)by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) in the text transferred by subparagraph (C) of this
paragraph as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.(2)Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and EngineeringParagraph (8) of such section is amended—(A)by striking the second sentence and inserting the text of subsection (a) of section 138b;(B)by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the following: The Assistant Secretary, in consultation with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Developmental Test and Evaluation, shall—
;(C)by transferring paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b) of section 138b to the end of that
paragraph (as amended by subparagraphs (A) and (B)), indenting those
paragraphs 2 ems from the left margin, and redesignating those paragraphs
as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;(D)in subparagraph (A) (as so transferred and redesignated)—(i)by striking The Assistant Secretary
and all that follows through Test and Evaluation, shall
; and(ii)by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and
; and(E)in subparagraph (B) (as so transferred and redesignated), by striking The Assistant Secretary
and all that follows through Test and Evaluation, shall
.(3)Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense ProgramsParagraph (10) of such section is amended—(A)by striking the second sentence and inserting the text of subsection (b) of section 138d; and(B)by inserting after the text added by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph the text of subsection (a)
of such section and in that text as so inserted—(i)by striking of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs
; and(ii)by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (3) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.(4)Repeal of separate sectionsSections 138a, 138b, and 138d are repealed.(f)Clarification of orders of precedence(1)Section 134(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking after
and all that follows and inserting the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense
.(2)Section 137a(d) of such title is amended by striking the Under Secretaries of Defense, and the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of
Defense
and inserting the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Chief Management
Officer of the Department of Defense, and the other Under Secretaries of
Defense
.(3)Section 138(d) of such title is amended by striking the Under Secretaries of Defense, the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of
Defense
and inserting the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Chief Management
Officer of the Department of Defense, the other Under Secretaries of
Defense
.(g)Clarification of policy and responsibilities of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy,
Installations, and Environment(1)Transfer of policy provisionsChapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(A)by adding at the end the following new section:2926.Operational energy activities;(B)by transferring paragraph (3) of section 138c(c) of such title to section 2926, as added by
subparagraph (A), inserting such paragraph after the section heading, and
redesignated such paragraph as subsection (a);(C)in subsection (a) (as so inserted and redesignated)—(i)by inserting Alternative fuel activities.—
before The Assistant Secretary
;(ii)by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (E) as paragraphs (1) through (5), respectively; and(iii)in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated), by striking subsection (e)(4)
and inserting subsection (c)(4)
;(D)by transferring subsections (d), (e), and (f) of section 138c of such title to section 2926, as
added by subparagraph (A), inserting those subsections after subsection
(a) (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph (B)), and
redesignating those subsections as subsections (b), (c), and (d),
respectively;(E)in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by
subparagraphs (B) and (D)), by inserting of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment
after Assistant Secretary
the first place it appears in each such subsection; and(F)in paragraph (4) of subsection (b) of section 2926 (as transferred and redesignated by subparagraph
(D)), by
striking provide guidance to, and consult with, the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense,
the Secretaries of the military departments,
and inserting make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and Deputy Secretary of Defense and provide
guidance to the Secretaries of the military departments
.(2)Repeal of former provisionSection 138c of such title is repealed.(h)Technical and conforming amendmentsTitle 10, United States Code, is further amended as follows:(1)In paragraph (6) of section 131(b) (as redesignated by subsection (a)(3))—(A)by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (H) as subparagraphs (B) through (I), respectively; and(B)by inserting before subparagraph (B), as redesignated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the
following new subparagraph (A):(A)The two Deputy Directors within the Office of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation under section 139a(c) of this title..(2)Section 132(b) is amended by striking is disabled or there is no Secretary of Defense
and inserting dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office
.(3)In section
186—
(A)in
subsection (a), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new
paragraph (2):
(2)The Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.
;
and
(B)in
subsection (b), by striking the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the
Department of Defense
and inserting the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense
.
(4)In section 2222,
by striking the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of
Defense
each place it appears in subsections (c)(2)(E), (d)(3),
(f)(1)(D), (f)(1)(E), and (f)(2)(E) and inserting the Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense
.(5)In section 2925(b), by striking Operational Energy Plans and Programs
and inserting Energy, Installations, and Environment
.(i)(1)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 4 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(A)by striking the items relating to sections 132a, 138a, 138b, 138c, and 138d; and(B)by inserting after item relating to section 133 the following new item:133a. Chief Management Officer..(2)The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter III of chapter 173 of such title is amended by
adding at the
end the following new item:2926. Operational energy activities..
(j)Executive
schedule matters(1)Executive Schedule Level IIISection 5314 of title 5, United States Code, is
amended by striking the item relating to the Deputy Chief Management Office of
the Department of Defense and inserting the following new item:
Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.
.(2)Conforming amendment to prior reduction in number of Assistant Secretaries of DefenseSection 5315 of such title is amended by striking Assistant Secretaries of Defense (16)
and inserting Assistant Secretaries of Defense (14)
.
(k)(1)Any
reference to the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense
in any provision of law or in any rule, regulation, or other record, document,
or paper of the United States shall be deemed to refer to the Chief Management
Officer of the Department of Defense.
(2)Any
reference to the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense
in any provision of law or in any rule, regulation, or other record, document,
or paper of the United States shall be deemed to refer to the Chief Management
Officer of the Department of Defense.(3)Any reference to the Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Operational Energy Plans and Programs or to the
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment in any
provision of law or in any rule,
regulation, or other paper of the United State shall
be deemed to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Energy, Installations, and Environment.902.Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs(a)Single Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs(1)Redesignation of positionThe position of Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs is hereby redesignated as the
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. The
individual serving in that position on the day before the date of the
enactment of this Act may continue in office after that date without
further appointment.(2)Paragraph (2) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:(2)One of the Assistant Secretaries is the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve
Affairs. In addition to any duties and powers prescribed under paragraph
(1), the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower and Reserve Affairs
shall have as the principal duty of such Assistant Secretary the overall
supervision of manpower and
reserve affairs of the Department of Defense..(b)Repeal of duplicative provision(1)Section 10201 of such title is repealed.(2)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1007 of such title is amended by striking the
item relating to section 10201.B911.Modifications to requirements for accounting for members of the Armed Forces and Department of
Defense civilian employees listed as missing(a)Section 1501(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the subsection heading, by striking Personnel
and inserting Persons
;(2)by striking paragraph (2);(3)by designating the second sentence of paragraph (1) as paragraph (2); and(4)by striking the first sentence of paragraph (1) and inserting the following:(1)(A)The Secretary of Defense shall designate a single organization within the Department of Defense to
have responsibility for Department matters relating to missing
persons, including accounting for missing persons and persons whose
remains have not been recovered from the conflict in which they were lost.(B)The organization designated under this paragraph shall be a Defense Agency or other entity of the
Department of Defense outside the military departments and is referred to
in this chapter as the designated Defense Agency
.(C)The head of the organization designated under this paragraph is referred to in this chapter as the designated Agency Director
..(b)Paragraph (2) of such section, as designated by subsection (a)(3), is amended—(1)in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking the official designated under this paragraph shall include—
and inserting the designated Agency Director shall include the following:
(2)by capitalizing the first letter of the first word of each of subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D);(3)by striking the semicolon at the end of subparagraph (A) and inserting a period;(4)in subparagraph (B)—(A)by inserting responsibility for
after as well as the
; and(B)by striking ; and
at the end and inserting a period; and(5)by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:(E)The establishment of a means for communication between officials of the designated Defense Agency
and family members of missing persons, veterans service organizations,
concerned citizens, and the public on the Department’s efforts to account
for missing persons, including a readily available means for communication
of their views and recommendations to the designated Agency Director..(c)Such section is further amended—(1)in paragraph (3), by striking the official designated under paragraphs (1) and (2)
and inserting the designated Agency Director
; and(2)in paragraphs (4) and (5), by striking The designated official
and inserting The designated Agency Director
.(d)Such section is further amended by striking paragraph (6).(e)Public-private partnerships and other forms of supportChapter 76 of such title is amended by inserting after section 1501 the following new section:1501a.Public-private partnerships; other forms of support(a)Public-private partnershipsThe Secretary of Defense may enter into arrangements known as public-private partnerships with
appropriate entities outside the Government for the purposes of
facilitating the activities of the designated Defense Agency. The
Secretary may only partner with foreign governments or foreign entities
with the concurrence of the Secretary of State. Any such arrangement shall
be entered into in accordance with authorities provided under this section
or any other authority otherwise available to the Secretary. Regulations
prescribed under subsection (f)(1) shall include provisions for the
establishment and implementation of such partnerships.(b)Acceptance of voluntary personal servicesThe Secretary of Defense may accept voluntary services to facilitate accounting for missing persons
in the same manner as the Secretary of a military department may accept
such services under section 1588(a)(9) of this title.(c)Cooperative agreements and grants(1)The Secretary of Defense may enter into a cooperative agreement with, or make a grant to, a private
entity for purposes related to support of the activities of the designated
Defense Agency.(2)Inapplicability of certain contract requirementsNotwithstanding
section 2304(k) of this title, the Secretary may enter such cooperative
agreements or grants on a sole source basis pursuant to section 2304(c)(5)
of this title.(d)Use of department of defense personal propertyThe Secretary may allow a private entity to use, at no cost, personal property of the Department of
Defense to assist the entity in supporting the activities of the
designated Defense Agency.(e)(1)The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to implement this section.(2)Such regulations shall provide that acceptance of a gift (including a gift
of services) or use of a gift under this section may not occur if the
nature or circumstances of the acceptance or use would
compromise the integrity, or the appearance of integrity, of any program
of the Department of Defense or any individual involved in such program.(f)In this section:(1)The term cooperative agreement means an authorized cooperative agreement as described in section 6305 of title 31.(2)The term grant means an authorized grant as described in section 6304 of title 31..(f)Section 1505 conforming amendmentsSection 1505(c) of such title is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by striking the office established under section 1501 of this title
and inserting the designated Agency Director
; and(2)in paragraphs (2) and (3), by striking head of the office established under section 1501 of this title
and inserting designated Agency Director
.(g)Section 1509 of such title is amended—(1)in subsection (b)—(A)in the subsection heading, by striking Process
;(B)in paragraph (1), by striking POW/MIA accounting community
and inserting through the designated Agency Director
;(C)by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph (2):(2)(A)The Secretary shall assign or detail to the designated Defense Agency on a full-time basis a senior
medical examiner from the personnel of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner
System. The primary duties of the medical examiner so assigned or detailed
shall include the identification of remains in support of the function of
the designated Agency Director to account for unaccounted for persons
covered by subsection (a).(B)In carrying out functions under this chapter, the medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall
report to the designated Agency Director.(C)The medical examiner so assigned or detailed shall—(i)exercise scientific identification authority;(ii)establish identification and laboratory policy consistent with the Armed Forces Medical Examiner
System; and(iii)advise the designated Agency Director on forensic science disciplines.(D)Nothing in this chapter shall be interpreted as affecting the authority of the Armed Forces Medical
Examiner under section 1471 of this title..(2)in subsection (d)—(A)in the subsection heading, by inserting ; Centralized database
after Files
; and(B)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(4)The Secretary of Defense shall establish and maintain a single centralized database and case
management system containing information on all missing persons for whom a
file has been established under this subsection. The database and case
management system shall be accessible to all elements of the Department of
Defense involved in the search, recovery, identification, and
communications phases of the program established by this section.; and(3)in subsection (f)—(A)in paragraph (1)—(i)by striking establishing and
; and(ii)by striking Secretary of Defense shall coordinate
and inserting designated Agency Director shall ensure coordination
;(B)in paragraph (2)—(i)by inserting staff
after National Security Council
; and(ii)by striking POW/MIA accounting community
; and(C)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(3)In carrying out the program, the designated Agency Director shall coordinate all external
communications and events associated with the program..(h)Technical and conforming amendments(1)Cross-reference correctionSection 1513(1) of such title is amended in the last sentence by striking subsection (b)
and inserting subsection (c)
.(2)The heading of section 1509 of such title is amended to read as follows:1509.Program to resolve missing person cases.(3)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 76 of such title is amended—(A)by inserting after the item relating to section 1501 the following new item:1501a. Public-private partnerships; other forms of support.
; and(B)in the item relating to section 1509, by striking preenactment
.XA1001.General
transfer authority
(a)Authority To
transfer authorizations
(1)Upon
determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the
national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made
available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2015
between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions
thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be
available for the same purposes as the authorization to which
transferred.
(2)Except
as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the
Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed
$5,000,000,000.
(3)Exception for
transfers between military personnel authorizationsA transfer of
funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be
counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).
(b)The
authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—
(1)may
only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than
the items from which authority is transferred; and
(2)may
not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization
by Congress.
(c)Effect on
authorization amountsA transfer made from one account to another
under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount
authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount
equal to the amount transferred.
(d)The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each
transfer made under subsection (a).1002.National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund(a)Chapter 131 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2218 the
following new section:2218a.National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund(a)There is established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund
.(b)The Secretary of Defense shall administer the Fund consistent with the provisions of this section.(c)Funds in the Fund shall be available for obligation and expenditure only for construction
(including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of
national
sea-based deterrence vessels.(d)There shall be deposited in the Fund all funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for
construction (including design of vessels), purchase, alteration, and
conversion of national
sea-based deterrence vessels.(e)The construction, purchase, alteration, or conversion of national sea-based deterrence
vessels with funds in the Fund pursuant to subsection (c) shall be
conducted in United States shipyards.(f)Expiration of funds after 5 yearsNo part of an appropriation that is deposited in the Fund pursuant to subsection (d) shall
remain available for obligation more than five years after the end of
fiscal year for which appropriated except to the extent specifically
provided by law.(g)Budget requests submitted to Congress for the Fund shall separately identify the amount requested
for programs, projects, and activities for construction (including design
of
vessels), purchase, alteration, and conversion of national
sea-based deterrence vessels.(h)In this section:(1)The term Fund means the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund established by subsection (a).(2)The term national sea-based deterrence vessel means any vessel owned, operated, or controlled by the Department of Defense that carries
operational intercontinental ballistic missiles..(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 2218 the following new item:2218a. National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund..1003.Sense of Senate on sequestration(a)The Senate makes the following findings:(1)The budget of the President for fiscal year 2015, as submitted to Congress pursuant to section
1105 of title 31, United States Code, provides for significant reductions
to the military force structure and in military compensation over the
course of the future-years defense program, including proposals to
restrict pay
raises for members of the Armed Forces below the rate of inflation, freeze
pay for general and flag officers, reduce the growth of housing allowances
by requiring members of the Armed Forces to pay 5 percent out-of-pocket
for housing costs, reduce appropriated fund subsidies to the defense
commissaries, make significant changes to benefits under the TRICARE
program, reduce
the end strength of the Army by more than 60,000, retire the A–10 and U–2
aircraft of the Air Force, inactivate half of the cruiser fleet of the
Navy, and reduce the size of the helicopter fleet of the Army by 25
percent
and terminate the Ground Combat Vehicle program of the Army.(2)These proposed reductions are the result of the budget caps enacted by Congress in the
Budget Control Act of 2011 and reaffirmed (with some relief for fiscal
years 2014 and 2015) in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2014, which cut more
than $900,000,000,000 from the planned Department of Defense budget over a
period of ten years. Under these budget caps, the Department of Defense
budget is unchanged from the funding level in fiscal years 2013 and 2014,
and remains more than $30,000,000,000 below the funding provided to the
Department in fiscal years 2010, 2011, and 2012. In inflation-adjusted
terms, the drop
is even greater, with a reduction of $75,000,000,000 since fiscal year
2010
and virtually no projected growth in inflation-adjusted dollars through
the balance of the future-years defense program.(3)If the budget caps remain unchanged for fiscal year 2016 and beyond, the Department of Defense will
be required to make even deeper cuts, including an additional reduction of
60,000 in the end strength of the Army, the retirement of the entire KC–10
tanker aircraft fleet and the Global Hawk Block 40 fleet, reduced
purchases of Joint Strike Fighters and unmanned aerial vehicles, the
inactivation of additional naval vessels, reduced purchases of destroyers,
and the elimination of an aircraft carrier and a carrier air wing. Senior
civilian and military leaders of the Department of Defense have testified
that if these additional reductions are carried out, the United States
Armed Forces will not be able to carry out the National Defense Strategy.(4)The budget of the President for fiscal year 2015 proposes to add $115,000,000,000 to the budget
caps of the Department of Defense for the four fiscal years starting in
fiscal year 2016 in order to avoid the need to make the additional cuts
described in paragraph (3). The budget proposes to add an equal amount to
the budget caps for the non-defense agencies of the Federal Government in
order to ensure that such agencies can continue to meet their obligation
to protect and promote public safety, health, education, justice,
transportation, the environment, and other domestic needs.(b)It is the sense of the Senate that—(1)leaving the budget caps described in subsection (a)(2) for fiscal year 2016 and beyond unchanged
would require cuts that would seriously undermine the ability of the
Department of Defense to carry out its national security mission and
reduce the ability of other Federal Government agencies to adequately
address non-defense priorities; and(2)Congress should avoid these adverse impacts to the national interests of the United States by
enacting deficit-neutral legislation to increase the budget caps, offset
by a bipartisan comprehensive package.B1011.Extension of authority to support unified counter-drug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia(a)Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005
(Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section
1011(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public Law 113–66; 126 Stat. 843), is further amended—(1)in subsection (a), by striking 2014
and inserting 2017
; and(2)in subsection (c), by striking 2014
and inserting 2017
.(b)Notice to Congress on assistanceNot later than 15 days before providing assistance under section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by
subsection (a)) using funds available for fiscal year 2015, 2016, or 2017,
the Secretary
of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice
setting forth the assistance to be provided, including the types of such
assistance, the budget for such assistance, and the anticipated completion
date and duration of the provision of such assistance.1012.Extension and modification of authority for joint task forces supporting law enforcement agencies
conducting activities to
counter transnational organized crime to support law enforcement agencies
conducting counter-terrorism activities(a)Subsection (a) of section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (10
U.S.C. 371 note) is amended by inserting or activities to counter transnational organized crime
after counter-drug activities
.(b)Subsection (b) of such section is amended—(1)by striking fiscal year 2015
and inserting fiscal year 2020
;(2)by inserting for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities that are
after funds
; and(3)by inserting or activities to counter transnational organized crime
after counter-drug activities
.(c)Subsection (c) of such section is amended—(1)in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—(A)by striking after 2008
; and(B)by striking Congress
and inserting the congressional defense committees
;(2)in paragraph (1)—(A)by inserting , counter-transnational organized crime,
after counter-drug
the first place it appears; and(B)by inserting or funds to counter transnational organized crime
after counter-drug funds
;(3)in paragraph (2), by inserting before the period the following: , and a description of the objectives of such support
; and(4)in paragraph (3), by inserting before the period the following: or operations to counter transnational organized crime
.(d)Subsection (d)(2) of such section is amended—(1)in subparagraph (A)—(A)by inserting or funds to counter transnational organized crime
after counter-drug funds
; and(B)by inserting or activities to counter transnational organized crime, as applicable,
after counter-drug activities
;(2)in subparagraph (B)—(A)by striking vital to
and inserting in
;(B)by striking Congress
and inserting the congressional defense committees
; and(C)by inserting before the period at the end of the second sentence the following: , together with a description of the national security interests associated with the support
covered by such waiver
; and(3)by striking subparagraph (C).(e)Counter-illicit trafficking activitiesSuch section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:(e)Support for counter-illicit trafficking activities(1)In addition to any support authorized by subsection (a), a joint task force of the Department
described in that subsection may also provide, subject to all applicable
laws and regulations, support to law enforcement agencies conducting
counter-illicit trafficking activities.(2)Illicit trafficking definedIn this subsection, the term illicit trafficking means the trafficking of money, goods, or value gained from illegal activities, including human
trafficking, illegal trade in natural resources and wildlife, trade in
illegal drugs and weapons, illicit financial flows, and other forms of
illicit activities determined by the Secretary of Defense to directly
benefit organizations that have been determined to be a security threat to
the United States..1013.Extension of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign
governments(a)Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998
(Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section
1013(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 844), is further amended by striking September 30, 2016
and inserting September 30, 2020
.(b)Subsection (e) of such section 1033 (111 Stat. 1882), as most recently amended by section 1013(b)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat.
844), is further amended to read as follows:(e)Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2014 in which the
authority under this section is in effect for drug interdiction and
counter-drug activities, an amount not to exceed $125,000,000 shall be
available in such fiscal year for the provision of support under this
section..1014.Extension and modification of authority of Department of Defense to provide additional support for
counterdrug activities of other governmental agencies(a)Subsection (a) of section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10
U.S.C. 374 note) is amended by striking 2014
and inserting 2020
.(b)Expansion of authority To include activities To counter transnational organized crimeSuch section is further amended—(1)by inserting or activities to counter transnational organized crime
after counter-drug activities
each place it appears;(2)in subsection (a)(3), by inserting or responsibilities for countering transnational organized crime
after counter-drug responsibilities
; and(3)in subsection (b)(5), by inserting or counter-transnational organized crime
after Counter-drug
.(c)Notice to Congress on facilities projectsSubsection (h)(2) of such section is amended by striking $500,000
and inserting $250,000
.(d)The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:1004.Additional support for counter-drug activities and activities to counter transnational organized
crime.CNaval Vessels and Shipyards1021.Limitation on use of funds for inactivation of U.S.S. George WashingtonNo funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for the Navy may be obligated or expended to conduct tasks connected to
the inactivation of the U.S.S. George Washington (CVN–73) unless such
tasks are identical to tasks that would be necessary to conduct a
refueling and complex overhaul of the vessel.1022.Availability of funds for retirement or inactivation of Ticonderoga class cruisers or dock landing
ships(a)Limitation on availability of funds(1)Except as otherwise provided in this section, none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or
otherwise
made available for the Department of Defense by this Act or the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) may be
obligated or expended
to retire, prepare to retire, inactivate, or place in storage a cruiser or
dock landing ship.(2)Funds in the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment
Fund (SMOSF) may be used only for 11 Ticonderoga-class cruisers (CG 63
through CG 73) and 3 dock landing ships (LSD 41, LSD 42, and LSD 46). The
Secretary of the Navy may use such funds only to man, operate, equip,
sustain, and modernize
such vessels.(b)Phased modernization of Ticonderoga class cruisers and dock landing shipsThe Secretary of the Navy shall retain 22 Ticonderoga-class cruisers (CGs) and 12 Whidbey
Island/Harpers Ferry-class dock landing ships (LSDs) until the end of
their expected service lives, as follows:(1)The naval combat forces of the Navy shall include not less than 11 operational cruisers (CG 52
through CG 62) and 11 operational dock landing ships (all members of the
LSD 41 class, except LSD 41, LSD, 42 and LSD 46). For purposes of this
paragraph, a cruiser or dock landing ship is operational if such
vessel is available for worldwide deployment other than during
routine or scheduled maintenance or repair.(2)The Secretary may conduct phased modernization of the cruisers and dock landing ships for
which funds in the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment
Fund are authorized to be available pursuant to subsection (a)(2). During
a phased modernization period, the
Secretary may reduce manning on such vessels to the minimal level
necessary to
ensure the safety and security of such vessels and to retain critical
skills.(3)End of service and transition from phased modernization to operational forcesCruisers covered by paragraph (1) may only be decommissioned when replaced by one of the cruisers
for which the Navy has conducted a
phased modernization using funds in the Ship, Modernization, Operations,
and Sustainment
Fund as described in paragraph (2). After being reintroduced into the
operational fleet, the cruisers modernized as described in paragraph (2)
may be decommissioned individually upon reaching the end of their expected
service life, excluding time
spent in a phased modernization status under paragraph (2). After being
reintroduced into the operational fleet, the dock landing ships modernized
as described in paragraph (2) may
be decommissioned upon reaching the end of their expected service life,
excluded time spent in a phased modernization status under paragraph (2).(c)Requirements and limitations on phased modernization(1)During the period of phased modernization under subsection (b)(2) of the vessels specified in
subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of
the Navy shall—(A)continue to maintain the vessels in a manner that will ensure the ability of the vessels to
reenter the
operational fleet;(B)conduct planning activities to ensure scheduled and deferred maintenance and modernization work
items are identified and included in maintenance availability work
packages;(C)conduct hull, mechanical, and electrical (HM&E) and combat system modernization necessary to achieve a service life of 40 years;(D)in the case of the cruisers, schedule completion of maintenance and modernization, including
required testing
and crew training, to replace on a one-for-one basis, active cruisers that
will be decommissioned upon reaching the end of their expected service
life;(E)ensure adequate funds are available to execute phased modernization activities for all the vessels.(2)During the period of phased modernization under subsection (b)(2) of the vessels specified in
subsection (a)(2), the Secretary may not—(A)permit removal or cannibalization of equipment or systems to support operational vessels, other
than—(i)rotatable pool equipment; and(ii)equipment or systems necessary to support
urgent operational requirements (but only with the approval of the
Secretary of
Defense); or(B)make any irreversible modifications that will prohibit the vessel from reentering the operational
fleet.(d)Authority To enter into economic order quantity contractsThe Secretary of the Navy may enter into a so-called economic order quantity
contracts with private shipyards for ship maintenance and modernization, and with private industry
for equipment procurement for the phased modernization under subsection
(b)(2) of the vessels specified in subsection (a)(2).(e)(1)At the same time as the submittal to Congress of the budget of the President under section 1105 of
title 31, United States, for each fiscal year in which activities under
the phased modernization of vessels will be carried out under this
section, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional
defense committees a written report on
the status of the phased modernization of vessels under this section.(2)Each report under this subsection shall include the following:(A)The status of phased modernization efforts, including availability schedules, equipment procurement
schedules, and by-fiscal year funding requirements.(B)The readiness, and operational and manning status of each vessel to be undergoing phased
modernization under this section during the fiscal year covered by such
report.(C)The current material condition assessment for each such vessel.(D)A list of rotatable pool equipment that is identified across the whole class of cruisers to support
operations on a continuing basis.(E)A list of equipment, other than rotatable pool equipment and components incidental to performing
maintenance, removed from each such vessel, including a justification for
the
removal, the disposition of the equipment, and plan for restoration of the
equipment.(F)A detailed plan for obligations and expenditures by vessel for the fiscal year beginning in the
year of such report, and
projections of obligations by vessel by fiscal year for the remaining time
a vessel
is in the phased modernization program.(G)A statement of the funding required during the fiscal year beginning in the year of such report to
ensure the Ship, Modernization, Operations, and Sustainment
Fund account has adequate resources to execute the plan under subparagraph
(F) in the execution fiscal year and the following
fiscal year.
(3)Notice on variance from planNot later than 30 days before executing any material deviation from a plan under paragraph (2)(F)
for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall notify the
congressional defense
committees in writing of such deviation from the plan.(f)Repeal of superseded limitationSection 1023 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 846) is
repealed.1023.Operational readiness of Littoral Combat Ships on extended deployments(a)Subsection (a) of section 7310 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the subsection heading, by inserting under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Navy
after vessels
;(2)by striking A naval vessel
and inserting (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), a naval vessel
; and(3)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(2)(A)Subject to subparagraph (B), in the case of a naval vessel that is classified as a Littoral Combat
Ship and is operating on deployment, corrective and preventive
maintenance or repair (whether intermediate or depot level) and facilities
maintenance may be performed on the vessel—(i)in a foreign shipyard;(ii)at a facility outside of a foreign shipyard; or(iii)at any other facility convenient to the vessel.(B)(i)Corrective and preventive maintenance or repair may be performed on a vessel as described in
subparagraph (A) only if the work is performed by United States Government
personnel or United States contractor personnel.(ii)Facilities maintenance may be performed by a foreign contractor on a vessel as described in
subparagraph (A) only as approved by the Secretary of the Navy..(b)Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:(d)In this section:(1)The term corrective and preventive maintenance or repair means—(A)maintenance or repair actions performed as a result of a failure in order to return or restore
equipment to acceptable performance levels; and(B)scheduled maintenance or repair actions intended to prevent or discover functional failures,
including scheduled periodic maintenance requirements and integrated class
maintenance plan tasks that are time-directed maintenance actions.(2)The term facilities maintenance means—(A)preservation or corrosion control efforts, encompassing surface preparation and preservation of the
structural facility to minimize effects of corrosion; and(B)cleaning services, encompassing—(i)light surface cleaning of ship structures and compartments; and(ii)deep cleaning of bilges to remove dirt, oily waste, and other foreign matter..(c)(1)The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:7310.Overhaul, repair, and maintenance of vessels in foreign shipyards and facilities: restrictions;
exceptions.(2)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 633 of such title is amended by striking the item
relating to section 7310 and inserting the following:7310. Overhaul, repair, and maintenance of vessels in foreign shipyards and facilities:
restrictions; exceptions..1024.Authority for limited coastwise trade for certain vessels providing transportation services under a
shipbuilding or ship repair contract with the Secretary of the Navy(a)Chapter 645 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:7525.(a)Contractor-owned vessel definedIn this section, the term contractor-owned vessel means a dry dock, a tugboat, or a towing vessel that—(1)was built in the United States;(2)is owned or operated by a person that—(A)is under contract with the Navy to construct, maintain, or repair a vessel of the Navy; and(B)in conjunction with such contract, is operating under a special security agreement with the
Secretary of Defense;(3)is used, pursuant to such contract, to construct, maintain, or repair a vessel of the Navy; and(4)is crewed by citizens of the United States.(b)A contractor-owned vessel may, at the direction of the Secretary of the Navy, engage in coastwise
trade for the exclusive purpose of performing a contract with the Navy to
construct, maintain, or repair a vessel of the Navy, and any law
pertaining to coastwise trade shall not apply to such vessel, the owner or
operator of such vessel, or the operation of such vessel.(c)The Secretary of the Navy shall provide notice to the Secretary of Homeland Security if a
contractor-owned vessel is authorized, pursuant to this section, to engage
in coastwise trade.(d)An authorization to engage in coastwise trade pursuant to this section shall be non-transferrable
and shall expire on the earlier of—(1)the date of the sale of the contractor-owned vessel;(2)the date of that the contract with the Navy to construct, maintain, or repair a vessel of the Navy
expires or that the Secretary of the Navy terminates such contract; or(3)the date that the Secretary of Defense terminates the special security agreement with the
contractor that owns the vessel..(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 645 of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new item:7525. Limited coastwise trade..D1031.Limitation
on the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
(a)Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds
authorized to be appropriated by this Act for fiscal year 2015 may be used to
transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United
States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other
detainee who—
(1)is
not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United
States; and
(2)is
or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense.
(b)Transfer for
detention and trialThe Secretary of Defense may transfer a
detainee described in subsection (a) to the United States for detention
pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40), trial,
and incarceration if the Secretary—
(1)determines that
the transfer is in the national security interest of the United States;
(2)determines that
appropriate actions have been taken, or will be taken, to address any risk to
public safety that could arise in connection with detention and trial in the
United States; and
(3)notifies the
appropriate committees of Congress not later than 30 days before the date of
the proposed transfer.
(c)A notification on a transfer under subsection (b)(3)
shall include the following:
(1)A
statement of the basis for the determination that the transfer is in the
national security interest of the United States.
(2)A
description of the action the Secretary determines have been taken, or will be
taken, to address any risk to the public safety that could arise in connection
with the detention and trial in the United States.
(d)Status while in
the United StatesA detainee who is transferred to the United
States under this section—
(1)shall not be
permitted to apply for asylum under section 208 of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158) or be eligible to apply for admission into the
United States;
(2)shall be
considered to be paroled into the United States temporarily pursuant to section
212(d)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)(A));
and
(3)shall not, as a
result of such transfer, have a change in designation as an unprivileged enemy
belligerent eligible for detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of
Military Force, as determined in accordance with applicable law and
regulations.
(e)Limitation on
transfer or release or detainees transferred to the United
StatesNotwithstanding any other provision of law, an individual who is transferred to the United States
under this section shall not be released within the United States or its
territories, and may only be
transferred or released in accordance with the procedures under section
1035 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113–66; 128 Stat. 851).
(f)Limitations on
judicial review
(1)Except
as provided for in paragraph (2), no court, justice, or judge shall have
jurisdiction to hear or consider any action against the United States or its
agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, or
conditions of confinement of a detainee described in subsection (a) who is held
by the Armed Forces of the United States.
(2)A
detainee who is transferred to the United States under this section shall not
be deprived of the right to challenge his designation as an unprivileged enemy
belligerent by filing a writ of habeas corpus as provided by the Supreme Court
in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (548 U.S. 557 (2006)) and Boumediene v. Bush (553 U.S.
723 (2008)).
(3)No
cause of action in decision not To transferA decision not to
transfer a detainee to the United States under this section shall not give rise
to a judicial cause of action.
(g)
(1)Subsections (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) shall take effect
on the date, following the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the
appropriate
committees of Congress a detailed plan to close the detention facility at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, that Congress fails to
enact a joint resolution disapproving such report pursuant to subsection
(i).
(2)The
report required by paragraph (1) shall contain the following:
(A)A
case-by-case determination made for each individual detained at Guantanamo of
whether such individual is intended to be transferred to a foreign country,
transferred to the United States for the purpose of civilian or military trial,
or transferred to the United States or another country for continued detention
under the law of armed conflict.
(B)The specific
facility or facilities that are intended to be used, or modified to be used, to
hold individuals inside the United States for the purpose of trial, for
detention in the aftermath of conviction, or for continued detention under the
law of armed conflict.
(C)The estimated
costs associated with the detention inside the United States of individuals
detained at Guantanamo.
(D)A
description of the legal implications associated with the detention inside the
United States of an individual detained at Guantanamo, including but not
limited to the right to challenge such detention as unlawful.
(E)A
detailed description and assessment, made in consultation with the Secretary of
State and the Director of National Intelligence, of the actions that would be
taken prior to the transfer to a foreign country of an individual detained at
Guantanamo that would substantially mitigate the risk of such individual
engaging or reengaging in any terrorist or other hostile activity that
threatens the United States or United States person or interests.
(F)What additional
authorities, if any, may be necessary to detain an individual detained at
Guantanamo inside the United States as an unprivileged enemy belligerent
pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force,
pending the end of hostilities or a future determination by the Secretary of
Defense that such individual no longer poses a threat to the United States or
United States persons or interests.
(3)The
report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but
may include a classified annex.
(h)The prohibition in section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1911)
shall apply to funds appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year
2015 for the Department of Defense from the date of the enactment of this Act
until the effective date specified in subsection (g).(i)Consideration by Congress of Secretary of Defense report(1)For purposes of this section the term joint resolution means only a joint resolution which is introduced within the 10-day period beginning on the date
on which the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress
a report under subsection (g) and—(A)which does not have a preamble;(B)the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: That Congress disapproves the report of the Secretary of
Defense under section 1031(g) of the Carl Levin National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 as submitted by the
Secretary of
Defense to Congress on ______
, the blank space being filled in with the appropriate date; and(C)the title of which is as follows: Joint resolution disapproving the Guantanamo Detention Facility Closure report of the Secretary of
Defense.
.(2)A resolution described in paragraph (1) that is introduced in the House of Representatives shall
be referred to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives. A resolution described in paragraph (1) introduced in
the Senate shall be referred to the Committee on Armed Services of the
Senate.(3)If the committee to which a resolution described in paragraph (1) is referred has not reported
such resolution (or an identical resolution) by the end of the 20-day
period beginning on the date on which the Secretary submits to Congress a
report under subsection (g), such committee shall be, at the end of
such period, discharged from further consideration of such resolution, and
such resolution shall be placed on the appropriate calendar of the House
involved.(4)(A)On or after the third day after the date on which the committee to which such a resolution is
referred has reported, or has been discharged (under paragraph (3)) from
further consideration of, such a resolution, it is in order (even though a
previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) for any Member
of the respective House to move to proceed to the consideration of the
resolution. A Member may make the motion only on the day after the
calendar day on which the Member announces to the House concerned the
Member’s intention to make the motion, except that, in the case of the
House of Representatives, the motion may be made without such prior
announcement if the motion is made by direction of the committee to which
the resolution was referred. All points of order against the resolution
(and against consideration of the resolution) are waived. The motion is
highly privileged in the House of Representatives and is privileged in the
Senate and is not debatable. The motion is not subject to amendment, or to
a motion to postpone, or to a motion to proceed to the consideration of
other business. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is
agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to
the consideration of the resolution is agreed to, the respective House
shall immediately proceed to consideration of the joint resolution without
intervening motion, order, or other business, and the resolution shall
remain the unfinished business of the respective House until disposed of.(B)Debate on the resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall
be limited to not more than 2 hours, which shall be divided equally
between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. An amendment to
the resolution is not in order. A motion further to limit debate is in
order and not debatable. A motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to
the consideration of other business, or a motion to recommit the
resolution is not in order. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the
resolution is agreed to or disagreed to is not in order.(C)Immediately following the conclusion of the debate on a resolution described in paragraph (1) and
a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in
accordance with the rules of the appropriate House, the vote on final
passage of the resolution shall occur.(D)Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or
the House of Representatives, as the case may be, to the procedure
relating to a resolution described in paragraph (1) shall be decided
without debate.(5)Consideration by other house(A)If, before the passage by one House of a resolution of that House described in paragraph (1), that
House receives from the other House a resolution described in paragraph
(1), then the following procedures shall apply:(i)The resolution of the other House shall not be referred to a committee and may not be considered in
the House receiving it except in the case of final passage as provided in
clause (ii)(II).(ii)With respect to a resolution described in paragraph (1) of the House receiving the resolution—(I)the procedure in that House shall be the same as if no resolution had been received from the other
House; but(II)the vote on final passage shall be on the resolution of the other House.(B)Upon disposition of the resolution received from the other House, it shall no longer be in order to
consider the resolution that originated in the receiving House.(6)Rules of the Senate and the House of RepresentativesThis subsection is enacted by Congress—(A)as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate and House of Representatives, respectively,
and as such it is deemed a part of the rules of each House, respectively,
but applicable only with respect to the procedure to be followed in that
House in the case of a resolution described in paragraph (1), and it
supersedes other rules only to the extent that it is inconsistent with
such rules; and(B)with full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change the rules (so far as
relating to the procedure of that House) at any time, in the same manner,
and to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of that House.(j)In
this section:
(1)The
term appropriate committees of Congress means—
(A)the Committee on
Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)the Committee on
Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)The
term individual detained at Guantanamo means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October
1, 2009, who—(A)is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and(B)is—(i)in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense; or(ii)otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.1032.Report on facilitation of transfer overseas of certain individuals detained at United States Naval
Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba(a)Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and
the
Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate
committees of Congress a report on the actions that have been taken and
are planned to be
taken to facilitate the transfer overseas of individuals detained at
Guantanamo who have been approved for transfer.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)For each individual detained at Guantanamo in detention as of December 26, 2013, who has been
approved for transfer
overseas and has not been so transferred, a description of factors
impeding the transfer.(2)A description of the actions that have been taken by the Department of Defense and other Federal
agencies
to address the factors described in paragraph (1) impeding the transfer
overseas of individuals described in that paragraph.(3)A description of additional actions that are planned to be taken to address the factors described
in
paragraph (1) impeding the transfer overseas of such individuals.(4)Such recommendations for legislative action as the Secretaries jointly consider appropriate to
facilitate the transfer overseas of such individuals.(c)Treatment as approved for transferFor purposes of this section, an individual shall be considered to have been approved for transfer
if—(1)the individual was approved for transfer under the review conducted by the Guantanamo Detainee
Review Task Force established pursuant to Executive Order 13492;(2)the Secretary of Defense determines, following a review conducted in accordance with the
requirements of section 1023 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 801 note) and Executive Order 13567, that the
individual is no longer a threat to the national security of the United
States; or(3)the individual has been approved for transfer consistent with the provisions of section 1035 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113–66; 127 Stat. 851; 10 U.S.C. 801 note).(d)In
this section:
(1)The
term appropriate committees of Congress means—
(A)the Committee on
Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate; and
(B)the Committee on
Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
(2)The
term individual detained at Guantanamo has the meaning given that
term in section 1031(i)(2).1033.Authority
to temporarily transfer individuals detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States for emergency or critical medical
treatment
(a)Transfer for
emergency or critical medical treatment
authorizedNotwithstanding section
1031(a), or any other provision of law
enacted after September 30, 2013, but subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of
Defense may temporarily
transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to a Department of Defense
medical facility in the United States for the sole purpose of providing the
individual medical treatment if the Secretary determines that—
(1)the
Senior Medical Officer, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has determined
that the medical treatment is necessary to prevent death or imminent
significant injury or harm to the health of the individual;
(2)based on the
recommendation of the Senior Medical Officer, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay,
Cuba, the medical treatment is not available to be provided at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, without incurring excessive and
unreasonable costs; and
(3)the
Department of Defense has provided for appropriate security measures for the
custody and control of the individual during any period in which the individual
is temporarily in the United States under this subsection.(b)Notice to Congress required before transfer(1)In addition to the requirements in subsection (a), an individual may not be temporarily transferred
under the authority in that subsection unless the Secretary of Defense
submits to the appropriate committees of Congress the notice described in
paragraph (2)—(A)not later than 30 days before the date of the
proposed transfer; or(B)if notice cannot be provided in accordance with subparagraph (A) because of an especially immediate
need for the provision of medical treatment to
prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the
individual, as soon as is practicable, but not later than 5 days after the
date of transfer.(2)The notice on the transfer of an individual under this subsection shall include the following:(A)A statement of the basis for the determination that the transfer is necessary to prevent death or
imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual.(B)The specific Department of Defense medical facility that will provide medical treatment to the
individual.(C)A description of the actions the Secretary determines have been taken, or will be taken, to address
any risk to the public safety that could arise in connection with the
provision of medical
treatment to the individual in the United States.(c)Limitation on
exercise of authorityThe authority of the Secretary of Defense
under subsection (a) may be exercised only by the Secretary of Defense or by
another official of the Department of Defense at the level of Under Secretary
of Defense or higher.
(d)An individual who is temporarily transferred under the
authority in subsection (a) shall—
(1)while in the United States, remain in the
custody and control of the Secretary of Defense at all times; and
(2)be
returned to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as soon as
feasible after a Department of Defense physician determines that—
(A)the individual is
medically cleared to travel; and
(B)in consultation
with the Commander, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, any necessary
follow-up medical care may reasonably be provided the individual at United
States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(e)Status while in
United StatesAn individual who is temporarily transferred under
the authority in subsection (a), while in the United States—(1)shall be deemed at all times and in all respects to be in the uninterrupted custody of the
Secretary of Defense, as though the individual remained physically at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba;(2)shall not at any time be subject to, and may not apply for or obtain, or be deemed to enjoy, any
right, privilege, status, benefit, or eligibility for any benefit under
any provision of the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17)), or any other
law or regulation;(3)shall not be
permitted to avail himself of any right, privilege, or benefit of any law of
the United States beyond those available to individuals detained at United
States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and(4)shall not, as a result of such transfer, have a change in any designation that may have attached to
that detainee while detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public
Law 107–40), as determined in accordance with applicable law and
regulations..(f)Judicial review
precluded(1)No creation of enforceable rightsNothing in this section is intended to create any enforceable right or benefit, or any claim or
cause of action, by any party against the United States, or any other
person or entity.(2)Limitation on judicial reviewExcept as provided in paragraph (3), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or
consider any claim or action against the United States or its agents
relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, or
conditions of confinement of an individual transferred under this
section.(3)(A)The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction to
consider an application for writ of habeas corpus challenging the fact or
duration of detention and seeking release from custody filed by or on
behalf of an individual who is in the United States pursuant to a
temporary transfer under subsection (a). Such jurisdiction shall be
limited to that required by the Constitution with respect to the fact or
duration of detention.(B)A court order in a proceeding covered by paragraph (3) may not—(i)review, halt, or stay the return of the individual who is the object of the application to United
States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including pursuant to
subsection (d); or(ii)order the release of the individual within the United States.(g)In this section:(1)The term appropriate committees of Congress has the meaning given that term in section 1031(i)(1).(2)The term individual detained at Guantanamo has the meaning given that term in section 1031(i)(2).1034.Prohibition on transfer or release to Yemen of individuals detained at United States Naval Station,
Guantanamo Bay, CubaNone of the amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of
Defense may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or
release, during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this
Act and ending on December 31, 2015, of any individual detained in the
custody or under the control of the Department of Defense at United States
Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the custody or control of the
Republic of Yemen or any entity within Yemen.EMiscellaneous Authorities and Limitations1041.Reduction in Department of Defense civilian personnel and review of certain headquarters spending(a)Report on certain civilian positions in Department of DefenseNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the
following:(1)The total number of civilian positions created in the Department of Defense between September 11,
2001, and December 31, 2013, as a result of conversions of support
functions from performance by military personnel to performance by
civilian personnel, set forth separated by the number of each of
administrative, technical, and medical positions.(2)The total number of civilian positions created as described in paragraph (1) that were created as
temporary provisions and are now being converted back to military
positions.(3)The total number of civilian positions created as described in paragraph (1) that have been or are
being eliminated.(b)It is the sense of Congress that the number of civilian positions in the Department of Defense
created as described in subsection (a)(1) should be reduced simultaneously
with reductions in the end strengths of the Armed Forces, and by the same
percentages as the reductions in such end strengths which such reductions
in civilian positions accompany.(c)Review of spending on headquarters in lower echelon commandsThe Secretary shall conduct a review of spending on headquarters in commands at command echelons
below the level of major command with the objective of—(1)identifying opportunities to consolidate or eliminate commands that are geographically
close or have similar missions;(2)seeking further opportunities to centralize administrative and command support services,
functions, or
programs; and(3)identifying means of achieving a reduction in spending for headquarters at such commands by an
amount that is not less than the amount equal to 10 percent of the
spending for headquarters of such commands in fiscal year 2014.(d)Revision of Department of Defense instruction 5100.73, major DOD headquarters activitiesThe Secretary shall require the Director of Administration and Management, in consultation with the
Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, to revise
Department of Defense Instruction 5100.73, Major DOD Headquarters
Activities, to—(1)include all major Department of Defense headquarter activity organizations within the purview of
the instruction;(2)specify how contractors performing major Department of Defense headquarters activity functions will
be identified and
included in headquarters reporting;(3)clarify how components are to compile the major Department of Defense headquarters activities
information needed to
respond to the reporting requirements in section 1111 of the Duncan Hunter
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10 U.S.C. 143
note) and section 115a(f) of title 10, United States Code, as a result of
the amendments made by section 1109 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2492); and(4)establish time frames for implementing the actions required pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (3)
in order improve tracking and reporting
of headquarters resources for major Department of Defense headquarters.(e)Guidance for combatant commandsIn order to ensure that the combatant commands are properly sized to meet their assigned
missions and to improve the transparency of the authorized
manpower, assigned personnel, and mission and headquarters-support costs
of the combatant commands,
the Secretary shall require—(1)the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to revise Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Instruction 1001.01A to require—(A)a comprehensive, periodic evaluation of whether the size and structure of the combatant commands
are proper to ensure that the combatant commands meet assigned mission;
and(B)the combatant commands to—(i)identify, manage, and track all personnel, including temporary personnel
such as civilian overhires and Reserves on active duty, in the electronic
Joint Manpower and Personnel System (e-JMAPS) of the Joint Staff; and(ii)identify specific guidelines and timeframes for the combatant commands to
consistently input personnel information and review assigned personnel in
the electronic Joint Manpower and Personnel System (e-JMAPS) of the Joint
Staff;(2)the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military
departments and the commanders of the combatant commands, to develop and
implement a formal
process to gather information on authorized manpower and assigned
personnel of the component commands of the Armed Forces; and(3)the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) to revise Department of Defense Financial
Management Regulation 7000.14R to require the military departments, in
their annual budget documents for operation and maintenance, to identify
the authorized military position and civilian and contractor full-time
equivalents at each combatant command and provide detailed information on
funding required by each combatant command for mission and headquarters
support, such as civilian pay, contract services, travel and supplies.1042.Protection
of Department of Defense installations(a)Secretary of
Defense authorityChapter 159 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by inserting after section 2671 the following new section:2672.Protection of
buildings, grounds, property, and persons(a)The Secretary of Defense shall protect the buildings,
grounds, and property that are under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of
the Department of Defense and the persons on that property.(b)(1)(A)The Secretary may
designate military or civilian personnel of the Department of Defense as
officers and agents to perform the functions of the Secretary under subsection
(a), including, with regard to civilian officers and agents, duty in areas
outside the property specified in that subsection to the extent necessary to
protect that property and persons on that property.(B)A designation under subparagraph (A)
may be made by individual, by position, by installation, or by such other
category of personnel as the Secretary considers appropriate.(C)In making a designation under
subparagraph (A) with respect to any category of personnel, the Secretary shall
specify each of the following:(i)The personnel or positions to be
included in the category.(ii)Which authorities provided for in
paragraph (2) may be exercised by personnel in that category.(iii)In the case of civilian personnel in
that category—(I)which authorities provided for in
paragraph (2), if any, are authorized to be exercised outside the property
specified in subsection (a); and(II)with respect to the exercise of
any such authorities outside the property specified in subsection (a), the
circumstances under which coordination with law enforcement officials outside
of the Department of Defense should be sought in advance.(D)The Secretary may make a designation
under subparagraph (A) only if the Secretary determines, with respect to the
category of personnel to be covered by that designation, that—(i)the exercise of each specific
authority provided for in paragraph (2) to be delegated to that category of
personnel is necessary for the performance of the duties of the personnel in
that category and such duties cannot be performed as effectively without such
authorities; and(ii)the necessary and proper training for
the authorities to be exercised is available to the personnel in that
category.(2)Subject to subsection (h) and to the
extent specifically authorized by the Secretary, while engaged in the
performance of official duties pursuant to this section, an officer or agent
designated under this subsection may—(A)enforce Federal laws and regulations
for the protection of persons and property;(B)carry firearms;(C)make arrests—(i)without a warrant for any offense
against the United States committed in the presence of the officer or agent;
or(ii)for any felony cognizable under
the laws of the United States if the officer or agent has reasonable grounds to
believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing a
felony;(D)serve warrants and subpoenas issued
under the authority of the United States; and(E)conduct investigations, on and off the
property in question, of offenses that may have been committed against property
under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense or
persons on such property.(c)(1)The Secretary may
prescribe regulations, including traffic regulations, necessary for the
protection and administration of property under the jurisdiction, custody, or
control of the Department of Defense and persons on that property. The
regulations may include reasonable penalties, within the limits prescribed in
paragraph (2), for violations of the regulations. The regulations shall be
posted and remain posted in a conspicuous place on the property to which they
apply.(2)A person violating a regulation
prescribed under this subsection shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for
not more than 30 days, or both.(d)Limitation on
delegation of authorityThe authority of the Secretary of Defense
under subsections (b) and (c) may be exercised only by the Secretary or the
Deputy Secretary of Defense.(e)Disposition of
persons arrestedA person who is arrested pursuant to authority
exercised under subsection (b) may not be held in a military confinement
facility, other than in the case of a person who is subject to chapter 47 of
this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).(f)Facilities and
services of other agencies(1)In implementing this section, when the
Secretary determines it to be economical and in the public interest, the
Secretary may use the facilities and services of Federal, State, Indian tribal,
and
local law enforcement agencies, with the consent of those agencies, and may
reimburse those agencies for the use of their facilities and services.(2)Services of State, Indian tribal, and local law enforcement, including
application of their powers of law enforcement, may be provided
under paragraph (1) notwithstanding that the property is subject to the
legislative
jurisdiction of the United States.(g)Authority
outside Federal propertyFor the protection of property under the
jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense and persons on
that property, the Secretary may enter into agreements with Federal agencies
and with State, Indian tribal, and local governments to obtain authority for
civilian
officers and agents designated under this section to enforce Federal laws and
State, Indian tribal, and local laws concurrently with other Federal law
enforcement
officers and with State, Indian tribal, and local law enforcement officers.(h)Attorney
General approvalThe powers granted pursuant to subsection (b)(2)
to officers and agents designated under subsection (b)(1) shall be exercised in
accordance with guidelines approved by the Attorney General.(i)Limitation with regard to other Federal agenciesNothing in this section shall be construed as affecting the authority of the Secretary of Homeland
Security to provide for the protection of facilities under the
jurisdiction, custody, or control, in whole or in part, of Federal
agencies, including the buildings, grounds, and properties of the General
Services Administration, other than the Department of Defense and located
off of a military installation.(j)Cooperation with local law enforcement agenciesWith regard to civilian officers and agents performing duty in areas outside the property specified
in subsection (a), the Secretary shall enter into agreements with
local law enforcement agencies exercising jurisdiction over such areas for
the purposes of avoiding conflicts of jurisdiction, promoting notification
of planned law enforcement actions, and facilitating productive working
relationships.(k)Limitation on
statutory constructionNothing in this section shall be
construed—(1)to
preclude or limit the authority of any Federal law enforcement agency;(2)to
restrict the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security under the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) or the authority of the
Administrator of General Services, including the authority to promulgate
regulations affecting property under the custody and control of that Secretary
or the Administrator, respectively;(3)to
expand or limit section 21 of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C.
