In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
July 7, 2016.
Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 2943) entitled “An Act to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2017 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.”, do pass with the following
AMENDMENT:
This Act may be cited as the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017”.
(b) Table of contents.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
In this Act, the term “congressional defense committees” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for procurement for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in the funding table in section 4101.
(a) Authority for Multiyear Procurement.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2017 program year, for the procurement of AH–64E Apache helicopters.
(b) Condition for Out-year Contract Payments.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2017 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.
(a) Authority for multiyear procurement.—Subject to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army may enter into one or more multiyear contracts, beginning with the fiscal year 2017 program year, for the procurement of UH–60M and HH–60M Black Hawk helicopters.
(b) Condition for out-year contract payments.—A contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2017 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such later fiscal year.
(a) Assessment.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff of the Army, shall conduct an assessment of the following capabilities with respect to the Department of the Army:
(2) Air defense artillery capacity and responsiveness, including—
(b) Report.—Not later than April 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing—
(a) Increase.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated for procurement, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4101, for missile procurement, Army, surface-to-air missile system, MSE missile (Line 002) is hereby increased by $82,400,000.
(b) Offset.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated for Department of Energy national security programs, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4701, for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D, Material management and minimization is hereby reduced by $82,400,000.
(a) Procurement authority in support of construction of Ford class aircraft carriers.—
(1) AUTHORITY FOR ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY.—The Secretary of the Navy may procure materiel and equipment in support of the construction of the Ford class aircraft carriers designated CVN–80 and CVN–81 in economic order quantities when cost savings are achievable.
(2) LIABILITY.—Any contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.
(b) Refueling and complex overhaul of Nimitz class aircraft carriers.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy may carry out the nuclear refueling and complex overhaul of each of the following Nimitz class aircraft carriers:
(2) USE OF INCREMENTAL FUNDING.—With respect to any contract entered into under paragraph (1) for the nuclear refueling and complex overhaul of a Nimitz class aircraft carrier, the Secretary may use incremental funding for a period not to exceed six years after advance procurement funds for such nuclear refueling and complex overhaul effort are first obligated.
(3) CONDITION FOR OUT-YEAR CONTRACT PAYMENTS.—Any contract entered into under paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract for a fiscal year after fiscal year 2017 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for that later fiscal year.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) In a report submitted to Congress on March 17, 2015, the Secretary of the Navy indicated the Department of the Navy has a requirement of 11 aircraft carriers.
(2) In the Congressional Budget Office report titled “An Analysis of the Navy’s Fiscal Year 2016 Shipbuilding Plan”, the Office stated as follows: “To prevent the carrier force from declining to 10 ships in the 2040s, 1 short of its inventory goal of 11, the Navy could accelerate purchases after 2018 to 1 every four years, rather than 1 every five years”.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the plan of the Department of the Navy to schedule the procurement of one aircraft carrier every five years will reduce the overall aircraft carrier inventory to 10 aircraft carriers, a level insufficient to meet peacetime and war plan requirements; and
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract, beginning with the fiscal year 2017 program year, for the design and construction of the LHA Replacement ship designated LHA 8 using amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy.
(b) Use of incremental funding.—With respect to the contract entered into under subsection (a), the Secretary may use incremental funding to make payments under the contract.
(c) Condition for out-year contract payments.—The contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under such contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2017 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such fiscal year.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract, beginning with the fiscal year 2017 program year, for the design and construction of the replacement dock landing ship designated LX(R) or the amphibious transport dock designated LPD–29 using amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy.
(b) Use of incremental funding.—With respect to the contract entered into under subsection (a), the Secretary may use incremental funding to make payments under the contract.
(c) Condition for out-year contract payments.—The contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under such contract for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2017 is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose for such fiscal year.
(a) Contract authority.—Notwithstanding section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of the Navy may enter into a contract to procure up to 45 Ship to Shore Connector craft.
(b) Liability.—Any contract entered into under subsection (a) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose, and that the total liability to the Government for termination of any contract entered into shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated at time of termination.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Navy shall be used to select only a single contractor for the construction of the Littoral Combat Ship or any successor frigate class ship program until the Secretary of the Navy certifies to the congressional defense committees that such selection of a single contractor will be conducted—
(a) Report required.—Not later than October 1, 2017, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding future capabilities for the P–8 Poseidon aircraft.
(b) Elements.—The report under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the P–8 Poseidon aircraft, the following:
Section 231a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 141 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1659) is amended by striking subsection (d).
Section 136 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2114) is amended by striking subsection (b).
(a) Prohibition on Availability of Funds for Retirement.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any A–10 aircraft.
(b) Additional limitation on retirement.—In addition to the prohibition in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force may not retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any A–10 aircraft until a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (e)(2).
(c) Prohibition on significant reductions in manning levels.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to make significant reductions to manning levels with respect to any A–10 aircraft squadrons or divisions.
(d) Minimum inventory requirement.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall ensure the Air Force maintains a minimum of 171 A–10 aircraft designated as primary mission aircraft inventory until a period of 90 days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (e)(2).
(e) Reports required.—
(1) The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(2) Not later than 180 days after the date of the submission of the report under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(A) the views of the Secretary with respect to the results of the initial operational test and evaluation of the F–35 aircraft program as summarized in the report under paragraph (1), including any issues or concerns of the Secretary with respect to such results;
(f) Special rule.—
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out the transition of the A–10 unit at Fort Wayne Air National Guard Base, Indiana, to an F–16 unit as described by the Secretary in the Force Structure Actions map submitted in support of the budget of the President for fiscal year 2017 (as submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code).
(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided by subsection (b) and in addition to the prohibition under section 144 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 758) none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2018 for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, or prepare to retire, any Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System aircraft.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the cost of the B–21 aircraft. The report shall include an estimate of the total cost of research, production, and maintenance for the aircraft expressed in constant base-year dollars and in current dollars.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Air Force may be obligated or expended to retire, prepare to retire, or place in storage or on backup aircraft inventory status any U–2 aircraft.
Section 123(a)(1) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4158; 10 U.S.C. 167 note.) is amended by inserting “ending on or before September 30, 2018” after “each fiscal quarter”.
(a) Guidance required.—
(b) Elements.—The guidance regarding fire suppressant and fuel containment standards issued pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
(c) Report to congress.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Navy shall each submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
(d) Covered vehicles.—In this section, the term “covered vehicles” means ground vehicles acquired on or after October 1, 2018, under a major defense acquisition program (as such term is defined in section 2430 of title 10, United States Code), including light tactical vehicles, medium tactical vehicles, heavy tactical vehicles, and ground combat vehicles.
(a) Report required.—Not later than April 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the munitions strategy for the combatant commands, including an identification of munitions requirements, an assessment of munitions gaps and shortfalls, and necessary munitions investments. Such strategy shall cover the 10-year period beginning with 2016.
(b) Elements.—The report on munitions strategy required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(2) An assessment of munitions gaps and shortfalls, including a census of current munitions capabilities and programs, not including ammunition.
(3) A description of current and planned munitions programs, including with respect to procurement; research, development, test, and evaluation; and deployment activities.
(7) An assessment of how current and planned munitions programs, and promising technologies, may affect existing operational concepts and capabilities of the military departments or lead to new operational concepts and capabilities.
(8) An assessment of programs and capabilities by other countries to counter the munitions programs and capabilities of the Armed Forces, not including with respect to ammunition, and how such assessment affects the munitions strategy of each military department.
(a) Review.—Not later than September 30, 2017, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the sustainment support structure for the F–35 Lightning II aircraft program.
(b) Elements.—The review under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the F–35 Lightning II aircraft program, the following:
(1) The status of the sustainment support strategy for the program, including goals for personnel training, required infrastructure, and fleet readiness.
(a) Briefing required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, in consultation with the Secretary of the Army, shall present to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the acquisition strategy for the Ground Mobility Vehicle for use with the Global Response Force.
(b) Elements.—The briefing under subsection (a) shall include an assessment of—
(1) whether the Ground Mobility Vehicle is a suitable candidate for solutions that would utilize militarized commercial off-the-shelf platforms leveraging existing global automotive supply chains to satisfy requirements and reduce the life-cycle cost of the program;
(a) Report.—If, on the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Army and the Marine Corps are each using different variants of 5.56mm rifle ammunition, the Secretary of Defense shall, on such date, submit to the congressional defense committees a report explaining the reasons that the Army and the Marine Corps are using different variants of such ammunition.
(b) Standardization requirement.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Army and the Marine Corps are using the same variant of 5.56mm rifle ammunition.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the funding table in section 4201.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, shall carry out a Program to be known as the “Laboratory Quality Enhancement Program” under which the Secretary shall establish the panels described in subsection (b) and direct such panels—
(1) to review and make recommendations to the Secretary with respect to—
(c) Composition of panels.—
(e) Personnel demonstration project authority.—Section 342(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 108 Stat. 2721) (as amended by section 1114(a)(2)(C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106–398; 114 Stat. 1654A–315)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(f) Science and technology reinvention laboratory defined.—In this section, the term “science and technology reinvention laboratory” means a science and technology reinvention laboratory designated under section 1105 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note).
Section 219 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note), as most recently amended by section 262 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66), is amended—
(a) Notice required.—The Secretary of the Navy shall not initiate a covered activity until a period of 10 business days has elapsed following the date on which the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees the notice described in subsection (b) with respect to such activity.
(b) Elements of notice.—The notice described in this subsection is a written notice of the intention of the Secretary to initiate a covered activity. Each such notice shall include the following:
(2) Estimated costs and funding sources for the activity, including a description of any cost-sharing or in-kind support arrangements with other participants.
(a) Quality control and quality assurance program.—The Secretary of Defense, acting through the executive agent for the biological select agent and toxin biosafety program of the Department of Defense, shall carry out a program to implement certain quality control and quality assurance measures at each covered facility.
(b) Quality control and quality assurance measures.—Subject to subsection (c), the quality control and quality assurance measures implemented at each covered facility under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(3) Production procedures that prohibit operations where live biological select agents and toxins are used in the same laboratory where viability testing is conducted.
(4) Production procedures that prohibit work on multiple organisms or multiple strains of one organism within the same biosafety cabinet.
(5) A video surveillance program that uses video monitoring as a tool to improve laboratory practices in accordance with regulatory requirements.
(6) Formal, recurring data reviews of production in an effort to identify data trends and nonconformance issues before such issues affect end products.
(c) Waiver.—In carrying out the program under subsection (a), the Secretary may waive any of the quality control and quality assurance measures required under subsection (b) in the interest of national defense.
(d) Study and report required.—
(e) Comptroller general review.—Not later than September 1, 2017, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:
(1) A review of—
(A) the actions taken by the Department of Defense to address the findings and recommendations of the report of the Department of the Army titled “Individual and Institutional Accountability for the Shipment of Viable Bacillus Anthracis from Dugway Proving Grounds”, dated December 15, 2015, including any actions taken to address the culture of complacency in the biological select agent and toxin production program identified in such report; and
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall develop and implement an information technology system (in this section referred to as the “System”) to—
(1) modernize and sustain the security clearance information architecture of the National Background Investigations Bureau and the Department of Defense;
(2) support decision-making processes for the evaluation and granting of personnel security clearances;
(3) improve cyber security capabilities with respect to sensitive security clearance data and processes;
(b) Guidance required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall issue guidance establishing the respective roles, responsibilities, and obligations of the Secretary and Directors with respect to the development and implementation of the System.
(c) Elements of system.—In developing the System under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1) conduct a review of security clearance business processes and, to the extent practicable, modify such processes to maximize compatibility with the security clearance information technology architecture to minimize the need for customization of the System;
(2) conduct business process mapping (as such term is defined in section 2222(i) of title 10, United States Code) of the business processes described in paragraph (1);
(3) use spiral development and incremental acquisition practices to rapidly deploy the System, including through the use of prototyping and open architecture principles;
(d) Completion date.—The Secretary shall complete the development and implementation of the System by not later than September 30, 2019.
(e) Briefing.—Beginning on December 1, 2016, and on a quarterly basis thereafter until the completion date of the System under subsection (d), the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives (and other appropriate congressional committees on request) on the progress of the Secretary in developing and implementing the System.
(f) Review of applicable laws.—The Secretary shall review laws, regulations, and executive orders relating to the maintenance of personnel security clearance information by the Federal Government. Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives (and other appropriate congressional committees on request) a briefing that includes—
(a) Prohibitions.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the countering weapons of mass destruction situational awareness information system commonly known as “Constellation” may be obligated or expended for research, development, or prototyping for such system.
(b) Review.—The Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the Defense Information Systems Agency, shall review the requirements and program plan for research, development, and prototyping for the Constellation system.
(c) Report required.—Not later than February 1, 2017, the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the Defense Information Systems Agency, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the review under subsection (b). Such report shall include the following, with respect to the Constellation system:
(1) A review of the major software components of the system and an explanation of the requirements of the Department of Defense with respect to each such component.
(2) Identification of elements and applications of the system that cannot be implemented using the existing technical infrastructure and tools of the Department of Defense or the infrastructure and tools in development.
(3) A description of major developmental milestones and decision points for additional prototypes needed to establish the full capabilities of the system, including a timeline and detailed metrics and criteria for each such milestone and decision point.
(4) An overview of a security plan to achieve an accredited cross-domain solution system, including security milestones and proposed security architecture to mitigate both insider and outsider threats.
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds specified in subsection (c), not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees the report under subsection (b).
(b) Report required.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the Defense Innovation Unit Experimental. Such report shall include the following:
(2) A description of—
(C) the process for coordinating and deconflicting the activities of the Unit with similar activities of the military departments, Defense Agencies, and other departments and agencies of the Federal Government, including activities carried out by In-Q-Tel, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and Department of Defense laboratories;
(D) the direct staffing requirements of the Unit, including a description of the desired skills and expertise of such staff;
(E) the number of civilian and military personnel provided by the military departments and Defense Agencies to support the Unit;
(F) any planned expansion to new sites, the metrics used to identify such sites, and an explanation of how such expansion will provide access to innovations of nontraditional defense contractors (as such term is defined in section 2302 of title 10, United States Code) that are not otherwise accessible;
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Tactical Combat Training System Increment II of the Navy, not more than 80 percent may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Air Force submit to the congressional defense committees the report required by section 235 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 780).
(a) In general.—Not later than April 1, 2017, the Secretary of the Army shall restructure versions of the distributed common ground system of the Army after Increment 1—
(b) Limitation.—The Secretary of the Army shall not award any contract for the development of any capability for the distributed common ground system of the Army if such a capability is available for purchase on the commercial market, except for minor capabilities that are incidental to and necessary for the proper functioning of a major component of the system.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(a) Strategy.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy to ensure that the Department of Defense has assured access to trusted microelectronics by not later than September 30, 2020.
(b) Elements.—The strategy under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) Definitions of the various levels of trust required by classes of Department of Defense systems.
(2) Means of classifying systems of the Department of Defense based on the level of trust such systems are required to maintain with respect to microelectronics.
(4) Means to increase the supplier base for assured microelectronics to ensure multiple supply pathways.
(5) An assessment of the microelectronics needs of the Department of Defense in future years, including the need for trusted, radiation-hardened microelectronics.
(c) Submission.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the strategy developed under subsection (a). The strategy shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d) Directive required.—Not later than September 30, 2020, the Secretary of Defense shall issue a directive for the Department of Defense describing how Department of Defense entities may access assured and trusted microelectronics supply chains for Department of Defense systems.
(e) Certification.—Not later than September 30, 2020, the Secretary of the Defense shall certify to the congressional defense committees that—
(f) Definition.—In this section, the terms “trust” and “trusted” refer, with respect to microelectronics, to the ability of the Department of Defense to have confidence that the microelectronics function as intended and are free of exploitable vulnerabilities, either intentionally or unintentionally designed or inserted as part of the system at any time during its life cycle.
(a) Pilot program.—The Director of the Defense Information Systems Agency shall carry out a pilot program to evaluate commercially available information technology tools to better understand the potential impact of such tools on networks and computing environments of the Department of Defense.
(b) Activities.—Activities under the pilot program may include the following:
(1) Prototyping, experimentation, operational demonstration, military user assessments, and other means of obtaining quantitative and qualitative feedback on the commercial information technology products.
(a) In general.—The Assistant Secretaries shall jointly carry out a pilot program to demonstrate methods for the more effective development of research, development, test, and evaluation functions.
(b) Selection and priority.—The Assistant Secretaries shall jointly select not more than one laboratory and one test and evaluation center from each of the military services to participate in the pilot program under subsection (a).
(c) Participation in program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), the director of a laboratory or test and evaluation center selected under subsection (b) shall propose and implement alternative and innovative methods of rapid project delivery, support, experimentation, prototyping, and partnership with universities and private sector entities to—
(d) Waiver authority for demonstration and implementation.—Until the termination of the pilot program under subsection (f), the director of a laboratory or test and evaluation center selected under subsection (b) may waive any restriction or departmental instruction that would affect the implementation of a method proposed under subsection (c), unless such implementation would be prohibited by Federal law.
(e) Minimum participation requirement.—Each laboratory or test and evaluation center selected under subsection (b) shall participate in the pilot program under subsection (a) for a period of not fewer than six years beginning not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(f) Termination.—The pilot program under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date determined appropriate by the Secretary of Defense that is on or after the end of the six-year period described in subsection (e).
(g) Assistant Secretary defined.—In this section, the term “Assistant Secretary” means—
(1) the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, with respect to a working capital fund institution of the Air Force;
(a) Pilot program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program on the modernization of electromagnetic spectrum warfare systems and electronic warfare systems.
(2) SELECTION.—If the Secretary carries out the pilot program under paragraph (1), the Electronic Warfare Executive Committee shall select from the list described in section 237(b)(4) a total of five electromagnetic spectrum warfare systems and electronic warfare systems across at least two military departments that are currently in sustainment for modernization under the pilot program.
(a) Independent review required.—The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct an independent review of the plans, programs, and research of the Department of the Navy with respect to—
(b) Conduct of review.—In conducting the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall—
(c) Review elements.—The review under subsection (a) shall include an evaluation of—
(1) any data of the Department of the Navy relating to the increased frequency of physiological events affecting aircrew of the F/A–18 Hornet and the F/A–18 Super Hornet aircraft during the covered period;
(3) the cost and effectiveness of all material, operational, maintenance, and other measures carried out by the Department of the Navy to mitigate such physiological events during the covered period;
(a) Study required.—The Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct a study on technologies with the potential to prevent and mitigate helicopter crashes.
(b) Elements.—The study required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) Identification of technologies with the potential—
(2) A cost-benefit analysis of each technology identified under paragraph (1) that takes into account the cost of developing and deploying the technology compared to the potential of the technology to prevent casualties or injuries.
(a) Report required.—Not later than April 1, 2017, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, acting through the Electronic Warfare Executive Committee, shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the electronic warfare capabilities of the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements.—The report under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A strategy for advancing and accelerating research, development, test, and evaluation, and fielding, of electronic warfare capabilities to meet current and projected requirements, including recommendations for streamlining acquisition processes with respect to such capabilities.
(2) A methodology for synchronizing and overseeing electronic warfare strategies, operational concepts, and programs across the Department of Defense, including electronic warfare programs that support or enable cyber operations.
(3) The training and operational support required for fielding and sustaining current and planned investments in electronic warfare capabilities.
(4) A comprehensive list of investments of the Department of Defense in electronic warfare capabilities, including the capabilities to be developed, procured, or sustained in—
(5) Progress on increasing innovative electromagnetic spectrum warfighting methods and operational concepts that provide advantages within the electromagnetic spectrum operational domain.
(6) Specific attributes needed in future electronic warfare capabilities, such as networking, adaptability, agility, multifunctionality, and miniaturization, and progress toward incorporating such attributes in new electronic warfare systems.
(7) Capability gaps with respect to asymmetric and near-peer adversaries identified pursuant to a capability gap assessment.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in the funding table in section 4301.
(a) Increase.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for Civil Military Programs is hereby increased by $15,000,000 (to be used in support of the National Guard Youth Challenge Program).
(b) Offset.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide is hereby reduced by $15,000,000.
Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–140; 42 U.S.C. 17142) is amended by adding at the end the following: “This provision shall not be construed as a constraint on any conventional or unconventional fuel procurement necessary for military operations, including for test and certification purposes.”.
(a) Production and use of natural gas at Fort Knox.—Chapter 449 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 4781. Natural gas: production, treatment, management, and use at Fort Knox, Kentucky
“(a) Authority.— (1) The Secretary of the Army may provide for the production, treatment, management, and use of natural gas located under Fort Knox, Kentucky, without regard to section 3 of the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands (30 U.S.C. 352).
“(b) Limitation on uses.—Any natural gas produced under subsection (a) may be used only to support activities and operations at Fort Knox and may not be sold for use elsewhere.
“(c) Ownership of facilities.—The Secretary of the Army may take ownership of any gas production and treatment equipment and facilities and associated infrastructure from an entity with which the Secretary has entered into a contract under subsection (a) in accordance with the terms of the contract.
In carrying out the disposal of munitions in the stockpile of conventional ammunition awaiting demilitarization and disposal (commonly referred to as munitions in the “B5A account”) the Secretary of the Army shall consider using cost-competitive technologies that minimize waste generation and air emissions as alternatives to disposal by open burning, open detonation, direct contact combustion, and incineration.
It is the Sense of Congress that the Department of Defense should work with State and local health officials to prevent human exposure to perfluorinated chemicals.
(a) In general.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to carry out the provisions described in subsection (b).
During the five-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall treat a Government-owned, contractor-operated industrial plant of the Department of the Army as an eligible facility under section 4551(2) of title 10, United States Code.
(a) Assessments required.—During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the date of the final briefing under subsection (d), the Secretary of the Navy shall conduct quarterly assessments of Naval ship maintenance and loading activities carried out by private sector entities at each covered port.
(b) Elements of assessments.—Each assessment under subsection (a) shall include, with respect to each covered port, the following:
(1) Resources per day, including daily ship availabilities and the workforce available to carry out maintenance and loading activities, for the fiscal year preceding the quarter covered by the assessment through the end of such quarter.
(2) Projected resources per day, including daily ship availabilities and the workforce available to carry out maintenance and loading activities, through the end of the second fiscal year beginning after the quarter covered by the assessment.
(c) Sense of Congress.—It is the Sense of Congress that the Secretary should implement measures to minimize workload fluctuations at covered ports to stabilize the private sector workforce and reduce the cost of maintenance availabilities.
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the operation of the Defense Contract Management Agency, not more than 90 percent may be obligated or expended in fiscal year 2017 until the Director of the agency provides to the congressional defense committees the briefing under subsection (b).
(b) Briefing.—The Director of the Defense Contract Management Agency shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives (and other congressional defense committees on request) a briefing that includes the following:
(1) A plan describing how the agency will foster the adoption, implementation, and verification of item-unique identification standards for tangible personal property across the Department of Defense and the defense industrial base (as prescribed under Department of Defense Instruction 8320.04).
(a) Modification of annual report related to installations energy management.—Subsection (a) of section 2925 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Annual report related to installations energy management.—Not later than 120 days after the end of each fiscal year ending before January 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an installation energy report detailing the fulfillment during that fiscal year of the energy performance goals for the Department of Defense under section 2911 of this title. Each report shall contain the following:
“(1) The energy performance goals for the Department of Defense with respect to transportation systems, support systems, utilities, and infrastructure and facilities for the fiscal year covered by the report and the next 5, 10, and 20 fiscal years, including any changes to such energy performance goals since the submission of the previous report under this section.
“(2) A master plan for the achievement of the energy performance goals of the Department of Defense, as such goals are set forth in any laws, regulations, executive orders, or Department of Defense policies, including—
“(B) a standard for the measurement of energy consumed by transportation systems, support systems, utilities, and facilities and infrastructure, applied consistently across the military departments;
“(3) A table listing all energy projects financed through third party financing mechanisms (including energy savings performance contracts, enhanced use leases, utility energy service contracts, utility privatization agreements, and other contractual mechanisms), including—
“(4) A description of the types and quantities of energy consumed by the Department of Defense and by members of the armed forces and civilian personnel residing or working on military installations during the fiscal year covered by the report, including a breakdown of energy consumption by—
“(5) A description of the types and amount of financial incentives received under section 2913 of this title during the preceding fiscal year and the appropriation account or accounts to which the incentives were credited.
“(6) A description and estimate of the progress made by the military departments in meeting the certification requirements for sustainable green-building standards in construction and major renovations as required by section 433 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–140; 121 Stat. 1612).
(a) Report required.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget of the President for fiscal year 2018 is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, Unites States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the equipment, weapons, weapons systems, components, subcomponents, and end-items purchased from foreign entities that identifies those items which could be manufactured in the military arsenals of the United States or the military depots of the United States to meet the goals of this section or section 2464 of title 10, United States Code, as well as a plan for moving that workload into such arsenals or depots.
(b) Elements.—The report under subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) A list of items identified in the report required under section 333 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 792) and a list of any items purchased from foreign manufacturers after the date of the submission of such report that are—
(A) described in section 8302(a)(1) of title 41, United States Code, and purchased from a foreign manufacturer by reason of an exception under section 8302(a)(2)(A) or section 8302(a)(2)(B) of such title;
(2) An assessment of the skills required to manufacture the items described in paragraph (1) and a comparison of those skills with skills required to meet the critical capabilities identified in the report of the Army to Congress on Critical Manufacturing Capabilities and Capacities, dated August 2013, and the core logistics capabilities identified by each military service pursuant to section 2464 of title 10, United States Code, as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
(3) An identification of the tooling, equipment, and facilities upgrades necessary for a military arsenal or depot to manufacture items described in paragraph (1).
(4) An identification of items described in paragraph (1) most appropriate for transfer to military arsenals or depots to meet the goals of this section or the requirements of section 2464 of title 10, United States Code.
(c) Authority to adjust labor rates to reflect work production.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a two-year pilot program for the purpose of permitting the Army arsenals to adjust periodically, throughout the year, their labor rates charged to customers based upon changes in workload and other factors.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the travel expenses of members of reserve components associated with performing active duty service, active service, full-time National Guard duty, active Guard and Reserve duty, and inactive-duty training, as such terms are defined in section 101(d) of title 10, United States Code. Such report shall include the average annual cost for all travel expenses for a member of a reserve component.
Section 3063 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) In general.—Chapter 136 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2283. Explosive ordnance disposal program
“(a) In General.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a program to be known as the ‘Explosive Ordnance Disposal Program’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Program’) under which the Secretary shall ensure close and continuous coordination between the military departments on matters relating to explosive ordnance disposal.
“(b) Roles, responsibilities, and authorities.—In carrying out the Program under subsection (a)—
“(1) the Secretary of Defense shall—
“(A) assign responsibility for the coordination and integration of explosive ordnance disposal to a single office or entity in the Office of the Secretary of Defense;
“(B) designate the Secretary of the Navy, or a designee of the Secretary’s choice, as the executive agent for the Department of Defense to coordinate and integrate research, development, test, and evaluation activities and procurement activities of the military departments with respect to explosive ordnance disposal; and
“(c) Annual budget justification documents.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress, as a part of the defense budget materials for each fiscal year after fiscal year 2017, a consolidated budget justification display, in classified and unclassified form, that covers all activities of Department of Defense relating to the Program.
“(d) Management Review.— (1) The Secretary of Defense, acting through the Office of the Secretary of Defense assigned responsibility for the coordination and integration of explosive ordnance disposal under subsection (b)(1)(A), shall conduct a review of the management structure of the Program, including—
(b) Studies.—Section 44718(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(b) Studies.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, if the Secretary decides that constructing or altering a structure may result in an obstruction of the navigable airspace, an interference with air navigation facilities and equipment or the navigable airspace, or, after consultation with the Secretary of Defense, an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States, the Secretary shall conduct an aeronautical study to decide the extent of such impacts on the safe and efficient use of the airspace, facilities, or equipment. In conducting the study, the Secretary shall—
“(A) consider factors relevant to the efficient and effective use of the navigable airspace, including—
“(i) the impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under visual flight rules;
“(ii) the impact on arrival, departure, and en route procedures for aircraft operating under instrument flight rules;
(c) National security finding; definition.—Section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(f) National security finding.—As part of an aeronautical study conducted under subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall—
(d) Conforming amendments.—
(1) SECTION HEADING.—Section 44718 of title 49, United States Code, is amended in the section heading by inserting “or national security” after “air commerce”.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 44718 and inserting the following:
“44718. Structures interfering with air commerce or national security.”.
The Secretary of the Navy and the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall work in coordination with the Secretary of the Army to develop, not later than April 1, 2017, a joint acquisition strategy to provide more effective personal protective equipment and organizational clothing and equipment to meet the specific and unique requirements for female Marines and soldiers.
(a) Study required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall seek to enter into a contract with a federally funded research and development center to conduct an independent study on the space-available travel system of the Department of Defense.
(b) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after entering into a contract with a federally funded research and development center under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report summarizing the results of the study conducted under such subsection.
(c) Elements.—The report under subsection (b) shall include, with respect to the space-available travel system, the following:
(1) A determination of—
(3) A discussion of the efficiency of the system and data regarding the use of available space with respect to each category of passengers eligible for space-available travel under existing regulations.
(4) A description of the effect on system capacity if eligibility for space-available travel is extended to—
(5) A discussion of logistical and management problems, including congestion at terminals, waiting times, lodging availability, and personal hardships experienced by travelers.
(6) An evaluation of the cost of the system and whether space-available travel is and can remain cost-neutral.
(7) An evaluation of the feasibility of expanding the categories of passengers eligible for space-available travel to include—
(A) in the case of overseas travel, retired members of an active or reserve component, including retired members of reserve components, who, but for being under the eligibility age applicable to the member under section 12731 of title 10, United States Code, would be eligible for retired pay under chapter 1223 of such title; and
To ensure that an adequate, competitive supply of custom designed motors is available to the Department of Defense, particularly to meet its replacement motor requirements for older equipment, and to protect small businesses that supply such motors to the Department of Defense, the requirements of section 431.25 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, shall not be enforced against manufacturers of specialty motors, whether characterized by the Department as special purpose or definite purpose motors, provided that such manufacturers qualify as small businesses and provided further that such manufacturers do not also manufacture general purpose motors and provided further that such manufacturers were in the business of manufacturing such motors on June 1, 2016.
Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide, for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, for fiscal year 2017, not more than 85 percent of such amounts may be obligated or expended until the Secretary of Defense establishes and implements the process by which members of the Armed Forces may carry an appropriate firearm on a military installation, as required by section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 813; 10 U.S.C. 2672 note).
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense, acting through the commander of the United States Transportation Command, should reassess the guidelines for the evaluation of motor carrier safety performance under the Transportation Protective Services program taking into consideration the Government Accountability Office report numbered GAO-16-82 and titled “Defense Transportation; DoD Needs to Improve the Evaluation of Safety and Performance Information for Carriers Transporting Security-Sensitive Materials”.
(b) Evaluation of safety technology.—To avoid catastrophic accidents and exposure of material, the Secretary shall evaluate the need for proven safety technology in vehicles transporting Transportation Protective Services shipments, such as electronic logging devices, roll stability control, forward collision avoidance, lane departure warning systems, and speed limiters.
(a) Briefing required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives (and other congressional defense committees on request) a briefing on the well-drilling capabilities of the active and reserve components.
Consistent with section 2492a of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense is encouraged to enter into contracts with third-party vendors in order to provide members of the Armed Forces who are deployed overseas at any United States military facility, at which wireless high-speed Internet and network connections are otherwise available, with access to such Internet and network connections without charge.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement a formal process to provide Government agencies outside the Department of Defense with information on the availability of surplus, serviceable ammunition for the purpose of reducing the overall storage and disposal costs related to such ammunition.
(a) Increase.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 1404 for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4501, for drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, Defense-wide is hereby increased by $30,000,000 (to be used in support of the National Guard counter-drug programs).
(b) Offset.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D—
(1) the amount authorized to be appropriated for in section 101 for procurement, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4101, for Aircraft Procurement, Navy, for Common Ground Equipment (Line 064), is hereby reduced by $20,000,000; and
(2) the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 201 for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4201, for advanced component development and prototypes, Advanced Innovative Technologies (Line 095) is hereby reduced by $10,000,000.
The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for active duty personnel as of September 30, 2017, as follows:
Section 691(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs:
(a) In general.—The Armed Forces are authorized strengths for Selected Reserve personnel of the reserve components as of September 30, 2017, as follows:
(b) End strength reductions.—The end strengths prescribed by subsection (a) for the Selected Reserve of any reserve component shall be proportionately reduced by—
(c) End strength increases.—Whenever units or individual members of the Selected Reserve for any reserve component are released from active duty during any fiscal year, the end strength prescribed for such fiscal year for the Selected Reserve of such reserve component shall be increased proportionately by the total authorized strengths of such units and by the total number of such individual members.
Within the end strengths prescribed in section 411(a), the reserve components of the Armed Forces are authorized, as of September 30, 2017, the following number of Reserves to be serving on full-time active duty or full-time duty, in the case of members of the National Guard, for the purpose of organizing, administering, recruiting, instructing, or training the reserve components:
The minimum number of military technicians (dual status) as of the last day of fiscal year 2017 for the reserve components of the Army and the Air Force (notwithstanding section 129 of title 10, United States Code) shall be the following:
(a) Limitations.—
(1) NATIONAL GUARD.—Within the limitation provided in section 10217(c)(2) of title 10, United States Code, the number of non-dual status technicians employed by the National Guard as of September 30, 2017, may not exceed the following:
During fiscal year 2017, the maximum number of members of the reserve components of the Armed Forces who may be serving at any time on full-time operational support duty under section 115(b) of title 10, United States Code, is the following:
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) an adequately supported, full-time support force consisting of active and reserve personnel and military technicians for the Army National Guard is essential to maintaining the readiness of the Army National Guard;
(2) the full-time support force for the Army National Guard is the primary mechanism through which the programs of the Army and the Department of Defense are delivered to all 350,000 soldiers of the Army National Guard;
(3) reductions in active and reserve personnel and military technicians since 2014, totaling 2401, have adversely impacted the readiness of the Army National Guard;
(4) the growth in the full-time support force for the Army National Guard since 2014 is due solely to validated requirements originating before September 11, 2001, and not war-time growth;
(5) funding for the full-time support force for the Army National Guard has never exceeded 72 percent of the validated requirement of the headquarters of the Department of the Army;
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in the funding table in section 4401.
(a) Distribution of commissioned officers on active duty in general officer and flag officer grades.—Section 525(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 638a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): “(e) (1) In the case of action under subsection (b)(4), the Secretary of the military department concerned shall specify the total number of officers described in that subsection that a selection board convened under section 611(b) of this title pursuant to the authority of that subsection may recommend for early retirement or discharge. Officers who are eligible, or are within two years of becoming eligible, to be retired under any provision of law (other than by reason of eligibility pursuant to section 4403 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484)), if selected by the board, shall be retired or retained until becoming eligible to retire under sections 3911, 6323, or 8911 of this title, and those officers who are otherwise ineligible to retire under any provision of law shall, if selected by the board, be discharged. “(2) In the case of action under subsection (b)(4), the Secretary of the military department concerned may submit to a selection board convened pursuant to that subsection— “(A) the names of all eligible officers described in that subsection, whether or not they are eligible to be retired under any provision of law, in a particular grade and competitive category; or “(B) the names of all eligible officers described in that subsection in a particular grade and competitive category, whether or not they are eligible to be retired under any provision of law, who are also in particular year groups, specialties, or retirement categories, or any combination thereof, with that competitive category. “(3) The number of officers specified under paragraph (1) may not be more than 30 percent of the number of officers considered.
Section 1161(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or the Secretary of Defense, or in the case of a commissioned officer of the Coast Guard, the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating when it is not operating in the Navy,” after “President”.
Section 512 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 752; 32 U.S.C. prec. 301 note) is amended—
Section 514(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 810) is amended by inserting “and fiscal year 2017” after “During fiscal year 2016”.
Section 12304b(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph:
“(2) In lieu of paragraph (1), units may be ordered to active duty under this section if—
“(A) the manpower and associated costs of such active duty has been identified by the Secretary concerned as an emerging requirement in the year of execution; and
“(B) the Secretary concerned provides 30-day advance notification to the congressional defense committees that identifies the funds required to support the order, a description of the mission for which the units will be ordered to active duty, and the anticipated length of time of the order of such units to active duty on an involuntary basis.”.
Section 10216(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “reductions” the following: “(including temporary reductions by furlough or otherwise)”.
The Secretary of Defense shall establish an electronic means by which members of the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces can track their operational active-duty service performed after January 28, 2008, under section 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10, United States Code. The tour calculator shall specify early retirement credit authorized for each qualifying tour of active duty, as well as cumulative early reserve retirement credit authorized to date under section 12731(f) of such title.
Section 701(i) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following new paragraph:
“(3) In the event that two members of the armed forces who are married to each other adopt a child in a qualifying child adoption, the two members shall be allowed a total of at least 36 days of leave under this subsection, to be shared between the two members. The Secretary concerned shall permit the transfer of such leave between the two members to accommodate individual family circumstances.”.
(a) Deployment prioritization and readiness.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1003 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 10102 the following new section:
Ҥ 10102a. Deployment prioritization and readiness of army components
“(a) Deployment prioritization.—The Secretary of the Army shall maintain a system for identifying the priority of deployment for units of all components of the Army.
“(b) Deployability readiness rating.—The Secretary of the Army shall maintain a readiness rating system for units of all components of the Army that provides an accurate assessment of the deployability of a unit and those shortfalls of a unit that require the provision of additional resources. The system shall ensure—
“(1) that the personnel readiness rating of a unit reflects—
(b) Repeal of superseded provisions of law.—Sections 1121 and 1135 of the Army National Guard Combat Readiness Reform Act of 1992 (title XI of Public Law 102–484; 10 U.S.C. 10105 note) are repealed.
(a) Expansion of authority to execute military testamentary instruments.—
The Secretaries of each of the military departments shall ensure that each member of the Armed Forces with dependents receives annually, and prior to each deployment, notice of the child custody protections afforded to members of the Armed Forces under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.).
(a) Pilot program.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall carry out a pilot program to consolidate the recruiting efforts of the Regular Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard under which a recruiter in one of the components participating in the pilot program may recruit individuals to enlist in any of the components regardless of the funding source of the recruiting activity. Under the pilot program, the recruiter shall receive credit toward periodic enlistment goals for each enlistment regardless of the component in which the individual enlists.
(b) Reports.—
(1) INTERIM REPORT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the date on which the pilot program under subsection (a) commences, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the pilot program.
(B) ELEMENTS.—The report under subparagraph (A) shall include each of the following:
(i) An analysis of the effects that consolidated recruiting efforts has on the overall ability of recruiters to attract and place qualified candidates.
(ii) A determination of the extent to which consolidating recruiting efforts affects efficiency and recruiting costs.
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the pilot program under subsection (a) is completed, the Secretary shall submit to the committees specified in paragraph (1)(A) a final report on the pilot program. Such final report shall include any recommendations of the Secretary with respect to extending or making permanent the pilot program and a description of any related legislative actions that the Secretary considers appropriate.
(a) Report required.—Not later than July 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1) submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the current and future need for a centralized registration system under the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.); and
(b) Elements of report.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A detailed analysis of the current benefits derived, both directly and indirectly, from the Military Selective Service System, including—
(2) An analysis of the functions currently performed by the Selective Service System that would be assumed by the Department of Defense in the absence of a national registration capability.
(3) An analysis of the systems, manpower, and facilities that would be needed by the Department to physically mobilize inductees in the absence of the Selective Service System.
(4) An analysis of the feasibility and utility of eliminating the current focus on mass mobilization of primarily combat troops in favor of a system that focuses on mobilization of all military occupational specialties, and the extent to which such a change would impact the need for both male and female inductees.
(c) Comptroller General Review.—Not later than December 1, 2017, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a review of the procedures used by the Department of Defense in evaluating selective service requirements.
(a) Additional parental leave authority.—
(1) AVAILABILITY OF PARENTAL LEAVE.—Chapter 40 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 701 the following new section:
“(a) Leave authorized.—A member of the armed forces who is performing active service may be allowed leave under this section for each instance in which the member becomes a parent as a result of the member’s spouse giving birth.
“(b) Amount of leave.—Leave under this section shall be at least 14 days, under regulations prescribed under this section by the Secretary concerned.
“(c) Duration of availability of leave.—Leave under this section is lost as follows:
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 40 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 701 the following new item:
“701a. Parental leave.”.
(b) Coverage of commissioned officers of the public health service.—Section 221(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 213a(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) Reporting by military and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense.—Section 1787 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting before subsection (c), as so redesignated, the following new subsections: “(a) Reporting by military and civilian personnel.—A member of the armed forces, civilian employee of the Department of Defense, or contractor employee working on a military installation who is mandated by Federal regulation or State law to report known or suspected instances of child abuse and neglect shall provide the report directly to State Child Protective Services or another appropriate State agency in addition to the member’s or employee’s chain of command or any designated Department point of contact. “(b) Training for mandated reporters.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that individuals referred to in subsection (a) who are mandated by State law to report known or suspected instances of child abuse and neglect receive appropriate training, in accordance with State guidelines, intended to improve their—
(b) Conforming and clerical amendments.—Section 1787 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended—
(1) in subsection (c), as redesignated by subsection (a)(1), by striking “In General.—” and inserting “Reporting by States.—”; and
Section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4433; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(g) Coordination of release date between annual report regarding sexual assaults and family advocacy report.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the report required under subsection (a) for a year is delivered to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives simultaneously with the Department of Defense Family Advocacy Report for that year required by section 543 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017.”.
(a) Annual report on child abuse and domestic violence.—Not later than January 31, 2017, and annually thereafter through January 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the child abuse and domestic abuse incident data from the Department of Defense Family Advocacy Program central registry of child abuse and domestic abuse incidents for the preceding calendar year.
(b) Contents.—The report shall contain each of the following:
(3) An analysis of—
(c) Coordination of release date between annual report regarding sexual assaults and family advocacy program report.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the sexual assault report required under section 1631 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 10 U.S.C. 1561 note) is delivered to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate simultaneously with the report required under this section.
(a) Anti-Hazing Database.—The Secretary of Defense shall provide for the establishment and use of a comprehensive and consistent data-collection system for the collection of reports, including anonymous reports, of incidents of hazing involving a member of the Armed Forces. The Secretary shall issue department-wide guidance regarding the availability and use of the database, including information on protected classes, such as race and religion, who are often the victims of hazing.
(b) Improved training.—The Secretary of each military department, in consultation with the Chief of Staff of each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary, shall seek to improve training to assist members of the Armed Forces better recognize, prevent, and respond to hazing at all command levels.
(c) Annual Survey.—The Secretary of each military department, in consultation with the Chief of Staff of each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary, shall conduct an annual survey among members of each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary to determine the following:
(d) Annual reports on hazing.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than January 31 of each year through January 31, 2021, the Secretary of each military department, in consultation with the Chief of Staff of each Armed Force under the jurisdiction of such Secretary, shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report containing a description of efforts during the previous year—
(2) ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS.—Each report required by this subsection also shall address the same elements originally addressed in the anti-hazing reports required by section 534 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1726).
(a) Burdens of Proof.—Section 1034 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection (i): “(i) Burdens of Proof.—The burdens of proof specified in section 1221(e) of title 5 shall apply in any investigation conducted by an Inspector General under subsection (c) or (d), any review performed by a board for the correction of military records under subsection (g), and any review conducted by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (h).”.
Section 1034(c)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(F) The Secretary concerned shall ensure that any individual investigating an allegation as described in paragraph (1) must have training in the definition and characteristics of retaliation. In addition, if the investigation involves alleged retaliation in response to a communication regarding a violation of a law or regulation prohibiting rape, sexual assault, or other sexual misconduct in violation of sections 920 through 920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the training shall include specific instruction regarding such violations.”.
(a) Career litigation track required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of each military department shall establish a career military justice litigation track for judge advocates in the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.
(2) CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force shall establish the litigation track required by this section in consultation with the Judge Advocate General of the Army and the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force, respectively. The Secretary of the Navy shall establish the litigation track in consultation with the Judge Advocate General of the Navy and the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps.
(b) Elements.—Each career litigation track under this section shall provide for the following:
(1) Assignment and advancement of qualified judge advocates in and through assignments and billets relating to the practice of military justice under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(2) Establishing for each Armed Force the assignments and billets covered by paragraph (1), which shall include trial counsel, defense counsel, military trial judge, military appellate judge, academic instructor, all positions within criminal law offices or divisions of such Armed Force, Special Victims Prosecutor, Victims' Legal Counsel, Special Victims' Counsel, and such other positions as the Secretary of the military department concerned shall specify.
(c) Implementation deadline.—Each Secretary of a military department shall implement the career litigation track required by this section for the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary by not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(d) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary of a military department shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the progress of such Secretary in implementing the career litigation track required under this section for the Armed Forces under the jurisdiction of such Secretary.
Section 2015(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “is accredited by an accreditation body that” and all that follows and inserting “meets one of the requirements specified in paragraph (2).”; and
(2) by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph:
“(2) The requirements for a credentialing program specified in this paragraph are that the credentialing program—
“(A) is accredited by a nationally-recognized third-party personnel certification program accreditor;
(a) In general.—Chapter 103 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2111c. Senior military colleges: ROTC cyber institutes
“(a) Program authorized.—The Secretary of Defense may establish cyber institutes at each of the senior military colleges and each of the Reserve Officer Training Corps institutions selected for partnership by the cyber institutes at the individual service academies for the purpose of accelerating the development of foundational expertise in critical cyber operational skills for future military and civilian leaders of the armed forces and the Department of Defense, including such leaders of the reserve components.
