To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2016 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

This Act may be cited as the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016”.

In this Act, the term “congressional defense committees” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purposes of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled “Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation” for this Act, jointly submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Budget Committees, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage in the House acting first on the conference report or amendment between the Houses.

SEC. 111. Amendment to cost limitation baseline for CVN–78 class aircraft carrier program.

SEC. 112. Limitation on availability of funds for USS JOHN F. KENNEDY (CVN–79).

(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for procurement for the USS JOHN F. KENNEDY (CVN–79), $100,000,000 may not be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Navy submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and of the House of Representatives the certification required under subsection (b) and the reports required under subsection (c) and (d).

(b) Certification regarding full ship shock trials.—The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and of the House of Representatives a certification that the Navy will conduct by not later than September 30, 2017, full ship shock trials on the USS GERALD R. FORD (CVN–78).

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and of the House of Representatives a report that evaluates cost issues related to the USS JOHN F. KENNEDY (CVN–79) and the USS ENTERPRISE (CVN–80).

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(B) Options to freeze the design of CVN–79 for CVN–80, with exceptions only for changes due to full ship shock trials or other significant test and evaluation results.

(D) Options to transition all non-nuclear government furnished equipment, including launch and arresting equipment, to contractor furnished equipment.

(E) Options to build the ships at the most economic pace, such as four years between ships.

(F) A business case analysis for the Enterprise Air Search Radar modification to CVN–79 and CVN–80.

(G) A business case analysis for the two-phase CVN–79 delivery proposal and impact on fleet deployments.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than April 1, 2016, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and of the House of Representatives a report on potential requirements, capabilities, and alternatives for future development of aircraft carriers that would replace or supplement the CVN–78 class aircraft carrier.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) A description of fleet, sea-based tactical aviation capability requirements for a range of operational scenarios beginning in the 2025 timeframe.

(B) A description of alternative aircraft carrier designs that meet the requirements described under subparagraph (A).

(D) A description of tonnage options ranging from less than 20,000 tons to greater than 100,000 tons.

(G) A notional acquisition strategy for development and construction of alternatives.

(H) A description of shipbuilding industrial base considerations and a plan to ensure opportunity for competition among alternatives.

(I) A description of funding and timing considerations related to developing the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels required under section 231 of title 10, United States Code.

(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for advance procurement for the USS ENTERPRISE (CVN–80), $191,400,000 may not be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Navy submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives the certification required under subsection (b) and the report required under subsection (c).

(b) Certification regarding CVN–80 design.—The Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a certification that the design of CVN–80 will repeat that of CVN–79, with modifications only for significant test and evaluation results or significant cost reduction initiatives that still meet threshold requirements.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report that details the plans costs related to the USS ENTERPRISE (CVN–80).

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements, reported by total cost and cost by fiscal year, with a detailed description and a justification for why each cost is recurring and attributable to CVN–80:

“(3) (A) As part of the report required under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Navy shall include a description of new design and engineering changes to CVN–78 class aircraft carriers if applicable.

“(B) The additional reporting requirement in subparagraph (A) shall include, with respect to CVN–78 class aircraft carriers in each reporting period—

“(i) any design or engineering change with an associated cost greater than $5,000,000;

“(ii) program or ship cost increases for each design or engineering change identified in subparagraph (A); and

“(C) The Secretary of the Navy and Chief of Naval Operations shall each personally sign (not autopen) the additional reporting requirement in subparagraph (A). This certification may not be delegated. The certification shall include a determination that each change—

“(ii) cannot be deferred to a future ship due to operational necessity, safety, or substantial cost reduction that still meets threshold requirements; and

“(iii) was personally reviewed and endorsed by the Secretary of the Navy and Chief of Naval Operations.”.

(1) A Capabilities Based Assessment to assess capability gaps and associated capability requirements and risks for the upgraded Littoral Combat Ship, which is proposed to commence with LCS 33. This assessment shall conform with the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System, including Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3170.01H.

(2) A certification that the Joint Requirements Oversight Council has validated an updated Capabilities Development Document for the upgraded Littoral Combat Ship.

(3) A report describing the upgraded Littoral Combat Ship modernization, which shall, at a minimum, include the following elements:

(A) A description of capabilities that the LCS program delivers, and a description of how these relate to the characteristics of the future joint force identified in the Capstone Concept for Joint Operations, concept of operations, and integrated architecture documents.

(C) A concept of operations for LCS modernization ships at the operational level and tactical level describing how they integrate and synchronize with joint and combined forces to achieve the Joint Force Commander’s intent.

(D) A description of threat systems of potential adversaries that are projected or assessed to reach initial operational capability within 15 years against which the lethality and survivability of the LCS should be determined.

(F) A description of system capabilities required for LCS modernization, including key performance parameters and key system attributes.

(H) A plan for information technology and national security systems supportability.

(J) A plan for electromagnetic environmental effects (E3) and spectrum supportability.

(K) A description of assets required to achieve initial operational capability (IOC) of an LCS modernization increment.

(L) A schedule and initial operational capability and full operational capability definitions.

(M) A description of doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership, education, personnel, facilities, and policy considerations.

(4) A plan for future periodic combat systems upgrades, which are necessary to ensure relevant capability throughout the Littoral Combat Ship or Frigate class service lives, using the process described in paragraph (3).

SEC. 116. Extension and modification of limitation on availability of funds for Littoral Combat Ship.

(1) by striking “this Act, the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, or otherwise made available for fiscal years 2014 or 2015” and inserting “this Act, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, or otherwise made available for fiscal years 2014, 2015, or 2016”; and

“(6) A Littoral Combat Ship seaframe acquisition strategy for the Littoral Combat Ships designated as LCS 25 through LCS 32, including upgrades to be installed on these ships that were identified for the upgraded Littoral Combat Ship, which is proposed to commence with LCS 33.

“(7) A Littoral Combat Ship mission module acquisition strategy to reach the total acquisition quantity of each mission module.

“(8) A cost and schedule plan to outfit Flight 0 and Flight 0+ Littoral Combat Ships with capabilities identified for the upgraded Littoral Combat Ship.

“(9) A current Test and Evaluation Master Plan for the Littoral Combat Ship Mission Modules, approved by the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, which includes the performance levels expected to be demonstrated during developmental testing for each component and mission module prior to commencing the associated operational test phase.”.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract beginning with the fiscal year 2016 program year for the procurement of one Arleigh Burke class destroyer in addition to the ten DDG–51s in the fiscal year 2013 through 2017 multiyear procurement contract or for one DDG–51 in fiscal year 2018. The Secretary may employ incremental funding for such procurement.

(b) Condition on Out-year Contract Payments.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under such contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2016 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such fiscal year.

(a) Contract authority.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into one or more contracts to procure up to six Fleet Replenishment Oilers. Such procurements may also include advance procurement for Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) and long lead time materials, beginning with the lead ship, commencing not earlier than fiscal year 2016.

(b) Liability.—Any contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at the time of termination.

(6) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics average follow-on ship affordability target.

(7) Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics operations and sustainment cost per hull per year affordability target.

SEC. 131. Limitations on retirement of B–1, B–2, and B–52 bomber aircraft.

(a) In general.—Except as provided in subsection (b), no B–1, B–2, or B–52 bomber aircraft may be retired during a fiscal year prior to initial operational capability (IOC) of the LRS–B unless the Secretary of Defense certifies, in the materials submitted in support of the budget of the President for that fiscal year (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code), that—

(1) the retirement of the aircraft is required to reallocate funding and manpower resources to enable LRS–B to reach IOC and full operational capability (FOC); and

(2) the Secretary has concluded that retirements of B–1, B–2, and B–52 bomber aircraft in the near-term will not detrimentally affect operational capability.

(b) Exception.—A certification described in sub-section (a) is not required with respect to the retirement of B–1 bomber aircraft carried out in accordance with section 132(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1320).

(a) Inventory requirement.—Section 8062 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(i) Inventory requirement.— (1) Effective October 1, 2015, the Secretary of the Air Force shall maintain a total aircraft inventory of fighter aircraft of not less than 1,950 aircraft, and a total primary mission aircraft inventory (combat-coded) of not less than 1,116 fighter aircraft.

“(iii) executes single-role or multi-role missions, including air-to-air combat, air-to-ground attack, air interdiction, suppression or destruction of enemy air defenses, close air support, strike control and reconnaissance, combat search and rescue support, or airborne forward air control.

“(B) The term ‘primary mission aircraft inventory’ means aircraft assigned to meet the primary aircraft authorization to a unit for the performance of its wartime mission.”.

(1) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force may not proceed with a decision to retire fighter aircraft in any number that would reduce the total number of such aircraft in the Air Force total active inventory (TAI) below 1,950, and shall maintain a minimum of 1,116 fighter aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory (PMAI).

(2) ADDITIONAL LIMITATIONS ON RETIREMENT OF FIGHTER AIRCRAFT.—The Secretary of the Air Force may not retire fighter aircraft from the total active inventory as of the date of the enactment of this Act until the later of the following:

(A) The date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report required under paragraph (3).

(B) The date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that—

(i) the retirement of such fighter aircraft will not increase the operational risk of meeting the National Defense Strategy; and

(ii) the retirement of such aircraft will not reduce the total fighter force structure below 1,950 fighter aircraft or the primary mission aircraft inventory below 1,116.

(3) REPORT ON RETIREMENT OF AIRCRAFT.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following:

(A) The rationale for the retirement of existing fighter aircraft and an operational analysis of replacement fighter aircraft that demonstrates performance of the designated mission at an equal or greater level of effectiveness as the retiring aircraft.

(B) An assessment of the implications for the Air Force, the Air National Guard, and the Air Force Reserve of the force mix ratio of fighter aircraft.

(1) IN GENERAL.—At least 90 days before the date on which a fighter aircraft is retired, the Secretary of the Air Force, in consultation with (where applicable) the Director of the Air National Guard or Chief of the Air Force Reserve, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the proposed force structure and basing of fighter aircraft.

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) A list of each aircraft in the inventory of fighter aircraft, including for each such aircraft—

(B) A list of each fighter aircraft proposed for retirement, including for each such aircraft—

(C) A list of each unit affected by a proposed retirement listed under subparagraph (B) and a description of how such unit is affected.

(D) For each military installation and unit listed under subparagraph (B)(iii), a description of changes, if any, to the designed operational capability (DOC) statement of the unit as a result of a proposed retirement.

(E) A description of any anticipated changes in manpower authorizations as a result of a proposed retirement listed under subparagraph (B).

(d) Fighter aircraft defined.—In this section, the term “fighter aircraft” has the meaning given the term in subsection (i)(2)(A) of section 8062 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section.

(a) Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any A–10 aircraft.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the limitation in subsection (a), during the period before December 31, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup flying status any A–10 aircraft.

(2) MINIMUM INVENTORY REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure the Air Force maintains a minimum of 171 A–10 aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory (PMAI).

(c) Prohibition on availability of funds for significant reductions in manning levels.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to make significant reductions to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons or divisions.

(d) Additional limitation on significant reductions in manning levels.—-In addition to the limitation in subsection (c), during the period before December 31, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force may not make significant reductions to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons or divisions.

(e) Study on replacement capability requirements or mission platform for the A–10 aircraft.—

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall commission an appropriate entity outside the Department of Defense to conduct an assessment of the required capabilities or mission platform to replace the A–10 aircraft. This assessment would represent preparatory work to inform an analysis of alternatives.

(B) ELEMENTS.—The assessment required under subparagraph (A) shall include each of the following:

(i) Future needs analysis for the current A–10 aircraft mission set to include troops-in-contact/close air support, air interdiction, strike control and reconnaissance, and combat search and rescue support in both contested and uncontested battle environments. At a minimum, the needs analysis should specifically address the following areas:

(I) The ability to safely and effectively conduct troops-in-contact/danger close missions or missions in close proximity to civilians in the presence of the air defenses found with enemy ground maneuver units.

(II) The ability to effectively target and destroy moving, camouflaged, or dug-in troops, artillery, armor, and armored personnel carriers.

(III) The ability to remain within visual range of friendly forces and targets to facilitate responsiveness to ground forces and minimize re-attack times.

(IV) The ability to safely conduct close air support beneath low cloud ceilings and in reduced visibilities at low airspeeds in the presence of the air defenses found with enemy ground maneuver units.

(V) The capability to enable the pilot and aircraft to survive attacks stemming from small arms, machine guns, MANPADs, and lower caliber anti-aircraft artillery organic or attached to enemy ground forces and maneuver units.

(VI) The ability to communicate effectively with ground forces and downed pilots, including in communications jamming or satellite-denied environments.

(VII) The ability to execute the missions described in subclauses (I), (II), (III), and (IV) in a GPS- or satellite-denied environment with or without sensors.

(VIII) The ability to deliver multiple lethal firing passes and sustain long loiter endurance to support friendly forces throughout extended ground engagements.

(IX) The ability to operate from unprepared dirt, grass, and narrow road runways and to generate high sortie rates under these austere conditions.

(ii) Identification and assessment of gaps in the ability of existing and programmed mission platforms in providing required capabilities to conduct missions specified in clause (i) in both contested and uncontested battle environments.

(iii) Assessment of operational effectiveness of existing and programmed mission platforms to conduct missions specified in clause (i) in both contested and uncontested battle environments.

(iv) Assessment of probability of likelihood of conducting missions requiring troops-in-contact/close air support operations specified in clause (i) in contested environments as compared to uncontested environments.

(v) Any other matters the independent entity or the Secretary of the Air Force determines to be appropriate.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 30, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the assessment required under paragraph (1).

(B) FORM.—The report required under subparagraph (A) may be submitted in classified form, but shall also contain an unclassified executive summary and may contain an unclassified annex.

(3) NONDUPLICATION OF EFFORT.—If any information required under paragraph (1) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress by law, the Secretary of the Air Force may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required under paragraph (2) in lieu of including such information in the report required under paragraph (2).

SEC. 135. Prohibition on availability of funds for retirement of EC–130H Compass Call aircraft.

(a) Prohibition on retirement.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or backup aircraft inventory status any EC–130H Compass Call aircraft.

(b) Additional limitations on retirement of EC–130h compass call aircraft.—In addition to the limitation in subsection (a), during the period preceding December 31, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup flying status any EC-130H Compass Call aircraft.

(c) Report on retirement of EC–130h compass call aircraft.—Not later than September 30, 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following:

(1) The rationale for the retirement of existing EC–130H Compass Call aircraft, including an operational analysis of the impact of such retirements on combatant commander warfighting requirements.

(2) A plan for how the Air Force will fulfill the capability requirement of the EC–130H mission, transition the mission capabilities of the EC–130H into a replacement platform, or integrate the required capabilities into other mission platforms.

(3) Such other matters relating to the required mission capabilities and transition of the EC–130H Compass Call fleet as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(1) the United States Air Force will maintain dedicated C–130 wings to support the daily training and contingency requirements of the XVIII Airborne Corps, 82nd Airborne Division, and United States Army Special Operations Command at manning levels required to support and operate the number of aircraft that existed as part of regular and reserve Air Force operations in support of such units as of September 30, 2014; and

(2) failure to maintain such Air Force operations will not adversely impact the daily training requirement of those airborne and special operations units.

SEC. 138. Restriction on retirement of the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS), EC-130H Compass Call, and Airborne Early Warning and Control (AWACS) Aircraft.

SEC. 139. Sense of Congress regarding the OCONUS basing of the F–35A aircraft.

(a) Finding.—Congress finds that the Department of Defense is continuing its process of permanently stationing the F–35 aircraft at installations in the Continental United States (in this section referred to as “CONUS”) and forward-basing Outside the Continental United States (in this section referred to as “OCONUS”).

(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of the Air Force, in the strategic basing process for the F–35A aircraft, should continue to consider the benefits derived from sites that—

(1) are capable of hosting fighter-based bilateral and multilateral training opportunities with international partners;

(2) have sufficient airspace and range capabilities and capacity to meet the training requirements;

(3) have existing facilities to support personnel, operations, and logistics associated with the flying mission;

(4) have limited encroachment that would adversely impact training or operations; and

SEC. 140. Sense of Congress on F–16 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar upgrade.

(1) National Guard F–16 aircraft are protecting the United States from terrorist air attack from inside or outside the contiguous United States 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

(2) These aircraft, stationed throughout the United States, are tasked with the zero-fail mission of guarding and securing United States airspace.

(3) The United States is facing an increased threat from both state and non-state actors.

(4) The National Guard F–16 aircraft performing the Aerospace Control Alert (ACA) mission are operating legacy radar systems.

(5) Air Force Chief of Staff General Mark Welsh testified to Congress in March 2015, stating, “We need to develop an AESA radar plan for our F–16s who are conducting the homeland defense mission in particular.”

(6) First Air Force, United States Northern Command, issued a Joint Urgent Operational Need (JUON) request in March 2015 for radar upgrades to its F–16 fleet.

(1) it is essential to our Nation’s defense that Air Force aircraft modification funding is made available to purchase these Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars as the United States Air Force bridges the gap between 4th and 5th generation fighters;

(2) the United States Government must invest in radar upgrades which ensure that 4th generation aircraft succeed at this zero-fail mission; and

(a) Report required.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Navy shall jointly submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the plan of the Army and the Marine Corps to modernize small arms for the Army and the Marine Corps during the 15-year period beginning on the date of such plan, including the mechanisms to be used to promote competition among suppliers of small arms and small arms parts in achieving the plan.

(b) Small arms.—The small arms covered by the plan under subsection (a) shall include the following:

(5) Such other small arms as the Secretaries consider appropriate for purposes of the report required by subsection (a).

(c) Non-standard small arms.—In addition to the arms specified in subsection (b), the plan under subsection (a) shall also address non-standard small arms not currently in the small arms inventory of the Army or the Marine Corps.

(a) In general.—Chapter 139 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2367 the following new section:

“(a) Designation.— (1) The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall designate each science and technology reinvention laboratory as a Center for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership in the recognized core competencies of the designee.

“(2) The Secretary of Defense shall establish a policy to encourage the Secretary of each military department to reengineer management and business processes and adopt best-business and personnel practices at their Centers for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership in connection with their core competency requirements, so as to serve as recognized leaders in their core competencies throughout the Department of Defense and in the national technology and industrial base (as defined in section 2500 of this title).

“(3) The Secretary of Defense, acting through the directors of the Centers for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership, may conduct one or more pilot programs, consistent with applicable requirements of law, to test any practices referred to in paragraph (2) that the Directors determine could—

“(A) improve the efficiency and effectiveness of operations at Centers for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership;

“(B) improve the support provided by the Centers for the Department of Defense users of the services of the Centers; and

“(C) enhance capabilities by reducing the cost and improving the performance and efficiency of executing laboratory missions.

“(4) In this subsection, the term ‘science and technology reinvention laboratory’ means a science and technology reinvention laboratory designated under section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note).

“(b) Public-private partnerships.— (1) To achieve one or more objectives set forth in paragraph (2), the Secretary may authorize and establish incentives for the Director of a Center for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership to enter into public-private cooperative arrangements (in this section referred to as a ‘public-private partnership’) to provide for any of the following:

“(A) For employees of the Center, private industry, or other entities outside the Department of Defense to perform (under contract, subcontract, or otherwise) work related to the core competencies of the Center, including any work that involves one or more core competencies of the Center.

“(B) For private industry or other entities outside the Department of Defense to use, for any period of time determined to be consistent with the needs of the Department of Defense, any facilities or equipment of the Center that are not fully used for Department of Defense activities.

“(2) The objectives for exercising the authority provided in paragraph (1) are as follows:

“(A) To maximize the use of the capacity of a Center for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership.

“(B) To reduce or eliminate the cost of ownership and maintenance of a Center by the Department of Defense.

“(C) To reduce the cost of research and testing activities of the Department of Defense.

“(i) such efforts as research and equipment recapitalization for a Center; and

“(ii) the promotion of the undertaking of commercial business ventures based on the core competencies of a Center, as determined by the director of the Center.

“(E) To foster cooperation between the armed forces, academia, and private industry.

“(F) To increase access by a Center to a skilled technical workforce that can contribute to the effective and efficient execution of Department of Defense missions.

“(c) Private sector use of excess capacity.—Any facilities or equipment of a Center for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership made available to private industry may be used to perform research and testing activities in order to make more efficient and economical use of Government-owned facilities and encourage the creation and preservation of jobs to ensure the availability of a workforce with the necessary research and technical skills to meet the needs of the armed forces.

“(d) Crediting of amounts for performance.—Amounts received by a Center for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership for work performed under a public-private partnership may—

“(1) be credited to the appropriation or fund, including a working-capital fund, that incurs the cost of performing the work; or

“(2) be used by the Director of the Center as the Director considers appropriate and consistent with section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note).

“(e) Availability of excess equipment to private-sector partners.—Equipment or facilities of a Center for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership may be made available for use by a private-sector entity under this section only if—

“(1) the use of the equipment or facilities will not have a significant adverse effect on the performance of the Center or the ability of the Center to achieve its mission, as determined by the Director of the Center; and

“(A) to reimburse the Department of Defense for the direct and indirect costs (including any rental costs) that are attributable to the entity’s use of the equipment or facilities, as determined by that Secretary; and

“(i) any claim for damages or injury to any person or property arising out of the use of the equipment or facilities, except under the circumstances described in section 2563(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code; and

“(ii) any liability or claim for damages or injury to any person or property arising out of a decision by the Secretary to suspend or terminate that use of equipment or facilities during a war or national emergency.

“(f) Construction of provision.—Nothing in this section may be construed to authorize a change, otherwise prohibited by law, from the performance of work at a Center for Science, Technology, and Engineering Partnership by Department of Defense personnel to performance by a contractor.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2367 the following new item:

SEC. 212. Department of Defense technology offset program to build and maintain the military technological superiority of the United States.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a technology offset program to build and maintain the military technological superiority of the United States by—

(A) accelerating the fielding of offset technologies that would help counter technological advantages of potential adversaries of the United States, including directed energy, low-cost, high-speed munitions, autonomous systems, undersea warfare, cyber technology, and intelligence data analytics, developed using Department of Defense research funding and accelerating the commercialization of such technologies; and

(B) developing and implementing new policies and acquisition and business practices.

(2) GUIDELINES.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue guidelines for the operation of the program, including—

(A) criteria for an application for funding by a military department, defense agency, or a combatant command;

(B) the purposes for which such a department, agency, or command may apply for funds and appropriate requirements for technology development or commercialization to be supported using program funds;

(C) the priorities, if any, to be provided to field or commercialize offset technologies developed by certain types of Department research funding; and

(D) criteria for evaluation of an application for funding or changes to policies or acquisition and business practices by a department, agency, or command for purposes of the program.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with such officials and third-party experts as the Secretary considers appropriate, shall develop a directed energy strategy to ensure that the United States directed energy technologies are being developed and deployed at an accelerated pace.

(2) COMPONENTS OF STRATEGY.—The strategy required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) A technology roadmap for directed energy that can be used to manage and assess investments and policies of the Department in this high priority technology area.

(B) Proposals for legislative and administrative action to improve the ability of the Department to develop and deploy technologies and capabilities consistent with the directed energy strategy.

(C) An approach to program management that is designed to accelerate operational prototyping of directed energy technologies and develop cost-effective, real-world military applications for such technologies.

(3) BIENNIAL REVISIONS.—Not less frequently than once every 2 years, the Secretary shall revise the strategy required by paragraph (1).

(4) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.— (A) Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary completes the development of the strategy required by paragraph (1) and not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary completes a revision to such strategy under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a copy of such strategy.

(B) The strategy submitted under subparagraph (A) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Under the program, the Secretary shall, not less frequently than annually, solicit from the heads of the military departments, the defense agencies, and the combatant commands applications for funding to be used to enter into contracts, cooperative agreements, or other transaction agreements entered into pursuant to section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note) with appropriate entities for the fielding or commercialization of technologies.

(2) TREATMENT PURSUANT TO CERTAIN CONGRESSIONAL RULES.—Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to require any official of the Department of Defense to provide funding under this section to any earmark as defined pursuant to House Rule XXI, clause 9, or any congressionally directed spending item as defined pursuant to Senate Rule XLIV, paragraph 5.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the availability of appropriations for such purpose, of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide for fiscal year 2016, not more than $400,000,000 may be used for any such fiscal year for the program established under subsection (a).

(2) AMOUNT FOR DIRECTED ENERGY.—Of this amount, not more than $200,000,000 may be used for activities in the field of directed energy.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may transfer funds available for the program to the research, development, test, and evaluation accounts of a military department, defense agency, or a combatant command pursuant to an application, or any part of an application, that the Secretary determines would support the purposes of the program.

(2) SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANT.—The transfer authority provided in this subsection is in addition to any other transfer authority available to the Department of Defense.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority to carry out a program under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2020.

(2) TRANSFER AFTER TERMINATION.—Any amounts made available for the program that remain available for obligation on the date the program terminates may be transferred under subsection (e) during the 180-day period beginning on the date of the termination of the program.

SEC. 213. Reauthorization of defense research and development rapid innovation program.

(a) Extension of program.—Section 1073 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 2359a note) is amended—

(2) in subsection (g), by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2020”.

(b) Modification of guidelines for operation of program.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended—

“(1) The issuance of an annual broad agency announcement or the use of any other competitive or merit-based processes by the Department of Defense for candidate proposals in support of defense acquisition programs as described in subsection (a).”;

(A) in the first sentence, by striking “be funded under the program for more than two years” and inserting “receive more than a total of two years of funding under the program”; and

“(5) Mechanisms to facilitate transition of follow-on or current projects carried out under the program into defense acquisition programs, through the use of the authorities of section 819 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) or such other authorities as may be appropriate to conduct further testing, low rate production, or full rate production of technologies developed under the program.

“(6) Projects are selected using merit based selection procedures and the selection of projects is not subject to undue influence by Congress or other Federal agencies.”.

(1) in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (b), by inserting “and private sector persons” after “foreign nations” both places it appears; and

(2) in subsection (f), by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2025”.

SEC. 215. Science and technology activities to support business systems information technology acquisition programs.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Undersecretary of Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Deputy Chief Management Officer, and the Chief Information Officer shall establish a set of science, technology, and innovation activities to improve the acquisition outcomes of major automated information systems through improved performance and reduced developmental and life cycle costs.

(b) Execution of activities.—The activities established under subsection (a) shall be carried out by such military departments and defense agencies as the Under Secretary and the Deputy Chief Management Officer consider appropriate.

(1) Development of capabilities in Department of Defense laboratories, test centers, and Federally-funded research and development centers to provide technical support for acquisition program management and business process re-engineering activities.

(2) Funding of intramural and extramural research and development activities as described in subsection (d).

(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out the set of activities required by subsection (a), the Secretary may award grants or contracts to eligible entities to carry out intramural or extramural research and development in areas of interest described in paragraph (3).

(2) ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—For purposes of this subsection, an eligible entity includes the following:

(D) Nontraditional defense contractors (as defined in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code).

(E) Federally-funded research and development centers, primarily for the purpose of improving technical expertise to support acquisition efforts.

(G) Government laboratories and test centers, primarily for the purpose of improving technical expertise to support acquisition efforts.

(3) AREAS OF INTEREST.—The areas of interest described in this paragraph are the following:

(A) Management innovation, including personnel and financial management policy innovation.

(E) Software development, including systems and techniques to limit unique interfaces and simplify processes to customize commercial software to meet the needs of the Department of Defense.

(F) Hardware development, including systems and techniques to limit unique interfaces and simplify processes to customize commercial hardware to meet the needs of the Department of Defense.

(G) Development of methodologies and tools to support development and operational test of large and complex business systems.

(H) Analysis tools to allow decision makers to balance between requirements, costs, technical risks, and schedule in major automated information system acquisition programs

(J) Innovative acquisition policies and practices to streamline acquisition of information technology systems.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out the set of activities required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall give priority to—

(i) address the innovation and technology needs of the Department of Defense; and

(ii) support activities of initiatives, programs and offices identified by the Under Secretary and Deputy Chief Management Officer; and

(2) PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS IDENTIFIED.—The projects and programs identified in this paragraph are the following:

(B) Projects and programs under the oversight of the Deputy Chief Management Officer.

(E) Military and civilian personnel policy development for information technology workforce.

SEC. 216. Expansion of eligibility for financial assistance under Department of Defense Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation program to include citizens of countries participating in The Technical Cooperation Program.

(1) in subparagraph (C), by striking “, in coordination with the Center for Assured Software of the National Security Agency,”; and

(2) in subparagraph (E), by striking “, in coordination with the Defense Microelectronics Activity,”.

SEC. 218. Limitation on availability of funds for development of the Shallow Water Combat Submersible.

(a) Limitation.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for Special Operations Command for development of the Shallow Water Combat Submersible, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date that is 15 days after the later of the date on which—

(1) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics designates a civilian official responsible for oversight and assistance to Special Operations Command for all undersea mobility programs; and

(2) the Under Secretary, in coordination with the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, submits to the congressional defense committees the report described in subsection (b).

(b) Report described.—The report described in this subsection is a report on the Shallow Water Combat Submersible that includes the following:

(1) An analysis of the reasons for cost and schedule overruns associated with the Shallow Water Combat Submersible program.

(2) A revised timeline for initial and full operational capability of the Shallow Water Combat Submersible.

(4) A plan to prevent, identify, and mitigate any additional cost and schedule overruns.

(6) A description of such lessons as the Under Secretary may have learned from the Shallow Water Combat Submersible program that could be applied to future undersea mobility acquisition programs.

SEC. 219. Limitation on availability of funds for distributed common ground system of the Army.

(a) Limitation.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense by section 201 and available for research, development, test, and evaluation, Army, for the distributed common ground system of the Army as specified in the funding tables in title XLII, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Army—

(1) conducts a review of the program planning for the distributed common ground system of the Army; and

(2) submits to the appropriate congressional committees the report required by subsection (b)(1).

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the review of the distributed common ground system of the Army conducted under subsection (a)(1).

(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) A review of the segmentation of Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system program of the Army into discrete software components with the associated requirements of each component.

(B) Identification of each component of Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system of the Army for which commercial software exists that is capable of fulfilling most or all of the system requirements for each such component.

(D) Determination of the degree to which commercial software solutions are compliant with the standards required by the framework and guidance for the Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise, the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise, and the Joint Information Environment.

(E) Identification of each component of Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system of the Army that the Secretary determines may be acquired through competitive means.

(F) An acquisition plan for Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system of the Army that prioritizes the acquisition of commercial software components, including a data integration layer, in time to meet the projected deployment schedule for Increment 2.

(G) A review of the timetable for the distributed common ground system program of the Army in order to determine whether there is a practical, executable acquisition strategy, including the use of operational capability demonstrations, that could lead to an initial operating capability of Increment 2 of the distributed common ground system of the Army prior to fiscal year 2017.

(c) Appropriate congressional committees defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—

(2) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 220. Limitation on availability of funds for distributed common ground system of the United States Special Operations Command.

(a) Limitation.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense by section 201 and available for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the United States Special Operations Command for the distributed common ground system, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the Commander of the United States Special Operations Command submits to the congressional defense committees the report required by subsection (b).

(b) Report required.—The Commander shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the distributed common ground system. Such report shall include the following:

(1) A review of the segmentation of the distributed common ground system special operations forces program into discrete software components with the associated requirements of each component.

(2) Identification of each component of the distributed common ground system special operations forces program for which commercial software exists that is capable of fulfilling most or all of the system requirements for each such component.

(3) A cost analysis of each such commercial software that compares performance with projected cost.

(4) A determination of the degree to which commercial software solutions are compliant with the standards required by the framework and guidance for the Intelligence Community Information Technology Enterprise, the Defense Intelligence Information Enterprise, and the Joint Information Environment.

(5) Identification of each component of the distributed common ground system special operations forces program that the Commander determines may be acquired through competitive means.

(6) An assessment of the extent to which elements of the distributed common ground system special operations forces program could be modified to increase commercial acquisition opportunities.

(7) An acquisition plan that leads to full operational capability prior to fiscal year 2019.

SEC. 231. Assessment of air-land mobile tactical communications and data network requirements and capabilities.

(a) Assessment required.—The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, in consultation with the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, shall contract with an independent entity to conduct a comprehensive assessment of current and future requirements and capabilities of the Department of Defense with respect to an air-land ad hoc, mobile tactical communications, and data network, including the technological feasibility, suitability, and survivability of such a network.

(b) Elements.—The assessment required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:

(1) Concepts, capabilities, and capacities of current or future communications and data network systems to meet the requirements of current or future tactical operations effectively, efficiently, and affordably.

(2) Software requirements and capabilities, particularly with respect to communications and data network waveforms.

(3) Hardware requirements and capabilities, particularly with respect to receiver/transmission technology, tactical communications, and data radios at all levels and on all platforms, all associated technologies, and their integration, compatibility, and interoperability.

(4) Any other matters that in the judgment of the independent entity are relevant or necessary to a comprehensive assessment of tactical networks or networking.

(c) Independent entity.—The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall select an independent entity with direct, long-standing, and demonstrated experience and expertise in program test and evaluation of concepts, requirements, and technologies for joint tactical communications and data networking to perform the assessment under subsection (a).

(d) Report required.—Not later than April 30, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense commitments a report including the findings and recommendations of the assessment conducted under subsection (a), together with the Secretary's comments.

(e) Availability of funds.—The Secretary of Defense shall use funds authorized by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide to carry out activities under this section.

(f) Limitation on obligation of funds.—The Secretary of the Army may not obligate or expend more than 50 percent of the funds authorized by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for Other Procurement, Army and available for the Warfighter Information Network—Tactical (Increment 2) until the Secretary of Defense submits the report required under subsection (d).

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a hardware assurance study to assess the presence, scope, and effect on Department of Defense operations of counterfeit electronic parts that have passed through the Department supply chain and into field systems.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall direct the federation established under section 937(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note) to coordinate execution of the study required by subsection (a) using capabilities of the Department in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act to conduct technical analysis on a sample of failed electronic parts in field systems.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The technical analysis required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) Selection of a representative sample of electronic component types, including digital, mixed-signal, and analog integrated circuits.

(B) An assessment of the presence of counterfeit parts, including causes and attributes of failures of any identified counterfeit part.

(C) For components found to have counterfeit parts present, an assessment of the impact of the counterfeit part in the failure mechanism.

(D) For cases with counterfeit parts contributing to the failure, a determination of the failure attributes, factors, and effects on subsystem and system level reliability, readiness, and performance.

(c) Recommendations.—As part of the study required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall develop recommendations for such legislative and administrative action, including budget requirements, as the Secretary considers necessary to conduct sampling and technical hardware analysis of counterfeit parts in identified areas of high concern.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 540 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study carried out under subsection (a).

(2) CONTENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) The findings of the Secretary with respect to the study conducted under subsection (a).

(a) Joint demonstration required.—The Secretary of the Air Force, the Secretary of the Army, and the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency shall jointly conduct a demonstration of the Persistent Close Air Support (PCAS) capability in fiscal year 2016.

(1) SELECTION AND EQUIPMENT OF AIRCRAFT.—As part of the demonstration required by subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force shall select and equip at least two aircraft for use in the demonstration that the Secretary otherwise intends to use for close air support, as identified by the United States Air Force Close Air Support Forum.

(2) CLOSE AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS.—The demonstration required by subsection (a) shall include close air support operations that involve the following:

(A) Multiple tactical radio networks representing diverse ground force user communities.

(B) Two-way digital exchanges of situational awareness data, video, and calls for fire between aircraft and ground users without modification to aircraft operational flight profiles.

(D) Lightweight digital tools based on commercial-off-the-shelf technology for pilots and joint tactical air controllers.

(c) Assessment.—The Secretary of the Air Force, the Secretary of the Army, and the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency shall jointly—

(1) assess the effect of the capabilities demonstrated as part of the demonstration required by subsection (a) on—

(2) estimate the costs that would be incurred in transitioning the technology used in the Persistent Close Air Support capability to the Army and the Air Force.

(a) Plan required.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly, in consultation with the Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Navy, develop a plan—

(A) the secure dissemination of national and tactical intelligence information to fourth-generation fighter aircraft and supporting airborne platforms and to low-observable penetrating platforms such as the F–22 and F–35; and

(B) the secure reception and dissemination of sensor data from low-observable penetrating aircraft, such as the F–22 and F–35;

(2) to provide secure data sharing between the fifth-generation fighter aircraft of the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps, with minimal changes to the outer surfaces of the aircraft and to aircraft operational flight programs; and

(3) to enable secure data sharing between fifth-generation and fourth-generation aircraft in jamming environments.

(b) Additional plan requirements.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include non-proprietary and open systems approaches that are compatible with the Rapid Capabilities Office Open Mission Systems initiative of the Air Force and the Future Airborne Capability Environment initiative of the Navy.

(c) Prohibition.—No funds may be obligated or expended by the Department of Defense on the interim communications initiatives identified as Talon Hate and Multi-Domain Adaptable Processing System until the congressional defense committees are briefed by the Under Secretary or the Vice Chairman about the plan required by subsection (a).

SEC. 235. Report on Technology Readiness Levels of the technologies and capabilities critical to the Long Range Strike Bomber aircraft.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) of the technologies and capabilities critical to the Long Range Strike Bomber aircraft.

(b) Review by Comptroller General of the United States.—Not later than 60 days after the report of the Secretary is submitted under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall review the report and submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the matters contained in the report.

(2) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), (8), (9), (10), (11), and (12) as paragraphs (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), and (10), respectively;

(3) by amending paragraph (7), as redesignated by paragraph (2) of this section, to read as follows:

“(7) A description and estimate of the progress made by the military departments in meeting current high performance and sustainable building standards under the Unified Facilities Criteria.”;

(4) by amending paragraph (9), as redesignated by such paragraph (2), to read as follows:

“(9) Details of all commercial utility outages caused by threats and those caused by hazards at military installations that last eight hours or longer, whether or not the outage was mitigated by backup power, including non-commercial utility outages and Department of Defense-owned infrastructure, including the total number and location of outages, the financial impact of the outages, and measure taken to mitigate outages in the future at the affected locations and across the Department of Defense.”; and

“(11) At the discretion of the Secretary of Defense, a classified annex, as appropriate.”.

SEC. 312. Report on efforts to reduce high energy costs at military installations.

(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in conjunction with the assistant secretaries responsible for installations and environment for the military services and the Defense Logistics Agency, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report detailing the efforts to achieve cost savings at military installations with high energy costs.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) A comprehensive, installation-specific assessment of feasible and mission-appropriate energy initiatives supporting energy production and consumption at military installations with high energy costs.

(B) An assessment of current sources of energy in areas with high energy costs and potential future sources that are technologically feasible, cost-effective, and mission-appropriate for military installations.

(C) A comprehensive implementation strategy to include required investment for feasible energy efficiency options determined to be the most beneficial and cost-effective, where appropriate, and consistent with Department of Defense priorities.

(D) An explanation on how military services are working collaboratively in order to leverage lessons learned on potential energy efficiency solutions.

(E) An assessment of extent of which activities administered under the Federal Energy Management Program could be used to assist with the implementation strategy.

(F) An assessment of State and local partnership opportunities that could achieve efficiency and cost savings, and any legislative authorities required to carry out such partnerships or agreements.

(3) COORDINATION WITH STATE AND LOCAL AND OTHER ENTITIES.—In preparing the report required under paragraph (1), the Under Secretary may work in conjunction and coordinate with the States containing areas of high energy costs, local communities, and other Federal departments and agencies.

(b) Definitions.—In this section, the term “high energy costs” means costs for the provision of energy by kilowatt of electricity or British Thermal Unit of heat or steam for a military installation in the United States that is in the highest 20 percent of all military installations for a military department.

(a) Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas.—Chapter 631 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 7235. Establishment of the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas

“(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of the Navy shall establish areas, to be known as ‘Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas’, for national defense purposes. Such areas shall include each of the following:

“(1) The area that includes Naval Base Ventura County, San Nicolas Island, and Begg Rock and the adjacent and surrounding waters within the following coordinates:

“(2) The area that includes Naval Base Coronado, San Clemente Island and the adjacent and surrounding waters running parallel to shore to 3 nautical miles from the high tide line designated by part 165 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, on May 20, 2010, as the San Clemente Island 3NM Safety Zone.

“N. Latitude/W. Longitude
33°27.8′/119°34.3′
33°20.5′/119°15.5′
33°13.5′/119°11.8′
33°06.5′/119°15.3′
33°02.8′/119°26.8′
33°08.8′/119°46.3′
33°17.2′/119°56.9′
33°30.9′/119°54.2′.

“(1) INCIDENTAL TAKINGS UNDER ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973.—Sections 4 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533, 1538) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting a military readiness activity.

“(2) INCIDENTAL TAKINGS UNDER MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1972.—Sections 101 and 102 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371, 1372) shall not apply with respect to the incidental taking of any southern sea otter in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas in the course of conducting a military readiness activity.

“(3) TREATMENT AS SPECIES PROPOSED TO BE LISTED.—For purposes of conducting a military readiness activity, any southern sea otter while within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas shall be treated for the purposes of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536) as a member of a species that is proposed to be listed as an endangered species or a threatened species under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533).

“(c) Removal.—Nothing in this section or any other Federal law shall be construed to require that any southern sea otter located within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas be removed from the Areas.

“(d) Revision or termination of exceptions.—The Secretary of the Interior may revise or terminate the application of subsection (b) if the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy and the Marine Mammal Commission, determines that military activities occurring in the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas are impeding the southern sea otter conservation or the return of southern sea otters to optimum sustainable population levels.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct monitoring and research within the Southern Sea Otter Military Readiness Areas to determine the effects of military readiness activities on the growth or decline of the southern sea otter population and on the near-shore ecosystem. Monitoring and research parameters and methods shall be determined in consultation with the Service and the Marine Mammal Commission.

“(2) REPORTS.—Not later than 24 months after the date of the enactment of this section and every three years thereafter, the Secretary of the Navy shall report to Congress and the public on monitoring undertaken pursuant to paragraph (1).

“(1) SOUTHERN SEA OTTER.—The term ‘southern sea otter’ means any member of the subspecies Enhydra lutris nereis.

“(A) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), shall have the meaning given such term in that Act; and

“(B) when used in reference to activities subject to regulation by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) shall have the meaning given such term in that Act.

“(3) INCIDENTAL TAKING.—The term ‘incidental taking’ means any take of a southern sea otter that is incidental to, and not the purpose of, the carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity.

“(4) MILITARY READINESS ACTIVITY.—The term ‘military readiness activity’ has the meaning given that term in section 315(f) of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (16 U.S.C. 703 note) and includes all training and operations of the armed forces that relate to combat and the adequate and realistic testing of military equipment, vehicles, weapons, and sensors for proper operation and suitability for combat use.

“(5) OPTIMUM SUSTAINABLE POPULATION.—The term ‘optimum sustainable population’ means, with respect to any population stock, the number of animals that will result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 321. Repeal of limitation on authority to enter into a contract for the sustainment, maintenance, repair, or overhaul of the F117 engine.

SEC. 331. Modification of annual report on prepositioned materiel and equipment.

“(8) A list of any equipment used in support of contingency operations slated for retrograde and subsequent inclusion in the prepositioned stocks.”.

SEC. 341. Modification of requirements for transferring aircraft within the Air Force inventory.

(a) Modification of requirements.—Section 345 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 8062 note) is amended—

(A) by striking the first sentence and inserting the following: “Before making an aircraft transfer described in subsection (c), the Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure that a written agreement regarding such transfer has been entered into between the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and the Director of the Air National Guard or the Chief of Air Force Reserve.”; and

“(b) Submittal of agreements to the Department of Defense and Congress.—The Secretary of the Air Force may not take any action to transfer an aircraft until the Secretary ensures that the Air Force has complied with applicable Department of Defense regulations and, for a transfer described in subsection (c)(1), until the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees an agreement entered into pursuant to subsection (a) regarding the transfer of the aircraft.”; and

“(c) Covered aircraft transfers.— (1) An aircraft transfer described in this subsection is the transfer (other than as specified in paragraph (2)) from a reserve component of the Air Force to the regular component of the Air Force of—

“(A) the permanent assignment of an aircraft that terminates a reserve component’s equitable interest in the aircraft; or

“(A) A routine temporary transfer of possession of an aircraft from a reserve component that is made solely for the benefit of the reserve component for the purpose of maintenance, upgrade, conversion, modification, or testing and evaluation.

“(B) A routine permanent transfer of assignment of an aircraft that terminates a reserve component’s equitable interest in the aircraft if notice of the transfer has previously been provided to the congressional defense committees and the transfer has been approved by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to Department of Defense regulations.

“(C) A transfer described in paragraph (1)(A) when there is a reciprocal permanent assignment of an aircraft from the regular component of the Air Force to the reserve component that does not degrade the capability of, or reduce the total number of, aircraft assigned to the reserve component.

“(d) Return of aircraft after routine temporary transfer.—In the case of an aircraft transferred from a reserve component of the Air Force to the regular component of the Air Force for which an agreement under subsection (a) is not required by reason of subparagraph (A) of subsection (c)(2), possession of the aircraft shall be transferred back to the reserve component upon completion of the work described in such subparagraph.”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—Subsection (a)(7) of such section is amended by striking “Commander of the Air Force Reserve Command” and inserting “Chief of Air Force Reserve”.

(c) Technical amendments to delete references to aircraft ownership.—Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by striking “the ownership of” each place it appears.

SEC. 342. Limitation on use of funds for Department of Defense sponsorships, advertising, or marketing associated with sports-related organizations or sporting events.

(1) conducts a review of current contracts and task orders for such sponsorships, advertising, and marketing (as awarded by the regular and reserve components of the Armed Forces) in order to assess—

(A) whether such sponsorships, advertising, and marketing are effective in meeting the recruiting objectives of the Department;

(B) whether consistent metrics are used to evaluate the effectiveness of each such activity in generating leads and recruit accessions; and

(C) whether the return on investment for such activities is sufficient to warrant continuing use of Department funds for such activities; and

(2) submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report that includes—

(A) a description of the actions being taken to coordinate efforts of the Department relating to such sponsorships, advertising, and marketing, and to minimize duplicative contracts for such sponsorships, advertising, and marketing, as applicable; and

(B) the results of the review required by paragraph (1), including an assessment of the extent to which continuing use of Department funds for such sponsorships, advertising, and marketing is warranted in light of the review and the actions described pursuant to subparagraph (A).

SEC. 343. Temporary authority to extend contracts and leases under ARMS initiative.

SEC. 351. Streamlining of Department of Defense management and operational headquarters.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a comprehensive review of the management and operational headquarters of the Department of Defense for purposes of consolidating and streamlining headquarters functions.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The review required by paragraph (1) shall address the following:

(A) The extent, if any, to which the staff of the Secretaries of the military departments and the Chiefs of Staff of the Armed Forces have duplicative staff functions and services and could be consolidated into a single service staff.

(B) The extent, if any, to which the staff of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the military departments, the Defense Agencies, and temporary organizations have duplicative staff functions and services and could be streamlined with respect to—

(ii) performing staff functions and services specific to the military department concerned;

(iv) performing functions and services across the Department of Defense with respect to intelligence collection and analysis.

(C) The extent, if any, to which the Joint Staff, the combatant commands, and their subordinate service component commands have duplicative staff functions and services that could be shared, consolidated, eliminated, or otherwise streamlined with—

(ii) the staff of the combatant commands performing only staff functions and services specific to the combatant command concerned; and

(iii) the staff of the service component commands of the combatant commands performing only staff functions and services specific to the service component command concerned.

(D) The extent, if any, to which reductions in military and civilian end-strength in management or operational headquarters could be used to create, build, or fill shortages in force structure for operational units.

(E) The extent, if any, to which revisions are required to the Defense Officers Personnel Management Act, including requirements for officers to serve in joint billets, the number of qualifying billets, the rank structure in the joint billets, and the joint qualification requirement for officers to be promoted while serving for extensive periods in critical positions such as program managers of major defense acquisition programs, and officers in units of component forces supporting joint commands, in order to achieve efficiencies, provide promotion fairness and equity, and obtain effective governance in the management of the Department of Defense.

(F) The structure and staffing of the Joint Staff, and the number, structure, and staffing of the combatant commands and their subordinate service component commands, including, in particular—

(i) whether or not the staff organization of each such entity has documented and periodically validated requirements for such entity;

(ii) whether or not there are an appropriate number of combatant commands relative to the requirements of the National Security Strategy, the Quadrennial Defense Review, and the National Military Strategy; and

(iii) whether or not opportunities exist to consolidate staff functions and services common to the Joint Staff and the service component commands into a single staff organization that provides the required functions, services, capabilities, and capacities to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and supported combatant commanders, and if so—

(I) where in the organizational structure such staff functions, services, capabilities, and capacities would be established; and

(II) whether or not the military departments could execute such staff functions, services, capabilities, and capacities while executing their requirements to organize, train, and equip the Armed Forces.

(G) The statutory and regulatory authority of the combatant commands to establish subordinate joint commands or headquarters, including joint task forces, led by a general or flag officer, and the extent, if any, to which the combatant commands have used such authority—

(i) to establish temporary or permanent subordinate joint commands or headquarters, including joint task forces, led by general or flag officers;

(ii) to disestablish temporary or permanent subordinate joint commands or headquarters, including joint task forces, led by general or flag officers;

(iii) to increase requirements for general and flag officers in the joint pool which are exempt from the end strength limitations otherwise applicable to general and flag officers in the Armed Forces;

(iv) to participate in the management of joint officer qualification in order to ensure the efficient and effective quality and quantity of officers needed to staff headquarters functions and services and return to the services officers with required professional experience and skills necessary to remain competitive for increased responsibility and authority through subsequent assignment or promotion, including by identifying—

(I) circumstances, if any, in which officers spend a disproportionate amount of time in their careers to attain joint officer qualifications with corresponding loss of opportunities to develop in the service-specific assignments needed to gain the increased proficiency and experience to qualify for service and command assignments; and

(II) circumstances, if any, in which the military departments detail officers to joint headquarters staffs in order to maximize the number of officers receiving joint duty credit with a focus on the quantity, instead of the quality, of officers achieving joint duty credit;

(v) to establish commanders’ strategic planning groups, advisory groups, or similar parallel personal staff entities that could risk isolating function and staff processes, including an assessment of the justification used to establish such personal staff organizations and their impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of organizational staff functions, services, capabilities, and capacities; and

(vi) to ensure the identification and management of officers serving or having served in units in subordinate service component or joint commands during combat operations and did not receive joint credit for such service.

(3) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall, to the extent practicable and as the Secretary considers appropriate, conduct the review required by paragraph (1) in consultation with such experts on matters covered by the review who are independent of the Department of Defense.

(4) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the results of the review required by paragraph (1).

(b) Plan on reduction in amounts used for administration in fiscal years 2016 through 2019.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 31, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, and implement, a plan designed to ensure that the amount used by the Department of Defense for administration from amounts authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for operation and maintenance shall be as follows:

(A) In fiscal year 2016, an amount that is 7.5 percent less than the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2015 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for administration (in this paragraph referred to as the “fiscal year 2015 administration amount”).

(B) In fiscal year 2017, an amount that is 15 percent less than the fiscal year 2015 administration amount.

(D) In fiscal year 2019, an amount that is 30 percent less than the fiscal year 2015 administration amount.

(2) ACHIEVEMENT OF REDUCTIONS.—As part of meeting the requirements in paragraph (1), the plan shall provide for reductions in personnel (including military and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense and contract personnel in support of the Department) in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the secretariats and military staffs of the military departments, the staffs of the Defense Agencies, the staffs of the Joint Staff, the staffs of the combatant commands, and the staffs of their subordinate service component commands.

(3) EXCLUSION.—The plan may not meet the requirements in paragraph (1) through reductions in funding for administration for the following:

(c) Comptroller General of the United States reports.—Not later than 90 days after the end of each of fiscal years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the assessment of the Comptroller General of the extent to which the Department of Defense met the applicable requirement in subsection (b)(1) during such fiscal year.

(d) Limitation on availability of funds for contract personnel support for OSD.—In each of fiscal years 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020, amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense and available for the Office of the Secretary of Defense may not be obligated or expended for contract personnel in support of the Office of the Secretary of Defense until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that the applicable requirement in subsection (b)(1) was met during the preceding fiscal year.

(a) Transfer for adoption.—Subsection (f) of section 2583 of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking “may transfer” and inserting “shall transfer”.

(b) Preference in adoption for former handlers.—Such section is further amended—

“(g) Preference in adoption of retired military working dogs for former handlers.— (1) In providing for the adoption under this section of a retired military working dog described in paragraph (1) or (3) of subsection (a), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall accord a preference to the former handler of the dog unless the Secretary determines that adoption of the dog by the former handler would not be in the best interests of the dog.

“(2) In the case of a dog covered by paragraph (1) with more than one former handler seeking adoption of the dog at the time of adoption, the Secretary shall provide for the adoption of the dog by such former handler whose adoption of the dog will best serve the interests of the dog and such former handlers. The Secretary shall make any determination required by this paragraph with respect to a dog following consultation with the kennel master of the unit at which the dog was last located before adoption under this section.

“(3) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as altering, revising, or overriding any policy of a military department for the adoption of military working dogs by law enforcement agencies before the end of the dogs' useful lives.”.

SEC. 353. Modification of required review of projects relating to potential obstructions to aviation.

(A) in paragraph (3), by striking “from State and local officials or the developer of a renewable energy development or other energy project” and inserting “from a State government, an Indian tribal government, a local government, a landowner, or the developer of an energy project”; and

(B) in paragraph (4), by striking “readiness, and” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “readiness and to clearly communicate actions being taken by the Department of Defense to the party requesting an early project review under this section.”;

“(4) The term ‘landowner’ means a person or other legal entity that owns a fee interest in real property on which a proposed energy project is planned to be located.”.

(a) Pilot program authorized.—The Secretary of Defense may, in consultation with the National Security Education Board, carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of providing scholarships in accordance with the David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991 (50 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) to individuals otherwise eligible for scholarships under that Act for intensive language instruction in a covered Asian language.

(b) Covered Asian language.—For purposes of this section, a covered Asian language is any of the five Asian languages that would be treated as a language in which deficiencies exist for purposes of section 802(a)(1)(A) of the David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991 (50 U.S.C. 1902(a)(2)(A)) if the National Security Education Board could treat an additional five Asian languages as a language in which such deficiencies exist.

(c) Use of scholarships.—Notwithstanding any provision of the David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991, a scholarship awarded pursuant to the pilot program may be used for intensive language instruction in—

(2) a country in which the covered Asian language concerned is spoken by a significant portion of the population (as determined by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program).

(d) National Security Education Board defined.—In this section, the term “National Security Education Board” means the National Security Education Board established pursuant to section 803 of the David L. Boren National Security Education Act of 1991 (50 U.S.C. 1903).

(e) Termination.—No scholarship may be awarded under the pilot program after the date that is five years after the date on which the pilot program is established.

SEC. 402. Enhancement of authority for management of end strengths for military personnel.

(a) Repeal of specification of permanent end strengths to support two major regional contingencies.—

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 39 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 691.

(1) SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AUTHORITY.—Subsection (f) of section 115 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “increase” each place it appears and inserting “vary”.

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “increase” each place it appears and inserting “vary”; and

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking “increase” each place it appears and inserting “variance”.

(a) In general.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2016, as follows:

(b) End strength reductions.—The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—

(1) the total authorized strength of units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component which are on active duty (other than for training) at the end of the fiscal year; and

(2) the total number of individual members not in units organized to serve as units of the Selected Reserve of such component who are on active duty (other than for training or for unsatisfactory participation in training) without their consent at the end of the fiscal year.

(c) End strength increases.—Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve of any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.

(1) Several States routinely recruit and retain members of the Army National Guard of the United States in excess of State authorizations to offset States that do not recruit to State authorizations.

(2) The States that routinely recruit and retain members of the Army National Guard of the United States in excess of authorizations do not receive any extra full-time operational support duty personnel to support excess members.

(b) Sense of Senate.—It is the sense of the Senate that the National Guard Bureau should account for States that routinely recruit and retain members in excess of State authorizations when allocating full-time operational support duty personnel.

(c) End strengths.—Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2016, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components:

(d) Allocation among States.—In allocating Reserves on full-time duty in the Army National Guard of the United States authorized by subsection (c)(1) among the States, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall take into account the actual number of members of the Army National Guard of the United States serving in each State as of September 30 each year.

(1) NATIONAL GUARD.—Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2016, may not exceed the following:

(2) ARMY RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Army Reserve as of September 30, 2016, may not exceed 595.

(3) AIR FORCE RESERVE.—The number of non-dual status technicians employed by the Air Force Reserve as of September 30, 2016, may not exceed 90.

(b) Non-dual status technicians defined.—In this section, the term “non-dual status technician” has the meaning given that term in section 10217(a) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 415. Maximum number of reserve personnel authorized to be on active duty for operational support.

SEC. 416. Chief of the National Guard Bureau authority to increase certain end strengths applicable to the Army National Guard.

(a) Authority.—Subject to subsection (b), the Chief of the National Guard Bureau may increase each of the end strengths for fiscal year 2016 applicable to the Army National Guard as follows:

(1) The end strength for Selected Reserve personnel of the Army National Guard of the United States in section 411(a)(1) by up to 3,000 members in addition to the number specified in section 411(a)(1).

(2) The end strength for Reserves serving on full-time duty for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training for the Army National Guard of the United States specified in section 412(1) by up to 615 Reserves in addition to the number specified in section 412(1).

(3) The end strength for military technicians (dual status) for the Army National Guard of the United States specified in section 413(1) by up to 1,111 technicians in addition to the number specified in section 413(1).

(b) Limitation.—The Chief of the National Guard Bureau may increase an end strength using the authority in subsection (a) only if such increase is paid for out of funds appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for Operation and Maintenance, Army National Guard.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.

(b) Construction of authorization.—The authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) supersedes any other authorization of appropriations (definite or indefinite) for such purpose for fiscal year 2016.

SEC. 501. Authority of promotion boards to recommend officers of particular merit be placed at the top of the promotion list.

(a) Authority of promotion boards To recommend officers of particular merit Be placed at top of promotion list.—Section 616 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g) (1) In selecting the officers to be recommended for promotion, a selection board may, when authorized by the Secretary of the military department concerned, recommend officers of particular merit, from among those officers selected for promotion, to be placed at the top of the promotion list promulgated by the Secretary under section 624(a)(1) of this title.

“(2) The determination whether an officer is an officer of particular merit for purposes of this subsection shall be made in accordance with criteria prescribed by the Secretary of the military department concerned for such purposes.

“(3) The number of such officers placed at the top of the promotion list may not exceed the number equal to 10 percent of the maximum number of officers that the board is authorized to recommend for promotion in such competitive category. If the number determined under this subsection is less than one, the board may recommend one such officer.

“(4) No officer may be recommended to be placed at the top of the promotion list unless the officer receives the recommendation of at least three-quarters of the members of a board for such placement.

“(5) For the officers recommended to be placed at the top of the promotion list, the board shall recommend the order in which these officers should be promoted.”.

(b) Officers of particular merit appearing at top of promotion list.—Section 624(a)(1) of such title is amended by inserting “, except such officers of particular merit who were approved by the President and recommended by the board to be placed at the top of the promotion list under section 616(g) of this title as these officers shall be placed at the top of the promotion list in the order recommended by the board” after “officers on the active-duty list”.

SEC. 502. Minimum grades for certain corps and related positions in the Army, Navy, and Air Force.

(1) CHIEF OF LEGISLATIVE LIAISON.—Section 3023(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the second sentence by striking “the grade of major general” and inserting “a grade above the grade of colonel”.

(2) ASSISTANT SURGEON GENERAL.—Section 3039(b) of such title is amended by striking the last sentence and inserting the following new sentence: “An officer appointed to that position shall be an officer in a grade above the grade of colonel.”.

(3) CHIEF OF THE NURSE CORPS.—Section 3069(b) of such title is amended by striking “whose regular grade” and all that follows through “major general.” and inserting “. An officer appointed to that position shall be an officer in a grade above the grade of colonel.”.

(4) CHIEF OF THE VETERINARY CORPS.—Section 3084 of such title is amended by striking the last sentence and inserting the following new sentence: “An officer appointed to that position shall be an officer in a grade above the grade of lieutenant colonel.”.

(1) CHIEF OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS.—Section 5027(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “the grade of rear admiral” and inserting “a grade above the grade of captain”.

(A) by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the following new subsection (a):

“(a) There is a Chief of the Dental Corps in the Department of the Navy. An officer assigned to that position shall be an officer in a grade above the grade of captain.”; and

(B) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (b) and (c), respectively.

(A) in the first sentence, by striking “for promotion” and all that follows through the end of the sentence and inserting a period; and

(B) by inserting after the first sentence the following new sentence: “An officer so selected shall be an officer in a grade above the grade of captain.”.

(1) CHIEF OF LEGISLATIVE LIAISON.—Section 8023(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the second sentence by striking “the grade of major general” and inserting “a grade above the grade of colonel”.

(2) CHIEF OF THE NURSE CORPS.—Section 8069(b) of such title is amended by striking “whose regular grade” and all that follows through “major general.” and inserting “. An officer appointed to that position shall be an officer in a grade above the grade of colonel.”.

(3) ASSISTANT SURGEON GENERAL FOR DENTAL SERVICES.—Section 8081 of such title is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting the following new sentence: “An officer appointed to that position shall be an officer in a grade above the grade of colonel.”.

(d) Transition.—In the case of an officer who on the date of the enactment of this Act is serving in a position that is covered by an amendment made by this section, the continued service of that officer in such position after the date of the enactment of this Act shall not be affected by that amendment.

SEC. 503. Enhancement of military personnel authorities in connection with the defense acquisition workforce.

(a) Inclusion of acquisition matters within joint matters for officer management.—

(1) JOINT MATTERS.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 688 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(B) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and

“(E) acquisition addressed by military personnel acting under chapter 87 of this title.”.

(2) JOINT DUTY ASSIGNMENT.—Subsection (b)(1)(A) of such section is amended by striking “limited to assignments in which” and all that follows and inserting “limited to—

“(i) assignments in which the officer gains significant experience in joint matters; and

(1) CONSULTATION OF SERVICE CHIEFS IN POLICIES AND GUIDANCE.—Subsection (a) of section 1722a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “such military department)” the following: “, in consultation with the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps (with respect to the armed force under the jurisdiction of each),”.

(2) ENHANCED CAREER PATHS FOR PERSONNEL.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended—

(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting “single-tracked” before “career path”;

(B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and

“(2) A dual-tracked career path that attracts the highest quality officers and enlisted personnel and allows them to gain experience in, and receive credit for, a primary career in combat arms and a functional secondary career in the acquisition field in order to more closely align the military operational requirements and acquisition workforces of each armed force.”.

(1) INCLUSION OF BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL TRAINING IN JOINT PROFESSIONAL MILITARY EDUCATION.—Subsection (a) of section 2151 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by inserting “(1)” before “Joint professional military education”; and

“(2) The subject matter to be covered by joint professional military education shall include at least the following:

“(3) In lieu of the subject matters covered by paragraph (2), or in supplement to one or more of such matters, the subject matter to be covered by joint professional military education may include subjects addressed in training programs under section 2013(a) of this title by, in, or through organizations described in paragraph (2)(D) of that section.”.

(2) SENIOR LEVEL SERVICE SCHOOLS.—Subsection (b)(1) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(E) A training program section 2013(a) of this title by, in, or through an organization described in paragraph (2)(D) of that section.”.

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “in residence at”;

(B) by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following new subparagraph (A):

(C) in subparagraph (B), by striking “a senior level service school” and inserting “in residence at a senior level service school, or by, in, or though a senior level service school described in section 2151(b)(1)(E) of this title,”.

(4) JOINT PROFESSIONAL MILITARY EDUCATION PHASE II.—Section 2155 of such title is amended—

(i) in the subsection caption, by inserting “for joint military subjects” after “Phase II requirements”; and

(ii) by inserting “described in section 2151(a)(2) of this title” after “joint professional military education”;

(i) in the subsection caption, by inserting “for joint military subjects” after “Curriculum content”;

(ii) by striking “section 2151(a)” and inserting “section 2151(a)(2)”; and

(iii) by inserting “described in such section” after “joint professional military education”;

“(d) Curriculum content for business and commercial training.—The curriculum for Phase II joint professional military education described in section 2151(a)(3) of this title shall include such matters as the Secretary shall specify in connection with training programs described in that section in order to satisfy requirements for successful performance in the acquisition or acquisition-related field.”; and

(E) in subsection (e), as redesignated by subparagraph (C), by inserting “(other than a service school described in section 2151(b)(1)(E) of this title)” after “senior level service school”.

(d) Acquisition-related functions of service chiefs.—Section 2547 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in subsection (b), by striking “this subsection” the first place it appears and inserting “subsection (a)”;

“(c) Annual report on promotion rates for officers in acquisition positions.— (1) Not later than January 1 each year, the Chief of Staff of the Army, the Chief of Naval Operations, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall each submit to Congress a report on the promotion rates during the preceding fiscal year of officers who are serving in, or have served in, positions covered by chapter 87 of this title, and officers who have been certified under that chapter, in the grades specified in paragraph (2). If promotion rates for any such grade of officers failed to meet objectives for the fiscal year concerned for promotion rates for such grade, the chief of the armed force concerned shall include in the report for such fiscal year information on such failure and on the actions taken or to be taken by such chief to prevent further such failures.

“(C) The grade of major (or lieutenant commander, in the case of the Navy).”.

SEC. 504. Enhanced flexibility for determination of officers to continue on active duty and for selective early retirement and early discharge.

SEC. 505. Authority to defer until age 68 mandatory retirement for age of a general or flag officer serving as Chief or Deputy Chief of Chaplains of the Army, Navy, or Air Force.

(a) Authority.—Section 1253 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(c) Exception for Chiefs of Chaplains and Deputy Chiefs of Chaplains.—The Secretary of the military department concerned may defer the retirement under subsection (a) of an officer serving in a general or flag officer grade who is the Chief of Chaplains or Deputy Chief of Chaplains of that officer's armed force. Such a deferment may not extend beyond the first day of the month following the month in which the officer becomes 68 years of age.”.

(1) HEADING.—The heading of such section is amended by striking “exception” and inserting “exceptions”.

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 63 of such title is amended in the item relating to section 1253 by striking “exception” and inserting “exceptions”.

SEC. 506. Reinstatement of enhanced authority for selective early discharge of warrant officers.

(1) in subsection (a), by striking “November 30, 1993, and ending on October 1, 1999” and inserting “October 1, 2015, and ending on October 1, 2019”; and

(B) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively.

(2) by striking “that he held on the day before the date of his retirement, or in any higher warrant officer grade”.

SEC. 511. Authority to designate certain reserve officers as not to be considered for selection for promotion.

“(j) Certain officers not To be considered for selection for promotion.—The Secretary of the military department concerned may provide that an officer who is in an active status, but is in a duty status in which the only points the officer accrues under section 12732(a)(2) of this title are pursuant to subparagraph (C)(i) of that section (relating to membership in a reserve component), shall not be considered for selection for promotion at any time the officer otherwise would be so considered. Any such officer may remain on the reserve active-status list.”.

SEC. 512. Clarification of purpose of reserve component special selection boards as limited to correction of error at a mandatory promotion board.

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “a selection board” and inserting “a mandatory promotion board convened under section 14101(a) of this title”; and

(B) in subparagraphs (A) and (B), by striking “selection board” and inserting “mandatory promotion board”; and

(2) in the first sentence of paragraph (3), by striking “selection board” and inserting “mandatory promotion board”.

SEC. 513. Reconciliation of contradictory provisions relating to citizenship qualifications for enlistment in the reserve components of the Armed Forces.

“(1) that person has met the citizenship or residency requirements established in section 504(b)(1) of this title; or

“(2) that person is authorized to enlist by the Secretary concerned under section 504(b)(2) of this title.”.

SEC. 514. Authority for certain Air Force reserve component personnel to provide training and instruction regarding pilot instructor training.

(1) IN GENERAL.—During fiscal year 2016, the Secretary of the Air Force may authorize personnel described in paragraph (2) to provide training and instruction regarding pilot instructor training to the following:

(A) Members of the reserve components of the Air Force on active Guard and Reserve duty (as that term is defined in section 101(d) of title 10, United States Code) who are not otherwise authorized to conduct the training described in paragraph (1) due to the limitations in section 10216 of title 10, United States Code.

(B) Members of the Air Force who are military technicians (dual status) who are not otherwise authorized to conduct the training described in paragraph (1) due to the limitations in section 328(b) of title 32, United States Code

(3) LIMITATION.—The total number of personnel described in paragraph (2) who may provide training and instruction under the authority in paragraph (1) at any one time may not exceed 50.

(4) FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT.—Members of the uniformed services described in paragraph (2) who provide training and instruction pursuant to the authority in paragraph (1) shall be covered by the Federal Tort Claims Act for purposes of any claim arising from the employment of such individuals under that authority.

(b) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth a plan to eliminate pilot instructor shortages within the Air Force using authorities available to the Secretary under current law.

SEC. 521. Duty required for eligibility for preseparation counseling for members being discharged or released from active duty.

(a) Requirement for 180 continuous days of active duty service for eligibility.—Subparagraph (A) of section 1142(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “continuous” after “first 180”.

(b) Exclusion of training from periods of active duty.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(C) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term ‘active duty’ does not include full-time training duty, annual training duty, and attendance, while in the active military service, at a school designated as a service school by law or by the Secretary of the military department concerned.”.

SEC. 522. Expansion of pilot programs on career flexibility to enhance retention of members of the Armed Forces.

SEC. 523. Sense of Senate on development of gender-neutral occupational standards for occupational assignments in the Armed Forces.

(a) Finding.—The Senate remains interested in the integration of women into the combat arms of the Armed Forces and the development of gender-neutral occupational standards for occupational assignments in the Armed Forces.

(1) the development of gender-neutral occupational standards is vital in determining the occupational assignments of all members of the Armed Forces;

(2) studies being conducted by the Armed Forces are important to the development of these standards and should incorporate the best scientific practices available; and

(3) the Armed Forces should consider such studies on these standards carefully in order to ensure that—

(A) such studies do not result in unnecessary barriers to service in the Armed Forces; and

(i) are based on an objective analysis of the tasks required to perform the occupational assignment concerned; and

(ii) do not negatively impact the required combat capabilities of the Armed Forces, including units whose primary mission is to engage in direct combat at the tactical level.

SEC. 532. Termination of program of educational assistance for reserve component members supporting contingency operations and other operations.

(a) In general.—Chapter 1607 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) Sunset.—The authority to provide educational assistance under this chapter shall terminate on the date that is four years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016.

“(b) Limitation on provision of assistance pending sunset.—Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 and ending on the date that is four years after the date of the enactment of that Act, educational assistance may be provided under this chapter only to a member otherwise eligible for educational assistance under this chapter who received educational assistance under this chapter for a course of study at an educational institution for the enrollment period at the educational institution that immediately preceded the date of the enactment of that Act.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1607 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 533. Reports on educational levels attained by certain members of the Armed Forces at time of separation from the Armed Forces.

(a) Annual reports required.—Each Secretary concerned shall submit to Congress each year a report on the educational levels attained by members of the Armed Forces described in subsection (b) under the jurisdiction of such Secretary who separated from the Armed Forces during the preceding year.

(b) Covered members.—The members of the Armed Forces described in this subsection are members of the Armed Forces who transferred unused education benefits to family members pursuant to section 3319 of title 38, United States Code, while serving as members of the Armed Forces.

(c) Secretary concerned defined.—In this section, the term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given that term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.

SEC. 534. Sense of Congress on transferability of unused education benefits to family members.

(a) In general.—It is the sense of Congress that each Secretary concerned should—

(1) exercise the authority in section 3319(a) of title 38, United States Code, relating to the transferability of unused education benefits to family members, in a manner that encourages the retention of individuals in the Armed Forces; and

(b) Definitions.—In this section, the terms “Armed Forces” and “Secretary concerned” have the meaning given such terms in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.

SEC. 535. No entitlement to unemployment insurance while receiving Post-9/11 Education Assistance.

SEC. 536. Repeal of statutory specification of minimum duration of in-resident instruction for courses of instruction offered as part of Phase II joint professional military education.

(a) Repeal of statutory requirement for in-resident instruction.—Section 2154(a)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “taught in residence at” and inserting “offered through”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 107 of such title amended by striking the item relating to section 2156.

SEC. 537. Quality assurance of certification programs and standards for professional credentials obtained by members of the Armed Forces.

(1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and

“(c) Quality assurance of certification programs and standards.— (1) Commencing not later than three years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, each Secretary concerned shall ensure that any credentialing program used in connection with the program under subsection (a) is accredited by an accreditation body that meets the requirements specified in paragraph (2).

“(2) The requirements for accreditation bodies specified in this paragraph are requirements that an accreditation body—

“(A) be an independent body that has in place mechanisms to ensure objectivity and impartiality in its accreditation activities;

“(B) meet a recognized national or international standard that directs its policy and procedures regarding accreditation;

“(C) apply a recognized national or international certification standard in making its accreditation decisions regarding certification bodies and programs;

“(D) conduct on-site visits, as applicable, to verify the documents and records submitted by credentialing bodies for accreditation;

“(E) have in place policies and procedures to ensure due process when addressing complaints and appeals regarding its accreditation activities;

“(F) conduct regular training to ensure consistent and reliable decisions among reviewers conducting accreditations; and

“(G) meet such other criteria as the Secretary concerned considers appropriate in order to ensure quality in its accreditation activities.”.

(a) In general.—Chapter 403 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(1) CONTRACTS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary of the Army may enter into contracts and cooperative agreements with the Army West Point Athletic Association for the purpose of supporting the athletic and physical fitness programs of the Academy. Notwithstanding section 2304(k) of this title, the Secretary may enter such contracts or cooperative agreements on a sole source basis pursuant to section 2304(c)(5) of this title. Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, a cooperative agreement under this section may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the Academy.

“(2) FINANCIAL CONTROLS.— (A) Before entering into a contract or cooperative agreement under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure that such contract or agreement includes appropriate financial controls to account for Academy and Association resources in accordance with accepted accounting principles.

“(B) Any such contract or cooperative agreement shall contain a provision that allows the Secretary, at the Secretary’s discretion, to review the financial accounts of the Association to determine whether the operations of the Association—

“(i) are consistent with the terms of the contract or cooperative agreement; and

“(ii) will not compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of the Army.

“(3) LEASES.—Section 2667(h) of this title shall not apply to any leases the Secretary may enter into with the Association for the purpose of supporting the athletic and physical fitness programs of the Academy.

“(1) AUTHORITY.—To the extent required by a contract or cooperative agreement under subsection (a), the Secretary may provide support services to the Association while the Association conducts its support activities at the Academy. The Secretary may provide support services described in paragraph (2) only if the Secretary determines that the provision of such services is essential for the support of the athletic and physical fitness programs of the Academy.

“(2) SUPPORT SERVICES DEFINED.— (A) In this subsection, the term ‘support services’ includes utilities, office furnishings and equipment, communications services, records staging and archiving, audio and video support, and security systems in conjunction with the leasing or licensing of property.

“(i) housing for Association personnel on United States Army Garrison, West Point, New York; and

“(ii) enrollment of dependents of Association personnel in elementary and secondary schools under the same criteria applied to dependents of Federal employees under section 2164(a) of this title, except that educational services provided pursuant to this clause shall be provided on a reimbursable basis.

“(3) NO LIABILITY OF THE UNITED STATES.—Any such support services may only be provided without any liability of the United States to the Association.

“(1) SUPPORT RECEIVED FROM THE ASSOCIATION.—Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the Secretary may accept from the Association funds, supplies, and services for the support of the athletic and physical fitness programs of the Academy. For the purposes of this section, employees or personnel of the Association may not be considered to be employees of the United States.

“(2) FUNDS RECEIVED FROM NCAA.—The Secretary may accept funds from the National Collegiate Athletic Association to support the athletic and physical fitness programs of the Academy.

“(3) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall ensure that contributions under this subsection and expenditure of funds pursuant to subsection (e) do not reflect unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Army, any of its employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner, or compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of the Army, or any individual involved in such a program.

“(1) LICENSING, MARKETING, AND SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENTS.—An agreement under subsection (a) may, consistent with section 2260 of this title (other than subsection (d) of such section), authorize the Association to enter into licensing, marketing, and sponsorship agreements relating to trademarks and service marks identifying the Academy, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Army.

“(2) LIMITATIONS.—No licensing, marketing, or sponsorship agreement may be entered into under paragraph (1) if—

“(A) such agreement would reflect unfavorably on the ability of the Department of the Army, any of its employees, or any member of the armed forces to carry out any responsibility or duty in a fair and objective manner; or

“(B) the Secretary determines that the use of the trademark or service mark would compromise the integrity or appearance of integrity of any program of the Department of the Army, or any individual involved in such a program.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Any funds received by the Secretary under this section other than money rentals received for property leased pursuant to section 2667 of this title shall be used by the Academy for one or more of the following purposes:

“(B) To enhance the ability of the Academy to compete against other colleges and universities.

“(2) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Funds described in paragraph (1) shall remain available until expended.

“(f) Service on Association Board of Directors.—The Association is a designated entity for which authorization under sections 1033(a) and 1589(a) of this title may be provided.

“(g) Conditions.—The authority provided in this section with respect to the Association is available only so long as the Association continues—

“(1) to qualify as a nonprofit organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and operates in accordance with this section, the law of the State of New York, and the constitution and bylaws of the Association; and

“(2) to operate exclusively to support the athletic and physical fitness programs of the Academy.

“(h) Association defined.—In this section, the term ‘Association’ means the Army West Point Athletic Association.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 403 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 539. Online access to the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program.

(a) Notice to program participants of availability of component online through the Department of Defense.—If a member of the Armed Forces, veteran, or dependent requests a certificate of eligibility from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to prove the eligibility of the member, veteran, or dependent, as the case may be, for educational assistance under chapter 33 of title 38, United States Code, the Secretary shall notify the member, veteran, or dependent of the availability of the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) on the Transition GPS Standalone Training Internet website of the Department of Defense.