797);(4)to
affect chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice);(5)to
restrict any other authority of the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a
military
department; or(6)to restrict the authority of the Director of the National Security Agency under section 11 of the
National Security Agency Act of 1959 (50 U.S.C. 3609)..(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159
of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2671
the following new item:2672. Protection of
buildings, grounds, property, and persons..1043.Authority to accept certain voluntary legal support servicesSection 1588(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:(10)Voluntary legal support services provided by law students through internship and externship
programs approved by the Secretary concerned..1044.Inclusion of Chief of the National Guard Bureau among leadership of the Department of Defense
provided physical protection and personal security(a)Subsection (a) of section 1074 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 330) is amended—(1)by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8); and(2)by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraph (7):(7)Chief of the National Guard Bureau..(b)Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (7)
and inserting paragraphs (1) through (8)
.1045.Inclusion of regional organizations in authority for assignment of civilian employees of the
Department of Defense as advisors to foreign ministries of defense(a)Inclusion of regional organizations in authoritySection 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (10 U.S.C. 168 note) is
amended—(1)in subsection (a)—(A)in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by inserting or regional organizations
after foreign countries
; and(B)by inserting or organization
after ministry
each place it appears in paragraphs (1) and (2); and(2)in subsection (c), by inserting and regional organizations
after defense ministries
each place it appears in paragraphs (1) and (5).(b)Update of policy guidance on authorityThe Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall issue an update of the policy of the Department of
Defense for assignment of civilian employees of the Department as advisors
to foreign ministries of defense and regional organizations under the
authority in section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012, as amended by this section.(c)The section heading of such section is amended to read as follows:1081.Authority for assignment of civilian employees of the Department of Defense as advisors to foreign
ministries of defense and regional organizations.1046.Extension of authority to waive reimbursement of costs of activities for nongovernmental
personnel at Department of Defense regional centers for security studiesSection 941(b)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (10
U.S.C. 184 note) is amended by striking through 2014
and inserting through 2017
.F1061.Reports on recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force(a)Not later than 30 days after the date of the submittal to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of
title 31, United States Code, of the budget of the President for each of
fiscal years 2016 through 2019, the Secretary of the Air Force shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the response of
the Air Force to the 42 specific recommendations of the National
Commission on the Structure of the Air Force in the report of the
Commission pursuant to section 363(b) of the National Commission on the
Structure of the Air Force Act of 2012 (subtitle G of title III of Public
Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1704).(b)Elements of initial reportThe initial report of the Secretary under subsection (a) shall set forth the following:(1)Specific milestones for review by the Air Force of the recommendations of the Commission described
in subsection (a).(2)A preliminary implementation plan for each of such recommendations that do not require further
review by the Air Force as of the date of such report for implementation.(c)Elements of subsequent reportsEach report of the Secretary under subsection (a) after the initial report shall set forth the
following:(1)An implementation plan for each of the recommendations of the Commission described in subsection
(a), and not previously covered by a report under this section, that do
not require further review by the Air Force as of the date of such report
for implementation.(2)A description of the accomplishments of the Air Force in implementing the recommendations of the
Commission previously identified as not requiring further review by the
Air Force for implementation in an earlier report under this section,
including a description of any such recommendation that is fully
implemented as of the date of such report.(d)Deviation from Commission recommendationsIf any implementation plan under this section includes a proposal to deviate in a material manner
from a recommendation of the Commission described in subsection (a), the
report setting forth such implementation plan shall—(1)describe the deviation; and(2)include a justification of the Air Force for the deviation.(e)Each report of the Secretary under subsection (a) shall—(1)identify any savings achieved by the Air Force as of the date of such report in implementing the
recommendations of the Commission described in subsection (a) when
compared with spending anticipated by the budget of the President for
fiscal year 2015; and(2)indicate the manner in which such savings affected the budget request of the President for the
fiscal year beginning in the year in which such report is submitted.1062.Review of operation of certain ships during the Vietnam era(a)By not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall review the logs of each ship under the authority of the Secretary of
the Navy that is known to have operated in the waters near Vietnam during
the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975, to
determine—(1)whether each such ship operated in the territorial waters of the Republic of Vietnam during such
period; and(2)for each such ship that so operated—(A)the date or dates when the ship so operated; and(B)the distance from the shore of the location where the ship operated that was the closest proximity
to shore.(b)Provision of information to Secretary of Veterans AffairsUpon a determination that any such ship so operated, the Secretary of Defense shall provide such
determination, together with the information described in subsection
(a)(2) about the ship, to the Secretary of Veteran Affairs.1063.Assessment of the operations research tools, processes, and capabilities in support of requirements
analysis for
major defense acquisition programs and allocation of intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance assets(a)The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense
for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics and the Director of Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation, shall conduct an assessment of the following:(1)The potential benefits to systems acquisition of increased application of rigorous operations
research tools, processes, and capabilities to the analysis of
requirements for major defense
acquisition programs and the programs of Major Automated Information
Systems (commonly referred to as MAIS
) to achieve balance between cost, performance, schedule, and risk requirements at the beginning of
such programs and at subsequent milestone reviews.(2)The potential benefits to the prioritization and allocation of existing intelligence, surveillance,
and
reconnaissance assets to the combatant commands of increased
application of rigorous evidence-based operations research tools,
processes, and capabilities to
the analysis of
the requirements submitted by the commanders of the combatant
commands.(3)The standardization and quality of the data related to requirements submitted
by the commanders of the combatant commands for intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance support that are collected and available
to assess those requirements.(4)The contribution of operations research to the decision making process within the Joint
Requirements Oversight Council (commonly referred to as JROC
) and the senior leadership in the Joint Staff for fixing requirements for systems acquisitions and
validating and prioritizing intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance
assets.(5)The operations research resources, both government employee and contractor operations research
professionals, available in the Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
office (commonly referred to as CAPE
), the Warfighting Analysis Division of the Force Structure, Resources, and Assessment directorate
of the Joint Staff (commonly referred to as the J8
), other elements of such directorate, the Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence,
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (commonly referred to as JFCC ISR
), and such other elements of the Department of Defense or the intelligence community (as defined
in section 4 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) as the
Vice Chairman considers appropriate for purposes of this subsection.(6)The extent to which the resources described in paragraph (5) are utilized, and the degree to which
they could and should be
utilized, to support the analysis, validation, and prioritization of
requirements for
intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance among the commanders of the
geographic combatant commands and for new system
acquisitions.(7)Whether additional operations research capability is needed to effectively support the requirements
analysis responsibilities of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council and
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.(8)Whether the current policies and processes relating to the analysis, validation, and prioritization
of requirements for intelligence,
surveillance, and
reconnaissance assets under the Global Force Management process need to be
modified,
including consideration of the following:(A)Making the personnel and other resources for processing, exploitation, and dissemination part of
the Global Force
Management process, and creating means to re-allocate
resources for processing, exploitation, and dissemination, including
across combatant commands, when missions or sorties cannot be executed as
planned.(B)Integrating the assessment division of the Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence,
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance more closely with the Force Structure,
Resources, and Assessment directorate of the Joint Staff to support
analysis and validation of requirements of the combatant commands.(C)Standardizing the requirements prioritization schema, tools, and data used by the geographic
combatant commands.(D)Standardizing the qualifications and training of personnel of the geographic combatant commands
that are
responsible for generating requirements.(E)Factoring national intelligence collection operations into the Global Force Management process for
analyzing
and validating requirements of the geographic combatant commands.(F)Creating larger number of discriminating standard metrics for support of intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance in
addition to combat air patrol orbits, sorties per month, or hours of
collection.(b)Briefing of Congress on findingsNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Vice Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition and the
Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, shall brief the
congressional defense committees on the findings of the Vice Chairman with
respect to
the assessment conducted under subsection (a).(c)Submittal to Congress of operations research analysis of requirements for ISR asset allocation in
GFMAP for FY2015Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Vice Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the congressional defense committees and
the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 4 of the
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) the data collected and the
operations research analysis of that data used to validate the
requirements submitted by the commanders of the combatant commands
for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance asset prioritization
and allocation under
the Global Force Management Allocation Plan for fiscal year 2015.1064.
Review of United States military strategy and the force posture of allies and
partners in the United States Pacific Command area of responsibility(a)(1)The Secretary of Defense shall commission an independent review of the United States Asia-Pacific
re-balance, with a focus on policy issues that will be critical during the
10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act,
including the national security interests and military strategy of the
United States in the Asia-Pacific region.(2)The review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be conducted by an independent organization
that has—(A)recognized credentials and expertise in maritime strategy and military affairs; and(B)access to policy experts throughout the United States and from the Asia-Pacific region.(3)The review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:(A)An assessment of the current and planned United States force posture adjustments and the impact of
such
adjustments on the strategy to re-balance to the Asia-Pacific region.(B)An assessment of the risks to United States national security interests in the United States
Pacific Command area of responsibility during the
10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act posed by
potential adversaries or emerging technologies.(C)An analysis of the willingness and capacity of allies, partners, and regional organizations to
contribute to the security and stability of the Asia-Pacific region,
including potential required adjustments to United States military
strategy based on that analysis.(D)An evaluation of current and projected wide-area, long-range, persistent intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities and capability gaps of the
United States and its partners.(E)An analysis of regional ballistic missile capabilities and adequacy of regional and United States
missile defense plans and capabilities for the Asia-Pacific region.(F)An appraisal of the Arctic ambitions of actors in the Asia-Pacific region in the context of current
and projected capabilities, including an analysis of the adequacy and
relevance of the Arctic Roadmap prepared by the Navy.(G)An evaluation of partner capacity building efforts of the United States Pacific Command in the
context of current and projected threats with a focus on maritime domain
awareness, maritime security, and border security capabilities, including—(i)an examination of the capabilities and naval force posture of allies and partners of the United
States, with specific focus on current and projected submarine
capabilities of United States and regional actors and the implications for
maritime security strategy;(ii)an assessment of the advantages or disadvantages of the formation of an East Asian maritime
security partnership; and(iii)a description of the role of multilateral organizations, such as the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations, in reducing tensions and negotiating resolution of maritime
disputes.(H)The views of noted policy leaders and regional experts, including military commanders, in the
Asia-Pacific region.(b)(1)Submission to the Secretary of DefenseNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the independent organization
that conducted the review pursuant to
subsection (a)(1) shall submit to the Secretary of Defense an unclassified
report, along with a classified annex, containing the findings of the
review.(2)Not later than 90 days after the date of receipt of the report required by paragraph (1), the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees the report, together with any comments on the report that the
Secretary considers appropriate.1065.Department of Defense policies on community involvement in Department community outreach
events(a)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth such
recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate for modifications
of the policies of the Department of Defense on the involvement of
non-Federal entities in
Department community outreach
events (including, but not limited to, air shows, parades, and open
houses) that
feature any unit, aircraft, vessel, equipment, or members of the Armed
Forces in order to increase the involvement of non-Federal entities in
such events.(b)The Secretary shall prepare the report required by subsection (a) in consultation with the Director
of the Office of Government Ethics.(c)The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)A description of current Department of Defense policies and
regulations on the acceptance and use of voluntary
gifts, donations, sponsorships, and other forms of support from
non-Federal entities and persons for Department community outreach events
described in subsection (a).(2)Recommendations for modifications of such policies and regulations in order to permit additional
voluntary support and funding from
non-Federal entities for such events, including recommendations on matters
such as increased recognition of donors, authority for military
units to endorse the fundraising efforts of certain donors, and authority
for the Armed Forces to charge fees or solicit and accept donations for
parking and admission to such events.1066.Comptroller General of the United States briefing and report on management of the conventional
ammunition demilitarization stockpile of the Department of Defense(a)Congress finds that the Comptroller General of the United States recently reported that there is
risk that the Armed Forces may budget funds to procure new supplies of
conventional ammunition to meet requirements when such ammunition is
currently available in the inventories of the Department of Defense, but
categorized for demilitarization or disposal.(b)(1)The Comptroller General shall provide a briefing and submit a report to the congressional defense
committees on the management of the conventional ammunition
demilitarization stockpile of the Department of Defense(2)The briefing and report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:(A)An assessment of the adequacy of Department policies and procedures governing the demilitarization
of excess, obsolete, and unserviceable conventional ammunition.(B)An assessment of the adequacy of the maintenance by the Department of information on the quantity,
value, condition, and location of excess, obsolete, and unserviceable
conventional ammunition for each of the Armed Forces.(C)An assessment whether the Department has conducted an analysis comparing the costs of storing and
maintaining items in the conventional ammunition demilitarization
stockpile with the costs of the disposal of items in the stockpile.(D)An assessment whether the Department has—(i)identified challenges in managing the current and anticipated conventional ammunition
demilitarization stockpile; and(ii)if so, developed mitigation plans to address such challenges.(E)Such other matters relating to the management of the conventional ammunition demilitarization
stockpile as the Comptroller General considers appropriate.(3)The briefing required by paragraph (1) shall be provided not later than April 30, 2015. The report
required by that paragraph shall be submitted not later than June 1, 2015.1067.Repeal and modification of reporting requirements(a)Title 10, United States CodeTitle 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:(1)Section 1073b is repealed.(2)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 is amended by striking the item relating to
section 1073b.(b)National defense authorization acts(1)Subsection (b) of section 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1576) is amended to read as follows:(b)Any report under subsection (a) may be submitted in classified form..(2)Section 330(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law
110–181; 122 Stat. 68), as most recently amended by section 332 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112–239; 126 Stat. 1697), is further amended by adding at the end the
following
new sentence: However, a report is not required under this paragraph for any fiscal year during which the
Secretary concerned did not use the authority in subsection (a).
.(3)Subsection (d) of section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004
(division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently
amended by section 2806(d) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for
Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4725), is
further amended—(A)in the heading by striking quarterly
and inserting annual
;(B)in paragraph (1)—(i)by striking fiscal-year quarter
and inserting fiscal year
; and(ii)by striking quarter
and inserting fiscal year
; and(C)in paragraph (2), by striking all of the quarterly reports that were
and inserting the report
.(c)Inclusion of extremity trauma and amputation center of excellence annual report in Department
of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense joint annual report on
health care coordination and sharing activities(1)Section 723 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public
Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4508) is amended by striking subsection (d).(2)Section 8111(f) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new
paragraph:(6)The two Secretaries shall include in the annual report under this subsection a report on the
activities of the Center of Excellence in the Mitigation, Treatment, and
Rehabilitation of Traumatic Extremity Injuries and Amputations
(established pursuant to section 723 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417)) during the
one-year period ending
on the date of such report. Such report shall include a description of the
activities of the center and an assessment of the role of such activities
in improving and enhancing the efforts of the Department of Defense and
the Department of Veterans Affairs for the mitigation, treatment, and
rehabilitation of traumatic extremity injuries and amputations..1068.Repeal of requirement for Comptroller General of the United States annual reviews and report on
pilot program on commercial fee-for-service air refueling support for the
Air ForceSection 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–81; 122
Stat. 335) is amended by striking subsection (d).GUniformed Services VotingIProvision of
voter assistance to members of the Armed Forces1071.Provision of annual voter assistance(a)(1)Chapter 80 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1566a the
following new section:1566b.(a)The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the following activities:(1)In coordination with the Secretary of each military department—(A)affirmatively offer, on an annual basis, each member of the armed forces on active duty (other
than active duty for training) the opportunity, through the online system
developed under paragraph (2), to—(i)register to vote in an election for Federal office;(ii)update the member's voter registration information; or(iii)request an absentee ballot; and(B)provide services to such members for the purpose of carrying out the activities in clauses (i),
(ii), and (iii) of subparagraph (A).(2)Implement an online system that, to the extent practicable, is integrated with the existing
systems of each of the military departments and that—(A)provides an electronic means for carrying out the requirements of paragraph (1);(B)in the case of an individual registering to vote in a State that accepts electronic voter
registration and operates its own electronic voter registration system
using a form that meets the requirements for mail voter registration forms
under section 9(b) of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (42
U.S.C. 1973gg–7(b)), directs such individual to that system; and(C)in the case of an individual using the official post card form prescribed under section 101(b)(2)
of
the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C.
1973ff(b)(2)) to register to vote and request an absentee ballot—(i)pre-populates such official post card form with the personal information of such individual, and(ii)(I)produces the pre-populated form and a pre-addressed envelope for use in transmitting such official
post card form; or(II)transmits the completed official post card form electronically to the appropriate State or local
election officials.(3)Implement a system (either independently or in conjunction with the online system under paragraph
(2)) by which any change of address by a member of the armed forces on
active duty who is undergoing a permanent change of station, deploying
overseas for at least six months, or returning from an overseas deployment
of at least six months automatically triggers a
notification via electronic means to such member that—(A)indicates that such member's voter registration or absentee mailing address should be updated with
the appropriate State or local election officials; and(B)includes instructions on how to update such voter registration using the online system developed
under paragraph (2).(b)The online system developed under subsection (a)(2) shall collect and store all data required to
meet the reporting requirements of section 1071(b) of the Carl Levin
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 and section
105A(b)(2) of the
Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (42 U.S.C.
1973ff–4a(b)(2)) in a manner that complies with section 552a of title 5
(commonly known as the Privacy Act of 1974), and
imposes no new record management burden on any military unit or military
installation.(c)Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Defense
shall prescribe regulations implementing the requirements of subsection
(a). Such regulations shall include procedures to inform those members
of the armed forces on active duty (other than active duty for training)
experiencing a change of address about the benefits of this section and
the timeframe for requesting an absentee ballot to ensure sufficient time
for State delivery of the ballot..(2)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 80 of such title is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 1566a the following new item:1566b. Annual voter assistance..(b)Report on
status of implementation(1)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment
of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the relevant
committees
of Congress a report on the status of the implementation of the
requirements of section 1566b of title 10, United States Code, as added by
subsection (a)(1).(2)The
report under paragraph (1) shall include—(A)a detailed description of any specific
steps already taken towards the implementation of the requirements of
such section 1566b;(B)a detailed plan for the implementation of such requirements, including milestones and deadlines for
the completion of such implementation;(C)the costs expected to be incurred in the implementation of such requirements;(D)a description of how the annual voting assistance and system under subsection (a)(3) of such
section will be integrated with Department of Defense personnel databases
that track military servicemembers' address changes;(E)an estimate of how long it will take an average member to complete the voter assistance process
required under subsection (a)(1) of such section;(F)an explanation of how the Secretary of Defense will collect reliable data on the utilization of
the online system under subsection (a)(2) of such section; and(G)a summary of any objections, concerns, or comments made by State or local election officials
regarding the implementation of such section.(3)Relevant
committees of congress definedIn this subsection, the term
relevant committees of Congress
means—(A)the Committees on
Appropriations, Armed Services, and Rules and Administration of the
Senate;
and(B)the Committees on
Appropriations, Armed Services, and House Administration of the House of
Representatives.1072.Designation of voter assistance officesSection 1566a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in subsection (a)—(A)by striking Not later than
and all that follows through subsection (f), the Secretaries
and inserting The Secretaries
; and
(B)by striking shall designate
and inserting may designate
;(2)in subsection (c), by striking shall ensure
and all that follows through necessity,
and inserting may ensure
;(3)in subsection (d), by striking shall
and inserting may
;(4)in subsection (e), by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: Any office so designated may provide voting assistance described in this section.
; and(5)in subsection (f)—(A)in the first sentence—(i)by striking shall
and inserting may
; and(ii)by striking the requirements of
; and(B)by striking the second sentence.IIElectronic
voting systems1076.Repeal of
electronic voting demonstration projectSection 1604 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (42 U.S.C. 1973ff note) is
repealed.H1081.Biennial surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees on workplace and gender relations
matters(a)(1)Chapter 23 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 481 the following
new section:481a.Workplace and gender relations issues: surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees(a)(1)The Secretary of Defense shall carry out every other fiscal year a survey of civilian employees of
the Department of Defense to solicit information on gender issues,
including issues relating to gender-based assault, harassment, and
discrimination, and the climate in the Department for forming professional
relationships between male and female civilian employees of the
Department.(2)Each survey under this section shall be known as a Department of Defense Civilian Employee Workplace and Gender Relations Survey
.(b)Each survey conducted under this section shall be conducted so as to solicit information on the
following:(1)Indicators of positive and negative trends for professional and personal relationships between male
and female civilian employees of the Department of Defense.(2)The specific types of assault on civilian employees
of the Department by other personnel of the Department (including
contractor personnel) that have occurred, and the number of times each
respondent has been so assaulted during the preceding fiscal year.(3)The effectiveness of Department policies designed to improve professional relationships between
male and female civilian employees of the Department.(4)The effectiveness of current processes for complaints on and investigations into gender-based
assault, harassment, and discrimination involving civilian employees of
the Department.(5)Any other issues relating to assault, harassment, or discrimination involving civilian employees of
the Department that the Secretary considers appropriate.(c)Upon the completion of a survey under this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report
containing the results of the survey..(2)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 23 of such title is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 481 the following new item:481a. Workplace and gender relations issues: surveys of Department of Defense civilian employees..(3)The Secretary of Defense shall carry out the first survey required by section 481a of title 10,
United States Code (as added by this subsection), during fiscal year 2016.(b)Report on feasibility of similar surveys of military dependents and Department of Defense
contractors(1)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of
Representatives a report setting forth an assessment by the Secretary of
the feasibility of conducing recurring surveys of each population
specified in paragraph (2) on issues relating to gender-based assault,
harassment,
and discrimination.(2)The populations specified in this paragraph are the following:(A)Military dependents.(B)Contractors of the Department of Defense.1082.Transfer of administration of Ocean Research Advisory Panel from Department of the Navy to National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(a)Authority for ocean research advisory panelSubsection (a) of section 7903 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—(A)by inserting , through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
after The Council
;(B)by striking Panel consisting
and inserting Panel. The Panel shall consist
; and(C)by striking chairman,
and inserting Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, on behalf of the Council,
;(2)in paragraph (1), by striking National Academy of Science.
and inserting National Academies.
; and(3)by striking paragraphs (2) and (3) and redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (2) and
(3), respectively.(b)Responsibilities of panelSubsection (b) of such section is amended—(1)by inserting , through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
after The Council
;(2)by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively; and(3)by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraphs (2) and (3):(2)To advise the Council on the determination of scientific priorities and needs.(3)To provide the Council strategic advice regarding execution and collaboration related to the
National Oceanographic Partnership Program..(c)Funding to support activities of panelSubsection (c) of such section is amended by striking Secretary of the Navy
and inserting Secretary of Commerce
.1083.Authority to require employees of the Department of Defense and members of the Army, Navy, Air
Force, and Marine Corps to occupy quarters on a rental basis while
performing official travel(a)Subsection (e) of section 5911 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—(1)by striking The head
and inserting (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the head
; and(2)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(2)The Secretary of Defense may require an employee of the Department of Defense or a member of the
uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the Secretary who is
performing duty on
official travel to occupy adequate quarters on a rental basis when
available..(b)Subsection (a)(5) of such section is amended by inserting or commercial lodging arranged through a Government lodging program
after leased by the Government
.(c)(1)Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the
exercise of the authority provided by paragraph (2) of section 5911(e) of
title 5, United States Code (as added by subsection (a)). The report shall
include the following:(A)The date, if any, on which the exercise of the authority commenced.(B)The manner in which the authority has been exercised.(C)An estimate of the savings achieved by the Department of Defense through the exercise of the
authority, and an estimate of the additional savings to be achieved by the
Department over the course of the future-years defense program current as
of the date of such report.(D)An assessment whether the quality of lodging has improved for civilian employees of the Department
of Defense and members of the Armed Forces as a result of the exercise of
the authority.(E)Such other matters relating to the exercise of the authority as the Secretary considers
appropriate.(2)Appropriate committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—(A)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and(B)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.1084.Expansion of authority for Secretary of Defense to use the Department of Defense reimbursement rate
for transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense
entities(a)Eligible categories of transportationSubsection (a) of section 2642 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking The Secretary
and inserting Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary
;(2)in paragraph (3)—(A)by striking During the period beginning on October 28, 2009, and ending on October 28, 2019, for
and inserting For
; and(B)by striking of Defense
the first place it appears and all that follows through military sales
and inserting of Defense
; and(3)by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:(4)For military transportation services provided in support of foreign military sales.(5)For military transportation services provided to a State, local, or tribal agency (including any
organization composed of State, local, or tribal agencies).(6)For military transportation services provided to a Department of Defense contractor when
transporting supplies that are for, or destined for, a Department of
Defense entity..(b)Termination of authority for certain categories of transportationSuch section is further amended—(1)by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and(2)by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b):(b)Termination of authority for certain categories of transportationThe provisions of paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6) of subsection (a) shall apply only to military
transportation services provided before October 1, 2019..(c)(1)The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:2642.Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense agencies and entities: use of
Department of Defense reimbursement rate.(2)The item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 157 of such
title is amended to read as follows:2642. Transportation services provided to certain non-Department of Defense agencies and entities:
use of Department of Defense reimbursement rate..1085.Pilot program to rehabilitate and modify homes of disabled and low-income veterans(a)In this section:(1)The
term disabled means an individual with a disability, as defined by
section 12102 of title 42, United States Code.(2)The term
eligible veteran means a disabled or low-income veteran.(3)Energy efficient
features or equipmentThe term energy efficient features or
equipment means features of, or equipment in, a primary residence that
help reduce the amount of electricity used to heat, cool, or ventilate
such
residence, including insulation, weatherstripping, air sealing, heating
system
repairs, duct sealing, or other measures.(4)The term
low-income veteran means a veteran whose income does not exceed 80
percent of the median income for an area, as determined by the
Secretary.(5)The term
nonprofit organization means an organization that is—(A)described in
section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
and(B)exempt from tax
under section 501(a) of such Code.(6)(A)The term
primary residence means a single family house, a duplex, or a unit
within a multiple-dwelling structure that is the principal
dwelling of an eligible veteran and is owned by such veteran or a family
member of such
veteran.(B)For purposes of this paragraph, the term family
member includes—(i)a
spouse, child, grandchild, parent, or sibling;(ii)a
spouse of such a child, grandchild, parent, or sibling; or(iii)any individual
related by blood or affinity whose close association with a veteran is the
equivalent of a family relationship.(7)The term
qualified organization means a nonprofit organization that
provides nationwide or statewide programs that primarily serve veterans or
low-income individuals.(8)The term Secretary means the
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.(9)The term veteran has the meaning given the term in section 101 of title 38, United States
Code.(10)Veterans
service organizationThe term veterans service
organization means any organization recognized by the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs for the representation of veterans under section 5902 of
title
38, United States Code.(b)Establishment of
a pilot program(1)(A)The Secretary shall
establish a pilot program to award grants to qualified organizations to
rehabilitate and modify the primary residence of eligible veterans.(B)The
Secretary shall work in conjunction with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
to
establish and oversee the pilot program and to ensure that such program
meets
the needs of eligible veterans.(C)A grant award under the pilot program to any one qualified
organization shall not exceed $1,000,000 in any one fiscal year, and such
an
award shall remain available until expended by such organization.(2)(A)Each qualified
organization that desires a grant under the pilot program shall submit an
application to the Secretary at such time, in such manner, and, in
addition to
the information required under subparagraph (B), accompanied by such
information
as the Secretary may reasonably require.(B)Each application submitted under subparagraph
(A) shall include—(i)a plan of action
detailing outreach initiatives;(ii)the approximate
number of veterans the qualified organization intends to serve using grant
funds;(iii)a description of
the type of work that will be conducted, such as interior home
modifications,
energy efficiency improvements, and other similar categories of work;
and(iv)a plan for working
with the Department of Veterans Affairs and veterans service organizations
to
identify veterans who are not eligible for programs under chapter 21 of
title
38, United States Code, and meet their needs.(C)In awarding grants under the pilot program,
the Secretary shall give preference to a qualified organization—(i)with experience in
providing housing rehabilitation and modification services for disabled
veterans; or(ii)that proposes to provide housing
rehabilitation and modification services for eligible veterans who live in
rural, including tribal, areas (the Secretary, through regulations, shall
define the term
rural areas).(3)In order to receive a grant award under the
pilot program, a qualified organization shall meet the following
criteria:(A)Demonstrate
expertise in providing housing rehabilitation and modification services
for
disabled or low-income individuals for the purpose of making the homes of
such
individuals accessible, functional, and safe for such individuals.(B)Have established outreach initiatives
that—(i)would engage
eligible veterans and veterans service organizations in projects utilizing
grant funds under the pilot program;(ii)ensure veterans
who are disabled receive preference in selection for assistance under this
program; and(iii)identify eligible
veterans and their families and enlist veterans involved in skilled
trades,
such as carpentry, roofing, plumbing, or HVAC work.(C)Have an established nationwide or statewide
network of affiliates that are—(i)nonprofit
organizations; and(ii)able to provide
housing rehabilitation and modification services for eligible veterans.(D)Have experience in
successfully carrying out the accountability and reporting requirements
involved in the proper administration of grant funds, including funds
provided
by private entities or Federal, State, or local government entities.(4)A grant award under the
pilot program shall be used—(A)to modify and
rehabilitate the primary residence of an eligible veteran, and may
include—(i)installing wheelchair ramps, widening
exterior and interior doors, reconfigurating and re-equipping bathrooms
(which
includes installing new fixtures and grab bars), removing doorway
thresholds,
installing special lighting, adding additional electrical outlets and
electrical service, and installing appropriate floor coverings to—(I)accommodate the
functional limitations that result from having a disability; or(II)if such residence does not have
modifications necessary to reduce the chances that an elderly, but not
disabled
person, will fall in their home, reduce the risks of such an elderly
person
from falling;(ii)rehabilitating
such residence that is in a state of interior or exterior disrepair; and(iii)installing energy efficient features or
equipment if—(I)an
eligible veteran’s monthly utility costs for such residence is more than 5
percent of such veteran’s monthly income; and(II)an
energy audit of such residence indicates that the installation of energy
efficient features or equipment will reduce such costs by 10 percent or
more; and(B)in connection with modification and
rehabilitation services provided under the pilot program, to provide
technical,
administrative, and training support to an affiliate of a qualified
organization receiving a grant under such pilot program.(5)The
Secretary shall direct the oversight of the grant funds for the pilot
program
so that such funds are used efficiently until expended to fulfill the
purpose
of addressing the adaptive housing needs of eligible veterans.(6)(A)A qualified
organization receiving a grant under the pilot program shall contribute
towards
the housing modification and rehabilitation services provided to eligible
veterans an amount equal to not less than 50 percent of the grant award
received by such organization.(B)In order to
meet the requirement under subparagraph (A), such organization may arrange
for
in-kind contributions.(7)Limitation cost
to the veteransA qualified
organization receiving a grant under the pilot program shall modify or
rehabilitate the primary residence of an eligible veteran at no cost to
such
veteran (including application fees) or at a cost such that such veteran
pays
no more than 30 percent of his or her income in housing costs during any
month.(8)(A)The Secretary shall
submit to Congress, on an annual basis, a report that provides, with
respect to
the year for which such report is written—(i)the number of
eligible veterans provided assistance under the pilot program;(ii)the socioeconomic
characteristics of such veterans, including their gender, age, race, and
ethnicity;(iii)the total number,
types, and locations of entities contracted under such program to
administer
the grant funding;(iv)the amount of
matching funds and in-kind contributions raised with each grant;(v)a description of
the housing rehabilitation and modification services provided, costs
saved, and
actions taken under such program;(vi)a description of
the outreach initiatives implemented by the Secretary to educate the
general
public and eligible entities about such program;(vii)a description of
the outreach initiatives instituted by grant recipients to engage eligible
veterans and veteran service organizations in projects utilizing grant
funds
under such program;(viii)a description of
the outreach initiatives instituted by grant recipients to identify
eligible
veterans and their families; and(ix)any other
information that the Secretary considers relevant in assessing such
program.(B)Not later than 6 months after the completion of the pilot
program, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that provides
such
information that the Secretary considers relevant in assessing the pilot
program.(C)Not later than March 31, 2019, the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development shall submit to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the
Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report
containing a review of—(i)the use of appropriated funds by the Secretary and by grantees under the pilot program; and(ii)oversight and accountability of grantees under the pilot program.(9)Authorization of
appropriationsThere are
authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Housing and Urban
Development for carrying out this section $4,000,000 for
each of
fiscal years 2015 through 2019.1086.Technical and clerical amendments(a)Amendment to National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013Effective as of January 2, 2013, and as if included therein as enacted, section 604(b)(1) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112–239; 126 Stat. 1774) is amended by striking the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
and inserting this Act
.(b)Amendments to title 10, United States Code, to reflect enactment of title 41, United States CodeTitle 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:(1)Section 2013(a)(1) is amended by striking section 6101(b)-(d) of title 41
and inserting section 6101 of title 41
.(2)Section 2302 is amended—(A)in paragraph (7), by striking section 4 of such Act
and inserting such section
; and(B)in paragraph (9)(A)—(i)by striking section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)
and inserting chapter 15 of title 41
; and(ii)by striking such section
and inserting such chapter
.(3)Section 2306a(b)(3)(B) is amended by striking section 4(12)(C)(i) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(C)(i))
and inserting section 103(3)(A) of title 41
.(4)Section 2314 is amended by striking Sections 6101(b)-(d)
and inserting Sections 6101
.(5)Section 2321(f)(2) is amended by striking section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))
and inserting section 104 of title 41
.(6)Section 2359b(k)(4)(A) is amended by striking section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)
and inserting section 110 of title 41
.(7)Section 2379 is amended—(A)in subsections (a)(1)(A), (b)(2)(A), and (c)(1)(B)(i), by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))
and inserting section 103 of title 41
; and(B)in subsections (b) and (c)(1), by striking section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))
and inserting section 104 of title 41
.(8)Section 2410m(b)(1) is amended—(A)in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking section 7 of such Act
and inserting section 7104(a) of such title
; and(B)in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking section 7 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978
and inserting section 7104(a) of title 41
.(9)Section 2533(a) is amended by striking such Act
in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting chapter 83 of such tittle
.(10)Section 2533b is amended—(A)in subsection (h)—(i)in paragraph (1), by striking sections 34 and 35 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430 and 431)
and inserting sections 1906 and 1907 of title 41
; and(ii)in paragraph (2), by striking section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))
and inserting section 104 of title 41
; and(B)in subsection (m)—(i)in paragraph (2), by striking section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)
and inserting section 105 of title 41
;(ii)in paragraph (3), by striking section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)
and inserting section 131 of title 41
; and(iii)in paragraph (5), by striking section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))
and inserting section 104 of title 41
.(11)Section 2545(1) is amended by striking section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(16))
and inserting section 131 of title 41
.(12)Section 7312(f) is amended by striking Section 3709 of the Revised Statutes (41 U.S.C. 5)
and inserting Section 6101 of title 41
.(c)Amendments to other defense-related statutes to reflect enactment of title 41, United States Code(1)The Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383) is
amended as follows:(A)Section 846(a) (10 U.S.C. 2534 note) is amended—(i)by striking the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a et seq.)
and inserting chapter 83 of title 41, United States Code
; and(ii)by striking that Act
and inserting that chapter
.(B)Section 866 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—(i)in subsection (b)(4)(A), by striking section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)
and inserting chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code
; and(ii)in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking section 4(13) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(13))
and inserting section 110 of title 41, United States Code
.(C)Section 893(f)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking section 26 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422)
and inserting chapter 15 of title 41, United States Code
.(2)The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended as
follows:(A)Section 805(c)(1) (10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended—(i)in subparagraph (A), by striking section 4(12)(E) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(E))
and inserting section 103(5) of title 41, United States Code
; and(ii)in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking section 4(12)(F) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)(F))
and inserting section 103(6) of title 41, United States Code
.(B)Section 821(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))
and inserting section 103 of title 41, United States Code
.(C)Section 847 (10 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended—(i)in subsection (a)(5), by striking section 27(e) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423(e))
and inserting section 2105 of title 41, United States Code,
;(ii)in subsection (c)(1), by striking section 4(16) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act
and inserting section 131 of title 41, United States Code,
; and(iii)in subsection (d)(1), by striking section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)
and inserting chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code
.(D)Section 862 (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—(i)in subsection (b)(1), by striking section 25 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421)
and inserting section 1303 of title 41, United States Code,
; and(ii)in subsection (d)(1), by striking section 6(j) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(j))
and inserting section 1126 of title 41, United States Code
.(3)The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364) is
amended as follows:(A)Section 832(d)(3) (10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking section 8(b) of the Service Contract Act of 1965 (41 U.S.C. 357(b))
and inserting section 6701(3) of title 41, United States Code
.(B)Section 852(b)(2)(A)(ii) (10 U.S.C. 2324 note) is amended by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))
and inserting section 103 of title 41, United States Code
.(4)Section 8118 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108–287; 10 U.S.C.
2533a note) is amended by striking section 34 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 430)
and inserting section 1906 of title 41, United States Code
.(5)The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136) is amended as
follows:(A)Section 812(b)(2) (10 U.S.C. 2501 note) is amended by striking section 6(d)(4)(A) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 405(d)(4)(A))
and inserting section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States Code,
.(B)Section 1601(c) (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended—(i)in paragraph (1)(A), by striking section 32A of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, as added by section 1443 of this Act
and inserting section 1903 of title 41, United States Code
; and(ii)in paragraph (2)(B), by striking Subsections (a) and (b) of section 7 of the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 (41 U.S.C. 57(a) and (b))
and inserting Section 8703(a) of title 41, United States Code
.(6)Section 8025(c) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108–87; 10 U.S.C.
2410d note) is amended by striking the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48)
and inserting chapter 85 of title 41, United States Code
.(7)Section 817(e)(1)(B) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003
(Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking section 26(f)(5)(B) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 422(f)(5)(B))
and inserting section 1502(b)(3)(B) of title 41, United States Code
.(8)Section 801(f)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law
107–107; 10 U.S.C. 2330 note) is amended by striking section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))
and inserting section 1702(c)(1) of title 41, United States Code
.(9)Section 803(d) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999
(Public Law 105–261; 10 U.S.C. 2306a note) is amended by striking subsection (b)(1)(B) of section 304A of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of
1949 (41 U.S.C. 254b)
and inserting section 3503(a)(2) of title 41, United States Code
.(10)Section 848(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law
105–85; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note) is amended by striking section 32 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 428)
and inserting section 1902 of title 41, United States Code
.(11)Section 722(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law
104–201; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note) is amended by striking section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c))
and inserting section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code.
.(12)Section 3412(k) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106;
10 U.S.C. 7420 note) is amended by striking section 303(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (41 U.S.C. 253(c))
and inserting section 3304(a) of title 41, United States Code
.(13)Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10
U.S.C. 2371 note) is amended—(A)in subsection (a)(2)(A), by striking section 16(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(c))
and inserting section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code,
;(B)in subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii), by striking section 16(3) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 414(3))
and inserting paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 1702(c) of title 41, United States Code
;(C)in subsection (e)(2)(A), by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))
and inserting section 103 of title 41, United States Code
; and(D)in subsection (h), by striking section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 423)
and inserting chapter 21 of title 41, United States Code
.(14)Section 326(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law
102–484; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking section 25(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c))
and inserting section 1303(a) of title 41, United States Code
.(15)Section 806 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (Public Law
102–190; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—(A)in subsection (b), by striking section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act
and inserting section 103 of title 41, United States Code
; and(B)in subsection (c)—(i)by striking section 25(a) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act
and inserting section 1302(a) of title 41, United States Code
; and(ii)by striking section 25(c)(1) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421(c)(1))
and inserting section 1303(a)(1) of such title 41
.(16)Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 10
U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—(A)by designating the subsection after subsection (k), relating to definitions, as subsection (l); and(B)in paragraph (8) of that subsection, by striking the first section of the Act of June 25, 1938 (41 U.S.C. 46; popularly known as the Wagner-O'Day Act
)
and inserting section 8502 of title 41, United States Code
.(d)Amendments to title 10, United States Code, to reflect reclassification of provisions of law
proposed for codification in title 50, United States CodeTitle 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:(1)Sections 113(b), 125(a), and 155(d) are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 401)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3002)
.(2)Sections 113(e)(2), 117(a)(1), 118(b)(1), 118a(b)(1), 153(b)(1)(C)(i), 231(b)(1), and 231a(c)(1)
are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 404a)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3043)
.(3)Sections 167(g) and 421(c) are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 413 et seq.)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.)
.(4)Section 201(b)(1) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 403-6(b))
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3041(b))
.(5)Section 429 is amended—(A)in subsection (a), by striking (50 U.S.C. 403–1)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3024)
; and(B)in subsection (e), by striking (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))
.(6)Section 442(d) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 404e(a))
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3045(a))
.(7)Section 444 is amended—(A)in subsection (b)(2), by striking (50 U.S.C. 403o)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3515)
; and(B)in subsection (e)(2)(B), by striking (50 U.S.C. 403a et seq.)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
.(8)Section 457 is amended—(A)in subsection (a), by striking (50 U.S.C. 431)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3141)
; and(B)in subsection (c), by striking (50 U.S.C. 431(b))
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3141(b))
.(9)Section 462 is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 402 note)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3614)
.(10)Sections 491(c)(3), 494(d)(1), and 496(a)(1) are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))
.(11)Section 1599a(a) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 402 note)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3614)
.(12)Section 1605(a)(2) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 403r)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3518)
.(13)Section 1623(a) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 402 note)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3614)
.(14)Section 2409(e)(1) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))
.(15)Section 2501(a)(1)(A) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 404a)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3043)
.(16)Section 2557(c) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 413 et seq.)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.)
.(17)Section 2723(d)(2) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 413)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3091)
.(e)Amendments to other defense-related statutes to reflect reclassification of provisions of law
proposed for codification in title 50, United States Code(1)The following provisions of law are amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 401a(4))
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3003(4))
:(A)Section 911(3) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public
Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note).(B)Sections 801(b)(3) and 911(e)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
(Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 2304 note; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note).(C)Section 812(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136;
10 U.S.C. 2501 note).(2)Section 901(d) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law
107–314; 10 U.S.C. 137 note) is amended by striking (50 U.S.C. 401 et seq.)
and inserting (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.)
.(f)Other cross-reference amendments(1)Title 10, United States CodeTitle 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:(A)Section 2430(c)(2) is amended by striking section 2366a(a)(4)
and inserting section 2366a(a)(6)
.(B)Section 7292(d)(2) is amended by striking section 1024(a)
and inserting section 1018(a)
.(2)Title 40, United States CodeSection 591(b)(2)(A) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by striking section 2394 of title 10
and inserting section 2922a of title 10
.(g)Date of enactment referencesTitle 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:(1)Section 1218(d)(3) is amended by striking on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
and inserting on October 28, 2014
.(2)Section 1566a(a) is amended by striking Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2010 and under
and inserting Under
.(3)Section 2275(d) is amended—(A)in paragraph (1), by striking before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
and inserting before January 2, 2013
; and(B)in paragraph (2), by striking on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013
and inserting on or after January 2, 2013
.(4)Section 2601a(e) is amended by striking after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
and inserting after December 31, 2011,
.(5)Section 6328(c) is amended by striking on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010
and inserting after October 27, 2009,
.(h)Other amendments to title 10, United States CodeTitle 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:(1)Section 118 is amended by striking subsection (g).(2)Section 407(a)(3)(A) is amended by striking the comma after as applicable
.(3)Section 429 is amended—(A)in subsection (a), by striking Section
in the second sentence and inserting section
; and(B)in subsection (c), by striking act
and inserting law
.(4)Section 1074m(a)(2) is amended by striking subparagraph
in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting subparagraphs
.(5)Section 1154(a)(2)(A)(ii) is amended by striking U.S.C.1411
and inserting U.S.C. 1411
.(6)Section 2222(g)(3) is amended by striking (A)
after (3)
.(7)Section 2335(d) is amended—(A)by designating the last sentence of paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and(B)in paragraph (3), as so designated—(i)by inserting before Each of
the following paragraph heading: Other terms.—
;(ii)by striking the term
and inserting that term
; and(iii)by inserting Election
after Federal Campaign
.(8)Section 2371 is amended by striking subsection (h).(9)Section 2601a is amended—(A)in subsection (a)(1), by striking issue
and inserting prescribe
; and(B)in subsection (d), by striking issued
and inserting prescribed
.(10)Section 2853(c)(1)(A) is amended by striking can be still be
and inserting can still be
.(11)Section 2866(a)(4)(A) is amended by striking repayed
and inserting repaid
.(12)Section 2884(c) is amended by striking on evaluation
in the matter preceding paragraph (1) and inserting an evaluation
.(i)Transfer of section 2814 to chapter 631(1)Transfer and redesignationSection 2814 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 631 of such title, inserted
after section 7205, and redesignated as section 7206.(2)Such section, as so transferred and redesignated, is amended—(A)in paragraphs (2) and (3)(B) of subsection (i), by striking this chapter
and inserting chapter 169 of this title
; and(B)by striking subsection (l) and inserting the following new subsection (l):(l)In this section:(1)The term appropriate committees of Congress has the meaning given such term in section 2801 of this title.(2)The term property support services means the following:(A)Any utility service or other service listed in section 2686(a) of this title.(B)Any other service determined by the Secretary to be a service that supports the operation and
maintenance of real property, personal property, or facilities..(3)(A)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 169 of such title is amended by striking the item
relating to section 2814.(B)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 631 of such title is amended by inserting after
the item relating to section 7205 the following new item:7206. Special authority for development of Ford Island, Hawaii..(j)Coordination with other amendments made by this ActFor purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the
amendments made by subsections (b) through (h) of this section shall be
treated as having been enacted immediately before any such amendments by
other provisions of this Act.
XICivilian Personnel Matters1101.Extension and modification of experimental program for scientific and technical personnel(a)Positions covered by authority(1)Subsection (b)(1) of section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended—(A)in subparagraph (A), by striking 60 scientific and engineering positions
and inserting 100 scientific and engineering positions
;(B)in subparagraph (B), by adding and
at the end;(C)by striking subparagraphs (C) and (D); and(D)by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (C).(2)Subsection (c)(2) of such section is amended by striking the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
and inserting the Department of Defense
.(b)Subsection (d) of such section is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by striking 12-month period
and inserting calendar year
; and(2)in paragraph (2), by striking fiscal year
and inserting calendar year
.(c)Subsection (e)(1) of such section is amended by striking September 30, 2016
and inserting September 30, 2019
.1102.Modifications of biennial strategic workforce plan relating to senior management, functional, and
technical workforces of the Department of Defense(a)Senior management workforceSubsection (c) of section 115b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph (1):(1)Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall—(A)specifically address the shaping and improvement of the senior management workforce of the
Department of Defense; and(B)include an assessment of the senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of
Defense within the appropriate functional community.; and(2)in paragraph (2), by striking such senior management, functional, and technical workforce
and inserting such senior management workforce and such senior functional and technical workforce
.(b)Such section is further amended—(1)in subsection (b)(2), by striking subsection (f)(1)
in subparagraphs (D) and (E) and inserting subsection (h)(1) or (h)(2)
;(2)by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as subsections (g) and (h), respectively; and(3)by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f):(f)(1)Each strategic workforce plan under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the workforce of
the Department of Defense comprised of highly qualified experts appointed
pursuant to section 9903 of title 5 (in this subsection referred to as the HQE workforce
).(2)For purposes of paragraph (1), each plan shall include, with respect to the HQE workforce—(A)an assessment of the critical skills and competencies of the existing HQE workforce and projected
trends in that workforce based on expected losses due to retirement and
other attrition;(B)specific strategies for attracting, compensating, and motivating the HQE workforce of the
Department, including the program objectives of the Department to be
achieved through such strategies and the funding needed to implement such
strategies;(C)any incentives necessary to attract or retain HQE personnel;(D)any changes that may be necessary in resources or in the rates or methods of pay needed to ensure
the Department has full access to appropriately qualified personnel; and(E)any legislative actions that may be necessary to achieve HQE workforce goals..(c)Subsection (h) of such section (as redesignated by subsection (b)(2)) is amended to read as
follows:(h)In this section:(1)The term senior management workforce of the Department of Defense includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:(A)Appointees in the Senior Executive Service under section 3131 of title 5.(B)Persons serving in the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service under section 1606 of this
title.(2)The term senior functional and technical workforce of the Department of Defense includes the following categories of Department of Defense civilian personnel:(A)Persons serving in positions described in section 5376(a) of title 5.(B)Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721), as amended
by section 1114 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398 (114 Stat.
1654A–315)).(C)Scientists and engineers appointed pursuant to section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note).(D)Persons serving in Intelligence Senior Level positions under section 1607 of this title.(3)The term acquisition workforce includes individuals designated under section 1721 of this title as filling acquisition positions..(d)The heading of subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows: Senior management workforce; senior functional and technical workforce.—
.(e)Formatting of annual reportSubsections (d)(1) and (e)(1) of such section are each amended by striking include a separate chapter to
.
1103.One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation
on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseasSection 1101(a) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009
(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4615), as most recently amended by section
1101 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 885), is further amended by striking through 2014
and inserting through 2015
.1104.Personnel authorities for civilian personnel for the United States Cyber Command(a)It is the sense of the Senate that—(1)the Secretary of Defense needs enhanced authorities for employing, compensating, and promoting
civilian personnel with technical and operational cyber expertise in order
to enable the United States Cyber Command to recruit and retain a civilian
workforce able to
support its demanding cyber missions; and(2)sections 1601 through 1607 of title 10, United States Code, provide an example of authorities which
might suit that purpose.(b)Recommendations on personnel authoritiesNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor to
the Secretary of Defense shall—(1)identify improvements to be made to the support provided by the Air Force, in its capacity as
executive agent for the United States Cyber Command, to meet the needs of
the Command for obtaining and retaining civilian personnel with the skills
and experience required to support the missions and responsibilities of
the Command;(2)identify the additional employment, compensation, and promotion authorities necessary for the Air
Force, in that capacity, to ensure that the United States Cyber Command
has a civilian workforce able to support the missions and responsibilities
of the Command; and(3)submit to the Secretary recommendations for administrative and legislative actions, including
actions in connection
with authorities identified pursuant to paragraph (2), to ensure that the
United States Cyber Command has a civilian workforce able to support the
missions and responsibilities of the Command.
XIIMatters Relating to Foreign NationsA1201.Modification of Department of Defense authority for humanitarian stockpiled
conventional munitions assistance programsSection 407(e)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by striking and includes
and inserting small arms, and light weapons, including man-portable air-defense systems. Such term includes
; and
(2)by inserting before the period at the end the following: , small arms, and light weapons, including man-portable air-defense systems
.1202.Codification of recurring limitations on the use of funds for assistance for units of
foreign
security forces that have committed a gross violation of human rights(a)Codification of limitations(1)Subchapter I of chapter 134 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section
2245a the following new section:2246.Limitation on use of funds for assistance for units of foreign security forces that have
committed
gross violations of human rights(a)Funds authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense may not be used for training,
equipment, or other
assistance for the
members of a unit of a foreign security force if the Secretary of Defense
has credible information that such unit has committed a
gross violation of
human rights.(b)The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply if the Secretary determines that—(1)the government
of the country of the foreign security force unit concerned has undertaken
all necessary corrective steps; or(2)the training, equipment, or
other assistance concerned is necessary—(A)to assist in disaster relief operations or
other humanitarian or national security emergencies; or(B)to conduct human rights training of foreign security forces.(c)The Secretary may waive the
prohibition in subsection (a) if the Secretary determines
that the waiver is required by extraordinary circumstances.(d)Information on violations of human rights(1)The Secretary shall ensure that, before
a decision to provide training, equipment, or other assistance to
a
unit of a foreign security force, full consideration is given to any
credible information available to the Department of State
relating to
human rights violations by such unit.(2)The Secretary shall establish, and periodically update, procedures to ensure that any
information in the possession of the Department of Defense about gross
violations of human rights by units of foreign security forces is shared
on a timely basis with the Department of State.(e)The Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of State in the discharge of subsections
(b), (c), and (d).(f)Not later than 15 days after the application of any exception under subsection (b) or the exercise
of any waiver under subsection (c), the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the
following:(1)In the case a report on an exception under subsection (b), notice of the use of the exception and
a description of the grounds for the exception.(2)In the case of a report on a waiver under subsection (c), a description of—(A)the foreign security force unit concerned;(B)the information relating to the gross
violation of human rights by such unit;(C)the circumstances that necessitate such waiver;
and(D)the cost, purpose, and duration of the training, equipment, or other assistance covered by such
waiver.(g)In this section, the term other assistance means assistance whose primary purpose is to build the capacity of a foreign security force.