“(b) Elements.—Each cyber institute established under this section shall include each of the following:
“(1) Training for members of the program who possess cyber operational expertise from beginning through advanced skill levels, including instruction and practical experiences that lead to cyber certifications recognized in the field.
“(2) Training in targeted strategic foreign language proficiency designed to significantly enhance critical cyber operational capabilities and tailored to current and anticipated readiness requirements.
“(c) Partnerships With Department of Defense and the Armed Forces.—Any cyber institute established under this section may enter into a partnership with any active or reserve component of the armed forces or any agency of the Department of Defense to facilitate the development of critical cyber skills.
“(d) Partnerships With Other Schools.—Any cyber institute established under this section may enter into a partnership with one or more local educational agencies to facilitate the development of critical cyber skills under the program among students attending the elementary and secondary schools of such agencies who may pursue a military career. The cyber institute may place a special emphasis on entering into a partnership under this subsection with a local educational agency located in a rural, underserved, or underrepresented community.
(a) Report.— Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall jointly report to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate on steps the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security have taken or intend to take to—
(1) maximize the extent to which United States armed forces service, training, and qualifications are creditable toward meeting the laws and regulations governing United States merchant mariner license, certification, and document laws and the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, including steps to enhance interdepartmental coordination; and
(2) to promote better awareness among armed forces personnel who serve in vessel operating positions of the requirements for post-service use of armed forces training, education, and practical experience in satisfaction of requirements for merchant mariner credentials under section 11.213 of title 46, Code of Federal Regulation, and the need to document such service in a manner suitable for post-service use.
(a) Addition of Army University and additional faculty.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 4021 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following new subsection:
“(a) Authority of Secretary.—The Secretary of the Army may employ as many civilians as professors, instructors, lecturers, researchers, and administrative faculty at the Army War College, the United States Army Command and General Staff College, and the Army University as the Secretary considers necessary.”; and
(b) Naval War College and Marine Corps University.—Section 7478 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Revision required.—Section 1551 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(b) Effect of change in name.—The Secretary of the military department concerned shall reissue a certificate of discharge or an order of acceptance of resignation in the new name of any person who, after separation from an armed force under the jurisdiction of that Secretary, legally changes the person’s name to reflect the person’s gender identity.”.
(b) Clerical amendments.—
(1) SECTION HEADING.—The heading of section 1551 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(2) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 79 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 1551 and inserting the following new item:
“1551. Correction of name after separation from service.”.
(a) Program authority.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program to enhance the efforts of the Department of Defense to provide job placement assistance and related employment services directly to members in the National Guard and Reserves.
(b) Administration.—The pilot program shall be offered to, and administered by, the adjutants general appointed under section 314 of title 32, United States Code.
(c) Cost-sharing requirement.—As a condition on the provision of funds under this section to a State to support the operation of the pilot program in the State, the State must agree to contribute an amount, derived from non-Federal sources, equal to at least 30 percent of the funds provided by the Secretary of Defense under this section.
(d) Direct Employment Program Model.—The pilot program should follow a job placement program model that focuses on working one-on-one with a member of a reserve component to cost-effectively provide job placement services, including services such as identifying unemployed and under employed members, job matching services, resume editing, interview preparation, and post-employment follow up. Development of the pilot program should be informed by State direct employment programs for members of the reserve components, such as the programs conducted in California and South Carolina.
(e) Evaluation.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop outcome measurements to evaluate the success of the pilot program.
(f) Reporting requirements.—
(1) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than January 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report describing the results of the pilot program. The Secretary shall prepare the report in coordination with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau.
(2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—A report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description and assessment of the effectiveness and achievements of the pilot program, including the number of members of the reserve components hired and the cost-per-placement of participating members.
(B) An assessment of the impact of the pilot program and increased reserve component employment levels on the readiness of members of the reserve components.
(a) Prohibition.—Section 2102 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Prohibition related to display of Confederate battle flag.— (1) The Secretary of a military department may not establish, maintain, or support a unit of the program at any educational institution, including any senior military college specified in section 2111a of this title, that displays, in a location other than in a museum exhibit, the Confederate battle flag.
“(2) (A) Upon making a determination under paragraph (1) that an educational institution displays, in a location other than in a museum exhibit, the Confederate battle flag, the Secretary of the military department concerned shall terminate, in accordance with subparagraph (B), any unit of the program at that educational institution in existence as of the date of the determination.
“(3) Not later than January 31, 2017, and each January 31 thereafter through January 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report—
“(4) In this subsection, the term ‘Confederate battle flag’ means the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia, the battle flag of the Army of Tennessee, the battle flag of Forrest’s Cavalry Corps, the Second Confederate Navy Jack, the Second Confederate Navy Ensign, or other flag with a like design.”.
(b) Conforming amendments.— (1) Section 2102(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “The President” and inserting “Subject to subsection (e), the President”.
(a) Report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report on the demographic composition of service academies that includes—
(1) an analysis of—
(B) how such composition compares to the demographic composition of—
(iv) other institutions of higher education (as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)); and
Section 1142(b)(11) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before the period the following: “and information concerning the availability of treatment options and resources to address substance abuse, including alcohol, prescription drug, and opioid abuse”.
Section 1144(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) Report required.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and make available to the public, a report evaluating the success of the Job Training, Employment Skills Training, Apprenticeships, and Internships (known as JTEST–AI) and SkillBridge initiatives, under which civilian businesses and companies make available to members of the Armed Forces who are being separated from the Armed Forces training or internship opportunities that offer a high probability of employment for the members after their separation.
(b) Elements of report.—In preparing the report required by subsection (a), the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall use the effectiveness metrics described in Enclosure 5 of Department of Defense Instruction No. 1322.29. The report shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(2) Recommendations by the Under Secretary regarding ways in which the administration of the JTEST–AI and SkillBridge initiatives could be improved.
(3) Recommendations by civilian companies participating in the initiatives regarding ways in which the administration of the JTEST–AI and SkillBridge initiatives could be improved.
(c) Issuance of Guidance.—Not later than 180 days after the submission of the report required by subsection (a), the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall issue guidance to commanders of units of the Armed Forces for the purpose of encouraging commanders, consistent with unit readiness, to allow members of the Armed Forces under their command who are being separated from the Armed Forces to participate in a JTEST–AI or SkillBridge initiative.
(a) United States Military Academy.—Section 4342(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter after paragraph (10) by adding at the end the following new sentence: “When a nominee of a Senator, Representative, or Delegate is selected for appointment as a cadet, the Senator, Representative, or Delegate shall be notified at least 48 hours before the official notification or announcement of the appointment is made.”.
(b) United States Naval Academy.—Section 6954(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter after paragraph (10) by adding at the end the following new sentence: “When a nominee of a Senator, Representative, or Delegate is selected for appointment as a midshipman, the Senator, Representative, or Delegate shall be notified at least 48 hours before the official notification or announcement of the appointment is made.”.
(c) United States Air Force Academy.—Section 9342(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter after paragraph (10) by adding at the end the following new sentence: “When a nominee of a Senator, Representative, or Delegate is selected for appointment as a cadet, the Senator, Representative, or Delegate shall be notified at least 48 hours before the official notification or announcement of the appointment is made.”.
(d) United States Merchant Marine Academy.—Section 51302 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(e) Congressional notification in advance of appointments.—When a nominee of a Senator, Representative, or Delegate is selected for appointment as a cadet, the Senator, Representative, or Delegate shall be notified at least 48 hours before the official notification or announcement of the appointment is made”.
(e) Application of amendments.—The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to the appointment of cadets and midshipmen to the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, and United States Merchant Marine Academy for classes entering these service academies after January 1, 2018.
(a) Assistance to schools with significant numbers of military dependent students.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in division D, $30,000,000 shall be available only for the purpose of providing assistance to local educational agencies under subsection (a) of section 572 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 20 U.S.C. 7703b).
(b) Local educational agency defined.—In this section, the term “local educational agency” has the meaning given that term in section 8013(9) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7713(9)).
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may provide financial or non-monetary support to qualified nonprofit organizations in order to assist such organizations in carrying out programs to support the attendance at a camp or camp-like setting of children of military families who have experienced the death of a family member or other loved one or who have another family member living with a substance use disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder.
(b) Application for support.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Each organization seeking support pursuant to subsection (a) shall submit to the Secretary an application therefor containing such information as the Secretary shall specify for purposes of this section.
(2) CONTENTS.—Each application submitted under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description of the program for which support is being sought, including the location of the setting or settings under the program, the duration of such setting or setting, any local partners participating in or contributing to the program, and the ratio of counselors, trained volunteers, or both to children at such setting or settings.
(B) An estimate of the number of children of military families to be supported using the support sought.
(c) Preference in approval of applications.—The Secretary shall accord a preference in the approval of applications submitted pursuant to subsection (b) to applications submitted by organizations that—
(1) provide a traditional camp or camp-like environment setting that is hosted by an accredited service provider or facility;
Notwithstanding section 5(d) of the Every Student Succeeds Act (Public Law 114–95; 129 Stat. 1806), the amendment made by section 7004(1) of such Act (Public Law 114–95; 129 Stat. 2077)—
(1) for fiscal year 2016, shall—
(A) be applied as if amending section 8003(a)(5)(A) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the Every Student Succeeds Act (Public Law 114–95; 129 Stat. 1802); and
(2) for fiscal year 2017 and each succeeding fiscal year, shall be in effect with respect to appropriations for use under title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (Public Law 114–95; 129 Stat. 1802).
Section 3330d(c) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) Review required.—The Secretary of each military department shall review the service records of each Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander war veteran described in subsection (b) to determine whether that veteran should be awarded the Medal of Honor.
(b) Covered veterans.— The Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander war veterans whose service records are to be reviewed under subsection (a) are the following:
(c) Consultations.—In carrying out the review under subsection (a), the Secretary of each military department shall consult with such veterans service organizations as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(d) Recommendations based on review.—If the Secretary concerned determines, based upon the review under subsection (a) of the service records of any Asian American or Native American Pacific Islander war veteran, that the award of the Medal of Honor to that veteran is warranted, the Secretary shall submit to the President a recommendation that the President award the Medal of Honor to that veteran.
(e) Authority to award medal of honor.—A Medal of Honor may be awarded to an Asian American or Native American Pacific Islander war veteran in accordance with a recommendation of the Secretary concerned under subsection (d).
(f) Congressional notification.—No Medal of Honor may be awarded pursuant to subsection (e) until the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives notice of the recommendations under subsection (d), including the name of each Asian American or Native American Pacific Islander war veteran recommended to be awarded a Medal of Honor and the rationale for such recommendation.
(g) Waiver of time limitations.—An award of the Medal of Honor may be made under subsection (e) without regard to—
(h) Definition.—In this section the term “Native American Pacific Islander” means a Native Hawaiian or Native American Pacific Islander, as those terms are defined in section 815 of the Native American Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992c).
(a) Authorization.—Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in sections 3744, 6248, 8744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the United States Armed Forces, the President may award a medal referred to in subsection (c) to a member or former member of the United States Armed Forces identified as warranting award of that medal pursuant to the review of valor award nominations for Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, Operation Freedom’s Sentinel, and Operation Inherent Resolve that was directed by the Secretary of Defense on January 7, 2016.
(b) Award of medal of honor.—If, pursuant to the review referred to in subsection (a), the President decides to award to a member or former member of the Armed Forces the Medal of Honor, the medal may only be awarded after the Secretary of Defense submits to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a letter identifying the intended recipient of the Medal of Honor and the rationale for awarding the medal of honor to such intended recipient.
(a) Authorization.—Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President is authorized to award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to Gary M. Rose for the acts of valor described in subsection (b).
(a) Waiver of time limitations.—Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the President may award the Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to Charles S. Kettles for the acts of valor during the Vietnam War described in subsection (b).
(b) Acts of valor described.—The acts of valor referred to in subsection (a) are the actions of Charles S. Kettles during combat operations on May 15, 1967, while serving as Flight Commander, 176th Aviation Company, 14th Aviation Battalion, Task Force Oregon, Republic of Vietnam, for which he was previously awarded the Distinguished-Service Cross.
(a) Waiver of time limitations.—Notwithstanding the time limitations specified in section 3744 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation with respect to the awarding of certain medals to persons who served in the Armed Forces, the Secretary of the Army may award the Distinguished-Service Cross under section 3742 of such title to First Lieutenant Melvin M. Spruiell of the Army for the acts of valor during World War II described in subsection (b).
(a) In general.—Section 2410 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) (1) The Secretary of the Army shall ensure that under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, the cremated remains of any person described in paragraph (2) are eligible for inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery with military honors in accordance with section 1491 of title 10.
“(2) A person described in this paragraph is a person whose service has been determined to be active duty service pursuant to section 401 of the GI Bill Improvement Act of 1977 (Public Law 95–202; 38 U.S.C. 106 note) as of the date of the enactment of this paragraph.”.
(b) Applicability.—
(c) Report on capacity of Arlington National Cemetery.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs and the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the interment and inurnment capacity of Arlington National Cemetery, including—
(1) the estimated date that the Secretary determines the cemetery will reach maximum interment and inurnment capacity; and
(2) in light of the unique and iconic meaning of the cemetery to the United States, recommendations for legislative actions and nonlegislative options that the Secretary determines necessary to ensure that the maximum interment and inurnment capacity of the cemetery is not reached until well into the future, including such actions and options with respect to—
(a) In general.—Chapter 7 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 190. Representation on boards, councils, and committees making recommendations relating to military personnel issues
“(a) Representation required.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any board, council, or committee established under this chapter that is responsible for making any recommendation relating to any military personnel issue affecting enlisted members of the armed forces shall include representation on the board, council, or committee from enlisted members of the armed forces or retired enlisted members of the armed forces.
Section 1142(b)(11) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before the period at the end the following: “, and information concerning options available to the member for registering at or following separation to donate brain tissue at time of the member’s death for research regarding traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy”.
Congress—
(2) commends female members of the Armed Forces who have sacrificed their lives in defense of the United States;
(3) recognizes that female members of the Armed Forces are an integral and invaluable part of the Armed Forces;
(4) urges the Secretary of Defense to ensure that female members of the Armed Forces receive adequate, well-fitted equipment in order to ensure optimal safety and protection;
(5) urges the Secretary of Defense to ensure that female members of the Armed Forces have access to adequate health services that fully address their specific medical needs;
(a) Finding.—Congress finds that the plight of male victims of military sexual trauma remains in the shadows due a lack of social awareness on the issue of male victimization.
(b) Sense of congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should—
(1) enhance victims’ access to intensive medical and mental health treatment for military sexual trauma treatment;
It is the sense of Congress that a statute currently exists, specifically paragraph (2) of section 504(b) of title 10, United States Code, which states that “the Secretary concerned may authorize the enlistment of a person not described in paragraph (1) [of that section] if the Secretary determines that such enlistment is vital to the national interest”.
(a) Short title.—This section may be cited as the “Protect Our Military Families’ 2nd Amendment Rights Act”.
(b) Residency of spouses of members of the armed forces to be determined on the same basis as the residency of such members for purposes of Federal firearms laws.—Section 921(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(b) For purposes of this chapter:
“(1) A member of the Armed Forces on active duty and the spouse of such a member are residents of the State in which the permanent duty station of the member is located.
(a) In general.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall establish a pilot program to demonstrate the feasibility of using portable, disposable alcohol breathalyzers and a cloud based server platform to collect data and monitor the progress of alcohol abuse prevention programs through the use of digital applications.
(b) Elements.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—
(1) select at least three locations at which to carry out the program, including at least one military service initial training location;
(c) Duration.—The pilot program under subsection (a) shall be operational for a minimum of 6 months and shall terminate not later than September 30, 2018.
(d) Reports required.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives—
(a) In general.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of Veterans Affairs, Education, and Labor, shall submit to Congress a report on the transfer of skills into equivalent college credits or technical certifications for members of the Armed Forces leaving the military. Such report shall describe each the following:
(1) Each skill that may be acquired during military service that is eligible for transfer into an equivalent college credit or technical certification.
(2) The academic level of the equivalent college credit or technical certification for which each such skill is eligible.
(a) Service medal required.—The Secretary of Defense shall design and produce a military service medal, to be known as the “Atomic Veterans Service Medal”, to honor retired and former members of the Armed Forces who are radiation-exposed veterans (as such term is defined in section 1112(c)(3) of title 38, United States Code).
(b) Distribution of medal.—
(1) ISSUANCE TO RETIRED AND FORMER MEMBERS.—At the request of a radiation-exposed veteran, the Secretary of Defense shall issue the Atomic Veterans Service Medal to the veteran.
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report detailing the information, assistance, and efforts to support and inform active duty members of the Armed Forces with respect to the rights and resources available under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.) regarding student loans. The report shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) A description of the coordination and information sharing between the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Education regarding the eligibility of members, and requests by members, to apply the interest rate limitation under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act with respect to existing Federal and private student loans.
(2) The number of such members with student loans who elect to have the maximum interest rates set in accordance with such Act.
(3) The number of such members whose student loans have an interest rate that exceeds such maximum rate.
(a) In general.—Section 1503(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph (6):
“(6) payments regarding reimbursements of any kind (including insurance settlement payments) for medical expenses resulting from any accident, theft, loss, or casualty loss (as defined by the Secretary), but the amount excluded under this clause shall not exceed the costs of medical care provided to the victim of the accident, theft, loss, or casualty loss.”.
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of each military department and the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating should—
(1) provide for the issuance of a Gold Star Installation Access Card to Gold Star family members who are the survivors of deceased members of the Armed Forces in order to expedite the ability of a Gold Star family member to gain unescorted access to military installations for the purpose of obtaining the on-base services and benefits for which the Gold Star family member is entitled or eligible;
(2) work jointly to ensure that a Gold Star Installation Access Card issued to a Gold Star family member by one Armed Force is accepted for access to military installations of another Armed Force; and
Section 1967(f)(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking the second sentence.
Section 10219(g) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “October 1, 2017” and inserting “October 1, 2018”.
The adjustment in the rates of monthly basic pay required by subsection (a) of section 1009 of title 37, United States Code, to be made on January 1, 2017, shall take effect, notwithstanding any determination made by the President under subsection (e) of such section with respect to an alternative pay adjustment to be made on such date.
Section 403(b)(7)(E) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.
(a) Members.—Section 474(d)(3) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Secretary of a military department shall not alter the amount of the per diem allowance, or the maximum amount of reimbursement, for a locality based on the duration of the temporary duty assignment in the locality of a member of the armed forces under the jurisdiction of the Secretary.”.
(b) Civilian employees.—Section 5702(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “The Secretary of Defense shall not alter the amount of the per diem allowance, or the maximum amount of reimbursement, for a locality based on the duration of the travel in the locality of an employee of the Department.”.
(c) Repeal of policy and regulations.—The policy, and any regulations issued pursuant to such policy, implemented by the Secretary of Defense on November 1, 2014, with respect to reductions in per diem allowances based on duration of temporary duty assignment or civilian travel shall have no force or effect.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”:
(3) Section 308d(c), relating to special pay for enlisted members assigned to certain high-priority units.
(4) Section 308g(f)(2), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment bonus for persons without prior service.
(5) Section 308h(e), relating to Ready Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(6) Section 308i(f), relating to Selected Reserve enlistment and reenlistment bonus for persons with prior service.
(a) Title 10 authorities.—The following sections of title 10, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”:
(b) Title 37 authorities.—The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”:
(4) Section 302g(e), relating to special pay for Selected Reserve health professionals in critically short wartime specialties.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”:
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”:
(5) Section 335(k), relating to special bonus and incentive pay authorities for officers in health professions.
The following sections of title 37, United States Code, are amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”:
(5) Section 316a(g), relating to incentive pay for members of precommissioning programs pursuing foreign language proficiency.
Section 334(c)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:
Section 332(c)(1)(B) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “$12,000” and inserting “$20,000”.
(a) Family care plans.—Section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 10 U.S.C. 991 note) is amended by inserting “or 351” after “section 310”.
(b) Dependents’ medical care.—Section 1079(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or 351” after “section 310”.
(c) Retention on active duty during disability evaluation process.—Section 1218(d)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or 351” after “section 310”.
(d) Storage space.—Section 362(1) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 2825 note) is amended by inserting “, or paragraph (1) or (3) of section 351(a),” after “section 310”.
(e) Student assistance programs.—Sections 455(o)(3)(B) and 465(a)(2)(D) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(o)(3)(B), 1087ee(a)(2)(D)) are amended by inserting “or paragraph (1) or (3) of section 351(a).” after “section 310”.
(f) Armed forces retirement home.—Section 1512(a)(3)(A) of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 412(a)(3)(A)) is amended by inserting “or 351” after “section 310”.
(g) Veterans of foreign wars membership.—Section 230103(3) of title 36, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or 351” after “section 310”.
(h) Military pay and allowances.—Title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(i) Exclusions from income for purpose of supplemental security income.—Section 1612(b)(20) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382a(b)(20)) is amended by inserting “, or paragraph (1) or (3) of section 351(a),” after “section 310”.
(j) Exclusions from income for purpose of head start program.—Section 645(a)(3)(B)(i) of the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9840(a)(3)(B)(i)) is amended by inserting “or 351” after “section 310”.
(k) Exclusions from gross income for federal income tax purposes.—Section 112(c)(5)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting “, or paragraph (1) or (3) of section 351(a),” after “section 310”.
Subparagraph (B) of section 1413a(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “the amount equal to” and all that follows through “creditable service multiplied” and inserting the following: “the amount equal to the retired pay multiplier determined for the member under section 1409 of this title multiplied”.
The amendment to be made by section 632(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 847) shall not take effect.
(a) Continuation pay.—Section 356 of title 37, United States Code, which shall take effect on January 1, 2018, pursuant to section 635 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 851), is amended—
(3) by amending subsection (b) to read as follows: “(b) Payment amount.—The Secretary concerned shall determine the payment amount under this section as a multiple of a full TSP member’s monthly basic pay but shall not be less than 2.5 times the member’s monthly basic pay. The maximum amount the Secretary concerned may pay the member under this section is— “(1) in the case of a member of a regular component or in a reserve component if the member is performing active Guard and Reserve duty (as defined in section 101(d)(6) of title 10), 13 times the amount of the monthly basic pay payable to the member for the month during which the agreement under subsection (a)(2) is entered into; and “(2) in the case of any member not covered by paragraph (1), 6 times the amount of monthly basic pay to which the member would be entitled for the month during which the agreement under subsection (a)(2) is entered into if the member were serving on active duty at the time the agreement is entered into.”; and
(b) Clerical amendment.—The item relating to section 356 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 5 of title 37, United States Code, which shall take effect on January 1, 2018, pursuant to section 635 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 851), is amended by striking “12 years” and inserting “8 to 12 years”.
(a) Payment amount per fiscal year.—Paragraph (2)(I) of section 1450(m) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “fiscal year 2017” and inserting “each of fiscal years 2017 and 2018”.
(c) Report.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the dependency and indemnity compensation offset under sections 1450(c) of title 10, United States Code. The report shall include the following:
(2) Of the number of individuals covered under paragraph (1), the number who are covered by section 1448(d) of title 10, United States Code, listed by the rank of the deceased member and the current age of the individual.
(3) Of the number of individuals under paragraph (1), the number who are not covered by section 1448(d) of title 10, United States Code, listed by the rank of the deceased member and the current age of the individual.
(a) Treatment of inactive-Duty training in same manner as active duty.—Section 1451(c)(1)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Consistent treatment of dependent children.—Paragraph (2) of section 1448(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(2) DEPENDENT CHILDREN ANNUITY.—
“(A) ANNUITY WHEN NO ELIGIBLE SURVIVING SPOUSE.—In the case of a person described in paragraph (1), the Secretary concerned shall pay an annuity under this subchapter to the dependent children of that person under section 1450(a)(2) of this title as applicable.
“(B) OPTIONAL ANNUITY WHEN THERE IS AN ELIGIBLE SURVIVING SPOUSE.—The Secretary may pay an annuity under this subchapter to the dependent children of a person described in paragraph (1) under section 1450(a)(3) of this title, if applicable, instead of paying an annuity to the surviving spouse under paragraph (1), if the Secretary concerned, in consultation with the surviving spouse, determines it appropriate to provide an annuity for the dependent children under this paragraph instead of an annuity for the surviving spouse under paragraph (1).”.
(c) Deemed elections.—Section 1448(f) of title 10, United States Code, is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(d) Availability of special survivor indemnity allowance.—Section 1450(m)(1)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or (f)” after “subsection (d)”.
(e) Application of amendments.—
(1) PAYMENT.—No annuity benefit under subchapter II of chapter 73 of title 10, United States Code, shall accrue to any person by reason of the amendments made by this section for any period before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) ELECTIONS.—For any death that occurred before the date of the enactment of this Act with respect to which an annuity under such subchapter is being paid (or could be paid) to a surviving spouse, the Secretary concerned may, within six months of that date and in consultation with the surviving spouse, determine it appropriate to provide an annuity for the dependent children of the decedent under paragraph 1448(f)(2)(B) of title 10, as added by subsection (b)(1), instead of an annuity for the surviving spouse. Any such determination and resulting change in beneficiary shall be effective as of the first day of the first month following the date of the determination.
(a) Use of current pay grade required.—Section 1408(a)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by inserting after “member is entitled” the following: “(to be determined using the member’s pay grade and years of service at the time of the court order, rather than the member’s pay grade and years of service at the time of retirement, unless the same)”.
(b) Application of amendment.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any division of property as part of a final decree of divorce, dissolution, annulment, or legal separation involving a member of the Armed Forces to which section 1408 of title 10, United States Code, applies that becomes final after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Optimization strategy.—Section 2481(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following paragraph:
“(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to optimize management practices across the defense commissary system and the exchange system that reduce reliance of those systems on appropriated funding without reducing benefits to the patrons of those systems or the revenue generated by nonappropriated fund entities or instrumentalities of the Department of Defense for the morale, welfare, and recreation of members of the armed forces.
“(B) The Secretary shall ensure that savings generated due to such optimization practices are shared by the defense commissary system and the exchange system through contracts or agreements that appropriately reflect the participation of the systems in the development and implementation of such practices.
“(C) If the Secretary determines that the reduced reliance on appropriated funding pursuant to subparagraph (A) is insufficient to maintain the benefits to the patrons of the defense commissary system, and if the Secretary converts the defense commissary system to a nonappropriated fund entity or instrumentality pursuant to paragraph (1) of section 2484(j) of this title, the Secretary shall transfer appropriated funds pursuant to paragraph (2) of such section to ensure the maintenance of such benefits.
“(4) On not less than a quarterly basis, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the defense commissary system, including—
(b) Authorization to supplement appropriations through business optimization.—Section 2483(c) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Such appropriated amounts may also be supplemented with additional funds derived from improved management practices implemented pursuant to sections 2481(c)(3) and 2487(c) of this title and the variable pricing program implemented pursuant to section 2484(i) of this title.”.
(c) Variable pricing pilot program.—Section 2484 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:
“(i) Variable pricing program.— (1) Notwithstanding subsection (e), and subject to subsection (k), the Secretary may establish a variable pricing program pursuant to which prices may be established in response to market conditions and customer demand, in accordance with the requirements of this subsection. Notwithstanding the amount of the uniform surcharge assessed in subsection (d), the Secretary may provide for an alternative surcharge of not more than five percent of sales proceeds under such variable pricing program to be made available for the purposes specified in subsection (h).
“(2) Subject to subsection (k), before establishing a variable pricing program under this subsection, the Secretary shall establish the following:
“(A) Specific, measurable benchmarks for success in the provision of high quality grocery merchandise, discount savings to patrons, and levels of customer satisfaction while achieving savings for the Department of Defense.
“(B) A baseline of overall savings to patrons achieved by commissary stores prior to the initiation of the variable pricing program, based on a comparison of prices charged by those stores on a regional basis with prices charged by relevant local competitors for a representative market basket of goods.
“(3) The Secretary shall ensure that the defense commissary system implements the variable pricing program by conducting price comparisons using the methodology established for paragraph (2)(B) and adjusting pricing as necessary to ensure that pricing in the variable pricing program achieves overall savings to patrons that are consistent with the baseline savings established for the relevant region pursuant to such paragraph.
“(j) Conversion to nonappropriated fund entity or instrumentality.— (1) Subject to subsection (k), if the Secretary determines that the variable pricing program has met the benchmarks for success established pursuant to paragraph (2)(A) of subsection (i) and the savings requirements established pursuant to paragraph (3) of such subsection over a period of at least six months, the Secretary may convert the defense commissary system to a nonappropriated fund entity or instrumentality, with operating expenses financed in whole or in part by receipts from the sale of products and the sale of services. Upon such conversion, appropriated funds shall be transferred to the defense commissary system only in accordance with paragraph (2) or section 2491 of this title. The requirements of section 2483 shall not apply to the defense commissary system operating as a nonappropriated fund entity or instrumentality.
“(2) If the Secretary determines that the defense commissary system operating as a nonappropriated fund entity or instrumentality is likely to incur a loss in any fiscal year as a result of compliance with the savings requirement established in subsection (i), the Secretary shall authorize a transfer of appropriated funds available for such purpose to the commissary system in an amount sufficient to offset the anticipated loss. Any funds so transferred shall be considered to be nonappropriated funds for such purpose.
“(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense may identify positions of employees in the defense commissary system who are paid with appropriated funds whose status may be converted to the status of an employee of a nonappropriated fund entity or instrumentality.
“(B) The status and conversion of employees in a position identified by the Secretary under subparagraph (A) shall be addressed as provided in section 2491(c) for employees in morale, welfare, and recreation programs, including with respect to requiring the consent of such employee to be so converted.
“(k) Oversight required to ensure continued benefit to patrons.— (1) With respect to each action described in paragraph (2), the Secretary may not carry out such action until—
(d) Establishment of common business practices.—Section 2487 of such title is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): “(c) Common business practices.— (1) Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b), the Secretary of Defense may establish common business processes, practices, and systems—
“(2) The Secretary may authorize the defense commissary system and the exchange system to enter into contracts or other agreements— “(3) For the purpose of a contract or agreement authorized under paragraph (2), the Secretary may— “(A) use funds appropriated pursuant to section 2483 of this title to reimburse a nonappropriated fund entity or instrumentality for the portion of the cost of a contract or agreement entered by the nonappropriated fund entity or instrumentality that is attributable to the defense commissary system; and
(e) Authority for expert commercial advice.—Section 2485 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(h) Expert commercial advice.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into a contract with an entity to obtain expert commercial advice, commercial assistance, or other similar services not otherwise carried out by the Defense Commissary Agency, to implement section 2481(c), subsections (i) and (j) of section 2484, and section 2487(c) of this title.”.
(f) Clarification of references to “the exchange system”.—Section 2481(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “Any reference in this chapter to ‘the exchange system’ shall be treated as referring to each separate administrative entity within the Department of Defense through which the Secretary of Defense has implemented the requirement under this subsection for a world-wide system of exchange stores.”.
(g) Operation of defense commissary system as a nonappropriated fund entity.—In the event that the defense commissary system is converted to a nonappropriated fund entity or instrumentality as authorized by section 2484(j)(1) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (c) of this section, the Secretary may—
Section 478a(c) of title 37, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by striking “The amount” and inserting the following: “(1) Except as provided by paragraph (2), the amount”; and
Section 1007(c)(3) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
“(C) (i) In accordance with clause (ii), if the indebtedness of a member of the uniformed services to the United States occurs, through no fault of the member, as a result of the overpayment of pay or allowances to the member or upon the settlement of the member’s accounts, the Secretary concerned may not recover the indebtedness from the member, including a retired or former member, using deductions from the pay of the member, deductions from retired or separation pay, or any other collection method unless recovery of the indebtedness commences before the end of the 10-year period beginning on the date on which the indebtedness was incurred.
“(D) (i) Not later than January 1 of each of years 2017 through 2027, the Director of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service shall review all cases occurring during the 10-year period prior to the date of the review of indebtedness of a member of the uniformed services, including a retired or former member, to the United States in which—
(a) Establishment.—
(1) TRICARE PREFERRED.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1074n the following new section:
“(a) Establishment.— (1) Not later than January 1, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a self-managed, preferred-provider network option under the TRICARE program. Such option shall be known as ‘TRICARE Preferred’.
“(b) Enrollment eligibility.— (1) The beneficiary categories for purposes of eligibility to enroll in TRICARE Preferred and cost sharing requirements applicable to such category are as follows: “(A) An ‘active-duty family member’ category that consists of beneficiaries who are covered by section 1079 of this title (as dependents of active duty members).
“(c) Cost-sharing requirements.—The cost sharing requirements under TRICARE Preferred are as follows:
“(1) With respect to beneficiaries in the active-duty family member category or the retired category by reason of being a member or former member of the uniformed services who originally enlists or is appointed in the uniformed services on or after January 1, 2018, or by reason of being a dependent of such a member, the cost sharing requirements shall be calculated pursuant to subsection (d)(1).
“(2) (A) Except as provided by subsection (e), with respect to beneficiaries described in subparagraph (B) in the active-duty family member category or the retired category, the cost sharing requirements shall be calculated as if the beneficiary were enrolled in TRICARE Extra or TRICARE Standard as if TRICARE Extra or TRICARE Standard, as the case may be, were still being carried out by the Secretary.
“(B) Beneficiaries described in this subparagraph are beneficiaries who are eligible to enroll in the TRICARE program by reason of being a member or former member of the uniformed services who originally enlists or is appointed in the uniformed services before January 1, 2018, or by reason of being a dependent of such a member.
“(3) With respect to beneficiaries in the reserve and young adult category, the cost sharing requirements shall be calculated pursuant to subsection (d)(1) as if the beneficiary were in the active-duty family member category or the retired category, as applicable, except that the premiums calculated pursuant to sections 1076d, 1076e, or 1110b of this title, as the case may be, shall apply instead of any enrollment fee required under this section.
“(d) Cost-sharing amounts for certain beneficiaries.— (1) Beneficiaries described in subsection (c)(1) enrolled in TRICARE Preferred shall be subject to cost-sharing requirements in accordance with the amounts and percentages under the following table during calendar year 2018 and as such amounts are adjusted under paragraph (2) for subsequent years:
“TRICARE Preferred
Active-Duty Family Member (Individual/Family)
Retired (Individual/Family)
Annual Enrollment
$300 / $600
$425 / $850
Annual deductible
$0
$0
Annual catastrophic cap
$1,000
$3,000
Outpatient visit civilian network
$15 primary care
$25 primary care
$25 specialty care
$40 specialty care
Out of network: 20%
25% of out of network
ER visit civilian network
$40 network
$60 network
20% out of network
Urgent care civilian network
$20 network
$40 network
20% out of network
25% out of network
Ambulatory surgery civilian network
$40 network
$80 network
20% out of network
25% out of network
Ambulance civilian network
$15
$25
Durable medical equipment civilian network
10%
20%
Inpatient visit civilian network
$60 per network admission
$125 per admission network
20% out of network
25% out of net work
Inpatient skilled nursing/rehab civilian
$20 per day network
$50 per day network
$50 per day out of network
$300 per day or 20% of billed charges out of network
“(2) Each dollar amount expressed as a fixed dollar amount in the table set forth in paragraph (1), and the amounts determined under subsection (e), shall be annually indexed to the amount by which retired pay is increased under section 1401a of this title, rounded to the next lower multiple of $1. The remaining amount above such multiple of $1 shall be carried over to, and accumulated with, the amount of the increase for the subsequent year or years and made when the aggregate amount of increases carried over under this clause for a year is $1 or more.
“(e) Exceptions to certain cost-sharing amounts for certain beneficiaries eligible prior to 2018.— (1) Subject to paragraph (3), and in accordance with subsection (d)(2), the Secretary shall establish an annual enrollment fee for beneficiaries described in subsection (c)(2)(B) in the retired category who enroll in TRICARE Preferred (other than such beneficiaries covered by paragraph (2)). Such enrollment fee shall be $100 for an individual and $200 for a family.
“(2) The enrollment fee established pursuant to paragraph (1) for beneficiaries described in subsection (c)(2)(B) in the retired category shall not apply with respect to the following beneficiaries:
“(3) The Secretary may not establish an annual enrollment fee under paragraph (1) until 90 days has elapsed following the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States is required to submit the review under paragraph (4).
“(4) Not later than February 1, 2020, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a review of the following:
“(A) Whether health care coverage for covered beneficiaries has changed since the enactment of this section.
“(f) Publication of measures.—As part of the administration of TRICARE Prime and TRICARE Preferred, the Secretary shall publish on a publically available Internet website of the Department of Defense data on all measures required by section 711 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017. The published measures shall be updated not less frequently than quarterly.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1074n, the following new item:
“1075. TRICARE Preferred.”.
(b) TRICARE Prime cost sharing.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1075, as added by subsection (a), the following new section:
Ҥ 1075a. TRICARE Prime: cost sharing
“(a) Cost-sharing requirements.—The cost sharing requirements under TRICARE Prime are as follows:
“(1) There are no cost-sharing requirements for beneficiaries who are covered by section 1074(a) of this title.
“(2) With respect to beneficiaries in the active-duty family member category or the retired category (as described in section 1075(b)(1) of this title) by reason of being a member or former member of the uniformed services who originally enlists or is appointed in the uniformed services on or after January 1, 2018, or by reason of being a dependent of such a member, the cost-sharing requirements shall be calculated pursuant to subsection (b)(1).
“(3) (A) With respect to beneficiaries described in subparagraph (B) in the active-duty family member category or the retired category (as described in section 1075(b)(1) of this title), the cost-sharing requirements shall be calculated in accordance with the other provisions of this chapter without regard to subsection (b).
“(B) Beneficiaries described in this subparagraph are beneficiaries who are eligible to enroll in the TRICARE program by reason of being a member or former member of the uniformed services who originally enlists or is appointed in the uniformed services before January 1, 2018, or by reason of being a dependent of such a member.
“(b) Cost-sharing amounts.— (1) Beneficiaries described in subsection (a)(2) enrolled in TRICARE Prime shall be subject to cost-sharing requirements in accordance with the amounts and percentages under the following table during calendar year 2018 and as such amounts are adjusted under paragraph (2) for subsequent years:
“TRICARE Prime
Active-Duty Family Member (Individual/Family)
Retired (Individual/Family)
Annual Enrollment
$180 / $360
$325 / $650
Annual deductible
No1
No1
Annual catastrophic cap
$1,000
$3,000 per family
Outpatient visit civilian network
$0 with authorization
$20 primary care
$30 specialty care
ER visit civilian network
$0
$50 network
Urgent care civilian network
$0
$30 network
Ambulatory surgery civilian network
$0 with authorization
$60 network with authorization
Ambulance civilian network
$0
$20
Durable medical equipment civilian network
$0 with authorization
20%
Inpatient visit civilian network
$0 with authorization
$100 network per admission with authorization
Inpatient skilled nursing/rehab civilian
$0 with authorization
$30 per day network with authorization
1: Deductibles and cost-sharing does apply to TRICARE Prime beneficiaries that seek care in the civilian network care through the point-of-service option (without a referral). Annual deductible is $300 individual and $600 family. Cost-sharing for covered inpatient and outpatient services are 50% of the TRICARE allowable charges.
“(2) Each dollar amount expressed as a fixed dollar amount in the table set forth in paragraph (1) shall be annually indexed to the amount by which retired pay is increased under section 1401a of this title, rounded to the next lower multiple of $1. The remaining amount above such multiple of $1 shall be carried over to, and accumulated with, the amount of the increase for the subsequent year or years and made when the aggregate amount of increases carried over under this clause for a year is $1 or more.
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1075, as added by subsection (a), the following new item:
“1075a. TRICARE Prime: cost sharing.”.
(c) Portability.—Section 1073 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Portability in program.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the enrollment status of covered beneficiaries is portable between or among TRICARE program regions of the United States and that effective procedures are in place for automatic electronic transfer of information between or among contractors responsible for administration in such regions and prompt communication with such beneficiaries. Each covered beneficiary enrolled in TRICARE Prime who has relocated the beneficiary’s primary residence to a new area in which enrollment in TRICARE Prime is available shall be able to obtain a new primary health care manager or provider within 10 days of the relocation and associated request for such manager or provider.”.
(d) Termination of TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra.—Beginning on January 1, 2018, the Secretary of Defense may not carry out TRICARE Standard and TRICARE Extra under the TRICARE program. The Secretary shall ensure that any individual who is covered under TRICARE Standard or TRICARE Extra as of December 31, 2017, enrolls in TRICARE Prime, TRICARE Preferred, or TRICARE for Life, as the case may be, as of January 1, 2018, for the individual to continue coverage under the TRICARE program.
(e) Implementation plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than June 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate an implementation plan to improve access to health care for TRICARE beneficiaries pursuant to the amendments made by this section.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The plan under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) ensure that at least 85 percent of the beneficiary population under TRICARE Preferred is covered by the network by January 1, 2018;
(E) monitor on a monthly basis complaints by beneficiaries with respect to network adequacy and the availability of health care providers;
(G) mechanisms to evaluate the quality metrics of the network providers established under section 711;
(f) GAO reviews.—
(1) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.—Not later than December 1, 2017, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a review of the implementation plan of the Secretary under paragraph (1) of subsection (e), including an assessment of the adequacy of the plan in meeting the elements specified in paragraph (2) of such subsection.
(2) NETWORK.—Not later than September 1, 2017, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a review of the network established under TRICARE Extra, including the following:
(B) An assessment of the extent to which beneficiaries are able to obtain appointments under TRICARE extra.
(g) Definitions.—In this section:
(h) Conforming amendments.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(A) Section 1072 is amended—
(i) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the following:
“(7) The term ‘TRICARE program’ means the various programs carried out by the Secretary of Defense under this chapter and any other provision of law providing for the furnishing of medical and dental care and health benefits to members and former members of the uniformed services and their dependents, including the following health plan options:
(ii) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
“(11) The term ‘TRICARE Extra’ means the preferred provider option of the TRICARE program made available prior to January 1, 2018, under which TRICARE Standard beneficiaries may obtain discounts on cost-sharing as a result of using TRICARE network providers.
“(12) The term ‘TRICARE Preferred’ the self-managed, preferred-provider network option under the TRICARE program established by section 1075 of this title.
“(13) The term ‘TRICARE for Life’ means the Medicare wraparound coverage option of the TRICARE program made available to the beneficiary by reason of section 1086(d) of this title.
(B) Section 1076d is amended—
(i) in subsection (d)(1), by inserting after “coverage.” the following: “Such premium shall apply instead of any enrollment fees required under section 1075 of this section.”; and
(C) Section 1076e is amended—
(i) in subsection (d)(1), by inserting after “coverage.” the following: “Such premium shall apply instead of any enrollment fees required under section 1075 of this section.”; and
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended—
(A) in the item relating to section 1076d, by striking “TRICARE Standard” and inserting “TRICARE Reserve Select”;
(a) Administration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1073b the following new section:
Ҥ 1073c. Administration of Defense Health Agency and military medical treatment facilities
“(a) Administration of military medical treatment facilities.— (1) Beginning October 1, 2018, the Director of the Defense Health Agency shall be responsible for the administration of each military medical treatment facility, including with respect to—
“(b) DHA Assistant Director.— (1) The Secretary of Defense may establish in the Defense Health Agency an Assistant Director for Health Care Administration. If so established, the Assistant Director shall—
“(2) If established under paragraph (1), the Assistant Director shall be appointed from among individuals who have equivalent education and experience as a chief executive officer leading a large, civilian health care system.
“(3) If established under paragraph (1), the Assistant Director shall be responsible for the following:
“(B) Establishing policies and procedures for the provision of direct care at military medical treatment facilities.
“(C) Establishing priorities for budgeting matters with respect to the provision of direct care at military medical treatment facilities.
“(c) DHA Deputy Assistant Directors.— (1) (A) The Secretary of Defense may establish in the Defense Health Agency a Deputy Assistant Director for Information Operations.
“(2) (A) The Secretary of Defense may establish in the Defense Health Agency a Deputy Assistant Director for Financial Operations.
“(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense may establish in the Defense Health Agency a Deputy Assistant Director for Health Care Operations.
“(4) (A) The Secretary of Defense may establish in the Defense Health Agency a Deputy Assistant Director for Medical Affairs.
“(B) If established under subparagraph (A), the Deputy Assistant Director for Medical Affairs shall be responsible for the management and leadership of clinical quality and process improvement, patient safety, infection control, graduate medical education, clinical integration, utilization review, risk management, patient experience, and civilian physician recruiting.
“(d) DHA Deputy Director.— (1) In addition to the other duties of the Joint Staff Surgeon, the Joint Staff Surgeon shall serve as the Deputy Director for Combat Support of the Defense Health Agency.
“(2) The responsibilities of the Deputy Director shall include the following:
“(A) Ensuring that the Defense Health Agency meets the operational needs of the commanders of the combatant commands.
“(e) Appointments.—In carrying out subsection (a)(3), including with respect to establishing positions under subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary shall make appointments under such subsections—
(b) Implementation plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a plan to implement section 1073c of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
(c) Reports.—
(1) INTERIM REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2017, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing—
(2) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2018, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the final version of the plan developed under subsection (b)(1).
(a) Administration.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 702, is further amended by inserting after section 1073c the following new section:
Ҥ 1073d. Military medical treatment facilities
“(a) In general.—To support the medical readiness of the armed forces and the readiness of medical personnel, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall maintain the military medical treatment facilities described in subsections (b), (c), and (d).
“(b) Medical centers.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall maintain medical centers in areas with a large population of members of the armed forces and covered beneficiaries.
“(2) Medical centers shall serve as referral facilities for members and covered beneficiaries who require comprehensive health care services that support medical readiness.
“(c) Hospitals.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall maintain hospitals in areas where civilian health care facilities are unable to support the health care needs of members of the armed forces and covered beneficiaries.