(b) Availability of component online through the Department of Veterans Affairs.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall, in collaboration with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, assess the feasibility of—

(A) providing access for veterans and dependents to the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program on the eBenefits Internet website of the Department of Veterans Affairs; and

(2) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report setting forth a description of the cost and length of time required to provide access and begin tracking completion of the higher education component of the Transition Assistance Program as described in paragraph (1).

SEC. 546. Modification of Rule 304 of the Military Rules of Evidence relating to the corroboration of a confession or admission.

(1) To provide that an admission or a confession of the accused may be considered as evidence against the accused on the question of guilt or innocence only if independent evidence, either direct or circumstantial, has been admitted into evidence which would tend to establish the trustworthiness of the admission or confession.

(2) To provide that not every element or fact contained in the admission or confession must be independently proven for the admission or confession to be admitted into evidence in its entirety.

(3) To strike the rule that if independent evidence raises an inference of the truth of some but not all of the essential facts admitted, the confession or admission may be considered as evidence against the accused only with respect to those essential facts stated in the confession or admission that are corroborated by the independent evidence.

(4) With respect to the quantum of evidence needed to establish corroboration, to provide that the independent evidence need raise only an inference of the truth of the admission or confession.

SEC. 547. Modification of Rule 104 of the Rules for Courts-Martial to establish certain prohibitions concerning evaluations of Special Victims' Counsel.

SEC. 548. Right of victims of offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice to timely disclosure of certain materials and information in connection with prosecution of offenses.

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through (8) as paragraphs (4) through (9), respectively; and

“(3) The right to the timely disclosure by trial counsel to the victim (or the Special Victims' Counsel of the victim if the victim is so represented) of the following:

“(B) Any motions filed by trial counsel or defense counsel in connection with the court-martial of the offense, unless otherwise protected from disclosure.

“(D) Any statement by the victim in connection with the offense that is in the possession of the government.

“(E) Any portions relating to the victim in any report of an investigation of the offense that is in the possession of the government.

“(F) In the event the staff judge advocate advises pursuant to section 834 of this title (article 34) that any charge or specification in connection with the offense not be referred for trial, the advice making such recommendation, with such advice to be so provided before the convening authority acts on the advice.”.

SEC. 549. Enforcement of certain crime victims' rights by the Court of Criminal Appeals.

“(d) Enforcement of certain rights by Court of Criminal Appeals.— (1) (A) If the victim of an offense under this chapter believes that a preliminary hearing ruling under section 832 of this title (article 32), or a court-martial ruling, violates the victim's rights afforded by a section (article) or rule specified in paragraph (2), the victim may file an interlocutory appeal of such ruling by petitioning the Court of Criminal Appeals for an order to require the judge advocate conducting such preliminary hearing, or the court-martial, as the case may be, to comply with the section (article) or rule, as applicable.

“(B) A victim of an offense under this chapter who is subject to an order to submit to a deposition notwithstanding the fact that the victim shall be available to testify at the court-martial of the offense may file an interlocutory appeal of such order by petitioning the Court of Criminal Appeals for an order to quash such order.

“(C) The Court of Criminal Appeals shall provide a de novo review of the question or questions raised by a petition filed under this paragraph. A single judge or panel of judges shall take up and decide the petition within 72 hours after the petition is filed.

“(2) Paragraph (1)(A) applies with respect to the protections afforded by the following:

“(B) Military Rule of Evidence 412, relating to the admission of evidence regarding a victim's sexual background.

“(C) Military Rule of Evidence 513, relating to the psychotherapist-patient privilege.

“(D) Military Rule of Evidence 514, relating to the victim advocate-victim privilege.

“(3) The proceedings of a preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32), or a court-martial, may not be stayed or subject to a continuance of more than five days for purposes of enforcing this subsection. If the Court of Criminal Appeals denies the relief sought, the reasons for the denial shall be clearly stated on the record in a written opinion.”.

SEC. 550. Release to victims upon request of complete record of proceedings and testimony of courts-martial in cases in which sentences adjudged could include punitive discharge.

(a) In general.—Section 854(e) of title 10, United States Code (article 54(e) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—

(2) in paragraph (1), as so designated, by inserting “or the victim requests such records” before the period at the end of the first sentence; and

“(2) In the case of a general or special court-martial involving an offense (other than an offense covered by paragraph (1)) for which the sentence as adjudged could include punitive discharge from the armed forces, a copy of all prepared records of the proceedings of the court-martial shall be given to the victim of the offense if the victim requests such records.

“(3) Records given to a victim under this subsection at the request of the victim in a case where the court-martial concerned resulted in the acquittal of the accused may include restrictions on release or use of such records or information in such records in order to protect the privacy or other interests of the accused.”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to courts-martial first convened on or after that date.

SEC. 551. Representation and assistance of victims by Special Victims' Counsel in questioning by military criminal investigators.

“(3) (A) In carrying out paragraph (1), a military criminal investigator seeking to question an individual eligible for the assistance of a Special Victims' Counsel under this section shall inform the individual of the individual's right to be represented by a Special Victims' Counsel in connection with such questioning.

“(B) If an individual described in subparagraph (A) requests representation by a Special Victims' Counsel in connection with questioning described in that subparagraph—

“(i) a Special Victims' Counsel shall represent and assist the individual during and in connection with such questioning;

“(ii) the military criminal investigator shall contact and question the individual only through the Special Victims' Counsel representing the individual; and

“(iii) the military criminal investigation may not contact or question the individual without the consent of such Special Victims' Counsel.

“(C) Nothing in this paragraph confers any right on an accused under investigation.

“(D) A violation of this paragraph shall not be a basis for the suppression of any statement of an individual described in subparagraph (A), or derivative evidence of such a statement, in a proceeding against a person accused with committing an offense against such individual.”.

SEC. 552. Authority of Special Victims' Counsel to provide legal consultation and assistance in connection with various Government proceedings.

“(A) any complaint against the Government, including an allegation under review by an inspector general and a complaint regarding equal employment opportunities;

“(B) any request to the Government for information, including a request under section 552a of title 5 (commonly referred to as a 'Freedom of Information Act request'); and

SEC. 553. Enhancement of confidentiality of restricted reporting of sexual assault in the military.

(a) Preemption of State law to ensure confidentiality of reporting.—Subsection (b) of section 1565b of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) In the case of information disclosed pursuant to paragraph (1), any State law or regulation that would require an individual specified in paragraph (2) to disclose the personally identifiable information of the adult victim or alleged perpetrator of the sexual assault to a State or local law enforcement agency shall not apply, except when reporting is necessary to prevent or mitigate a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of an individual.”.

(b) Clarification of scope.—Paragraph (1) of such subsection is amended by striking “a dependent” and inserting “an adult dependent”.

“(1) SEXUAL ASSAULT.—The term ‘sexual assault’ includes the offenses of rape, sexual assault, forcible sodomy, aggravated sexual contact, abusive sexual contact, and attempts to commit such offenses, as punishable under applicable Federal or State law.

“(2) STATE.—The term ‘State’ includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any territory or possession of the United States.”.

SEC. 554. Establishment of Office of Complex Investigations within the National Guard Bureau.

(a) In general.—Chapter 1101 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) In general.—There is in the National Guard Bureau an Office of Complex Investigations (in this section referred to as the ‘Office’) under the authority, direction, and control of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.

“(b) Disposition and functions.—The Office shall be organized, trained, equipped, and managed to conduct administrative investigations in order to assist the States in the organization, maintenance, and operation of the National Guard as follows:

“(1) In investigations of allegations of sexual assault involving members of the National Guard.

“(2) In Investigations in circumstances involving members of the National Guard in which other law enforcement agencies within the Department of Defense do not have, or have limited, jurisdiction or authority to investigate.

“(3) In investigations in such other circumstances involving members of the National Guard as the Chief of the National Guard Bureau may direct.

“(c) Scope of investigative authority.—Individuals performing investigations described in subsection (b)(1) are authorized—

“(1) to have access to all records, reports, audits, reviews, documents, papers, recommendations, or other material available to the applicable establishment which relate to programs and operations with respect to the National Guard; and

“(2) to request such information or assistance as may be necessary for carrying out those duties from any Federal, State, or local governmental agency or unit thereof.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1101 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 555. Modification of deadline for establishment of Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces.

SEC. 556. Comptroller General of the United States reports on prevention and response to sexual assault by the Army National Guard and the Army Reserve.

(a) Initial report.—Not later than April 1, 2016, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report on the preliminary assessment of the Comptroller General (made pursuant to a review conducted by the Comptroller General for purposes of this section) of the extent to which the Army National Guard and the Army Reserve—

(1) have in place policies and programs to prevent and respond to incidents of sexual assault involving members of the Army National Guard or the Army Reserve, as applicable;

(2) provide medical and mental health care services to members of the Army National Guard or the Army Reserve, as applicable, following a sexual assault; and

(3) have identified whether the nature of service in the Army National Guard or the Army Reserve, as the case may be, poses challenges to the prevention of or response to sexual assault.

(b) Additional reports.—If after submitting the report required by subsection (a) the Comptroller General makes additional assessments as a result of the review described in that subsection, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress such reports on such additional assessments as the Comptroller General considers appropriate.

SEC. 557. Sense of Congress on the service of military families and on sentencing retirement-eligible members of the Armed Forces.

(1) Military families serve alongside their member of the Armed Forces, enduring hardships, lending support, and contributing to the member’s career. These family members endure frequent moves, long periods of separation, and other unique hardships associated with military life.

(2) Innocent family members are sometimes inadvertently punished when the member they depend on forfeits retirement benefit eligibility due to a court-martial sentence.

(3) When a retirement-eligible member forfeits retirement eligibility, that member’s innocent family members lose the security of benefits they had planned for and helped earn.

(4) Military juries may choose to impose unjustly light sentences on convicted members out of concern for the innocent family members when a just sentence would require stripping the member of retirement eligibility.

(1) that military juries should not face the difficult choice between imposing a fair sentence or protecting the benefits of a member of the Armed Forces for the sake of innocent family members;

(2) that innocent military family members of retirement-eligible members should not be made to forgo benefits they have sacrificed for and helped to earn; and

(3) to welcome the opportunity to work with the Department of Defense to develop the necessary laws and regulations to improve the military justice system and to protect the benefits that military families have helped earn.

SEC. 561. Continuation of authority to assist local educational agencies that benefit dependents of members of the Armed Forces and Department of Defense civilian employees.

(a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $25,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).

(b) Local educational agency defined.—In this section, the term “local educational agency” has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).

SEC. 563. Authority to use appropriated funds to support Department of Defense student meal programs in domestic dependent elementary and secondary schools located outside the United States.

(A) by striking “the defense dependents’ education system” and inserting “overseas defense dependents’ schools”; and

(B) by striking “students enrolled in that system” and inserting “students enrolled in such a school”;

(2) in subsection (d), by striking “Department of Defense dependents' schools which are located outside the United States” and inserting “overseas defense dependents’ schools”; and

“(e) Overseas defense dependents’ school defined.—In this section, the term ‘overseas defense dependents’ school’ means the following:

“(1) A school established as part of the defense dependents' education system provided for under the Defense Dependents' Education Act of 1978 (20 U.S.C. 921 et seq.).

“(2) An elementary or secondary school established pursuant to section 2164 of this title that is located in a territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States.”.

(1) HEADING AMENDMENT.—The heading of such section is amended by inserting “defense” after “overseas”.

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 134 of such title is amended in the item relating to section 2243 by inserting “defense” after “overseas”.

SEC. 564. Biennial surveys of military dependents on military family readiness matters.

(a) Biennial surveys required.—The Director of the Office of Family Policy of the Department of Defense shall undertake every other year a survey of adult dependents of members of the Armed Forces on the matters specified in subsection (b). Participation by dependents in the survey shall be voluntary.

(2) Incidence of suicide and suicidal ideation among dependents of members of the Armed Forces.

(4) Incidence of spousal abuse, child abuse, sexual assault, and harassment among dependents of members of the Armed Forces.

(7) Adequacy and availability of child care for dependents of members of the Armed Forces.

(9) Such other matters relating to military family readiness as the Director considers appropriate.

SEC. 571. Extension of semiannual reports on the involuntary separation of members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for operation and maintenance for the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended until a period of 15 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the congressional defense committees the report described in subsection (b).

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on remotely piloted aircraft career field manning levels and actions the Air Force will take to rectify personnel shortfalls.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) A description of current and projected manning requirements and inventory levels for remotely piloted aircraft systems.

(B) A description of rated and non-rated officer and enlisted manning policies for authorization and inventory levels in effect for remotely piloted aircraft systems and units, to include whether remotely piloted aircraft duty is considered as a permanent Air Force Specialty Code or treated as an ancillary single assignment duty, and if both are used, the division of authorizations between permanently assigned personnel and those who will return to a different primary career field.

(C) Comparisons to other Air Force manned combat aircraft systems and units with respect to personnel policies, manpower authorization levels, and projected personnel inventory.

(D) Identification and assessment of mitigation actions to increase unit manning levels, including recruitment and retention bonuses, incentive pay, use of enlisted personnel, and increased weighting to remotely piloted aircraft personnel on promotion boards, and to ensure the school house for remotely piloted aircraft personnel is sufficient to meet increased manning demands.

(E) Analysis demonstrating the requirements determination for how remotely piloted aircraft pilot and sensor operators are selected, including whether individuals are prior rated or non-rated qualified, what prerequisite training or experience is necessary, and required and types of basic and advanced qualification training for each mission design series of remotely piloted aircraft in the Air Force inventory.

(F) Recommendations for changes to existing legislation required to implement mitigation actions.

(G) An assessment of the authorization levels of government civilian and contractor support required for sufficiency of remotely piloted aircraft career field manning.

(H) A description and associated timeline of actions the Air Force will take to increase remotely piloted aircraft career field manpower authorizations and manning levels to at least the equal of the normative levels of manning and readiness of all other combat aircraft career fields.

(I) A description of any other matters concerning remotely piloted aircraft career field manning levels the Secretary of the Air Force determines to be appropriate.

(3) FORM.—The report required under paragraph (1) may be submitted in classified form, but shall also contain an unclassified executive summary and may contain an unclassified annex.

(4) NONDUPLICATION OF EFFORT.—If any information required under paragraph (1) has been included in another report or notification previously submitted to Congress by law, the Secretary of the Air Force may provide a list of such reports and notifications at the time of submitting the report required under this subsection in lieu of including such information in the report.

SEC. 581. Improvement of financial literacy and preparedness of members of the Armed Forces.

(A) in the subsection heading, by striking “consumer education” and inserting “financial literacy training”;

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking “education” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting “financial literacy training”;

“(C) upon arrival at each duty station following the first duty station in the case of each member in pay grade E–4 or below or in pay grade O–3 or below;

“(D) on the date of promotion, in the case of each member in pay grade E–5 or below or in pay grade O–4 or below;

(v) in subparagraph (J), as redesignated by clause (iii), by inserting “as” before “a component”;

“(4) The Secretary concerned shall prescribe regulations setting forth any additional events and circumstances (other than those described in paragraph (2)) for which the Secretary determines that training under this subsection shall be required.”.

(b) Financial literacy and preparedness survey.—Such section is further amended—

“(d) Financial literacy and preparedness survey.— (1) The Director of the Defense Manpower Data Center shall annually include in the status of forces survey a survey of the status of the financial literacy and preparedness of members of the armed forces.

“(A) shall be used by each of the Secretaries concerned as a benchmark to evaluate and update training provided under this section; and

“(B) shall be submitted to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.”.

(c) Additional financial services covered by literacy training.—Subsection (e) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) Health insurance, budget management, Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), retirement lump sum payments (including rollover options and tax consequences), and Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) .”.

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 50 of such title is amended by striking the item related to section 992 and inserting the following new item:

SEC. 582. Financial literacy training with respect to certain financial services for members of the uniformed services.

(a) In general.—The Secretary concerned shall provide the financial literacy training under section 992 of title 10, United States Code, for the financial services described in paragraph (4) of section 992(e) of such title (as amended and added by section 581 of this Act) to members of the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of such Secretary commencing not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(b) Definitions.—In this section, the terms “uniformed services” and “Secretary concerned” have the meaning given such terms in section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 583. Sense of Congress on financial literacy and preparedness of members of the Armed Forces.

(1) the Secretary of Defense should strengthen arrangements with other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, as well as with nonprofit organizations, in order to improve the financial literacy and preparedness of members of the Armed Forces; and

(2) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Chiefs of Staff of the Armed Forces should provide support for the financial literacy and preparedness training carried out under section 992 of title 10, United States Code (as amended by section 581 of this Act).

SEC. 586. Authority for applications for correction of military records to be initiated by the Secretary concerned.

(1) by striking “or his heir or legal representative” and inserting “(or the claimant’s heir or legal representative) or the Secretary concerned”; and

SEC. 587. Recordation of obligations for installment payments of incentive pays, allowances, and similar benefits when payment is due.

(a) In general.—Chapter 19 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 1015. Recordation of installment payment obligations for incentive pays and similar benefits

“(a) In general.—In the case of any pay, allowance, bonus, or other benefit described in subsection (b) that is paid to a member of the uniformed services on an installment basis, each installment payment shall be charged to appropriations that are available for obligation at the time such payment is payable.

“(b) Covered pay and benefits.—Subsection (a) applies to any incentive pay, special pay, or bonus, or similar periodic payment of pay or allowances, or of educational benefits or stipends, that is paid to a member of the uniformed services under this title or title 10.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 19 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(a) Scope and purpose.—Section 582 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended—

(2) in subsection (b), by striking “informational events and activities” and inserting “information, events, and activities”.

(1) in subsection (a), by striking “National Guard and Reserve members and their families” and inserting “eligible individuals”;

(2) in subsection (b), by striking “members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces, their families,” and inserting “eligible individuals”;

(3) in subsection (d)(2)(C), by striking “members of the Armed Forces and their families” and inserting “eligible individuals”;

(A) by striking “members of the Armed Forces and their family members” and inserting “eligible individuals”; and

(B) by striking “such members and their family members” and inserting “such eligible individuals”;

(5) in subsection (j), by striking “members of the Armed Forces and their families” and inserting “eligible individuals”;

(6) in subsection (k), by striking “individual members of the Armed Forces and their families” and inserting “eligible individuals”; and

“(l) Eligible individuals.—For the purposes of this section, the term ‘eligible individual’ means a member of a reserve component, a member of their family, or a designated representative who the Secretary of Defense determines to be eligible for the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program.”.

(1) OVERSIGHT OF YELLOW RIBBON REINTEGRATION PROGRAM.—Paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (d) of such section is amended by striking the second and third sentence and inserting “The office shall exercise oversight over the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program, and shall be responsible for coordination with State National Guard and Reserve organizations, including existing family and support programs.”.

(2) PARTNERSHIPS TO PROVIDE QUALITY OF LIFE SERVICES.—Paragraph (1)(B) of such subsection is amended by striking “substance abuse and mental health treatment services” and inserting “substance abuse, mental health treatment, and other quality of life services”.

(3) GRANT AUTHORITY.—Such subsection is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) GRANTS.—The Office for Reintegration Programs may make grants to conduct data collection, trend analysis, and curriculum development, and to prepare reports, in support of activities under this section.”.

(1) in subsection (d)(1)(A), by striking “and Air Force Reserve” and inserting “Air Force Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve”; and

(2) in subsection (e)(1), by striking “and Air Force Reserve” and inserting “Air Force Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve”.

(e) Due date of advisory board annual report.—Subsection (e)(4) of such section is amended by striking “March” and inserting “April”.

(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “administer the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration Program at the State level” and inserting “support and assist State National Guard and Reserve organization reintegration efforts”; and

(1) ENHANCED FLEXIBILITY.—Subsection (g) of such section is amended to read as follows:

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Office for Reintegration Programs shall assist State National Guard and Reserve organizations with the development and provision of information, events, and activities to support the health and well-being of eligible individuals before, during, and after periods of activation, mobilization, or deployment.

“(A) BEFORE ACTIVATION, MOBILIZATION, OR DEPLOYMENT.—Before such a period, the information, events, and activities described in paragraph (1) should focus on preparing eligible individuals and affected communities for the rigors of activation, mobilization, and deployment.

“(B) DURING ACTIVATION, MOBILIZATION, OR DEPLOYMENT.—During such a period, the information, events, and activities described in paragraph (1) should focus on—

“(i) helping eligible individuals cope with the challenges and stress associated with such period;

“(ii) decreasing the isolation of eligible individuals during such period; and

“(iii) preparing eligible individuals for the challenges associated with reintegration.

“(C) AFTER ACTIVATION, MOBILIZATION, OR DEPLOYMENT.—After such a period, the information, events, and activities described in paragraph (1) should focus on—

“(iii) helping eligible individuals deal with the challenges of reintegration;

“(iv) ensuring that eligible individuals understand what benefits they are entitled to and what resources are available to help them overcome the challenges of reintegration; and

“(v) providing a forum for addressing negative behaviors related to operational stress and reintegration.

“(3) MEMBER PAY.—Members shall receive appropriate pay for days spent attending such events and activities.

“(4) MINIMUM NUMBER OF EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES.—State National Guard and Reserve organizations shall provide to eligible individuals—

“(A) one event or activity before a period of activation, mobilization, or deployment;

“(B) one event or activity during a period of activation, mobilization, or deployment; and

“(C) two events or activities after a period of activation, mobilization, or deployment.”.

(A) in subsection (a), by striking “throughout the entire deployment cycle”;

(ii) by striking “well-being through the 4 phases” through the end of the subsection and inserting “well-being.”;

(D) in subsection (f), by striking “State Deployment Cycle” in the subsection heading.

(h) Additional permitted outreach service.—Subsection (h) of such section is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

(i) Support of department-Wide suicide prevention efforts.—Such section is further amended by inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection:

“(i) Support of suicide prevention efforts.—The Office for Reintegration Programs shall assist the Defense Suicide Prevention Office and the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury to collect and analyze information, suggestions, and best practices from State National Guard and Reserve organizations with respect to suicide prevention and community response programs.”.

(1) in subsection (d)(1)(B), by striking “Substance Abuse and the Mental Health Services Administration” and inserting “Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration”; and

(2) in subsection (e)(3)(C), by striking “Office of Reintegration Programs” and inserting “Office for Reintegration Programs”.

SEC. 589. Priority processing of applications for Transportation Worker Identification Credentials for members undergoing discharge or release from the Armed Forces.

(a) Priority processing.—The Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Secretary of Homeland Security to afford a priority in the processing of applications for a Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) to applications submitted by members of the Armed Forces who are undergoing separation, discharge, or release from the Armed Forces under honorable conditions, with such priority to provide for the review and adjudication of such an application by not later than 14 days after submittal, unless an appeal or waiver applies or further application documentation is necessary. The priority shall be so afforded commencing not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act to members who undergo separation, discharge, or release from the Armed Forces after the date on which the priority so commences being afforded.

(b) Memorandum of understanding.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall enter into a memorandum of understanding in connection with achieving the requirement in subsection (a).

(c) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall jointly submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the requirements of this section. The report shall set forth the following:

(2) A description of the number of individuals who applied for, and the number of individuals who have been issued, a Transportation Worker Identification Credential pursuant to the memorandum of understanding as of the date of the report.

(3) If any applications for a Transportation Worker Identification Credential covered by paragraph (2) were not reviewed and adjudicated within the deadline specified in subsection (a), a description of the reasons for the failure and of the actions being taken to assure that future applications for a Credential are reviewed and adjudicated within the deadline.

SEC. 590. Issuance of Recognition of Service ID Cards to certain members separating from the Armed Forces.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall issue to each covered individual a card that identifies such individual as a veteran and includes a photo of the individual and the name of the individual.

(2) DESIGNATION.—A card issued under paragraph (1) may be known as a “Recognition of Service ID Card”.

(b) Covered individuals.—For purposes of this section, a “covered individual” is an individual who is undergoing discharge or release from the Armed Forces (other than as the result of a punitive discharge adjudicated as part of a sentence at a court-martial after the effective date of this section) on or after the effective date provided for in subsection (e).

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may collect from civilian employees of the Department of Defense and contractor personnel of the Department who are issued a replacement card for a lost or stolen Department of Defense identification card such amount as the Secretary considers appropriate to defray the cost of the issuance of cards under subsection (a), and to implement the issuance of cards without the assignment of additional personnel for that purpose.

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS.—The Secretary shall deposit amounts collected under this subsection to the account or accounts providing funds for the issuance of cards under subsection (a).

(d) Recognition of Recognition of Service ID Cards for reduced prices of services, consumer products, and pharmaceuticals.—The Secretary of Defense may work with national retail chains that offer reduced prices on services, consumer products, and pharmaceuticals to veterans to ensure that such retail chains recognize cards issued under subsection (a) for purposes of offering reduced prices on services, consumer products, and pharmaceuticals.

(e) Effective date.—This section shall take effect on the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(a) Establishment of policy.—It is the policy of the United States that the Secretary of Defense shall minimize and reduce, to the maximum extent practicable, the number of uniformed military personnel providing network services to military installations within the United States.

(b) Prohibition.—Except as provided in subsection (c), each military service shall be prohibited from using uniform military personnel to provide network services to military installations within the United States 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) Exception.—Nothing in subsection (b) shall be construed as prohibiting the use of military personnel providing network services in support of combatant commands, special operations, the intelligence community, or the United States Cyber Command, including training for these organizations.

(d) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense or the Chief Information Officer may waive the prohibition in subsection (b) if necessary for the safety of human life, protection of property, or providing network services in support of a combat operation.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 30, 2016, the Chief Information Officer shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the transition of the current performance of network services from military personnel to other means.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) An assessment of the costs of using military personnel versus other means to provide network services for the military services.

(B) An estimate of the savings of transitioning the current performance of network services from military personnel to other means.

(f) Validation of cost and savings estimates.—The report required under subsection (e) shall be validated by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.

SEC. 592. Increase in number of days of active duty required to be performed by reserve component members for duty to be considered Federal service for purposes of unemployment compensation for ex-servicemembers.

(a) Increase of number of days.—Section 8521(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “90 days” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) and inserting “180 days”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the eanctment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to periods of Federal service commencing on or after that date.

(a) Waiver of section 1009 adjustment.—The adjustment to become effective during fiscal year 2016 required by section 1009 of title 37, United States Code, in the rates of monthly basic pay authorized members of the uniformed services shall not be made.

(b) Increase in basic pay.—Effective on January 1, 2016, the rates of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services are increased by 1.3 percent for enlisted member pay grades, warrant officer pay grades, and commissioned officer pay grades below pay grade O–7.

(c) Application of Executive Schedule Level II ceiling on payable rates for general and flag officers.—Section 203(a)(2) of title 37, United States Code, shall be applied for rates of basic pay payable for commissioned officers in pay grades O–7 through O–10 during calendar year 2016 by using the rate of pay for level II of the Executive Schedule in effect during 2014.

SEC. 602. Modification of percentage of national average monthly cost of housing usable in computation of basic allowance for housing inside the United States.

(a) Modification of percentage usable.—Section 403(b)(3)(B) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “one percent” and inserting “five percent”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2016, and shall apply with respect to computations of monthly amounts of basic allowance for housing inside the United States that occur for years beginning on or after that date.

SEC. 603. Extension of authority to provide temporary increase in rates of basic allowance for housing.

SEC. 604. Basic allowance for housing for married members of the uniformed services assigned for duty within normal commuting distance and for other members living together.

(a) BAH for married members assigned for duty within normal commuting distance.—Section 403 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(p) Single allowance for married members assigned for duty within normal commuting distance.—In the event two members of the uniformed services entitled to receive a basic allowance for housing under this section are married to one another and are each assigned for duty within normal commuting distance, basic allowance for housing under this section shall be paid only to the member having the higher pay grade, or to the member having rank in grade if both members have the same pay grade, and at the rate payable for a member of such pay grade with dependents (regardless of whether or not such members have dependents).”.

(b) BAH for other members living together.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(q) Reduced allowance for members living together.— (1) In the event two or more members of the uniformed services who are entitled to receive a basic allowance for housing under this section live together, basic allowance for housing under this section shall be paid to each such member at the rate as follows:

“(A) In the case of such a member in a pay grade below pay grade E–4, the rate otherwise payable to such member under this section.

“(B) In the case of such a member in a pay grade above pay grade E–3, the rate equal to the greater of—

“(i) 75 percent of the rate otherwise payable to such member under this section; or

(1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on October 1, 2015, and shall, except as provided in paragraph (2), apply with respect to allowances for basic housing payable for months beginning on or after that date.

(2) PRESERVATION OF CURRENT BAH FOR MEMBERS WITH UNINTERRUPTED ELIGIBILITY FOR BAH.—Notwithstanding any amendment made by this section, the monthly amount of basic allowance for housing payable to a member of the uniformed services under section 403 of title 37, United States Code, as of September 30, 2015, shall not be reduced by reason of such amendment so long as the member retains uninterrupted eligibility for such basic allowance for housing within an area of the United States or within an overseas location (as applicable).

SEC. 605. Repeal of inapplicability of modification of basic allowance for housing to benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

(a) Repeal.—Subsection (b) of section 604 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is repealed.

(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2016.

SEC. 606. Limitation on eligibility for supplemental subsistence allowances to members serving outside the United States and associated territory.

(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting “and paragraph (4)” after “subsection (d)”; and

“(4) After September 30, 2016, a member is eligible for a supplemental subsistence allowance under this section only if the member is serving outside the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or Guam.”.

SEC. 611. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for reserve forces.

(2) Section 308c(i), relating to Selected Reserve affiliation or enlistment bonus.

(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units.

(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.

(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.

(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.

(7) Section 478a(e), relating to reimbursement of travel expenses for inactive-duty training outside of normal commuting distance.

(8) Section 910(g), relating to income replacement payments for reserve component members experiencing extended and frequent mobilization for active duty service.

SEC. 612. One-year extension of certain bonus and special pay authorities for health care professionals.

(a) Title 10 authorities.—The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:

(2) Section 16302(d), relating to repayment of education loans for certain health professionals who serve in the Selected Reserve.

(b) Title 37 authorities.—The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”:

(1) Section 302c-1(f), relating to accession and retention bonuses for psychologists.

(3) Section 302e(a)(1), relating to incentive special pay for nurse anesthetists.

(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties.

(7) Section 302k(f), relating to accession bonus for medical officers in critically short wartime specialties.

(8) Section 302l(g), relating to accession bonus for dental specialist officers in critically short wartime specialties.

SEC. 613. One-year extension of special pay and bonus authorities for nuclear officers.

(1) Section 312(f), relating to special pay for nuclear-qualified officers extending period of active service.

SEC. 614. One-year extension of authorities relating to title 37 consolidated special pay, incentive pay, and bonus authorities.

(3) Section 333(i), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for nuclear officers.

(4) Section 334(i), relating to special aviation incentive pay and bonus authorities for officers.

(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.

(6) Section 336(g), relating to contracting bonus for cadets and midshipmen enrolled in the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps.

(10) Section 355(h), relating to retention incentives for members qualified in critical military skills or assigned to high priority units.

SEC. 615. One-year extension of authorities relating to payment of other title 37 bonuses and special pays.

(5) Section 316a(g), relating to incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency.

(6) Section 324(g), relating to accession bonus for new officers in critical skills.

(7) Section 326(g), relating to incentive bonus for conversion to military occupational specialty to ease personnel shortage.

(8) Section 327(h), relating to incentive bonus for transfer between Armed Forces.

(a) Increase.—Section 333(d)(1)(A) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “$35,000” and inserting “$50,000”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2016, and shall apply with respect to agreements entered into under section 333 of title 37, United States Code, on or after that date.

SEC. 617. Repeal of obsolete authority to pay bonus to encourage Army personnel to refer persons for enlistment in the Army.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 333 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 3252.

SEC. 621. Repeal of obsolete special travel and transportation allowance for survivors of deceased members from the Vietnam conflict.

SEC. 631. Thrift Savings Plan participation for members of the uniformed services.

(a) Modernized retirement system.—Section 8440e of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following:

“(1) TSP CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary concerned shall make contributions to the Thrift Savings Fund, in accordance with section 8432, except to the extent the requirements under such section are modified by this subsection, for the benefit of a member who—

“(B) makes an election described in section 1409(b)(4)(B) or 12739(f) of title 10.

“(2) MAXIMUM AMOUNT.—The amount contributed under this subsection by the Secretary concerned for the benefit of a member described in paragraph (1) for any pay period shall be not more than 5 percent of such member’s basic pay for such pay period.

“(A) AUTOMATIC CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary concerned shall make a contribution described in section 8432(c)(1) under this subsection for the benefit of a member described in paragraph (1) for any pay period during the period that—

“(i) begins on or after the day that is 60 days after the date the member first enters a uniformed service; and

“(ii) ends on the day such member completes 20 years of service as a member of the uniformed services.

“(B) MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary concerned shall make a contribution described in section 8432(c)(2) under this subsection for the benefit of a member described in paragraph (1) for any pay period during the period that—

“(i) begins on or after the day that is 2 years and 1 day after the date the member first enters a uniformed service; and

“(ii) ends on the day such member completes 20 years of service as a member of the uniformed services.

“(4) PROTECTIONS FOR SPOUSES AND FORMER SPOUSES.—Section 8435 shall apply to a member described in paragraph (1) in the same manner as such section is applied to an employee or Member under such section.

“(5) DEFINITION OF SECRETARY CONCERNED.—In this subsection the term ‘Secretary concerned’ has the meaning given the term in section 101 of title 37.”.

(b) Automatic enrollment in TSP.—Section 8432(b)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by striking “(ii) Members” and inserting “(ii)(I) Except as provided in subclause (II), members”; and

“(II) A member described in section 8440e(e)(1) shall be an eligible individual for purposes of this paragraph.”; and

“(F) Notwithstanding any other provision of this paragraph, a member described in section 8440e(e)(1) who has declined automatic enrollment into the Thrift Savings Plan shall be automatically reenrolled, on January 1 of the year succeeding the year for which the determination is made, to make contributions under subsection (a) at the default percentage of basic pay.

“(G) In this paragraph the term ‘member’ has the meaning given the term in section 211 of title 37.”.

“(C) 2 years of service in the case of a member of the uniformed services.”; and

“(6) For purposes of this subsection, a member of the uniformed services shall be considered to have separated from Government employment if the member is discharged or released from service in the uniformed services.”.

(d) Thrift Savings Plan default investment fund.—Section 8438(c)(2) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by section 2(a) of the Smarter Savings Act (Public Law 113–255), is amended—

(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking “(A) Consistent with the requirements of subparagraph (B), if an” and inserting “If an”; and

(2) Section 8432b(c)(2)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking “(including pursuant to an agreement under section 211(d) of title 37)”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries concerned, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, and the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board shall each and jointly take appropriate actions to ensure the full and effective commencement of the implementation of the amendments made by this section as of January 1, 2018.

(2) SECRETARY CONCERNED DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “Secretary concerned” has the meaning given that term in section 101 of title 37, United States Code.

(1) MODERNIZED RETIREMENT SYSTEM.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(2) OTHER AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by subsections (b) through (e) shall take effect on January 1, 2018.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1409(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(A) REDUCED MULTIPLIERS FOR MEMBERS RECEIVING TSP MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS.—Notwithstanding paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), in the case of a member who first becomes a member of the uniformed services after January 1, 2018, or a member who makes the election described in subparagraph (B)—

“(i) subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting ‘2’ for ‘2½”;

“(ii) clause (i) of paragraph (3)(B) shall be applied by substituting ‘60 percent’ for ‘75 percent’; and

“(iii) subclause (I) of paragraph (3)(B)(ii) shall be applied by substituting ‘2’ for ‘2½’.

“(i) ELECTION.—A member of a uniformed service serving on January 1, 2018, may elect to accept the reduced multipliers described in subparagraph (A) for purposes of calculating the retired pay of the member.

“(ii) EFFECT OF ELECTION.—A member making the election described in clause (i) shall—

“(I) have the retired pay of the member calculated using the reduced multipliers described in subparagraph (A);

“(II) receive Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) matching contributions pursuant to section 8440e(e) of title 5 for periods of service between the completion of 2 years of service and the completion of 20 years of service in accordance with paragraph (3)(B) of such section; and

“(I) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subclauses (II) and (III), a member of a uniformed service may make the election described in clause (i) during the period that begins on July 1, 2018, and ends on December 31, 2018.

“(II) HARDSHIP EXTENSION.—The Secretary concerned may extend the election period described in subclause (I) for a member who experiences a hardship as determined by the Secretary concerned.

“(III) MEMBERS EXPERIENCING BREAK IN SERVICE.—A member of a uniformed service returning to service after a break in service in which falls the election period specified in subclause (I) shall make the election described in clause (i) on the date of the reentry into service of the member.

“(iv) NO RETROACTIVE MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS PURSUANT TO ELECTION.—Thrift Savings Plan matching contributions may not be made for a member under this subparagraph for any pay period beginning before the date of the member's election under clause (i).

“(C) REGULATIONS.—Each Secretary concerned shall prescribe regulations to implement this paragraph.”.

(2) NON-REGULAR SERVICE.—Section 12739 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(1) REDUCED MULTIPLIERS FOR PERSONS RECEIVING TSP MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS.—In the case of a person who first performs reserve component service after January 1, 2018, after not having performed regular or reserve component service on or before that date, or a person who makes the election described in paragraph (2)—

“(A) paragraph (2) of subsection (a) shall be applied by substituting ‘2 percent’ for ‘2½ percent’;

“(B) subparagraph (A) of subsection (c)(2) shall be applied by substituting ‘60 percent’ for ‘75 percent’; and

“(C) clause (ii) of subsection (c)(2)(B) shall be applied by substituting ‘2 percent’ for ‘2½ percent’.

“(A) ELECTION.—A person performing reserve component service on January 1, 2018, may elect to accept the reduced multipliers described in paragraph (1) for purposes of calculating the retired pay of the person.

“(B) EFFECT OF ELECTION.—A person making the election described in subparagraph (A) shall—

“(i) have the retired pay of the person calculated using the reduced multipliers described in paragraph (1):

“(ii) receive Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) matching contributions pursuant to section 8440e(e) of title 5 for periods of service between the completion of 2 years of service and the completion of 20 years of service in accordance with paragraph (3)(B) of such section; and

“(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in clauses (ii) and (iii), a person performing reserve component service may make the election described in subparagraph (A) during the period that begins on July 1, 2018, and ends on December 31, 2018.

“(ii) HARDSHIP EXTENSION.—The Secretary concerned may extend the election period described in clause (i) for a person who experiences a hardship as determined by the Secretary concerned.

“(iii) PERSONS EXPERIENCING BREAK IN SERVICE.—A person returning to reserve component service after a break in reserve component service in which falls the election period specified in clause (i) shall make the election described in subparagraph (A) on the date of the reentry into service of the person.

“(iv) NO RETROACTIVE MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS PURSUANT TO ELECTION.—Thrift Savings Plan matching contributions may not be made for a person under this paragraph for any pay period beginning before the date of the person's election under subparagraph (A).

“(3) REGULATIONS.—Each Secretary concerned shall prescribe regulations to implement this subsection.”.

(A) COMPUTATION OF RETIRED PAY.—The table in section 1401(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(i) in paragraph (1) in column 2 of formula number 1, by striking “2½% of years of service credited to him under section 1208” and inserting “the retired pay multiplier determined for the member under section 1409 of this title”;

(ii) in paragraph (1) in column 2 of formula number 2, by striking “2½% of years of service credited to him under section 1208” and inserting “the retired pay multiplier determined for the member under section 1409 of this title”; and

(iii) in column 2 of each of formula number 4 and formula number 5, by striking “section 1409(a)” and inserting “section 1409”.

(B) CLARIFICATION REGARDING MODERNIZED RETIREMENT SYSTEM.—Section 1401a(b) of such title is amended—

“(5) ADJUSTMENTS FOR PARTICIPANTS IN MODERNIZED RETIREMENT SYSTEM.—Notwithstanding paragraph (3), if a member makes the election described in section 1409(b)(4) of this title, the Secretary shall increase the retired pay of such member in accordance with paragraph (2).”.

(2) NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONED OFFICER CORPS ACT OF 2002.—Paragraph (2) of section 245(a) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps Act of 2002 (33 U.S.C. 3045(a)) is amended to read as follows:

“(2) the retired pay multiplier determined under section 1409 of such title for the number of years of service that may be credited to the officer under section 1405 of such title as if the officer's service were service as a member of the Armed Forces.”.

(A) 15-YEAR CAREER STATUS BONUS REPAYMENT.—Subsection (f) of section 354 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—

“(2) If a person who is paid a bonus under this section subsequently makes an election described in section 1409(b)(4) or 12739(f) of title 10, the person shall repay any bonus payments received under this section in the same manner as repayments are made under section 373 of this title.”.

(B) SUNSET AND CONTINUATION OF PAYMENTS.—Such section 354 is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(g) Sunset and continuation of payments.— (1) A Secretary concerned may not pay a new bonus under this section after December 31, 2017.

“(2) Subject to subsection (f)(2), the Secretary concerned may continue to make payments after December 31, 2017, for bonuses that were awarded under this section on or before that date.”.

(4) PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.—Paragraph (4) of section 211(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 212) is amended—

(A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “at the rate of 2 ½ per centum of the basic pay of the highest grade held by him as such officer” and inserting “calculated by multiplying the retired pay base determined under section 1406 of title 10, United States Code, by the retired pay multiplier determined under section 1409 of such title for the numbers of years of service credited to the officer under this paragraph”; and

(i) in subparagraph (C), by striking “such pay, and” and inserting “such pay,”; and

(ii) in subparagraph (D), by striking “such basic pay.” and inserting “such basic pay, and (E) in the case of any officer who makes the election described in section 1409(b)(4) of title 10, United States Code, subparagraph (C) shall be applied by substituting ‘40 per centum’ for ‘50 per centum’ each place the term appears and subparagraph (D) shall be applied by substituting ‘60 per centum’ for ‘75 per centum’.”.

(1) MODERNIZED RETIREMENT SYSTEMS.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amendments made by subsection (b) shall take effect on January 1, 2018.

(B) TITLE 37 AMENDMENTS.—The amendments made by paragraph (3) of subsection (b) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 71 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(1) COVERED RETIRED PAY.—The term ‘covered retired pay’ means retired pay under—

“(C) the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps Act of 2002 (33 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.); or

“(A) (i) first becomes a member of a uniformed service on or after January 1, 2018; or

“(ii) makes the election described in section 1409(b)(4) or 12739(f) of this title; and

“(3) RETIREMENT AGE.—The term ‘retirement age’ has the meaning given the term in section 216(l) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 416(l)).

“(1) IN GENERAL.—An eligible person entitled to covered retired pay (including an eligible person who is entitled to such pay by reason of an election described in subsection (a)(2)(A)(ii)) may elect—

“(A) to receive a lump sum payment of the discounted present value at the time of the election of the amount of the covered retired pay that the eligible person is otherwise entitled to receive for the period beginning on the date of retirement and ending on the date the eligible person attains the eligible person’s retirement age; or

“(i) a lump sum payment of an amount equal to 50 percent of the amount otherwise receivable by the eligible person pursuant to subparagraph (A); and

“(ii) a monthly amount during the period described in subparagraph (A) equal to 50 percent of the amount of monthly covered retired pay the eligible person is otherwise entitled to receive during such period.

“(2) DISCOUNTED PRESENT VALUE.—The Secretary of Defense shall compute the discounted present value of amounts of covered retired pay that an eligible person is otherwise entitled to receive for a period for purposes of paragraph (1)(A) by—

“(A) estimating the aggregate amount of retired pay the person would receive for the period, taking into account cost-of-living adjustments under section 1401a of this title projected by the Secretary at the time the person separates from service and would otherwise begin receiving covered retired pay; and

“(B) reducing the aggregate amount estimated pursuant to subparagraph (A) by an appropriate percentage determined by the Secretary—

“(i) using average personal discount rates (as defined and calculated by the Secretary taking into consideration applicable and reputable studies of personal discount rates for military personnel and past actuarial experience in the calculation of personal discount rates under this paragraph); and

“(ii) in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices.

“(3) TIMING OF ELECTION.—An eligible person shall make the election under this subsection not later than 90 days before the date of the retirement of the eligible person from the uniformed services.

“(4) SINGLE PAYMENT OR COMBINATION OF PAYMENTS.—An eligible person may elect to receive a lump sum payment under this subsection in a single payment or in a combination of payments.

“(5) COMMENCEMENT OF PAYMENT.—An eligible person who makes an election under this subsection shall receive the lump sum payment, or the first installment of a combination of payments of the lump sum payment if elected under paragraph (4), as follows:

“(A) Not later than 60 days after the date of the retirement of the eligible person from the uniformed services.

“(B) In the case of an eligible person who is a member of a reserve component, not later than 60 days after the later of—

“(ii) the date on which the eligible person first becomes entitled to covered retired pay.

“(6) NO SUBSEQUENT ADJUSTMENT.—An eligible person who accepts payment of a lump sum under this subsection may not seek the review of or otherwise challenge the amount of the lump sum in light of any variation in cost-of-living adjustments under section 1401a of this title, actuarial assumptions, or other factors used by the Secretary in calculating the amount of the lump sum that occur after the Secretary pays the lump sum.

“(1) GENERAL RULE.—Subject to paragraph (2), an eligible person who makes an election described in subsection (b) shall be entitled to receive the eligible person’s monthly covered retired pay calculated in accordance with paragraph (2) after the eligible person attains the eligible person’s retirement age.

“(2) RESTORATION OF FULL RETIREMENT AMOUNT AT RETIREMENT AGE.—The retired pay of an eligible person who makes an election described in subsection (a) shall be recomputed, effective on the first day of the first month beginning after the person attains the eligible person’s retirement age, so as to be an amount equal to the amount of covered retired pay to which the eligible person would otherwise be entitled on that date if the annual increases, in the retired pay of the eligible person made to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index, had been made in accordance with section 1401a of this title.

“(d) Payment of retired pay to persons not making election.—An eligible person who does not make the election described in subsection (b) shall be paid the retired pay to which the eligible person is otherwise entitled under the applicable provisions of law referred to in subsection (a)(1).

“(e) Regulations.—The Secretary of Defense concerned shall prescribe regulations to carry out the provisions of this section.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 71 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(3) PAYMENTS FROM DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE MILITARY RETIREMENT FUND.—Section 1463(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “or 1414” and inserting “, 1414, or 1415”.

(b) Offset of veterans pension and compensation by amount of lump sum payments.—Section 5304 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) (1) Other than amounts payable under section 1413a or 1414 of title 10, the amount of pension and compensation benefits payable to a person under this title shall be reduced by the amount of any lump sum payment made to such person under section 1415 of title 10.

“(2) The Secretary shall collect any reduction under paragraph (1) from amounts otherwise payable to the person under this title, including pension and compensation payable under this title, before any pension and compensation payments under this title may be paid to the person.”.

SEC. 634. Continuation pay after 12 years of service for members of the uniformed services participating in the modernized retirement systems.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sections:

“§ 356. Continuation pay after 12 years of service: members participating in modernized retirement systems

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary concerned shall make a payment of continuation pay to each member of the uniformed services under the jurisdiction of the Secretary who—

“(A) (i) first becomes a member of a uniformed service after January 1, 2018; or

“(ii) subject to paragraph (2), makes the election described in section 1409(b)(4) or 12739(f) of title 10; and

“(B) after the date on which the member satisfies the applicable requirement in subparagraph (A)—

“(ii) enters into an agreement with the Secretary to serve for an additional 4 years of obligated service.

“(2) ELIGIBILITY DEPENDENT ON ELECTION BEFORE COMPLETION OF 12 YEARS OF SERVICE.—A member who makes an election described in paragraph (1)(A)(ii) after the member completes 12 years of service is not eligible for continuation pay under this section.

“(b) Amount.—The amount of continuation pay payable to a member under this section shall be the amount that is equal to—

“(A) the monthly basic pay of the member at 12 years of service multiplied by 2.5; plus

“(B) at the discretion of the Secretary concerned, the monthly basic pay of the member at 12 years of service multiplied by such number of months (not to exceed 13 months) as the Secretary concerned shall specify in the agreement of the member under subsection (a); and

“(A) the amount of monthly basic pay to which the member would be entitled at 12 years of service if the member were a member of a regular component multiplied by 0.5; plus

“(B) at the discretion of the Secretary concerned, the amount of monthly basic pay described in subparagraph (A) multiplied by such number of months (not to exceed 6 months) as the Secretary concerned shall specify in the agreement of the member under subsection (a).

“(c) Timing of payment.—The Secretary concerned shall pay continuation pay under this section to a member when the member completes 12 years of service.

“(d) Lump sum or installments.—A member may elect to receive continuation pay under this section in a lump sum or in a series of not more than 4 payments.

“(e) Relationship to other pay and allowances.—Continuation pay under this section is in addition to any other pay or allowance to which the member is entitled.

“(f) Repayment.—A member who receives continuation pay under this section and fails to complete the obligated service required under subsection (a)(2)(B)(ii) shall be subject to the repayment provisions of section 373 of this title.

“(g) Regulations.—Each Secretary concerned shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 5 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2018, and shall apply with respect to agreements entered into under section 356 of title 37, United States Code, after that date.

SEC. 635. Authority for retirement flexibility for members of the uniformed services.

(a) Authority for retirement flexibility.—Chapter 63 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

“§ 1276. Retirement flexibility: authority to modify years of service required for retirement for particular occupational specialities or other groupings

“(a) Authority.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary concerned may modify the years of service required for an eligible member to retire, to greater than or fewer than 20 years of service, in order to facilitate management actions that shape the personnel profile or correct manpower shortages within an occupational specialty or other grouping of members of the uniformed services.

“(b) Eligible member defined.—In this section, the term ‘eligible member’ means a member of the uniformed services working in an occupational specialty or other grouping designated by the Secretary concerned as in need of a management action described in subsection (a).

“(1) NOTICE REQUIRED.—The Secretary concerned shall submit to Congress notice of any proposed modification under subsection (a).

“(2) LIMITATION.—The Secretary concerned may not implement a proposed modification under subsection (a) until one year after the day on which the notice of the modification is submitted to Congress under paragraph (1).

“(d) Applicability.—The Secretary concerned may only modify the required years of service under subsection (a) for an eligible member who first becomes a member of a uniformed service on or after the date of the expiration of the one year period described in subsection (c)(2) that is applicable to the occupational specialty or other grouping in which the eligible member works.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 63 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 636. Treatment of Department of Defense Military Retirement Fund as a qualified trust.

(a) In general.—Chapter 74 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(1) the Fund shall be treated as a trust described in section 401(a) of such Code (26 U.S.C. 401(a)) which is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code (26 U.S.C. 501(a)); and

“(2) any contribution to, or distribution from, the Fund shall be treated in the same manner as contributions to or distributions from such a trust.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 74 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 641. Death of former spouse beneficiaries and subsequent remarriages under Survivor Benefit Plan.

(a) In general.—Section 1448(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(A) TERMINATION OF PARTICIPATION IN PLAN.—A person who elects to provide an annuity to a former spouse under paragraph (2) or (3) and whose former spouse subsequently dies is no longer a participant in the Plan, effective on the date of death of the former spouse.

“(B) AUTHORITY FOR ELECTION OF NEW SPOUSE BENEFICIARY.—If a person’s participation in the Plan is discontinued by reason of the death of a former spouse beneficiary, the person may elect to resume participation in the Plan and to elect a new spouse beneficiary as follows:

“(i) MARRIED ON THE DATE OF DEATH OF FORMER SPOUSE.—A person who is married at the time of the death of the former spouse beneficiary may elect to provide coverage to that person’s spouse. Such an election must be received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of death of the former spouse beneficiary.

“(ii) MARRIAGE AFTER DEATH OF FORMER SPOUSE BENEFICIARY.—A person who is not married at the time of the death of the former spouse beneficiary and who later marries may elect to provide spouse coverage. Such an election must be received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries.

“(C) EFFECTIVE DATE OF ELECTION.—The effective date of election under this paragraph shall be as follows:

“(i) An election under subparagraph (B)(i) is effective as of the first day of the first calendar month following the death of the former spouse beneficiary.

“(ii) An election under subparagraph (B)(ii) is effective as of the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

“(D) LEVEL OF COVERAGE.—A person making an election under subparagraph (B) may not reduce the base amount previously elected.

“(E) PROCEDURES.—An election under this paragraph shall be in writing, signed by the participant, and made in such form and manner as the Secretary concerned may prescribe.

(b) Effective date.—Paragraph (7) of section 1448(b) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to any person whose former spouse beneficiary dies on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(A) who before the date of the enactment of this Act had a former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor Benefit Plan who died before that date; and

may elect to provide spouse coverage for such spouse under the Plan, regardless of whether the person married such spouse before or after the death of the former spouse beneficiary. Any such election may only be made during the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE OF ELECTION IF MARRIED AT LEAST A YEAR AT DEATH FORMER SPOUSE.—If the person providing the annuity was married to the spouse beneficiary for at least one year at the time of the death of the former spouse beneficiary, the effective date of such election shall be the first day of the first month after the death of the former spouse beneficiary.

(3) OTHER EFFECTIVE DATE.—If the person providing the annuity married the spouse beneficiary after (or during the one-year period preceding) the death of the former spouse beneficiary, the effective date of the election shall be the first day of the first month following the first anniversary of the person’s marriage to the spouse beneficiary.

(4) RESPONSIBILITY FOR PREMIUMS.—A person electing to participate in the Plan under this subsection shall be responsible for payment of all premiums due from the effective date of the election.

SEC. 642. Transitional compensation and other benefits for dependents of members of the Armed Forces ineligible to receive retired pay as a result of court-martial sentence.

(a) In general.—Chapter 53 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1059 the following new section:

“§ 1059a. Dependents of members of the armed forces ineligible to receive retired pay as a result of court-martial sentence: transitional compensation and other benefits; commissary and exchange benefits

“(a) Authority To pay compensation.—The Secretary of Defense, with respect to the armed forces (other than the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy), and the Secretary of Homeland Security, with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, may each carry out a program under which the Secretary may pay monthly transitional compensation in accordance with this section to dependents or former dependents of a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b) who is under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.

“(b) Members covered.—This section applies in the case of a member of the armed forces eligible for retired or retainer pay under this title for years of service who—

“(1) is separated from the armed forces pursuant to the sentence of a court-martial as a result of misconduct while a member; and

“(2) has eligibility to receive retired pay terminated pursuant to such sentence.

“(c) Recipient of payments.— (1) In the case of a member of the armed forces described in subsection (b), the Secretary may pay compensation under this section to dependents or former dependents of the member as follows:

“(A) If the member was married at the time of the commission of the offense resulting in separation from the armed forces, such compensation may be paid to the spouse or former spouse to whom the member was married at that time, including an amount for each, if any, dependent child of the member who resides in the same household as that spouse or former spouse.

“(B) If there is a spouse or former spouse who is or, but for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible for compensation under this section and if there is a dependent child of the member who does not reside in the same household as that spouse or former spouse, compensation under this section may be paid to each such dependent child of the member who does not reside in that household.

“(C) If there is no spouse or former spouse who is or, but for subsection (d)(2), would be eligible under this section, compensation under this section may be paid to the dependent children of the member.

“(2) A dependent or former dependent of a member described in subsection (b) is not eligible for transitional compensation under this section if the Secretary concerned determines (under regulations prescribed under subsection (g)) that the dependent or former dependent either—

“(A) was an active participant in the conduct constituting the offense under chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) for which the member was convicted and separated from the armed forces; or

“(d) Commencement and duration of payment.— (1) Payment of transitional compensation under this section shall commence—

“(A) as of the date the court-martial sentence is adjudged if the sentence, as adjudged, includes—

“(B) if there is a pretrial agreement that provides for disapproval or suspension of the dismissal, dishonorable discharge, bad conduct discharge, or forfeiture of all pay and allowances, as of the date of the approval of the court-martial sentence by the person acting under section 860(c) of this title (article 60(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) if the sentence, as approved, includes—

“(i) an unsuspended dismissal, dishonorable discharge, or bad conduct discharge; and

“(2) Paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (e), paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (g), and subsections (f) and (h) of section 1059 of this title shall apply in determining—

“(C) the circumstances under which the payment of such compensation may or will cease.

“(e) Commissary and exchange benefits.—A dependent or former dependent who receives transitional compensation under this section shall, while receiving such payments, be entitled to use commissary and exchange stores in the same manner as provided in subsection (j) of section 1059 of this title.

“(f) Coordination of benefits.— (1) The Secretary concerned may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both this section, on the one hand, and section 1059, 1408(h), or 1408(i) of this title, on the other hand. In the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court order provides for payments pursuant to section 1408(h) or 1408(i) of this title and to whom the Secretary offers payments under this section or section 1059 of this title, the spouse or former spouse shall elect which payments to receive.

“(2) Upon the cessation of payments of transitional compensation to a spouse or former spouse under this section pursuant to subsection (d)(2), a spouse or former spouse who elected payments of transitional compensation under this section and either remains or becomes eligible for payments under section 1408(h) or 1408(i) of this title, as applicable, may commence receipt of payments under such section 1408(h) or 1408(i) in accordance with such section.

“(g) Regulations.—The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section with respect to the armed forces (other than the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy). The Secretary of Homeland Security shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy.

“(h) Dependent child defined.—In this section, the term ‘dependent child’, with respect to a member or former member of the armed forces referred to in subsection (b), has the meaning given such term in subsection (l) of section 1059 of this title, except that status as a ‘dependent child’ shall be determined as of the date on which the member described in subsection (b) is convicted of the offense concerned.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1059 the following new item:

“(i) Coordination of benefits.—The Secretary concerned may not make payments to a spouse or former spouse under both this section, on the one hand, and section 1059a, 1408(h), or 1408(i) of this title, on the other hand. In the case of a spouse or former spouse for whom a court order provides for payments pursuant to section 1408(h) or 1408(i) of this title and to whom the Secretary offers payments under this section or section 1059a of this title, the spouse or former spouse shall elect which payments to receive.”.

(a) Operating expenses.—Section 2483 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

“(d) Transportation costs for certain goods and supplies.—Appropriated funds may be used to pay any costs associated with the transportation of commissary goods and supplies to overseas areas, but only to the extent that the working capital fund for commissary operations is reimbursed for the payment of such costs. The sales prices in commissary stores worldwide shall be adjusted in an equal percentage to the extent necessary to provide sufficient gross revenues from such sales to make such reimbursements.

“(e) Uniform system-wide pricing.—The defense commissary system shall be managed with the objective of attaining uniform system-wide pricing.”.

“(e) Sales price establishment.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish the sales price of merchandise sold in, at, or by commissary stores in amounts sufficient to finance operating expenses as prescribed in section 2483(b) of this title and the replenishment of inventories.”; and

(A) in the subsection caption, by striking “and maintenance” and inserting “maintenance, and purchase of operating supplies”; and

(ii) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

(c) Overseas transportation.—Section 2643(b) of such title is amended by striking the first sentence and inserting the following new sentence: “Defense working capital funds may be used to cover the transportation costs of commissary goods and supplies as provided in section 2483(d) of this title.”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth a plan for the privatization, in whole or in part, of the defense commissary system of the Department of Defense.

(2) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary shall consult with major grocery retailers in the continental United States in developing the plan.

(1) PLAN ELEMENTS.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall ensure the provision of high quality grocery goods and products, discount savings to patrons, and high levels of customer satisfaction while achieving savings for the Department of Defense.

(A) an evaluation of the current rates of basic pay and basic allowance for subsistence payable to members of the Armed Forces, and an assessment whether such pay and allowance should be adjusted to ensure that members maintain purchasing power for grocery goods and products under the plan; and

(B) an estimate of any initial and long-term costs or savings to the Department as a result of the implementation of the plan.

(3) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION.—The plan shall include recommendations for such legislative action as the Secretary considers appropriate to implement the plan.

(c) Comptroller General of the United States assessment of plan.—Not later than 120 days after the submittal of the report required by subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the committees of Congress referred to in that subsection a report setting forth an assessment by the Comptroller General of the plan set forth in the report required by that subsection.

(1) PILOT PROGRAM REQUIRED.—Commencing as soon as practicable after the submittal to Congress of the report required by subsection (c), the Secretary shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of the plan set forth in the report required by subsection (a).

(2) NUMBER AND LOCATION OF COMMISSARIES.—The pilot program shall involve not fewer than five commissaries selected by the Secretary for purposes of the pilot program from among commissaries in the largest markets of the defense commissary system in the United States.

(3) SCOPE OF PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program in accordance with the plan described in paragraph (1) as modified by the Secretary in light of the assessment of the plan by the Comptroller General pursuant to subsection (c). The Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a notice on any modifications made to the plan for purposes of the pilot program in light of the assessment.

(4) ADDITIONAL ELEMENT ON ONLINE PURCHASES.—In an addition to any requirements under paragraph (3), the Secretary may include in the pilot program a component designed to permit eligible beneficiaries of the defense commissary system in the catchment areas of the commissaries selected for participation in the pilot program to order and purchase grocery goods and products otherwise available through the defense commissary system through the Internet and to receive items so ordered through home delivery.

(6) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the completion of the pilot program, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the pilot program, including—

(A) an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of carrying out the plan described in paragraph (1), as modified, if at all, as described in paragraph (3); and

(B) a description of any modifications to the plan the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the pilot program.

SEC. 653. Comptroller General of the United States report on the Commissary Surcharge, Non-appropriated Fund, and Privately-Financed Major Construction Program.

(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the Commissary Surcharge, Non-appropriated Fund and Privately-Financed Major Construction Program of the Department of Defense.

(1) An assessment whether the Secretary of Defense has established policies and procedures to ensure the timely submittal to the committees of Congress referred to in subsection (a) of notice on construction projects proposed to be funded through the program referred to in that subsection.

(2) An assessment whether the Secretaries of the military departments have developed and implemented policies and procedures to comply with the policies and directives of the Department of Defense for the submittal to such committees of Congress of notice on such construction projects.

(3) An assessment whether the Secretary of Defense has established policies and procedures to notify such committees of Congress when such construction projects have been commenced without notice to Congress.

(4) An assessment whether construction projects described in paragraph (3) have been completed before submittal of notice to Congress as described in that paragraph and, if so, a list of such projects.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the regulations prescribed under this section, a covered beneficiary under the TRICARE program shall have access to up to four urgent care visits per year under that program without the need for preauthorization for such visits.

(2) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out paragraph (1).

(1) publish information on any modifications made pursuant to subsection (a) to the authorization requirements for the receipt of urgent care under the TRICARE program—

(A) on the primary Internet website that is available to the public of the Department; and

(B) on the primary Internet website that is available to the public of each military medical treatment facility; and

(2) ensure that such information is made available on the primary Internet website that is available to the public of each current managed care contractor that has established a health care provider network under the TRICARE program.

(c) Definitions.—In this section, the terms “covered beneficiary” and “TRICARE program” have the meaning given such terms in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 702. Modifications of cost-sharing requirements for the TRICARE Pharmacy Benefits Program.

“(6) (A) In the case of any of the years 2016 through 2025, the cost-sharing amounts under this subsection shall be determined in accordance with the following table:

“(B) For any year after 2025, the cost-sharing amounts under this subsection shall be equal to the cost-sharing amounts for the previous year adjusted by an amount, if any, determined by the Secretary to reflect changes in the costs of pharmaceutical agents and prescription dispensing, rounded to the nearest dollar.

“(C) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (B), the cost-sharing amounts under this subsection for any year for a dependent of a member of the uniformed services who dies while on active duty, a member retired under chapter 61 of this title, or a dependent of such a member shall be equal to the cost-sharing amounts, if any, for 2015.”.

“For:	The cost-sharing amount for 30-day supply of a retail generic is:	The cost-sharing amount for 30-day supply of a retail formulary is:	The cost-sharing amount for a 90-day supply of a mail order generic is:	The cost-sharing amount for a 90-day supply of a mail order formulary is:	The cost-sharing amount for a 90-day supply of a mail order non-formulary is:
2016	$8	$28	$0	$28	$54
2017	$8	$30	$0	$30	$58
2018	$8	$32	$0	$32	$62
2019	$9	$34	$9	$34	$66
2020	$10	$36	$10	$36	$70
2021	$11	$38	$11	$38	$75
2022	$12	$40	$12	$40	$80
2023	$13	$43	$13	$43	$85
2024	$14	$45	$14	$45	$90
2025	$14	$46	$14	$46	$92

SEC. 703. Expansion of continued health benefits coverage to include discharged and released members of the Selected Reserve.

(a) In general.—Subsection (b) of section 1078a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (3) through (5), respectively; and

“(2) A member of the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve of a reserve component of the armed forces who—

“(A) is discharged or released from service in the Selected Reserve, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, under other than adverse conditions, as characterized by the Secretary concerned;

“(B) immediately preceding that discharge or release, is eligible to enroll in TRICARE Standard coverage under section 1076d of this title; and

“(C) after that discharge or release, would not otherwise be eligible for any benefits under this chapter.”.

(b) Notification of eligibility.—Subsection (c)(2) of such section is amended by inserting “or subsection (b)(2)” after “subsection (b)(1)”.

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (3) through (5), respectively; and

“(2) In the case of a member described in subsection (b)(2), the written election shall be submitted to the Secretary concerned before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the later of—

“(A) the date of the discharge or release of the member from service in the Selected Reserve; and

“(B) the date the member receives the notification required pursuant to subsection (c).”.

(d) Coverage of dependents.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended by inserting “or subsection (b)(2)” after “subsection (b)(1)”.

(e) Period of continued coverage.—Subsection (g)(1) of such section is amended—

(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) through (D) as subparagraphs (C) through (E); and

“(B) in the case of a member described in subsection (b)(2), the date which is 18 months after the date the member ceases to be eligible to enroll in TRICARE Standard coverage under section 1076d of this title;”.

(A) in paragraph (3), by striking “subsection (b)(2)” and inserting “subsection (b)(3)”; and

(B) in paragraph (4), by striking “subsection (b)(3)” and inserting “subsection (b)(4)”;

(A) in paragraph (3), as redesignated by subsection (c)(1), by striking “subsection (b)(2)” and inserting “subsection (b)(3)”;

(B) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated, by striking “subsection (b)(3)” and inserting “subsection (b)(4)”; and

(3) in subsection (e), by striking “subsection (b)(2) or subsection (b)(3)” and inserting “subsection (b)(3) or subsection (b)(4)”; and

(i) in subparagraph (C), as redesignated by subsection (e)(1), by striking “subsection (b)(2)” and inserting “subsection (b)(3)”;

(ii) in subparagraph (D), as so redesignated, by striking “subsection (b)(3)” and inserting “subsection (b)(4)”; and

(iii) in subparagraph (E), as so redesignated, by striking “subsection (b)(4)” and inserting “subsection (b)(5)”;

(i) by striking “paragraph (1)(B)” and inserting “paragraph (1)(C)”; and

(ii) by striking “subsection (b)(2)” and inserting “subsection (b)(3)”; and

(i) by striking “paragraph (1)(C)” and inserting “paragraph (1)(D)”; and

SEC. 704. Expansion of reimbursement for smoking cessation services for certain TRICARE beneficiaries.

(3) in paragraph (2), by striking “during fiscal year 2009” and inserting “after September 30, 2008”.

SEC. 705. Pilot program on treatment of members of the Armed Forces for post-traumatic stress disorder related to military sexual trauma.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may conduct a pilot program to provide intensive outpatient programs to treat members of the Armed Forces suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from military sexual trauma, including treatment for substance abuse, depression, and other issues related to such conditions.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out the pilot program through the award of grants to community partners described in paragraph (2).

(2) COMMUNITY PARTNERS.—A community partner described in this paragraph is a private health care organization or institution that—

(B) provides evidence-based treatment for psychological and neurological conditions that are common among members of the Armed Forces, including post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, substance abuse, and depression;

(D) provides health care under the TRICARE program (as that term is defined in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code).

(1) carry out intensive outpatient programs of short duration to treat members of the Armed Forces suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from military sexual trauma, including treatment for substance abuse, depression, and other issues related to such conditions;

(2) use evidence-based and evidence-informed treatment strategies in carrying out such programs;

(3) share clinical and outreach best practices with other community partners participating in the pilot program; and

(4) annually assess outcomes for members of the Armed Forces individually and throughout the community partner with respect to the treatment of conditions described in paragraph (1).

(d) Federal share.—The Federal share of the costs of a program carried out by a community partner using a grant under this section may not exceed 50 percent.

(e) Termination.—The Secretary of Defense may not carry out the conduct of the pilot program after the date that is three years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE program seeking an appointment for health care under such program at a military medical treatment facility obtain such an appointment at such facility within the wait-time goals specified for the receipt of such health care pursuant to the health care access standards established under subsection (b).

(2) USE OF CONTRACT AUTHORITY.—If a covered beneficiary is unable to obtain an appointment within the wait-time goals described in paragraph (1), such covered beneficiary shall be offered an appointment within such wait-time goals with a health care provider with which a contract has been entered into under the TRICARE program.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish health care access standards, including wait-time goals for appointments, for the receipt of health care under the TRICARE program, whether received at military medical treatment facilities or from health care providers with which a contract has been entered into under such program.

(2) CATEGORIES OF CARE.—The health care access standards established under paragraph (1) shall include standards with respect to the following categories of health care:

(A) Primary care, including pediatric care, maternity care, gynecological care, and other subcategories of primary care.

(B) Specialty care, including behavioral health care and other subcategories of specialty care.

(3) MODIFICATIONS.—The Secretary may modify the health care access standards established under paragraph (1) whenever the Secretary considers the modification of such standards appropriate.

(4) PUBLICATION.—The Secretary shall publish the health care access standards established under paragraph (1), and any modifications to such standards, in the Federal Register and on a publicly accessible Internet website of the Department of Defense.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall publish on a publicly accessible Internet website of each military medical treatment facility that offers a category or subcategory of health care covered by the standards under subsection (b)(2) the average wait-time for a covered beneficiary for an appointment at such facility for the receipt of each such category and subcategory of health care.

(2) MODIFICATIONS.—Whenever there is a modification of a wait-time for a category or subcategory of health care published under this subsection, the Secretary shall publish on a publicly accessible Internet website of each military medical treatment facility that provides such category or subcategory of health care the modified wait-time for such category or subcategory of health care.

(d) Definitions.—In this section, the terms “covered beneficiary” and “TRICARE program” have the meaning given such terms in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE program who are covered under a health plan under such program are able to seamlessly access health care under such health plan in each TRICARE program region.

(2) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out paragraph (1).

(b) Mechanisms to ensure portability.—In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall do the following:

(1) Provide for the automatic electronic transfer of demographic, enrollment, and claims information between the contractors responsible for administering the TRICARE program in each TRICARE region when covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE program relocate between such regions.

(2) Ensure such covered beneficiaries are able to obtain a new primary health care provider within ten days of undergoing such relocation.

(3) Develop a process for such covered beneficiaries to receive urgent care without preauthorization while undergoing such relocation.

(1) publish information on any modifications made pursuant to subsection (a) with respect to the ability of covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE program who are covered under a health plan under such program to access health care in each TRICARE region on the primary Internet website of the Department that is available to the public; and

(2) ensure that such information is made available on the primary Internet website that is available to the public of each current contractor responsible for administering the TRICARE program.

(d) Definitions.—In this section, the terms “covered beneficiary” and “TRICARE program” have the meaning given such terms in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 713. Improvement of mental health care provided by health care providers of the Department of Defense.

(1) INITIAL TRAINING.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all primary care and mental health care providers of the Department of Defense receive, or have already received, evidence-based training on the recognition and assessment of individuals at risk for suicide and the management of such risk.

(2) ADDITIONAL TRAINING.—The Secretary shall ensure that providers who receive, or have already received, training described in paragraph (1) receive such additional training thereafter as may be required based on evidence-based changes in health care practices.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report assessing the mental health workforce of the Department of Defense and the long-term mental health care needs of members of the Armed Forces and their dependents for purposes of determining the long-term requirements of the Department for mental health care providers.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include an assessment of the following:

(A) The number of mental health care providers of the Department of Defense as of the date of the submittal of the report, disaggregated by specialty, including psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, mental health counselors, and marriage and family therapists.

(B) The number of mental health care providers that are anticipated to be needed by the Department.

(D) Locations in which mental health care providers are anticipated to be needed by the Department.

(c) Plan for development of procedures to measure mental health data.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a plan for the Department of Defense to develop procedures to compile and assess data relating to the following:

(2) Variations in such outcomes among different medical facilities of the Department.

(3) Barriers, if any, to the implementation by mental health care providers of the Department of the clinical practice guidelines and other evidence-based treatments and approaches recommended for such providers by the Secretary.

SEC. 714. Comprehensive standards and access to contraception counseling for members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Purpose.—The purpose of this section is to ensure that all health care providers employed by the Department of Defense who provide care for members of the Armed Forces, including general practitioners, are provided, through clinical practice guidelines, the most current evidence-based and evidence-informed standards of care with respect to methods of contraception and counseling on methods of contraception.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall compile clinical practice guidelines for health care providers described in subsection (a) on standards of care with respect to methods of contraception and counseling on methods of contraception for members of the Armed Forces.

(2) SOURCES.—The Secretary shall compile clinical practice guidelines under this subsection from among clinical practice guidelines established by appropriate health agencies and professional organizations, including the following:

(3) UPDATES.—The Secretary shall from time to time update the list of clinical practice guidelines compiled under this subsection to incorporate into such guidelines new or updated standards of care with respect to methods of contraception and counseling on methods of contraception.

(A) INITIAL DISSEMINATION.—As soon as practicable after the compilation of clinical practice guidelines pursuant to paragraph (1), but commencing not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide for rapid dissemination of the clinical practice guidelines to health care providers described in subsection (a).

(B) UPDATES.—As soon as practicable after the adoption under paragraph (3) of any update to the clinical practice guidelines compiled pursuant to this subsection, the Secretary shall provide for the rapid dissemination of such clinical practice guidelines, as so updated, to health care providers described in subsection (a).

(C) PROTOCOLS.—Clinical practice guidelines, and any updates to such guidelines, shall be disseminated under this paragraph in accordance with administrative protocols developed by the Secretary for that purpose.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, in order to assist health care providers described in subsection (a), develop and implement clinical decision support tools that reflect, through the clinical practice guidelines compiled pursuant to subsection (b), the most current evidence-based and evidence-informed standards of care with respect to methods of contraception and counseling on methods of contraception.

(2) UPDATES.—The Secretary shall from time to time update the clinical decision support tools developed under this subsection to incorporate into such tools new or updated guidelines on methods of contraception and counseling on methods of contraception.

(3) DISSEMINATION.—Clinical decision support tools, and any updates to such tools, shall be disseminated under this subsection in accordance with administrative protocols developed by the Secretary for that purpose. Such protocols shall be similar to the administrative protocols developed under subsection (b)(4)(C).

(d) Access to contraception counseling.—As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall ensure that women members of the Armed Forces have access to comprehensive counseling on the full range of methods of contraception provided by health care providers described in subsection (a) during health care visits, including visits as follows:

(1) During predeployment health care visits, including counseling that provides specific information women need regarding the interaction between anticipated deployment conditions and various methods of contraception.

(e) Incorporation into surveys of questions on servicewomen experiences with family planning services and counseling.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall integrate into the surveys by the Department of Defense specified in paragraph (2) questions designed to obtain information on the experiences of women members of the Armed Forces—

(B) in using family planning methods, including information on which method was preferred and whether deployment conditions affected the decision on which family planning method or methods to be used; and

(2) COVERED SURVEYS.—The surveys into which questions shall be integrated as described in paragraph (1) are the following:

(1) EDUCATION PROGRAMS.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a uniform standard curriculum to be used in education programs on family planning for all members of the Armed Forces, including both men and women members.

(2) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that the education programs described in paragraph (1) should use the latest technology available to efficiently and effectively deliver information to members of the Armed Forces.

(3) ELEMENTS.—The uniform standard curriculum under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) Information for members of the Armed Forces on active duty to make informed decisions regarding family planning.

(B) Information about the prevention of unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

(C) Information on the importance of providing comprehensive family planning for members of the Armed Forces, and their commanding officers, and on the positive impact family planning can have on the health and readiness of the Armed Forces.

(E) Clear, user-friendly information on the full range of methods of contraception and where members of the Armed Forces can access their chosen method of contraception.

(F) Information on all applicable laws and policies so that members are informed of their rights and obligations.

(H) Information on the unique circumstances encountered by members of the Armed Forces, and the effects of such circumstances on the use of contraception.

SEC. 715. Waiver of recoupment of erroneous payments due to administrative error under the TRICARE program.

(a) In general.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1095f the following new section:

“§ 1095g. TRICARE program: waiver of recoupment of erroneous payments due to administrative error

“(a) Waiver of recoupment.—The Secretary of Defense may waive recoupment from a covered beneficiary who has benefitted from an erroneous TRICARE payment in a case in which each of the following applies:

“(1) The payment was made due to an administrative error by an employee of the Department of Defense or a contractor under the TRICARE program.

“(2) The covered beneficiary (or in the case of a minor, the parent or guardian of the covered beneficiary) had a good faith, reasonable belief that the covered beneficiary was entitled to the benefit of such payment under this chapter.

“(4) The Secretary determines that a waiver of recoupment of such payment is necessary to prevent an injustice.

“(b) Responsibility of contractor.—In any case in which the Secretary waives recoupment under subsection (a) and the administrative error was on the part of a contractor under the TRICARE program, the Secretary shall, consistent with the requirements and procedures of the applicable contract, impose financial responsibility on the contractor for the erroneous payment.

“(c) Finality of determinations.—Any determination by the Secretary under this section to waive or decline to waive recoupment under subsection (a) is a final determination and shall not be subject to appeal or judicial review.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1095f the following new item:

SEC. 716. Designation of certain non-Department mental health care providers with knowledge relating to treatment of members of the Armed Forces.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a system by which any non-Department mental health care provider that meets eligibility criteria established by the Secretary relating to the knowledge described in paragraph (2) receives a mental health provider readiness designation from the Department of Defense.

(2) KNOWLEDGE DESCRIBED.—The knowledge described in this paragraph is the following:

(A) Knowledge and understanding with respect to the culture of members of the Armed Forces and family members and caregivers of members of the Armed Forces.