.(2)The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 134 of such title is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 2245a the following new item:2246. Limitation on use of funds for assistance for units of foreign security forces that
have
committed gross violations of human rights..(b)The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2014, and shall apply with
respect to funds available to the Department of Defense for fiscal years
beginning on or after that date.1203.Codification and enhancement of authority to build the capacity of foreign
security forces
(a)Codification,
extension, and enhancement of authority
(1)Chapter 136 of title 10, United States Code, is amended
by adding at the end the following new section:
2282.Authority to
build the capacity of foreign security forces
(a)The
Secretary of Defense is authorized to conduct or support a program or programs as
follows:
(1)To
build the capacity of a foreign country's national military forces in order for
that country to—
(A)conduct
counterterrorism operations; or
(B)participate in or
support allied or coalition military or stability operations that
benefit the national security interests of the United States.
(2)To
build the capacity of a foreign country's national maritime or border security
forces to conduct
counterterrorism operations.
(3)To build the capacity of a foreign country's other security forces that have a
counterterrorism mission in order for such forces to conduct
counterterrorism operations.(b)Concurrence of Secretary of StateThe Secretary of Defense shall obtain the concurrence of the Secretary of State before conducting
or supporting a program under subsection (a).(c)Types of
capacity building
(1)A program under subsection (a) may include the
provision of equipment, supplies, training, defense services, and small-scale
military
construction.
(2)A program under subsection (a) shall include elements
that promote the following:(A)Observance of and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.(B)Respect for civilian control of the military.(d)
(1)Annual funding
limitationThe Secretary of Defense may use up to $350,000,000 of
funds available for operation and maintenance for any fiscal year to conduct or
support activities under subsection (a) in that fiscal year.(2)In addition to the amount available as specified in paragraph (1), up to $150,000,000 of funds
available for operation and maintenance for any fiscal year may be used to
conduct or support activities under subsection (a) in that fiscal year if
transferred for such purposes in accordance with established procedures
for reprogramming of funds under section 1001 of the Carl Levin National
Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, and successor provisions of law.(3)Assistance
otherwise prohibited by lawThe Secretary of Defense may not use
the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of assistance described in
subsection (b) that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law.(4)Limitation on
eligible countriesThe Secretary of Defense may not use the
authority in subsection (a) to provide assistance described in subsection (b)
to any foreign country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of
assistance under any other provision of law.(5)Availability of
funds for activities across fiscal years(A)Amounts available under
this subsection for the authority in subsection (a) for a fiscal year may be
used for programs under that authority that begin in such fiscal year but end
in the next fiscal year.(B)Achievement of full operational capabilityIf, in accordance with subparagraph (A), equipment is delivered under a program under the authority
in subsection (a) in the fiscal year after the fiscal
year in which the program begins, amounts for supplies,
training, defense services, and small-scale military construction
associated with such
equipment and necessary to ensure that the recipient unit achieves full
operational capability for such equipment may be used in the fiscal year
in which
the foreign country takes receipt of such equipment and in the next fiscal
year.(6)Limitation on amount for building capacity to participate in allied or coalition
military or stability operationsOf the amounts available under this subsection for the
authority in subsection (a) for a fiscal year, not more than $150,000,000 may be
used in such fiscal year for purposes described in subsection
(a)(1)(B).(7)Limitations on availability of funds for small-scale military construction(A)Activities under particular programsThe amount that may be obligated or expended for small-scale
military construction activities under any particular program authorized
under subsection (a) may not exceed $750,000.(B)Activities under all programsThe amount that may be obligated or expended for small-scale military construction activities
during a fiscal year for all programs authorized under subsection (a)
during that fiscal year may not exceed $25,000,000.(e)Formulation and
execution of programThe Secretary of Defense and the Secretary
of State shall jointly formulate any program under subsection (a). The
Secretary of Defense shall coordinate with the Secretary of State in the
implementation of any program under subsection (a).
(f)Congressional notification(1)Not less than 15 days before initiating activities under a program under subsection (a), the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
appropriate committees of Congress
a notice of the following:(A)The country whose
capacity to engage in activities in subsection (a) will be built under the
program.
(B)The budget,
implementation timeline with milestones, anticipated delivery schedule for
assistance, military department responsible for management and associated
program executive office, and completion
date for the program.(C)The source and
planned expenditure of funds to complete the program.(D)A description of the arrangements, if any, for the sustainment of the program and the source of
funds to support sustainment of the capabilities and performance
outcomes achieved under the program beyond its completion
date, if applicable.(E)A description of the program objectives and assessment framework to be used to develop capability
and performance metrics associated with operational outcomes for the
recipient unit.(F)Information, including the amount, type, and purpose, on the assistance provided the
country during the three preceding fiscal years under each of the following
programs, accounts, or activities:
(i)A
program under this section.
(ii)The
Foreign Military Financing program under the Arms Export Control Act.
(iii)Peacekeeping
Operations.
(iv)The
International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) program under
section 481 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2291).
(v)Nonproliferation,
Anti-Terrorism, Demining, and Related Programs (NADR).
(vi)Counterdrug
activities authorized by section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note) and section 1033 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998.
(vii)Any other significant program, account, or activity for the provision of security assistance that
the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State consider appropriate.(2)Coordination with Secretary of StateAny notice under paragraph (1) shall be prepared in coordination with the Secretary of State.(g)Amounts available to conduct or support programs under subsection (a) shall be available to the
Secretary of Defense to conduct assessments and determine the
effectiveness of such
programs in building the operational capacity and performance of the
recipient units concerned.(h)Appropriate
committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term
appropriate committees of Congress means—
(1)the Committee on
Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on
Appropriations of the Senate; and
(2)the Committee on
Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on
Appropriations of the House of Representatives..
(2)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 136
of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
2282. Authority to build the
capacity of foreign security
forces.
.
(b)
(1)Section 943(g)(1)
of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009
(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578), as most recently amended by section
1205(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1624), is further amended by striking sections
1206 and 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006
(Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3456 and 3458)
and inserting
section 2282 of title 10, United States Code, and section 1207 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163;
119 Stat. 3458)
.
(2)Section
1209(b)(1)(A) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 368), as most recently amended by section
1203(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2512), is further amended by striking section 1206
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law
109–163; 119 Stat. 3456)
and inserting section 2282 of title 10,
United States Code
.
(c)Repeal of
superseded authoritySection 1206 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163) is repealed.(d)Annual
Secretary of Defense reports
(1)Not later than 90 days after the end of each of fiscal years 2015 through 2025,
the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report summarizing the
findings of the assessments of programs carried out under subsection (g)
of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by subsection
(a)), during such fiscal year.
(2)Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, for each program assessed under such subsection (g)
during the fiscal year
covered by such report, the following:(A)A description of the nature and the extent
of the potential or actual terrorist threat, if any, that the program is intended
to
address.
(B)A description of the program, including the
objectives of the program, the types of recipient country units receiving
assistance under the program, and the baseline operational capability and
performance of the units receiving assistance under the program before the
commencement of receipt of assistance under the program.
(C)A description of the extent to which the
program is implemented by United States Government personnel or
contractors.(D)A description of the assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics
associated with operational outcomes for units receiving assistance under
the program.(E)An assessment of the program using the assessment framework described in subparagraph (D).
(F)An assessment of the effectiveness of the program in achieving its intended purpose.(e)Annual Comptroller General of the United States audits(1)Not later than March 31 of each of 2015 through 2025, the Comptroller General of the United States
shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an audit of such
program or programs conducted
or supported pursuant to section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as
so
added), during the preceding fiscal year as the
Comptroller General shall, in consultation with the appropriate committees
of Congress, select for purposes of such report.(2)Each report shall include, for the program or programs covered by such report and the fiscal year
covered by such report, the following:(A)A description of the program or programs, including—(i)the objectives of the program or programs;(ii)the types of units receiving assistance under the program or programs;(iii)the delivery and completion schedules for assistance under the program or programs; and(iv)the baseline operational capability and performance of the units receiving assistance under the
program or programs before the commencement of receipt of assistance under
the program or programs.(B)An assessment of the capacity of each recipient country to absorb assistance under the program or
programs.(C)An assessment of the arrangements, if any, for the sustainment of the program or programs,
including any source of funds to support sustainment of the capabilities
and performance outcomes achieved under the program or program beyond
completion date, if applicable.(D)A description of the extent to which the program or programs are implemented by United States
Government personnel or contractors.(E)A description of the assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics
associated with operational outcomes for units receiving assistance under
the program or programs.(F)A description of the assessment of the program or programs using the assessment framework described
in subparagraph (E).(G)An assessment of the effectiveness of the program or programs in achieving their intended purpose.(H)Such other matters as the Comptroller considers appropriate.(f)Appropriate committees of Congress definedIn subsections (d) and (e), the term appropriate committees of Congress has the meaning given that term in subsection (h) of section 2282 of title 10, United States Code
(as so added).1204.Training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries to promote respect for
the
rule of law and human rights(a)Chapter 136 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1203 of this Act, is further
amended by adding at the end the following new
section:2283.Training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries to promote respect for
the rule
of law and human rights(a)The Secretary of Defense is authorized to conduct human rights training of security forces and
associated
ministries of foreign countries.(b)Construction with limitation on use of fundsHuman rights training authorized by this section may be conducted for security forces otherwise
prohibited from receiving such training under section 2242 of this title
in accordance with the exception in subsection (b)(2)(B) of that section.(c)Secretary of State concurrence requiredTraining activities may be conducted under this section only with the concurrence of the Secretary
of State.(d)Human rights training authorized by this section may include associated activities and expenses
necessary for the conduct of
training and assessments designed to further the purposes of this
section.(e)Human rights training definedIn this section, the term human rights training includes training conducted for one or more of the
following purposes:(1)To enhance the rule of law and respect for human rights.(2)To develop respect for civilian control over the military.(3)To promote compliance with the law of armed conflict or the establishment of a military justice
system.(4)To assist in the prohibition or prevention of the use of child soldiers.(5)To otherwise address and alleviate the factors contributing to a gross violation of human rights by
the security forces of a foreign country..(b)The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 136 of such title, as so amended, is further
amended by adding at the end
the following new item:2283. Training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign countries to promote
respect for the rule of law and human rights..1205.Modification and extension of Global Security Contingency Fund authority(a)Subsection (c)(1) of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended by
striking the provision of equipment, supplies, and training.
and inserting “the provision of the following:(A)Equipment, including routine maintenance and repair of such equipment.(B)Supplies.(C)Small-scale construction not exceeding $750,000.(D)Training..(b)Subsection (f)(1) of such section is amended by striking for Defense-wide activities
in the first sentence.(c)Two-year extension of availability of fundsSubsection (i) of such section is amended by striking September 30, 2015
and inserting September 30, 2017
.(d)Extension of expiration dateSubsection (p) of such section is amended—(1)by striking September 30, 2015
and inserting September 30, 2017
; and(2)by striking funds available for fiscal years 2012 through 2015
and inserting funds available for a fiscal year beginning before that date
.1206.Use of acquisition and cross-servicing agreements to lend certain military equipment to certain
foreign forces for personnel protection and survivability(a)Section 1202(e) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public
Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2413), as most recently amended by section 1217(b)
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113–66; 127 Stat. 909), is further amended by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31, 2015
.(b)Waiver of reimbursement in case of loss of equipment in combat(1)In the case of equipment loaned to the military forces of another nation under the authority of
section 1202 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2007, as amended by subsection (a), that is damaged or
destroyed as a result of combat operations during coalition operations
while held by the forces to
which loaned, the Secretary of Defense may, with respect to such
equipment and without regard to the date of loan of such equipment under
such authority, waive any applicable requirement under subchapter I of
chapter
138 of title 10, United States Code, for—(A)reimbursement;(B)replacement-in-kind; or(C)exchange of supplies or services of an equal value.(2)Any waiver under this subsection may be made only if the Secretary determines that the waiver is in
the national security interest of the United States.(3)Any waiver under this subsection may be made only on a case-by-case basis.1207.Cross servicing agreements for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment
in coalition operations(a)Use of agreements for loan of equipment(1)Subchapter I of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section
2342 the following new section:2342a.Cross-servicing agreements: use for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability
equipment in coalition operations(a)The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, enter into an
arrangement, under an agreement concluded pursuant to section 2342 of this
title, under which the United States agrees to loan personnel protection
and personnel survivability equipment for the use of such equipment by
military forces of a nation participating with the United States in a
coalition operation as part of a contingency operation or a peacekeeping
operation under the Charter of the United Nations or another international
agreement.(b)(1)Equipment may be loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section
only upon a determination by the Secretary of Defense that the United
States forces in the coalition operation concerned have no unfulfilled
requirements for such equipment.(2)Equipment loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section may be used
by those forces only for personnel protection or to aid in the personnel
survivability
of those forces and only in a coalition operation with the United States
described in subsection (a).(3)Equipment loaned to the military forces of a nation under the authority of this section may be used
by the military forces of that nation for the duration of that country’s
participation in the coalition operation concerned.(c)Waiver of reimbursement in case of loss of equipment in combat(1)In the case of equipment loaned under the authority of this section that is damaged or destroyed as
a result of combat operations during coalition operations while held by
forces to which loaned under
this section, the Secretary of Defense may, with respect to such
equipment, waive any other applicable requirement under this subchapter
for—(A)reimbursement;(B)replacement-in-kind; or(C)exchange of supplies or services of an equal value.(2)Any waiver under this subsection may be made only if the Secretary determines that the waiver is in
the national security interest of the United States.(3)Any waiver under this subsection may be made only on a case-by-case basis.(d)If the authority provided under this section is exercised during a fiscal year, the Secretary of
Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the
appropriate committees of Congress a report on the exercise of such
authority by not later than October 30 of the year in which such fiscal
year ends. Each report on the exercise of such authority shall specify the
recipient country of the equipment loaned, the type of equipment loaned,
and the duration of the loan of such equipment..(2)The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 138 of such title is amended by
inserting after the item relating to section 2342 the following new item:2342a. Cross-servicing agreements: use for loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability
equipment in coalition operations..(b)Section 2350 of such title is amended by adding at end the following new paragraphs:(5)The term personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment means items designated as significant military equipment in categories I, II, III, VII, XI, XIII
of the United States Munitions List under section 38(a)(1) of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778(a)(1) that the Secretary of Defense
designates as available for loan under section 2342a of this title.(6)The term appropriate committees of Congress means—(A)the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and(B)the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives..1208.Extension and modification of authority for support of special operations to combat terrorism(a)Amount available for supportSubsection (a) of section 1208 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal
Year 2005
(Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section
1203(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012
(Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1621), is further amended by striking $50,000,000
and inserting $60,000,000
.(b)Subsection (h) of such section 1208, as most recently amended by section
1203(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2012, is
further amended by striking 2015
and inserting 2016
.1209.Assistance to foster a negotiated settlement to the conflict in Syria(a)Authority To provide assistanceThe Secretary of Defense is authorized to provide equipment, supplies, training, and defense
services to
assist vetted elements of the Syrian opposition for the purposes as
follows:(1)Defending the Syrian people from attacks by the Syrian regime.(2)Protecting the United States, its friends and allies, and the Syrian people from the threats posed
by terrorists in Syria.(3)Promoting the conditions for a negotiated settlement to end the conflict in Syria.(b)Vetted elements of the Syrian oppositionFor the purposes of this section, vetted elements of the Syrian opposition are units of the Free
Syrian Army and the Supreme Military Council, and other Syrian forces,
groups, or individuals opposed to the Syrian regime, who,
after a review of information available to the United States Government
are—(1)determined by the Secretary of Defense not to be organizations or persons that have been designated
as a foreign terrorist
organization pursuant to section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality
Act (8 U.S.C. 1189) or a Specifically Designated Global Terrorist pursuant
to Executive Order 13224 (66 Fed. Reg. 49079); and(2)assessed by the Secretary of Defense to be suitable recipients of United States support after
conducting a
review of available information that they are—(A)committed to rejecting terrorism, and cooperating with international counterterrorism and
nonproliferation efforts;(B)opposed to sectarian violence and revenge killings;(C)committed to establishing a peaceful, pluralistic, and democratic Syria that respects the human
rights and fundamental freedoms of all its citizens; and(D)committed to civilian rule, including subordinating the military to civilian authority, and the
rule of law for Syria.(c)Assistance to third countries in provision of training and equipmentThe Secretary may provide assistance to third countries for purposes of the provision of training
and equipment under subsection (a).(d)Concurrence of Secretary of StateThe Secretary of Defense shall obtain the concurrence of the Secretary of State before providing
assistance pursuant to this section.(e)Authority To accept contributionsThe Secretary of Defense may accept contributions from foreign governments to provide assistance
under this section. Any funds so accepted by the Secretary may be
credited to the account from which funds are made
available for the provision of such assistance, and may be used for such purpose
until
expended.(f)Notice to Congress on assistanceThe Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed notice on the
following:(1)Any
assistance provided pursuant to this section.(2)Any contributions accepted by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (e).(g)The authority to provide assistance under this section shall terminate on December 31, 2018.(h)Appropriate committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—(1)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign
Relations of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign
Affairs of the House of Representatives.1210.Limitations on security assistance for the Government of Burma(a)(1)Except as provided in paragraph (2), no amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made
available for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense by this Act
may be available for security assistance to the Government of Burma
unless the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of
State, certifies to the appropriate committees of Congress that—(A)the Government of Burma is taking steps toward—(i)establishing civilian oversight of the Burma military;(ii)implementing human rights reform in the Burma military; and(iii)terminating military relations with North Korea;(B)the Government of Burma is taking steps toward establishing a transparent and inclusive
process to amend the constitution of Burma, including the full
participation of the political opposition and all ethnic minority groups
in that process; and(C)the Burma military is demonstrating—(i)progress toward and reasonable adherence to ceasefire agreements; and(ii)increased transparency and accountability through activities such as establishing or updating a
code of conduct, a uniform code of military justice, an inspector general,
an ombudsman, or guidelines for relations between the military and
civilians.(2)Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the use of funds with respect to human rights and disaster relief
training as follows:(A)Consultation, education, and training on human rights, the law of armed conflict, civilian control
of the military, rule of law, and other legal training.(B)English-language, disaster relief, or military medicine education.(C)Courses or workshops on regional norms of security cooperation, defense institution reform, and
transnational issues such as human trafficking and international crime.(D)Observation of bilateral or multilateral military exercises on humanitarian assistance or disaster
relief.(E)Training on humanitarian assistance and disaster relief for the Burma military.(F)Aid or support for the Government of Burma in the event of a humanitarian crisis or natural
disaster.(b)(1)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the
Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State,
submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the strategy
and plans for military-to-military engagement between the United States
Armed Forces and the Burma military.(2)Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:(A)A description and assessment of the current strategy of the Government of Burma for reform of the
security sector of Burma.(B)A description of the current United States strategy for the military-to-military relationship
between the United States and Burma, and how military-to-military
engagement supports the United States national security strategy for
Burma.(C)A description and assessment of the record of the Burma military with respect to the
implementation of human rights reforms, including—(i)cooperation with civilian authorities to investigate and resolve cases of human rights violations;
and(ii)actions to demonstrate respect for law of war and human rights, including with respect to child
soldiers.(D)A description of the elements of the current military-to-military engagement between the United
States and Burma that promote the implementation of human rights reforms
described in subparagraph (C).(E)A current list of ongoing military-to-military activities conducted between the United States and
Burma, including a description of each such activity and an update of
any such activities in prior years that are ongoing as of the date of such
report.(F)A list of military-to-military activities between the United States and Burma that
are planned to occur during the one-year period beginning on the date of
such report, including a description of each such activity.(G)An assessment of current progress on the peaceful settlement of armed conflicts between the
Government of Burma and ethnic minority groups in Burma.(3)Each report under this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.(c)Appropriate committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—(1)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign
Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign
Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of
Representatives.1211.Biennial report on programs carried out by the Department of Defense to provide training,
equipment,
or other assistance or reimbursement to foreign security forces(a)Not later than February 1 of each of 2016, 2018, and 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall, in
coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to
the congressional defense committees a report that sets forth, on a
country-by-country basis, a description of each program carried out by
the Department of Defense to provide training,
equipment, or other security assistance or reimbursement during the two
fiscal
years ending in the year before the year in which such report is submitted
under the authorities specified in subsection (c).(b)Each report required under subsection (a) shall provide for each program covered by such report,
and for the reporting period covered by such report, the following:(1)A description of the purpose and type of the training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement
provided.(2)The cost of such training, equipment, or assistance or reimbursement, including by type of support
provided under such program.(c)The authorities specified in this subsection are the following:(1)Section 127d of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to provide logistic support,
supplies, and services to allied forces participating in a combined
operation with the Armed Forces.(2)Section 166a(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, relating to humanitarian and civic assistance
by the commanders of the combatant commands.(3)Section 168 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority—(A)to provide assistance to nations
of the former Soviet Union as part of the Warsaw Initiative Fund;(B)to conduct the Defense Institution Reform Initiative; and(C)to conduct a program to increase defense institutional legal capacity through the Defense Institute
of International Legal Studies.(4)Section 2010 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to reimburse foreign troops for
participation in combined exercises.(5)Section 2011 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to reimburse foreign troops for
participation in Joint Combined Exercise Training.(6)Section 2249c of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to use appropriated funds for
costs associated with education and training of foreign officials under
the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program.(7)Section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1203 of this Act), relating to
authority to build the capacity of foreign
military forces, or the predecessor authority to such section in section
1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006
(Public Law 109–163;
119 Stat. 3456).(8)Section 2561 of title 10, United States Code, relating to authority to provide humanitarian
assistance.(9)Section 1523, relating to the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund.(10)Section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (32 U.S.C. 107 note),
relating to authority for National Guard State Partnership program.(11)Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 168 note),
relating to the Ministry of Defense Advisors program.(12)Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note),
relating to the Global Security Contingency Fund.(13)Section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181;
122 Stat. 393), relating to authority to reimburse certain coalition
nations for support provided to United States military operations.(14)Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 394),
relating to authorization for logistical support for coalition forces
supporting certain United States military operations.(15)Section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111
Stat. 1881), relating to authority to provide additional support for
counter-drug activities of Peru and Colombia.(16)Section 1004 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (10 U.S.C. 374 note),
relating to additional support for counter-drug activities.(17)Any other authority on assistance or reimbursement that the Secretary of Defense considers
appropriate and consistent with subsection (a).(d)If any information required under subsection (a) has been included in another report or
notification previously submitted to Congress by law, the Secretary of
Defense may provide a compilation of such reports and notifications at the
time of submitting the report required by subsection (a) in lieu of
including such information in the report required by subsection (a).(e)Each report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain
a classified annex.(f)Repeal of superseded requirementSection 1209 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 368) is
repealed.1212.Sense of the Senate on multilateral humanitarian assistance and disaster relief exercisesIt is the sense of the Senate that—(1)humanitarian assistance and disaster relief multilateral exercises provide nations in the
Asia-Pacific region with the training, capacity building, and coordination
expertise necessary to respond to natural disasters that often cause
serious damage and loss of human life, as seen recently with the
devastation caused by the Haiyan typhoon in the Philippines; and(2)both the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan should be afforded the opportunity to participate in
the humanitarian assistance and disaster relief portions of future
multilateral exercises, such as Pacific Partnership, Pacific Angel, or the
Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC), to increase their capacity to effectively
respond to these types of disasters.BMatters Relating to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq1221.Commanders' Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan(a)Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125
Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 1211 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127
Stat. 904), is further amended by striking fiscal year 2014
each place it appears and inserting fiscal year 2015
.(b)Subsection (b) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—(1)in the subsection heading, by striking Quarterly
and inserting Semi-annual
; and(2)in paragraph (1)—(A)in the paragraph heading, by striking Quarterly
and inserting Semi-annual
;(B)by striking fiscal year quarter
and inserting half fiscal year
; and(C)by striking that quarter
and inserting that half fiscal year
.(c)Funds available during fiscal year 2015Subsection (a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking $60,000,000
and inserting $20,000,000
.(d)Restriction on amount of paymentsSubsection (e) of such section is amended by striking $20,000,000
and inserting $2,000,000
.(e)Notification on certain projectsSubsection (g) of such section is amended—(1)in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking $5,000,000
and inserting $500,000
;(2)in paragraph (1), by striking to advance the military campaign plan for Afghanistan
and inserting to directly benefit the security or stability of the people of Afghanistan
; and(3)in paragraph (3), by striking any agreement with either the Government of Afghanistan,
and inserting any written agreement with either the Government of Afghanistan, an entity owned or controlled by
the Government of Afghanistan,
.(f)Submittal of revised guidanceNot later than 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the guidance
issued by the Secretary to the Armed Forces concerning the Commanders'
Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan as revised to take into account
the amendments made by this section.1222.Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military
and security forces of Afghanistan(a)Subsection (h) of section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992) is amended by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31, 2015
.(b)Subsection (f)(1) of such section is amended by striking March 31, 2015
and inserting March 31, 2016
.(c)Subsection (i)(2) of such section is amended by striking and 2014
each place it appears and inserting , 2014, and 2015
.1223.One-year extension of authority to use funds for reintegration activities in AfghanistanSection 1216 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law
111–383; 124 Stat. 4392), as most recently amended by section 1212 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113–66; 127 Stat. 905), is further amended—(1)in subsection (a)—(A)by striking $25,000,000
and inserting $15,000,000
; and(B)by striking for fiscal year 2014
and inserting for fiscal year 2015
; and(2)in subsection (e), by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31, 2015
.1224.Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support
provided to United States military operations(a)Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
(Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section
1213 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 905), is further amended by striking fiscal year 2014
and inserting fiscal year 2015
.(b)Such section, as so amended, is further amended—(1)in subsection (a)(1), by striking in Operation Enduring Freedom
and inserting in Afghanistan
;(2)in subsection (b), by striking in Operation Enduring Freedom
in the matter preceding paragraph (1).(c)Limitation on amounts availableSubsection (d)(1) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—(1)in the second sentence, by striking during fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $1,500,000,000
and inserting during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $1,200,000,000
; and(2)in the third sentence, by striking during fiscal year 2013 may not exceed $1,200,000,000
and inserting during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $900,000,000
.(d)Extension of notice requirement relating to reimbursement of Pakistan for support provided by
PakistanSection 1332(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393),
as most recently amended by section 1213(c) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 906), is further amended
by striking September 30, 2014
and inserting September 30, 2015
.(e)Extension of limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on PakistanSection 1227(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2001), as amended by section 1213(d) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 906),
is further amended by striking fiscal year 2014
and inserting fiscal year 2015
.(f)Additional limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on PakistanOf the total amount of reimbursements and support authorized for Pakistan during fiscal year 2015
pursuant to the third sentence of section 1233(d)(1) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (as amended by subsection
(c)(2)), $300,000,000 shall not be eligible for the waiver under section
1227(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(126 Stat. 2001) unless the Secretary of Defense certifies that Pakistan
has undertaken military operations in North Waziristan that have
significantly disrupted the safe haven and freedom of movement of the
Haqqani network in Pakistan.1225.One-year extension
of logistical support for coalition forces supporting certain United States
military operationsSection
1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law
110–181; 122 Stat. 394), as most recently amended by section 1217(a) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66;
127 Stat. 909), is further amended—(1)in subsection (a), by striking fiscal year 2014
and inserting fiscal year 2015
;(2)in subsection (d), by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31, 2015
; and(3)in subsection (e)(1), by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31, 2015
.1226.Prohibition on use of funds for certain programs and projects of the Department of Defense in
Afghanistan that
cannot be safely accessed by United States Government personnel(a)Amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act for the Department of Defense may not be
obligated or expended for a reconstruction or other infrastructure
projects of the Department in Afghanistan if military
or civilian personnel of the
United States
Government with authority to conduct oversight of such program or project
cannot safely access such program or project.(b)(1)The prohibition in subsection (a) may be waived with respect to a program or project otherwise
covered by that subsection if a determination described in paragraph (2)
is made as follows:(A)In the case of a program or project with an estimated lifecycle cost of less than $1,000,000, by
the contracting officer assigned to oversee the program or project.(B)In the case of a program or project with an estimated lifecycle cost of $1,000,000 or more, but
less than $40,000,000, by the Commander of United States
Forces-Afghanistan.(C)In the case of a program or project with an estimated lifecycle cost of $40,000,000 or more, by the
Secretary of Defense.(2)A determination described in this paragraph with respect to a program or project is a determination
of each of the following:(A)That the program or project clearly contributes to United States national interests or strategic
objectives.(B)That the Government of Afghanistan has requested or expressed a need for the program or project.(C)That the program or project has been coordinated with the Government of Afghanistan, and with any
other implementing agencies or international donors.(D)That security conditions permit effective implementation and oversight of the program or project.(E)That the program or project includes safeguards to detect, deter, and mitigate corruption and
waste, fraud, and abuse of funds.(F)That adequate arrangements have been made for the sustainment of the program or project following
its completion, including arrangements with respect to funding and
technical
capacity for sustainment.(G)That meaningful metrics have been established to measure the progress and effectiveness of the
program or project in meeting its objectives(3)Notice on certain waiversIn the event a waiver is issued under paragraph (1) for a program or project described in
subparagraph (C) of that paragraph, the Secretary of Defense shall notify
Congress of the waiver not later than 15
days after the issuance of the waiver.1227.Semiannual report on enhancing the strategic partnership between the United States and Afghanistan(a)(1)The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the
appropriate committees of Congress on a semiannual basis a report on
building and
sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF).(2)A report under paragraph (1) shall be
submitted not later than April 30 each year, for the 6-month period ending
on the preceding March 31, and not later than October 31 each year, for
the 6-month period ending on the preceding September 30. No report is
required to be submitted under paragraph (1) after the report required to
be submitted on October
31, 2017.(3)Each report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.(b)Each report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)Objectives of United States and NATO missions in Afghanistan after 2014A statement of the objectives of any United States mission, and of any mission agreed by the
North Atlantic
Treaty Organization, to train, advise, and assist the Afghan National
Security Forces after 2014.(2)An assessment of the current security conditions in Afghanistan and the security conditions
anticipated in Afghanistan during the 24-month period beginning on the
date of the submittal of such report.(3)Description of size and structure of ANSFA description of—(A)the size and force structure of the Afghan National Security Forces, including the Afghanistan
National Army (ANA), the Afghanistan National Police (ANP), the Afghan
Border Police, the Afghan
Local Police, and such other major force components of the Afghan National
Security Forces as the Secretary considers appropriate;(B)the rationale for any changes in the overall end strength or the mix of force structure for the
Afghan National Security Forces during the period covered by such report;
and(C)levels of recruitment, retention, and attrition within the Afghan National Security Forces, in the
aggregate and by force
component; and(D)personnel levels within the Afghanistan Ministry of Defense and the Afghanistan Ministry of
Security.(4)Assessment of size, structure, and capabilities of ANSFAn assessment whether the size, structure, and capabilities of the Afghan National Security Forces
are sufficient to provide security with an acceptable level of risk in
light of the current security conditions in Afghanistan and the security
conditions anticipated in Afghanistan during the 24-month period beginning
on the date of the submittal of such report.(5)Building key capabilities and enabling forces within ANSF(A)A description of programs to achieve key mission enabling capabilities within the Afghan National
Security Forces, including any major milestones and timelines, and the end
states
intended to be achieved by such programs, including for the following:(i)Security institution capacity building.(ii)Special operations forces and their key enablers.(iii)Intelligence.(iv)Logistics.(v)Maintenance.(vi)Air forces.(B)Metrics for monitoring and evaluating the performance of such programs in achieving the intended
outcomes of such programs.(6)A description of—(A)any plan agreed by the United States, the international community, and the Government of
Afghanistan to fund and sustain the Afghan National Security Forces that
serves as current guidance on such matters during the period covered by
such report, including a description of whether such plan differs from—(i)in the case of the first report submitted under subsection (a), commitments undertaken at the 2012
NATO Summit in Chicago and the Tokyo Mutual Accountability Framework; or(ii)in the case of any other report submitted under subsection (a), such plan as set forth in the
previous report submitted under subsection (a);(B)the Afghan Security Forces Fund financing plan through 2017;(C)contributions by the international community to sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces
during the period covered by such report;(D)contributions by the Government of Afghanistan to sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces
during the period covered by such report;
and(E)efforts to ensure that the Government of Afghanistan can assume an increasing financial
responsibility for sustaining the Afghan National Security Forces
consistent with its commitments at
the Chicago Summit and the Tokyo Mutual Accountability Framework.(c)Appropriate
committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term
appropriate committees of Congress means—(1)the
Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee
on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and(2)the
Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee
on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.(d)Repeal of superseded authoritySection 1230 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is
repealed.1228.Report on bilateral security cooperation with Pakistan(a)Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and every six months thereafter,
the Secretary of Defense shall,
in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate
committees of Congress a report on the nature and extent of bilateral
security cooperation between the United States and Pakistan.(b)The report required under subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:(1)A description of any strategic security objectives that the United States and Pakistan have agreed
to pursue in cooperation.(2)A description of programs or activities that the United States and Pakistan have jointly undertaken
to pursue mutually agreed security cooperation objectives.(3)A description and assessment of the effectiveness of efforts by Pakistan, unilaterally or jointly
with the United States, to disrupt operations and eliminate safe havens of
al Qaeda, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan, and other militant extremist groups
such as the Haqqani Network and the Quetta Shura Taliban located in
Pakistan.(4)A description and assessment of efforts by Pakistan, unilaterally or jointly with the United
States, to counter the threat of improvised explosive devices and the
networks involved in the acquisition, production, and delivery of such
devices and their precursors and components.(5)An assessment of the effectiveness of any United States security assistance to Pakistan to achieve
the strategic security objectives described in paragraph (1).(6)A description of any metrics used to assess the effectiveness of programs and activities described
in paragraph (2).(7)An assessment of the cooperation of the Government of Pakistan in the search for Army Sergeant Bowe
Bergdahl, who was captured on June 30, 2009, in Paktika Province in
eastern Afghanistan, including an assessment of the degree to which the
Government of Pakistan has provided the Department of Defense all
requested information and intelligence relating to Sergeant Bergdahl, his
captors, and his whereabouts that could assist in his recovery. The
assessment should include a description of any unmet or partially met
requests for information and intelligence to the extent practicable.(c)The report required under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.(d)The requirements in this section shall terminate on December 31, 2017.(e)Appropriate committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—(1)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign
Relations of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Committee on Foreign
Affairs of the House of Representatives.(f)Repeal of obsolete and superseded requirementsSection 1232 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is
amended by striking subsections (a) and (c).1229.Surface clearance of unexploded ordnance on former United States training ranges in Afghanistan(a)Authority To conduct surface clearanceSubject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may, using funds specified in subsection (c),
conduct surface clearance of unexploded ordnance at closed training ranges
used by the Armed Forces of the United States in Afghanistan.(b)(1)Limitation to ranges not transferred to AfghanistanThe surface clearance of unexploded ordnance authorized under subsection (a) may only take place on
training ranges managed and operated by the Armed Forces of the United
States that have not been transferred to the Government of the Islamic
Republic of Afghanistan for use by its armed forces.(2)Limitation on amounts availableFunds expended for clearance pursuant to the authority in subsection (a) may not exceed
$125,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2015 and 2016.(c)The surface clearance of unexploded ordnance authorized by subsection (a) shall be paid for using
amounts as follows:(1)For fiscal year 2015, amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 1502 and available for
operation and maintenance for overseas contingency operations.(2)For fiscal year 2016, amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the Department
of Defense as additional authorizations of appropriations for overseas
contingency operations and available for operation and maintenance for
overseas contingency operations.(d)Unexploded ordnance definedIn this section, the term unexploded ordnance has the meaning given that term in section 101(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code.1230.Afghan
Special Immigrant Visa Program(a)This section may be cited as the
Afghan Allies Protection Extension Act
.(b)Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies
Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—(1)in paragraph (2)(A)—(A)by amending clause (ii) to read as
follows:(ii)was or is employed in Afghanistan on or
after October 7, 2001, for not less than 1 year—(I)by, or on behalf
of, the United States Government; or(II)by, or on behalf of, an organization or entity closely
associated with the United States mission in Afghanistan that has
received
United States Government funding through an official and documented
contract,
award, grant, or cooperative
agreement, including the International Security Assistance Force;;(B)in clause (iii), by striking the
United States Government
and inserting an entity or organization
described in clause (ii)
; and(C)in clause (iv), by striking
by the United States Government
and inserting described in clause (ii)
; and(2)in paragraph (3), by amending subparagraph (D) to read as follows:(D)For each of the fiscal years 2014 and 2015, the total number of principal aliens who may be
provided
special immigrant status under this section may not exceed 4,000 per year,
except that—(i)notwithstanding subparagraph (C), any unused balance of the total number of principal aliens who
may be provided special immigrant status in fiscal years 2014 and 2015 may
be carried forward and provided through December 31, 2016;(ii)the 1-year period during which an alien must have been employed in accordance with paragraph
(2)(A)(ii) shall be the period from October 7, 2001, through December 31,
2014; and(iii)the principal alien seeking special immigrant status under this subparagraph shall apply to the
Chief of Mission in accordance with paragraph (2)(D) not later than
December 31, 2015..1231.Extension and modification of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of
Security Cooperation in Iraq(a)Subsection (f)(1) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking fiscal year 2014
and inserting fiscal year 2015
.(b)Such section is further amended—(1)in subsection (c), by striking fiscal year 2014 may not exceed $209,000,000
and inserting fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $30,000,000
; and(2)in subsection (d), by striking fiscal year 2014
and inserting fiscal year 2015
.C1241.Report on impact of end of major combat operations in Afghanistan on authority to use military
force(a)Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall,
in
consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, submit
to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth an
assessment of the
impact, if any, of the end of major combat operations in Afghanistan on
the authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to use military
force, including the authority to detain, with regard to al Qaeda, the
Taliban and associated forces pursuant to—(1)the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40); and(2)any other available legal authority.(b)The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.(c)Appropriate committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—(1)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on the
Judiciary of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on the
Judiciary of the House of
Representatives.1242.United States strategy for enhancing security and stability in Europe(a)(1)Report on strategy requiredNot later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall,
in
consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate
committees of Congress a report on a strategy for enhancing security and
stability in Europe.(2)Sense of Congress on strategyIt is the sense of Congress that the United States strategy for enhancing security and stability in
Europe
should be guided by the following:(A)The United States reaffirms its commitment to the goal of a Europe that is whole, free, and
secure.(B)The United States is unwavering in its commitment to its obligations under the North Atlantic
Treaty, including the collective defense of allies under Article V.(C)Respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the countries of Europe within
internationally-recognized borders is fundamental to the security and
stability of the region and the national security interests of the United
States.(D)Overcoming the threat to security and stability produced by the actions of the Russian Federation
in seizing and annexing territory of
neighboring countries and ongoing
violations of the sovereignty of those countries is critical to United
States interests in regional stability.(b)United States and NATO force posture in Europe and contingency plans(1)The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the force posture, readiness, and
responsiveness of United States forces and the forces of other members of
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in the area of
responsibility of
the United States European Command, and of contingency plans for such
United States forces, with the objective of ensuring that the
posture, readiness, and responsiveness of such forces are
appropriate to meet the obligations of collective self-defense under
Article V of the North
Atlantic Treaty.(2)Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth
the following:(A)A summary of the
findings of the review conducted under paragraph (1).(B)A description of any
initiatives or recommendations of the Secretary for enhancing the force
posture,
readiness, and responsiveness of United States forces in the area of
responsibility of the United States European Command and contingency plans
as a
result
of that review.(C)A description of any initiatives of other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for
enhancing
the force posture, readiness, and responsiveness of their forces within
the area of responsibility of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.(c)Plan for enhancing reassurances to NATO allies(1)Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense
shall, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate
committees of Congress a report on a plan for reassuring Central European
and Eastern European members
of the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization regarding the commitment of the
United
States and other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to
their obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty, including collective
defense under Article V.(2)The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:(A)A description of measures to be undertaken by the United States to reassure members of the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization
regarding the commitment of the United States to its obligations under the
North Atlantic Treaty.(B)A description of measures undertaken or to be undertaken by other members of the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization to provide assurances of their commitment to meet
their obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty.(C)A description of any planned measures to increase the presence of the Armed Forces of the United
States and the forces of other members of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization, including on a
rotational basis, on the territories of the Central European and Eastern
European
members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.(D)A description of the measures undertaken by the United States and other members of the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization to enhance the capability of members of the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization to respond to tactics like those used
by the Russian Federation in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine or to assist
members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in
responding to such tactics.(d)Plan for enhancing United States security cooperation with NATO partners(1)Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and
the
Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of
Congress a plan for enhancing bilateral and multilateral security
cooperation with appropriate countries participating in the North Atlantic
Treaty
Organization Partnership for
Peace program.(2)Authorities for enhancing security cooperationFor purposes of this subsection, the authorities for enhancing security cooperation with countries
specified in paragraph (1) may include, but are not limited to, the
following:(A)Section 168 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the Warsaw Initiative Fund.(B)Section 2282 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1203 of this Act), relating to
authority to build the capacity of foreign
military forces.(C)Section 2283 of title 10, United States Code (as added by section 1204 of this Act), relating to
training of security forces and associated ministries of foreign
countries to promote respect for
the rule
of law and human rights.(D)Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(10 U.S.C. 168 note), relating to the Ministry of Defense Advisors
program.(E)Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(22 U.S.C. 2151 note), relating to the Global Security Contingency Fund.(F)Any other authority available to the Secretary of Defense or Secretary of State appropriate for
such purpose.(e)United States military-to-military relations with Russian Federation(1)Prohibition of use of funds for bilateral security cooperation activitiesNone of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used to conduct bilateral
security cooperation activities between the military forces of the United
States and the Russian
Federation until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives that the
armed forces of Russia have drawn down from areas adjacent to the border
of Ukraine and ceased
aggressive activities that threaten the security and territorial integrity
of Ukraine and members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.(2)The prohibition in paragraph (1) shall not apply to any activities necessary to ensure the
compliance of the United States with its
obligations under any bilateral or multilateral arms control or
nonproliferation agreement or any other treaty obligation of the United
States.(3)The Secretary of Defense may waive the applicability of the prohibition in paragraph (1) to the
extent the Secretary determines that such waiver is necessary—(A)to provide logistical or other support to the conduct of United States or North Atlantic Treaty
Organization military operations
in Afghanistan or the withdrawal from Afghanistan;(B)to provide for the orderly and complete elimination of the Syrian chemical weapons program;(C)to provide support to international negotiations on the nuclear program of Iran, including
implementation of the Joint Plan of Action and negotiation of a long-term
comprehensive agreement; or(D)to meet other critical national security needs of the United States.(f)Appropriate committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—(1)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on
Appropriations of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on
Appropriations of the
House of Representatives.1243.Report on military and security developments involving the Russian
Federation(a)Not later than June 1, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the specified congressional
committees a report on the security and military strategy of the Russian
Federation.(b)The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:(1)The elements set forth in paragraphs (1) through (7) of section 1254(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 927).(2)A description of Russian military spending and investment priorities and their alignment with
security priorities and objectives described in paragraph (1) of such
section, including
the capabilities under development and acquisition timelines for Russia’s
5th generation fighter program.(3)A description of Russia's modernization program for its command, control, communications,
computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and its
applications for Russia's precision guided weapons.(4)A description of Russia’s current missile defense strategy and capabilities, including efforts to
develop missile defense capabilities.(5)An assessment of the tactics, techniques, and procedures used by Russia in operations in Ukraine.(6)A description of Russia's asymmetric strategy and capabilities, including efforts to develop and
deploy electronic warfare, space and counterspace, and cyberwarfare
capabilities, including details on
the number of malicious cyber incidents and associated activities against
Department of Defense networks that are known or suspected to have been
conducted or directed by the Government of the Russian Federation.(7)A description of Russia's nuclear strategy and associated doctrines, and nuclear capabilities,
including the size and state of Russia's nuclear weapons stockpile, its
nuclear weapons
production capacities, and plans for developing its nuclear capabilities.(8)A description of changes to United States policy on military-to-military contacts with Russia
resulting from Russia’s annexation of Crimea.(c)Nonduplication of effortsIf any information required under subsection (b) has been included in another report or
notification previously submitted to Congress as required by law, the
Secretary of
Defense may provide a compilation of such reports and notifications
at the time of submitting the report required by subsection (a) in lieu
of including such information.(d)Specified congressional committees definedIn this section, the term specified congressional committees means—(1)the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives.1244.Modification of matters for discussion in annual reports of United States-China Economic and
Security
Review Commission(a)Section 1238(c)(2) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001
(as enacted into
law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C. 7002(c)(2)) is amended by striking
subparagraphs (A) through (J) and inserting the following new
subparagraphs:(A)The role of the People’s Republic of China in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and
other weapons (including dual use technologies), including actions the
United States might take to encourage the People’s Republic of China to
cease such practices.(B)The qualitative and quantitative nature of the transfer of United States production activities to
the People’s Republic of China, including the relocation of manufacturing,
high technology and intellectual property, and research and development
facilities, the impact of such transfers on the national security of the
United States (including the dependence of the national security
industrial base of the United States on imports from China), the economic
security of the United States, and employment in the United States, and
the adequacy of United States export control laws in relation to the
People's Republic of China.(C)The effects of the need for energy and natural resources in the People’s Republic of China on the
foreign and military policies of the People's Republic of China, the
impact of the large and growing economy of the People’s Republic of China
on world energy and natural resource supplies, prices, and the
environment, and the role the United States can play (including through
joint research and development efforts and technological assistance) in
influencing the energy and natural resource policies of the People’s
Republic of China.(D)Foreign investment by the United States in the People’s Republic of China and by the People’s
Republic of China in the United States, including an assessment of its
economic and security implications, the challenges to market access
confronting potential United States investment in the People’s Republic of
China, and foreign activities by financial institutions in the People's
Republic of China.(E)The military plans, strategy and doctrine of the People’s Republic of China, the structure and
organization of the People's Republic of China military, the
decision-making
process of the People's Republic of China military, the interaction
between the civilian and military leadership in the People's Republic of
China, the development and promotion process for leaders in
the People's Republic of China military, deployments of the People's
Republic of China military, resources available to the People's
Republic of China military (including the development and execution of
budgets and the allocation of funds), force modernization objectives and
trends for the People's Republic of China military, and the implications
of such objectives and trends for the national security of the United
States.(F)The strategic economic and security implications of the cyber operations of the People’s Republic
of China.(G)The national budget, fiscal policy, monetary policy, capital controls, and currency management
practices of the People's Republic of China, their impact on internal
stability in the People’s Republic of China, and their implications for
the United States.(H)The drivers, nature, and implications of the growing economic, technological, political, cultural,
people-to-people, and security relations of the People’s Republic of
China’s with other countries, regions, and international and regional
entities (including multilateral organizations), including the triangular
relationship among the United States, Taiwan, and the People’s Republic of
China.(I)The compliance of the People’s Republic of China with its commitments to the World Trade
Organization, other multilateral commitments, bilateral agreements signed
with the United States, commitments made to bilateral science and
technology programs, and any other commitments and agreements strategic to
the United States (including agreements on intellectual property rights
and prison labor imports), and United States enforcement policies with
respect to such agreements.(J)The implications of restrictions on speech and access to information in the People’s Republic of
China for its relations with the United States in economic
and security policy, as well as any potential impact of media control by
the People's Republic of China on United States economic interests.(K)The safety of food, drug, and other products imported from China, the measures used by the People's
Republic of China Government and the United States Government to monitor
and enforce product safety, and the role the United States can play
(including through technical assistance) to improve product safety in the
People’s Republic of China..(b)The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act,
and shall apply with respect to annual reports submitted under section
1238(c) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2001
after that date.1245.Report on maritime security strategy and annual briefing on military to military engagement
with the People’s Republic of China(a)(1)Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to
the
congressional defense committees a report that outlines the strategy of
the Department of Defense with regard to maritime security in the South
China Sea and the East
China Sea that seeks to balance the interests of the United States,
the People's Republic of China, and other countries in the region.(2)The report required by paragraph (1) shall outline the strategy described in that paragraph and
include the following:(A)A description of any current or planned bilateral or regional maritime capacity building
initiatives in the South China Sea and the East
China Sea region.(B)An assessment of anti-access and area denial capabilities of the People's Republic of China in the
region, including weapons and technologies, and
their impact on United States maritime strategy in the region.(C)An assessment of how the actions of the People’s Republic of China in the South
China Sea and the East China Sea have
changed the status quo with regard to competing territorial and maritime
claims in those seas.(D)A detailed analysis and assessment of the manner in which military to military engagements between
the United States and the People's Republic of China facilitates a
reduction in potential
miscalculation and tension in the South China Sea and the East China Sea,
including a specific description of the effect of such engagements on
particular incidents or interactions involving the People's Republic of
China in those seas.(E)A description of the naval modernization efforts of the People's Republic of China, including both
defense and law enforcement
capabilities and the implications of such efforts for United States
maritime strategy in the region.(3)The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.(b)Not later than May 15 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the congressional
defense committees a
briefing (in classified form, if appropriate) on the following:(1)An outline in detail of all of the planned and
potential military to military engagements between the United States and
the People's Republic of China during the fiscal year beginning in the
year of such briefing, including the objectives of such engagements.(2)An assessment of the military to military engagements between the United States and the People's
Republic of China during the fiscal year ending in the year preceding such
briefing, and during the first fiscal half year of the fiscal year of such
briefing, including an assessment of the success of such engagements in
meeting the objectives of the Commander of the United States Pacific
Command for such engagements.1246.Report on military assistance to Ukraine(a)Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter,
the Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment and submit a report
to the congressional defense committees related to military assistance to
Ukraine.(b)At a minimum, the report required under subsection (a) should provide a detailed explanation of the
following matters:(1)Military equipment, supplies, and defense services, including type, quantity, and prioritization of
such items, requested by the Government of Ukraine.(2)Military equipment, supplies, and defense services, including type,
quantity, and actual or estimated delivery date, that the United States
Government has provided, is currently providing, and plans to provide to
the Government of Ukraine.(3)An assessment of what United States military assistance to the Government of Ukraine, including
type and quantity, would most effectively improve the military readiness
and capabilities of the Ukrainian military.(4)An assessment of the need for, appropriateness of, and force protection concerns of any United
States military advisors that may be made available to the armed forces of
Ukraine.(5)Military training requested by the Government of Ukraine.(6)Military training the United States Government has conducted with Ukraine in the previous six
months.(7)Military training the United States Government plans to conduct with the Government of Ukraine in
the next
year.(c)The requirements in this section shall terminate on January 31, 2017.D1261.
Treatment of Kurdistan Democratic Party and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan under the Immigration and
Nationality Act(a)Exclusion of Kurdistan Democratic Party and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan from treatment as
terrorist organizationsThe Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, or the Secretary
of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may
exclude the Kurdistan Democratic
Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan from the definition of
terrorist organization in section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III)).(b)Relief for certain members of Kurdistan Democratic Party and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan
regarding admissibilityIf the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security uses the authority provided in
subsection (a), such Secretary shall not apply paragraph (3)(B) of
section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.1182(a)) to
an alien with respect to activities undertaken in association with the
Kurdistan Democratic Party or the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan in
opposition to the regime of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party and the
autocratic dictatorship of Saddam Hussein in Iraq.(c)Prohibition on judicial reviewNotwithstanding any other provision of law (whether statutory or nonstatutory), section 242 of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S. C. 1252), sections 1361 and 1651
of title 28, United States Code, section 2241 of such title, and any other
habeas corpus provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review
any determination made pursuant to subsection (a) or (b).1262.Notification on potentially significant arms control noncompliance(a)If the Secretary of Defense has substantial reason to believe that there is a potentially
significant case of foreign noncompliance with an arms control treaty to
which the United States is a party, the Secretary shall notify the
President of such belief.(b)Not later than 30 days after notifying the President of a belief under subsection (a), the
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee
on
Foreign Relations, and the Select Committee on
Intelligence of the Senate a notice of the action taken to notify the
President pursuant to that subsection.1263.Enhanced authority for provision of support to foreign military liaison officers of foreign
countries while assigned to the Department of Defense(a)Subsection (a) of section 1051a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the matter preceding paragraph (1)—(A)by striking involved in a military operation with the United States
; and(B)by striking temporarily
;(2)in paragraph (1)—(A)by striking , component command,
; and(B)by striking in connection with the planning for, or conduct of, a military operation
; and(3)in paragraph (2), by striking To the headquarters of
and all that follows and inserting To the Joint Staff.