“(d) Ambulatory care centers.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall maintain ambulatory care centers in areas where civilian health care facilities are able to support the health care needs of members of the armed forces and covered beneficiaries.
(b) Update of study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in collaboration with the Secretaries of the military departments, shall update the report described in paragraph (2) to address the restructuring or realignment of military medical treatment facilities pursuant to section 1073d of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), including with respect to any expansions or consolidations of such facilities.
(2) REPORT DESCRIBED.—The report described in this paragraph is the Military Health System Modernization Study dated May 29th, 2015, required by section 713(a)(2) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3414).
(c) Implementation plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees an implementation plan to restructure or realign the military medical treatment facilities pursuant to section 1073d of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
(a) In general.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1077 the following new section:
Ҥ 1077a. Access to military medical treatment facilities and other facilities
“(a) Urgent care.— (1) Beginning not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that military medical treatment facilities, at locations the Secretary determines appropriate, provide urgent care services for members of the armed forces and covered beneficiaries until 11:00 p.m each day.
“(2) With respect to areas in which a military medical treatment facility covered by paragraph (1) is not located, the Secretary shall ensure that members of the armed forces and covered beneficiaries may access urgent care clinics that are open during the hours specified in such paragraph through the health care provider network under the TRICARE program.
“(3) A covered beneficiary may access urgent care services without the need for preauthorization for such services.
“(b) Nurse advice line.—The Secretary shall ensure that the nurse advice line of the Department directs covered beneficiaries seeking access to care to the source of the most appropriate level of health care required to treat the medical conditions of the beneficiaries, including urgent care services described in subsection (a).”.
(a) In general.—Section 1077a of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 704, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Primary care clinics.— (1) The Secretary shall ensure that primary care clinics at military medical treatment facilities are available for members of the armed forces and covered beneficiaries between the hours determined appropriate under paragraph (2), including with respect to expanded hours described in subparagraph (B) of such paragraph.
“(2) (A) The Secretary shall determine the hours that each primary care clinic at a military medical treatment facility is available for members of the armed forces and covered beneficiaries based on—
“(B) The primary care clinic hours at a military medical treatment facility determined under subparagraph (A) shall include expanded hours beyond regular business hours during weekdays and the weekend if the Secretary determines under such subparagraph that sufficient demand exists at the military medical treatment facility for such expanded primary care clinic hours.”.
(a) In general.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1095g the following new section:
Ҥ 1095h. TRICARE program: value-based health care
“(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense may develop and implement value-based incentive programs as part of any contract awarded under this chapter for the provision of health care services to covered beneficiaries to encourage health care providers under the TRICARE program (including physicians, hospitals, and other persons and facilities involved in providing such health care services) to improve the following:
“(b) Value-based incentive programs.— (1) In developing value-based incentive programs under subsection (a), the Secretary shall— “(A) link payments to health care providers under the TRICARE program to improved performance with respect to quality, cost, and reducing the provision of inappropriate care; “(B) consider the characteristics of the population of covered beneficiaries affected by the value-based incentive program; “(C) consider how the value-based incentive program would affect the receipt of health care under the TRICARE program by such covered beneficiaries; “(D) establish or maintain an assurance that such covered beneficiaries will have timely access to health care during the operation of the value-based incentive program;
“(c) Use of existing models.—In developing a value-based incentive program under subsection (a), the Secretary may adapt a value-based incentive program conducted by a TRICARE managed care support contractor, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or any other governmental or commercial health care program.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1095g the following new item:
(c) Briefings.—
(1) PRIOR TO CERTAIN CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS.—Not later than 60 days before the date on which the Secretary of Defense modifies a contract awarded under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, to implement a value-based incentive program under section 1095h of such title, as added by subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate (and any other appropriate congressional committee upon request) a briefing on any implementation plan of the Secretary with respect to such a value-based incentive program.
(2) ANNUAL BRIEFING.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter through 2022, the Secretary shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate (and any other appropriate congressional committee upon request) a briefing on the quality performance metrics and expenditures relating to a value-based incentive program developed and implemented under section 1095h of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a).
(a) Partnership agreements.—Subsection (a) of section 1096 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Partnership agreements.—The Secretary of Defense may enter into a partnership agreement between facilities of the uniformed services and local or regional health care systems if the Secretary determines that such an agreement would—
(b) In general.—Such section 1096 is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsections: “(c) Criteria.—In entering into an agreement under subsection (a) between a facility of the uniformed services and a local or regional health care system, the Secretary shall— “(2) assess— “(A) how such agreement affects the delivery of health care at the facility and the readiness of the members of the uniformed services; “(d) Local consortium.—The Secretary shall ensure that an agreement entered into under subsection (a) between a facility of the uniformed services and a local or regional health care system is developed by a consortium representing the community of the facility and such health care system. “(e) Biennial evaluation.—The Secretary of Defense shall evaluate each agreement entered into under subsection (a) on a biennial basis to— “(1) assess whether the agreement provides increased access to health care for covered beneficiaries;
(a) Plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate an implementation plan to establish a Joint Trauma System within the Defense Health Agency that promotes improved trauma care to members of the Armed Forces and other individuals who are eligible to be treated for trauma at a military medical treatment facility.
(2) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary shall implement the plan under paragraph (1) after a 90-day period has elapsed following the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States is required to submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate the review under subsection (c). In implementing such plan, the Secretary shall take into account any recommendation made by the Comptroller General under such review.
(b) Elements.—The Joint Trauma System described in subsection (a)(1) shall include the following elements:
(2) Establish standards of care for trauma services provided at military medical treatment facilities.
(c) Review.—Not later than 120 days after the date on which the Secretary submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate the implementation plan under subsection (a)(1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to such committees a review of such plan to determine if each element under subsection (b) is included in such plan.
(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a Joint Trauma Education and Training Directorate (in this section referred to as the “Directorate”) to ensure that the traumatologists of the Armed Forces maintain readiness and are able to be rapidly deployed for future armed conflicts. The Secretary shall carry out this section in collaboration with the Secretaries of the military departments.
(b) Duties.—The duties of the Directorate are as follows:
(2) To establish the goals of such partnerships necessary for trauma combat casualty care teams led by traumatologists to maintain professional competency in trauma care.
(c) Partnerships.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall enter into partnerships with civilian academic medical centers and large metropolitan teaching hospitals that have level I civilian trauma centers.
(2) TRAUMA COMBAT CASUALTY CARE TEAMS.—Under the partnerships entered into with civilian academic medical centers and large metropolitan teaching hospitals under paragraph (1), trauma combat casualty care teams of the Armed Forces led by traumatologists of the Armed Forces shall embed within the trauma centers of the medical centers and hospitals on an enduring basis.
(3) SELECTION.—The Secretary shall select civilian academic medical centers and large metropolitan teaching hospitals to enter into partnerships under paragraph (1) based on patient volume, acuity, and other factors the Secretary determines necessary to ensure that the traumatologists of the Armed Forces and the associated clinical support teams have adequate and continuous exposure to critically injured patients.
(d) Analysis.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an analysis to determine the number of traumatologists of the Armed Forces, by specialty, that must be maintained within the Department of Defense to meet the requirements of the combatant commands.
(e) Implementation plan.—Not later than July 1, 2017, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate an implementation plan for establishing the Joint Trauma Education and Training Directorate under subsection (a) and entering into partnerships under subsection (c).
(f) Level I civilian trauma center defined.—In this section, the term “level I civilian trauma center” means a comprehensive regional resource that is a tertiary care facility central to the trauma system and is capable of providing total care for every aspect of injury from prevention through rehabilitation.
(a) First call resolution.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall implement standard processes to ensure that, in the case of a beneficiary contacting a military medical treatment facility over the telephone for, at a minimum, scheduling an appointment, requesting a prescription drug refill, and other matters determined appropriate by the Secretary, the needs of the beneficiary are met during the first such telephone call.
(b) Appointment scheduling.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall implement standard processes to schedule beneficiaries for appointments at military medical treatment facilities.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The standard processes implemented under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) Requiring clinics at military medical treatment facilities to allow a beneficiary to schedule an appointment for wellness visits or follow-up appointments during the six-month or longer period beginning on the date of the request for the appointment.
(B) A process to remind a beneficiary of future appointments in a manner that the beneficiary prefers, which may include sending postcards to the beneficiary prior to appointments and making reminder telephone calls, emails, or cellular text messages to the beneficiary at specified intervals prior to appointments.
(c) Appointment supply and demand.—
(1) PRODUCTIVITY.—The Secretary shall implement standards for the productivity of health care providers at military medical treatment facilities. In developing such standards, the Secretary shall consider civilian benchmarks for measuring the productivity of health care providers, the optimal number of appointments (patient contact hours) required to maintain access according to the standards developed by the Secretary, and readiness requirements.
(2) MANAGING USE OF FACE-TO-FACE APPOINTMENTS.—The Secretary shall implement strategies for managing the use of face-to-face appointments at military medical treatment facilities. Such strategies may include—
(A) maximizing the use of telehealth and virtual appointments for beneficiaries at the discretion of the health care provider and the beneficiary;
(d) Implementation.—The Secretary shall implement subsections (a), (b), and (c) by not later than February 1, 2017.
(a) Adoption.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall adopt the core quality performance metrics agreed upon by the Core Quality Measures Collaborative for use by the military health system and in contracts awarded to carry out the TRICARE program.
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(a) Study.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study of options for providing health care coverage that improves the continuity of health care provided to current and former members of the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve who are not—
(2) eligible for the Transitional Assistance Management Program under section 1145 of title 10, United States Code; or
(3) eligible for the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program under chapter 89 of title 5.
(b) Elements.—The study under subsection (a) shall address the following:
(1) Whether to allow current and former members of the Selected Reserve to participate in the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program under chapter 89 of title 5.
(2) Whether to pay a stipend to current and former members to continue coverage in a health plan obtained by the member.
(3) Whether to allow current and former members to participate in the TRICARE program under section 1076d of title 10, United States Code.
(4) Whether to allow members of the National Guard assigned to Homeland Response Force Units mobilized for a State emergency pursuant to chapter 9 of title 32, United States Code, to remain eligible for the TRICARE program.
(c) Consultation.—In carrying out the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with, and obtain the opinions of, current and former members of the Selected Reserve, including the leadership of the Selected Reserve.
(d) Submission.—
(1) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the study under subsection (a).
(2) MATTERS INCLUDED.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) A description of the health care coverage options addressed by the Secretary under subsection (b).
(B) Identification of such health care coverage option that the Secretary recommends as the best option.
(D) The number and proportion of the current and former members of the Selected Reserve projected to participate in such recommended best option.
Section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) In general.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1076e the following new section:
Ҥ 1076f. TRICARE program: extension of coverage for certain members of the National Guard and dependents during certain disaster response duty
“(a) Extended coverage.—During a period in which a member of the National Guard is performing disaster response duty, the member shall be treated as being on active duty for a period of more than 30 days for purposes of the eligibility of the member and dependents of the member for health care benefits under the TRICARE program if such period immediately follows a period in which the member served on full-time National Guard duty under section 502(f) of title 32, including pursuant to chapter 9 of such title, unless the Governor of the State (or, with respect to the District of Columbia, the mayor of the District of Columbia) determines that such extended eligibility is not in the best interest of the member or the State.
“(b) Contribution by State.— (1) The Secretary may charge a State for the costs of providing coverage under the TRICARE program to members of the National Guard of the State and the dependents of the members pursuant to subsection (a). Such charges shall be paid from the funds of the State or from any other non-Federal funds.
“(2) Any amounts received by the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the appropriation available for the Defense Health Program Account under section 1100 of this title, shall be merged with sums in such Account that are available for the fiscal year in which collected, and shall be available under subsection (b) of such section, including to carry out subsection (a) of this section.
“(c) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘disaster response duty’ means duty performed by a member of the National Guard in State status pursuant to an emergency declaration by the Governor of the State (or, with respect to the District of Columbia, the mayor of the District of Columbia) in response to a disaster or in preparation for an imminent disaster.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1076e the following new item:
(a) In general.—Chapter 13 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
Ҥ 519. Prospective payment of funds necessary to provide medical care
“(a) Prospective payment required.—In lieu of the reimbursement required under section 1085 of title 10, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall make a prospective payment to the Secretary of Defense of an amount that represents the actuarial valuation of treatment or care—
“(1) that the Department of Defense shall provide to members of the Coast Guard, former members of the Coast Guard, and dependents of such members and former members (other than former members and dependents of former members who are a Medicare-eligible beneficiary or for whom the payment for treatment or care is made from the Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Care Fund) at facilities under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense or a military department; and
“(b) Amount.—The amount of the prospective payment under subsection (a) shall be—
“(1) in the case of treatment or care to be provided to members of the Coast Guard and their dependents, derived from amounts appropriated for the operating expenses of the Coast Guard;
(b) Clerical amendment.—The analysis for chapter 13 of title 14, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
(c) Repeal.—Section 217 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–120), as amended by section 3504, and the item relating to that section in the table of contents in section 2 of such Act, are repealed.
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(1) conduct a comprehensive review of the prescribing practices at military treatment facilities of pharmaceutical agents for the treatment of post-traumatic stress;
(a) Mefloquine.—In providing health care to members of the Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall require—
(b) Process and review.—
(1) PROCESS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, in providing health care to members of the Armed Forces, the Secretary shall develop a standardized process to document the screening for contraindications and patient education, including a prior authorization form, to be used by all medical providers prescribing mefloquine for malaria prophylaxis.
(2) ANNUAL REVIEW.—The Secretary shall conduct an annual review of each mefloquine prescription at all military medical treatment facilities to evaluate the documentation of the assessment for contraindications, justification for not using other chemoprophylaxis, and patient education for the safe use of mefloquine and its side effects.
(c) Adverse health effects of mefloquine.—The Secretary of Defense shall expand the missions of the Hearing Center of Excellence, the Vision Center of Excellence, the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury (including the Deployment Health Clinical Center), and the Center for Deployment Health Research to include, as appropriate, improving the clinical evaluation, diagnosis, management, and epidemiological study of adverse health effects among members of the Armed Forces following exposure to mefloquine.
(a) Rates of reimbursement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—In furnishing applied behavior analysis under the TRICARE program to individuals described in paragraph (2) during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, and ending on December 31, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the reimbursement rates for providers of applied behavior analysis are not less than the rates that were in effect on March 31, 2016.
(2) INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED.—Individuals described in this paragraph are individuals who are covered beneficiaries (as defined in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code) by reason of being a member or former member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps, including the reserve components thereof, or a dependent of such a member or former member.
(b) Analysis.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Upon the completion of the Department of Defense Comprehensive Autism Care Demonstration, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs shall conduct an analysis to—
(A) use data gathered during the demonstration to set future reimbursement rates for providers of applied behavior analysis under the TRICARE program; and
(c) Funding.—
(1) INCREASE.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 1405 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4501, for Private Sector Care is hereby increased by $32,000,000.
(2) OFFSET.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated in section 4301 for operation and maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (Line 300) is hereby reduced by $32,000,000.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall develop a methodology that identifies which members and units of the military services are at high risk of suicide.
(b) Mental Health Resources.—
(1) HIGH RISK MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY SERVICES.—The Secretary of Defense shall use the results under subsection (c) to—
(2) PREVENTATIVE MENTAL HEALTH CARE.—The Secretary of Defense shall use the results under subsection (c) to—
(c) Methodology.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall develop a methodology to assess the rate of suicide and suicide attempts of members of the military services of units that have been deployed in support of a contingency operation after September 11, 2001.
(d) Reports.—Not later than September 30, 2017, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate a report on the activities carried out under this section and the effectiveness of such activities.
(e) Restriction on use of information.—Information disclosed or obtained pursuant to the provisions of this section may be used by officers, employees, and contractors of the Department of Defense only for the purposes of, and to the extent necessary in, carrying out this section.
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for advanced development for research, development, test, and evaluation for the Defense Health Program, not more than $25,000,000 may be used to award grants to medical researchers and universities to support research into early detection of chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
In furnishing health care and medical treatment to members of the Armed Forces who have incurred injuries from improvised explosive devices and other blast-related events, the Secretary of Defense shall consider using non-invasive technologies that increase blood flow to areas of reduced circulation, including through the use of active oscillating negative pressure treatment.
(a) Study required.—The Secretary of Defense shall carry out a long-term study of career helicopter and tiltrotor pilots to assess potential links between the operation of helicopter and tiltrotor aircraft and acute and chronic medical conditions experienced by such pilots.
(b) Elements.—The study under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(a) Authority to establish pilot program.—The Secretary of Defense may conduct a pilot program to evaluate whether, in carrying out the TRICARE pharmacy benefits program under section 1074g of title 10, United States Code, extending additional discounts for prescription drugs filled at retail pharmacies will maintain or reduce prescription drug costs for the Department of Defense.
(b) Elements of pilot program.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall require that for prescription medications, including but not limited to non-generic maintenance medications, that are dispensed to retired TRICARE beneficiaries that are not Medicare eligible, through any TRICARE participating retail pharmacy, including small business pharmacies, manufacturers shall pay rebates such that those medications are available to the Department at the lowest rate available. In addition to utilizing the authority under section 1074g(f) of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary shall have the authority to enter into a purchase blanket agreement with prescription drug manufactures for supplemental discounts for prescription drugs dispensed in the pilot to be paid in the form of manufactures rebates.
(d) Duration of pilot program.—If the Secretary carries out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall commence such pilot program no later than October 1, 2017, and may terminate such program no later than September 30, 2018.
(e) Reports.—If the Secretary carries out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, including the House and Senate Committees on Armed Services, reports on the pilot program as follows:
(1) Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report containing an implementation plan for the pilot program.
(2) Not later than 180 days after the date on which the pilot program commences, an interim report on the pilot program.
(3) Not later than 90 days after the date on which the pilot program terminates, a final report describing the results of the pilot program, including any recommendations of the Secretary to expand such program. The final report will include—
(A) an analysis of the changes in prescription drug costs for the Department related to the pilot program;
(a) Study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a study on the feasibility of placing in a conspicuous location at each urgent care clinic of a military medical treatment facility, pharmacy of such a facility, and emergency room of such a facility an electronic sign that displays the current average wait time for a patient to be seen by a qualified medical professional or to receive a filled prescription, as the case may be.
(2) DETERMINATION OF CERTAIN WAIT TIMES.—For purposes of conducting the study under paragraph (1) with respect to urgent care clinics and emergency rooms, the average wait time that would be displayed shall be—
(A) determined by calculating, for the four-hour period preceding the calculation, the average length of time beginning at the time of the arrival of a patient and ending at the time at which the patient is first seen by a doctor of medicine, a doctor of osteopathy, a physician assistant, or an advanced registered nurse practitioner; and
(b) Report.—Not later than March 1, 2017, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report on the study conducted under subsection (a)(1), including the estimated costs for displaying the wait times as described in such subsection.
Not later than November 1, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the feasibility of furnishing acupuncture services and chiropractic services under the TRICARE program to beneficiaries who are retired members of the uniformed services (not including any dependent of such a retired member).
Section 1080 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1000; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) shall not apply to reports submitted by the Secretary of Defense to Congress under section 721 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2294).
The Office of Health of the Department of Defense shall work in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health to—
(a) Studies.—With respect to programs of the Department of Defense that dispense drugs to patients, the Secretary of Defense (referred to in this section as the “Secretary”) shall study the feasibility, the effectiveness in preventing the diversion of opioid medications, and the cost-effectiveness of—
Section 196 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (c)(1)(B), by striking “of the Major Range and Test Facility Base, including with respect to the expansion, divestment, consolidation, or curtailment of activities,” and inserting the following: “that comprise the Major Range and Test Facility Base and other facilities and resources used to support the acquisition programs of the Department of Defense”;
(2) in subsection (d)(2)(E)—
(3) in subsection (f)—
(B) in paragraph (1)—
(i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking “modification of the test” and all that follows through “activities,” and inserting “change of the test and evaluation facilities and resources that comprise the Major Range and Test Facility Base and other facilities and resources used to support the acquisition programs of the Department of Defense”;
(4) in subsection (i)—
(B) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) The term ‘significant change’ means—
“(A) any action that will limit or preclude a test and evaluation capability from fully performing its intended purpose;
(a) Allowable profit.—Section 2326(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(2) If a contractor submits a qualifying proposal to definitize an undefinitized contractual action and the contracting officer for such action definitized the contract after the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date on which the contractor submitted the qualifying proposal, the head of the agency concerned shall ensure that the profit allowed on the contract accurately reflects the cost risk of the contractor as it existed on the date the contractor submitted the qualifying proposal.”.
(b) Foreign military sales.—Section 2326 of such title is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): “(f) Foreign military sales.—A contracting officer of the Department of Defense may not enter into an undefinitized contractual action for a foreign military sale unless the contractual action provides for agreement upon contractual terms, specifications, and price by the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date on which the contractor submits a qualifying proposal to definitize such terms, specifications, and price. This subsection may be waived in the same manner as subsection (b) may be waived under subsection (b)(4).”.
(a) Revision to current requirements.—Section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by redesignating subsections (e), (h), (i), and (j) as subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and
(3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c): “(c) Inventory.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall implement a method for inventory of Department of Defense contracts for services. The method implemented under this subsection shall provide the capability to— “(A) make appropriate comparisons of contractor and Government civilian full-time equivalent employees for the purpose of informing sourcing decisions and workforce planning in compliance with section 129a of this title; “(B) distinguish between different types of services contracts, including contracts for labor or staff augmentation and other types of services contracts;
(b) Implementation of inventory method.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall implement a method for inventory of Department of Defense contracts for services, as required by subsection (c) of section 2330a, as amended by subsection (a). In implementing the method, the Secretary shall use methods and systems, including time-and-attendance systems, or combinations of methods and systems, in existence as of the date of the enactment of this Act, as determined appropriate by the Secretary.
(c) Submission to Congress.—Not later than the end of the third quarter of each fiscal year, through fiscal year 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a summary of the inventory reporting activities performed by each military department, each combatant command, and each Defense Agency, during the preceding fiscal year pursuant to contracts for services (and pursuant to contracts for goods to the extent services are a significant component of performance as identified in a separate line item of a contract) for or on behalf of the Department of Defense.
(d) Conforming amendments.—
(1) Section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, is further amended—
(2) Section 235(b) of such title is amended—
Section 884 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 948; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(2) by striking “that is predominately” and all that follows through “price” and inserting “described in subsection (b)”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(b) Source selection criteria described.—For purposes of subsection (a), the source selection criteria described in this subsection are criteria— “(1) that are predominately based on technical qualifications of the item and not predominately based on price;
(a) Repeal of retroactive applicability.—Section 803(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1485; 10 U.S.C. 2324 note) is amended by striking “amendments made by” and all that follows and inserting “amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to costs of compensation incurred after January 1, 2012, under contracts entered into on or after December 31, 2011.”.
Section 818 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (3) of subsection (c)—
(B) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking “trusted suppliers in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to subparagraph (C) or (D) who” and inserting “suppliers that meet anticounterfeiting requirements in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to subparagraph (C) or (D) and that”;
(C) in subparagraphs (A)(ii) and (A)(iii), by striking “trusted suppliers” each place it appears and inserting “suppliers that meet anticounterfeiting requirements”;
Section 1903(a) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
(3) by adding after paragraph (2) the following new paragraphs:
“(3) in support of a request from the Secretary of State or the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development to facilitate the provision of international disaster assistance pursuant to chapter 9 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2292 et seq.); or
“(4) in support of an emergency or major disaster (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)).”.
Section 418 of title 37, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(d) (1) In the case of athletic footwear needed by members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps upon their initial entry into the armed forces, the Secretary of Defense shall furnish such footwear directly to the members instead of providing a cash allowance to the members for the purchase of such footwear.
“(2) In procuring athletic footwear to comply with paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense shall comply with the requirements of section 2533a of title 10, without regard to the applicability of any simplified acquisition threshold under chapter 137 of title 10 (or any other provision of law).
(a) Requirement.—Section 2330a of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 803, is further amended by adding by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(h) Request for services contract approval.— (1) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall— “(A) ensure that Department of Defense Instruction 1100.22, Guidance for Manpower Mix, is modified to incorporate policies establishing a standard checklist to be completed ensuring the appropriate alignment of workload to the private sector prior to the issuance of a solicitation for any new contract for services or exercising an option under an existing contract for services, including services provided under a contract for goods; and “(B) in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, ensure that such policies and checklist are incorporated by reference or otherwise into the Service Requirements Review Board processes established under Department of Defense Instruction 5000.74 and into the pre-solicitation requirements of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement.
(b) Army model.—In implementing section 2330a(g) of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness shall model, to the maximum extent practicable, its policies and checklist on the policies and checklist relating to services contract approval established and in use by the Department of the Army (as set forth in the request for services contract approval form updated as of August 2012, or any successor form).
Section 808 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1489), as most recently amended by section 813 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3429) is further amended—
Section 801(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 804; 10 U.S.C. 2514 note) is amended by striking “2017” and inserting “2021”.
Section 2432(f) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “45” the first place it occurs and inserting “10”.
(a) Amendments.—Section 2334 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking “selection of confidence levels” both places it appears and inserting “discussion of risk”;
(2) in subsection (a)(6)—
(3) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), and (h), respectively;
(4) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsection (b): “(b) Independent cost estimate required before approval.— (1) A milestone decision authority may not approve the system development and demonstration, or production and deployment, of a major defense acquisition program, major automated information system program, or major subprogram unless an independent cost estimate of the full life-cycle cost of the program or subprogram has been conducted or approved by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation and considered by the milestone decision authority. “(2) The regulations governing the content and submission of independent cost estimates required by subsection (a) shall require that the independent cost estimate of the full life-cycle cost of a program or subprogram include—
(5) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, in paragraph (3), by striking “confidence level” and inserting “discussion of risk”;
(6) in subsection (e), as so redesignated—
(A) by amending the subsection heading to read as follows: “Discussion of risk in cost estimates.—”;
(7) by inserting after subsection (f), as so redesignated, the following new subsection: “(g) Guidelines and collection of cost data.— (1) The Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall, in consultation with the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, develop policies, procedures, guidance, and a collection method to ensure that acquisition cost data are collected in a standardized format that facilitates cost estimation and comparison across acquisition programs. “(2) The program manager and contracting officer for each major defense acquisition program, major automated information system program, and major subprogram, in consultation with the cost estimating component of the relevant military department or Defense Agency, shall ensure that cost data are collected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (1) for any acquisition program in an amount greater than $100,000,000.
(b) Conforming amendments to add subprograms.—Section 2334 of such title is further amended—
(2) in paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) of subsection (a) and in subsection (c)(1) (as redesignated by subsection (a) of this section), by striking “major defense acquisition programs and major automated information system programs” and inserting “major defense acquisition programs, major automated information system programs, and major subprograms” each place it appears;
(3) in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (d) (as so redesignated), and in subsection (f)(4) (as so redesignated), by striking “major defense acquisition program or major automated information system program” and inserting “major defense acquisition program, major automated information system program, or major subprogram” each place it appears;
(4) in subsection (d)(4) (as so redesignated), by inserting before the period “or major subprogram”;
Section 2366b(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Requirement for review.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the extent to which sustainment matters are considered in decisions related to the requirements, acquisition, cost estimating, and programming and budgeting processes for major defense acquisition programs. The review shall include the following:
(1) A determination of whether information related to the operation and sustainment of major defense acquisition programs, including cost data, is available to inform decisions made during those processes.
(2) If such information exists, an evaluation of the completeness, timeliness, quality, and suitability of the information for aiding in decisions made during those processes.
(3) A determination of whether information related to the operation and sustainment of existing major weapon systems is used to forecast the operation and sustainment needs of major weapon systems proposed for or under development.
(4) A description of the potential benefits from improved completeness, timeliness, quality, and suitability of data on operation and support costs and increased consideration of such data.
(6) An assessment of product support strategies for major weapon systems required by section 2337 of title 10, United States Code, or other similar life-cycle sustainment strategies, including an evaluation of—
(7) An assessment of how effectively the military departments consider sustainment matters at key decision points for acquisition and life-cycle management in accordance with the requirements of sections 2431a, 2366a, 2366b, and 2337 of title 10, United States Code and section 832 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 2430 note).
(b) Contract with independent entity.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall enter into a contract with an independent entity with appropriate expertise to conduct the review required by subsection (a). The contract also shall require the entity to provide to the Secretary a report on the findings of the entity.
(c) Briefing.—Not later than March 1, 2017, the Secretary shall provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives on the preliminary findings of the independent entity.
(d) Submission to Congress.—Not later than August 1, 2017, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of the report of the independent entity, along with comments on the report, proposed revisions or clarifications to laws related to life-cycle management or sustainment planning for major weapon systems, and a description of any actions the Secretary may take to revise or clarify regulations related to life-cycle management or sustainment planning for major weapon systems.
Section 2377 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e), and in that subsection by striking “subsection (c)” and inserting “subsections (c) and (d)”; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d): “(d) Market research for price analysis.—The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that procurement officials in the Department of Defense conduct or obtain market research to support the determination of the reasonableness of price for commercial items contained in any bid or offer submitted in response to an agency solicitation. To the extent necessary to support such market research, the procurement official for the solicitation—
Subsection 2379(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2):
“(2) An offeror may submit information or analysis relating to the value of a commercial item to aid in the determination of the reasonableness of the price of such item. A contracting officer may consider such information or analysis in addition to the information submitted pursuant to paragraphs (1)(A) and (1)(B).”.
Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 2380 of title 10, United States Code, are amended to read as follows:
“(1) establish and maintain a centralized capability with necessary expertise and resources to provide assistance to the military departments and Defense Agencies in making commercial item determinations, conducting market research, and performing analysis of price reasonableness for the purposes of procurements by the Department of Defense; and
(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may carry out a pilot program, to be known as a “commercial solutions opening pilot program”, under which innovative commercial items may be acquired through a competitive selection of proposals resulting from a general solicitation and the peer review of such proposals.
(b) Treatment as competitive procedures.—Use of general solicitation competitive procedures for the pilot program under subsection (a) shall be considered to be use of competitive procedures for purposes of chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code.
(c) Limitations on funding.—
(d) Limitation relating to major defense acquisition program systems.—The Secretary may not acquire innovative commercial items under the pilot program to replace a system under a major defense acquisition program in its entirety.
(e) Guidance.—The Secretary shall issue guidance for the implementation of the pilot program under this section within the Department of Defense. Such guidance shall be issued in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget and shall be posted for access by the public.
(f) Reports required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than six months after the initiation of the pilot program, and every six months thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the activities the Department of Defense carried out under the pilot program.
(2) ELEMENTS OF REPORT.—The report under this subsection shall include the following:
(B) An assessment of the ability under the pilot program to attract proposals from nontraditional defense contractors (as defined in section 2302(9) of title 10, United States Code).
(a) Review.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of the bid protest processes related to major defense acquisition programs. The review shall examine the extent to which—
(1) the incidence and duration of bid protests have increased or decreased during the previous decade;
(3) there are differences in the incidence and outcomes of bid protests filed by incumbent and non-incumbent contractors;
(b) Contract with independent entity.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an independent entity with appropriate expertise to conduct the review required in subsection (a).
(a) Report.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall deliver, not later than March 31, 2018, a report to Congress on the use by the Department of Defense of indefinite delivery contracts entered into during fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
(b) Elements.—The report under subsection (a) shall address, at a minimum, the following:
(1) A review of Department of Defense policies for using indefinite delivery contracts, including requirements for competition.
(2) The number and value of all indefinite delivery contracts entered into by the Department of Defense.
(3) An assessment of the number and value of indefinite delivery contracts entered into by the Department of Defense that included competition between multiple vendors.
(a) Review required.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of contractual flow-down provisions related to major defense acquisition programs. The review shall—
(1) identify the flow-down provisions that exist in the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement;
(3) examine the extent to which clauses in contracts with the Department of Defense are being applied inappropriately in subcontracts under the contracts;
(4) assess the applicability of flow-down provisions for the purchase of commodity items that are acquired in bulk for multiple acquisition programs;
(b) Contract.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an independent entity with appropriate expertise to conduct the review required by subsection (a).
(c) Briefing.—Not later than March 1, 2017, the Secretary, or his designee, shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on interim findings of the independent entity as well as initial recommendations of the entity on how to modify or eliminate contractual flow-down requirements that the entity considers burdensome or unnecessary.
(a) Review required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall conduct a review of the policy, guidance, regulations, and training related to specifications included in information technology acquisitions to ensure current policies eliminate the unjustified use of potentially anti-competitive specifications. In conducting the review, the Under Secretary shall examine the use of brand names or proprietary specifications or standards in solicitations for procurements of goods and services, as well as the current acquisition training curriculum related to those areas.
(a) Functions of Chief Acquisition Officer.—Section 56(c) of title 14, United States Code, is amended by striking “and” after the semicolon at the end of paragraph (8), striking the period at the end of paragraph (9) and inserting “; and”, and adding at the end the following:
“(10) (A) keeping the Commandant informed of the progress of major acquisition programs (as that term is defined in section 581);
(b) Customer service mission of directorate.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 15 of title 14, United States Code, is amended—
(B) in section 562, by repealing subsection (b) and redesignating subsections (c) through (g) as subsections (b) through (f), respectively;
(C) in section 563, by striking “Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010, the Commandant shall commence implementation of” and inserting “The Commandant shall maintain”;
(D) by adding at the end of section 564 the following:
“(c) Acquisition of unmanned aerial systems.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commandant—
“(A) may not award a contract for design of an unmanned aerial system for use by the Coast Guard; and
(E) in subchapter II, by adding at the end the following:
Ҥ 578. Role of Vice Commandant in major acquisition programs
“The Vice Commandant—
Ҥ 579. Extension of major acquisition program contracts
“(a) In general.—Notwithstanding section 564(a)(2) of this title and section 2304 of title 10, and subject to subsections (b) and (c) of this section, the Secretary may acquire additional units procured under a Coast Guard major acquisition program contract, by extension of such contract without competition, if the Comptroller General of the United States determines that the costs that would be saved through award of a new contract in accordance with such sections would not exceed the costs of such an award.
“(b) Limitation on number of additional units.—The number of additional units acquired under a contract extension under this section may not exceed the number of additional units for which such determination is made.
“(c) Determination of costs upon request.—The Comptroller General shall, at the request of the Secretary, determine for purposes of this section—
(c) Review required.—
(1) REQUIREMENT.—The Commandant of the Coast Guard shall conduct a review of—
(A) the authorities provided to the Commandant in chapter 15 of title 14, United States Code, and other relevant statutes and regulations related to Coast Guard acquisitions, including developing recommendations to ensure that the Commandant plays an appropriate role in the development of requirements, acquisition processes, and the associated budget practices;
(2) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2017, the Commandant shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing, at a minimum, the following:
(3) MODIFICATION OF POLICIES, DIRECTIVES, AND REGULATIONS.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall modify the acquisition policies, directives, and regulations of the Coast Guard as necessary to ensure the development and implementation of a customer-oriented acquisition system, pursuant to the review under paragraph (1)(C).
(d) Analysis of using multiyear contracting.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—No later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate an analysis of the use of multiyear contracting, including procurement authority provided under section 2306b of title 10, United States Code, and authority similar to that granted to the Navy under section 121(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1648) and section 150 of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (Public Law 111–242; 124 Stat. 3519), to acquire any combination of at least five—
Section 2308(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Authority.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of the Navy may close out the contracts described in subsection (b) through the issuance of one or more modifications to such contracts without completing further reconciliation audits or corrective actions other than those described in this section. To accomplish closeout of such contracts—
(b) Contracts covered.—The contracts covered by this section are a group of contracts that are with one contractor and identified by the Secretary, each one of which is a contract—
(2) with respect to which the Secretary of the Navy has established the total final contract value; and
(3) with respect to which the Secretary of the Navy has determined that the final allowable cost may have a negative or positive unliquidated obligation balance for which it would be difficult to determine the year or type of appropriation because—
(B) the records for the contract are available but the contracting officer, in collaboration with the certifying official, has determined that a discrepancy is of such a minimal value that the time and effort required to determine the cause of an out-of-balance condition is disproportionate to the amount of the discrepancy.
(a) Additional procurement limitation.—Section 2534(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(b) Implementation.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(k) Implementation of auxiliary ship component limitation.—Subsection (a)(6) applies only with respect to contracts awarded by the Secretary of a military department for new construction of an auxiliary ship after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 using funds available for National Defense Sealift Fund programs or Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy.”.
Subsection (d)(2)(D) of section 1705 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “$400,000,000” the following: “except that, in the case of fiscal year 2017, the Secretary may reduce the amount to $0”.
Section 893(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; Stat. 952) is amended—
The Department of Defense shall select service providers for auditing services and audit readiness services based on the best value to the Department, as determined by the resource sponsor for an auditing contract, rather than based on the lowest price technically acceptable service provider.
(a) Repeal of simplified justification and approval process.—Section 811 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2405; 41 U.S.C. 3304 note) is repealed.
(b) Requirements for justification and approval process.—
(1) DEFENSE PROCUREMENTS.—Section 2304(f)(2)(D)(ii) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting “only if such procurement is for property or services in an amount less than $20,000,000” before the semicolon at the end.
(2) CIVILIAN PROCUREMENTS.—Section 3304(e)(4) of title 41, United States Code, is amended—
(B) in subparagraph (D), by striking “or section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)).” and inserting “; or”; and
(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(E) the procurement is for property or services in an amount less than $20,000,000 and is conducted under section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)).”.
Not later than February 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing on the use and implementation of the two-phase design-build selection procedures. The briefing shall address the following:
(1) How the Department of Defense continues to implement the updates to the Federal Acquisition Regulation that implemented the 2015 amendments to section 2305a, title 10, United States Code.
(2) A list of instances in which the Department awarded a design-build contract pursuant to section 2305a of title 10, United States Code, that had more than five finalists for phase-two requests for proposals during fiscal year 2016, and the list of design-build requests for proposals that used a one-step process.
No Department of Defense function that is performed by Department of Defense civilian employees and is tied to a certain military base may be converted to performance by a contractor until the Secretary of Defense conducts an assessment to determine if the Department of Defense has carried out sufficient outreach programs to assist small business concerns owned and controlled by women (as such term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(D))) and small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals (as such term is defined in section 8(d)(3)(C) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)(C))) that are located in the geographic area near the military base.
The Comptroller General of the United States shall include in the annual report to Congress on the Government Accountability Office each year a list of the most common grounds for sustaining protests relating to bids for contracts during such year.
Section 901(a)(1) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” Mckeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3462; 10 U.S.C. 132a note) is amended by striking “February 1, 2017” and inserting “February 1, 2018”.
(a) Statement of policy.—It shall be the policy of the Department of Defense to avoid using lowest price technically acceptable source selection criteria in inappropriate circumstances that potentially deny the Department the benefits of cost and technical tradeoffs in the source selection process.
(b) Requirement for Solicitations.—For new solicitations issued on or after the date that is 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, lowest price technically acceptable source selection criteria shall be used only in situations in which—
(1) the Department of Defense is able to comprehensively and clearly describe the minimum requirements expressed in term of performance objectives, measures, and standards that will be used to determine acceptability of offers;
(2) the Department would realize no, or minimal, value from a contract proposal exceeding the minimum technical or performance requirements set forth in the request for proposal;
(3) the proposed technical approaches will require no, or minimal, subjective judgment by the source selection authority as to the desirability of one offeror’s proposal versus a competing proposal;
(4) a review of technical proposals of offerors other than the lowest bidder would result in no, or minimal, benefit to the Department; and
(5) the contracting officer has included a justification for the use of a lowest price technically acceptable evaluation methodology in the contract file, if the contract to be awarded is predominately for the acquisition of information technology services, systems engineering and technical assistance services, or other knowledge-based professional services.
(c) Avoidance of use of Lowest Price Technically Acceptable source selection criteria in procurements of information technology and auditing.—To the maximum extent practicable, the use of lowest price technically acceptable source selection criteria shall be avoided when the procurement is predominately for the acquisition of information technology services, systems engineering and technical assistance services, audit or audit readiness services, or other knowledge-based professional services.
(d) Reporting.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 3 years, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the number of instances in which lowest-price technically acceptable source selection criteria is used, including an explanation of how the criteria was considered when making a determination to use lowest price technically acceptable source selection criteria.
(a) Study.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall carry out a study on the number and types of contracts for the procurement of goods or services for the Department of Defense awarded to minority-owned and women-owned businesses during fiscal years 2010 through 2015. In conducting the study, the Comptroller General shall identify minority-owned businesses according to the categories identified in the Federal procurement data system (described in section 1122(a)(4)(A) of title 41, United States Code).
It is the sense of Congress that the following principles should be adhered to in any reform of the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986:
(2) The role of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in providing independent military advice, as the principal military advisor to the President and the Secretary of Defense, must be preserved.
(3) Any changes to the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986 should be rooted in a clear identification and understanding of the issues and the objectives and ramifications of any changes.
(4) Any changes to the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986 should enhance the capabilities of the United States Armed Forces.
(5) Each Geographical Unified Command has its own distinct area of emphasis and expertise, as well as requirements and responsibilities. Combining Northern Command and Southern Command, or combining European Command and Africa Command, would severely degrade mission effectiveness, but would provide only marginal increased efficiency. Additionally, consolidating Geographic Unified Commands would cause unacceptable risk to both global strategic influence as well as regional capability, and would exacerbate already significant capacity challenges.
(a) Establishment.—There is hereby established a commission to be known as the “Commission on the National Defense Strategy for the United States”. The purpose of the commission is to examine and make recommendations with respect to national defense strategy for the United States.
(b) Composition.—
(1) MEMBERSHIP.—The commission shall be composed of 12 members appointed as follows:
(A) Three members appointed by the chair of the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives.
(c) Duties.—
(1) REVIEW.—The commission shall review the current national defense strategy of the United States, including the assumptions, missions, force posture and capabilities, and strategic and military risks associated with the strategy.
(2) ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—The commission shall conduct a comprehensive assessment of the strategic environment, the size and shape of the force, the readiness of the force, the posture and capabilities of the force, the allocation of resources, and strategic and military risks to provide recommendations on national defense strategy for the United States.
(d) Cooperation from Government.—
(e) Report.—
(1) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than December 1, 2017, the commission shall submit to the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report on the commission’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations. The report shall address, but not be limited to, each of the following:
(A) The strategic environment, including security challenges, and the national security interests of the United States.
(B) The military missions for which the Department of Defense should prepare and the force planning construct.
(C) The roles and missions of the Armed Forces to carry out those missions and the roles and capabilities provided by other United States Government agencies and by allies and international partners.
(2) INTERIM BRIEFING.—Not later than June 1, 2017, the commission shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a briefing on the status of its review and assessment, and include a discussion of any interim recommendations.
Subsection (g) of section 113 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(g) Defense strategic and policy guidance.—
“(1) DEFENSE STRATEGIC GUIDANCE.—The Secretary of Defense, with the advice and assistance of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall provide every four years to the heads of the military departments, the unified and specified combatant commands, all other Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities, and any other elements of the Department of Defense named in paragraphs (1) to (10) of section 111(b) of this title, written strategic guidance expressing the national defense strategy of the United States. The strategic guidance shall—
“(A) support the most recent national security strategy report of the President under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043);
“(B) be a mechanism for—
“(i) setting priorities for sizing and shaping the force, guiding the development and sustainment of capabilities, allocating resources, and adjusting the organization of the Department of Defense to respond to changes in the strategic environment;
“(ii) monitoring, assessing, and holding accountable agencies within the Department of Defense for the development of policies and programs that support the national defense strategy;
“(C) provide a comprehensive discussion of—
“(i) the assumed strategic environment, including security challenges, and the assumed or defined prioritized national security interests and objectives of the United States;
“(ii) the prioritized military missions for which the Department of Defense must prepare and the assumed force planning scenarios and constructs;
“(iii) the roles and missions of the armed forces to carry out those missions, and the assumed roles and capabilities provided by other United States Government agencies and by allies and international partners;
“(2) POLICY GUIDANCE ON DEVELOPMENT OF FORCES.—In implementing the guidance in paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense, with the advice and assistance of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall provide annually to the heads of the military departments, the unified and specified combatant commands, all other Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities, and any other elements of the Department of Defense named in paragraphs (1) to (10) of section 111(b) of this title, written policy guidance for the preparation and review of the program recommendations and budget proposals of their respective components to guide the development of forces. Such guidance shall include—
“(B) the prioritized military missions of the Department of Defense, including the assumed force planning scenarios and constructs;
“(C) the force size and shape, posture, capabilities, readiness, infrastructure, organization, personnel, and other elements of the defense program necessary to support the strategy;
“(3) POLICY GUIDANCE ON CONTINGENCY PLANNING.—In implementing the guidance in paragraph (1), the Secretary of Defense, with the approval of the President and after consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, shall provide, every two years or more frequently as needed, to the Chairman written policy guidance for the preparation and review of contingency plans, including plans for providing support to civil authorities in an incident of national significance or a catastrophic incident, for homeland defense, and for military support to civil authorities. Such guidance shall include guidance on the employment of forces, including specific force levels and specific supporting resource levels projected to be available for the period of time for which such plans are to be effective.
“(4) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.— (A) Not later than February 15th in any calendar year in which any of the written guidance in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) is required, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a copy of such guidance developed under such paragraphs.
“(B) In addition, not later than February 15th in any calendar year in which the written guidance in paragraph (1) is required, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a detailed summary of any classified aspects of the strategic guidance, including assumptions regarding the strategic environment; military missions; force planning scenarios and constructs; force size, shape, posture, capabilities, and readiness; and any additional or alternative views of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.”.