(B) Knowledge with respect to evidence-based treatments that have been approved by the Department for the treatment of mental health issues among members of the Armed Forces.

(1) REGISTRY.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish and update as necessary a registry that is available to the public of all non-Department mental health care providers that are currently designated under subsection (a)(1).

(2) PROVIDER LIST.—The Secretary shall update all lists maintained by the Secretary of non-Department mental health care providers that provide mental health care under the laws administered by the Secretary by indicating the providers that are currently designated under subsection (a)(1).

(c) Non-Department mental health care provider defined.—In this section, the term “non-Department mental health care provider”—

(2) includes psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric nurses, social workers, mental health counselors, marriage and family therapists, and other mental health care providers designated by the Secretary of Defense.

SEC. 717. Limitation on conversion of military medical and dental positions to civilian medical and dental positions.

(a) Limited authority for conversion.—Chapter 49 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 976 the following new section:

“§ 977. Conversion of military medical and dental positions to civilian medical and dental positions: limitation

“(a) Requirements relating to conversion.—A military medical or dental position within the Department of Defense may not be converted to a civilian medical or dental position unless the Secretary of Defense determines that—

“(2) conversion of the position would not result in the degradation of medical or dental care or the medical or dental readiness of the armed forces; and

“(3) conversion of the position to a civilian medical or dental position is more cost effective than retaining the position as a military medical or dental position, consistent with Department of Defense Instruction 7041.04.

“(1) The term ‘military medical or dental position’ means a position for the performance of health care functions within the armed forces held by a member of the armed forces.

“(2) The term ‘civilian medical or dental position’ means a position for the performance of health care functions within the Department of Defense held by an employee of the Department or of a contractor of the Department.

“(3) The term ‘military essential’, with respect to a position, means that the position must be held by a member of the armed forces, as determined in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

“(4) The term ‘conversion’, with respect to a military medical or dental position, means a change of the position to a civilian medical or dental position, effective as of the date of the manning authorization document of the military department making the change (through a change in designation from military to civilian in the document, the elimination of the listing of the position as a military position in the document, or through any other means indicating the change in the document or otherwise).”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 49 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 976 the following new item:

(c) Repeal of related prohibition.—Section 721 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (10 U.S.C. 129c note) is repealed.

SEC. 718. Extension of authority for joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund.

SEC. 720. Pilot program on incentive programs to improve health care provided under the TRICARE program.

(a) Pilot program.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess whether a reduction in the rate of increase in health care spending by the Department of Defense and an enhancement of the operation of the military health system may be achieved by developing and implementing value-based incentive programs to encourage health care providers under the TRICARE program (including physicians, hospitals, and others involved in providing health care to patients) to improve the following:

(1) The quality of health care provided to covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE program.

(2) The experience of covered beneficiaries in receiving health care under the TRICARE program.

(1) DEVELOPMENT.—In developing an incentive program under this section, the Secretary shall—

(A) consider the characteristics of the population of covered beneficiaries affected by the incentive program;

(B) consider how the incentive program would impact the receipt of health care under the TRICARE program by such covered beneficiaries;

(C) establish or maintain a reasonable assurance that such covered beneficiaries will have timely access to health care during operation of the incentive program;

(D) ensure that there are no additional financial costs to such covered beneficiaries of implementing the incentive program; and

(2) ELEMENTS.—With respect to an incentive program developed and implemented under this section, the Secretary shall ensure that—

(A) the size, scope, and duration of the incentive program is reasonable in relation to the purpose of the incentive program; and

(B) appropriate criteria and data collection are used to ensure adequate evaluation of the feasibility and advisability of implementing the incentive program throughout the TRICARE program.

(3) USE OF EXISTING MODELS.—In developing an incentive program under this section, the Secretary may adapt a value-based incentive program conducted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services or any other governmental or commercial health care program.

(c) Termination.—The authority of the Secretary to carry out the pilot program under this section shall terminate on December 31, 2019.

(d) Report.—Not later than March 15, 2019, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the pilot program that includes the following:

(1) An assessment of each incentive program developed and implemented under this section, including whether such incentive program—

(A) improves the quality of health care provided to covered beneficiaries, the experience of covered beneficiaries in receiving health care under the TRICARE program, or the health of covered beneficiaries;

(B) reduces the rate of increase in health care spending by the Department of Defense; or

(2) Such recommendations for administrative or legislative action as the Secretary considers appropriate in light of the pilot program, including to implement any such incentive program or programs throughout the TRICARE program.

(e) Definitions.—In this section, the terms “covered beneficiary” and “TRICARE program” have the meanings given those terms in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 731. Publication of certain information on health care provided by the Department of Defense through the Hospital compare website of the Department of Health and Human Services.

(a) Memorandum of understanding required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Secretary of Health and Human Services for the provision by the Secretary of Defense of such information as the Secretary of Health and Human Services may require to report and make publicly available information on quality of care and health outcomes regarding patients at military medical treatment facilities through the Hospital Compare Internet website of the Department of Health and Human Services, or any successor Internet website.

(b) Information provided.—The information provided by the Secretary of Defense to the Secretary of Health and Human Services under subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) Measures of the timeliness and effectiveness of the health care provided by the Department of Defense.

(3) Survey data of patient experiences, including the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems or any similar survey developed by the Department of Defense.

(4) Any other measures or data required of or reported with respect to hospitals participating in the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.).

SEC. 732. Publication of data on patient safety, quality of care, satisfaction, and health outcome measures under the TRICARE program.

(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall publish on an Internet website of the Department of Defense that is available to the public data on all measures used by the Department to assess patient safety, quality of care, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes for health care provided under the TRICARE program at each military medical treatment facility.

(b) Updates.—The Secretary shall publish an update to the data published under subsection (a) not less frequently than once each quarter during each fiscal year.

(c) Accessibility.—The Secretary shall ensure that the data published under subsection (a) and updated under subsection (b) is accessible to the public through the primary Internet website of the Department and the primary Internet website of the military medical treatment facility with respect to which such data applies.

(d) TRICARE program defined.—In this section, the term “TRICARE program” has the meaning given such terms in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 733. Annual report on patient safety, quality of care, and access to care at military medical treatment facilities.

(a) In general.—Not later than March 1 each year beginning in 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a comprehensive report on patient safety, quality of care, and access to care at military medical treatment facilities.

(b) Elements.—Each report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) The number of sentinel events, as defined by the Joint Commission, that occurred at military medical treatment facilities during the year preceding the submittal of the report, disaggregated by—

(B) a description of any actions taken by the Secretary of the military department concerned in response to such event, including any actions taken to hold individuals accountable.

(3) The number of practitioners providing health care in military medical treatment facilities that were reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank during the year preceding the submittal of the report.

(4) The results of any internal analyses conducted by the Patient Safety Center of the Department of Defense during such year on matters relating to patient safety at military medical treatment facilities.

(A) the current accreditation status of such facility, including any recommendations for corrective action made by the relevant accrediting body;

(B) any policies or procedures implemented during such year by the Secretary of the military department concerned that were designed to improve patient safety, quality of care, and access to care at such facility;

(E) data on patient safety, quality of care, and access to care as compared to standards established by the Department with respect to patient safety, quality of care, and access to care.

SEC. 734. Report on plans to improve experience with and eliminate performance variability of health care provided by the Department of Defense.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a comprehensive report setting forth the current and future plans of the Secretary, with estimated dates of completion, to carry out the following:

(A) To improve the experience of beneficiaries with health care provided in military medical treatment facilities and through purchased care.

(B) To eliminate performance variability with respect to the provision of such health care.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The comprehensive report required by paragraph (1) shall include the plans of the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, as follows:

(A) To align performance measures for health care provided in military medical treatment facilities with performance measures for health care provided through purchased care.

(B) To improve underperformance in the provision of health care by the Department of Defense by eliminating performance variability with respect to the provision of health care in military medical treatment facilities and through purchased care.

(C) To use innovative, high-technology services to improve access to care, coordination of care, and the experience of care in military medical treatment facilities and through purchased care.

(D) To collect and analyze data throughout the Department with respect to health care provided in military medical treatment facilities and through purchased care to improve the quality of such care, patient safety, and patient satisfaction.

(E) To develop a performance management system, including by adoption of common measures for access to care, quality of care, safety, and patient satisfaction, that holds medical leadership throughout the Department personally accountable for sustained improvement of performance.

(F) To use such other methods as the Secretary considers appropriate to improve the experience of beneficiaries with and eliminate performance variability with respect to health care received from the Department.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the submittal of the comprehensive report required by subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the plans of the Secretary of Defense set forth in the comprehensive report submitted under such subsection.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) An assessment whether the plans included in the comprehensive report submitted under subsection (a) will, with respect to members of the Armed Forces and covered beneficiaries under the TRICARE program—

(iii) ensure that such individuals are able to equitably obtain quality health care in all military medical treatment facilities and through purchased care.

(B) An assessment whether such plans can be reasonably achieved within the estimated dates of completion set forth by the Department under such subsection.

(D) An assessment whether the Department of Defense has adequately budgeted amounts to fund the carrying out of such plans.

(1) The term “purchased care” means health care provided pursuant to a contract entered into under the TRICARE program.

(2) The terms “covered beneficiary” and “TRICARE program” have the meaning given such terms in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 735. Report on plan to improve pediatric care and related services for children of members of the Armed Forces.

(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth a plan of the Department of Defense to improve pediatric care and related services for children of members of the Armed Forces.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) In order to ensure that children receive developmentally-appropriate and age-appropriate health care services from the Department, a plan to align preventive pediatric care under the TRICARE program with—

(A) standards for such care as required by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148);

(B) guidelines established for such care by the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment program under the Medicaid program carried out under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.); and

(2) A plan to develop a uniform definition of “pediatric medical necessity” for the Department that aligns with recommendations of organizations that specialize in pediatrics in order to ensure that a consistent definition of such term is used in providing health care in military medical treatment facilities and by health care providers under the TRICARE program.

(3) A plan to revise certification requirements for residential treatment centers of the Department to expand the access of children of members of the Armed Forces to services at such centers.

(4) A plan to develop measures to evaluate and improve access to pediatric care, coordination of pediatric care, and health outcomes for such children.

(5) A plan to include an assessment of access to pediatric specialty care in the annual report to Congress on the effectiveness of the TRICARE program.

(6) A plan to improve the quality of and access to behavioral health care under the TRICARE program for such children, including intensive outpatient and partial hospitalization services.

(7) A plan to mitigate the impact of permanent changes of station and other service-related relocations of members of the Armed Forces on the continuity of health care services received by such children who have special medical or behavioral health needs.

(8) A plan to mitigate deficiencies in data collection, data utilization, and data analysis to improve pediatric care and related services for children of members of the Armed Forces.

(c) TRICARE program defined.—In this section, the term “TRICARE program” has the meaning given such term in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 736. Report on preliminary mental health screenings for individuals becoming members of the Armed Forces.

(a) Report on recommendations in connection with screenings.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on mental health screenings of individuals enlisting or accessioning into the Armed Forces before enlistment or accession.

(1) Recommendations with respect to establishing a secure, electronically-based preliminary mental health screening of members of the Armed Forces to bring mental health screenings to parity with physical screenings of members.

(2) Recommendations with respect to the composition of the mental health screening, evidenced-based best practices, and how to track changes in mental health screenings relating to traumatic brain injuries, post-traumatic stress disorder, and other conditions.

(1) in coordination with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the surgeons general of the military departments; and

(2) in consultation with experts in the field, including the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health.

SEC. 737. Comptroller General report on use of quality of care metrics at military treatment facilities.

(a) In general.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the use by the Department of Defense of metrics with respect to the quality of care provided at military treatment facilities.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) The extent to which the Department of Defense and each military department use metrics to monitor and assess the quality of care provided at military treatment facilities.

(2) How, if at all, the use of such metrics varies among the Department of Defense and each military department.

(3) The extent to which the Department of Defense and each military department use the information from such metrics to identify and address issues such as the performance of individual health care providers and areas in need of improvement system-wide.

(4) The extent to which the Department of Defense and each military department oversee the process of using metrics to monitor and assess the quality of care provided at military treatment facilities.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 149 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2546 the following new section:

“(a) Objective.—It shall be the objective of the defense acquisition system to meet the needs of its customers in the most cost-effective manner practicable. The acquisition policies, directives, and regulations of the Department of Defense shall be modified as necessary to ensure the development and implementation of a customer-oriented acquisition system.

“(b) Customer.—The customer of the defense acquisition system is the military service that will have primary responsibility for fielding the system or systems acquired. The customer is represented with regard to a major defense acquisition program by the Secretary of the relevant military department and the Chief of the relevant military service.

“(c) Role of customer.—The customer of a major defense acquisition program shall be responsible for balancing resources against priorities on the acquisition program and ensuring that appropriate trade-offs are made among cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance on a continuing basis throughout the life of the acquisition program.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 149 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2546 the following new item:

(b) Responsibilities of chiefs.—Section 2547(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (6) as paragraphs (3) through (7), respectively;

“(2) Decisions regarding the balancing of resources and priorities, and associated trade-offs among cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance on major defense acquisition programs.”; and

(3) in paragraph (6), as redesignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by striking “The development” and inserting “The development and management”.

(c) Responsibilities of military deputies.—Section 908(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 278; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is amended to read as follows:

“(d) Duties of principal military deputies.—Each Principal Military Deputy to a service acquisition executive shall be responsible for—

“(1) keeping the Chief of Staff of the Armed Force concerned informed of the progress of major defense acquisition programs;

“(2) informing the Chief of Staff on a continuing basis of any developments on major defense programs, which may require new or revisited trade-offs among cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance, including—

“(B) requirements creep (as defined in section 2547(c)(1) of title 10, United States Code); and

“(3) ensuring that the views of the Chief of Staff on cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance trade-offs are strongly considered by program managers and program executive officers in all phases of the acquisition process.”.

(1) JOINT REQUIREMENTS OVERSIGHT COUNCIL.—Section 181(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(3) The Council shall seek, and strongly consider, the views of the Chiefs of Staff of the Armed Forces, in their roles as customers of the acquisition system, on matters pertaining to trade-offs among cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance under subsection (b)(1)(C) and the balancing of resources with priorities pursuant to subsection (b)(3).”.

(2) MILESTONE A DECISIONS.—The chief of the relevant military service shall advise the milestone decision authority for a major defense acquisition program of the chief’s views on cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance trade-offs that have been made with regard to the program, as provided in section 2366a(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 844 of this Act, prior to a Milestone A decision on the program.

(3) MILESTONE B DECISIONS.—The chief of the relevant military service shall advise the milestone decision authority for a major defense acquisition program of the chief’s views on cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance trade-offs that have been made with regard to the program, as provided in section 2366b(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 845 of this Act, prior to a Milestone B decision on the program.

(A) Section 3033(d)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 171” and inserting “sections 171 and 2547”.

(B) Section 5033(d)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 171” and inserting “sections 171 and 2547”.

(C) Section 5043(e)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 171” and inserting “sections 171 and 2547”.

(D) Section 8033(d)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “section 171” and inserting “sections 171 and 2547”.

“(1) DETERMINATION OF NEED FOR RAPID ACQUISITION AND DEPLOYMENT.— (A) In the case of any supplies and associated support services that, as determined in writing by the Secretary of Defense, are urgently needed to eliminate a documented deficiency that has resulted in combat casualties, or is likely to result in combat casualties, the Secretary may use the procedures developed under this section in order to accomplish the rapid acquisition and deployment of the needed supplies and associated support services.

“(B) In the case of any supplies and associated support services that, as determined in writing by the Secretary of Defense, are urgently needed to eliminate a documented deficiency that impacts an ongoing or anticipated contingency operation and that, if left unfulfilled, could potentially result in loss of life or critical mission failure, the Secretary may use the procedures developed under this section in order to accomplish the rapid acquisition and deployment of the needed supplies and associated support services.

“(C) (i) In the case of any supplies and associated support services that, as determined in writing by the Secretary of Defense without delegation, are urgently needed to eliminate a deficiency that as the result of a cyber attack has resulted in critical mission failure, the loss of life, property destruction, or economic effects, or if left unfilled is likely to result in critical mission failure, the loss of life, property destruction, or economic effects, the Secretary may use the procedures developed under this section in order to accomplish the rapid acquisition and deployment of the needed offensive or defensive cyber capabilities, supplies, and associated support services.

“(ii) In this subparagraph, the term ‘cyber attack’ means a deliberate action to alter, disrupt, deceive, degrade, or destroy computer systems or networks or the information or programs resident in or transiting these systems or networks.

“(2) DESIGNATION OF SENIOR OFFICIAL RESPONSIBLE.— (A) Whenever the Secretary makes a determination under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1) that certain supplies and associated support services are urgently needed to eliminate a deficiency described in that subparagraph, the Secretary shall designate a senior official of the Department of Defense to ensure that the needed supplies and associated support services are acquired and deployed as quickly as possible, with a goal of awarding a contract for the acquisition of the supplies and associated support services within 15 days.

“(B) Upon designation of a senior official under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall authorize that official to waive any provision of law, policy, directive, or regulation described in subsection (d) that such official determines in writing would unnecessarily impede the rapid acquisition and deployment of the needed supplies and associated support services. In a case in which the needed supplies and associated support services cannot be acquired without an extensive delay, the senior official shall require that an interim solution be implemented and deployed using the procedures developed under this section to minimize adverse consequences resulting from the urgent need.

“(3) USE OF FUNDS.— (A) In any fiscal year in which the Secretary makes a determination described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), the Secretary may use any funds available to the Department of Defense for acquisitions of supplies and associated support services if the determination includes a written finding that the use of such funds is necessary to address the deficiency in a timely manner.

“(B) The authority of this section may only be used to acquire supplies and associated support services—

“(i) in the case of determinations by the Secretary under paragraph (1)(A), in an amount aggregating not more than $200,000,000 during any fiscal year;

“(ii) in the case of determinations by the Secretary under paragraph (1)(B), in an amount aggregating not more than $200,000,000 during any fiscal year; and

“(iii) in the case of determinations by the Secretary under paragraph (1)(C), in an amount aggregating not more than $200,000,000 during any fiscal year.

“(4) NOTIFICATION TO CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES.— (A) In the case of a determination by the Secretary under paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of the determination within 15 days after the date of the determination.

“(B) In the case of a determination by the Secretary under paragraph (1)(B) the Secretary shall notify the congressional defense committees of the determination at least 10 days before the date on which the determination is effective.

“(D) A notice under this paragraph shall be sufficient to fulfill any requirement to provide notification to Congress for a new start program.

“(E) A notice under this paragraph shall be provided in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.

“(5) TIME FOR TRANSITIONING TO NORMAL ACQUISITION SYSTEM.—Any acquisition initiated under this subsection shall transition to the normal acquisition system not later than two years after the date on which the Secretary makes the determination described in paragraph (1) with respect to the supplies and associated support services concerned.

“(6) LIMITATION ON OFFICERS WITH AUTHORITY TO MAKE A DETERMINATION.—The authority to make a determination under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1) may be exercised only by the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Defense.”.

(a) Guidance required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Comptroller of the Department of Defense and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall establish guidance for a “middle tier” of acquisition programs that are intended to be completed in a period of two to five years.

(b) Acquisition pathways.—The guidance required by subsection (a) shall cover the following two acquisition pathways:

(1) RAPID PROTOTYPING.—The rapid prototyping pathway shall provide for the use of innovative technologies to rapidly develop fieldable prototypes to demonstrate new capabilities and meet emerging military needs. The objective of an acquisition program under this pathway shall be to field a prototype that can be demonstrated in an operational environment and provide for a residual operational capability within five years of the development of an approved requirement.

(2) RAPID FIELDING.—The rapid fielding pathway shall provide for the use of proven technologies to field production quantities of new or upgraded systems with minimal development required. The objective of an acquisition program under this pathway shall be to begin production within six months and complete fielding within five years of the development of an approved requirement.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide for a streamlined and coordinated requirements, budget, and acquisition process that results in the development of an approved requirement for each program in a period of not more than six months from the time that the process is initiated. Programs that are subject to the guidance shall not be subject to the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System Manual and Department of Defense Directive 5000.01, except to the extent specifically provided in the guidance.

(2) RAPID PROTOTYPING.—With respect to the rapid prototyping pathway, the guidance shall include—

(A) a merit-based process for the consideration of innovative technologies and new capabilities to meet needs communicated by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the combatant commanders;

(B) a process for developing and implementing acquisition and funding strategies for the program;

(C) a process for cost-sharing with the military departments on rapid prototype projects, to ensure an appropriate commitment to the success of such projects;

(D) a process for demonstrating and evaluating the performance of fieldable prototypes developed pursuant to the program in an operational environment; and

(E) a process for transitioning successful prototypes to new or existing acquisition programs for production and fielding under the rapid fielding pathway or the traditional acquisition system.

(3) RAPID FIELDING.—With respect to the rapid fielding pathway, the guidance shall include—

(A) a merit-based process for the consideration of existing products and proven technologies to meet needs communicated by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the combatant commanders;

(B) a process for demonstrating performance and evaluating for current operational purposes the proposed products and technologies;

(D) a process for considering lifecycle costs and addressing issues of logistics support and system interoperability.

(4) STREAMLINED PROCEDURES.—The guidance for the programs may provide for any of the following streamlined procedures:

(A) The service acquisition executive of the military department concerned shall appoint a program manager for such program from among candidates from among civilian employees or members of the armed forces who have significant and relevant experience managing large and complex programs.

(B) The program manager for each program shall report with respect to such program directly, without intervening review or approval, to the service acquisition executive of the military department concerned.

(C) The service acquisition executive of the military department concerned shall evaluate the job performance of such manager on an annual basis. In conducting an evaluation under this paragraph, a service acquisition executive shall consider the extent to which the manager has achieved the objectives of the program for which the manager is responsible, including quality, timeliness, and cost objectives.

(D) The program manager of a defense streamlined program shall be authorized staff positions for a technical staff, including experts in business management, contracting, auditing, engineering, testing, and logistics, to enable the manager to manage the program without the technical assistance of another organizational unit of an agency to the maximum extent practicable.

(E) The program manager of a defense streamlined program shall be authorized, in coordination with the users of the equipment and capability to be acquired and the test community, to make trade-offs among life-cycle costs, requirements, and schedules to meet the goals of the program.

(F) The service acquisition executive, acting in coordination with the defense acquisition executive, shall serve as the milestone decision authority for the program.

(G) The program manager of a defense streamlined program shall be provided a process to expeditiously seek a waiver from Congress from any statutory or regulatory requirement that the program manager determines adds little or no value to the management of the program.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a fund to be known as the “Department of Defense Rapid Prototyping Fund” to provide funds, in addition to other funds that may be available for acquisition programs under the rapid prototyping pathway established pursuant to this section. The Fund shall be managed by a senior official of the Department of Defense designated by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. The Fund shall consist of amounts appropriated to the Fund and amounts credited to the Fund pursuant to section 849 of this Act.

(2) TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—Amounts available in the Fund may be transferred to a military department for the purpose of carrying out an acquisition program under the rapid prototyping pathway established pursuant to this section. Any amount so transferred shall be credited to the account to which it is transferred. The transfer authority provided in this subsection is in addition to any other transfer authority available to the Department of Defense.

(3) CONGRESSIONAL NOTICE.—The senior official designated to manage the Fund shall notify the congressional defense committees of all transfers under paragraph (2). Each notification shall specify the amount transferred, the purpose of the transfer, and the total projected cost and estimated cost to complete the acquisition program to which the funds were transferred.

(a) Authority of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to carry out certain prototype projects.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 193 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2371a the following new section:

“§ 2371b. Authority of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to carry out certain prototype projects

“(a) Authority.— (1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Secretary of a military department, or any other official designated by the Secretary of Defense may, under the authority of section 2371 of this title, carry out prototype projects that are directly relevant to enhancing the mission effectiveness of military personnel and the supporting platforms, systems, components, or materials proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense, or to improvement of platforms, systems, components, or materials in use by the armed forces.

“(A) may be exercised for a prototype project that is expected to cost the Department of Defense in excess of $50,000,000 but not in excess of $250,000,000 (including all options) only upon a written determination by the senior procurement executive for the agency as designated for the purpose of section 1702(c) of title 41, or, for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or the Missile Defense Agency, the director of the agency that—

“(ii) the use of the authority of this section is essential to promoting the success of the prototype project; and

“(B) may be exercised for a prototype project that is expected to cost the Department of Defense in excess of $250,000,000 (including all options) only if—

“(i) the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics determines in writing that—

“(II) the use of the authority of this section is essential to meet critical national security objectives; and

“(ii) the congressional defense committees are notified in writing at least 30 days before such authority is exercised.

“(3) The authority of a senior procurement executive or director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or Missile Defense Agency under paragraph (2)(A), and the authority of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics under paragraph (2)(B), may not be delegated.

“(1) Subsections (e)(1)(B) and (e)(2) of such section 2371 shall not apply to projects carried out under subsection (a).

“(2) To the maximum extent practicable, competitive procedures shall be used when entering into agreements to carry out projects under subsection (a).

“(c) Comptroller general access to information.— (1) Each agreement entered into by an official referred to in subsection (a) to carry out a project under that subsection that provides for payments in a total amount in excess of $5,000,000 shall include a clause that provides for the Comptroller General, in the discretion of the Comptroller General, to examine the records of any party to the agreement or any entity that participates in the performance of the agreement.

“(2) The requirement in paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to a party or entity, or a subordinate element of a party or entity, that has not entered into any other agreement that provides for audit access by a Government entity in the year prior to the date of the agreement.

“(3) (A) The right provided to the Comptroller General in a clause of an agreement under paragraph (1) is limited as provided in subparagraph (B) in the case of a party to the agreement, an entity that participates in the performance of the agreement, or a subordinate element of that party or entity if the only agreements or other transactions that the party, entity, or subordinate element entered into with Government entities in the year prior to the date of that agreement are cooperative agreements or transactions that were entered into under this section or section 2371 of this title.

“(B) The only records of a party, other entity, or subordinate element referred to in subparagraph (A) that the Comptroller General may examine in the exercise of the right referred to in that subparagraph are records of the same type as the records that the Government has had the right to examine under the audit access clauses of the previous agreements or transactions referred to in such subparagraph that were entered into by that particular party, entity, or subordinate element.

“(4) The head of the contracting activity that is carrying out the agreement may waive the applicability of the requirement in paragraph (1) to the agreement if the head of the contracting activity determines that it would not be in the public interest to apply the requirement to the agreement. The waiver shall be effective with respect to the agreement only if the head of the contracting activity transmits a notification of the waiver to Congress and the Comptroller General before entering into the agreement. The notification shall include the rationale for the determination.

“(5) The Comptroller General may not examine records pursuant to a clause included in an agreement under paragraph (1) more than three years after the final payment is made by the United States under the agreement.

“(d) Appropriate use of authority.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that no official of an agency enters into a transaction (other than a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement) for a prototype project under the authority of this section unless one of following conditions is met:

“(A) There is at least one nontraditional defense contractor participating to a significant extent in the prototype project.

“(B) All parties to the transaction other than the Federal Government are innovative small businesses and non-traditional contractors with unique capabilities relevant to the prototype project.

“(C) At least one third of the total cost of the prototype project is to be paid out of funds provided by parties to the transaction other than the Federal Government.

“(D) The senior procurement executive for the agency determines in writing that exceptional circumstances justify the use of a transaction that provides for innovative business arrangements or structures that would not be feasible or appropriate under a contract.

“(2) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the amounts counted for the purposes of this subsection as being provided, or to be provided, by a party to a transaction with respect to a prototype project that is entered into under this section other than the Federal Government do not include costs that were incurred before the date on which the transaction becomes effective.

“(B) Costs that were incurred for a prototype project by a party after the beginning of negotiations resulting in a transaction (other than a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement) with respect to the project before the date on which the transaction becomes effective may be counted for purposes of this subsection as being provided, or to be provided, by the party to the transaction if and to the extent that the official responsible for entering into the transaction determines in writing that—

“(i) the party incurred the costs in anticipation of entering into the transaction; and

“(ii) it was appropriate for the party to incur the costs before the transaction became effective in order to ensure the successful implementation of the transaction.

“(1) The term ‘nontraditional defense contractor’ has the meaning given the term under section 2302(9) of this title.

“(2) The term ‘small business’ means a small business concern as defined under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632).

“(f) Follow-on production contracts or transactions.— (1) A transaction entered into under this section for a prototype project may provide for the award of a follow-on production contract or transactions to the participants in the transaction.

“(2) A follow-on production contract or transaction provided for in a transaction under paragraph (1) may be awarded to the participants in the transaction without the use of competitive procedures, notwithstanding the requirements of section 2304 of this title, if—

“(A) competitive procedures were used for the selection of parties for participation in the transaction; and

“(B) the participants in the transaction successfully completed the prototype project provided for in the transaction.

“(3) Contracts and transactions entered into pursuant to this subsection may be awarded using the authority in subsection (a), under the authority of chapter 137 of this title, or under such procedures, terms, and conditions as the Secretary of Defense may establish by regulation.

“(g) Authority to provide prototypes and follow-on production items as government furnished equipment.—An agreement entered pursuant to the authority of subsection (a) or a follow-on contract entered pursuant to the authority of subsection (f) may provide for prototypes or follow-on production items to be provided to another contractor as government-furnished equipment.

“(h) Applicability of procurement ethics requirements.—An agreement entered into under the authority of this section shall be treated as a Federal agency procurement for the purposes of chapter 21 of title 41.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2371a the following new item:

(b) Modification to definition of non-traditional contractor.—Section 2302(9) of such title is amended to read as follows:

“(9) The term ‘nontraditional defense contractor’, with respect to a procurement or with respect to a transaction authorized under section 2371(a) of this title, means an entity that—

“(A) is not currently performing and has not performed, for at least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources by the Department of Defense for the procurement or transaction, any contract or subcontract that is subject to full coverage under the cost accounting standards prescribed pursuant to 1502 of title 41 and the regulations implementing such section; and

“(B) has not been awarded, for at least the one-year period preceding the solicitation of sources by the Department of Defense for the procurement or transaction, any other contract under which the contractor was required to submit certified cost or pricing data under section 2306a of this title.”.

(c) Repeal of obsolete authority.—Section 845 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (Public Law 103–160; 10 U.S.C. 2371 note) is hereby repealed.

(d) Technical and conforming amendment.—Section 1601(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (Public Law 108–136; 10 U.S.C. 2370a note) is amended by restating subparagraph (B) to read as follows:

SEC. 805. Use of alternative acquisition paths to acquire critical national security capabilities.

(a) Guidelines.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures and guidelines for alternative acquisition pathways to acquire capital assets and services that meet critical national security needs. The guidelines shall—

(2) be supported by streamlined contracting, budgeting, and requirements processes;

(3) establish alternative acquisition paths based on the capabilities being bought and the time needed to deploy these capabilities; and

(b) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes a summary of the guidelines established under subsection (a) and recommendations for any legislation necessary to meet the objectives set forth in subsection (a) and to implement the guidelines established under such subsection.

SEC. 806. Secretary of Defense waiver of acquisition laws to acquire vital national security capabilities.

(a) Waiver authority.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized to waive any provision of acquisition law or regulation described in subsection (c) for the purpose of acquiring a capability that would not otherwise be available to the Armed Forces of the United States, upon a determination that—

(1) the acquisition of the capability is in the vital national security interest of the United States;

(2) the application of the law or regulation to be waived would impede the acquisition of the capability in a manner that would undermine the national security of the United States; and

(3) the underlying purpose of the law or regulation to be waived can be addressed in a different manner or at a different time.

(b) Designation of responsible official.—Whenever the Secretary of Defense makes a determination under subsection (a)(1) that the acquisition of a capability is in the vital national security interest of the United States, the Secretary shall designate a senior official of the Department of Defense who shall be personally responsible and accountable for the rapid and effective acquisition and deployment of the needed capability. The Secretary shall provide the designated official such authority as the Secretary determines necessary to achieve this objective, and may use the waiver authority in subsection (a) for this purpose.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Upon a determination described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense is authorized to waive any provision of law or regulation addressing—

(A) the establishment of a requirement or specification for the capability to be acquired;

(B) research, development, test, and evaluation of the capability to be acquired;

(D) solicitation, selection of sources, and award of contracts for the capability to be acquired.

(d) Report to Congress.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees at least 30 days before exercising the waiver authority under subsection (a). Each such notice shall include—

(1) an explanation of the basis for determining that the acquisition of the capability is in the vital national security interest of the United States;

(A) an explanation of why the application of the provision would impede the acquisition in a manner that would undermine the national security of the United States; and

(B) a description of the time or manner in which the underlying purpose of the law or regulation to be waived will be addressed.

(e) Non-delegation.—The authority of the Secretary to waive provisions of laws and regulations under subsection (a) is non-delegable.

SEC. 807. Acquisition authority of the Commander of United States Cyber Command.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commander of the United States Cyber Command shall be responsible for, and shall have the authority to conduct, the following acquisition activities:

(A) Development and acquisition of cyber operations-peculiar equipment and capabilities.

(B) Acquisition of cyber capability-peculiar equipment, capabilities, and services.

(2) ACQUISITION FUNCTIONS.—Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the Commander shall have authority to exercise the functions of the head of an agency under chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The staff of the Commander shall include a command acquisition executive, who shall be responsible for the overall supervision of acquisition matters for the United States Cyber Command. The command acquisition executive shall have the authority—

(A) to negotiate memoranda of agreement with the military departments to carry out the acquisition of equipment, capabilities, and services described in subsection (a)(1) on behalf of the Command;

(B) to supervise the acquisition of equipment, capabilities, and services described in subsection (a)(1);

(C) to represent the Command in discussions with the military departments regarding acquisition programs for which the Command is a customer; and

(D) to work with the military departments to ensure that the Command is appropriately represented in any joint working group or integrated product team regarding acquisition programs for which the Command is a customer.

(2) DELIVERY OF ACQUISITION SOLUTIONS.—The command acquisition executive of the United States Cyber Command shall be—

(A) responsible to the Commander for rapidly delivering acquisition solutions to meet validated cyber operations-peculiar requirements;

(D) included on the distribution list for acquisition directives and instructions of the Department of Defense.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide the United States Cyber Command with the personnel or funding equivalent to ten full-time equivalent personnel to support the Commander in fulfilling the acquisition responsibilities provided for under this section with experience in—

(2) EXISTING PERSONNEL.—The personnel provided under this subsection shall be provided from among the existing personnel of the Department of Defense.

(d) Inspector general activities.—The staff of the Commander of the United States Cyber Command shall on a periodic basis include a representative from the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General who shall conduct internal audits and inspections of purchasing and contracting actions through the United States Cyber Command and such other Inspector General functions as may be assigned.

(e) Budget.—In addition to the activities of a combatant command for which funding may be requested under section 166(b) of title 10, United States Code, the budget proposal of the United States Cyber Command shall include requests for funding for—

(2) acquisition of other capabilities or services that are peculiar to offensive cyber operations activities.

(f) Cyber Operations Procurement Fund.—There is authorized to be appropriated for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2021, out of funds made available for procurement, Defense-wide, $75,000,000 for a Cyber Operations Procurement Fund to support acquisition activities provided for under this section.

(g) Rule of construction regarding intelligence and special activities.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute authority to conduct any activity which, if carried out as an intelligence activity by the Department of Defense, would require a notice to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives under title V of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.).

(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2021.

(2) LIMITATION ON DURATION OF ACQUISITIONS.—The authority under this section does not include major defense acquisitions or acquisitions of foundational infrastructure or software architectures the duration of which is expected to last more than five years.

(a) Establishment.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish under the sponsorship of the Defense Acquisition University and the National Defense University an advisory panel on streamlining acquisition regulations.

(b) Membership.—The panel shall be composed of at least nine individuals who are recognized experts in acquisition and procurement policy. In making appointments to the advisory panel, the Under Secretary shall ensure that the members of the panel reflect diverse experiences in the public and private sectors.

(1) review the acquisition regulations applicable to the Department of Defense with a view toward streamlining and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the defense acquisition process and maintaining defense technology advantage; and

(2) make any recommendations for the amendment or repeal of such regulations that the panel considers necessary, as a result of such review, to—

(A) establish and administer appropriate buyer and seller relationships in the procurement system;

(E) eliminate any regulations that are unnecessary for the purposes described in subparagraphs (A) through (D).

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide the advisory panel established pursuant to subsection (a) with timely access to appropriate information, data, resources, and analysis so that the advisory panel may conduct a thorough and independent assessment as required under such subsection.

(2) INAPPLICABILITY OF FACA.—The requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the advisory panel established pursuant to subsection (a).

(1) PANEL REPORT.—Not later than two years after the date on which the Secretary of Defense establishes the advisory panel, the panel shall transmit a final report to the Secretary.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The final report shall contain a detailed statement of the findings and conclusions of the panel, including—

(A) a history of each current acquisition regulation and a recommendation as to whether the regulation and related law (if applicable) should be retained, modified, or repealed; and

(B) such additional recommendations for legislation as the panel considers appropriate.

(3) INTERIM REPORTS.— (A) Not later than 6 months and 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to or brief the congressional defense committees on the interim findings of the panel with respect to the elements set forth in paragraph (2).

(B) The panel shall provide regular updates to the Secretary of Defense for purposes of providing the interim reports required under this paragraph.

(4) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 30 days after receiving the final report of the advisory panel, the Secretary of Defense shall transmit the final report, together with such comments as the Secretary determines appropriate, to the congressional defense committees.

(f) Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund support.—The Secretary of Defense may use amounts available in the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund established under section 1705 of title 10, United States Code, to support activities of the advisory panel under this section.

SEC. 809. Review of time-based requirements process and budgeting and acquisition systems.

(a) Time-based requirements process.—The Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall review the requirements process with the goal of establishing an agile and streamlined system that develops requirements that provide stability and foundational direction for acquisition programs. The requirements system should be informed by technological market research and provide a time-based or phased distinction between capabilities needed to be deployed urgently, within 2 years, within 5 years, and longer than 5 years.

(b) Budgeting and acquisition systems.—The Secretary of Defense shall review and ensure that the acquisition and budgeting systems are structured to meet time-based or phased requirements in a manner that is predictable, cost effective, and efficient and takes advantage of emerging technological developments. The Secretary shall make all necessary changes in regulation and policy to achieve a time-based requirements, budgeting, and acquisition system and shall identify and report to Congress within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act on any statutory impediments to achieving such a system.

SEC. 810. Improvement of program and project management by the Department of Defense.

(a) Department-wide responsibilities of Secretary of Defense.—In fulfilling the responsibilities under chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall—

(1) develop Department-wide standards, policies, and guidelines for program and project management for the Department of Defense based on appropriate and applicable nationally accredited standards for program and project management;

(2) develop polices to monitor compliance with the standards, policies, and guidelines developed under paragraph (1); and

(3) engage with the private sector on matters relating to program and project management for the Department.

(b) Responsibilities of USD (ATL).—In fulfilling the responsibilities under chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, for the military departments and the Defense Agencies, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall—

(1) advise and assist Secretary of Defense with respect Department of Defense practices related to program and project management;

(2) review programs identified as high-risk in program and project management by the Government Accountability Office, and make recommendations for actions to be taken by the Secretary to mitigate such risks;

(3) assess matters of importance to the workforce in program and project management, including—

(B) policies to support continuous improvement in program and project management; and

(4) advise on the development and applicability of standards Department-wide for program and project management transparency.

(c) Responsibilities of acquisition executives.—In fulfilling the responsibilities under chapter 87 of title 10, United States Code, for the military departments, the service acquisition executives (in consultation with the Chiefs of the Armed Forces with respect to military program managers), and the component acquisition executives for the Defense Agencies, shall—

(1) ensure the compliance of the department or Agency concerned with standards, policies, and guidelines for program and project management for the Department of Defense developed by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a)(1); and

(A) training and educational opportunities for program managers, including exchange programs with the private sector;

(B) mentoring of current and future program managers by experienced public and private sector senior executives and program managers;

(D) incentives for the recruitment of highly qualified individuals to serve as program managers;

(E) improved means of collecting and disseminating best practices and lessons learned to enhance program management; and

(F) improved methods to support improved data gathering and analysis for program management and oversight purposes.

(d) Deadline for standards, policies, and guidelines.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue the standards, policies, and guidelines required by subsection (a)(1). The Secretary shall provide Congress an interim update on the progress made in implementing this section not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 821. Preference for fixed-price contracts in determining contract type for development programs.

(a) Establishment of preference.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement shall be revised to establish a preference for fixed-price contracts, including fixed-price incentive fee contracts, in the determination of contract type for development programs.

(b) Technical and conforming changes.—Section 818(c) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2329) is amended—

(1) in the first sentence, by inserting “or major automated information system” after “major defense acquisition program”; and

SEC. 822. Applicability of cost and pricing data and certification requirements.

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and

SEC. 823. Risk-based contracting for smaller contract actions under the Truth in Negotiations Act.

(a) Increase in thresholds.—Subsection (a) of section 2306a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by striking “December 5, 1990” each place it appears and inserting “January 15, 2016”;

(B) by striking “$500,000” each place it appears and inserting “$5,000,000”; and

(2) in paragraph (7), by striking “fiscal year 1994 constant dollar value” and inserting “fiscal year 2016 constant dollar value”.

(b) Risk-based contracting.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended to read as follows:

“(1) AUTHORITY TO REQUIRE SUBMISSION.—Subject to paragraph (4), when certified cost or pricing data are not required to be submitted by subsection (a) for a contract, subcontract, or modification of a contract or subcontract, such data may nevertheless be required to be submitted by the head of the procuring activity, if the head of the procuring activity—

“(A) determines that such data are necessary for the evaluation by the agency of the reasonableness of the price of the contract, subcontract, or modification of a contract or subcontract; or

“(B) requires the submission of such data in accordance with a risk-based contracting approach established pursuant to paragraph (3).

“(2) WRITTEN DETERMINATION REQUIRED.—In any case in which the head of the procuring activity requires certified cost or pricing data to be submitted under paragraph (1)(A), the head of the procuring activity shall justify in writing the reason for such requirement.

“(3) RISK-BASED CONTRACTING.—The head of an agency shall establish a risk-based sampling approach under which the submission of certified cost or pricing data may be required for a risk-based sample of contracts, the price of which is expected to exceed the dollar amount in subsection (a)(1)(A)(ii), but not the amount in subsection (a)(1)(A)(i). The authority to require certified cost or pricing data under this paragraph shall not apply to any contract of an offeror that has not been awarded, for at least the one-year period preceding the issuance of a solicitation for the contract, any other contract in excess of the amount in subsection (a)(1)(A)(i) under which the offeror was required to submit certified cost or pricing data under this section.

“(4) EXCEPTION.—The head of the procuring activity may not require certified cost or pricing data to be submitted under this subsection for any contract or subcontract, or modification of a contract or subcontract, covered by the exceptions in subparagraph (A) or (B) of subsection (b)(1).

“(5) DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY PROHIBITED.—The head of a procuring activity may not delegate functions under this subsection.”.

SEC. 824. Limitation on use of reverse auction and lowest price technically acceptable contracting methods.

(1) to prohibit the use by the Department of Defense of reverse auction or lowest price technically acceptable contracting methods for the procurement of personal protective equipment where the level of quality or failure of the item could result in combat casualties; and

(2) to establish a preference for the use of best value contracting methods for the procurement of such equipment.

(a) Rights in technical data relating to major weapon systems.—Paragraph (2) of section 2321(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“(2) In the case of a challenge to a use or release restriction that is asserted with respect to technical data of a contractor or subcontractor for a major system or a subsystem or component thereof on the basis that the major weapon system, subsystem, or component was developed exclusively at private expense—

“(i) with regard to a commercial subsystem or component of a major system, if the major system was acquired as a commercial item in accordance with section 2379(a) of this title;

“(ii) with regard to a component of a subsystem, if the subsystem was acquired as a commercial item in accordance with section 2379(b) of this title; and

“(iii) with regard to any other component, if the component is a commercially available off-the-shelf item or a commercially available off-the-shelf item with modifications of a type customarily available in the commercial marketplace or minor modifications made to meet Federal Government requirements; and

“(B) in all other cases, the challenge to the use or release restriction shall be sustained unless information provided by the contractor or subcontractor demonstrates that the item was developed exclusively at private expense.”.

(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, acting through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall establish a government-industry advisory panel for the purpose of reviewing sections 2320 and 2321 of title 10, United States Code, regarding rights in technical data and the validation of proprietary data restrictions and the regulations implementing such sections, for the purpose of ensuring that such statutory and regulatory requirements are best structured to serve the interests of the taxpayers and the national defense.

(2) MEMBERSHIP.—The panel shall be chaired by an individual selected by the Under Secretary, and the Under Secretary shall ensure that—

(A) the government members of the advisory panel are knowledgeable about technical data issues and appropriately represent the three military departments, as well as the legal, acquisition, logistics, and research and development communities in the Department of Defense; and

(B) the private sector members of the advisory panel include independent experts and individuals appropriately representative of the diversity of interested parties, including large and small businesses, traditional and non-traditional government contractors, prime contractors and subcontractors, suppliers of hardware and software, and institutions of higher education.

(3) SCOPE OF REVIEW.—In conducting the review required by paragraph (1), the advisory panel shall give appropriate consideration to the following factors:

(A) Ensuring that the Department of Defense does not pay more than once for the same work.

(B) Ensuring that Department of Defense contractors are appropriately rewarded for their innovation and invention.

(C) Providing for cost-effective reprocurement, sustainment, modification, and upgrades to Department of Defense systems.

(D) Encouraging the private sector to invest in new products, technologies, and processes relevant to the missions of the Department of Defense.

(E) Ensuring that the Department of Defense has appropriate access to innovative products, technologies, and processes developed by the private sector for commercial use.

(4) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than September 30, 2016, the advisory panel shall submit its final report and recommendations to the Secretary of Defense. Not later than 60 days after receiving the report, the Secretary shall submit a copy of the report, together with any comments or recommendations, to the congressional defense committees.

(a) Additional procurement authority.—Subsection (a) of section 2373 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “transportation, energy, medical, space-flight,” before “and aeronautical supplies”.

(b) Applicability of chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended by striking “only when such purchases are made in quantity” and inserting “only when such purchases are made in quantities greater than necessary for experimentation, technical evaluation, assessment of operational utility, or safety or to provide a residual operational capability”.

SEC. 827. Extension of authority to acquire products and services produced in countries along a major route of supply to Afghanistan.

SEC. 828. Reporting related to failure of contractors to meet goals under negotiated comprehensive small business subcontracting plans.

SEC. 830. Treatment of interagency and State and local purchases when the Department of Defense acts as contract intermediary for the General Services Administration.

SEC. 831. Pilot program for streamlining awards for innovative technology projects.

(a) Exception from certified cost and pricing date requirements.—The requirements under section 2306a(a) of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to a contract, subcontract, or modification of a contract or subcontract valued at less than $7,500,000 awarded to a small business or non-traditional defense contractor pursuant to—

(1) a technical merit based selection procedure, such as a broad agency announcement; or

(b) Exception from records examination requirement.—The requirements under section 2313 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply to a contract valued at less than $7,500,000 awarded to a small business or non-traditional defense contractor pursuant to—

(1) a technical merit based selection procedure, such as a broad agency announcement; or

SEC. 841. Acquisition strategy required for each major defense acquisition program.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2431 the following new section:

“(a) Requirement.— (1) There shall be an acquisition strategy for each major defense acquisition program. The acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program shall be reviewed by the milestone decision authority for the program at each time specified in paragraph (2). The milestone decision authority may approve, disapprove, or revise the acquisition strategy at any such time.

“(2) The times at which the acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program shall be reviewed by the milestone decision authority for the program under paragraph (1) are the following:

“(b) Guidance.—The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall issue policies and procedures governing the contents of, and the review and approval process for, the acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program.

“(c) Contents.—The acquisition strategy for a major defense acquisition program shall present a top-level description of the business and technical management approach designed to achieve the objectives of the program within the resource constraints imposed. The strategy shall be tailored to address program requirements and constraints, and shall express the program manager’s approach to the program in sufficient detail to allow the milestone decision authority to assess the viability of approach, method of implementation of laws and policies, and program objectives. Subject to guidance issued pursuant to subsection (b), each acquisition strategy shall address the following:

“(1) An acquisition approach, including industrial base considerations in accordance with section 2440 of this title, and consideration of alternative acquisition approaches.

“(2) A risk management strategy, addressing cost, schedule, and technical risk.

“(3) An approach to ensuring the maturity of technologies and avoiding unnecessary or excessive concurrency.

“(4) A strategy for dividing the acquisition into increments or spirals, and continuously adopting commercial and defense technologies, where appropriate.

“(5) A business strategy, including measures to ensure continuing competition in through the life of the acquisition program.

“(6) A contracting strategy addressing the selection of sources, contract types, and small business participation.

“(7) An intellectual property strategy, in accordance with section 2320 of this title.

“(8) An approach to international involvement, including foreign military sales and cooperative opportunities, in accordance with section 2350a of this title.

“(d) In this section, the term ‘milestone decision authority’, with respect to a major defense acquisition program, means the official within the Department of Defense designated with the overall responsibility and authority for acquisition decisions for the program, including authority to approve entry of the program into the next phase of the acquisition process.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2431 the following new item:

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking “the Under Secretary of Defense for” and all that follows through “of the Board” and inserting “opportunities for such cooperative research and development shall be addressed in the acquisition strategy for the project”; and

(ii) in subparagraph (A), by striking “A statement indicating whether” and inserting “Whether”;

(I) by striking “by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics”; and

(II) by striking “of the United States under consideration by the Department of Defense”; and

(II) by striking “of the Under Secretary” and inserting “to the milestone decision authority”.

(2) Section 803 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is repealed.

(a) Guidance on risk reduction in major defense acquisition programs.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the acquisition strategy developed pursuant to section 2431a of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 841, for each major defense acquisition program for which development activities are required includes the following elements:

(1) A comprehensive approach to continuously identifying and addressing risk (including technical, cost, and schedule risk) beginning at program initiation and continuing until the start of full rate production as a means to improve programmatic decision making and appropriately minimize and manage program concurrency.

(2) Documentation of the major sources of risk identified and the approach to retiring that risk.

(b) Elements of comprehensive approach to risk reduction.—The comprehensive approach to identifying and addressing risk for purposes of subsection (a)(1) shall include some combination of the following elements as appropriate for the item or system being acquired:

(5) Prototyping (including prototyping at the system or subsystem level and competitive prototyping, where appropriate).

(c) Preference for prototyping.—To the maximum extent practicable and consistent with the economical use of available financial resources, the milestone decision authority for each major defense acquisition program shall ensure that the acquisition strategy for the program provides for—

(1) the production of competitive prototypes at the system or subsystem level before Milestone B approval; or

(2) if the production of competitive prototypes is not practicable, the production of single prototypes at the system or subsystem level.

(d) Repeal of mandatory prototyping provision.—Section 203 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note) is repealed.

(a) In general.—Section 2430 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) (1) The milestone decision authority for major defense acquisition programs shall be the service acquisition executive of the military service that is managing the program, unless the Secretary of Defense designates another official to serve as the milestone decision authority.

“(2) The Secretary of Defense may designate an alternate milestone decision authority in programs where—

“(A) the Secretary determines that the program is addressing a joint requirement;

“(B) the Secretary determines that the program is best managed by a defense agency;

“(C) the program has incurred a unit cost increase greater than the significant cost threshold or critical cost threshold under section 2433 of this title;

“(D) the program has failed to develop an acquisition program baseline within 2 years of program initiation;

“(E) the program is critical to a major interagency requirement or technology development effort, or has significant international partner involvement; or

“(F) the Secretary certifies that an alternate official serving as the milestone decision authority will best position the program to achieve desired cost, schedule, and performance outcomes.

“(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense may redelegate the position of milestone decision authority for a program designated above upon request of the Secretary of the military department concerned. A decision on redelegation must be made within 180 days of the request of the Secretary of the military department concerned.

“(B) If the Secretary of Defense denies the request for redelegation, the Secretary shall certify to the congressional defense committees that an alternate official serving as milestone decision authority will best position the program to achieve desired cost, schedule, and performance outcomes. No such redelegation is authorized after a program has incurred a unit cost increase greater than the significant cost threshold or critical cost threshold under section 2433 of this title, except for exceptional circumstances.

“(4) For major defense acquisition programs where the service acquisition executive of the military service that is managing the program is the milestone decision authority—

“(A) the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that no documentation is required outside of the military service organization, without a determination by the Deputy Chief Management Officer that the documentation supports a specific statutory requirement and is implemented in a manner that will not result in program delays or increased costs, and no acquisition programmatic approvals shall be required outside of the military service organization, with the exception of approval of the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation of the Test and Evaluation Master Plan; and

“(B) the Secretary of the military department concerned and the chief of the Armed Force concerned shall, in each Selected Acquisition Report required under section 2432 of this title, certify that program requirements are stable and funding is adequate to meet cost, schedule, and performance objectives for the program and identify and report to the congressional defense committees on any increased risk to the program since the last report.”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 133(b)(5) of such title is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, except that the Under Secretary shall exercise only advisory authority over service acquisition programs for which the service acquisition executive is the milestone decision authority”.

(1) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for implementing subsection (d) of section 2430 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section.

(2) GUIDANCE.—The Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics and the service acquisition executives, shall issue guidance to ensure that by not later than October 1, 2016, the acquisition policy, guidance, and practices of the Department of Defense conform to the requirements of subsection (d) of section 2430 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section. The guidance shall be designed to ensure a streamlined decision-making and approval process and to minimize any information requests, consistent with the requirement of paragraph (4)(A) of such subsection (d).

(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect on October 1, 2016.

SEC. 844. Revision of Milestone A decision authority responsibilities for major defense acquisition programs.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 2366a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 2366a. Major defense acquisition programs: responsibilities at Milestone A approval

“(a) Responsibilities.—Before granting Milestone A approval for a major defense acquisition program or a major subprogram, the milestone decision authority for the program or subprogram shall ensure that—

“(1) information about the program or subprogram is sufficient to warrant entry of the program or subprogram into the risk reduction phase;

“(2) the Secretary of the relevant military department and the chief of the relevant military service concur in cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance trade-offs that have been made with regard to the program; and

“(3) there are sound plans for progression of the program or subprogram to the development phase.

“(b) Considerations.—In carrying out subsection (a), the milestone decision authority shall take appropriate action to ensure that—

“(A) meets a joint military requirement and responds to an anticipated or likely threat;

“(B) has been developed in light of appropriate market research and a review of alternative approaches and does not unnecessarily duplicate a capability already provided by an existing system; and

“(C) is affordable in light of cost estimates developed pursuant to the guidance of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation; and

“(A) identifies areas of risk and, for each such identified area of risk, includes a plan to reduce the risk;

“(C) complies with the requirements of section 2431a of this title and the policies and procedures implementing such section; and

“(3) the program or subprogram meets any other considerations the milestone decision authority considers relevant.

“(c) Notification.—Not later than 30 days after granting Milestone A approval for a major defense acquisition program or major subprogram, the milestone decision authority for that program or subprogram shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice of the approval in writing. The milestone decision authority’s decision memorandum with respect to such approval shall be available to the congressional defense committees upon request, consistent with any relevant classification requirements.

“(1) The term ‘major defense acquisition program’ means a Department of Defense acquisition program that is a major defense acquisition program for purposes of section 2430 of this title.

“(2) The term ‘major subprogram’ means a major subprogram of a major defense acquisition program designated under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title.

“(3) The term ‘milestone decision authority’, with respect to a major defense acquisition program or a major subprogram, means the official within the Department of Defense designated with the overall responsibility and authority for acquisitions decisions for the program or subprogram, including authority to approve entry of the program or subprogram into the next phase of the acquisition process.

“(4) The term ‘Milestone A approval’ means a decision to enter into a risk reduction phase pursuant to guidance prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the management of Department of Defense acquisition programs.

“(5) The term ‘joint military requirement’ has the meaning given that term in section 181(g)(1) of this title.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 139 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2366a and inserting the following:

(b) Considerations in making milestone a determinations.—In making a Milestone A determination pursuant to section 2366a of title 10, United States Code, the milestone decision authority shall include consideration of the following:

(1) With respect to joint military requirements, the factors outlined under section 181(b) of title 10, United States Code.

(2) With respect to alternative approaches, the factors outlined under section 201(a) of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note).

(3) With respect to affordability and cost estimates and analyses, the factors outlined under section 2334(a) of title 10, United States Code.

(5) With respect to sustainment, the factors outlined under section 2337 and section 2464 of this title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 845. Revision of Milestone B decision authority responsibilities for major defense acquisition programs.

(a) Revision to milestone b requirements.—Section 2366b of title 10, United Stated Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 2366b. Major defense acquisition programs: certification required before Milestone B approval

“(a) Certification.—A major defense acquisition program may not receive Milestone B approval until the milestone decision authority certifies that the technology in the program has been demonstrated in a relevant environment, as determined by the Milestone Decision Authority on the basis of an independent review and assessment by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, in consultation with the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation.

“(b) Determination.—A major defense acquisition program may not receive Milestone B approval until the milestone decision authority determines that appropriate steps have been taken to ensure that—

“(1) the program is affordable when considering the ability of the Department of Defense to accomplish the program's mission using alternative systems;

“(2) trade-offs among cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance objectives have been made to ensure that the program is affordable when considering the per unit cost and the total acquisition cost in the context of the total resources available during the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted during the fiscal year in which the certification is made;

“(3) the Secretary of the relevant military department and the chief of the relevant military service concur in the trade-offs made in accordance with paragraph (2);

“(4) reasonable cost and schedule estimates have been developed to execute, with the concurrence of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, the product development and production plan under the program;

“(5) funding is available to execute the product development and production plan under the program, through the period covered by the future-years defense program submitted during the fiscal year in which the certification is made, consistent with the estimates described in paragraph (4) for the program;

“(6) market research has been conducted prior to technology development to reduce duplication of existing technology and products;

“(7) the Department of Defense has completed an analysis of alternatives and a business case analysis with respect to the program;

“(8) the Joint Requirements Oversight Council has accomplished its duties with respect to the program pursuant to section 181(b) of this title, including an analysis of the operational requirements for the program;

“(9) life-cycle sustainment planning, including corrosion prevention and mitigation planning, has identified and evaluated relevant sustainment costs throughout development, production, operation, sustainment, and disposal of the program, and any alternatives, and that such costs are reasonable and have been accurately estimated;

“(10) an estimate has been made of the requirements for core logistics capabilities and the associated sustaining workloads required to support such requirements;

“(11) there is a plan to mitigate and account for any costs in connection with any anticipated de-certification of cryptographic systems and components during the production and procurement of the major defense acquisition program to be acquired;

“(12) a preliminary design review or assessment of engineering design knowledge of the system has been satisfactorily completed; and

“(13) the program complies with all relevant policies, regulations, and directives of the Department of Defense.

“(c) Changes to certification.— (1) The program manager for a major defense acquisition program that has received milestone B approval under this section shall immediately notify the milestone decision authority of any changes to the program or a designated major subprogram of such program that—

“(A) alter the substantive basis for the certification of the milestone decision authority under subsection (a) or any element of the determination of the milestone decision authority under subsection (b); or

“(B) otherwise cause the program or subprogram to deviate significantly from the material provided to the milestone decision authority in support of such certification or determination.

“(2) Upon receipt of information under paragraph (1), the milestone decision authority may withdraw the certification or determination concerned or rescind Milestone B approval if the milestone decision authority determines that such certification, determination, or approval is no longer valid.

“(d) Submission to congress.— (1) The certification required under subsection (a) and the determination under subsection (b) with respect to a major defense acquisition program shall be submitted to the congressional defense committees with the first Selected Acquisition Report submitted under section 2432 of this title after completion of the certification.

“(2) A summary of any information provided to the milestone decision authority pursuant to subsection (c) and a description of the actions taken as a result of such information shall be submitted with the first Selected Acquisition Report submitted under section 2432 of this title after receipt of such information by the milestone decision authority.

“(e) Waiver for national security.— (1) The milestone decision authority may waive the applicability to a major defense acquisition program of the certification requirement in subsection (a) or one or more components of the determination requirement in subsection (b) if the milestone decision authority determines that, but for such a waiver, the Department would be unable to meet critical national security objectives.

“(2) Whenever the milestone decision authority makes such a determination and authorizes such a waiver the waiver, the determination, and the reasons for the determination shall be submitted in writing to the congressional defense committees within 30 days after the waiver is authorized.

“(f) Nondelegation.—The milestone decision authority may not delegate the certification requirement under subsection (a), the determination requirement under subsection (b), or the authority to waive any component of such requirement under subsection (e).

“(1) The term ‘major defense acquisition program’ means a Department of Defense acquisition program that is a major defense acquisition program for purposes of section 2430 of this title.

“(2) The term ‘designated major subprogram’ means a major subprogram of a major defense acquisition program designated under section 2430a(a)(1) of this title.

“(3) The term ‘milestone decision authority’, with respect to a major defense acquisition program, means the individual within the Department of Defense designated with overall responsibility for the program.

“(4) The term ‘Milestone B approval’ has the meaning provided that term in section 2366(e)(7) of this title.

“(5) The term ‘core logistics capabilities’ means the core logistics capabilities identified under section 2464(a) of this title.”.

(b) Considerations in making milestone b determinations.—In making a Milestone B determination pursuant to section 2366b of title 10, United States Code, the milestone decision authority shall review the acquisition strategy required by section 2431a of title 10, as added by section 841 of this Act and include consideration of the following:

(1) With respect to affordability, the factors outlined under section 2334 of title 10, United States Code.

(3) With respect to fulfilling a joint military requirement, the factors outlined under section 181 of title 10, United States Code.

(A) the factors outlined under section 202 of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note); and

(5) With respect to sustainment, the factors outlined under section 2337 and section 2464 of title 10, United States Code.

(c) Conforming change.—Section 2334(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in paragraph (6)(A)(i) by striking “any certification under” and inserting in lieu thereof “any decision to grant milestone approval pursuant to”.

SEC. 846. Tenure and accountability of program managers for program development periods.

(a) Revised guidance required.—Not later than 180 days after date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise Department of Defense guidance for defense acquisition programs to address the tenure and accountability of program managers for the program development period of defense acquisition programs.

(b) Program development period.—For the purpose of this section, the term “program development period” refers to the period before a decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program).

(c) Responsibilities.—The revised guidance required by subsection (a) shall provide that the program manager for the program development period of a defense acquisition program is responsible for—

(1) bringing to maturity the technologies and manufacturing processes that will be needed to carry out the program;

(2) ensuring continuing focus during program development on meeting stated mission requirements and other requirements of the Department of Defense;

(3) making trade-offs between program cost, schedule, and performance for the life-cycle of the program;

(5) ensuring that appropriate information is available to the milestone decision authority to make a decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program), including information necessary to make the certification required by section 2366a of title 10, United States Code.

(d) Qualifications, resources, and tenure.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each program manager for the program development period of a defense acquisition program—

(1) has the appropriate management, engineering, technical, and financial expertise needed to meet the responsibilities assigned pursuant to subsection (c);

(2) is provided the resources and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating expertise, and software development expertise) needed to meet such responsibilities; and

(3) is assigned to the program manager position for such program until such time as such program is ready for a decision on Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program), unless removed for cause or due to exceptional circumstances.

SEC. 847. Tenure and accountability of program managers for program execution periods.

(a) Revised guidance required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise Department of Defense guidance for defense acquisition programs to address the tenure and accountability of program managers for the program execution period of defense acquisition programs.

(b) Program execution period.—For purposes of this section, the term “program execution period” refers to the period after Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program).

(1) require the program manager for the program execution period of a defense acquisition program to enter into a performance agreement with the milestone decision authority for such program within six months of assignment, that—

(A) establishes expected parameters for the cost, schedule, and performance of the program consistent with the business case for the program;

(B) provides the commitment of the milestone decision authority to provide the level of funding and resources required to meet such parameters; and

(C) provides the assurance of the program manager that such parameters are achievable and that the program manager will be accountable for meeting such parameters; and

(A) veto the addition of new program requirements that would be inconsistent with the parameters established in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1), subject to the authority of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics to override the veto based on critical national security reasons;

(B) make trade-offs between cost, schedule, and performance, provided that such trade-offs are consistent with the parameters established in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1);

(C) redirect funding within such program, to the extent necessary to achieve the parameters established in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1);

(D) develop such interim goals and milestones as may be required to achieve the parameters established in the performance agreement entered into pursuant to paragraph (1); and

(E) use program funds to recruit and hire such technical experts as may be required to carry out the program, if necessary expertise is not otherwise provided by the Department of Defense.

(d) Qualifications, resources, and tenure.—The Secretary shall ensure that each program manager for the program execution period of a defense acquisition program—

(1) has the appropriate management, engineering, technical, and financial expertise needed to meet the responsibilities assigned pursuant to subsection (c);

(2) is provided the resources and support (including systems engineering expertise, cost estimating expertise, and software development expertise) needed to meet such responsibilities; and

(3) is assigned to the program manager position for such program at the time of Milestone B approval (or Key Decision Point B approval in the case of a space program) and continues in such position until the delivery of the first production units of the program, unless removed for cause or due to exceptional circumstances.

(e) Limited waiver authority.—The Secretary may waive the requirement in paragraph (3) of subsection (d) that a program manager for the program execution period of a defense acquisition program serve in that position until the delivery of the first production units of such program upon submitting to the congressional defense committees a written determination that—

(1) the program is so complex, and the delivery of the first production units will take so long, that it would not be feasible for a single individual to serve as program manager for the entire period covered by such paragraph; and

(2) the complexity of the program, and length of time that will be required to deliver the first production units, are not the result of a failure to meet the certification requirements under section 2366a of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 848. Repeal of requirement for stand-alone manpower estimates for major defense acquisition programs.

(a) Repeal of requirement.—Subsection (a)(1) of section 2434 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “and a manpower estimate for the program have” and inserting “has”.

(b) Conforming amendments relating to regulations.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended—

(2) by striking “shall require—” and all that follows through “that the independent” and inserting “shall require that the independent”;

(3) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and moving those paragraphs, as so redesignated, two ems to the left; and

(A) by striking “and operations and support,” and inserting “operations and support, and manpower to operate, maintain, and support the program upon full operational deployment,”; and

(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 144 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2434 and inserting the following:

(a) In general.—For each fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of each military department shall pay a penalty for cost overruns on the covered major defense acquisition programs of the military department.

(1) The amount of the cost overrun or underrun on any major defense acquisition program or subprogram in a fiscal year is the difference between the current program acquisition unit cost for the program or subprogram and the program acquisition unit cost for the program as shown in the original Baseline Estimate for the program or subprogram, multiplied by the quantity of items to be purchased under the program or subprogram, as reported in the final Selected Acquisition Report for the fiscal year in accordance with section 2432 of title 10, United States Code.

(2) Cost overruns or underruns for covered major defense acquisition programs that are joint programs of more than one military department shall be allocated among the military departments in percentages determined by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

(3) The cumulative amount of cost overruns for a military department in a fiscal year is the sum of the cost overruns and cost underruns for all covered major defense acquisition programs of the department in the fiscal year (including cost overruns or underruns allocated to the military department in accordance with paragraph (2)).

(4) The cost overrun penalty for a military department in a fiscal year is three percent of the cumulative amount of cost overruns of the military department in the fiscal year, as determined pursuant to paragraph (3), except that the cost overrun penalty may not be a negative amount.

(1) REDUCTION OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION ACCOUNTS.—Not later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2015, the Secretary of each military department shall reduce each research, development, test, and evaluation account of the military department by the percentage determined under paragraph (2), and remit such amount to the Secretary of Defense.

(2) DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT.—The percentage reduction to research, development, test, and evaluation accounts of a military department referred to in paragraph (1) is the percentage reduction to such accounts necessary to equal the cost overrun penalty for the fiscal year for such department determined pursuant to subsection (b)(4).

(3) CREDITING OF FUNDS.—Any amount remitted under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the Rapid Prototyping Fund established pursuant to section 803 of this Act.

(d) Covered programs.—A major defense acquisition program is covered under this section if the original Baseline Estimate was established for such program under section 2435(d) (1) or (2) on or after the date of the enactment of the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–23).

SEC. 850. Streamlining of reporting requirements applicable to Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering regarding major defense acquisition programs.

(a) Reporting to under secretary of defense for acquisition, technology, and logistics before milestone b approval.—Subparagraph (A) of paragraph (8) of section 138(b) of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 901(h)(2) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3466), is further amended—

(2) by striking “the major defense acquisition programs” and inserting “each major defense acquisition program”;

(3) by inserting “before the Milestone B approval for that program” after “Department of Defense”; and

(4) by striking “such reviews and assessments” and inserting “such review and assessment”.

(b) Annual report to secretary of defense and congressional defense committees.—Subparagraph (B) of such paragraph is amended by inserting “for which a Milestone B approval occurred during the preceding fiscal year” after “Department of Defense”.

SEC. 851. Configuration Steering Boards for cost control under major defense acquisition programs.

(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respectively; and

SEC. 861. Inapplicability of certain laws and regulations to the acquisition of commercial items and commercially available off-the-shelf items.

(a) Amendment to title 10, United States code.—Section 2375 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 2375. Relationship of commercial item provisions to other provisions of law

“(a) Applicability of government-wide statutes.— (1) No contract for the procurement of a commercial item entered into by the head of an agency shall be subject to any law properly listed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation pursuant to section 1906(b) of title 41.

“(2) No subcontract under a contract for the procurement of a commercial item entered into by the head of an agency shall be subject to any law properly listed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation pursuant to section 1906(c) of title 41.

“(3) No contract for the procurement of a commercially available off-the-shelf item entered into by the head of an agency shall be subject to any law properly listed in the Federal Acquisition Regulation pursuant to section 1907 of title 41.

“(b) Applicability of defense-unique statutes to contracts for commercial items.— (1) The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement shall include a list of defense-unique provisions of law that are inapplicable to contracts for the procurement of commercial items. A provision of law properly included on the list pursuant to paragraph (2) does not apply to purchases of commercial items by the Department of Defense. This section does not render a provision of law not included on the list inapplicable to contracts for the procurement of commercial items.

“(2) A provision of law described in subsection (e) that is enacted after January 1, 2015, shall be included on the list of inapplicable provisions of law required by paragraph (1) unless the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics makes a written determination that it would not be in the best interest of the Department of Defense to exempt contracts for the procurement of commercial items from the applicability of the provision.

“(c) Applicability of defense-unique statutes to subcontracts for commercial items.— (1) The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement shall include a list of provisions of law that are inapplicable to subcontracts under a Department of Defense contract or subcontract for the procurement of commercial items. A provision of law properly included on the list pursuant to paragraph (2) does not apply to those subcontracts. This section does not render a provision of law not included on the list inapplicable to subcontracts under a contract for the procurement of commercial items.

“(2) A provision of law described in subsection (e) shall be included on the list of inapplicable provisions of law required by paragraph (1) unless the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics makes a written determination that it would not be in the best interest of the Department of Defense to exempt subcontracts under a contract for the procurement of commercial items from the applicability of the provision.

“(3) In this subsection, the term ‘subcontract’ includes a transfer of commercial items between divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of a contractor or subcontractor. The term does not include agreements entered into by a contractor for the supply of commodities that are intended for use in the performance of multiple contracts with the Department of Defense and other parties and are not identifiable to any particular contract.

“(4) This subsection does not authorize the waiver of the applicability of any provision of law with respect to any first-tier subcontract under a contract with a prime contractor reselling or distributing commercial items of another contractor without adding value.

“(d) Applicability of defense-unique statutes to contracts for commercially available, off-the-shelf items.— (1) The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement shall include a list of provisions of law that are inapplicable to contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items. A provision of law properly included on the list pursuant to paragraph (2) does not apply to Department of Defense contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items. This section does not render a provision of law not included on the list inapplicable to contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items.

“(2) A provision of law described in subsection (e) shall be included on the list of inapplicable provisions of law required by paragraph (1) unless the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics makes a written determination that it would not be in the best interest of the Department of Defense to exempt contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items from the applicability of the provision.

“(e) Covered provision of law.—A provision of law referred to in subsections (b)(2), (c)(2), and (d)(2) is a provision of law that the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics determines sets forth policies, procedures, requirements, or restrictions for the procurement of property or services by the Federal Government, except for a provision of law that—

“(2) specifically refers to this section and provides that, notwithstanding this section, it shall be applicable to contracts for the procurement of commercial items.”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—To the maximum extent practicable, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall ensure that—

(A) the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement does not require the inclusion of contract clauses in contracts for the procurement of commercial items or contracts for the procurement of commercially available off-the-shelf items, unless such clauses are—

(i) required to implement provisions of law or executive orders applicable to such contracts; or

(B) the flow-down of contract clauses to subcontracts under contracts for the procurement of commercial items or commercially available off-the-shelf items is prohibited unless such flow-down is required to implement provisions of law or executive orders applicable to such subcontracts.

(2) SUBCONTRACTS.—In this subsection, the term “subcontract” includes a transfer of commercial items between divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of a contractor or subcontractor. The term does not include agreements entered into by a contractor for the supply of commodities that are intended for use in the performance of multiple contracts with the Department of Defense and other parties and are not identifiable to any particular contract.

(c) Report on inclusion of contract clauses.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report listing all standard contract clauses included in contracts awarded using commercial acquisition procedures under part 12 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, including a justification for the inclusion of each such clause.

(a) Guidance required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall issue guidance to ensure that acquisition officials of the Department of Defense fully comply with the requirements of section 2377 of title 10, United States Code, regarding market research and commercial items. The guidance issued pursuant to this subsection shall, at a minimum—

(1) provide that the head of an agency may not enter into a contract in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold for information technology products or services that are not commercial items unless the head of the agency determines in writing that no commercial items are suitable to meet the agency’s needs as provided in subsection (c)(2) of such section; and

(2) ensure that market research conducted in accordance with subsection (c) of such section is used, where appropriate, to inform price reasonableness determinations.

(b) Review required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall review Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3170.01, the Manual for the Operation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System, and other documents governing the requirements development process and revise these documents as necessary to ensure that the Department of Defense fully complies with the requirement in section 2377(c) of title 10, United States Code, and section 10.001 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation for Federal agencies to conduct appropriate market research before developing new requirements.

(c) Market research defined.—For the purposes of this section, the term “market research” means a review of existing systems, subsystems, capabilities, and technologies that are available or could be made available to meet the needs of the Department of Defense in whole or in part. The review may include any of the techniques for conducting market research provided in section 10.002(b)(2) of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and shall include, at a minimum, contacting knowledgeable individuals in Government and industry regarding existing market capabilities.

(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement shall be modified to address the validity of commercial item determinations for multiple procurements.

(b) Required elements.—The modification required by paragraph (1) shall, at a minimum—

(1) provide that a written determination by an authorized agency official that an item is a commercial item for the purposes of section 2306a of title 10, United States Code, shall be presumed to be valid for any subsequent procurement unless the contracting officer for such procurement determines in writing that the earlier determination was made in error or was based on inadequate information; and

(2) establish a process by which the contractor may appeal a determination by a contracting officer that an earlier determination was made in error or was based on inadequate information to the head of contracting for the agency.

(c) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude the contracting officer for the procurement of a commercial item from requiring the contractor to supply information that is sufficient to determine the reasonableness of price, regardless whether or not the contractor was required to provide such information in connection with any earlier procurement.

(a) Amendments to requirements related to major weapon systems.—Section 2379 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12))” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code”; and

(ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “; and”;

(A) by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41, United States Code,”; and

(i) by striking “in writing that—” and all that follows through “(A) the subsystem” and inserting “in writing that the subsystem”;

(ii) by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)); and” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code.”; and

(A) by striking “section 35(c) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 431(c))” and inserting “section 104 of title 41, United States Code,”; and

(i) by striking “in writing that—” and all that follows through “(i) the component” and inserting “in writing that the component”;

(ii) by striking “section 4(12) of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403(12)); and” and inserting “section 103 of title 41, United States Code.”; and

“(d) Information submitted.— (1) To the extent necessary to determine the reasonableness of the price for items acquired under this section, the contracting officer shall require the offeror to submit—

“(A) prices paid for the same or similar commercial items under comparable terms and conditions by both government and commercial customers;

“(B) if the contracting officer determines that the offeror does not have access to and cannot provide sufficient information described in subparagraph (A) to determine the reasonableness of price, information on—

“(i) prices for the same or similar items sold under different terms and conditions;

“(ii) prices for similar levels of work or effort on related products or services;

“(iv) other relevant information that can serve as the basis for a price assessment; and

“(C) if the contracting officer determines that the information submitted pursuant to subparagraphs (A) and (B) is not sufficient to determine the reasonableness of price, other relevant information regarding the basis for price or cost, including information on labor costs, material costs, and overhead rates.

“(2) An offeror may not be required to submit information described in paragraph (1)(C) with regard to a commercially available off-the-shelf item or any other item that was developed exclusively at private expense.”.

(b) Conforming amendment to truth in negotiations act.—Section 2306a(d)(1) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “If the contracting officer determines that the offeror does not have access to and cannot provide sufficient information on prices for the same or similar items to determine the reasonableness of price, the contracting officer shall require the submission of information on prices for similar levels or work or effort on related products or services, prices for alternative solutions or approaches, and other information that is relevant to the determination of a fair and reasonable price.”.

SEC. 865. Limitation on conversion of procurements from commercial acquisition procedures.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may not convert the procurement of commercial items or services from commercial acquisition procedures under part 12 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation to non-commercial acquisition procedures under part 15 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation unless the Secretary, in consultation with the head of the acquisition component, certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Department of Defense will realize a significant cost savings compared to the cost of procuring a similar quantity or level of such item or service using commercial acquisition procedures.

(2) CERTIFICATION FACTORS.—In making a certification under paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall consider the following factors:

(A) The estimated cost of foregone research and development to be performed by the existing contractor to improve future products or services.

(B) The transaction costs for the Department of Defense and the contractor in assessing and responding to data requests to support a conversion to non-commercial acquisition procedures.

(D) Costs associated with potential procurement delays resulting from the conversion.