.(b)Travel, subsistence, and medical care expensesSubsection (b) of such section is amended—(1)in paragraph (1)—(A)by striking to the headquarters of a combatant command
; and(B)by inserting or by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as appropriate
before the period at the end; and(2)in paragraph (3), by striking if such travel
and all that follows and inserting “if such travel meets each of the following conditions:(A)The travel is in support of the national interests of the United States.(B)The commander of the combatant command concerned or the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as
applicable, directs round-trip travel from the assigned location to one or
more travel locations..(c)Subsection (c) of such section is amended—(1)by striking To the extent that the Secretary determines appropriate, the
and inserting The
; and(2)by adding at the end the following new sentence: The terms of reimbursement shall be specified in the appropriate international agreement used to
assign the liaison officer to a combatant command or to the Joint Staff.
.(d)Subsection (d) of such section is amended by inserting training programs conducted to familiarize, orient, or certify liaison personnel regarding unique
aspects of the assignments of the liaison personnel,
after police protection,
.1264.One-year extension of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities(a)Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578), as most recently amended
by section 1241 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 920), is further amended by striking 2015
and inserting 2016
.(b)Cross-reference amendmentSubsection (f) of such section is amended by striking 413b(e)
and inserting 3093(e)
.1265.Inter-European Air Forces Academy(a)The Secretary of the Air Force may operate the Air Force education and training facility known as
the Inter-European Air Forces Academy (in this section referred to as the Academy
).(b)The purpose of the Academy shall be to provide military education and training to military
personnel of countries that are members of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization or
signatories to the Partnership for Peace Framework Documents.(c)(1)Concurrence of Secretary of StateMilitary personnel of a country may be provided education and training under this section only with
the concurrence of the Secretary of State.(2)Assistance otherwise prohibited by lawEducation and training may not be provided under this section to the military personnel of any
country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such type of
assistance under any other provision of law.(d)The Secretary of the Air Force may, under such conditions as the Secretary may prescribe, provide
to a person receiving education and training under this section the
following:(1)Transportation incident to such education and training.(2)Supplies and equipment to be used during such education and training.(3)Billeting, food, and health services in connection with the receipt of such education and training.(e)The Secretary of the Air Force may pay to a person receiving education and training under this
section a living allowance at a rate to be prescribed by the Secretary,
taking into account the rates of living allowances authorized for a member
of the Armed Forces under similar circumstances.(f)Amounts for the operations and maintenance of the Academy, and for the provision of education and
training through the Academy, may be paid from funds available for the Air
Force for operation and maintenance.(g)(1)Not later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the Secretary of the Air Force
operates the Academy pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall submit
to the congressional defense committees a report on the operations of the
Academy during such fiscal year.(2)Each report under this subsection shall set forth, for the fiscal year covered by such report, the
following:(A)A description of the operations of the Academy.(B)A summary of the number of individuals receiving education and training through the Academy, set
forth by country of origin and education or training provided.(C)The amount paid by the Secretary for the operations and maintenance of the Academy.(D)The amounts paid by the Secretary under subsections (d) and (e) in connection with the provision
of education and training through the Academy.(h)The authority in subsection (a) shall expire on September 30, 2017.1266.Extension of limitations on providing certain missile defense information to the Russian FederationSection 1246(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66;
127 Stat. 922) is amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by striking 2016
and inserting 2017
; and(2)in paragraph (2), by inserting or 2015
after 2014
.1267.Prohibition on direct or indirect use of funds to enter into contracts or agreements with
Rosoboronexport
(a)
(1)
The Department of Defense may not enter into a contract, memorandum of understanding, or
cooperative agreement with, or make a grant to, or provide a loan or
loan agreement to Rosoboronexport or any subsidiary or affiliate of
Rosoboronexport.
(2)
Termination of existing contracts and agreements
The Secretary of Defense shall immediately terminate any contract, memorandum of
understanding, cooperative agreement, loan, or loan agreement described in
paragraph (1).(b)National security waiver authorityThe President may waive the applicability of subsection (a) if the President, in consultation with
the Secretary of Defense, certifies in writing to the congressional
defense
committees that, to the best of the President's knowledge—(1)Rosoboronexport has ceased the transfer of lethal military equipment to, and the maintenance of
existing lethal military equipment for, the Government of the Syrian Arab
Republic;(2)the armed forces of the Russian Federation have withdrawn from Crimea (other than military forces
present on military bases subject to agreements in force between the
Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of Ukraine); and(3)agents of the Russian Federation are not taking active measures to destabilize the control of the
Government of Ukraine over eastern Ukraine (including through active
support of efforts to unlawfully occupy facilities of the Government of
Ukraine).(c)Report on Rosoboronexport activities(1)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the
following:(A)A list of the known transfers of lethal military equipment by Rosoboronexport to the Government of
the Syrian Arab Republic since March 15, 2011.(B)A list of the known contracts, if any, that Rosoboronexport has signed with the Government of the
Syrian Arab Republic since March 15, 2011.(C)A detailed list of all existing contracts, subcontracts, memorandums of understanding, cooperative
agreements, grants, loans, and loan guarantees between the Department of
Defense and Rosoboronexport, including a description of the transaction,
signing dates, values, and quantities.(2)The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.XIIICOOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTIONA1301.Specification of Cooperative Threat Reduction funds(a)Fiscal year 2015 cooperative threat reduction funds definedAs used in this subtitle, the term fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and
made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of
Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program established under section 1321.(b)Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made
available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of
Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years
2015, 2016, and 2017.1302.(a)Funding for specific purposesOf the $365,088,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year
2015 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section
4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program established under section 1321, the following amounts
may
be obligated for the purposes specified:(1)For strategic offensive arms elimination, $1,000,000.(2)For chemical weapons destruction, $15,720,000.(3)For global nuclear security, $20,703,000.(4)For cooperative biological engagement, $256,742,000.(5)For proliferation prevention, $40,704,000.(6)For threat reduction engagement, $2,375,000.(7)For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $27,844,000.(b)Report on obligation or expenditure of funds for other purposesNo fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds may be obligated or expended for a purpose
other than a purpose listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection
(a) until 15 days after the date that the Secretary of Defense submits to
Congress a report on the purpose for which the funds will be obligated or
expended and the amount of funds to be obligated or expended. Nothing in
the preceding sentence shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or
expenditure of fiscal year 2015 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a
purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is
specifically prohibited under this title or any other provision of law.(c)Limited authority to vary individual amounts(1)Subject to paragraph (2), in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that it is
necessary to do so in the national interest, the Secretary may obligate
amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for a purpose listed in
paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in excess of the specific
amount authorized for that purpose.(2)An obligation of funds for a purpose stated in paragraphs (1) through (7) of subsection (a) in
excess of the specific amount authorized for such purpose may be made
using the authority provided in paragraph (1) only after—(A)the Secretary submits to Congress notification of the intent to do so together with a complete
discussion of the justification for doing so; and(B)15 days have elapsed following the date of the notification.BConsolidation and modernization of statutes relating to the Department of Defense Cooperative
Threat Reduction Program1311.This subtitle may be cited as the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act
.I1321.Authority to carry out the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program(a)The Secretary of Defense may carry out a program, referred
to as the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program
, with respect to foreign states to do the following:(1)Facilitate the elimination and the safe and secure transportation and storage of chemical,
biological, or other weapons, weapons components, weapons-related
materials, and their delivery vehicles.(2)Facilitate—(A)the safe and secure transportation and storage of nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons-usable or
high-threat radiological materials, nuclear weapons components, and their
delivery vehicles; and(B)the elimination of nuclear weapons components and nuclear weapons delivery vehicles.(3)Prevent the proliferation of nuclear and chemical weapons, weapons components, and weapons-related
materials, technology, and expertise.(4)Prevent the proliferation of biological weapons, weapons components, and weapons-related materials,
technology, and expertise, which may include activities that facilitate
detection and reporting of highly pathogenic diseases or other diseases
that are associated with or that could be utilized as an early warning
mechanism for disease outbreaks that could impact the Armed Forces of the
United States or allies of the United States.(5)Prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction-related materials, including all
materials, equipment, and technology that could be used for the design,
development, production, or use of nuclear, chemical, and biological
weapons and their means of delivery.(6)Carry out military-to-military and defense contacts for advancing the mission of the Program,
subject to subsection (f).(b)Concurrence of Secretary of StateThe authority under subsection (a) to carry out the Program is subject to any concurrence of the
Secretary
of State or other appropriate agency head required under section
1322 or 1323
(unless such concurrence is otherwise exempted by
section 1352).(c)The authority to carry out the Program in subsection (a) includes authority to provide equipment,
goods, and services, but does not include authority to provide cash
directly to a project or activity carried out under the Program.(d)The Program carried out under subsection (a) may involve assistance in planning and in resolving
technical problems associated with weapons destruction and proliferation.
The Program may also involve the funding of critical short-term
requirements related to weapons destruction.(e)Reimbursement of other agenciesThe Secretary of Defense may reimburse other United States Government departments and agencies
under this section for costs of participation in the Program carried out
under subsection (a).(f)Military-to-military and defense contactsThe Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the military-to-military and defense contacts carried
out under subsection (a)(6)—(1)are focused and expanded to support specific relationship-building opportunities, which could lead
to Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program development
in new geographic areas and achieve other Department of Defense
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program benefits;(2)are directly administered as part of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program; and(3)include cooperation and coordination with—(A)the unified combatant commands; and(B)the Department of State.(g)Prior notice to congress of obligation of funds(1)Not less than 15 days before any obligation of any funds appropriated for any fiscal year for the
Program, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report on that proposed
obligation for that fiscal year.(2)Matters to be specified in reportsEach such report shall specify—(A)the activities and forms of assistance for which the Secretary of Defense plans to obligate funds;(B)the amount of the proposed obligation; and(C)the projected involvement (if any) of any department or agency of the United States (in addition to
the Department of Defense) and of the private sector of the United States
in the activities and forms of assistance for which the Secretary of
Defense plans to obligate such funds.1322.Use of Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for certain emergent threats or
opportunities(a)For purposes of the Program specified in section 1321, the Secretary of Defense may obligate and
expend Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for a
fiscal year, and any Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
funds for a fiscal year before such fiscal year that remain available for
obligation, for a proliferation threat reduction project or activity if
the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State,
determines each of the following:(1)That such project or activity will—(A)assist the United States in the resolution of a critical emerging proliferation threat; or(B)permit the United States to take advantage of opportunities to achieve long-standing
nonproliferation goals.(2)That such project or activity will be completed in a short period of time.(3)That the Department of Defense is the entity of the Federal Government that is most capable of
carrying out such project or activity.(b)Congressional notificationNot later than 10 days after obligating funds under the authority in subsection (a) for a project
or activity, the Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional
defense committees and the Secretary of State shall notify the Committee
on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Foreign Relations of the Senate in writing of the determinations made
under subsection (a) with respect to such project or activity, together
with—(1)a justification for such determinations; and(2)a description of the scope and duration of such project or activity.(c)Non-defense agency partner-nation contactsFor military-to-military and defense contacts carried out under subsection (a)(6) of section 1321,
as further described in subsection (f) of such section, concurrence of the
Secretary of State is
required only for participation by personnel from
non-defense agencies.1323.Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program authority for urgent threat reduction
activities(a)Subject to the requirements under subsection (b) or (c), as applicable, not more than 15 percent of
the total amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal
year for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program
may be expended, notwithstanding any other provision of law, for
activities described
under subsections (b)(1)(B) and (c)(1)(B).(b)Secretary of defense determination and notice(1)Subject to paragraph (2), amounts may be expended by the Secretary of Defense as described in
subsection (a) if the Secretary makes a written determination that—(A)a threat arising from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons or
weapons-related materials, technologies, or expertise must be addressed
urgently;(B)certain provisions of law would unnecessarily impede the Secretary's ability to carry out
activities of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program to address that threat; and(C)it is necessary to expend amounts as described in subsection (a) to carry out such activities.(2)A determination by the Secretary of Defense under paragraph (1) may only be made with the
concurrence of the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Energy.(3)Not later than 15 days after obligating or expending funds under the authority provided in
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall, after consultation with
the Secretary of State, notify the congressional defense committees, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate of the determination made
under paragraph (1). The notice shall include the following:(A)The determination.(B)The activities to be undertaken by the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.(C)The expected time frame for such activities.(D)The expected costs of such activities.(c)Presidential determination and notice(1)Amounts may be made available under subsection (a) if the President makes a written
determination that—(A)a threat arising from the proliferation of chemical, nuclear, or biological weapons or
weapons-related materials, technologies, or expertise must be addressed
urgently in an ungoverned area or an area that is not controlled by an
effective governmental authority, as determined by the Secretary of State;
and(B)it is necessary to make available amounts as described in subsection (a) to carry out activities of
the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program to address
that threat.(2)Not less than 15 days before obligating or expending funds under the authority provided in
subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall, after consultation with
the Secretary of State, notify the congressional defense committees, the
Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the
Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate of the determination made
under paragraph (1). The notice shall include the following:(A)The determination.(B)The activities to be undertaken through the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program.(C)The expected time frame for such activities.(D)The expected costs of such activities.1324.Use of funds for other purposes or for increased amounts(a)Notice to congress of intent to use funds for other purposes(1)For any fiscal year for which amounts are specifically authorized in an Act other than an
appropriations Act for specific purposes (specified by law) within the
Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, amounts
appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program for that fiscal year may be obligated
or expended for a Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
purpose other than one of the purposes so specified if—(A)the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest; and(B)the requirements of subsection (c) have been met.(2)Construction with other lawsNothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed as authorizing the obligation or expenditure of
Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program funds for a
purpose for which the obligation or expenditure of such funds is
specifically prohibited under any provision of law.(b)Limited authority to vary individual amounts provided for any fiscal year for specified purposesFor any fiscal year for which amounts are specifically authorized in an Act other than an
appropriations Act for specific purposes (specified by law) within the
Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, the Secretary
of Defense may obligate funds appropriated or
otherwise made available for any such purpose for that fiscal year in
excess of the specific amount so authorized for that purpose if—(1)the Secretary of Defense determines that it is necessary to do so in the national interest; and(2)the requirements of subsection (c) have been met.(c)Notice-and-wait requirementsThe requirements of this subsection for purposes of subsections (a) and (b) are that—(1)the Secretary of Defense submit to the congressional defense committees notification of the intent
to obligate
funds as described in subsection (a) or (b), together with a complete
discussion of the justification for doing so and, in the case of a report
for purposes of subsection (a), a statement of the purpose for which the
funds will be used and the amount of funds to be used; and(2)15 days have elapsed following the date of the notification.1325.Use of contributions to the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program(a)Authority to enter into agreements(1)Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may enter into one or more agreements with any
person (including a foreign government, international organization,
multinational entity, or any other entity) that the Secretary of Defense
considers appropriate under which the person contributes funds for
activities conducted under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program.(2)Requirement for secretary of state concurrenceThe Secretary of Defense may enter into an agreement under this subsection only with the
concurrence of the Secretary of State.(b)Retention and use of amountsNotwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, United States Code, and subject to subsections (c) and
(d), the Secretary of Defense may retain and obligate or expend amounts
contributed pursuant to subsection (a) for purposes of the Department of
Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Amounts so contributed shall
be retained in a separate fund established in the Treasury for such
purposes and shall be available to be obligated or expended without
further appropriation.(c)Return of amounts not obligated or expended within three yearsIf the Secretary of Defense does not obligate or expend an amount contributed pursuant to
subsection (a) by the date that is three years after the date on which the
contribution was made, the Secretary shall return the amount to the person
who made the contribution.(d)Notice to congressional defense committees(1)Not later than 30 days after receiving an amount contributed pursuant to subsection (a), the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees
a notice—(A)specifying the value of the contribution and the purpose for which the contribution was made; and(B)identifying the person who made the contribution.(2)Limitation on use of amountsThe Secretary of Defense may not obligate an amount contributed pursuant to subsection (a) until
the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the
notice required by paragraph (1).(e)Not later than the first Monday in February of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on amounts contributed
pursuant to subsection (a) during the preceding fiscal year. Each such
report shall include, for the fiscal year covered by the report, the
following:(1)A statement of any amounts contributed pursuant to subsection (a), including, for each such amount,
the value of the contribution and the identity of the person who made the
contribution.(2)A statement of any amounts so contributed that were obligated or expended by the Secretary of
Defense, including, for each such amount, the purposes for which the
amount was obligated or expended.(3)A statement of any amounts so contributed that were retained but not obligated or expended,
including, for each such amount, the purposes (if known) for which the
Secretary of Defense intends to obligate or expend the amount.(f)The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an implementation
plan for the authority provided under this section prior to obligating or
expending any amounts contributed pursuant to subsection (a). The
Secretary of Defense shall submit updates to such plan as needed.IIRestrictions and limitations1331.Prohibition on use of funds for specified purposes(a)Funds appropriated for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program may not be
obligated or expended for any of the following purposes:(1)Conducting any peacekeeping exercise or other peacekeeping-related activity.(2)Provision of housing.(3)Provision of assistance to promote environmental restoration.(4)Provision of assistance to promote job retraining.(5)Provision of assistance to promote defense conversion.(b)Limitation with respect to conventional weaponsFunds appropriated for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program may not be
obligated or expended for elimination of—(1)conventional weapons; or(2)conventional weapons delivery vehicles, unless such delivery vehicles could reasonably be used or
adapted to be used for the delivery of chemical, nuclear, or biological
weapons.1332.Requirement for on-site managers(a)On-site manager requirementBefore obligating any Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program funds for a
project described in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall
appoint one on-site manager for that project. The manager shall be
appointed from among employees of the Federal Government.(b)Subsection (a) applies to a project—(1)to be located in a state of the former Soviet Union;(2)which involves dismantlement, destruction, or storage facilities, or construction of a facility;
and(3)with respect to which the total contribution by the Department of Defense is expected to exceed
$50,000,000.(c)Duties of on-site managerThe on-site manager appointed under subsection (a) shall—(1)develop, in cooperation with representatives from governments of states participating in the
project, a list of those steps or activities critical to achieving the
project's disarmament or nonproliferation goals;(2)establish a schedule for completing those steps or activities;(3)meet with all participants to seek assurances that those steps or activities are being completed on
schedule; and(4)suspend United States participation in a project when a non-United States participant fails to
complete a scheduled step or activity on time, unless directed by the
Secretary of Defense to resume United States participation.(d)Authority to manage more than one project(1)Subject to paragraph (2), an employee of the Federal Government may serve as on-site manager for
more than one project, including projects at different locations.(2)If such an employee serves as on-site manager for more than one project in a fiscal year, the total
cost of the projects for that fiscal year may not exceed $150,000,000.(e)Steps or activities referred to in subsection (c)(1) are those activities that, if not completed,
will prevent a project from achieving its disarmament or nonproliferation
goals, including, at a minimum, the following:(1)Identification and acquisition of permits (as defined in section 1333).(2)Verification that the items, substances, or capabilities to be dismantled, secured, or otherwise
modified are available for dismantlement, securing, or modification.(3)Timely provision of financial, personnel, management, transportation, and other resources.(f)In any case in which the Secretary of Defense directs an on-site manager to resume United States
participation in a project under subsection (c)(4), the Secretary shall
concurrently notify the congressional defense committees of such
direction.1333.Limitation on use of funds until certain permits obtained(a)The Secretary of Defense shall seek to obtain all the permits required to complete each phase of
construction of a project under the Department of Defense Cooperative
Threat Reduction Program in a state of the former Soviet Union before
obligating significant amounts of funding for that phase of the project.(b)Use of funds for new construction projectsExcept as provided in subsection (c), with respect to a new construction project to be carried out
by the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, not
more than 40 percent of the total costs of the project may be obligated
from Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program funds for
any fiscal year until the Secretary of Defense—(1)determines the number and type of permits that may be required for the lifetime of the project in
the proposed location or locations of the project; and(2)obtains from the state in which the project is to be located any permits that may be required to
begin construction.(c)Exception to limitations on use of fundsThe limitation in subsection (b) on the obligation of funds for a construction project otherwise
covered by such subsection shall not apply with respect to the obligation
of funds for a particular project if the Secretary of Defense—(1)determines that it is necessary in the national interest to obligate funds for such project; and(2)submits to the congressional defense committees a notification of the intent to obligate funds for
such project, together with a complete discussion of the justification for
doing so.(d)In this section, with respect to a project under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program:(1)The term new construction project means a construction project for which no funds have been obligated or expended as of November 24,
2003.(2)The term permit means any local or national permit for development, general construction, environmental, land use,
or other purposes that is required for purposes of major construction.IIIRecurring certifications and reports1341.Annual certifications on use of facilities being constructed for Department of Defense Cooperative
Threat Reduction projects or activitiesNot later than the first Monday in February each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a certification for each facility for a
Cooperative Threat Reduction project or activity for which construction
occurred during the preceding fiscal year on matters as follows:(1)Whether or not such facility will be used for its intended purpose by the government of the state
of the former Soviet Union in which the facility is constructed.(2)Whether or not the government of such state remains committed to the use of such facility for its
intended purpose.(3)Whether those actions needed to ensure security at the facility, including secure transportation of
any materials, substances, or weapons to, from, or within the facility,
have been taken.1342.Requirement to submit summary of amounts requested by project category(a)The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees in the materials and
manner specified in subsection (c)—(1)a descriptive summary, with respect to the appropriations requested for the Department of Defense
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program for the fiscal year after the fiscal
year in which the summary is submitted, of the amounts requested for each
project category under each Department of Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program element; and(2)a descriptive summary, with respect to appropriations for the Department of Defense Cooperative
Threat Reduction Program for the fiscal year in which the list is
submitted and the previous fiscal year, of the amounts obligated or
expended, or planned to be obligated or expended, for each project
category under each Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program element.(b)Description of purpose and intentThe descriptive summary required under subsection (a) shall include a narrative description of each
program and project category under each Department of Defense Cooperative
Threat Reduction Program element that explains the purpose and intent of
the funds requested.(c)Inclusion in certain materials submitted to congressThe summary required to be submitted in a fiscal year under subsection (a) shall be set forth by
project category, and by amounts specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of
that subsection in connection with such project category, in each of the
following:(1)The annual report on activities and assistance under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program required in such fiscal year under section 1343.(2)The budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the Department of Defense
budget for the fiscal year succeeding such fiscal year (as submitted with
the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United
States Code).1343.Reports on activities and assistance under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program(a)In any year in which the budget of the President under section 1105 of title 31, United States
Code, for the fiscal year beginning in such year requests funds for the
Department of Defense for assistance or activities under the Department of
Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, the Secretary of Defense
shall, after consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the
congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the
House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the
Senate a report on activities and assistance during the preceding fiscal
year under the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program
setting forth the matters in subsection (c).(b)The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted not later than the first Monday in February of a
year.(c)The report under subsection (a) in a year shall set forth the following:(1)An estimate of the total amount that will be required to be expended by the United States in order
to achieve the objectives of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction Program.(2)A five-year plan setting forth the amount of funds and other resources proposed to be provided by
the
United States for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program over the term of the plan, including the purpose for which such
funds and resources will be used, and to provide guidance for the
preparation of annual budget submissions with respect to the Department of
Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.(3)A description of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction activities carried out
during the fiscal year ending in the year preceding the year of the
report, including—(A)the amounts notified, obligated, and expended for such activities and the purposes for which such
amounts were notified, obligated, and expended for such fiscal year and
cumulatively for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program;(B)a description of the participation, if any, of each department and agency of the United States
Government in such activities;(C)a description of such activities, including the forms of assistance provided;(D)a description of the United States private sector participation in the portion of such activities
that were supported by the obligation and expenditure of funds for the
Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program; and(E)such other information as the Secretary of Defense considers appropriate to inform Congress fully
of the operation of Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
programs and activities, including, with respect to proposed
demilitarization or conversion projects, information on the progress
toward demilitarization of facilities and the conversion of the
demilitarized facilities to civilian activities.(4)A description of the means (including program management, audits, examinations, and other means)
used by the United States during the fiscal year ending in the year
preceding the year of the report to ensure that assistance provided under
the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program is fully
accounted for, that such assistance is being used for its intended
purpose, and that such assistance is being used efficiently and
effectively, including—(A)if such assistance consisted of equipment, a description of the current location of such equipment
and the current condition of such equipment;(B)if such assistance consisted of contracts or other services, a description of the status of such
contracts or services and the methods used to ensure that such contracts
and services are being used for their intended purpose;(C)a determination whether the assistance described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) has been used for its
intended purpose and an assessment of whether the assistance being
provided is being used effectively and efficiently; and(D)a description of the efforts planned to be carried out during the fiscal year beginning in the year
of the report to ensure that Department of Defense Cooperative Threat
Reduction assistance provided during such fiscal year is fully accounted
for and is used for its intended purpose.(5)A description of the defense and military activities carried out under section 1321(a)(6) during
the fiscal year ending in the year
preceding the year of the report, including—(A)the amounts obligated or expended for such activities;(B)the strategy, goals, and objectives for which such amounts were obligated and expended;(C)a description of the activities carried out, including the forms of assistance provided, and the
justification for each form of assistance provided;(D)the success of each activity, including the goals and objectives achieved for each;(E)a description of participation by private sector entities in the United States in carrying out such
activities, and the participation of any other Federal department or
agency in such activities; and(F)any other information that the Secretary considers relevant to provide a complete description of
the operation and success of activities carried out under the Department
of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.1344.Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction ProgramThe Secretary of Defense shall implement metrics to measure the impact and effectiveness of
activities of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction
Program to address threats arising from the proliferation of chemical,
nuclear, and biological weapons and weapons-related materials,
technologies, and expertise.IVRepeals and transition provisions1351.The following provisions of law are repealed:(1)Sections 212, 221, 222, and 231 of the Soviet Nuclear Threat Reduction Act of 1991 (title II of
Public Law
102–228; 22 U.S.C. 2551 note).(2)Sections 1412 and 1431 of the Former Soviet Union Demilitarization Act of 1992 (22
U.S.C. 5902 and 5921).(3)Sections 1203, 1204, 1206, and 1208 of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 1993 (22 U.S.C.
5952, 5953, 5955, and 5957).(4)Section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106;
22 U.S.C. 5955 note).(5)Section 1501 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 50
U.S.C. 2362 note).(6)Section 1307 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public
Law 105–261; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).(7)Section 1303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 22
U.S.C. 5952 note).(8)(A)Sections 1303 and 1304 of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2001 (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C.
5952 note).(B)Section 1306 of such Act (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat.
1654A–340).(C)Section 1308 of such Act (as enacted into law by Public Law 106–398; 22 U.S.C.
5959).(9)Section 1304 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107–107; 22
U.S.C. 5952 note).(10)Sections 1305 and 1306 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003
(Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2673; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).(11)Sections 1303, 1305, 1307, and 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004
(22 U.S.C. 5960, 5961, 5962, and 5963).(12)(A)Section 1303 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
(Public Law 111–84; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).(B)Sections 1304 and 1305 of such Act
(22 U.S.C. 5964 and 5965).(C)Section 1306 of such Act
(Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2560; 22 U.S.C. 5952 note).
1352.(a)Determinations relating to certain proliferation threat reduction projects and activitiesAny determination made before the date of the enactment of this Act under section 1308(a) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (22 U.S.C.
5963(a)) shall be treated as a determination under section 1322(a).(b)Determinations relating to urgent threat reduction activitiesAny
determination made before the date of the enactment of this Act under
section 1305(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2010 (22 U.S.C. 5965(b)) shall be treated as a determination under section
1323(b).(c)Exception to requirement for certain determinationsThe requirement for a determination under section 1322(a) shall not apply to a state that was part
of the former Soviet Union, but regular coordination
practices shall apply.
(d)Funds available for Cooperative Threat Reduction programFunds made available for Cooperative Threat Reduction programs pursuant to the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat.
1632) or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 672) that remain available for obligation as
of the date of the enactment of this Act shall be available for the
Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program.
XIVA1401.Funds are hereby
authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the use of the Armed
Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for
providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the
funding table in section 4501.
1402.Chemical
Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense
(a)Authorization
of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated
for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise
provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as
specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b)Amounts
authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—
(1)the
destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section
1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521);
and
(2)the
destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not
covered by section 1412 of such Act.
1403.Drug
Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wideFunds are hereby authorized to be
appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 for expenses,
not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities,
Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
1404.Defense
Inspector GeneralFunds are
hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal
year 2015 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the
Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding
table in section 4501.
1405.Funds are
hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Defense
Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4501, for use of
the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense
in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries.
BNational Defense Stockpile and Related Matters1411.Report on development of secure supply of rare earth materials(a)Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the
United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report on the supply of rare earth materials extracted, processed, and
refined from secure sources of supply to
develop and produce advanced technologies in support of
requirements of the Department of Defense.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)A description of the current capacity for extracting, processing, and refining rare earth materials
from secure sources of supply in
support of requirements of the Department of
Defense.(2)An evaluation of the current global supply and demand for rare earth materials, prices for such
materials, and trends and projections relating to such materials.(3)A description of any challenges relating to developing the capacity from secure sources of supply
to extract, process, and refine rare earth materials in support of
requirements of the Department of Defense, including challenges relating
to ownership of intellectual property.(4)A description of any constraints faced by suppliers of rare earth materials for the Department of
Defense in trying to meet the demand for such materials using foreign
suppliers of such materials.(5)An assessment of the current role of the Department of Defense in the development of a secure
supply chain for rare earth materials.(6)An assessment of the future plans and quantities for rare earth materials related to the National
Defense Stockpile, including the potential role of the Federal Government
in the development of secure sources of supply.C1421.Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs
Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Federal
Health
Care Center, Illinois(a)Authority for transfer of fundsOf the funds authorized to be appropriated for section 1405 and available for the Defense Health
Program for operation and maintenance, $146,857,000 may be transferred by
the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of
Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by
subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes
of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall
be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the
purpose of such a transfer.(b)For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds
transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain
James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North
Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center,
and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical
facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the
Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009
(Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).1422.Comptroller General of the United States report on Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care
Center, North Chicago, Illinois(a)Not later than 120 days after the date of the submittal to Congress by the Secretary of Defense and
the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of the evaluation report on the joint
Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility
demonstration project known as the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health
Care Center, North Chicago, Illinois, that is required to be submitted in
March 2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to
the appropriate committees of Congress a report on that demonstration
project.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment by the Comptroller General of the
following:(1)The evaluation measures, standards, and criteria used by the Department of Defense and the
Department of Veterans Affairs to measure the overall effectiveness and
success of the medical facility referred to in subsection (a).(2)The measurable effect, if any, on the missions of the Department of the Navy and the Department of
Veterans Affairs of the provision of care in a joint facility such as the
medical facility.(3)Such other matters with respect to the medical facility demonstration project described in
subsection (a) as the Comptroller General considers appropriate.(c)Availability of certain documentsNot later than 30 days after the date of the receipt from the contractor for the medical facility
demonstration project described in subsection (a) of any documents created
by the contractor for the evaluation of the demonstration project
(including any evaluation plans, task summaries, in-process reviews,
interim reports, and draft final report), the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall make such documents available to the
Comptroller General for purposes of the report required by subsection (a).(d)Appropriate committees of Congress definedIn this section, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—(1)the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of
Representatives.1423.Authorization of appropriations for Armed Forces Retirement HomeThere is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 from the Armed Forces Retirement
Home Trust Fund the sum of $63,400,000 for the operation of the Armed
Forces Retirement Home.1424.Designation and responsibilities of Senior Medical Advisor for the Armed Forces Retirement Home(a)Designation of Senior Medical AdvisorSubsection (a) of section 1513A of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 413a) is
amended—(1)in paragraph (1), by striking Deputy Director of the TRICARE Management Activity
and inserting Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency
; and(2)in paragraph (2), by striking Deputy Director of the TRICARE Management Activity
both places it appears and inserting Deputy Director of the Defense Health Agency
.(b)Clarification of responsibilities and duties of senior medical advisorSubsection (c)(2) of such section is amended by striking health care standards of the Department of Veterans Affairs
and inserting nationally-recognized health care standards and requirements
.
XVAuthorization of Additional Appropriations for Overseas Contingency OperationsAAuthorization of
Additional Appropriations
1501.The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize
appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2015 to provide
additional funds for overseas contingency operations being carried out by the
Armed Forces.
1502.Overseas contingency operationsFunds are hereby authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense for overseas
contingency operations in such amounts as may be designated as
provided in section 251(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency
Deficit Control Act of 1985.B
1511.Treatment as
additional authorizationsThe
amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts
otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act.
1512.Special
transfer authority
(a)Authority To
transfer authorizations
(1)Upon
determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the
national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made
available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2015
between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions
thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be
available for the same purposes as the authorization to which
transferred.
(2)The
total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the
authority of this subsection may not exceed $4,000,000,000.
(b)Transfers under this section shall be subject to the
same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001.
(c)The transfer authority provided by this section is in
addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001.
CLimitations, Reports, and Other Matters1521.Plan for transition of funding of United States Special Operations Command from supplemental
funding for overseas contingency operations to recurring funding for
future-years defense programsAt the same time the budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 is submitted to Congress pursuant
to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to maintain
critical and enduring special operations capabilities for the United
States Special Operations Command by fully transitioning funding for the
United States Special Operations Command from funds available for overseas
contingency operations to funds available for the Department of Defense on
a recurring basis for purposes of future-years defense programs.1522.Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund(a)Use and transfer of fundsSubsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John
Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law
109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the amendments made by
section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649) but as amended by
subsection (b) of this section, shall apply to the
funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised
Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2015.(b)Subsection (b) of section 1514 of the John Warner
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 is amended by
inserting in connection with Operation Enduring Freedom and any successor operation to that operation
before the period at the end.(c)Termination of availabilityNotwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts in the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat
Fund may not be obligated or transferred under any authority in law after
September 30, 2015.(d)Plan for elimination and consolidation of certain functions(1)The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a plan to eliminate (as appropriate) any
non-enduring functions, associated capabilities, and funding, and to
consolidate into an appropriate existing organization or organizations
any enduring functions,
associated capabilities, and funding, of the following organizations:(A)The Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO).(B)The Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell (JRAC).(C)The Warfighter Senior Integration Group (SIG).(D)The Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Task Force.(E)The Afghanistan Resources Oversight Council (AROC).(F)Any other Department of Defense-wide or military department specific organizations, and associated
capabilities and funding, carrying out comparable joint urgent operational
needs (JUONs) or joint emergent operational needs (JEONs) efforts.(2)The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall prepare the plan
required by paragraph (1) in coordination with the Secretaries of the
military departments, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, the Under
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), the Under Secretary of Defense for
Intelligence, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Commander of
the United States Special Operations Command, and the Director of Cost
Assessment and Program Evaluation of the Department of Defense.(e)Extension of interdiction of improvised explosive device precursor chemicals authoritySection 1532(c)(4) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law
112–239; 126 Stat. 2057), as amended by section 1532(c) of the
National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113–66; 127 Stat. 939), is further amended by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31, 2015
.1523.Afghanistan
Security Forces Fund
(a)Continuation of
prior authorities and notice and reporting requirementsFunds available to the Department of
Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2015 shall be
subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section
1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law
110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383;
124 Stat. 4424).
(b)Extension of authority on promotion of recruitment and retention of womenSubsection (c)(1) of section 1531 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 938) is amended by striking fiscal year 2014
and inserting fiscal year 2015
.(c)Extension of authority To accept certain equipmentSubsection (d)(1) of such section 1531 (127 Stat. 938; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended by striking prior Acts
and inserting Acts enacted before the date of the enactment of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal
Year 2015
.1524.Afghanistan Infrastructure FundNo amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be available for, or used for purposes of,
the Afghanistan Infrastructure Fund.1525.Sense of Congress regarding counter-improvised explosive devicesIt is the sense of Congress that—(1)counter-improvised explosive device tactics, techniques, and procedures used in Iraq and
Afghanistan have produced important lessons learned and enduring
technology critical to mitigating the devastating effects of improvised
explosive devices, which have been the leading cause of combat casualties;(2)without the preservation of knowledge about counter-improvised explosive devices, the United States
Government could
fail to take advantage of the lessons and investments of
counter-improvised explosive device operations to enhance warfighter
readiness; and(3)the Department of Defense should to the extent appropriate retain in the military departments a
knowledge base relating to counter-improvised explosive device operations.XVIStrategic Programs, Cyber, and Intelligence MattersA1601.Procurement authority for certain parts of intercontinental ballistic missile fuzes(a)The Secretary of the Air Force may enter into contracts for the life-of-type procurement of covered
parts of the intercontinental ballistic missile fuze.(b)Notwithstanding section 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amount authorized to be
appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 101 and available for Missile
Procurement, Air Force as specified in the funding table in section 4101,
$4,700,000 shall be available for the procurement of covered parts
pursuant to contracts entered into under subsection (a).(c)In this section, the term covered parts means commercially available off-the-shelf items as defined in section 104 of title 41, United
States Code.1602.Form of and cost estimates relating to annual reports on plan for the nuclear weapons stockpile,
nuclear weapons complex, nuclear
weapons delivery systems, and nuclear weapons command and control systemSection 1043 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125
Stat. 1576), as amended by section 1041 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat.
1931) and section 1054 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 861), is further amended by
striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new subsection (b):
(b)Estimate of costs by Congressional Budget OfficeIn the case of a report required to be transmitted under subsection (a)(1) not later than 30 days
after the submission to Congress of the budget of the President for an
odd-numbered fiscal year, the Director of the
Congressional Budget Office shall, not later than 120 days after the
transmission of that report, submit to the congressional defense
committees a report setting forth the following:(1)An estimate of the costs over the 10-year period
beginning on the date of the report associated with fielding and
maintaining the current nuclear weapons and nuclear weapon
delivery systems of the United States.(2)An estimate of the costs over the 10-year period
beginning on the date of the report of any life extension,
modernization, or replacement of any current nuclear weapons or
nuclear weapon delivery systems of the United States that is
anticipated as of the date of the report..1603.Reports on installation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems at the United
States Strategic Command headquarters(a)Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget
of the President for a fiscal year is submitted to Congress
pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, the Commander of the United
States Strategic Command shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the installation and operation of nuclear command,
control, and communications systems associated with the construction of
the United States Strategic Command headquarters.(b)The report required by subsection (a) shall address, with respect to the installation and
operation of nuclear command, control, and communications systems
associated with the construction of the United States Strategic Command
headquarters, the following:(1)Milestones and costs associated with installation of communications systems.(2)Milestones and costs associated with integrating targeting and analysis planning tools.(3)An assessment of progress on the upgrade of systems that existed before the date of the enactment
of this Act, such as the Strategic Automated Command and Control System
and the MILSTAR satellite communications system, for compatibility with
such nuclear command, control, and communications systems.(4)Such other information as the Commander of the United States Strategic Command considers necessary
to assess adherence to overall cost, scope, and schedule milestones.(c)The Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall not be required to submit a report under
subsection (a) with the budget of the President for any fiscal year after
the date on which the Commander certifies to the congressional defense
committees that all milestones relating to the installation of nuclear
command, control, and communications systems associated with the
construction of the United States Strategic Command headquarters have been
completed and such systems are fully operational.1604.Reports on potential reductions to B61 life extension program(a)Report by Nuclear Weapons CouncilNot later than 7 days before any decision to reduce the number of final production units for the
B61 life extension program below the total number of such units planned in
the stockpile stewardship and management plan required by section 4203 of
the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523) for fiscal year 2015, the
Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council established under section 179 of
title 10, United States Code, shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report that includes the following:(1)A notification of the decision.(2)An explanation of the proposed changes to the life extension program.(3)A comprehensive discussion of the justification for those changes.(b)Report by Commander of United States Strategic CommandNot later than 30 days after any decision described in subsection (a) with respect to the B61 life
extension program, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command
shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that
includes the following:(1)An assessment the changes, or proposed changes, to the life extension program.(2)A description of the risks associated with the decision.(3)An assessment of the impact of the decision on the ability of the United States Strategic Command
to meet deterrence requirements.(c)Each report required by this section shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.1605.Sense of Congress on deterrence and defense posture of the North Atlantic Treaty OrganizationIt is the sense of Congress that the United States reaffirms and remains committed to the policies
enumerated in the Deterrence and Defense Posture Review of the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization, dated May 20, 2012, including the following
statements:(1)The greatest responsibility of the Alliance is to protect and defend our territory and our
populations against attack, as set out in Article 5 of the Washington
Treaty. The Alliance does not consider any country to be its adversary.
However, no one should doubt NATO’s resolve if the security of any of its
members were to be threatened. NATO will ensure that it maintains the
full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against any
threat to the safety and security of our populations, wherever it should
arise. Allies’ goal is to bolster deterrence as a core element of our
collective defense and contribute to the indivisible security of the
Alliance.
.(2)Nuclear weapons are a core component of NATO’s overall capabilities for deterrence and defense
alongside conventional and missile defense forces. The review has shown
that the Alliance’s nuclear force posture currently meets the criteria for
an effective deterrence and defense posture.
.(3)The circumstances in which any use of nuclear weapons might have to be contemplated are extremely
remote. As long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear
alliance. The supreme guarantee of the security of the Allies is provided
by the strategic nuclear forces of the Alliance, particularly those of the
United States; the independent strategic forces of the United Kingdom and
France, which have a deterrent role of their own, contribute to the
overall deterrence and security of the Allies.
.(4)NATO must have the full range of capabilities necessary to deter and defend against threats to the
safety of its populations and the security of its territory, which is the
Alliance’s greatest responsibility.
.(5)NATO is committed to maintaining an appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional, and missile defense
capabilities for deterrence and defense to fulfill its commitments as set
out in the Strategic Concept. These capabilities, underpinned by NATO’s
Integrated Command Structure, offer the strongest guarantee of the
Alliance’s security and will ensure that it is able to respond to a
variety of challenges and unpredictable contingencies in a highly complex
and evolving international security environment.
.B1611.Homeland ballistic missile defense(a)Congress makes the following findings:(1)The United States has deployed the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system, with 30
Ground-Based
Interceptors (GBIs) currently in Alaska and California, for defense of
the United
States homeland against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack
from nations such as North Korea and Iran.(2)The system has experienced several flight test failures since 2010 involving the deployed
Capability Enhancement-I and Capability Enhancement-II Exo-atmospheric
Kill Vehicles (EKVs), and the Missile Defense Agency plans to conduct an
intercept flight test in the summer of 2014 to demonstrate corrections to
the kill vehicles.(3)The Department of Defense is taking, and planning to take, numerous actions to improve United
States
homeland ballistic missile defense capabilities over the next decade to
keep pace with evolving ballistic missile threats, including the following
key actions:(A)Deployment of 14 additional Ground-Based Interceptors in Alaska by the end of 2017.(B)Improvement of the sensor network that supports homeland ballistic missile defense, including
deployment of a new
Long-Range Discriminating Radar in Alaska.(C)Investment in improvements to the discrimination capabilities needed to improve the
operational effectiveness and efficiency of the homeland ballistic
missile defense system.(D)Re-design of the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle to increase significantly its
performance, reliability, cost-effectiveness, and affordability.(E)Design and development of a Next Generation Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle that will
incorporate new technologies and the potential for defeating multiple
threat objects with individual interceptors.(b)It is the sense of Congress that—(1)it is a national priority to defend the United States homeland against the threat of limited
ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran;(2)although the currently deployed Ground-based Midcourse Defense system provides protection of the
entire United States homeland, including the East Coast, against the
threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran, this
capability needs to be improved to meet evolving ballistic missile
threats;(3)the initial step in this process of improvement is to correct the problems that caused the flight
test failures with the current kill vehicles, and to improve the
reliability of the deployed Ground-Based Interceptor fleet;(4)as indicated by senior Department of Defense officials, investments to enhance homeland defense
sensor and discrimination capabilities are essential to improve the
operational effectiveness and shot doctrine of the Ground-based Midcourse
Defense system;(5)given limitations with the currently deployed Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicles, it is important to
re-design the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle using a rigorous acquisition
approach, including
realistic testing, that can achieve a demonstrated capability as soon as
practicable using sound acquisition principles and practices; and(6)in order to stay ahead of evolving ballistic missile threats, the Department should design the Next
Generation Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle
to take full advantage of improvements in sensors, discrimination, kill
assessment, battle management, and command and control, including the
potential to engage multiple objects.(c)(1)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the
status of current and planned efforts to improve the homeland ballistic
missile
defense capability of the United States.(2)The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:(A)A description of the status of efforts to correct the problems that caused the flight test failures
of the Capability Enhancement-I and Capability Enhancement-II
Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicles.(B)A description of the status of efforts to field the additional 14 Ground-Based Interceptors planned
for deployment at Fort Greely, Alaska, including the status of the
refurbishment of Missile Field 1 at Fort Greely, and the operational
impact of the additional interceptors.(C)A description of the plans and progress toward improving the capability, reliability, and
availability of fielded Ground-Based Interceptors, including progress
toward improving the
capabilities of Ground-Based Interceptors deployed with upgraded
Capability Enhancement-I and Capability Enhancement-II
Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicles.(D)A description of the planned improvements to homeland ballistic missile defense sensor and
discrimination
capabilities, including an assessment of the expected operational benefits
of such improvements to homeland ballistic missile defense.(E)A description of the plans and efforts to redesign, develop, test, and field the Exo-atmospheric
Kill Vehicle for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, and an
explanation of its expected improvements in capability,
cost-effectiveness, reliability, maintainability, and producibility.(F)A description of the plans for developing, testing, and fielding the Next Generation
Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle, and an explanation of how the anticipated
capabilities are intended to help keep pace with evolving ballistic
missile threats.(G)Any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.(3)The report required under paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.1612.Regional ballistic missile defense(a)It is the sense of Congress that—(1)the regional ballistic missile capabilities of countries such as Iran and North Korea pose a
serious and growing threat to United States forward deployed forces,
allies, and partner countries;(2)given this growing threat, it is a high priority for the United States to develop, test, and deploy
effective regional missile defense capabilities to provide the commanders
of the geographic combatant commands with capabilities to meet their
operational
requirements, and for United States allies and partners to improve their
regional missile defense capabilities;(3)the United States and its North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) partners should continue the
development, testing, and implementation of Phases 2 and 3 of the European
Phased Adaptive Approach, to defend United States forward deployed forces,
allies, and partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Europe
against the growing regional missile capability of Iran;(4)the United States should continue efforts to improve regional missile defense capabilities in the
Middle East, including its close cooperation with Israel and its efforts
with countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council, in order to improve
regional security against the growing regional missile capabilities of
Iran; and(5)the United States should continue to work closely with its allies in Asia, particularly Japan,
South Korea, and Australia, to improve regional missile defense
capabilities against the growing threat of North Korean ballistic
missiles.(b)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the
status and progress of efforts to improve United States regional missile
defense capabilities in Europe, the Middle East, and in the Asia-Pacific
region, including efforts and cooperation by allies and partner countries.(c)The report required in subsection (b) shall include the following:(1)A description of the status of implementation of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, including
the status of efforts to develop, test, and deploy the capabilities
planned for Phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach.(2)A description of the status of efforts to improve the regional missile defense capabilities of the
United States and the Gulf Cooperation Council countries in the Middle
East against regional missile threats from Iran, including progress
toward, and benefits of, multilateral cooperation and data sharing among
the Gulf Cooperation Council countries for multilateral integrated air and
missile defense against threats from Iran.(3)A description of the progress of the United States and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region,
particularly Japan, South Korea, and Australia, to improve regional
missile defense capabilities against missile threats from North Korea.(4)A description of the degree of coordination among the commanders of the geographic combatant
commands for
integrated missile defense planning and operations, including obstacles
and opportunities to improving such coordination and integrated
capabilities.(5)A description of the phased and adaptive elements of United States regional missile defense
approaches tailored to the specific regional requirements in the areas of
responsibility of the United States Central Command and the United States
Pacific Command, including the role of missile defense capabilities of
United States allies and partners in each region.(6)A summary of the regional missile defense risk assessment and priorities of the commanders of the
geographic combatant commands.(7)Such other matters as the Secretary considers appropriate.(d)The report required by subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
classified annex.1613.Availability of funds for missile defense programs of Israel(a)Except as otherwise provided in this section, of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal
year 2015 by section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation,
Defense-wide, and available for the Missile
Defense Agency, $350,900,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel
to procure the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system as specified
in the funding table in section 4201, including for co-production of Iron
Dome parts and components in the United States by United
States industry.(b)Availability of amounts for higher priority missile defense programsIf the Government of Israel determines that it is a higher priority for its national security, of
the amount authorized under subsection (a), up to $175,000,000 may be used
for
the following cooperative missile defense programs:(1)The Arrow System Improvement Program.(2)The Arrow-3 Upper Tier interceptor development program.(3)The David’s Sling short-range ballistic missile defense system.(c)(1)Amounts authorized in subsection (a) to produce the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program
shall be available subject to the terms, conditions, and
co-production targets specified for fiscal year 2015 in the Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of
Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System
Procurement,
signed on March 5, 2014.(2)Other missile defense programsIf the Government of Israel decides to use amounts authorized in subsection (a) for the
cooperative missile defense programs identified in subsection (b), amounts
for such cooperative missile defense programs shall be subject to the
terms and conditions of the
joint United States-Israel Project Agreements governing the management and
execution of these cooperative programs.1614.Acquisition plan for re-designed Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle(a)It is the sense of Congress that—(1)the existing models of the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense
system are prototype designs that were developed and deployed without
robust and rigorous acquisition practices;(2)consequently, the deployed models of the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle have experienced flight test
failures since 2010, and have not demonstrated the degree of reliability,
robustness, cost-effectiveness, or performance that are desirable;(3)the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle for the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system needs to be
re-designed to improve substantially its performance and reliability; and(4)in order to avoid repeating the problems with the designs of the Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle, the
Department of Defense should follow a robust and rigorous acquisition plan
for the design, development, and testing of the re-designed
Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle.(b)Acquisition plan requiredThe Secretary of Defense shall develop a robust acquisition plan for the re-design of the
Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system
that includes rigorous elements for system engineering, design,
integration, development, testing, and evaluation.(c)The objectives of the acquisition plan required by subsection (b) shall be to ensure that the
re-designed Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle is operationally effective,
reliable, producible, cost-effective, maintainable, and testable.(d)Approval of acquisition plan requiredThe acquisition plan required by subsection (b) shall be subject to approval by the Under Secretary
of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.(e)Prior to operational deployment of the re-designed Exo-atmospheric Kill Vehicle, the Secretary
shall ensure that it has demonstrated, through successful, operationally
realistic flight testing, a high probability of working in an
operationally effective manner and that it has the ability to accomplish
its intended mission.(f)Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition,
Technology, and Logistics approves of the acquisition plan under
subsection (d), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report describing the acquisition
plan and the manner in which it will meet the objectives described in
subsection (c).