Paragraph (1) of section 153(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(1) NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY.— (A) The Chairman shall determine each even-numbered year whether to prepare a new National Military Strategy in accordance with this subparagraph or to update a strategy previously prepared in accordance with this subsection. The Chairman shall provide such National Military Strategy or update to the Secretary of Defense in time for transmittal to Congress pursuant to paragraph (3), including in time for inclusion of the report of the Secretary of Defense, if any, under paragraph (4).
“(B) Each National Military Strategy (or update) under this paragraph shall be based on a comprehensive review conducted by the Chairman in conjunction with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the commanders of the unified and specified combatant commands. Each update shall address only those parts of the most recent National Military Strategy for which the Chairman determines, on the basis of this review, that a modification is needed.
“(C) Each National Military Strategy (or update) submitted under this paragraph shall describe how the military will support the objectives of the United States as articulated in—
“(i) the most recent National Security Strategy prescribed by the President pursuant to section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043);
“(ii) the most recent annual report of the Secretary of Defense submitted to the President and Congress pursuant to section 113 of this title;
Section 1064(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 989) is amended—
(a) Amendments.—Section 152(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “a term of two years” and all that follows through the end and inserting the following: “a term of four years, beginning on October 1 of a year that is three years following a year evenly divisible by four. The limitation of this paragraph on the length of term does not apply in time of war.”; and
Section 153(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
Section 162(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Grade of service or functional component commander.—Section 164(e) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph:
(b) Definitions.—Section 164 of such title is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(h) Definitions.—For purposes of this section—
“(1) a service component command is subordinate to the commander of a unified command and consists of the service component commander and the service forces (such as individuals, units, detachments, and organizations, including the support forces), as assigned by the Secretary of Defense, that have been assigned to that combatant commander; and
“(2) a functional component command is a command normally, but not necessarily, composed of forces of two or more military departments which may be established across the range of military operations to perform particular operational missions that may be of short duration or may extend over a period of time.”.
(c) Reduction in positions.—
(1) REDUCTION.—The Secretary of Defense shall reduce the total number of officers in the grade of general or admiral on active duty by five positions.
(2) REPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on how the Department of Defense plans to implement the reductions required by paragraph (1), including how to balance and reduce the total number of general officers and flag officers in accordance with sections 525 and 526 of title 10, United States Code.
(d) Treatment of current commanders.—An officer serving on the date of the enactment of this Act as a commander of a service or functional component command under a commander of a combatant command shall serve in that position until the appointment of another officer in accordance with the amendment made by subsection (a).
(a) Establishment of cyber command.—Chapter 6 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 169. Unified combatant command for cyber operations
“(a) Establishment.—With the advice and assistance of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the President, through the Secretary of Defense, shall establish under section 161 of this title a unified combatant command for cyber operations forces (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ‘cyber command’). The principal function of the command is to prepare cyber operations forces to carry out assigned missions.
“(b) Assignment of forces.—Unless otherwise directed by the Secretary of Defense, all active and reserve cyber operations forces of the armed forces stationed in the United States shall be assigned to the cyber command.
“(c) Grade of commander.—The commander of the cyber operations command shall hold the grade of general or, in the case of an officer of the Navy, admiral while serving in that position, without vacating his permanent grade. The commander of such command shall be appointed to that grade by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, for service in that position.
“(d) Command of activity or mission.— (1) Unless otherwise directed by the President or the Secretary of Defense, a cyber operations activity or mission shall be conducted in coordination with the command of the commander of the unified combatant command in whose geographic area the activity or mission is to be conducted.
“(e) Authority of combatant commander.— (1) In addition to the authority prescribed in section 164(c) of this title, the commander of the cyber command shall be responsible for, and shall have the authority to conduct, all affairs of such command relating to cyber operations activities.
“(2) The commander of such command shall be responsible for, and shall have the authority to conduct, the following functions relating to cyber operations activities (whether or not relating to the cyber command):
“(B) Preparing and submitting to the Secretary of Defense program recommendations and budget proposals for cyber operations forces and for other forces assigned to the cyber command.
“(C) Exercising authority, direction, and control over the expenditure of funds—
“(ii) for cyber operations forces assigned to unified combatant commands other than the cyber command, with respect to all matters covered by section 807 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 886; 10 U.S.C. 2224 note) and, with respect to a matter not covered by such section, to the extent directed by the Secretary of Defense.
“(f) Intelligence and special activities.—This section does not constitute authority to conduct any activity which, if carried out as an intelligence activity by the Department of Defense, would require a notice to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives under title V of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.).”.
(a) Minimum length of assignment.—Section 664(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “assignment—” and paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting “ assignment shall not be less than two years.”.
(b) Repeal of requirements relating to initial assignment of certain officers and Average tour lengths.—Section 664 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (c) and (e).
(c) Exclusions from tour length.—Section 664(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(e) Constructive credit.—Section 664(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(f) Clerical and conforming amendments.—Section 664 of title 10, United States Code, is further amended—
(1) by redesignating subsections (d), (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
(2) in subsection (c), as redesignated, by striking “subsection (f)(3)” and inserting “subsection (d)(2)”;
(3) in subsection (d), as redesignated, by striking “subsection (g)” and inserting “subsection (e)”;
(a) Definition of joint matters.—Paragraph (1) of section 668(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(1) In this chapter, the term ‘joint matters’ means matters related to any of the following:
“(A) The development or achievement of strategic objectives through the synchronization, coordination, and organization of integrated forces in operations conducted across domains, such as land, sea, or air, in space, or in the information environment, including matters relating to any of the following:
(b) Definition of integrated forces.—Section 668(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended in the matter preceding subparagraph (A)—
(a) Assessment required.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a contract with an independent entity with appropriate expertise to conduct an assessment on combatant command structure, and to provide recommendations for improving the overall effectiveness of combatant command structures.
(b) Elements.—The assessment shall include an examination of the following:
(1) The evolution of combatant command requirements and resources over the last 15 years of conflict.
(3) The resources of combatant commands, including the degree to which combatant commands are adequately resourced and the degree to which combatant command requirements for forces are met.
(a) Modifications to report to Congress.—Section 2228(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting after “2009” the following: “and ending with the budget submitted on or before January 31, 2021”;
(b) Report to Director of Corrosion Policy and Oversight.—Section 2228(e)(2) of such title is amended—
(2) by striking “a copy of” and all that follows through the period and inserting “a summary of the most recent report required by subparagraph (B)”; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(B) Not later than December 31 of each year, through December 31, 2020, the corrosion control and prevention executive of a military department shall submit to the Director of Corrosion Policy and Oversight a report containing recommendations pertaining to the corrosion control and prevention program of the military department. Such report shall include recommendations for the funding levels necessary for the executive to carry out the duties of the executive under this section. The report required under this subparagraph shall—
(c) Conforming repeal.—Section 903(b) of Public Law 110–417 (10 U.S.C. 2228 note) is amended by striking paragraph (5).
Section 1595(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
Section 129a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(g) Guidelines for performance of certain functions by military personnel.— (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), no functions performed by civilian personnel or contractors may be converted to performance by military personnel unless—
“(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the following functions:
“(B) Functions related to—
“(ii) specialized collective and individual training requiring military-unique knowledge and skills based on recent operational experience;
(a) Release of inspector general of the Department of Defense administrative misconduct reports.—Section 141 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Within 60 days after issuing a final report, the Inspector General of the Department of Defense shall publicly release any reports of administrative investigations that confirm misconduct, including violations of Federal law and violations of policies of the Department of Defense, of members of the Senior Executive Service, individuals who are employed in positions of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or commissioned officers in the Armed Forces in pay grades O–6 promotable and above. In releasing the reports, the Inspector General shall ensure that information that would be protected under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the ‘Freedom of Information Act’), section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the ‘Privacy Act of 1974’), or section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is not disclosed.”.
(b) Release of inspector general of the army administrative misconduct reports.—Section 3020 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(f) Within 60 days after issuing a final report, the Inspector General of the Army shall publicly release any reports of administrative investigations that confirm misconduct, including violations of Federal law and violations of policies of the Department of Defense, of members of the Senior Executive Service, individuals who are employed in positions of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or commissioned officers in the Armed Forces in pay grades O–6 promotable and above. In releasing the reports, the Inspector General shall ensure that information that would be protected under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the ‘Freedom of Information Act’), section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the ‘Privacy Act of 1974’), or section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is not disclosed.”.
(c) Release of Naval inspector general administrative misconduct reports.—Section 5020 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(e) Within 60 days after issuing a final report, the Naval Inspector General shall publicly release any reports of administrative investigations that confirm misconduct, including violations of Federal law and violations of policies of the Department of Defense, of members of the Senior Executive Service, individuals who are employed in positions of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or commissioned officers in the Armed Forces in pay grades O–6 promotable and above. In releasing the reports, the Naval Inspector General shall ensure that information that would be protected under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the ‘Freedom of Information Act’), section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the ‘Privacy Act of 1974’), or section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is not disclosed.”.
(d) Release of inspector general of the air force administrative misconduct reports.—Section 8020 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(f) Within 60 days after issuing a final report, the Inspector General of the Air Force shall publicly release any reports of administrative investigations that confirm misconduct, including violations of Federal law and violations of policies of the Department of Defense, of members of the Senior Executive Service, individuals who are employed in positions of a confidential or policy-determining character under schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or commissioned officers in the Armed Forces in pay grades O–6 promotable and above. In releasing the reports, the Inspector General shall ensure that information that would be protected under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the ‘Freedom of Information Act’), section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the ‘Privacy Act of 1974’), or section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is not disclosed.”.
(a) Limitation of Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency to missing persons from past conflicts.—Section 1501(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting “from past conflicts” after “matters relating to missing persons”;
(2) in paragraph (2)—
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The National Security Council has increasingly micromanaged military operations and centralized decisionmaking within the staff of the National Security Council. The size of the staff has contributed this problem.
(2) As stated by former Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, “It was the operational micromanagement that drove me nuts of White House and [National Security Council] staffers calling senior commanders out in the field and asking them questions, second guessing commanders”, and by another former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, “[B]ecause of that centralization of that authority at the White House, there are too few voices being heard in terms of the ability to make decisions and that includes members of the cabinet.”.
(3) Gates stated, “You have 25 people working on a single military problem... They are going to be doing things they shouldn’t be doing,” and Panetta noted, “The National Security Council has grown enormously, which means you have a lot more staff people running around at the White House on these foreign policy issues.”.
(4) Press reports indicate that National Security Council micromanagement has included selecting targets in ongoing military operations, specifying detailed parameters and limitations on military operations, and managing military planning and the execution of plans.
(5) As stated in section 101(a) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3021(a)), the “function of the Council shall be to advise the President with respect to the integration of domestic, foreign, and military policies relating to the national security so as to enable the military services and the other departments and agencies of the Government to cooperate more effectively in matters involving the national security”.
(6) As stated in the November 1961 staff reports and recommendations on “Organizing for National Security” submitted to the Committee on Government Operations of the Senate by the Subcommittee on National Policy Machinery, “The Council is an interagency committee: It can inform, debate, review, adjust, and validate... The Council is not a decisionmaking body; it does not itself make policy. It serves only in an advisory capacity to the President, helping him arrive at decisions which he alone can make.”.
(7) As noted in the 1987 Report of the President’s Special Review Board (commonly known as the “Tower Commission Report”), “As a general matter, the [National Security Council] staff should not engage in the implementation of policy or the conduct of operations. This compromises their oversight role and usurps the responsibilities of the departments and agencies.”.
(8) As noted in the “Addendum on Structure and Process Analyses: Volume II – Executive Office of the President,” accompanying the February 2001 U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century (commonly known as the “Hart-Rudman Commission”), “[T]he degree to which the [National Security Council] gets involved in operational issues raises a question of congressional oversight. Today there is limited congressional oversight of the [National Security Council]... Assigning the [National Security Council] greater operational responsibility would likely result in calls for more congressional oversight and legislative control...”.
(9) According to analysis from the Brookings Institution’s National Security Council Project, the size of the National Security Council staff from the early 1960s to the mid-1990s remained consistently under 60 personnel. Since then, it has grown significantly in size.
(10) As former National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, wrote in “The NSC’s Midlife Crisis” in Foreign Policy, Winter 1987–1988, “There is no magic number, but it would appear that for successful strategic planning and policy coordination 30-40 senior staff members are probably adequate. However, to ensure effective supervision over policy implementation as well, the size of the staff should be somewhat larger. An optimal figure for the senior staff probably would be about 50 senior staff members.”.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the function of the National Security Council, consistent with the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), is to advise the President as an independent honest broker on national security matters, to coordinate national security activities across departments and agencies, and to make recommendations to the President regarding national security objectives and policy, and the size of the staff of the National Security Council should be appropriately aligned to this function;
(2) the President is entitled to privacy in the Office of the President and to a confidential relationship with the National Security Advisor and the National Security Council; and
(3) however, a National Security Council, enabled by a large staff, that assumes a central policymaking or operational role is no longer advisory and should be publicly accountable to the American people through Senate confirmation of its leadership and the activities of the Council subject to direct oversight by Congress.
(c) Amendments to National Security Act of 1947.—Section 101 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3021), is amended—
(2) in subsection (c), by striking “shall receive compensation at the rate of $10,000 a year.” and inserting “shall report to, and be under the general supervision of, the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.”;
(4) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection: “(d) (1) (A) Except as provided by subparagraph (B), the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs shall be appointed by the President. “(B) If the staff of the Council exceeds 100 covered employees at any point during a term of the President, and for the duration of such term (without regard to any changes to the number of such covered employees), the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. “(2) (A) Beginning on the date on which the staff of the Council exceeds 100 covered employees, the person appointed as the Assistant under paragraph (1)(A), the person nominated by the President to be appointed the Assistant under paragraph (1)(B), or any other person designated by the President to serve as the Assistant in an acting capacity, may serve in an acting capacity for no longer than 210 days. “(3) The President shall notify Congress in writing not more than seven days after the date on which the staff of the Council exceeds 100 covered employees.
(d) Conforming amendment.—Section 3(12) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6402(12)) is amended by striking “section 101(i)” and inserting “section 101(l)”.
(a) Redesignation of Military Department.—The military department designated as the Department of the Navy is redesignated as the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps.
(b) Redesignation of Secretary and Other Statutory Offices.—
(1) SECRETARY.—The position of the Secretary of the Navy is redesignated as the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.
(2) OTHER STATUTORY OFFICES.—The positions of the Under Secretary of the Navy, the four Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy are redesignated as the Under Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps, and the General Counsel of the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps, respectively.
(a) Definition of “Military Department”.—Paragraph (8) of section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(b) Organization of Department.—The text of section 5011 of such title is amended to read as follows: “The Department of the Navy and Marine Corps is separately organized under the Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps.”.
(c) Position of Secretary.—Section 5013(a)(1) of such title is amended by striking “There is a Secretary of the Navy” and inserting “There is a Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps”.
(e) Other Amendments.—
(1) Title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Department of the Navy” and “Secretary of the Navy” each place they appear other than as specified in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) (including in section headings, subsection captions, tables of chapters, and tables of sections) and inserting “Department of the Navy and Marine Corps” and “Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps”, respectively, in each case with the matter inserted to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter stricken.
(2) (A) Sections 5013(f), 5014(b)(2), 5016(a), 5017(2), 5032(a), and 5042(a) of such title are amended by striking “Assistant Secretaries of the Navy” and inserting “Assistant Secretaries of the Navy and Marine Corps”.
(B) The heading of section 5016 of such title, and the item relating to such section in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 503 of such title, are each amended by inserting “and Marine Corps” after “of the Navy”, with the matter inserted in each case to be in the same typeface and typestyle as the matter amended.
(a) Title 37, United States Code.—Title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking “Department of the Navy” and “Secretary of the Navy” each place they appear and inserting “Department of the Navy and Marine Corps” and “Secretary of the Navy and Marine Corps”, respectively.
(b) Other References.—Any reference in any law other than in title 10 or title 37, United States Code, or in any regulation, document, record, or other paper of the United States, to the Department of the Navy shall be considered to be a reference to the Department of the Navy and Marine Corps. Any such reference to an office specified in section 2(b) shall be considered to be a reference to that officer as redesignated by that section.
This subtitle and the amendments made by this subtitle shall take effect on the first day of the first month beginning more than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) Authority to transfer authorizations.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this division for fiscal year 2017 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof). Amounts of authorizations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(b) Limitations.—The authority provided by subsection (a) to transfer authorizations—
(a) Transfer required.—During fiscal year 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer, from amounts available in the Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund from amounts credited to the Fund pursuant to section 1705(d)(2) of title 10, United States Code, $475,000,000 to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in the general fund of the Treasury.
Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report ranking all military departments and Defense Agencies in order of how advanced they are in achieving auditable financial statements as required by law. The report should not include information otherwise available in other reports to Congress.
Section 1033(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85; 111 Stat. 1881), as most recently amended by section 1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 963), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2017” and inserting “September 30, 2019”.
(a) In general.—Section 901 of the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–469; 32 U.S.C. 112 note) is amended—
Section 1021 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2042), as most recently amended by section 1011(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 962), is further amended—
The Secretary of Defense shall coordinate unmanned aerial systems training missions along the southern border of the United States in order to support the Department of Homeland Security’s counter-narcotic trafficking efforts.
(a) Increase.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated for drug interdiction and counterdrug activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4501 is hereby increased by $3,000,000.
(b) Offset.—Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in the funding tables in division D, the amount authorized to be appropriated for operation and maintenance, as specified in the corresponding funding table in section 4301, for administration and servicewide activities, Defense Logistics Agency (Line 160) is hereby reduced by $3,000,000.
The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the effectiveness of the United States Southern Command Operation to limit threats to the national security of the United States by detecting and monitoring drug trafficking, specifically heroin and fentanyl.
Section 7299a(c)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “six months” and inserting “10 months”.
(a) In general.—Chapter 633 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 7318. Warranty requirements for shipbuilding contracts
“(a) Requirement.—A contracting officer for a contract for which funds are expended from the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy account shall require, as a condition of the contract, that the work performed under the contract is covered by a warranty for a period of at least one year.
“(b) Waiver.—If the contracting officer for a contract covered by the requirement under subsection (a) determines that a limited liability of warranted work is in the best interest of the Government, the contracting officer may agree to limit the liability of the work performed under the contract to a level that the contracting officer determines is sufficient to protect the interests of the Government and in keeping with historical levels of warranted work on similar vessels.”.
(a) Transfer authority.—Section 1022(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3487), as amended by section 1022(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92), is further amended by striking “or 2017” and inserting “2017, or 2018”.
(b) Authority for multiyear procurement of critical components to support continuous production.—Section 2218a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection (i): “(i) Authority for multiyear procurement of critical components to support continuous production.— (1) To implement the continuous production of critical components, the Secretary of the Navy may use funds deposited in the Fund, in conjunction with funds appropriated for the procurement of other nuclear-powered vessels, to enter into one or more multiyear contracts (including economic ordering quantity contracts), for the procurement of critical contractor-furnished and Government-furnished components for national sea-based deterrence vessels. The authority under this subsection extends to the procurement of equivalent critical parts, components, systems, and subsystems common with and required for other nuclear-powered vessels. “(2) Any contract entered into pursuant to paragraph (1) shall provide that any obligation of the United States to make a payment under the contract is subject to the availability of appropriations for that purpose and that the total liability to the Government for the termination of the contract shall be limited to the total amount of funding obligated for the contract as of the date of the termination.”.
(a) Limitation on retirement or inactivation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 may be obligated or expended—
(2) to place in a modernization status more than six cruisers and one dock landing ship identified in section 1026(a)(2) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3490).
(b) Hull, mechanical, and electrical modernization.—Not more than 75 percent of the funds made available for the Office of the Secretary of Defense for fiscal year 2017 may be obligated until the Secretary of the Navy—
(1) enters into a contract for the modernization industrial period associated with four cruisers and one dock landing ship referred to in section 1026(a)(2) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3490); and
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 485 of title 10, United States Code is amended by striking “quarterly” and inserting “monthly”.
No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2017, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release to or within the United States, its territories, or possessions of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or any other detainee who—
(a) In general.—No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2017, to construct or modify any facility in the United States, its territories, or possessions to house any individual detained at Guantanamo for the purposes of detention or imprisonment in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense unless authorized by Congress.
(b) Exception.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any modification of facilities at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(c) Individual detained at Guantanamo defined.—In this section, the term “individual detained at Guantanamo” has the meaning given that term in section 1034(f)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 971; 10 U.S. C. 801 note).
No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense may be used during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2017, to transfer, release, or assist in the transfer or release of any individual detained in the custody or under the control of the Department of Defense at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the custody or control of any country, or any entity within such country, as follows:
No amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 may be used—
Section 130f of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following: “(d) Sensitive military operation defined.—In this section, the term ‘sensitive military operation’ means an operation— “(1) conducted by the United States armed forces outside the United States, whether conducted by the United States acting alone or cooperatively; “(2) conducted pursuant to— “(A) the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541); or
(a) In general.—Not later than July 19, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence, submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report setting forth the details of a comprehensive strategy for the detention of current and future individuals captured and held pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40) pending the end of hostilities.
(b) Comprehensive strategy.—The comprehensive detention strategy required by subsection (a) shall contain the following:
(1) A policy and plan applicable to individuals lawfully detained under the effective control of the United States.
(c) Form.—The comprehensive detention strategy required under subsection (b) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(a) In general.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall—
(1) complete a declassification review of intelligence reports prepared by the National Counterterrorism Center prior to Periodic Review Board sessions or detainee transfers on the past terrorist activities of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who were transferred or released from United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay;
(2) make available to the public any information declassified as a result of the declassification review; and
(b) Past terrorist activities.—For purposes of this section, the past terrorist activities of an individual shall include the terrorist activities conducted by the individual before the transfer of the individual to the detention facility at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, including, at a minimum, the following:
(a) Prohibition.—No order, ruling, finding, or other determination of a military commission may be construed or implemented to prohibit or restrict a member of the Armed Forces from carrying out duties otherwise lawfully assigned to such member to the extent that the basis for such prohibition or restriction is the gender of such member.
(b) Applicability to prior orders, Etc.—In the case of an order, ruling, finding, or other determination described in subsection (a) that was issued before the date of the enactment of this Act in a military commission and is still effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act, such order, ruling, finding, or determination shall be deemed to be vacated and null and void only to the extent of any prohibition or restriction on the duties of members of the Armed Forces that is based on the gender of members.
(c) Military commission defined.—In this section, the term “military commission” means a military commission established under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code, and any military commission otherwise established or convened by law.
(a) Transportation of allied and civilian personnel and cargo.—Subsection (c) of section 2649 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Commercial insurance.—Such section is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(d) Commercial insurance.—The Secretary may enter into a contract or other arrangement with one or more commercial providers to make insurance products available to non-Department of Defense shippers using the Defense Transportation System to insure against the loss or damage of the shipper’s cargo. Any such contract or arrangement shall provide that—
Section 1090 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 111–92; 129 Stat. 1016) is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
“(b) Limitation on retirement of MCM ships.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of the Navy for fiscal year 2017 may be obligated or expended to retire, deactivate, decommission, to prepare to retire, deactivate, decommission, or to place in storage backup inventory or reduced operating status any MCM-1 class ship.
“(2) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy may waive the limitation under paragraph (1) with respect to any MCM-1 class ship if the Secretary provides to the congressional defense committees certification that the operational test and evaluation for replacement capabilities for the ship is complete and such capabilities are available in sufficient quantities to ensure sufficient mine countermeasures capacity is available to meet requirements as set forth in the Join Strategic Capabilities Plan, the campaign plans of the combatant commanders, and the Navy’s Force Structure Assessment.
“(B) REPORT.—The first time the Secretary of the Navy exercises the waiver authority under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes—
“(ii) the recommendations of the Secretary regarding how to ensure the operational effectiveness of the surface MCM force through 2025 based on current capabilities and capacity, replacement schedules, and service life extensions or retirement schedules;
Section 44310(b) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking “December 31, 2018” and inserting “December 31, 2019”.
(a) Mandatory possession or wear date.—The Secretary of the Navy shall change the mandatory possession or wear date of the alternate combination cover or the unisex combination cover from October 31, 2016, to October 31, 2020.
(b) Evaluation and report.—The Secretary of the Navy may not implement or enforce any change to Navy female service dress uniforms until the Secretary submits to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the evaluation of the Navy female service dress uniforms. Such evaluation shall include each of the following:
(1) An identification of the operational need addressed by the alternate combination cover or the unisex combination cover.
(2) An assessment of the individual cost of service dress uniform items to members of the Armed Forces as a percentage of their monthly pay.
Section 1004 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–74; 47 U.S.C. 921 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(d) Protection of certain Federal spectrum operations.—If the report required by subsection (a) determines that reallocation and auction of the spectrum described in the report would harm national security by impacting existing terrestrial Federal spectrum operations at the Nevada Test and Training Range, the Commission, in coordination with the Secretary shall, prior to the auction described in subsection (c)(1)(B), establish rules for licensees in such spectrum sufficient to mitigate harmful interference to such operations.
“(e) Rule of construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect any requirement under section 1062(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (47 U.S.C. 921 note; Public Law 106–65).”.
(a) Availability of transportation.—Section 2641b of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection (f): “(f) Special priority for certain disabled veterans.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall provide transportation on scheduled and unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility Command on a space-available basis for any member or former member of the armed forces with a disability rated as total on the same basis as such transportation is provided to members of the armed forces entitled to retired or retainer pay.
(a) Statement of policy.—It shall be the policy of the Department of Defense that flyovers of public events in support of community relations activities may only be flown as part of an approved training mission at no additional expense to the Federal Government.
(b) National guard flyover approval process.—The Adjutant General of a State in which an Army National Guard or Air National Guard unit is based will be the approval authority for all Air National Guard and Army National Guard flyovers in that State, including any request for a flyover in any civilian domain at a nonaviation related event.
(c) Flyover record maintenance; report.—
(1) RECORD MAINTENANCE.—The Secretary of Defense shall keep and maintain records of flyover requests, approvals, and the total costs of all flyover missions, including the costs of fuel, maintenance, and manpower, in a publicly accessible database that is updated annually.
(2) GAO REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate a report on flyovers and the process whereby flyover requests are made and evaluated, including—
(d) Flyover defined.—In this section, the term “flyover” means aviation support—
(a) In general.—Section 552(f)(1) of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act), is amended by inserting “and the National Security Council” after “the Executive Office of the President”.
(b) Effective date; application.—
(1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date on which the first Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, pursuant to section 101(d)(1)(B) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3021(d)(1)(B)), as added by title IX of this Act.
Section 2576a of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(g) Preference for border security purposes.— (1) In transferring the personal property described in paragraph (2) under this section, the Secretary of Defense may give first preference to the Department of Homeland Security and then to Federal and State agencies that agree to use the property primarily for the purpose of strengthening border security along the southern border of the United States.
(a) Exceptions to reports termination provision.—Section 1080 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1000; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) does not apply to any report required to be submitted to Congress by the Department of Defense, or by any officer, official, component, or element of the Department, pursuant to a provision of law specified in this section, notwithstanding the enactment of the reporting requirement by an annual national defense authorization Act or the inclusion of the report in the list of reports prepared by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to subsection (c) of such section 1080.
(b) Final termination date for submittal of exempted reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), each report required pursuant to a provision of law specified in this section that is still required to be submitted to Congress as of January 31, 2021, shall no longer be required to be submitted to Congress after that date.
(2) REPORTS EXEMPTED FROM TERMINATION.—The termination dates specified in paragraph (1) and section 1080 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 do not apply to the following:
(A) The submission of the reports on the National Military Strategy and Risk Assessment under section 153(b)(3) of title 10, United States Code.
(B) The submission of the future-years defense program (including associated annexes) under section 221 of title 10, United States Code.
(C) The submission of the future-years mission budget for the military programs of the Department of Defense under section 221 of such title.
(D) The submission of audits of contracting compliance by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense under section 1601(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 2533a note).
(c) Reports required by title 10, United States Code.—Subject to subsection (b), subsection (a) applies to reporting requirements contained in the following sections of title 10, United States Code:
(1) Section 127b(f), relating to a report on the administration of Department of Defense rewards program against international terrorism.
(2) Section 127d(d), relating to a report on provision of logistic support, supplies, and services to allied forces participating in combined operations.
(3) Section 139(h), relating to a report on operational test and evaluation activities of the Department of Defense, including the report component required by section 2399(g) on operational test and evaluation of defense acquisition programs.
(4) Section 139b(d), relating to a report on activities of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Developmental Test and Evaluation.
(6) Section 179(f), relating to reports and assessments regarding nuclear stockpile and stockpile stewardship program.
(7) Section 196(d), relating to a report on the strategic plan reflecting the needs of the Department of Defense with respect to test and evaluation facilities and resources.
(8) Section 229, relating to submission of budget information regarding Department of Defense programs for combating terrorism.
(9) Section 231, relating to submission of naval vessel construction plan and related certification.
(10) Section 238, relating to submission of a budget justification display regarding cyber mission forces.
(11) Section 401(d), relating to a report on the provision of humanitarian and civic assistance in conjunction with military operations.
(15) Section 1557(e), relating to a report on any failure to achieve timeliness standard for disposition of applications before Corrections Boards.
(16) Section 2011(e), relating to a report on training of special operations forces with friendly foreign forces.
(17) Section 2166(i), relating to a report on the activities of the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation.
(18) Section 2218(h), relating to submission of budget requests for the National Defense Sealift Fund.
(19) Section 2228(e), relating to a report on the long-term strategy and related matters regarding reducing corrosion and its effects on military equipment and infrastructure.
(21) Section 2249c(c), relating to a report on the administration of the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program.
(22) Section 2275, relating to reports on major satellite acquisition programs, including report updates under subsection (f) of such section.
(23) Section 2276(e), relating to a report on the funds, services, and equipment accepted and used in connection with commercial space launch cooperation.
(24) Section 2445b, relating to submission of budget justification documents regarding major automated information system programs and other major information technology investment programs.
(26) Section 2466(d), relating to a report on expenditures for performance of depot-level maintenance and repair workloads.
(27) Section 2561(c), relating to a report on the use of humanitarian assistance for providing transportation of humanitarian relief and for other humanitarian purposes.
(28) Section 2684a(g), relating to a report on projects undertaken under agreements to limit encroachments and other constraints on military training, testing, and operations.
(29) Section 2687a, relating to reports on the status of overseas closures and realignments and master plans, expenditures from the Department of Defense Overseas Facility Investment Recovery Account, and agreement of settlement with host countries regarding the release of facility improvements made by the United States.
(32) Sections 2884(b) and (c), relating to reports on the Department of Defense Housing Funds, provision of a basic allowance for housing to members of the Armed Forces living in military privatized housing, plans for housing privatization activities, and the status of oversight and accountability measures for military housing privatization projects.
(34) Section 2925, relating to reports on Department of Defense energy management and operational energy.
(35) Section 4721(e), relating to submission of a budget request and related materials regarding Army National Military Cemeteries.
(36) Section 7310(c), relating to a report on repairs and maintenance performed on certain naval vessels in a foreign shipyard.
(d) Reports required by National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015.—Subject to subsection (b), subsection (a) applies to reporting requirements contained in the following sections of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291):
(1) Section 232(e) (10 U.S.C. 2358 note), relating to a report on the pilot program on assignment to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency of certain private sector personnel.
(2) Section 546(d) (10 U.S.C. 1561 note), relating to a report on activities of the Defense Advisory Committee on Investigation, Prosecution, and Defense of Sexual Assault in the Armed Forces.
(3) Section 1003 (10 U.S.C. 221 note), relating to reporting of balances carried forward by the Department of Defense at the end of each fiscal year.
(4) Section 1026(d) (128 Stat. 3490), relating to a report on the status of the modernization of Ticonderoga-class cruisers and dock landing ships.
(5) Section 1055 (128 Stat. 3498), relating to a report on the Air Force response to the recommendations of the National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force.
(6) Section 1204(b) (10 U.S.C. 2249e note), relating to a report on administration of section 2249e of title 10, United States Code.
(7) Section 1205(e) (128 Stat. 3537), relating to a report on the assessment of programs carried out under section 2282(f) of title 10, United States Code.
(8) Section 1206(e) (10 U.S.C. 2282 note), relating to a report on the training of security forces and associated security ministries of foreign countries to promote respect for the rule of law and human rights.
(9) Section 1207(d) (10 U.S.C. 2342 note), relating to a report on loan of personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment to military forces of foreign nations.
(10) Section 1211 (128 Stat. 3544), relating to a report on programs carried out by the Department of Defense to provide training, equipment, or other assistance or reimbursement to foreign security forces.
(11) Section 1225 (128 Stat. 3550), relating to a report on enhancing security and stability in Afghanistan.
(12) Section 1245 (128 Stat. 3566), relating to a report on military and security developments involving the Russian Federation.
(13) Section 2821(a)(3) (10 U.S.C. 2687 note), relating to notice of any adjustment to the funding limitation on implementation of the Record of Decision for the relocation of Marine Corps forces to Guam.
(e) Reports required by National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.—Subject to subsection (b), subsection (a) applies to reporting requirements contained in the following sections of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66):
(1) Section 704(e) (10 U.S.C. 1074 note), relating to a report on the pilot program on investigational treatment of members of the Armed Forces for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder.
(2) Sections 713(f), (g), and (h) (10 U.S.C. 1071 note), relating to providing a financial summary of efforts to develop interoperable electronic health records, updates on the progress of data sharing, and information on executive committee activities.
(f) Reports required by National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.—Subject to subsection (b), subsection (a) applies to reporting requirements contained in the following sections of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239):
(g) Reports required by National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011.—Subject to subsection (b), subsection (a) applies to reporting requirements contained in the following sections of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383):
(1) Section 123 (10 U.S.C. 167 note), relating to a report on use of combat mission requirements funds.
(2) Section 1631(d) (10 U.S.C. 1561 note), relating to a report on sexual assaults involving members of the Armed Forces and improvement to sexual assault prevention and response program.
(h) Reports required by National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010.—Subject to subsection (b), subsection (a) applies to reporting requirements contained in the following sections of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84):
(1) Section 711(d) (10 U.S.C. 1071 note), relating to a report on the comprehensive policy on pain management by the Military Health Care System.
(2) Section 1003(b) (10 U.S.C. 2222 note), relating to a report on implementation by the Department of Defense of the Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness Plan.
(i) Reports required by Other laws.—Subject to subsection (b), subsection (a) applies to reporting requirements contained in the following provisions of law:
(1) Section 717(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104–106; 10 U.S.C. 1073 note), relating to a report on TRICARE Program effectiveness.
(2) Section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), relating to a report on military and security developments involving the People's Republic of China.
(3) Section 1208(f) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), relating to a report on the provision of support for special operations to combat terrorism.
(4) Section 1405(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 10 U.S.C. 801 note), relating to a report on any modification made to the procedures for status review of detainees outside the United States.
(5) Section 1017(e) of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 10 U.S.C. 2631 note), relating to a report regarding overhaul, repair, and maintenance performed on certain vessels in the United States.
(6) Section 1034(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 309), relating to a report on the provision of support for non-Federal development and testing of material for chemical agent defense.
(7) Section 1236 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1641), relating to a report on military and security developments involving the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
(8) Section 103A(b)(3) of the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670c–1(b)(3)), relating to a report on the disposition of certain appropriated funds provided under cooperative and interagency agreements for land management on installations.
(9) Section 1511(h) of the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 (24 U.S.C. 411(h)), relating to a report on the financial and other affairs of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.
(10) Section 901(f) of the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 (Public Law 109–469; 32 U.S.C. 112 note), as added by section 1008 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239), relating to a report on the activities of the National Guard counterdrug schools.
(11) Section 14 of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98h–5), relating to a report on the requirements of the National Defense Stockpile.
(12) Sections 1412(i) and (j) of the National Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521), as amended by section 1421 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383), relating to reports on destruction of existing stockpile of lethal chemical agents and munitions, including implementation by the United States of its chemical weapons destruction obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention.
(13) Section 1703 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (50 U.S.C. 1523), relating to a report on chemical and biological warfare defense.
(14) Section 234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (50 U.S.C. 2367), relating to a report on acquisition of technology relating to weapons of mass destruction and their threat.
(15) Section 105A(b) of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (52 U.S.C. 20308(b)), as added by section 586 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84), relating to a report on effectiveness of activities and utilization of certain procedures under Federal Voting Assistance Program.
(j) Conforming amendment.—Section 1080(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1000; 10 U.S.C. 111 note) is amended—
Section 127b(h) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Notification requirement.—Not later than 15 days after notice of any theft, loss, or release of a biological select agent or toxin involving the Department of Defense is provided to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, as specified by section 331.19 of part 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees notice of such theft, loss, or release.
(b) Elements.—Notice of a theft, loss, or release of a biological select agent or toxin under subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) The name of the agent or toxin and any identifying information, including the strain or other relevant characterization information.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written report on common service support contributed from each of the military services toward special operations forces. Such report shall include—
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly prepare and submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on military units that have been assigned to policing or citizen security responsibilities in Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador.
(b) Matters to be included.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) The following information, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, with respect to military units assigned to policing or citizen security responsibilities in each of Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador:
(A) The proportion of individuals in each such country’s military who participate in policing or citizen security activities relative to the total number of individuals in that country’s military.
(B) Of the military units assigned to policing or citizen security responsibilities, the types of units conducting police activities.
(c) Form.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.
(d) Public availability.—The unclassified matter of the report required by subsection (a) shall be posted on a publicly available Internet website of the Department of Defense and a publicly available Internet website of the Department of State.
(e) Appropriate congressional committees.—In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a biennial report on the counterproliferation activities and programs of the Department of Defense. The Secretary shall submit the first such report by not later than May 1, 2017.
(b) Matters included.—Each report required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) A complete list and assessment of existing and proposed capabilities and technologies for support of United States nonproliferation policy and counterproliferation policy, with regard to—
(2) For the existing and proposed capabilities and technologies identified under paragraph (1), an identification of goals, a description of ongoing efforts, and recommendations for further enhancements.
(3) A complete description of requirements and priorities for the development and deployment of highly effective capabilities and technologies, including identifying areas for capability enhancement and deficiencies in existing capabilities and technologies.
(a) In general.—Paragraph (2)(A) of section 153(c) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting before the period the following: “, including the integrated priorities list requirements for ballistic missile defense by the geographic combatant commands and the prioritized capabilities list for ballistic missile defense developed by the Commander of the United States Strategic Command”.
(a) Review and report to the congressional defense committees.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every two years thereafter until January 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of a comprehensive review conducted by the Secretary and the Chairman of all uses by the Department of Defense of spectrum. Such review shall include the use of spectrum in military plans, training, test, and in military capabilities that are in development or have been fielded for any known or potential impacts of sharing or repurposing of spectrum used or allocated to be used by the Department of Defense that may be reallocated or shared pursuant to a spectrum auction, sharing arrangement, or other arrangement, or that is otherwise identified as part of the 10-year plan developed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, and whether there are known or possible mitigations in the event of reallocation or sharing that they recommend, including exclusion zones, equipment modifications, development or procurement of new technology, or any other mitigation they believe will protect Department of Defense use of such spectrum, including projected or estimated potential costs of the same, and whether such costs will be borne out of Defense of Defense total obligation authority.
(b) Certification.—At the time of the submission of the report required under subsection (a), the Secretary and the Chairman shall both certify that they understand any potential impacts to Department of Defense use of spectrum that could result from a spectrum auction, reallocation, or sharing arrangement as of that date, and submit such certification to the congressional defense committees.
(c) Report of non-concurrence or veto.—The Secretary of Defense shall notify the congressional defense committees as to whether the Secretary has not concurred with or otherwise objected to the most recent version of the 10-year plan developed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration not later than 30 days after the date of such non-concurrence or other objection.
(d) Funding withheld.—The Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff may not obligate more than 95 percent of the funding authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 for operation and maintenance for headquarters operations before the date that is 30 days after the date on which the report required by subsection (a) and the certification required under subsection (b) are submitted to the congressional defense committees.
(a) Annual report required.—Section 10504 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking “Report.—” and inserting “Report on State of the National Guard.—(1)”;
(3) by striking “annual report of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau” and inserting “annual report required by paragraph (1)”; and
(4) by adding at the end the following new subsection (b): “(b) Annual report on Non-Federalized service National Guard personnel, training, and equipment requirements.— (1) Not later than January 31 of each of calendar years 2017 through 2021, the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the officials specified in paragraph (5) a report setting forth the personnel, training, and equipment required by the National Guard during the next fiscal year to carry out its mission, while not Federalized, to provide prevention, protection mitigation, response, and recovery activities in support of civilian authorities in connection with natural and man-made disasters. “(2) To determine the annual personnel, training, and equipment requirements of the National Guard referred to in paragraph (1), the Chief of the National Guard Bureau shall take into account, at a minimum, the following: “(3) Personnel, training, and equipment requirements shall be collected from the States, validated by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, and be categorized in the report required by paragraph (1) by each of the following: “(4) The annual report required by paragraph (1) shall be prepared in consultation with the chief executive of each State, other appropriate civilian authorities, and the Council of Governors.
(b) Clerical amendments.—
(2) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 1011 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 10504 and inserting the following new section:
“10504. Chief of the National Guard Bureau: annual reports.”.
(a) Briefing.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide a briefing to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on the Department of the Air Force’s process and reasoning for using proximity to primary medium commercial hub airports as part of the mission criteria for the Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center headquarters strategic basing process.
(b) Contents of briefing.—The briefing under subsection (a) will specifically address the rationale behind the distance categories used to allocate points under this mission criteria referred to in subsection (a), and shall provide references to any existing government guidance that supports use of these distance categories. In addition, the briefing shall include an analysis regarding the reasons why the Department did not consider commuting times as a more equitable way of determining proximity to commercial hub airports that would account for the impact of different traffic conditions across the candidate locations.
(a) Report to congress.—Not later than April 1, 2018, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains the findings of an assessment of all operational minehunting Synthetic Aperture Sonar (hereinafter referred to as “SAS”) technologies suitable to meet the requirements for use on the Littoral Combat Ship Mine Countermeasures Mission Package.
(b) Elements.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include—
(2) specific details regarding the capabilities of all in-production SAS systems available for integration into the Littoral Combat Ship Mine Countermeasure Mission Package;
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the impact of changes to existing carrier air wing force structure and the impact a potential reduction to 9 carrier air wings would have on overall fleet readiness if aircraft and personnel were to be distributed throughout the remaining 9 air wings.
(a) Report required.—Until January 31, 2020, the Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Army shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate quarterly reports—
(b) Joint Airborne Air Transportability Training contracts.—As part of each report submitted under subsection (a), the Secretaries shall specifically provide the following:
(1) The number of Joint Airborne Air Transportability Training contracts requested during the three-month period covered by the report by all units located at Fort Bragg and Pope Army Airfield.
(2) The number of Joint Airborne Air Transportability Training contracts validated during the three-month period covered by the report for units located at Fort Bragg and Pope Army Airfield.
(a) Briefing required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall brief the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives on the status of the Installation Geospatial Information and Services of the Department of Defense as it relates to the real property inventory of the Department, and the extent to which the Department has made use of the cadastral geographic information systems-based real property inventory.
(b) Matters covered.—The briefing required by subsection (a) shall, at a minimum, cover the following:
(1) The status of current policies of the Department governing real property inventories and the use of geospatial information systems, the status of real property inventory in relation to the financial improvement and audit readiness efforts of the Department, and the status of implementation of Department of Defense Instruction 8130.01, Installation Geospatial Information and Services (IGI&S).
(2) The extent to which the Department is coordinating with the Federal Geographic Data Committee, other Federal agencies, and State and local governments, and how existing Department standards and common protocols ensure that the interoperability of geospatial information complies with section 216 of the E-Government Act of 2002 (Public Law 107–347; 44 U.S.C. 3501 note) and Executive Orders 12906 and 13327.
(3) The existing real property inventories systems or any components of any cadastre currently authorized by law or conducted by the Department of Defense, the statutory authorization for such inventories or components, and the amount expended by the Federal Government for each such activity in fiscal year 2015.
(4) A discussion of the Department's ability to make this information publicly available on the Internet in a graphically geo-enabled and searchable format, and how the Department plans to prevent the disclosure of any parcel or parcels of land, any buildings or facilities on any such parcel, or any information related to any such parcel, building, or facility, if such disclosure would impair or jeopardize the national security or homeland defense of the United States.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a briefing on the adjustment and diversification assistance authorized by subsections (b) and (c) of section 2391 of title 10, United States Code. Such briefing shall include each of the following:
(1) A description of the activities and programs currently being conducted under subsections (b)(1) and (c) of such section, including a list of the recipients of grants, and amount received by each recipient, of such activities and programs in each of the five most recent fiscal years.
(2) For each of the five fiscal years preceding the fiscal year during which the briefing is conducted, separate estimates of the funding the Department of Defense has directed to activities under each of clauses (A) through (E) of paragraph (1) of subsection (b) and under subsection (c) of such section and the recipients of such funding.
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the efforts of the Department of Defense to protect the personally identifiable information of members of the Armed Forces and their families, and of employees of the Department of Defense, which shall include—
(a) Title 10, United States Code.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) Section 130h is amended by striking “subsection (a) and (b)” both places it appears and inserting “subsections (a) and (b)”.
(2) Section 187(a)(2)(C) is amended by striking “Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology” and inserting “Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics”.
(3) Section 196(c)(1)(A)(ii) is amended by striking “section 139(i)” and inserting “section 139(j)”.
(4) Subsection (b)(1)(B) of section 1415, to be added by section 633(a)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 848), is amended by adding a period at the end of clause (ii).
