[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 732 Introduced in House (IH)]
114th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 732
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the opportunity for
veterans to use video conferencing for hearings before the Board of
Veterans' Appeals.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 4, 2015
Mr. Ruiz (for himself, Mrs. Walorski, Ms. Norton, Mr. Cartwright, Ms.
Brownley of California, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Jolly, Ms. Kuster, Mr.
Honda, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Thompson of California, and Mr. Rangel)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Veterans' Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the opportunity for
veterans to use video conferencing for hearings before the Board of
Veterans' Appeals.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Access to Speedy Review
Act''.
SEC. 2. BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS VIDEO HEARINGS.
Section 7107 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (d), by amending paragraph (1) to read as
follows:
``(1)(A) Upon request for a hearing, the Board shall determine, for
purposes of scheduling the hearing for the earliest possible date,
whether a hearing before the Board will be held at its principal
location or at a facility of the Department or other appropriate
Federal facility located within the area served by a regional office of
the Department. The Board shall also determine whether to provide a
hearing through the use of the facilities and equipment described in
subsection (e)(1) or by the appellant personally appearing before a
Board member or panel.
``(B) The Board shall notify the appellant of the determinations of
the location and type of hearing made under subparagraph (A). Upon
notification, the appellant may request a different location or type of
hearing as described in such subparagraph. If so requested, the Board
shall grant such request and ensure that the hearing is scheduled at
the earliest possible date without any undue delay or other prejudice
to the appellant.''; and
(2) in subsection (e), by amending paragraph (2) to read as
follows:
``(2) Any hearing provided through the use of the facilities and
equipment described in paragraph (1) shall be conducted in the same
manner as, and shall be considered the equivalent of, a personal
hearing''.
<all>