1615.Testing and assessment of missile defense systems prior to production and deployment(a)Congress makes the following findings:(1)The initial acquisition approach to the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system did not follow
standard acquisition practices, including the fly before you buy
approach of adequately testing and demonstrating the performance of major defense systems before
final production and deployment.(2)Consequently, the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system was deployed in 2004 without any intercept
flight tests of the production interceptor and kill vehicle, and was
fielded with a prototype experimental design kill vehicle that had not
been fully engineered, developed, or tested.(3)In July 2013, the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system had a flight test failure with the
initially-deployed Capability Enhancement-I Kill Vehicle because the kill
vehicle failed to separate from the booster.(4)The upgraded Capability Enhancement-II Kill Vehicle was deployed starting in 2008, prior to any
successful intercept flight tests, and it has not had any successful
intercept flights test as of May 2014.(5)As a result of this highly concurrent acquisition approach, the Ground-based Midcourse Defense
system has had a variety of kill vehicle problems that have caused several
flight test failures since 2010, which have required more than
$1,300,000,000 and four years of effort to correct.(b)It is the sense of Congress that—(1)it is a high priority that United States ballistic missile defense systems should work in an
operationally effective and cost-effective manner;(2)prior to making final production decisions for and prior to operational deployment of such systems,
the United States should conduct operationally realistic intercept flight
testing, which should create sufficiently challenging operational
conditions to establish confidence that such systems will work in an
operationally effective and cost-effective manner when needed; and(3)in order to achieve these objectives, and to avoid post-production and post-deployment problems
like those encountered with the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, it
is essential for the Department of Defense to follow a fly before you buy
approach to adequately test and assess the elements of the Ballistic Missile Defense System before
final production decisions or operational deployment.(c)Successful testing required prior to final production or operational deploymentPrior to making a final production decision for, and prior to the operational deployment of, a new
or substantially upgraded interceptor or weapon system of the Ballistic
Missile Defense System, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that—(1)sufficient and operationally realistic testing of the system is conducted to assess the performance
of the system in order to inform a final production decision or an
operational deployment decision; and(2)the results of such testing have demonstrated a high probability that the interceptor or weapon
system will work in an operationally effective manner and has the ability
to accomplish its intended mission.(d)Director of Operational Test and Evaluation assessmentPrior to any final production decision or operational deployment described in subsection (c), the
Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall—(1)provide to the Secretary the assessment of the Director, based on the available test data, of the
sufficiency, adequacy, and results of the testing of such system,
including an assessment of whether the system will be sufficiently
effective, suitable, and survivable when needed; and(2)provide to the congressional defense committees a written summary of that assessment.C1621.Update of National Security Space Strategy to include space control and space superiority strategy(a)The Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of
National Intelligence, update the National Security Space Strategy
developed pursuant to the Space Posture Review conducted under section 913
of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4572) to include a strategy relating
to space control and space superiority for the protection of national
security space assets.(b)The strategy relating to space control and space superiority required by subsection (a) shall
address the following:(1)Threats to national security space assets.(2)Protection of national security space assets.(3)The role of offensive space operations.(4)Countering offensive space operations.(5)Operations to implement the strategy.(6)Projected resources required over the period covered by the current future-years defense program
under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.(7)The development of an effective deterrence posture.(c)Consistency with Space Protection StrategyThe Secretary shall, in consultation with the Director, ensure that the strategy relating to space
control and space superiority
required by subsection (a) is consistent with the Space Protection
Strategy developed under section 911 of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 2271 note).(d)(1)Not later than March 31, 2015, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Director, submit a
report on the strategy relating to space control and space superiority
required by subsection (a) to—(A)the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and(B)the Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives.(2)The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form with an unclassified
summary.1622.Allocation of funds for the Space Security and Defense Program; report on space control(a)Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or any other Act and made available for the
Space Security and Defense Program (PE# 0603830F), a preponderance of such
funds shall be allocated to the development of offensive space control and
active defensive strategies.(b)Statement with respect to allocationThe Secretary of Defense shall include, in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress
in support of the budget of the Department of Defense for a fiscal year
(as submitted with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of
title 31, United States Code), a statement with
respect to whether the budget of the Department allocates funds for the
Space Security and Defense Program as required by subsection (a).(c)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to
Congress a report that contains the following:(1)An updated integrated capabilities document for offensive space control.(2)A concept of operations for the defense of critical national security space assets in all orbital
regimes.(3)An assessment of the effectiveness of existing deterrence strategies.1623.Prohibition on contracting with Russian suppliers of critical space launch supplies for the Evolved
Expendable Launch Vehicle program(a)The Secretary of Defense may not enter into or renew a contract, on or after the date of the
enactment of this Act, for the procurement of property or services for
space launch activities under the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle
program from any person if that person purchases supplies
critical for space launch activities covered by the contract from a
Russian entity.(b)The Secretary may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) with respect to a contract for the
procurement of property or services for space launch activities if the
Secretary determines, and certifies to the congressional defense
committees not later than 30 days before the waiver takes effect, that—(1)the waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States; and(2)the space launch services and capabilities covered by the contract could not be obtained at a fair
and reasonable price without
the purchase of supplies critical for space launch activities from a
Russian entity.(c)In this section, the term Russian entity means an entity organized under the laws of the Russian Federation or otherwise subject to the
jurisdiction of the Russian Federation.1624.Assessment of Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle programNot later than March 31, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the Evolved Expendable Launch
Vehicle program that includes an assessment of the advisability of
the Secretary of Defense requiring, when selecting launch providers for
the program using competitive procedures as described in section 2304 of
title 10, United States Code, that new entrant launch providers
or incumbent launch providers establish or maintain business systems that
comply with the data requirements and cost accounting standards of the
Department of Defense, including certified cost or price data.1625.Report on reliance of Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program on foreign manufacturersNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the
United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report on the risks to the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle program of
reliance on foreign manufacturers that includes the following:(1)An assessment of the degree to which the Air Force, through its contractors and subcontractors,
relies on foreign manufacturers for supplies necessary for any qualified
or certified provider of the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle.(2)An assessment of the extent to which such reliance subjects the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle
program to—(A)supply chain disruption relating to geopolitical events or other reasons;(B)introduction of counterfeit parts;(C)limited price transparency; and(D)other areas of risk identified by the Comptroller General.(3)Recommendations for measures the Air Force could take to mitigate the risks to the Evolved
Expendable Launch Vehicle program of reliance on foreign manufacturers and
a cost-benefit analysis for each such recommendation.1626.Availability of additional rocket cores pursuant to competitive procedures(a)Relative to the number of rocket cores for which space launch providers may submit bids or
competitive proposals under competitive procedures pursuant to the fiscal
year 2015 National Security Space Launch Procurement Forecast, the
Secretary
of Defense shall—(1)in fiscal year 2015, increase by one the number of such cores for which such providers may submit
bids or competitive proposals; and(2)for fiscal years 2015 through 2017, increase by one (in addition to the core referred to in
paragraph (1)) the number of such cores for which such providers may
submit bids or competitive proposals, unless the Secretary—(A)determines that there is no practicable way to increase the number of such cores for which such
providers may submit bids or competitive proposals and remain in
compliance with the requirements of the firm fixed price contract for 36
rocket engine cores over the 5 fiscal years beginning with fiscal year
2013; and(B)not later than 45 days after making that determination, submits to the congressional defense
committees—(i)a certification that there is no practicable way to increase the number of such cores for which
such providers may submit bids or competitive proposals and remain in
compliance with the requirements of the firm fixed price contract for 36
rocket engine cores over the 5 fiscal years beginning with fiscal year
2013; and(ii)a description of the basis for the determination.(b)Competitive procedures definedIn this section, the term competitive procedures means procedures as described in section 2304 of title 10, United States Code.1627.Competitive procedures required to launch payload for mission number five of the Operationally
Responsive Space Program(a)Before entering into a contract for the launch of the payload for mission number five of the
Operationally Responsive Space Program, the Secretary of the Air Force
shall follow competitive procedures described in section 2304 of title 10,
United States Code, and the policies of the Department of Defense
concerning competitive space launch opportunities.(b)The Secretary may waive the requirement under subsection (a) if the Secretary—(1)determines that the waiver is necessary for the national security interests of the United States;
and(2)not less than 15 days before waiving the requirement, submits a report to the congressional defense
committees on the waiver.1628.Limitation on funding for storage of Defense Meteorological Satellite Program satellitesNone of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by this Act may be obligated
or expended for the storage of a satellite of the Defense Meteorological
Satellite Program unless the Secretary
of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—(1)the Department of Defense intends to launch the satellite;(2)sufficient funding is reflected in the current future-years defense program under section 221 of
title 10, United States Code, to launch the satellite; and(3)storing the satellite until a launch in 2020 is the most cost-effective approach to meeting the
requirements of the Department.1629.Plan for development of liquid rocket engine for medium or heavy lift launch vehicle; transfer of
certain funds(a)(1)The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan for the production of a liquid rocket
engine, by 2019, capable of supporting the requirements of the Department
of Defense for a medium or heavy lift
launch vehicle to support national security launch missions.(2)The plan required by paragraph (1) shall provide for the use of competitive procedures in
accordance with section 2304 of title 10, United States Code.(3)Not later than September 30, 2014, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense
committees the plan required by paragraph (1).(b)Transfer of certain fiscal year 2014 funds(1)To the extent provided in appropriations Acts, the Secretary of the Air Force may transfer from the
funds described in paragraph (2), not more than $20,000,000 to other,
higher priority programs of the Air Force if the Secretary determines
there is an urgent need to do so.(2)The funds described in this paragraph are amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year
2014 by section 201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 703) and available for research,
development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the dual launch
capability (PE# 0604853F) as specified in the funding table in section
4201 of that Act.(3)Effect on authorization amountsA transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this subsection shall be deemed
to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is
transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.(4)Construction of authorityThe transfer authority under this subsection is in addition to any other transfer authority
provided in this Act.1630.Study of space situational awareness architecture(a)The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Science Board to conduct a study of the
effectiveness of the ground
and space sensor system architecture for space situational awareness.(b)The study required by subsection (a) shall include an assessment of the following:(1)Projected needs, based on current and future threats, for the ground and space sensor system during
the five-, 10-, and 20-year periods beginning on the date of the enactment
of
this Act.(2)Capabilities of the ground and space sensor system to conduct defensive and offensive operations.(3)Integration of ground and space sensors with ground processing, control, and battle management
systems.(4)Any other matters relating to space situational awareness the Secretary considers appropriate.(c)(1)Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on the study conducted under
subsection (a).(2)The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in classified form with an unclassified
summary.1631.Sense of the Senate on resolution limits on commercial space imagery(a)Congress makes the following findings:(1)The Department of Defense and the security of the United States depend on the United States
commercial space imaging industry for mapping, intelligence, battle damage
assessment, coalition warfare, and humanitarian relief.(2)The Department of Defense could benefit from the relaxation of the current limits on the resolution
of the imagery that the United States commercial space imaging industry is
permitted to sell because the industry will respond to larger market
opportunities by increasing the quantity of spacecraft and the quality and
diversity of the imagery and imagery-derived products the industry
provides.(3)The Department of Defense has a need to protect some places and events from the
collection and sale of high-resolution imagery. That need could be met
through existing licensing and contractual authorities that either permit
the government to exercise direct
control of specific collection tasking and image dissemination or to
restrict collection.(4)Instead of using the approach described in paragraph (3), the United States commercial space
imaging industry has been prohibited from selling imagery over the vast
majority of the planet where there are no national security sensitivities.(5)Limits on the resolution of commercial space imaging have been relaxed somewhat in the past, but
only when the United States commercial space imaging industry has faced
competition from foreign providers of such imaging.(b)It is the sense of the Senate that—(1)the Secretary of Defense should support relaxation, as soon as practicable, of panchromatic,
spectral, and infrared imagery resolution limits so that the United States
commercial space imaging industry may promptly begin—(A)to attract investment in new satellite capabilities;(B)to design and build new satellites; and(C)to create new processing capabilities, business strategies, and marketing capacity; and(2)the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy should provide a recommendation to Congress by April 1,
2015, on the design and development of a flexible and dynamic capability
to control the collection and sale of commercial space imagery to protect
national security.DCyber warfare, cyber security, and related matters1641.(a)Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall
designate a network or network segment within the Department of Defense
for the purpose of carrying out the cyberspace mapping
pilot approved by the Cyber Investment Management
Board.(b)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Principal Cyber Advisor
shall submit to the Secretary policy recommendations regarding the mapping
of cyberspace to
support the offensive and defensive operational requirements of the United
States Cyber Command.1642.Review of cross domain solution policy and requirement for cross domain solution strategy(a)The Secretary of Defense shall review the policies and guidance of the Department of Defense
concerning the procurement, approval, and use of cross domain solutions by
the Department of Defense.(b)Strategy for cross domain solutions(1)Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a
strategy for procurement, approval, and use of cross domain solutions by
the Department.(2)The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:(A)Identification and assessment of the current cross domain solutions in use throughout the
Department of Defense, including the relative capabilities of such
solutions and any gaps in current capabilities.(B)A determination of the requirements for cross domain solutions for enterprise applications as well
as deployed warfighting operations, including operations with coalition
partners.(C)A plan to enable verification of compliance with Department of Defense policies regarding the use
of cross domain solutions.(D)A review of the current Department of Defense Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation
Process for the applicability of such process to future virtualized cross
domain technology.(E)A plan to meet the cross domain solution requirements for the Defense Intelligence Information
Enterprise that must operate within the Joint Information Environment and
the Intelligence Community Information Technology Environment.1643.Budgeting and accounting for cyber mission forces(a)For the budget submitted by the President to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United
States Code, for fiscal year 2017 and for the supporting information
submitted along with such budget for the Department of Defense, and for
each fiscal year thereafter, the
Secretary of Defense shall—(1)develop a major force program category for the five year defense plan of the Department of Defense
for the training, arming, and equipping of the cyber mission forces; and(2)establish program elements for the cyber mission forces.(b)Assessment of transfer account for cyber activities(1)The Secretary shall assess the feasibility and advisability of establishing a transfer account to
execute the funds contained in the major force program category required
by subsection (a).(2)(A)Not later than April 1, 2015, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report on the assessment carried out under paragraph (1).(B)The report required by subparagraph (A) shall include the following:(i)The findings of the Secretary with respect to the assessment carried out under paragraph (1).(ii)A recommendation as to whether a transfer account should be established as described in such
paragraph.1644.Requirement for strategy to develop and deploy decryption service for the Joint Information
Environment(a)The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy to develop and deploy a decryption service that
enables the efficient decryption and re-encryption of encrypted
communications within the Joint Information Environment and through the
Internet access points of the Joint Information Environment in a manner
that allows the Secretary to inspect the content of such communications to
detect cyber threats and insider threat activity.(b)The strategy required developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)Requirements.(2)An estimate of the cost.(3)An assessment of the added security benefit.(4)An
architecture.(5)A concept of operations.(c)Not later than October 1, 2015, the Secretary shall brief the congressional defense committees and
the congressional intelligence committees (as defined in section 4 of the
National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) on the strategy developed
under subsection (a).1645.Reporting on penetrations into networks and information systems of operationally critical
contractors(a)Procedures for reporting penetrations(1)The Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures that require an operationally critical
contractor to report to the component of the Department of Defense
designated by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (d)(2)(A) when a
network
or information system of such operationally critical contractor is
successfully penetrated by a known or suspected advanced persistent threat
actor.(2)Advanced persistent threatsFor purposes of this section, advanced persistent threats shall consist of such threats as the
Secretary shall specify for the procedures established under this
subsection.(b)(1)Designation and notificationThe procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall include a process for—(A)designating operationally critical contractors; and(B)notifying a contractor that it has been designated as an operationally critical contractor.(2)The procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall require each operationally critical
contractor to rapidly report to the component of the Department designated
pursuant to subsection (d)(2)(A) on each successful penetration of any
network
or information systems of such contractor. Each such report shall include
the following:(A)The technique or method used in such penetration.(B)A sample of any malicious software, if discovered and isolated by the contractor, involved in such
penetration.(3)Department assistance and access to equipment and information by Department personnelThe procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall include mechanisms for Department
personnel to—(A)if requested, assist operationally critical contractors in detecting and mitigating penetrations;
and(B)upon request, obtain access to equipment or information of an operationally critical contractor
necessary to conduct forensic analysis in addition to any analysis
conducted by such contractor.(4)Protection of trade secrets and other informationThe procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall provide for the reasonable protection
of trade secrets, commercial or financial information, and information
that can be used to identify a specific person.(5)Dissemination of informationThe procedures established pursuant to subsection (a) shall permit the dissemination of information
obtained or derived through the procedures to agencies that conduct
counterintelligence investigations for their use in such investigations.(c)The Secretary shall establish the procedures required by subsection (a) by not later than 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act. The procedures shall take
effect on the date of establishment.(d)Assessment of Department policies(1)Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the Act, the Secretary shall complete an
assessment of—(A)requirements that were in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act for
contractors to share information with Department components regarding
successful penetrations into networks or information systems of
contractors; and(B)Department policies and systems for sharing information on
successful penetrations into networks or information systems of
Department contractors.(2)Actions following assessmentUpon completion of the assessment required by paragraph (1), the Secretary shall—(A)designate a single Department component to receive reports from Department contractors or other
governmental agencies on successful penetrations into Department
contractor networks or information systems; and(B)issue or revise
guidance applicable to Department components that ensures the rapid
sharing by the component designated pursuant to subparagraph (A)
of information relating to successful penetrations into networks or
information systems of contractors with other appropriate Department
components.(e)In this section:(1)The term contingency operation has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.(2)The term operationally critical contractor means a contractor designated by the Secretary for purposes of this section as a critical source
of supply for airlift, sealift, intermodal transportation services, or
logistical support that is essential to the mobilization, deployment, or
sustainment of the Armed Forces in a contingency operation.1646.Sense of Congress on the future of the Internet and the .MIL top-level domainIt is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should—(1)advise the President to transfer the remaining role of the United States Government in the
functions of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority to a global
multi-stakeholder community only if the President is confident that the .MIL
top-level domain and the Internet Protocol address numbers used exclusively by the Department of
Defense for national security will remain exclusively used by the
Department of Defense; and(2)take all necessary steps to sustain the successful stewardship and good standing of the Internet
root zone servers managed by components of the Department of Defense.EIntelligence-Related matters1651.Extension of Secretary of Defense authority to engage in commercial activities as security for
intelligence collection activitiesSection 431(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended, in the second sentence, by striking December 31, 2015
and inserting December 31, 2017
.1652.Authority for Secretary of Defense to engage in commercial activities as security for military
operations abroad(a)Authority to engage in commercial activities as security for military operationsSubsection (a) of section 431 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting and military operations
after intelligence collection activities
.(b)Congressional committee references(1)Subsection (c) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:(3)The term congressional intelligence committees has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C.
3003).(4)The term appropriate congressional committees means—(A)with respect to a matter that pertains to a commercial activity undertaken under this subchapter to
provide security for intelligence collection activities, the congressional
defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees; and(B)with respect to a matter that pertains to a commercial activity undertaken under this subchapter to
provide security for military operations, the Committee on Armed Services
of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives..(2)Section 437 of such title is amended by striking subsection (c).(c)The second sentence of section 432(b)(2) of such title is amended to read as follows: The results of any such audit shall be promptly reported to the appropriate congressional
committees.
.(d)Authority to waive other Federal laws when necessary to maintain securitySection 433(b)(1) of such title is amended by inserting or military operation
after intelligence activity
.(e)Section 435 of such title is amended—(1)in subsection (a), by inserting or military operation
after intelligence activity
; and(2)in subsection (b), by inserting or military operations
after intelligence activities
.(f)Section 437 of such title is amended, in subsections (a) and (b), by striking congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees
each place it appears and inserting appropriate congressional committees
.(g)(1)(A)The heading of subchapter II of chapter 21 of such title is amended to read as follows:IIDefense commercial activities.(B)The item relating to that subchapter in the table of subchapters at the beginning of such chapter
is amended to read as follows:II.Defense Commercial Activities431.(2)(A)The heading of section 431 of such title is amended to read as follows:431.Authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection activities and
military operations..(B)The item relating to that section in the table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of
chapter 21 of such title is amended to read as follows:431. Authority to engage in commercial activities as security for intelligence collection
activities and military operations..1653.Extension of authority relating to jurisdiction over Department of Defense facilities for
intelligence collection or special operations activities abroadSection 926(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81;
125 Stat. 1541) is amended, in the matter before paragraph (1)—(1)by striking September 30, 2015
and inserting September 30, 2017
; and(2)by striking fiscal year 2016
and inserting fiscal year 2018
.1654.Personnel security and insider threat(a)Interim and objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability for personnel
security(1)Interim system to continuously evaluate security status of covered personnel(A)Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall establish an interim system with
the capability
to continuously evaluate the security status of—(i)at a minimum, the priority population; and(ii)to the extent practicable, all covered personnel.(B)The Secretary shall ensure that the interim system established under subparagraph (A) serves as a
means of developing
requirements, lessons learned, business rules, privacy standards, and
operational concepts applicable to the objective automated records checks
and continuous evaluation capability required by the strategy developed
under section 907(c) of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113–66).(C)In this paragraph:(i)The term covered personnel means the employees and contractors of the Department who have been determined eligible for and
granted access to
secret or top secret classified information by the Department of Defense
Central Adjudication Facility.(ii)The term priority population means the covered personnel who have been rated by the Secretary as
high risk based on such factors as their access to sensitive information
and their role in managing the movement and security of information.(2)Engineering to support automation-assisted insider threat analysesThe Secretary shall ensure that the interim system established under paragraph (1)(A) and the
objective automated records checks and
continuous evaluation capability for initial investigations and
reinvestigations required by the strategy developed under section 907(c)
of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66) are engineered
to support automation-assisted insider threat analyses conducted across
the law enforcement, personnel security, human resources,
counterintelligence, physical security, network behavior monitoring, and
cybersecurity activities of all the components of the Department of
Defense, pursuant to Executive Order 13587.(3)Competitive acquisition processThe Secretary shall ensure that the objective continuous evaluation capability required by section
907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(Public
Law 113–66) is—(A)acquired through competitive processes to exploit
advanced commercial technology; and(B)designed as an open system to
enable changing vendors and products as the commercial sector’s
capabilities evolve.(b)Integrated, automation-assisted insider threat monitoring(1)Team to support Senior Agency Official with development of capability(A)The Secretary of Defense shall establish a team to provide assistance to the Under Secretary of
Defense for Intelligence, as the Senior Agency Official in the Department
of Defense for insider threat detection and prevention pursuant to
Executive Order 13587, in developing an integrated, automation-assisted
insider threat capability.(B)The Secretary shall ensure that the team established under subparagraph (A) is a multi-disciplinary
management team composed of—(i)operational and technical experts in
counterintelligence, personnel security, law enforcement, human resources,
physical security, network monitoring, cybersecurity, and privacy and
civil liberties from relevant components of the Department; and(ii)experts in information technology, large-scale data analysis, systems
engineering, and program acquisition.(2)Designation of official to be responsible and accountable for developing capabilityThe Secretary of Defense, acting through the Senior Agency Official, shall designate a senior
official of the Department to be responsible and accountable for
developing the integrated, automation-assisted insider threat capability
referred to in paragraph (1).(3)Executive Committee to support Senior Agency OfficialThe Secretary of Defense shall establish an executive committee to support the Senior Agency
Official in developing the integrated, automation-assisted insider threat
capability referred to in
paragraph (1), which shall include the following:(A)The Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.(B)The Chief Information Officer of
the Department of Defense.(C)The Under Secretary of Defense for
Personnel and Readiness.(4)Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary, acting through the Senior Agency Official, shall
develop a plan to develop the
integrated, automation-assisted insider threat capability referred to in
paragraph (1), including an
acquisition strategy, cost estimate, architecture, concept of operation,
milestones, and schedule.(c)The Secretary shall carry out this section—(1)subject to direction by the President and to the provisions of applicable statutes and Executive
orders; and(2)consistently with direction from the Suitability and Security Clearance Performance Accountability
Council and the authorities of the Suitability Executive Agent and of the
Security Executive Agent established under Executive Order 13467 (73 Fed.
Reg. 38103).1655.Migration of Distributed Common Ground System of Department of the Army to an open system
architecture(a)Not later than three years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army
shall migrate the Distributed Common Ground System of the Department of
the Army, including the Red Disk initiative under development at the
Intelligence and Security Command, to an open system architecture to
enable—(1)competitive acquisition of components, services, and applications for the Distributed Common Ground
System; and(2)rapid competitive development and integration of new capabilities for the Distributed Common Ground
System.(b)Compliance with open system architecture standardsIn carrying out the migration required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure that the
Distributed Common Ground System—(1)is in compliance with the open system architecture standards developed under the Defense
Intelligence Information Enterprise by the Under Secretary of Defense for
Intelligence; and(2)reuses services and components of the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise.(c)Open system architecture definedIn this section, the term open system architecture means, with respect to an information technology system, an integrated business and technical
strategy that—(1)employs a modular design and uses widely supported and consensus-based standards for key
interfaces;(2)is subjected to successful validation and verification tests to ensure key interfaces comply with
widely supported and consensus-based standards; and(3)uses a system architecture that allows components to be added, modified, replaced, removed, or
supported by different vendors throughout the system's life-cycle in order
to afford opportunities for enhanced competition and innovation while
yielding—(A)significant cost and schedule savings; and(B)increased interoperability.XVIINational Commission on the Future of the Army1701.This title may be cited as the National Commission on the Future of the Army Act of 2014
.1702.Prohibition on use of fiscal year 2015 funds to reduce strengths of Army personnelSubject to an authorized reduction under section 691(e) of title 10, United States Code (as applied
to the end strengths below), none of the funds authorized to be
appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for the Army
may be used to reduce the Army below the authorized fiscal year end
strengths for personnel of the Army as follows:(1)490,000 for active duty personnel of the Army.(2)350,200 for the Army National Guard.(3)202,000 for the Army Reserve.1703.Limitation on use of fiscal year 2015 funds for transfer or divestment of certain aircraft assigned
to the Army National Guard(a)(1)None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for the Army may be used to divest, retire, or transfer, or prepare to
divest, retire, or transfer, any AH–64 Apache aircraft of the Army
assigned to units of the Army National Guard as of January 15, 2014.(2)None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015
for the Army may be used to reduce personnel related to any AH–64 Apache
aircraft of the Army National Guard below the levels of such personnel as
of September 30, 2014.(3)Readiness of aircraft and crewsThe Secretary of the Army shall ensure the continuing readiness of the AH–64 Apache aircraft
referred to in paragraph (1) and the crews of such aircraft during fiscal
year 2015, including through the allocation of funds for operation and
maintenance and support of such aircraft and for personnel connected with
such aircraft as described in paragraph (2).(b)Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed to limit the use of funds described in that subsection
for the training of members of the Army National Guard or Army Reserve who
are pilots, crew, or mechanics of AH–64 Apache aircraft on any other
aircraft.(c)Notwithstanding subsection (a), funds described in that subsection may be used for the transfer of
not more than 48 AH–64 Apache aircraft from the Army National Guard to the
regular Army if the Secretary of Defense certifies in writing to the
congressional defense committees that such a transfer would not—(1)degrade the strategic depth or regeneration capacities of the Army;(2)degrade the Army National Guard in its role as the combat reserve of the Army; and(3)occur before October 1, 2014.1704.National Commission on the Future of the Army(a)There is established the National Commission on the Future of the Army (in this title referred to
as
the Commission
).(b)(1)The Commission shall be composed of eight members, of whom—(A)four shall be appointed by the President;(B)one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;(C)one shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;(D)one shall be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives; and(E)one shall be appointed by the Ranking Member of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of
Representatives.(2)The appointments of the members of the Commission shall be made not later than 90 days after the
date of the enactment of this Act.(3)Effect of lack of appointment by appointment dateIf 1 or more appointments under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment
date specified in paragraph (2), the authority to make such appointment or
appointments shall expire, and the number of members of the Commission
shall be reduced by the number equal to the number of appointments so not
made. If an appointment under subparagraph (B), (C), (D), or (E) of
paragraph (1) is not made by the appointment date specified in paragraph
(2), the authority to make an appointment under such subparagraph shall
expire, and the number of members of the Commission shall be reduced by
the number equal to the number otherwise appointable under such
subparagraph.(4)In making appointments under this subsection, consideration should be given to individuals with
expertise in national and international security policy and strategy,
military forces capability, force structure design, organization, and
employment, and reserve forces policy.(c)Period of appointment; vacanciesMembers shall be appointed for the life of the Commission. Any vacancy in the Commission shall not
affect its powers, but shall be filled in the same manner as the original
appointment.(d)The Commission shall select a Chair and Vice Chair from among its members.(e)Not later than 30 days after the date on which all members of the Commission have been appointed,
the Commission shall hold its initial meeting.(f)The Commission shall meet at the call of the Chair.(g)A majority of the members of the Commission shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number of
members may hold hearings.1705.(a)Study on structure of the Army(1)The Commission shall undertake a comprehensive study of the structure of the Army, and policy
assumptions related to the size and force mixture of the Army, in order—(A)to make an assessment of the size and force mixture of the active component of the Army and the
reserve components of the Army; and(B)to make recommendations on the modifications, if any, of the structure of the Army that are
necessary to
fulfill current and anticipated mission requirements for the Army at
acceptable levels of national risk and in a manner consistent with
available resources and anticipated future resources.(2)In undertaking the study required by subsection (a), the Commission shall give particular
consideration to the following:(A)An evaluation and identification of a structure for the Army that—(i)has the depth and scalability to meet current and anticipated requirements of the combatant
commands;(ii)achieves cost-efficiency between the regular and reserve components of the Army, manages military
risk, takes advantage of the strengths and capabilities of each, and
considers fully burdened lifecycle costs;(iii)ensures that the regular and reserve components of the Army have the capacity needed to support
current and anticipated homeland defense and disaster assistance missions
in the United States;(iv)provides for sufficient numbers of regular members of the Army to provide a base of trained
personnel from which the personnel of the reserve components of the Army
could be recruited;(v)maintains a peacetime rotation force to avoid exceeding operational tempo goals of 1:2 for active
members of the Army and 1:5 for members of the reserve components of the
Army; and(vi)maximizes and appropriately balances affordability, efficiency, effectiveness, capability, and
readiness.(B)An evaluation and identification of force generation policies for the Army with respect to size and
force mixture in order to best fulfill current and anticipated mission
requirements for the Army in a manner consistent with available resources
and anticipated future resources, including policies in connection with—(i)readiness;(ii)training;(iii)equipment;(iv)personnel; and(v)maintenance of the reserve components as an operational reserve in order to maintain as much as
possible the level of expertise and experience developed since September
11, 2001.(C)An identification and evaluation of the distribution of responsibility and authority for the
allocation of Army National Guard personnel and force structure to the
States and territories.(D)An identification and evaluation of the strategic basis or rationale, analytical methods, and
decision-making processes for the allocation of Army National Guard
personnel and force structure to the States and territories.(b)Study on transfer of certain aircraft(1)The Commission shall also conduct a study of a transfer of Army National Guard AH–64 Apache
aircraft from the Army National Guard to the regular Army.(2)In conducting the study required by paragraph (1), the Commission shall consider the factors
specified in subsection (a)(2).(c)Not later than February 1, 2016, the Commission shall submit to the President and the congressional
defense committees a report setting forth a detailed statement of the
findings and conclusions of the Commission as a result of the studies
required by subsections (a) and (b), together with its recommendations for
such
legislative and administrative actions as the Commission considers
appropriate in light of the results of the studies.1706.(a)The Commission may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony,
and receive such evidence as the Commission considers advisable to carry
out its duties under this title.(b)Information from federal agenciesThe Commission may secure directly from any Federal department or agency such information as the
Commission considers necessary to carry out its duties under this title.
Upon request of the Chair of the Commission, the head of such department
or agency shall furnish such information to the Commission.(c)The Commission may use the United States mails in the same manner and under the same conditions as
other departments and agencies of the Federal Government.1707.Commission personnel matters(a)Each member of the Commission who is not an officer or employee of the Federal Government may be
compensated at a rate not to exceed the daily equivalent of the annual
rate of $155,400 for each day (including travel time) during which such
member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission. All
members of the Commission who are officers or employees of the United
States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for
their services as officers or employees of the United States.(b)The members of the Commission shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of
subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under
subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from
their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services
for the Commission.(c)(1)The Chair of the Commission may, without regard to the civil service laws and regulations, appoint
and terminate an executive director and such other additional personnel as
may be necessary to enable the Commission to perform its duties. The
employment of an executive director shall be subject to confirmation by
the Commission.(2)The Chair of the Commission may fix the compensation of the executive director and other personnel
without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5,
United States Code, relating to classification of positions and General
Schedule pay rates, except that the rate of pay for the executive director
and other personnel may not exceed the rate payable for level V of the
Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.(d)Detail of government employeesAny Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Commission without reimbursement, and such
detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil service status or
privilege.(e)Procurement of temporary and intermittent servicesThe Chair of the Commission may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b)
of title 5, United States Code, at rates for individuals which do not
exceed the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for
level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of such title.1708.Termination of the CommissionThe Commission shall terminate 90 days after the date on which the Commission submits its
report under section 1705(c).1709.Amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 301 and available for
operation and
maintenance for the Army as specified in the funding table in section
4301 may be available for the activities of the
Commission under this title.
BMilitary construction authorizations2001.This division may be cited as the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015
.2002.Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law(a)Expiration of authorizations after three yearsExcept as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for
military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects
and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of
appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—(1)October 1, 2017; or(2)the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2018.(b)Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and
authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds
have been obligated before the later of—(1)October 1, 2017; or(2)the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2018 for military
construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and
facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment Program.XXIArmy military construction2101.Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects(a)Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and
available for military construction projects inside the United States as
specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army
may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for
the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the
amounts, set forth in the following table:Army: Inside the United StatesStateInstallation or
LocationAmount
CaliforniaConcord$15,200,000
Fort Irwin$45,000,000
ColoradoFort
Carson$89,000,000
HawaiiFort
Shafter$311,400,000
KentuckyBlue Grass Army Depot$15,000,000
Fort
Campbell$23,000,000
New YorkFort Drum $27,000,000
PennsylvaniaLetterkenny Army Depot$16,000,000
South CarolinaFort Jackson$52,000,000
VirginiaJoint Base
Langley-Eustis$7,700,000
(b)Outside the
United StatesUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military
construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations
outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:
Army: Outside the United States
CountryInstallation or
LocationAmount
Cuba
Guantanamo Bay$23,800,000
Japan
Kadena Air Base$10,600,000
2102.Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and
available for military family housing functions as specified in the
funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or
acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting
facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and
in the amounts set forth in the following table:Army: Family HousingState/CountryInstallation or LocationUnitsAmount
Illinois
Rock Island33$19,500,000
KoreaCamp Walker90$57,800,000
2103.Authorization of appropriations, Army(a)Authorization of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014,
for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.(b)Limitation on total cost of construction projectsNotwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects
carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the
following:(1)The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding
table in section 4601.(2)$225,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) for a Command and Control
Facility at Fort Shafter, Hawaii).(3)$6,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239;
126 Stat. 2119) for cadet barracks at the United States Military
Academy, New York).(4)$78,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public
Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), as amended by section 2105(d), for a Secure
Administration/Operations Facility at Fort Belvoir, Virginia).2104.Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2004 projectIn the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public
Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1697) for Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, for
construction of an Explosives Research and Development Loading Facility at
the installation, the Secretary of the Army may use available unobligated
balances of amounts appropriated for military construction for the Army to
complete work on the project within the scope specified for the project in
the justification data provided to Congress as part of the request for
authorization of the project.2105.Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 projects(a)(1)In executing the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Drum, New York, for construction of
an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the
Army may provide a capital contribution to a public or private utility
company in order for the utility company to extend the utility company’s
gas line to the installation boundary.(2)The capital contribution under subsection (a) shall not be construed as a change in the scope of
work under section 2853 of title 10, United States Code.(b)In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public
Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, for
construction of Battalion Complex Facilities at the installation, the
Secretary of the Army may construct the Battalion Headquarters with
classrooms for a unit other than a Global Defense Posture Realignment
unit.(c)In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public
Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for Fort McNair, District of Columbia, for
construction of a Vehicle Storage Building at the installation, the
Secretary of the Army may construct up to 20,227 square feet of vehicle
storage.(d)The table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013
(division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) is amended in the item
relating to Fort Belvoir, Virginia, by striking $94,000,000
in the amount column and inserting $172,000,000
.2106.Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 project(a)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that
Act (124 Stat. 4437), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.(b)The
table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
Army: Extension of 2011 Project
AuthorizationsStateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount
GeorgiaFort
Benning Land Acquisition$12,200,000
2107.Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects(a)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that
Act (125 Stat. 1661), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.(b)The
table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
Army: Extension of 2012 Project
AuthorizationsStateInstallation or LocationProjectAmount
GeorgiaFort BenningLand Acquisition$5,100,000
Fort BenningLand Acquisition$25,000,000
North CarolinaFort BraggUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hangar$54,000,000
TexasFort BlissApplied Instruction Building$8,300,000
Fort BlissVehicle Maintenance Facility$19,000,000
Fort HoodUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Maintenance Hangar$47,000,000
VirginiaFort
BelvoirRoad and Infrastructure Improvements$25,000,000
2108.Limitation on construction of cadet barracks at United States Military Academy, New YorkNo amounts may be obligated or expended for the construction of increment 3 of the Cadet Barracks
at the United States Military Academy, New York, as authorized by section
2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), until the
Secretary of the Army certifies to the congressional defense committees
that the Secretary intends to award a contract for the renovation of the
MacArthur Long Barracks at the United States Military Academy concurrent
with assuming beneficial occupancy of the renovated MacArthur Short
Barracks at the United States Military Academy.2109.Limitation on funding for family housing construction at Camp Walker, Republic of Korea(a)None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for construction of military
family housing units at Camp Walker, Republic of Korea, may be obligated
or expended until 30 days following the delivery of the report required
under subsection (b).(b)(1)Not later than March 1, 2015, the Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the Commander, U.S.
Forces-Korea, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a
report on future military family housing requirements in the Republic
of Korea and potential courses of action for meeting those requirements.(2)The report required under paragraph (1) shall, at a minimum—(A)identify the number of authorized Command Sponsored Families, by location, in the Republic of
Korea;(B)validate that the number of authorized Command Sponsored Families identified pursuant to
subparagraph (A) is necessary for operational effectiveness;(C)identify and validate each key and essential Command Sponsored Family billet requiring on-post
housing in the Republic of Korea;(D)identify and validate the number of authorized Command Sponsored Families in excess of key and
essential requiring on-post housing in the Republic of Korea;(E)identify the number and estimated cost of on-post family housing units required to support the
validated requirements;(F)contain a plan for meeting the on-post family housing requirements in the Republic of Korea,
including the source of funding; and(G)contain a prioritized list of planned military construction projects to be funded with Special
Measures Agreement funds over the future-years defense plan, including a
certification that each proposed project is a higher priority than family
housing.XXIINavy military construction2201.Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects(a)Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military
construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601,
the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Inside the United StatesStateInstallation
or LocationAmount
ArizonaYuma$16,608,000
California Bridgeport$16,180,000
San Diego
$47,110,000
District of ColumbiaNaval Support Activity Washington$31,735,000
Florida
Jacksonville $30,235,000
Mayport
$20,520,000
Hawaii Kaneohe Bay
$53,382,000
Pearl
Harbor $9,698,000
Maryland Annapolis$120,112,000
Indian Head$15,346,000
Patuxent River$9,860,000
Nevada Fallon $31,262,000
North Carolina Camp Lejeune$50,706,000
Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station$41,588,000
PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia$23,985,000
South CarolinaCharleston $35,716,000
VirginiaDahlgren $27,313,000
Norfolk$39,274,000
Portsmouth$9,743,000
Quantico$12,613,000
Yorktown$26,988,000
WashingtonBremerton$30,234,000
Port Angeles$20,638,000
Whidbey Island$24,390,000
(b)Outside the
United StatesUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military
construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the installation or location
outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:
Navy: Outside the United StatesCountryInstallation
or LocationAmount
Bahrain IslandSouthwest Asia$27,826,000
Djibouti Camp
Lemonier$9,923,000
GuamJoint Region Marianas$50,651,000
JapanIwakuni$6,415,000
Kadena Air Base$19,411,000
Marine Corps Air Station Futenma$4,639,000
Okinawa$35,685,000
SpainRota$20,233,000
Worldwide UnspecifiedUnspecified Worldwide Locations$38,985,000
2202.Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and
available for military family housing as specified in the funding table in
section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and
engineering services and construction design activities with respect to
the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not
to exceed $472,000.2203.Improvements to military family housing unitsSubject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to
the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for
military family housing as specified in the funding table in section 4601,
the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing
units in an amount not to exceed $15,940,000.2204.Authorization of appropriations, Navy(a)Authorization of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014,
for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Navy as specified in the funding table
in section 4601.(b)Limitation on total cost of construction projectsNotwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects
carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the
following:(1)The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding
table in section 4601.(2)$90,112,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(a) for a Center for Cyber
Security Studies Building at Annapolis, Maryland).(3)$274,099,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) for an explosive handling wharf at Kitsap,
Washington).(4)$68,196,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(b) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2633) for ramp parking at Joint Region Marianas,
Guam.2205.Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects(a)In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Yuma, Arizona, for construction of a
Double Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, the Secretary of the Navy may
construct up to approximately 70,000 square feet of additional apron to be
utilized as a taxi-lane using amounts appropriated for this project
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204 of such
Act (125 Stat. 1667).(b)In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Camp Pendleton, California, for
construction of an Infantry Squad Defense Range, the Secretary of the Navy
may construct up to 9,000 square feet of vehicular bridge using amounts
appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).(c)In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666), for Kings Bay, Georgia, for construction of a
Crab Island Security Enclave, the Secretary of the Navy may expand the
enclave fencing system to three layers of fencing and construct two
elevated fixed fighting positions with associated supporting facilities
using amounts appropriated for this project pursuant to the authorization
of appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (125 Stat. 1667).2206.Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 projectIn the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public
Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 989), for Yorktown, Virginia, for construction of
Small Arms Ranges, the Secretary of the Navy may construct 240 square
meters of armory, 48 square meters of Safety Officer/Target Storage
Building, and 667 square meters of Range Operations Building using
appropriations available for the project pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2204 of such Act (127 Stat. 990).2207.Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 projects(a)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that
Act (124 Stat. 4441) and extended by section 2207 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public
Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 991), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015,
or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for
fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.(b)The
table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
Navy: Extension of 2011 Project AuthorizationCountryInstallation
or LocationProjectAmount
BahrainSouthwest AsiaNavy Central Command Ammunition Magazines$89,280,000
GuamNaval Activities, Guam
Defense Access Roads Improvements $66,730,000
2208.Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects(a)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that
Act (125 Stat. 1666), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the
date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2016, whichever is later.(b)The
table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
Navy: Extension of 2012 Project AuthorizationsStateInstallation
or LocationProjectAmount
CaliforniaCamp PendletonNorth Area Waste Water Conveyance$78,271,000
Camp PendletonInfantry Squad Defense Range$29,187,000
Twentynine PalmsLand Expansion$8,665,000
FloridaJacksonvilleP–8A Hangar Upgrades$6,085,000
GeorgiaKings BayCrab Island Security Enclave$52,913,000
Kings BayWRA Land/Water Interface$33,150,000
MarylandPatuxent RiverAircraft Prototype Facility Phase 2$45,844,000
XXIIIAir Force military construction2301.Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects(a)Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2302(a) and available for military
construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601,
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Air Force: Inside the United StatesStateInstallation
or LocationAmount
AlaskaClear Air Force Station$11,500,000
ArizonaLuke Air
Force Base$26,800,000
KansasMcConnell Air Force
Base$34,400,000
MassachusettsHanscom Air Force Base $13,500,000
NevadaNellis Air
Force Base $53,900,000
New
JerseyJoint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst$5,900,000
OklahomaTinker Air
Force Base$111,000,000
Texas Joint Base San Antonio
$5,800,000
(b)Outside the
United StatesUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2302(a) and available for military
construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding
table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property
and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations
outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:
Air Force: Outside the United StatesCountryInstallation
or LocationAmount
Guam Joint
Region Marianas $47,800,000
United KingdomRoyal Air Force Croughton $92,223,000
2302.Authorization of appropriations, Air Force(a)Authorization of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014,
for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of the Air Force as specified in the funding
table in section 4601.(b)Limitation on total cost of construction projectsNotwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects
carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the
following:(1)The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding
table in section 4601.(2)$107,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2301(a) of the Military
Construction Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66;
127 Stat. 992) for the CYBERCOM Joint Operations Center at Fort Meade,
Maryland).2303.Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2008 projectIn the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public
Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 515), for Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, for
Base Infrastructure at that location, the Secretary of the Air Force may
acquire fee or lesser real property interests in approximately 11.5 acres
of land contiguous to Shaw Air Force Base for the project using funds
appropriated to the Department of the Air Force for construction in years
prior to fiscal year 2015.2304.Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project(a)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that
Act (124 Stat. 4444), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.(b)The
table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
Air Force: Extension of 2011 Project
Authorization
CountryInstallation
or LocationProjectAmount
Bahrain, Southwest Asia Shaikh Isa Air
Base North Apron Expansion $45,000,000
2305.Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects(a)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of
Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the
table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that
Act (125 Stat. 1670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.(b)The
table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
Air Force: Extension of 2012 Project
AuthorizationsState/CountryInstallation
or LocationProjectAmount
Alaska Eielson Air Force BaseDormitory (168 RM) $45,000,000
ItalySigonella Naval Air StationUAS SATCOM Relay Pads and Facility$15,000,000
XXIVDefense agencies military constructionADefense agency authorizations2401.Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects(a)Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military
construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in
section 4601,
the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Defense Agencies: Inside the United StatesStateInstallation or Location Amount
ArizonaFort Huachuca$1,871,000
California Camp Pendleton $11,841,000
Coronado$70,340,000
Lemoore$52,500,000
ColoradoPeterson Air Force Base$15,200,000
CONUS ClassifiedClassified Location$53,073,000
Georgia Hunter Army Airfield $7,692,000
Robins Air Force Base$19,900,000
Hawaii Joint
Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam $52,900,000
KentuckyFort Campbell $18,000,000
MarylandFort Meade$54,207,000
Joint Base Andrews$18,300,000
MississippiStennis$27,547,000
MichiganSelfridge Air National Guard Base$35,100,000
NevadaFallon$20,241,000
New
MexicoCannon Air Force Base$23,333,000
North CarolinaCamp Lejeune $52,748,000
Fort Bragg
$93,136,000
Seymour Johnson Air Force Base$8,500,000
South
CarolinaBeaufort $40,600,000
South DakotaEllsworth Air Force Base$8,000,000
Texas Joint
Base San Antonio $38,300,000
Virginia Craney Island$36,500,000
Defense Distribution Depot Richmond$5,700,000
Fort Belvoir$7,239,000
Joint Base Langley-Eustis$41,200,000
Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story$39,558,000
Pentagon$15,100,000
(b)Outside the
United StatesUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the
authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military
construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding
table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and
carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations
outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following
table:
Defense Agencies: Outside the United StatesCountryInstallation or LocationAmount
AustraliaGeraldton$9,600,000
Belgium Brussels $79,544,000
CubaGuantanamo Bay$76,290,000
JapanMisawa Air Base$37,775,000
Okinawa$170,901,000
Sasebo$37,681,000
2402.Authorized energy conservation projects(a)Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and
available for energy conservation projects inside the United States as
specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense
may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10,
United States Code, for the installations or locations inside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United StatesStateInstallation or LocationAmount
CaliforniaEdwards$4,500,000
Fort Hunter Liggett$13,500,000
Vandenberg$2,965,000
ColoradoFort Carson$3,000,000
FloridaEglin$3,850,000
GeorgiaMoody$3,600,000
HawaiiMarine Corps Base Hawaii$8,460,000
IllinoisNaval Station Great Lakes$2,190,000
MainePortsmouth Naval Shipyard$2,740,000
MarylandFort Detrick$2,100,000
NebraskaOffutt$2,869,000
North CarolinaFort Bragg$3,350,000
OklahomaTinker$4,609,000
OregonOregon National Guard$9,400,000
UtahDugway Proving Ground$15,400,000
VirginiaNaval Station Norfolk$11,360,000
Pentagon$2,120,000
Various LocationsVarious Locations$13,311,000
(b)Outside the United StatesUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and
available for energy conservation projects outside the United States as
specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense
may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10,
United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United StatesCountryInstallation or LocationAmount
Diego Garcia Diego Garcia$14,620,000
DijboutiCamp Lemonnier$4,766,000
GermanySpangdahlem$4,800,000
Japan Yokosuka$8,030,000
Various LocationsVarious Locations$8,661,000
2403.Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies(a)Authorization of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013,
for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing
functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military
departments) as specified in the funding table in section 4601.(b)Limitation on total cost of construction projectsNotwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and
any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects
carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the
following:(1)The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding
table in section 4601.(2)$79,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239;
126 Stat. 2128) for NSAW Recapitalize Building #1 at Fort Meade,
Maryland).(3)$141,039,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for a data center at Fort Meade, Maryland).(4)$50,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base
Andrews, Maryland).(5)$54,300,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base
San Antonio, Texas).(6)$656,168,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(b) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1673) for a hospital at the Rhine Ordnance
Barracks, Germany).(7)$281,325,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public
Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2640) for a hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas).(8)$123,827,000 (the balance of the amount authorized as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide project
by title X of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law
111–32; 123 Stat. 1888) for a data center at Camp Williams, Utah).2404.Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2011 project(a)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorizations set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that
Act (124 Stat. 4446), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the
date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year
2016, whichever is later.(b)The
table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2011 Project
AuthorizationStateInstallation
or LocationProjectAmount
District of Columbia Bolling Air Force BaseCooling Tower Expansion$2,070,000
DIAC Parking Garage$13,586,000
Electrical Upgrades$1,080,000
2405.Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2012 projects(a)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that
Act (125 Stat. 1673), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.(b)The
table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
Defense Agencies: Extension of 2012 Project AuthorizationsState/CountryInstallation
or LocationProjectAmount
CaliforniaCoronadoSpecial Operations Forces Support Activity Operations Facility$42,000,000
GermanyBaumholderWetzel-Smith Elementary School (Replacement)$59,419,000
ItalyVicenzaVicenza High School (Replacement)$41,864,000
JapanYokota Air BaseYokota High School (Replace/Renovate)$49,606,000
VirginiaPentagon ReservationHeliport Control Tower and Fire Station$6,457,000
Pentagon ReservationPentagon Memorial Pedestrian Plaza$2,285,000
BChemical demilitarization authorizations2411.Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, defense-wide(a)Authorization of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30,
2014, for military construction and land acquisition for chemical
demilitarization, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.(b)Limitation on total cost of construction projectsNotwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code,
and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all
projects carried out under this section may not exceed the sum of the
following:(1)The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding
table in section 4601.(2)$2,049,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2412 for ammunition
demilitarization at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky).2412.Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2000 project(a)The table in section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000
(division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as most recently
amended by section 2412 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public
Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), is amended—(1)in the item relating to Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, by striking $746,000,000
in the amount column and inserting $780,000,000
; and(2)by striking the amount identified as the total in the amount column and inserting $1,237,920,000
.(b)Section 2405(b)(3) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B
of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 839), as most recently amended by section
2412 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383;
124 Stat. 4450), is further amended by striking $723,200,000
and inserting $757,200,000
.XXVNorth atlantic treaty organization security investment program2501.Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projectsThe Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security
Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States
Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be
appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected
from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction
previously financed by the United States.2502.Authorization of appropriations, NATOFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2014,
for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title
10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of
projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment
Program authorized by section 2501, in the amount of $174,700,000.XXVIGuard and Reserve forces facilitiesAProject authorizations and authorization of appropriations2601.Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projectsUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and
available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601,
the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:Army National Guard: Inside the United StatesStateLocationAmount
MaineAugusta$32,000,000
MarylandHavre de Grace$12,400,000
Montana Helena $38,000,000
New MexicoAlamogordo$5,000,000
North Dakota Valley City $10,800,000
VermontNorth Hyde Park$4,400,000
2602.Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projectsUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and
available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601,
the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United
States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:Army ReserveStateLocationAmount
California
Fresno$22,000,000
Riverside$25,000,000
Colorado
Fort Carson$5,000,000
New
Jersey Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst$26,000,000
New York
Mattydale$23,000,000
Virginia Fort Lee$16,000,000
2603.Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projectsUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and
available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601,
the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the
following table:Navy Reserve Marine Corps ReserveStateLocationAmount
PennsylvaniaPittsburgh$17,650,000
WashingtonNaval Station Everett$47,869,000
Whidbey Island$27,755,000
2604.Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projectsUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and
available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601,
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out
military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:Air National GuardStateLocationAmount
ArkansasFort Smith Municipal Airport$13,200,000
Connecticut Bradley International Airport$16,306,000
Iowa Des Moines Municipal Airport$8,993,000
Michigan W.K. Kellog Regional Airport$6,000,000
New HampshirePease International Trade Port$41,902,000
PennsylvaniaHorsham Air Guard Station (Willow Grove)$5,662,000
2605.Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projectsUsing amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and
available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in section 4601,
the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out
military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside
the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:Air Force ReserveStateLocationAmount
ArizonaDavis-Monthan Air Force Base$14,500,000
Georgia Robins Air Force Base $27,700,000
North CarolinaSeymour Johnson Air Force Base $9,800,000
TexasForth Worth$3,700,000
2606.Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and ReserveFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013,
for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and
construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for
contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code
(including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as
specified in the funding table in section 4601.B2611.Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 projects(a)(1)In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1678), for Kansas City, Kansas, for construction of
an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may,
instead of constructing a new facility in Kansas City, construct a new
facility in the vicinity of Kansas City, Kansas.(2)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set
forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or
the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.(b)(1)In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public
Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1678), for Attleboro, Massachusetts, for
construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of
the Army may, instead of constructing a new facility in Attleboro,
construct a new facility in the vicinity of Attleboro, Massachusetts.(2)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set
forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or
the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.2612.Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 projectIn the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2601 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public
Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2134) for Stormville, New York, for construction of
a Combined Support Maintenance Shop Phase I, the Secretary of the Army may
instead construct the facility at Camp Smith, New York and build a 53,760
square foot maintenance facility in lieu of a 75,156 square foot
maintenance facility.2613.Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2011 project(a)Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011
(division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4436), the authorization set
forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2601 of that
Act (124 Stat. 4452), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2015, or the
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military
construction for fiscal year 2016, whichever is later.(b)The
table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
Extension of 2011 National Guard and Reserve Project AuthorizationStateLocationProjectAmount
Puerto RicoCamp SantiagoMulti Purpose Machine Gun Range$9,200,000
XXVIIBase realignment and closure activities2701.Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through
Department of Defense Base Closure AccountFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2013,
for base realignment and closure activities, including real property
acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of
Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department
of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 established by section 2906 of such
Act, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
2702.Prohibition on conducting additional base realignment and closure (BRAC) roundNothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional round of defense base closure and
realignment.2703.(a)Section 3(p)(5)(A)(i)(I) of the Small Business Act (15
U.S.C. 632(p)(5)(A)(i)(I)) is amended—(1)in
item (aa), by striking or
at the end;(2)by
redesignating item (bb) as item (cc); and(3)by
inserting after item (aa) the following:- (bb)pursuant to
subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (3), that its principal
office is located in a HUBZone described in paragraph (1)(E) (relating to base
closure areas) (in this item referred to as the
base closure HUBZone
), and that not fewer than 35 percent of its employees reside
in—(AA)a
HUBZone;(BB)the
census tract in which the base closure HUBZone is wholly contained;(CC)a census tract the boundaries of which intersect the boundaries of the base closure HUBZone; or(DD)a
census tract the boundaries of which are contiguous to a census tract described
in subitem (BB) or (CC);
or .(b)Period for base
closure areas(1)(A)Section 152(a)(2) of title I of division K of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (15 U.S.C. 632 note) is amended by
striking 5 years
and inserting 8 years
.(B)Section 1698(b)(2) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (15 U.S.C. 632 note)
is amended by striking 5 years
and inserting 8 years
.(2)Effective date; applicabilityThe amendments made by paragraph (1) shall—(A)take effect on the date of enactment of this Act; and(B)apply to—(i)a base closure area (as defined in section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C.