(b) Amendments related to elimination of title 50 appendix.—
(1) MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT CITATION CHANGES.—
(A) TITLE 10, UNITED STATES CODE.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(i) Section 101(d)(6)(B)(v) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 460(b)(2))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3809(b)(2))”.
(ii) Section 513(c) is amended—
(I) by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.)”; and
(II) by inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3806(c)(2)(A))” after “of that Act”.
(iii) Section 523(b)(7) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 460(b)(2))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3809(b)(2))”.
(iv) Section 651(a) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 456(d)(1))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3806(d)(1))”.
(v) Section 671(c)(1) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 454(a))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3803(a))”.
(vi) Section 1475(a)(5)(B) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.)”.
(vii) Section 12103 is amended—
(I) in subsections (b) and (d), by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.)” both places it appears and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.)”; and
(II) in subsection (d), by striking “section 6(c)(2)(A)(ii) and (iii) of such Act” and inserting “clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 6(c)(2)(A) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 3806(c)(2)(A))”.
(viii) Section 12104(a) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.)” both places it appears and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.)”.
(ix) Section 12208(a) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.)” both places it appears and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.)”.
(B) TITLE 37, UNITED STATES CODE.—Section 209(a)(1) of title 37, United States Code is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 456(d)(1))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3806(d)(1))”.
(2) SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT CITATION CHANGES.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(A) Section 987 is amended—
(i) in subsection (e)(2), by inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.)” before the semicolon; and
(ii) in subsection (g), by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 527)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3937)”.
(B) Section 1408(b)(1)(D) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 501 et seq.)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.)”.
(3) EXPORT ADMINISTRATION ACT OF 1979 CITATION CHANGES.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(A) Section 130(a) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2401–2420)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.)”.
(B) Section 2249a(a)(1) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)(A))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4605(j)(1)(A))”.
(C) Section 2327 is amended—
(i) in subsection (a), by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)(A))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4605(j)(1)(A))”; and
(ii) in subsection (b)(2), by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)(1)(A))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4605(j)(1)(A))”.
(D) Section 2410i(a) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2402(5)(A))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4602(5)(A))”.
(E) Section 7430(e) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et seq.)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.)”.
(4) DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT OF 1950 CITATION CHANGES.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(A) Section 139c of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(i) in subsection (b)—
(I) in paragraph (11), by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2171)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4567)”; and
(II) in paragraph (12)—
(aa) by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2062(b))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4502(b))”; and
(bb) by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.)”; and
(ii) in subsection (c), by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2170(k))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4565(k))”.
(B) Section 2537(c) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2170(a))” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4565(a))”.
(C) Section 9511(6) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2071)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4511)”.
(D) Section 9513(e) is amended by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 2071)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4511)”.
(5) MERCHANT SHIP SALES ACT OF 1946 CITATION CHANGES.—Section 2218 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(A) in subsection (c)(1)(E), by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 1744)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4405)”; and
(B) in subsection (k)(3)(B), by striking “(50 U.S.C. App. 1744)” and inserting “(50 U.S.C. 4405)”.
(c) National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016.—Effective as of November 25, 2015, and as if included therein as enacted, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92) is amended as follows:
(2) Section 883(a)(2) (129 Stat. 947) is amended by striking “such chapter” and inserting “chapter 131 of such title”.
(3) Section 883 (129 Stat. 942) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(f) Conforming amendments.— “(1) Effective on the effective date specified in subsection (a)(1) of section 901 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3462; 10 U.S.C. 132a note), section 2222 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— “(2) The second paragraph (3) of section 901(k) of such Act (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3468; 10 U.S.C. 2222 note) is repealed.”.
Section 1034 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181) is amended—
(1) in subsection (d)—
(A) by striking “report on the use of the authority under subsection (a)” and all that follows and inserting “report that includes—”
(2) in subsection (e), by striking “this section” and all that follows and inserting “this section:”
“(1) The terms ‘precursor’, ‘protective purposes’, and ‘toxic chemical’ have the meanings given those terms in the convention referred to in subsection (c), in paragraph 2, paragraph 9(b), and paragraph 1, respectively, of article II of that convention.
Section 407(c)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “$10,000,000” and inserting “$15,000,000”.
(a) Liquidation of unpaid credits.—Section 2345 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) (1) Any credits of the United States accrued as a result of the provision of logistic support, supplies, and services under the authority of this subchapter that remain unliquidated more than 18 months after the date of delivery of the logistic support, supplies, or services may, at the option of the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, be liquidated by offsetting the credits against any amount owed by the Department of Defense, pursuant to a transaction or transactions concluded under the authority of this subchapter, to the government or international organization to which the logistic support, supplies, or services were provided by the United States.
Section 9516 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(a) Strategy and implementation plan required.—The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of Agriculture shall jointly develop a national biodefense strategy and associated implementation plan, which shall include a review and assessment of biodefense policies, practices, programs and initiatives. Such Secretaries shall review and, as appropriate, revise the strategy biennially.
(b) Elements.—The strategy and associated implementation plan required under subsection (a) shall include each of the following:
(1) An inventory and assessment of all existing strategies, plans, policies, laws, and interagency agreements related to biodefense, including prevention, deterrence, preparedness, detection, response, attribution, recovery, and mitigation.
(2) A description of the biological threats, including biological warfare, bioterrorism, naturally occurring infectious diseases, and accidental exposures.
(3) A description of the current programs, efforts, or activities of the United States Government with respect to preventing the acquisition, proliferation, and use of a biological weapon, preventing an accidental or naturally occurring biological outbreak, and mitigating the effects of a biological epidemic.
(4) A description of the roles and responsibilities of the Executive Agencies, including internal and external coordination procedures, in identifying and sharing information related to, warning of, and protection against, acts of terrorism using biological agents and weapons and accidental or naturally occurring biological outbreaks.
(5) An articulation of related or required interagency capabilities and whole-of-Government activities required to support the national biodefense strategy.
(6) Recommendations for strengthening and improving the current biodefense capabilities, authorities, and command structures of the United States Government.
(c) Submittal to congress.—Not later than 275 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the strategy and associated implementation plan required by subsection (a). The strategy and implementation plan shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d) Briefings.—Not later than March 1, 2017, and annually thereafter until March 1, 2019, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of Agriculture shall provide to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives a joint briefing on the strategy developed under subsection (a) and the status of the implementation of such strategy.
(e) GAO review.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the submittal of the strategy and implementation plan under subsection (c), the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of the strategy and implementation plan to analyze gaps and resources mapped against the requirements of the National Biodefense Strategy and existing United States biodefense policy documents.
(f) Appropriate congressional committees defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(2) The Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate.
(a) Program authorized.—The Secretary of the Army shall carry out a program to support the socio-cultural understanding needs of the Department of the Army, to be known as the Global Cultural Knowledge Network.
(b) Goals.—The Global Cultural Knowledge Network shall support the following goals:
(1) Provide socio-cultural analysis support to any unit deployed, or preparing to deploy, to an exercise or operation in the assigned region of responsibility of the unit being supported.
(c) Elements of the program.—The Global Cultural Knowledge Network shall include the following elements:
(1) A center in the continental United States (referred to in this section as a “reach-back center”) to support requests for information and analysis.
(2) Outreach to academic institutions and other Federal agencies involved in social science research to increase the network of resources for the reach-back center.
(d) Directive required.—The Secretary of the Army shall issue a directive within one year after the date of the enactment of this Act for the governance of the Global Cultural Knowledge Network, including oversight and process controls for auditing the activities of personnel of the Network, the employment of the Global Cultural Knowledge Network by operation forces, and processes for requesting support by operational Army units and other Department of Defense and Federal entities.
(e) Prohibition on deployments under Global Cultural Knowledge Network.—
(2) WAIVER.—The Secretary of the Army may waive the prohibition in paragraph (1) if the Secretary submits, at least 10 days before the deployment, to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate—
(3) ELEMENTS OF WAIVER NOTICE.—A waiver notice under this subsection also shall include the following:
(A) The operational unit, or units, requesting support, including the location or locations where the social scientists are to be deployed.
(a) Conversion of certain military technician (dual status) positions.—Subsection (a) of section 1053 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 981; 10 U.S.C. 10216 note) is amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following new paragraph (1):
“(1) IN GENERAL.—By not later than October 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall convert not fewer than 20 percent of all military technician positions to positions filled by individuals who are employed under section 3101 of title 5, United States Code, or section 1601 of title 10, United States Code, or serving under section 328 of title 32, United States Code, and are not military technicians. The positions to be converted are described in paragraph (2).”;
(b) Conversion of Army Reserve, Air Force Reserve, and National Guard Non-dual status positions.—Subsection (e) of section 10217 of title 10, United States Code, is amended is amended to read as follows:
“(e) Conversion of positions.— (1) No individual may be newly hired or employed, or rehired or reemployed, as a non-dual status technician for purposes of this section after September 30, 2017.
“(2) On October 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall convert all non-dual status technicians to positions filled by individuals who are employed under section 3101 of title 5 or section 1601 of this title and are not military technicians.
(c) Report on conversion of military technician positions to personnel performing active Guard and Reserve duty.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than March 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense, shall in consultation with the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on the feasibility and advisability of converting any remaining military technicians (dual status) to personnel performing active Guard and Reserve duty under section 328 of title 32, United States Code, or other applicable provisions of law. The report shall include the following:
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) On March 2, 1867, Congress enacted a naval appropriations Act that authorized the Secretary of the Navy to “receive and accept a deed of gift, when offered by the State of Connecticut, of a tract of land with not less than one mile of shore front on the Thames River near New London, Connecticut, to be held by the United States for naval purposes”.
(2) The people of Connecticut and the towns and cities in the southeastern region of Connecticut subsequently gifted land to establish a military installation to fulfil the Nation’s need for a naval facility on the Atlantic coast.
(3) On April 11, 1868, the Navy accepted the deed of gift of land from Connecticut to establish a naval yard and storage depot along the eastern shore of the Thames River in Groton, Connecticut.
(4) Between 1868 and 1912, the New London Navy Yard supported a diverse range of missions, including berthing inactive Civil War era ironclad warships and serving as a coaling station for refueling naval ships traveling in New England waters.
(5) Congress rejected the Navy’s proposal to close New London Navy Yard in 1912, following an impassioned effort by Congressman Edwin W. Higgins, who stated that “this action proposed is not only unjust but unreasonable and unsound as a military proposition”.
(6) The outbreak of World War I and the enemy use of submarines to sink allied military and civilian ships in the Atlantic sparked a new focus on developing submarine capabilities in the United States.
(7) October 18, 1915, marked the arrival at the New London Navy Yard of the submarines G–1, G–2, and G–4 under the care of the tender U.S.S. OZARK, soon followed by the arrival of submarines E–1, D–1, and D–3 under the care of the tender U.S.S. TONOPAH, and on November 1, 1915, the arrival of the first ship built as a submarine tender, the U.S.S. FULTON (AS–1).
(8) On June 21, 1916, Commander Yeates Stirling assumed the command of the newly designated Naval Submarine Base New London, the New London Submarine Flotilla, and the Submarine School.
(9) In the 100 years since the arrival of the first submarines to the base, Naval Submarine Base New London has grown to occupy more than 680 acres along the east side of the Thames River, with more than 160 major facilities, 15 nuclear submarines, and more than 70 tenant commands and activities, including the Submarine Learning Center, Naval Submarine School, the Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory, the Naval Undersea Medical Institute, and the newly established Undersea Warfighting Development Center.
(10) In addition to being the site of the first submarine base in the United States, Connecticut was home to the foremost submarine manufacturers of the time, the Lake Torpedo Boat Company in Bridgeport and the Electric Boat Company in Groton, which later became General Dynamics Electric Boat.
(11) General Dynamics Electric Boat, its talented workforce, and its Connecticut-based and nationwide network of suppliers have delivered more than 200 submarines from its current location in Groton, Connecticut, including the first nuclear-powered submarine, the U.S.S. NAUTILUS (SSN 571), and nearly half of the nuclear submarines ever built by the United States.
(12) The Submarine Force Library and Museum, located adjacent to Naval Submarine Base New London in Groton, Connecticut, is the only submarine museum operated by the United States Navy and today serves as the primary repository for artifacts, documents, and photographs relating to the bold and courageous history of the Submarine Force and highlights as its core exhibit the Historic Ship NAUTILUS (SSN 571) following her retirement from service.
(13) Reflecting the close ties between Connecticut and the Navy that began with the gift of land that established the base, the State of Connecticut has set aside $40,000,000 in funding for critical infrastructure investments to support the mission of the base, including construction of a new dive locker building, expansion of the Submarine Learning Center, and modernization of energy infrastructure.
(14) On September 29, 2015, Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy designated October 2015 through October 2016 as Connecticut's Submarine Century, a year-long observance that celebrates 100 years of submarine activity in Connecticut, including the Town of Groton's distinction as the Submarine Capital of the World, to coincide with the centennial anniversary of the establishment of Naval Submarine Base New London and the Naval Submarine School.
(b) Sense of Congress.—Congress—
(1) commends the longstanding dedication and contribution to the Navy and submarine force by the people of Connecticut, both through the initial deed of gift that established what would become Naval Submarine Base New London and through their ongoing commitment to support the mission of the base and the Navy personnel assigned to it;
(2) honors the submariners who have trained and served at Naval Submarine Base New London throughout its history in support of the Nation’s security and undersea superiority;
(3) recognizes the contribution of the industry and workforce of Connecticut in designing, building, and sustaining the Navy’s submarine fleet; and
(4) encourages the recognition of Connecticut’s Submarine Century by Congress, the Navy, and the American people by honoring the contribution of the people of Connecticut to the defense of the United States and the important role of the submarine force in safeguarding the security of the United States for more than a century.
(a) Action on applications.—
(1) DECISION DEADLINE.—For proposals that must also obtain authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or the United States Maritime Administration to site, construct, expand, or operate LNG export facilities, the Department of Energy shall issue a final decision on any application for the authorization to export natural gas under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) not later than 30 days after the later of—
(A) the conclusion of the review to site, construct, expand, or operate the LNG facilities required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); or
(2) CONCLUSION OF REVIEW.—For purposes of paragraph (1), review required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 shall be considered concluded—
(A) for a project requiring an Environmental Impact Statement, 30 days after publication of a Final Environmental Impact Statement;
(3) JUDICIAL ACTION.— (A) The United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the export facility will be located pursuant to an application described in paragraph (1) shall have original jurisdiction over any civil action for the review of—
(B) If the Court in a civil action described in subparagraph (A) finds that the Department of Energy has failed to issue a final decision on the application as required under paragraph (1), the Court shall order the Department of Energy to issue such final decision not later than 30 days after the Court’s order.
(b) Public disclosure of export destinations.—Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b) is amended by adding at the end the following:
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) in the report accompanying H.R. 1735 of the 114th Congress (House Report 114–102), the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives encouraged the Secretary of Defense to “publicly clarify the causes of the MV-22 mishap at Marana Northwest Regional Airport, Arizona, in a way consistent with the results of all investigations as soon as possible”;
(2) the Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert O. Work did an excellent job reviewing the investigations of such mishap and concluded that there was a misrepresentation of facts by the media which incorrectly identified pilot error as the cause of the mishap which the Deputy Secretary publicly made known in March 2016; and
(a) In general.—Section 40728(h) of title 36, United States Code, is amended—
(1) by striking “(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary may transfer” and inserting “The Secretary shall transfer”;
(b) Pilot program.—Section 1087 of National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1012) is amended—
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) On December 6, 1941—one day before the attack on Pearl Harbor—the War Department established Tyndall Field as an Army Air Force gunnery school in Panama City, Florida.
(2) Tyndall Field was named in honor of native Floridian Lieutenant Francis B. Tyndall, who received the U.S. Air Force flying ace designation for his service in the First World War.
(3) Tyndall Field became an important center for aerial gunnery training during the Second World War, hosting training missions using aircraft including A–33, 0–47, AT-6, Martin B-26 Marauders, and B–17 bombers.
(4) On January 13, 1948, Tyndall Field became Tyndall Air Force Base and was an active site for air training and defense throughout the Cold War.
(5) Tyndall AFB is now home to the First Air Force as well as the 325th Fighter Wing Headquarters and their F–22 Raptors.
(6) The 325th Fighter Wing has been instrumental to national security at such crucial junctures as the Cuban Missile Crisis, throughout the Cold War, and more recently in intercepting unidentified aircraft and supporting anti-smuggling efforts.
(8) The Navy Mine Countermeasure Station developed into the Naval Support Activity Panama City (NSAPC), which has faithfully carried out its mission since its inception and continues to support the crucial efforts and important research of tenant command organizations such as the Naval Surface Warfare Center: Panama City Division (NSWC PCD) and the Navy Experimental Diving Unit (NEDU).
(9) Research performed at NSWC PCD has been integral to equipping the Navy with the personnel and technology necessary to maintaining its status as the world’s greatest and most technologically advanced.
(10) NSWC PCD’s newest facility, the Littoral Warfare Research Facility, is one of the Navy’s major research, development, test, and evaluation laboratories and where standards for weapons integration on Littoral Combat Ships are often developed.
(12) During the Second World War, the Wainwright Shipyard in Panama City built over 100 vessels for the war effort and employed over 15,000 people.
(b) Sense of Congress.—Congress—
(1) commends the longstanding dedication and contribution to the Armed Forces by the people of Panama City, both through the legacy of naval shipbuilding and through their ongoing commitment to support the mission of Panama City’s military installations and the personnel assigned to them;
(2) honors the members of the Armed Forces who have trained and served at the several military installations in and around Panama City;
Any branch or agency of the Federal Government shall, with respect to any religious corporation, religious association, religious educational institution, or religious society that is a recipient of or offeror for a Federal Government contract, subcontract, grant, purchase order, or cooperative agreement, provide protections and exemptions consistent with sections 702(a) and 703(e)(2) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-1(a) and 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(e)(2)) and section 103(d) of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12113(d)).
The provisions of Executive Order 13673 and any implementing rules or regulations shall not apply to the acquisition, contracting, contract administration, source selection, or any other activities of the Department of Defense or the National Nuclear Security Administration. The Secretary of Defense and the Administrator for Nuclear Security may not issue, or be required to comply with, any policy, guidance, or rules to carry out such executive order or otherwise implement any provision of such executive order or any related implementation rules or regulations.
(a) Determination and Disclosure of Costs by Secretary.—In the case of a trip taken by a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives or Senate in carrying out official duties outside the United States for which the Department of Defense provides transportation, the Secretary of Defense shall—
(b) Inclusion of Information in Travel Reports.—Any Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives or Senate who takes a trip to which subsection (a) applies shall include the information contained in the written statement provided to the Member, officer, or employee under subsection (a)(2) with respect to the trip in any report that the Member, officer, or employee is required to file with respect to the trip under any provision of law and under any provision of the Rules of the House of Representatives or the Standing Rules of the Senate (as the case may be).
(c) Exceptions.—This section does not apply with respect to any trip the sole purpose of which is to visit one or more United States military installations or to visit United States military personnel in a war zone (or both).
The Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, may waive the polygraph examination requirement under section 3 of the Anti-Border Corruption Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–376) for any applicant who—
(a) Access to Installations for Credentialed Transportation Workers.—During the period that the Secretary is developing and fielding physical access standards, capabilities, processes, and electronic access control systems, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, ensure that the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) shall be accepted as a valid credential for unescorted access to Department of Defense installations by transportation workers.
(b) Credentialed Transportation Workers with Secret Clearance.—TWIC-carrying transportation workers who also have a current Secret Level Clearance issued by the Department of Defense shall be considered exempt from further vetting when seeking unescorted access at Department of Defense facilities. Access security personnel shall verify such person’s security clearance in a timely manner and provide them with unescorted access to complete their freight service.
(c) Report on Credentialed Persons Denied Access to Department of Defense Installations.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall begin documenting each instance when a credentialed transportation worker is denied unescorted access to a military facility in the Continental United States, Hawaii, Alaska, Guam, or Native American lands. The report shall include, but not be limited to, the reasons for such denial, and the amount of time the credentialed party denied entrance waited to obtain access. The report shall be submitted to the Armed Services Committees of the House and Senate no later than the first day of February of each year until complete fielding of Identity Management Enterprise Services Architecture and electronic access control systems are achieved.
(a) Limitation.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended for the destruction of anti-personnel landmine munitions before the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits the report required by subsection (c).
(b) Exception for safety.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to any anti-personnel landmine munitions that the Secretary determines are unsafe or could pose a safety risk if not demilitarized or destroyed.
(c) Report required.—
(d) Anti-personnel landmine munitions defined.—In this section, the term “anti-personnel landmine munitions” includes anti-personnel landmines and sub-munitions as defined by the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction, as determined by the Secretary.
Section 1034(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 969; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is amended—
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall—
(b) Focus.—In conducting the study under subsection (a), the Secretary and the Administrator shall focus on air traffic control, airspace design, airspace management, and types of aircraft, to address helicopter noise problems and shall take into account the needs of law enforcement, emergency, and military operations.
(c) Consideration of Views.—In conducting the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the views of representatives of—
(a) Short Title.—This section may be cited as the “Maritime Occupational Safety and Health Advisory Committee Act”.
(b) Maritime Occupational Safety and Health Advisory Committee.—Section 7 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 656) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(d) There is established a Maritime Occupational Safety and Health Advisory Committee, which shall be a continuing body and shall provide advice to the Secretary in formulating maritime industry standards and regarding matters pertaining to the administration of this Act related to the maritime industry. The composition of this advisory committee shall be consistent with the advisory committees established under subsection (b), provided that a member of this committee who is otherwise qualified may continue to serve until a successor is appointed. The Secretary may promulgate or amend regulations as necessary to implement this subsection.”.
It is the sense of the Congress that—
(1) the United States Northern Command plays a crucial role in providing additional response capability to State and local governments in domestic disaster relief and consequence management operations;
(2) the United States Northern Command must continue to build upon its current efforts to develop command strategies, leadership training, and response plans to effectively work with civil authorities when acting as the lead agency or a supporting agency; and
The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and the Director of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, shall post on the public Web site of the Department of Defense the costs, including the relevant legacy costs, to each American taxpayer of each of the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.
(a) In general.—Section 6(b) of the Joint Resolution entitled “A Joint Resolution to approve the ‘Covenant To Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union With the United States of America’, and for other purposes”, approved March 24, 1976 (48 U.S.C. 1806(b)) is amended to read as follows:
“(b) Numerical limitations for nonimmigrant workers.—An alien, if otherwise qualified, may seek admission to Guam or to the Commonwealth during the transition program as a nonimmigrant worker under section 101(a)(15)(H) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)) without counting against the numerical limitations set forth in section 214(g) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)). An alien, if otherwise qualified, may, before October 1, 2028, be admitted under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of such Act for a period of up to 3 years (which may be extended by the Secretary of Homeland Security before October 1, 2028, for an additional period or periods not to exceed 3 years each) to perform services or labor on Guam pursuant to any agreement entered into by a prime contractor or subcontractor calling for services or labor required for performance of the contract or subcontract in direct support of all military-funded construction, repairs, renovation, and facilities services, or to perform services or labor on Guam as a health-care worker, notwithstanding the requirement of such section that the service or labor be temporary. This subsection does not apply to any employment to be performed outside of Guam or the Commonwealth.”.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review and update Department of Defense regulations to ensure such regulations comply with Federal consumer protection law with respect to the collection of debt.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) National Rosie the Riveter Day is a collective national effort to raise awareness of the 16 million women working during World War II.
(2) Americans have chosen to honor female workers who contributed on the home front during World War II.
(3) These women left their homes to work or volunteer full-time in factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, banks, and other institutions in support of the military overseas.
(4) These women worked with the USO and Red Cross, drove trucks, riveted airplane parts, collected critical materials, rolled bandages, and served on rationing boards.
(a) Recovery.—Subchapter II of chapter 407 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 40728A the following new section:
Ҥ 40728B. Recovery of excess rifles, ammunition, and parts granted to foreign countries and transfer to certain persons
“(a) Authority to recover.— (1) Subject to paragraph (2) and subsection (b), the Secretary of the Army may acquire from any person any rifle, ammunition, repair parts, or other supplies described in section 40731(a) of this title which were— “(A) provided to any country on a grant basis under the conditions imposed by section 505 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2314) that became excess to the needs of such country; and
“(b) Cost of recovery.—The Secretary of the Army may not acquire anything under subsection (a) if the United States would incur any cost for such acquisition.
“(c) Availability for transfer.—Any rifles, ammunition, repair parts, or supplies acquired under subsection (a) shall be available for transfer in the United States to the person from whom acquired if such person—
“(d) Contracts.—Notwithstanding subsection (k) of section 2304 of title 10, the Secretary may enter into such contracts or cooperative agreements on a sole source basis pursuant to paragraphs (4) and (5) of subsection (c) of such section to carry out this section.
“(e) AECA.—Transfers authorized under this section may only be made in accordance with applicable provisions of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).
(b) Sale.—Section 40732 of such title is amended—
(1) by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(d) Sales by other persons.—A person who receives a rifle or any ammunition, repair parts, or supplies under section 40728B(c) of this title may sell, at fair market value, such rifle, ammunition, repair parts, or supplies. With respect to rifles other than caliber .22 rimfire and caliber .30 rifles, the seller shall obtain a license as a dealer in rifles and abide by all requirements imposed on persons licensed under chapter 44 of title 18, including maintaining acquisition and disposition records, and conducting background checks.”; and
(c) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 407 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 40728A the following new item:
(a) Deputy Director for Management.—
(1) ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS.—Section 503 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: “(c) Program and project management.— “(1) REQUIREMENT.—Subject to the direction and approval of the Director, the Deputy Director for Management or a designee shall— “(A) adopt governmentwide standards, policies, and guidelines for program and project management for executive agencies; “(B) oversee implementation of program and project management for the standards, policies, and guidelines established under subparagraph (A); “(D) establish standards and policies for executive agencies, consistent with widely accepted standards for program and project management planning and delivery; “(E) engage with the private sector to identify best practices in program and project management that would improve Federal program and project management; “(F) conduct portfolio reviews to address programs identified as high risk by the Government Accountability Office; “(2) APPLICATION TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the Department of Defense to the extent that the provisions of that paragraph are substantially similar to or duplicative of— “(A) the provisions of chapter 87 of title 10; or
(2) DEADLINE FOR STANDARDS, POLICIES, AND GUIDELINES.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Deputy Director for Management of the Office of Management and Budget shall issue the standards, policies, and guidelines required under section 503(c) of title 31, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1).
(3) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the standards, policies, and guidelines are issued under paragraph (2), the Deputy Director for Management of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Program Management Policy Council established under section 1126(b) of title 31, United States Code, as added by subsection (b)(1), and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall issue any regulations as are necessary to implement the requirements of section 503(c) of title 31, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1).
(b) Program Management Improvement Officers and Program Management Policy Council.—
(1) AMENDMENT.—Chapter 11 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
Ҥ 1126. Program Management Improvement Officers and Program Management Policy Council
“(a) Program Management Improvement Officers.—
“(1) DESIGNATION.—The head of each agency described in section 901(b) shall designate a senior executive of the agency as the Program Management Improvement Officer of the agency.
“(2) FUNCTIONS.—The Program Management Improvement Officer of an agency designated under paragraph (1) shall—
“(B) develop a strategy for enhancing the role of program managers within the agency that includes the following:
“(i) Enhanced training and educational opportunities for program managers that shall include—
“(ii) Mentoring of current and future program managers by experienced senior executives and program managers within the agency.
“(iv) A plan to encourage the recruitment and retention of highly qualified individuals to serve as program managers.
“(3) APPLICATION TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.—This subsection shall not apply to the Department of Defense to the extent that the provisions of this subsection are substantially similar to or duplicative of the provisions of chapter 87 of title 10. For purposes of paragraph (1), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (or a designee of the Under Secretary) shall be considered the Program Management Improvement Officer.
“(b) Program Management Policy Council.—
“(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established in the Office of Management and Budget a council to be known as the ‘Program Management Policy Council’ (in this subsection referred to as the ‘Council’).
“(2) PURPOSE AND FUNCTIONS.—The Council shall act as the principal interagency forum for improving agency practices related to program and project management. The Council shall—
“(B) review programs identified as high risk by the General Accountability Office and make recommendations for actions to be taken by the Deputy Director for Management of the Office of Management and Budget or a designee;
“(3) MEMBERSHIP.—
“(A) COMPOSITION.—The Council shall be composed of the following members:
“(4) MEETINGS.—The Council shall meet not less than twice per fiscal year and may meet at the call of the Chairperson or a majority of the members of the Council.
(2) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with each Program Management Improvement Officer designated under section 1126(a)(1) of title 31, United States Code, shall submit to Congress a report containing the strategy developed under section 1126(a)(2)(B) of such title, as added by paragraph (1).
(c) Program and project management personnel standards.—
(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term “agency” means each agency described in section 901(b) of title 31, United States Code, other than the Department of Defense.
(2) REGULATIONS REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date on which the standards, policies, and guidelines are issued under section 503(c) of title 31, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1), the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall issue regulations that—
(d) GAO report on effectiveness of policies on program and project management.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Government Accountability Office shall issue, in conjunction with the High Risk list of the Government Accountability Office, a report examining the effectiveness of the following on improving Federal program and project management:
(1) The standards, policies, and guidelines for program and project management issued under section 503(c) of title 31, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1).
(2) The 5-year strategic plan established under section 503(c)(1)(H) of title 31, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(1).
This subtitle may be cited as the “United States Naval Station Guantanamo Bay Preservation Act”.
Congress makes the following findings:
(1) United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has been a strategic military asset critical to the defense of the United States and the maintenance of regional security for more than a century.
(2) The United States continues to exercise control over the area of United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, pursuant to the Guantanamo Lease Agreements, which were initiated and concluded pursuant to an Act of Congress.
(3) Senior United States military leaders have consistently voiced strong support for maintaining United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, noting its strategic value for military basing and logistics, disaster relief, humanitarian work, terrorist detention, and counter-narcotics purposes.
(4) On February 29, 2016, Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter, discussing United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, stated that “it’s a strategic location, we've had it for a long time, it's important to us and we intend to hold onto it”.
(5) On March 12, 2015, Commander of United States Southern Command, General John Kelly, testified that the United States facilities at Naval Station Guantanamo Bay “are indispensable to the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, and State’s operational and contingency plans. … As the only permanent U.S. military base in Latin America and the Caribbean, its location provides persistent U.S. presence and immediate access to the region, as well as supporting a layered defense to secure the air and maritime approaches to the United States”.
(6) In testimony before Congress in 2012, then-Commander of United States Southern Command, General Douglas Fraser, stated that “the strategic capability provided by U.S. Naval Station Guantanamo Bay remains essential for executing national priorities throughout the Caribbean, Latin America, and South America”.
(7) Following a 1991 coup in Haiti that prompted a mass exodus of people by boat, United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, provided a location for temporary housing and the orderly adjudication of asylum claims outside of the continental United States.
(8) In 2010, United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, was a critical hub for the provision of humanitarian disaster relief following the devastating earthquakes in Haiti.
(9) The United States presence at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has its origins in Acts of Congress undertaken pursuant to the powers of Congress expressly enumerated in the Constitution of the United States.
(10) By joint resolution approved on April 20, 1898, Congress “directed and empowered” the President “to use the entire land and naval forces of the United States” as necessary to ensure that the Government of Spain “relinquish its authority and government in the island of Cuba, and withdraw its land and naval forces from Cuba and Cuban waters”.
(11) Congress declared war against Spain on April 25, 1898, which lasted until December 10, 1898, when the United States and Spain signed the Treaty of Paris, in which Spain relinquished all claims of sovereignty over Cuba, and United States governance of Cuba was established.
(12) Nearly three years later, in the Act of March 2, 1901 (Chapter 803; 31 Stat. 898), Congress granted the President the authority to return “the government and control of the island of Cuba to its people” subject to several express conditions including, in article VII of the Act of March 2, 1901, the sale or lease by Cuba to the United States of lands necessary for naval stations.
(13) Pursuant to the authority granted by article VII of the Act of March 2, 1901, the United States negotiated the Guantanamo Lease Agreements, which specified the area of, and United States jurisdiction and control over, what became United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
(14) On October 2, 1903, when approving the Lease to the United States by the Government of Cuba of Certain Areas of Land and Water for Naval or Coaling Stations, signed in Havana on July 2, 1903, President Theodore Roosevelt cited the Act of March 2, 1901, as providing his authority to do so: “I, Theodore Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, having seen and considered the foregoing lease, do hereby approve the same, by virtue of the authority conferred by the seventh of the provisions defining the relations which are to exist between the United States and Cuba, contained in the Act of Congress approved March 2, 1901, entitled ‘An Act making appropriation for the support of the Army for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1902.’”.
(15) Obtaining United States naval station rights in Cuba was an express condition of the authority that Congress gave the President to return control and governance of Cuba to the people of Cuba. In exercising that authority and concluding the Guantanamo Lease Agreements, President Theodore Roosevelt recognized the source of that authority as the Act of March 2, 1901.
(16) The Treaty of Relations between the United States of America and the Republic of Cuba, signed at Washington, May 29, 1934, did not supersede, abrogate, or modify the Guantanamo Lease Agreements, but noted that the stipulations of those agreements “shall continue in effect” until the United States and Cuba agree to modify them.
(17) The Constitution of the United States expressly grants to Congress the power to provide for the common defense of the United States, the power to provide and maintain a Navy, and the power “to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States”.
No action may be taken to modify, abrogate, or replace the stipulations, agreements, and commitments contained in the Guantanamo Lease Agreements, or to impair or abandon the jurisdiction and control of the United States over United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, unless specifically authorized or otherwise provided by—
(a) Authority.—During fiscal years 2017 and 2018, the Secretary of Defense may appoint, without regard to the provisions of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, other than sections 3303 and 3328 of such title, qualified candidates to positions in the competitive service at any defense industrial base facility or the Major Range and Test Facilities Base or as a military technician (dual status).
(b) Report.—Not later than 60 days after the end of fiscal year 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate on the use of the authority provided under subsection (a). Such report shall include the total number of individuals appointed under such authority and the effectiveness of such authority in fulfilling the manpower needs of the defense industrial base facilities or the Major Range and Test Facilities Base.
(a) In general.—Notwithstanding chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, or any other provision of law relating to the examination, certification, and appointment of individuals in the competitive service, during fiscal years 2017 and 2018, an employee of a defense industrial base facility or the Major Range and Test Facilities Base serving under a time-limited appointment in the competitive service is eligible to compete for a permanent appointment in the competitive service at (A) any such facility, Base, or any other component of the Department of Defense when such facility, Base, or component (as the case may be) is accepting applications from individuals within the facility, Base, or component's workforce under merit promotion procedures, or (B) any agency when the agency is accepting applications from individuals outside its own workforce under merit promotion procedures of the applicable agency, if—
(1) the employee was appointed initially under open, competitive examination under subchapter I of chapter 33 of such title to the time-limited appointment;
(b) Waiver of age requirement.—In determining the eligibility of a time-limited employee under this section to be examined for or appointed in the competitive service, the Office of Personnel Management or other examining agency shall waive requirements as to age, unless the requirement is essential to the performance of the duties of the position.
(c) Status.—An individual appointed under this section—
(d) Former employees.—A former employee of a defense industrial base facility or the Major Range and Test Facilities Base who served under a time-limited appointment and who otherwise meets the requirements of this section shall be deemed a time-limited employee for purposes of this section if—
Paragraph (2) of section 1603(a) of the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109–234; 120 Stat. 443), as added by section 1102 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4616) and as most recently amended by section 1102 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1022), is further amended by striking “2017” and inserting “2018”.
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 5524a of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Permanent authority and codification.—Chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1589 a new section 1590 consisting of—
(2) a text consisting of the text of subsection (a), (b), (c), and (d) of section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 5 U.S.C. 3104 note).
(b) Conforming amendments.—Section 1590 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(c) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 81 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1589 the following new item:
(d) Conforming repeal.—Section 1101 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 5 U.S.C. 3104 note) is repealed.
Section 1110 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 5 U.S.C. 3702 note) is amended—
(a) In general.—Pursuant to section 5707 of title 5, United States Code, the Administrator of General Services shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to provide that, with respect to per diem rates for Ohio, the locality described as Dayton/Fairborn and the locality described as Cincinnati are considered 1 locality for purposes of establishing per diem allowance or maximum amount of reimbursement under section 5702(a)(2) of such title.
Section 9602 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subsection (a) by striking “any land management agency or any other agency (as defined in section 101 of title 31) under the internal merit promotion procedures of the applicable agency” and inserting “such land management agency when such agency is accepting applications from individuals within the agency’s workforce under merit promotion procedures, or any agency, including a land management agency, when the agency is accepting applications from individuals outside its own workforce under the merit promotion procedures of the applicable agency”; and
(a) In general.—Subchapter II of chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
Ҥ 6330. Limitation on administrative leave
“(a) In general.—During any calendar year, an employee may not be placed on administrative leave, or any other paid non-duty status without charge to leave, for more than 14 total days for reasons relating to misconduct or performance. After an employee has been placed on administrative leave for 14 days, the employing agency shall return the employee to duty status, utilizing telework if available, and assign the employee to duties if such employee is not a threat to safety, the agency mission, or Government property.
“(b) Extended administrative leave.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—If an agency finds that an employee is a threat to safety, the agency mission, or Government property and upon the expiration of the 14-day period described in subsection (a), an agency head may place the employee on extended administrative leave for additional periods of not more than 30 days each.
“(2) REPORT.—For any additional period of 30 days granted to the employee after the initial 30-day extension, the agency head shall submit to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in the House of Representatives, the agency’s authorizing committees of jurisdiction of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate a report, not later than 5 business days after granting the additional period, containing—
“(A) title, position, office or agency subcomponent, job series, pay grade, and salary of the employee on administrative leave;
“(D) an explanation as to why the employee is a threat to safety, the agency mission, or Government property;
“(E) an explanation as to why the employee is not able to telework or be reassigned to another position within the agency;
“(c) Extension pending related investigation.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—If an employee is under a related investigation by an investigative entity at the time an additional period described under subsection (b)(2) is granted and, in the opinion of the investigative entity, additional time is needed to complete the investigation, such entity shall certify to the applicable agency that such additional time is needed and include in the certification an estimate of the length of such additional time.
“(d) Definitions.—In this section, the following definitions apply:
(b) Effective date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall begin to apply 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
(c) Rules of Construction.—Nothing in the amendment made by subsection (a) shall be construed to—
(1) supersede the provisions of chapter 75 of title 5, United States Code; or
(d) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections for subchapter II of chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding after the item relating to section 6329 the following new item:
(a) In general.—Subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3321 the following:
Ҥ 3322. Voluntary separation before resolution of personnel investigation
“(a) With respect to any employee occupying a position in the competitive service or the excepted service who is the subject of a personnel investigation and resigns from Government employment prior to the resolution of such investigation, the head of the agency from which such employee so resigns shall, if an adverse finding was made with respect to such employee pursuant to such investigation, make a permanent notation in the employee’s official personnel record file. The head shall make such notation not later than 40 days after the date of the resolution of such investigation.
“(b) Prior to making a permanent notation in an employee’s official personnel record file under subsection (a), the head of the agency shall—
“(1) notify the employee in writing within 5 days of the resolution of the investigation and provide such employee a copy of the adverse finding and any supporting documentation;
“(2) provide the employee with a reasonable time, but not less than 30 days, to respond in writing and to furnish affidavits and other documentary evidence to show why the adverse finding was unfounded (a summary of which shall be included in any notation made to the employee’s personnel file under subsection (d)); and
“(c) An employee is entitled to appeal the decision of the head of the agency to make a permanent notation under subsection (a) to the Merit Systems Protection Board under section 7701.
“(d) (1) If an employee files an appeal with the Merit Systems Protection Board pursuant to subsection (c), the agency head shall make a notation in the employee’s official personnel record file indicating that an appeal disputing the notation is pending not later than 2 weeks after the date on which such appeal was filed.
“(2) If the head of the agency is the prevailing party on appeal, not later than 2 weeks after the date that the Board issues the appeal decision, the head of the agency shall remove the notation made under paragraph (1) from the employee’s official personnel record file.
“(3) If the employee is the prevailing party on appeal, not later than 2 weeks after the date that the Board issues the appeal decision, the head of the agency shall remove the notation made under paragraph (1) and the notation of an adverse finding made under subsection (a) from the employee’s official personnel record file.
(b) Application.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to any employee described in section 3322 of title 5, United States Code, (as added by such subsection) who leaves the service after the date of enactment of this Act.
(c) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 3321 the following:
(a) In general.—Subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
Ҥ 3330e. Review of official personnel file of former Federal employees before rehiring
“(a) If a former Government employee is a candidate for a position within the competitive service or the excepted service, prior to making any determination with respect to the appointment or reinstatement of such employee to such position, the appointing authority shall review and consider the information relating to such employee’s former period or periods of service in such employee’s official personnel record file.
(b) Application.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to any former Government employee (as described in section 3330e of title 5, United States Code, as added by such subsection) appointed or reinstated on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
(c) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections of subchapter I of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) A large, disproportionate, and duplicative civilian work force coupled with bureaucratic, structural inefficiencies has detracted from the Pentagon’s production of combat power and its ability to modernize.
(2) The recent uniformed military drawdown has not been accompanied by an equivalent reduction of either the civilian or contractor work force. Right sizing the civilian workforce must be statutory in number but implemented with executive discretion. Across-the-board cuts to the defense civilian workforce are not the answer.
(b) Reports.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit a preliminary report within 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and a final report within 180 days after such date, to the congressional defense committees detailing the structure and number of the civilian workforce and contractors of the Department of Defense.
(2) CONTENTS.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), each report shall include the following for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020, including a breakdown in location, job function, General Schedule (GS) level, and date of when the job was created for the following individuals:
(A) The total number of full time equivalent employees, including each of the following:
(a) Authority.—Chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1105 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“(a) Assignment authority.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary may, with the agreement of a private-sector organization and the consent of the employee, arrange for the temporary assignment of an employee to such private-sector organization, or from such private-sector organization to a Department of Defense organization under this section.
“(b) Agreements.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall provide for a written agreement among the Department of Defense, the private-sector organization, and the employee concerned regarding the terms and conditions of the employee’s assignment under this section. The agreement— “(A) shall require that the employee of the Department of Defense, upon completion of the assignment, will serve in the Department of Defense, or elsewhere in the civil service if approved by the Secretary, for a period equal to the length of the assignment; and “(B) shall provide that if the employee of the Department of Defense or of the private-sector organization (as the case may be) fails to carry out the agreement, such employee shall be liable to the United States for payment of all expenses of the assignment, unless that failure was for good and sufficient reason, as determined by the Secretary of Defense.
“(2) An amount for which an employee is liable under paragraph (1) shall be treated as a debt due the United States.
“(3) The Secretary may waive, in whole or in part, collection of a debt described in paragraph (2) based on a determination that the collection would be against equity and good conscience and not in the best interests of the United States, after taking into account any indication of fraud, misrepresentation, fault, or lack of good faith on the part of the employee.
“(c) Termination.—An assignment under this section may, at any time and for any reason, be terminated by the Department of Defense or the private-sector organization concerned.
“(d) Duration.—An assignment under this section shall be for a period of not less than 3 months and not more than one year, renewable up to a total of 4 years. No employee of the Department of Defense may be assigned under this section for more than a total of 4 years inclusive of all such assignments.
“(e) Status of Federal Employees Assigned to Private-Sector Organizations.—An employee of the Department of Defense who is assigned to a private-sector organization under this section shall be considered, during the period of assignment, to be on detail to a regular work assignment in the Department for all purposes. The written agreement established under subsection (b)(1) shall address the specific terms and conditions related to the employee’s continued status as a Federal employee.
“(f) Terms and conditions for private-sector employees.—An employee of a private-sector organization who is assigned to a Department of Defense organization under this section—
“(1) shall continue to receive pay and benefits from the private-sector organization from which such employee is assigned and shall not receive pay or benefits from the Department of Defense, except as provided in paragraph (2);
“(2) is deemed to be an employee of the Department of Defense for the purposes of—
“(F) chapter 21 of title 41;
“(g) Prohibition against charging certain costs to the Federal Government.—A private-sector organization may not charge the Department of any other agency of the Federal Government, as direct or indirect costs under a Federal contract, the costs of pay or benefits paid by the organization to an employee assigned to a Department organization under this section for the period of the assignment.
“(h) Considerations.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary of Defense—
“(1) shall ensure that, of the assignments made under this section each year, at least 20 percent are from small business concerns (as defined by section 3703(e)(2)(A) of title 5);
(b) Table of sections amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter, as amended by section 1105 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new item:
Section 1234 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 394), as most recently amended by section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1035), is further amended—
Section 1203(h) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 894; 10 U.S.C. 2011 note) is amended by striking “September 30, 2017” and inserting “December 31, 2019”.
(a) Limitation on availability of authority for other countries.—Subsection (b) of section 1204 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 896; 10 U.S.C. 401 note) is amended by striking “of the Secretary’s intention” and inserting “not later than 48 hours after the Secretary makes a determination”.
(b) Availability of funds.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section is amended to read as follows:
“(1) FUNDS AVAILABLE.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for Operation and Maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency for a fiscal year, not more than $20,000,000 may be made available for assistance under this section for such fiscal year.”.
(c) Notice to Congress on certain assistance.—Subsection (e) of such section, as amended by section 1202 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3530), is further amended—
(1) by striking “If the amount” and inserting “If the Secretary of Defense determines that the amount”;
(d) Expiration.—Subsection (h) of such section, as amended by section 1273 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1076), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2019” and inserting “September 30, 2020”.
(e) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with respect to assistance authorized to be provided under subsection (a) of section 1204 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 on or after such date of enactment.