(1) INVENTORY.—The Secretary of Defense shall prepare an inventory of all contracts and subcontracts converted from commercial acquisition procedures to non-commercial procedures during the previous five years.

(2) REPORTS.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on each conversion identified in the inventory prepared under paragraph (1) that identifies and compares per unit costs and prices paid for the item or service under commercial acquisition procedures with those paid under non-commercial procurement procedures.

(1) REVIEW OF REPORTS.—Not later than 180 days after the Secretary of Defense submits a report under subsection (b)(2), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of the accuracy of the report.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report including any recommendations for additional costs and benefits that should be considered when the Department of Defense is planning to convert a procurement of items or services from commercial to non-commercial procurement procedures.

(B) FACTORS.—In making recommendations under subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General shall consider the following factors:

(ii) The estimated cost of foregone research and development to be performed by existing contractors to improve future products or services.

(iii) The transaction costs for the Department of Defense and contractors in assessing and responding to data requests to support conversions to non-commercial acquisition procedures.

(iv) Costs associated with potential procurement delays resulting from conversions.

(d) Sunset.—The requirements of this section shall terminate 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 866. Treatment of goods and services provided by nontraditional contractors as commercial items.

(a) In general.—Chapter 140 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 2380. Treatment of goods and services provided by nontraditional contractors as commercial items

“Notwithstanding section 2376(1) of this title, items and services provided by nontraditional contractors (as that term is defined in section 2302(9) of this title) may be treated by the head of an agency as commercial items for purposes of this chapter.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 140 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2379 the following new item:

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

“§ 2222. Defense business systems: business process reengineering; enterprise architecture; management

“(a) Defense business systems generally.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each covered defense business system developed, deployed, and operated by the Department of Defense—

“(1) is integrated into a comprehensive defense business enterprise architecture;

“(2) is managed in a manner that provides visibility into, and traceability of, expenditures for the system; and

“(3) uses an acquisition and sustainment strategy that prioritizes use of commercial software and business practices.

“(b) Defense business processes generally.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that defense business processes are reviewed, and as appropriate revised through business process reengineering to match best commercial practices, to the maximum extent practicable, so as to minimize customization of commercial business systems.

“(1) SECRETARY OF DEFENSE GUIDANCE.—The Secretary shall issue guidance to provide for the coordination of, and decision making for, the planning, programming, and control of investments in covered defense business systems.

“(2) SUPPORTING GUIDANCE.—The Secretary shall direct the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, the Chief Information Officer, and the Chief Management Officer of each of the military departments to issue and maintain supporting guidance for the guidance of the Secretary issued under paragraph (1), within their respective areas of responsibility, as necessary.

“(d) Guidance elements.—The guidance issued pursuant to subsection (c)(1) shall include the following elements:

“(1) Policy to ensure that the business processes of the Department of Defense are continuously evolved to—

“(A) implement the most streamlined and efficient business process practicable; and

“(B) eliminate or reduce the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf systems to meet unique requirements or incorporate unique requirements or incorporate unique interfaces to the maximum extent practicable.

“(2) A process to establish requirements for covered defense business systems.

“(3) Policy requiring the periodic review of covered defense business systems that have been fully deployed, by portfolio, to ensure that investments in such portfolios are appropriate.

“(4) Policy to ensure full consideration of sustainability and technological refreshment requirements, and the appropriate use of open architectures.

“(e) Defense business council.—The Secretary shall establish a Defense Business Council to provide advice to the Secretary on reengineering the Department’s business processes and developing and deploying defense business systems. The Council shall be chaired by the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense, and shall include membership from the public sector, defense industry, and commercial industry.

“(f) Approvals required for development.— (1) The Secretary shall ensure that a covered defense business system program cannot proceed into development (or, if no development is required, into production or fielding) unless the appropriate approval officials (as specified in paragraph (3)) have determined that—

“(A) a business process has been, or is being, reengineered to be as streamlined and efficient as practicable, and the implementation of the business process will maximize the elimination of unique software requirements and unique interfaces;

“(B) the system has valid, achievable requirements and a viable plan for implementing those requirements (including, as appropriate, market research, business process reengineering, and prototyping activities);

“(C) the system has an acquisition strategy designed to eliminate or reduce the need to tailor commercial-off-the-shelf systems to meet unique requirements or incorporate unique requirements or incorporate unique interfaces to the maximum extent practicable; and

“(D) the system is in compliance with the Department’s auditability requirements.

“(2) (A) For any fiscal year in which funds are expended for development or sustainment pursuant to a covered defense business system program, the appropriate approval officials shall review the system and certify, certify with conditions, or decline to certify, as the case may be, that—

“(ii) an acquisition program baseline has been established within two years of program initiation; and

“(iii) program requirements and have not changed in a manner that is increasing acquisition costs or schedule, without sufficient cause and only after maximum efforts to reengineer business processes prior to changing requirements.

“(B) If an approval officially determines that full certification cannot be granted, the approval official shall notify the acquisition milestone decision authority for the program and provide a recommendation for corrective action, and provide a copy of such recommendations to the congressional defense committees within 60 days.

“(3) For purposes of paragraph (1), the appropriate approval officials with respect to a covered defense business system are the following:

“(A) In the case of a priority defense business system, the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense.

“(B) In the case of other covered business systems, an official designated under procedures established by the Secretary of Defense.

“(g) Responsibility of milestone decision authority.—The milestone decision authority for a covered defense business system program shall be responsible for the acquisition of such system and shall ensure that acquisition process approvals are not considered for such system until the relevant certifications and approvals have been made under this section.

“(1) DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM.— (A) The term ‘defense business system’ means an information system that is operated by, for, or on behalf of the Department of Defense, including any of the following:

“(ii) an information system used exclusively by and within the defense commissary system or the exchange system or other instrumentality of the Department of Defense conducted for the morale, welfare, and recreation of members of the armed forces using nonappropriated funds.

“(2) COVERED DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM.—The term ‘covered defense business system’ means a defense business system that is expected to have a total amount of budget authority over the period of the current future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title, in excess of $50,000,000.

“(3) COVERED DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM PROGRAM .—The term ‘covered defense business system program’ means a defense acquisition program to develop and field a covered defense business system or an increment of a covered defense business system.

“(4) PRIORITY DEFENSE BUSINESS SYSTEM PROGRAM.—The term ‘priority defense business system’ means a defense business system that is—

“(A) expected to have a total amount of budget authority over the period of the current future-years defense program submitted to Congress under section 221 of this title in excess of $250,000,000; or

“(B) designated by the Deputy Chief Management Officer of the Department of Defense as a priority defense business system, based on specific program analyses of factors including complexity, scope, and technical risk, and after notification to Congress of such designation.

“(5) ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE.—The term ‘enterprise architecture’ has the meaning given that term in section 3601(4) of title 44.

“(6) INFORMATION SYSTEM.—The term ‘information system’ has the meaning given that term in section 11101 of title 40, United States Code.

“(7) NATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM.—The term ‘national security system’ has the meaning given that term in section 3552(b)(2) of title 44.

“(8) MILESTONE DECISION AUTHORITY.—The term ‘milestone decision authority’, with respect to a defense acquisition program, means the individual within the Department of Defense designated with the responsibility to grant milestone approvals for that program.

“(9) BUSINESS PROCESS MAPPING.—The term ‘business process mapping’ means a procedure in which the steps in a business process are clarified and documented in both written form and in a flow chart.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 131 of such title is amended to read as follows:

(b) Implementation of previously enacted title change.—Effective February 1, 2017, section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by striking “the Deputy Chief Management Officer” each place that it appears and inserting “the Under Secretary of Defense for Business Management and Information”.

(c) Deadline for guidance.—The guidance required by subsection (b)(1) of section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a)(1), shall be issued not later than December 31, 2016.

(d) Modification of comptroller general assessment.—Section 332(d) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 1856) is amended to read as follows:

“(d) Comptroller general assessment.—In each odd-numbered year, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the extent to which the actions taken by the Department of Defense comply with the requirements of such section.”.

(a) Modifications to department of defense acquisition workforce development fund.—Section 1705 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

“(C) For purposes of this paragraph, the applicable percentage for a fiscal year is the percentage that results in the credit to the Fund of $500,000,000 in each fiscal year.”; and

(B) in paragraph (3), by striking “24-month period” and inserting “36-month period”;

(2) in subsection (f), by striking “60 days” and inserting “120 days”; and

(3) in subsection (g)(2), by striking “September 30, 2017” and inserting “September 30, 2023”.

(b) Modifications to biennial strategic workforce plan.—Section 115b(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “the defense acquisition workforce, including both military and civilian personnel” and inserting “the military, civilian, and contractor personnel that directly support the acquisition processes of the Department of Defense, including persons serving in acquisition-related positions designated by the Secretary of Defense under section 1721 of this title”;

“(ii) a description of steps that will be taken to address any new or expanded critical skills and competencies the civilian employee workforce will need to address recent trends in defense acquisition, emerging best practices, changes in the government and commercial marketplace, and new requirements established in law or regulation; and”; and

“(3) For the purposes of paragraph (1), contractor personnel shall be treated as directly supporting the acquisition processes of the Department if, and to the extent that, such contractor personnel perform functions in support of personnel in Department of Defense positions designated by the Secretary of Defense under section 1721 of this title.”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Deputy Chief Management Officer, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics shall jointly complete a business case analysis, using the resources of the Director of Cost Analysis and Program Evaluation, to determine the most effective and efficient way to procure and deploy information technology services.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The business case analysis required by paragraph (1) shall include an assessment of whether the Department of Defense should—

(A) (i) acquire a unified set of commercially provided common or enterprise information technology services, including such services as messaging, collaboration, directory, security, and content delivery; or

(ii) allow the military departments and other components of the Department to acquire such services separately;

(B) (i) acquire such services from a single provider that bundles all of the services; or

(ii) require that each common service be independently defined and use open standards to enable continuous adoption of best commercial technology; and

(C) enable availability of multiple versions of each type of service and application to enable choice and competition while supporting interoperability where necessary.

(b) Governance mechanism and process.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Deputy Chief Management Officer and the Chief Information Officer, establish a governance mechanism and process to ensure essential interoperability across Department networks through the imposition of a minimum set of standards or common solutions.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, the Director of National Intelligence, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and the chief information officers of the military departments, develop a cloud strategy for the Secret Internet Protocol Network (SIPRNet) of the Department.

(2) MATTERS ADDRESSED.—This strategy required by paragraph (1) shall address the following:

(B) The compatibility of applications currently utilized within the Secret Internet Protocol Network with a cloud computing environment.

(D) How a Secret Internet Protocol Network cloud system would achieve interoperability with the cloud systems of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) operating at the security level Sensitive Compartmented Information.

(b) Pricing policy and cost recovery process for certain cloud services.—The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, develop a consistent pricing policy and cost recovery process for the use by Department of Defense components of the cloud services provided through the Intelligence Community Information Technology Environment.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense shall assess the feasibility and advisability of imposing a minimum set of open standards for cloud infrastructure, middle-ware, metadata, and application programming interfaces to promote interoperability, information sharing, and ease of access to data, and competition across all of the cloud computing systems and services utilized by components of the Department of Defense.

(2) COORDINATION.—The Chief Information Officer shall coordinate the assessment required by paragraph (1) with the Director of National Intelligence with respect to the cloud services offered through the Intelligence Community Information Technology Environment.

SEC. 875. Development period for Department of Defense information technology systems.

(a) Flexible limitation on development period.—Section 2445b of title 10, United States Code is amended—

“(d) Time-certain development.—If the baseline documents prepared under subsection (c) for a major automated information system that is not a national security system provide for a period in excess of five years from the time of program initiation to the time of a full deployment decision, the documents submitted pursuant to subsection (a) shall include a written determination by the senior Department of Defense official responsible for the program justifying the need for the longer period.”.

(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting “; or”;

(C) by striking subparagraph (D), as added by section 802(a)(3) of the Carl Levin and Howard “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3427).

(2) Section 811 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2316) is repealed.

SEC. 876. Revisions to pilot program on acquisition of military purpose non-developmental items.

(1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking “with nontraditional defense contractors”; and

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “awarded using competitive procedures in accordance with chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code”; and

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking “$50,000,000” and inserting “$100,000,000”.

SEC. 877. Extension of the Department of Defense Mentor-Protégé pilot program.

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2016”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “September 30, 2018” and inserting “September 30, 2019”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning October 1, 2016, the Defense Contract Audit Agency may provide audit support for non-Defense Agencies once the Secretary of Defense certifies that the backlog for incurred cost audits is less than 12 months of incurred cost inventory.

(2) ADJUSTMENT IN FUNDING FOR REIMBURSEMENTS FROM NON-DEFENSE AGENCIES.—The amount appropriated and otherwise available to the Defense Contract Audit Agency for a fiscal year beginning after September 30, 2016, shall be reduced by an amount equivalent to any reimbursements received by the Agency from non-Defense Agencies for support provided in violation of the limitation under paragraph (1).

(b) Use of third party audits.—The Secretary of Defense shall use up to 5 percent of the auditing staff of the service audit agencies augmented by private sector auditors to help eliminate the audit backlog in incurred cost, pre-award accounting systems audits and to reduce the time to complete pre-award audits.

(c) Use of Inspector General auditing staff.—The Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall make available 5 percent of its auditing staff to the Defense Contract Audit Agency to help eliminate the audit backlog in incurred cost, pre-award accounting systems audits and to reduce the time to complete pre-award audits.

(d) Defense Contract Audit Agency annual report.—Section 2313a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

“(D) the total costs of sustained or recovered costs both as a total number and as a percentage of questioned costs; and”;

“(4) a description of actions taken to ensure alignment of policies and practices across the Defense Contract Audit Agency regional organizations, offices, and individual auditors;

“(5) a description of outreach actions toward industry to promote more effective use of audit resources; and”.

(e) Acquisition oversight and audits.—The Secretary of Defense shall review the oversight and audit structure of the Department of Defense with the goal of enhancing the productivity of oversight and program and contract auditing to avoid duplicative audits and the streamlining of oversight reviews. The Secretary shall take all necessary measures to streamline oversight reviews and avoid duplicative audits and make recommendation for any necessary changes in law.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on actions taken to avoid duplicative audits and streamline oversight reviews.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) A description of actions taken to avoid duplicative audits and streamline oversight reviews based on the review conducted under subsection (e).

(B) A comparison of commercial industry accounting practices, including requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–204), with the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) to determine if some portions of CAS compliance can be met through such practices or requirements.

(C) A description of standards of materiality used by the Defense Contract Audit Agency and the Inspector General of the Department of Defense for defense contract audits.

(D) An estimate of average delay and range of delays in contract awards due to time necessary for the Defense Contract Audit Agency to complete pre-award audits.

(g) Incurred cost inventory defined.—In this section, the term “incurred cost inventory” means the level of contractor incurred cost proposals in inventory from prior fiscal years that are currently being audited by the Defense Contract Audit Agency.

(a) Survey.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a survey of the top ten contractors with the highest level of reimbursements for cost type contracts with the Department of Defense during fiscal year 2014 to estimate industry's cost of regulatory compliance (as a percentage of total costs) with government unique acquisition regulations and requirements in the categories of quality assurance, accounting and financial management, contracting and purchasing, program management, engineering, logistics, material management, property administration, and other unique requirements not imposed on contracts for commercial items.

(b) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the findings of the survey conducted under subsection (a). The data received as a result of the survey and included in the report shall be aggregated to protect against the public release of proprietary information.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the prevalence and impact of bid protests on Department of Defense acquisitions over the previous 10 years, including both protests to the Government Accountability Office and protests filed in Federal court.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following elements:

(1) A description of trends in the number of bid protests filed, and the rate of such bid protests compared to the number of procurements.

(2) A description of comparative rates for bid protests filed by incumbent contractors and bid protests filed by non-incumbent contractors.

(3) An assessment of the cost and schedule impact of successful and unsuccessful bid protests filed by incumbent contractors on contracts for services with a value in excess of $100,000,000.

(4) A description of trends in the number of bid protests filed and the rate of such bid protests on contracts for the procurement of major defense acquisition programs.

(5) An assessment of the cost and schedule impact of successful and unsuccessful bid protests filed on contracts for the procurement of major defense acquisition programs.

(6) A description of any views the Comptroller General may have on the likely impact of a provision requiring a losing protester on a contract for the procurement of a major defense acquisition program to pay the legal fees of the government.

SEC. 881. Steps to identify and address potential unfair competitive advantage of technical advisors to acquisition officials.

(a) Guidance required.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall issue guidance on steps that should be taken to identify and evaluate, and to avoid, neutralize, or mitigate, any potentially unfair competitive advantage of entities providing technical advice to acquisition officials in the award of research and development work by such officials.

(1) the term “potentially unfair competitive advantage” means unequal access to acquisition officials responsible for award decisions or allocation of resources or to acquisition information relevant to award decisions or allocation of resources; and

(2) the term “entity providing technical advice to acquisition officials” means a contractor, Federally-funded research and development center and other non-profit entity, or Federal laboratory that provides systems engineering and technical direction, participates in technical evaluations, helps prepare specifications or work statements, or otherwise provides technical advice to acquisition officials on the conduct of defense acquisition programs.

(ii) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; or”; and

“(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified disaster area’ means any census tract or nonmetropolitan county located in an area for which the President has declared a major disaster under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) or located in an area in which a catastrophic incident has occurred, if—

“(I) in the case of a census tract, the census tract ceased to be a qualified census tract during the period beginning 5 years before and ending 2 years after the date on which—

“(II) in the case of a nonmetropolitan county, the nonmetropolitan county ceased to be a qualified nonmetropolitan county during the period beginning 5 years before and ending 2 years after the date on which—

“(ii) TREATMENT.—A qualified disaster area shall only be treated as a HUBZone—

“(I) in the case of a major disaster declared by the President, during the 5-year period beginning on the date on which the President declared the major disaster for the area in which the census tract or nonmetropolitan county, as applicable, is located; and

“(II) in the case of a catastrophic incident, during the 10-year period beginning on the date on which the catastrophic incident occurred in the area in which the census tract or nonmetropolitan county, as applicable, is located.”; and

(2) in section 31(c)(3) (15 U.S.C. 657a(c)(3)), by inserting “the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency,” after “the Secretary of Labor,”.

(b) Applicability.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to a major disaster declared by the President under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) or a catastrophic incident that occurs on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

(a) In general.—Section 3(p)(5)(A)(i)(I) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(5)(A)(i)(I)) is amended—

“(bb) pursuant to subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D), or (E) of paragraph (3), that its principal office is located in a HUBZone described in paragraph (1)(E) (relating to base closure areas) (in this item referred to as the ‘base closure HUBZone’), and that not fewer than 35 percent of its employees reside in—

“(CC) a census tract the boundaries of which intersect the boundaries of the base closure HUBZone; or

“(DD) a census tract the boundaries of which are contiguous to a census tract described in subitem (BB) or (CC); or”.

(A) IN GENERAL.—Section 152(a)(2) of title I of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (15 U.S.C. 632 note) is amended by striking “5 years” and inserting “8 years”.

(B) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1698(b)(2) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (15 U.S.C. 632 note) is amended by striking “5 years” and inserting “8 years”.

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by paragraph (1) shall—

(i) a base closure area (as defined in section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D))) that, on the day before the date of enactment of this Act, is treated as a HUBZone described in section 3(p)(1)(E) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(1)(E)) under—

(I) section 152(a)(2) of title I of division K of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (15 U.S.C. 632 note); or

(II) section 1698(b)(2) of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (15 U.S.C. 632 note); and

(ii) a base closure area relating to the closure of a military instillation under the authority described in clauses (i) through (iv) of section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D)) that occurs on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 901. Update of statutory specification of functions of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff relating to advice on requirements, programs, and budget.

“(H) Advising the Secretary on development of joint command, control, communications, and cyber capabilities, including integration and interoperability of such capabilities, through requirements, integrated architectures, data standards, and assessments.”.

SEC. 902. Reorganization and redesignation of Office of Family Policy and Office of Community Support for Military Families with Special Needs.

(1) REDESIGNATION AS OFFICE OF MILITARY FAMILY READINESS POLICY.—Section 1781(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(A) by striking “Office of Family Policy” and inserting “Office of Military Family Readiness Policy”; and

(B) by striking “Director of Family Policy” and inserting “Director of Military Family Readiness Policy”.

(2) REQUIREMENT FOR DIRECTOR TO BE MEMBER OF SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE OR GENERAL OR FLAG OFFICER.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Director shall be a member of the Senior Executive Service or a general officer or flag officer.”.

(3) INCLUSION OF DIRECTOR ON MILITARY FAMILY READINESS COUNCIL.—Subsection (b)(1)(E) of section 1781a of such title is amended by striking “Office of Community Support for Military Families with Special Needs” and inserting “Office of Military Family Readiness Policy”.

(4) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 131(b)(7)(F) of such title is amended by striking “Director of Family Policy” and inserting “Director of Military Family Readiness Policy”.

(A) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of section 1781 of such title is amended to read as follows:

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 88 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1781 and inserting the following new item:

(1) REDESIGNATION AS OFFICE OF SPECIAL NEEDS.—Subsection (a) of section 1781c of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Office of Community Support for Military Families with Special Needs” and inserting “Office of Special Needs”.

(2) REORGANIZATION UNDER OFFICE OF MILITARY FAMILY READINESS POLICY.—Such subsection is further amended by striking “Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness” and inserting “Office of Military Family Readiness Policy”.

(3) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR HEAD OF OFFICE TO BE MEMBER OF SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE OR GENERAL OR FLAG OFFICER.—Such section is further amended by striking subsection (c).

(A) by redesignating subsections (d) through (i) as subsections (c) through (h), respectively;

(B) by striking “subsection (e)” each place it appears and inserting “subsection (d)”;

(C) in subsection (c), as so redesignated, by striking “subsection (f)” in paragraph (2) and inserting “subsection (e)”; and

(D) in subsection (g), as so redesignated, by striking “subsection (d)(4)” in paragraph (2)(B) and inserting “subsection (c)(4)”.

(A) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

(B) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 88 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 1781c and inserting the following new item:

SEC. 903. Repeal of requirement for annual Department of Defense funding for Ocean Research Advisory Panel.

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2016 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.

(2) LIMITATION.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), the total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $4,500,000,000.

(3) EXCEPTION FOR TRANSFERS BETWEEN MILITARY PERSONNEL AUTHORIZATIONS.—A transfer of funds between military personnel authorizations under title IV shall not be counted toward the dollar limitation in paragraph (2).

(b) Limitations.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—

(1) may only be used to provide authority for items that have a higher priority than the items from which authority is transferred; and

(2) may not be used to provide authority for an item that has been denied authorization by Congress.

(c) Effect on authorization amounts.—A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.

(d) Notice to Congress.—The Secretary shall promptly notify Congress of each transfer made under subsection (a).

SEC. 1002. Annual audit of financial statements of Department of Defense components by independent external auditors.

(a) Audits required.—For purposes of satisfying the requirement under section 3521(e) of title 31, United States Code, for audits of financial statements of Department of Defense components identified by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget under section 3515(c) of such title, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall obtain each year audits of the financial statements of each such component by an independent external auditor.

(1) select independent external auditors for purposes of subsection (a) based, among other appropriate criteria, on their qualifications, independence, and capacity to conduct audits described in subsection (a) in accordance with applicable generally accepted government auditing standards; and

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Inspector General shall require the independent external auditors conducting audits under subsection (a) to submit a report on their audits each year to the Secretary of Defense, the Controller of the Office of Federal Financial Management in the Office of Management and Budget, and the appropriate committees of Congress.

(2) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

(1) shall be implemented in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of section 1008 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (10 U.S.C. 2222 note);

(2) shall not be construed to alter the requirement under section 3521(e) of title 31, United States Code, that the financial statements of the Department of Defense as a whole be audited by the Inspector General or by an independent external auditor, as determined by the Inspector General; and

(3) shall not be construed to limit or alter the authorities of the Comptroller General of the United States under section 3521(g) of title 31, United States Code.

SEC. 1003. Treatment as part of the base budget of certain amounts authorized for overseas contingency operations upon enactment of an Act revising the Budget Control Act discretionary spending limits for fiscal year 2016.

(a) In general.—In the event of the enactment of an Act revising in proportionally equal amounts the defense and non-defense discretionary spending limits for fiscal year 2016, the amount authorized to be appropriated by title XV that is in excess of the $50,900,000,000 that is authorized to be appropriated by that title for revised security category activities, and is also not greater than the amount of the increase in the discretionary spending limit for revised security category activities revised by that Act, shall be deemed to have been authorized to be appropriated by title III.

(1) The term “Act revising the defense and non-defense discretionary spending limits for fiscal year 2016” means an Act—

(i) increases in proportionally equal amounts the discretionary spending limits for fiscal year 2016 for the revised security category and the revised nonsecurity category; and

(ii) may include increases to the discretionary spending limits for fiscal years 2017 through 2021.

(2) The terms “discretionary spending limit”, “revised nonsecurity category”, and “revised security category” have the meanings given such terms in section 250 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 900).

(1) the nation’s fiscal challenges are a top priority for Congress, and sequestration—non-strategic, across-the-board budget cuts—remains an unreasonable and inadequate budgeting tool to address the nation’s deficits and debt;

(3) sequestration relief should include equal defense and non-defense relief; and

(4) sequestration relief should be offset through targeted changes in mandatory and discretionary categories and revenues.

SEC. 1011. Extension of authority to support unified counterdrug and counterterrorism campaign in Colombia.

(a) Extension of authority.—Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1011(a) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), is further amended—

(b) Extension of annual notice to Congress on assistance.—Section 1011(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 is amended by striking “(as amended by subsection (a)) using funds available for fiscal year 2015” and inserting “using funds available for any fiscal year”.

SEC. 1012. Extension and expansion of authority to provide additional support for counter-drug activities of certain foreign governments.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1013 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 844), is further amended by striking “2016” and inserting “2017”.

(b) Maximum amount of support.—Subsection (e)(2) of such section 1033, as so amended, is further amended by striking “2016” and inserting “2017”.

(c) Additional governments eligible To receive support.—Subsection (b) of such section 1033, as so amended, is further amended by adding at the end of the following new paragraphs:

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the performance of three independent studies of alternative future fleet platform architectures for the Navy in the 2030 timeframe.

(2) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than May 1, 2016, the Secretary shall forward the results of each study to the congressional defense committees.

(3) FORM.—Each such study shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex as necessary.

(b) Entities to perform studies.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the studies under subsection (a) to be performed as follows:

(1) One study shall be performed by the Department of the Navy and shall include participants from—

(A) the Office of Net Assessment within the Office of the Secretary of Defense; and

(2) The second study shall be performed by a federally funded research and development center.

(3) The final study shall be conducted by an independent, non-governmental institute which is described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code, and has recognized credentials and expertise in national security and military affairs.

(1) INDEPENDENT PERFORMANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall require the three studies under this section to be conducted independently of each other.

(2) MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED.—In performing a study under this section, the organization performing the study, while being aware of the current and projected fleet platform architectures, shall not be limited by the current or projected fleet platform architecture and shall consider the following matters:

(B) Potential future threats to the United States and to United States naval forces in the 2030 timeframe.

(E) Other government and non-government analyses that would contribute to the study through variations in study assumptions or potential scenarios.

(F) The role of evolving technology on future naval forces, including unmanned systems.

(H) Current and projected capabilities of other United States military services that could affect force structure capability and capacity requirements of United States naval forces.

(1) present the alternative fleet platform architectures considered, with assumptions and possible scenarios identified for each;

(A) the numbers, kinds, and sizes of vessels, the numbers and types of associated manned and unmanned vehicles, and the basic capabilities of each of those platforms;

(B) other information needed to understand that architecture in basic form and the supporting analysis;

(C) deviations from the current Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels required under section 231 of title 10, United States Code;

(D) options to address ship classes that begin decommissioning prior to 2035; and

(E) implications for naval aviation, including the future carrier air wing and land-based aviation platforms.

SEC. 1023. Extension of authority for reimbursement of expenses for certain Navy mess operations afloat.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (b) of section 1014 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4585), as amended by section 1021 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4348), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2015’’ and inserting “September 30, 2020”.

(b) Technical and clarifying amendments.—Subsection (a) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—

(1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking “not more that” and inserting “not more than”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “Naval vessels” and inserting “such vessels”.

SEC. 1031. Prohibition on use of funds to construct or modify facilities in the United States to house detainees transferred from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(a) Prohibition.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise available for the Department of Defense may be used, during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the effective date specified in section 1032(f), to construct or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house an individual detained at Guantanamo for the purpose of detention or imprisonment in the custody or control of the United States Government unless authorized by Congress.

(b) Exception.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(c) Individual detained at Guantanamo defined.—In this section, the term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—

(1) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(B) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(d) Repeal of superseded prohibition.—Section 1033 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 850), as amended by section 1032 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), is repealed.

SEC. 1032. Limitation on the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(a) In general.—Except as provided in subsection (b), no amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise available for the Department of Defense may be used to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who—

(1) is not a United States citizen or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(2) is or was held on or after January 20, 2009, at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the Department of Defense.

(b) Transfer for detention and trial.—The Secretary of Defense may transfer a detainee described in subsection (a) to the United States for detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40), trial, and incarceration if the Secretary—

(1) determines that the transfer is in the national security interest of the United States;

(2) determines that appropriate actions have been taken, or will be taken, to address any risk to public safety that could arise in connection with detention and trial in the United States; and

(3) notifies the appropriate committees of Congress not later than 30 days before the date of the proposed transfer.

(1) A statement of the basis for the determination that the transfer is in the national security interest of the United States.

(2) A description of the action the Secretary determines have been taken, or will be taken, to address any risk to the public safety that could arise in connection with the detention and trial in the United States.

(d) Status while in the United States.—A detainee who is transferred to the United States under this section—

(1) shall not be permitted to apply for asylum under section 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158) or be eligible to apply for admission into the United States;

(2) shall be considered to be paroled into the United States temporarily pursuant to section 212(d)(5)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)(A));

(3) shall not at any time be subject to, and may not apply for or obtain, or be deemed to enjoy, any right, privilege, status, benefit, or eligibility for any benefit under any provision of the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17)), or any other law or regulation; and

(4) shall not, as a result of such transfer, have a change in designation as an unprivileged enemy belligerent eligible for detention pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force, as determined in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

(1) LIMITATIONS.—Except as provided for in paragraph (2), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, or conditions of confinement of a detainee described in subsection (a) who is held by the Armed Forces of the United States.

(2) EXCEPTION.—A detainee who is transferred to the United States under this section shall not be deprived of the right to challenge his designation as an unprivileged enemy belligerent by filing a writ of habeas corpus as provided by the Supreme Court in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (548 U.S. 557 (2006)) and Boumediene v. Bush (553 U.S. 723 (2008)).

(3) NO CAUSE OF ACTION IN DECISION NOT TO TRANSFER.—A decision not to transfer a detainee to the United States under this section shall not give rise to a judicial cause of action.

(f) Effective date.—Subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) shall take effect on the effective date of a joint resolution approved pursuant to subsection (h) on the plan on the disposition of detainees held at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, submitted pursuant to subsection (g).

(1) REPORT ON PLAN REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a comprehensive plan on the disposition of detainees held at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall contain the following:

(A) A case-by-case determination made for each individual detained at Guantanamo of whether such individual is intended to be transferred to a foreign country, transferred to the United States for the purpose of civilian or military trial, or transferred to the United States or another country for continued detention under the law of armed conflict.

(B) The specific facility or facilities that are intended to be used, or modified to be used, to hold individuals inside the United States for the purpose of trial, for detention in the aftermath of conviction, or for continued detention under the law of armed conflict.

(D) A description of the legal implications associated with the detention inside the United States of an individual detained at Guantanamo, including but not limited to the right to challenge such detention as unlawful.

(E) A detailed description and assessment, made in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, of the actions that would be taken prior to the transfer to a foreign country of an individual detained at Guantanamo that would substantially mitigate the risk of such individual engaging or reengaging in any terrorist or other hostile activity that threatens the United States or United States person or interests.

(F) What additional authorities, if any, may be necessary to detain an individual detained at Guantanamo inside the United States as an unprivileged enemy belligerent pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force, pending the end of hostilities or a future determination by the Secretary of Defense that such individual no longer poses a threat to the United States or United States persons or interests.

(G) A plan for the disposition of any individuals who are detained by the United States under the law of armed conflict after the date of the report, including a plan to detain and interrogate such individuals for the purposes of—

(i) protecting the security of the United States, its persons, allies, and interests; and

(ii) collecting intelligence necessary to ensure the security of the United States, its person, allies, and interests.

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(1) TERMS OF THE RESOLUTION.—For purposes of this section the term “joint resolution” means only a joint resolution which is introduced within the 10-day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress a report under subsection (g) and—

(B) the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: “That Congress approves the plan of the Secretary of Defense on the disposition of detainees held at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, under section 1032(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 as submitted by the Secretary of Defense to Congress on ______”, the blank space being filled in with the appropriate date; and

(C) the title of which is as follows: “Joint resolution approving the plan of the Secretary of Defense on the disposition of detainees held at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.”.

(2) REFERRAL.—A resolution described in paragraph (1) that is introduced in the House of Representatives shall be referred to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives. A resolution described in paragraph (1) introduced in the Senate shall be referred to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.

(3) DISCHARGE.—If the committee to which a resolution described in paragraph (1) is referred has not reported such resolution (or an identical resolution) by the end of the 20-day period beginning on the date on which the Secretary submits to Congress a report under subsection (g), such committee shall be, at the end of such period, discharged from further consideration of such resolution, and such resolution shall be placed on the appropriate calendar of the House involved.

(4) CONSIDERATION.— (A) On or after the third day after the date on which the committee to which such a resolution is referred has reported, or has been discharged (under paragraph (3)) from further consideration of, such a resolution, it is in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) for any Member of the respective House to move to proceed to the consideration of the resolution. A Member may make the motion only on the day after the calendar day on which the Member announces to the House concerned the Member’s intention to make the motion, except that, in the case of the House of Representatives, the motion may be made without such prior announcement if the motion is made by direction of the committee to which the resolution was referred. All points of order against the resolution (and against consideration of the resolution) are waived. The motion is highly privileged in the House of Representatives and is privileged in the Senate and is not debatable. The motion is not subject to amendment, or to a motion to postpone, or to a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution is agreed to, the respective House shall immediately proceed to consideration of the joint resolution without intervening motion, order, or other business, and the resolution shall remain the unfinished business of the respective House until disposed of.

(B) Debate on the resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more than 2 hours, which shall be divided equally between those favoring and those opposing the resolution. An amendment to the resolution is not in order. A motion further to limit debate is in order and not debatable. A motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the consideration of other business, or a motion to recommit the resolution is not in order. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the resolution is agreed to or disagreed to is not in order.

(C) Immediately following the conclusion of the debate on a resolution described in paragraph (1) and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance with the rules of the appropriate House, the vote on final passage of the resolution shall occur.

(D) Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, to the procedure relating to a resolution described in paragraph (1) shall be decided without debate.

(5) CONSIDERATION BY OTHER HOUSE.— (A) If, before the passage by one House of a resolution of that House described in paragraph (1), that House receives from the other House a resolution described in paragraph (1), then the following procedures shall apply:

(i) The resolution of the other House shall not be referred to a committee and may not be considered in the House receiving it except in the case of final passage as provided in clause (ii)(II).

(ii) With respect to a resolution described in paragraph (1) of the House receiving the resolution—

(I) the procedure in that House shall be the same as if no resolution had been received from the other House; but

(B) Upon disposition of the resolution received from the other House, it shall no longer be in order to consider the resolution that originated in the receiving House.

(6) RULES OF THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.—This subsection is enacted by Congress—

(A) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate and House of Representatives, respectively, and as such it is deemed a part of the rules of each House, respectively, but applicable only with respect to the procedure to be followed in that House in the case of a resolution described in paragraph (1), and it supersedes other rules only to the extent that it is inconsistent with such rules; and

(B) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change the rules (so far as relating to the procedure of that House) at any time, in the same manner, and to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of that House.

(i) Limitation on transfer or release of detainees transferred to the United States.—

(1) LIMITATION PENDING ENACTMENT OF JOINT RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAN.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law and subject to paragraph (2), any individual detained at Guantanamo who is transferred to the United States after the date of the enactment of this Act shall not be released within the United States or its territories, and may only be transferred or released in accordance with the procedures under section 1033.

(2) LIMITATION ON TRANSFER OVERSEAS AFTER ENACTMENT OF JOINT RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAN.—Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (f)—

(A) the provisions of section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 851; 10 U.S.C. 801 note), as previously repealed by section 1033, shall be revived;

(B) the procedures under such section 1035, as so revived, shall apply to the transfer of individuals detained at Guantanamo to foreign countries rather than the procedures under section1033; and

(C) in the application of procedures under such section 1035 as described in subparagraph (B), any reference to an individual detained at Guantanamo shall be deemed to refer also to any such individual transferred to the United States after such effective date.

(j) Repeal of superseded prohibition.—Section 1034 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 851), as amended by section 1033 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), is repealed.

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(2) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

SEC. 1033. Reenactment and modification of certain prior requirements for certifications relating to transfer of detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries and other foreign entities.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity unless the Secretary submits to the appropriate committees of Congress the certification described in subsection (b) not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual.

(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress of promptly after issuance).

(b) Certification.—A certification described in this subsection is a written certification made by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, that—

(1) the government of the foreign country or the recognized leadership of the foreign entity to which the individual detained at Guantanamo is to be transferred—

(A) is not a designated state sponsor of terrorism or a designated foreign terrorist organization;

(B) maintains control over each detention facility in which the individual is to be detained if the individual is to be housed in a detention facility;

(C) is not, as of the date of the certification, facing a threat that is likely to substantially affect its ability to exercise control over the individual;

(D) has taken or agreed to take effective actions to ensure that the individual cannot take action to threaten the United States, its citizens, or its allies in the future;

(E) has taken or agreed to take such actions as the Secretary of Defense determines are necessary to ensure that the individual cannot engage or reengage in any terrorist activity; and

(ii) could affect the security of the United States, its citizens, or its allies;

(2) the United States Government and the government of the foreign country have entered into a written memorandum of understanding (MOU) regarding the transfer of the individual and such memorandum of understanding has previously been transmitted to the appropriate committees of Congress; and

(3) includes an assessment, in classified or unclassified form, of the capacity, willingness, and past practices (if applicable) of the foreign country or entity in relation to the Secretary’s certifications.

(1) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in paragraph (2) and subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may not use any amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to the custody or control of the individual’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity if there is a confirmed case of any individual who was detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, at any time after September 11, 2001, who was transferred to such foreign country or entity and subsequently engaged in any terrorist activity.

(2) EXCEPTION.—Subject to subsection (e), paragraph (1) shall not apply to any action taken by the Secretary to transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to effectuate an order affecting the disposition of the individual that is issued by a court or competent tribunal of the United States having lawful jurisdiction (which the Secretary shall notify the appropriate committees of Congress of promptly after issuance).

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (e), the Secretary of Defense may waive the applicability to a detainee transfer of a certification requirement specified in subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), or the prohibition in subsection (c), if the Secretary certifies the rest of the criteria required by subsection (b) for transfers prohibited by subsection (c) and, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, determines that—

(A) alternative actions will be taken to address the underlying purpose of the requirement or requirements to be waived;

(B) in the case of a waiver of subparagraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated, but the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate such risks with regard to the individual to be transferred;

(C) in the case of a waiver of subsection (c), the Secretary has considered any confirmed case in which an individual who was transferred to the country subsequently engaged in terrorist activity, and the actions to be taken under subparagraph (A) will substantially mitigate the risk of recidivism with regard to the individual to be transferred; and

(2) REPORTS.—Whenever the Secretary makes a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress, not later than 30 days before the transfer of the individual concerned, the following:

(i) an explanation why the transfer is in the national security interests of the United States;

(ii) in the case of a waiver of paragraph (D) or (E) of subsection (b)(1), an explanation why it is not possible to certify that the risks addressed in the paragraph to be waived have been completely eliminated; and

(I) the individual’s record of cooperation while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and

(II) the agreements and mechanisms in place to provide for continuing cooperation.

(C) A summary of the alternative actions to be taken to address the underlying purpose of, and to mitigate the risks addressed in, the paragraph or subsection to be waived.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In assessing the risk that an individual detained at Guantanamo will engage in terrorist activity or other actions that could affect the security of the United States if released for the purpose of making a certification under subsection (b) or a waiver under subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense may give favorable consideration to any such individual—

(A) who has substantially cooperated with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities, pursuant to a pre-trial agreement, while in the custody of or under the effective control of the Department of Defense; and

(B) for whom agreements and effective mechanisms are in place, to the extent relevant and necessary, to provide for continued cooperation with United States intelligence and law enforcement authorities.

(2) REPORTS.—Each certification under subsection (b) or report under subsection (d)(2) that includes an assessment in which favorable consideration was given an individual as described in paragraph (1) shall also include the following:

(A) A description of the cooperation for which favorable consideration was so given.

(B) A description of operational outcomes, if any, affected by such cooperation.

(i) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(ii) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(B) In connection with a certification made under subsection (b), the term also includes the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, but only with respect to the submittal to such committees of a copy of the written memorandum of understanding concerned described in subsection (b)(2).

(2) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(3) The term “foreign terrorist organization” means any organization so designated by the Secretary of State under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).

(4) The term “state sponsor of terrorism” has the meaning given that term in section 301(13) of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 (22 U.S.C. 8541(13)).

(g) Repeal of superseded requirements and limitations.—Section 1035 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 851; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is repealed.

SEC. 1034. Authority to temporarily transfer individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States for emergency or critical medical treatment.

(a) Transfer for emergency or critical medical treatment authorized.—Notwithstanding any other provision of this subtitle, or any other provision of law enacted after September 30, 2013, but subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may temporarily transfer any individual detained at Guantanamo to a Department of Defense medical facility in the United States for the sole purpose of providing the individual medical treatment if the Secretary determines that—

(1) the Senior Medical Officer, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has determined that the medical treatment is necessary to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual;

(2) based on the recommendation of the Senior Medical Officer, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the medical treatment is not available to be provided at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, without incurring excessive and unreasonable costs;

(3) the Department of Defense has provided for appropriate security measures for the custody and control of the individual during any period in which the individual is temporarily in the United States under this subsection; and

(4) except in cases involving the especially immediate need for the provision of medical treatment to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual, the estimated aggregate cost of providing the individual medical treatment in a Department of Defense medical facility in the United States (including the cost of transferring and securing the individual in such facility during any period in which the individual is temporarily in the United States for treatment and the cost of treatment) would be less than the estimated cost of providing the individual such medical treatment at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the requirements in subsection (a), an individual may not be temporarily transferred under the authority in that subsection unless the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate committees of Congress the notice described in paragraph (2)—

(B) if notice cannot be provided in accordance with subparagraph (A) because of an especially immediate need for the provision of medical treatment to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual, as soon as is practicable, but not later than 5 days after the date of transfer.

(2) NOTICE ELEMENTS.—The notice on the transfer of an individual under this subsection shall include the following:

(A) A statement of the basis for the determination that the transfer is necessary to prevent death or imminent significant injury or harm to the health of the individual.

(B) The specific Department of Defense medical facility that will provide medical treatment to the individual.

(C) A description of the actions the Secretary determines have been taken, or will be taken, to address any risk to the public safety that could arise in connection with the provision of medical treatment to the individual in the United States.

(c) Limitation on exercise of authority.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense under subsection (a) may be exercised only by the Secretary of Defense or by another official of the Department of Defense at the level of Under Secretary of Defense or higher.

(d) Conditions of transfer.—An individual who is temporarily transferred under the authority in subsection (a) shall—

(1) while in the United States, remain in the custody and control of the Secretary of Defense at all times; and

(2) be returned to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as soon as feasible after a Department of Defense physician determines that—

(B) in consultation with the Commander, Joint Task Force–Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, any necessary follow-up medical care may reasonably be provided the individual at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(e) Status while in United States.—An individual who is temporarily transferred under the authority in subsection (a), while in the United States—

(1) shall be deemed at all times and in all respects to be in the uninterrupted custody of the Secretary of Defense, as though the individual remained physically at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba;

(2) shall not at any time be subject to, and may not apply for or obtain, or be deemed to enjoy, any right, privilege, status, benefit, or eligibility for any benefit under any provision of the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17)), or any other law or regulation;

(3) shall not be permitted to avail himself of any right, privilege, or benefit of any law of the United States beyond those available to individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and

(4) shall not, as a result of such transfer, have a change in any designation that may have attached to that detainee while detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40), as determined in accordance with applicable law and regulations..

(1) NO CREATION OF ENFORCEABLE RIGHTS.—Nothing in this section is intended to create any enforceable right or benefit, or any claim or cause of action, by any party against the United States, or any other person or entity.

(2) LIMITATION ON JUDICIAL REVIEW.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, or conditions of confinement of an individual transferred under this section.

(A) JURISDICTION.—The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction to consider an application for writ of habeas corpus challenging the fact or duration of detention and seeking release from custody filed by or on behalf of an individual who is in the United States pursuant to a temporary transfer under subsection (a). Such jurisdiction shall be limited to that required by the Constitution with respect to the fact or duration of detention.

(B) SCOPE OF AUTHORITY.—A court order in a proceeding covered by paragraph (3) may not—

(i) review, halt, or stay the return of the individual who is the object of the application to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including pursuant to subsection (d); or

(g) Notification.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of any temporary transfer of an individual under the authority in subsection (a) not later than 5 days after the transfer of the individual under that authority.

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(2) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

SEC. 1035. Prohibition on use of funds for transfer or release to Yemen of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

SEC. 1036. Report on current detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, determined or assessed to be high risk or medium risk.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees and members of Congress a report, in unclassified form, setting forth a list of the individuals detained at Guantanamo as of the date of the enactment of this Act who have been determined or assessed by Joint Task Force Guantanamo, at any time before the date of the report, to be a high-risk or medium-risk threat to the United States, its interests, or its allies.

(b) Elements.—The report under subsection (a) shall set forth, for each individual covered by the report, the following:

(2) The date on which first designated or assessed as a high-risk or medium-risk threat to the United States, its interests, or its allies.

(3) Whether, as of the date of the report, currently designated or assessed as a high-risk or medium-risk threat to the United States, its interests, or its allies.

(4) If the designation or assessment changed between the date specified pursuant to paragraph (2) and the date of the report, the year and month in which the designation or assessment changed and the designation or assessment to which changed.

(5) To the extent practicable, without jeopardizing intelligence sources and methods—

(A) prior actions in support of terrorism, hostile actions against the United States or its allies, gross violations of human rights, and other violations of international law; and

(B) any affiliations with al Qaeda, al Qaeda affiliates, or other terrorist groups.

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate;

(C) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives; and

(D) the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives.

(2) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

SEC. 1037. Report to Congress on memoranda of understanding with foreign countries regarding transfer of detainees at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall transmit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the written memorandum of understanding between the United States Government and the government of the foreign country concerned regarding each individual detained at Guantanamo who was transferred to a foreign country during the 18-month period ending on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(2) STATEMENT ON LACK OF MOU.—If an individual detained at Guantanamo was transferred to a foreign country during the period described in paragraph (1) and no memorandum of understanding exists between the United States Government and the government of the foreign country regarding such individual, the report under paragraph (1) shall include an unclassified statement of that fact.

(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(2) The term “individual detained at Guantanamo” means any individual located at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as of October 1, 2009, who—

(A) is not a citizen of the United States or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States; and

(ii) otherwise under detention at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

SEC. 1038. Semiannual reports on use of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and any other Department of Defense or Bureau of Prisons prison or other detention or disciplinary facility in recruitment and other propaganda of terrorist organizations.

(a) In general.—Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every six months thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, submit to Congress a report on the use by terrorist organizations and their leaders of images and symbols relating to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and any other Department of Defense or Bureau of Prisons prison or other detention or disciplinary facility for recruitment and other propaganda purposes during the six-month period ending on the date of such report. Each report shall include the following:

(1) A description and assessment of the effectiveness of the use of such images and symbols for recruitment and other propaganda purposes.

(2) A description and assessment of the efforts of the United States Government to counter the use of such images and symbols for such purposes and to disseminate accurate information about such facilities.

(b) Additional material in first report.—The first report under subsection (a) shall include a description of the use by terrorist organizations and their leaders of images and symbols relating to United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and any other Department of Defense or Bureau of Prisons prison or other detention or disciplinary facility for recruitment and other propaganda purposes before the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1039. Extension and modification of authority to make rewards for combating terrorism.

(a) Extension of authority To make rewards through Government personnel of allied forces.—Subsection (c)(3)(C) of section 127b of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.

(b) Modification of reporting requirements.—Subsection (f)(2) of such section is amended—

(2) by redesignating subparagraphs (E), (F), and (G), as subparagraphs (D), (E), and (F), respectively; and

(3) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, including in which countries the program is being operated”.

(c) Report on designation of countries for which rewards may be paid.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(h) Report on designation of countries for which rewards may be paid.—Not later than 15 days after the date on which the Secretary designates a country as a country in which an operation or activity of the armed forces is occurring in connection with which rewards may be paid under this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the designation. Each report shall include the following:

“(3) A justification for the designation of the country for purposes of this section.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 127b and inserting the following new item:

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide assistance to United States Customs and Border Protection for purposes of increasing ongoing efforts to secure the southern land border of the United States.

(b) Concurrence in assistance.—Assistance under subsection (a) shall be provided with the concurrence of the Secretary of Homeland Security.

(1) Deployment of members and units of the regular and reserve components of the Armed Forces to the southern land border of the United States.

(2) Deployment of manned aircraft, unmanned aerial surveillance systems, and ground-based surveillance systems to support continuous surveillance of the southern land border of the United States.

(d) Materiel and logistical support.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized to deploy such materiel and equipment and logistics support as is necessary to ensure the effectiveness of assistance provided under subsection (a).

(e) Funding.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense by this Act, the Secretary of Defense may use up to $75,000,000 to provide assistance under this section.

(f) Reports.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on any provision of assistance under subsection (a) during the 90-day period ending on the date of such report. Each report shall include, for the period covered by such report, the following:

(2) A description of the sources and amounts of funds used to provide such assistance.

(a) Secretary of defense authority.—Chapter 159 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2671 the following new section:

“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall protect the buildings, grounds, and property that are under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense and the persons on that property.

“(b) Officers and agents.— (1) (A) The Secretary of Defense may designate military or civilian personnel of the Department of Defense as officers and agents to perform the functions of the Secretary under subsection (a), including, with regard to civilian officers and agents, duty in areas outside the property specified in that subsection to the extent necessary to protect that property and persons on that property.

“(B) A designation under subparagraph (A) may be made by individual, by position, by installation, or by such other category of personnel as the Secretary determines appropriate.

“(C) In making a designation under subparagraph (A) with respect to any category of personnel, the Secretary shall specify each of the following:

“(ii) Which authorities provided for in paragraph (2) may be exercised by personnel in that category.

“(I) which authorities provided for in paragraph (2), if any, are authorized to be exercised outside the property specified in subsection (a); and

“(II) with respect to the exercise of any such authorities outside the property specified in subsection (a), the circumstances under which coordination with law enforcement officials outside of the Department of Defense should be sought in advance.

“(D) The Secretary may make a designation under subparagraph (A) only if the Secretary determines, with respect to the category of personnel to be covered by that designation, that—

“(i) the exercise of each specific authority provided for in paragraph (2) to be delegated to that category of personnel is necessary for the performance of the duties of the personnel in that category and such duties cannot be performed as effectively without such authorities; and

“(ii) the necessary and proper training for the authorities to be exercised is available to the personnel in that category.

“(2) Subject to subsection (h) and to the extent specifically authorized by the Secretary, while engaged in the performance of official duties pursuant to this section, an officer or agent designated under this subsection may—

“(A) enforce Federal laws and regulations for the protection of persons and property;

“(i) without a warrant for any offense against the United States committed in the presence of the officer or agent; or

“(ii) for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if the officer or agent has reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing a felony;

“(D) serve warrants and subpoenas issued under the authority of the United States; and

“(E) conduct investigations, on and off the property in question, of offenses that may have been committed against property under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense or persons on such property.

“(c) Regulations.— (1) The Secretary of Defense may prescribe regulations, including traffic regulations, necessary for the protection and administration of property under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense and persons on that property. The regulations may include reasonable penalties, within the limits prescribed in paragraph (2), for violations of the regulations. The regulations shall be posted and remain posted in a conspicuous place on the property to which they apply.

“(2) A person violating a regulation prescribed under this subsection shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 30 days, or both.

“(d) Limitation on delegation of authority.—The authority of the Secretary of Defense under subsections (b) and (c) may be exercised only by the Secretary or the Deputy Secretary of Defense.

“(e) Disposition of persons arrested.—A person who is arrested pursuant to authority exercised under subsection (b) may not be held in a military confinement facility, other than in the case of a person who is subject to chapter 47 of this title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).

“(f) Facilities and services of other agencies.—In implementing this section, when the Secretary of Defense determines it to be economical and in the public interest, the Secretary may utilize the facilities and services of Federal, State, Indian tribal, and local law enforcement agencies, with the consent of those agencies, and may reimburse those agencies for the use of their facilities and services. Such services of State, Indian tribal, and local law enforcement, including application of their powers of law enforcement, may be provided notwithstanding that the property is subject to the legislative jurisdiction of the United States.

“(g) Authority outside Federal property.—For the protection of property under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Department of Defense and persons on that property, the Secretary of Defense may enter into agreements with Federal agencies and with State, Indian tribal, and local governments to obtain authority for civilian officers and agents designated under this section to enforce Federal laws and State, Indian tribal, and local laws concurrently with other Federal law enforcement officers and with State, Indian tribal, and local law enforcement officers.

“(h) Attorney General approval.—The powers granted pursuant to subsection (b)(2) to officers and agents designated under subsection (b)(1) shall be exercised in accordance with guidelines approved by the Attorney General. Such guidelines may include specification of the geographical extent of property outside of the property specified in subsection (a) within which those powers may be exercised.

“(i) Limitation with regard to other Federal agencies.—Nothing in this section shall be construed as affecting the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide for the protection of facilities (including the buildings, grounds, and properties of the General Services Administration) that are under the jurisdiction, custody, or control, in whole or in part, of a Federal agency other than the Department of Defense and that are located off of a military installation.

“(j) Cooperation with local law enforcement agencies.—Before authorizing civilian officers and agents to perform duty in areas outside the property specified in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall consult with, and is encouraged to enter into agreements with, local law enforcement agencies exercising jurisdiction over such areas for the purposes of avoiding conflicts of jurisdiction, promoting notification of planned law enforcement actions, and otherwise facilitating productive working relationships.

“(k) Limitation on statutory construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed—

“(1) to preclude or limit the authority of any Federal law enforcement agency;

“(2) to restrict the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security under the Homeland Security Act of 2002 or of the Administrator of General Services, including the authority to promulgate regulations affecting property under the custody and control of that Secretary or the Administrator, respectively;

“(3) to expand or limit section 21 of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 797);

“(5) to restrict any other authority of the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department; or

“(6) to restrict the authority of the Director of the National Security Agency under section 11 of the National Security Agency Act of 1959 (50 U.S.C. 3609).”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 159 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2671 the following new item:

SEC. 1043. Strategy to protect United States national security interests in the Arctic region.

(a) Report on strategy required.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that sets forth an updated military strategy for the protection of United States national security interests in the Arctic region.

(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

(2) A description of operational plans and associated military requirements for the protection of United States national security interests in the Arctic region, including United States citizens, territory, freedom of navigation, and economic and trade interests.

(3) An identification of any operational seams and a plan to enhance unity of effort among the combatant commands with responsibility for the Arctic region.

(4) A description of the security environment in the Arctic region, including the activities of foreign nations operating within the Arctic region.

(5) A description of United States military capabilities required to implement the strategy required by subsection (a).

(6) An identification of any capability gaps and resource gaps, including in installations, infrastructure, and personnel in the Arctic region, that would impact the implementation of the strategy required by subsection (a) or the execution of any associated operational plan, and a mitigation plan to address such gaps.

(7) A plan to enhance military-to-military cooperation with partner nations that have mutual security interests in the Arctic region.

(c) Form.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1044. Extension of limitations on the transfer to the regular Army of AH–64 Apache helicopters assigned to the Army National Guard.

(a) Extension.—Section 1712 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended by striking “March 31, 2016” each place it appears and inserting “September 30, 2016”.

(b) Readiness of aircraft and personnel.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal years 2015 and 2016”.

SEC. 1045. Treatment of certain previously transferred Army National Guard helicopters as counting against number transferrable under exception to limitation on transfer of Army National Guard helicopters.

(a) Notice to Congress.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the number of AH–64D Apache helicopters that have been transferred from the Army National Guard to the original equipment manufacturer for the purpose of remanufacture to the AH–64E Apache helicopter variant.

(b) Treatment as counting against number transferrable.—The Secretary of the Army shall treat the number of helicopters specified in the report under subsection (a) as counting against the total number of AH–64 Apache helicopters that may be transferred from the Army National Guard to the regular Army pursuant to subsection (e) of section 1712 of the Carl Levin and Howard B. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3668).

(c) Construction with required certification.—Nothing in this subsection may be construed to alter or terminate the requirement for a certification by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to subsection (f) of section 1712 of the Carl Levin and Howard B. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 as a precondition for any action under subsection (e) of such section.

(a) Conversion of certain military technician (dual status) positions to civilian positions.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall convert not fewer than 20 percent of the positions described in paragraph (2) as of January 1, 2017, from military technician (dual status) positions to positions filled by individuals who are employed under section 3101 of title 5, United States Code, and are not military technicians.

(2) COVERED POSITIONS.—The positions described in this paragraph are military technician (dual status) positions as follows:

(A) Military technician (dual status) positions identified as general administration, clerical, and office service occupations in the report of the Secretary of Defense under section 519 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1397).

(B) Such other military technician (dual status) positions as the Secretary shall specify for purposes of this subsection.

(b) Phased-in termination of Army Reserve, Air Force Reserve, and National Guard non-dual status technicians.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 10217 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

“(d) Phased-in termination of positions.— (1) No individual may be newly hired or employed, or rehired or reemployed, as a non-dual status technician for the purposes of this section after December 31, 2016.

“(2) Commencing January 1, 2017, the maximum number of non-dual status technicians employable by the Army Reserve and by the Air Force Reserve shall be reduced from the number otherwise provided by subsection (c)(1) by one for each individual who retires, is separated from, or otherwise ceases service as a non-dual status technician of the Army Reserve or the Air Force Reserve, as the case may be, after such date until the maximum number of non-dual status technicians employable by the Army Reserve or the Air Force Reserve, as the case may be, is zero.

“(3) Commencing January 1, 2017, the maximum number of non-dual status technicians employable by the National Guard shall be reduced from the number otherwise provided by subsection (c)(2) by one for each individual who retires, is separated from, or otherwise ceases service as a non-dual status technician of the National Guard after such date until the maximum number of non-dual status technicians employable by the National Guard is zero.

“(4) Any individual newly hired or employed, or rehired or employed, to a position required to be filled by reason of the amendment made by paragraph (1) shall be an individual employed in such position under section 3101 of title 5, and may not be a military technician.

“(5) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to terminate the status as a non-dual status technician under this section after December 31, 2016, of any individual who is a non-dual status technician for the purposes of this section on that date.”.

(2) REPORT ON PHASED-IN TERMINATIONS.—Not later than February 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report setting forth a plan for implementing the amendment made by paragraph (1).

SEC. 1047. Sense of Congress on consideration of the full range of Department of Defense manpower worldwide in decisions on the proper mix of military, civilian, and contractor personnel to accomplish the National Defense Strategy.

(1) As senior United States statesmen Dr. Henry Kissinger wrote in testimony submitted to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate on January 29, 2015, “[t]he United States has not faced a more diverse and complex array of crises since the end of the Second World War.”.

(2) The rise of committed, non-state forces and near peer competitors has introduced destabilizing pressures around the globe.

(3) Advances in information and weapons technology have reduced the time available for the United States to prepare for a respond to crises against either known or unknown threats.

(4) The importance of the maritime domain cannot be overstated. As acknowledged in the March 2015 Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard maritime strategy entitled “A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower: Forward, Engaged, Ready”, “[o]ceans are the lifeblood of the interconnected global community…90 percent of trade by volume across the oceans. Approximately 70 percent of the world’s population lives within 100 miles of the coastline”.

(5) In this global security environment, it is critical that the United States possess a maritime forces whose mission and ethos is readiness, a fight tonight force, forward deployed, that can respond immediately to emergent crises across the full range of military operations around the globe either from the sea or home station.

(6) The need for such forces was recognized by the 82nd Congress during the Korean War, when it mandated a core mission for the Nation’s leanest force, the Marine Corps, to be most ready when the nation is least ready.

(7) In recognition of this continued need and the wisdom of the 82nd Congress, the Senate reaffirms section 5063 of title 10, United States Code, uniquely charging the United States Marine Corps with this responsibility.

(1) the Marine Corps, within the Department of the Navy, should remain the Nation’s expeditionary, crisis response force; and

(2) as provided in section 5063 of title 10, United States Code, the Marine Corps should—

(A) be organized to include no less than three combat divisions and three air wings, and such other land combat, aviation, and other services as may be organic to it;

(B) be organized, trained, and equipped to provide fleet marine forces of combined arms, together with supporting air components, for service with the fleet in the seizure or defense of advanced naval bases and for the conduct of such land operations as may be essential to the prosecution of a naval campaign; and

(C) provide detachments and organizations for service on armed vessels of the Navy, provide security detachments for the protection of naval property at naval stations and bases, and perform such other duties as the President may direct;

(D) develop, in coordination with the Army and the Air Force, those phases of amphibious operations that pertain to the tactics, techniques, and equipment used by landing forces; and

(E) be responsible, in accordance with the integrated joint mobilization plans, for the expansion of peacetime components of the Marine Corps to meet the needs of war.

(1) ANNUAL REPORT ON GIFTS MADE FOR THE BENEFIT OF MILITARY MUSICAL UNITS.—Section 974(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (3).

(2) BIENNIAL REPORT ON SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY.—Section 2272(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (5).

(3) ANNUAL REPORT ON PRIZES FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ACHIEVEMENTS.—Section 2374a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) REPORTS ON USE OF TEMPORARY AUTHORITIES FOR CERTAIN POSITIONS AT DOD RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING FACILITIES.—Section 1107 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended—

(2) ANNUAL REPORT ON ADVANCING SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH.—Section 1611 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (127 Stat. 946) is amended by striking subsection (d).

(1) ANNUAL REPORTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS FOR MEDICAL EVALUATION BOARDS AND PHYSICIAN EVALUATION BOARDS AND RELATED PERSONNEL.—Section 524 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1723; 10 U.S.C. 1222 note) is amended by striking subsection (c).

(2) ANNUAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON NUMBER OF MEMBERS IN INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION SYSTEM ON READINESS REQUIREMENTS.—Section 528 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 1725) is repealed.

(3) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON NOTICE ON UNFUNDED PRIORITIES.—Section 1003 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 1903) is repealed.

(d) Annual updates on implementation plan for whole-of-Government vision prescribed in the National Security Strategy.—Section 1072 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1592; 50 U.S.C. 3043 note) is amended—

(1) REPORTS ON DEFENSE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RAPID INNOVATION PROGRAM.—Section 1073 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4366; 10 U.S.C. 2359 note) is amended—

(2) REPORT ON TASK FORCE FOR BUSINESS AND STABILITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.—Section 1535(a) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (124 Stat. 4426) is amended by striking paragraph (6).

(f) Annual report on the electronic warfare strategy of the Department of Defense.—Section 1053 of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2458) is repealed.

(1) MITIGATION OF POWER OUTAGE RISKS FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES.—Section 335 of the Duncan Hunter Nation Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4422; 10 U.S.C. 2911 note) is amended by striking subsection (c).

(2) UPDATES OF INCREASES IN NUMBER OF UNITS OF JROTC.—Section 548 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (122 Stat. 4466) is amended by striking subsection (e).

(3) ANNUAL REPORTS ON CENTER OF EXCELLENCE ON TRAUMATIC EXTREMITY INJURIES AND AMPUTATIONS.—Section 723 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (122 Stat. 4508) is amended by striking (d).

(4) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT ON STATUS OF NAVY NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORKS PROGRAM.—Section 1034 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (122 Stat. 4593) is hereby repealed.

(1) BIENNIAL UPDATE OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PLAN.—Section 904(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 275) is amended by striking paragraph (3).

(2) REPORTS ON ACCESS OF RECOVERING SERVICEMEMBERS TO ADEQUATE OUTPATIENT RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES.—Section 1662 of the Wounded Warrior Act (title XVI of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 479; 10 U.S.C. 1071 note) is amended—

(1) ROADMAPS AND REPORTS ON HYPERSONICS DEVELOPMENT.—Section 218 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended—

(2) UPDATES OF ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES EXPERIENCING GROWTH IN ENROLLMENT DUE TO FORCE STRUCTURE CHANGE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES.—Section 574 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (20 U.S.C. 7703b note) is amended—

(B) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively.

(3) ANNUAL REPORT ON OVERHAUL, REPAIR, AND MAINTENANCE OF VESSELS UNDER ACQUISITION POLICY ON OBTAINING CARRIAGE BY VESSEL.—Section 1017 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (120 Stat. 2379) is amended—

(j) Reports on annual review of roles and missions of the reserve components.—Section 513(h) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 1882; 10 U.S.C. 10101 note) is amended—

(k) Annual submittal of information regarding information technology capital assets.—Section 351 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 10 U.S.C. 221 note) is hereby repealed.

(l) Reports on experimental personnel management program for scientific and technical personnel.—Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is amended by striking subsection (g).

SEC. 1062. Termination of requirement for submittal to Congress of reports required of the Department of Defense by statute.

(a) Termination.—Effective on the date that is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, each report described in subsection (b) that is still required to be submitted to Congress as of such effective date shall no longer be required to be submitted to Congress.

(b) Covered reports.—A report described in this subsection is a report that is required to be submitted to Congress by the Department of Defense, or by any officer, official, component, or element of the Department, by a provision of statute (including title 10, United States Code, and any annual national defense authorization Act) as of April 1, 2015.

(1) The most current Munitions Assessments, as defined by Department of Defense Instruction Number 3000.04, relating to the Department of Defense munitions process.

(2) The most current Sufficiency Assessments, as defined by that Department of Defense Instruction.

(3) The most current approved memorandum of the Joint Requirements Oversight Council resulting from the Munitions Requirements Process (MRP).

SEC. 1064. Potential role for United States ground forces in the Pacific theater.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly conduct a comprehensive operational assessment of a potential future role for United States ground forces in the island chains of the western Pacific in creating anti-access and area denial capabilities in cooperation with host nations in order to deter and defeat aggression in the western Pacific region.

(2) CAPABILITIES TO BE EXAMINED.—In conducting the assessment, the Secretary and the Chairman shall assess the feasibility and potential effectiveness of the deployment by United States ground forces, jointly with host nations, of the following:

(A) Anti-ship mines and mobile missiles as a means of neutralizing adversary naval forces, including amphibious forces, and inhibiting their movement, and protecting the shores of host nations and friendly naval forces and supply operations.

(B) Mobile air defense surveillance and missile systems to protect host-nation territory and ground, naval, and air forces, and to deny access to defended airspace by adversaries.

(D) Hardened ground-based communications capabilities for host-nation defense and for augmentation and extension of naval, air, and satellite communications.

(E) Maneuver forces to assist in host-nation defense, deny access to adversaries, and provide security for air and naval deployments.

(b) Geopolitical impact of enhanced ground force role.—The Secretary and the Chairman shall also jointly assess the potential geopolitical impact on the United States posture in the Pacific theater of a strategy of long-term engagement by United States ground forces with the island nations of the western Pacific to enhance United States strategic relationships with potential partners in the region.

(c) Types of analyses To Be conducted.—The Secretary and the Chairman shall conduct the assessment required by subsection (a) using operations research methods and war gaming, in addition to historical analysis of the use of ground forces by the United States and Japan in the Pacific theater during World War II.

(d) Resources.—In conducting the assessment required by subsection (a), the Secretary and the Chairman shall use the following, as appropriate:

(2) The Joint Requirements and Analysis Division and the war gaming resources of the Warfighting Analysis Division of the Force Structure, Resources, and Assessment Directorate of the Joint Staff, augmented as necessary and appropriate from the war colleges of the military departments.

(e) Completion date.—The assessments required by this section shall be completed not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act

(f) Briefing of Congress.—Upon the completion of the assessments required by this section, the Secretary and the Chairman shall provide a briefing on the assessments to—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

(a) Amendments To title 10, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:

(1) The tables of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, and at the beginning of part I of such subtitle, are each amended by striking the item relating to chapter 19 and inserting the following new item:

“§ 130e. Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of certain critical infrastructure security information”.

(3) The heading of section 153(a)(5) is amended to read as follows: “Joint force development activities.—”.

(4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 19 is amended by striking the item relating to section 391 and inserting the following new item:

(5) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 21 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 429 the following new item:

(A) in subsection (a), by striking “August, 1” and inserting “August 1”; and

(B) by striking “the such program or authorities” and inserting “the program”.

(7) Sections 2222(j)(5), 2223(c)(3), and 2315 are each amended by striking “section 3552(b)(5)” and inserting “section 3552(b)(6)”.

(8) Section 2229(d)(1) is amended by striking “certification” and inserting “a certification”.

(9) Section 2679, as transferred, redesignated, and amended by section 351 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3346), is amended in subsection (a)(1) by striking “with” before “, on a sole source”.

(10) Section 2684(d)(1) is amended by striking “section 101(a) of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470a(a))” and inserting “section 302101 of title 54”.

(11) Section 2687a(d)(2) is amended by inserting “fair market” before “value”.

(12) Section 2926, as added and amended by section 901(g) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (128 Stat. 3464), is amended in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) by striking “for Installations, Energy,” each place it appears and inserting “for Energy, Installations,”.

(13) Section 9314a(b) is amended by striking “only so long at” and inserting “only so long as”.

(b) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.—Effective as of December 19, 2014, and as if included therein as enacted, the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended as follows:

(1) Section 351(b)(1) (128 Stat. 3346) is amended by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting “; and”.

(2) Section 901(g)(1)(F) (128 Stat. 3465) is amended by inserting “paragraph (4) of” before “subsection (b) of section 2926”.

(3) Section 1072(a)(2) (128 Stat. 3516) is amended by inserting “in the table of sections” before “at the beginning of”.

(4) Section 1079(a)(1) (128 Stat. 3561) is amended by striking “section 12102 of title 42, United States Code” and inserting “section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102)”.

(5) Section 1104(b)(2) (128 Stat. 3526) is amended by striking “paragraph (2)” and inserting “paragraph (1)(A)”.

(6) Section 1208 (128 Stat. 3551) is amended by striking “of Fiscal Year” each place it appears and inserting “for Fiscal Year”.

(7) Section 2803(a) (128 Stat. 3696) is amended in paragraph (2) of the subsection (f) being added by the amendment to be made by that section by inserting “section” before “1105 of title 31”.

(8) Section 2832(c)(3) (128 Stat. 3704) is amended by striking “United State Code” and inserting “United States Code”.

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “Section 8” and inserting “Section 18”; and

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking “S1/2 N1/2 SE” and inserting “S1/2 N1/2 SE1/4”.

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively;

(B) in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, in the matter being added by subparagraph (C)—

(ii) by striking “the permit or lease required” and inserting “the allotment management plan, permit, or lease required”;

(i) by striking “a grazing permit or lease” in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) of such subsection and inserting “an allotment management plan or grazing permit or lease”;

(ii) in subparagraph (A) of such subsection, by striking “permit or lease” and inserting “allotment management plan, permit, or lease”; and

(iii) in subparagraph (B)(i) of such subsection, by striking “lease or permit” and inserting “allotment management plan, permit, or lease”; and

(D) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so redesignated, the following new paragraph:

“(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘by the Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to lands within National Forests in the sixteen contiguous Western States’ and inserting ‘on National Forest System land by the Secretary of Agriculture (notwithstanding, for purposes of this section, the definition in section 103(p))’;”.

(A) in subsection (e), by inserting before the period at the end the following: “report using National Median Price values”; and

(i) in subparagraph (A), by striking “by regulation establish criteria pursuant to which the annual fee determined in accordance with this section may be suspended or reduced temporarily” and inserting “provide for suspension or reduction temporarily of the annual fee determined in accordance with this section”; and

(c) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.—Section 1709(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 962; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended—

(1) by striking “Retaliation and personnel action described.—” and all that follows through “For purposes of the” and inserting “Retaliation described.—For purposes of the”;

(2) by striking “at a minimum—” and that follows through “ostracism” and inserting “at a minimum ostracism”; and

(d) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009.—Section 943(d)(1) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4578) by striking the second period at the end of the first sentence.

(e) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005.—Section 1208(f)(2) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as amended by section 1202(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 363) and section 1202(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat 2512), is further amended—

(1) by redesignating the paragraphs (1) through (8) added by section 1202(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat 2512) as subparagraphs (A) through (H), respectively; and

(2) by moving the margins of such subparagraphs, as so redesignated, two ems to the right.

(f) Coordination with other amendments made by this Act.—For purposes of applying amendments made by provisions of this Act other than this section, the amendments made by this section shall be treated as having been enacted immediately before any such amendments by other provisions of this Act.

SEC. 1082. Authority to provide training and support to personnel of foreign ministries of defense.

(a) Authority.—Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 168 note), as amended by section 1047 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), is further amended—

(1) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as subsections (c) through (f), respectively; and

“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, carry out a program to provide training and associated training support services to personnel of foreign ministries of defense (or ministries with security force oversight) or regional organizations with security missions—

“(ii) establishing responsible defense governance and internal controls in order to help build effective, transparent, and accountable defense institutions;

“(iii) assessing organizational weaknesses and establishing a roadmap for addressing shortfalls; and

“(iv) enhancing ministerial, general or joint staff, or service level core management competencies; and

“(B) for such other purposes as the Secretary considers appropriate, consistent with the authority in subsection (a).

“(2) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—Each fiscal year quarter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on activities under the program under paragraph (1) during the preceding fiscal year quarter. Each report shall include, for the fiscal year quarter covered by such report, the following:

“(B) A list of any organization described in paragraph (1) to which the Secretary assigned employees under the program, including the number of such employees so assigned, the duration of each assignment, a brief description of each assigned employee’s activities, and a statement of the cost of each assignment.

“(C) A comprehensive justification of any activities conducted pursuant to paragraph (1)(B).”.

(1) in subsection (a), by inserting “Ministry of Defense Advisor” before “Authority”;

(2) in subsections (d) and (e), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1) of this section, by striking “the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Armed Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives” and inserting “the appropriate committees of Congress”; and

“(g) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means—

“(1) the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

“(2) the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.”.

(c) Conforming amendment to section heading to reflect name of program.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

SEC. 1083. Expansion of outreach for veterans transitioning from serving on active duty.

(a) Expansion of pilot program.—Subsection (c)(2) of section 5 of the Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act (Public Law 114–2; 38 U.S.C. 1712A note) is amended—

(2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(E) conducts outreach to individuals transitioning from serving on active duty in the Armed Forces who are participating in the Transition Assistance Program of the Department of Defense or other similar transition programs to inform such individuals of the community oriented veteran peer support network under paragraph (1) and other support programs and opportunities that are available to such individuals.”.

(b) Inclusion of information in interim report.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section is amended—

(2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(i) received outreach from the Department of Veterans Affairs while serving on active duty as a member of the Armed Forces; and

“(ii) participated in a peer support program under the pilot program for veterans transitioning from serving on active duty.”.

SEC. 1084. Modification of certain requirements applicable to major medical facility lease for a Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

(1) by striking out “in Tulsa.—” and all that follows through “In carrying out” and inserting “in Tulsa.—In carrying out”;

(3) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (E) as paragraphs (1) through (5), respectively, and adjusting the indentation of the margin of such paragraphs, as so redesignated, two ems to the left;

(4) in paragraph (1), as so redesignated, by striking “140,000 gross square feet” and inserting “140,000 net usable square feet”;

(5) in paragraph (2), as so redesignated, by striking “not more than the average” and all that follows and inserting “not more than the average of equivalent medical facility leases executed by the Department of Veterans Affairs over the last five years, plus 20 percent;”; and

(6) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by striking “30-year life cycle” and inserting “20-year life cycle”.

SEC. 1101. Required probationary period for new employees of the Department of Defense.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) In general.—Notwithstanding sections 3321 and 3393(d) of title 5, the appointment of a covered employee shall become final only after such employee has served a probationary period of two years. The Secretary of the military department concerned may extend a probationary period under this subsection at the discretion of such Secretary.

“(b) Covered employee defined.—In this section, the term ‘covered employee’ means any individual—

“(1) appointed to a permanent position within the competitive service at the Department of Defense; or

“(2) appointed as a career appointee (as that term is defined in section 3132(a)(4) of title 5) within the Senior Executive Service at the Department.

“(c) Employment becomes final.—Upon the expiration of a covered employee’s probationary period under subsection (a), the supervisor of the employee shall determine whether the appointment becomes final based on regulations prescribed for such purpose by the Secretary.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 81 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

(b) Application.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to any covered employee (as that term is defined in section 1599e of title 10, United States Code, as added by such subsection) appointed after the date of the enactment of this section.

(B) by inserting at the end before the period the following: “, or any individual covered by section 1599e of title 10”; and

(2) in section 3393(d), by adding at the end the following: “The preceding sentence shall not apply to any individual covered by section 1599e of title 10.”.

SEC. 1102. Delay of periodic step increase for civilian employees of the Department of Defense based upon unacceptable performance.

(a) Delay.—Under procedures established by the Secretary of Defense, upon a determination by the Secretary that the work of an employee is not at an acceptable level of competence, the period of time during which the work of the employee is not at an acceptable level of competence shall not count toward completion of the period of service required for purposes of subsection (a) of section 5335 of title 5, United States Code, or subsection (e)(1) or (e)(2) of section 5343 of such title.