632(p)(4)(D))) that, on the day before the date of enactment of this Act,
is treated as a HUBZone described in section 3(p)(1)(E) of the Small
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(1)(E)) under—(I)section 152(a)(2) of title I of division K of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (15 U.S.C. 632 note); or(II)section 1698(b)(2) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (15 U.S.C. 632
note); and(ii)a base closure area relating to the closure of a military instillation under the authority
described in clauses (i) through (iv) of section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D)) that occurs on or after the date of
enactment of this Act.XXVIIIMilitary Construction General ProvisionsAMilitary Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes2801.
Clarification of authorized use of in-kind payments and in-kind contributions(a)Section 2687a(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)in the subsection heading, by inserting in-kind contributions
after payments-in-kind
;(2)in paragraph (1), by striking a payment-in-kind contribution pursuant to
and inserting payment-in-kind or as an in-kind contribution required by
;(3)in paragraph (2)—(A)by striking a payment-in-kind contribution
and inserting payment-in-kind or an in-kind contribution required by a bilateral agreement with a host country
; and(B)by inserting or contribution
after such payment
;(4)in paragraph (3)—(A)by striking , facility improvement,
; and(B)by striking a payment-in-kind contribution
and inserting payment-in-kind or by an in-kind contribution required by a bilateral agreement with a host country
; and(5)in paragraph (4)—(A)by inserting or in-kind contribution toward operating costs
after does not apply to a military construction project
; and(B)in subparagraph (C), by inserting is a military construction project that
before will cost less
.(b)Section 2802(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking payment-in-kind contributions
and inserting payments-in-kind or in-kind contributions
.2802.Residential building construction standardsAll residential buildings funded, planned, remodeled, or authorized by this Act that will be
designed and constructed to meet an above code green building standard or
rating system may use the ICC 700 National Green Building Standard, the
LEED
Green Building Standard System, or an equivalent protocol which has been
developed using a voluntary consensus standard, as
defined in Office of Management and Budget Circular Number A–119.2803.Modification of minor military construction authority for projects to correct deficiencies that are
life-, health-, or safety-threateningSection 2805(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking $3,000,000
in the second sentence and inserting $4,000,000
.2804.
Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction
projects in certain areas outside the United StatesSection 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of
Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section
2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014
(division B of Public Law 112–239; 127 Stat. 1012), is further amended—(1)in subsection (c)(1), by striking shall not exceed
and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting shall not exceed $100,000,000 between October 1, 2014, and the earlier of December 31, 2015, or the
date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military activities
of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016.
; and(2)in subsection (h)—(A)in paragraph (1), by striking December 31, 2014
and inserting December 31, 2015
; and(B)in paragraph (2), by striking fiscal year 2015
and inserting fiscal year 2016
.2805.
Limitation on construction projects in European Command area of responsibility(a)Except as provided in subjection (b), the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military
department may not award any contract in connection with a construction
project authorized by this division to be carried out at an installation
operated in the United States European Command area of responsibility
until the
Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees
that—(1)the installation and specific military construction requirement—(A)have been assessed as part of the basing assessment initiated by the Secretary of Defense on
January
25, 2013 (known as the European Infrastructure Consolidation Assessment
); and(B)have been determined, pursuant to such assessment, to be of an enduring nature; and(2)the specific military construction requirement most effectively meets combatant commander
requirements at the authorized location.(b)Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to a construction project that—(1)is authorized by law before the date of the enactment of this Act;(2)is funded through the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program or intended to
specifically support the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; or(3)is carried out under the authority of, and subject to the limits specified in, section 2805 of
title 10, United States Code.2806.
Limitation on construction of new facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba(a)None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for
fiscal year 2015 for the Department of Defense may be used to construct
new facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba until the Secretary of Defense
certifies to the congressional defense committees that any new
construction of facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba has enduring military
value independent of a high value detention mission.(b)Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as limiting the ability of the Department of Defense
to obligate or expend available funds to correct a deficiency that is
life-threatening, health-threatening, or safety-threatening.BReal Property and Facilities Administration2811.
Deposit of reimbursed funds to cover administrative expenses relating to certain real property
transactions(a)Authority to credit reimbursed funds to accounts currently availableSection 2695(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—(1)by inserting (1)
before Amounts collected
;(2)by striking shall be credited to the appropriation
and inserting the following: “shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary concerned, to—(A)the appropriation; and(3)by striking were paid. Amounts so credited
and inserting the following: “were paid; or(B)an appropriation, fund, or account currently available to the Secretary for the purposes
for which the expenses were paid.(2)Amounts so credited.(b)Prospective applicabilityThe amendments made by subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to expenses incurred with
appropriations provided to the Secretary of a military department before
the date of the enactment of this Act.2812.
Renewals, extensions, and succeeding leases for financial institutions operating on Department of
Defense installationsSubsection (h) of section 2667 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the
following
new paragraph:(4)(A)Paragraph (1) does not apply to a renewal, extension, or succeeding lease by the Secretary
concerned with a financial institution selected in accordance with the
Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation providing for the
selection of financial institutions to operate on military installations
if each of the following applies:(i)The on-base financial institution was selected before the date of the enactment of this paragraph
or competitive procedures are used for the selection of any new financial
institutions.(ii)A current and binding operating agreement is in place between the installation commander and the
selected on-base financial institution.(B)The renewal, extension, or succeeding lease shall terminate upon the termination of the operating
agreement described in subparagraph (A)(ii)..CProvisions Related to Asia-Pacific Military Realignment2821.Realignment of Marines Corps forces in Asia-Pacific region(a)Restriction on use of fundsExcept as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this
Act, and none of the amounts provided by the Government of Japan for
construction activities on land under the jurisdiction of the Department
of Defense, may be obligated or expended to implement the realignment of
Marine Corps
forces from Okinawa to Guam or Hawaii until the Secretary of Defense
submits to the congressional defense committees each of the following:(1)The report required by section 1068(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1945).(2)Master plans for the construction of facilities and infrastructure to execute the Marine Corps
distributed lay-down on Guam and Hawaii, including a detailed description
of costs and the schedule for such construction.(3)A plan, coordinated by all pertinent Federal agencies, detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a
schedule for completion of construction, improvements, and repairs to the
nonmilitary utilities, facilities, and infrastructure, if any, on Guam
affected by the realignment of forces.(b)Exceptions to restriction on use of fundsNotwithstanding subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may use funds described in such subsection
for the following purposes:(1)To complete additional analysis or studies required under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for proposed actions on Guam or Hawaii.(2)To initiate planning and design of construction projects on Guam.(3)To carry out any military construction project for which an authorization of appropriations is
provided in section 2204, as specified in the funding table in section
4601.(4)To carry out the Government of Japan-funded construction of a Driver Convoy Course and an Urban
Combat Skills Training Course
at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.(c)Restriction on development of public infrastructureIf the Secretary of Defense determines that any grant, cooperative agreement, transfer of funds to
another Federal agency, or supplement of funds available in fiscal year
2014 under Federal programs administered by agencies other than the
Department of Defense will result in the development (including repair,
replacement, renovation, conversion, improvement, expansion, acquisition,
or construction) of public infrastructure on Guam, the Secretary of
Defense may not carry out such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement, or
supplemental funding unless such grant, transfer, cooperative agreement,
or supplemental funding is specifically authorized by law.(d)In this section:(1)The term distributed laydown refers to the planned distribution of members of the Marine Corps in Okinawa, Guam, Hawaii,
Australia, and possibly elsewhere that is contemplated in support of the
joint statement of the United States–Japan Security Consultative Committee
issued April 26, 2012, in the District of Columbia (April 27, 2012, in
Tokyo, Japan) and revised on October 3, 2013, in Tokyo.(2)The term master plan means documentation that provides the scope, cost, and schedule for each military construction
project.(3)The term public infrastructure means any utility, method of transportation, item of equipment, or facility under the control of a
public entity or State or local government that is used by, or constructed
for the benefit of, the general public.D2831.
Land conveyance, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii(a)The Secretary of the Navy may convey, without consideration, to the Honolulu Authority for Rapid
Transportation (in this section referred to as the Honolulu Authority
) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the real property, including any
improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 1.2 acres located at or
in the
nearby vicinity of Radford Drive and the Makalapa Gate, which is part of
the Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, for the purpose of permitting the
Honolulu Authority to use the property for the public benefit of a rail
platform.(b)Condition on use of revenuesIf the property conveyed under subsection (a) is used, consistent with such subsection, for a
public purpose that results in the generation of revenue for the Honolulu
Authority, the Honolulu Authority shall agree that any revenue generated
by the use of the property shall be only for passenger rail transit
purposes by depositing the revenues in a fund designated for passenger
rail transit use.(c)Payment of costs of conveyance(1)The Secretary of the Navy shall require the Honolulu Authority to cover costs to be incurred by the
Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs, to carry out the
conveyance under subsection (a). If amounts paid to the
Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary
to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount
to the Honolulu Authority.(2)Treatment of amounts receivedAmounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry
out the conveyance under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or
account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in
carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with
amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same
purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts
in such fund or account.(d)The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a)
shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Navy.(e)Additional terms and conditionsThe Secretary of the Navy may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the
conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to
protect the interests of the United States.2832.
Land exchange, Arlington County, Virginia(a)(1)The Secretary of Defense may convey—(A)to Arlington County, Virginia (in this section referred to as the County
), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to one or more parcels of real
property, together with any improvements thereon, located south of
Columbia
Pike and west of South Joyce Street in Arlington County, Virginia; and(B)to the Commonwealth of Virginia (referred to in this section as the Commonwealth
), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to one or more parcels of property
east of Joyce Street in Arlington County, Virginia, necessary for the
realignment of Columbia Pike and the Washington Boulevard-Columbia Pike
interchange, as well as for future improvements to Interstate 395 ramps.(2)The conveyances authorized under this paragraph may be accomplished through a phasing of several
exchanges,
if necessary.(b)As consideration for the conveyances of real property under subsection (a), the Secretary of
Defense shall receive—(1)from the County, all right, title, and interest of the County in and to one or more parcels of real
property in the area known as the Southgate Road right-of-way, Columbia
Pike right-of-way, and South Joyce Street right-of-way located in
Arlington County, Virginia; and(2)from the Commonwealth, all right, title, and interest of the Commonwealth in and to one or more
parcels
of property in the area known as the Columbia Pike right-of-way, and the
Washington Boulevard-Columbia Pike interchange.(c)Selection of property for conveyanceThe Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Army and Arlington County, signed in
January 2013, shall be used as a guide in determining the properties to
be
exchanged. After consultation with the Commonwealth and the County, the
Secretary shall determine the exact parcels to be exchanged and such
determination shall be final. In selecting the properties to be exchanged
under subsections (a) and (b), the parties shall, within their respective
authorities, seek to—(1)remove existing barriers to contiguous expansion of Arlington National Cemetery north of Columbia
Pike through a realignment of Southgate Road to the western boundary of
the former Navy Annex site;(2)provide the County with sufficient property to construct a museum that honors the history of
freedman’s village, as well as any other County or public use this is
compatible with a location immediately adjacent to Arlington National
Cemetery, one of our Nation’s most sacred shrines; and(3)support the realignment and straightening of Columbia Pike, a redesign of the Washington
Boulevard-Columbia Pike interchange, and future improvements to the
Interstate 395 ramps.(d)The exact acreage and legal description of the real property to be conveyed under this section
shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary, in
consultation with the Commonwealth and the County.(e)The conveyances of real property authorized under this section shall be accomplished by one or
more exchange
agreements upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to
the Secretary, the Commonwealth, and the County.(f)Repeal of obsolete authoritySection 2881 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005
(Public Law
108–375; 118 Stat. 2153) is hereby repealed.2833.Transfers of administrative jurisdiction, Camp Frank D. Merrill and Lake Lanier, Georgia(a)(1)Not later than September 30, 2015, the Secretary of Agriculture shall transfer to the
administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Army for required Army
force protection measures certain Federal land administered as part of the
Chattahoochee National Forest, but permitted to the Secretary of the Army
for Camp Frank D. Merrill in Dahlonega, Georgia, consisting of
approximately 282 acres identified in the permit numbers 0018–01.(2)In exchange for the land transferred under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Army (acting through
the Chief of Engineers) shall transfer to the administrative jurisdiction
of the Secretary of Agriculture certain Federal land administered by the
Army Corps of Engineers and consisting of approximately 10 acres adjacent
to Lake Lanier at 372 Dunlap Landing Road, Gainesville, Georgia.(b)(1)(A)On receipt of the land under subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of the Army shall—(i)continue to use the land for military purposes;(ii)maintain a public access road through the land or provide for alternative public access in
coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture; and(iii)make accommodations for public access and enjoyment of the land, when such public use is consistent
with Army mission and force protection requirements.(B)The land transferred under subsection (a)(1) shall return to the jurisdiction of the Secretary of
Agriculture, based on the best interests of the United States, if the
Secretary of the Army determines that the transferred land is no longer
needed for military purposes.(2)(A)On receipt of the land under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Agriculture shall use the land for
administrative purposes.(B)The Secretary of Agriculture may—(i)sell or exchange land transferred under subsection (a)(2);(ii)deposit the proceeds of a sale or exchange under clause (i) in the fund established under Public
Law 90–171 (commonly known as the Sisk Act
) (16 U.S.C. 484a); and(iii)retain the proceeds for future acquisition of land within the Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forest,
with the proceeds to remain available for expenditure without further
appropriation or fiscal year limitation.(c)Use and occupancy of National Forest System LandUse and occupancy of National Forest System Land by the Department of the Army, other than land
transferred pursuant to this Act, shall continue to be subject to all laws
(including regulations) applicable to the National Forest System.(d)(1)Critical habitat designation for dartersNothing in the transfer required by subsection (a)(1) shall affect the prior designation of land
within the Chattahoochee National Forest as critical habitat for the
Etowah darter (Etheostoma etowahae) and the Holiday darter (Etheostoma
brevistrum).(2)Future critical habitat listings and designationsNothing in the transfer required by subsection (a)(1) shall affect the operation of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) for future listing or
designations of critical habitat.(e)Legal description and map(1)Preparation and publicationThe Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture shall publish in the Federal Register a
legal description and map of both parcels of land to be transferred under
subsection (a).(2)The legal description and map filed under paragraph (1) for a parcel of land shall have the same
force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretaries
may correct errors in the legal description and map.(f)The Secretary of the Army shall reimburse the Secretary of Agriculture for all costs related to the
transfer required by subsection (a), including, at a minimum, any costs
incurred by the Secretary of Agriculture to assist in the preparation of
the legal description and maps required by subsection (e).2834.
Transfer of administrative jurisdiction, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma(a)Upon a determination by the Secretary of the Army that the parcel of property at Camp Gruber,
Oklahoma, conveyed by the war asset deed dated June 29, 1949, between
the United States of America and the State of Oklahoma, or any portion
there-of, is needed for national defense purposes, including military
training, and that the transfer of the parcel is
in the best interest of the Department of the Army, the Administrator of
General Services shall execute the reversionary clause in the deed
and immediately transfer administrative jurisdiction to the Department
of the Army.(b)The exact acreage and legal description of any real property to be transferred under subsection (a)
may be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.(c)Additional term and conditionsThe Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with a transfer
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect
the interests of the United States.E2841.Establishment of memorial to the victims of the shooting at the Washington Navy Yard on September
16, 2013(a)The Secretary of the Navy may permit a third party to establish and maintain a memorial
dedicated to the victims of the shooting attack at the Washington Navy
Yard that occurred on September 16, 2013.(b)The Secretary may permit the memorial authorized by subsection (a) to be established at the
Washington Navy Yard.(c)An account shall be established on the books of the Treasury for the purpose of managing
contributions received pursuant to paragraph (d).(d)Acceptance of contributionsThe Secretary of the Navy may establish procedures under which the Secretary may solicit and accept
monetary contributions or gifts of property for the purpose of the
activities described in subsection (a). a(e)Without regard to the limitations set forth under section 2601(c)(2) of title 10, United States
Code, the Secretary of the Navy shall deposit monetary contributions
accepted under paragraph (d) in the
account established under paragraph (c). The funds in the account
established under paragraph (c) shall be available until expended without
further appropriation, but only for the purposes described in subsection
(a).(f)Use of federal funds prohibitedFederal funds may not be used to design, procure, prepare, install, or maintain the memorial
authorized by subsection (a).(g)The memorial authorized by subsection (a) may not be established until the Secretary determines
that an assured source of non-Federal funding has been established for the
design, procurement, installation, and maintenance of the memorial in
perpetuity.(h)The final design of the memorial authorized by subsection (a) shall be subject to the approval of
the Secretary.CDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONSXXXIDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMSANational security programs authorizations3101.National Nuclear Security Administration(a)Authorization of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for
the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying
out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.(b)Authorization of new plant projectsFrom funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the
Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National
Nuclear Security Administration as follows:Project 15–D–613, Emergency Operations Center, Y–12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge,
Tennessee, $2,000,000.Project 15–D–612, Emergency Operations Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore,
California, $2,000,000.Project 15–D–611, Emergency Operations Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New
Mexico, $4,000,000.Project 15–D–302, TA–55 Reinvestment Project Phase III, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,
New Mexico, $16,062,000. Project 15–D–301, High Explosive Science and Engineering Facility, Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas,
$11,800,000. Project 15–D–904, Overpack Storage Expansion 3, Naval Reactors Facility, Idaho, $400,000. Project 15–D–903, Fire System Upgrade, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Schenectady, New York,
$600,000. Project 15–D–902, Engine Room Team Trainer Facility, Kesselring Site, West Milton, New York,
$1,500,000. Project 15–D–901, Central Office and Prototype Staff Building, Kesselring Site, West Milton, New
York, $24,000,000.
3102.Defense environmental cleanup(a)Authorization of appropriationsFunds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for
defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as
specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b)Authorization of new plant projectsFrom funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the
Secretary of Energy may carry out, for defense environmental cleanup
activities, the following new plant projects:Project 15–D–401, KW Basin Sludge Removal Project, Hanford, Washington, $26,290,000. Project 15–D–402, Saltstone Disposal Unit #6, Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina,
$34,642,000.Project 15–D–405, Sludge Processing Facility Build Out, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, $4,200,000. Project 15–D–406, Hexavalent Chromium Pump and Treatment Remedy Project, Los Alamos National
Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $28,600,000. Project 15–D–409, Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Hanford, Washington, $23,000,000.
3103.Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2015 for
other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the
funding table in section 4701.BProgram authorizations, restrictions, and limitations3111.Life-cycle cost estimates of certain atomic energy defense capital assets(a)Subtitle A of title XLVII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2741 et seq.) is amended by
adding at the end the following new section:
4714.Life-cycle cost estimates of certain atomic energy defense capital assets(a)The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that an independent life-cycle cost estimate under Department
of
Energy Order 413.3
(relating to program management and project management for the
acquisition of capital assets) of each capital asset described in subsection (b) is conducted
before the asset
achieves critical decision 2 in the acquisition process.(b)A capital asset described in this subsection is an atomic energy defense capital asset—(1)the total project cost of which exceeds $100,000,000; and(2)the purpose of which is to perform a limited-life, single-purpose mission.(c)For purposes of subsection (a), the term independent, with respect to a life-cycle cost estimate of a capital asset, means that the life-cycle cost
estimate is prepared by an organization independent of the project
sponsor, using the same detailed technical and procurement information as
the sponsor, to determine if the life-cycle cost estimate of the sponsor
is accurate and reasonable..(b)The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4713
the following new item:Sec. 4714. Life-cycle cost estimates of certain atomic energy defense capital assets..3112.Expansion of requirement for independent cost estimates on life extension programs and new nuclear
facilitiesSection 4217(b) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2537(b)) is amended—(1)by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respectively;(2)by inserting before subparagraph (B), as redesignated by paragraph (1), the following new
subparagraph (A):(A)Each nuclear weapon system undergoing life extension at the completion of phase 6.1, relating to
concept assessment.; and(3)in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by striking critical decision 2
and inserting critical decision 1 and before such facility achieves critical decision 2
.3113.Implementation of Phase I of Uranium Capabilities Replacement ProjectSection 3123 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239;
126 Stat. 2177) is amended by striking subsection (d) and inserting the
following new subsection (d):(d)Implementation of Phase I(1)Critical decision 3 in the acquisition process may not be approved for Phase I (subproject
06–D–141–04) until all processes (or substitute processes) that require
Category I and II special nuclear material protection and are actively
used to support the
stockpile in building 9212—(A)are present in the facility to be built under Phase I with a technology readiness level of 7 or
higher; or(B)can be accommodated in other facilities of the Y–12 National Security Complex with a technology
readiness level of 7 or higher.(2)Technology readiness level definedIn this subsection, the term technology readiness level has the meaning given that term in Department of Energy Guide 413.3–4A (relating to technology
readiness assessment)..3114.Establishment of the
Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health(a)Advisory Board
on Toxic Substances and Worker HealthSubtitle B of the Energy Employees
Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7384l et
seq.)
is amended by adding at the end the following:3632.Advisory
Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health(a)(1)Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment
of the Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015, the
President shall establish and appoint an
Advisory Board on
Toxic Substances and Worker Health (in this section referred to as
the
Board).(2)The President shall make appointments to the Board
in consultation with organizations with expertise on worker health
issues in
order to ensure that the membership of the Board reflects a proper
balance of
perspectives from the scientific, medical, legal, worker, worker
families, and
worker advocate communities.(3)The
President shall designate a Chair of the Board from among its
members.(b)The
Board shall—(1)advise the
President concerning the review and approval of the site
exposure matrix of the Department of
Labor;(2)conduct periodic
peer reviews of, and approve, medical guidance for claims
examiners for claims under subtitle E with
respect to the weighing of the medical evidence of claimants;(3)obtain periodic
expert review of evidentiary requirements for claims under this
subtitle related
to lung
disease regardless of approval;(4)provide oversight
of industrial hygienists and staff physicians
and
consulting physicians of the Department and their reports to
ensure
quality, objectivity, and consistency; and(5)coordinate
exchanges of data and findings with the Advisory Board on Radiation
and Worker
Health established under section 3624 to the extent necessary.(c)(1)The President shall appoint a staff to facilitate the
work of the Board. The staff of the Board shall be headed by a
Director who
shall be appointed under subchapter VIII of chapter 33 of title 5,
United
States Code.(2)The President may authorize the detail of employees of
Federal agencies to the Board as necessary to enable the Board to
carry out its
duties under this section. The detail of such personnel may be on a
nonreimbursable basis.(3)The
Board shall have same powers as the Advisory Board on Radiation
and Worker
Health established under section 3624.(4)The
Secretary shall employ outside contractors and specialists selected
by the
Board to support the work of the Board.(d)Members
of the Board, other than full-time employees of the United States,
while
attending meetings of the Board or while otherwise serving at the
request of
the President, and while serving away from their homes or regular
place of
business, shall be allowed travel and meal expenses, including per
diem in lieu
of subsistence (as authorized by section 5703 of title 5, United
States Code)
for individuals in the Federal Government serving without pay.(e)(1)The
Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the members and staff of the
Board, and
the contractors performing work in support of the Board, are
afforded the
opportunity to apply for a security clearance for any matter for
which such a
clearance is appropriate.(2)The
Secretary of Energy should, not later than 180 days after receiving
a completed
application for a security clearance for an individual under this
subsection, make a
determination of whether or not the individual is eligible
for the
clearance.(3)For
fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of
Energy
shall include in the budget justification materials submitted to
Congress in
support of the Department of Energy budget for that fiscal year (as
submitted
with the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31,
United
States Code) a report specifying the number of applications for
security
clearances under this subsection, the number of such applications
granted, and
the number of such applications denied.(f)The
Secretary of Energy shall, in accordance with law, provide to the
Board and the
contractors of the Board, access to any information that the Board
considers
relevant to carry out its responsibilities under this section,
including
information such as Restricted Data (as defined in section 11 y. of
the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014(y))) and information covered by
section 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the Privacy Act
).(g)Authorization of appropriations(1)There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.(2)Treatment as discretionary spendingAmounts appropriated to carry out this section—(A)shall not be appropriated to the account established under subsection (a) of section 151 of title I
of division B of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–554; 114 Stat.
2763A–251); and(B)shall not be subject to subsection (b) of that section.(h)The Board shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of the
Carl Levin National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015..(b)Department of
Labor response to the Office of the Ombudsman annual
report; repeal of sunset dateSection 3686 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 7385s–15) is amended—(1)in subsection
(e)—(A)in paragraph (1), by striking February 15
and inserting July
30
; and(B)by adding at the end the following:(4)Not later than 180 days after the submission to Congress of the
annual report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Labor shall
submit to Congress in writing, and post on the public Internet website of
the
Department of Labor, a response to the report that—(A)includes a statement of whether the Secretary agrees or disagrees
with the
specific issues raised by the Ombudsman in the report;(B)if the Secretary agrees with the Ombudsman on those issues,
describes the
actions to be taken to correct those issue; and(C)if
the Secretary does not agree with the Ombudsman on those issues,
describes the reasons the Secretary does not agree.; and(2)by striking subsection (h).(c)The amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 by section 3103 for other defense
activities and made available as specified in the funding table in section
4701 is hereby decreased by $2,000,000, with the amount of the decrease
to be allocated as follows:(1)$1,000,000 from the amount available for environmental safety and health.(2)$1,000,000 from the amount available for the Office of Legacy Management.3115.Comments of Administrator for Nuclear Security on reports of Congressional Advisory Panel on the
Governance of the Nuclear Security EnterpriseNot later than 90 days after receiving a report of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the
Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise under paragraph (1) or (2)
of section 3166(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2209), as amended by section 3142
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law
113–66; 127 Stat. 1069), the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall
submit to the congressional defense committees any comments of the
Administrator with respect to the findings, conclusions, and
recommendations included in that report.3116.Identification of amounts required for uranium technology sustainment in budget materials for
fiscal year 2016The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall include, in the budget justification materials
submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the President for fiscal
year 2016 (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31,
United States Code), specific identification, as a budgetary line item,
of the amounts required for uranium technology sustainment in support of
the nuclear weapons stockpile in a manner that minimizes the use of
plant-directed research and development funds for full-scale technology
development past a technology readiness level of 5 (as defined in
Department of Energy Guide 413.3–4A (relating to technology
readiness assessment)).XXXIIDEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD3201.There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015, $30,150,000 for the operation of
the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).XXXV
3501.Section 109 of title 49, United States Code,
is amended to read as follows:
§ 109. Maritime
administration
(a)The Maritime Administration is an administration in
the Department of Transportation. The mission of the Maritime Administration is
to foster, promote, and develop the merchant maritime industry of the United
States.
(b)The head of the Maritime Administration is the
Maritime Administrator, who is appointed by the President by and with the
advice and consent of the Senate. The Administrator shall report directly to
the Secretary of Transportation and carry out the duties prescribed by the
Secretary.
(c)Deputy maritime
administratorThe Maritime Administration shall have a Deputy
Maritime Administrator, who is appointed in the competitive service by the
Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator
shall carry out the duties prescribed by the Administrator. The Deputy
Administrator shall be Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of
the Administrator and, unless the Secretary designates another individual,
during a vacancy in the office of Administrator.
(d)Duties and
powers vested in secretaryAll duties and powers of the Maritime
Administration are vested in the Secretary.
(e)The Maritime Administration shall have regional offices
for the Atlantic, Gulf, Great Lakes, and Pacific port ranges, and may have
other regional offices as necessary. The Secretary shall appoint a qualified
individual as Director of each regional office. The Secretary shall carry out
appropriate activities and programs of the Maritime Administration through the
regional offices.
(f)Interagency and
industry relationsThe Secretary shall establish and maintain
liaison with other agencies, and with representative trade organizations
throughout the United States, concerned with the transportation of commodities
by water in the export and import foreign commerce of the United States, for
the purpose of securing preference to vessels of the United States for the
transportation of those commodities.
(g)Detailing
officers from armed forcesTo assist the Secretary in carrying
out duties and powers relating to the Maritime Administration, not more than
five officers of the armed forces may be detailed to the Secretary at any one
time, in addition to details authorized by any other law. During the period of
a detail, the Secretary shall pay the officer an amount that, when added to the
officer's pay and allowances as an officer in the armed forces, makes the
officer's total pay and allowances equal to the amount that would be paid to an
individual performing work the Secretary considers to be of similar importance,
difficulty, and responsibility as that performed by the officer during the
detail.
(h)Contracts,
cooperative agreements, and audits
(1)Contracts and
cooperative agreementsIn the same manner that a private
corporation may make a contract within the scope of its authority under its
charter, the Secretary may make contracts and cooperative agreements for the
United States Government and disburse amounts to—
(A)carry out the
Secretary's duties and powers under this section, subtitle V of title 46, and
all other Maritime Administration programs; and
(B)protect,
preserve, and improve collateral held by the Secretary to secure
indebtedness.
(2)The
financial transactions of the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be audited by
the Comptroller General. The Comptroller General shall allow credit for an
expenditure shown to be necessary because of the nature of the business
activities authorized by this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once
a year, the Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the
Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once a year, the
Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the
Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46.
(i)Grant
administrative expensesExcept as otherwise provided by law, the
administrative and related expenses for the administration of any grant
programs by the Maritime Administrator may not exceed 3 percent.
(j)Authorization
of appropriations
(1)Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, there
are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out
the duties and powers of the Secretary relating to the Maritime
Administration.
(2)Only
those amounts specifically authorized by law may be appropriated for the use of
the Maritime Administration for—
(A)acquisition,
construction, or reconstruction of vessels;
(B)construction-differential
subsidies incident to the construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning of
vessels;
(C)costs of national
defense features;
(D)payments of
obligations incurred for operating-differential subsidies;
(E)expenses
necessary for research and development activities, including reimbursement of
the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund for losses resulting from expenses of
experimental vessel operations;
(F)the Vessel
Operations Revolving Fund;
(G)National Defense
Reserve Fleet expenses;
(H)expenses
necessary to carry out part B of subtitle V of title 46; and
(I)other operations
and training expenses related to the development of waterborne transportation
systems, the use of waterborne transportation systems, and general
administration.
(3)Amounts may not be appropriated for the purchase or
construction of training vessels for State maritime academies unless the
Secretary has approved a plan for sharing training vessels between State
maritime
academies.
.D4001.Authorization of amounts in funding tables(a)Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project,
program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified
dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized,
subject to the availability of appropriations.(b)A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a
dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall—(1)be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections
2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive
procedures; and(2)comply with other applicable provisions of law.(c)Relationship to transfer and programming authorityAn amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under
a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of
this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount
specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such
transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act
or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would
move funds between appropriation accounts.(d)Applicability to classified annexThis section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.(e)Oral written communicationsNo oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this
division shall supersede the requirements of this section.XLI
4101.
SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
LineItemFY 2015 RequestSenate Authorized
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
FIXED WING
2 UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT13,61713,617
3 AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP)185,090185,090
4 MQ–1 UAV190,581190,581
5 RQ–11 (RAVEN)3,9643,964
ROTARY
6 HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH)416,617612,617
Risk reduction for buy of LUH to meet Army training fleet plans[196,000]
7 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN494,009494,009
8 AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN157,338157,338
12 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP)1,237,0011,382,001
Army unfunded priority only for Army National Guard[145,000]
13 UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP)132,138132,138
14 CH–47 HELICOPTER892,504892,504
15 CH–47 HELICOPTER102,361102,361
MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
16 MQ–1 PAYLOAD (MIP)26,91326,913
18 GUARDRAIL MODS (MIP)14,18214,182
19 MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP)131,892131,892
20 AH–64 MODS181,869181,869
21 CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP)32,09232,092
22 UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS15,02915,029
23 UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS76,51576,515
25 NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN114,182114,182
26 COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE115,795115,795
27 GATM ROLLUP54,27754,277
28 RQ–7 UAV MODS125,380125,380
GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS
29 AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT66,45074,250
At Army request transfer from APA 31[7,800]
30SURVIVABILITY CM032,400
At Army request transfer from APA 31[32,400]
31 CMWS107,36460,164
At Army request transfer to APA 29 and APA 30[–47,200]
OTHER SUPPORT
32 AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT6,8476,847
33 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT29,23129,231
34 AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS48,08148,081
35 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL127,232127,232
36 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES1,2031,203
37 LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET2,9312,931
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY TOTAL5,102,6855,436,685
MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM
2 LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD)110,300110,300
3 MSE MISSILE384,605384,605
AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM
4 HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY4,4524,452
ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS
5 JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY77,66877,668
6 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY50,36850,368
7 TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY19,98419,984
8 GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)127,145127,145
9 MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR)21,27421,274
MODIFICATIONS
12 PATRIOT MODS131,838131,838
13 STINGER MODS1,3551,355
14 AVENGER MODS5,6115,611
15 ITAS/TOW MODS19,67619,676
16 MLRS MODS10,38010,380
17 HIMARS MODIFICATIONS6,0086,008
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
18 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS36,93036,930
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
19 AIR DEFENSE TARGETS3,6573,657
20 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES)1,5221,522
21 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT4,7104,710
MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY TOTAL1,017,4831,017,483
PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY
TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
1 STRYKER VEHICLE385,110385,110
MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
2 STRYKER (MOD)39,68339,683
3 FIST VEHICLE (MOD)26,75926,759
4 BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)107,506144,506
Army unfunded priority and industrial base risk mitigation[37,000]
5 HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD)45,41145,411
6 PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)247,400247,400
7 IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES)50,451126,364
Army unfunded priority and industrial base risk mitigation[75,913]
8 ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD)2,4732,473
9 ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE36,58336,583
10 M88 FOV MODS1,9751,975
11 JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE49,4628,262
Early to need[–41,200]
12 M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD)237,023261,023
Army unfunded priority and industrial base risk mitigation[24,000]
14 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV)6,4786,478
WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES
16 MORTAR SYSTEMS5,0125,012
17 XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM)28,39028,390
18 COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM148148
19 CARBINE29,36620,616
At Army request transfer to WTCV 31 and RDTEA 70 and 86[–8,750]
21 COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION8,4098,409
22 HANDGUN3,9573,957
MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH
24 M777 MODS18,16618,166
25 M4 CARBINE MODS3,4466,446
At Army request transfer from WTCV 19, 28, and 31[3,000]
26 M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS25,29625,296
27 M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS5,5465,546
28 M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS4,6352,635
At Army request transfer to WTCV 31 and RDTEA 70 and 86[–2,000]
29 SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS4,0794,079
30 M119 MODIFICATIONS72,71872,718
31 M16 RIFLE MODS1,9520
At Army request transfer to WTCV 31 and RDTEA 70 and 86[–1,952]
32 MORTAR MODIFICATION8,9038,903
33 MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)2,0892,089
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
34 ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)2,0052,005
35 PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV)8,9118,911
36 INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS414414
37 SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG)1,6821,682
PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY TOTAL1,471,4381,557,449
PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY
SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION
1 CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES34,94334,943
2 CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES12,41812,418
3 CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES9,6558,155
Program decrease—ahead of need[–1,500]
4 CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES29,30429,304
6 CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES8,1818,181
7 CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES52,66752,667
8 CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES40,90439,004
Program decrease—ahead of need[–1,900]
MORTAR AMMUNITION
9 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES41,74241,742
10 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES42,43342,433
11 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES39,36539,365
TANK AMMUNITION
12 CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES101,900101,900
ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
13 ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES37,45537,455
14 ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES47,02347,023
15 PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M98235,67235,672
16 ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL94,01079,010
Program decrease—PGK[–15,000]
ROCKETS
19 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES945945
20 ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES27,28627,286
OTHER AMMUNITION
21 DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES22,89922,899
22 GRENADES, ALL TYPES22,75122,751
23 SIGNALS, ALL TYPES7,0827,082
24 SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES11,63811,638
MISCELLANEOUS
25 AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES3,5943,594
27 CAD/PAD ALL TYPES5,4305,430
28 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO)8,3378,337
29 AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT14,90614,906
30 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO)14,34914,349
31 CLOSEOUT LIABILITIES111111
PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT
32 PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES148,092148,092
33 CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION113,881113,881
34 ARMS INITIATIVE2,5042,504
PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY TOTAL1,031,4771,013,077
OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
TACTICAL VEHICLES
1 TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS7,9877,987
2 SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED:160160
4 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE164,615164,615
6 FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP8,4158,415
7 FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV)28,42528,425
8 PLS ESP89,26389,263
13 TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS38,22638,226
14 MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP91,17391,173
15 MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS14,73114,731
NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
16 HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN175175
17 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES1,3381,338
18 NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER11,10111,101
COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS
19 WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK763,087638,087
Point of Presence (POP) and Soldier Network Extension (SNE) delay[–125,000]
20 SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM21,15721,157
21 JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY7,9157,915
22 JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM)5,4405,440
COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
23 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS118,085118,085
24 TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS13,99913,999
25 SHF TERM6,4946,494
26 NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE)1,6351,635
27 SMART-T (SPACE)13,55413,554
28 GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS18,89918,899
29 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT)2,8492,849
30 ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND (EMC)100,000100,000
COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
33 JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM175,71187,711
Under execution of prior years funds[–88,000]
34 MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)9,6921,692
Under execution of prior years funds[–8,000]
35 RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2)17,13617,136
37 AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA222,09922,099
38 TRACTOR DESK3,7243,724
39 SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT969969
40 SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS294294
41 TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM24,35424,354
42 UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE17,44517,445
43 RADIO, IMPROVED HF (COTS) FAMILY1,0281,028
44 FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE22,61422,614
COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM
46 CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE1,5191,519
47 ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT12,47812,478
INFORMATION SECURITY
50 INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP2,1132,113
51 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC)69,64669,646
COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS
52 BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS28,91328,913
COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS
53 INFORMATION SYSTEMS97,09197,091
54 DEFENSE MESSAGE SYSTEM (DMS)246246
55 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM5,3625,362
56 INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM79,96579,965
ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA)
60 JTT/CIBS-M870870
61 PROPHET GROUND55,89655,896
63 DCGS-A (MIP)128,207128,207
64 JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS)5,2865,286
65 TROJAN (MIP)12,61412,614
66 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP)3,9013,901
67 CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS)7,3927,392
ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW)
68 LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR24,82824,828
70 AIR VIGILANCE (AV)7,0007,000
72 COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES1,2851,285
ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV)
75 SENTINEL MODS44,30544,305
76 NIGHT VISION DEVICES160,901160,901
78 SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF18,52018,520
80 INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS68,29668,296
81 FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS)49,20537,205
Early to need[–12,000]
82 ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP4,8964,896
83 PROFILER3,1153,115
84 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (FIREFINDER RADARS)4,1864,186
85 JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P)97,89287,892
Under execution of prior years funds[–10,000]
86 JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS)27,45027,450
87 MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR)14,08514,085
88 MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM29,04029,040
89 COUNTERFIRE RADARS209,050128,650
Excessive LRIP and concurrency[–80,400]
ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS
92 FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY13,82313,823
95 AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS27,37427,374
97 LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS)2,5082,508
99 NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE21,52421,524
100MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)95,45595,455
101GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A)118,600118,600
102INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP32,97032,970
104RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET10,11310,113
ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION
105ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION9,0159,015
106AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP155,223140,223
Reduce IT procurement[–15,000]
107GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM16,58116,581
108HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP)65,25265,252
110RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS)17,63117,631
ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V)
112ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT)5,4375,437
ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT
113PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E)426426
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
113ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS3,7073,707
CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT
115FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE)937937
116BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS)1,9301,930
117CBRN DEFENSE17,46817,468
BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
119TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON5,4425,442
120COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP11,01311,013
ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT
121GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS)37,64937,649
122HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS)18,54518,545
123ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS)4,7014,701
124EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION6,3466,346
125EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT)15,85615,856
126REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS4,4854,485
127< $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT4,9384,938
COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
128HEATERS AND ECU'S9,2359,235
130SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT1,6771,677
131PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS)16,72816,728
132GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM84,76184,761
134FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT15,17915,179
135CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM28,19428,194
137FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS41,96741,967
138ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT)20,09020,090
PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
139QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT1,4351,435
140DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER40,69240,692
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
141COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL46,95746,957
MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
142MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS23,75823,758
143ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ)2,7892,789
CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
144GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE)5,8275,827
145SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING14,92614,926
147COMPACTOR4,3484,348
148HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR4,9384,938
149TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED34,07134,071
150ALL TERRAIN CRANES4,9384,938
151PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING667667
153ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP14,92414,924
154CONST EQUIP ESP15,93315,933
155ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP)6,7496,749
RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT
156ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP10,50910,509
157ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL)2,1662,166
GENERATORS
158GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP115,190115,190
MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT
160FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS14,32714,327
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
161COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT65,06265,062
162TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM101,295101,295
163CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER13,40613,406
164AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER14,44014,440
165GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING10,16510,165
TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD)
166CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT5,7265,726
167INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE)37,48237,482
168TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD)16,06116,061
OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
170RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT2,3802,380
171PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3)30,68630,686
172BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT1,0081,008
173MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3)98,55980,559
Watercraft C4ISR early to need[–18,000]
174PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH)1,6971,697
175SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING25,39425,394
176AMC CRITICAL ITEMS OPA312,97512,975
OPA2
180INITIAL SPARES—C&E50,03250,032
OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY TOTAL4,893,6344,537,234
JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND
STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE
4 OPERATIONS115,0580
Program decrease[–115,058]
JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND TOTAL115,0580
SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY13,631,77513,561,928
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
COMBAT AIRCRAFT
1 EA–18G43,54768,547
Preserve option of buying more EA–18G aircraft[25,000]
5 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV610,652610,652
6 JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV29,40029,400
7 JSF STOVL1,200,4101,200,410
8 JSF STOVL143,885143,885
9 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT)1,487,0001,487,000
10 V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT)45,92045,920
11 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)778,757778,757
12 H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)80,92680,926
13 MH–60S (MYP)210,209210,209
15 MH–60R (MYP)933,882933,882
16 MH–60R (MYP)106,686106,686
17 P–8A POSEIDON2,003,3272,003,327
18 P–8A POSEIDON48,45748,457
19 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE819,870819,870
20 E–2D ADV HAWKEYE225,765225,765
OTHER AIRCRAFT
23 KC–130J92,29092,290
26 MQ–4 TRITON37,44537,445
27 MQ–8 UAV40,66340,663
MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
29 EA–6 SERIES10,99310,993
30 AEA SYSTEMS34,76834,768
31 AV–8 SERIES65,47265,472
32 ADVERSARY8,4188,418
33 F–18 SERIES679,177679,177
34 H–46 SERIES480480
36 H–53 SERIES38,15938,159
37 SH–60 SERIES108,850108,850
38 H–1 SERIES45,03345,033
39 EP–3 SERIES32,89052,890
SPIRAL 3 & ELINT KITS[20,000]
40 P–3 SERIES2,8232,823
41 E–2 SERIES21,20821,208
42 TRAINER A/C SERIES12,60812,608
44 C–130 SERIES40,37840,378
45 FEWSG640640
46 CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES4,6354,635
47 E–6 SERIES212,876212,876
48 EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES71,32871,328
49 SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT21,31721,317
50 T–45 SERIES90,05290,052
51 POWER PLANT CHANGES19,09419,094
52 JPATS SERIES1,0851,085
54 COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT155,644155,644
55 COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES157,531157,531
56 COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM1,9581,958
57 ID SYSTEMS38,88038,880
58 P–8 SERIES29,79729,797
59 MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION14,77014,770
60 MQ–8 SERIES8,7418,741
61 RQ–7 SERIES2,5422,542
62 V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY135,584135,584
63 F–35 STOVL SERIES285,968285,968
64 F–35 CV SERIES20,50220,502
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
65 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS1,229,6511,194,651
Reduce rate of growth in replenishment spares[–35,000]
66 COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT418,355418,355
67 AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES23,84323,843
68 WAR CONSUMABLES15,93915,939
69 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES5,6305,630
70 SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT65,83965,839
71 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION1,7681,768
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY TOTAL13,074,31713,084,317
WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
1 TRIDENT II MODS1,190,4551,201,455
Additional FCET[11,000]
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
2 MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES5,6715,671
STRATEGIC MISSILES
3 TOMAHAWK194,258276,258
Maintain minimum sustaining rate of production [82,000]
TACTICAL MISSILES
4 AMRAAM32,16532,165
5 SIDEWINDER73,92873,928
6 JSOW130,759130,759
7 STANDARD MISSILE445,836445,836
8 RAM80,79280,792
11 STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM)1,8101,810
12 AERIAL TARGETS48,04648,046
13 OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT3,2953,295
MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
14 ESSM119,434119,434
15 HARM MODS111,739111,739
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
16 WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES2,5312,531
17 FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON208,700208,700
ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
18 ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT73,21173,211
TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
19 SSTD6,5626,562
20 MK–48 TORPEDO14,15314,153
21 ASW TARGETS2,5152,515
MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
22 MK–54 TORPEDO MODS98,92898,928
23 MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS46,89346,893
24 QUICKSTRIKE MINE6,9666,966
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
25 TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT52,67052,670
26 ASW RANGE SUPPORT3,7953,795
DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION
27 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION3,6923,692
GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
28 SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS13,24013,240
MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
29 CIWS MODS75,10875,108
30 COAST GUARD WEAPONS18,94818,948
31 GUN MOUNT MODS62,65162,651
33 AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS15,00615,006
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
35 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS74,18874,188
WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY TOTAL3,217,9453,310,945
PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC
NAVY AMMUNITION
1 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS107,069107,069
2 AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES70,39670,396
3 MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION20,28420,284
4 PRACTICE BOMBS26,70126,701
5 CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES53,86653,866
6 AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES59,29459,294
7 JATOS2,7662,766
8 LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE113,092113,092
9 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION35,70235,702
10 INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION36,47536,475
11 OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION43,90643,906
12 SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO51,53551,535
13 PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION11,65211,652
14 AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION4,4734,473
MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
15 SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION31,70831,708
16 LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES692692
17 40 MM, ALL TYPES13,63013,630
18 60MM, ALL TYPES2,2612,261
19 81MM, ALL TYPES1,4961,496
20 120MM, ALL TYPES14,85514,855
22 GRENADES, ALL TYPES4,0004,000
23 ROCKETS, ALL TYPES16,85316,853
24 ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES14,77214,772
26 FUZE, ALL TYPES9,9729,972
27 NON LETHALS998998
28 AMMO MODERNIZATION12,31912,319
29 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION11,17811,178
PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC TOTAL771,945771,945
SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY
OTHER WARSHIPS
1 CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM1,300,0001,300,000
2 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE3,553,2543,553,254
3 VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE2,330,3252,330,325
04CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS046,000
Transfer from OMN, line 360[46,000]
6 DDG 1000419,532419,532
7 DDG–512,671,4152,671,415
8 DDG–51134,039134,039
9 LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP1,427,0491,427,049
AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
10 LPD–1712,56512,565
14 LHA REPLACEMENT29,09329,093
15 JOINT HIGH SPEED VESSEL4,5904,590
AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST
16 MOORED TRAINING SHIP737,268737,268
17 MOORED TRAINING SHIP64,38864,388
18 OUTFITTING546,104546,104
19 SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR123,233123,233
20 LCAC SLEP40,48585,485
At USMC request transfer from RDTEN 53[45,000]
21 COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS1,007,2851,007,285
SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY TOTAL14,400,62514,491,625
OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT
1 LM–2500 GAS TURBINE7,8227,822
2 ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE2,1552,155
3 HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED)22,70422,704
GENERATORS
4 SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E29,12029,120
NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
5 OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT45,43145,431
PERISCOPES
6 SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP60,97060,970
OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT
7 DDG MOD338,569338,569
8 FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT15,48615,486
9 COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD2,2192,219
10 LHA/LHD MIDLIFE17,92817,928
11 LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM22,02522,025
12 POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT12,60712,607
13 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT16,49216,492
14 VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT74,12974,129
15 LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT36,20636,206
16 SUBMARINE BATTERIES37,35237,352
17 LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT49,09549,095
18 ELECTRONIC DRY AIR2,9962,996
19 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP11,55811,558
20 DSSP EQUIPMENT5,5185,518
22 LCAC7,1587,158
23 UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS58,78358,783
24 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION68,74868,748
25 CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS2,9372,937
26 SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM8,3858,385
REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT
28 REACTOR COMPONENTS288,822288,822
OCEAN ENGINEERING
29 DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT10,57210,572
SMALL BOATS
30 STANDARD BOATS129,784129,784
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
31 OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT17,15217,152
PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT
32 OPERATING FORCES IPE39,40939,409
OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
33 NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS118,129118,129
34 LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT37,41337,413
35 LCS MCM MISSION MODULES15,27015,270
36 LCS ASW MISSION MODULES2,7292,729
37 LCS SUW MISSION MODULES44,20844,208
38 REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS)42,27642,276
SHIP SONARS
40 SPQ–9B RADAR28,00728,007
41 AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM79,80279,802
42 SSN ACOUSTICS165,655165,655
43 UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT9,4879,487
44 SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS11,62111,621
ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
46 SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM24,22124,221
47 SSTD12,05112,051
48 FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM170,831170,831
49 SURTASS9,6199,619
50 MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE14,39014,390
ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT
51 AN/SLQ–32214,582214,582
RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT
52 SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT124,862124,862
53 AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS)164164
SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT
54 SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG45,36245,362
OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
55 COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY33,93933,939
56 TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS)324324
57 NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS)18,19218,192
58 ATDLS16,76816,768
59 NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS)5,2195,219
60 MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT42,10842,108
62 NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE)15,23215,232
63 AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE4,5244,524
64 STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP6,3826,382
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
65 OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT46,12246,122
AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
66 MATCALS16,99916,999
67 SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL9,3669,366
68 AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM21,35721,357
69 NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM26,63926,639
70 FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS9,2149,214
71 LANDING SYSTEMS13,90213,902
72 ID SYSTEMS34,90134,901
73 NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS13,95013,950
OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
74 DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL1,2051,205
75 MARITIME INTEGRATED BROADCAST SYSTEM3,4473,447
76 TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS16,76616,766
77 DCGS-N23,64923,649
78 CANES357,589357,589
79 RADIAC8,3438,343
80 CANES-INTELL65,01565,015
81 GPETE6,2846,284
82 INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY4,0164,016
83 EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION4,1134,113
84 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION45,05345,053
SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS
85 SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS14,41014,410
86 SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION20,83020,830
88 COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M14,14514,145
89 SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT11,05711,057
90 SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT67,85267,852
SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
91 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS13,21813,218
92 NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT)272,076272,076
SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
93 JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT4,3694,369
94 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS1,4021,402
CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT
95 INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)110,766110,766
96 MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM979979
97 CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP11,50211,502
OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT
98 COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT2,9672,967
SONOBUOYS
100SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES182,946182,946
AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
101WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT47,94447,944
103AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT76,68376,683
106METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT12,57512,575
107DCRS/DPL1,4151,415
109AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES23,15223,152
114AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT52,55552,555
SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
115SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT5,5725,572
SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT
118SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT165,769165,769
123TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT61,46261,462
FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
126STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP229,832229,832
ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
127SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS66,02066,020
128ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT7,5597,559
OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
132EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP20,61920,619
133ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION11,25111,251
137TRAINING DEVICE MODS84,08084,080
CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
138PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES2,2822,282
139GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS547547
140CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP8,9498,949
141FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT14,62114,621
142TACTICAL VEHICLES957957
143AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT8,1878,187
144POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT2,9422,942
145ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION17,59217,592
146PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES1,1771,177
SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
147MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT10,93710,937
148OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT10,37410,374
149FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION5,6685,668
150SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS90,92190,921
TRAINING DEVICES
151TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT22,04622,046
COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
152COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT24,20824,208
153EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT874874
154MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT2,6342,634
156NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT3,5733,573
157OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT3,9973,997
158C4ISR EQUIPMENT9,6389,638
159ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT21,00121,001
160PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT94,95794,957
161ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY87,21472,214
Program reduction[–15,000]
OTHER
164NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE116,165116,165
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
164ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS10,84710,847
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
165SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS325,084325,084
OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY TOTAL5,975,8285,960,828
PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
1 AAV7A1 PIP16,75616,756
2 LAV PIP77,73677,736
ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS
3 EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM5,7425,742
4 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER4,5324,532
5 HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM19,47419,474
6 WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION7,2507,250
OTHER SUPPORT
7 MODIFICATION KITS21,90921,909
8 WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM3,2083,208
GUIDED MISSILES
9 GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE31,43931,439
10 JAVELIN343343
11 FOLLOW ON TO SMAW4,9954,995
12 ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H)1,5891,589
OTHER SUPPORT
13 MODIFICATION KITS5,1345,134
COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
14 UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER9,1789,178
15 COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C12,27212,272
REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
16 REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT30,59130,591
OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
17 COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM2,3852,385
COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
19 ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)4,2054,205
20 AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS8,0028,002
RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
21 RADAR SYSTEMS19,59519,595
22 Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar89,23089,230
23 RQ–21 UAS70,56570,565
INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
24 FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM11,86011,860
25 INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT44,34044,340
28 RQ–11 UAV2,7372,737
30 DCGS-MC20,62020,620
OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
31 NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT9,7989,798
32 NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN)2,0732,073
33 COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES33,57033,570
34 COMMAND POST SYSTEMS38,18638,186
35 RADIO SYSTEMS64,49464,494
36 COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS72,95672,956
37 COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT43,31743,317
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
37ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS2,4982,498
ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES
38 COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES332332
39 COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES11,03511,035
TACTICAL VEHICLES
40 5/4T TRUCK HMMWV (MYP)57,25557,255
41 MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS938938
44 JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE7,5007,500
45 FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS10,17910,179
OTHER SUPPORT
46 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION11,02311,023
ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT
47 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT994994
48 BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT1,2561,256
49 TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS3,7503,750
50 POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED8,98511,885
USMC unfunded priority[2,900]
51 AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT4,4184,418
52 EOD SYSTEMS6,5286,528
MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
53 PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT26,51026,510
54 GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE)1,9101,910
55 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP8,8078,807
56 FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION128128
GENERAL PROPERTY
58 TRAINING DEVICES3,4123,412
59 CONTAINER FAMILY1,6621,662
60 FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT3,6693,669
62 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION4,2724,272
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
63 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS16,21016,210
PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS TOTAL983,352986,252
SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY38,424,01238,605,912
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
TACTICAL FORCES
1 F–353,553,0463,553,046
2 F–35291,880291,880
3 KC–46A TANKER1,582,6851,582,685
OTHER AIRLIFT
4 C–130J482,396482,396
5 C–130J140,000140,000
6 HC–130J332,024332,024
7 HC–130J50,00050,000
8 MC–130J190,971190,971
9 MC–130J80,00080,000
MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT
12 CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C2,5622,562
OTHER AIRCRAFT
13 TARGET DRONES98,57698,576
16 RQ–454,47544,475
Delayed trainer [–10,000]
17 AC–130J11
18 MQ–9240,218202,418
Use available prior year funds for FY 15 requirements [–37,800]
STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
20 B–2A23,86523,865
21 B–1B140,252140,252
22 B–52180,148180,148
23 LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES13,15913,159
TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
25 F–15387,314387,314
26 F–1612,33612,336
27 F–22A180,207180,207
28 F–35 MODIFICATIONS187,646187,646
29 INCREMENT 3.2B28,50028,500
AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
30 C–514,73114,731
31 C–5M331,466281,466
Delayed installation of RERP kits[–50,000]
33 C–17A127,494127,494
34 C–21264264
35 C–32A8,7678,767
36 C–37A18,45718,457
TRAINER AIRCRAFT
38 GLIDER MODS132132
39 T–614,48614,486
40 T–17,6507,650
41 T–3834,84534,845
OTHER AIRCRAFT
42U–2 MODS064,300
Keep U–2 rather than enhance Global Hawk Block 30[64,300]
44 KC–10A (ATCA)34,31334,313
45 C–121,9601,960
48 VC–25A MOD1,0721,072
49 C–407,2927,292
50 C–13035,86983,469
C–130 enigine upgrades[22,600]
C–130 avionics modernization program[25,000]
51 C–130J MODS7,9197,919
52 C–13563,56863,568
53 COMPASS CALL MODS57,82857,828
54 RC–135152,746152,746
55 E–316,49116,491
56 E–422,34122,341
58 AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM160,284160,284
59 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS32,02632,026
60 H–18,2378,237
61 H–6060,11060,110
62 RQ–4 MODS21,35421,354
63 HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS1,9021,902
64 OTHER AIRCRAFT32,10632,106
65 MQ–1 MODS4,7554,755
66 MQ–9 MODS155,445125,445
Lynx radar[–30,000]
69 CV–22 MODS74,87474,874
AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
70 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS466,562466,562
COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
71 AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP22,47022,470
POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT
74 B–2A44,79344,793
75 B–525,2495,249
77 C–17A20,11020,110
78 CV–22 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT16,93116,931
80 C–1354,4144,414
81 F–151,1221,122
82 F–1610,99410,994
83 F–22A5,9295,929
84 OTHER AIRCRAFT2727
INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS
85 INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS21,36321,363
WAR CONSUMABLES
86 WAR CONSUMABLES82,90682,906
OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES
87 OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES1,007,2761,007,276
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
87ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS69,38069,380
AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TOTAL11,542,57111,526,671
MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC
1 MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC80,18780,187
TACTICAL
3 JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE337,438337,438
4 SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X)132,995132,995
5 AMRAAM329,600329,600
6 PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE33,87833,878
7 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB70,57818,047
Delay in Milestone C and contract award[–52,531]
INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
8 INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION749749
CLASS IV
9 MM III MODIFICATIONS28,47728,477
10 AGM–65D MAVERICK276276
11 AGM–88A HARM297297
12 AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)16,08316,083
13 SMALL DIAMETER BOMB6,9246,924
MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
14 INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS87,36687,366
SPACE PROGRAMS
15 ADVANCED EHF298,890298,890
16 WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE)38,97138,971
17 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT235,397235,397
18 GPS III SPACE SEGMENT57,00057,000
19 SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC)16,20116,201
20 GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE)52,09052,090
21 DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE)87,0000
Program decrease[–87,000]
22 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH (INFRAST.)750,143750,143
23 EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE)630,903630,903
24 SBIR HIGH (SPACE)450,884450,884
SPECIAL PROGRAMS
28 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS60,17960,179
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
28ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS888,000888,000
MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TOTAL4,690,5064,550,975
PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE
ROCKETS
1 ROCKETS4,6964,696
CARTRIDGES
2 CARTRIDGES133,271133,271
BOMBS
3 PRACTICE BOMBS31,99831,998
4 GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS148,614157,414
Readiness funding increase—PACOM unfunded priority list[8,800]
5 JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION101,400101,400
OTHER ITEMS
6 CAD/PAD29,98929,989
7 EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD)6,9256,925
8 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS494494
9 MODIFICATIONS1,6101,610
10 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION4,2374,237
FLARES
11 FLARES86,10186,101
FUZES
12 FUZES103,417103,417
SMALL ARMS
13 SMALL ARMS24,64824,648
PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE TOTAL677,400686,200
OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES
1 PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES6,5286,528
CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES
2 MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE7,6397,639
3 CAP VEHICLES961961
4 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION11,02711,027
SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES
5 SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES4,4474,447
6 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION693693
FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
7 FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES10,15210,152
MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
8 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION15,10815,108
BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
9 RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP10,21210,212
10 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION57,04957,049
COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
11 COMSEC EQUIPMENT106,182106,182
12 MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC)1,3631,363
INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
13 INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT2,8322,832
14 INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT32,32929,329
NCCT[–3,000]
16 MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS15,64915,649
ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
17 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS42,20042,200
18 NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM6,3336,333
19 BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED2,7082,708
20 THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS50,03350,033
21 WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST16,34816,348
22 STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL139,984139,984
23 CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX20,10120,101
26 INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN)9,0609,060
SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS
27 GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY39,10039,100
28 AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS19,01019,010
29 MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL11,46211,462
30 AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM37,42637,426
31 COMBAT TRAINING RANGES26,63426,634
32 MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N1,2891,289
33 C3 COUNTERMEASURES11,50811,508
34 GCSS-AF FOS3,6703,670
35 DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING AND MGMT SYSTEM15,29815,298
36 THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM9,5659,565
37 AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS25,77225,772
AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS
38 INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS81,286112,586
Transfer from OPAF 39[31,300]
39 AFNET122,22890,928
Transfer to OPAF 38[–31,300]
41 USCENTCOM16,34216,342
SPACE PROGRAMS
42 FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS60,23060,230
43 SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE26,10026,100
44 NAVSTAR GPS SPACE2,0752,075
45 NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE4,6564,656
46 AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE54,63054,630
47 SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE69,71369,713
48 MILSATCOM SPACE41,35541,355
49 SPACE MODS SPACE31,72231,722
50 COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM61,60361,603
ORGANIZATION AND BASE
51 TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT50,33550,335
53 RADIO EQUIPMENT14,84614,846
54 CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT3,6353,635
55 BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE79,60779,607
MODIFICATIONS
56 COMM ELECT MODS105,398105,398
PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP
57 NIGHT VISION GOGGLES12,57712,577
58 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION31,20931,209
DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ
59 MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP7,6707,670
BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
60 BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT14,12537,725
ICBM training equipment[23,600]
61 CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS16,74416,744
62 PRODUCTIVITY CAPITAL INVESTMENT2,4952,495
63 MOBILITY EQUIPMENT10,57310,573
64 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION5,4625,462
66 DARP RC13524,71024,710
67 DCGS-AF206,743206,743
69 SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM537,370537,370
70 DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG.77,89877,898
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
70ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS13,990,19613,990,196
SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
72 SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS32,81332,813
OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE TOTAL16,566,01816,586,618
SUBTOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE33,476,49533,350,464
PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
1 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION1,5941,594
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
2 MAJOR EQUIPMENT4,3254,325
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
3 PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION17,26817,268
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
8 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY10,49110,491
10 TELEPORT PROGRAM80,62280,622
11 ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION14,14714,147
12 NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)1,9211,921
13 DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK80,14480,144
15 CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE8,7558,755
16 WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY33,73733,737
17 SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE32,54432,544
18 JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT13,30013,300
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
20 MAJOR EQUIPMENT7,4367,436
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT
21 MAJOR EQUIPMENT11,64011,640
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA
22 AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS1,2691,269
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
24 VEHICLES1,5001,500
25 MAJOR EQUIPMENT1,0391,039
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
26 VEHICLES5050
27 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT7,6397,639
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY
28 AEGIS BMD ADVANCE PROCUREMENT68,88068,880
29 THAAD464,424464,424
30 AEGIS BMD435,430435,430
31 BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS48,14048,140
32 AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III225,774225,774
34 IRON DOME175,9720
Transfer to RDT&E, Defense-Wide Line 96[–175,972]
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
41 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)3,4483,448
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
42 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD43,70843,708
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
44 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS10,78310,783
MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
46 MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS29,59929,599
CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
46ACLASSIFIED PROGRAMS540,894540,894
AVIATION PROGRAMS
47 MC–1240,5000
Unjustified Request[–40,500]
48 ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT112,226112,226
49 MH–60 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM3,0213,021
50 NON-STANDARD AVIATION48,20048,200
52 MH–47 CHINOOK22,23022,230
53 RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE6,3976,397
54 CV–22 MODIFICATION25,57825,578
56 MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE15,65121,351
Capability Improvements[5,700]
57 STUASL01,5001,500
58 PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE145,929145,929
59 AC/MC–130J65,13065,130
61 C–130 MODIFICATIONS39,56339,563
SHIPBUILDING
63 UNDERWATER SYSTEMS25,45925,459
AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
65 ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M144,336144,336
OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
68 INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS81,00181,001
70 DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS17,32317,323
71 OTHER ITEMS <$5M84,85284,852
72 COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS51,93751,937
74 SPECIAL PROGRAMS31,01731,017
75 TACTICAL VEHICLES63,13463,134
76 WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M192,448192,448
78 COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS19,98419,984
81 GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES5,0445,044
82 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE38,12638,126
88 OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS243,849243,849
CBDP
95 CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS170,137170,137
96 CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION150,392150,392
PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE TOTAL4,221,4374,010,665
SUBTOTAL, DEFENSE-WIDE4,221,4374,010,665
JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
1 JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND20,00020,000
JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND TOTAL20,00020,000
PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS
1 PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS–265,6850
PRIOR YEAR RESCISSIONS TOTAL–265,6850
TOTAL, TITLE I89,508,03489,548,969
XLIIRESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
4201.RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars)
LineProgramElementItemFY 2015 RequestSenate Authorized
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY
BASIC RESEARCH
1 0601101AIN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH13,46413,464
2 0601102ADEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES238,167238,167
3 0601103AUNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES69,80889,808
Basic research program increase[20,000]
4 0601104AUNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS102,737102,737
SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH424,176444,176
APPLIED RESEARCH
5 0602105AMATERIALS TECHNOLOGY28,00628,006
6 0602120ASENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY33,51533,515
7 0602122ATRACTOR HIP16,35816,358
8 0602211AAVIATION TECHNOLOGY63,43363,433
9 0602270AELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY18,50218,502
10 0602303AMISSILE TECHNOLOGY46,19446,194
11 0602307AADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY28,52828,528
12 0602308AADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION27,43527,435
13 0602601ACOMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY72,88372,883
14 0602618ABALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY85,59785,597
15 0602622ACHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY3,9713,971
16 0602623AJOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM6,8536,853
17 0602624AWEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY38,06938,069
18 0602705AELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES56,43556,435
19 0602709ANIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY38,44538,445
20 0602712ACOUNTERMINE SYSTEMS25,93925,939
21 0602716AHUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY23,78323,783
22 0602720AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY15,65915,659
23 0602782ACOMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY33,81733,817
24 0602783ACOMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY10,76410,764
25 0602784AMILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY63,31163,311
26 0602785AMANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY23,29523,295
27 0602786AWARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY25,75125,751
28 0602787AMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY76,06876,068
SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH862,611862,611
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
29 0603001AWARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY65,13965,139
30 0603002AMEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY67,29167,291
31 0603003AAVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY88,99088,990
32 0603004AWEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY57,93157,931
33 0603005ACOMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY110,031110,031
34 0603006ASPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY6,8836,883
35 0603007AMANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY13,58013,580
36 0603008AELECTRONIC WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY44,87144,871
37 0603009ATRACTOR HIKE7,4927,492
38 0603015ANEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS16,74916,749
39 0603020ATRACTOR ROSE14,48314,483
41 0603125ACOMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT24,27024,270
42 0603130ATRACTOR NAIL3,4403,440
43 0603131ATRACTOR EGGS2,4062,406
44 0603270AELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY26,05726,057
45 0603313AMISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY44,95744,957
46 0603322ATRACTOR CAGE11,10511,105
47 0603461AHIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM181,609181,609
48 0603606ALANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY13,07413,074
49 0603607AJOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM7,3217,321
50 0603710ANIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY44,13844,138
51 0603728AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS9,1979,197
52 0603734AMILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY17,61317,613
53 0603772AADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY39,16439,164
SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT917,791917,791
ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
54 0603305AARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION12,79712,797
55 0603308AARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION13,99913,999
58 0603639ATANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION29,33429,334
60 0603747ASOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY9,6029,602
61 0603766ATACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV8,9538,953
62 0603774ANIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT3,0523,052
63 0603779AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL7,8307,830
65 0603790ANATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT2,9542,954
67 0603804ALOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV13,38613,386
69 0603807AMEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV23,65923,659
70 0603827ASOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT6,8309,830
At Army request transfer from WTCV 19, 28, and 31[3,000]
72 0604100AANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES9,9139,913
73 0604115ATECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES74,74074,740
74 0604120AASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT)9,9309,930
76 0604319AINDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2)96,17766,177
Program delay and funds requested early to need[–30,000]
SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES323,156296,156
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
79 0604201AAIRCRAFT AVIONICS37,24637,246
81 0604270AELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT6,0026,002
82 0604280AJOINT TACTICAL RADIO9,8329,832
83 0604290AMID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)9,7309,730
84 0604321AALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM5,5325,532
85 0604328ATRACTOR CAGE19,92919,929
86 0604601AINFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS27,88429,586
Only for XM25 CDTEWS under execution of prior years funds [–5,000]
At Army request transfer from WTCV 19, 28, and 31[6,702]
87 0604604AMEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLES210210
88 0604611AJAVELIN4,1664,166
89 0604622AFAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES12,91312,913
90 0604633AAIR TRAFFIC CONTROL16,76416,764
91 0604641ATACTICAL UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE (TUGV)6,7706,770
92 0604710ANIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV65,33365,333
93 0604713ACOMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT1,3351,335
94 0604715ANON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV8,9458,945
96 0604741AAIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV15,90615,906
97 0604742ACONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT4,3944,394
98 0604746AAUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT11,08411,084
99 0604760ADISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV10,02710,027
100 0604780ACOMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE42,43042,430
101 0604798ABRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION105,279105,279
102 0604802AWEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV15,00615,006
103 0604804ALOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV24,58124,581
104 0604805ACOMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV4,4334,433
105 0604807AMEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV30,39730,397
106 0604808ALANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV57,70557,705
108 0604818AARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE29,68329,683
109 0604820ARADAR DEVELOPMENT5,2245,224
111 0604823AFIREFINDER37,49237,492
112 0604827ASOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL6,1576,157
113 0604854AARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD1,9121,912
116 0605013AINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT69,76169,761
117 0605018AINTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A)138,465138,465
118 0605028AARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV)92,35392,353
119 0605030AJOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)8,4408,440
120 0605031AJOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN)17,99917,999
121 0605035ACOMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM)145,409145,409
122 0605350AWIN-T INCREMENT 3—FULL NETWORKING113,210113,210
123 0605380AAMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS)6,8826,882
124 0605450AJOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)83,83883,838
125 0605456APAC–3/MSE MISSILE35,00935,009
126 0605457AARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD)142,584142,584
127 0605625AMANNED GROUND VEHICLE49,16049,160
128 0605626AAERIAL COMMON SENSOR17,74817,748
129 0605766ANATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP)15,21215,212
130 0605812AJOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH45,71845,718
131 0605830AAVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT10,04110,041
132 0210609APALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)83,30083,300
133 0303032ATROJAN—RH12983983
134 0304270AELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT8,9618,961
SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION1,719,3741,721,076
RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
135 0604256ATHREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT18,06218,062
136 0604258ATARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT10,04010,040
137 0604759AMAJOR T&E INVESTMENT60,31760,317
138 0605103ARAND ARROYO CENTER20,61220,612
139 0605301AARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL176,041187,041
Additional SSA operations (STRATCOM unfunded priority)[11,000]
140 0605326ACONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM19,43919,439
142 0605601AARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES275,025275,025
143 0605602AARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS45,59645,596
144 0605604ASURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS33,29533,295
145 0605606AAIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION4,7004,700
146 0605702AMETEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES6,4136,413
147 0605706AMATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS20,74620,746
148 0605709AEXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS7,0157,015
149 0605712ASUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING49,22149,221
150 0605716AARMY EVALUATION CENTER55,03955,039
151 0605718AARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG1,1251,125
152 0605801APROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES64,16964,169
153 0605803ATECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES32,31932,319
154 0605805AMUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY49,05249,052
155 0605857AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT2,6122,612
156 0605898AMANAGEMENT HQ—R&D49,59249,592
SUBTOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT1,000,4301,011,430
OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
158 0603778AMLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM17,11217,112
159 0607141ALOGISTICS AUTOMATION3,6543,654
160 0607664ABIOMETRIC ENABLING CAPABILITY (BEC)1,3321,332
161 0607865APATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT152,991152,991
194 0708045AEND ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES76,22576,225
162 0102419AAEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT OFFICE54,07654,076
163 0203726AADV FIELD ARTILLERY TACTICAL DATA SYSTEM22,37422,374
164 0203728AJOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS)24,37124,371
165 0203735ACOMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS295,177295,177
166 0203740AMANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM45,09245,092
167 0203744AAIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS264,887264,887
168 0203752AAIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM381381
169 0203758ADIGITIZATION10,91210,912
170 0203801AMISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM5,1155,115
171 0203802AOTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS49,84849,848
172 0203808ATRACTOR CARD22,69122,691
173 0205402AINTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV4,3644,364
174 0205410AMATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT834834
175 0205412AENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV280280
176 0205456ALOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM78,75878,758
177 0205778AGUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS)45,37745,377
178 0208053AJOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM10,20910,209
181 0303028ASECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES12,52512,525
182 0303140AINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM14,17514,175
183 0303141AGLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM4,5274,527
184 0303142ASATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE)11,01111,011
185 0303150AWWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM2,1512,151
187 0305204ATACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES22,87022,870
188 0305208ADISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS20,15520,155
189 0305219AMQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS46,47246,472
191 0305233ARQ–7 UAV16,38916,389
192 0307665ABIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE1,9741,974
193 0310349AWIN-T INCREMENT 2—INITIAL NETWORKING3,2493,249
194A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS4,8024,802
SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT1,346,3601,346,360
TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY6,593,8986,599,600
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY
BASIC RESEARCH
1 0601103NUNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES113,908133,908
Basic research program increase[20,000]
2 0601152NIN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH18,73418,734
3 0601153NDEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES443,697443,697
SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH576,339596,339
APPLIED RESEARCH
4 0602114NPOWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH95,75395,753
5 0602123NFORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH139,496139,496
6 0602131MMARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY45,83145,831
7 0602235NCOMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH43,54143,541
8 0602236NWARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH46,92346,923
9 0602271NELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH107,872107,872
10 0602435NOCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH45,38845,388
11 0602651MJOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH5,8875,887
12 0602747NUNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH86,88086,880
13 0602750NFUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH170,786170,786
14 0602782NMINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH32,52632,526
SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH820,883820,883
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
15 0603114NPOWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY37,73437,734
16 0603123NFORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY25,83125,831
17 0603271NELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY64,62364,623
18 0603640MUSMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD)128,397128,397
19 0603651MJOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT11,50611,506
20 0603673NFUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT256,144256,144
21 0603729NWARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY4,8384,838
22 0603747NUNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY9,9859,985
23 0603758NNAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS53,95653,956
24 0603782NMINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY2,0002,000
SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT595,014595,014
ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
25 0603207NAIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS40,42940,429
26 0603216NAVIATION SURVIVABILITY4,3254,325
27 0603237NDEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL2,9912,991
28 0603251NAIRCRAFT SYSTEMS12,65112,651
29 0603254NASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT7,7827,782
30 0603261NTACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE5,2755,275
31 0603382NADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY1,6461,646
32 0603502NSURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES100,349100,349
33 0603506NSURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE52,78152,781
34 0603512NCARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT5,9595,959
35 0603525NPILOT FISH148,865148,865
36 0603527NRETRACT LARCH25,36525,365
37 0603536NRETRACT JUNIPER80,47780,477
38 0603542NRADIOLOGICAL CONTROL669669
39 0603553NSURFACE ASW1,0601,060
40 0603561NADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT70,55170,551
41 0603562NSUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS8,0448,044
42 0603563NSHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN17,86417,864
43 0603564NSHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES23,71623,716
44 0603570NADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS499,961499,961
45 0603573NADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS21,02621,026
46 0603576NCHALK EAGLE542,700542,700
47 0603581NLITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS)88,73488,734
48 0603582NCOMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION20,88120,881
49 0603595NOHIO REPLACEMENT849,277849,277
50 0603596NLCS MISSION MODULES196,948196,948
51 0603597NAUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST (ATRT)8,1158,115
52 0603609NCONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS7,6037,603
53 0603611MMARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES105,74938,049
At USMC request transfer to RDTEN 183[–7,000]
At USMC request transfer to SCN 20[–45,000]
At USMC request transfer to OMMC 130[–15,700]
54 0603635MMARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM1,3421,342
55 0603654NJOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT21,39921,399
56 0603658NCOOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT43,57843,578
57 0603713NOCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT7,7647,764
58 0603721NENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION13,20013,200
59 0603724NNAVY ENERGY PROGRAM69,41569,415
60 0603725NFACILITIES IMPROVEMENT2,5882,588
61 0603734NCHALK CORAL176,301176,301
62 0603739NNAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY3,8733,873
63 0603746NRETRACT MAPLE376,028376,028
64 0603748NLINK PLUMERIA272,096272,096
65 0603751NRETRACT ELM42,23342,233
66 0603764NLINK EVERGREEN46,50446,504
67 0603787NSPECIAL PROCESSES25,10925,109
68 0603790NNATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT9,6599,659
69 0603795NLAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY318318
70 0603851MJOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING40,91240,912
71 0603860NJOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL54,89654,896
73 0603925NDIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS58,69658,696
74 0604112NGERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80)43,61343,613
75 0604122NREMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS)21,11021,110
76 0604272NTACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM)5,6575,657
77 0604279NASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION8,0338,033
78 0604454NLX (R)36,85936,859
79 0604653NJOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW)15,22715,227
81 0604707NSPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT22,39322,393
82 0604786NOFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT202,9390
Halt program pending analysis demonstrating need [–202,939]
83 0605812MJOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH11,45011,450
84 0303354NASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP6,4956,495
85 0304270NELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP332332
SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES4,591,8124,321,173
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
86 0603208NTRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT25,15325,153
87 0604212NOTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT46,15446,154
88 0604214NAV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV25,37225,372
89 0604215NSTANDARDS DEVELOPMENT53,71253,712
90 0604216NMULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT11,43411,434
91 0604218NAIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING2,1642,164
92 0604221NP–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM1,7101,710
93 0604230NWARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM9,0949,094
94 0604231NTACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM70,24870,248
95 0604234NADVANCED HAWKEYE193,200193,200
96 0604245NH–1 UPGRADES44,11544,115
97 0604261NACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS23,22723,227
98 0604262NV–22A61,24961,249
99 0604264NAIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT15,01415,014
100 0604269NEA–1818,73018,730
101 0604270NELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT28,74228,742
102 0604273NEXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT388,086388,086
103 0604274NNEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ)246,856246,856
104 0604280NJOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY)7,1067,106
105 0604307NSURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING189,112189,112
106 0604311NLPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION376376
107 0604329NSMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)71,84971,849
108 0604366NSTANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS53,19853,198
109 0604373NAIRBORNE MCM38,94138,941
110 0604376MMARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) FOR AVIATION7,8327,832
111 0604378NNAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING15,26315,263
112 0604404NUNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE (UCLASS) SYSTEM403,017403,017
113 0604501NADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS20,40920,409
114 0604503NSSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION71,56571,565
115 0604504NAIR CONTROL29,03729,037
116 0604512NSHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS122,083122,083
118 0604522NADVANCED MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM144,706144,706
119 0604558NNEW DESIGN SSN72,69572,695
120 0604562NSUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM38,98538,985
121 0604567NSHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E48,47048,470
122 0604574NNAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES3,9353,935
123 0604580NVIRGINIA PAYLOAD MODULE (VPM)132,602132,602
124 0604601NMINE DEVELOPMENT19,06719,067
125 0604610NLIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT25,28025,280
126 0604654NJOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT8,9858,985
127 0604703NPERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS7,6697,669
128 0604727NJOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS4,4004,400
129 0604755NSHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL)56,88956,889
130 0604756NSHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL)96,93796,937
131 0604757NSHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW)134,564134,564
132 0604761NINTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING200200
133 0604771NMEDICAL DEVELOPMENT8,2878,287
134 0604777NNAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM29,50429,504
135 0604800MJOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD513,021513,021
136 0604800NJOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD516,456516,456
137 0605013MINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT2,8872,887
138 0605013NINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT66,31766,317
139 0605212NCH–53K RDTE573,187573,187
140 0605220NSHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC)67,81567,815
141 0605450NJOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)6,3006,300
142 0605500NMULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA)308,037308,037
143 0204202NDDG–1000202,522202,522
144 0304231NTACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP1,0111,011
145 0304785NTACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS10,35710,357
146 0305124NSPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM23,97523,975
SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION5,419,1085,419,108
RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
147 0604256NTHREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT45,27245,272
148 0604258NTARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT79,71879,718
149 0604759NMAJOR T&E INVESTMENT123,993123,993
150 0605126NJOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION4,9604,960
151 0605152NSTUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY8,2968,296
152 0605154NCENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES45,75245,752
154 0605804NTECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES876876
155 0605853NMANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT72,07072,070
156 0605856NSTRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT3,2373,237
157 0605861NRDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT73,03373,033
158 0605863NRDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT138,304138,304
159 0605864NTEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT336,286336,286
160 0605865NOPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY16,65816,658
161 0605866NNAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT2,5052,505
162 0605867NSEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT8,3258,325
163 0605873MMARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT17,86617,866
SUBTOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT977,151977,151
OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
168 0604402NUNMANNED COMBAT AIR VEHICLE (UCAV) ADVANCED COMPONENT AND PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT35,94935,949
169 0604766MMARINE CORPS DATA SYSTEMS215215
170 0605525NCARRIER ONBOARD DELIVERY (COD) FOLLOW ON8,8738,873
172 0101221NSTRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT96,94396,943
173 0101224NSSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM30,05730,057
174 0101226NSUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT4,5094,509
175 0101402NNAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS13,67613,676
176 0203761NRAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT)12,48012,480
177 0204136NF/A–18 SQUADRONS76,21676,216
179 0204163NFLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL)27,28127,281
180 0204228NSURFACE SUPPORT2,8782,878
181 0204229NTOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC)32,38532,385
182 0204311NINTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM39,37139,371
183 0204413NAMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT)4,60911,609
At USMC request transfer from RDTEN 53[7,000]
184 0204460MGROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR)99,10699,106
185 0204571NCONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT39,92239,922
186 0204574NCRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT1,1571,157
187 0204575NELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT22,06722,067
188 0205601NHARM IMPROVEMENT17,42017,420
189 0205604NTACTICAL DATA LINKS151,208151,208
190 0205620NSURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION26,36626,366
191 0205632NMK–48 ADCAP25,95225,952
192 0205633NAVIATION IMPROVEMENTS106,936106,936
194 0205675NOPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS104,023104,023
195 0206313MMARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS77,39877,398
196 0206335MCOMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S)32,49532,495
197 0206623MMARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS156,626156,626
198 0206624MMARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT20,99920,999
199 0206625MUSMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP)14,17914,179
200 0207161NTACTICAL AIM MISSILES47,25847,258
201 0207163NADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)10,21010,210
206 0303109NSATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE)41,82941,829
207 0303138NCONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES)22,78022,780
208 0303140NINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM23,05323,053
209 0303150MWWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM296296
212 0305160NNAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC)359359
213 0305192NMILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES6,1666,166
214 0305204NTACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES8,5058,505
216 0305208MDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS11,61311,613
217 0305208NDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS18,14618,146
218 0305220NRQ–4 UAV498,003498,003
219 0305231NMQ–8 UAV47,29447,294
220 0305232MRQ–11 UAV718718
221 0305233NRQ–7 UAV851851
222 0305234NSMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0)4,8134,813
223 0305239MRQ–21A8,1928,192
224 0305241NMULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT22,55922,559
225 0305242MUNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP)2,0002,000
226 0308601NMODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT4,7194,719
227 0702207NDEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)21,16821,168
228 0708011NINDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS37,16937,169
229 0708730NMARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH)4,3474,347
229A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,162,6841,162,684
SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT3,286,0283,293,028
TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY16,266,33516,022,696
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF
BASIC RESEARCH
1 0601102FDEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES314,482314,482
2 0601103FUNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES127,079147,079
Basic research program increase[20,000]
3 0601108FHIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES12,92912,929
SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH454,490474,490
APPLIED RESEARCH
4 0602102FMATERIALS105,680105,680
5 0602201FAEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES105,747105,747
6 0602202FHUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH81,95781,957
7 0602203FAEROSPACE PROPULSION172,550172,550
8 0602204FAEROSPACE SENSORS118,343118,343
9 0602601FSPACE TECHNOLOGY98,22998,229
10 0602602FCONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS87,38787,387
11 0602605FDIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY125,955125,955
12 0602788FDOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS147,789147,789
13 0602890FHIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH37,49637,496
SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH1,081,1331,081,133
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
14 0603112FADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS32,17732,177
15 0603199FSUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T)15,80015,800
16 0603203FADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS34,42034,420
17 0603211FAEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO91,06291,062
18 0603216FAEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY124,236124,236
19 0603270FELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY47,60247,602
20 0603401FADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY69,02669,026
21 0603444FMAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS)14,03114,031
22 0603456FHUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT21,78821,788
23 0603601FCONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY42,04642,046
24 0603605FADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY23,54223,542
25 0603680FMANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM42,77242,772
26 0603788FBATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION35,31535,315
SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT593,817593,817
ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
27 0603260FINTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT5,4085,408
31 0603438FSPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY6,0756,075
32 0603742FCOMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY10,98010,980
33 0603790FNATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT2,3922,392
34 0603791FINTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATIVE R&D833833
35 0603830FSPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM32,31332,313
37 0603851FINTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL30,88530,885
39 0603859FPOLLUTION PREVENTION—DEM/VAL1,7981,798
40 0604015FLONG RANGE STRIKE913,728913,728
42 0604317FTECHNOLOGY TRANSFER2,6692,669
45 0604422FWEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON39,90139,901
49 0604800FF–35—EMD4,9764,976
51 0604858FTECH TRANSITION PROGRAM59,00459,004
54 0207110FNEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE15,72215,722
55 0207455FTHREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR)88,82588,825
56 0305164FNAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE)156,659156,659
SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES1,372,1681,372,168
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
59 0604233FSPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING13,32413,324
60 0604270FELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT1,9651,965
61 0604281FTACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE39,11039,110
62 0604287FPHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT3,9263,926
63 0604329FSMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD68,75968,759
64 0604421FCOUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS23,74623,746
65 0604425FSPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS9,4629,462
66 0604426FSPACE FENCE214,131214,131
67 0604429FAIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK30,68730,687
68 0604441FSPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD319,501311,501
Upgrade mobile ground units (STRATCOM unfunded priority)[5,000]
Hosted payload demonstration[–5,000]
Wide field of view test bed[–8,000]
69 0604602FARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT31,11231,112
70 0604604FSUBMUNITIONS2,5432,543
71 0604617FAGILE COMBAT SUPPORT46,34046,340
72 0604706FLIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS8,8548,854
73 0604735FCOMBAT TRAINING RANGES10,12910,129
75 0604800FF–35—EMD563,037563,037
770604853FEVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD0100,000
Liquid rocket engine[100,000]
78 0604932FLONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON4,9384,938
79 0604933FICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION59,82659,826
80 0605030FJOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)7878
81 0605213FF–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B173,647173,647
82 0605214FGROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT5,3325,332
83 0605221FKC–46776,937776,937
84 0605223FADVANCED PILOT TRAINING8,2018,201
86 0605278FHC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E7,4977,497
87 0605431FADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE)314,378298,378
Satellite contractor support[–9,000]
Protected tactical demonstration[–7,000]
88 0605432FPOLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE)103,552103,552
89 0605433FWIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE)31,42531,425
90 0605458FAIR & SPACE OPS CENTER 10.2 RDT&E85,93885,938
91 0605931FB–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM98,76898,768
92 0101125FNUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION198,357198,357
94 0207701FFULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING8,8318,831
95 0307581FNEXTGEN JSTARS73,08810,000
Integrate exisitng technology in replacement[–63,088]
SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION3,337,4193,350,331
97 0604256FTHREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT24,41824,418
98 0604759FMAJOR T&E INVESTMENT47,23247,232
99 0605101FRAND PROJECT AIR FORCE30,44330,443
101 0605712FINITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION12,26612,266
102 0605807FTEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT689,509689,509
103 0605860FROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)34,36434,364
104 0605864FSPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP)21,16121,161
104AOPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE020,000
Program Increase[20,000]
105 0605976FFACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT46,95546,955
106 0605978FFACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT32,96532,965
107 0606017FREQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION13,85013,850
108 0606116FSPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT19,51219,512
110 0606392FSPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE181,727181,727
111 0308602FENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS)4,9384,938
112 0702806FACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT18,64418,644
113 0804731FGENERAL SKILL TRAINING1,4251,425
114 1001004FINTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES3,7903,790
SUBTOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT1,183,1991,203,199
OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
115 0603423FGLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT299,760299,760
118 0604618FJOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION2,4692,469
119 0605018FAF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS)90,21860,218
Delayed contract award[–30,000]
120 0605024FANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY34,81534,815
122 0101113FB–52 SQUADRONS55,45755,457
123 0101122FAIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)450450
124 0101126FB–1B SQUADRONS5,3535,353
125 0101127FB–2 SQUADRONS131,580131,580
126 0101213FMINUTEMAN SQUADRONS139,109139,109
127 0101313FSTRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM35,60335,603
128 0101314FNIGHT FIST—USSTRATCOM3232
130 0102326FREGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM1,5221,522
131 0105921FSERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES3,1343,134
133 0205219FMQ–9 UAV170,396170,396
136 0207133FF–16 SQUADRONS133,105133,105
137 0207134FF–15E SQUADRONS261,969261,969
138 0207136FMANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION14,83114,831
139 0207138FF–22A SQUADRONS156,962156,962
140 0207142FF–35 SQUADRONS43,66643,666
141 0207161FTACTICAL AIM MISSILES29,73929,739
142 0207163FADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)82,19582,195
144 0207171FF–15 EPAWSS68,94449,444
Delays in pre-EMD phase[–19,500]
145 0207224FCOMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY5,0955,095
146 0207227FCOMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE883883
147 0207247FAF TENCAP5,8125,812
148 0207249FPRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT1,0811,081
149 0207253FCOMPASS CALL14,41114,411
150 0207268FAIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM109,664109,664
151 0207325FJOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM)15,89715,897
152 0207410FAIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC)41,06641,066
153 0207412FCONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC)552552
154 0207417FAIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS)180,804180,804
155 0207418FTACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS3,7543,754
157 0207431FCOMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES7,8917,891
158 0207444FTACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD5,8915,891
159 0207448FC2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK1,7821,782
161 0207452FDCAPES821821
163 0207590FSEEK EAGLE23,84423,844
164 0207601FUSAF MODELING AND SIMULATION16,72316,723
165 0207605FWARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS5,9565,956
166 0207697FDISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES4,4574,457
167 0208006FMISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS60,67960,679
169 0208059FCYBER COMMAND ACTIVITIES67,05767,057
170 0208087FAF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS13,35513,355
171 0208088FAF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS5,5765,576
179 0301400FSPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE12,21812,218
180 0302015FE–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC)28,77828,778
181 0303131FMINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)81,03581,035
182 0303140FINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM70,49770,497
183 0303141FGLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM692692
185 0303601FMILSATCOM TERMINALS55,20855,208
187 0304260FAIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE106,78676,086
ASIP 2C[–30,700]
190 0305099FGLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM)4,1574,157
193 0305110FSATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE)20,80620,806
194 0305111FWEATHER SERVICE25,10225,102
195 0305114FAIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS)23,51623,516
196 0305116FAERIAL TARGETS8,6398,639
199 0305128FSECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES498498
200 0305145FARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION13,22213,222
201 0305146FDEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES360360
206 0305173FSPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER3,6743,674
207 0305174FSPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT2,4802,480
208 0305179FINTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS)8,5928,592
209 0305182FSPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE)13,46213,462
210 0305202FDRAGON U–25,51111,311
Keep U–2 rather than enhance Global Hawk Block 30[5,800]
212 0305206FAIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS28,11328,113
213 0305207FMANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS13,51613,516
214 0305208FDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS27,26527,265
215 0305219FMQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV1,3781,378
216 0305220FRQ–4 UAV244,514108,514
Keep U–2 rather than enhance Global Hawk Block 30[–136,000]
217 0305221FNETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING11,0962,296
NCCT[–8,800]
218 0305236FCOMMON DATA LINK (CDL)36,13736,137
219 0305238FNATO AGS232,851232,851
220 0305240FSUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE20,21820,218
221 0305265FGPS III SPACE SEGMENT212,571212,571
222 0305614FJSPOC MISSION SYSTEM73,77973,779
223 0305881FRAPID CYBER ACQUISITION4,1024,102
225 0305913FNUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE)20,46820,468
226 0305940FSPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS11,59611,596
227 0306250FCYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT4,9384,938
228 0308699FSHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW)1,2121,212
230 0401119FC–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF)38,77338,773
231 0401130FC–17 AIRCRAFT (IF)83,77383,773
232 0401132FC–130J PROGRAM26,71526,715
233 0401134FLARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM)5,1725,172
234 0401219FKC–10S2,7142,714
235 0401314FOPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT27,78427,784
236 0401318FCV–2238,71938,719
237 0401319FPRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT (PAR)11,00611,006
238 0408011FSPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL8,4058,405
239 0702207FDEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)1,4071,407
241 0708610FLOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT)109,68597,185
Reduce unjustified program growth[–12,500]
242 0708611FSUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT16,20916,209
243 0804743FOTHER FLIGHT TRAINING987987
244 0808716FOTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES126126
245 0901202FJOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY2,6032,603
246 0901218FCIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM1,5891,589
247 0901220FPERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION5,0265,026
248 0901226FAIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY1,3941,394
249 0901279FFACILITIES OPERATION—ADMINISTRATIVE3,7983,798
250 0901538FFINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT107,314107,314
250A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS11,441,12011,392,474
Classified program reduction [–16,700]
Classified adjustment[–31,946]
SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT15,717,66615,437,320
TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF23,739,89223,512,458
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW
BASIC RESEARCH
1 0601000BRDTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE37,77837,778
2 0601101EDEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES312,146332,146
Basic research program increase[20,000]
3 0601110D8ZBASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES44,56434,564
Faculty fellows program reduction[–10,000]
4 0601117EBASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE49,84849,848
5 0601120D8ZNATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM45,48855,488
Military Child STEM Education programs[10,000]
6 0601228D8ZHISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS24,41234,412
Program increase[10,000]
7 0601384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM48,26148,261
SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH562,497592,497
APPLIED RESEARCH
8 0602000D8ZJOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY20,06520,065
9 0602115EBIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY112,242112,242
11 0602234D8ZLINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM51,87551,875
12 0602251D8ZAPPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES41,96531,965
Program reduction[–10,000]
13 0602303EINFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY334,407334,407
15 0602383EBIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE44,82544,825
16 0602384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM226,317226,317
18 0602668D8ZCYBER SECURITY RESEARCH15,0007,500
Program reduction[–7,500]
20 0602702ETACTICAL TECHNOLOGY305,484305,484
21 0602715EMATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY160,389160,389
22 0602716EELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY179,203179,203
23 0602718BRWEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES151,737151,737
24 0602751D8ZSOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH9,1569,156
25 1160401BBSOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT39,75039,750
SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH1,692,4151,674,915
ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
26 0603000D8ZJOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY26,68826,688
27 0603121D8ZSO/LIC ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT8,6828,682
28 0603122D8ZCOMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT69,67569,675
29 0603133D8ZFOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING30,00020,000
Program reduction[–10,000]
30 0603160BRCOUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT283,694283,694
32 0603176CADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT8,4708,470
33 0603177CDISCRIMINATION SENSOR TECHNOLOGY45,11045,110
34 0603178CWEAPONS TECHNOLOGY14,06814,068
35 0603179CADVANCED C4ISR15,32915,329
36 0603180CADVANCED RESEARCH16,58416,584
37 0603225D8ZJOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT19,33519,335
38 0603264SAGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY2,5442,544
39 0603274CSPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY51,03351,033
40 0603286EADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS129,723129,723
41 0603287ESPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY179,883179,883
42 0603288D8ZANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS12,0004,500
Program reduction[–7,500]
43 0603289D8ZADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS60,00045,000
Program reduction[–15,000]
44 0603294CCOMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY25,63925,639
45 0603384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT132,674132,674
46 0603618D8ZJOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY10,96510,965
47 0603648D8ZJOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS131,960111,960
Program reduction[–20,000]
52 0603680D8ZDEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM91,09591,095
53 0603699D8ZEMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT33,70633,706