Subsection (h) of section 1208 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108–375; 118 Stat. 2086), as most recently amended by section 1208(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541), is further amended by striking “2017” and inserting “2020”.
(a) Annual report required.—Subsection (a) of section 1211 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3544) is amended—
(1) by striking “Biennial” and all that follows through “the Secretary of Defense” and inserting “Annual report required.—Not later than January 31 of each year through January 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense”;
(b) Elements of report.—Subsection (b) of such section is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following:
“(4) For each foreign country in which the training, equipment, or other assistance or reimbursement was provided, a description of the extent of participation, if any, by the military forces and security forces or other government organizations of such foreign country.
(c) Modification to specified authorities.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended—
(3) by redesignating paragraphs (6), (8), (9), (10), and (12) through (17) as paragraphs (4) through (13), respectively;
(4) by adding at the end the following:
“(14) Section 401, relating to humanitarian and civic assistance provided in conjunction with military operations.
“(15) Section 1206 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (128 Stat. 3538; 10 U.S.C. 2282 note), relating to authority to conduct human rights training of security forces and associated security ministries of foreign countries.
“(16) Section 1534 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (128 Stat. 3616), relating to the Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund.
“(17) Section 1203 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 894; 10 U.S.C. 2011 note), relating to training of general purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces with military and other security forces of friendly foreign countries.”; and
(d) Form.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended by adding “that may also include other sensitive information” after “annex”.
(e) Codification of section 1211 of FY 2015 NDAA.—
(1) CODIFICATION.—Chapter 11 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1261 of this Act, is further amended by inserting after section 251 a new section 252 consisting of—
(B) a text consisting of the text of subsections (a) through (e) of section 1211 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3544), as amended by subsections (a) through (d) of this section.
(2) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 1211 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3544), as amended by subsections (a) through (d) of this section, is repealed.
(f) Repeal of other reporting requirements.—
(1) ANNUAL REPORT ON HUMANITARIAN AND CIVIC ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES.—Section 401 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS ON COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND.—Section 1534 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3616) is amended—
(3) ANNUAL REPORT ON USE OF AUTHORITY TO TRAIN GENERAL PURPOSE FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES WITH MILITARY AND OTHER SECURITY FORCES OF FRIENDLY FOREIGN COUNTRIES.—Section 1203 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 894; 10 U.S.C. 2011 note) is amended—
(4) ANNUAL REPORT ON USE OF AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL GUARD STATE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 1205 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 897; 32 U.S.C. 107 note) is amended—
(a) Assessment required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with a federally funded research and development center, or another appropriate independent entity, with expertise in security cooperation to conduct an assessment of the Strategic Framework for Department of Defense Security Cooperation.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The assessment under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(A) An assessment of each of the elements of the Strategic Framework for Department of Defense Security Cooperation, as directed by section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1036; 10 U.S.C. 113 note).
(B) An assessment of the extent to which security cooperation programs, individually and in combination, as identified in the Comptroller General Inventory of Department of Defense Security Cooperation Programs directed in the committee report (H. Rept. 114–102) accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016, and any other relevant studies, contribute to the strategic goals, primary objectives, priorities, and desired end-states of Department of Defense security cooperation programs.
(b) Report required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than November 1, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report that includes the assessment under subsection (a) and any other matters the Secretary considers appropriate.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Secretary of Defense should develop and maintain an assessment, monitoring, and evaluation framework for security cooperation with foreign countries to ensure accountability and foster implementation of best practices; and
(a) Report required.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on its implementation of section 294 of title 10, United States Code (relating to prohibition on use of funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces that have committed a gross violation of human rights).
(b) Matters to be included.—The report required under subsection (a) shall contain the following:
(1) A detailed description of the policies and procedures governing the manner in which Department of Defense personnel identify and report information on gross violations of human rights and how such information is shared with personnel responsible for implementing the prohibition in subsection (a)(1) of section 294 of title 10, United States Code.
(2) The funding expended in fiscal years 2015 and 2016 for purposes of implementing section 294 of title 10, United States Code, including any relevant training of personnel, and a description of the titles, roles, and responsibilities of the personnel responsible for reviewing credible information relating to human rights violations and the personnel responsible for making decisions regarding the implementation of the prohibition in subsection (a)(1) of such section 294.
(a) Extension.—Section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1619), as most recently amended by section 1211 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1042), is further amended—
(b) Authority for certain payments To redress injury and loss in Iraq.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—During the period beginning on October 1, 2016, and ending on December 31, 2017, amounts available pursuant to section 1201 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, as amended by this section, shall also be available for ex gratia payments for damage, personal injury, or death that is incident to combat operations of the Armed Forces in Iraq.
(2) NOTICE AND WAIT.—The authority in this subsection may not be used until 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the following:
(3) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT AVAILABLE.—The total amount of payments made pursuant to this subsection during the period beginning on October 1, 2016, and ending on December 31, 2017, may not exceed $5,000,000.
(4) AUTHORITIES APPLICABLE TO PAYMENT.—Any payment made pursuant to this subsection shall be made in accordance with the authorities and limitations in section 8121 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2015 (division C of Public Law 113–235), other than subsection (h) of such section.
(a) Extension.—Subsection (a) of section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1212 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1043), is further amended by striking “fiscal year 2016” and inserting “the period beginning on October 1, 2016, and ending on December 31, 2017,”.
(b) Limitation on amounts available.—Subsection (d)(1) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(c) Extension of notice requirement relating to reimbursement of Pakistan for support provided by Pakistan.—Section 1232(b)(6) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (122 Stat. 393), as most recently amended by section 1212(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (129 Stat. 1043), is further amended by striking “September 30, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.
(d) Extension of limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan.—Section 1227(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2001), as most recently amended by section 1212(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (129 Stat. 1043), is further amended by striking “for fiscal year 2016 or any prior fiscal year” and inserting “for any period prior to December 31, 2017” .
(e) Additional limitation on reimbursement of Pakistan pending certification on Pakistan.—Of the total amount of reimbursements and support authorized for Pakistan during the period beginning on October 1, 2016, and ending on December 31, 2017, pursuant to the third sentence of section 1233(d)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (as amended by subsection (b)(2)), $450,000,000 shall not be eligible for the waiver under section 1227(d)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (126 Stat. 2001) unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that—
(1) Pakistan continues to conduct military operations in North Waziristan that are contributing to significantly disrupting the safe haven and freedom of movement of the Haqqani Network in Pakistan;
(2) Pakistan has taken steps to demonstrate its commitment to prevent the Haqqani Network from using North Waziristan as a safe haven;
(3) the Government of Pakistan actively coordinates with the Government of Afghanistan to restrict the movement of militants, such as the Haqqani Network, along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border;
(4) Pakistan has shown progress in arresting and prosecuting Haqqani network senior leaders and mid-level operatives; and
(5) Pakistan is not using its military or any funds or equipment provided by the United States to persecute minority groups seeking political or religious freedom, including the Balochi, Sindhi, and Hazara ethnic groups and minority religious groups, including Christian, Hindu, and Ahmadiyya Muslim.
Section 801(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2399), as most recently amended by section 1214 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1045), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.
(a) Extension.—Subsection (h) of section 1222 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1992), as most recently amended by section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1045), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The United States continues to have vital national security interests in ensuring that Afghanistan is a stable, sovereign country.
(2) President Obama signed a Strategic Partnership Agreement and a Bilateral Security Agreement with the President of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, which commits the United States to the long-term security of, and defense cooperation with, the Government of Afghanistan and designates Afghanistan as a “major non-NATO ally”.
(3) The unity government in Afghanistan, led by President Ghani and Chief Executive Abdullah, should be applauded for their continued leadership and commitment to Afghanistan’s stability and security.
(5) The best long-term guarantor of stability and security in Afghanistan is a stable unity government and a capable Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF).
(6) The President’s current policy is to draw down from 9,800 to 5,500 United States troops by January 1, 2017. As the recent commander in Afghanistan, General John Campbell, testified to the Senate Armed Services Committee, “the 5,500 [U.S. troops] plan was developed primarily around counterterrorism. There’s very limited train-advise-and-assist...in those numbers. To continue to build on the Afghan Security Forces, the gaps and seams in aviation, logistics, intelligence...we’d have to make some adjustments to that number.”.
(7) The President’s policy of limiting the number of United States troops that the commander can employ in Afghanistan is hindering the effectiveness of the United States mission therein.
(8) Further, at the current policy of 9,800 United States troops, the new commander of Operation Resolute Support in Afghanistan, General John “Mick” Nicholson, agreed in testimony with the Senate Armed Services Committee that the security situation in Afghanistan has been deteriorating rather than improving.
(9) General John Campbell also stated “…Afghan shortfalls will persist beyond 2016. Capability gaps still exist in fixed and rotary-wing aviation, combined arms operations, intelligence collection and dissemination, and maintenance.”.
(10) General John Campbell further stated “I have the authority to protect coalition members against any insurgents…to attack the Taliban just because they’re Taliban, I do not have that authority.”.
(11) The Taliban have made territorial gains and are holding terrain in key geographic areas in Afghanistan, including in Helmand Province.
(12) The Taliban held the city of Kunduz, Afghanistan, which is the first time the Taliban have held a major city in Afghanistan in 14 years.
(13) The Haqqani Network, a designated foreign terrorist organization aligned with the Taliban, is the most lethal group on the battlefield in Afghanistan, and continues to provide safe haven to al-Qaeda.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the President should authorize at least 9,800 United States troops to continue the train, advise, and assist and counterterrorism missions in Afghanistan after 2016;
(2) the President should provide the United States commander in Afghanistan with the authority to unilaterally strike the Taliban and the Haqqani Network;
(3) the President should provide additional resources to strike the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Afghanistan;
(4) the President should provide the United States commander in Afghanistan the authority to conduct the train, advise, and assist mission below the corps level of the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF);
(5) the United States should provide United States Armed Forces lift and close air support to ANDSF units until the ANDSF has a fully capable, organic lift and close air support capability and capacity;
(6) the United States should provide monetary and advisory support for 352,000 ANDSF personnel and 30,000 Afghan Local Police, including intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance support, through 2018;
(a) Aliens described.—Section 602(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended to read as follows:
“(I) (aa) by, or on behalf of, the United States Government, in the case of an alien submitting an application for Chief of Mission approval pursuant to subparagraph (D) before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017; or
“(bb) in the case of an alien submitting an application for Chief of Mission approval pursuant to subparagraph (D) on or after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, in a capacity that required the alien—
“(AA) to serve as an interpreter or translator for personnel of the Department of State or the United States Agency for International Development in Afghanistan while traveling away from United States embassies or consulates with such personnel;
“(BB) to serve as an interpreter or translator for United States military personnel in Afghanistan while traveling off-base with such personnel; or
“(CC) to perform sensitive and trusted activities for United States military personnel stationed in Afghanistan; or”.
(b) Numerical limitations.—Clauses (i) and (ii) of section 602(b)(3)(F) of such Act are each amended by striking “December 31, 2016;” and inserting “December 31, 2017;”.
Subsection (b) of section 1225 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3550), as amended by section 1213 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1045), is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(8) AFGHAN PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM.—A description of the status of the implementation of the Afghan Personnel and Pay System (APPS) at the Afghan Ministry of Interior and the Afghan Ministry of Defense for personnel funds provided through the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund, including a description of the following:
“(A) The expected completion date of installation and full implementation and utilization of the APPS.
“(B) If installation of the APPS is complete at one, or both, ministries, the extent to which the APPS is being utilized to distribute personnel funds to the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police.
“(C) If installation of the APPS is not complete at one, or both, ministries, or full implementation and utilization of the APPS has not been achieved at one, or both, ministries, an explanation of any delays, any expected obstacles, and any additional support that may be needed for installation or full implementation and utilization.
“(D) Any examples of intentional delay or obstruction by members of the Government of Afghanistan, to include one, or both, ministries, or any sub-unit thereof, to installing or fully implementing or utilizing the APPS.
“(E) If the APPS is fully implemented at one, or both, ministries, the identified cost savings to date, due to the elimination of waste, fraud, and abuse at the ministry compared to the previous payroll system. If the APPS is not fully implemented at one, or both, ministries, the expected cost savings due to the elimination of waste, fraud, and abuse at the ministry once the APPS is fully implemented.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The attacks of September 11, 2001, killed approximately 3,000 people, most of whom were Americans, but also included hundreds of individuals with foreign citizenships, nearly 350 New York Fire Department personnel, and about 50 law enforcement officers.
(2) Downed United Airlines flight 93 was reportedly intended, under the control of the al-Qaeda high-jackers, to crash into the White House or the Capitol in an attempt to kill the President of the United States or Members of the United States Congress.
(3) The September 11, 2001, attacks were largely planned and carried out by the al-Qaeda terrorist network led by Osama bin Laden and his deputy Ayman al Zawahiri, after which Osama bin Laden enjoyed safe haven in Pakistan from where he continued to plot deadly attacks against the United States and the world.
(4) The United States has obligated nearly $30 billion between 2002 and 2014 in United States taxpayer money for security and economic aid to Pakistan.
(5) The United States very generously and swiftly responded to the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake in Pakistan with more than $200 million in emergency aid and the support of several United States military aircraft, approximately 1,000 United States military personnel, including medical specialists, thousands of tents, blankets, water containers and a variety of other emergency equipment.
(6) The United States again generously and swiftly contributed approximately $150 million in emergency aid to Pakistan following the 2010 Pakistan flood, in addition to the service of nearly twenty United States military helicopters, their flight crews, and other resources to assist the Pakistan Army’s relief efforts.
(7) The United States continues to work tirelessly to support Pakistan’s economic development, including millions of dollars allocated towards the development of Pakistan’s energy infrastructure, health services and education system.
(8) The United States and Pakistan continue to have many critical shared interests, both economic and security related, which could be the foundation for a positive and mutually beneficial partnership.
(9) Dr. Shakil Afridi, a Pakistani physician, is a hero to whom the people of the United States, Pakistan and the world owe a debt of gratitude for his help in finally locating Osama bin Laden before more innocent American, Pakistani and other lives were lost to this terrorist leader.
(10) Pakistan, the United States and the international community had failed for nearly 10 years following attacks of September 11, 2001, to locate and bring Osama bin Laden, who continued to kill innocent civilians in the Middle East, Asia, Europe, Africa and the United States, to justice without the help of Dr. Afridi.
(11) The Government of Pakistan’s imprisonment of Dr. Afridi presents a serious and growing impediment to the United States’ bilateral relations with Pakistan.
Not later than December 31, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the extent to which the Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan has adequate access to financial records of the Government of Afghanistan to audit the use of funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for assistance for Afghanistan.
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 1209 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541) is amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.
(b) Reprogramming requirement.—Subsection (f) of such section, as amended by section 1225(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1055), is further amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following:
“(3) CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING REPROGRAMMING REQUESTS.—Each request under paragraph (1) shall include a certification of the Secretary of Defense that—
“(A) a required number and type of United States Armed Forces have been deployed to support the strategy for Syria required under section 1225(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1054) and to support a plan to retake and hold Raqqa, Syria; and
“(B) a required number and type of United States Armed Forces have been deployed to support the elements of the Syrian opposition and other Syrian groups and individuals that are to be trained and equipped under this section to ensure that such elements, groups, and individuals are able to defend themselves from attacks by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and Government of Syria forces consistent with the purposes set forth in subsection (a).”.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) it should be the policy of the United States to support, within the framework of the Iraqi Constitution, the Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga, the Iraqi Security Forces, and Sunni tribal forces in the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant;
(2) recognizing the important role of the Iraqi Kurdish Peshmerga within the military campaign against ISIL in Iraq, the United States should provide arms, training, and appropriate equipment directly to the Kurdistan Regional Government;
(b) Authority.—Subsection (a) of section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3559) is amended by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.
(c) Funding.—Subsection (g) of such section, as amended by section 1223 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1049), is further amended—
(1) by striking the first sentence and inserting the following: “Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 for Overseas Contingency Operations in title XV for fiscal year 2017, there are authorized to be appropriated $680,000,000 to carry out this section.”; and
(d) Submission of plan requirement.—Subsection (k) of such section is amended to read as follows:
“(k) Submission of plan requirement.—Not more than 75 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this section may be obligated or expended until not earlier than 15 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submits to the appropriate congressional committees a plan to re-take Mosul, Iraq from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and to hold Mosul, Iraq.”.
(e) Briefing and authority to assist directly certain covered groups.—Subsection (l) of such section, as so amended, is further amended—
(2) in paragraph (1)—
(B) in subparagraph (A)—
(3) in paragraph (2)—
(A) in subparagraph (A)—
(f) Prohibition on assistance and report on equipment or supplies transferred to or acquired by violent extremist organizations.—
(1) PROHIBITION.—Assistance authorized under section 1236 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3559), as so amended, may not be provided to the Government of Iraq after the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act unless the Secretary of Defense certifies to the appropriate congressional committees, after the date of the enactment of this Act, that the Government of Iraq has taken such actions as may be reasonably necessary to safeguard against such assistance being transferred to or acquired by violent extremist organizations.
(2) BRIEFING.—
(A) BRIEFING REQUIRED.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense makes any determination that equipment or supplies provided pursuant to section 1236(a) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3559), as so amended, have been transferred to or acquired by a violent extremist organization, the Secretary shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a briefing that contains a description of the determination of the Secretary and the transfer to or acquisition by the violent extremist organization.
(B) ELEMENTS.—Each briefing under paragraph (1) shall include, with respect to the transfer covered by the report, the following:
(i) An assessment of the type and quantity of equipment or supplies transferred to the violent extremist organization.
(ii) A description of the criteria used to determine that the organization is a violent extremist organization.
(iii) A description, if known, of how the equipment or supplies were transferred to or acquired by the violent extremist organization.
(3) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection:
(B) VIOLENT EXTREMIST ORGANIZATION.—The term “violent extremist organization” means an organization that—
(i) is a foreign terrorist organization designated by the Secretary of State under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189) or is associated with a foreign terrorist organization; or
(a) Extension of authority.—Subsection (f)(1) of section 1215 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1631; 10 U.S.C. 113 note), as most recently amended by section 1221 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1047), is further amended—
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that describes the political, economic, and security conditions in Iraq and Syria that would be necessary and sufficient to prevent the formation of future terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria that may present a danger to the United States, its allies, and the stability of Iraq, Syria, and the rest of the Middle East region.
(b) Matters to be included.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A detailed construct of the conditions that must be met for the Islamic State to be considered defeated and a successful conclusion to Operation Inherent Resolve achieved.
(2) A detailed explanation of the political, economic, and security conditions that would—
(A) provide reasonable confidence a new terrorist organization, including a successor to al Qaeda or Islamic State, or an unrelated organization, would not form in the region in the short and long term;
(a) Reports required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress, on a semiannual basis, a report on the political and military strategies to defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant.
(b) Matters to be included.—Each report required under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) Military strategy and objectives of the United States Department of Defense and coalition partners against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (hereinafter in this section referred to as “ISIL”);
(2) Political strategy and objectives of the United States Department of State and coalition partners to address the political roots underlying the growth of ISIL, including—
(A) a comprehensive political plan for achieving a transition plan, interim government, and free and fair internationally monitored elections after the end of the current government headed by Bashar al-Assad;
(B) a comprehensive political plan for Iraqi political reform and reconciliation between ethnic groups and political parties (including a plan for passage of national guard legislation, repeal of de-Baathification laws, and a plan for equitable petroleum revenue sharing with the Kurdistan Regional Government); and
(c) Report by Comptroller General.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a review of—
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) Attacks intentionally targeting civilians, medical personnel, or medical facilities constitute grave violations of international humanitarian law.
(2) In Syria, schools, markets, and hospitals are routinely destroyed in attacks and medical providers routinely targeted for attacks.
(3) Physicians for Human Rights has documented at least 350 airstrikes against medical facilities and the deaths of over 700 medical personnel in Syria since 2011.
(4) So far in May 2016, there have been at least six attacks on medical facilities in the city of Aleppo alone in less than a week killing dozens, including the last pediatrician still working in Aleppo.
(5) These attacks seriously hinder access to medical care and are compounded by ongoing efforts by the Syrian regime to block or limit humanitarian aid to Syrians.
(6) Secretary of State John Kerry has condemned these attacks arguing, “there is no justification for this horrific violence that targets civilians or medical facilities or first responders no matter who it is, whether it’s a member of the opposition retaliating or the regime in its brutality against the civilians which has continued for five years.”.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Department of Defense and all other appropriate United States Government agencies should continue to strongly condemn and call for an immediate end to attacks on medical facilities and medical providers in Syria and work to ensure that doctors can do their job and provide care to the those in need;
(2) humanitarian crises in Syria and Iraq, exacerbated by targeted attacks on medical facilities, personnel, and schools, threaten the achievement of United States goals in the region, such as destroying and dismantling the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and peace and stability in the region, including Syria;
(3) the United States and international community should do more to support medical professionals and medical nonprofit organizations working in Syria, at great risk to their personal well-being, to treat the ill and infirm and ensure some level of medical care for Syrians; and
(4) the Department of Defense is strongly encouraged to support, where appropriate, other appropriate United States Government agencies and entities engaged in meeting urgent and increasing humanitarian and medical needs in Syria, especially in areas where medical facilities and providers have been targeted by the Syrian regime, ISIL, or Al-Qaeda.
The President shall instruct the United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations to use the voice and vote of the United States at the United Nations to seek the establishment of a United Nations processing center in Erbil, Iraqi Kurdistan, to assist internationally-displaced communities.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) For nearly two years, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has capitalized on established oil production facilities throughout Iraq and Syria in order to fund its jihadist operations globally.
(3) In 2015, ISIS oil sales brought in over $400,000,000 to prop up the terror group’s operations world-wide.
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 may be obligated or expended to transfer or facilitate the transfer of man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) to any entity in Syria.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(b) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act or any other Act for fiscal year 2017 or any subsequent fiscal year may be used to approve or otherwise permit the approval of a request by the Russian Federation to carry out an initial or exhibition observation flight or certification event of an observation aircraft on which is installed an upgraded sensor with infrared or synthetic aperture radar capability over the territory of the United States or over the territory of a covered state party under the Open Skies Treaty unless and until the Secretary of Defense, jointly with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Director of National Intelligence, and the commander of U.S. Strategic Command and the Commander of U.S. Northern Command in the case of a flight over the territory of the United States and the Commander of U.S. European Command in the case of other flights, submits to the appropriate congressional committees the following:
(1) CERTIFICATION.—A certification that—
(B) covered state parties have been notified and briefed on concerns of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) regarding upgraded sensors used under the Open Skies Treaty.
(2) REPORT.—A report on the Open Skies Treaty that includes the following:
(A) The annual costs to the United States associated with countermeasures to combat potential abuses of Russian flights carried out under the Open Skies Treaty over European and United States territories with a sensor described in paragraph (1)(B).
(B) A plan to replace the Open Skies Treaty architecture with a more robust sharing of overhead commercial imagery, consistent with United States national security, with covered state parties, excluding the Russian Federation.
(c) Notice.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 14 days after the completion of an observation flight over the United States, the Secretary of Defense, jointly with the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall notify the appropriate congressional committees of such flight.
(2) CONTENTS.—Notice submitted for a flight pursuant to paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(B) An analysis of whether and the extent to which any United States critical infrastructure was the subject of image capture activities of such flight.
(d) Additional limitation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not more than 65 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act or any other Act for fiscal year 2017 year may be used to carry out any activities to implement the Open Skies Treaty until the requirements described in paragraph (2) are met.
(2) REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED.—The requirements described in this paragraph are the following:
(A) The Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the following:
(i) Whether it is possible, consistent with United States national security interests, to provide enhanced access to United States commercial imagery or other United States capabilities, consistent with the protection of sources and methods and United States national security, to covered state parties that is qualitatively similar to that derived by flights over the territory of the United States or over the territory of a covered state party under the Open Skies Treaty, on a more timely basis.
(ii) What the cost would be to provide enhanced access to such commercial imagery or other capabilities as compared to the current imagery sharing through the Open Skies Treaty.
(iii) Whether any new agreements would be needed to provide enhanced access to such commercial imagery or other capabilities and what would be required to obtain such agreements.
(iv) Whether transitioning to such commercial imagery or other capabilities from the current imagery sharing through the Open Skies Treaty would reduce opportunities by the Russian Federation to exceed imagery limits and reduce utility for Russian intelligence collection against the United States or covered state parties.
(a) In general.—An amount equal to $10,000,000 of the amount authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 to provide support services to the Executive Office of the President shall be withheld from obligation or expenditure until the Secretary of Defense—
(1) submits to the appropriate congressional committees the plan for the development of military capabilities as described in paragraph (1) of section 1243(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1062); and
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense may be used for any bilateral military-to-military cooperation between the Governments of the United States and the Russian Federation until the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(b) Nonapplicability.—The limitation in subsection (a) shall not apply to—
(c) Waiver.—The Secretary of Defense may waive the limitation in subsection (a) if the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State—
(d) Exception for certain military bases.—The certification requirement specified in paragraph (1) of subsection (a) shall not apply to military bases of the Russian Federation in Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula operating in accordance with its 1997 agreement on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet Stationing on the Territory of Ukraine.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The Russian Federation, under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin, continues to demonstrate its intent to expand its sphere of influence and limit Western influence both regionally and globally.
(2) In March 2016, at a House Armed Services Committee hearing discussing worldwide threats, Major General James Marrs, Director for Intelligence in the Joint Staff stated, “principally, what we are seeing in Russia…is just a breadth of capabilities from strategic systems to anti access area denial to even, I would say, a growing adeptness at operating sort of just short of traditional military conflict that is posing a significant challenge in the future”.
(3) In July 2015, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Joseph Dunford, testified to the Senate Armed Services Committee, that “Russia presents the greatest threat to our national security”. In November 2015, Secretary of Defense, Ashton Carter, discussed the need for “adapting our operational posture and contingency plans…to deter Russia’s aggression”.
(4) In February 2016, the Rand Corporation released its report, “Reinforcing Deterrence on NATO’s Eastern Flank”, concluding that at a maximum it would take Russian forces approximately 60 hours to reach the capitals of Estonia and Latvia, exhibiting the challenge to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries of successfully defending such territory with its current posture and capability.
(5) In February 2016, the Center for Strategic and International Studies released its report, “Evaluating U.S. Army Force Posture in Europe”, calling for increased pre-positioned sets of United States military equipment, increased rotational forces and associated enablers, increased logistics capabilities, and increased investment in combating unconventional warfare methods in Europe.
(6) In February 2016, the National Commission on the Future of the Army released its findings and recommendations, which included Recommendation 14 calling for stationing an Armored Brigade Combat Team Forward in Europe and Recommendation 15 calling for the conversion of Army Europe Aviation Headquarters to a warfighting mission command.
(7) In the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 114–92) and the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 113–291), Congress authorized approximately $1,800,000,000 for the European Reassurance Initiative to reassure allies through expanded United States military presence in Europe through rotational deployments of United States troops, bilateral and multilateral exercises, improved infrastructure, increased pre-positioned United States military equipment, and building partnership capacity.
(8) The budget of the President for fiscal year 2017 submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, includes $3,420,000,000 for the European Reassurance Initiative to begin the transition from primarily reassuring United States partners and allies to deterring the Russian Federation.
(b) Statement of policy.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—It is the policy of the United States to reassure United States partners and allies in Europe and to work with United States partners and allies to deter aggression by the Government of the Russian Federation in order to enhance regional and global security and stability.
(2) CONDUCT OF POLICY.—The policy described in paragraph (1) shall, among other things, be carried out through a comprehensive defense strategy and guidance to outline the future path of defense resources and capabilities in the European theater. Such strategy and guidance shall include—
(A) use and expansion of conventional methods, including increased United States presence, pre-positioning of United States military equipment, increased infrastructure, and building partnership capacity in Europe;
(a) Authority to provide assistance.—Subsection (a) of section 1250 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1068) is amended—
(a) Prohibition.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to implement any activity that recognizes the sovereignty of the Russian Federation over Crimea.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Ukraine’s border is 6,995 kilometers long, including 1,974 kilometers of controlled border with the Russian Federation, 195 kilometers of an administrative line with Crimea, and 409 kilometers of border in the east that is currently uncontrolled.
(2) Since the beginning of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in 2014, 64 Ukrainian border guards have been killed and another 391 have been wounded.
(3) Implementation of the Minsk Agreement, signed in February 2015, requires the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine to reestablish border checkpoints in currently uncontrolled territory and to monitor the border to verify full implementation of the Agreement.
(4) Ukraine is developing engineering and technical systems to strengthen the controlled border between Ukraine and the Russian Federation, Ukrainian maritime borders, and areas adjacent to the uncontrolled territory and occupied Crimea.
(5) Russian unmanned aerial vehicles are being used to support Russian-backed separatist artillery fire against Ukrainian forces.
(6) Due to a lack of resources and equipment, Ukraine lacks an effective early warning network to warn of any new aggression on the border.
(7) Section 1250 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1068) calls for the United States to provide to Ukraine critical training and equipment to enhance the capabilities of the military and other security forces of Ukraine to defend against further aggression from the Russian Federation and Russian-backed separatists.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States should continue to support the Government of Ukraine’s efforts to provide and maintain security in Ukraine;
(c) Modification and extension of report on military assistance to Ukraine.—
(1) CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.—Subsection (b) of section 1275 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3591) is amended by inserting “and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives” after “congressional defense committees”.
(3) EXTENSION.—Subsection (e) of such section, as amended by section 1250(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1070), is further amended by striking “December 31, 2017” and inserting “December 31, 2019”.
(a) Additional matters.—Subsection (b) of section 1245 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3566), as amended by section 1248(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1066), is further amended—
(2) by inserting after paragraph (17) the following:
“(18) The current state of Russia’s foreign military deployments, which shall include the following:
“(A) For each such deployment, the estimated number of forces, types of capabilities to include advanced weapons, length of deployment, and where possible identifying basing agreements.
“(B) The following information with respect to such deployments to be disaggregated on a country-by-country basis:
“(i) The number of Russian military personnel, including combat troops, military trainers, combat enabling capabilities and border security agents, deployed to the country with the consent of the national or local government. The number and type of transient Russian naval vessels that have utilized ports of the country. Such information should include the length of the basing arrangements, including the use of ports of such country by transient Russian naval vessels, and the strategic importance of the location.
(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply with respect to reports submitted under section 1245 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 after that date.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds that the Government of Iran continues to conduct provocative, malign activities in the region, including—
(1) the launch of the Shahab-3 medium-range ballistic missile and Qiam-1 short-range ballistic missiles;
(2) the intent to launch the Simorgh Space-Launch Vehicle (SLV) as stated by Lieutenant General Vincent Stewart in testimony to the House Armed Services Committee: “Iran stated publicly it intends to launch the Simorgh (SLV), which would be capable of intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) range.”;
(3) the detention of United States service members, which the Secretary of Defense, Ashton Carter, described in testimony to the House Armed Services Committee as “unprofessional” and “outrageous”;
(4) the support of foreign terrorist organizations designated by the Department of State, such as Lebanese Hezbollah and Kata’ib Hizbollah;
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) does not address the totality of the malign activities of the Government of Iran, including ballistic missile launches, support for designated foreign terrorist organizations, or other proxies conducting malign activities in the region and globally;
(2) the United States should increase its efforts to counter the continued expansion of malign activities of the Government of Iran in the Middle East;
(a) Annual report.—Subsection (a) of section 1202 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 781; 10 U.S.C. 113 note) is amended by striking “March 1 each year” and inserting “January 31 of each year through January 31, 2021”.
(b) Matters to be included.—Subsection (b) of such section, as most recently amended by section 1252(a) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3571), is further amended by adding at the end the following:
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States should continue to conduct bilateral cooperation and support the strategic partnership with Singapore to promote peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region;
(2) the United States welcomes the signing of the enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement with Singapore and should expand bilateral training and cooperation on security issues, including maritime security, cyber security, countering violent extremism, humanitarian assistance, and disaster relief;
(a) In general.—Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated by this Act for Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid, the Secretary of Defense is authorized to use up to 5 percent of such amounts to conduct monitoring and evaluation of programs that are funded using such amounts during fiscal year 2017.
(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State may enter into an agreement under which each Secretary may provide covered support, supplies, and services on a reimbursement basis, or by exchange of covered support, supplies, and services, to the other Secretary during a contingency operation and related transition period for up to two years following the end of such contingency operation.
(b) Agreement.—An agreement entered into under this section shall be in writing and shall include the following terms:
(1) The price charged by a supplying agency shall be the direct costs that such agency incurred by providing the covered support, supplies, or services to the requesting agency under this section.
(2) Credits and liabilities of the agencies accrued as a result of acquisitions and transfers of covered support, supplies, and services under this section shall be liquidated not less often than once every 3 months by direct payment to the agency supplying such support, supplies, or services by the agency receiving such support, supplies, or services.
(3) Exchange entitlements accrued as a result of acquisitions and transfers of covered support, supplies, and services under this section shall be satisfied within 12 months after the date of the delivery of the covered support, supplies, or services. Exchange entitlements not so satisfied shall be immediately liquidated by direct payment to the agency supplying such covered support, supplies, or services.
(c) Effect of obligation and availability of funds.—An order placed by an agency pursuant to an agreement under this section is deemed to be an obligation in the same manner that a similar order placed under a contract with, or a contract for similar goods or services awarded to, a private contractor is an obligation. Appropriations remain available to pay an obligation to the servicing agency in the same manner as appropriations remain available to pay an obligation to a private contractor.
(d) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) COVERED SUPPORT, SUPPLIES, AND SERVICES.—The term “covered support, supplies, and services” means food, billeting, transportation (including airlift), petroleum, oils, lubricants, communications services, medical services, ammunition, base operations support, use of facilities, spare parts and components, repair and maintenance services, and calibration services.
(e) Crediting of receipts.—Any receipt as a result of an agreement entered into under this section shall be credited, at the option of the Secretary of Defense with respect to the Department of Defense and the Secretary of State with respect to the Department of State, to—
(f) Notification.—Not later than 30 days after the end of a fiscal year in which covered support, supplies, and services are provided or exchanged pursuant to an agreement under this section, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a notification that contains a copy of such agreement and a description of such covered support, supplies, and services.
(a) Extension of authority.—Subsection (h) of section 943 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4579), as most recently amended by section 1271 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1075), is further amended by striking “2018” and inserting “2020”.
(b) Modification to authorized activities.—Subsection (c) of such section is amended by inserting “, or other individuals, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, with respect to already established non-conventional assisted recovery capabilities” before the period at the end of the first sentence.
(a) Authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense may destroy the chemical munitions described in subsection (c).
(2) EX GRATIA ACTION.—The action authorized by this section is “ex gratia” on the part of the United States, as the term “ex gratia” is used in section 321 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note).
(b) Conditions.—The Secretary of Defense may exercise the authority under subsection (a) only if the Republic of Panama has—
(1) revised the declaration of the Republic of Panama under the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction to indicate that the chemical munitions described in subsection (c) are “old chemical weapons” rather than “abandoned chemical weapons”; and
(2) affirmed, in writing, that it understands (A) that the United States intends only to destroy the munitions described in subsections (c) and (d), and (B) that the United States is not legally obligated and does not intend to destroy any other munitions, munitions constituents, and associated debris that may be located on San Jose Island as a result of research, development, and testing activities conducted on San Jose Island during the period of 1943 through 1947.
(c) Chemical munitions.—The chemical munitions described in this subsection are the eight United States-origin chemical munitions located on San Jose Island, Republic of Panama, that were identified in the 2002 Final Inspection Report of the Technical Secretariat of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.
(d) Limited incidental authority to destroy other munitions.—In exercising the authority under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense may destroy other munitions located on San Jose Island, Republic of Panama, but only to the extent essential and required to reach and destroy the chemical munitions described in subsection (c).
(a) Required report.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that contains the strategy for United States defense interests in Africa.
(b) Matters to be included.—The report required by subsection (a) shall address the following:
(1) United States national security interests in Africa, including an assessment of threats to global and regional United States national security interests emanating from the continent.
(3) Courses of action to accomplish United States defense objectives in Africa, including those conducted in cooperation with other Federal agencies.
(4) Measures to improve coordination between United States Africa Command and other combatant commands to achieve unity of effort to counter threats that cross combatant command boundaries.
(a) Authority To Establish Directed Energy Capabilities Program With Israel.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, upon the request of the Ministry of Defense of Israel, and with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, may carry out research, development, test, and evaluation activities, on a joint basis with Israel, to establish directed energy capabilities to detect and defeat ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles, mortars, and improvised explosive devices that threaten the United States, deployed forces of the United States, or Israel. Any activities carried out pursuant to such authority shall be conducted in a manner that appropriately protects sensitive information and the national security interests of the United States and Israel.
(2) REPORT.—The activities described in paragraph (1) may be carried out after the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth the following:
(A) A memorandum of agreement between the United States and Israel regarding sharing of research and development costs for the capabilities described in paragraph (1), and any supporting documents.
(b) Lead agency.—The Secretary of Defense shall designate the Missile Defense Agency as the appropriate research and development entity and as the lead agency of the Department of Defense in carrying out this section.
(c) Semiannual reports.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress on a semiannual basis a report that contains a copy of the most recent semiannual report provided by the Government of Israel to the Department of Defense pursuant to subsection (a)(2)(B)(iii).
(d) Sunset.—The authority in this section to carry out activities described in subsection (a) shall expire on December 31, 2018.
(e) Appropriate committees of congress defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate committees of Congress” means—
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are highly valued allies of the United States, and they have repeatedly demonstrated their commitment to advancing our mutual interests as well as those of the NATO Alliance.
(2) Operation Atlantic Resolve is a series of exercises and coordinating efforts demonstrating the United States’ commitment to its European partners and allies, including the Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, with the shared goal of peace and stability in the region. Operation Atlantic Resolve strengthens communication and understanding, and is an important effort to deter Russian aggression in the region.
(b) Sense of Congress.—Congress—
(1) reaffirms its support for the principle of collective defense in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty for our NATO allies, including Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania;
(2) supports the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and inviolability of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania as well as their internationally recognized borders, and expresses concerns over increasingly aggressive military maneuvering by the Russian Federation near their borders and airspace;
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) Georgia is a valued friend of the United States and has repeatedly demonstrated its commitment to advancing the mutual interests of both countries, including the deployment of Georgian forces as part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan and the Multi-National Force in Iraq.
(2) The European Reassurance Initiative builds the partnership capacity of Georgia so it can work more closely with the United States and NATO, as well as provide for its own defense.
(a) In general.—Subsection (b)(3) of section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2542) is amended—
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) through (G) as subparagraphs (G) through (I), respectively; and
(2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
(a) In general.—It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Defense should conduct a program of senior military exchanges between the United States and Taiwan that have the objective of improving military-to-military relations and defense cooperation between the United States and Taiwan.
(b) Administration of program.—It is the sense of Congress that the program described in subsection (a)—
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) SENIOR MILITARY EXCHANGE.—The term “senior military exchange” means an activity, exercise, professional education event, or observation opportunity in which senior military officers and senior defense officials participate.
(a) In general.—Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 130i. Quarterly report on freedom of navigation operations
“(a) Report required.—Not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal quarter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on any excessive territorial claims of foreign countries that were challenged by freedom of navigation operations and flights carried out by the armed forces during such fiscal quarter.
Section 36 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(j) At the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committees on Armed Services and Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report that lists each request received from Taiwan and each letter of offer to sell any defense articles or services under this Act to Taiwan during such fiscal year. The report shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.”.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been the cornerstone of transatlantic security cooperation and an enduring instrument for promoting stability in Europe and around the world for over 65 years.
(2) NATO currently faces a range of evolving security challenges, including Russian aggression in Eastern Europe, and instability and conflict in the Middle East and North Africa. In the face of these varied challenges, NATO must deter threats and, if necessary, defend NATO member states against adversaries.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) at the July 2016 NATO Summit in Warsaw, Poland and beyond, the United States should—
(D) encourage the leaders of Macedonia and Greece to find a mutually agreeable solution to the name dispute between the two countries;
(F) work with the Republic of Kosovo to prepare the country for entrance into the Partnership for Peace (PfP) program;
(2) in Warsaw, NATO member states should build upon the progress made since the 2014 Wales Summit, by committing additional resources to NATO’s Readiness Action Plan and related measures to enhance allied readiness and deterrence;
(3) NATO member states should review defense spending to ensure sufficient funding is obligated to meet NATO responsibilities, including to allocate at least 2 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defense spending, and to devote at least 20 percent of defense spending to defense modernization and new equipment;
(4) the United States should commit to maintaining a robust military presence in Europe as a means of promoting allied interoperability, providing visible assurance to NATO allies, and deterring Russian aggression in the region; and
(5) the United States reaffirms and remains committed to the policies enumerated by NATO member states in the Deterrence and Defense Posture Review, dated May 20, 2012, and the Wales Summit Declaration of September 2014, including the following statement: “Deterrence, based on an appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional, and missile defence capabilities, remains a core element of our overall strategy.”.
The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on violence and cartel activity in Mexico and the impact of such on United States national security.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) For more than 50 years, the United States and Taiwan have had a unique and close relationship, which has supported the economic, cultural, and strategic advantage to both countries.
(3) The Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) has been instrumental in maintaining peace, security, and stability in the Taiwan Strait since its enactment in 1979.
(4) The Taiwan Relations Act states that it is the policy of the United States to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character and to maintain the capacity of the United States to defend against any forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Taiwan.
(b) Statement of policy.—The Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) forms the cornerstone of United States policy and relations with Taiwan.
(c) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than February 15, 2017, the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that contains a description of the steps the United States has taken, plans to take, and will take to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character in accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act (Public Law 96–8; 22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.).
(a) In general.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to fund a Secretariat or any other international organization established to support the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty, to sustain domestic prosecutions based on any charge related to the Treaty, or to implement the Treaty until the Senate approves a resolution of ratification for the Treaty and implementing legislation for the Treaty has been enacted into law.
(a) Limitation.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense may be used for any bilateral military-to-military contact or cooperation between the Governments of the United States and Cuba until the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, certify to the appropriate congressional committees that—
(1) the Government of Cuba has—
(2) the Cuban military and other security forces in Cuba have ceased committing human right abuses, including arbitrary arrests, beatings, and other acts of repudiation, against those who express opposition to the Castro regime, civil rights activists and other citizens of Cuba, as well as all persecution, intimidation, arrest, imprisonment, and assassination of dissidents and members of faith-based organizations;
(3) the Cuban military has ceased providing military intelligence, weapons training, strategic planning, and security logistics to the military and security forces of Venezuela;
(4) the Government of Cuba no longer demands that the United States relinquish control of Guantanamo Bay, in violation of an international treaty;
(b) Exceptions.—The limitation on the use of funds under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to—
(1) payments in furtherance of the lease agreement, or other financial transactions necessary for maintenance and improvements of the military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including any adjacent areas under the control or possession of the United States;
(2) assistance or support in furtherance of democracy-building efforts for Cuba described in section 109 of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C. 6039); or
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) BILATERAL MILITARY-TO-MILITARY CONTACT OR COOPERATION.—The term “bilateral military-to-military contact or cooperation”—
(3) CUBAN MILITARY.—The term “Cuban military” means—
(A) the Ministry of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Cuba, the Ministry of the Interior of Cuba, or any subdivision of either such Ministry;
(a) Establishment.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, shall establish a Global Engagement Center (in this section referred to as the “Center”). The purposes of the Center are—
(1) to lead and coordinate the compilation and examination of information on foreign government information warfare efforts monitored and integrated by the appropriate interagency entities with responsibility for such information, including information provided by recipients of information access fund grants awarded under subsection (f) and other sources;
(2) to establish a framework for the integration of critical data and analysis provided by the appropriate interagency entities with responsibility for such information on foreign propaganda and disinformation efforts into the development of national strategy;
(3) to develop, plan, and synchronize, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, whole-of-government initiatives to expose and counter foreign propaganda and disinformation directed against United States national security interests and proactively advance fact-based narratives that support United States allies and interests;
(4) to demonstrate new technologies, methodologies and concepts relevant to the missions of the Center that can be transitioned to other departments or agencies of the United States Government, foreign partners or allies, or other nongovernmental entities;
(b) Functions.—The Center shall carry out the following functions:
(1) Integrating interagency and international efforts to track and evaluate counterfactual narratives abroad that threaten the national security interests of the United States and United States allies.
(2) Integrating, and analyzing relevant information, data, analysis, and analytics from United States Government agencies, allied nations, think tanks, academic institutions, civil society groups, and other nongovernmental organizations.
(3) Developing and disseminating fact-based narratives and analysis to counter propaganda and disinformation directed at United States allies and partners.
(4) Identifying current and emerging trends in foreign propaganda and disinformation based on the information provided by the appropriate interagency entities with responsibility for such information, including information obtained from print, broadcast, online and social media, support for third-party outlets such as think tanks, political parties, and nongovernmental organizations, and the use of covert or clandestine special operators and agents to influence targeted populations and governments in order to coordinate and shape the development of tactics, techniques, and procedures to expose and refute foreign misinformation and disinformation and proactively promote fact-based narratives and policies to audiences outside the United States.
(5) Facilitating the use of a wide range of technologies and techniques by sharing expertise among agencies, seeking expertise from external sources, and implementing best practices.
(6) Identifying gaps in United States capabilities in areas relevant to the Center’s mission and recommending necessary enhancements or changes.
(7) Identifying the countries and populations most susceptible to foreign government propaganda and disinformation based on information provided by appropriate interagency entities.
(9) Coordinating with allied and partner nations, particularly those frequently targeted by foreign disinformation operations, and international organizations and entities such as the NATO Center of Excellence on Strategic Communications, the European Endowment for Democracy, and the European External Action Service Task Force on Strategic Communications, in order to amplify the Center’s efforts and avoid duplication.