(b) Applicability to periods of service.—Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to any period of service performed before the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 1103. Procedures for reduction in force of Department of Defense civilian personnel.

“(f) Reductions based primarily on performance.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish procedures to provide that, in implementing any reduction in force for civilian positions in the Department of Defense in the competitive service or the excepted service, the determination of which employees shall be separated from employment in the Department shall be made primarily on the basis of performance, as determined under any applicable performance management system.”.

(a) In general.—Chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(A) establish, as positions in the excepted service, such qualified positions in the Department as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the United States Cyber Command including—

“(i) staff of the headquarters of the United States Cyber Command provided to the Command by the Air Force;

“(ii) elements of the United States Cyber Command enterprise relating to cyberspace operations;

“(iii) elements of the United States Cyber Command provided by the armed forces; and

“(B) appoint an individual to a qualified position (after taking into consideration the availability of preference eligibles for appointment to the position); and

“(C) subject to the requirements of subsections (b) and (c), fix the compensation of an individual for service in a qualified position.

“(2) The authority of the Secretary under this subsection applies without regard to the provisions of any other law relating to the appointment, number, classification, or compensation of employees.

“(b) Basic pay.— (1) In accordance with this section, the Secretary shall fix the rates of basic pay for any qualified position established under subsection (a)—

“(A) in relation to the rates of pay provided for employees in comparable positions in the Department, in which the incumbent performs, manages, or supervises functions that execute the cyber mission of the Department; and

“(B) subject to the same limitations on maximum rates of pay established for such employees by law or regulation.

“(A) consistent with section 5341 of title 5, adopt such provisions of that title as provide for prevailing rate systems of basic pay; and

“(B) apply those provisions to qualified positions for employees in or under which the Department may employ individuals described by section 5342(a)(2)(A) of such title.

“(c) Additional compensation, incentives, and allowances.— (1) The Secretary may provide employees in qualified positions compensation (in addition to basic pay), including benefits, incentives, and allowances, consistent with, and not in excess of the level authorized for, comparable positions authorized by title 5.

“(2) An employee in a qualified position whose rate of basic pay is fixed under subsection (b)(1) shall be eligible for an allowance under section 5941 of title 5 on the same basis and to the same extent as if the employee was an employee covered by such section, including eligibility conditions, allowance rates, and all other terms and conditions in law or regulation.

“(d) Plan for execution of authorities.—Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of Congress with a plan for the use of the authorities provided under this section.

“(e) Collective bargaining agreements.—Nothing in subsection (a) may be construed to impair the continued effectiveness of a collective bargaining agreement with respect to an office, component, subcomponent, or equivalent of the Department that is a successor to an office, component, subcomponent, or equivalent of the Department covered by the agreement before the succession.

“(f) Required regulations.—The Secretary, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section.

“(g) Annual report.— (1) Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this section and not less frequently than once each year thereafter until the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this section, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, in coordination with the Secretary, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed report on the administration of this section during the most recent one-year period.

“(2) Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include, for the period covered by the report, the following:

“(A) A discussion of the process used in accepting applications, assessing candidates, ensuring adherence to veterans’ preference, and selecting applicants for vacancies to be filled by an individual for a qualified position.

“(i) How the Secretary plans to fulfill the critical need of the Department to recruit and retain employees in qualified positions.

“(iii) Any actions taken during the reporting period to fulfill such critical need.

“(C) A discussion of how the planning and actions taken under subparagraph (B) are integrated into the strategic workforce planning of the Department.

“(D) The metrics on actions occurring during the reporting period, including the following:

“(i) The number of employees in qualified positions hired, disaggregated by occupation, grade, and level or pay band.

“(ii) The placement of employees in qualified positions, disaggregated by directorate and office within the Department.

“(iv) The number of separations of employees in qualified positions, disaggregated by occupation and grade and level or pay band.

“(v) The number of retirements of employees in qualified positions, disaggregated by occupation, grade, and level or pay band.

“(vi) The number and amounts of recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives paid to employees in qualified positions, disaggregated by occupation, grade, and level or pay band.

“(E) A description of the training provided to supervisors of employees in qualified positions at the Department on the use of the new authorities.

“(h) Three-year probationary period.—The probationary period for all employees hired under the authority established in this section shall be three years.

“(i) Incumbents of existing competitive service positions.— (1) An individual serving in a position on the date of enactment of this section that is selected to be converted to a position in the excepted service under this section shall have the right to refuse such conversion.

“(2) After the date on which an individual who refuses a conversion under paragraph (1) stops serving in the position selected to be converted, the position may be converted to a position in the excepted service.

“(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

“(B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

“(2) The term ‘collective bargaining agreement’ has the meaning given that term in section 7103(a)(8) of title 5.

“(3) The term ‘excepted service’ has the meaning given that term in section 2103 of title 5.

“(4) The term ‘preference eligible’ has the meaning given that term in section 2108 of title 5.

“(5) The term ‘qualified position’ means a position, designated by the Secretary for the purpose of this section, in which the incumbent performs, manages, or supervises functions that execute the responsibilities of the United States Cyber Command relating to cyber operations.

“(6) The term ‘Senior Executive Service’ has the meaning given that term in section 2101a of title 5.”.

(b) Conforming amendment.—Section 3132(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended in the matter following subparagraph (E)—

“(iv) any position established as a qualified position in the excepted service by the Secretary of Defense under section 1599e of title 10;”.

(c) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1599d the following new item:

SEC. 1105. One-year extension of authority to waive annual limitation on premium pay and aggregate limitation on pay for Federal civilian employees working overseas.

SEC. 1106. Five-year extension of expedited hiring authority for designated defense acquisition workforce positions.

SEC. 1107. One-year extension of discretionary authority to grant allowances, benefits, and gratuities to civilian personnel on official duty in a combat zone.

SEC. 1108. Extension of rate of overtime pay for Department of the Navy employees performing work aboard or dockside in support of the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier forward deployed in Japan.

SEC. 1109. Expansion of temporary authority to make direct appointments of candidates possessing bachelor's degrees to scientific and engineering positions at science and technology reinvention laboratories.

(a) Expansion.—Section 1107(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by striking “3 percent” and inserting “5 percent”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2016, and shall apply with respect to appointments of candidates under section 1107(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 on or after that date.

SEC. 1110. Extension of authority for the civilian acquisition workforce personnel demonstration project.

(a) Extension.—Section 1762(g) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “September 30, 2017” and inserting “December 31, 2020”.

(b) Technical amendment.—Such section is further amended by striking “demonstration program” and inserting “demonstration project”.

SEC. 1111. Pilot program on dynamic shaping of the workforce to improve the technical skills and expertise at certain Department of Defense laboratories.

(a) Pilot program required.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasability and advisability of the use of the authorities specified in subsection (b) at the Department of Defense laboratories specified in subsection (c) to permit the directors of such laboratories to dynamically shape the mix of technical skills and expertise in the workforces of such laboratories in order to achieve one or more of the following:

(1) To meet organizational and Department-designated missions in the most cost-effective and efficient manner.

(2) To upgrade and enhance the scientific quality of the workforces of such laboratories.

(b) Workforce shaping authorities.—The authorities that may be used by the director of a Department of Defense laboratory under the pilot program are the following:

(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this paragraph, authority otherwise available to the director by law (and within the available budgetary resources of the laboratory) to appoint qualified scientific and technical personnel who are not currently Department of Defense civilian employees into any scientific or technical position in the laboratory for a period of more than one year but not more than six years.

(B) BENEFITS.—Personnel appointed under this paragraph shall be provided with benefits comparable to those provided to similar employees at the laboratory concerned, including professional development opportunities, eligibility for all laboratory awards programs, and designation as “status applicants” for the purposes of eligibility for positions in the Federal service.

(C) EXTENSION OF APPOINTMENTS.—The appointment of any individual under this paragraph may be extended at any time during any term of service of the individual under this paragraph for an additional period of up to six years under such conditions as the director concerned shall establish for purposes of this paragraph.

(D) CONSTRUCTION WITH CERTAIN LIMITATION.—For purposes of determining the workforce size of a laboratory in connection with compliance with section 955 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1896; 10 U.S.C. 129a note), any individual serving in an appointment under this paragraph shall be treated as a fractional employee of the laboratory, which fraction is—

(i) the current term of appointment of the individual under this paragraph; divided by

(ii) the average length of tenure of a career employee at the laboratory, as calculated at the end of the last fiscal year ending before the date of the most recent appointment or extension of the individual under this paragraph.

(2) REEMPLOYMENT OF ANNUITANTS.—Authority to reemploy annuitants in accordance with section 9902(g) of title 5, United States Code, except that as a condition for reemployment the director may authorize the deduction from the pay of any annuitant so reemployed of an amount up to the amount of the annuity otherwise payable to such annuitant allocable to the period of actual employment of such annuitant, which amount shall be determined in a manner specified by the director for purposes of this paragraph to ensure the most cost effective execution of designated missions by the laboratory while retaining critical technical skills.

(3) EARLY RETIREMENT INCENTIVES.—Authority to authorize voluntary early retirement of employees in accordance with section 8336 of title 5, United States Code, without regard to section 8336(d)(2)(D) or 3522 of such title, and with employees so separated voluntarily from service under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for purposes of the pilot program.

(4) SEPARATION INCENTIVE PAY.—Authority to pay voluntary separation pay to employees in accordance with section 8414(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United States Code, without regard to clause (iv) or (v) of such section or section 3522, of such title, and with—

(A) employees so separated voluntarily from service under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for purposes of the pilot program; and

(B) payments to employees so separated authorized under section 3523 of such title without regard to—

(c) Laboratories.—The Department of Defense laboratories specified in this subsection are the laboratories specified in section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2486; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note).

(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority in this section shall expire on December 31, 2023.

(2) CONTINUATION OF AUTHORITIES EXERCISED BEFORE TERMINATION.—The expiration in paragraph (1) shall not be construed to effect the continuation after the date specified in paragraph (1) of any term of employment or other benefit authorized under this section before that date in accordance with the terms of such authorization.

SEC. 1112. Pilot program on temporary exchange of financial management and acquisition personnel.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of the temporary assignment of covered employees of the Department of Defense to nontraditional defense contractors and of covered employees of such contractors to the Department.

(1) COVERED EMPLOYEES.—An employee of the Department of Defense or a nontraditional Defense contractor is a covered employee for purposes of this section if the employee—

(B) is considered by the Secretary of Defense to be an exceptional employee; and

(2) NONTRADITIONAL DEFENSE CONTRACTORS.—For purposes of this section, the term “nontraditional defense contractor” has the meaning given that term in section 2302(9) of title 10, United States Code.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for a written agreement among the Department of Defense, the nontraditional defense contractor concerned, and the employee concerned regarding the terms and conditions of the employee’s assignment under this section.

(A) shall require, in the case of an employee of the Department, that upon completion of the assignment, the employee will serve in the civil service for a period at least equal to three times the length of the assignment, unless the employee is sooner involuntarily separated from the service of the employee’s agency; and

(B) shall provide that if the employee of the Department or of the contractor (as the case may be) fails to carry out the agreement, or if the employee is voluntarily separated from the service of the employee’s agency before the end of the period stated in the agreement, the employee shall be liable to the United States for payment of all expenses of the assignment unless that failure or voluntary separation was for good and sufficient reason, as determined by the Secretary.

(3) DEBT TO THE UNITED STATES.—An amount for which an employee is liable under paragraph (2)(B) shall be treated as a debt due the United States. The Secretary may waive, in whole or in part, collection of such a debt based on a determination that the collection would be against equity and good conscience and not in the best interests of the United States.

(d) Termination.—An assignment under this section may, at any time and for any reason, be terminated by the Department of Defense or the nontraditional defense contractor concerned.

(e) Duration.—An assignment under this section shall be for a period of not less than three months and not more than one year.

(f) Status of Federal employees assigned to contractors.—An employee of the Department of Defense who is assigned to a nontraditional defense contractor under this section shall be considered, during the period of assignment, to be on detail to a regular work assignment in the Department for all purposes. The written agreement established under subsection (c) shall address the specific terms and conditions related to the employee’s continued status as a Federal employee.

(g) Terms and conditions for private sector employees.—An employee of a nontraditional defense contractor who is assigned to a Department of Defense organization under this section—

(1) shall continue to receive pay and benefits from the contractor from which such employee is assigned;

(2) shall be deemed to be an employee of the Department of Defense for the purposes of—

(B) sections 201, 203, 205, 207, 208, 209, 603, 606, 607, 643, 654, 1905, and 1913 of title 18, United States Code, and any other conflict of interest statute;

(H) subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, relating to compensation for work-related injuries; and

(3) may not have access, while the employee is assigned to a Department organization, to any trade secrets or to any other nonpublic information which is of commercial value to the contractor from which such employee is assigned.

(h) Prohibition against charging certain costs to Federal Government.—A nontraditional defense contractor may not charge the Department of Defense or any other agency of the Federal Government, as direct or indirect costs under a Federal contract, the costs of pay or benefits paid by the contractor to an employee assigned to a Department organization under this section for the period of the assignment.

(i) Consideration.—In providing for assignments of employees under this section, the Secretary of Defense shall take into consideration the question of how assignments might best be used to help meet the needs of the Department of Defense with respect to the training of employees in financial management or in acquisition.

(1) DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES.—The number of employees of the Department of Defense who may be assigned to nontraditional defense contractors under this section at any given time may not exceed the following:

(2) NONTRADITIONAL DEFENSE CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES.—The total number of nontraditional defense contractor employees who may be assigned to the Department under this section at any given time may not exceed 10 such employees.

(k) Termination of authority for assignments.—No assignment of an employee may commence under this section after September 30, 2019.

SEC. 1113. Pilot program on enhanced pay authority for certain acquisition and technology positions in the Department of Defense.

(a) Pilot program authorized.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of using the pay authority specified in subsection (d) to fix the rate of basic pay for positions described in subsection (c) in order to assist the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the military departments in attracting and retaining high quality acquisition and technology experts in positions responsible for managing and developing complex, high cost, technological acquisition efforts of the Department of Defense.

(b) Approval required.—The pilot program may be carried out only with approval as follows:

(1) Approval of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in the case of positions in the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

(2) Approval of the Service Acquisition Executive of the military department concerned, in the case of positions in a military department.

(1) require expertise of an extremely high level in a scientific, technical, professional, or acquisition management field; and

(2) are critical to the successful accomplishment of an important acquisition or technology development mission.

(d) Rate of basic pay.—The pay authority specified in this subsection is authority as follows:

(1) Authority to fix the rate of basic pay for a position at a rate not to exceed 150 percent of the rate of basic pay payable for level I of the Executive Schedule, upon the approval of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics or the Service Acquisition Executive concerned, as applicable.

(2) Authority to fix the rate of basic pay for a position at a rate in excess of 150 percent of the rate of basic pay payable for level I of the Executive Schedule, upon the approval of the Secretary of Defense.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority in subsection (a) may be used only to the extent necessary to competitively recruit or retain individuals exceptionally well qualified for positions described in subsection (c).

(2) NUMBER OF POSITIONS.—The authority in subsection (a) may not be used with respect to more than five positions in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and more than five positions in each military department at any one time.

(3) TERM OF POSITIONS.—The authority in subsection (a) may be used only for positions having terms less than five years.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority to fix rates of basic pay for a position under this section shall terminate on October 1, 2020.

(2) CONTINUATION OF PAY.—Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to prohibit the payment after October 1, 2020, of basic pay at rates fixed under this section before that date for positions whose terms continue after that date.

SEC. 1114. Pilot program on direct hire authority for veteran technical experts into the defense acquisition workforce.

(a) Pilot program.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of appointing qualified veteran candidates to positions described in subsection (b) in the defense acquisition workforce of the military departments without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code. The Secretary shall carry out the pilot program in each military department through the Service Acquisition Executive of such military department.

(b) Positions.—The positions described in this subsection are scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematics positions, including technicians, within the defense acquisition workforce.

(c) Limitation.—Authority under subsection (a) may not, in any calendar year and with respect to any military department, be exercised with respect to a number of candidates greater than the number equal to 1 percent of the total number positions the acquisition workforce of that military department that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending before the start of such calendar year.

(1) The term “employee” has the meaning given that term in section 2105 of title 5, United States Code.

(2) The term “veteran” has the meaning given that term in section 101 of title 38, United States Code.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The authority to appoint candidates to positions under the pilot program shall expire on the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(2) EFFECT ON EXISTING APPOINTMENTS.—The termination by paragraph (1) of the authority in subsection (a) shall not affect any appointment made under that authority before the termination date specified in paragraph (1) in accordance with the terms of such appointment.

SEC. 1115. Direct hire authority for technical experts into the defense acquisition workforce.

(a) Authority.—Each Secretary of a military department may appoint qualified candidates possessing a scientific or engineering degree to positions described in subsection (b) for that military department without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code.

(b) Applicability.—Positions described in this subsection are scientific and engineering positions within the defense acquisition workforce.

(c) Limitation.—Authority under this section may not, in any calendar year and with respect to any military department, be exercised with respect to a number of candidates greater than the number equal to 5 percent of the total number of scientific and engineering positions within the acquisition workforce of that military department that are filled as of the close of the fiscal year last ending before the start of such calendar year.

(d) Nature of appointment.—Any appointment under this section shall be treated as an appointment on a full-time equivalent basis, unless such appointment is made on a term or temporary basis.

(e) Employee defined.—In this section, the term “employee” has the meaning given that term in section 2105 of title 5, United States Code.

(f) Termination.—The authority to make appointments under this section shall not be available after December 31, 2020.

SEC. 1201. One-year extension of funding limitations for authority to build the capacity of foreign security forces.

(A) by striking “for fiscal year 2015” and all that follows through “section 4301” and inserting “for fiscal year 2015 or 2016 for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “for fiscal year 2015” and inserting “for a fiscal year specified in that paragraph”.

SEC. 1202. Extension and expansion of authority for reimbursement to the Government of Jordan for border security operations.

(a) Expansion to Government of Lebanon.—Subsection (a) of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 902; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note) is amended—

(1) by inserting “and the Government of Lebanon” after “the Government of Jordan” each place it appears; and

(2) by striking “armed forces of Jordan” each place it appears and inserting “armed forces of the country concerned”.

(B) by striking “increase security and sustain increased security along the border between Jordan and Syria” and inserting “sustain security along the border of Jordan with Syria and Iraq and increase or sustain security along the border of Lebanon with Syria, as applicable”; and

(B) by striking “increase security or sustain increased security along the border between Jordan and Syria” and inserting “sustain security along the border of Jordan with Syria and Iraq or increase or sustain security along the border of Lebanon with Syria, as applicable”.

“(b) Funds available for assistance.—While the authority in this section is in effect, amounts may be used to provide assistance under the authority in subsection (a) as follows:

“(1) Amounts authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for the Department of Defense and available for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations pursuant to section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–81).

“(2) Amounts authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for the Department of Defense for the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund.”.

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “may not exceed $150,000,000” and inserting “in any fiscal year may not exceed $125,000,000”; and

“(2) ASSISTANCE TO GOVERNMENT OF LEBANON.—Assistance provided under the authority in subsection (a) to the Government of Lebanon may be used only for the armed forces of Lebanon, and may not be used for or to reimburse Hezbollah or any forces other than the armed forces of Lebanon.”.

(e) Expiration of authority.—Subsection (f) of such section is amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2020”.

(f) Conforming amendment.—The heading of such section is amended to read as follows:

“SEC. 1207. Assistance to the Government of Jordan and the Government of Lebanon for border security operations”.

SEC. 1203. Extension of authority to conduct activities to enhance the capability of foreign countries to respond to incidents involving weapons of mass destruction.

SEC. 1204. Redesignation, modification, and extension of National Guard State Partnership Program.

(a) Redesignation.—The heading of section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 897; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is amended to read as follows:

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “a program of exchanges” and all that follows and inserting “a program of activities described in paragraph (2) between members of the National Guard of a State or territory and any of the following:

“(C) Governmental organizations of a foreign country whose primary functions include disaster response or emergency response.”; and

“(2) STATE PARTNERSHIP.—Each program established under this subsection shall be known as a ‘State Partnership’.”.

(c) Limitation.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended by striking “activity under a program” and all that follows through “State or territory,” and inserting “activity with forces referred to in subsection (a)(1)(B) or organizations described in subsection (a)(1)(C) under a program established under subsection (a)”.

(d) State Partnership Program Fund.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a joint assessment of the feasibility and advisability of establishing a central fund to manage funds for programs and activities under the Department of Defense State Partnership Program under section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, as amended by this section.

(f) Permanent authority.—Such section is further amended by striking subsection (i).

SEC. 1205. Authority to provide support to national military forces of allied countries for counterterrorism operations in Africa.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense is authorized, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to provide, on a nonreimbursable basis, logistic support, supplies, and services to the national military forces of an allied country conducting counterterrorism operations in Africa if the Secretary of Defense determines that the provision of such logistic support, supplies, and services, on a nonreimbursable basis, is—

(2) critical to the timely and effective participation of such national military forces in such operations.

(b) Notice to Congress on support provided.—Not later than 15 days after providing logistic support, supplies, or services under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice setting forth the following:

(4) The purpose of the operations for which such support was provided, and the objectives of such support.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of support that is otherwise prohibited by any other provision of law.

(2) AMOUNT.—The aggregate amount of logistic support, supplies, and services provided under subsection (a) in any fiscal year may not exceed $100,000,000.

(d) Reports.—Not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every six months thereafter through the expiration date in subsection (f) of the authority provided by this section, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a description of the use of the authority provided by this section during the six-month period ending on the date of such report. Each report shall include the following:

(1) An assessment of the extent to which the support provided under this section during the period covered by such report facilitated the national military forces of allied countries so supported in conducting counterterrorism operations in Africa.

(2) A description of any efforts by countries that received such support to address, as practicable, the requirements of their forces for logistics support, supplies, or services for conducting counterterrorism operations in Africa, including under acquisition and cross-servicing agreements.

(e) Logistic support, supplies, and services defined.—In this section, the term “logistic support, supplies, and services” has the meaning given that term in section 2350(1) of title 10, United States Code.

(f) Expiration.—The authority provided by this section may not be exercised after September 30, 2018.

SEC. 1206. Authority to build the capacity of foreign military intelligence forces.

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, is authorized to conduct or support a program or programs to train the military intelligence forces of a foreign county in order for that country to—

(2) enhance the capacity of such forces to receive and act upon time-sensitive intelligence;

(3) increase the capacity and capability of such forces to fuse and analyze intelligence; and

(4) ensure the ability of such forces to support the military forces of that country in conducting lawful military operations in which intelligence plays a critical role.

(1) AUTHORIZED ELEMENTS.—A program under subsection (a) may include the provision of training, and associated supplies and support.

(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS.—A program under subsection (a) shall include elements that promote the following:

(1) ANNUAL FUNDING LIMITATION.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for a fiscal year and available for the military intelligence program (MIP), the Secretary of Defense may use up to $25,000,000 in such fiscal year to carry out programs authorized by subsection (a).

(2) ASSISTANCE OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide any type of assistance described in subsection (b) that is otherwise prohibited by any provision of law.

(3) LIMITATION ON ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.—The Secretary of Defense may not use the authority in subsection (a) to provide assistance described in subsection (b) to any foreign country that is otherwise prohibited from receiving such assistance under any other provision of law.

(d) Congressional notification.—Not less than 15 days before initiating activities under a program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a notice on the following:

(1) The country whose capacity to engage in activities in subsection (a) will be built under the program.

(2) The budget, implementation timeline with milestones, military department responsible for management and associated program executive office, and completion date for the program.

(3) Assurances, if any, provided with respect to an enduring arrangement between the United States and the forces provided training pursuant to subsection (a).

(4) The objectives and assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics associated with operational outcomes for the recipient forces.

(5) An assessment of the capacity of the recipient country to absorb assistance under the program.

(6) An assessment of the manner in which the program fits into the theater security cooperation strategy of the applicable geographic combatant command.

(e) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1207. Prohibition on assistance to entities in Yemen controlled by the Houthi movement.

(a) Prohibition.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense by this Act may be used to provide assistance to an entity in Yemen that is controlled by members of the Houthi movement.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply if the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, determines that the provision of assistance as described in that subsection is important to the national security interests of the United States.

(2) NOTICE REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after providing assistance under this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees notice on such assistance, including the following:

(3) FORM.—Each notice under paragraph (2) shall be submitted in an unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a detailed description of the military support the Secretary considers it necessary to provide to recipients of assistance under section 1209 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541) upon their return to Syria to make use of such assistance.

(b) Covered potential support.—The support the Secretary may consider it necessary to provide for purposes of the report is the following:

(5) Any other support the Secretary considers appropriate for purposes of the report.

(1) For each type of support the Secretary considers it necessary to provide as described in subsection (a), a description of the actions to be taken by the Secretary to ensure that such support would not benefit any of the following:

(A) The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the Al-Nusra Front, al-Qaeda, the Khorasan Group, or any other extremist Islamic organization

(B) The Syrian Arab Army or any group or organization supporting President Bashir Assad.

(d) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute an authorization for the use of force in Syria.

(1) the drawdown of United States forces in Afghanistan should be based on security conditions in Afghanistan and United States security interests in the region; and

(2) as the Afghan National Defense Security Forces develop security capabilities and capacity, an appropriate United States and international presence should continue, upon invitation by the Government of Afghanistan, to provide adequate capability and capacity to preserve gains made to date and continue counterterrorism operations in Afghanistan against terrorist organizations that can threaten United States interests or the United States homeland.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 10 days after the approval by the Secretary of Defense of orders to redeploy United States forces from Afghanistan in order to effect a reduction of the United States force presence in Afghanistan by a significant amount in accordance with plans approved by the President to drawdown United States forces in Afghanistan, the President shall certify to the congressional defense committees that the reduction of such force presence will result in an acceptable level of risk to United States national security objectives taking into consideration the security conditions on the ground.

(2) SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT.—For the purposes of this subsection, a significant amount in the reduction of the force presence of United States forces shall be a reduction by the lesser of—

(B) the number of troops equal to 20 percent of the troops in Afghanistan at the time of the reduction.

(3) WAIVER.—The President may waive the requirement for a certification under paragraph (1) if the making of the certification would impede national security objectives of the United States. The President shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on each such waiver, including the national security objectives that would otherwise be impeded if not for the waiver.

SEC. 1222. Extension and modification of Commanders' Emergency Response Program.

(a) One-year extension.—Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 1221 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3546), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” in subsections (a), (b), and (f) and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.

(b) Restriction on amount of payments.—Subsection (e) of such section 1201, as so amended, is further amended by striking “$2,000,000” and inserting “$500,000”.

(c) Submittal of revised guidance.—Not later than 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the guidance issued by the Secretary to the Armed Forces concerning the Commanders’ Emergency Response Program in Afghanistan as revised to take into account the amendments made by this section.

(1) IN GENERAL.—During fiscal year 2016, amounts available pursuant to section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, as amended by this section, shall also be available for ex gratia payments for damage, personal injury, or death that is incident to combat operations of the Armed Forces in Iraq.

(2) AUTHORITIES APPLICABLE TO PAYMENT.—Any payment made pursuant to this subsection shall be made in accordance with the authorities and limitations in section 8121 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2015 (division C of Public Law 113–235), other than subsection (h) of such section.

(3) CONSTRUCTION WITH RESTRICTION ON AMOUNT OF PAYMENTS.—For purposes of the application of subsection (e) of such section 1201, as so amended, to any payment under this subsection, such payment shall be deemed to be a project described by such subsection (e).

SEC. 1223. Extension of authority to transfer defense articles and provide defense services to the military and security forces of Afghanistan.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (h) of section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992), as amended by section 1231 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2105 (Public Law 113–291), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.

(b) Quarterly reports.—Subsection (f)(1) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking “March 31, 2016” and inserting ‘‘March 31, 2017’’.

(c) Excess defense articles.—Subsection (i)(2) of such section, as so amended, is further amended by striking “, 2014, and 2015” each place it appears and inserting “through 2016”.

SEC. 1224. Extension and modification of authority for reimbursement of certain coalition nations for support provided to United States military operations.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–81; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1222 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), is further amended—

(1) by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”; and

(2) in paragraph (1), by striking “Operation Enduring Freedom” and inserting “Operation Freedom's Sentinel”.

(b) Other support.—Subsection (b) of such section 1233, as so amended, is further amended by striking “Operation Enduring Freedom” and inserting “Operation Freedom's Sentinel”.

(1) in the second sentence, by striking “during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $1,200,000,000” and inserting “during fiscal year 2016 may not exceed $1,160,000,000”; and

(2) in the third sentence, by striking “during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $1,000,000,000” and inserting “during fiscal year 2016 may not exceed $900,000,000”.

(d) Quarterly reports.—Subsection (f) of such section 1233, as added by section 1223(e) of the National Defense Authorization act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2520), is amended by striking “on any” and all that follows and inserting “on any reimbursements made during such quarter under the authorities as follows:

“(3) Section 1224(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016.”.

(e) Extension of notice requirement relating to reimbursement of Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan.—Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1222 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Act for Fiscal Year 2015, is further amended by striking “September 30, 2015” and inserting “September 30, 2016”.

(f) Extension of limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan.—Section 1227(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2001), as so amended, is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.

(g) Additional limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan.—Of the total amount of reimbursements and support authorized for Pakistan during fiscal year 2016 pursuant to the third sentence of section 1233(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (as amended by subsection (c)(2)), $300,000,000 shall not be eligible for the waiver under section 1227(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2001) unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—

(1) Pakistan has undertaken military operations in North Waziristan that have contributed to significantly disrupting the safe haven and freedom of movement of the Haqqani network in Pakistan;

(2) Pakistan has taken actions that have demonstrated a commitment to ensuring that North Waziristan does not return to being a safe haven for the Haqqani network; and

(3) the Government of Pakistan has taken actions to promote stability in Afghanistan, including encouraging the participation of the Taliban in reconciliation talks with the Government of Afghanistan.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the total amount of reimbursements and support authorized for Pakistan during fiscal year 2016 pursuant to the third sentence of section 1233(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (as so amended), $100,000,000 may be available for stability activities undertaken by Pakistan in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), including the provision of funds to the Pakistan military and the Pakistan Frontier Corps Khyber Pakhtunkhwa for activities undertaken in support of the following:

(B) Strengthening cooperative efforts between the Pakistan military and the Afghan National Defense Security Forces in activities that include—

(ii) sustaining critical infrastructure within the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, such as maintaining key ground lines of communication;

(iii) increasing training for the Pakistan Frontier Corps Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; and

(iv) training to improve interoperability between the Pakistan military and the Pakistan Frontier Corps Khyber Pakhtunkwha.

(2) REPORT.—Not later than December 31, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the expenditure of funds available under paragraph (1), including a description of the following:

(B) Each organization on whose behalf such funds were expended, including the amount expended on such organization and the number of members of such organization trained with such amount.

(C) Any limitation imposed on the expenditure of funds under that paragraph, including on any recipient of funds or any use of funds expended.

(3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “appropriate congressional committees” has the meaning given that term in section 1233(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008.

SEC. 1225. Prohibition on transfer to violent extremist organizations of equipment or supplies provided by the United States to the Government of Iraq.

(a) Prohibition.—No assistance authorized by section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) may be provided to the Government of Iraq after the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to Congress, after the date of the enactment of this Act, that appropriate steps have been taken by the Government of Iraq to safeguard against transferring or otherwise providing such assistance to violent extremist organizations.

(b) Violent extremist organization.—For purposes of this section, an organization is a violent extremist organization if the organization—

(2) is known to be under the command and control of, or is associated with, the Government of Iran.

(1) REPORTS REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the Secretary of Defense makes any determination that equipment or supplies provided pursuant to section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 have been transferred to a violent extremist organization, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the determination and the transfer.

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, for the transfer covered by such report, the following:

(A) An assessment of the type and quantity of equipment or supplies so transferred.

(B) A description of the criteria used to determine that the organization to which transferred was a violent extremist organization.

(C) A description, if known, of how such equipment or supplies were transferred or acquired by the violent extremist organization concerned.

(D) If such equipment or supplies are determined to remain under the current control of any violent extremist organization, a description of each such organization, including its relationship, if any, with the security forces of the Government of Iraq.

(E) A description of end use monitoring or other policies and procedures in place for the equipment or supplies so transferred in order prevent the transfer or acquisition of such equipment or supplies by violent extremist organizations.

(d) Submittal time for quarterly progress reports on assistance to counter ISIL.—Section 1236(d) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 is amended by striking “30 days thereafter” and inserting “90 days thereafter”.

SEC. 1226. Report on lines of communication of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and other foreign terrorist organizations.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the following:

(1) An assessment of the lines of communication that enable the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Jabhal al-Nusra, and other foreign terrorist organizations by facilitating the delivery of foreign fighters, funding, equipment, or other assistance through countries bordering on Syria.

(2) An assessment of the impacts of the lines of communication described in paragraph (1) on the security of the United States homeland and the protection of personnel and installations of the Department of Defense and diplomatic facilities in Europe and the Middle East.

(b) Appropriate committees of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

(1) TERM OF EMPLOYMENT.—Clause (ii) of section 602(b)(2)(A) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by striking “year—” and inserting “year, or, if submitting a petition after September 30, 2015, for a period of not less than 2 years—”.

(A) SUCCESSOR NAME FOR INTERNATIONAL SECURITY ASSISTANCE FORCE.—Subclause (II) of section 602(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—

(i) in the matter preceding item (aa), by striking “Force” and inserting “Force (or any successor name for such Force)”;

(ii) in item (aa), by striking “Force,” and inserting “Force (or any successor name for such Force),”; and

(iii) in item (bb), by striking “Force;” and inserting “Force (or any successor name for such Force);”.

(B) SHORT TITLE.—Section 601 of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 is amended by striking “This Act” and inserting “This title”.

(C) EXECUTIVE AGENCY REFERENCE.—Section 602(c)(4) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 is amended by striking “section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 403)” and inserting “section 133 of title 41, United States Code”.

(b) Numerical limitations.—Subparagraph (F) of section 602(b)(3) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended—

(1) in the heading, by striking “2015 and 2016” and inserting “2015, 2016, and 2017”;

(A) by striking “and ending on September 30, 2016,” and inserting “until such time that available special immigrant visas under subparagraphs (D) and (E) and this subparagraph are exhausted,” and

(3) in clause (i), by striking “September 30, 2015;” and inserting “December 31, 2016;”;

(4) in clause (ii), by striking “December 31, 2015;” and inserting “December 31, 2016;”; and

(5) in clause (iii), by striking “March 31, 2017.” and inserting “the date such visas are exhausted.”.

(c) Reports and sense of Congress.—Section 602(b) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(15) REPORTS INFORMING THE CONCLUSION OF THE AFGHAN SPECIAL IMMIGRANT VISA PROGRAM.—Not later than June 1, 2016, and every six months thereafter, the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report that contains—

“(A) a description of the United States force presence in Afghanistan during the previous 6 months;

“(B) a description of the projected United States force presence in Afghanistan;

“(C) the number of citizens or nationals of Afghanistan who were employed by or on behalf of the entities described in paragraph (2)(A)(ii) during the previous 6 months; and

“(D) the projected number of such citizens or nationals who will be employed by or on behalf of such entities.

“(16) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that the necessity of providing special immigrant status under this subsection should be assessed at regular intervals by the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, taking into account the scope of the current and planned presence of United States troops in Afghanistan, the current and prospective numbers of citizens and nationals of Afghanistan employed by or on behalf of the entities described in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), and the security climate in Afghanistan.”.

SEC. 1228. Extension of authority to support operations and activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.

(a) Extension of authority.—Subsection (f)(1) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.

(1) in subsection (c), by striking “fiscal year 2015” and all that follows and inserting “fiscal year 2016 may not exceed $80,000,000.”; and

(2) in subsection (d), by striking “fiscal year 2015” and inserting “fiscal year 2016”.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 30, 2015, and every 180 days thereafter until the authority in this section expires, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq.

“(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report under this subsection shall include the following:

“(A) A current description of capability gaps in the security forces of Iraq, including capability gaps relating to intelligence matters, protection of Iraq airspace, and logistics and maintenance, and a current description of the extent, if any, to which the Government of Iraq has requested assistance in addressing such capability gaps.

“(B) A current description of the activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq and the extent, if any, to which the programs conducted by the Office in conjunction with other United States programs (such as the Foreign Military Financing program, the Foreign Military Sales program, and the assistance provided pursuant to section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291)) will address the capability gaps described pursuant to subparagraph (A).

“(C) A current description of how the activities of the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq are coordinated with, and complement and enhance, the assistance provided pursuant to section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.

“(D) A current description of end use monitoring programs, and any other programs or procedures, used to improve accountability for equipment provided to the Government of Iraq.

“(E) A current description of the measures of effectiveness used to evaluate the activities of the Office of the Security Cooperation in Iraq, and an analysis of any determinations to expand, alter, or terminate specific activities of the Office based on such evaluations.

“(F) A current evaluation of the effectiveness of the training described in subsection (f)(2) in promoting respect for human rights, military professionalism, and respect for legitimate civilian authority in Iraq.

“(3) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ means—

“(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

“(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.”.

(1) the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) poses an acute threat to the people and territorial integrity of Iraq, including the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, and the security and stability of the Middle East and the world;

(2) the United States should, in coordination with coalition partners, provide, in an expeditious and responsive manner and without undue delay, the security forces of the Kurdistan Regional Government associated with the Government of Iraq with defense articles and assistance described in subsection (b), defense services, and related training to more effectively partner with the United States and other international coalition members to defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant;

(3) defeating the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant is critical to maintaining a unified Iraq in which all faiths, sects, and ethnicities are afforded equal protection and full integration into the Government and society of Iraq;

(4) due to the threat to United States national security and a free and inclusive Iraq brought by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) authorizes the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance, including training, equipment, logistics support, supplies, and services, stipends, facility and infrastructure repair and renovation, and sustainment, to military and other security forces of or associated with the Government of Iraq, including Kurdish forces;

(5) leaders of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant have stated that they intend to conduct terrorist attacks internationally, including against the United States, its citizens, and its interests; and

(6) the Kurdistan Regional Government is the democratically elected government of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, and Iraqi Kurds have been a reliable, stable, and capable partner of the United States, particularly in support of United States military and civilian personnel during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation New Dawn.

(b) Defense articles and assistance.—The defense articles and assistance described in this subsection include anti-tank and anti-armor weapons, armored vehicles, long-range artillery, crew-served weapons and ammunition, secure command and communications equipment, body armor, helmets, logistics equipment, night optical devices, and other excess defense articles and military assistance considered appropriate by the President.

SEC. 1241. Modification and extension of annual report on the military power of Iran.

(a) Element on cyber capabilities in description of strategy.—Paragraph (1) of subsection (b) of section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2542) is amended—

(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(D) Iranian strategy regarding offensive cyber capabilities and defensive cyber capabilities.”.

(b) Elements on cyber capabilities in assessments of unconventional forces.—Paragraph (3) of such subsection, as amended by section 1232(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 920), is further amended—

(2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and

“(G) Iranian ability to manipulate the information environment both domestically and against the interests of the United States and its allies.”.

(c) Extension of reports.—Subsection (d) of such section 1245, as amended by section 1277 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3592), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2021”.

(d) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to reports required to be submitted under section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, as so amended, after that date.

(a) Authority To provide assistance.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 by title XV and available for overseas contingency operations as specified in the funding tables in division D, $300,000,000 may be available to the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, to provide appropriate security assistance and intelligence support, including training, equipment, and logistics support, supplies and services, to military and other security forces of the Government of Ukraine for the purposes as follows:

(1) To enhance the capabilities of the military and other security forces of the Government of Ukraine to defend against further aggression.

(2) To assist Ukraine in developing the combat capability to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

(3) To support the Government of Ukraine in defending itself against actions by Russia and Russian-backed separatists that violate the ceasefire agreements of September 4, 2014, and February 11, 2015.

(b) Appropriate security assistance and intelligence support.—For purposes of subsection (a), appropriate security assistance and intelligence support includes the following:

(2) Lethal assistance such as anti-armor weapon systems, mortars, crew-served weapons and ammunition, grenade launchers and ammunition, and small arms and ammunition.

(6) Counter-electronic warfare capabilities such as secure communications equipment and other electronic protection systems.

(8) Training required to maintain and employ systems and capabilities described in paragraphs (1) through (7).

(9) Training for critical combat operations such as planning, command and control, small unit tactics, counter-artillery tactics, logistics, countering improvised explosive devices, battle-field first aid, and medical evacuation.

(1) TRAINING.—Up to 20 percent of the amount described in subsection (a) may be used to support training pursuant to section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note), relating to the Global Security Contingency Fund.

(2) LIMITATION.—Not more than 50 percent of the amount described in subsection (a) may be obligated or expended until an amount equal to 20 percent of such amount has been obligated or expended for appropriate security assistance described in subparagraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (b) for the Government of Ukraine.

(3) ALTERNATIVE OF FUNDS.—In the event funds otherwise available pursuant to subsection (a) are not used by reason of the limitation in paragraph (2), such funds may be used at the discretion of the Secretary of Defense, with concurrence of the Secretary of State, to provide security assistance and intelligence support, including training, equipment, logistics support, supplies and services to military and other national-level security forces of Partnership for Peace nations other than Ukraine that the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate to assist such governments in preserving their sovereignty and territorial integrity against Russian aggression.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to any assistance provided pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense is authorized, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to make available to the Government of Ukraine weapons and other defense articles, from the United States inventory and other sources, and defense services, in such quantity as the Secretary of Defense determines to be appropriate to achieve the purposes specified in subsection (a).

(2) REPLACEMENT.—Amounts for the replacement of any items provided to the Government of Ukraine pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be derived from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for overseas contingency operations for weapons procurement.

(e) Construction of authorization.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a specific statutory authorization for the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situations wherein hostilities are clearly indicated by the circumstances.

(f) Termination of authority.—Assistance may not be provided under the authority in this section after December 31, 2017.

(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, carry out a program (to be known as the “Eastern European Training Initiative”) to provide training, and pay the incremental expenses incurred by a country as the direct result of participation in such training, for the national military forces of the following:

(1) A country that is a signatory to the Partnership for Peace Framework Documents, but is not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

(2) A country that became a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization after January 1, 1999.

(b) Types of training.—The training provided to the national military forces of a country under subsection (a) shall be limited to multilateral or regional training—

(4) to increase capacity to respond to calls for collective action within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

(c) Required elements.—Training provided to the national military forces of a country under subsection (a) shall include elements that promote—

(1) ANNUAL FUNDING LIMITATION.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance, up to $28,000,000 may be used to provide training and pay incremental expenses under subsection (a) in that fiscal year.

(2) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ACTIVITIES ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.—Amounts available in a fiscal year to carry out the authority in subsection (a) may be used for training under that authority that begins in that fiscal year and ends in the next fiscal year.

(e) Briefing to Congress on use of authority.—Not later that 90 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the authority in subsection (a) is used, the Secretary shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the use of the authority during such fiscal year, including each country with which training under the authority was conducted and the types of training provided.

(f) Construction of authority.—The authority provided in subsection (a) is in addition to any other authority provided by law authorizing the provision of training for the national military forces of a foreign country, including section 2282 of title 10, United States Code.

(g) Incremental expenses defined.—In this section, the term “incremental expenses” means the reasonable and proper cost of the goods and services that are consumed by a country as a direct result of that country’s participation in training under the authority of this section, including rations, fuel, training ammunition, and transportation. Such term does not include pay, allowances, and other normal costs of a country’s personnel.

(h) Termination of authority.—The authority under this section shall terminate on September 30, 2018. Any activity under this section initiated before that date may be completed, but only using funds available for fiscal years 2016 through 2018.

SEC. 1253. Increased presence of United States ground forces in Eastern Europe to deter aggression on the border of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

(1) the increased presence of United States and allied ground forces in Eastern Europe since April 2014 has provided a level of reassurance to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members in the region and strengthened the capability of the Organization to respond to any potential Russian aggression against Organization members;

(2) at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Wales summit in September 2014 member countries agreed on a Readiness Action Plan which is intended to improve the ability of the Organization to respond quickly and effectively to security threats on the borders of the Organization, including in Eastern Europe, and the challenges posed by hybrid warfare;

(3) the capability of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to respond to threats on the eastern border of the Organization would be enhanced by a more sustained presence on the ground of Organization forces on the territories of Organization members in Eastern Europe; and

(4) an increased presence of United States ground forces in Eastern Europe should be matched by an increased force presence of European allies.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment of options for expanding the presence of United States ground forces of the size of a Brigade Combat Team in Eastern Europe to respond, along with European allies and partners, to the security challenges posed by Russia and increase the combat capability of forces able to respond to unconventional or hybrid warfare tactics such as those used by the Russian Federation in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.

(A) An evaluation of the optimal location or locations of the enhanced ground force presence described in paragraph (1) that considers such factors as—

(i) proximity, suitability, and availability of maneuver and gunnery training areas;

(iii) availability of facilities, including for potential equipment storage and prepositioning;

(v) a site or sites for prepositioning of equipment, a rotational presence or permanent presence of troops, or a combination of options; and

(B) A description of any initiatives by other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or other European allies and partners, for enhancing force presence on a permanent or rotational basis in Eastern Europe to match or exceed the potential increased presence of United States ground forces in the region.

SEC. 1254. Sense of Congress on European defense and North Atlantic Treaty Organization spending.

(1) North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries, at the 2014 North Atlantic Treaty Organization Summit in Wales, pledged to “reverse the trend of declining defense budgets, to make the most effective use of our funds and to further a more balanced sharing of costs and responsibilities”.

(2) Former Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel stated on May 2, 2014, that “[t]oday, America’s GDP is smaller than the combined GDPs of our 27 NATO allies. But America’s defense spending is three times our Allies’ combined defense spending. Over time, this lopsided burden threatens NATO’s integrity, cohesion, and capability, and ultimately both European and transatlantic security”.

(3) Former North Atlantic Treaty Organization Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen stated on July 3, 2014, that “[d]uring the last five years, Russia has increased defense spending by 50 percent, while NATO allies on average have decrease their defense spending by 20 percent. That is not sustainable, we need more investment in defense and security”.

(1) it is in the national security and fiscal interests of the United States that prompt efforts should be undertaken by North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies to meet defense budget commitments made in Declaration 14 of the Wales Summit Declaration of September 2014;

(2) the United States Government should continue efforts through the Department of Defense and other agencies to encourage North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies towards meeting the defense spending goals set out at the Wales Summit;

(3) some North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies have already taken positive steps to reverse declines in defense spending and should continue to be supported in those efforts; and

(4) thoughtful and coordinated defense investments by European allies in military capabilities would add deterrence value to the posture of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization against Russian aggression and terrorist organizations and more appropriately balance the share of Atlantic defense spending.

SEC. 1255. Additional matters in annual report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation.

(a) Additional matters.—Subsection (b) of section 1245 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended—

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) through (15) as paragraphs (6) through (17), respectively; and

“(4) An assessment of the force structure and capabilities of Russian military forces stationed in each of the Arctic, Kaliningrad, and Crimea, including a description of any changes to such force structure or capabilities during the one-year period ending on the date of such report and with a particular emphasis on the anti-access and area denial capabilities of such forces.

“(5) An assessment of Russian military strategy and objectives for the Arctic region.”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to reports submitted under section 1245 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 after that date.

SEC. 1256. Report on alternative capabilities to procure and sustain nonstandard rotary wing aircraft historically procured through Rosoboronexport.

(a) Report on assessment of alternative capabilities.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall, in consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth an assessment, obtained by the Under Secretary for purposes of the report, of the feasibility and advisability of using alternative industrial base capabilities to procure and sustain, with parts and service, nonstandard rotary wing aircraft historically acquired through Rosoboronexport, or nonstandard rotary wing aircraft that are in whole or in part reliant upon Rosoboronexport for continued sustainment, in order to benefit United States national security interests.

(b) Independent assessment.—The assessment obtained for purposes of subsection (a) shall be conducted by a federally funded research and development center (FFRDC), or another appropriate independent entity with expertise in the procurement and sustainment of complex weapon systems, selected by the Under Secretary for purposes of the assessment.

(1) An identification and assessment of international industrial base capabilities, other than Rosoboronexport, to provide one or more of the following:

(A) Means of procuring nonstandard rotary wing aircraft historically procured through Rosoboronexport.

(B) Reliable and timely supply of required and appropriate parts, spares, and consumables of such aircraft.

(D) Access to required reference data on such aircraft, including technical manuals and service bulletins.

(E) Credible certification of airworthiness of such aircraft through physical inspection, notwithstanding any current administrative requirements to the contrary.

(2) An assessment (including an assessment of associated costs and risks) of alterations to administrative processes of the United States Government that may be required to procure any of the capabilities specified in paragraph (1), including waivers to Department of Defense or Department of State requirements applicable to foreign military sales or alterations to procedures for approval of airworthiness certificates.

(3) An assessment of the potential economic impact to Rosoboronexport of procuring nonstandard rotary wing aircraft described in paragraph (1)(A) through entities other than Rosoboronexport.

(4) An assessment of the risks and benefits of using the entities identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) to procure aircraft described in that paragraph.

(d) Use of previous studies.—The entity conducting the assessment for purposes of subsection (a) may use and incorporate information from previous studies on matters appropriate to the assessment.

(e) Form of report.—The report under subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized, for the purpose of increasing maritime security and maritime domain awareness of foreign countries along the South China Sea—

(A) to provide assistance to national military or other security forces of such countries that have among their functional responsibilities maritime security missions; and

(B) to provide training to ministry, agency, and headquarters level organizations for such forces.

(2) DESIGNATION OF ASSISTANCE AND TRAINING.—The provision of assistance and training under this section may be referred to as the “South China Sea Initiative”.

(b) Recipient countries.—The foreign countries that may be provided assistance and training under subsection (a) are the following:

(1) AUTHORIZED ELEMENTS OF ASSISTANCE.—Assistance provided under subsection (a)(1)(A) may include the provision of equipment, supplies, training, and small-scale military construction.

(2) REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF ASSISTANCE AND TRAINING.—Assistance and training provided under subsection (a) shall include elements that promote the following:

(B) Respect for legitimate civilian authority within the country to which the assistance is provided.

(d) Priorities for assistance and training.—In developing programs for assistance or training to be provided under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall accord a priority to assistance, training, or both that will enhance the maritime capabilities of the recipient foreign country, or a regional organization of which the recipient country is a member, to respond to emerging threats to maritime security.

(e) Incremental expenses of personnel of certain other countries for training.—

(1) AUTHORITY FOR PAYMENT.—If the Secretary of Defense determines that the payment of incremental expenses in connection with training described in subsection (a)(1)(B) will facilitate the participation in such training of organization personnel of foreign countries specified in paragraph (2), the Secretary may use amounts available under subsection (f) for assistance and training under subsection (a) for the payment of such incremental expenses.

(2) COVERED COUNTRIES.—The foreign countries specified in this paragraph are the following:

(f) Funding.—Funds may be used to provide assistance and training under subsection (a) as follows:

(1) In fiscal year 2016, $50,000,000 from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for that fiscal year for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide.

(2) In fiscal year 2017, $75,000,000 from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for that fiscal year for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide.

(3) In each of fiscal years 2018 through 2020, $100,000,000 from amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for such fiscal year for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide.

(g) Notice to Congress on assistance and training.—Not later than 15 days before exercising the authority under subsection (a) or (e) with respect to a recipient foreign country, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notification containing the following:

(2) A detailed justification of the program for the provision of the assistance or training concerned, and its relationship to United States security interests.

(3) The budget for the program, including a timetable of planned expenditures of funds to implement the program, an implementation timeline for the program with milestones (including anticipated delivery schedules for any assistance under the program), the military department or component responsible for management of the program, and the anticipated completion date for the program.

(4) A description of the arrangements, if any, to support host nation sustainment of any capability developed pursuant to the program, and the source of funds to support sustainment efforts and performance outcomes to be achieved under the program beyond its completion date, if applicable.

(5) A description of the program objectives and an assessment framework to be used to develop capability and performance metrics associated with operational outcomes for the recipient force.

(h) Expiration.—The authority provided under this section may not be exercised after September 30, 2020.

SEC. 1262. Sense of Congress reaffirming the importance of implementing the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region.

(1) The United States has a longstanding national interest in maintaining security in the Asia-Pacific region.

(2) The Asia-Pacific region is home to the world’s three largest economies, four most populous countries, and five largest militaries. The Asia-Pacific's rapid economic growth and mounting security tensions require a renewed focus from the United States on the region to maintain security, expand prosperity, and support common values.

(3) In 2011, President Barack Obama announced that the United States would rebalance to the Asia-Pacific. Since then, there have been a number of actions taken to strengthen the United States posture and relationships in the region, including the negotiation of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement with the Philippines, the distributed laydown of the United States Marines Corps in the Pacific, the rotational stationing of the Littoral Combat Ship in Singapore, and a new comprehensive partnership with Vietnam on defense and security.

(4) Leaders in regional states remain concerned about a variety of regional military challenges. These include China’s military modernization and its increasingly assertive actions in the East and South China Sea and North Korea’s continued belligerence and its pursuit of nuclear and ballistic missile technology. United States allies and partners are looking to the United States to demonstrate its willingness and ability to maintain regional peace and security by fully implementing the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific.

(5) In April 2015, the Commander of the United States Pacific Command Admiral Samuel Locklear warned, “Our relative superiority I think has declined and continues to decline…we rely very heavily on power projection, which means we have to be able to get the forces forward…”. Admiral Locklear also noted, “Any significant force structure moves out of my AOR in the middle of a rebalance would have to be understood and have to be explained because it would counterintuitive to a rebalance to move significant forces in another direction.”

(1) in order to maintain the credibility of the United States rebalance, it is vital that the United States continue to shift forces to the Asia-Pacific region to strengthen the ability of the United States Armed Forces to project power to shape the choices of regional states and to deter, and if necessary defend, against hostile military actions;

(2) United States allies and partners in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as potential adversaries, would take note of any withdrawal of forces from the Asia-Pacific theater;

(3) any withdrawal of United States forces from Outside the Continental United States (“OCONUS”) Asia-Pacific region or from United States Pacific Command would therefore seriously undermine the rebalance; and

(4) in order to properly implement United States rebalance policy, United States forces under the operational control of the United States Pacific Command should be increased consistent with commitments already made by the Department of Defense and aligned with the requirement to maintain a balance of military power that favors the United States and United States allies in the Asia-Pacific region.

SEC. 1263. Sense of Senate on Taiwan asymmetric military capabilities and bilateral training activities.

(1) the United States, in accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8), should continue to make available to Taiwan such defense articles and services as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense;

(2) the United States should continue to support the efforts of Taiwan to integrate innovative and asymmetric measures to balance the growing military capabilities of the People's Republic of China, including fast-attack craft, coastal-defense cruise missiles, rapid-runway repair systems, offensive mines, and submarines optimized for defense of the Taiwan straits;

(3) the military forces of Taiwan should be permitted to participate in bilateral training activities hosted by the United States that increase credible deterrent capabilities of Taiwan, particularly those that emphasize the defense of Taiwan Island from missile attack, maritime blockade, and amphibious invasion by the People's Republic of China;

(4) toward that goal, Taiwan should be encouraged to participate in exercises that include realistic air-to-air combat training, including the exercise conducted at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, and Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, commonly referred to as “Red Flag”; and

(5) Taiwan should also be encouraged to participate in advanced bilateral training for its ground forces, Apache attack helicopters, and P–3C surveillance aircraft in island-defense scenarios.

SEC. 1271. Item in quarterly reports on assistance to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant on forces ineligible to receive assistance due to a gross violation of human rights.

(a) Item in reports.—Section 1236(d) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph

“(11) A list of the forces or elements of forces restricted from receiving assistance under subsection (a), unless waived pursuant to subsection (j), as a result of vetting required by subsection (e) or section 2249e of title 10, United States Code, and a detailed description of the reasons for such restriction, including for each force or element—

“(A) information relating to gross violation of human rights by such force or element (including the timeframe of the alleged violation);

“(B) the source of the information described in subparagraph (A), and an assessment of the veracity of the information;

“(C) the association of such force or element with terrorist groups or groups associated with the Government of Iran; and

“(D) the amount and type of any assistance provided such force or element by the Government of Iran.”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to reports submitted pursuant to section 1236(d) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 after that date.

SEC. 1272. Report on bilateral agreement with Israel on joint activities to establish an anti-tunneling defense system.

(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the feasibility and advisability of the entry by the United States and Israel into a bilateral agreement through which the governments of the two countries carry out research, development, and test activities on a joint basis to establish an anti-tunneling defense system to detect, map, and neutralize underground tunnels into and directed at the territory of Israel.

(b) Appropriate committee of Congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—

(1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

SEC. 1273. Sense of Senate and report on Qatar fighter aircraft capability contribution to regional security.

(1) the United States should consider, in a timely manner, opportunities to enhance the strike capability of fighter aircraft of the Qatar air force that would contribute to Qatar’s self-defense and deter Iran's regional ambitions and simultaneously preserve the qualitative military edge of Israel; and

(2) Qatar should be afforded the opportunity through acquisition of appropriate technologies and exercises with the United States Armed Forces and the armed forces of partner nations to develop improved self-defense and counter force aviation capabilities that advanced fighter aircraft would provide.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 31, 2016, the Secretary of Defense, shall, in consultation with the Secretary of State, submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the risks and benefits under consideration as they relate to capabilities described in subsection (a).

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) A description of the key assumptions regarding the increase to Qatar air force capabilities as a result of potential pending transfer of technologies and weapons systems.

(B) A description of the key assumptions regarding items described in subparagraph (A) as they impact considerations regarding preservation of Israel’s qualitative military edge.

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) may be submitted in classified or unclassified form.

SEC. 1282. Two-year extension and modification of authorization for non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities.

(a) Extension.—Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4579), as most recently amended by section 1261(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), is further amended by striking “2016” and inserting “2018”.

(b) Source of funds.—Subsection (a) of such section 943, as amended by section 1205(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1623), is further amended by striking “for ‘Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide’” and inserting “for the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance”.

(1) by striking “(b) Procedures.—The Secretary” and inserting the following:

“(2) PROGRAMMATIC AND POLICY OVERSIGHT.—The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict shall have primary programmatic and policy oversight of non-conventional assisted recovery activities authorized by this section.”.

(a) Fiscal year 2016 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds defined.—As used in this title, the term “fiscal year 2016 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds” means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711).

(b) Availability of funds.—Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in section 4301 for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2016, 2017, and 2018.

(7) For activities designated as Other Assessments/Administrative Costs, $29,320,000.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.

(b) Use.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—

(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and

(2) the destruction of chemical warfare materiel of the United States that is not covered by section 1412 of such Act.

SEC. 1411. Authority for transfer of funds to joint Department of Defense-Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund for Captain James A. Lovell Health Care Center, Illinois.

(a) Authority for transfer of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 1406 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $120,400,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.

(b) Use of transferred funds.—For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).

SEC. 1413. Inspections of the Armed Forces Retirement Home by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense.

(a) Inspections.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 1518 of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 418) is amended by striking “a comprehensive inspection of all aspects of each facility of the Retirement Home” and all that follows and inserting “an inspection of the Retirement Home. The Inspector General shall determine the scope of each such inspection using a risk-based analysis of the operations of the Retirement Home.”.

(b) Reports.—Subsection (c)(1) of such section is amended in the second sentence by striking “Not later than 90 days after completing the inspection of the facility, the Inspector General” and inserting “The Inspector General”.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.

(b) Duration of availability.—Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) shall remain available for obligation through September 30, 2017.

(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2016 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.

(2) LIMITATION.—The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $4,000,000,000.

(b) Terms and conditions.—Transfers under this section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as transfers under section 1001.

(c) Additional authority.—The transfer authority provided by this section is in addition to the transfer authority provided under section 1001.

(a) Continuation of prior authorities and notice and reporting requirements.—Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2016 shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (g) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424).

(b) Extension of authority To accept certain equipment.—Section 1532(b)(1) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended by striking “this Act” and inserting “Acts enacted before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016.”.

(a) Use and transfer of funds.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 1514 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2439), as in effect before the amendments made by section 1503 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4649), shall apply to the funds made available to the Department of Defense for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund for fiscal year 2016.

(b) Extension of interdiction of improvised explosive device precursor chemicals authority.—Section 1532(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2057) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by inserting “and for fiscal year 2016,” after “fiscal year 2013,”; and

(2) in paragraph (4), as most recently amended by section 1533(c) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291), by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”.

(c) Limitation on use of funds for certain assignments of personnel.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization may be used for the purposes of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization assigning personnel or contractors on a permanent or temporary basis, or as a detail, to the combatant commands or associated military components, or the combat support agencies, unless such personnel or contractors are supporting—

(3) another operation that, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, requires the direct support of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization.

(d) Notice to Congress.—If after the date of the enactment of this Act the Secretary of Defense makes a determination described in subsection (c)(3) that an operation requires the direct support of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notice of the determination and the reasons for the determination.

(e) Limitation on implementation of JIEDDO as combat support agency.—Relating to the determination by the Deputy Secretary of Defense on March 11, 2015, to make the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization a combat support agency, the Secretary of Defense is prohibited from implementing such determination until 90 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following

(1) A detailed plan for the disposition of the Organization as a combat support agency, including the enduring requirements and key functions of the Organization, the chain of command for the Organization, and funding for the Organization as such an agency.

(2) A statement of potential alternative means to achieving the objective of designating the Organization as a combat support agency, including the assumption of one or more functions of the Organization by one or more other components or elements of the Department of Defense, and an assessment of the feasibility and advisability of each such alternative.

SEC. 1533. Availability of Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund funds for training of foreign security forces to defeat improvised explosive devices.

(a) Availability of funds.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund, up to $30,000,000 may be available to provide training to foreign security forces in defeating improvised explosive devices under authority provided the Department of Defense under any other provision of law.

(b) Construction of availability of funds.—The availability of funds under subsection (a) shall not be construed as authority in and of itself for the provision of training as described in that subsection.

(1) in locations in which the Department of Defense is conducting a named operation; or

(2) in geographic areas in which the Secretary of Defense has determined that a foreign security force is facing a significant threat from improvised explosive devices.

(d) Coordination with geographic combatant commands.—The Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, coordinate the provision of training using funds available under subsection (a) with requests received from the commanders of the geographic combatant commands.

(e) Expiration.—The authority to use funds described in subsection (a) in accordance with this section shall expire on December 31, 2018.

(a) In general.—The President shall establish an interagency process to provide for the development of a policy to deter adversaries in space—

(A) reducing risks to the United States and allies of the United States in space; and

(B) protecting and preserving the rights, access, capabilities, use, and freedom of action of the United States in space and the right of the United States to respond to an attack in space and, if necessary, deny adversaries the use of space capabilities hostile to the national interests of the United States; and

(2) that integrates the interests and responsibilities of the agencies participating in the process.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report setting forth the policy developed pursuant to subsection (a).

(2) FUNDING RESTRICTION.—If the President has not submitted the policy developed under subsection (a) and the answers to Enclosure 1, regarding offensive space control policy, of the classified annex to this Act, to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives by the date required by paragraph (1), an amount equal to $10,000,000 of the amount authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2016 to provide support services to the Executive Office of the President shall be withheld from obligation or expenditure until the policy and such answers are submitted to such Committees.

(3) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

(a) In general.—Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall designate an individual to serve as the Principal Space Control Advisor, who shall act as the principal advisor to the Secretary on space control activities.

“(b) Responsibilities.—The Principal Space Control Advisor shall be responsible for the following:

“(1) Supervision of space control activities related to the development, procurement, and employment of, and strategy relating to, space control capabilities.

“(2) Oversight of policy, resources, personnel, and acquisition and technology relating to space control activities.

“(c) Cross-functional team.—The Principal Space Control Advisor shall integrate the space control expertise and perspectives of appropriate organizational entities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the military departments, the Defense Agencies, and the combatant commands, by establishing and maintaining a full-time, cross-functional team of subject-matter experts from those entities.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2799 the following new item:

SEC. 1603. Exception to the prohibition on contracting with Russian suppliers of rocket engines for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program.

(1) in subsection (a), by striking “subsections (b) and (c)” and inserting “subsections (b), (c), and (d)”; and

“(1) IN GENERAL.—For not more than 9 competitive opportunities described in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense may award a contract—

“(A) requiring the use of a rocket engine designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation that is eligible for a waiver under subsection (b) or an exception under subsection (c); or

“(B) if a rocket engine described in subparagraph (A) is not available, requiring the use of a rocket engine designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation that is not eligible for such a waiver or exception.

“(2) COMPETITIVE OPPORTUNITIES DESCRIBED.—A competitive opportunity described in this paragraph is—

“(A) an opportunity to compete for a contract for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities under the evolved expendable launch vehicle program; and

“(B) one of the 9 Phase 1A competitive opportunities for fiscal years 2015 through 2017, as specified in the budget justification materials submitted to Congress in support of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2016 (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code).”.

SEC. 1604. Elimination of launch capabilities contracts under evolved expendable launch vehicle program.

(a) In general.—Except as provided by subsections (b) and (c), on and after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense may not award or renew a contract, or maintain a separate contract line item, for the procurement of property or services for space launch capabilities under the evolved expendable launch vehicle program.

(b) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) and award or renew a contract or maintain a separate contract line item for the procurement of property or services for space launch capabilities if the Secretary of Defense determines, and reports to the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days before the waiver takes effect, that—

(1) awarding or renewing such a contract or maintaining such a contract line item is necessary for the national security interests of the United States and the contract or contract line item does not support space launch activities using rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation; and

(2) failing to award or renew such a contract or maintain such a contract line item will have significant consequences to national security and will result in the significant loss of life or property or economic harm.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply to the placement of orders or the exercise of options under the contract numbered FA8811–13–C–0003 and awarded on December 18, 2013.

(2) TERMINATION.—The exception under paragraph (1) shall terminate on September 30, 2019.

(d) Space launch capabilities defined.—In this section, the term “space launch capabilities” includes all work associated with space launch infrastructure maintenance and sustainment, program management, systems engineering, launch site operations, launch site depreciation, and maintenance commodities.

(a) In general.—The amount requested in the budget of the President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2017, 2018, or 2019 for the Air Force for the launch of Air Force satellites under the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability program shall bear the same ratio to the total amount requested in that budget for that fiscal year for the launch of national security satellites under the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch capability program as the amount requested in that budget for that fiscal year for the procurement of cores for the Air Force for the launch of Air Force satellites under the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch services program bears to the total amount requested in that budget for that fiscal year for the procurement of cores for the launch of national security satellites under the evolved expendable launch vehicle launch services program.

(b) National security satellite defined.—In this section, the term “national security satellite” is a satellite launched for national security purposes, including such a satellite launched by the Air Force, the Navy, or the National Reconnaissance Office, or any other element of the Department of Defense.

SEC. 1606. Inclusion of plan for development and fielding of a full-up engine in rocket propulsion system development program.

SEC. 1607. Limitations on availability of funds for the Defense Meteorological Satellite program.

(a) In general.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Defense Meteorological Satellite program (PE# 0305160F and line number MS0554) or for the launch of Defense Meteorological Satellite program satellite #20 (in this section referred to as “DMSP20”), and none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2015 for that program or the launch of DMSP20 that remain available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act, may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff jointly certify to the congressional defense committees that—

(1) relying on civil and international contributions to meet space-based environmental monitoring requirements is insufficient or is a risk to national security and launching DMSP20 will meet those requirements;

(2) launching DMSP20 is the most affordable solution to meeting requirements validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council; and

(3) nonmaterial solutions within the Department of Defense, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration are incapable of meeting the cloud characterization and theater weather requirements validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council.

(b) Comparative cost and capability assessment.—If the Secretary and the Chairman determine that a material solution is required to meet the cloud characterization and theater weather requirements validated by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, the Secretary and the Chairman shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a cost and capability assessment that compares the cost of meeting those requirements with DMSP20 and with an alternate material solution that includes electro-optical infrared weather imaging or other comparable solutions.

SEC. 1608. Quarterly reports on Global Positioning System III space segment, Global Positioning System operational control segment, and Military Global Positioning System user equipment acquisition programs.

(a) Reports required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the Comptroller General of the United States a report on the Global Positioning System III space segment, the Global Positioning System operational control segment, and the Military Global Positioning System user equipment acquisition programs.

(b) Elements.—Each report required by subsection (a) shall include, with respect to an acquisition program specified in that subsection, the following:

(1) A statement of the status of the program with respect to cost, schedule, and performance.

(3) A description of any technical risks impacting the cost, schedule, and performance of the program.

(4) An assessment of how such risks are to be addressed and the costs associated with such risks.

(5) An assessment of the extent to which the segments of the program are synchronized.

(c) Briefings by Comptroller General.—The Comptroller General shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on a report submitted under subsection (a)—

(1) in the case of the first such report, not later than 30 days after receiving that report; and

(d) Termination.—The requirement under subsection (a) shall terminate with respect to an acquisition program specified in that subsection on the date on which that program reaches full operational capability.

SEC. 1609. Plan for consolidation of acquisition of commercial satellite communications services.

(a) In general.—Not later than January 31, 2016, the Department of Defense Executive Agent for Space shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for the consolidation, during the three-year period beginning on the date on which the plan is submitted, of the acquisition of commercial satellite communications services from across the Department of Defense into a program office in the Space and Missile Systems Center of the Air Force.

(A) an assessment of the management and overhead costs relating to the acquisition of commercial satellite communications services across the Department of Defense; and

(i) the costs of implementing the consolidation of the acquisition of such services described in subsection (a); and

(2) VALIDATION BY DIRECTOR OF COST ASSESSMENT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION.—The assessment required by paragraph (1)(A) and the estimates required by paragraph (1)(B) shall be validated by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.

SEC. 1610. Council on Oversight of the Department of Defense Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Enterprise.

(a) In general.—Chapter 135 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1602, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 2279b. Council on Oversight of the Department of Defense Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Enterprise

“(a) Establishment.—There is within the Department of Defense a council to be known as the ‘Council on Oversight of the Department of Defense Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Enterprise’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Council’).

“(2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics.

“(9) Such other officers of the Department of Defense as the Secretary may designate.

“(c) Co-chair.—The Council shall be co-chaired by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“(d) Responsibilities.— (1) The Council shall be responsible for oversight of the Department of Defense positioning, navigation, and timing enterprise, including positioning, navigation, and timing services provided to civil, commercial, scientific, and international users.

“(2) In carrying out the responsibility for oversight of the Department of Defense positioning, navigation, and timing enterprise as specified in paragraph (1), the Council shall be responsible for the following:

“(E) Such other responsibilities as the Secretary of Defense shall specify for purposes of this section.

“(e) Annual reports.—At the same time each year that the budget of the President is submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the activities of the Council. Each report shall include the following:

“(1) A description and assessment of the activities of the Council during the previous fiscal year.

“(2) A description of the activities proposed to be undertaken by the Council during the period covered by the current future-years defense program under section 221 of this title.

“(3) Any changes to the requirements of the Department of Defense positioning, navigation, and timing enterprise made during the previous year, along with an explanation for why the changes were made and a description of the effects of the changes to the capability of such enterprise.

“(4) A breakdown of each program element in such budget that relates to the Department of Defense positioning, navigation, and timing enterprise, including how such program element relates to the operation and sustainment, research and development, procurement, or other activity of such enterprise.

“(f) Budget and funding matters.— (1) Not later than 30 days after the President submits to Congress the budget for a fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff an assessment of—

“(A) whether such budget allows the Federal Government to meet the required capabilities of the Department of Defense positioning, navigation, and timing enterprise during the fiscal year covered by the budget and the four subsequent fiscal years; and

“(B) if the Commander determines that such budget does not allow the Federal Government to meet such required capabilities, a description of the steps being taken to meet such required capabilities.

“(2) Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff receives the assessment of the Commander of the United States Strategic Command under paragraph (1), the Chairman shall submit to the congressional defense committees—

“(3) If a House of Congress adopts a bill authorizing or appropriating funds for the activities of the Department of Defense positioning, navigation, and timing enterprise that, as determined by the Council, provides insufficient funds for such activities for the period covered by such bill, the Council shall notify the congressional defense committees of the determination.

“(g) Notification of anomalies.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees written notification of an anomaly in the Department of Defense positioning, navigation, and timing enterprise that is reported to the Secretary or the Council by not later than 14 days after the date on which the Secretary or the Council learns of such anomaly, as the case may be.

“(2) In this subsection, the term ‘anomaly’ means any unplanned, irregular, or abnormal event, whether unexplained or caused intentionally or unintentionally by a person or a system.

“(h) Termination.—The Council shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter, as amended by section 1602, is further amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2799a the following new item:

(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an analysis of alternatives for a follow-on wide-band communications system to the Wideband Global SATCOM System that includes space, air, and ground layer communications capabilities of the Department of Defense.

(b) Report required.—Not later than March 31, 2017, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the analysis conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 1612. Expansion of goals for pilot program for acquisition of commercial satellite communication services.

(2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and

“(5) demonstrates the potential to achieve order-of-magnitude improvements in satellite communications capability.”.

(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that eliminating duplicative requirements and approvals for commercial launch and reentry operations will promote and encourage the development of the commercial space sector.

(b) Reaffirmation of policy.—Congress reaffirms that the Secretary of Transportation, in overseeing and coordinating commercial launch and reentry operations, should—

(2) facilitate Government, State, and private sector involvement in enhancing United States launch sites and facilities;

(3) protect public health and safety, safety of property, national security interests, and foreign policy interests of the United States; and

(4) consult with the head of another executive agency, including the Secretary of Defense or the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as necessary to provide consistent application of licensing requirements under chapter 509 of title 51, United States Code.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Transportation under section 50918 of title 51, United States Code, and subject to section 50905(b)(2)(C) of that title, shall consult with the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the heads of other executive agencies, as appropriate—

(A) to identify all requirements that are imposed to protect the public health and safety, safety of property, national security interests, and foreign policy interests of the United States relevant to any commercial launch of a launch vehicle or commercial reentry of a reentry vehicle; and

(B) to evaluate the requirements identified in subparagraph (A) and, in coordination with the licensee or transferee and the heads of the relevant executive agencies—

(i) determine whether the satisfaction of a requirement of one agency could result in the satisfaction of a requirement of another agency; and

(ii) resolve any inconsistencies and remove any outmoded or duplicative requirements or approvals of the Federal Government relevant to any commercial launch of a launch vehicle or commercial reentry of a reentry vehicle.

(2) REPORTS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until the Secretary of Transportation determines no outmoded or duplicative requirements or approvals of the Federal Government exist, the Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the commercial space sector, and the heads of other executive agencies, as appropriate, shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, and the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:

(A) A description of the process for the application for and approval of a permit or license under chapter 509 of title 51, United States Code, for the commercial launch of a launch vehicle or commercial reentry of a reentry vehicle, including the identification of—

(i) any unique requirements for operating on a United States Government launch site, reentry site, or launch property; and

(B) A description of current efforts, if any, to coordinate and work across executive agencies to define interagency processes and procedures for sharing information, avoiding duplication of effort, and resolving common agency requirements.

(i) streamline requirements in order to improve efficiency, reduce unnecessary costs, resolve inconsistencies, remove duplication, and minimize unwarranted constraints; and

(ii) consolidate or modify requirements across affected agencies into a single application set that satisfies the requirements identified in paragraph (1)(A).

(A) any applicable definitions set forth in section 50902 of title 51, United States Code, shall apply;

(B) the terms “launch”, “reenter”, and “reentry” include landing of a launch vehicle or reentry vehicle; and

(C) the terms “United States Government launch site” and “United States Government reentry site” include any necessary facility, at that location, that is commercially operated on United States Government property.

(a) In general.—Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“The Secretary of Defense shall develop, prepare, coordinate, and, when authorized by the President to do so, conduct a military cyber operation in response to malicious cyber activity carried out against the United States or a United States person by a foreign power (as defined in section 101 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801)).”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 1622. Designation of Department of Defense entity responsible for acquisition of critical cyber capabilities.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, for each critical cyber capability described in paragraph (2), designate an entity of the Department of Defense to be responsible for the acquisition of the critical cyber capability.

(2) CRITICAL CYBER CAPABILITIES DESCRIBED.—The critical cyber capabilities described in this paragraph are all of the cyber capabilities that the Secretary considers critical to the mission of the Department of Defense, including the following:

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the designations made under subsection (a).

(2) CONTENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(B) Estimates of the funding requirements and acquisition timelines for each critical cyber capability for which a designation was made under subsection (a).

(C) An explanation of whether critical cyber capabilities could be acquired more quickly with changes to acquisition authorities.

(D) Such recommendations as the Secretary may have for legislation or administrative action to improve the acquisition of, or acquire more quickly, the critical cyber capabilities for which designations are made under subsection (a).

SEC. 1623. Incentive for submittal to Congress by President of integrated policy to deter adversaries in cyberspace.

SEC. 1624. Authorization for procurement of relocatable Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility.

SEC. 1625. Evaluation of cyber vulnerabilities of major weapon systems of the Department of Defense.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall complete an evaluation of the cyber vulnerabilities of each major weapon system of the Department of Defense by not later than December 31, 2019.

(2) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary may waive the requirement of paragraph (1) with respect to a weapon system or complete the evaluation of a weapon system required by such paragraph after the date specified in such paragraph if the Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees before that date that all known cyber vulnerabilities in the weapon system have minimal consequences for the capability of the weapon system to meet operational requirements or otherwise satisfy mission requirements.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the plan of the Secretary for the evaluations of major weapon systems required by subsection (a), including an identification of each of the weapon systems to be evaluated and an estimate of the funding required to conduct the evaluations.

(2) PRIORITY IN EVALUATIONS.—The plan under paragraph (1) shall accord a priority among evaluations based on the criticality of major weapon systems, as determined by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff based on an assessment of employment of forces and threats.

(3) INTEGRATION WITH OTHER EFFORTS.—The plan under paragraph (1) shall build upon existing efforts regarding the identification and mitigation of cyber vulnerabilities of major weapon systems, and shall not duplicate similar ongoing efforts such as “Task Force Cyber Awakening” of the Navy or “Task Force Cyber Secure” of the Air Force.