54 0603712SGENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS16,83616,836
55 0603713SDEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY29,68329,683
56 0603716D8ZSTRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM57,79657,796
57 0603720SMICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT72,14472,144
58 0603727D8ZJOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM7,4057,405
59 0603739EADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES92,24692,246
60 0603760ECOMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS243,265243,265
62 0603766ENETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY386,926366,926
Program reduction[–20,000]
63 0603767ESENSOR TECHNOLOGY312,821312,821
64 0603769SEDISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT10,69210,692
65 0603781D8ZSOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE15,77615,776
66 0603826D8ZQUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS69,31969,319
68 0603832D8ZDOD MODELING AND SIMULATION MANAGEMENT OFFICE3,0003,000
71 0603941D8ZTEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY81,14881,148
72 0604055D8ZOPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT31,80031,800
73 0303310D8ZCWMD SYSTEMS46,06646,066
74 1160402BBSOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT57,62257,622
SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT2,933,4022,860,902
ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
77 0603161D8ZNUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P41,07241,072
79 0603600D8ZWALKOFF90,55890,558
80 0603714D8ZADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM15,51819,518
Continue important test programs[4,000]
81 0603851D8ZENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM51,46251,462
82 0603881CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT299,598284,598
THAAD 2.0 early to need[–15,000]
83 0603882CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT1,003,7681,033,768
GMD reliability and maintenance improvements[30,000]
84 0603884BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL179,236179,236
85 0603884CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS392,893392,893
86 0603890CBMD ENABLING PROGRAMS410,863410,863
87 0603891CSPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA310,261310,261
88 0603892CAEGIS BMD929,208929,208
89 0603893CSPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM31,34631,346
90 0603895CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS6,3896,389
91 0603896CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI443,484443,484
92 0603898CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT46,38746,387
93 0603904CMISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC)58,53058,530
94 0603906CREGARDING TRENCH16,19916,199
95 0603907CSEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX)64,40964,409
96 0603913CISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS96,803447,775
Israeli Missile Defense Programs[175,000]
Transfer from Procurement, Defense-Wide Line 34[175,972]
97 0603914CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST386,482386,482
98 0603915CBALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS485,294485,294
99 0603920D8ZHUMANITARIAN DEMINING10,19410,194
100 0603923D8ZCOALITION WARFARE10,13910,139
101 0604016D8ZDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM2,9077,907
Program increase[5,000]
102 0604250D8ZADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES190,000190,000
103 0604400D8ZDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT3,7023,702
104 0604445JWIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE53,00053,000
1060604775D8ZDEFENSE RAPID INNOVATION FUND075,000
Program increase[75,000]
107 0604787JJOINT SYSTEMS INTEGRATION7,0027,002
108 0604828JJOINT FIRES INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY TEAM7,1027,102
109 0604880CLAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3)123,444123,444
110 0604881CAEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT263,695263,695
113 0605170D8ZSUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION12,50012,500
114 0303191D8ZJOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM2,6562,656
115 0305103CCYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE961961
SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES6,047,0626,497,034
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
116 0604161D8ZNUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD7,9367,936
117 0604165D8ZPROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT70,76270,762
118 0604384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD345,883335,883
Program under-execution[–10,000]
119 0604764KADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO)25,45925,459
120 0604771D8ZJOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS)17,56217,562
121 0605000BRWEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES6,8876,887
122 0605013BLINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT12,53012,530
123 0605021SEHOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE286286
124 0605022D8ZDEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM3,2443,244
125 0605027D8ZOUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES6,5006,500
126 0605070SDOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION15,32615,326
127 0605075D8ZDCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION19,35119,351
128 0605080SDEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM41,46541,465
129 0605090SDEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS)10,13510,135
130 0605210D8ZDEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES9,5469,546
131 0303141KGLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM14,24114,241
132 0305304D8ZDOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM)3,6603,660
SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION610,773600,773
RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
133 0604774D8ZDEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS)5,6165,616
134 0604875D8ZJOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT3,0923,092
135 0604940D8ZCENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP)254,503254,503
136 0604942D8ZASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS21,66121,661
138 0605100D8ZJOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC)27,16227,162
139 0605104D8ZTECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS24,50124,501
142 0605126JJOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO)43,17643,176
145 0605142D8ZSYSTEMS ENGINEERING44,24644,246
146 0605151D8ZSTUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD2,6652,665
147 0605161D8ZNUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY4,3664,366
148 0605170D8ZSUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION27,90127,901
149 0605200D8ZGENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE)2,8552,855
150 0605384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM105,944105,944
156 0605502KASMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH400400
159 0605790D8ZSMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER1,6341,634
160 0605798D8ZDEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS12,1057,355
Program reduction[–4,750]
161 0605801KADEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC)50,38950,389
162 0605803SER&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION8,4528,452
163 0605804D8ZDEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION15,18715,187
164 0605898EMANAGEMENT HQ—R&D71,36271,362
165 0606100D8ZBUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS4,1004,100
166 0203345D8ZDEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI)1,9561,956
167 0204571JJOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT10,32110,321
170 0303166JSUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES11,55211,552
172 0305193D8ZCYBER INTELLIGENCE6,7486,748
174 0804767D8ZCOCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)44,00540,005
Program decrease—historical under-execution[–4,000]
175 0901598CMANAGEMENT HQ—MDA36,99836,998
176 0901598D8WMANAGEMENT HEADQUARTERS WHS612612
177A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS44,36744,367
SUBTOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT887,876879,126
OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
178 0604130VENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS)3,9883,988
179 0605127TREGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA1,7501,750
180 0605147TOVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS)286286
181 0607210D8ZINDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT14,77814,778
182 0607310D8ZOPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT2,9532,953
183 0607327TGLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS)10,35010,350
184 0607384BPCHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT)28,49628,496
185 0607828JJOINT INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY11,96811,968
186 0208043JPLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS)1,8421,842
187 0208045KC4I INTEROPERABILITY63,55863,558
189 0301144KJOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING3,9313,931
193 0302016KNATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT924924
194 0302019KDEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION9,6579,657
195 0303126KLONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS25,35525,355
196 0303131KMINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)12,67112,671
197 0303135GPUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI)222222
198 0303136GKEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI)32,69832,698
199 0303140D8ZINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM11,30411,304
200 0303140GINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM125,854155,854
Sharkseer[30,000]
2010303140KINFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM012,600
Transfer from line 212 (PE 0305103K)[3,200]
Cyber Situational Awareness[9,400]
202 0303150KGLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM33,79333,793
203 0303153KDEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION13,42313,423
204 0303170KNET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)3,7743,774
205 0303260D8ZDEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO)951951
206 0303610KTELEPORT PROGRAM2,6972,697
208 0304210BBSPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES19,29419,294
212 0305103KCYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE3,23434
Transfer to line 201 (PE 0303140K)[–3,200]
213 0305125D8ZCRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION (CIP)8,8468,846
217 0305186D8ZPOLICY R&D PROGRAMS7,0657,065
218 0305199D8ZNET CENTRICITY23,98423,984
221 0305208BBDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS5,2865,286
224 0305208KDISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS3,4003,400
229 0305327VINSIDER THREAT8,6708,670
230 0305387D8ZHOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM2,1102,110
239 0708011SINDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS22,36622,366
240 0708012SLOGISTICS SUPPORT ACTIVITIES1,5741,574
241 0902298JMANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS4,4094,409
242 1105219BBMQ–9 UAV9,70214,902
Capability Improvements[5,200]
243 1105232BBRQ–11 UAV259259
245 1160403BBAVIATION SYSTEMS164,233164,233
247 1160405BBINTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT9,4909,490
248 1160408BBOPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS75,25375,253
252 1160431BBWARRIOR SYSTEMS24,66124,661
253 1160432BBSPECIAL PROGRAMS20,90820,908
259 1160480BBSOF TACTICAL VEHICLES3,6723,672
262 1160483BBMARITIME SYSTEMS57,90557,905
264 1160489BBGLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES3,7883,788
265 1160490BBOPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE16,22516,225
265A9999999999CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS3,118,5023,118,502
SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT3,957,4904,002,090
TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW16,766,08417,181,906
OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE
MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
1 0605118OTEOPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION74,58374,583
2 0605131OTELIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION45,14245,142
3 0605814OTEOPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES48,01348,013
TOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT167,738167,738
TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE167,738167,738
TOTAL, TITLE II63,533,94763,484,398
XLIIIOPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
4301.OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars)
LineItemFY 2015 RequestSenate Authorized
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
OPERATING FORCES
010MANEUVER UNITS969,281969,281
020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES61,99061,990
030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE450,987450,987
040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS545,773545,773
050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT1,057,4531,057,453
060AVIATION ASSETS1,409,3471,409,347
070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT3,592,3343,592,334
080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS411,388411,388
090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,001,2321,186,832
Readiness funding increase[185,600]
100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT7,428,9727,428,972
110FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION2,066,4342,179,434
Facilities Sustainment[18,750]
Readiness funding increase—fully funds 6% CIP[94,250]
120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS411,863411,863
130COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS179,399179,399
170COMBATANT COMMANDS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT432,281432,281
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES20,018,73420,317,334
MOBILIZATION
180STRATEGIC MOBILITY316,776316,776
190ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS187,609187,609
200INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS6,4636,463
SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION510,848510,848
TRAINING AND RECRUITING
210OFFICER ACQUISITION124,766124,766
220RECRUIT TRAINING51,96851,968
230ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING43,73543,735
240SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS456,563456,563
250SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING886,529886,529
260FLIGHT TRAINING890,070890,070
270PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION193,291193,291
280TRAINING SUPPORT552,359552,359
290RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING466,927466,927
300EXAMINING194,588194,588
310OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION205,782205,782
320CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING150,571150,571
330JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS169,784169,784
SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING4,386,9334,386,933
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION541,877541,877
360CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES722,291722,291
370LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES602,034602,034
380AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT422,277422,277
390ADMINISTRATION405,442405,442
400SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS1,624,7421,624,742
410MANPOWER MANAGEMENT289,771289,771
420OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT390,924390,924
430OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT1,118,5401,118,540
440ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES241,234241,234
450REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT243,509243,509
460FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS200,615200,615
470INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS462,591462,591
480MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS27,37527,375
525CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,030,4111,030,411
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES8,323,6338,323,633
UNDISTRIBUTED
530UNDISTRIBUTED0–320,000
Foreign currency fluctuation savings[–48,900]
Program decrease—overestimate of civilian personnel[–250,000]
Travel savings[–21,100]
SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED0–320,000
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY33,240,14833,218,748
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
OPERATING FORCES
020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES15,20015,200
030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE502,664502,664
040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS107,489107,489
050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT543,989543,989
060AVIATION ASSETS72,96372,963
070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT360,082360,082
080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS72,49172,491
090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE58,87373,873
Readiness funding increase[15,000]
100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT388,961388,961
110FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION228,597233,597
Facilities Sustainment[5,000]
120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS39,59039,590
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES2,390,8992,410,899
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
130SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION10,60810,608
140ADMINISTRATION18,58718,587
150SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS6,6816,681
160MANPOWER MANAGEMENT9,1929,192
170RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING54,60254,602
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES99,67099,670
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES2,490,5692,510,569
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
OPERATING FORCES
010MANEUVER UNITS660,648683,648
Readiness funding increase[23,000]
020MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES165,942165,942
030ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE733,800733,800
040THEATER LEVEL ASSETS83,08483,084
050LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT22,00522,005
060AVIATION ASSETS920,085920,085
070FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT680,887680,887
080LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS69,72669,726
090LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE138,263138,263
100BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT804,517804,517
110FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION490,205495,205
Facilities Sustainment[5,000]
120MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS872,140872,140
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES5,641,3025,669,302
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
130SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION6,6906,690
140REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT1,7651,765
150ADMINISTRATION63,07563,075
160SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS37,37237,372
170MANPOWER MANAGEMENT6,4846,484
180OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT274,085260,285
Program decrease for advertising[–13,800]
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES389,471375,671
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG6,030,7736,044,973
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
OPERATING FORCES
010MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS4,947,2024,947,202
020FLEET AIR TRAINING1,647,9431,647,943
030AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES37,05037,050
040AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT96,13996,139
050AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT363,763363,763
060AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE814,770923,670
Readiness funding increase[108,900]
070AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT36,49436,494
080AVIATION LOGISTICS350,641350,641
090MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS3,865,3793,865,379
100SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING711,243711,243
110SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE5,296,4085,296,408
120SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT1,339,0771,339,077
130COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS708,634708,634
140ELECTRONIC WARFARE91,59991,599
150SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE207,038207,038
160WARFARE TACTICS432,715432,715
170OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY338,116338,116
180COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES892,316892,316
190EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE128,486128,486
200DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT2,4722,472
210COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS101,200101,200
220COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT188,920188,920
230CRUISE MISSILE109,911109,911
240FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE1,172,8231,174,123
Additional FCET[1,300]
250IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT104,139104,139
260WEAPONS MAINTENANCE490,911490,911
270OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT324,861324,861
290ENTERPRISE INFORMATION936,743936,743
300SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION1,483,4951,587,495
Facilities Sustainment[18,750]
Readiness funding increase—fully funds 6% CIP[85,250]
310BASE OPERATING SUPPORT4,398,6674,398,667
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES31,619,15531,833,355
MOBILIZATION
320SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE526,926526,926
330READY RESERVE FORCE195195
340AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS6,7046,704
350SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS251,538205,538
Transfer to SCN, line4, for CVN 73 RCOH[–46,000]
360EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS124,323124,323
370INDUSTRIAL READINESS2,3232,323
380COAST GUARD SUPPORT20,33320,333
SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION932,342886,342
TRAINING AND RECRUITING
390OFFICER ACQUISITION156,214156,214
400RECRUIT TRAINING8,8638,863
410RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS148,150148,150
420SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING601,501601,501
430FLIGHT TRAINING8,2398,239
440PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION164,214164,214
450TRAINING SUPPORT182,619182,619
460RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING230,589230,589
470OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION115,595115,595
480CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING79,60679,606
490JUNIOR ROTC41,66441,664
SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING1,737,2541,737,254
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
500ADMINISTRATION858,871858,871
510EXTERNAL RELATIONS12,80712,807
520CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT119,863119,863
530MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT356,113356,113
540OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT255,605255,605
550SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS339,802339,802
570SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION172,203172,203
590PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN283,621283,621
600ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT1,111,4641,111,464
610HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT43,23243,232
620COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS25,68925,689
630SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS73,15973,159
640NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE548,640548,640
700INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES4,7134,713
705CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS531,324531,324
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES4,737,1064,737,106
UNDISTRIBUTED
710UNDISTRIBUTED0–88,700
Foreign currency fluctuation savings[–74,200]
Travel savings[–14,500]
SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED0–88,700
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY39,025,85739,105,357
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
OPERATING FORCES
010OPERATIONAL FORCES905,744939,544
Readiness funding increase—SPMAGTFs in CENTCOM and SOUTHCOM[33,800]
020FIELD LOGISTICS921,543921,543
030DEPOT MAINTENANCE229,058229,058
040MARITIME PREPOSITIONING87,66087,660
050SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION573,926592,676
Facilities Sustainment[18,750]
060BASE OPERATING SUPPORT1,983,1181,983,118
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES4,701,0494,753,599
TRAINING AND RECRUITING
070RECRUIT TRAINING18,22718,227
080OFFICER ACQUISITION948948
090SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING98,44898,448
100PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION42,30542,305
110TRAINING SUPPORT330,156330,156
120RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING161,752161,752
130OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION19,13734,837
At USMC request transfer from RDTEN 53[15,700]
140JUNIOR ROTC23,27723,277
SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING694,250709,950
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
150SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION36,35936,359
160ADMINISTRATION362,608353,415
Program decrease—museum expansion[–9,193]
180ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT70,51570,515
185CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS44,70644,706
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES514,188504,995
UNDISTRIBUTED
190UNDISTRIBUTED0–33,200
Foreign currency fluctuation savings[–28,400]
Travel savings[–4,800]
SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED0–33,200
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS5,909,4875,935,344
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
OPERATING FORCES
010MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS565,842565,842
020INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE5,9485,948
040AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE82,63682,636
050AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT353353
060AVIATION LOGISTICS7,0077,007
070MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS8,1908,190
080SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING556556
090SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE4,5714,571
100COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS14,47214,472
110COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES119,056119,056
120WEAPONS MAINTENANCE1,8521,852
130ENTERPRISE INFORMATION25,35425,354
140SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION48,27153,271
Facilities Sustainment[5,000]
150BASE OPERATING SUPPORT101,921101,921
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES986,029991,029
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
160ADMINISTRATION1,5201,520
170MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT12,99812,998
180SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS3,3953,395
190ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT3,1583,158
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES21,07121,071
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES1,007,1001,012,100
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010OPERATING FORCES93,09393,093
020DEPOT MAINTENANCE18,37718,377
030SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION29,23234,232
Facilities Sustainment[5,000]
040BASE OPERATING SUPPORT106,447106,447
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES247,149252,149
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
050SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION914914
060ADMINISTRATION11,83111,831
070RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING8,6888,688
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES21,43321,433
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
OPERATING FORCES
010PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES3,163,4573,163,457
020COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES1,694,3391,694,339
030AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)1,579,1781,579,178
040DEPOT MAINTENANCE6,119,5226,119,522
050FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION1,453,5891,472,339
Facilities Sustainment[18,750]
060BASE SUPPORT2,599,4192,599,419
070GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING908,790908,790
080OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS856,306856,306
090TACTICAL INTEL AND OTHER SPECIAL ACTIVITIES800,689792,689
RC–135[–8,000]
100LAUNCH FACILITIES282,710282,710
110SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS397,818397,818
120COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT871,840860,840
Program decrease—classified program[–11,000]
130COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS237,348217,348
Program decrease—JECC[–20,000]
130AAIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM034,600
Retain current AWACS fleet[34,600]
130BA–10 FLYING HOURS0188,400
Retain current A–10 fleet[188,400]
130CA–10 WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUSTAINMENT068,100
Retain current A–10 fleet[68,100]
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES20,965,00521,235,855
MOBILIZATION
140AIRLIFT OPERATIONS1,968,8101,968,810
150MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS139,743139,743
160DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,534,5601,534,560
170FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION173,627173,627
180BASE SUPPORT688,801688,801
SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION4,505,5414,505,541
TRAINING AND RECRUITING
190OFFICER ACQUISITION82,39682,396
200RECRUIT TRAINING19,85219,852
210RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)76,13476,134
220FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION212,226212,226
230BASE SUPPORT759,809759,809
240SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING356,157356,157
250FLIGHT TRAINING697,594697,594
260PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION219,441219,441
270TRAINING SUPPORT91,00191,001
280DEPOT MAINTENANCE316,688316,688
290RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING73,92073,920
300EXAMINING3,1213,121
310OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION181,718181,718
320CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING147,667147,667
330JUNIOR ROTC63,25063,250
SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING3,300,9743,300,974
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
340LOGISTICS OPERATIONS1,003,5131,013,813
Readiness funding increase—PACOM unfunded priority list[10,300]
350TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES843,449843,449
360DEPOT MAINTENANCE78,12678,126
370FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION247,677247,677
380BASE SUPPORT1,103,4421,103,442
390ADMINISTRATION597,234597,234
400SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS506,840506,840
410OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES892,256892,256
420CIVIL AIR PATROL24,98124,981
450INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT92,41992,419
465CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS1,169,7361,164,376
Classified adjustment[–5,360]
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES6,559,6736,564,613
UNDISTRIBUTED
470UNDISTRIBUTED0–69,200
Foreign currency fluctuation savings[–51,900]
Travel savings[–17,300]
SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED0–69,200
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE35,331,19335,537,783
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
OPERATING FORCES
010PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES1,719,4671,719,467
020MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS211,132211,132
030DEPOT MAINTENANCE530,301530,301
040FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION85,67290,672
Facilities Sustainment[5,000]
050BASE SUPPORT367,966367,966
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES2,914,5382,919,538
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
060ADMINISTRATION59,89959,899
070RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING14,50914,509
080MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC)20,34520,345
090OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP)6,5516,551
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES101,304101,304
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE3,015,8423,020,842
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
OPERATING FORCES
010AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS3,367,7293,367,729
020MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS718,295718,295
030DEPOT MAINTENANCE1,528,6951,528,695
040FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION137,604142,604
Facilities Sustainment[5,000]
050BASE SUPPORT581,536581,536
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES6,333,8596,338,859
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
060ADMINISTRATION27,81227,812
070RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING31,18831,188
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES59,00059,000
TOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG6,392,8596,397,859
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
OPERATING FORCES
010JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF462,107462,107
020SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES4,762,2454,791,845
USSOCOM NCR[–5,000]
USSOCOM RSCC[–1,800]
UFR Flying Hours[36,400]
UFR Unit Readiness Training[20,000]
SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES5,224,3525,253,952
TRAINING AND RECRUITING
030DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY135,437135,437
040NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY80,08280,082
050SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/TRAINING AND RECRUITING371,620371,620
SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING587,139587,139
ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
060CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS119,888144,888
Starbase[25,000]
080DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY556,493556,493
090DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY1,340,3741,340,374
100DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY633,300633,300
110DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY1,263,6781,263,678
130DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY26,71026,710
140DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY381,470394,170
PTAP funding increase[12,700]
150DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY194,520194,520
160DEFENSE POW/MIA OFFICE21,48521,485
170DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY544,786537,786
Program decrease—Combatting terrorism fellowship[–7,000]
180DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE527,812527,812
200DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION32,78732,787
230DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY2,566,4242,596,424
Supplemental Impact Aid[25,000]
Disability Impact Aid[5,000]
240MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY416,644416,644
260OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT186,987106,387
Program decrease—ahead of need[–80,600]
270OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE1,891,1631,882,363
Program decrease—BRAC 2015[–4,800]
Program decrease for DOD rewards program[–4,000]
280SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/ADMIN & SVC-WIDE ACTIVITIES87,91587,915
290WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES610,982610,982
295CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS13,983,32314,024,923
Additional AFRICOM ISR Support[60,000]
DCS[–18,400]
SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES25,386,74125,399,641
UNDISTRIBUTED
305UNDISTRIBUTED0–29,800
Foreign currency fluctuation savings[–17,500]
Travel savings[–17,300]
Blue water review[5,000]
SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED0–29,800
TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE31,198,23231,210,932
MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
010US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE13,72313,723
010OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID100,000100,000
010COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT365,108365,108
010ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD212,875212,875
030ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY201,560201,560
040ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY277,294277,294
050ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE408,716408,716
060ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE8,5478,547
070ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES208,353208,353
080OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS TRANSFER FUND5,0005,000
090SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL SPORTING COMPETITIONS, DEFENSE10,0005,700
Program decrease—SISC[–4,300]
TOTAL, MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS1,811,1761,806,876
TOTAL, TITLE III165,721,818166,074,965
XLIV
4401.
SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars)
ItemFY 2015 RequestSenate Authorized
MILITARY PERSONNEL
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS128,957,593128,910,683
Military Personnel Historical Underexecution[–761,610]
Restore lost savings relating to retiree COLA[500,000]
Restore assumed savings for TRICARE consolidation[78,000]
Readiness funding increase—CTC rotations for Army National Guard[45,000]
Reduction in meals-ready-to-eat[–20,000]
Retain current A–10 fleet[82,800]
Retain current AWACS fleet[24,900]
Increase state ESGR personnel[4,000]
SUBTOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS128,957,593128,910,683
MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS
MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS6,236,0926,236,092
SUBTOTAL, MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS6,236,0926,236,092
TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL135,193,685135,146,775
XLV
4501.
SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
LineItemFY 2015 RequestSenate Authorized
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
010PREPOSITIONED WAR RESERVE STOCKS13,72713,727
TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY13,72713,727
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
010SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS (MEDICAL/DENTAL)61,71761,717
TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE61,71761,717
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
010DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)44,29339,293
Program decrease—MREs[–5,000]
TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE44,29339,293
WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
010WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA1,114,7311,314,731
Restore Commissary Cut[200,000]
TOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA1,114,7311,314,731
TOTAL, ALL WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS1,234,4681,429,468
NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND
010 NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND0100,000
National Sea-based Deterrence Fund[100,000]
TOTAL, NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND0100,000
CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION
010OPERATION & MAINTENANCE222,728222,728
020RDT&E595,913595,913
030PROCUREMENT10,22710,227
TOTAL, CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION828,868828,868
OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
010OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE310,830310,830
020PROCUREMENT1,0001,000
TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL311,830311,830
DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF
010DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE719,096739,096
Additional SOUTHCOM ISR Support[20,000]
020DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM101,591101,591
TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF820,687840,687
DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
DHP OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
010IN-HOUSE CARE8,799,0868,799,086
020PRIVATE SECTOR CARE15,412,59915,412,599
030CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT2,462,0962,462,096
040INFORMATION MANAGEMENT1,557,3471,557,347
050MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES366,223366,223
060EDUCATION AND TRAINING750,866750,866
070BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS1,683,6941,683,694
070AUNDISTRIBUTED0–78,000
Reduction for anticipated cost of TRICARE consolidation[–88,000]
Mental Health Assessments[10,000]
SUBTOTAL, DHP OPERATION & MAINTENANCE31,031,91130,953,911
DHP RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
090R&D RESEARCH10,31710,317
100R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT49,01549,015
110R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT226,410226,410
120R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION97,78797,787
130R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT217,898217,898
140R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT38,07538,075
150R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT15,09215,092
SUBTOTAL, DHP RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT654,594654,594
DHP PROCUREMENT
160PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING13,05713,057
170PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION283,030283,030
180PROC THEATER MEDICAL INFORMATION PROGRAM3,1453,145
190PROC IEHR9,1819,181
SUBTOTAL, DHP PROCUREMENT308,413308,413
DHP UNDISTRIBUTED
190ATRANSFERS TO THE VETERANS ADMINISTRATION–161,857–161,857
SUBTOTAL, DHP UNDISTRIBUTED–161,857–161,857
TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM31,833,06131,755,061
TOTAL, TITLE XIV35,028,91435,265,914
XLVI
4601.
SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars)
AccountState or Country and InstallationProject TitleBudget RequestSenate Authorized
Military Construction, Army
California
MC, ArmyConcordAccess Control Point9,9009,900
MC, ArmyConcordGeneral Purpose Maintenance Shop5,3005,300
MC, ArmyFort IrwinUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar45,00045,000
Colorado
MC, ArmyFort Carson, ColoradoAircraft Maintenance Hangar60,00060,000
MC, ArmyFort Carson, ColoradoUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar29,00029,000
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
MC, ArmyGuantanamo BayDining Facility12,00012,000
MC, ArmyGuantanamo BayHealth Clinic11,80011,800
Hawaii
MC, ArmyFort ShafterCommand and Control Facility (Scif)96,00086,400
Japan
MC, ArmyKadena AbMissile Magazine10,60010,600
Kentucky
MC, ArmyBlue Grass Army DepotConsolidated Shipping Center015,000
MC, ArmyFort Campbell, KentuckyUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar23,00023,000
New York
MC, ArmyFort Drum, New YorkUnmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar27,00027,000
MC, ArmyU.S. Military AcademyCadet Barracks, Incr 358,00058,000
Pennsylvania
MC, ArmyLetterkenny Army DepotRebuild Shop16,00016,000
South Carolina
MC, ArmyFort JacksonTrainee Barracks Complex 3, Ph152,00052,000
Virginia
MC, ArmyJoint Base Langley-EustisTactical Vehicle Hardstand7,7007,700
Worldwide Unspecified
MC, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideHost Nation Support Fy1533,00033,000
MC, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideMinor Construction Fy1525,00025,000
MC, ArmyUnspecified WorldwidePlanning and Design Fy1518,12718,127
Subtotal, Military Construction, Army539,427544,827
<bold></bold>
Military Construction, Navy
Arizona
MC, NavyYumaAviation Maintenance and Support Complex16,60816,608
Bahrain Island
MC, NavySw AsiaP–8a Hangar27,82627,826
California
MC, NavyBridgeportE-Lmr Communications Towers16,18016,180
MC, NavySan DiegoSteam Distribution System Decentralization47,11047,110
District of Columbia
MC, NavyDistrict of ColumbiaElectronics Science and Technology Laboratory31,73531,735
Djibouti
MC, NavyCamp Lemonier, DjiboutiEntry Control Point9,9239,923
Florida
MC, NavyJacksonvilleMh60 Parking Apron8,5838,583
MC, NavyJacksonvilleP–8a Runway Thresholds and Taxiways21,65221,652
MC, NavyMayportLcs Operational Training Facility20,52020,520
Guam
MC, NavyJoint Region MarianasGse Shops at North Ramp21,88021,880
MC, NavyJoint Region MarianasMwss Facilities at North Ramp28,77128,771
Hawaii
MC, NavyKaneohe BayFacility Modifications for Vmu, Mwsd, & Ch53e51,18251,182
MC, NavyKaneohe BayRoad and Infrastructure Improvements2,2002,200
MC, NavyPearl HarborSubmarine Maneuvering Room Trainer Facility9,6989,698
Japan
MC, NavyIwakuniSecurity Mods Dpri Mc167–T (Cvw–5 E2d Ea–18g)6,4156,415
MC, NavyKadena AbAircraft Maint Hangar Alterations and Sap-F19,41119,411
MC, NavyMCAS FutenmaHangar & Rinse Facility Modernizations4,6394,639
MC, NavyOkinawaLhd Practice Site Improvements35,68535,685
Maryland
MC, NavyAnnapolisCenter for Cyber Security Studies Building120,11230,000
MC, NavyIndian HeadAdvanced Energetics Research Lab Complex Ph 215,34615,346
MC, NavyPatuxent RiverAtlantic Test Range Facility9,8609,860
Nevada
MC, NavyFallonAir Wing Training Facility27,76327,763
MC, NavyFallonFacility Alteration for F–35 Training Mission3,4993,499
North Carolina
MC, NavyCamp Lejeune2nd Radio Bn Complex, Phase I050,706
MC, NavyCherry Point MCASWater Treatment Plant Replacement41,58841,588
Pennsylvania
MC, NavyPhiladelphiaOhio Replacement Power & Propulsion Facility23,98523,985
South Carolina
MC, NavyCharlestonNuclear Power Operational Support Facility35,71635,716
Spain
MC, NavyRotaShip Berthing Power Upgrades20,23320,233
Virginia
MC, NavyDahlgrenMissile Support Facility27,31327,313
MC, NavyNorfolkEOD Consolidated Ops & Logistics Facilities39,27439,274
MC, NavyPortsmouthSubmarine Maintenance Facility9,7439,743
MC, NavyQuanticoAmmunition Supply Point Expansion12,61312,613
MC, NavyYorktownBachelor Enlisted Quarters19,15219,152
MC, NavyYorktownFast Company Training Facility7,8367,836
Washington
MC, NavyBremertonIntegrated Water Treatment Syst. Dd 1, 2, & 516,40116,401
MC, NavyKitsapExplosives Handling Wharf #2 (Inc)83,77883,778
MC, NavyKitsapRegional Ship Maintenance Support Facility013,833
MC, NavyPort AngelesTps Port Angeles Forward Operating Location20,63820,638
MC, NavyWhidbey IslandP–8a Aircraft Apron and Supporting Facilities24,39024,390
Worldwide Unspecified
MC, NavyUnspecified WorldwideF–35c Facility Addition and Modification16,59416,594
MC, NavyUnspecified WorldwideF–35c Operational Training Facility22,39122,391
MC, NavyUnspecified WorldwideMcon Design Funds33,36633,366
MC, NavyUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction7,1637,163
Subtotal, Military Construction, Navy1,018,772993,199
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Military Construction, AF
Alaska
MC, AFClear AFSEmergency Power Plant Fuel Storage11,50011,500
Arizona
MC, AFLuke AFBF–35 Aircraft Mx Hangar—Sqdn #211,20011,200
MC, AFLuke AFBF–35 Flightline Fillstands15,60015,600
Guam
MC, AFJoint Region MarianasGuam Strike Fuel Systems Maint.hangar Inc 264,00064,000
MC, AFJoint Region MarianasPar Low Observable / Corrosion Control / Composite Repair Shop034,400
MC, AFJoint Region MarianasPrtc—Combat Comm Infrastr Facility3,7503,750
MC, AFJoint Region MarianasPrtc—Red Horse Logistics Facility3,1503,150
MC, AFJoint Region MarianasPrtc—Satellite Fire Station6,5006,500
Kansas
MC, AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Adal Mobility Bag Strg Expansion2,3002,300
MC, AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Adal Regional Mx Tng Facility16,10016,100
MC, AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Alter Composite Mx Shop4,1004,100
MC, AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Alter Taxiway Foxtrot5,5005,500
MC, AFMcconnell AFBKC–46a Fuselage Trainer6,4006,400
Maryland
MC, AFFort MeadeCybercom Joint Operations Center, Increment 2166,000166,000
Massachusetts
MC, AFHanscom AFBDormitory (72 Rm)13,50013,500
Nebraska
MC, AFOffutt AFBUsstratcom Replacement Facility- Incr 4180,000180,000
Nevada
MC, AFNellis AFBF–22 Flight Simulator Facility14,00014,000
MC, AFNellis AFBF–35 Aircraft Mx Unit—4 Bay Hangar31,00031,000
MC, AFNellis AFBF–35 Weapons School Facility8,9008,900
New Jersey
MC, AFJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-LakehurstFire Station5,9005,900
Oklahoma
MC, AFTinker AFBKC–46a Depot Maint Complex Spt Infrastr48,00048,000
MC, AFTinker AFBKC–46a Two-Bay Depot Mx Hangar63,00063,000
Texas
MC, AFJoint Base San AntonioFire Station5,8005,800
United Kingdom
MC, AFCroughton RafJiac Consolidation—Phase 192,22392,223
Worldwide Unspecified
MC, AFVarious WorldwidePlanning and Design10,73810,738
MC, AFVarious WorldwideUnspecified Minor Military Construction22,61322,613
Subtotal, Military Construction, AF811,774846,174
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Military Construction, Defense-Wide
Arizona
MC, Def-WideFort HuachucaJitc Building 52120 Renovation1,8711,871
Australia
MC, Def-WideGeraldtonCombined Communications Gateway Geraldton9,6009,600
Belgium
MC, Def-WideBrusselsBrussells Elementary/High School Replacement41,62641,626
MC, Def-WideBrusselsNATO Headquarters Facility37,91837,918
California
MC, Def-WideCamp Pendleton, CaliforniaSOF Comm/Elec Maintenance Facility11,84111,841
MC, Def-WideCoronadoSOF Logistics Support Unit 1 Ops Facility #141,74041,740
MC, Def-WideCoronadoSOF Support Activity Ops Facility #228,60028,600
MC, Def-WideLemooreReplace Fuel Storage & Distribution Fac.52,50052,500
Colorado
MC, Def-WidePeterson AFBDental Clinic Replacement15,20015,200
Conus Classified
MC, Def-WideClassified LocationSOF Skills Training Facility53,07353,073
Georgia
MC, Def-WideHunter Army AirfieldSOF Company Operations Facility7,6927,692
MC, Def-WideRobins AFBReplace Hydrant Fuel System19,90019,900
Germany
MC, Def-WideRhine Ordnance BarracksMedical Center Replacement Incr 4259,69559,695
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
MC, Def-WideGuantanamo BayReplace Fuel Tank11,10011,100
MC, Def-WideGuantanamo BayW.t. Sampson E/M and Hs Consolid./Replacement65,19065,190
Hawaii
MC, Def-WideJoint Base Pearl Harbor-HickamReplace Fuel Tanks3,0003,000
MC, Def-WideJoint Base Pearl Harbor-HickamUpgrade Fire Supression & Ventilation Sys.49,90049,900
Japan
MC, Def-WideMisawa AbEdgren High School Renovation37,77537,775
MC, Def-WideOkinawaKillin Elementary Replacement/Renovation71,48171,481
MC, Def-WideOkinawaKubasaki High School Replacement/Renovation99,42099,420
MC, Def-WideSaseboE.j. King High School Replacement/Renovation37,68137,681
Kentucky
MC, Def-WideFort Campbell, KentuckySOF System Integration Maintenance Office Fac18,00018,000
Maryland
MC, Def-WideFort MeadeNSAW Campus Feeders Phase 154,20754,207
MC, Def-WideFort MeadeNSAW Recapitalize Building #1/Site M Inc 345,52145,521
MC, Def-WideJoint Base AndrewsConstruct Hydrant Fuel System18,30018,300
Michigan
MC, Def-WideSelfridge ANGBReplace Fuel Distribution Facilities35,10035,100
Mississippi
MC, Def-WideStennisSOF Applied Instruction Facility10,32310,323
MC, Def-WideStennisSOF Land Acquisition Western Maneuver Area17,22417,224
Nevada
MC, Def-WideFallonSOF Tactical Ground Mob. Vehicle Maint Fac.20,24120,241
New Mexico
MC, Def-WideCannon AFBSOF Squadron Operations Facility (Sts)23,33323,333
North Carolina
MC, Def-WideCamp Lejeune, NCLejeune High School Addition/Renovation41,30641,306
MC, Def-WideCamp Lejeune, NCSOF Intel/Ops Expansion11,44211,442
MC, Def-WideFort BraggSOF Battalion Operations Facility37,07437,074
MC, Def-WideFort BraggSOF Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility8,0008,000
MC, Def-WideFort BraggSOF Training Command Building48,06248,062
MC, Def-WideSeymour Johnson AFBReplace Hydrant Fuel System8,5008,500
South Carolina
MC, Def-WideBeaufortReplace Fuel Distibution Facilities40,60040,600
South Dakota
MC, Def-WideEllsworth AFBConstruct Hydrant System8,0008,000
Texas
MC, Def-WideFort BlissHospital Replacement Incr 6131,500131,500
MC, Def-WideJoint Base San AntonioMedical Clinic Replacement38,30038,300
Virginia
MC, Def-WideCraney IslandReplace & Alter Fuel Distibution Facilities36,50036,500
MC, Def-WideDef Dist Depot RichmondReplace Access Control Point5,7005,700
MC, Def-WideFort BelvoirParking Lot7,2397,239
MC, Def-WideJoint Base Langley-EustisHopsital Addition/Cup Replacement41,20041,200
MC, Def-WideJoint Exp Base Little CreekSOF Human Performance Center11,20011,200
MC, Def-WideJoint Exp Base Little CreekSOF Indoor Dynamic Range14,88814,888
MC, Def-WideJoint Exp Base Little CreekSOF Mobile Comm Det Support Facility13,50013,500
MC, Def-WidePentagonRedundant Chilled Water Loop15,10015,100
Worldwide Unspecified
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideContingency Construction9,0009,000
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideEcip Design10,00010,000
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideEnergy Conservation Investment Program150,000150,000
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideExercise Related Minor Construction8,5818,581
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwidePlanning & Design38,70438,704
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwidePlanning and Design24,42524,425
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwidePlanning and Design745745
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwidePlanning and Design42,38742,387
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwidePlanning and Design599599
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwidePlanning and Design1,1831,183
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction2,7002,700
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction4,1004,100
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction5,9325,932
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction6,8466,846
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction2,0002,000
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction10,33410,334
MC, Def-WideUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Milcon2,9942,994
MC, Def-WideVarious WorldwidePlanning and Design24,19724,197
Subtotal, Military Construction, Defense-Wide2,061,8901,861,890
Military Construction, Army National Guard
Maine
MC, ARNGAugustaNational Guard Reserve Center30,00030,000
Maryland
MC, ARNGHavre DE GraceNational Guard Readiness Center12,40012,400
Montana
MC, ARNGHelenaNational Guard Readiness Center Add/Alt38,00038,000
New Mexico
MC, ARNGAlamagordoReadiness Cener Add/Alt05,000
North Dakota
MC, ARNGValley CityNational Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop10,80010,800
Vermont
MC, ARNGNorth Hyde ParkNational Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop4,4004,400
Worldwide Unspecified
MC, ARNGUnspecified WorldwidePlanning and Design17,60017,600
MC, ARNGUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction13,72013,720
Subtotal, Military Construction, Army National Guard126,920131,920
Military Construction, Air National Guard
Arkansas
MC, ANGFt Smith Municipal AirportConsolidated Scif013,200
Connecticut
MC, ANGBradley IAPConstruct C–130 Fuel Cell and Corrosion Contr16,30616,306
Iowa
MC, ANGDes Moines MapRemotely Piloted Aircraft and Targeting Group8,9938,993
Michigan
MC, ANGW. K. Kellog Regional AirportRpa Beddown6,0006,000
New Hampshire
MC, ANGPease International Trade PortKC–46a Adal Airfield Pavements & Hydrant Syst7,1007,100
MC, ANGPease International Trade PortKC–46a Adal Fuel Cell Building 25316,80016,800
MC, ANGPease International Trade PortKC–46a Adal Maint Hangar Building 25418,00218,002
Pennsylvania
MC, ANGWillow Grove ArfRpa Operations Center5,6625,662
Worldwide Unspecified
MC, ANGVarious WorldwidePlanning and Design7,7007,700
MC, ANGVarious WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction8,1008,100
Subtotal, Military Construction, Air National Guard94,663107,863
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Military Construction, Army Reserve
California
MC, Army ResRiversideArmy Reserve Center, Phase Ii025,000
MC, Army ResFresnoArmy Reserve Center/AMSA22,00022,000
Colorado
MC, Army ResFort Carson, ColoradoTraining Building Addition5,0005,000
New Jersey
MC, Army ResJoint Base Mcguire-Dix-LakehurstArmy Reserve Center26,00026,000
New York
MC, Army ResMattydaleArmy Reserve Center/AMSA23,00023,000
Virginia
MC, Army ResFort LeeTass Training Center16,00016,000
Worldwide Unspecified
MC, Army ResUnspecified WorldwidePlanning and Design8,3378,337
MC, Army ResUnspecified WorldwideUnspecified Minor Construction3,6093,609
Subtotal, Military Construction, Army Reseserve103,946128,946
<bold></bold>
Military Construction, Navy Reseserve
Pennsylvania
MC, Navy ResPittsburghReserve Training Center—Pittsburgh, PA17,65017,650
Washington
MC, Navy ResEverettJoint Reserve Intelligence Center047,869
MC, Navy ResWhidbey IslandC–40 Aircraft Maintenance Hangar27,75527,755
Worldwide Unspecified
MC, Navy ResUnspecified WorldwideMcnr Planning & Design2,1232,123
MC, Navy ResUnspecified WorldwideMcnr Unspecified Minor Construction4,0004,000
Subtotal, Military Construction, Navy Reserve51,52899,397
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Military Construction, AF Reseserve
Arizona
MC, AF ResDavis-Monthan AFBGuardian Angel Operations014,500
Georgia
MC, AF ResRobins AFBAfrc Consolidated Mission Complex, Ph I27,70027,700
North Carolina
MC, AF ResSeymour Johnson AFBKC–135 Tanker Parking Apron Expansion9,8009,800
Texas
MC, AF ResFort WorthEOD Facility3,7003,700
Worldwide Unspecified
MC, AF ResVarious WorldwidePlanning and Design6,8926,892
MC, AF ResVarious WorldwideUnspecified Minor Military Construction1,4001,400
Subtotal, Military Construction, AF Reserve49,49263,992
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Chemical Demilitarization Construction
Kentucky
Chem DemilBlue Grass Army DepotAmmunition Demilitarization Ph Xv38,71538,715
Subtotal, Chemical Demilitarization Construction38,71538,715
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
NATO Security Investment Program
Worldwide Unspecified
NATO SIPNATO Security Investment ProgramNATO Security Investment Program199,700174,700
Subtotal, NATO Security Investment Program199,700174,700
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Total, Military Construction5,096,8274,991,623
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Family Housing
Family Housing Construction, Army
Illinois
FHC, ArmyRock IslandFamily Housing New Construction19,50019,500
Korea
FHC, ArmyCamp WalkerFamily Housing New Construction57,80057,800
Worldwide Unspecified
FHC, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideFamily Housing P & D1,3091,309
Subtotal, Family Housing Construction, Army78,60978,609
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Family Housing O&M, Army
Worldwide Unspecified
FHO, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideFurnishings14,13614,136
FHO, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideLeased Housing112,504112,504
FHO, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideMaintenance of Real Property Facilities65,24565,245
FHO, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideManagement Account3,1173,117
FHO, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideManagement Account43,48043,480
FHO, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideMilitary Housing Privitization Initiative20,00020,000
FHO, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideMiscellaneous700700
FHO, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideServices9,1089,108
FHO, ArmyUnspecified WorldwideUtilities82,68682,686
Subtotal, Family Housing O&M, Army350,976350,976
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps
Worldwide Unspecified
FHC, N/MCUnspecified WorldwideDesign472472
FHC, N/MCUnspecified WorldwideImprovements15,94015,940
Subtotal, Family Housing Construction, Navy and Marine Corps16,41216,412
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Family Housing O&M, Navy and Marine Corps
Worldwide Unspecified
FHO, N/MCUnspecified WorldwideFurnishings Account17,88117,881
FHO, N/MCUnspecified WorldwideLeasing65,99965,999
FHO, N/MCUnspecified WorldwideMaintenance of Real Property97,61297,612
FHO, N/MCUnspecified WorldwideManagement Account55,12455,124
FHO, N/MCUnspecified WorldwideMiscellaneous Account366366
FHO, N/MCUnspecified WorldwidePrivatization Support Costs27,87627,876
FHO, N/MCUnspecified WorldwideServices Account18,07918,079
FHO, N/MCUnspecified WorldwideUtilities Account71,09271,092
Subtotal, Family Housing O&M, Navy and Marine Corps354,029354,029
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Family Housing O&M, AF
Worldwide Unspecified
FHO, AFUnspecified WorldwideFurnishings Account38,54338,543
FHO, AFUnspecified WorldwideHousing Privatization40,76140,761
FHO, AFUnspecified WorldwideLeasing43,65143,651
FHO, AFUnspecified WorldwideMaintenance99,93499,934
FHO, AFUnspecified WorldwideManagement Account47,83447,834
FHO, AFUnspecified WorldwideMiscellaneous Account1,9931,993
FHO, AFUnspecified WorldwideServices Account12,70912,709
FHO, AFUnspecified WorldwideUtilities Account42,32242,322
Subtotal, Family Housing O&M, AF327,747327,747
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Family Housing O&M, Defense-Wide
Worldwide Unspecified
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideFurnishings Account3,3623,362
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideFurnishings Account2020
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideFurnishings Account746746
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideLeasing42,08342,083
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideLeasing11,17911,179
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideMaintenance of Real Property344344
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideMaintenance of Real Property2,1282,128
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideManagement Account378378
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideServices Account3131
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideUtilities Account170170
FHO, DWUnspecified WorldwideUtilities Account659659
Subtotal, Family Housing O&M, Defense-Wide61,10061,100
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Family Housing Improvement Fund
Worldwide Unspecified
FHIFUnspecified WorldwideFamily Housing Improvement Fund1,6621,662
Subtotal, Family Housing Improvement Fund1,6621,662
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Total, Family Housing1,190,5351,190,535
Base Realignment and Closure
Defense Base Closure Account—Army
Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC—ArmyBase Realignment & Closure, ArmyBase Realignment and Closure84,41784,417
Subtotal, Defense Base Closure Account—Army84,41784,417
Defense Base Closure Account—Navy
Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC—NavyBase Realignment & Closure, NavyBase Realignment & Closure57,40657,406
BRAC—NavyUnspecified WorldwideDon–100: Planing, Design and Management7,6827,682
BRAC—NavyUnspecified WorldwideDon–101: Various Locations21,41621,416
BRAC—NavyUnspecified WorldwideDon–138: NAS Brunswick, ME904904
BRAC—NavyUnspecified WorldwideDon–157: Mcsa Kansas City, MO4040
BRAC—NavyUnspecified WorldwideDon–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA6,0666,066
BRAC—NavyUnspecified WorldwideDon–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria Reg Ap1,1781,178
Subtotal, Defense Base Closure Account—Navy94,69294,692
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Defense Base Closure Account—AF
Worldwide Unspecified
BRAC—AFUnspecified WorldwideDod BRAC Activities—Air Force90,97690,976
Subtotal, Defense Base Closure Account—AF90,97690,976
<bold></bold><bold></bold>
Total, Base Realignment and Closure270,085270,085
Grand Total, Military Construction & Family Housing6,557,4476,452,243
XLVIIDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
4701.DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars)
ProgramFY 2015 RequestSenate Authorized
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation
Energy Programs
Nuclear energy104,000104,000
Advisory Board
Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health02,000
Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National nuclear security administration:
Weapons activities8,314,9028,314,902
Defense nuclear nonproliferation1,555,1561,840,156
Naval reactors1,377,1001,377,100
Federal salaries and expenses410,842403,342
Total, National nuclear security administration11,658,00011,935,500
Environmental and other defense activities:
Defense environmental cleanup5,327,5384,864,538
Other defense activities753,000751,000
Total, Environmental & other defense activities6,080,5385,615,538
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities17,738,53817,551,038
Total, Discretionary Funding17,842,53817,657,038
Nuclear Energy
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security104,000104,000
Total, Nuclear Energy104,000104,000
Advisory Board
Advisory Board on Toxic Substances and Worker Health02,000
Total, Advisory Board02,000
Weapons Activities
Directed stockpile work
B61 Life extension program643,000643,000
W76 Life extension program259,168259,168
W88 Alt 370165,400165,400
Cruise missile warhead life extension program9,41816,918
Stockpile systems
B61 Stockpile systems109,615109,615
W76 Stockpile systems45,72845,728
W78 Stockpile systems62,70362,703
W80 Stockpile systems70,61070,610
B83 Stockpile systems63,13663,136
W87 Stockpile systems91,25591,255
W88 Stockpile systems88,06088,060
Total, Stockpile systems531,107531,107
Weapons dismantlement and disposition
Operations and maintenance30,00830,008
Stockpile services
Production support350,942350,942
Research and development support29,64929,649
R&D certification and safety201,479201,479
Management, technology, and production241,805241,805
Plutonium sustainment144,575144,575
Tritium readiness140,053140,053
Total, Stockpile services1,108,5031,108,503
Total, Directed stockpile work2,746,6042,754,104
Campaigns:
Science campaign
Advanced certification58,74758,747
Primary assessment technologies112,000112,000
Dynamic materials properties117,999117,999
Advanced radiography79,34079,340
Secondary assessment technologies88,34488,344
Total, Science campaign456,430456,430
Engineering campaign
Enhanced surety52,00352,003
Weapon systems engineering assessment technology20,83220,832
Nuclear survivability25,37125,371
Enhanced surveillance37,79937,799
Total, Engineering campaign136,005136,005
Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign
Ignition77,99477,994
Support of other stockpile programs23,59823,598
Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimenta support61,29761,297
Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion5,0245,024
Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas9,1009,100
Facility operations and target production335,882328,382
Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield campaign512,895505,395
Advanced simulation and computing campaign610,108610,108
Readiness Campaign
Nonnuclear readiness125,909125,909
Total, Readiness campaign125,909125,909
Total, Campaigns1,841,3471,833,847
Readiness in technical base and facilities (RTBF)
Operations of facilities
Kansas City Plant125,000125,000
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory71,00071,000
Los Alamos National Laboratory198,000198,000
Nevada National Security Site89,00089,000
Pantex75,00075,000
Sandia National Laboratory106,000106,000
Savannah River Site81,00081,000
Y–12 National security complex151,000151,000
Total, Operations of facilities896,000896,000
Program readiness136,700136,700
Material recycle and recovery138,900138,900
Containers26,00026,000
Storage40,80040,800
Maintenance and repair of facilities205,000205,000
Recapitalization209,321209,321
Subtotal, Readiness in technical base and facilities1,652,7211,652,721
Construction:
15–D–613 Emergency Operations Center, Y–122,0002,000
15–D–612 Emergency Operations Center, LLNL2,0002,000
15–D–611 Emergency Operations Center, SNL4,0004,000
15–D–301 HE Science & Engineering Facility, PX11,80011,800
15–D–302, TA–55 Reinvestment project, Phase 3, LANL16,06216,062
12–D–301 TRU waste facilities, LANL6,9386,938
11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, LANL10,00010,000
07–D–220-04 Transuranic liquid waste facility, Lanl15,00015,000
06–D–141 PED/Construction, UPF Y–12, Oak Ridge, TN335,000335,000
Total, Construction402,800402,800
Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities2,055,5212,055,521
Secure transportation asset
Operations and equipment132,851132,851
Program direction100,962100,962
Total, Secure transportation asset233,813233,813
Nuclear counterterrorism incident response173,440173,440
Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation Programs76,90176,901
Site stewardship
Environmental projects and operations53,00053,000
Nuclear materials integration16,21816,218
Minority serving institution partnerships program13,23113,231
Total, Site stewardship82,44982,449
Defense nuclear security
Operations and maintenance618,123618,123
Total, Defense nuclear security618,123618,123
Information technology and cybersecurity179,646179,646
Legacy contractor pensions307,058307,058
Subtotal, Weapons activities8,314,9028,314,902
Total, Weapons Activities8,314,9028,314,902
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation
Global threat reduction initiative
Global threat reduction initiative333,488373,488
Total, Global threat reduction initiative333,488373,488
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D
Operations and maintenance360,808390,808
Nonproliferation and international security141,359141,359
International material protection and cooperation305,467375,467
Fissile materials disposition
Operations and maintenance
U.S. plutonium disposition85,00085,000
U.S. uranium disposition25,00025,000
Total, Operations and maintenance110,000110,000
Construction:
99–D–143 Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River, SC196,000341,000
99–D–141–02 Waste Solidification Building, Savannah River, SC5,1255,125
Total, Construction201,125346,125
Total, Fissile materials disposition311,125456,125
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs1,452,2471,737,247
Legacy contractor pensions102,909102,909
Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation1,555,1561,840,156
Naval Reactors
Naval reactors operations and infrastructure412,380412,380
Naval reactors development425,700425,700
Ohio replacement reactor systems development156,100156,100
S8G Prototype refueling126,400126,400
Program direction46,60046,600
Construction:
15–D–904 NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3400400
15–D–903 KL Fire System Upgrade600600
15–D–902 KS Engineroom team trainer facility1,5001,500
15–D–901 KS Central office building and prototype staff facility24,00024,000
14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF141,100141,100
13–D–905 Remote-handled low-level waste facility, INL14,42014,420
13–D–904 KS Radiological work and storage building, KSO20,10020,100
10-D–903, Security upgrades, KAPL7,4007,400
08–D–190 Expended Core Facility M–290 receiving/discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID400400
Total, Construction209,920209,920
Subtotal, Naval Reactors1,377,1001,377,100
Total, Naval Reactors1,377,1001,377,100
Federal Salaries And Expenses
Program direction410,842403,342
Defense Environmental Cleanup
Closure sites:
Closure sites administration4,8894,889
Hanford site:
River corridor and other cleanup operations332,788332,788
Central plateau remediation:
Central plateau remediation474,292474,292
Construction
15–D–401 Containerized sludge (Rl-0012)26,29026,290
Total, Central plateau remediation500,582500,582
Richland community and regulatory support14,70114,701
Total, Hanford site848,071848,071
Idaho National Laboratory:
Idaho cleanup and waste disposition364,293364,293
Idaho community and regulatory support2,9102,910
Total, Idaho National Laboratory367,203367,203
NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory1,3661,366
Nuclear facility D & D Nevada64,85164,851
Sandia National Laboratories2,8012,801
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Los Alamos National Laboratory196,017196,017
Construction:
15–D–406 Hexavalent chromium D & D (Vl-Lanl-0030)28,60028,600
Total, Los Alamos National Laboratory224,617224,617
Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites293,635293,635
Oak Ridge Reservation:
OR Nuclear facility D & D73,15573,155
Construction
14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility9,4009,400
Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D82,55582,555
U233 Disposition Program41,62641,626
OR cleanup and disposition
OR cleanup and disposition71,13771,137
Construction:
15–D–405—Sludge Buildout4,2004,200
Total, OR cleanup and disposition75,33775,337
OR reservation community and regulatory support4,3654,365
Solid waste stabilization and disposition
Oak Ridge technology development3,0003,000
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation206,883206,883
Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment and immobilization plant
01–D–416 A-D/ORP-0060 / Major construction575,000575,000
01–D–16E Pretreatment facility115,000115,000
Total, Waste treatment and immobilization plant690,000690,000
Tank farm activities
Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition522,000522,000
Construction:
15–D–409 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Hanford23,00023,000
Total, Tank farm activities545,000545,000
Total, Office of River protection1,235,0001,235,000
Savannah River sites:
Savannah River risk management operations:
Savannah River risk management operations416,276416,276
SR community and regulatory support11,01311,013
Radioactive liquid tank waste:
Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition553,175553,175
Construction:
15–D–402—Saltstone Disposal Unit #634,64234,642
05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River135,000135,000
Total, Construction169,642169,642
Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste722,817722,817
Total, Savannah River site1,150,1061,150,106
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Waste isolation pilot plant216,020216,020
Program direction280,784280,784
Program support14,97914,979
Safeguards and Security:
Oak Ridge Reservation16,38216,382
Paducah7,2977,297
Portsmouth8,4928,492
Richland/Hanford Site63,66863,668
Savannah River Site132,196132,196
Waste Isolation Pilot Project4,4554,455
West Valley1,4711,471
Total, Safeguards and Security233,961233,961
Technology development13,00713,007
Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup4,864,5384,864,538
Legislative Proposal
Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution463,0000
Subtotal Legislative Proposal463,0000
Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup5,327,5384,864,538
Other Defense Activities
Specialized security activities202,152202,152
Environment, health, safety and security
Environment, health, safety and security118,763117,763
Program direction62,23562,235
Total, Environment, Health, safety and security180,998179,998
Independent enterprise assessments
Independent enterprise assessments24,06824,068
Program direction49,46649,466
Total, Independent enterprise assessments73,53473,534
Office of Legacy Management
Legacy management158,639157,639
Program direction13,34113,341
Total, Office of Legacy Management171,980170,980
Defense related administrative support
Chief financial officer46,87746,877
Chief information officer71,95971,959
Total, Defense related administrative support118,836118,836
Office of hearings and appeals5,5005,500
Subtotal, Other defense activities753,000751,000
Total, Other Defense Activities753,000751,000
June 2, 2014Read twice
and placed on the calendar