(d) Employees of the Center.—
(1) DETAILEES.—Any Federal Government employee may be detailed to the Center without reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil service status or privilege for a period of not more than three years.
(2) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTORS.—The Secretary of State may exercise the authority provided under section 3161 of title 5, United States Code, to establish a program (referred to in this subsection as the “Program”) for hiring United States citizens or aliens as personal services contractors for purposes of personnel resources of the Center, if—
(B) the period in which services are provided by a personal services contractor under the Program, including options, does not exceed three years, unless the Secretary determines that exceptional circumstances justify an extension of up to one additional year;
(e) Authorization of appropriations.—Under “Diplomatic and Consular Programs”, for each of fiscal years 2017 and 2018, $10,000,000 is authorized to be appropriated to the Department of State and may remain available until expended to carry out the functions, duties, and responsibilities of the Center.
(f) Information access fund.—
(1) AUTHORITY FOR GRANTS.—The Center is authorized to provide grants or contracts of financial support to civil society groups, journalists, nongovernmental organizations, federally-funded research and development centers, private companies, or academic institutions for the following purposes:
(A) To support local independent media who are best placed to refute foreign disinformation and manipulation in their own communities.
(B) To collect and store examples in print, online, and social media, disinformation, misinformation, and propaganda directed at the United States and its allies and partners.
(2) FUNDING AVAILABILITY AND LIMITATIONS.—The Secretary of State shall provide that each organization that applies to receive funds under this subsection undergoes a vetting process in accordance with the relevant existing regulations to ensure its bona fides, capability, and experience, and its compatibility with United States interests and objectives.
The United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.; Public Law 103–236) is amended—
(1) by amending section 304 (22 U.S.C. 6203) to read as follows:
“SEC. 304. Establishment of the Chief Executive Officer of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
“(a) Continued existence within executive branch.—The Broadcasting Board of Governors shall continue to exist within the Executive branch of Government as an entity described in section 104 of title 5, United States Code.
“(b) Chief Executive Officer.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The head of the Broadcasting Board of Governors shall be a Chief Executive Officer, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The President shall nominate the Chief Executive Officer not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this section. Until such time as a Chief Executive Officer is appointed and has qualified, the current or acting Chief Executive Officer appointed by the Board may continue to serve and exercise the authorities and powers under this Act.
“(c) Termination of Director of International Broadcasting Bureau.—Immediately upon appointment of the Chief Executive Officer under subsection (b), the Director of the International Broadcasting Bureau shall be terminated, and all of the responsibilities, authorities, and immunities of the Director or the Board under this or any other Act or authority before the date of the enactment of this section shall be transferred to and assumed or overseen by the Chief Executive Officer, as head of the agency.
“(d) Members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.—Members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors in office as of the date of the enactment of this section may serve the remainder of their terms of office in an advisory capacity, but such terms may not be extended beyond the date on which such terms are set to expire.
“(e) Immunity from civil liability.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all limitations on liability that apply to the Chief Executive Officer shall also apply to members of the board of directors of RFE/RL, Inc., Radio Free Asia, the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, or any organization that consolidates such entities when such members are acting in their official capacities.”; and
(2) in section 305 (22 U.S.C. 6204)—
(A) in subsection (a)—
(vii) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
“(20) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including section 308(a), to condition, if appropriate, any grant or cooperative agreement to RFE/RL, Inc., Radio Free Asia, and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks on authority to determine membership of their respective boards, and the consolidation of such entities into a single grantee organization.
The United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.; Public Law 103–236) is amended—
(2) by striking section 307 (22 U.S.C. 6206); and
(3) by inserting after section 309 the following new sections:
“SEC. 310. Broadcast entities reporting to Chief Executive Officer.
“(a) Grantee organizations.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the following provisions shall apply:
“(1) CONSOLIDATION.—The Chief Executive Officer, subject to the regular notification procedures of the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, who is authorized to incorporate a grantee, may condition annual grants to RFE/RL, Inc., Radio Free Asia, and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks on the consolidation of such grantees into a single, consolidated private, non-profit corporation (in accordance with section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such Code), which may broadcast and provide news and information to audiences wherever the Agency may broadcast, for activities that the Chief Executive Officer determines are consistent with the purposes of this Act, including the terms and conditions of subsections (g)(5), (h), (i), and (j) of section 308, except that the Agency may select any name for such a consolidated grantee.
“(2) FEDERAL STATUS.—Nothing in this or any other Act, or any action taken pursuant to this or any other Act, may be construed to make such a consolidated grantee described in paragraph (1) or RFE/RL, Inc., Radio Free Asia, or the Middle East Broadcasting Networks or any other grantee or entity provided funding by the Agency a Federal agency or instrumentality. Employees or staff of such grantees or entities shall not be considered Federal employees. For purposes of this subsection and this Act, the term ‘grant’ includes agreements under section 6305 of title 31, United States Code, and the term ‘grantee’ includes recipients of such agreements.
“(3) LEADERSHIP OF GRANTEE ORGANIZATIONS.—Officers of RFE/RL Inc., Radio Free Asia, and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks or any organization that is established through the consolidation of such entities, or authorized under this Act, shall serve at the pleasure of the Chief Executive Officer of the Agency.
“(b) Voice of America.—
“(1) STATUS AS A FEDERAL ENTITY.—The Chief Executive Officer is authorized to establish an independent grantee organization, as a private nonprofit organization, to carry out all broadcasting and related programs currently performed by the Voice of America. The Chief Executive Officer may make and supervise grants or cooperative agreements to such grantee, including under terms and conditions and in any manner authorized under section 305(a). Such grantee shall not be considered a Federal agency or instrumentality and shall adhere to the same standards of professionalism and accountability required of all Board broadcasters and grantees. The Board is authorized to transfer any facilities or equipment to such grantee, and to utilize the provisions of subchapter VI of chapter 33 of title 5, United States Code.
“(2) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the Congress that the Voice of America, operating as a nonprofit organization, should have the mission to—
“(A) serve as a consistently reliable and authoritative source of news on the United States, its policies, its people, and the international developments that affect the United States;
“(B) provide accurate, objective, and comprehensive information, with the understanding that these three values provide credibility among global news audiences;
“SEC. 311. Inspector General authorities.
“(a) In general.—The Inspector General of the Department of State and the Foreign Service shall exercise the same authorities with respect to the Broadcasting Board of Governors and the International Broadcasting Bureau as the Inspector General exercises under the Inspector General Act of 1978 and section 209 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 with respect to the Department of State.
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of the Congress that the United States should continue supporting the efforts to the Southeast Asian nations to strengthen their maritime security capacity, domain awareness, and integration of their capabilities.
(b) Redesignation as Southeast Asia Maritime Security Initiative.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 1263 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1073; 10 U.S.C. 2282 note) is amended by striking “the ‘South China Sea Initiative’” and inserting “the ‘Southeast Asia Maritime Security Initiative’”.
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretaries of the military departments and the Secretary of State, shall submit to Congress a report that describes—
(a) Reports.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the following reports:
(1) A report on the Open Skies Treaty containing—
(A) an assessment, conducted by the Chairman jointly with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State, of whether and why, the Treaty remains in the national security interest of the United States, including if there are compliance concerns related to implementation by the Russian Federation of the Treaty;
(2) A report on the INF Treaty containing—
(A) an assessment, conducted by the Chairman jointly with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State, of whether and why, the Treaty remains in the national security interest of the United States, including how any ongoing violation bear on the assessment if such a violation is not resolved in the near-term;
(B) a specific plan by the Chairman jointly with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to remedy violation by the Russian Federation of the Treaty, and a judgment of whether Russia intends to take the steps required to establish verifiable evidence that Russia has resumed its compliance with the Treaty if such non-compliance and inconsistencies are not resolved by the date of the enactment of this Act; and
(b) Update.—Not later than February 15, 2018, the Chairman, the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees an update to each report under subsection (a).
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(2) The term “INF Treaty” means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate- Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, signed at Washington December 8, 1987, and entered into force June 1, 1988.
It is the sense of Congress that continued United States leadership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is critical to the national security of the United States.
(a) In general.—The President is authorized to provide assistance to Israel to improve maritime security and maritime domain awareness.
(b) Activities supported.—Activities that may be supported by assistance under subsection (a) include the following:
(1) Procurement, maintenance, and sustainment of the David’s Sling Weapon System for purposes of intercepting short-range missiles.
It is the sense of Congress that United States foreign policy should support a denuclearized Korean peninsula.
(a) Imposition of measures.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c), on and after the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall impose the measures described in subsection (b) with respect to—
(2) COUNTRY DESCRIBED.—A country described in this paragraph is a country that the President or the Secretary of State has determined, in the most recent annual report submitted to Congress pursuant to section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a), is not in full compliance with its obligations undertaken in all arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements or commitments to which the United States is a participating state.
(b) Measures described.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The measures to be imposed with respect to a person under subsection (a) are the head of any executive agency (as defined in section 133 of title 41, United States Code) may not enter into, renew, or extend a contract for the procurement of goods or services with the person.
(2) EXCEPTION FOR MAJOR ROUTES OF SUPPLY.—The requirement to impose measures under paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to any contract for the procurement of goods or services along a major route of supply to a zone of active combat or major contingency operation.
(3) REQUIREMENT TO REVISE REGULATIONS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, and the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards shall be revised to implement paragraph (1)(B).
(B) CERTIFICATIONS.—The revisions to the Federal Acquisition Regulation under subparagraph (A) shall include a requirement for a certification from each person that is a prospective contractor that the person, and any person owned or controlled by the person, does not engage in any activity described in subsection (a)(1)(A)(ii).
(C) REMEDIES.—If the head of an executive agency determines that a person has submitted a false certification under subparagraph (B) on or after the date on which the applicable revision of the Federal Acquisition Regulation required by this paragraph becomes effective—
(i) the head of that executive agency shall terminate a contract with such person or debar or suspend such person from eligibility for Federal contracts for a period of not less than 2 years;
(ii) any such debarment or suspension shall be subject to the procedures that apply to debarment and suspension under the Federal Acquisition Regulation under subpart 9.4 of part 9 of title 48, Code of Federal Regulations; and
(iii) the Administrator of General Services shall include on the List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs maintained by the Administrator under part 9 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation each person that is debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment or suspension by the head of an executive agency on the basis of a determination of a false certification under subparagraph (B).
(4) UNITED STATES PERSON DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term “United States person” means—
(A) a natural person who is a citizen or resident of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)); and
(c) Waiver.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The President may waive the application of measures on a case-by-case basis under subsection (a) with respect to a person if the President—
(2) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by paragraph (1)(B) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(d) Termination.—The measures imposed with respect to a person under subsection (a) shall terminate on the date on which the President submits to Congress a subsequent annual report pursuant to section 403 of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2593a) that does not contain a determination of the President that the country described in subsection (a)(2) with respect to which the measures were imposed with respect to the person is a country that is not in full compliance with its obligations undertaken in all arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements or commitments to which the United States is a participating state.
(a) Report required.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to Congress a report on cooperation between Iran and the Russian Federation and how and to what extent such cooperation affects United States national security and strategic interests.
(b) Matters to be included.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) How and to what extent Iran and the Russian Federation cooperate on matters relating to Iran’s space program, including how and to what extent such cooperation strengthens Iran’s ballistic missile program.
(2) How and to what extent Iran’s interests and actions and the Russian Federation’s interests and actions overlap with respect to Latin America.
(3) A description and analysis of the intelligence-sharing center established by Iran, the Russian Federation, and Syria in Baghdad, Iraq and whether such center is being used for purposes other than the purposes of the joint mission of such countries in Syria.
(4) A description and analysis of—
(5) A description of the increased cooperation between Iran and the Russian Federation since the start of the current conflict in Syria.
(6) The steps Iran has taken to adopt the Russian Federation model of hybrid warfare against potential targets such as Gulf Cooperation Council states with sizeable Shiite populations.
(a) Findings.—Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8601 et seq.) established the policy of the United States to support the inherent right of Israel to self-defense.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that Israel should be able to defend its vital national interests and protect its territory and population against existential threats.
(c) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall submit to the specified congressional committees a report that—
(A) identifies defensive capabilities and platforms requested by the Government of Israel that would contribute to maintenance of Israel’s defensive capability against threats to its territory and population, including nuclear and ballistic missile facilities in Iran, and defend its vital national interests;
(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the President, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on use by the Government of Iran of commercial aircraft and related services for illicit military or other activities during the 5-year period ending of such date of enactment.
(b) Elements of report.—The report required under subsection (a) shall include a description of the extent to which—
(1) the Government of Iran has used commercial aircraft or related services to transport illicit cargo to or from Iran, including military goods, weapons, military personnel, military-related electronic parts and mechanical equipment, and rocket or missile components;
The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized to enter into agreements with the governments of foreign countries to develop land-based water resources in support of and in preparation for contingency operations, including water selection, pumping, purification, storage, distribution, cooling, consumption, water reuse, water source intelligence, research and development, training, acquisition of water support equipment, and water support operations.
Section 1252(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (22 U.S.C. 8808(a)) is amended in the matter preceding paragraph (1) by striking “2016” and inserting “2019”.
(a) Notification.—The President shall notify Congress within 48 hours of a suspected ballistic missile launch, including a test, by Iran based on credible information indicating that such a launch took place.
(b) Assessment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The President shall initiate an assessment within 48 hours of providing the notification described in subsection (a) to determine whether a missile launch, including a test, described in subsection (a) took place.
(2) DETERMINATION AND NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 15 days after the date on which an assessment is initiated under paragraph (1), the President shall determine whether Iran engaged in a launch described in subsection (a) and shall notify Congress of the basis for any such determination.
(3) AFFIRMATIVE DETERMINATION.—If the President determines under paragraph (2) that a launch described in subsection (a) took place, the President shall further notify Congress of the following:
(a) Purpose.—The purpose of this section is to authorize assistance and training to increase maritime security and domain awareness of foreign countries bordering the Persian Gulf, the Arabian Sea, or the Mediterranean Sea in order to deter and counter illicit smuggling and related maritime activity by Iran, including illicit Iranian weapons shipments.
(b) Authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—To carry out the purpose of this section as described in subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, is authorized—
(c) Types of training.—
(d) Availability of funds.—Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 by section 301 and available for operation and maintenance for Defense-wide activities as specified in the funding table in section 4301, $50,000,000 shall be available only for the provision of assistance and training under subsection (b).
(e) Cost sharing.—
(1) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that, given income parity among recipient countries, the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, should seek, through appropriate bilateral and multilateral arrangements, payments sufficient in amount to offset any training costs associated with implementation of subsection (b).
(2) COST-SHARING AGREEMENT.—The Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall negotiate a cost-sharing agreement with a recipient country regarding the cost of any training provided pursuant to section (b). The agreement shall set forth the terms of cost sharing that the Secretary of Defense determines are necessary and appropriate, but such terms shall not be less than 50 percent of the overall cost of the training.
(f) Notice to Congress on training.—Not later than 15 days before exercising the authority under subsection (b) with respect to a recipient country, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a notification containing the following:
(2) A detailed justification of the program for the provision of the training concerned, and its relationship to United States security interests.
(3) The budget for the program, including a timetable of planned expenditures of funds to implement the program, an implementation time-line for the program with milestones (including anticipated delivery schedules for any assistance and training under the program), the military department or component responsible for management of the program, and the anticipated completion date for the program.
(4) A description of the arrangements, if any, to support recipient country sustainment of any capability developed pursuant to the program, and the source of funds to support sustainment efforts and performance outcomes to be achieved under the program beyond its completion date, if applicable.
(a) Sense of congress.—Congress—
(1) strongly condemns the ongoing violence and the systematic gross human rights violations against the people of Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin carried out by Boko Haram;
(2) expresses its support for the people of Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin who wish to live in a peaceful, economically prosperous, and democratic region; and
(3) calls on the President to support Nigerian, Lake Chad Basin, and International Community efforts to ensure accountability for crimes against humanity committed by Boko Haram against the people of Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin, particularly young girls kidnapped from Chibok and other internally displaced persons affected by the actions of Boko Haram.
(b) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Attorney General shall jointly submit to Congress a report on efforts to combat Boko Haram in Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements:
(A) A description of initiatives undertaken by the Department of Defense to assist the Government of Nigeria and countries in the Lake Chad Basin to develop capacities to deploy special forces to combat Boko Haram.
(B) A description of United States’ activities to enhance the capacity of Nigeria and countries in the Lake Chad Basin to investigate and prosecute human rights violations perpetrated against the people of Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin by Boko Haram, al-Qaeda affiliates, and other terrorist organizations to promote respect for rule of law in Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin.
(a) Statutory codification.—Chapter 11 of part I of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“In this chapter:
“(1) The terms ‘appropriate congressional committees’ and ‘appropriate committees of Congress’ mean the following:
“(2) The term ‘small-scale construction’ means, with respect to a project, construction at a total cost not to exceed $750,000 for the project.
(b) Codification of section 1207 of FY 2010 NDAA.—
(1) CODIFICATION.—Chapter 11 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by inserting after the heading of subchapter II a new section 256 consisting of—
(B) a text consisting of the text of section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 168 note).
(2) REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 256 of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), is amended—
(3) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is repealed.
(c) Transfer of section 1051b.—Section 1051b of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 11 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), inserted after section 256, as inserted by subsection (b), and redesignated as section 257.
(d) Transfer of section 2010.—Section 2010 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 11 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), inserted after the heading of subchapter III, and redesignated as section 263.
(e) Transfer of section 127d.—Section 127d of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 11 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), inserted after the heading of subchapter IV, and redesignated as section 271.
(f) Transfer of section 2282.—Section 2282 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 11 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), inserted after section 271, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (e), and redesignated as section 272.
(g) Codification of section 1081 of FY 2012 NDAA.—
(1) CODIFICATION.—Chapter 11 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is amended by inserting after section 272, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (f), a new section 273 consisting of—
(B) a text consisting of the text of subsections (a) through (d) of section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 168 note).
(2) EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.—Subsection (c)(1) of section 273 of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), is amended by striking “at the close of December 31, 2017” and inserting “on December 31, 2019”.
(3) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 1081 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 10 U.S.C. 168 note) is repealed.
(h) Transfer of section 184 and codification of related provisions.—
(1) TRANSFER.—Section 184 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 11 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), inserted after the heading of subchapter V, and redesignated as section 281.
(2) CODIFICATION OF REIMBURSEMENT-RELATED PROVISIONS.—Subsection (f)(3) of section 281 of title 10, United States Code, as transferred and redesignated by paragraph (1), is amended—
(B) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(B) (i) In fiscal years 2017 through 2019, the Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, waive reimbursement otherwise required under this subsection of the costs of activities of Regional Centers under this section for personnel of nongovernmental and international organizations who participate in activities of the Regional Centers that enhance cooperation of nongovernmental organizations and international organizations with United States forces if the Secretary of Defense determines that attendance of such personnel without reimbursement is in the national security interests of the United States.
(3) CODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO SPECIFIC CENTERS.—Section 281 of title 10, United States Code, as transferred and redesignated by paragraph (1), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: “(h) Authorities specific to marshall center.— (1) The Secretary of Defense may authorize participation by a European or Eurasian country in programs of the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies (in this subsection referred to as the ‘Marshall Center’) if the Secretary determines, after consultation with the Secretary of State, that such participation is in the national interest of the United States. “(2) (A) In the case of any person invited to serve without compensation on the Marshall Center Board of Visitors, the Secretary of Defense may waive any requirement for financial disclosure that would otherwise apply to that person solely by reason of service on such Board. “(3) (A) The Secretary of Defense may waive reimbursement of the costs of conferences, seminars, courses of instruction, or similar educational activities of the Marshall Center for military officers and civilian officials from states located in Europe or the territory of the former Soviet Union if the Secretary determines that attendance by such personnel without reimbursement is in the national security interest of the United States. “(i) Authorities specific to inouye center.— (1) The Secretary of Defense may waive reimbursement of the cost of conferences, seminars, courses of instruction, or similar educational activities of the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies for military officers and civilian officials of foreign countries if the Secretary determines that attendance by such personnel, without reimbursement, is in the national security interest of the United States.
(4) CONFORMING REPEALS.—The following provisions of law are repealed:
(A) Section 941(b) of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 10 U.S.C. 184 note).
(B) Section 1065 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Public Law 104–201; 10 U.S.C. 113 note).
(C) Section 1306 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 (Public Law 103–337; 10 U.S.C. 113 note).
(D) Section 8073 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2003 (Public Law 107–248; 10 U.S.C. prec. 2161 note).
(i) Transfer of section 2166.—
(1) TRANSFER.—Section 2166 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 11 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), inserted after section 281, as transferred, redesignated, and amended by subsection (h), and redesignated as section 282.
(j) Transfer of section 2350m.—Section 2350m of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 11 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), inserted after section 282, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (i), and redesignated as section 283.
(k) Transfer of section 2249d.—
(l) Consolidation of chapter 905 and sections 9381, 9382, and 9383.—
(1) CONSOLIDATION.—Chapter 11 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by inserting after section 284, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (k), the following new section:
Ҥ 285. Aviation leadership program
“(a) Establishment of program.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Air Force may establish and maintain an Aviation Leadership Program to provide undergraduate pilot training and necessary related training to personnel of the air forces of friendly, developing foreign countries. Training under this section shall include language training and programs to promote better awareness and understanding of the democratic institutions and social framework of the United States.
(2) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Chapter 905 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
(m) Transfer of section 9415.—Section 9415 of title 10, United States Code, is transferred to chapter 11 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), inserted after section 285, as added by subsection (l), and redesignated as section 286.
(n) Codification of section 1268 of FY 2015 NDAA.—
(1) CODIFICATION.—Chapter 11 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by inserting after section 286, as transferred and redesignated by subsection (m), a new section 287 consisting of—
(B) a text consisting of the text of section 1268 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 10 U.S.C. 9411 note).
(2) REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 287 of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), is amended—
(3) CONFORMING REPEAL.—Section 1268 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 10 U.S.C. 9411 note) is repealed.
(o) Transfer of sections 2249a and 2249e.—
(1) TRANSFER.—Sections 2249a and 2249e of title 10, United States Code, are transferred to chapter 11 of such title, as amended by subsection (a), inserted after the heading of subchapter VI, and redesignated as sections 293 and 294, respectively.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 294 of title 10, United States Code, as transferred and redesignated by paragraph (1), is amended by striking subsection (f).
(3) CROSS-REFERENCE.—Section 1204(b) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3533; 10 U.S.C. 2249e note) is amended—
(p) Clerical amendments.—Title 10, United States Code, is amended as follows:
(1) The tables of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A, and at the beginning of part I of subtitle A, are amended by striking the item relating to chapter 11 and inserting the following new item:
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 is amended by striking the item relating to section 127d.
(3) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 7 is amended by striking the item relating to section 184.
(4) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 53 is amended by striking the item relating to section 1051b.
(5) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 101 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2010.
(6) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 108 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2166.
(7) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter I of chapter 134 is amended by striking the items relating to sections 2249a, 2249d, and 2249e.
(8) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 136 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2282.
(9) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 138 is amended by striking the item relating to section 2350m.
(a) Required actions.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State shall jointly take such actions as may be necessary to—
(B) designate an individual within the Executive branch who has experience in defense acquisition and technology—
(C) approve and facilitate the transfer of advanced technology, consistent with United States conventional arms transfer policy, to support combined military planning with the Indian military for missions such as humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, counter piracy, and maritime domain awareness missions;
(D) strengthen the effectiveness of the DTTI and the durability of the Department of Defense’s “India Rapid Reaction Cell”;
(E) collaborate with the Government of India to develop mutually agreeable mechanisms to verify the security of defense articles and related technology, such as appropriate cyber security and end use monitoring arrangements, consistent with United States export control laws and policy;
(F) promote policies that will encourage the efficient review and authorization of defense sales and exports to India;
(G) encourage greater government-to-government and commercial military transactions between the United States and India;
(2) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on how the United States is supporting its defense relationship with India in relation to the actions described in paragraph (1).
(b) Military planning.—The Secretary of Defense is encouraged to coordinate with the Ministry of Defense for the Government of India to develop combined military plans for missions such as humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, maritime domain awareness, and other missions in the national security interests of both countries.
(c) Assessment required.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State shall jointly, on an annual basis, conduct an assessment of the extent to which India possesses strategic operational capabilities to support military operations of mutual interest between the United States and India.
(a) Fiscal year 2017 cooperative threat reduction funds defined.—In this title, the term “fiscal year 2017 Cooperative Threat Reduction funds” means the funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711).
(b) Availability of funds.—Funds appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program shall be available for obligation for fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019.
(a) In general.—Of the $325,604,000 authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 in section 301 and made available by the funding table in division D for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program established under section 1321 of the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3711), the following amounts may be obligated for the purposes specified:
(5) For proliferation prevention, $50,709,000, of which—
(A) $4,000,000 may be obligated for purposes relating to nuclear nonproliferation assisted or caused by additive manufacture technology (commonly referred to as “3D printing”);
(B) $4,000,000 may be obligated for monitoring the “proliferation pathways” under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action;
(C) $4, 000,000 may be obligated for enhancing law enforcement cooperation and intelligence sharing; and
(D) $4,000,000 may be obligated for the Proliferation Security Initiative under subtitle B of title XVIII of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (50 U.S.C. 2911 et seq.).
(b) Modifications to certain requirements.—The Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.) is amended as follows:
(1) Section 1321(g)(1) (50 U.S.C. 3711(g)(1)) is amended by striking “15 days” and inserting “45 days”.
(2) Section 1322(b) (50 U.S.C. 3712(b)) is amended—
(A) by striking “At the time at which” and inserting “Not later than 15 days before the date on which”;
(3) Section 1323(b)(3) (50 U.S.C. 3713(b)(3)) is amended by striking “at the time at which” and inserting “not later than seven days before the date on which”.
(4) Section 1324 (50 U.S.C. 3714) is amended—
(c) Joint comprehensive plan of action defined.—In this section, the term “Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action” means the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, signed at Vienna July 14, 2015, by Iran and by the People’s Republic of China, France, Germany, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States, with the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and all implementing materials and agreements related to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, and transmitted by the President to Congress on July 19, 2015, pursuant to section 135(a) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended by the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–17; 129 Stat. 201).
The Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Act (50 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 1334 the following new section:
“SEC. 1335. Limitation on availability of funds for Cooperative Threat Reduction activities in People’s Republic of China.
“(a) Quarterly installments.—In carrying out activities under the Program in the People’s Republic of China, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for such activities are obligated or expended in quarterly installments.
“(b) Quarterly certifications.—
“(1) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may not obligate or expend any Cooperative Threat Reduction funds for activities in the People’s Republic of China during a quarter unless the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate the certification under paragraph (2) with respect to such quarter.
“(2) SUBMISSION.—On a quarterly basis, the Secretary shall submit to the committees specified in paragraph (1) a certification, made in concurrence with the Secretary of State, of the following:
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the National Defense Sealift Fund, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Chemical Agents and Munitions Destruction, Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(b) Use.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a) are authorized for—
(1) the destruction of lethal chemical agents and munitions in accordance with section 1412 of the Department of Defense Authorization Act, 1986 (50 U.S.C. 1521); and
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4501, for use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense in providing for the health of eligible beneficiaries.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund as specified in the funding table in section 4501.
(a) Disposal authority.—Pursuant to section 5(b) of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98d(b)), the National Defense Stockpile Manager may dispose of the following materials contained in the National Defense Stockpile in the following quantities:
(b) Acquisition authority.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Using funds available in the National Defense Stockpile Transaction Fund, the National Defense Stockpile Manager may acquire the following materials determined to be strategic and critical materials required to meet the defense, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States:
(a) Materials constituting the national defense stockpile.—Section 4 of the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98c) is amended—
(b) Qualification of domestic sources.—Section 15(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 98h–6(a)) is amended—
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
“(3) by qualifying existing domestic facilities and domestically produced strategic and critical materials to meet the requirements of defense and essential civilian industries in times of national emergencies when existing domestic sources of supply are either insufficient or vulnerable to single points of failure; and
(a) Authority for transfer of funds.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated for section 506 and available for the Defense Health Program for operation and maintenance, $122,375,000 may be transferred by the Secretary of Defense to the Joint Department of Defense–Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility Demonstration Fund established by subsection (a)(1) of section 1704 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2571). For purposes of subsection (a)(2) of such section 1704, any funds so transferred shall be treated as amounts authorized and appropriated specifically for the purpose of such a transfer.
(b) Use of transferred funds.—For the purposes of subsection (b) of such section 1704, facility operations for which funds transferred under subsection (a) may be used are operations of the Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, consisting of the North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, the Navy Ambulatory Care Center, and supporting facilities designated as a combined Federal medical facility under an operational agreement covered by section 706 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4500).
There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 from the Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund the sum of $64,300,000 for the operation of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.
(a) Purpose.—The purpose of this subtitle is to authorize appropriations for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 to provide additional funds—
(2) pursuant to sections 1502, 1503, 1504, 1505, and 1507 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for procurement, research, development, test, and evaluation, operation and maintenance, military personnel, and defense-wide drug interdiction and counter-drug activities, as specified in the funding tables in sections 4103, 4203, 4303, 4403, and 4503.
(b) Support of base budget requirements; treatment.—Funds identified in subsection (a)(2) are being authorized to be appropriated in support of base budget requirements as requested by the President for fiscal year 2017 pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code. The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall apportion the funds identified in such subsection to the Department of Defense without restriction, limitation, or constraint on the execution of such funds in support of base requirements, including any restriction, limitation, or constraint imposed by, or described in, the document entitled “Criteria for War/Overseas Contingency Operations Funding Requests” transmitted by the Director to the Department of Defense on September 9, 2010, or any successor or related guidance.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for procurement accounts for the Army, the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Air Force, and Defense-wide activities, as specified in—
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Department of Defense for research, development, test, and evaluation, as specified in—
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for operation and maintenance, as specified in—
(b) Period of availability.—Amounts specified in the funding table in section 4302 shall remain available for obligation only until April 30, 2017, at a rate for operations as provided in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2016 (division C of Public Law 114–113).
(c) Condition on use of funds for Syria Train and Equip programs.—Amounts authorized to be appropriated by this section for the Syria Train and Equip programs, as specified in the funding table in section 4302, may not be provided to any recipient that the Secretary of Defense has reported, pursuant to a quarterly progress report submitted pursuant to section 1209 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3541), as having misused provided training and equipment.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for military personnel, as specified in—
(b) Period of availability.—Amounts specified in the funding table in section 4402 shall remain available for obligation only until April 30, 2017, at a rate for operations as provided in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2016 (division C of Public Law 114–113).
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for the use of the Armed Forces and other activities and agencies of the Department of Defense for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
(b) Period of availability.—Amounts specified in the funding table in section 4502 for providing capital for working capital and revolving funds shall remain available for obligation only until April 30, 2017, at a rate for operations as provided in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2016 (division C of Public Law 114–113).
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense-wide, as specified in—
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 for expenses, not otherwise provided for, for the Defense Health Program, as specified in the funding table in section 4502.
(b) Period of availability.—Amounts specified in the funding table in section 4502 for the Defense Health Program shall remain available for obligation only until April 30, 2017, at a rate for operations as provided in the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2016 (division C of Public Law 114–113).
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by this title are in addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated by this Act.
(a) Authority to transfer authorizations.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—Upon determination by the Secretary of Defense that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary may transfer amounts of authorizations made available to the Department of Defense in this title for fiscal year 2017 between any such authorizations for that fiscal year (or any subdivisions thereof).
(2) EFFECT OF TRANSFER.—Amounts of authorizations transferred under this subsection shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization to which transferred.
(3) LIMITATIONS.—The total amount of authorizations that the Secretary may transfer under the authority of this subsection may not exceed $4,500,000,000.
(4) EXCEPTION.—In the case of the authorizations of appropriations contained in sections 1502, 1503, 1504, 1505, and 1507 that are provided for the purpose specified in section 1501(a)(2), the transfer authority provided under section 1001, rather than the transfer authority provided by this subsection, shall apply to any transfer of amounts of such authorizations.
The Secretary of Defense shall implement the following criteria in requests for overseas contingency operations:
(1) Geographic Area Covered – For theater of operations for non-classified war overseas contingency operations funding, the geographic areas in which combat or direct combat support operations occur are: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrhyzstan, the Horn of Africa, Persian Gulf and Gulf nations, Arabian Sea, the Indian Ocean, the Philippines, and other countries on a case-by-case basis.
(2) Permitted Inclusions in the Overseas Contingency Operation Budget
(A) Major Equipment
(i) Replacement of loses that have occurred but only for items not already programmed for replacement in the Future Years Defense Plan (FYDP), but not including accelerations, which must be made in the base budget.
(ii) Replacement or repair to original capability (to upgraded capability if that is currently available) of equipment returning from theater. The replacement may be a similar end item if the original item is no longer in production. Incremental cost of non-war related upgrades, if made, should be included in the base.
(B) Ground Equipment Replacement
(C) Equipment Modifications
(F) Military Construction
(G) Research and development projects for combat operations in these specific theaters that can be delivered in 12 months.
(H) Operations
(ii) Within the theater, the incremental costs above the funding programmed in the base budget to:
(J) Personnel
(M) Security force funding to train, equip, and sustain Iraqi and Afghan military and police forces.
(3) Excluded items from Overseas Contingency Funding that must be funded from the base budget
(A) Training vehicles, aircraft, ammunition, and simulators, but not training base stocks of specialized, theater-specific equipment that is required to support combat operations in the theater of operations, and support to deployment-specific training described above.
(B) Acceleration of equipment service life extension programs already in the Future Years Defense Plan.
(F) Personnel
(a) In general.—Funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund during the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2017, shall be subject to the conditions contained in subsections (b) through (f) of section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424).
(b) Allocation of funds.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the funds available to the Department of Defense for the Afghan Security Forces Fund for fiscal year 2017, it is the goal that $25,000,000 shall be used for—
(2) TYPES OF PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES.—Such programs and activities may include—
(A) efforts to recruit women into the Afghan National Security Forces, including the special operations forces;
(B) programs and activities of the Afghan Ministry of Defense Directorate of Human Rights and Gender Integration and the Afghan Ministry of Interior Office of Human Rights, Gender and Child Rights;
(C) development and dissemination of gender and human rights educational and training materials and programs within the Afghan Ministry of Defense and the Afghan Ministry of Interior;
(D) efforts to address harassment and violence against women within the Afghan National Security Forces;
(c) Reporting requirement.—
(1) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not later than January 31 and July 31 of each year through January 31, 2021, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report summarizing the details of any obligation or transfer of funds from the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund during the preceding six-calendar month period.
(2) CONFORMING REPEALS.— (A) Section 1513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 428), as amended by section 1531(b) of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4424), is further amended by striking subsection (g).
(B) Section 1517 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2442) is amended by striking subsection (f).
(a) Use and transfer of funds.—Subsection 1532(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1091) is amended by striking “fiscal year 2016” and inserting “fiscal years 2016 and 2017”.
(b) Extension of interdiction of improvised explosive device precursor chemicals authority.—Section 1532(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2057) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1)—
(A) by striking “for fiscal year 2013 and for fiscal year 2016,” and inserting “for fiscal years 2013, 2016, and 2017”;
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “of the Government of Pakistan” and inserting “of foreign governments”;
(3) in paragraph (3)—
(4) in paragraph (4), as most recently amended by section 1532(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1091), by striking “December 31, 2016” and inserting “December 31, 2017”.
Section 1533(e) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1093) is amended by striking “September 30, 2018” and inserting “September 30, 2020”.
(a) Use of funds.—Section 1604 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3623; 10 U.S.C. 2273 note), as amended by section 1606 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1099), is further amended by striking subsection (d) and inserting the following new subsections:
“(d) Use of funds under development program.—
“(1) DEVELOPMENT OF ROCKET PROPULSION SYSTEM.—The funds described in paragraph (2)—
“(2) FUNDS DESCRIBED.—The funds described in this paragraph are the following:
“(A) Funds authorized to be appropriated by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense for the development of the rocket propulsion system under subsection (a).
“(B) Funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 or otherwise made available for fiscal years 2015 or 2016 for the Department of Defense for the development of the rocket propulsion system under subsection (a) that are unobligated as of the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017.
“(3) OTHER PURPOSES.—The Secretary may obligate or expend not more than a total of 31 percent of the funds that are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the rocket propulsion system and launch system investment for activities not authorized by paragraph (1)(A), including for developing a launch vehicle, an upper stage, a strap-on motor, or related infrastructure. The Secretary may exceed such limit in fiscal year 2017 for such purposes if—
“(A) the Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that, as of the date of the certification—
(b) Rights to intellectual property.—Subsection (a) of such section 1604 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) PLAN TO PROTECT GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT AND ASSURED ACCESS TO SPACE.—
“(A) In developing the rocket propulsion system under paragraph (1), and in any development conducted pursuant to subsection (d)(3), the Secretary shall develop a plan to protect the investment of the United States and the assured access to space, including, consistent with section 2320 of title 10, United States Code, and in accordance with other applicable provisions of law, acquiring the rights, as appropriate, for the purpose of developing alternative sources of supply and manufacture in the event such alternative sources are necessary and in the best interest of the United States, such as in the event that a company goes out of business or the system is otherwise unavailable after the Federal Government has invested significant resources to use and rely on such system for launch services.
Section 1608 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3626; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note), as amended by section 1607 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1100), is further amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsection:
“(c) Exception.—The prohibition in subsection (a) shall not apply to any of the following:
“(1) The placement of orders or the exercise of options under the contract numbered FA8811–13–C–0003 and awarded on December 18, 2013.
“(2) Contracts that are awarded for the procurement of property or services for space launch activities that include the use of a total of eighteen rocket engines designed or manufactured in the Russian Federation, in addition to Russian-designed or -manufactured engines to which paragraph (1) applies.”.
Section 1611 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1103) is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new subsections:
“(b) Scope.—
“(1) STUDY GUIDANCE.—In conducting the analysis of alternatives under subsection (a), the Secretary shall develop study guidance that requires such analysis to include the full range of military and commercial satellite communications capabilities, acquisition processes, and service delivery models.
“(2) OTHER CONSIDERATIONS.—The Secretary shall ensure that—
“(A) any cost assessments of military or commercial satellite communications systems included in the analysis of alternatives conducted under subsection (a) include detailed full life-cycle costs, as applicable, including with respect to—
“(c) Comptroller General review.—
“(1) SUBMISSION.—Upon completion of the analysis of alternatives conducted under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit such analysis to the Comptroller General of the United States.
“(2) REVIEW.—Not later than 120 days after the date on which the Comptroller General receives the analysis of alternatives under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of the analysis.
“(d) Briefings.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, and semiannually thereafter until the date on which the analysis of alternatives conducted under subsection (a) is completed, the Secretary shall provide the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate (and any other congressional defense committee upon request) a briefing on such analysis.”.
Section 1605 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 10 U.S.C. 2208 note), as amended by section 1612 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1103), is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
(a) Roles of DOD and NOAA.—
(1) MECHANISMS.—The Secretary of Defense and the Director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall jointly establish mechanisms to collaborate and coordinate in defining the roles and responsibilities of the Department of Defense and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to—
(b) Report.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Director shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the mechanisms established under subsection (a)(1).
(a) Prohibition.—During the period beginning not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on September 30, 2018, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the Armed Forces and each element of the Department of Defense do not use a non-allied positioning, navigation, and timing system or service provided by such a system.
(b) Waiver.—The Secretary may waive the prohibition in subsection (a) if—
(c) Assessment.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Director of National Intelligence shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of the risks to national security and to the operations and plans of the Department of Defense from using a non-allied positioning, navigation, and timing system or service provided by such a system. Such assessment shall—
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for increment 3 of the Joint Space Operations Center Mission System, not more than 25 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force, in coordination with the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, submits to the congressional defense committees a report on such increment, including—
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(b) Limitation on development and acquisition of alternatives.—
(1) LIMITATION.—Except as provided by paragraph (4), the Secretary of Defense may not develop or acquire an alternative to the space-based infrared system program of record or develop or acquire an alternative to the advanced extremely high frequency program of record until the date on which the Commander of the United States Strategic Command and the Director of the Space Security and Defense Program, in consultation with the Defense Intelligence Officer for Science and Technology of the Defense Intelligence Agency, jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees the assessments described in paragraph (2) for the respective program.
(2) ASSESSMENT.—The assessments described in this paragraph are—
(3) ELEMENTS.—An assessment described in paragraph (2) shall include, with respect to each alternative to the space-based infrared system program of record and each alternative to the advanced extremely high frequency program of record being considered by the Secretary of the Air Force, the following:
(a) Limitation.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Air Force, for the weather satellite follow-on system, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of the Air Force submits to the appropriate congressional committees the plan under paragraph (2).
(2) AIR FORCE PLAN.—The Secretary shall develop a plan for the Air Force to transfer, beginning with fiscal year 2018, the acquisition authority and the funding authority for covered space-based environmental monitoring missions from the Air Force to the National Reconnaissance Office, including a description of the amount of funds that would be necessary to be transferred from the Air Force to the National Reconnaissance Office during fiscal years 2018 through 2022 to carry out such plan.
(b) NRO Plan.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the National Reconnaissance Office shall develop a plan for the National Reconnaissance Office to address how to carry out covered space-based environmental monitoring missions. Such plan shall include—
(2) ACTIVITIES.—In developing the plan under paragraph (1), the Director may conduct pre-acquisition activities, including with respect to requests for information, analyses of alternatives, study contracts, modeling and simulation, and other activities the Director determines necessary to develop such plan.
(c) Independent cost estimate.—The Director of the Cost Assessment Improvement Group of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, in coordination with the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, shall certify to the appropriate congressional committees that the amounts of funds identified under subsections (a)(2) and (b)(1)(C) as being necessary to transfer are appropriate and include funding for positions and personnel to support program office costs.
(a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a pilot program to assess the viability of commercial satellite weather data to support requirements of the Department of Defense.
(b) Commercial weather data.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Secretary of Defense to carry out the pilot program under subsection (a), not more than $3,000,000 may be obligated or expended to carry out such pilot program by purchasing and evaluating commercial weather data that meets the standards and specifications set by the Department of Defense.
(c) Duration.—The Secretary may carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) for a period not exceeding one year.
(d) Briefings.—
(1) INTERIM BRIEFING.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate (and to any other congressional defense committee upon request) demonstrating how the Secretary plans to implement the pilot program under subsection (a).
(2) FINAL BRIEFING.—Not later than 90 days after the pilot program under subsection (a) is completed, the Secretary shall provide a briefing to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate (and to any other congressional defense committee upon request) on the utility, cost, and other considerations regarding the purchase of commercial satellite weather data to support the requirements of the Department of Defense.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) National security space capabilities are a vital element of the national defense of the United States.
(2) The advantages of the United States in national security space are now threatened to an unprecedented degree by growing and serious counterspace capabilities of potential foreign adversaries, and the space advantages of the United States must be protected.
(3) The Department of Defense has recognized the threat and has taken initial steps necessary to defend space, however the organization and management may not be strategically postured to fully address this changed domain of operations over the long term.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that, to modernize and fully address the growing threat to the national security space advantage of the United States, the Secretary of Defense must evaluate the range of options and take further action to strengthen the leadership, management, and organization of the national security space activities of the Department of Defense, including with respect to—
(1) unifying, integrating, and de-conflicting activities to provide for stronger prioritization, accountability, coherency, focus, strategy, and integration of the joint space program of the Department;
(2) streamlining decision-making, limiting unnecessary bureaucracy, and empowering the appropriate level of authority, while enabling effective oversight;
(c) Recommendations.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall each separately submit to the appropriate congressional committees recommendations, in accordance with subsection (b), to strengthen the leadership, management, and organization of the Department of Defense with respect to the national security space activities of the Department.
(a) Review.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review of charter of the Operationally Responsive Space Program Office established by section 2273a of title 10, United States Code (in this section referred to as the “Office”).
(b) Elements.—The review under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A review of the key operationally responsive space needs with respect to the warfighter and with respect to national security.
(2) How the Office could fit into the broader resilience and space security strategy of the Department of Defense.
(3) An assessment of the potential of the Office to focus on the reconstitution capabilities with small satellites using low-cost launch vehicles and existing infrastructure.
(a) Study.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The covered Secretaries shall jointly conduct a study to assess and identify the technology-neutral requirements to backup and complement the positioning, navigation, and timing capabilities of the Global Positioning System for national security and critical infrastructure.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the covered Secretaries shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the study under paragraph (1). Such report shall include—
(A) with respect to the Department of each covered Secretary, the identification of the respective requirements to backup and complement the positioning, navigation, and timing capabilities of the Global Positioning System for national security and critical infrastructure;
(b) Single designated official.—Each covered Secretary shall designate a single senior official of the Department of the Secretary to act as the primary representative of such Department for purposes of conducting the study under subsection (a)(1).
(a) Report.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the feasibility of using available spacecraft assets of the space-based infrared system wide-field-of-view program to satisfy other mission requirements of the Department of Defense or the intelligence community.
(b) Matters covered.—The report required by subsection (a) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(c) Form.—The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex if necessary to protect the national security interests of the United States.
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide, for intelligence management, not more than 95 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence submits to the appropriate congressional committees the reports on counterintelligence activities described in any classified annex accompanying this Act.
(a) Limitations.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Intelligence Fusion Center of the United States Central Command—
(b) Report on procedures.—The Commander shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the steps taken by the Commander to formalize and disseminate procedures for establishing, staffing, and operating the Intelligence Fusion Center of the United States Central Command.
(c) Report on IG findings.—The Commander shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the steps taken by the Commander to address the findings of the final report of the Inspector General of the Department of Defense regarding the processing of intelligence information by the Intelligence Directorate of the United States Central Command.