(c) Status on progress.—On a regular basis, the Secretary shall inform the congressional defense committees of the activities undertaken in the evaluation of major weapon systems under this section.

(d) Risk mitigation strategies.—As part of the evaluation of cyber vulnerabilities of major weapon systems of the Department under this section, the Secretary shall develop strategies for mitigating the risks of cyber vulnerabilities identified in the course of such evaluations.

(e) Authorization of appropriations.—Of amounts appropriated or otherwise made available under section 201, $200,000,000 shall be available to the Secretary to conduct the evaluations required by subsection (a)(1).

SEC. 1626. Assessment of capabilities of United States Cyber Command to defend the United States from cyber attacks.

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Principal Cyber Advisor, with the assistance of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall sponsor an independent panel to assess the ability of the National Mission Forces of the United States Cyber Command to reliably prevent or block large-scale attacks on the United States by foreign powers with capabilities comparable to the capabilities of China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia expected in the years 2020 and 2025.

(2) INDEPENDENT EXPERTS.—The panel sponsored under paragraph (1) shall include—

(A) independent experts in cyber warfare technology, intelligence, and operations; and

(b) War games.—The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in consultation with the Principal Cyber Advisor, shall conduct a series of war games through the Warfighting Analysis Division of the Force Structure, Resources, and Assessment Directorate to assess the strategy, assumptions, and capabilities of the United States Cyber Command to prevent large-scale cyber attacks by foreign powers with capabilities described in subsection (a)(1) from reaching United States targets.

(1) the Principal Cyber Advisor shall convey to the congressional defense committees the findings of the Principal Cyber Advisor with respect to the assessment conducted by the panel sponsored under subsection (a)(1); and

(2) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall convey to the congressional defense committees the findings of the Chairman with respect to the war games conducted under subsection (b)(1).

(d) Foreign power defined.—In this section, the term “foreign power” has the meaning given the term in section 101 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801).

SEC. 1627. Biennial exercises on responding to cyber attacks against critical infrastructure.

(a) Biennial exercises required.—Not less frequently than once every two years until the date that is six years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the heads of the critical infrastructure sector-specific agencies designated under Presidential Policy Directive–21 (entitled “Critical Infrastructure Security Resilience” and dated February 12, 2013) and in consultation with governors of the States and the owners and operators of critical infrastructure, organize and execute one or more exercises based on scenarios in which—

(1) critical infrastructure of the United States is attacked through cyberspace; and

(B) provide support to civil authorities in responding to and recovering from cyber attacks.

(b) Purposes.—The purposes of the exercises required by subsection (a) are as follows:

(1) To improve cooperation and coordination between various parts of the Government and industry so that the Government and industry can more effectively and efficiently respond to cyber attacks.

(2) To exercise command and control, coordination, communications, and information sharing capabilities under the stressing conditions of an ongoing cyber attack.

(3) To identify gaps and problems that require new enhanced training, capabilities, procedures, or authorities.

(c) Requirement for variation of assumptions and conditions.—In conducting the exercises required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall ensure that there is an appropriate degree of variation from exercise to exercise of the following:

(2) The degree of warning and knowledge that is available to the Department of Defense about the attack and the means used in the attack and the degree of delegation of authority from the President to react, including with pre-planned responses.

(3) The effectiveness of the National Mission Force of the United States Cyber Command in preempting and defeating the attack.

(4) The effectiveness of the attacks on critical infrastructure in general and particularly in specific industry sectors.

(d) Cost sharing agreements.—The Secretary shall coordinate with those with whom the Secretary is required to coordinate under subsection (a) to develop equitable cost sharing agreements to defray the expenses of the exercises required by subsection (a).

SEC. 1631. Designation of Air Force officials to be responsible for policy on and procurement of nuclear command, control, and communications systems.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 24 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 499. Designation of Air Force officials to be responsible for policy on and procurement of nuclear command, control, and communications systems

“(a) Procurement.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall designate a senior acquisition official of the Air Force to be responsible for ensuring the procurement and integration of the nuclear command, control, and communication systems of the Air Force.

“(b) Policy.—The Secretary shall designate an official of the Air Force to be responsible for—

“(1) formulating an integrated policy for the nuclear command, control, and communications systems of the Air Force that includes long-term requirements to satisfy the requirements of the Department of Defense for nuclear command, control, and communications; and

“(2) ensuring that such policy is integrated across all Air Force systems using nuclear command, control, and communications systems.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 24 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 498 the following new item:

(1) designate the officials required by section 499 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act; and

SEC. 1632. Comptroller General of the United States review of recommendations relating to the nuclear security enterprise.

(a) In general.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall, in each of fiscal years 2016 through 2021, conduct a review of the process of the Department of Defense for addressing the recommendations of the Department of Defense Internal Nuclear Enterprise Review, the Independent Review of the Department of Defense Nuclear Enterprise, and the Nuclear Deterrence Enterprise Review Group, that are evaluated by the Office of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation of the Department of Defense.

(b) Briefing and report.—After conducting each review under subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall—

(1) provide to the congressional defense committees an initial briefing on the review; and

(2) after providing the briefing under paragraph (1), submit to those committees a written report on the review and such other topics as the committees request during the briefing.

(1) Nuclear competition among countries has become both different and in some ways more complex than was the case during the Cold War.

(2) During the 25 years preceding the date of the enactment of this Act, additional countries have obtained nuclear weapons. North Korea is a nuclear-armed country and Iran aspires to acquire a nuclear weapons capability.

(3) A regional nuclear competition has emerged in South Asia between India and Pakistan. Another such competition may emerge in the Middle East between Iran and Israel, triggering a nuclear proliferation cascade across the Middle East, involving Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and perhaps other countries as well.

(4) The proliferation of nuclear weapons to countries the cultures of which are quite different from that of the United States raises concerns regarding how leaders in those countries calculate cost, benefit, and risk with respect to decisions regarding the use of nuclear weapons.

(b) Assessment required.—The Director of Net Assessment of the Department of Defense shall, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, conduct an assessment of the global environment with respect to nuclear weapons and the role of United States nuclear forces, policy, and strategy in that environment.

(c) Objectives.—The objectives of the assessment required by subsection (b) are to inform the long-term planning of the Department of Defense and policies relating to regional nuclear crises and operations that may involve the escalation of nuclear competition among countries.

(1) IN GENERAL.—In conducting the assessment required by subsection (b), the Director shall develop and analyze a range of contingencies and scenarios, including crises that may emerge from nuclear competition during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act that involve the following:

(E) Regional and cross-regional geography, including contingencies and scenarios in Europe, the Middle East, South Asia, and East Asia, and contingencies and scenarios that transcend regions.

(F) The long-term geopolitical and military-technical competition as it relates to nuclear weapons and strategic warfare.

(2) ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVE DISCONTINUITIES.—In analyzing the long-term geopolitical and military-technical competition as it relates to nuclear weapons and strategic warfare under paragraph (1)(F), the Director shall identify—

(B) strategies and capabilities the United States could adopt to improve its competitive position following such discontinuities.

(e) Staffing.—In conducting the assessment required by subsection (b), the Director shall engage the best talent available, with particular emphasis on engaging individuals and independent entities with demonstrated expertise in strategy and net assessment methodology.

(f) Report required.—Not later than November 15, 2016, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment required by subsection (b).

SEC. 1635. Availability of Air Force procurement funds for certain commercial off-the-shelf parts for intercontinental ballistic missile fuzes.

(a) Availability of procurement funds.—Notwithstanding section 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 by section 101 and available for Missile Procurement, Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4101, $13,700,000 shall be available for the procurement of covered parts pursuant to contracts entered into under section 1645 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3651).

(b) Covered parts defined.—In this section, the term “covered parts” has the meaning given that term in section 1645(c) of such Act.

(1) the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems plays a critical role in ensuring the national security of the United States; and

(2) retaining all three legs of the nuclear triad is among the highest priorities of the Department of Defense and will best maintain strategic stability at a reasonable cost, while hedging against potential technical problems and vulnerabilities.

(1) to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace the triad of strategic nuclear delivery systems consisting of—

(A) heavy bombers equipped with nuclear gravity bombs and air-launched nuclear cruise missiles;

(B) land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles equipped with nuclear warheads that are capable of carrying multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles; and

(2) to operate, sustain, and modernize or replace a capability to forward-deploy nuclear weapons and dual-capable fighter-bomber aircraft;

(3) to deter potential adversaries and assure allies and partners of the United States through strong and long-term commitment to the nuclear deterrent of the United States and the personnel, systems, and infrastructure that comprise such deterrent;

(4) to ensure that the members of the Armed Forces who operate the nuclear deterrent of the United States have the training, resources, and national support required to execute the critical national security mission of the members; and

(5) to achieve a modern and responsive nuclear infrastructure to support the full spectrum of deterrence requirements.

SEC. 1641. Plan for expediting deployment time of continental United States interceptor site.

(a) In general.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense completes preparation of an environmental impact statement pursuant to section 227(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), the Secretary of Defense shall—

(1) develop a plan for expediting the deployment time for a potential future continental United States interceptor site by at least two years, in the case that the President decides to proceed with such deployment; and

(b) Report elements.—The report submitted under subsection (a)(2) shall include the following:

(1) A description of the plan, including estimates of the cost of carrying out the plan and a schedule for carrying out the plan.

(2) A description of such legislative or administrative action as may be necessary to carry out the plan.

(3) An assessment of the risks associated with decreasing the deployment time, including with respect to cost and the operational effectiveness and reliability of interceptors.

(4) Identification of any deviation in the plan from robust acquisition processes, including with respect to testing prior to full operational capability designation.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary submits a report under subsection (a)(2), the Comptroller General shall—

(B) submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review conducted pursuant to subparagraph (A).

(2) REPORT ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1)(B) shall include the following:

(A) The findings of the Comptroller General with respect to the review conducted pursuant to paragraph (1)(A); and

(B) such recommendations as the Comptroller General may have for legislative or administrative action.

SEC. 1642. Additional missile defense sensor coverage for the protection of the United States homeland.

(1) According to the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, there are two fundamental means for improving homeland missile defense capability and capacity, “one, is the reliability of the interceptor, and two, is the discrimination capability of the system”.

(2) The Department of Defense will deploy a new midcourse tracking radar to provide persistent coverage and improve discrimination capabilities against threats to the United States homeland from the Pacific region.

(3) According to the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, a long-range discrimination radar will provide larger hit assessment coverage thereby enabling improved warfighting capabilities to manage ground-based interceptor (GBI) inventory and improve the capacity of the ballistic missile defense system.

(4) According to the Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, “while Iran has not yet deployed an intercontinental ballistic missile, its progress on space launch vehicles—along with its desire to deter the United States and its allies— provides Tehran with the means and motivation to develop longer-range missiles, including an ICBM. Iran publically stated that it intends to launch a space-launch vehicle as early as this year capable of intercontinental ranges, if configured as such”.

(1) the currently deployed ground-based midcourse defense system protects the entire United States homeland, including the East Coast, against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack from North Korea and Iran; and

(2) additional missile defense sensor discrimination capabilities are needed to enhance the protection of the United States homeland against potential long-range ballistic missiles from Iran that, according to the Department of Defense, could soon be obtained by Iran as a result of its active space launch program.

(c) Deployment of additional coverage.—The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall, in cooperation with the relevant combatant command, deploy by not later than December 31, 2020, a long-range discrimination radar or other appropriate tracking and discrimination sensor capabilities in a location optimized to support the defense of the homeland of the United States from emerging long-range ballistic missile threats from Iran.

SEC. 1643. Air defense capability at North Atlantic Treaty Organization missile defense sites.

(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the relevant combatant command, should ensure that arrangements are in place, including support from other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), to provide anti-air defense capability at all missile defense sites of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in support of phases 2 and 3 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach.

(b) Reports.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing—

(1) the plan to provide anti-air defense capability as described in subsection (a); and

(2) the contributions being made by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and members of such organization to support the provision of the capability described in such subsection.

SEC. 1644. Availability of funds for Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system.

(a) Availability of funds.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for Procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $41,400,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system, including for co-production of Iron Dome parts and components in the United States by industry of the United States.

(1) AGREEMENT.—Funds described in subsection (a) to produce the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms and conditions in the “Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement”, signed on March 5, 2014, including any terms and conditions applicable to coproduction of Iron Dome radar components under a negotiated amendment to that agreement.

(2) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days prior to the initial obligation of funds described in subsection (a), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees—

(A) a certification that the agreement specified in paragraph (1) is being implemented as provided in such agreement; and

(B) an assessment detailing any risks relating to the implementation of such agreement.

SEC. 1645. Israeli cooperative missile defense program codevelopment and potential coproduction.

(a) In general.—Except as otherwise provided in this section, of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2016 for Procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, $150,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure the David’s Sling Weapon System and $15,000,000 for the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program, including for co-production of parts and components in the United States by United States industry.

(b) Certification.—Following successful completion of milestones and production readiness reviews in the research, development, and technology agreements for the David’s Sling Weapon System and the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Development Program, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency may disburse amounts available pursuant to subsection (a) on the basis of a one-for-one cash match with such funds provided by the Government of Israel, or in amounts that otherwise meet best efforts (as mutually agreed by the United States and Israel), on or after the date that is 90 days after the date the Director and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a certification that the United States has entered into a bilateral agreement with the Government of Israel that accomplishes the following:

(1) Establishes the terms of co-production of parts and components of the respective systems—

(A) on the basis of what will minimize non-recurring engineering and facilitization expenses; and

(B) that ensures that, in the case of co-production for the David's Sling Weapon System, not less than half of such co-production is carried out by United States persons.

(2) Establishes complete transparency on the Israeli requirement for the number of interceptors and batteries of the respective systems that will be procured.

(3) Allows the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to establish technical milestones for co-production and procurement of the respective systems.

SEC. 1646. Development and deployment of multiple-object kill vehicle for missile defense of the United States homeland.

(1) the defense of the United States homeland against the threat of limited ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or deliberate) is a national priority; and

(2) as the threat described in paragraph (1) continues to evolve, the multiple-object kill vehicle could contribute critical capabilities to the future of the ballistic missile defense of the United States homeland.

(1) DEVELOPMENT.—The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall develop a highly reliable, cost-effective multiple-object kill vehicle for the ground-based midcourse defense system.

(A) conduct flight testing of the multiple-object kill vehicle developed under paragraph (1) by not later than 2020; and

(c) Capabilities and criteria.—The Director shall ensure that the multiple-object kill vehicle developed under subsection (b)(1) meets, at a minimum, the following capabilities and criteria:

(4) The ability to counter advanced counter measures, decoys, and penetration aids.

(7) Options to be integrated onto other missile defense interceptor vehicles other than the ground-based interceptors of the ground-based midcourse defense system.

(8) Sound acquisition processes, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Missile Defense Executive Board.

(d) Program management.—The management of the multiple-object kill vehicle program under subsection (b) shall report directly to the Deputy Director of the Missile Defense Agency.

SEC. 1647. Requirement to replace capability enhancement I exoatmospheric kill vehicles.

(a) In general.—Subject to subsection (b), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that all remaining ground-based interceptors of the ground-based midcourse defense system that are armed with the capability enhancement I exoatmospheric kill vehicle are replaced with the redesigned exoatmospheric kill vehicle before September 30, 2022.

(b) Condition.—Subsection (a) shall not apply if the Director determines that flight and intercept testing of the redesigned exoatmospheric kill vehicle is not successful.

(1) To address the growing threat posed by increasingly accurate and longer-ranged ballistic and cruise missiles, the Missile Defense Agency, in collaboration with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the military services, is pursuing a suite of laser technologies that could serve as a cost-effective solution for destroying cruise missiles and ballistic missiles in the boost phase.

(2) A successful airborne boost phase defense system could transform United States missile defense capabilities against a broad range of missile threats, and place defense on the winning side of the offense-defense cost-curve.

(1) prioritize technology investments in the Department of Defense to support efforts by the Missile Defense Agency to develop and field an airborne boost phase defense system by fiscal year 2025;

(2) ensure that development and fielding of the airborne boost phase defense system supports multiple warfighter missile defense requirements, including, specifically, protection of the homeland and allies against cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, particularly in the boost phase;

(3) continue development and fielding of high-energy lasers and high-power microwave systems as part of a layered architecture to defend ships and theater bases against air and cruise missile strikes;

(4) encourage collaboration amongst the military services and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency with respect to their high energy laser and directed energy efforts carried out in support of the Missile Defense Agency; and

(5) ensure cooperation and coordination between the Missile Defense Agency in its plans to develop an airborne laser and the Air Force in its requirements for unmanned aerial vehicles.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the efforts of the Department of Defense to develop and deploy an airborne boost phase defense system for missile defense by fiscal year 2025.

(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) Such schedules, costs, warfighter requirements, operational concept, constraints, potential alternative boost phase approaches, and other information regarding the efforts described in paragraph (1) as the Secretary considers appropriate.

(B) Analysis of the efforts described in paragraph (1) with respect to the following cases:

(i) A case in which the Department is under no funding constraints with respect to such efforts and progress is based on the state of the technology.

(ii) A case in which the Department is under funding constraints and the efforts are carried out in accordance with a moderately aggressive schedule and are subject to moderate technical risk.

(iii) A case in which the Department is under funding constraints and the efforts are carried out in accordance with a less aggressive schedule and are subject to less technical risk.

(C) An update on related efforts of the Department to develop high energy lasers and high power microwave systems to defend ships and theater bases against air and cruise missile strikes.

(D) Such recommendations as the Secretary may have for legislative or administrative action to enable more rapid fielding of a directed-energy based missile defense system.

(3) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

SEC. 1649. Extension of limitation on providing certain sensitive missile defense information to the Russian Federation.

SEC. 1650. Extension of requirement for Comptroller General of the United States review and assessment of missile defense acquisition programs.

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “through 2015” and inserting “through 2020”; and

(B) in paragraph (2), in the first sentence, by striking “through 2016” and inserting “through 2021”; and

(2) in subsection (b), in the matter before paragraph (1), by striking “first three”.

SEC. 1661. Measures in response to violations of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty by the Russian Federation.

(1) On July 31, 2014, the Department of State released its annual report entitled “Adherence to and Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments”, which included the finding that “[t]he United States has determined that the Russian Federation is in violation of its obligations under the INF Treaty not to possess, produce, or flight-test a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) with a range capability of 500 km to 5,500 km, or to possess or produce launchers of such missiles”.

(2) The United States has undertaken diplomatic efforts to address with the Russian Federation its violations of the INF Treaty since 2013, and the Russian Federation has failed to respond to those efforts in any way.

(3) The Commander of the United States European Command, and Supreme Allied Commander of Europe, General Philip Breedlove stated that “[a] weapon capability that violates the I.N.F., that is introduced into the greater European land mass, is absolutely a tool that will have to be dealt with” and “[i]t can’t go unanswered”.

(4) The Secretary of Defense has informed Congress that the range of options in response to the violation by the Russian Federation of the INF Treaty could include “active defenses to counter intermediate-range ground-launched cruise missiles; counterforce capabilities to prevent intermediate-range ground-launched cruise missile attacks; and countervailing strike capabilities to enhance U.S. or allied forces”.

(1) the development and deployment of a nuclear ground-launched cruise missile by the Russian Federation in violation of the INF Treaty would pose a dangerous threat to the United States and its allies;

(2) the Russian Federation has established an increasing role for nuclear weapons in its military strategy;

(3) efforts taken by the President to compel the Russian Federation to return to compliance with the INF Treaty must be persistent and are in the best interests of the United States, but cannot be open-ended; and

(4) efforts by the United States to develop military and nonmilitary options for responding to violations of the INF Treaty could encourage the Russian Federation to return to compliance with the INF Treaty.

(c) Notification.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the President shall notify the appropriate congressional committees with respect to whether the Russian Federation—

(1) has flight-tested, has deployed, or possesses a military system that has achieved an initial operating capability that is either a ground-launched ballistic missile or ground-launched cruise missile with a flight-tested range of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers; or

(2) has begun taking measures to return to full compliance with the INF Treaty, including verification measures necessary to achieve high confidence that any missile described in paragraph (1) will be eliminated.

(d) Updates to allies.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that describes—

(1) the status of updates provided to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and other allies of the United States on the Russian Federation’s flight testing, operating capability, and deployment of ground-launched ballistic missiles or ground-launched cruise missiles with a flight-tested range of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers; and

(2) efforts to develop, with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and such allies, collective responses, including economic and military responses, to arms control violations by the Russian Federation, including violations of the INF Treaty.

(A) IN GENERAL.—If, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, the Russian Federation has not begun taking measures to return to full compliance with the INF Treaty, including by agreeing to verification measures necessary to achieve high confidence that any ground-launched ballistic missile or ground-launched cruise missile with a flight-tested range of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers will be eliminated, the Secretary of Defense shall, not later than 120 days after such date of enactment, submit to Congress a plan with respect to developing the following military capabilities:

(i) Counterforce capabilities to prevent intermediate-range ground-launched ballistic missile and cruise missile attacks, whether or not such capabilities are in compliance with the INF Treaty and including capabilities that may be acquired from allies of the United States.

(ii) Countervailing strike capabilities to enhance the forces of the United States or allies of the United States, whether or not such capabilities are in compliance with the INF Treaty and including capabilities that may be acquired from allies of the United States.

(iii) Active defenses to defend against intermediate-range ground-launched cruise missile attacks.

(B) COST AND SCHEDULE ESTIMATES.—The Secretary shall include, in the plan required by subparagraph (A), with respect to each military capability described in clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of that subparagraph, an estimate of cost and the approximate time for achieving a Milestone A decision, if such a decision is required.

(C) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RECOMMENDED CAPABILITIES.—The Secretary may use funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4201, to carry out the development of capabilities pursuant to subparagraph (A) that are recommended by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to meet military requirements and current capability gaps. In making such a recommendation, the Chairman shall give priority to such capabilities that the Chairman determines could be tested and fielded most expediently, with the most priority given to capabilities that the Chairman determines could be fielded in two years.

(2) OTHER RESPONSE OPTIONS.—The President shall include in the plan required by paragraph (1)(A) such other options as the President considers useful to encourage the Russian Federation to return to full compliance with the INF Treaty or necessary to respond to the failure of the Russian Federation to return to full compliance with the INF Treaty.

(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—

(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(2) INF TREATY.—The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988 (commonly referred to as the “Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty” or “INF Treaty”).

SEC. 1662. Modification of notification and assessment of proposal to modify or introduce new aircraft or sensors for flight by the Russian Federation under the Open Skies Treaty.

(a) In general.—Section 1242(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “30 days” and inserting “90 days”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The assessment shall also include an assessment of the proposal by the commander of each combatant command potentially affected by the proposal, including an assessment of the potential effects of the proposal on operations and any potential vulnerabilities raised by the proposal.”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of any meeting of the Open Skies Consultative Commission that occurs after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth a description of such meeting, including a description of any agreements entered into during such meeting and whether any such agreement will result in a modification to the aircraft or sensors of any State Party to the Open Skies Treaty that will be subject to the Open Skies Treaty.

(2) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” and “Open Skies Treaty” have the meaning given such terms in section 1242 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.

SEC. 1663. Milestone A decision for the Conventional Prompt Global Strike Weapons System.

(2) the date that is 8 months after the successful completion of Intermediate Range Flight 2 of that System.

SEC. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law.

(a) Expiration of authorizations after three years.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2019.

(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of—

(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2019 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Alaska	Fort Greely	$7,800,000
California	Concord	$98,000,000
Colorado	Fort Carson	$5,800,000
Georgia	Fort Gordon	$90,000,000
Maryland	Fort Meade	$34,500,000
New York	Fort Drum	$19,000,000
	U. S. Military Academy	$70,000,000
Oklahoma	Fort Sill	$69,400,000
Texas	Corpus Christi	$85,000,000
Virginia	Fort Lee	$33,000,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Cuba	Guantanamo Bay	$76,000,000
Germany	Grafenwoehr	$51,000,000

(a) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:

Army: Family Housing
State/Country	Installation or Location	Units	Amount
Florida	Camp Rudder	Family Housing New Construction	$8,000,000
Illinois	Rock Island	Family Housing New Construction	$20,000,000
Korea	Camp Walker	Family Housing New Construction	$61,000,000

(b) Planning and design.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $7,195,000.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(2) $226,400,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291) for a Command and Control Facility at Fort Shafter, Hawaii).

(3) $6,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119) for cadet barracks at the United States Military Academy, New York).

(4) $78,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2119), as amended by section 2105(d) of this Act, for a Secure Administration/Operations Facility at Fort Belvoir, Virginia).

SEC. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (125 Stat. 1661), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Army: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
State	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Georgia	Fort Benning	Land Acquisition	$25,000,000
	Fort Benning	Land Acquisition	$5,100,000
Virginia	Fort Belvoir	Road and Infrastructure Improvements	$25,000,000

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (126 Stat. 2119) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Army: Extension of 2013 Project Authorizations
State or Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
District of Columbia	Fort McNair	Vehicle Storage Building, Installation	$7,191,000
Kansas	Fort Riley	Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Complex	$12,184,000
North Carolina	Fort Bragg	Aerial Gunnery Range	$41,945,000
Texas	Joint Base San Antonio	Barracks	$20,971,000
Virginia	Fort Belvoir	Secure Admin/Operations Facility	$93,876,000
Italy	Camp Ederle	Barracks	$35,952,000
Japan	Sagami	Vehicle Maintenance Shop	$17,976,000

(a) Project authorization.—The Secretary of the Army may carry out a military construction project to construct a vehicle bridge and traffic circle to facilitate traffic flow to and from the Medical Center at Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany, in the amount of $12,400,000.

(b) Use of host-nation payment-in-kind funds.—The Secretary may use available host-nation payment-in-kind funding for the project described in subsection (a).

SEC. 2109. Limitation on construction of new facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

(a) Limitation.—None of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2016 for the Department of Defense may be used to construct new facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, until the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that any new construction of facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has enduring military value independent of a high value detention mission.

(b) Rule of construction.—Nothing in subsection (a) shall be construed as limiting the ability of the Department of Defense to obligate or expend available funds to correct a deficiency that is life-threatening, health-threatening, or safety-threatening.

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Arizona	Yuma	$50,635,000
California	Coronado	$4,856,000
	Lemoore	$71,830,000
	Miramar	$11,200,000
	Pendleton	$83,800,000
	Point Mugu	$22,427,000
	San Diego	$37,366,000
	Twentynine Palms	$9,160,000
Florida	Jacksonville	$16,751,000
	Mayport	$16,159,000
	Pensacola	$18,347,000
	Whiting Field	$10,421,000
Georgia	Albany	$7,851,000
	Kings Bay	$8,099,000
	Townsend	$43,279,000
Hawaii	Barking Sands	$30,623,000
	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	$14,881,000
	Kaneohe Bay	$106,618,000
	Marine Corps Base Hawaii	$12,800,000
Maryland	Patuxent River	$40,935,000
North Carolina	Camp Lejeune	$74,249,000
	Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station	$57,726,000
	New River	$8,230,000
South Carolina	Parris Island	$27,075,000
Virginia	Dam Neck	$23,066,000
	Norfolk	$126,677,000
	Portsmouth	$45,513,000
	Quantico	$75,399,000
Washington	Bangor	$34,177,000
	Bremerton	$22,680,000
	Indian Island	$4,472,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Navy: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Bahrain Island	Southwest Asia	$89,791,000
Guam	Joint Region Marianas	$181,768,000
Italy	Sigonella	$102,943,000
Japan	Camp Butler	$11,697,000
	Iwakuni	$17,923,000
	Kadena Air Base	$23,310,000
	Yokosuka	$13,846,000
Poland	RedziKowo Base	$51,270,000

(a) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:

Navy: Family Housing
State	Installation or Location	Units	Amount
Virginia	Wallops Island	Family Housing New Construction	$438,000

(b) Planning and design.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,588,000.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(2) $274,099,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1666) for an explosive handling wharf at Kitsap, Washington).

(3) $68,196,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2201(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2633) for ramp parking at Joint Region Marianas, Guam.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (125 Stat. 1666) and extended by section 2208 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3678), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Navy: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
State	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
California	Camp Pendleton	Infantry Squad Defense Range	$29,187,000
Florida	Jacksonville	P–8A Hangar Upgrades	$6,085,000
Georgia	Kings Bay	Crab Island Security Enclave	$52,913,000

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (126 Stat. 2122), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Navy: Extension of 2013 Project Authorizations
State/Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
California	Camp Pendleton	Comm. Information Systems Ops Complex	$78,897,000
	Coronado	Bachelor Quarters	$76,063,000
	Twentynine Palms	Land Expansion Phase 2	$47,270,000
Greece	Souda Bay	Intermodal Access Road	$4,630,000
South Carolina	Beaufort	Recycling/Hazardous Waste Facility	$3,743,000
Virginia	Quantico	Infrastructure—Widen Russell Road	$14,826,000
Worldwide Unspecified	Various Worldwide Locations	BAMS Operational Facilities	$34,048,000

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Air Force: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Alaska	Eielson Air Force Base	$71,400,000
Arizona	Davis-Monthan Air Force Base	$16,900,000
	Luke Air Force Base	$77,700,000
Colorado	U. S. Air Force Academy	$10,000,000
CONUS Classified	Classified Location	$77,130,000
Florida	Cape Canaveral Air Force Station	$21,000,000
	Eglin Air Force Base	$8,700,000
	Hurlburt Field	$14,200,000
Hawaii	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	$46,000,000
Kansas	McConnell Air Force Base	$15,500,000
Louisiana	Barksdale	$20,000,000
Missouri	Whiteman Air Force Base	$29,500,000
Montana	Malmstrom Air Force Base	$19,700,000
Nebraska	Offutt Air Force Base	$21,000,000
Nevada	Nellis Air Force Base	$68,950,000
New Mexico	Cannon Air Force Base	$7,800,000
	Holloman Air Force Base	$6,200,000
	Kirtland Air Force Base	$12,800,000
New York	Fort Drum	$6,000,000
North Carolina	Seymour Johnson Air Force Base	$17,100,000
Oklahoma	Altus Air Force Base	$28,400,000
	Tinker Air Force Base	$49,900,000
South Dakota	Ellsworth Air Force Base	$23,000,000
Texas	Joint Base San Antonio	$106,000,000
Utah	Hill Air Force Base	$38,400,000
Wyoming	F. E. Warren Air Force Base	$95,000,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:

Air Force: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Greenland	Thule Air Base	$41,965,000
Guam	Joint Region Marianas	$50,800,000
Japan	Kadena Air Base	$3,000,000
	Yokota Air Base	$8,461,000
Niger	Agadez	$50,000,000
Oman	Al Musannah Air Base	$25,000,000
United Kingdom	Royal Air Force Croughton	$130,615,000

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(2) $21,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 992) for the CYBERCOM Joint Operations Center at Fort Meade, Maryland).

SEC. 2305. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project.

SEC. 2306. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project.

SEC. 2307. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2015 project.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (125 Stat. 1670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Air Force: Extension of 2012 Project Authorization
Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Italy	Sigonella Naval Air Station	UAS SATCOM Relay Pads and Facility	$15,000,000

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (126 Stat. 2126), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Air Force: Extension of 2013Project Authorization
Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
Portugal	Lajes Field	Sanitary Sewer Lift/Pump Station	$2,000,000

SEC. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects.

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
Alabama	Fort Rucker	$46,787,000
	Maxwell Air Force Base	$32,968,000
Arizona	Fort Huachuca	$3,884,000
California	Camp Pendleton	$20,552,000
	Coronado	$47,218,000
	Fresno Yosemite IAP ANG	$10,700,000
Colorado	Fort Carson	$8,243,000
CONUS Classified	Classified Location	$20,065,000
Delaware	Dover Air Force Base	$21,600,000
Florida	Hurlburt Field	$17,989,000
	MacDill Air Force Base	$39,142,000
Georgia	Moody Air Force Base	$10,900,000
Hawaii	Kaneohe Bay	$122,071,000
	Schofield Barracks	$123,838,000
Kentucky	Fort Campbell	$12,553,000
	Fort Knox	$23,279,000
Maryland	Fort Meade	$816,077,000
Nevada	Nellis Air Force Base	$39,900,000
New Mexico	Cannon Air Force Base	$45,111,000
New York	West Point	$55,778,000
North Carolina	Camp Lejeune	$69,006,000
	Fort Bragg	$168,811,000
Ohio	Wright-Patterson Air Force Base	$6,623,000
Oregon	Klamath Falls IAP	$2,500,000
South Carolina	Fort Jackson	$26,157,000
Texas	Joint Base San Antonio	$61,776,000
Virginia	Fort Belvoir	$9,500,000
	Joint Base Langley-Eustis	$28,000,000
	Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Story	$23,916,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following:

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Djibouti	Camp Lemonier	$43,700,000
Germany	Garmisch	$14,676,000
	Grafenwoehr	$38,138,000
	Spangdahlem Air Base	$39,571,000
	Stuttgart-Patch Barracks	$49,413,000
Japan	Kadena Air Base	$37,485,000
Poland	RedziKowo Base	$169,153,000
Spain	Rota	$13,737,000

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Energy Conservation Projects: Inside the United States
State	Installation or Location	Amount
American Samoa	Wake Island	$5,331,000
	Edwards Air Force Base	$4,550,000
	Fort Hunter Liggett	$22,000,000
Colorado	Schriever Air Force Base	$4,400,000
District of Columbia	NSA Washington/NRL	$10,990,000
Guam	Naval Base Guam	$5,330,000
Hawaii	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	$13,780,000
	Marine Corps Recruiting Command Kaneohe Bay	$5,740,000
Idaho	Moutain Home Air Force Base	$6,471,000
Montana	Malmstrom Air Force Base	$4,260,000
Virginia	Pentagon	$4,528,000
Washington	Joint Base Lewis-McChord	$14,770,000
Various locations	Various locations	$25,809,000

(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Energy Conservation Projects: Outside the United States
Country	Installation or Location	Amount
Bahamas	Ascension Aux Airfield St. Helena	$5,500,000
Japan	Yokoska	$12,940,000
Various locations	Various locations	$3,600,000

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2015, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the sum of the following:

(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.

(2) $747,435,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of this Act for an operations facility at Fort Meade, Maryland).

(3) $20,800,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2129) for the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System Complex at Deveselu, Romania).

(4) $141,039,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672), as amended by section 2404(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2131), for a data center at Fort Meade, Maryland).

(5) $50,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland).

(6) $54,300,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1672) for an Ambulatory Care Center at Joint Base San Antonio, Texas).

(7) $441,134,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1673) for a hospital at the Rhine Ordnance Barracks, Germany).

(8) $41,441,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2640) for a hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas).

(9) $123,827,000 (the balance of the amount authorized as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide project by title X of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1888) for a data center at Camp Williams, Utah).

SEC. 2404. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (125 Stat. 1672) and as amended by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3685), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Defense Agencies: Extension of 2012 Project Authorizations
State	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
California	Naval Base Coronado	SOF Support Activity Operations Facility	$38,800,000
Virginia	Pentagon Reservation	Heliport Control Tower and Fire Station	$6,457,000
		Pedestrian Plaza	$2,285,000

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (126 Stat. 2127), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Defense Agencies: Extension of 2013 Project Authorizations
State/Country	Installation or Location	Project	Amount
California	Naval Base Coronado	SOF Mobile Communications Detachment Support Facility	$9,327,000
Colorado	Pikes Peak	High Altitude Medical Research Center	$3,600,000
Germany	Ramstein AB	Replace Vogelweh Elementary School	$61,415,000
Hawaii	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	SOF SDVT–1 Waterfront Operations Facility	$22,384,000
Japan	CFAS Sasebo	Replace Sasebo Elementary School	$35,733,000
	Camp Zama	Renovate Zama High School	$13,273,000
Pennsylvania	DEF Distribution Depot New Cumberland	Replace reservoir	$4,300,000
United Kingdom	RAF Feltwell	Feltwell Elementary School Addition	$30,811,000

SEC. 2407. Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2014 project.

SEC. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.

Army National Guard
State	Location	Amount
Alabama	Camp Foley	$4,500,000
Connecticut	Camp Hartell	$11,000,000
Florida	Palm Coast	$18,000,000
Georgia	Fort Stewart	$6,800,000
Illinois	Sparta	$1,900,000
Kansas	Salina	$6,700,000
Maryland	Easton	$13,800,000
Mississippi	Gulfport	$40,000,000
Nevada	Reno	$8,000,000
Ohio	Camp Ravenna	$3,300,000
Oregon	Salem	$16,500,000
Pennsylvania	Fort Indiantown Gap	$16,000,000
Vermont	North Hyde Park	$7,900,000
Virginia	Richmond	$29,000,000

(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army Reserve: Inside the United States
State	Location	Amount
California	Miramar	$24,000,000
Florida	MacDill Air Force Base	$55,000,000
New York	Orangeburg	$4,200,000
Pennsylvania	Conneaut Lake	$5,000,000
Virginia	A.P. Hill	$24,000,000

(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out a military construction project for the Army Reserve location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:

Army Reserve: Outside the United States
Country	Location	Amount
Puerto Rico	Fort Buchanan	$10,200,000

SEC. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.

Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve
State	Location	Amount
Nevada	Fallon	$11,408,000
New York	Brooklyn	$2,479,000
Virginia	Dam Neck	$18,443,000

SEC. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.

Air National Guard
State	Location	Amount
Alabama	Dannelly Field	$7,600,000
California	Moffett Field	$6,500,000
Colorado	Buckley Air Force Base	$5,100,000
Connecticut	Bradley	$6,300,000
Florida	Cape Canaveral	$6,100,000
Georgia	Savannah/Hilton Head IAP	$9,000,000
Hawaii	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	$9,700,000
Iowa	Des Moines Map	$6,700,000
Kansas	Smokey Hill ANG Range	$2,900,000
Louisiana	New Orleans	$10,000,000
Maine	Bangor IAP	$7,200,000
New Hampshire	Pease International Tradeport	$4,300,000
New Jersey	Atlantic City IAP	$10,200,000
New York	Niagara Falls IAP	$7,700,000
North Carolina	Charlotte/Douglas IAP	$9,000,000
North Dakota	Hector IAP	$7,300,000
Oklahoma	Will Rogers World Airport	$7,600,000
Oregon	Klamath Falls IAP	$7,200,000
West Virginia	Yeager Airport	$3,900,000

SEC. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.

Air Force Reserve
State	Location	Amount
California	March Air Force Base	$4,600,000
Florida	Patrick Air Force Base	$3,400,000
Georgia	Dobbins Air Reserve Base	$10,400,000
Ohio	Youngstown	$9,400,000
Texas	Joint Base San Antonio	$9,900,000

SEC. 2611. Modification and extension of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2013 project.

(a) Modification.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2135) for Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, for construction of an Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may construct a new facility in the vicinity of Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

(b) Duration of authority.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorization set forth in subsection (a) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

SEC. 2612. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2015 projects.

(a) Davis-monthan afb.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2605 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3689) for Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, for construction of a Guardian Angel Operations facility at that location, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a new 5,913 square meter (63,647 square foot) facility in the amount of $18,200,000.

(b) Fort smith.—In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2604 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3689) for Fort Smith Municipal Airport, Arkansas, for construction of a consolidated Secure Compartmented Information Facility at that location, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct a new facility in the amount of $15,200,000.

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1660), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2602 of that Act (125 Stat. 1678), and extended by section 2611 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3690, 3691), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Extension of 2012 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorization
State	Location	Project	Amount
Kansas	Kansas City	Army Reserve Center	$13,000,000
Massachusetts	Attleboro	Army Reserve Center	$22,000,000

(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 2602, and 2603 of that Act (126 Stat. 2134, 2135) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2016, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2017, whichever is later.

Extension of 2013 National Guard and Reserve Project Authorization
State	Location	Project	Amount
Arizona	Yuma	Reserve Training Facility—Yuma	$5,379,000
California	Tustin	Army Reserve Center	$27,000,000
Iowa	Fort Des Moines	Joint Reserve Center—Des Moines	$19,162,000
Louisiana	New Orleans	Transient Quarters	$7,187,000
New York	Camp Smith (Stormville)	Combined Support Maintenance Shop Phase 1	$24,000,000

SEC. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense base closure account.

SEC. 2702. Prohibition on conducting additional base realignment and closure (BRAC) round.

SEC. 2801. Authority for acceptance and use of contributions for certain mutually beneficial projects.

(a) Authority.—Subchapter II of chapter 138 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“§ 2350n. Construction, maintenance, and repair projects mutually beneficial to the Department of Defense and armed forces of a partner nation

“(a) Authority to accept contributions.—The Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, may accept cash contributions from any partner nation for the purposes specified in subsection (c).

“(b) Accounting.—Contributions accepted under subsection (a) shall be placed in an account established by the Secretary of Defense and shall remain available until expended for the purposes specified in subsection (c).

“(c) Availability of contributions.—Contributions accepted under subsection (a) shall be available only for payment of costs in connection with mutually beneficial construction (including military construction not otherwise authorized by law), maintenance, and repair projects.

“(d) Prohibition on use of contributions to offset burden sharing contributions required of partner nations.—Contributions accepted under subsection (a) may not be used to offset burden sharing contributions that are otherwise required to be provided by partner nations.

“(e) Mutually beneficial defined.—A project shall be considered to be ‘mutually beneficial’ for purposes of this section if—

“(1) the project is in support of a bilateral defense cooperation agreement between the United States and a partner nation; or

“(2) the Secretary of Defense determines that the United States may derive a benefit from the project, including—

“(C) increased interoperability between the Department of Defense and the armed forces of a partner nation.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such subchapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

SEC. 2802. Change in authorities relating to scope of work variations for military construction projects.

(a) Limited authority for scope of work increase.—Section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—

(1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking “The scope of work” and inserting “Except as provided in subsection (d), the scope of work”;

(2) by redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and

“(d) The limitation in subsection (b)(2) on an increase in the scope of work does not apply if—

“(1) the increase in the scope of work is not more than 10 percent of the amount specified for that project, construction, improvement, or acquisition in the justification data provided to Congress as part of the request for authorization of the project, construction, improvement, or acquisition;

“(3) the Secretary concerned notifies the congressional defense committees in writing of the increase in scope and the reasons therefor; and

“(4) a period of 21 days has elapsed after the date on which the notification is received by the committees or, if over sooner, a period of 14 days has elapsed after the date on which a copy of the notification is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title.”.

(1) Subsection (a) of such section is amended by striking “subsection (c) or (d)” and inserting “subsection (c), (d), or (e)”.

(2) Subsection (f) of such section, as redesignated by subsection (a)(2), is amended by striking “through (d)” and inserting “through (e)”.

(c) Additional technical amendment.—Subsection (a) of such section is further amended by inserting “of this title” after “section 2805(a)”.

SEC. 2803. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects outside the United States.

(a) Extension of authority.—Subsection (h) of section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2806 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3699), is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “fiscal year 2016” and inserting “fiscal year 2017”.

(b) Limitation on use of authority.—Subsection (c)(1) of such section is amended—

(2) by striking “December 31, 2015” and inserting “December 31, 2016”; and

SEC. 2804. Modification of reporting requirement on in-kind construction and renovation payments.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than December 31, 2016, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall provide the congressional defense committees a report on in-kind construction and renovation payments received during the preceding fiscal year.

(2) ELEMENTS.—Each report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:

(A) A listing of each facility constructed or renovated for the Department of Defense as payment in-kind.

(B) An estimate of the value in United States dollars of that construction or renovation.

(D) A description of the agreement pursuant to which the in-kind payment was made.

(b) Repeal of existing reporting requirement.—Section 2805 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2149) is repealed.

(a) Authority To use research, development, test, and evaluation funds.—The Secretary of Defense may fund military construction projects at the Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratories (as designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note)), using amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation.

(b) Conditions.—Amounts made available pursuant to subsection (a) may be used for the purpose of funding major military construction projects that meet the following conditions:

(1) Projects are subject to the requirements of section 2802 of title 10, United States Code.

(2) Projects are included in the budget submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code.

(c) Certification.—The Secretary shall certify, as part of the budget submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, that military construction projects proposed pursuant to subsection (a)—

(1) will support the research and development activities at Department of Defense science and technology reinvention laboratories (as designated by section 1105(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note)) of more than one military department or Defense Agency or a technology development program that is consistent with the fielding of offset technologies as described in section 212.

(2) have been endorsed for funding by more than one military department or Defense Agency;

(3) will establish facilities that will have significant potential for use by entities outside the Department of Defense, including universities, industrial partners, and other Federal agencies; and

(4) cannot be fully funded under the thresholds specified by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code.

(d) Funds.—Amounts used for the pilot program established under this section may not exceed $100,000,000 for any fiscal year.

(e) Termination of authority.—The authority provided under this section terminates on October 1, 2020.

(1) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—The term “Executive Director” means the Executive Director of Walking Shield, Inc.

(2) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term “Indian tribe” means any Indian tribe included on the list published by the Secretary of the Interior under section 104 of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C.479a–1).

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Executive Director may submit to the Secretary of the military department concerned, on behalf of any Indian tribe, a request for conveyance of any relocatable military housing unit located at a military installation in the United States.

(2) CONFLICTS.—The Executive Director shall resolve any conflict among requests of Indian tribes for housing units described in paragraph (1) before submitting a request to the Secretary of the military department concerned under this subsection.

(c) Conveyance by a Secretary.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on receipt of a request under subsection (b)(1), the Secretary of the military department concerned may convey to the Indian tribe that is the subject of the request, at no cost to such military department and without consideration, any relocatable military housing unit described in subsection (b)(1) that, as determined by such Secretary, is in excess of the needs of the military.

(1) in the subsection heading, by striking “construction of” and inserting “conveyance of additional”; and

(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (D) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;

(C) in subparagraph (A), as redesignated by subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, by striking “utility system;” and inserting “, or operating the additional utility infrastructure would be in the best interest of the government using a business case analysis similar to the analysis required under subsection (d)(2); and”; and

(D) in subparagraph (B), as so redesignated, by striking “amount equal to the fair market value of” and inserting “amount for”.

SEC. 2812. Leasing of non-excess property of military departments and Defense Agencies; treatment of value provided by local education agencies and elementary and secondary schools.

“(k) Leases for education.—Notwithstanding subsection (b)(4), the Secretary concerned may accept consideration in an amount that is less than the fair market value of the lease, if the lease is to a local education agency or an elementary or secondary school (as those terms are defined in section 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801)).”.

(1) in subsection (d), by inserting “or 75 percent of the estimated cost of a military construction project to replace the facility, or the facility is located at an overseas location that has not been designated a main operating base or forward operating site” after “in excess of $7,500,000”;

“(e) Notification threshold.—The congressional notification requirement under subsection (d) does not apply to a repair project costing less than $1,000,000.”.

SEC. 2814. Increase of threshold of notice and wait requirement for certain facilities for reserve components and parity with authority for unspecified minor military construction and repair projects.

(a) Notice and wait requirement.—Subsection (a) of section 18233a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “$750,000” and inserting “the amount specified in section 2805(b)(1) of this title”.

(b) Repair projects.—Subsection (b)(3) of such section is amended by striking “$7,500,000” and inserting “the amount specified in section 2811(b) of this title”.

SEC. 2821. Release of reversionary interest retained as part of conveyance to the Economic Development Alliance of Jefferson County, Arkansas.

(a) Release of conditions and retained interests.—With respect to a parcel of real property in Jefferson County, Arkansas, consisting of approximately 1,447 acres and conveyed by deed to the Economic Development Alliance of Jefferson County, Arkansas (in this section referred to as the “Economic Development Alliance”) by the United States for use as the facility known as the “Bioplex” and related activities pursuant to section 2827 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201), the Secretary of the Army may release subject to the conditions of subsections (b) and (d) below, the conditions of conveyance of subsection (c) of such section 2827 and the reversionary interest retained by the United States under subsection (e) of such section.

(1) EFFECT OF RECONVEYANCE.—Notwithstanding subsection (d) of such section 2827, the release authorized by subsection (a) of this section shall be subject to the condition that, if the Economic Development Alliance reconveys all or any part of the conveyed property during the 25-year period referred to in subsection (c)(2) of such section, the Economic Development Alliance shall pay to the United States, upon reconveyance, an amount equal to the fair market value of the reconveyed property as of the time of the reconveyance, excluding the value of any improvements made to the property by the Economic Development Alliance.

(2) DETERMINATION OF FAIR MARKET VALUE.—The Secretary of the Army shall determine fair market value in accordance with Federal appraisal standards and procedures.

(3) TREATMENT OF LEASES.—The Secretary of the Army may treat a lease of the property within such 25-year period as a reconveyance if the Secretary determines that the lease is being used to avoid application of paragraph (1).

(4) DEPOSIT OF PROCEEDS.—The Secretary of the Army shall deposit any proceeds received under this subsection in the special account established pursuant to section 572(b) of title 40, United States Code.

(c) Instrument of release.—The Secretary of the Army may execute and file in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate instrument reflecting the release of conditions and retained interests under subsection (a).

(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall require the Economic Development Alliance to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the release of conditions and retained interests under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the release. If amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Economic Development Alliance.

(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the release. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.

(e) Additional terms and conditions.—The Secretary of the Army may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the release of conditions and retained interests under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States, including provisions that the Secretary determines are necessary to preclude any use of the property that would interfere with activities at Pine Bluff Arsenal.

(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2016 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.

(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out the following new plant project for the National Nuclear Security Administration:

(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) In general.—The Administrator shall establish and carry out a program to exercise the technical capabilities of the Administration with respect to design and production of nuclear weapons to ensure that the Administration is ready to respond to future uncertainties not addressed by existing life extension programs.

“(b) Program elements.—The Administrator shall ensure that the program required by subsection (a)—

“(1) is integrated across the science, engineering, design, and manufacturing cycle of the Administration;

“(A) physics models of components and systems the understanding of which will ensure existing models and experimental capabilities are robust, capable of being certified as safe and reliable in the absence of testing, and contribute to the predictive design framework;

“(B) shortened engineering design cycles that minimize the amount of time leading to an engineering prototype; and

“(C) rapid manufacturing capabilities to reduce the time and cost of production; and

“(3) integrates physics, engineering, and production capabilities into joint test assemblies and designs.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4219 the following new item:

SEC. 3112. Long-term plan for meeting national security requirements for unencumbered uranium.

(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.), as amended by section 3111, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 4221. Long-term plan for meeting national security requirements for unencumbered uranium.

“(a) In General.—Concurrent with the submission to Congress of the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, in each even-numbered year beginning in 2016, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan for meeting national security requirements for unencumbered uranium through 2065.

“(b) Plan requirements.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

“(1) An inventory of unencumbered uranium (other than depleted uranium), by program source and enrichment level, that, as of the date of the plan, is allocated to national security requirements.

“(2) An inventory of unencumbered uranium (other than depleted uranium), by program source and enrichment level, that, as of the date of the plan, is not allocated to national security requirements but could be allocated to such requirements.

“(3) An identification of national security requirements for unencumbered uranium, by program source and enrichment level.

“(4) A description of any shortfall in obtaining unencumbered uranium to meet national security requirements and an assessment of whether that shortfall could be mitigated through the blending down of uranium that is of a higher enrichment level.

“(5) An inventory of unencumbered depleted uranium, an assessment of the portion of that uranium that could be allocated to national security requirements through re-enrichment, and an estimate of the costs of re-enriching that uranium.

“(6) A description of the swap and barter agreements involving unencumbered uranium needed to meet national security requirements that are in effect on the date of the plan.

“(7) An assessment of whether additional enrichment of uranium will be required to meet national security requirements and an estimate of the time for production operations and the cost for each type of enrichment being considered.

“(8) A description of changes in policy that would mitigate any shortfall in obtaining unencumbered uranium to meet national security requirements and the implications of those changes.

“(c) Form of plan.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.

“(1) The term ‘depleted’, with respect to uranium, means that the uranium is depleted in uranium-235 compared with natural uranium.

“(2) The term ‘unencumbered’, with respect to uranium, means that the United States has no obligation to foreign governments to use the uranium for only peaceful purposes.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act, as amended by section 3111, is further amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4220 the following new item:

(a) In general.—Title XLIII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2563 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“(a) In general.—Concurrent with the submission to Congress of the budget of the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, in each odd-numbered year beginning in 2017, the Administrator shall submit to the congressional defense committees a five-year management plan for activities associated with the defense nuclear nonproliferation programs of the Administration.

“(b) Elements.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include, with respect to each defense nuclear nonproliferation program of the Administration, the following:

“(i) a list of relevant laws, policy directives issued by the President, and international agreements; and

“(ii) nuclear nonproliferation activities carried out by other Federal agencies.

“(B) The objectives and priorities of the program during the year preceding the submission of the plan required by subsection (a).

“(2) Plans for activities of the program during the five-year period beginning on the date on which the plan required by subsection (a) is submitted, including activities with respect to the following:

“(A) Preventing nuclear and radiological proliferation and terrorism, including through—

“(v) nonproliferation construction programs, including activities associated Department of Energy Order 413.1 (relating to program management controls).

“(C) Responding to nuclear and radiological proliferation and terrorism, including through—

“(4) A plan for funding the program during the five-year period beginning on the date on which the plan required by subsection (a) is submitted.

“(5) A description of funds for the program received through contributions from or cost-sharing agreements with foreign governments consistent section 3132(f) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (50 U.S.C. 2569(f)).

“(c) Form of report.—The plan required by subsection (a) may be submitted to the congressional defense committees in classified form if necessary.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4308 the following new item:

(1) Section 3122 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1710) is amended—

(B) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as subsections (a), (b), and (c), respectively; and

(C) in paragraph (2) of subsection (b), as redesignated by subparagraph (B), by striking “subsection (c)(2)” and inserting “subsection (a)(2)”.

(2) Section 3145 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2197) is repealed.

SEC. 3114. Plan for deactivation and decommissioning of nonoperational defense nuclear facilities.

(a) In general.—Subtitle B of title XLIV of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2602 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 4423. Plan for deactivation and decommissioning of nonoperational defense nuclear facilities.

“(a) In general.—During each even-numbered year beginning in 2016, the Secretary of Energy shall develop a plan to provide guidance for the activities of the Department of Energy relating to the deactivation and decommissioning of nonoperational defense nuclear facilities.

“(b) Elements.—The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following:

“(1) A list of nonoperational defense nuclear facilities, prioritized for deactivation and decommissioning based on the potential to reduce risks to human health, property, or the environment and to maximize cost savings.

“(2) An assessment of the life cycle costs of each nonoperational defense nuclear facility during the period beginning on the date on which the plan is submitted under subsection (c) and ending on the earlier of—

“(A) the date that is 25 years after the date on which the plan is submitted; or

“(3) An estimate of the cost and time needed to deactivate and decommission each nonoperational defense nuclear facility, if available.

“(4) An estimate of the time at which the Office of Environmental Management anticipates accepting nonoperational defense nuclear facilities for deactivation and decommissioning.

“(A) accelerating the cleanup of nonoperational defense nuclear facilities; or

“(c) Submission to congress.—Not later than March 31 of each even-numbered year beginning in 2016, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—

“(2) a description of the deactivation and decommissioning actions expected to be taken during the following fiscal year pursuant to the plan; and

“(3) in the case of a report submitted during 2018 or any year thereafter, a description of the deactivation and decommissioning actions taken at each nonoperational defense nuclear facility during the preceding fiscal year.

“(d) Termination.—The requirements of this section shall terminate after the submission to the congressional defense committees of the report required by subsection (c) to be submitted not later than March 31, 2026.

“(A) the present and future costs of all resources and associated cost elements required to develop, produce, deploy, or sustain the facility; and

“(B) the present and future costs to deactivate, decommission, and deconstruct the facility.

“(2) The term ‘nonoperational defense nuclear facility’ means a production facility or utilization facility (as those terms are defined in section 11 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014)) under the control or jurisdiction of the Secretary of Energy and operated for national security purposes that is no longer needed for the mission of the Department of Energy, including the National Nuclear Security Administration.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4422 the following new item:

(a) In general.—Subtitle C of title XLIV of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2621 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 4446. Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant contract oversight.

“(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, the Secretary of Energy shall arrange to have an owner's agent assist the Secretary in carrying out the oversight responsibilities of the Secretary with respect to the contract described in subsection (b).

“(b) Contract described.—The contract described in this subsection is the contract between the Office of River Protection of the Department of Energy and Bechtel National, Inc. or its successor relating to the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (contract number DE–AC27–01RV14136).

“(c) Duties.—The duties of the owner's agent under subsection (a) shall include the following:

“(1) Performing design, construction, nuclear safety, and operability oversight of each facility covered by the contract described in subsection (b).

“(2) Beginning not later than one year after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, ensuring that the preliminary documented safety analyses for all facilities covered by the contract meet the requirements of all applicable Department of Energy regulations and guidance, including section 830.206 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, and the Department of Energy Standard on the Integration of Safety into the Design Process (DOE–STD–1189–2008).

“(3) Assisting the Secretary in ensuring that, until the Secretary approves the documented safety analysis for each facility covered by the contract, the contractor ensures that each preliminary documented safety analysis is current.

“(4) Ensuring that the contractor acts to promptly resolve any unreviewed safety questions.

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, and every 180 days thereafter, the owner's agent specified in subsection (a) shall submit to the Secretary and the congressional defense committees a report on the assistance provided by the owner's agent to the Secretary under that subsection with respect to oversight of the contract described in subsection (b).

“(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

“(A) Information on the status of, and the plan for resolving, each unreviewed safety question at each facility covered by the contract described in subsection (b).

“(B) An identification of each instance of disagreement between the owner's agent and the contractor with respect to whether an unreviewed safety question exists and the plan for resolution of the disagreement.

“(C) An identification of each aspect of each preliminary documented safety analysis that is not current, the plan for making that aspect current, and the status of the corrective efforts.

“(D) Information on the status of, and the plan for resolving, each unresolved technical issue at each facility covered by the contract, and the status of corrective efforts.

“(2) The term ‘current’, with respect to a documented safety analysis, means that the documented safety analysis includes any design changes approved by the contractor and any safety evaluation reports issued by the Secretary with respect to the facility covered by the analysis before the date that is 60 days before the date of the analysis.

“(3) The terms ‘documented safety analysis’, ‘safety evaluation report’, and ‘unreviewed safety question’ have the meanings given those terms in section 830.3 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding similar ruling or regulation).

“(4) The term ‘owner's agent’ means a private third-party entity with nuclear safety management expertise and without any contractual relationship with the contractor or conflict of interest.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4445 the following new item:

(a) In general.—Subtitle A of title XLVIII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2781 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 4802 the following new section:

“SEC. 4802A. Assessments of emergency preparedness of defense nuclear facilities.

“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Energy shall include, in each award-fee evaluation conducted under section 16.401 of title 48, Code of Federal Regulations, of a management and operating contract for a Department of Energy defense nuclear facility in 2016 or any even-numbered year thereafter, an assessment of the adequacy of the emergency preparedness of that facility, including an assessment of the seniority level of employees and contractors of the Department of Energy that participate in emergency preparedness exercises at that facility.

“(b) Report required.—Not later than 60 days after conducting an assessment under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the assessment.”.

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4802 the following new item:

(a) Funding for laboratory-directed research and development.—Section 4811(c) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2791(c)) is amended by striking “not to exceed 6 percent” and inserting “of not less than 5 percent and not more than 8 percent”.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle B of title XLVIII of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2791 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 4811 the following new section:

“(a) Authority.—A covered facility that is funded out of funds available to the Department of Energy for national security programs may carry out facility-directed research and development.

“(b) Regulations.—The Secretary of Energy shall prescribe regulations for the conduct of facility-directed research and development under subsection (a).

“(c) Funding.—Of the funds provided by the Department of Energy to covered facilities, the Secretary shall provide a specific amount, not to exceed 4 percent of such funds, to be used by such facilities for facility-directed research and development.

“(1) COVERED FACILITY.—The term ‘covered facility’ means a nuclear weapons production facility or the Nevada Site Office of the Department of Energy.

“(2) FACILITY-DIRECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.—The term ‘facility-directed research and development’ means research and development work of a creative and innovative nature that, under the regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (b), is selected by the director or manager of a covered facility for the purpose of maintaining the vitality of the facility in defense-related scientific disciplines.”.

(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4811 the following new item:

SEC. 3118. Limitation on bonuses for employees of the National Nuclear Security Administration who engage in improper program management.

(a) In general.—Subtitle C of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

“SEC. 3245. Limitation on bonuses for employees who engage in improper program management.

“(a) Limitation.—If the Secretary of Energy or the Administrator determines that a senior employee of the Administration committed improper program management, the Secretary and the Administrator may not pay a bonus to that employee during the one-year period beginning on the date of the determination.

“(b) Waiver.—The Secretary or the Administrator may waive the limitation on the payment of bonuses under subsection (a) on a case-by-case basis if—

“(1) the Secretary or the Administrator, as the case may be, notifies the congressional defense committees of the waiver; and

“(2) a period of 60 days elapses following the notification before the bonus is paid.

“(B) an additional step-increase under section 5336 of title 5, United States Code;

“(D) a recruitment or relocation bonus under section 5753 of title 5, United States Code; and

“(A) a construction project of the Administration that is not a minor construction project (as defined in section 4703(d) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2743(d))); or

“(3) The term ‘improper program management’ means actions relating to the management of a covered project that significantly—

(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of contents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 3244 the following new item:

SEC. 3119. Modification of authorized personnel levels of the Office of the Administrator for Nuclear Security.

SEC. 3120. Modification of submission of assessments of certain budget requests relating to the nuclear weapons stockpile.

SEC. 3121. Repeal of phase three review of certain defense environmental cleanup projects.

(1) in subsection (a), by striking “a series of three reviews, as described in subsections (b), (c), and (d)” and inserting “two reviews, as described in subsections (b) and (c)”; and

SEC. 3122. Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and operating contracts.

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively; and

(B) by striking paragraphs (1) through (3) and inserting the following new paragraphs:

“(1) a clear and complete description of the cost savings the Administrator expects to result from the competition for the contract over the life of the contract, including associated analyses, assumptions, and information sources used to determine such cost savings;

“(2) a description of any key limitations or uncertainties that could affect such costs savings, including costs savings that are anticipated but not fully known;

“(3) the costs of the competition for the contract, including the immediate costs of conducting the competition;

“(4) a description of any expected disruptions or delays in mission activities or deliverables resulting from the competition for the contract;

“(5) a clear and complete description of the benefits expected by the Administrator with respect to mission performance or operations resulting from the competition;”;

(2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (d) and (e), respectively;

“(c) Information quality.—A report required by subsection (a) shall be prepared in accordance with—

“(1) the information quality guidelines of the Department of Energy that are relevant to the clear and complete presentation of information on each matter required to be included in the report under subsection (b); and

“(2) best practices of the Government Accountability Office and relevant industries for cost estimating, if appropriate.”;

(4) in subsection (d), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph (1):

“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of each report required by subsection (a) with respect to a contract not later than 3 years after the report is submitted to such committees that includes an assessment, based on the most current information available, of the following:

“(A) The actual cost savings achieved compared to cost savings estimated under subsection (b)(1), and any increased costs incurred under the contract that were unexpected or uncertain at the time the contract was awarded.

“(B) Any disruptions or delays in mission activities or deliverables resulting from the competition for the contract compared to the disruptions and delayed estimated under subsection (b)(4).

“(C) Whether expected benefits of the competition with respect to mission performance or operations have been achieved.”; and

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking “2013 through 2017” and inserting “2015 through 2020”;

(D) in paragraph (2), as redesignated by subparagraph (C), by striking “subsections (a) and (d)(2)” and inserting “subsection (a)”.

SEC. 3123. Review of implementation of recommendations of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise.

(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Public Administration (in this section referred to as the “joint panel”) to review the implementation of the recommendations specified in subsection (b) of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise established by section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2208).

(b) Recommendations specified.—The recommendations specified in this subsection are recommendations 4 through 10, 12, 13, and 15 through 19 in the table of recommendations in the report of the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise entitled “A New Foundation for the Nuclear Security Enterprise” and submitted to Congress pursuant to section 3166 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2208), as amended by section 3142 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1069).

(c) Report required.—Not later than March 31, 2016, and annually thereafter through 2020, the joint panel shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review required by subsection (a) that includes an assessment of—

(1) the status of the implementation of the recommendations specified in subsection (b); and

(2) the extent to which the implementation of the recommendations is resulting in the desired effect as envisioned by the Congressional Advisory Panel on the Governance of the Nuclear Security Enterprise.

(a) In general.—Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.

(b) Merit-based decisions.—A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall—

(1) be based on merit-based selection procedures in accordance with the requirements of sections 2304(k) and 2374 of title 10, United States Code, or on competitive procedures; and

(c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority.—An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts.

(d) Applicability to classified annex.—This section applies to any classified annex that accompanies this Act.

(e) Oral and written communications.—No oral or written communication concerning any amount specified in the funding tables in this division shall supersede the requirements of this section.

SEC. 4002. Clarification of applicability of undistributed reductions of certain operation and maintenance funding among all operation and maintenance funding.

SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT (In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2016 Request	Senate Authorized
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	FIXED WING
2	UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT	879	879
4	MQ–1 UAV	260,436	260,436
	ROTARY
6	HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH)	187,177	187,177
7	AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN	1,168,461	1,168,461
8	AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN (AP)	209,930	209,930
11	UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP)	1,435,945	1,435,945
12	UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) (AP)	127,079	127,079
13	UH–60 BLACK HAWK A AND L MODELS	46,641	46,641
14	CH–47 HELICOPTER	1,024,587	1,024,587
15	CH–47 HELICOPTER (AP)	99,344	99,344
	MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
16	MQ–1 PAYLOAD (MIP)	97,543	97,543
19	MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP)	95,725	95,725
20	AH–64 MODS	116,153	116,153
21	CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP)	86,330	86,330
22	GRCS SEMA MODS (MIP)	4,019	4,019
23	ARL SEMA MODS (MIP)	16,302	16,302
24	EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP)	13,669	13,669
25	UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS	16,166	16,166
26	UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS	13,793	13,793
28	NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN	112,807	112,807
29	COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE	82,904	82,904
30	GATM ROLLUP	33,890	33,890
31	RQ–7 UAV MODS	81,444	81,444
	GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS
32	AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT	56,215	56,215
33	SURVIVABILITY CM	8,917	8,917
34	CMWS	78,348	104,348
	Army UPL for AH–64 ASE: urgent survivability requirement		[26,000]
	OTHER SUPPORT
35	AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	6,937	6,937
36	COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT	64,867	64,867
37	AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS	44,085	44,085
38	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL	94,545	94,545
39	INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	1,207	1,207
40	LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET	3,012	3,012

	TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY	5,689,357	5,715,357

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM
1	LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD)	115,075	115,075
2	MSE MISSILE	414,946	614,946
	Army UPL for Patriot PAC 3 for improved ballistic missile defense		[200,000]
	AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM
3	HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY	27,975	27,975
4	JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS (JAGM)	27,738	27,738
	ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS
5	JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY	77,163	77,163
6	TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY	87,525	87,525
8	GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS)	251,060	251,060
9	MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR)	17,428	17,428
	MODIFICATIONS
11	PATRIOT MODS	241,883	241,883
12	ATACMS MODS	30,119	20,119
	Early to need		[–10,000]
13	GMLRS MOD	18,221	18,221
14	STINGER MODS	2,216	2,216
15	AVENGER MODS	6,171	6,171
16	ITAS/TOW MODS	19,576	19,576
17	MLRS MODS	35,970	35,970
18	HIMARS MODIFICATIONS	3,148	3,148
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
19	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	33,778	33,778
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
20	AIR DEFENSE TARGETS	3,717	3,717
21	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MISSILES)	1,544	1,544
22	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT	4,704	4,704

	TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY	1,419,957	1,609,957

	PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY
	TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
1	STRYKER VEHICLE	181,245	181,245
	MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
2	STRYKER (MOD)	74,085	74,085
3	STRYKER UPGRADE	305,743	305,743
5	BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD)	225,042	225,042
6	HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD)	60,079	60,079
7	PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)	273,850	273,850
8	IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES)	123,629	195,629
	16 M88A2s to supports modernization of ABCTs and industrial base		[72,000]
9	ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD)	2,461	2,461
10	ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE	2,975	2,975
11	M88 FOV MODS	14,878	14,878
12	JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE	33,455	33,455
13	M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD)	367,939	367,939
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
15	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (TCV-WTCV)	6,479	6,479
	WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES
16	MORTAR SYSTEMS	4,991	4,991
17	XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM)	26,294	26,294
18	PRECISION SNIPER RIFLE	1,984	0
	Early to need		[–1,984]
19	COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM	1,488	0
	Early to need		[–1,488]
20	CARBINE	34,460	34,460
21	COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION	8,367	14,767
	Transferred funds		[6,400]
22	HANDGUN	5,417	0
	RFP release delayed, early to need		[–5,417]
	MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH
23	MK–19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS	2,777	2,777
24	M777 MODS	10,070	10,070
25	M4 CARBINE MODS	27,566	27,566
26	M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS	44,004	44,004
27	M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS	1,190	1,190
28	M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS	1,424	1,424
29	SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS	2,431	1,031
	Early to need		[–1,400]
30	M119 MODIFICATIONS	20,599	20,599
32	MORTAR MODIFICATION	6,300	6,300
33	MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)	3,737	3,737
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
34	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV)	391	2,891
	Transfer funds		[2,500]
35	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (WOCV-WTCV)	9,027	9,027
36	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	304	304
37	SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG)	2,392	2,392

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY	1,887,073	1,957,684

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY
	SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION
1	CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES	43,489	43,489
2	CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES	40,715	40,715
3	CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES	7,753	6,801
	Program funding ahead of need		[–952]
4	CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES	24,728	24,728
5	CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES	8,305	8,305
6	CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES	34,330	34,330
7	CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES	79,972	69,972
	Early to need		[–10,000]
	MORTAR AMMUNITION
8	60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	42,898	42,898
9	81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	43,500	43,500
10	120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	64,372	64,372
	TANK AMMUNITION
11	CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES	105,541	105,541
	ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
12	ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES	57,756	57,756
13	ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES	77,995	77,995
14	PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982	45,518	45,518
15	ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL	78,024	78,024
	ROCKETS
16	SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	7,500	7,500
17	ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES	33,653	33,653
	OTHER AMMUNITION
18	CAD/PAD, ALL TYPES	5,639	5,639
19	DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	9,751	9,751
20	GRENADES, ALL TYPES	19,993	19,993
21	SIGNALS, ALL TYPES	9,761	9,761
22	SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES	9,749	9,749
	MISCELLANEOUS
23	AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES	3,521	3,521
24	NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES	1,700	1,700
25	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO)	6,181	6,181
26	AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT	17,811	17,811
27	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO)	14,695	14,695
	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT
29	PROVISION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	221,703	221,703
30	CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION	113,250	113,250
31	ARMS INITIATIVE	3,575	3,575

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY	1,233,378	1,222,426

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	TACTICAL VEHICLES
1	TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS	12,855	12,855
2	SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED:	53	53
4	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE	308,336	308,336
5	FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV)	90,040	90,040
6	FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP	8,444	8,444
7	FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV)	27,549	27,549
8	PLS ESP	127,102	127,102
10	TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS	48,292	48,292
11	MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP	130,993	130,993
12	MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS	19,146	19,146
	NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES
14	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	1,248	1,248
15	NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER	9,614	9,614
	COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS
16	WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK	783,116	583,116
	Delayed obligation of prior year funds		[–200,000]
17	SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	49,898	49,898
18	JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY	4,062	4,062
19	JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM)	5,008	5,008
	COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
20	DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS	196,306	196,306
21	TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS	44,998	29,998
	Early to need in FY16 due to one year delay		[–15,000]
22	SHF TERM	7,629	7,629
23	NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (SPACE)	14,027	14,027
24	SMART-T (SPACE)	13,453	13,453
25	GLOBAL BRDCST SVC—GBS	6,265	6,265
26	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (TAC SAT)	1,042	1,042
27	ENROUTE MISSION COMMAND (EMC)	7,116	7,116
	COMM—C3 SYSTEM
28	ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS)	10,137	10,137
	COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
29	JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM	64,640	64,640
30	MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)	27,762	27,762
31	RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2)	9,422	9,422
32	AMC CRITICAL ITEMS—OPA2	26,020	26,020
33	TRACTOR DESK	4,073	4,073
34	SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT	1,403	1,403
35	SPIDER FAMILY OF NETWORKED MUNITIONS INCR	9,199	9,199
36	SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM COMM/ELECTRONICS	349	349
37	TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM	25,597	25,597
38	UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE	21,854	21,854
40	FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE	24,388	24,388
	COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM
42	CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE	1,349	1,349
43	ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT	3,695	3,695
	INFORMATION SECURITY
45	INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY PROGRAM-ISSP	19,920	19,920
46	COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC)	72,257	72,257
	COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS
47	BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS	16,082	16,082
	COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS
48	INFORMATION SYSTEMS	86,037	86,037
50	EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	8,550	8,550
51	INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM	73,496	73,496
	ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA)
54	JTT/CIBS-M	881	881
55	PROPHET GROUND	63,650	48,650
	Unjustified program growth		[–15,000]
57	DCGS-A (MIP)	260,268	260,268
58	JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS)	3,906	3,906
59	TROJAN (MIP)	13,929	13,929
60	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP)	3,978	3,978
61	CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS)	7,542	7,542
62	CLOSE ACCESS TARGET RECONNAISSANCE (CATR)	8,010	8,010
63	MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM-M	8,125	8,125
	ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW)
64	LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR	63,472	63,472
65	EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT)	2,556	2,556
66	AIR VIGILANCE (AV)	8,224	8,224
67	CREW	2,960	2,960
68	FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE	1,722	1,722
69	COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES	447	447
70	CI MODERNIZATION	228	228
	ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV)
71	SENTINEL MODS	43,285	43,285
72	NIGHT VISION DEVICES	124,216	124,216
74	SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF	23,216	23,216
76	INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS	60,679	60,679
77	FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS)	53,453	53,453
78	ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP	3,338	3,338
79	PROFILER	4,057	4,057
81	JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P)	133,339	133,339
82	JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS)	47,212	47,212
83	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR)	22,314	22,314
84	COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32	12,131	12,131
85	MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM	10,075	10,075
86	COUNTERFIRE RADARS	217,379	142,379
	Under execution of prior year funds		[–75,000]
	ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS
87	FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY	1,190	1,190
90	AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS	28,176	28,176
91	IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM	20,917	20,917
92	LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS)	5,850	5,850
93	NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE	12,738	12,738
94	MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)	145,405	145,405
95	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A)	162,654	146,654
	Program growth		[–16,000]
96	INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP	4,446	4,446
98	RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET	16,218	16,218
99	MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (ENFIRE)	1,138	1,138
	ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION
100	ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION	12,089	12,089
101	AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP	105,775	93,775
	Reduce IT procurement		[–12,000]
102	GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM	18,995	18,995
103	HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP)	62,319	62,319
104	RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS)	17,894	17,894
	ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V)
106	ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT)	4,242	4,242
	ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT
107	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E)	425	425
108	BCT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES	7,438	7,438
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
108A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	6,467	6,467
	CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT
109	PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS	248	248
110	FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE)	1,487	1,487
112	CBRN DEFENSE	26,302	26,302
	BRIDGING EQUIPMENT
113	TACTICAL BRIDGING	9,822	9,822
114	TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON	21,516	21,516
115	BRIDGE SUPPLEMENTAL SET	4,959	4,959
116	COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP	52,546	52,546
	ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT
117	GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS)	58,682	58,682
118	HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS)	13,565	13,565
119	ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS)	2,136	2,136
120	EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION	6,960	6,960
121	EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT)	17,424	17,424
122	REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS	8,284	8,284
123	< $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT	5,459	5,459
124	FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS	8,429	8,429
	COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
125	HEATERS AND ECU'S	18,876	18,876
127	SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT	2,287	2,287
128	PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS)	7,733	7,733
129	GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM	49,798	49,798
130	MOBILE SOLDIER POWER	43,639	43,639
132	FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT	13,118	13,118
133	CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM	28,278	28,278
135	FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS	34,544	34,544
136	ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT)	595	595
	PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT
137	QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT	5,368	5,368
138	DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER	35,381	35,381
	MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
139	COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL	73,828	73,828
	MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
140	MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS	25,270	25,270
141	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ)	2,760	2,760
	CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
142	GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE)	5,903	5,903
143	SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING	26,125	26,125
146	TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED	27,156	27,156
147	ALL TERRAIN CRANES	16,750	16,750
148	PLANT, ASPHALT MIXING	984	984
149	HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE)	2,656	2,656
150	ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP	2,531	2,531
151	FAMILY OF DIVER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	446	446
152	CONST EQUIP ESP	19,640	19,640
153	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP)	5,087	5,087
	RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT
154	ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP	39,772	39,772
155	ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL)	5,835	5,835
	GENERATORS
156	GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP	166,356	166,356
157	TACTICAL ELECTRIC POWER RECAPITALIZATION	11,505	11,505
	MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT
159	FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS	17,496	17,496
	TRAINING EQUIPMENT
160	COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT	74,916	74,916
161	TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM	303,236	278,236
	Unjustified program growth		[–25,000]
162	CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER	45,210	45,210
163	AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER	30,068	30,068
164	GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING	9,793	9,793
	TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD)
165	CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT	4,650	4,650
166	INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE)	34,487	34,487
167	TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD)	11,083	11,083
	OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
169	RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	17,937	17,937
170	PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3)	52,040	52,040
171	BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT	1,568	1,568
172	MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3)	64,219	64,219
173	PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH)	1,525	1,525
174	SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING	3,268	3,268
176	TRACTOR YARD	7,191	7,191
	OPA2
177	INITIAL SPARES—C&E	48,511	48,511

	TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY	5,899,028	5,541,028

	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	COMBAT AIRCRAFT
2	F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET	0	1,150,000
	Additional 12 aircraft, unfunded requirement		[1,150,000]
3	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV	897,542	873,042
	Efficiencies and excess cost growth		[–24,500]
4	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV (AP)	48,630	48,630
5	JSF STOVL	1,483,414	2,508,314
	Efficiencies and excess cost growth		[–25,100]
	Additional 6 aircraft, unfunded requirement		[1,050,000]
6	JSF STOVL (AP)	203,060	203,060
7	CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT)	41,300	41,300
8	V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT)	1,436,355	1,436,355
9	V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) (AP)	43,853	43,853
10	H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z)	800,057	800,057
11	H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) (AP)	56,168	56,168
12	MH–60S (MYP)	28,232	28,232
14	MH–60R (MYP)	969,991	969,991
16	P–8A POSEIDON	3,008,928	3,008,928
17	P–8A POSEIDON (AP)	269,568	269,568
18	E–2D ADV HAWKEYE	857,654	857,654
19	E–2D ADV HAWKEYE (AP)	195,336	195,336
	TRAINER AIRCRAFT
20	JPATS	8,914	8,914
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
21	KC–130J	192,214	192,214
22	KC–130J (AP)	24,451	24,451
23	MQ–4 TRITON	494,259	494,259
24	MQ–4 TRITON (AP)	54,577	54,577
25	MQ–8 UAV	120,020	120,020
26	STUASL0 UAV	3,450	3,450
	MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
28	EA–6 SERIES	9,799	9,799
29	AEA SYSTEMS	23,151	23,151
30	AV–8 SERIES	41,890	45,190
	AV–8B Link 16 upgrades, unfunded requirement		[3,300]
31	ADVERSARY	5,816	5,816
32	F–18 SERIES	978,756	1,148,756
	Jamming protection upgrades, unfunded requirement		[170,000]
34	H–53 SERIES	46,887	46,887
35	SH–60 SERIES	107,728	107,728
36	H–1 SERIES	42,315	42,315
37	EP–3 SERIES	41,784	41,784
38	P–3 SERIES	3,067	3,067
39	E–2 SERIES	20,741	20,741
40	TRAINER A/C SERIES	27,980	27,980
41	C–2A	8,157	8,157
42	C–130 SERIES	70,335	70,335
43	FEWSG	633	633
44	CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES	8,916	8,916
45	E–6 SERIES	185,253	185,253
46	EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES	76,138	76,138
47	SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT	23,702	23,702
48	T–45 SERIES	105,439	105,439
49	POWER PLANT CHANGES	9,917	9,917
50	JPATS SERIES	13,537	13,537
51	COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT	131,732	131,732
52	COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES	202,745	202,745
53	COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM	3,062	3,062
54	ID SYSTEMS	48,206	48,206
55	P–8 SERIES	28,492	28,492
56	MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION	7,680	7,680
57	MQ–8 SERIES	22,464	22,464
58	RQ–7 SERIES	3,773	3,773
59	V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY	121,208	144,208
	MV–22 Integrated Aircraft Survivability		[15,000]
	MV–22 Ballistic Protection		[8,000]
60	F–35 STOVL SERIES	256,106	256,106
61	F–35 CV SERIES	68,527	68,527
62	QRC	6,885	6,885
	AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
63	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	1,563,515	1,563,515
	AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES
64	COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT	450,959	450,959
65	AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	24,010	24,010
66	WAR CONSUMABLES	42,012	42,012
67	OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES	2,455	2,455
68	SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	50,859	50,859
69	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	1,801	1,801

	TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY	16,126,405	18,473,105

	WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
1	TRIDENT II MODS	1,099,064	1,099,064
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
2	MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	7,748	7,748
	STRATEGIC MISSILES
3	TOMAHAWK	184,814	214,814
	Combined with 47 FY15 OCO missiles, returns production to MSR		[30,000]
	TACTICAL MISSILES
4	AMRAAM	192,873	207,873
	Additional captive air training missiles		[15,000]
5	SIDEWINDER	96,427	96,427
6	JSOW	21,419	21,419
7	STANDARD MISSILE	435,352	435,352
8	RAM	80,826	80,826
11	STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM)	4,265	4,265
12	AERIAL TARGETS	40,792	40,792
13	OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT	3,335	3,335
	MODIFICATION OF MISSILES
14	ESSM	44,440	44,440
15	ESSM (AP)	54,462	54,462
16	HARM MODS	122,298	122,298
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES
17	WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	2,397	2,397
18	FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON	39,932	39,932
	ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
19	ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	57,641	61,309
	Classified Program		[3,668]
	TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
20	SSTD	7,380	7,380
21	MK–48 TORPEDO	65,611	65,611
22	ASW TARGETS	6,912	6,912
	MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP
23	MK–54 TORPEDO MODS	113,219	113,219
24	MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS	63,317	63,317
25	QUICKSTRIKE MINE	13,254	13,254
	SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
26	TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	67,701	67,701
27	ASW RANGE SUPPORT	3,699	3,699
	DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION
28	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	3,342	3,342
	GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
29	SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS	11,937	11,937
	MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS
30	CIWS MODS	53,147	53,147
31	COAST GUARD WEAPONS	19,022	19,022
32	GUN MOUNT MODS	67,980	67,980
33	AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS	19,823	19,823
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
35	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	149,725	149,725

	TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY	3,154,154	3,202,822

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC
	NAVY AMMUNITION
1	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	101,238	101,238
2	AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	67,289	67,289
3	MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION	20,340	20,340
4	PRACTICE BOMBS	40,365	40,365
5	CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES	49,377	49,377
6	AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES	59,651	59,651
7	JATOS	2,806	2,806
8	LRLAP 6" LONG RANGE ATTACK PROJECTILE	11,596	11,596
9	5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION	35,994	35,994
10	INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION	36,715	36,715
11	OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION	45,483	45,483
12	SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO	52,080	52,080
13	PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION	10,809	10,809
14	AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION	4,469	4,469
	MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
15	SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION	46,848	46,848
16	LINEAR CHARGES, ALL TYPES	350	350
17	40 MM, ALL TYPES	500	500
18	60MM, ALL TYPES	1,849	1,849
19	81MM, ALL TYPES	1,000	1,000
20	120MM, ALL TYPES	13,867	13,867
22	GRENADES, ALL TYPES	1,390	1,390
23	ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	14,967	14,967
24	ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES	45,219	45,219
26	FUZE, ALL TYPES	29,335	29,335
27	NON LETHALS	3,868	3,868
28	AMMO MODERNIZATION	15,117	15,117
29	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	11,219	11,219

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC	723,741	723,741

	SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY
	OTHER WARSHIPS
1	CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM	1,634,701	1,634,701
2	CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM (AP)	874,658	874,658
3	VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE	3,346,370	3,346,370
4	VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE (AP)	1,993,740	2,793,740
	Accelerate shipbuilding funding		[800,000]
5	CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS	678,274	678,274
6	CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS (AP)	14,951	14,951
7	DDG 1000	433,404	433,404
8	DDG–51	3,149,703	3,549,703
	Incremental funding for one DDG–51		[400,000]
10	LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP	1,356,991	1,356,991
	AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS
12	LPD–17	550,000	550,000
13	AFLOAT FORWARD STAGING BASE	0	97,000
	Accelerate shipbuilding funding		[97,000]
15	LHA REPLACEMENT	277,543	476,543
	Accelerate LHA–8 advanced procurement		[199,000]
XX	LX (R) AP	0	51,000
	Accelerate LX (R)		[51,000]
XXX	LCU Replacement	0	34,000
	Accelerate LCU replacement		[34,000]
	AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST
17	TAO FLEET OILER	674,190	674,190
19	MOORED TRAINING SHIP (AP)	138,200	138,200
20	OUTFITTING	697,207	697,207
21	SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR	255,630	255,630
22	SERVICE CRAFT	30,014	30,014
23	LCAC SLEP	80,738	80,738
24	YP CRAFT MAINTENANCE/ROH/SLEP	21,838	21,838
25	COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS	389,305	389,305
XX	T-ATS(X) Fleet Tug	0	75,000
	Accelerate T-ATS(X)		[75,000]

	TOTAL SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY	16,597,457	18,253,457

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT
1	LM–2500 GAS TURBINE	4,881	4,881
2	ALLISON 501K GAS TURBINE	5,814	5,814
3	HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED)	32,906	32,906
	GENERATORS
4	SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E	36,860	36,860
	NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT
5	OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT	87,481	87,481
	PERISCOPES
6	SUB PERISCOPES & IMAGING EQUIP	63,109	63,109
	OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT
7	DDG MOD	364,157	424,157
	Restore additional DDG BMD modernization (CNO UPL)		[60,000]
8	FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT	16,089	16,089
9	COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD	2,255	2,255
10	LHA/LHD MIDLIFE	28,571	28,571
11	LCC 19/20 EXTENDED SERVICE LIFE PROGRAM	12,313	12,313
12	POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT	16,609	16,609
13	SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	10,498	10,498
14	VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	35,747	35,747
15	LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	48,399	48,399
16	SUBMARINE BATTERIES	23,072	23,072
17	LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	55,283	55,283
18	STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP	18,563	18,563
19	DSSP EQUIPMENT	7,376	7,376
21	LCAC	20,965	20,965
22	UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS	51,652	51,652
23	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	102,498	102,498
24	CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS	3,027	3,027
25	SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM	7,399	7,399
	REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT
27	REACTOR COMPONENTS	296,095	296,095
	OCEAN ENGINEERING
28	DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT	15,982	15,982
	SMALL BOATS
29	STANDARD BOATS	29,982	29,982
	TRAINING EQUIPMENT
30	OTHER SHIPS TRAINING EQUIPMENT	66,538	66,538
	PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT
31	OPERATING FORCES IPE	71,138	71,138
	OTHER SHIP SUPPORT
32	NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS	132,625	132,625
33	LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT	23,500	23,500
34	LCS MCM MISSION MODULES	85,151	29,351
	Procurement in excess of need ahead of satisfactory testing		[–55,800]
35	LCS SUW MISSION MODULES	35,228	35,228
36	REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS)	87,627	22,027
	Procurement in excess of need ahead of satisfactory testing		[–65,600]
	LOGISTIC SUPPORT
37	LSD MIDLIFE	2,774	2,774
	SHIP SONARS
38	SPQ–9B RADAR	20,551	20,551
39	AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM	103,241	103,241
40	SSN ACOUSTICS	214,835	234,835
	Towed Array-unfunded requirement		[20,000]
41	UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	7,331	7,331
42	SONAR SWITCHES AND TRANSDUCERS	11,781	11,781
	ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
44	SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM	21,119	21,119
45	SSTD	8,396	8,396
46	FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	146,968	146,968
47	SURTASS	12,953	12,953
48	MARITIME PATROL AND RECONNSAISANCE FORCE	13,725	13,725
	ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT
49	AN/SLQ–32	324,726	352,726
	SEWIP Block II unfunded requirement		[28,000]
	RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT
50	SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT	148,221	148,221
51	AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS)	152	152
	SUBMARINE SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT
52	SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROG	79,954	79,954
	OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
53	COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY	25,695	25,695
54	TRUSTED INFORMATION SYSTEM (TIS)	284	284
55	NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS)	14,416	14,416
56	ATDLS	23,069	23,069
57	NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS)	4,054	4,054
58	MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT	21,014	21,014
59	SHALLOW WATER MCM	18,077	18,077
60	NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE)	12,359	12,359
61	AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE	4,240	4,240
62	STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP	17,440	17,440
	TRAINING EQUIPMENT
63	OTHER TRAINING EQUIPMENT	41,314	41,314
	AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
64	MATCALS	10,011	10,011
65	SHIPBOARD AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL	9,346	9,346
66	AUTOMATIC CARRIER LANDING SYSTEM	21,281	21,281
67	NATIONAL AIR SPACE SYSTEM	25,621	25,621
68	FLEET AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS	8,249	8,249
69	LANDING SYSTEMS	14,715	14,715
70	ID SYSTEMS	29,676	29,676
71	NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS	13,737	13,737
	OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
72	DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND & CONTROL	1,314	1,314
74	TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS	13,600	13,600
75	DCGS-N	31,809	31,809
76	CANES	278,991	278,991
77	RADIAC	8,294	8,294
78	CANES-INTELL	28,695	28,695
79	GPETE	6,962	6,962
80	MASF	290	290
81	INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY	14,419	14,419
82	EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION	4,175	4,175
83	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	44,176	44,176
	SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS
84	SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS	8,722	8,722
85	SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION	108,477	108,477
86	COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M	16,613	16,613
	SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS
87	SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT	20,691	20,691
88	SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT	60,945	60,945
	SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
89	SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS	30,892	30,892
90	NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT)	118,113	118,113
	SHORE COMMUNICATIONS
91	JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT	4,591	4,591
92	ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS	1,403	1,403
	CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT
93	INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)	135,687	135,687
94	MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM	970	970
	CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT
95	CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP	11,433	11,433
	OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT
96	COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT	2,529	2,529
	SONOBUOYS
97	SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES	168,763	168,763
	AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
98	WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	46,979	46,979
100	AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	123,884	123,884
103	METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT	15,090	15,090
104	DCRS/DPL	638	638
106	AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES	14,098	14,098
111	AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	49,773	49,773
	SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT
112	SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT	5,300	5,300
	SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT
115	SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	298,738	298,738
120	TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	71,245	71,245
	FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
123	STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP	240,694	240,694
	ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
124	SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS	96,040	96,040
125	ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	30,189	30,189
	OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
129	EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP	22,623	22,623
130	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	9,906	9,906
	OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE
134	TRAINING DEVICE MODS	99,707	99,707
	CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
135	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	2,252	2,252
136	GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS	2,191	2,191
137	CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP	2,164	2,164
138	FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT	14,705	14,705
139	TACTICAL VEHICLES	2,497	2,497
140	AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT	12,517	12,517
141	POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT	3,018	3,018
142	ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION	14,403	14,403
143	PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES	1,186	1,186
	SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
144	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT	18,805	18,805
145	OTHER SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	10,469	10,469
146	FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION	5,720	5,720
147	SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS	211,714	211,714
	TRAINING DEVICES
148	TRAINING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	7,468	7,468
	COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
149	COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	36,433	36,433
150	EDUCATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	3,180	3,180
151	MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	4,790	4,790
153	NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	4,608	4,608
154	OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	5,655	5,655
155	C4ISR EQUIPMENT	9,929	9,929
156	ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	26,795	26,795
157	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	88,453	88,453
159	ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY	99,094	99,094
	OTHER
160	NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE	99,014	99,014
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
160A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	21,439	21,439
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
161	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	328,043	328,043

	TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY	6,614,715	6,601,315

	PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
	TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES
1	AAV7A1 PIP	26,744	26,744
2	LAV PIP	54,879	54,879
	ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS
3	EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM	2,652	2,652
4	155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER	7,482	7,482
5	HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM	17,181	17,181
6	WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION	8,224	8,224
	OTHER SUPPORT
7	MODIFICATION KITS	14,467	14,467
8	WEAPONS ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM	488	488
	GUIDED MISSILES
9	GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE	7,565	7,565
10	JAVELIN	1,091	1,091
11	FOLLOW ON TO SMAW	4,872	4,872
12	ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H)	668	668
	OTHER SUPPORT
13	MODIFICATION KITS	12,495	152,495
	Additional missiles		[140,000]
	COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
14	UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER	13,109	13,109
15	COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C	35,147	35,147
	REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT
16	REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT	21,210	21,210
	OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
17	COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	792	792
	COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
19	ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)	3,642	3,642
20	AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS	3,520	3,520
	RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
21	RADAR SYSTEMS	35,118	35,118
22	GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR)	130,661	98,546
	Not meeting performance reqs reduce until technology is refined		[–32,115]
23	RQ–21 UAS	84,916	84,916
	INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
24	FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM	9,136	9,136
25	INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	29,936	29,936
28	DCGS-MC	1,947	1,947
	OTHER COMM/ELEC EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
31	NIGHT VISION EQUIPMENT	2,018	2,018
	OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL)
32	NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN)	67,295	67,295
33	COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES	43,101	43,101
34	COMMAND POST SYSTEMS	29,255	29,255
35	RADIO SYSTEMS	80,584	80,584
36	COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS	66,123	66,123
37	COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT	79,486	79,486
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
37A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	2,803	2,803
	ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES
38	COMMERCIAL PASSENGER VEHICLES	3,538	3,538
39	COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES	22,806	22,806
	TACTICAL VEHICLES
41	MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS	7,743	7,743
43	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE	79,429	79,429
44	FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS	3,157	3,157
	OTHER SUPPORT
45	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	6,938	6,938
	ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT
46	ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT	94	94
47	BULK LIQUID EQUIPMENT	896	896
48	TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS	136	136
49	POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED	10,792	10,792
50	AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	3,235	3,235
51	EOD SYSTEMS	7,666	7,666
	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
52	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	33,145	33,145
53	GARRISON MOBILE ENGINEER EQUIPMENT (GMEE)	1,419	1,419
	GENERAL PROPERTY
57	TRAINING DEVICES	24,163	24,163
58	CONTAINER FAMILY	962	962
59	FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT	6,545	6,545
60	FAMILY OF INTERNALLY TRANSPORTABLE VEH (ITV)	7,533	7,533
	OTHER SUPPORT
62	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	4,322	4,322
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
63	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	8,292	8,292

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS	1,131,418	1,239,303

	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	TACTICAL FORCES
1	F–35	5,260,212	5,161,112
	Efficiencies and excess cost growth		[–99,100]
2	F–35 (AP)	460,260	460,260
	TACTICAL AIRLIFT
3	KC–46A TANKER	2,350,601	2,326,601
	FY15 excess to need by $24 million due to program delays		[–24,000]
	OTHER AIRLIFT
4	C–130J	889,154	889,154
5	C–130J (AP)	50,000	50,000
6	HC–130J	463,934	463,934
7	HC–130J (AP)	30,000	30,000
8	MC–130J	828,472	828,472
9	MC–130J (AP)	60,000	60,000
	MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT
11	CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C	2,617	2,617
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
12	TARGET DRONES	132,028	132,028
14	RQ–4	37,800	37,800
15	MQ–9	552,528	1,032,528
	Accelerating procurement schedule to meet CCDR demand		[480,000]
	STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT
17	B–2A	32,458	32,458
18	B–1B	114,119	114,119
19	B–52	148,987	148,987
20	LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES	84,335	84,335
	TACTICAL AIRCRAFT
22	F–15	464,367	713,671
	EPAWSS upgrade		[11,600]
	F–15C AESA radars		[48,000]
	F–15D AESA radars		[192,500]
	ADCP II upgrades		[10,000]
	F–15C MIDS JTRS transfer to RDT&E		[–6,387]
	F–15E MIDS JTRS transfer to RDT&E		[–6,409]
23	F–16	17,134	17,134
24	F–22A	126,152	126,152
25	F–35 MODIFICATIONS	70,167	70,167
26	INCREMENT 3.2B	69,325	69,325
	AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT
28	C–5	5,604	5,604
30	C–17A	46,997	46,997
31	C–21	10,162	10,162
32	C–32A	44,464	44,464
33	C–37A	10,861	10,861
	TRAINER AIRCRAFT
34	GLIDER MODS	134	134
35	T–6	17,968	17,968
36	T–1	23,706	23,706
37	T–38	30,604	30,604
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
38	U–2 MODS	22,095	22,095
39	KC–10A (ATCA)	5,611	5,611
40	C–12	1,980	1,980
42	VC–25A MOD	98,231	98,231
43	C–40	13,171	13,171
44	C–130	7,048	130,248
	C–130H Electronic Prop Control System – UPL		[13,500]
	C–130H In-flight Prop Balancing System – UPL		[1,500]
	C–130H T–56 3.5 Engine Mods		[33,200]
	Funds added to comply with Sec 134, FY15 NDAA		[75,000]
45	C–130J MODS	29,713	29,713
46	C–135	49,043	49,043
47	COMPASS CALL MODS	68,415	97,115
	Modification for restored EC–130H		[28,700]
48	RC–135	156,165	156,165
49	E–3	13,178	13,178
50	E–4	23,937	23,937
51	E–8	18,001	18,001
52	AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM	183,308	183,308
53	FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS	44,163	44,163
54	H–1	6,291	6,291
55	UH–1N REPLACEMENT	2,456	2,456
56	H–60	45,731	45,731
57	RQ–4 MODS	50,022	50,022
58	HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS	21,660	21,660
59	OTHER AIRCRAFT	117,767	115,521
	C2ISR TDL transfer to COMSEC equipment		[–2,246]
60	MQ–1 MODS	3,173	3,173
61	MQ–9 MODS	115,226	115,226
63	CV–22 MODS	58,828	58,828
	AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
64	INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS	656,242	656,242
	COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
65	AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP	33,716	33,716
	POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT
67	B–2A	38,837	38,837
68	B–52	5,911	5,911
69	C–17A	30,108	30,108
70	CV–22 POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT	3,353	3,353
71	C–135	4,490	4,490
72	F–15	3,225	3,225
73	F–16	14,969	14,969
74	F–22A	971	971
76	MQ–9	5,000	5,000
	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS
77	INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS	18,802	18,802
	WAR CONSUMABLES
78	WAR CONSUMABLES	156,465	156,465
	OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES
79	OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES	1,052,814	1,111,900
	Transfer from RDT&E for NATO AWACS		[59,086]
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
79A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	42,503	42,503

	TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE	15,657,769	16,472,713

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC
1	MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC	94,040	94,040
	TACTICAL
3	JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE	440,578	440,578
4	SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X)	200,777	200,777
5	AMRAAM	390,112	390,112
6	PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE	423,016	423,016
7	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB	133,697	133,697
	INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
8	INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION	397	397
	CLASS IV
9	MM III MODIFICATIONS	50,517	50,517
10	AGM–65D MAVERICK	9,639	9,639
11	AGM–88A HARM	197	197
12	AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)	25,019	25,019
	MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
14	INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS	48,523	48,523
	SPECIAL PROGRAMS
28	SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS	276,562	276,562
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
28A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	893,971	893,971

	TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE	2,987,045	2,987,045

	SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	SPACE PROGRAMS
1	ADVANCED EHF	333,366	333,366
2	WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE)	53,476	53,476
3	GPS III SPACE SEGMENT	199,218	0
	GPS III SV10 early to need		[–199,218]
4	SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC)	18,362	18,362
5	GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE)	66,135	66,135
6	DEF METEOROLOGICAL SAT PROG(SPACE)	89,351	0
	Cut DMSP #20		[–89,351]
7	EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH CAPABILITY	571,276	571,276
8	EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE)	800,201	800,201
9	SBIR HIGH (SPACE)	452,676	452,676

	TOTAL SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE	2,584,061	2,295,492

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE
	ROCKETS
1	ROCKETS	23,788	23,788
	CARTRIDGES
2	CARTRIDGES	131,102	169,602
	Increase to match size of A–10 fleet		[38,500]
	BOMBS
3	PRACTICE BOMBS	89,759	89,759
4	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	637,181	637,181
5	MASSIVE ORDNANCE PENETRATOR (MOP)	39,690	39,690
6	JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION	374,688	374,688
	OTHER ITEMS
7	CAD/PAD	58,266	58,266
8	EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD)	5,612	5,612
9	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	103	103
10	MODIFICATIONS	1,102	1,102
11	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	3,044	3,044
	FLARES
12	FLARES	120,935	120,935
	FUZES
13	FUZES	213,476	213,476
	SMALL ARMS
14	SMALL ARMS	60,097	60,097

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE	1,758,843	1,797,343

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES
1	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	8,834	8,834
	CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES
2	MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE	58,160	58,160
3	CAP VEHICLES	977	977
4	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	12,483	12,483
	SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES
5	SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES	4,728	4,728
6	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	4,662	4,662
	FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT
7	FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES	10,419	10,419
	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
8	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	23,320	23,320
	BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT
9	RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP	6,215	6,215
10	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	87,781	87,781
	COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC)
11	COMSEC EQUIPMENT	136,998	139,244
	Transfer for Link 16 upgrades		[2,246]
12	MODIFICATIONS (COMSEC)	677	677
	INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS
13	INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT	4,041	4,041
14	INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT	22,573	22,573
15	MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS	14,456	14,456
	ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS
16	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS	31,823	31,823
17	NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM	5,833	5,833
18	BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED	1,687	1,687
19	THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS	22,710	22,710
20	WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST	21,561	21,561
21	STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL	286,980	286,980
22	CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX	36,186	36,186
24	INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN)	9,597	9,597
	SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS
25	GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY	27,403	27,403
26	AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS	7,212	7,212
27	MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL	11,062	30,962
	Additional battlefield air operations kits to meet need		[19,900]
28	AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM	131,269	131,269
29	COMBAT TRAINING RANGES	33,606	33,606
30	MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N	5,232	5,232
31	C3 COUNTERMEASURES	7,453	7,453
32	INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM	3,976	3,976
33	GCSS-AF FOS	25,515	25,515
34	DEFENSE ENTERPRISE ACCOUNTING AND MGMT SYSTEM	9,255	9,255
35	THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM	7,523	7,523
36	AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS	12,043	12,043
37	AIR OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 10.2	24,246	24,246
	AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS
38	INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS	74,621	74,621
39	AFNET	103,748	86,748
	Restructure program		[–17,000]
41	JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE)	5,199	5,199
42	USCENTCOM	15,780	15,780
	SPACE PROGRAMS
43	FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS	79,592	79,592
44	SPACE BASED IR SENSOR PGM SPACE	90,190	90,190
45	NAVSTAR GPS SPACE	2,029	2,029
46	NUDET DETECTION SYS SPACE	5,095	5,095
47	AF SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK SPACE	76,673	76,673
48	SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE	113,275	113,275
49	MILSATCOM SPACE	35,495	35,495
50	SPACE MODS SPACE	23,435	23,435
51	COUNTERSPACE SYSTEM	43,065	43,065
	ORGANIZATION AND BASE
52	TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT	77,538	113,538
	Increase JTAC training and rehearsal simulators per AF unfunded priority list		[36,000]
54	RADIO EQUIPMENT	8,400	8,400
55	CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT	6,144	6,144
56	BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE	77,010	77,010
	MODIFICATIONS
57	COMM ELECT MODS	71,800	71,800
	PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP
58	NIGHT VISION GOGGLES	2,370	2,370
59	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	79,623	79,623
	DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ
60	MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP	7,249	7,249
	BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
61	BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT	9,095	9,095
62	ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT	17,866	17,866
64	MOBILITY EQUIPMENT	61,850	61,850
65	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	30,477	30,477
	SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS
67	DARP RC135	25,072	25,072
68	DCGS-AF	183,021	183,021
70	SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM	629,371	629,371
71	DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG.	100,663	100,663
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
71A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	15,038,333	15,038,333
	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS
73	SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS	59,863	59,863

	TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE	18,272,438	18,313,584

	PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA
1	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	1,488	1,488
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA
2	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	2,494	2,494
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA
3	PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION	9,341	9,341
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
7	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY	8,080	18,080
	Sharkseer increase		[10,000]
8	TELEPORT PROGRAM	62,789	62,789
9	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	9,399	9,399
10	NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)	1,819	1,819
11	DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK	141,298	141,298
12	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	12,732	12,732
13	WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY	64,098	64,098
14	SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE	617,910	617,910
15	JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT	84,400	84,400
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA
16	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	5,644	5,644
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT
17	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	11,208	11,208
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA
18	AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS	1,298	1,298
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS
20	MAJOR EQUIPMENT	1,048	1,048
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY
21	VEHICLES	100	100
22	OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT	5,474	5,474
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY
23	THAAD	464,067	464,067
24	AEGIS BMD	558,916	706,681
	Increase SM–3 Block IB purchase		[117,880]
	Increase SM–3 Block IB canisters		[2,565]
	Undifferentiated Block IB test and evaluation costs		[27,320]
25	AEGIS BMD (AP)	147,765	0
	Early to need		[–147,765]
26	BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS	78,634	78,634
27	AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III	30,587	30,587
28	IRON DOME	55,000	41,100
	Request excess of requirement		[–13,900]
XX	DAVIDS SLING	0	150,000
	Increase for David's Sling co-production		[150,000]
XXX	ARROW 3	0	15,000
	Increase for Arrow 3 co-production		[15,000]
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA
35	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP)	37,177	37,177
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD
36	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD	46,939	46,939
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS
38	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS	13,027	13,027
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS
40	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS	27,859	27,859
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
40A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	617,757	617,757
	AVIATION PROGRAMS
41	MC–12	63,170	0
	SOCOM requested realignment		[–63,170]
42	ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT	135,985	135,985
44	NON-STANDARD AVIATION	61,275	61,275
45	U–28	0	63,170
	SOCOM requested realignment		[63,170]
47	RQ–11 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE	20,087	20,087
48	CV–22 MODIFICATION	18,832	18,832
49	MQ–1 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE	1,934	1,934
50	MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE	11,726	21,726
	MQ–9 capability enhancements		[10,000]
51	STUASL0	1,514	1,514
52	PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE	204,105	204,105
53	AC/MC–130J	61,368	61,368
54	C–130 MODIFICATIONS	66,861	31,412
	C–130 TF/TA adjustments		[–35,449]
	SHIPBUILDING
55	UNDERWATER SYSTEMS	32,521	32,521
	AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
56	ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M	174,734	174,734
	OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
57	INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS	93,009	93,009
58	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	14,964	14,964
59	OTHER ITEMS <$5M	79,149	79,149
60	COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS	33,362	33,362
61	SPECIAL PROGRAMS	143,533	143,533
62	TACTICAL VEHICLES	73,520	73,520
63	WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M	186,009	186,009
64	COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS	19,693	19,693
65	GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES	3,967	3,967
66	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE	19,225	19,225
68	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS	213,252	213,252
	CBDP
74	CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS	141,223	141,223
75	CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION	137,487	137,487
	UNDISTRIBUTED
XX	USCC CYBER CAPABILITIES	0	75,000
	Cyber capabilities		[75,000]

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE	5,130,853	5,341,504

	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND
1	JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND	99,701	99,701

	TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND	99,701	99,701

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT	106,967,393	111,847,577

SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars)
	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	FIXED WING
3	AERIAL COMMON SENSOR (ACS) (MIP)	99,500	99,500
4	MQ–1 UAV	16,537	16,537
	MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
16	MQ–1 PAYLOAD (MIP)	8,700	8,700
23	ARL SEMA MODS (MIP)	32,000	32,000
31	RQ–7 UAV MODS	8,250	8,250

	TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY	164,987	164,987

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM
3	HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY	37,260	37,260

	TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY	37,260	37,260

	PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY
	WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES
16	MORTAR SYSTEMS	7,030	7,030
21	COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION	19,000	19,000

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY	26,030	26,030

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY
	SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION
4	CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES	4,000	4,000
	MORTAR AMMUNITION
8	60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	11,700	11,700
9	81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	4,000	4,000
10	120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES	7,000	7,000
	ARTILLERY AMMUNITION
12	ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES	5,000	5,000
13	ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES	10,000	10,000
15	ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL	2,000	2,000
	ROCKETS
17	ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES	136,340	136,340
	OTHER AMMUNITION
19	DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	4,000	4,000
21	SIGNALS, ALL TYPES	8,000	8,000

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY	192,040	192,040

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY
	TACTICAL VEHICLES
5	FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV)	243,998	243,998
9	HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV	223,276	223,276
11	MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP	130,000	130,000
12	MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS	393,100	393,100
	COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
21	TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS	5,724	5,724
	COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS
51	INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM	29,500	29,500
	ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA)
57	DCGS-A (MIP)	54,140	54,140
59	TROJAN (MIP)	6,542	6,542
61	CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS)	3,860	3,860
	ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW)
68	FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE	14,847	14,847
69	COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES	19,535	19,535
	ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV)
84	COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32	2,601	2,601
	ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS
87	FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY	48	48
94	MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS)	252	252
	ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION
101	AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP	652	652
	CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT
111	BASE DEFENSE SYSTEMS (BDS)	4,035	4,035
	COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
131	FORCE PROVIDER	53,800	53,800
133	CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM	700	700
	MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT
159	FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS	10,486	10,486
	OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
169	RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	8,500	8,500

	TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY	1,205,596	1,205,596

	JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND
	FORCE TRAINING
3	TRAIN THE FORCE	7,850	7,850
	JIEDDO DEVICE DEFEAT
2	DEFEAT THE DEVICE	77,600	77,600
	NETWORK ATTACK
1	ATTACK THE NETWORK	219,550	215,086
	Adjustment due to low execution in prior years		[–4,464]
	STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE
4	OPERATIONS	188,271	144,464
	Maintain prior year funding level		[–43,807]

	TOTAL JOINT IMPR EXPLOSIVE DEV DEFEAT FUND	493,271	445,000

	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
26	STUASL0 UAV	55,000	55,000
	MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT
30	AV–8 SERIES	41,365	41,365
32	F–18 SERIES	8,000	8,000
37	EP–3 SERIES	6,300	6,300
47	SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT	14,198	14,198
51	COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT	72,700	72,700
52	COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES	13,988	13,988
59	V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY	4,900	4,900
	AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES
65	AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES	943	943

	TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY	217,394	217,394

	WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	TACTICAL MISSILES
10	LASER MAVERICK	3,344	3,344

	TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY	3,344	3,344

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC
	NAVY AMMUNITION
1	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	9,715	9,715
2	AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	11,108	11,108
3	MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION	3,603	3,603
6	AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES	11,982	11,982
11	OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION	4,674	4,674
12	SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO	3,456	3,456
13	PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION	1,989	1,989
14	AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION	4,674	4,674
	MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION
20	120MM, ALL TYPES	10,719	10,719
23	ROCKETS, ALL TYPES	3,993	3,993
24	ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES	67,200	67,200
26	FUZE, ALL TYPES	3,299	3,299
25	DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES	518	518

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC	136,930	136,930

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY
	CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
135	PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES	186	186
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
160A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	12,000	12,000

	TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY	12,186	12,186

	PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS
	GUIDED MISSILES
10	JAVELIN	7,679	7,679
	OTHER SUPPORT
13	MODIFICATION KITS	10,311	10,311
	COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
14	UNIT OPERATIONS CENTER	8,221	8,221
	OTHER SUPPORT (TEL)
18	MODIFICATION KITS	3,600	3,600
	COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL)
19	ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC)	8,693	8,693
	INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL)
27	RQ–11 UAV	3,430	3,430
	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT
52	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	7,000	7,000

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS	48,934	48,934

	AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
15	MQ–9	13,500	13,500
	OTHER AIRCRAFT
44	C–130	1,410	1,410
56	H–60	39,300	39,300
58	HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS	5,690	5,690
61	MQ–9 MODS	69,000	69,000

	TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE	128,900	128,900

	MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	TACTICAL
6	PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE	280,902	280,902
7	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB	2,520	2,520
	CLASS IV
10	AGM–65D MAVERICK	5,720	5,720

	TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE	289,142	289,142

	PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE
	CARTRIDGES
2	CARTRIDGES	8,371	8,371
	BOMBS
4	GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS	17,031	17,031
6	JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION	184,412	184,412
	FLARES
12	FLARES	11,064	11,064
	FUZES
13	FUZES	7,996	7,996

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE	228,874	228,874

	OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE
	SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS
25	GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY	3,953	3,953
27	MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL	2,000	2,000
	AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS
42	USCENTCOM	10,000	10,000
	ORGANIZATION AND BASE
52	TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT	4,065	4,065
56	BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE	15,400	15,400
	PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP
58	NIGHT VISION GOGGLES	3,580	3,580
59	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	3,407	3,407
	BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
62	ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT	46,790	46,790
64	MOBILITY EQUIPMENT	400	400
65	ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION	9,800	9,800
	SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS
71	DEFENSE SPACE RECONNAISSANCE PROG.	28,070	28,070
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
71A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	3,732,499	3,732,499

	TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE	3,859,964	3,859,964

	PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE
	MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA
8	TELEPORT PROGRAM	1,940	1,940
	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS
40A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	35,482	35,482
	AVIATION PROGRAMS
41	MC–12	5,000	5,000
	AMMUNITION PROGRAMS
56	ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M	35,299	35,299
	OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS
61	SPECIAL PROGRAMS	15,160	15,160
63	WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M	15,000	15,000
68	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS	104,537	104,537

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE	212,418	212,418

	TOTAL PROCUREMENT	7,257,270	7,208,999

SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	ProgramElement	Item	FY 2016 Request	Senate Authorized
		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601101A	IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH	13,018	13,018
2	0601102A	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	239,118	279,118
		Basic research program increase		[40,000]
3	0601103A	UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES	72,603	72,603
4	0601104A	UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS	100,340	100,340
		SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH	425,079	465,079

		APPLIED RESEARCH
5	0602105A	MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY	28,314	28,314
6	0602120A	SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY	38,374	38,374
7	0602122A	TRACTOR HIP	6,879	6,879
8	0602211A	AVIATION TECHNOLOGY	56,884	56,884
9	0602270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY	19,243	19,243
10	0602303A	MISSILE TECHNOLOGY	45,053	45,053
11	0602307A	ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	29,428	29,428
12	0602308A	ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION	27,862	27,862
13	0602601A	COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY	68,839	68,839
14	0602618A	BALLISTIAG TECHNOLOGY	92,801	92,801
15	0602622A	CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY	3,866	3,866
16	0602623A	JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM	5,487	5,487
17	0602624A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY	48,340	48,340
18	0602705A	ELECTRONIAG AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES	55,301	55,301
19	0602709A	NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY	33,807	33,807
20	0602712A	COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS	25,068	25,068
21	0602716A	HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY	23,681	23,681
22	0602720A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY	20,850	20,850
23	0602782A	COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY	36,160	36,160
24	0602783A	COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY	12,656	12,656
25	0602784A	MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY	63,409	63,409
26	0602785A	MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY	24,735	24,735
27	0602786A	WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY	35,795	35,795
28	0602787A	MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY	76,853	76,853
		SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH	879,685	879,685

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
29	0603001A	WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	46,973	46,973
30	0603002A	MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	69,584	69,584
31	0603003A	AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	89,736	89,736
32	0603004A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	57,663	57,663
33	0603005A	COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	113,071	113,071
34	0603006A	SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	5,554	5,554
35	0603007A	MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	12,636	12,636
37	0603009A	TRACTOR HIKE	7,502	7,502
38	0603015A	NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS	17,425	17,425
39	0603020A	TRACTOR ROSE	11,912	11,912
40	0603125A	COMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	27,520	27,520
41	0603130A	TRACTOR NAIL	2,381	2,381
42	0603131A	TRACTOR EGGS	2,431	2,431
43	0603270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY	26,874	26,874
44	0603313A	MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	49,449	49,449
45	0603322A	TRACTOR CAGE	10,999	10,999
46	0603461A	HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	177,159	167,159
		Encourage use of commercial technology		[–10,000]
47	0603606A	LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	13,993	13,993
48	0603607A	JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM	5,105	5,105
49	0603710A	NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	40,929	40,929
50	0603728A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS	10,727	10,727
51	0603734A	MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	20,145	20,145
52	0603772A	ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY	38,163	38,163
53	0603794A	C3 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	37,816	37,816
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	895,747	885,747

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
54	0603305A	ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	10,347	10,347
55	0603308A	ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	25,061	25,061
56	0603619A	LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV	49,636	49,636
57	0603627A	SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING SYS-ADV DEV	13,426	13,426
58	0603639A	TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION	46,749	46,749
60	0603747A	SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY	6,258	6,258
61	0603766A	TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV	13,472	13,472
62	0603774A	NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	7,292	7,292
63	0603779A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL	8,813	8,813
65	0603790A	NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	6,075	6,075
67	0603804A	LOGISTIAG AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV	21,233	21,233
68	0603807A	MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV	31,962	31,962
69	0603827A	SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	22,194	22,194
71	0604100A	ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES	9,805	9,805
72	0604115A	TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES	40,917	40,917
73	0604120A	ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT)	30,058	30,058
74	0604319A	INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INCREMENT 2–INTERCEPT (IFPC2)	155,361	155,361
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES	498,659	498,659

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
76	0604201A	AIRCRAFT AVIONIAG	12,939	12,939
78	0604270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	18,843	18,843
79	0604280A	JOINT TACTICAL RADIO	9,861	9,861
80	0604290A	MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR)	8,763	8,763
81	0604321A	ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM	4,309	4,309
82	0604328A	TRACTOR CAGE	15,138	15,138
83	0604601A	INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS	74,128	76,628
		Transfer from WTCV		[2,500]
85	0604611A	JAVELIN	3,945	3,945
87	0604633A	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL	10,076	10,076
88	0604641A	TACTICAL UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE (TUGV)	40,374	40,374
89	0604710A	NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV	67,582	67,582
90	0604713A	COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT	1,763	1,763
91	0604715A	NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV	27,155	27,155
92	0604741A	AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV	24,569	24,569
93	0604742A	CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	23,364	23,364
94	0604746A	AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT	8,960	8,960
95	0604760A	DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV	9,138	9,138
96	0604780A	COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE	21,622	21,622
97	0604798A	BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION	99,242	99,242
98	0604802A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV	21,379	21,379
99	0604804A	LOGISTIAG AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV	48,339	48,339
100	0604805A	COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV	2,726	2,726
101	0604807A	MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV	45,412	45,412
102	0604808A	LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV	55,215	55,215
104	0604818A	ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE	163,643	163,643
105	0604820A	RADAR DEVELOPMENT	12,309	12,309
106	0604822A	GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS)	15,700	15,700
107	0604823A	FIREFINDER	6,243	6,243
108	0604827A	SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL	18,776	18,776
109	0604854A	ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD	1,953	1,953
110	0605013A	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	67,358	67,358
111	0605018A	INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A)	136,011	86,011
		Restructure program		[–50,000]
112	0605028A	ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV)	230,210	230,210
113	0605030A	JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC)	13,357	13,357
114	0605031A	JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN)	18,055	18,055
115	0605032A	TRACTOR TIRE	5,677	5,677
116	0605035A	COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM)	77,570	101,570
		Army UPL for AH–64 ASE development		[24,000]
117	0605051A	AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT	18,112	78,112
		Army UPL for AH–64 ASE development		[60,000]
118	0605350A	WIN-T INCREMENT 3—FULL NETWORKING	39,700	39,700
119	0605380A	AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS)	12,987	6,155
		Only for SALT program		[–6,832]
120	0605450A	JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)	88,866	88,866
121	0605456A	PAC–3/MSE MISSILE	2,272	2,272
122	0605457A	ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD)	214,099	214,099
123	0605625A	MANNED GROUND VEHICLE	49,247	49,247
124	0605626A	AERIAL COMMON SENSOR	2	2
125	0605766A	NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP)	10,599	10,599
126	0605812A	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH	32,486	32,486
127	0605830A	AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT	8,880	8,880
128	0210609A	PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM)	152,288	152,288
129	0303032A	TROJAN—RH12	5,022	5,022
130	0304270A	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	12,686	12,686
		SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION	2,068,950	2,098,618

		RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
131	0604256A	THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT	20,035	20,035
132	0604258A	TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	16,684	16,684
133	0604759A	MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT	62,580	62,580
134	0605103A	RAND ARROYO CENTER	20,853	20,853
135	0605301A	ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL	205,145	205,145
136	0605326A	CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM	19,430	19,430
138	0605601A	ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES	277,646	277,646
139	0605602A	ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS	51,550	51,550
140	0605604A	SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS	33,246	33,246
141	0605606A	AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION	4,760	4,760
142	0605702A	METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES	8,303	8,303
143	0605706A	MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS	20,403	20,403
144	0605709A	EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS	10,396	10,396
145	0605712A	SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING	49,337	49,337
146	0605716A	ARMY EVALUATION CENTER	52,694	52,694
147	0605718A	ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG	938	938
148	0605801A	PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES	60,319	60,319
149	0605803A	TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES	28,478	28,478
150	0605805A	MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY	32,604	24,604
		Under execution of prior year funds		[–8,000]
151	0605857A	ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT	3,186	3,186
152	0605898A	MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D	48,955	48,955
		SUBTOTAL, RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	1,027,542	1,019,542

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
154	0603778A	MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	18,397	18,397
155	0603813A	TRACTOR PULL	9,461	9,461
156	0607131A	WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS	4,945	4,945
157	0607133A	TRACTOR SMOKE	7,569	7,569
158	0607135A	APACHE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	69,862	69,862
159	0607136A	BLACKHAWK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	66,653	66,653
160	0607137A	CHINOOK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	37,407	37,407
161	0607138A	FIXED WING PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	1,151	1,151
162	0607139A	IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM	51,164	51,164
163	0607140A	EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FROM NIE	2,481	2,481
164	0607141A	LOGISTIAG AUTOMATION	1,673	1,673
166	0607665A	FAMILY OF BIOMETRIAG	13,237	13,237
167	0607865A	PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT	105,816	105,816
169	0202429A	AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT—COCOM EXERCISE	40,565	40,565
171	0203728A	JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOAG)	35,719	35,719
172	0203735A	COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS	257,167	297,167
		Stryker modification and improvement		[40,000]
173	0203740A	MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM	15,445	15,445
175	0203752A	AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	364	364
176	0203758A	DIGITIZATION	4,361	4,361
177	0203801A	MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	3,154	3,154
178	0203802A	OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS	35,951	35,951
179	0203808A	TRACTOR CARD	34,686	34,686
180	0205402A	INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE—OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEV	10,750	10,750
181	0205410A	MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT	402	402
183	0205456A	LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM	64,159	64,159
184	0205778A	GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS)	17,527	17,527
185	0208053A	JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM	20,515	20,515
187	0303028A	SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES	12,368	12,368
188	0303140A	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	31,154	31,154
189	0303141A	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	12,274	12,274
190	0303142A	SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE)	9,355	9,355
191	0303150A	WWMCAG/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM	7,053	7,053
193	0305179A	INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS)	750	750
194	0305204A	TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES	13,225	13,225
195	0305206A	AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS	22,870	22,870
196	0305208A	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	25,592	25,592
199	0305233A	RQ–7 UAV	7,297	7,297
201	0310349A	WIN-T INCREMENT 2—INITIAL NETWORKING	3,800	3,800
202	0708045A	END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES	48,442	48,442
	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	4,536	4,536
		SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	1,129,297	1,169,297

		TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY	6,924,959	7,016,627

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601103N	UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES	116,196	116,196
2	0601152N	IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH	19,126	19,126
3	0601153N	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	451,606	506,606
		Basic research program increase		[55,000]
		SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH	586,928	641,928

		APPLIED RESEARCH
4	0602114N	POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH	68,723	68,723
5	0602123N	FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH	154,963	154,963
6	0602131M	MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY	49,001	49,001
7	0602235N	COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH	42,551	42,551
8	0602236N	WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH	45,056	45,056
9	0602271N	ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH	115,051	115,051
10	0602435N	OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH	42,252	42,252
11	0602651M	JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH	6,119	6,119
12	0602747N	UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH	123,750	142,350
		Accelerate undersea warfare research		[18,600]
13	0602750N	FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH	179,686	179,686
14	0602782N	MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH	37,418	37,418
		SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH	864,570	883,170

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
15	0603114N	POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	37,093	37,093
16	0603123N	FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	38,044	38,044
17	0603271N	ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	34,899	34,899
18	0603640M	USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD)	137,562	137,562
19	0603651M	JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	12,745	12,745
20	0603673N	FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	258,860	248,860
		Capable manpower, enablers, and sea basing		[–10,000]
21	0603680N	MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	57,074	57,074
22	0603729N	WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	4,807	4,807
23	0603747N	UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	13,748	13,748
24	0603758N	NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS	66,041	66,041
25	0603782N	MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	1,991	1,991
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	662,864	652,864

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
26	0603207N	AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS	41,832	41,832
27	0603216N	AVIATION SURVIVABILITY	5,404	5,404
28	0603237N	DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL	3,086	3,086
29	0603251N	AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS	11,643	11,643
30	0603254N	ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	5,555	5,555
31	0603261N	TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE	3,087	3,087
32	0603382N	ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY	1,636	1,636
33	0603502N	SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES	118,588	118,588
34	0603506N	SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE	77,385	77,385
35	0603512N	CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	8,348	8,348
36	0603525N	PILOT FISH	123,246	123,246
37	0603527N	RETRACT LARCH	28,819	28,819
38	0603536N	RETRACT JUNIPER	112,678	112,678
39	0603542N	RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL	710	710
40	0603553N	SURFACE ASW	1,096	1,096
41	0603561N	ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT	87,160	98,160
		Accelerate unmanned underwater vehicle development		[11,000]
42	0603562N	SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS	10,371	10,371
43	0603563N	SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN	11,888	11,888
44	0603564N	SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES	4,332	4,332
45	0603570N	ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS	482,040	482,040
46	0603573N	ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS	25,904	25,904
47	0603576N	CHALK EAGLE	511,802	511,802
48	0603581N	LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LAG)	118,416	118,416
49	0603582N	COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION	35,901	35,901
50	0603595N	OHIO REPLACEMENT	971,393	971,393
51	0603596N	LAG MISSION MODULES	206,149	206,149
52	0603597N	AUTOMATED TEST AND RE-TEST (ATRT)	8,000	8,000
53	0603609N	CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS	7,678	7,678
54	0603611M	MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES	219,082	219,082
55	0603635M	MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM	623	623
56	0603654N	JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT	18,260	18,260
57	0603658N	COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT	76,247	76,247
58	0603713N	OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	4,520	4,520
59	0603721N	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION	20,711	20,711
60	0603724N	NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM	47,761	47,761
61	0603725N	FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT	5,226	5,226
62	0603734N	CHALK CORAL	182,771	182,771
63	0603739N	NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY	3,866	3,866
64	0603746N	RETRACT MAPLE	360,065	360,065
65	0603748N	LINK PLUMERIA	237,416	237,416
66	0603751N	RETRACT ELM	37,944	37,944
67	0603764N	LINK EVERGREEN	47,312	47,312
68	0603787N	SPECIAL PROCESSES	17,408	17,408
69	0603790N	NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	9,359	9,359
70	0603795N	LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY	887	887
71	0603851M	JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING	29,448	29,448
72	0603860N	JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL	91,479	91,479
73	0603925N	DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS	67,360	67,360
74	0604112N	GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80)	48,105	127,205
		Full ship shock trials for CVN–78		[79,100]
75	0604122N	REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS)	20,089	20,089
76	0604272N	TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM)	18,969	18,969
77	0604279N	ASE SELF-PROTECTION OPTIMIZATION	7,874	7,874
78	0604292N	MH-XX	5,298	5,298
79	0604454N	LX (R)	46,486	75,486
		Accelerate LX (R)		[29,000]
80	0604653N	JOINT COUNTER RADIO CONTROLLED IED ELECTRONIC WARFARE (JCREW)	3,817	3,817
81	0604659N	PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM	9,595	9,595
82	0604707N	SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT	29,581	29,581
83	0604786N	OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT	285,849	285,849
84	0605812M	JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH	36,656	36,656
85	0303354N	ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP	9,835	9,835
86	0304270N	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP	580	580
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES	5,024,626	5,143,726

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
87	0603208N	TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT	21,708	21,708
88	0604212N	OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT	11,101	11,101
89	0604214N	AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV	39,878	39,878
90	0604215N	STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT	53,059	53,059
91	0604216N	MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT	21,358	21,358
92	0604218N	AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING	4,515	4,515
93	0604221N	P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM	1,514	1,514
94	0604230N	WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM	5,875	5,875
95	0604231N	TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM	81,553	81,553
96	0604234N	ADVANCED HAWKEYE	272,149	272,149
97	0604245N	H–1 UPGRADES	27,235	27,235
98	0604261N	ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS	35,763	35,763
99	0604262N	V–22A	87,918	87,918
100	0604264N	AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	12,679	12,679
101	0604269N	EA–18	56,921	56,921
102	0604270N	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	23,685	23,685
103	0604273N	EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT	507,093	507,093
104	0604274N	NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ)	411,767	411,767
105	0604280N	JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY)	25,071	25,071
106	0604307N	SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING	443,433	443,433
107	0604311N	LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION	747	747
108	0604329N	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)	97,002	97,002
109	0604366N	STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS	129,649	129,649
110	0604373N	AIRBORNE MCM	11,647	11,647
111	0604376M	MARINE AIR GROUND TASK FORCE (MAGTF) ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) FOR AVIATION	2,778	2,778
112	0604378N	NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING	23,695	23,695
113	0604404N	UNMANNED CARRIER LAUNCHED AIRBORNE SURVEILLANCE AND STRIKE (UCLASS) SYSTEM	134,708	0
		Excess FY15 funds buy down FY16 requirements		[–134,708]
114	0604501N	ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS	43,914	43,914
115	0604503N	SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION	109,908	109,908
116	0604504N	AIR CONTROL	57,928	57,928
117	0604512N	SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS	120,217	120,217
118	0604522N	AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM	241,754	241,754
119	0604558N	NEW DESIGN SSN	122,556	122,556
120	0604562N	SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM	48,213	60,213
		Accelerate submarine combat and weapon system modernization		[12,000]
121	0604567N	SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E	49,712	49,712
122	0604574N	NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES	4,096	4,096
123	0604580N	VIRGINIA PAYLOAD MODULE (VPM)	167,719	167,719
124	0604601N	MINE DEVELOPMENT	15,122	15,122
125	0604610N	LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT	33,738	33,738
126	0604654N	JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT	8,123	8,123
127	0604703N	PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS	7,686	7,686
128	0604727N	JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS	405	405
129	0604755N	SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL)	153,836	153,836
130	0604756N	SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL)	99,619	99,619
131	0604757N	SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW)	116,798	116,798
132	0604761N	INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING	4,353	4,353
133	0604771N	MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT	9,443	9,443
134	0604777N	NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM	32,469	32,469
135	0604800M	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD	537,901	525,401
		F–35B Block 4 development early to need		[–12,500]
136	0604800N	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD	504,736	492,236
		F–35C Block 4 development early to need		[–12,500]
137	0604810M	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER FOLLOW ON DEVELOPMENT—MARINE CORPS	59,265	59,265
138	0604810N	JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER FOLLOW ON DEVELOPMENT—NAVY	47,579	47,579
139	0605013M	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	5,914	5,914
140	0605013N	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	89,711	89,711
141	0605212N	CH–53K RDTE	632,092	632,092
142	0605220N	SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC)	7,778	7,778
143	0605450N	JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM)	25,898	25,898
144	0605500N	MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA)	247,929	247,929
145	0204202N	DDG–1000	103,199	103,199
146	0304231N	TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP	998	998
147	0304785N	TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS	17,785	17,785
148	0305124N	SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM	35,905	35,905
		SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION	6,308,800	6,161,092

		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
149	0604256N	THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT	30,769	30,769
150	0604258N	TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	112,606	112,606
151	0604759N	MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT	61,234	61,234
152	0605126N	JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION	6,995	6,995
153	0605152N	STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY	4,011	4,011
154	0605154N	CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES	48,563	48,563
155	0605285N	NEXT GENERATION FIGHTER	5,000	5,000
157	0605804N	TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES	925	925
158	0605853N	MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT	78,143	78,143
159	0605856N	STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT	3,258	3,258
160	0605861N	RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT	76,948	76,948
161	0605863N	RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT	132,122	132,122
162	0605864N	TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	351,912	351,912
163	0605865N	OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY	17,985	17,985
164	0605866N	NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT	5,316	5,316
165	0605867N	SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT	6,519	6,519
166	0605873M	MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT	13,649	13,649
		SUBTOTAL, MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	955,955	955,955

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
174	0101221N	STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT	107,039	107,039
175	0101224N	SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	46,506	46,506
176	0101226N	SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	3,900	4,700
		Accelerate combat rapid attack weapon		[800]
177	0101402N	NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS	16,569	16,569
178	0203761N	RAPID TECHNOLOGY TRANSITION (RTT)	18,632	18,632
179	0204136N	F/A–18 SQUADRONS	133,265	133,265
181	0204163N	FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL)	62,867	62,867
182	0204228N	SURFACE SUPPORT	36,045	36,045
183	0204229N	TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC)	25,228	25,228
184	0204311N	INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	54,218	54,218
185	0204413N	AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT)	11,335	11,335
186	0204460M	GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR)	80,129	80,129
187	0204571N	CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	39,087	39,087
188	0204574N	CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT	1,915	1,915
189	0204575N	ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT	46,609	46,609
190	0205601N	HARM IMPROVEMENT	52,708	52,708
191	0205604N	TACTICAL DATA LINKS	149,997	149,997
192	0205620N	SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION	24,460	24,460
193	0205632N	MK–48 ADCAP	42,206	47,706
		Accelerate torpedo upgrades		[5,500]
194	0205633N	AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS	117,759	117,759
195	0205675N	OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS	101,323	101,323
196	0206313M	MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS	67,763	67,763
197	0206335M	COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S)	13,431	13,431
198	0206623M	MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS	56,769	56,769
199	0206624M	MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT	20,729	20,729
200	0206625M	USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP)	13,152	13,152
201	0206629M	AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE	48,535	48,535
202	0207161N	TACTICAL AIM MISSILES	76,016	76,016
203	0207163N	ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)	32,172	32,172
208	0303109N	SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE)	53,239	53,239
209	0303138N	CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES)	21,677	21,677
210	0303140N	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	28,102	28,102
211	0303150M	WWMCAG/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM	294	294
213	0305160N	NAVY METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEAN SENSORS-SPACE (METOC)	599	599
214	0305192N	MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES	6,207	6,207
215	0305204N	TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES	8,550	8,550
216	0305205N	UAS INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY	41,831	41,831
217	0305208M	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	1,105	1,105
218	0305208N	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	33,149	33,149
219	0305220N	RQ–4 UAV	227,188	227,188
220	0305231N	MQ–8 UAV	52,770	52,770
221	0305232M	RQ–11 UAV	635	635
222	0305233N	RQ–7 UAV	688	688
223	0305234N	SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0)	4,647	4,647
224	0305239M	RQ–21A	6,435	6,435
225	0305241N	MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT	49,145	49,145
226	0305242M	UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP)	9,246	9,246
227	0305421N	RQ–4 MODERNIZATION	150,854	150,854
228	0308601N	MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT	4,757	4,757
229	0702207N	DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)	24,185	24,185
231	0708730N	MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH)	4,321	4,321
231A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,252,185	1,252,185
		SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	3,482,173	3,488,473

		TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY	17,885,916	17,927,208

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601102F	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	329,721	374,721
		Basic research program increase		[45,000]
2	0601103F	UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES	141,754	141,754
3	0601108F	HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES	13,778	13,778
		SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH	485,253	530,253

		APPLIED RESEARCH
4	0602102F	MATERIALS	125,234	115,234
		Nanostructured and biological materials		[–10,000]
5	0602201F	AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES	123,438	123,438
6	0602202F	HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH	100,530	100,530
7	0602203F	AEROSPACE PROPULSION	182,326	182,326
8	0602204F	AEROSPACE SENSORS	147,291	147,291
9	0602601F	SPACE TECHNOLOGY	116,122	116,122
10	0602602F	CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS	99,851	99,851
11	0602605F	DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY	115,604	115,604
12	0602788F	DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS	164,909	164,909
13	0602890F	HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH	42,037	42,037
		SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH	1,217,342	1,207,342

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
14	0603112F	ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS	37,665	37,665
15	0603199F	SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T)	18,378	18,378
16	0603203F	ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS	42,183	42,183
17	0603211F	AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO	100,733	100,733
18	0603216F	AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY	168,821	168,821
19	0603270F	ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY	47,032	47,032
20	0603401F	ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY	54,897	54,897
21	0603444F	MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS)	12,853	12,853
22	0603456F	HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	25,448	25,448
23	0603601F	CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	48,536	48,536
24	0603605F	ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	30,195	30,195
25	0603680F	MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	42,630	42,630
26	0603788F	BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION	46,414	46,414
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	675,785	675,785

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES
27	0603260F	INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	5,032	5,032
29	0603438F	SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY	4,070	4,070
30	0603742F	COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY	21,790	21,790
31	0603790F	NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	4,736	4,736
33	0603830F	SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM	30,771	30,771
34	0603851F	INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL	39,765	39,765
36	0604015F	LONG RANGE STRIKE	1,246,228	786,228
		Delayed EMD contract award		[–460,000]
37	0604317F	TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER	3,512	3,512
38	0604327F	HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM	54,637	54,637
40	0604422F	WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON	76,108	76,108
44	0604857F	OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE	6,457	19,957
		Increase to match previous year funding level		[13,500]
45	0604858F	TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM	246,514	246,514
46	0605230F	GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT	75,166	75,166
49	0207110F	NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE	8,830	8,830
50	0207455F	THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR)	14,939	14,939
51	0305164F	NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE)	142,288	142,288
52	0306250F	CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	81,732	96,732
		Increase USCC Cyber Operations Technology Development		[15,000]
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES	2,062,575	1,631,075

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION
55	0604270F	ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT	929	929
56	0604281F	TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE	60,256	60,256
57	0604287F	PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT	5,973	5,973
58	0604329F	SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD	32,624	32,624
59	0604421F	COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS	24,208	24,208
60	0604425F	SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS	32,374	32,374
61	0604426F	SPACE FENCE	243,909	243,909
62	0604429F	AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK	8,358	8,358
63	0604441F	SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD	292,235	292,235
64	0604602F	ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT	40,154	40,154
65	0604604F	SUBMUNITIONS	2,506	2,506
66	0604617F	AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT	57,678	57,678
67	0604706F	LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS	8,187	8,187
68	0604735F	COMBAT TRAINING RANGES	15,795	15,795
69	0604800F	F–35—EMD	589,441	564,441
		F–35A Block 4 development early to need		[–25,000]
71	0604853F	EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD	84,438	84,438
72	0604932F	LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON	36,643	36,643
73	0604933F	ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION	142,551	142,551
74	0605213F	F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B	140,640	140,640
75	0605214F	GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT	3,598	3,598
76	0605221F	KC–46	602,364	402,364
		Schedule delay and availability of unobligated prior year funds		[–200,000]
77	0605223F	ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING	11,395	11,395
78	0605229F	AGAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION	156,085	156,085
80	0605431F	ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE)	228,230	228,230
81	0605432F	POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE)	72,084	72,084
82	0605433F	WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE)	56,343	56,343
83	0605458F	AIR & SPACE OPS CENTER 10.2 RDT&E	47,629	47,629
84	0605931F	B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM	271,961	271,961
85	0101125F	NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION	212,121	212,121
86	0207171F	F–15 EPAWSS	186,481	215,981
		NRE for ADCPII upgrade		[28,000]
		Flight test support		[1,500]
87	0207701F	FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING	18,082	18,082
88	0305176F	COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR	993	993
89	0307581F	NEXTGEN JSTARS	44,343	44,343
91	0401319F	PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT (PAR)	102,620	102,620
92	0701212F	AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS	14,563	14,563
		SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION	3,847,791	3,652,291

		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
93	0604256F	THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT	23,844	23,844
94	0604759F	MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT	68,302	68,302
95	0605101F	RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE	34,918	34,918
97	0605712F	INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION	10,476	10,476
98	0605807F	TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	673,908	673,908
99	0605860F	ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE)	21,858	21,858
100	0605864F	SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP)	28,228	28,228
101	0605976F	FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	40,518	40,518
102	0605978F	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT	27,895	27,895
103	0606017F	REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION	16,507	16,507
104	0606116F	SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT	18,997	18,997
106	0606392F	SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE	185,305	185,305
107	0308602F	ENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS)	4,841	4,841
108	0702806F	ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	15,357	15,357
109	0804731F	GENERAL SKILL TRAINING	1,315	1,315
111	1001004F	INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES	2,315	2,315
		SUBTOTAL, MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	1,174,584	1,174,584

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
112	0603423F	GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT	350,232	350,232
113	0604233F	SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING	10,465	10,465
114	0604445F	WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE	24,577	24,577
117	0605018F	AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS)	69,694	24,294
		Restructure program		[–45,400]
118	0605024F	ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY	26,718	26,718
119	0605278F	HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E	10,807	10,807
121	0101113F	B–52 SQUADRONS	74,520	74,520
122	0101122F	AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM)	451	451
123	0101126F	B–1B SQUADRONS	2,245	2,245
124	0101127F	B–2 SQUADRONS	108,183	108,183
125	0101213F	MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS	178,929	178,929
126	0101313F	STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM	28,481	28,481
127	0101314F	NIGHT FIST—USSTRATCOM	87	87
128	0101316F	WORLDWIDE JOINT STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS	5,315	5,315
131	0105921F	SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES	8,090	8,090
132	0205219F	MQ–9 UAV	123,439	123,439
134	0207131F	A–10 SQUADRONS	0	16,200
		Sustain avionics software development		[16,200]
135	0207133F	F–16 SQUADRONS	148,297	148,297
136	0207134F	F–15E SQUADRONS	179,283	192,079
		Transfer from procurement		[12,796]
137	0207136F	MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION	14,860	14,860
138	0207138F	F–22A SQUADRONS	262,552	262,552
139	0207142F	F–35 SQUADRONS	115,395	115,395
140	0207161F	TACTICAL AIM MISSILES	43,360	43,360
141	0207163F	ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM)	46,160	46,160
143	0207224F	COMBAT RESCUE AND RECOVERY	412	412
144	0207227F	COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE	657	657
145	0207247F	AF TENCAP	31,428	31,428
146	0207249F	PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT	1,105	1,105
147	0207253F	COMPASS CALL	14,249	14,249
148	0207268F	AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM	103,942	103,942
149	0207325F	JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM)	12,793	12,793
150	0207410F	AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC)	21,193	21,193
151	0207412F	CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC)	559	559
152	0207417F	AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWAAG)	161,812	161,812
153	0207418F	TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS	6,001	6,001
155	0207431F	COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES	7,793	7,793
156	0207444F	TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD	12,465	12,465
157	0207448F	C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK	1,681	1,681
159	0207452F	DCAPES	16,796	16,796
161	0207590F	SEEK EAGLE	21,564	21,564
162	0207601F	USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION	24,994	24,994
163	0207605F	WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS	6,035	6,035
164	0207697F	DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES	4,358	4,358
165	0208006F	MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS	55,835	55,835
167	0208087F	AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS	12,874	12,874
168	0208088F	AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS	7,681	7,681
171	0301017F	GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK (GSIN)	5,974	5,974
177	0301400F	SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE	13,815	13,815
178	0302015F	E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC)	80,360	80,360
179	0303001F	FAMILY OF ADVANCED BLOS TERMINALS (FAB-T)	3,907	3,907
180	0303131F	MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)	75,062	75,062
181	0303140F	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	46,599	46,599
183	0303142F	GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT—DATA INITIATIVE	2,470	2,470
186	0304260F	AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE	112,775	112,775
189	0305099F	GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM)	4,235	4,235
192	0305110F	SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE)	7,879	7,879
193	0305111F	WEATHER SERVICE	29,955	29,955
194	0305114F	AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS)	21,485	21,485
195	0305116F	AERIAL TARGETS	2,515	2,515
198	0305128F	SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES	472	472
199	0305145F	ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION	12,137	12,137
200	0305146F	DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES	361	361
203	0305173F	SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER	3,162	3,162
204	0305174F	SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	1,543	1,543
205	0305179F	INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS)	7,860	7,860
206	0305182F	SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE)	6,902	6,902
207	0305202F	DRAGON U–2	34,471	34,471
209	0305206F	AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS	50,154	50,154
210	0305207F	MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS	13,245	13,245
211	0305208F	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	22,784	22,784
212	0305219F	MQ–1 PREDATOR A UAV	716	716
213	0305220F	RQ–4 UAV	208,053	208,053
214	0305221F	NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING	21,587	21,587
215	0305236F	COMMON DATA LINK EXECUTIVE AGENT (CDL EA)	43,986	43,986
216	0305238F	NATO AGS	197,486	138,400
		Transfer from procurement for NATO AWACS		[−59,086]
217	0305240F	SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE	28,434	28,434
218	0305265F	GPS III SPACE SEGMENT	180,902	180,902
220	0305614F	JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM	81,911	81,911
221	0305881F	RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION	3,149	3,149
222	0305913F	NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE)	14,447	14,447
223	0305940F	SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS	20,077	20,077
225	0308699F	SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW)	853	853
226	0401115F	C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON	33,962	33,962
227	0401119F	C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF)	42,864	42,864
228	0401130F	C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF)	54,807	54,807
229	0401132F	C–130J PROGRAM	31,010	31,010
230	0401134F	LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM)	6,802	6,802
231	0401219F	KC–10S	1,799	1,799
232	0401314F	OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT	48,453	48,453
233	0401318F	CV–22	36,576	36,576
235	0408011F	SPECIAL TACTIAG / COMBAT CONTROL	7,963	7,963
236	0702207F	DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF)	1,525	1,525
237	0708610F	LOGISTIAG INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT)	112,676	81,676
		Program growth		[–31,000]
238	0708611F	SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	12,657	12,657
239	0804743F	OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING	1,836	1,836
240	0808716F	OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES	121	121
241	0901202F	JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY	5,911	5,911
242	0901218F	CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM	3,604	3,604
243	0901220F	PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION	4,598	4,598
244	0901226F	AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY	1,103	1,103
246	0901538F	FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	101,840	101,840
246A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	12,780,142	12,945,142
		Three program increases		[165,000]
		SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	17,010,339	17,068,849

		TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF	26,473,669	25,940,179

		RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW
		BASIC RESEARCH
1	0601000BR	DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE	38,436	38,436
2	0601101E	DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES	333,119	333,119
3	0601110D8Z	BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES	42,022	42,022
4	0601117E	BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE	56,544	56,544
5	0601120D8Z	NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM	49,453	49,453
6	0601228D8Z	HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS	25,834	25,834
7	0601384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM	46,261	46,261
		SUBTOTAL, BASIC RESEARCH	591,669	591,669

		APPLIED RESEARCH
8	0602000D8Z	JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY	19,352	19,352
9	0602115E	BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY	114,262	114,262
10	0602234D8Z	LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM	51,026	51,026
11	0602251D8Z	APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES	48,226	33,226
		General program decrease		[–15,000]
12	0602303E	INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY	356,358	356,358
14	0602383E	BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE	29,265	29,265
15	0602384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM	208,111	208,111
16	0602668D8Z	CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH	13,727	13,727
18	0602702E	TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY	314,582	309,582
		Multi-azimuth defense fast intercept round engagement system		[–5,000]
19	0602715E	MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY	220,115	210,115
		Decrease in program growth		[–10,000]
20	0602716E	ELECTRONIAG TECHNOLOGY	174,798	174,798
21	0602718BR	WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES	155,415	155,415
22	0602751D8Z	SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH	8,824	8,824
23	1160401BB	SOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	37,517	37,517
		SUBTOTAL, APPLIED RESEARCH	1,751,578	1,721,578

		ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
24	0603000D8Z	JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	25,915	25,915
26	0603122D8Z	COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT	71,171	71,171
27	0603133D8Z	FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING	21,782	21,782
28	0603160BR	COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT	290,654	290,654
30	0603176C	ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT	12,139	12,139
31	0603177C	DISCRIMINATION SENSOR TECHNOLOGY	28,200	28,200
32	0603178C	WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY	45,389	75,389
		Fiber laser prototype development		[20,000]
		Divert attitude control tech to support MOKV		[10,000]
33	0603179C	ADVANCED C4ISR	9,876	9,876
34	0603180C	ADVANCED RESEARCH	17,364	17,364
35	0603225D8Z	JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	18,802	18,802
36	0603264S	AGILE TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (AT21)—THEATER CAPABILITY	2,679	2,679
37	0603274C	SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY	64,708	64,708
38	0603286E	ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS	185,043	185,043
39	0603287E	SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY	126,692	126,692
40	0603288D8Z	ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS	14,645	9,645
		General program decrease		[–5,000]
41	0603289D8Z	ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS	59,830	59,830
42	0603294C	COMMON KILL VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY	46,753	66,753
		Increase for Multiple Object Kill Vehicle		[20,000]
43	0603384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	140,094	140,094
44	0603527D8Z	RETRACT LARCH	118,666	118,666
45	0603618D8Z	JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY	43,966	43,966
46	0603648D8Z	JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS	141,540	131,540
		General program decrease		[–10,000]
47	0603662D8Z	NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES	6,980	6,980
50	0603680D8Z	DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM	157,056	157,056
51	0603699D8Z	EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	33,515	33,515
52	0603712S	GENERIC LOGISTIAG R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS	16,543	16,543
53	0603713S	DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY	29,888	29,888
54	0603716D8Z	STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM	65,836	65,836
55	0603720S	MICROELECTRONIAG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT	79,037	79,037
56	0603727D8Z	JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM	9,626	9,626
57	0603739E	ADVANCED ELECTRONIAG TECHNOLOGIES	79,021	79,021
58	0603760E	COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS	201,335	201,335
59	0603766E	NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY	452,861	432,861
		Decrease to reduce inefficiency		[–20,000]
60	0603767E	SENSOR TECHNOLOGY	257,127	257,127
61	0603769SE	DISTRIBUTED LEARNING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	10,771	10,771
62	0603781D8Z	SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE	15,202	15,202
63	0603826D8Z	QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS	90,500	70,500
		Program decrease		[–20,000]
66	0603833D8Z	ENGINEERING SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY	18,377	18,377
67	0603941D8Z	TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY	82,589	82,589
68	0604055D8Z	OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT	37,420	37,420
69	0303310D8Z	CWMD SYSTEMS	42,488	42,488
70	1160402BB	SOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	57,741	57,741
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	3,229,821	3,224,821

		ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES
71	0603161D8Z	NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P	31,710	31,710
73	0603600D8Z	WALKOFF	90,567	90,567
74	0603714D8Z	ADVANCED SENSORS APPLICATION PROGRAM	15,900	19,900
		Increase to match previous year funding level		[4,000]
75	0603851D8Z	ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM	52,758	52,758
76	0603881C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT	228,021	228,021
77	0603882C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT	1,284,891	1,284,891
78	0603884BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL	172,754	172,754
79	0603884C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS	233,588	233,588
80	0603890C	BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS	409,088	409,088
81	0603891C	SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA	400,387	400,387
82	0603892C	AEGIS BMD	843,355	843,355
83	0603893C	SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM	31,632	31,632
84	0603895C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS	23,289	23,289
85	0603896C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI	450,085	450,085
86	0603898C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT	49,570	49,570
87	0603904C	MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC)	49,211	49,211
88	0603906C	REGARDING TRENCH	9,583	9,583
89	0603907C	SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX)	72,866	72,866
90	0603913C	ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS	102,795	268,795
		Increase for Arrow/David's Sling		[166,000]
91	0603914C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST	274,323	274,323
92	0603915C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS	513,256	513,256
93	0603920D8Z	HUMANITARIAN DEMINING	10,129	10,129
94	0603923D8Z	COALITION WARFARE	10,350	10,350
95	0604016D8Z	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM	1,518	11,518
		Program Increase		[10,000]
96	0604115C	TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES	96,300	96,300
97	0604250D8Z	ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES	469,798	469,798
98	0604400D8Z	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEM (UAS) COMMON DEVELOPMENT	3,129	3,129
103	0604826J	JOINT C5 CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ASSESSMENTS	25,200	25,200
105	0604873C	LONG RANGE DISCRIMINATION RADAR (LRDR)	137,564	137,564
106	0604874C	IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS	278,944	298,944
		Redesigned kill vehicle development		[20,000]
107	0604876C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST	26,225	26,225
108	0604878C	AEGIS BMD TEST	55,148	55,148
109	0604879C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSOR TEST	86,764	86,764
110	0604880C	LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3)	34,970	34,970
111	0604881C	AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT	172,645	172,645
112	0604887C	BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE SEGMENT TEST	64,618	64,618
114	0303191D8Z	JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM	2,660	2,660
115	0305103C	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	963	963
		SUBTOTAL, ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES	6,816,554	7,016,554

		SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION
116	0604161D8Z	NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD	8,800	8,800
117	0604165D8Z	PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT	78,817	88,817
		CPGS development and flight test		[10,000]
118	0604384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD	303,647	303,647
119	0604764K	ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO)	23,424	23,424
120	0604771D8Z	JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS)	14,285	14,285
121	0605000BR	WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES	7,156	7,156
122	0605013BL	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	12,542	12,542
123	0605021SE	HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE	191	191
124	0605022D8Z	DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM	3,273	3,273
125	0605027D8Z	OUSD(C) IT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES	5,962	5,962
126	0605070S	DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION	13,412	13,412
127	0605075D8Z	DCMO POLICY AND INTEGRATION	2,223	2,223
128	0605080S	DEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM	31,660	31,660
129	0605090S	DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS)	13,085	13,085
130	0605210D8Z	DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES	7,209	7,209
131	0303141K	GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM	15,158	5,158
		Early to need		[–10,000]
132	0305304D8Z	DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM)	4,414	4,414
		SUBTOTAL, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION	545,258	545,258

		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
133	0604774D8Z	DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS)	5,581	5,581
134	0604875D8Z	JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT	3,081	3,081
135	0604940D8Z	CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP)	229,125	229,125
136	0604942D8Z	ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS	28,674	28,674
138	0605100D8Z	JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC)	45,235	45,235
139	0605104D8Z	TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS	24,936	24,936
141	0605126J	JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO)	35,471	35,471
144	0605142D8Z	SYSTEMS ENGINEERING	37,655	32,655
		Reducing reporting and inefficiencies		[–5,000]
145	0605151D8Z	STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD	3,015	3,015
146	0605161D8Z	NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY	5,287	5,287
147	0605170D8Z	SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION	5,289	5,289
148	0605200D8Z	GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE)	2,120	2,120
149	0605384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM	102,264	102,264
158	0605790D8Z	SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER	2,169	2,169
159	0605798D8Z	DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS	13,960	13,960
160	0605801KA	DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC)	51,775	51,775
161	0605803SE	R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION	9,533	9,533
162	0605804D8Z	DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION	17,371	17,371
163	0605898E	MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D	71,571	71,571
164	0606100D8Z	BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS	4,123	4,123
165	0203345D8Z	DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI)	1,946	1,946
166	0204571J	JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT	7,673	7,673
169	0303166J	SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES	10,413	10,413
170	0303260D8Z	DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO)	971	971
171	0305193D8Z	CYBER INTELLIGENCE	6,579	6,579
173	0804767D8Z	COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)—MHA	43,811	43,811
174	0901598C	MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA	35,871	35,871
176	0903230D8W	WHS—MISSION OPERATIONS SUPPORT - IT	1,072	1,072
176A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	49,500	49,500
		SUBTOTAL, MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	856,071	851,071

		OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
178	0604130V	ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS)	7,929	7,929
179	0605127T	REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA	1,750	1,750
180	0605147T	OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS)	294	294
181	0607210D8Z	INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT	22,576	22,576
182	0607310D8Z	CWMD SYSTEMS: OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	1,901	1,901
183	0607327T	GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS)	8,474	8,474
184	0607384BP	CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT)	33,561	33,561
186	0208043J	PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS)	3,061	3,061
187	0208045K	C4I INTEROPERABILITY	64,921	64,921
189	0301144K	JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING	3,645	3,645
193	0302016K	NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT	963	963
194	0302019K	DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION	10,186	10,186
195	0303126K	LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DAG	36,883	36,883
196	0303131K	MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN)	13,735	13,735
197	0303135G	PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI)	6,101	6,101
198	0303136G	KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI)	43,867	43,867
199	0303140D8Z	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	8,957	8,957
200	0303140G	INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM	146,890	146,890
201	0303150K	GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM	21,503	21,503
202	0303153K	DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION	20,342	20,342
203	0303170K	NET-CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES)	444	444
205	0303610K	TELEPORT PROGRAM	1,736	1,736
206	0304210BB	SPECIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES	65,060	65,060
210	0305103K	CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE	2,976	2,976
215	0305186D8Z	POLICY R&D PROGRAMS	4,182	4,182
216	0305199D8Z	NET CENTRICITY	18,130	18,130
218	0305208BB	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	5,302	5,302
221	0305208K	DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS	3,239	3,239
225	0305327V	INSIDER THREAT	11,733	11,733
226	0305387D8Z	HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM	2,119	2,119
234	0708011S	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	24,605	24,605
235	0708012S	LOGISTIAG SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	1,770	1,770
236	0902298J	MANAGEMENT HQ—OJAG	2,978	2,978
237	1105219BB	MQ–9 UAV	18,151	23,151
		MQ–9 capability enhancements		[5,000]
238	1105232BB	RQ–11 UAV	758	758
240	1160403BB	AVIATION SYSTEMS	173,934	191,141
		ISR payload technology improvements		[2,000]
		C–130 TF/TA Program Adjustment		[15,207]
241	1160405BB	INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	6,866	6,866
242	1160408BB	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS	63,008	63,008
243	1160431BB	WARRIOR SYSTEMS	25,342	25,342
244	1160432BB	SPECIAL PROGRAMS	3,401	3,401
245	1160480BB	SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES	3,212	3,212
246	1160483BB	MARITIME SYSTEMS	63,597	63,597
247	1160489BB	GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES	3,933	3,933
248	1160490BB	OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE	10,623	10,623
248A	9999999999	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	3,564,272	3,564,272
		SUBTOTAL, OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT	4,538,910	4,561,117

		UNDISTRIBUTED
xx	xxxxx	DEFENSE WIDE CYBER VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT	0	200,000
		Assess all major weapon systems for cyber vulnerability		[200,000]
xxx	xxxxxx	UCAS-D DEVELOPMENT AND FOLLOW ON PROTOTYPING	0	725,000
		Supports continued efforts on UCAS-D and follow on prototyping		[725,000]
x	xxxxx	TECHNOLOGY OFFSET INITIATIVE	0	400,000
		Supports innovative technology development		[400,000]
		SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	1,325,000

		TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW	18,329,861	19,837,068

		OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE
		MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
1	0605118OTE	OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION	76,838	76,838
2	0605131OTE	LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION	46,882	46,882
3	0605814OTE	OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES	46,838	46,838
		SUBTOTAL, MANAGEMENT SUPPORT	170,558	170,558

		TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE	170,558	170,558

		TOTAL RDT&E	69,784,963	70,891,640

SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.

SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2016 Request	Senate Authorized
	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	1,094,429	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–1,094,429]
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	68,873	68,873
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	508,008	508,008
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	763,300	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–763,300]
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,054,322	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–1,054,322]
060	AVIATION ASSETS	1,546,129	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–1,546,129]
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	3,158,606	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–3,158,606]
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	438,909	438,909
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,214,116	1,291,316
	Readiness funding increase		[77,200]
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	7,616,008	7,626,508
	Readiness funding increase		[10,500]
110	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	2,617,169	2,651,169
	Kwajalein facilities restoration		[34,000]
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS	421,269	421,269
130	COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS	164,743	164,743
170	COMBATANT COMMANDS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	448,633	436,276
	Streamlining of Army Combatant Commands Direct Mission Support		[–12,357]
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	21,114,514	13,607,071

	MOBILIZATION
180	STRATEGIC MOBILITY	401,638	401,638
190	ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS	261,683	261,683
200	INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS	6,532	6,532
	SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION	669,853	669,853

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
210	OFFICER ACQUISITION	131,536	131,536
220	RECRUIT TRAINING	47,843	47,843
230	ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING	42,565	42,565
240	SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS	490,378	490,378
250	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	981,000	1,014,200
	Readiness funding increase		[33,200]
260	FLIGHT TRAINING	940,872	940,872
270	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	230,324	230,324
280	TRAINING SUPPORT	603,519	603,519
290	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	491,922	491,922
300	EXAMINING	194,079	194,079
310	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	227,951	227,951
320	CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING	161,048	161,048
330	JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS	170,118	170,118
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	4,713,155	4,746,355

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	485,778	485,778
360	CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES	813,881	813,881
370	LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	714,781	714,781
380	AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT	322,127	322,127
390	ADMINISTRATION	384,813	384,813
400	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	1,781,350	1,781,350
410	MANPOWER MANAGEMENT	292,532	292,532
420	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	375,122	375,122
430	OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT	1,119,848	1,115,348
	Army outreach reduction		[–4,500]
440	ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES	225,358	225,358
450	REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT	239,755	239,755
460	FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS	223,319	223,319
470	INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS	469,865	469,865
480	MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS	40,521	40,521
480A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,120,974	1,146,474
	Additional SOUTHCOM ISR and intel support		[20,000]
	Readiness increase		[5,500]
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–238,451
	Streamlining of Army Management Headquarters		[–238,451]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	8,610,024	8,392,573

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED FOREIGN CURRENCY ADJUSTMENT	0	–281,500
	Foreign currency adjustment		[–281,500]
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–260,100
	Bulk fuel savings		[–260,100]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–541,600

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY	35,107,546	26,874,252

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	16,612	16,612
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	486,531	486,531
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	105,446	105,446
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	516,791	516,791
060	AVIATION ASSETS	87,587	87,587
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	348,601	348,601
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	81,350	81,350
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	59,574	91,974
	Readiness funding increase		[32,400]
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	570,852	570,852
110	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	245,686	245,686
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS	40,962	40,962
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	2,559,992	2,592,392

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	10,665	10,665
140	ADMINISTRATION	18,390	18,390
150	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	14,976	14,976
160	MANPOWER MANAGEMENT	8,841	8,841
170	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	52,928	52,928
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–6,011
	Streamlining of Army Reserve Management Headquarters		[–6,011]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	105,800	99,790

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–7,600
	Bulk fuel savings		[–7,600]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–7,600

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES	2,665,792	2,684,581

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	709,433	709,433
020	MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES	167,324	167,324
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	741,327	741,327
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	88,775	96,475
	ARNG border security enhancement		[7,700]
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	32,130	32,130
060	AVIATION ASSETS	943,609	996,209
	Readiness funding increase		[39,600]
	ARNG border security enhancement		[13,000]
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	703,137	703,137
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	84,066	84,066
090	LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE	166,848	189,348
	Readiness funding increase		[22,500]
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,022,970	1,022,970
110	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	673,680	673,680
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS	954,574	954,574
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	6,287,873	6,370,673

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
130	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	6,570	6,570
140	ADMINISTRATION	59,629	59,379
	Reduction to National Guard Heritage Paintings		[–250]
150	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	68,452	68,452
160	MANPOWER MANAGEMENT	8,841	8,841
170	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	283,670	272,170
	Reduction to Army Marketing Program		[–11,500]
180	REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT	2,942	2,942
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–26,631
	Streamlining of Army National Guard Management Headquarters		[–26,631]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	430,104	391,723

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–25,300
	Bulk fuel savings		[–25,300]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–25,300

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG	6,717,977	6,737,096

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	4,940,365	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–4,940,365]
020	FLEET AIR TRAINING	1,830,611	1,830,611
030	AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES	37,225	37,225
040	AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT	103,456	103,456
050	AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT	376,844	390,744
	Readiness funding increase		[13,900]
060	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	897,536	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–897,536]
070	AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	33,201	33,201
080	AVIATION LOGISTICS	544,056	549,356
	Readiness funding increase		[5,300]
090	MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS	4,287,658	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–4,287,658]
100	SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING	787,446	787,446
110	SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE	5,960,951	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–5,960,951]
120	SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,554,863	1,554,863
130	COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS	704,415	704,415
140	ELECTRONIC WARFARE	96,916	96,916
150	SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE	192,198	192,198
160	WARFARE TACTICS	453,942	453,942
170	OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY	351,871	351,871
180	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	1,186,847	1,186,847
190	EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE	123,948	123,948
200	DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	2,443	2,443
210	COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS	98,914	98,914
220	COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	73,110	67,628
	Streamlining of Navy Combatant Commanders Direct Mission Support		[–5,483]
230	CRUISE MISSILE	110,734	110,734
240	FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE	1,206,736	1,206,736
250	IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT	141,664	141,664
260	WEAPONS MAINTENANCE	523,122	523,122
270	OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT	371,872	371,872
280	ENTERPRISE INFORMATION	896,061	896,061
290	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	2,220,423	2,220,423
300	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	4,472,468	4,486,468
	Funding increase for Behavioral Counseling		[14,000]
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	34,581,896	18,523,103

	MOBILIZATION
310	SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE	422,846	422,846
320	AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS	6,464	6,964
	Readiness funding increase		[500]
330	SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS	361,764	361,764
340	EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS	69,530	69,530
350	INDUSTRIAL READINESS	2,237	2,237
360	COAST GUARD SUPPORT	21,823	21,823
	SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION	884,664	885,164

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
370	OFFICER ACQUISITION	149,375	149,375
380	RECRUIT TRAINING	9,035	9,035
390	RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS	156,290	156,290
400	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	653,728	653,728
410	FLIGHT TRAINING	8,171	8,171
420	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	168,471	168,471
430	TRAINING SUPPORT	196,048	196,048
440	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	234,233	234,233
450	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	137,855	137,855
460	CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING	77,257	77,257
470	JUNIOR ROTC	47,653	47,653
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	1,838,116	1,838,116

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
480	ADMINISTRATION	923,771	923,771
490	EXTERNAL RELATIONS	13,967	13,967
500	CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	120,812	120,812
510	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	350,983	350,983
520	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	265,948	265,948
530	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	335,482	335,482
550	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	197,724	197,724
570	PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN	274,936	274,936
580	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	1,122,178	1,122,178
590	HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT	48,587	48,587
600	COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS	25,599	25,599
610	SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS	72,768	72,768
620	NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE	577,803	577,803
680	INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES	4,768	4,768
680A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	560,754	560,754
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–209,823
	Streamlining of Navy Management Headquarters		[–209,823]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	4,896,080	4,686,257

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED FOREIGN CURRENCY ADJUSTMENT	0	–59,900
	Foreign currency adjustment		[–59,900]
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–482,300
	Bulk fuel savings		[–482,300]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–542,200

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY	42,200,756	25,390,440

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATIONAL FORCES	931,079	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–931,079]
020	FIELD LOGISTICS	931,757	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–931,757]
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	227,583	227,583
040	MARITIME PREPOSITIONING	86,259	86,259
050	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	746,237	746,237
060	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	2,057,362	2,058,562
	Readiness funding increase for Criminal Investigative Equipment		[1,200]
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	4,980,277	3,118,641

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
070	RECRUIT TRAINING	16,460	16,460
080	OFFICER ACQUISITION	977	977
090	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	97,325	97,325
100	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	40,786	40,786
110	TRAINING SUPPORT	347,476	347,476
120	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	164,806	164,806
130	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	39,963	39,963
140	JUNIOR ROTC	23,397	23,397
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	731,190	731,190

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	37,386	37,386
160	ADMINISTRATION	358,395	358,395
180	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	76,105	76,105
180A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	45,429	45,429
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–32,588
	Streamlining of Marine Corps Management Headquarters		[–32,588]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	517,315	484,727

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED FOREIGN CURRENCY ADJUSTMENT	0	–19,800
	Foreign currency adjustment		[–19,800]
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–17,000
	Bulk fuel savings		[–17,000]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–36,800

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS	6,228,782	4,297,758

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	563,722	563,722
020	INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE	6,218	6,218
030	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	82,712	82,712
040	AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	326	326
050	AVIATION LOGISTICS	13,436	13,436
070	SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING	557	557
090	COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS	14,499	14,499
100	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	117,601	117,601
120	ENTERPRISE INFORMATION	29,382	29,382
130	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	48,513	48,513
140	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	102,858	102,858
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	979,824	979,824

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150	ADMINISTRATION	1,505	1,505
160	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	13,782	13,782
170	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	3,437	3,437
180	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	3,210	3,210
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–1,386
	Streamlining of Navy Reserve Management Headquarters		[–1,386]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	21,934	20,548

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–39,700
	Bulk fuel savings		[–39,700]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–39,700

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES	1,001,758	960,672

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATING FORCES	97,631	97,631
020	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	18,254	18,254
030	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	28,653	28,653
040	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	111,923	111,923
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	256,461	256,461

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
050	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	924	924
060	ADMINISTRATION	10,866	10,866
070	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	8,785	8,785
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–1,473
	Streamlining of Marine Corps Reserve Management Headquarters		[–1,473]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	20,575	19,102

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–1,000
	Bulk fuel savings		[–1,000]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–1,000

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE	277,036	274,563

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES	3,336,868	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–3,336,868]
020	COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES	1,897,315	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–1,897,315]
030	AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)	1,797,549	1,757,249
	Cancel transition of A–10 to F–15E training		[–78,000]
	Readiness increase		[37,700]
040	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	6,537,127	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–6,537,127]
050	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	1,997,712	1,997,712
060	BASE SUPPORT	2,841,948	2,841,948
070	GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING	930,341	930,341
080	OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS	924,845	924,845
100	LAUNCH FACILITIES	271,177	271,177
110	SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS	382,824	382,824
120	COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	900,965	885,586
	Streamlining of Air Force Combatant Commanders Direct Mission Support		[–15,380]
130	COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS	205,078	164,078
	Cutting Joint Enabling Capabilities Command		[–41,000]
xxx	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	907,496	924,296
	Increase One Program		[20,000]
	Unjustified increase		[–3,200]
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	22,931,245	11,080,055

	MOBILIZATION
140	AIRLIFT OPERATIONS	2,229,196	2,229,196
150	MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS	148,318	148,318
160	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,617,571	0
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[–1,617,571]
170	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	259,956	259,956
180	BASE SUPPORT	708,799	708,799
	SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION	4,963,840	3,346,269

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
190	OFFICER ACQUISITION	92,191	92,191
200	RECRUIT TRAINING	21,871	21,871
210	RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC)	77,527	77,527
220	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	228,500	228,500
230	BASE SUPPORT	772,870	772,870
240	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	359,304	402,404
	Readiness increase for RPA training		[43,100]
250	FLIGHT TRAINING	710,553	710,553
260	PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION	228,252	228,252
270	TRAINING SUPPORT	76,464	76,464
280	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	375,513	375,513
290	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	79,690	79,690
300	EXAMINING	3,803	3,803
310	OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION	180,807	180,807
320	CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING	167,478	167,478
330	JUNIOR ROTC	59,263	59,263
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	3,434,086	3,477,186

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
340	LOGISTICS OPERATIONS	1,141,491	1,141,491
350	TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES	862,022	852,022
	Acquisition Management Adjustment		[–10,000]
360	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	61,745	61,745
370	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	298,759	298,759
380	BASE SUPPORT	1,108,220	1,096,220
	Reduce IT procurement		[–12,000]
390	ADMINISTRATION	689,797	669,097
	DEAMS reduction-Funding ahead of need		[–20,700]
400	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	498,053	498,053
410	OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES	900,253	900,253
420	CIVIL AIR PATROL	25,411	25,411
450	INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT	89,148	89,148
450A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,187,859	1,182,959
	Unjustified increase		[–4,900]
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–276,203
	Streamlining of Air Force Management Headquarters		[–276,203]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	6,862,758	6,538,955

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xx	Restore EC–130 Compass Call	0	27,300
	Costs associated with preventing divestiture of EC–130		[27,300]
x	Restore A–10	0	235,300
	Costs associated with preventing divestiture of A–10 fleet		[235,300]
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–618,300
	Bulk fuel savings		[–618,300]
	UNDISTRIBUTED FOREIGN CURRENCY ADJUSTMENT	0	–137,800
	Foreign currency adjustment		[–137,800]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–493,500

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE	38,191,929	23,948,965

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES	1,779,378	1,779,378
020	MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS	226,243	226,243
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	487,036	487,036
040	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	109,342	109,342
050	BASE SUPPORT	373,707	373,707
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	2,975,706	2,975,706

	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
060	ADMINISTRATION	53,921	53,921
070	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	14,359	14,359
080	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC)	13,665	13,665
090	OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP)	6,606	6,606
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–2,116
	Costs associated with preventing divestiture of A–10 fleet		[2,500]
	Streamlining of Air Force Reserve Management Headquarters		[–4,616]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES	88,551	86,435

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xxxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–101,100
	Bulk fuel savings		[–101,100]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–101,100

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE	3,064,257	2,961,041

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
	OPERATING FORCES
010	AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS	3,526,471	3,526,471
020	MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS	740,779	743,379
	ARNG border security enhancement		[2,600]
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,763,859	1,763,859
040	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	288,786	288,786
050	BASE SUPPORT	582,037	582,037
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	6,901,932	6,904,532

	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES
060	ADMINISTRATION	23,626	23,626
070	RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING	30,652	30,652
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–3,015
	Streamlining of Air National Guard Management Headquarters		[–3,015]
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	42,200
	Costs associated with preventing divestiture of A–10 fleet		[42,200]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES	54,278	93,463

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xxxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–162,600
	Bulk fuel savings		[–162,600]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–162,600

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG	6,956,210	6,835,395

	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF	485,888	505,888
	Middle East Assurance Initiative		[20,000]
020	OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE	534,795	530,795
	DOD Rewards reduction-funding ahead of need		[–4,000]
030	SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES	4,862,368	4,862,368
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	5,883,051	5,899,051

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
040	DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY	142,659	142,659
050	NATIONAL DEFENSE UNIVERSITY	78,416	78,416
060	SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/TRAINING AND RECRUITING	354,372	354,372
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	575,447	575,447

	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
070	CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS	160,320	160,320
090	DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY	570,177	570,177
100	DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY	1,374,536	1,374,536
110	DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY	642,551	642,551
120	DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY	1,282,755	1,292,755
	Sharkseer increase		[10,000]
140	DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY	26,073	26,073
150	DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY	366,429	366,429
160	DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY	192,625	192,625
180	DEFENSE PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING AGENCY	115,372	115,372
190	DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY	524,723	517,723
	Reduction to Combating Terrorism Fellowship		[–7,000]
200	DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE	508,396	508,396
230	DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION	33,577	33,577
240	DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY	415,696	415,696
260	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY	2,753,771	2,784,021
	Impact Aid		[30,000]
	School lunches for territories		[250]
270	MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY	432,068	432,068
290	OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT	110,612	57,512
	Guam outside the fence infastructure		[–20,000]
	Defense industry adjustment		[–33,100]
300	OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE	1,388,285	1,378,785
	BRAC 2017 Planning and Support		[–10,500]
	OSD fleet architecture study		[1,000]
310	SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/ADMIN & SVC-WIDE ACTIVITIES	83,263	83,263
320	WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES	621,688	621,688
320A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	14,379,428	14,379,428
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–897,552
	Streamlining of Department of Defense Management Headquarters		[–897,552]
	SUBTOTAL, ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES	25,982,345	25,055,443

	UNDISTRIBUTED
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED FOREIGN CURRENCY ADJUSTMENT	0	–51,900
	Foreign currency adjustment		[–51,900]
xxx	UNDISTRIBUTED BULK FUEL SAVINGS	0	–36,000
	Bulk fuel savings		[–36,000]
	SUBTOTAL, UNDISTRIBUTED	0	–87,900

	TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE	32,440,843	31,442,041

	MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS
	US COURT OF APPEALS FOR ARMED FORCES, DEF
010	US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE	14,078	14,078
	SUBTOTAL, US COURT OF APPEALS FOR ARMED FORCES, DEF	14,078	14,078

	OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID
010	OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID	100,266	100,266
	SUBTOTAL, OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CIVIC AID	100,266	100,266

	COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT
010	FORMER SOVIET UNION (FSU) THREAT REDUCTION	358,496	358,496
	SUBTOTAL, COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION ACCOUNT	358,496	358,496

	DOD ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND
010	ACQ WORKFORCE DEV FD	84,140	84,140
	SUBTOTAL, DOD ACQUISITION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FUND	84,140	84,140

	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY
040	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY	234,829	234,829
	SUBTOTAL, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY	234,829	234,829

	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY
050	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY	292,453	292,453
	SUBTOTAL, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY	292,453	292,453

	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE
060	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE	368,131	368,131
	SUBTOTAL, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE	368,131	368,131

	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE
070	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE	8,232	8,232
	SUBTOTAL, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE	8,232	8,232

	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES
080	ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES	203,717	203,717
	SUBTOTAL, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES	203,717	203,717

	TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS	1,664,342	1,664,342

	TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE	176,517,228	134,071,146

SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars)
	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	257,900	1,352,329
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[1,094,429]
040	THEATER LEVEL ASSETS	1,110,836	1,874,136
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[763,300]
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	261,943	1,316,265
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[1,054,322]
060	AVIATION ASSETS	22,160	1,568,289
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[1,546,129]
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	1,119,201	4,277,807
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[3,158,606]
080	LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS	117,881	117,881
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	50,000	50,000
140	ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES	4,500,666	4,500,666
150	COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM	10,000	10,000
160	RESET	1,834,777	1,834,777
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	9,285,364	16,902,150

	MOBILIZATION
190	ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS	40,000	40,000
	SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION	40,000	40,000

	ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES
350	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	529,891	529,891
380	AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT	5,033	5,033
420	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	100,480	100,480
450	REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT	154,350	154,350
480A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,267,632	1,267,632
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	2,057,386	2,057,386

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY	11,382,750	18,999,536

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	2,442	2,442
050	LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT	813	813
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	779	779
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	20,525	20,525
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	24,559	24,559

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES	24,559	24,559

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MANEUVER UNITS	1,984	1,984
030	ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE	4,671	4,671
060	AVIATION ASSETS	15,980	15,980
070	FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT	12,867	12,867
100	BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT	23,134	23,134
120	MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS	1,426	1,426
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	60,062	60,062

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	783	783
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	783	783

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG	60,845	60,845

	AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND
	MINISTRY OF DEFENSE
010	SUSTAINMENT	2,214,899	2,214,899
030	EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION	182,751	182,751
040	TRAINING AND OPERATIONS	281,555	281,555
	SUBTOTAL, MINISTRY OF DEFENSE	2,679,205	2,679,205

	MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
060	SUSTAINMENT	901,137	901,137
080	EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION	116,573	116,573
090	TRAINING AND OPERATIONS	65,342	65,342
	SUBTOTAL, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR	1,083,052	1,083,052

	TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND	3,762,257	3,762,257

	IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND
	IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND
010	IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND	715,000	715,000
	SUBTOTAL, IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND	715,000	715,000

	TOTAL IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND	715,000	715,000

	SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND
	SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND
010	SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND	600,000	600,000
	SUBTOTAL, SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND	600,000	600,000

	TOTAL SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND	600,000	600,000

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	358,417	5,302,082
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[4,940,365]
	Readiness funding increase		[3,300]
030	AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES	110	110
040	AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT	4,513	4,513
050	AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT	126,501	126,501
060	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	75,897	990,433
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[897,536]
	Readiness funding increase		[17,000]
070	AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT	2,770	2,770
080	AVIATION LOGISTICS	34,101	34,101
090	MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS	1,184,878	5,472,536
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[4,287,658]
100	SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING	16,663	16,663
110	SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,922,829	7,883,780
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[5,960,951]
130	COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS	33,577	33,577
160	WARFARE TACTICS	26,454	26,454
170	OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY	22,305	22,305
180	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	513,969	513,969
190	EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE	10,007	10,007
250	IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT	60,865	60,865
260	WEAPONS MAINTENANCE	275,231	275,231
290	SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION	7,819	7,819
300	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	61,422	61,422
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	4,738,328	20,845,138

	MOBILIZATION
340	EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS	5,307	5,307
360	COAST GUARD SUPPORT	160,002	160,002
	SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION	165,309	165,309

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
400	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	44,845	44,845
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	44,845	44,845

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
480	ADMINISTRATION	2,513	2,513
490	EXTERNAL RELATIONS	500	500
510	MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT	5,309	5,309
520	OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT	1,469	1,469
550	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	156,671	156,671
580	ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT	8,834	8,834
620	NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE	1,490	1,490
680A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	6,320	6,320
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	183,106	183,106

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY	5,131,588	21,238,398

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATIONAL FORCES	353,133	1,284,212
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[931,079]
020	FIELD LOGISTICS	259,676	1,191,433
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[931,757]
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	240,000	240,000
060	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	16,026	16,026
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	868,835	2,731,671

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
110	TRAINING SUPPORT	37,862	37,862
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	37,862	37,862

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
150	SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION	43,767	43,767
180A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	2,070	2,070
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	45,837	45,837

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS	952,534	2,815,370

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES
	OPERATING FORCES
010	MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS	4,033	4,033
020	INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE	60	60
030	AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE	20,300	20,300
100	COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES	7,250	7,250
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	31,643	31,643

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES	31,643	31,643

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	OPERATING FORCES	2,500	2,500
040	BASE OPERATING SUPPORT	955	955
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	3,455	3,455

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE	3,455	3,455

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES	1,505,738	4,839,106
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[3,336,868]
	Retain Current A–10 Fleet		[–1,400]
	Unjustified Increase		[–2,100]
020	COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES	914,973	2,802,588
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[1,897,315]
	Unjustified Increase		[–14,000]
	Readiness funding increase		[4,300]
030	AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS)	31,978	31,978
040	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	1,192,765	7,729,892
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[6,537,127]
050	FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION	85,625	85,625
060	BASE SUPPORT	917,269	917,269
070	GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING	30,219	30,219
080	OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS	174,734	174,734
100	LAUNCH FACILITIES	869	869
110	SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS	5,008	5,008
120	COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT	100,190	100,190
xxx	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	22,893	22,893
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	4,982,261	16,740,371

	MOBILIZATION
140	AIRLIFT OPERATIONS	2,995,703	2,995,703
150	MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS	108,163	108,163
160	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	511,059	2,128,630
	Transfer base requirement to OCO due to BCA		[1,617,571]
180	BASE SUPPORT	4,642	4,642
	SUBTOTAL, MOBILIZATION	3,619,567	5,237,138

	TRAINING AND RECRUITING
190	OFFICER ACQUISITION	92	92
240	SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING	11,986	11,986
	SUBTOTAL, TRAINING AND RECRUITING	12,078	12,078

	ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES
340	LOGISTICS OPERATIONS	86,716	86,716
380	BASE SUPPORT	3,836	3,836
400	SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS	165,348	165,348
410	OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES	204,683	141,683
	Reduction to the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq		[–63,000]
450	INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT	61	61
450A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	15,463	15,463
	SUBTOTAL, ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES	476,107	413,107

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE	9,090,013	22,402,694

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE
	OPERATING FORCES
030	DEPOT MAINTENANCE	51,086	51,086
050	BASE SUPPORT	7,020	7,020
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	58,106	58,106

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE	58,106	58,106

	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG
	OPERATING FORCES
020	MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS	19,900	19,900
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	19,900	19,900

	TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG	19,900	19,900

	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE
	OPERATING FORCES
010	JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF	9,900	9,900
030	SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES	2,345,835	2,345,835
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATING FORCES	2,355,735	2,355,735

	ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES
090	DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY	18,474	18,474
120	DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY	29,579	29,579
140	DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY	110,000	110,000
160	DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY	5,960	5,960
190	DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY	1,677,000	1,577,000
	Reduction from Coalition Support Funds		[–100,000]
260	DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY	73,000	73,000
300	OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE	106,709	106,709
320	WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES	2,102	2,102
320A	CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS	1,427,074	1,427,074
	SUBTOTAL, ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES	3,449,898	3,349,898

	TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE	5,805,633	5,705,633

	TOTAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE	37,638,283	76,437,396

SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars)
MILITARY PERSONNEL
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	130,491,227	129,236,727
Military Personnel Underexecution		[–987,200]
Additional support for the National Guard’s Operation Phalanx		[21,700]
Reduction for anticipated cost of TRICARE consolidation		[–85,000]
TRICARE program improvement initiatives		[15,000]
Financial literacy improvement		[85,000]
Reduction from Foreign Currency Gains, Army		[–65,200]
Reduction from Foreign Currency Gains, Navy		[–81,400]
Reduction from Foreign Currency Gains, Marine Corps		[–27,000]
Reduction from Foreign Currency Gains, Air Force		[–130,400]
SUBTOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	130,491,227	129,236,727

MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS
MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS	6,243,449	6,243,449
SUBTOTAL, MEDICARE-ELIGIBLE RETIREE HEALTH FUND CONTRIBUTIONS	6,243,449	6,243,449

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL	136,734,676	135,480,176

SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars)
MILITARY PERSONNEL
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS
MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	3,204,758	3,204,758
SUBTOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL APPROPRIATIONS	3,204,758	3,204,758

TOTAL, MILITARY PERSONNEL	3,204,758	3,204,758

SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS (In Thousands of Dollars)
	WORKING CAPITAL FUND
	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY
020	SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY	50,432	50,432
	SUBTOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY	50,432	50,432

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
010	SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS	62,898	62,898
	SUBTOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE	62,898	62,898

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
030	DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)	45,084	45,084
	SUBTOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE	45,084	45,084

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA
020	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA	1,154,154	1,154,154
	SUBTOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA	1,154,154	1,154,154

	TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND	1,312,568	1,312,568

	NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND
040	POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING	15,456	15,456
060	LG MED SPD RO/RO MAINTENANCE	124,493	124,493
070	DOD MOBILIZATION ALTERATIONS	8,243	8,243
080	TAH MAINTENANCE	27,784	27,784
090	RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	25,197	25,197
100	READY RESERVE FORCE	272,991	272,991
	SUBTOTAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND	474,164	474,164

	TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND	474,164	474,164

	CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION
	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
01	CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—O&M	139,098	139,098
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE	139,098	139,098

	RDT&E
02	CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—RDT&E	579,342	579,342
	SUBTOTAL, RDT&E	579,342	579,342

	PROCUREMENT
03	CHEM DEMILITARIZATION—PROC	2,281	2,281
	SUBTOTAL, PROCUREMENT	2,281	2,281

	TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION	720,721	720,721

	DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF
	DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES
010	DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE	739,009	761,009
	SOUTHCOM Operational support		[30,000]
	Transfer to Demand Reduction Program		[–8,000]
	SUBTOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES	739,009	761,009

	DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM
020	DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM	111,589	119,589
	Expanded drug testing		[8,000]
	SUBTOTAL, DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM	111,589	119,589

	TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF	850,598	880,598

	OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
010	OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL	310,459	310,459
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE	310,459	310,459

	RDT&E
020	OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL	4,700	2,100
	Funding ahead of need		[–2,600]
	SUBTOTAL, RDT&E	4,700	2,100

	PROCUREMENT
030	OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL	1,000	0
	Funding ahead of need		[–1,000]
	SUBTOTAL, PROCUREMENT	1,000	0

	TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL	316,159	312,559

	DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
010	IN-HOUSE CARE	9,082,298	9,082,298
020	PRIVATE SECTOR CARE	14,892,683	14,892,683
030	CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT	2,415,658	2,405,368
	Reduction of funds related to Combating Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria (CARB) project		[–10,290]
040	INFORMATION MANAGEMENT	1,677,827	1,677,827
050	MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES	327,967	327,967
060	EDUCATION AND TRAINING	750,614	750,614
070	BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS	1,742,893	1,742,893
xx	UNDISTRIBUTED FOREIGN CURRENCY ADJUSTMENT	0	–36,400
	Foreign currency adjustment		[–36,400]
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE	30,889,940	30,843,250

	RDT&E
090	R&D RESEARCH	10,996	10,996
100	R&D EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT	59,473	56,323
	Reduction of funds related to Combating Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria (CARB) project		[–3,150]
110	R&D ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT	231,356	228,256
	Reduction of funds related to Combating Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria (CARB) project		[–3,100]
120	R&D DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION	103,443	103,443
130	R&D ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT	515,910	515,910
140	R&D MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT	41,567	41,567
150	R&D CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT	17,356	17,356
	SUBTOTAL, RDT&E	980,101	973,851

	PROCUREMENT
160	PROC INITIAL OUTFITTING	33,392	33,392
170	PROC REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION	330,504	330,504
180	PROC THEATER MEDICAL INFORMATION PROGRAM	1,494	1,494
190	PROC IEHR	7,897	7,897
	SUBTOTAL, PROCUREMENT	373,287	373,287

	TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM	32,243,328	32,190,388

	TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS	35,917,538	35,890,998

SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars)
Account	State or Country and Installation	Project Title	Budget Request	Senate Authorized
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
MILCON, ARMY
	Alaska
MILCON, ARMY	Fort Greely	Physical Readiness Training Facility	7,800	7,800
	California
MILCON, ARMY	Concord	Pier	98,000	98,000
	Colorado
MILCON, ARMY	Fort Carson, Colorado	Rotary Wing Taxiway	5,800	5,800
	Georgia
MILCON, ARMY	Fort Gordon	Command and Control Facility	90,000	90,000
	Germany
MILCON, ARMY	Grafenwoehr	Vehicle Maintenance Shop	51,000	51,000
	Guantanamo Bay, Cuba
MILCON, ARMY	Guantanamo Bay	Unaccompanied Personnel Housing	0	76,000
	Maryland
MILCON, ARMY	Fort Meade	Access Control Point-Reece Road	0	19,500
MILCON, ARMY	Fort Meade	Access Control Point-Mapes Road	0	15,000
	New York
MILCON, ARMY	Fort Drum, New York	NCO Academy Complex	19,000	19,000
MILCON, ARMY	U.S. Military Academy	Waste Water Treatment Plant	70,000	70,000
	Oklahoma
MILCON, ARMY	Fort Sill	Reception Barracks Complex Ph2	56,000	56,000
MILCON, ARMY	Fort Sill	Training Support Facility	13,400	13,400
	Texas
MILCON, ARMY	Corpus Christi	Powertrain Facility (Infrastructure/Metal)	85,000	85,000
MILCON, ARMY	Joint Base San Antonio	Homeland Defense Operations Center	43,000	0
	Virginia
MILCON, ARMY	Fort Lee	Training Support Facility	33,000	33,000
MILCON, ARMY	Joint Base Myer-Henderson	Instruction Building	37,000	0
	Worldwide Unspecified
MILCON, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Host Nation Support	36,000	36,000
MILCON, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Minor Construction	25,000	25,000
MILCON, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Planning and Design	73,245	73,245
MILCON, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Prior Year Unobligated Amounts	0	–52,000

SUBTOTAL, MILCON, ARMY	743,245	721,745

MIL CON, NAVY
	Arizona
MIL CON, NAVY	Yuma	Aircraft Maint. Facilities & Apron (So. CALA)	50,635	50,635
	Bahrain Island
MIL CON, NAVY	SW Asia	Mina Salman Pier Replacement	37,700	37,700
MIL CON, NAVY	SW Asia	Ship Maintenance Support Facility	52,091	52,091
	California
MIL CON, NAVY	Camp Pendleton, California	Raw Water Pipeline Pendleton to Fallbrook	44,540	0
MIL CON, NAVY	Camp Pendleton, California	Pendleton Ops Center	0	25,000
MIL CON, NAVY	Coronado	Coastal Campus Utilities	4,856	4,856
MIL CON, NAVY	Lemoore	F–35C Hangar Modernization and Addition	56,497	56,497
MIL CON, NAVY	Lemoore	F–35C Training Facilities	8,187	8,187
MIL CON, NAVY	Lemoore	RTO and Mission Debrief Facility	7,146	7,146
MIL CON, NAVY	Miramar	KC–130J Enlisted Air Crew Trainer	0	11,200
MIL CON, NAVY	Point Mugu	E–2C/D Hangar Additions and Renovations	19,453	19,453
MIL CON, NAVY	Point Mugu	Triton Avionics and Fuel Systems Trainer	2,974	2,974
MIL CON, NAVY	San Diego	LCS Support Facility	37,366	37,366
MIL CON, NAVY	Twentynine Palms, California	Microgrid Expansion	9,160	9,160
	Florida
MIL CON, NAVY	Jacksonville	Fleet Support Facility Addition	8,455	8,455
MIL CON, NAVY	Jacksonville	Triton Mission Control Facility	8,296	8,296
MIL CON, NAVY	Mayport	LCS Mission Module Readiness Center	16,159	16,159
MIL CON, NAVY	Pensacola	A-School Unaccopanied Housing (Corry Station)	18,347	18,347
MIL CON, NAVY	Whiting Field	T–6B JPATS Training Operations Facility	10,421	10,421
	Georgia
MIL CON, NAVY	Albany	Ground Source Heat Pumps	7,851	7,851
MIL CON, NAVY	Kings Bay	Industrial Control System Infrastructure	8,099	8,099
MIL CON, NAVY	Townsend	Townsend Bombing Range Expansion Phase 2	48,279	43,279
	Guam
MIL CON, NAVY	Joint Region Marianas	Live-Fire Training Range Complex (NW Field)	125,677	125,677
MIL CON, NAVY	Joint Region Marianas	Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Closure	10,777	10,777
MIL CON, NAVY	Joint Region Marianas	Sanitary Sewer System Recapitalization	45,314	45,314
	Hawaii
MIL CON, NAVY	Barking Sands	PMRF Power Grid Consolidation	30,623	30,623
MIL CON, NAVY	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	UEM Interconnect Sta C to Hickam	6,335	6,335
MIL CON, NAVY	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	Welding School Shop Consolidation	8,546	8,546
MIL CON, NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	Airfield Lighting Modernization	26,097	26,097
MIL CON, NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	Bachelor Enlisted Quarters	68,092	68,092
MIL CON, NAVY	Kaneohe Bay	P–8A Detachment Support Facilities	12,429	12,429
MIL CON, NAVY	Mcb Hawaii	LHD Pad Conversions MV22 Landing Pads	0	12,800
	Italy
MIL CON, NAVY	Sigonella	P–8A Hangar and Fleet Support Facility	62,302	62,302
MIL CON, NAVY	Sigonella	Triton Hangar and Operation Facility	40,641	40,641
	Japan
MIL CON, NAVY	Camp Butler	Military Working Dog Facilities (Camp Hansen)	11,697	11,697
MIL CON, NAVY	Iwakuni	E–2D Operational Trainer Complex	8,716	8,716
MIL CON, NAVY	Iwakuni	Security Modifications—CVW5/MAG12 HQ	9,207	9,207
MIL CON, NAVY	Kadena AB	Aircraft Maint. Shelters & Apron	23,310	23,310
MIL CON, NAVY	Yokosuka	Child Development Center	13,846	13,846
	Maryland
MIL CON, NAVY	Patuxent River	Unaccompanied Housing	40,935	40,935
	North Carolina
MIL CON, NAVY	Camp Lejeune	Range Safety Improvements	0	19,400
MIL CON, NAVY	Camp Lejeune, North Carolina	Simulator Integration/Range Control Facility	54,849	54,849
MIL CON, NAVY	Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station	Air Field Security Improvements	0	23,300
MIL CON, NAVY	Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station	KC130J Enlsited Air Crew Trainer Facility	4,769	4,769
MIL CON, NAVY	Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station	Unmanned Aircraft System Facilities	29,657	29,657
MIL CON, NAVY	New River	Operational Trainer Facility	3,312	3,312
MIL CON, NAVY	New River	Radar Air Traffic Control Facility Addition	4,918	4,918
	Poland
MIL CON, NAVY	RedziKowo Base	AEGIS Ashore Missile Defense Complex	51,270	51,270
	South Carolina
MIL CON, NAVY	Parris Island	Range Safety Improvements & Modernization	27,075	27,075
	Virginia
MIL CON, NAVY	Dam Neck	Maritime Surveillance System Facility	23,066	23,066
MIL CON, NAVY	Norfolk	Communications Center	75,289	75,289
MIL CON, NAVY	Norfolk	Electrical Repairs to Piers 2,6,7, and 11	44,254	44,254
MIL CON, NAVY	Norfolk	MH60 Helicopter Training Facility	7,134	7,134
MIL CON, NAVY	Portsmouth	Waterfront Utilities	45,513	45,513
MIL CON, NAVY	Quantico	ATFP Gate	5,840	5,840
MIL CON, NAVY	Quantico	Electrical Distribution Upgrade	8,418	8,418
MIL CON, NAVY	Quantico	Embassy Security Guard BEQ & Ops Facility	43,941	43,941
MIL CON, NAVY	Quantico	TBS Fire Station Replacement	0	17,200
	Washington
MIL CON, NAVY	Bangor	WRA Land/Water Interface	34,177	34,177
MIL CON, NAVY	Bremerton	Dry Dock 6 Modernization & Utility Improve.	22,680	22,680
MIL CON, NAVY	Indian Island	Shore Power to Ammunition Pier	4,472	4,472
	Worldwide Unspecified
MIL CON, NAVY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	MCON Design Funds	91,649	91,649
MIL CON, NAVY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Unspecified Minor Construction	22,590	22,590

SUBTOTAL, MIL CON, NAVY	1,605,929	1,665,289

MILCON, AIR FORCE
	Alaska
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Eielson AFB	F–35A Flight Sim/Alter Squad Ops/AMU Facility	37,000	37,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Eielson AFB	Rpr Central Heat & Power Plant Boiler Ph3	34,400	34,400
	Arizona
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Davis-Monthan AFB	HC–130J Age Covered Storage	4,700	4,700
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Davis-Monthan AFB	HC–130J Wash Rack	12,200	12,200
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Luke AFB	Communications Facility	0	21,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Luke AFB	F–35A ADAL Fuel Offload Facility	5,000	5,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Luke AFB	F–35A Aircraft Maintenance Hangar/Sq 3	13,200	13,200
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Luke AFB	F–35A Bomb Build-Up Facility	5,500	5,500
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Luke AFB	F–35A Sq Ops/AMU/Hangar/Sq 4	33,000	33,000
	Colorado
MILCON, AIR FORCE	U.S. Air Force Academy	Front Gates Force Protection Enhancements	10,000	10,000
	Florida
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Cape Canaveral AFS	Range Communications Facility	21,000	21,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Eglin AFB	F–35A Consolidated HQ Facility	8,700	8,700
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Hurlburt Field	ADAL 39 Information Operations Squad Facility	14,200	14,200
	Greenland
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Thule AB	Thule Consolidation Ph 1	41,965	41,965
	Guam
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Joint Region Marianas	APR—Dispersed Maint Spares & SE Storage Fac	19,000	19,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Joint Region Marianas	APR—Installation Control Center	22,200	22,200
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Joint Region Marianas	APR—South Ramp Utilities Phase 2	7,100	7,100
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Joint Region Marianas	PRTC Roads	2,500	2,500
	Hawaii
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	F–22 Fighter Alert Facility	46,000	46,000
	Japan
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Yokota AB	C–130J Flight Simulator Facility	8,461	8,461
	Kansas
MILCON, AIR FORCE	McConnell AFB	Air Traffic Control Tower	0	11,200
MILCON, AIR FORCE	McConnell AFB	KC–46A ADAL Deicing Pads	4,300	4,300
	Louisiana
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Barksdale AFB	Consolidated Communications Facility	0	20,000
	Maryland
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Fort Meade	CYBERCOM Joint Operations Center, Increment 3	86,000	86,000
	Missouri
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Whiteman AFB	Consolidated Stealth Ops & Nuclear Alert Fac	29,500	29,500
	Montana
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Malmstrom AFB	Tactical Response Force Alert Facility	19,700	19,700
	Nebraska
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Offutt AFB	Dormitory (144 RM)	21,000	21,000
	Nevada
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Nellis AFB	F–35A Airfield Pavements	31,000	31,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Nellis AFB	F–35A Live Ordnance Loading Area	34,500	34,500
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Nellis AFB	F–35A Munitions Maintenance Facilities	3,450	3,450
	New Mexico
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Cannon AFB	Construct AT/FP Gate—Portales	7,800	7,800
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Holloman AFB	Marshalling Area ARM/DE-ARM Pad D	3,000	3,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Holloman AFB	Fixed Ground Control	0	3,200
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Kirtland AFB	Space Vehicles Component Development Lab	12,800	12,800
	New York
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Fort Drum, New York	ASOS Expansion	0	6,000
	Niger
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Agadez	Construct Airfield and Base Camp	50,000	50,000
	North Carolina
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Seymour Johnson AFB	Air Traffic Control Tower/Base Ops Facility	17,100	17,100
	Oklahoma
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Altus AFB	Dormitory (120 RM)	18,000	18,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Altus AFB	KC–46A FTU ADAL Fuel Cell Maint Hangar	10,400	10,400
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Tinker AFB	Air Traffic Control Tower	12,900	12,900
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Tinker AFB	KC–46A Depot Maintenance Dock	37,000	37,000
	Oman
MILCON, AIR FORCE	AL Musannah AB	Airlift Apron	25,000	25,000
	South Dakota
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Ellsworth AFB	Dormitory (168 RM)	23,000	23,000
	Texas
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Joint Base San Antonio	BMT Classrooms/Dining Facility 3	35,000	35,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Joint Base San Antonio	BMT Recruit Dormitory 5	71,000	71,000
	United Kingdom
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Croughton Raf	Consolidated SATCOM/Tech Control Facility	36,424	36,424
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Croughton Raf	JIAC Consolidation—Ph 2	94,191	94,191
	Utah
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Hill AFB	F–35A Flight Simulator Addition Phase 2	5,900	5,900
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Hill AFB	F–35A Hangar 40/42 Additions and AMU	21,000	21,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Hill AFB	Hayman Igloos	11,500	11,500
	Worldwide Classified
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Classified Location	Long Range Strike Bomber	77,130	77,130
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Classified Location	Munitions Storage	3,000	3,000
	Worldwide Unspecified
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Prior Year Unobligated Amounts	0	–50,000
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Various Worldwide Locations	Planning and Design	89,164	89,164
MILCON, AIR FORCE	Various Worldwide Locations	Unspecified Minor Military Construction	22,900	22,900
	Wyoming
MILCON, AIR FORCE	F. E. Warren AFB	Weapon Storage Facility	95,000	95,000

SUBTOTAL, MILCON, AIR FORCE	1,354,785	1,366,185

MIL CON, DEF-WIDE
	Alabama
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Rucker	Fort Rucker ES/PS Consolidation/Replacement	46,787	46,787
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Maxwell AFB	Maxwell ES/MS Replacement/Renovation	32,968	32,968
	Arizona
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Huachuca	JITC Buildings 52101/52111 Renovations	3,884	3,884
	California
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Camp Pendleton, California	SOF Combat Service Support Facility	10,181	10,181
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Camp Pendleton, California	SOF Performance Resiliency Center-West	10,371	10,371
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Coronado	SOF Logistics Support Unit One Ops Fac. #2	47,218	47,218
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fresno Yosemite IAP ANG	Replace Fuel Storage and Distrib. Facilities	10,700	10,700
	Colorado
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Carson, Colorado	SOF Language Training Facility	8,243	8,243
	Conus Classified
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Classified Location	Operations Support Facility	20,065	20,065
	Delaware
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Dover AFB	Construct Hydrant Fuel System	21,600	21,600
	Djibouti
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Camp Lemonier, Djibouti	Construct Fuel Storage & Distrib. Facilities	43,700	43,700
	Florida
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Hurlburt Field	SOF Fuel Cell Maintenance Hangar	17,989	17,989
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	MacDill AFB	SOF Operational Support Facility	39,142	39,142
	Georgia
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Moody AFB	Replace Pumphouse and Truck Fillstands	10,900	10,900
	Germany
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Garmisch	Garmisch E/MS-Addition/Modernization	14,676	14,676
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Grafenwoehr	Grafenwoehr Elementary School Replacement	38,138	38,138
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Rhine Ordnance Barracks	Medical Center Replacement Incr 5	85,034	85,034
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Spangdahlem AB	Construct Fuel Pipeline	5,500	5,500
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Spangdahlem AB	Medical/Dental Clinic Addition	34,071	34,071
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Stuttgart-Patch Barracks	Patch Elementary School Replacement	49,413	49,413
	Hawaii
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Kaneohe Bay	Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement	122,071	122,071
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Schofield Barracks	Behavioral Health/Dental Clinic Addition	123,838	123,838
	Japan
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Kadena AB	Airfield Pavements	37,485	37,485
	Kentucky
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Campbell, Kentucky	SOF Company HQ/Classrooms	12,553	12,553
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Knox	Fort Knox HS Renovation/MS Addition	23,279	23,279
	Maryland
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Meade	NSAW Campus Feeders Phase 2	33,745	33,745
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Meade	NSAW Recapitalize Building #2 Incr 1	34,897	34,897
	Nevada
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Nellis AFB	Replace Hydrant Fuel System	39,900	39,900
	New Mexico
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Cannon AFB	Construct Pumphouse and Fuel Storage	20,400	20,400
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Cannon AFB	SOF Squadron Operations Facility	11,565	11,565
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Cannon AFB	SOF ST Operational Training Facilities	13,146	13,146
	New York
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	West Point	West Point Elementary School Replacement	55,778	55,778
	North Carolina
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Camp Lejeune, North Carolina	SOF Combat Service Support Facility	14,036	14,036
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Camp Lejeune, North Carolina	SOF Marine Battalion Company/Team Facilities	54,970	54,970
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Bragg	Butner Elementary School Replacement	32,944	32,944
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Bragg	SOF 21 STS Operations Facility	16,863	16,863
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Bragg	SOF Battalion Operations Facility	38,549	38,549
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Bragg	SOF Indoor Range	8,303	8,303
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Bragg	SOF Intelligence Training Center	28,265	28,265
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Bragg	SOF Special Tactics Facility (PH 2)	43,887	43,887
	Ohio
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Wright-Patterson AFB	Satellite Pharmacy Replacement	6,623	6,623
	Oregon
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Klamath Falls IAP	Replace Fuel Facilities	2,500	2,500
	Pennsylvania
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Philadelphia	Replace Headquarters	49,700	0
	Poland
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	RedziKowo Base	Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System Complex	169,153	169,153
	South Carolina
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Jackson	Pierce Terrace Elementary School Replacement	26,157	26,157
	Spain
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Rota	Rota ES and HS Additions	13,737	13,737
	Texas
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Bliss	Hospital Replacement Incr 7	239,884	239,884
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Joint Base San Antonio	Ambulatory Care Center Phase 4	61,776	61,776
	Virginia
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Belvoir	Construct Visitor Control Center	5,000	5,000
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Fort Belvoir	Replace Ground Vehicle Fueling Facility	4,500	4,500
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Joint Base Langley-Eustis	Replace Fuel Pier and Distribution Facility	28,000	28,000
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek—Story	SOF Applied Instruction Facility	23,916	23,916
	Worldwide Unspecified
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Contingency Construction	10,000	10,000
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	ECIP Design	10,000	10,000
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Energy Conservation Investment Program	150,000	150,000
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Exercise Related Minor Construction	8,687	8,687
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Planning and Design	118,632	118,632
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Unspecified Minor Construction	23,676	23,676
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Prior year savings, including rescoped medical facility at Fort Knox	0	–120,000
MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	Various Worldwide Locations	Planning & Design	31,772	31,772

SUBTOTAL, MIL CON, DEF-WIDE	2,300,767	2,131,067

MILCON, ARNG
	Alabama
MILCON, ARNG	Camp Foley	Vehicle Maintenance Shop	0	4,500
	Connecticut
MILCON, ARNG	Camp Hartell	Ready Building (CST-WMD)	11,000	11,000
	Delaware
MILCON, ARNG	Dagsboro	National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop	10,800	10,800
	Florida
MILCON, ARNG	Palm Coast	National Guard Readiness Center	18,000	18,000
	Georgia
MILCON, ARNG	Fort Stewart	Tactical Aerial Unmanned Systems	0	6,800
	Illinois
MILCON, ARNG	Sparta	Basic 10M–25M Firing Range (Zero)	1,900	1,900
	Kansas
MILCON, ARNG	Salina	Automated Combat Pistol/MP Firearms Qual Cour	2,400	2,400
MILCON, ARNG	Salina	Modified Record Fire Range	4,300	4,300
	Maryland
MILCON, ARNG	Easton	National Guard Readiness Center	13,800	13,800
	Mississippi
MILCON, ARNG	Gulfport	Aviation Classification and Repair	0	40,000
	Nevada
MILCON, ARNG	Reno	National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop Add/A	8,000	8,000
	Ohio
MILCON, ARNG	Camp Ravenna	Modified Record Fire Range	3,300	3,300
	Oregon
MILCON, ARNG	Salem	National Guard/Reserve Center Bldg Add/Alt (J	16,500	16,500
	Pennsylvania
MILCON, ARNG	Fort Indiantown Gap	Training Aids Center	16,000	16,000
	Vermont
MILCON, ARNG	North Hyde Park	National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop Addit	7,900	7,900
	Virginia
MILCON, ARNG	Richmond	National Guard/Reserve Center Building (JFHQ)	29,000	29,000
	Washington
MILCON, ARNG	Yakima	Enlisted Barracks, Transient Training	19,000	19,000
	Worldwide Unspecified
MILCON, ARNG	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Planning and Design	20,337	20,337
MILCON, ARNG	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Unspecified Minor Construction	15,000	15,000

SUBTOTAL, MILCON, ARNG	197,237	248,537

MILCON, ANG
	Alabama
MILCON, ANG	Dannelly Field	TFI—Replace Squadron Operations Facility	7,600	7,600
	California
MILCON, ANG	Moffett Field	Replace Vehicle Maintenance Facility	6,500	6,500
	Colorado
MILCON, ANG	Buckley Air Force Base	ASE Maintenance and Storage Facility	5,100	5,100
	Connecticut
MILCON, ANG	Bradley	Ops and Deployment Facility	0	6,300
	Florida
MILCON, ANG	Cape Canaveral AFS	Space Control Facility	0	6,100
	Georgia
MILCON, ANG	Savannah/Hilton Head IAP	C–130 Squadron Operations Facility	9,000	9,000
	Hawaii
MILCON, ANG	Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam	F–22 Composite Repair Facility	0	9,700
	Iowa
MILCON, ANG	Des Moines Map	Air Operations Grp/CYBER Beddown-Reno Blg 430	6,700	6,700
	Kansas
MILCON, ANG	Smokey Hill ANG Range	Range Training Support Facilities	2,900	2,900
	Louisiana
MILCON, ANG	New Orleans	Replace Squadron Operations Facility	10,000	10,000
	Maine
MILCON, ANG	Bangor IAP	Add to and Alter Fire Crash/Rescue Station	7,200	7,200
	New Hampshire
MILCON, ANG	Pease International Trade Port	Bidg Mo KC–46 Fuselage Trainer	0	1,500
MILCON, ANG	Pease International Trade Port	KC–46A ADAL Flight Simulator Bldg 156	2,800	2,800
	New Jersey
MILCON, ANG	Atlantic City IAP	Fuel Cell and Corrosion Control Hangar	10,200	10,200
	New York
MILCON, ANG	Niagara Falls IAP	Remotely Piloted Aircraft Beddown Bldg 912	7,700	7,700
	North Carolina
MILCON, ANG	Charlotte/Douglas IAP	Replace C–130 Squadron Operations Facility	9,000	9,000
	North Dakota
MILCON, ANG	Hector IAP	Intel Targeting Facilities	7,300	7,300
	Oklahoma
MILCON, ANG	Will Rogers World Airport	Medium Altitude Manned ISR Beddown	7,600	7,600
	Oregon
MILCON, ANG	Klamath Falls IAP	Replace Fire Crash/Rescue Station	7,200	7,200
	West Virginia
MILCON, ANG	Yeager Airport	Force Protection—Relocate Coonskin Road	3,900	3,900
	Worldwide Unspecified
MILCON, ANG	Various Worldwide Locations	Planning and Design	5,104	5,104
MILCON, ANG	Various Worldwide Locations	Unspecified Minor Construction	7,734	7,734

SUBTOTAL, MILCON, ANG	123,538	147,138

MILCON, ARMY R
	California
MILCON, ARMY R	Miramar	Army Reserve Center	24,000	24,000
	Florida
MILCON, ARMY R	MacDill AFB	AR Center/AS Facility	55,000	55,000
	Mississippi
MILCON, ARMY R	Starkville	Army Reserve Center	9,300	9,300
	New York
MILCON, ARMY R	Orangeburg	Organizational Maintenance Shop	4,200	4,200
	Pennsylvania
MILCON, ARMY R	Conneaut Lake	DAR Highway Improvement	5,000	5,000
	Puerto Rico
MILCON, ARMY R	Fort Buchanan	Access Control Point	0	10,200
	Virginia
MILCON, ARMY R	Fort AP Hill	Equipment Concentration	0	24,000
	Worldwide Unspecified
MILCON, ARMY R	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Planning and Design	9,318	9,318
MILCON, ARMY R	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Unspecified Minor Construction	6,777	6,777

SUBTOTAL, MILCON, ARMY R	113,595	147,795

MIL CON, NAVY RES
	Nevada
MIL CON, NAVY RES	Fallon	NAVOPSPTCEN Fallon	11,480	11,480
	New York
MIL CON, NAVY RES	Brooklyn	Reserve Center Storage Facility	2,479	2,479
	Virginia
MIL CON, NAVY RES	Dam Neck	Reserve Training Center Complex	18,443	18,443
	Worldwide Unspecified
MIL CON, NAVY RES	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	MCNR Planning & Design	2,208	2,208
MIL CON, NAVY RES	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	MCNR Unspecified Minor Construction	1,468	1,468

SUBTOTAL, MIL CON, NAVY RES	36,078	36,078

MILCON, AF RES
	California
MILCON, AF RES	March AFB	Satellite Fire Station	4,600	4,600
	Florida
MILCON, AF RES	Patrick AFB	Aircrew Life Support Facility	3,400	3,400
	Georgia
MILCON, AF RES	Dobbins	Fire Station/Security Complex	0	10,400
	Ohio
MILCON, AF RES	Youngstown	Indoor Firing Range	9,400	9,400
	Texas
MILCON, AF RES	Joint Base San Antonio	Consolidate 433 Medical Facility	9,900	9,900
	Worldwide Unspecified
MILCON, AF RES	Various Worldwide Locations	Planning and Design	13,400	13,400
MILCON, AF RES	Various Worldwide Locations	Unspecified Minor Military Construction	6,121	6,121

SUBTOTAL, MILCON, AF RES	46,821	57,221

NATO SEC INV PRGM
	Worldwide Unspecified
NATO SEC INV PRGM	NATO Security Investment Program	NATO Security Investment Program	120,000	120,000

SUBTOTAL, NATO SEC INV PRGM	120,000	120,000

TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION	6,641,995	6,641,055

FAMILY HOUSING
FAM HSG CON, ARMY
	Florida
FAM HSG CON, ARMY	Camp Rudder	Family Housing Replacement Construction	8,000	8,000
	Germany
FAM HSG CON, ARMY	Wiesbaden Army Airfield	Family Housing Improvements	3,500	3,500
	Illinois
FAM HSG CON, ARMY	Rock Island	Family Housing Replacement Construction	20,000	20,000
	Korea
FAM HSG CON, ARMY	Camp Walker	Family Housing New Construction	61,000	61,000
	Worldwide Unspecified
FAM HSG CON, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Family Housing P & D	7,195	7,195

SUBTOTAL, FAM HSG CON, ARMY	99,695	99,695

FAM HSG O&M, ARMY
	Worldwide Unspecified
FAM HSG O&M, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Furnishings	25,552	25,552
FAM HSG O&M, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Leased Housing	144,879	144,879
FAM HSG O&M, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Maintenance of Real Property Facilities	75,197	75,197
FAM HSG O&M, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Management Account	48,515	48,515
FAM HSG O&M, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Military Housing Privitization Initiative	22,000	22,000
FAM HSG O&M, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Miscellaneous	840	840
FAM HSG O&M, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Services	10,928	10,928
FAM HSG O&M, ARMY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Utilities	65,600	65,600

SUBTOTAL, FAM HSG O&M, ARMY	393,511	393,511

FAM HSG CON, N/MC
	Virginia
FAM HSG CON, N/MC	Wallops Island	Construct Housing Welcome Center	438	438
	Worldwide Unspecified
FAM HSG CON, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Design	4,588	4,588
FAM HSG CON, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Improvements	11,515	11,515

SUBTOTAL, FAM HSG CON, N/MC	16,541	16,541

FAM HSG O&M, N/MC
	Worldwide Unspecified
FAM HSG O&M, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Furnishings Account	17,534	17,534
FAM HSG O&M, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Leasing	64,108	64,108
FAM HSG O&M, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Maintenance of Real Property	99,323	99,323
FAM HSG O&M, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Management Account	56,189	56,189
FAM HSG O&M, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Miscellaneous Account	373	373
FAM HSG O&M, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Privatization Support Costs	28,668	28,668
FAM HSG O&M, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Services Account	19,149	19,149
FAM HSG O&M, N/MC	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Utilities Account	67,692	67,692

SUBTOTAL, FAM HSG O&M, N/MC	353,036	353,036

FAM HSG CON, AF
	Worldwide Unspecified
FAM HSG CON, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Improvements	150,649	150,649
FAM HSG CON, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Planning and Design	9,849	9,849

SUBTOTAL, FAM HSG CON, AF	160,498	160,498

FAM HSG O&M, AF
	Worldwide Unspecified
FAM HSG O&M, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Furnishings Account	38,746	38,746
FAM HSG O&M, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Housing Privatization	41,554	41,554
FAM HSG O&M, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Leasing	28,867	28,867
FAM HSG O&M, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Maintenance	114,129	114,129
FAM HSG O&M, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Management Account	52,153	52,153
FAM HSG O&M, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Miscellaneous Account	2,032	2,032
FAM HSG O&M, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Services Account	12,940	12,940
FAM HSG O&M, AF	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Utilities Account	40,811	40,811

SUBTOTAL, FAM HSG O&M, AF	331,232	331,232

FAM HSG O&M, DW
	Worldwide Unspecified
FAM HSG O&M, DW	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Furnishings Account	4,203	4,203
FAM HSG O&M, DW	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Leasing	51,952	51,952
FAM HSG O&M, DW	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Maintenance of Real Property	1,448	1,448
FAM HSG O&M, DW	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Management Account	388	388
FAM HSG O&M, DW	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Services Account	31	31
FAM HSG O&M, DW	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	Utilities Account	646	646

SUBTOTAL, FAM HSG O&M, DW	58,668	58,668

TOTAL FAMILY HOUSING	1,413,181	1,413,181

DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
DOD BRAC—ARMY
	Worldwide Unspecified
DOD BRAC—ARMY	Base Realignment & Closure, Army	Base Realignment and Closure	29,691	29,691

SUBTOTAL, DOD BRAC—ARMY	29,691	29,691

DOD BRAC—NAVY
	Worldwide Unspecified
DOD BRAC—NAVY	Base Realignment & Closure, Navy	Base Realignment & Closure	118,906	118,906
DOD BRAC—NAVY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	DON–100: Planing, Design and Management	7,787	7,787
DOD BRAC—NAVY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	DON–101: Various Locations	20,871	20,871
DOD BRAC—NAVY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	DON–138: NAS Brunswick, ME	803	803
DOD BRAC—NAVY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	DON–157: MCSA Kansas City, MO	41	41
DOD BRAC—NAVY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	DON–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA	4,872	4,872
DOD BRAC—NAVY	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	DON–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria Reg AP	3,808	3,808

SUBTOTAL, DOD BRAC—NAVY	157,088	157,088

DOD BRAC—AIR FORCE
	Worldwide Unspecified
DOD BRAC—AIR FORCE	Unspecified Worldwide Locations	DoD BRAC Activities—Air Force	64,555	64,555

SUBTOTAL, DOD BRAC—AIR FORCE	64,555	64,555

TOTAL DEFENSE BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE	251,334	251,334

TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, FAMILY HOUSING, AND BRAC	8,306,510	8,305,570

SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars)
Program	FY 2016 Request	Senate Authorized
Discretionary Summary By Appropriation
Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies
Appropriation Summary:
Energy Programs
Nuclear Energy	135,161	135,161

Atomic Energy Defense Activities
National nuclear security administration:
Weapons activities	8,846,948	9,026,948
Defense nuclear nonproliferation	1,940,302	1,945,302
Naval reactors	1,375,496	1,375,496
Federal salaries and expenses	402,654	402,654
Total, National nuclear security administration	12,565,400	12,750,400

Environmental and other defense activities:
Defense environmental cleanup	5,527,347	5,075,550
Other defense activities	774,425	774,425
Total, Environmental & other defense activities	6,301,772	5,849,975
Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities	18,867,172	18,600,375
Total, Discretionary Funding	19,002,333	18,735,536

Nuclear Energy
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security	126,161	126,161
Used nuclear fuel disposition	9,000	9,000
Total, Nuclear Energy	135,161	135,161

Weapons Activities
Directed stockpile work
Life extension programs
B61 Life extension program	643,300	643,300
W76 Life extension program	244,019	244,019
W88 Alt 370	220,176	220,176
W80–4 Life extension program	195,037	195,037
Total, Life extension programs	1,302,532	1,302,532

Stockpile systems
B61 Stockpile systems	52,247	52,247
W76 Stockpile systems	50,921	50,921
W78 Stockpile systems	64,092	64,092
W80 Stockpile systems	68,005	68,005
B83 Stockpile systems	42,177	42,177
W87 Stockpile systems	89,299	89,299
W88 Stockpile systems	115,685	115,685
Total, Stockpile systems	482,426	482,426

Weapons dismantlement and disposition
Operations and maintenance	48,049	48,049

Stockpile services
Production support	447,527	447,527
Research and development support	34,159	34,159
R&D certification and safety	192,613	192,613
Management, technology, and production	264,994	264,994
Total, Stockpile services	939,293	939,293

Nuclear material commodities
Uranium sustainment	32,916	32,916
Plutonium sustainment	174,698	174,698
Tritium sustainment	107,345	107,345
Domestic uranium enrichment	100,000	100,000
Total, Nuclear material commodities	414,959	414,959
Total, Directed stockpile work	3,187,259	3,187,259

Research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E)
Science
Advanced certification	50,714	50,714
Primary assessment technologies	98,500	98,500
Dynamic materials properties	109,000	109,000
Advanced radiography	47,000	47,000
Secondary assessment technologies	84,400	84,400
Total, Science	389,614	389,614

Engineering
Enhanced surety	50,821	50,821
Weapon systems engineering assessment technology	17,371	17,371
Nuclear survivability	24,461	24,461
Enhanced surveillance	38,724	48,724
Program increase		[10,000]
Total, Engineering	131,377	141,377

Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield
Ignition	73,334	73,334
Support of other stockpile programs	22,843	22,843
Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support	58,587	58,587
Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion	4,963	4,963
Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas	8,900	8,900
Facility operations and target production	333,823	333,823
Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield	502,450	502,450

Advanced simulation and computing	623,006	623,006

Response Capabilities Program	0	20,000
Supports flexible design capability for national labs		[20,000]

Advanced manufacturing
Component manufacturing development	112,256	112,256
Processing technology development	17,800	17,800
Total, Advanced manufacturing	130,056	130,056
Total, RDT&E	1,776,503	1,806,503

Readiness in technical base and facilities (RTBF)
Operating
Program readiness	75,185	75,185
Material recycle and recovery	173,859	173,859
Storage	40,920	40,920
Recapitalization	104,327	104,327
Total, Operating	394,291	394,291

Construction:
15–D–302, TA–55 Reinvestment project, Phase 3, LANL	18,195	18,195
11–D–801 TA–55 Reinvestment project Phase 2, LANL	3,903	3,903
07–D–220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility upgrade project, LANL	11,533	11,533
07–D–220-04 Transuranic liquid waste facility, LANL	40,949	40,949
06–D–141 PED/Construction, Uranium Capabilities Replacement Project Y–12	430,000	430,000
04–D–125 Chemistry and metallurgy replacement project, LANL	155,610	155,610
Total, Construction	660,190	660,190
Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities	1,054,481	1,054,481

Secure transportation asset
Operations and equipment	146,272	146,272
Program direction	105,338	105,338
Total, Secure transportation asset	251,610	251,610

Infrastructure and safety
Operations of facilities
Kansas City Plant	100,250	100,250
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory	70,671	70,671
Los Alamos National Laboratory	196,460	196,460
Nevada National Security Site	89,000	89,000
Pantex	58,021	58,021
Sandia National Laboratory	115,300	115,300
Savannah River Site	80,463	80,463
Y–12 National security complex	120,625	120,625
Total, Operations of facilities	830,790	830,790

Safety operations	107,701	107,701
Maintenance	227,000	227,000
Recapitalization	257,724	407,724
Increase to support deferred maintenance		[150,000]
Construction:
16–D–621 Substation replacement at TA–3, LANL	25,000	25,000
15–D–613 Emergency Operations Center, Y–12	17,919	17,919
Total, Construction	42,919	42,919
Total, Infrastructure and safety	1,466,134	1,616,134

Site stewardship
Nuclear materials integration	17,510	17,510
Minority serving institution partnerships program	19,085	19,085
Total, Site stewardship	36,595	36,595

Defense nuclear security
Operations and maintenance	619,891	619,891
Construction:
14–D–710 Device assembly facility argus installation project, NV	13,000	13,000
Total, Defense nuclear security	632,891	632,891

Information technology and cybersecurity	157,588	157,588

Legacy contractor pensions	283,887	283,887

Total, Weapons Activities	8,846,948	9,026,948

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D
Global material security	426,751	426,751
Material management and minimization	311,584	311,584
Nonproliferation and arms control	126,703	126,703
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D	419,333	419,333

Nonproliferation Construction:
99–D–143 Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility, SRS	345,000	345,000
Analysis of Alternatives	0	5,000
Assess alternatives to MOX		[5,000]
Total, Nonproliferation construction	345,000	350,000

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs	1,629,371	1,634,371

Legacy contractor pensions	94,617	94,617
Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response program	234,390	234,390
Use of prior-year balances	–18,076	–18,076
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation	1,940,302	1,945,302

Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation	1,940,302	1,945,302

Naval Reactors
Naval reactors operations and infrastructure	445,196	445,196
Naval reactors development	444,400	444,400
Ohio replacement reactor systems development	186,800	186,800
S8G Prototype refueling	133,000	133,000
Program direction	45,000	45,000
Construction:
15–D–904 NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3	900	900
15–D–903 KL Fire System Upgrade	600	600
15–D–902 KS Engineroom team trainer facility	3,100	3,100
14–D–902 KL Materials characterization laboratory expansion, KAPL	30,000	30,000
14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF	86,000	86,000
10-D–903, Security upgrades, KAPL	500	500
Total, Construction	121,100	121,100
Total, Naval Reactors	1,375,496	1,375,496

Federal Salaries And Expenses
Program direction	402,654	402,654
Total, Office Of The Administrator	402,654	402,654

Defense Environmental Cleanup
Closure sites:
Closure sites administration	4,889	4,889

Hanford site:
River corridor and other cleanup operations:
River corridor and other cleanup operations	196,957	196,957

Central plateau remediation:
Central plateau remediation	555,163	555,163
Richland community and regulatory support	14,701	14,701
Construction:
15–D–401 Containerized sludge removal annex, RL	77,016	77,016
Total, Hanford site	843,837	843,837

Idaho National Laboratory:
Idaho cleanup and waste disposition	357,783	357,783
Idaho community and regulatory support	3,000	3,000
Total, Idaho National Laboratory	360,783	360,783

NNSA sites
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory	1,366	1,366
Nevada	62,385	62,385
Sandia National Laboratories	2,500	2,500
Los Alamos National Laboratory	188,625	208,625
Accelerate cleanup of transuranic waste		[20,000]
Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites	254,876	274,876

Oak Ridge Reservation:
OR Nuclear facility D & D
OR Nuclear facility D & D	75,958	75,958
Construction:
14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility	6,800	6,800
Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D	82,758	82,758

U233 Disposition Program	26,895	26,895

OR cleanup and disposition:
OR cleanup and disposition	60,500	60,500
Total, OR cleanup and disposition	60,500	60,500

OR reservation community and regulatory support	4,400	4,400
Solid waste stabilization and disposition
Oak Ridge technology development	2,800	2,800
Total, Oak Ridge Reservation	177,353	177,353

Office of River Protection:
Waste treatment and immobilization plant
01–D–416 A-D/ORP-0060 / Major construction	595,000	595,000
01–D–16E Pretreatment facility	95,000	95,000
Total, Waste treatment and immobilization plant	690,000	690,000

Tank farm activities
Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition	649,000	649,000
Construction:
15–D–409 Low Activity Waste Pretreatment System, Hanford	75,000	75,000
Total, Tank farm activities	724,000	724,000
Total, Office of River protection	1,414,000	1,414,000

Savannah River sites:
Savannah River risk management operations	386,652	386,652
SR community and regulatory support	11,249	11,249

Radioactive liquid tank waste:
Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition	581,878	581,878
Construction:
15–D–402—Saltstone Disposal Unit #6	34,642	34,642
05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River	194,000	194,000
Total, Construction	228,642	228,642
Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste	810,520	810,520
Total, Savannah River site	1,208,421	1,208,421

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
Waste isolation pilot plant	212,600	212,600
Construction:
15–D–411 Safety significant confinement ventilation system, WIPP	23,218	23,218
15–D–412 Exhaust shaft, WIPP	7,500	7,500
Total, Construction	30,718	30,718
Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant	243,318	243,318

Program direction	281,951	281,951
Program support	14,979	14,979

Safeguards and Security:
Oak Ridge Reservation	17,228	17,228
Paducah	8,216	8,216
Portsmouth	8,492	8,492
Richland/Hanford Site	67,601	67,601
Savannah River Site	128,345	128,345
Waste Isolation Pilot Project	4,860	4,860
West Valley	1,891	1,891
Technology development	14,510	14,510
Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup	5,055,550	5,075,550

Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution	471,797	0
Requires industry match authorization that will not be forthcoming		[–471,797]

Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup	5,527,347	5,075,550

Other Defense Activities
Specialized security activities	221,855	221,855

Environment, health, safety and security
Environment, health, safety and security	120,693	120,693
Program direction	63,105	63,105
Total, Environment, Health, safety and security	183,798	183,798

Enterprise assessments
Enterprise assessments	24,068	24,068
Program direction	49,466	49,466
Total, Enterprise assessments	73,534	73,534

Office of Legacy Management
Legacy management	154,080	154,080
Program direction	13,100	13,100
Total, Office of Legacy Management	167,180	167,180

Defense-related activities
Defense related administrative support
Chief financial officer	35,758	35,758
Chief information officer	83,800	83,800
Management	3,000	3,000
Total, Defense related administrative support	122,558	122,558

Office of hearings and appeals	5,500	5,500
Subtotal, Other defense activities	774,425	774,425
Total, Other Defense Activities	774,425	774,425

SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars)
Line	Item	FY 2016 Request	Senate Authorized
	WORKING CAPITAL FUND
	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE
020	TRANSPORTATION OF FALLEN HEROES	2,500	2,500
	SUBTOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE	2,500	2,500

	WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE
030	DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA)	86,350	86,350
	SUBTOTAL, WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE	86,350	86,350

	TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND	88,850	88,850

	DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF
	DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES
010	DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE	186,000	186,000
	SUBTOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER DRUG ACTIVITIES	186,000	186,000

	TOTAL, DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF	186,000	186,000

	OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
	OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
010	OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL	10,262	10,262
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE	10,262	10,262

	TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL	10,262	10,262

	DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM
	OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
010	IN-HOUSE CARE	65,149	65,149
020	PRIVATE SECTOR CARE	192,210	192,210
030	CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT	9,460	9,460
060	EDUCATION AND TRAINING	5,885	5,885
	SUBTOTAL, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE	272,704	272,704

	TOTAL, DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM	272,704	272,704

	COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND
	COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND
090	COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND	2,100,000	1,000,000
	Request excess to need		[–1,100,000]
	SUBTOTAL, COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND	2,100,000	1,000,000

	TOTAL, COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND	2,100,000	1,000,000

	UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE
	UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE
xxx	UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE	0	300,000
	Provides assistance to Ukraine		[300,000]
	SUBTOTAL, UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE	0	300,000

	TOTAL, UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE	0	300,000

	TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATION	2,657,816	1,857,816