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for increased intelligence manpower positions for operation of the Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex at Royal Air Force Molesworth, United Kingdom, not more than 85 percent may be obligated or expended during fiscal year 2017 until the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits to the appropriate congressional committees the analysis under subsection (b)(1).
(b) Analysis.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a revised analysis of alternatives for the basing of a new Joint Intelligence Analysis Complex that is—
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The analysis under paragraph (1) shall, at a minimum—
(A) be conducted in a manner that—
(ii) appropriately accounts for non-recurring and life cycle costs, including with respect to cost of living and projected growth in cost of living;
(B) include the identification and assessments of—
Section 1903(a)(2) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by inserting “cyber,” before “nuclear,”.
Section 2165(b)(5) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “Information Resources Management College” and inserting “College of Information and Cyberspace”.
(a) Requirement for agreements.—Not later than September 30, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with each combatant command relating to the use of cyber opposition forces. Each agreement shall require the command—
(b) Joint standard for cyber opposition forces.—Not later than March 31, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall issue a joint training and certification standard for use by all cyber opposition forces within the Department of Defense.
(c) Briefing required.—Not later than September 30, 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on—
(2) with respect to each such agreement—
(B) the process for making decisions about deconfliction and risk mitigation of cyber opposition force activities in continuous exercises and training;
(C) identification of cyber opposition forces trained and certified to operate at the joint standard, as issued under subsection (b);
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for cryptographic systems and key management infrastructure, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Security Agency, submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the integration of the cryptographic modernization and key management infrastructure programs of the military departments, including a description of how the military departments have implemented stronger leadership, increased integration, and reduced redundancy with respect to such modernization and programs.
(a) Authority.—The Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force shall each carry out a pilot program to improve the ability of the Army and the Air Force, respectively, to recruit cyber professionals.
(b) Elements.—Under the pilot program, the Secretaries shall each allow individuals who meet educational, physical, and other requirements determined appropriate by the Secretary to receive original appointments as commissioned officers in a cyber specialty.
(a) Report required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on policies, doctrine, procedures, and authorities governing Department of Defense activities in response to malicious cyber activities carried out against the United States or United States persons by foreign states or non-state actors.
(a) Assessment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct an assessment of the sufficiency of the regulatory mechanisms of the Department of Defense to secure defense information held by cleared defense contractors to determine whether there are any gaps that may undermine the protection of such information.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) Army and Air National Guard personnel need to have situational awareness and reliable communications during any of the following events occurring in the United States:
(2) During such an event, it is vital that Army and Air National Guard personnel are able to communicate and coordinate response efforts with their own units and appropriate civilian emergency response forces.
(3) Current networks and communications systems of the National Guard, including commercial wireless solutions (such as mobile wireless kinetic mesh), and other systems that are interoperable with the systems of civilian first responders, should provide the necessary robustness, interoperability, reliability, and resilience to extend needed situational awareness and communications to all users and under all operating conditions, including degraded communications environments where infrastructure is damaged or destroyed or under cyber attack or disruption.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that the National Guard should be constantly seeking ways to improve and expand its communications and networking capabilities to provide for enhanced performance and resilience in the face of cyber attacks or disruptions, as well as other instances of degradation.
(a) Strategy required.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army, if the Secretary has not already done so, shall provide a briefing to the congressional defense committees outlining a strategy for incorporating Army National Guard cyber protection teams into the Department of Defense cyber mission force.
(b) Elements of strategy.—The strategy required by subsection (a) shall include, at minimum, the following:
(1) A timeline for incorporating Army National Guard cyber protection teams into the Department of Defense cyber mission force, including a timeline for receiving appropriate training.
(3) An assessment of how incorporation of Army National Guard cyber protection teams into the Department of Defense cyber mission force might be used to enhance readiness through improved individual and collective training capabilities.
(a) Responsibilities.—Subsection (d) of section 171a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(b) Ensuring capabilities.—Such section is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsections: “(i) Reports on space architecture development.— (1) Not less than 90 days before each of the dates on which a system described in paragraph (2) achieves Milestone A or Milestone B approval, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisitions, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report prepared by the Council detailing the implications of any changes to the architecture of such a system with respect to the systems, capabilities, and programs covered under subsection (d). “(j) Notification of reduction of certain warning time.— (1) None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense for any fiscal year may be used to change any command, control, and communications system described in subsection (d)(1) in a manner that reduces the warning time provided to the national leadership of the United States with respect to a warning of a strategic missile attack on the United States unless—
“(2) Not later than March 1, 2017, and each year thereafter, the Council shall determine whether the integrated tactical warning and attack assessment system and its command and control system have met all warfighter requirements for operational availability, survivability, and endurability. If the Council determines that such systems have not met such requirements, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees—
(d) Reporting requirements.—Subsection (e) of such section is amended by striking “At the same time” and all that follows through “title 31,” and inserting the following: “During the period preceding January 31, 2021, at the same time each year that the budget of the President is submitted to Congress pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, and from time to time after such period at the discretion of the Council,”.
(a) Special nuclear material.—Section 128 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(d) Information that the Secretary prohibits to be disseminated pursuant to subsection (a) that is provided to a State or local government shall remain under the control of the Department of Defense, and a State or local law authorizing or requiring a State or local government to disclose such information shall not apply to such information.”.
(b) Critical infrastructure security information.—Section 130e of such title is amended—
(1) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (f) and moving such subsection, as so redesignated, to appear after subsection (e); and
(2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following new subsections: “(b) Designation of Department of Defense critical infrastructure security information.—In addition to any other authority or requirement regarding protection from dissemination of information, the Secretary may designate information as being Department of Defense critical infrastructure security information, including during the course of creating such information, to ensure that such information is not disseminated without authorization. Information so designated is subject to the determination process under subsection (a) to determine whether to exempt such information from disclosure described in such subsection. “(c) Information provided to State and Local governments.— (1) Department of Defense critical infrastructure security information covered by a written determination under subsection (a) or designated under subsection (b) that is provided to a State or local government shall remain under the control of the Department of Defense. “(2) (A) A State or local law authorizing or requiring a State or local government to disclose Department of Defense critical infrastructure security information that is covered by a written determination under subsection (a) shall not apply to such information. “(B) If a person requests pursuant to a State or local law that a State or local government disclose information that is designated as Department of Defense critical infrastructure security information under subsection (b), the State or local government shall provide the Secretary an opportunity to carry out the determination process under subsection (a) to determine whether to exempt such information from disclosure pursuant to subparagraph (A).”.
(c) Conforming amendments.—
(1) SECTION 128.—Section 128 of such title is further amended in the section heading by striking “Physical” and inserting “Control and physical”.
(2) SECTION 130E.—Section 130e of such title is further amended—
(A) by striking the section heading and inserting the following new section heading: “Control and protection of critical infrastructure security information”;
(B) in subsection (a), by striking the subsection heading and inserting the following new subsection heading; “Exemption from Freedom of Information Act.—”;
(d) Clerical amendments.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 of such title is amended—
(a) Availability of funds.—Notwithstanding section 1502(a) of title 31, United States Code, of the amount authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 by section 101 and available for Missile Procurement, Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4101, $17,095,000 shall be available for the procurement of covered parts pursuant to contracts entered into under section 1645(a) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” Mckeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3651).
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for any of fiscal years 2017 or 2018 may be obligated or expended to retain the option for, or develop, a mobile variant of the ground-based strategic deterrent missile.
(a) Limitation.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 or any other fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to extend the New START Treaty unless—
(b) Report.—The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report detailing the following:
(1) The impacts on the nuclear forces and force planning of the United States with respect to a State Party to the New START Treaty developing a capability to conduct a rapid reload of its ballistic missiles.
(2) Whether any State Party to the New START Treaty has significantly increased its upload capability with non-deployed nuclear warheads and the degree to which such developments impact crisis stability and the nuclear forces, force planning, use concepts, and deterrent strategy of the United States.
(3) The extent to which non-treaty-limited nuclear or strategic conventional systems pose a threat to the United States or the allies of the United States.
(4) The extent to which violations of arms control treaty and agreement obligations pose a risk to the national security of the United States and the allies of the United States, including the perpetuation of violations ongoing as of the date of the enactment of this Act, as well as potential further violations.
(5) The extent to which—
(c) National intelligence estimate.—
(a) Role of major command.—
(1) CONSOLIDATION.—Not later than March 31, 2017, the Secretary of the Air Force shall consolidate under a major command commanded by a single general officer the responsibility, authority, accountability, and resources for carrying out the nuclear command, control, and communications functions of the Air Force, including, at a minimum, with respect to the following:
(2) OVERSIGHT AND BUDGET APPROVAL.—Not later than March 31, 2017, in addition to the responsibility, authority, accountability, and resources for carrying out the nuclear command, control, and communications functions of the Air Force provided to a commander of a major command under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall provide to the commander the responsibility, authority, accountability, and resources to—
(b) Report.—Not later than January 15, 2017, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the plans and actions taken by the Secretary to carry out subsection (a), including any guidance, directives, and orders that have been or will be issued by the Secretary, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, or other elements of the Air Force to carry out subsection (a).
(a) Report.—Not later than January 15, 2017, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, consistent with the protection of sources and methods, a report on the leadership survivability, command and control, and continuity of government programs and activities with respect to the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation, respectively. The report shall include the following:
(2) An assessment of how such programs and activities fit into the political and military doctrine and strategy of each respective country.
(3) An assessment of the size and scope of such activities, including the location and description of above-ground and underground facilities important to the political and military leadership survivability, command and control, and continuity of government programs and activities of each respective country.
(4) An identification of which facilities various senior political and military leaders of each respective country are expected to operate out of during crisis and wartime.
(5) A technical assessment of the political and military means and methods for command and control in wartime of each respective country.
(6) An identification of key officials and organizations of each respective country involved in managing and operating such facilities, programs and activities, including the command structure for each organization involved in such programs and activities.
(7) An assessment of how senior leaders of each respective country measure the effectiveness of such programs and activities.
(9) An assessment of the degree of enhanced survivability such programs and activities can be expected to provide in various military scenarios ranging from limited conventional conflict to strategic nuclear employment.
(10) An assessment of the type and extent of foreign assistance, if any, in such programs and activities.
(b) Council assessment.—Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Director submits the report under subsection (a), the Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications System established by section 171a of title 10, United States Code, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees an assessment of how the command, control, and communications systems for the national leadership of the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation, respectively, compare to such system of the United States.
(c) STRATCOM.—Together with the assessment submitted under subsection (b), the Commander of the United States Strategic Command shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the views of the Commander on the report under subsection (a), including a detailed description for how the leadership survivability, command and control, and continuity of government programs and activities of the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation, respectively, are considered in the plans and options under the responsibility of the Commander under the unified command plan.
(d) Forms.—Each report or assessment submitted under this section may be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States believes that the independent nuclear deterrent and decision-making of the United Kingdom provides a crucial contribution to international stability, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization alliance, and the national security of the United States;
(2) nuclear deterrence is and will continue to be the highest priority mission of the Department of Defense and the United States benefits when the closest ally of the United States clearly and unequivocally sets similar priorities;
(3) the United States sees the nuclear deterrent of the United Kingdom as central to trans-Atlantic security and to the commitment of the United Kingdom to NATO to spend two percent of gross domestic product on defense;
(4) the commitment of the United Kingdom to maintain a continuous at-sea deterrence posture today and in the future complements the deterrent capabilities of the United States and provides a credible “second center of decision making” which ensures potential attackers cannot discount the solidarity of the mutual relationship of the United States and the United Kingdom;
(5) the United States Navy must execute the Ohio-class replacement submarine program on time and within budget, seeking efficiencies and cost savings wherever possible, to ensure that the program delivers a Common Missile Compartment, the Trident II (D5) Strategic Weapon System, and associated equipment and production capabilities, that support the successful development and deployment of the Vanguard-successor submarines of the United Kingdom; and
(a) Certification.—Not later than five days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall certify to the congressional defense committees that the Chairman has approved any requests for forces, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, of a commander of a combatant command to meet the security requirements of land-based nuclear forces.
(b) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the travel and representational expenses of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Under Secretary certifies to the congressional defense committees that there is a competitive acquisition process in place to ensure that a UH–1N replacement aircraft is under contract in fiscal year 2018.
(a) Policy.—It is the policy of the United States to maintain and modernize a responsive and alert intercontinental ballistic missile force to ensure robust nuclear deterrence by preventing any adversary from believing it can carry out a small, surprise, first-strike attack on the United States that disarms the strategic forces of the United States.
(b) Prohibition.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided by paragraph (2), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 shall be obligated or expended for—
(2) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition in paragraph (1) shall not apply to any of the following activities:
(C) Reduction in the number of deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles that are carried out in compliance with—
(i) the limitations of the New START Treaty (as defined in section 494(a)(2)(D) of title 10, United States Code); and
(ii) section 1644 of the Carl Levin an Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3651; 10 U.S.C. 494 note).
(c) Report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force and the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report regarding efforts to carry out section 1057 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 10 U.S.C. 495 note).
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include the following with respect to the period of the expected lifespan of the Minuteman III system:
(A) The number of nuclear warheads required to support the capability to redeploy multiple independently retargetable reentry vehicles across the full intercontinental ballistic missile fleet.
(B) The current and planned (until 2030) readiness state of nuclear warheads intended to support the capability to redeploy multiple independently retargetable reentry vehicles across the full intercontinental ballistic missile fleet, including which portion of the active or inactive stockpile such warheads are classified within.
(C) The current and planned (until 2030) reserve of components or subsystems required to redeploy multiple independently retargetable reentry vehicles across the full intercontinental ballistic missile fleet, including the plans or industrial capability and capacity to produce more such components or subsystems, if needed.
(a) Prohibition on integration of certain missile defense systems.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 130h of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(B) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection (d):
“(d) Integration.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year for the Department of Defense may be obligated or expended to integrate a missile defense system of the Russian Federation or a missile defense system of the People’s Republic of China into any missile defense system of the United States.”; and
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 130h and inserting the following new item:
“130h. Prohibitions relating to missile defense information and systems.”.
(3) CONFORMING REPEALS.—Sections 1672 and 1673 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1130) are repealed.
(a) New review.—The Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly conduct a new review of the missile defeat capability, policy, and strategy of the United States, with respect to—
(b) Elements.—The review under subsection (a) shall address the following:
(1) The missile defeat policy, strategy, and objectives of the United States in relation to the national security strategy of the United States and the military strategy of the United States.
(4) With respect to both the five- and ten-year periods beginning on the date of the review, the planned and desired end-state of the missile defeat programs of the United States, including regarding the integration and interoperability of such programs with the joint forces and the integration and interoperability of such programs with allies, and specific benchmarks, milestones, and key steps required to reach such end-states.
(5) The organization, discharge, and oversight of acquisition for the missile defeat programs of the United States.
(6) The roles and responsibilities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Defense Agencies, combatant commands, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the military departments in such programs and the process for ensuring accountability of each stakeholder.
(7) The process for determining requirements for missile defeat capabilities under such programs, including input from the joint military requirements process.
(9) Standards for the military utility, operational effectiveness, suitability, and survivability of the missile defeat systems of the United States.
(10) The method in which resources for the missile defeat mission are planned, programmed, and budgeted within the Department of Defense.
(14) The role of international cooperation on missile defeat in the missile defeat policy and strategy of the United States and the plans, policies, and requirements for integration and interoperability of missile defeat capability with allies.
(15) Options for enhancing and making routine the codevelopment of missile defeat capabilities with allies of the United States in the near-term and far-term.
(16) Declaratory policy governing the employment of missile defeat capabilities and the military options and plans and employment options of such capabilities.
(17) The role of multi-mission defense and other assets of the United States, including space and terrestrial sensors and plans to achieve multi-mission capability in current, planned, and other future assets and acquisition programs.
(18) The indications and warning required to meet the missile defeat strategy and objectives of the United States described in paragraph (1) and the key enablers and programs to achieve such indications and warning.
(19) The impact of the mobility, countermeasures, and denial and deception capabilities of adversaries on the indications and warning described in paragraph (16) and the consequences of such impact for the missile defeat capability, objectives, and military options of the United States and the plans of the combatant commanders.
(c) Reports.—
(1) RESULTS.—Not later than January 31, 2018, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth the results of the review under subsection (a).
(2) FORM.—The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(3) ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION UPDATES.—During the five-year period beginning on the date of the submission of the report under paragraph (1), the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall submit to the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the congressional defense committees annual status updates detailing the progress of the Secretary in implementing the missile defeat strategy of the United States.
(4) THREAT REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit to the congressional defense committees, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate a report containing an unclassified summary, consistent with the protection of intelligence sources and methods, of—
(d) Notification.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 or any fiscal year thereafter for the Secretary of Defense may be obligated or expended to change the non-standard acquisition processes and responsibilities described in paragraph (2) until—
(2) NON-STANDARD ACQUISITION PROCESSES AND RESPONSIBILITIES DESCRIBED.—The non-standard acquisition processes and responsibilities described in this paragraph are such processes and responsibilities described in—
(a) Iron dome short-range rocket defense system.—
(1) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 101 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency, not more than $62,000,000 may be provided to the Government of Israel to procure Tamir interceptors for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense system, as specified in the funding table in division D, through coproduction of such interceptors in the United States by industry of the United States.
(2) CONDITIONS.—
(A) AGREEMENT.—Funds described in paragraph (1) for the Iron Dome short-range rocket defense program shall be available subject to the terms and conditions in the Agreement Between the Department of Defense of the United States of America and the Ministry of Defense of the State of Israel Concerning Iron Dome Defense System Procurement, signed on March 5, 2014, subject to an amended bilateral international agreement for coproduction for Tamir interceptors. In negotiations by the Missile Defense Agency and the Missile Defense Organization of the Government of Israel regarding such production, the goal of the United States is to maximize opportunities for coproduction of the Tamir interceptors described in paragraph (1) in the United States by industry of the United States.
(B) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days prior to the initial obligation of funds described in paragraph (1), the Director of the Missile Defense Agency and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall jointly submit to the appropriate congressional committees—
(b) Cooperative missile defense program codevelopment and coproduction.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), of the funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017 for procurement, Defense-wide, and available for the Missile Defense Agency—
(2) CERTIFICATION.—
(A) CRITERIA.—Except as provided by paragraph (3), the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a certification that—
(i) the Government of Israel has demonstrated the successful completion of the knowledge points, technical milestones, and production readiness reviews required by the research, development, and technology agreements for the David’s Sling Weapon System and the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Development Program, respectively;
(ii) funds specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) will be provided on the basis of a one-for-one cash match made by Israel for such respective systems or in another matching amount that otherwise meets best efforts (as mutually agreed to by the United States and Israel);
(iii) the United States has entered into a bilateral international agreement with Israel that establishes, with respect to the use of such funds—
(I) in accordance with clause (iv), the terms of coproduction of parts and components of such respective systems on the basis of the greatest practicable coproduction of parts, components, and all-up rounds (if appropriate) by United States industry and minimizes nonrecurring engineering and facilitization expenses to the costs needed for coproduction;
(II) complete transparency on the requirement of Israel for the number of interceptors and batteries of such respective systems that will be procured, including with respect to the procurement plans, acquisition strategy, and funding profiles of Israel;
(3) WAIVER.—The Under Secretary may waive the certification required by paragraph (2) if the Under Secretary certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the Under Secretary has received sufficient data from the Government of Israel to demonstrate—
(A) the funds specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) are provided to Israel solely for funding the procurement of long-lead components in accordance with a production plan, including a funding profile detailing Israeli contributions for production, including long-lead production, of either David’s Sling Weapon System or the Arrow 3 Upper Tier Interceptor Program;
(a) Anti-air warfare capability of Aegis Ashore sites.—
(1) EVALUATION.—The Secretary of Defense shall conduct a complete evaluation of the optimal anti-air warfare capability—
(b) Aegis Ashore capability evaluation.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees an evaluation of each of the following:
(1) The ballistic missile and air threat against the continental United States and the efficacy (including with respect to cost, ideal and optimal deployment locations, and potential deployment schedule) of deploying one or more Aegis Ashore sites and Aegis Ashore components for the ballistic and cruise missile defense of the continental United States.
(c) Aegis ashore site on the Pacific Missile Range Facility.—
(1) LIMITATION.—The Secretary of Defense may not reduce the manning levels or test capability, as such levels and capability existed on January 1, 2015, of the Aegis Ashore site at the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii, including by putting such site into a “cold” or “stand by” status.
(2) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.—
(A) Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Director of the Missile Defense Agency submits to the congressional defense committees the report under section 1689(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1144), the Director shall notify such committees on whether the preferred alternative for fielding a medium range ballistic missile defense sensor for the defense of Hawaii identified by such report would require an update to the environmental impact statement required for constructing the Aegis Ashore site at the Pacific Missile Range Facility.
(B) If the Director determines that an updated environmental impact statement, a new environmental impact statement, or another action is required or recommended pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. et seq.), the Director shall commence such action by not later than 60 days after the date on which the Director makes the notification under subparagraph (A).
(3) EVALUATION.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees an evaluation of the ballistic missile and air threat against Hawaii (including with respect to threats to the Armed Forces and installations located in Hawaii) and the efficacy (including with respect to cost and potential alternatives) of—
(a) Authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Missile Defense Agency is the technical authority of the Department of Defense for integrated air and missile defense activities and programs, including joint engineering and integration efforts for such activities and programs, including with respect to defining and controlling the interfaces of such activities and programs and the allocation of technical requirements for such activities and programs.
(2) DETAILEES.—
(A) In carrying out the technical authority under paragraph (1), the Director may seek to have staff detailed to the Missile Defense Agency from the Joint Functional Component Command for Integrated Missile Defense and the Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Organization in a number the Director determines necessary in accordance with subparagraph (B).
(B) In detailing staff under subparagraph (A) to carry out the technical authority under paragraph (1), the total number of staff, including detailees, of the Missile Defense Agency who carry out such authority may not exceed the number that is twice the number of such staff carrying out such authority as of January 1, 2016.
(b) Assessments and plans.—
(1) BIENNIAL SUBMISSION.—Not later than January 31, 2017, and biennially thereafter through 2021, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees an assessment of the state of integration and interoperability of the integrated air and missile defense capabilities of the Department of Defense.
(a) Development.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency, with the support of federally funded research and development centers with subject matter expertise, shall commence the planning for concept definition, design, research, development, engineering evaluation, and test of a space-based ballistic missile intercept and defeat layer to the ballistic missile defense system that—
(2) ACTIVITIES.—The planning activities authorized under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(A) The initiation of formal steps for potential integration into the ballistic missile defense system architecture.
(b) Space test bed.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall commence planning for research, development, test, and evaluation activities with respect to a space test bed for a missile interceptor capability.
(c) Budget submissions.—The Director shall submit with the budget of the President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2018 a detailed budget and development plan, irrespective of planned budgetary total obligation authority, for the activities described in subsections (a) and (b), assuming initial demonstration, on-orbit, of such the capabilities described in such subsections by 2025.
(a) Establishment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall establish a program of record in the ballistic missile defense system to develop and field a defensive system to defeat hypersonic boost-glide and maneuvering ballistic missiles. Such defense system may be a new system, a modification of an existing system, or developed by integrating existing systems.
(b) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the headquarters operations of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and the headquarters operations of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, $25,000,000 may not be obligated or expended for each such headquarters operations until—
(1) the Director certifies to the congressional defense committees that the Director has established the program of record under paragraph (1) of subsection (a), including a discussion of—
(2) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the military capability or capabilities and capability gaps relating to the threat posed by hypersonic boost-glide and maneuvering ballistic missiles to the United States, the forces of the United States, and the allies of the United States; and
(c) Report on MTCR.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, shall submit to the congressional defense committees and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the implications for the Missile Technology Control Regime regarding the development of a defensive system, including with respect to partnering with allies and partners of the United States, to counter hypersonic boost-glide and maneuvering ballistic missiles.
(d) Plan.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the budget of the President for fiscal year 2018 is submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31, Unites States Code, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to field the defensive system under paragraph (1) of subsection (a) by 2021, including—
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Patriot lower tier air and missile defense capability of the Army, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until each of the following occurs:
(1) The Director of the Missile Defense Agency certifies to the congressional defense committees that such capability, upon the completion of the modernization process addressed by the analysis of alternatives regarding such capability, will be fully interoperable with the ballistic missile defense system and other air and missile defense capabilities deployed and planned to be deployed by the United States.
(2) The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certifies to the congressional defense committees that such capability, upon the completion of the modernization process addressed by the analysis of alternatives regarding such capability, will meet—
(3) The Chief of Staff of the Army, in coordination with the Secretary of the Army, submits to the congressional defense committees—
(A) a determination as to whether the requirements of the lower tier air and missile defense program are appropriate for acquisition through the Army Rapid Capabilities Office, and if the determination is that such requirements are not so appropriate, an evaluation of why;
(B) the terms of the competition planned for the lower tier air and missile defense program to ensure fair competition for all competitors; and
(C) either—
(i) certification that—
(I) the requirements of the lower tier air and missile defense program can only be met through a multi-year development and acquisition program, rather than through more expedient modification of existing or demonstrated capabilities of the Department of Defense; and
(II) the lower tier air and missile defense acquisition program as designed as of the date of the certification will provide the most rapid deployment of a modernized capability to the warfighter at reasonable risk levels (as compared to systems with similar amounts of complexity and technological readiness); or
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for research, development, test, and evaluation, Defense-wide, for the conventional prompt global strike weapons system, not more than 75 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in consultation with the Commander of the United States European Command, the Commander of the United States Pacific Command, and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command, submits to the congressional defense committees a report on—
(a) Pilot program.—Beginning not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall carry out a pilot program to implement improvements to the data protection options in the programs of the Missile Defense Agency (including the contractors of the Agency), particularly with respect to unclassified, controlled technical information and controlled unclassified information.
(b) Priority.—In carrying out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Director shall give priority to implementing data protection options that are used by the private sector and have been proven successful.
(c) Duration.—The Director shall carry out the pilot program under subsection (a) for not more than a 5-year period.
(d) Notification.—Not later than 30 days before the date on which the Director commences the pilot program under subsection (a), the Director shall notify the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs of the Senate of—
(a) Budget sufficiency.—
(1) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on the ground-based midcourse defense system.
(2) ELEMENTS.—The report under paragraph (1) shall include an evaluation of each of the following:
(3) UPDATES.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which each budget is submitted through January 31, 2021, the Director shall submit to the congressional defense committees an update to the report under paragraph (1).
(4) CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which each budget is submitted through January 31, 2021, the Commander of the United States Northern Command shall certify to the congressional defense committees that the most recent defense budget materials include a sufficient level of funding for the ground-based midcourse defense system to modernize the system to remain paced ahead of the developing limited ballistic missile threat to the homeland, including from an accidental or unauthorized ballistic missile attack.
(b) Evaluation of transportable ground-based interceptor.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on transportable ground-based interceptors. Such report shall detail the views of the Director regarding—
(1) the cost that is unconstrained by current projected budget levels for the Missile Defense Agency (including a detailed program development production and deployment cost and schedule for the earliest technically possible deployment), the associated manning, and the comparative cost (including as compared to developing a fixed ground-based interceptor site), technical readiness, and feasibility of a transportable ground-based interceptor as a means to deploy additional ground-based interceptors for the defense of the United States and the operational value of a transportable ground-based interceptor for the defense of the homeland against a limited ballistic missile attack, including from accidental or unauthorized ballistic missile launch;
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees the following:
(1) Both the classified and unclassified declaratory policy of the United States regarding the use of the left-of-launch capability of the United States against potential targets and how the Secretary and the Chairman intend to ensure that such capability is a deterrent to attacks by adversaries.
(a) The Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall issue a request for proposals for such radar by not later than October 1, 2017.
(b) The Director shall plan to procure a medium-range discrimination radar or equivalent sensor for a location the Director determines will improve homeland missile defense for the defense of Hawaii from the limited ballistic missile threat (including accidental or unauthorized launch) and plan for such radar to be fielded by not later than December 31, 2021.
(a) Notifications.—Not less than once every 180-day period beginning 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on January 31, 2021, the Director of the Missile Defense Agency shall submit to the congressional defense committees a notification on—
(b) Elements.—Each notification shall include the following:
(1) With respect to each test described in subsection (a)(1)—
(B) any changes made to the scope or objectives of the test, or future tests, and an explanation for such changes;
(a) Policy.—It is the policy of the United States to maintain and improve a robust layered missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United States, allies, deployed forces, and capabilities against the developing and increasingly complex ballistic missile threat with funding subject to the annual authorization of appropriations and the annual appropriation of funds for National Missile Defense.
(b) Conforming repeal.—Section 2 of the National Missile Defense Act of 1999 (Public Law 106–38; 10 U.S.C. 2431 note) is repealed.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) President Obama, during his announcement of the European Phased Adaptive Approach on September 17, 2009, stated, “This approach is based on an assessment of the Iranian missile threat,” and “the best way to responsibly advance our security and the security of our allies is to deploy a missile defense system that best responds to the threats we face and that utilizes technology that is both proven and cost-effective.”.
(2) The 2010 Ballistic Missile Defense review stated that “The [European] Phased Adaptive Approach utilizes existing and proven capabilities to meet current threats and then will improve upon these capabilities over time by integrating new technology.”.
(3) Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, during a speech in Brussels on October 5, 2011, stated, “The United States is fully committed to building a missile defense capability for the full coverage and protection of all our NATO European populations, their territory and their forces against the growing threat posed by ballistic missiles.”.
(4) Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, during a press conference on March 15, 2013, stated, “The missile deployments the United States is making in phases one through three of the European Phased Adaptive Approach, including sites in Romania and Poland, will still be able to provide coverage of all European NATO territory as planned by 2018.”.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the United States is committed to the defense of deployed members of the Armed Forces of the United States and to the defense of the European allies of the Unites States by increasing the ballistic missile defense capability of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (in this section referred to as “NATO”);
(2) phase 2 of the European Phased Adaptive Approach will provide NATO with a substantial increase in ballistic missile defense capability since NATO declared Interim Ballistic Missile Defense Capability at the Chicago Summit in 2012, and such phase consists of—
(3) NATO is moving forward with the modernization of the defense capabilities of NATO that is responsive to 21st century threats to the territory and populations of member states of NATO;
(a) In general.—Chapter 3 of title 10, United States Code, as amended by section 1255, is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 130j. Protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft
“(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Defense may take, and may authorize the armed forces to take, such actions described in subsection (b)(1) that are necessary to mitigate the threat of an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft that poses an imminent threat (as defined by the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Transportation) to the safety or security of a covered facility or asset.
“(c) Forfeiture.— (1) Any unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft described in subsection (a) shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture to the United States.
“(d) Regulations.—The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe regulations and issue guidance in the respective areas of each Secretary to carry out this section.
“(e) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘covered facility or asset’ means any facility or asset that is—
“(B) located in the United States (including the territories and possessions of the United States); and
“(2) The terms ‘unmanned aircraft’ and ‘unmanned aircraft system’ have the meaning given those terms in section 331 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–95; 49 U.S.C. 40101 note).”.
Not later than December 31, 2016, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report evaluating whether establishing an intra-departmental council in the Department of Defense on the use electromagnetic spectrum by the Department would improve coordination within the Department on—
(a) Federal Communications Commission conditions on commercial terrestrial operations.—Part I of title III of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 343. Conditions on commercial terrestrial operations.
“(a) In general.—The Commission shall not permit commercial terrestrial operations in the 1525–1559 megahertz band or the 1626.5–1660.5 megahertz band until the date that is 90 days after the Commission resolves concerns of widespread harmful interference by such operations in such band to covered GPS devices.
“(b) Notice to Congress.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—At the conclusion of the proceeding on such operations in such band, the Commission shall submit to the congressional committees described in paragraph (2) official copies of the documents containing the final decision of the Commission regarding whether to permit such operations in such band. If the decision is to permit such operations in such band, such documents shall contain or be accompanied by an explanation of how the concerns described in subsection (a) have been resolved.
(b) Secretary of Defense Review of Harmful Interference.—
(1) REVIEW.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter until the date referred to in paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense shall conduct a review to—
(2) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—
(A) NOTICE.—If the Secretary of Defense determines during a review under paragraph (1) that commercial communications services are causing or will cause widespread harmful interference with covered GPS devices, the Secretary shall promptly submit to the congressional defense committees notice of such interference.
(B) CONTENTS.—The notice required under subparagraph (A) shall include—
(i) a list and description of the covered GPS devices that are being or expected to be interfered with by commercial communications services;
(ii) a description of the source of, and the entity causing or expect to cause, the interference with such receivers;
(iii) a description of the manner in which such source or such entity is causing or expected to cause such interference;
(v) a description of the duration of and the conditions and circumstances under which such interference is occurring or expected to occur;
(c) Covered GPS Device Defined.—In this section, the term “covered GPS device” means a Global Position System device of the Department of Defense.
(d) Conforming repeal.—Section 911 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1534) is repealed.
(a) In general.—Part IV of subtitle A of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter 144A the following new chapter:
Ҥ 2446a. Requirement for modular open system approach in major defense acquisition programs; definitions
“(a) Modular open system approach requirement.—A major defense acquisition program initiated after January 1, 2019, shall be designed and developed, to the maximum extent practicable, with a modular open system approach to enable incremental development.
“(b) Definitions.—In this chapter:
“(1) The term ‘modular open system approach’ means, with respect to a major defense acquisition program, an integrated business and technical strategy that—
“(A) employs a modular design that uses major system interfaces between a major system platform and a major system component or between major system components;
“(B) is subjected to verification to ensure major system interfaces comply with, if available and suitable, widely supported and consensus-based standards;
“(2) The term ‘major system platform’ means the highest level structure of a major weapon system that is not physically mounted or installed onto a higher level structure and on which a major system component can be physically mounted or installed.
“(3) The term ‘major system component’—
“(A) means a high level subsystem or assembly, including hardware, software, or an integrated assembly of both, that can be mounted or installed on a major system platform through well-defined major system interfaces; and
“(B) includes a subsystem or assembly that is likely to have additional capability requirements, is likely to change because of evolving technology or threat, is needed for interoperability, facilitates incremental deployment of capabilities, or is expected to be replaced by another major system component.
“(4) The term ‘major system interface’ means a shared boundary between a major system platform and a major system component or between major system components, defined by various physical, logical, and functional characteristics, such as electrical, mechanical, fluidic, optical, radio frequency, data, networking, or software elements.
“(5) The term ‘program capability document’ means, with respect to a major defense acquisition program, a document that specifies capability requirements for the program, such as a capability development document or a capability production document.
“(6) The terms ‘program cost target’ and ‘fielding target’ have the meanings provided in section 2448a(a) of this title.
Ҥ 2446b. Requirement to address modular open system approach in program capabilities development and acquisition weapon system design
“(a) Program capability document.—A program capability document for a major defense acquisition program shall identify and characterize—
“(b) Analysis of alternatives.—The Director of Cost Assessment and Performance Evaluation, in formulating study guidance for analyses of alternatives for major defense acquisition programs and performing such analyses under section 139a(d)(4) of this title, shall ensure that any such analysis for a major defense acquisition program includes consideration of evolutionary acquisition, prototyping, and a modular open system approach.
“(c) Acquisition strategy.—In the case of a major defense acquisition program that uses a modular open system approach, the acquisition strategy required under section 2431a of this title shall—
“(2) differentiate between the major system platform and major system components being developed under the program, as well as major system components developed outside the program that will be integrated into the major defense acquisition program;
“(3) clearly describe the evolution of major system components that are anticipated to be added, removed, or replaced in subsequent increments;
“(d) Request for proposals.—The milestone decision authority for a major defense acquisition program that uses a modular open system approach shall ensure that a request for proposals for the development or production phases of the program shall describe the modular open system approach and the minimum set of major system components that must be included in the design of the major defense acquisition program.
“(e) Milestone B.—A major defense acquisition program may not receive Milestone B approval under section 2366b of this title until the milestone decision authority determines in writing that—
“(1) in the case of a program that uses a modular open system approach—
“(A) the program incorporates clearly defined major system interfaces between the major system platform and major system components and between major system components;
Ҥ 2446c. Requirements relating to availability of major system interfaces and support for modular open system approach
“The Secretary of each military department shall—
“(1) coordinate with the other military departments, the defense agencies, defense and other private sector entities, national standards-setting organizations, and, when appropriate, with elements of the intelligence community with respect to the specification, identification, development, and maintenance of major system interfaces and standards for use in major system platforms, where practicable;
“(2) ensure that major system interfaces incorporate commercial standards and other widely supported consensus-based standards that are validated, published, and maintained by recognized standards organizations to the maximum extent practicable;
“(3) ensure that sufficient systems engineering and development expertise and resources are available to support the use of a modular open system approach in requirements development and acquisition program planning;
“(4) ensure that necessary planning, programming, and budgeting resources are provided to specify, identify, develop, and sustain the modular open system approach, associated major system interfaces, and any additional program activities necessary to sustain innovation and interoperability; and
“(5) ensure that adequate training in the use of a modular open system approach is provided to members of the requirements and acquisition workforce.
Ҥ 2446d. Requirement to include modular open system approach in Selected Acquisition Reports
“For each major defense acquisition program that receives Milestone B approval after January 1, 2019, a brief summary description of the key elements of the modular open system approach or, if a modular open system approach was not used, the rationale for not using such an approach, shall be submitted to the congressional defense committees with the first Selected Acquisition Report required under section 2432 of this title for the program.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of chapters for title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding after the item relating to chapter 144A the following new item:
(d) Effective date.—Subchapter I of chapter 144B of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect on October 1, 2016.
(a) In general.—Chapter 144B of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1701, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subchapter:
Ҥ 2447a. Technology development in the acquisition of major weapon systems
“Technology shall be developed in a major defense acquisition program that is initiated after January 1, 2019, only if the milestone decision authority for the program determines with a high degree of confidence that such development will not delay the fielding target of the program. If the milestone decision authority does not make such determination for a major system component being developed under the program, the milestone decision authority shall ensure that technology related to the major system component shall be sufficiently matured separate from the major defense acquisition program using the prototyping authorities of this section or other authorities, as appropriate.
Ҥ 2447b. Weapon system component or technology prototype projects: display of budget information
“(a) Requirements for budget display.—In the defense budget materials for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2017, the Secretary of Defense shall, with respect to advanced component development and prototype activities (within the research, development, test, and evaluation budget), set forth the amounts requested for each of the following:
“(b) Additional requirements.—For purposes of subsection (a)(2), the amounts requested for development, prototyping, and experimentation of weapon system components or other technologies shall be—
Ҥ 2447c. Weapon system component or technology prototype projects: oversight
“(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of each military department shall establish an oversight board or identify a similar group of senior advisors for managing prototype projects for weapon system components and other technologies and subsystems, including the use of funds for such projects, within the military department concerned.
“(b) Membership.—Each oversight board shall be comprised of senior officials with—
“(1) expertise in requirements; research, development, test, and evaluation; acquisition; or other relevant areas within the military department concerned;
“(c) Functions.—The functions of each oversight board are as follows:
“(1) To issue a strategic plan every three years that prioritizes the capability and weapon system component portfolio areas for conducting prototype projects, based on assessments of high priority warfighter needs, capability gaps on existing major weapon systems, opportunities to incrementally integrate new components into major weapon systems, and technologies that are expected to be sufficiently mature to prototype within three years.
“(2) To annually recommend funding levels for weapon system component or technology development and prototype projects across capability or weapon system component portfolios.
“(3) To annually recommend to the service acquisition executive of the military department concerned specific weapon system component or technology development and prototype projects, subject to the requirements and limitations in section 2447d of this title.
“(4) To ensure projects are managed by experts within the Department of Defense who are knowledgeable in research, development, test, and evaluation and who are aware of opportunities for incremental deployment of component capabilities and other technologies to major weapon systems or directly to support warfighting capabilities.
“(5) To ensure projects are conducted in a manner that allows for appropriate experimentation and technology risk.
“(6) To ensure necessary technical, contracting, and financial management resources are available to support each project.
“(7) To submit to the congressional defense committees a semiannual notification that includes the following:
Ҥ 2447d. Requirements and limitations for weapon system component or technology prototype projects
“(a) Limitation on prototype project duration.—A prototype project shall be completed within three years of its initiation.
“(b) Merit-based selection process.—A prototype project shall be selected by the service acquisition executive of the military department concerned through a merit-based selection process that identifies the most promising and cost-effective prototypes that address a high priority warfighter need and are expected to be successfully demonstrated in a relevant environment.
“(c) Type of transaction.—Prototype projects shall be funded through contracts, cooperative agreements, or other transactions.
“(d) Funding limit.— (1) Each prototype project may not exceed a total amount of $10,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2017 constant dollars), unless— “(A) the Secretary of the military department, or the Secretary’s designee, approves a larger amount of funding for the project, not to exceed $50,000,000; and
Ҥ 2447e. Mechanisms to speed deployment of successful weapon system component or technology prototypes
“(a) Selection of rapid fielding project for production.—A weapon system component or technology rapid fielding project may be selected by the service acquisition executive of the military department concerned for a follow-on production contract or other transaction without the use of competitive procedures, notwithstanding the requirements of section 2304 of this title, if—
“(2) competitive procedures were used for the selection of parties for participation in the rapid fielding project;
“(b) Special transfer authority.— (1) The Secretary of a military department may, as specified in advance by appropriations Acts, transfer funds that remain available for obligation in procurement appropriation accounts of the military department to fund the low-rate initial production of the rapid fielding project until required funding for full-rate production can be submitted and approved through the regular budget process of the Department of Defense.
“(2) The funds transferred under this subsection to fund the low-rate initial production of a rapid fielding project shall be for a period not to exceed two years, the amount for such period may not exceed $50,000,000, and the special transfer authority provided in this subsection may not be used more than once to fund procurement of a particular new or upgraded system.
“(c) Notification to congress.—Within 30 days after the service acquisition executive of a military department selects a weapon system component or technology rapid fielding project for a follow-on production contract or other transaction, the service acquisition executive shall notify the congressional defense committees of the selection and provide a brief description of the rapid fielding project.
(b) Effective date.—Subchapter II of chapter 144B of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect on October 1, 2016.
(a) In general.—Chapter 144B of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1701, is amended by adding at the end the following new subchapter:
Ҥ 2448a. Program cost, fielding, and performance goals in planning major defense acquisition programs
“(a) Program cost and fielding targets.— (1) Before a major defense acquisition program receives Milestone A approval or is otherwise initiated prior to Milestone B, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure, by establishing the goals described in paragraph (2), that—
“(b) Considerations.—In establishing goals under subsection (a) for the program, the Secretary of Defense shall consider each of the following:
“(1) The capability needs and timeframe specified in the initial capabilities document, opportunities for evolution of capabilities, and minimum acceptable capability increments.
“(2) Resources available to fund the development, production, and life cycle of the program, using a reasonable estimate of future defense budgets.
“(a) In general.—With respect to a major defense acquisition program, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall—
“(1) before any decision to grant Milestone A approval for the program pursuant to section 2366a of this title, identify critical technologies that need to be matured in the program; and
“(2) before any decision to grant Milestone B approval for the program pursuant to section 2366b of this title, any decision to enter into low-rate initial production or full-rate production, or at any other time considered appropriate by the Under Secretary, conduct or approve an independent technical risk assessment for the program, including the identification of any critical technologies that have not been successfully demonstrated in a relevant environment.
Ҥ 2448c. Adherence to requirements and thresholds in major defense acquisition programs
“(a) Capabilities determination.—The Secretary of the military department concerned shall ensure that the program capability document supporting a Milestone B or subsequent milestone for a major defense acquisition program may not be submitted to the Joint Requirements Oversight Council for approval until the Chief of the armed force concerned determines in writing that the requirements in the document are necessary and realistic in relation to the program cost and fielding targets established under section 2448a(a) of this title.
“(b) Compliance with targets before Milestone B approval.—A major defense acquisition program may not receive Milestone B approval until the milestone decision authority for the program determines in writing that the estimated program acquisition unit cost and the estimated date for initial operational capability for the baseline description for the program (established under section 2435) do not exceed the program cost and fielding targets established under section 2448a(a) of this title. If such estimated cost is higher than the program cost target or if such estimated date is later than the fielding target, the milestone decision authority may request that the Secretary of Defense increase the program cost target or delay the fielding target, as applicable.”.
(b) Effective date.—Subchapter III of chapter 144B of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to major defense acquisition programs that reach Milestone A after October 1, 2016.
(c) Modification of Milestone Decision Authority.—Effective October 1, 2016, subsection (d) of section 2430 of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 825(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 907), is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2)(A), by inserting “subject to paragraph (5),” before “the Secretary determines”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(5) The authority of the Secretary of Defense to designate an alternative milestone decision authority for a program with respect to which the Secretary determines that the program is addressing a joint requirement, as set forth in paragraph (2)(A), shall apply only for a major defense acquisition program that reaches Milestone A after October 1, 2016, and before October 1, 2019.”.
(a) Reports on milestone decision metrics.—Subchapter III of chapter 144B of title 10, United States Code, as added by section 1703, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Ҥ 2448d. Reports on milestone decision metrics
“(a) Report on milestone A.—Not later than 15 days after granting Milestone A approval for a major defense acquisition program, the milestone decision authority for the program shall provide to the congressional defense committees and, in the case of intelligence or intelligence-related activities, the congressional intelligence committees a brief summary report that contains the following elements:
“(1) The program cost and fielding targets established by the Secretary of Defense under section 2448a(a) of this title.
“(2) The estimated cost and schedule for the program established by the military department concerned, including—
“(3) The independent estimated cost for the program established pursuant to section 2334(a)(6) of this title, and any independent estimated schedule for the program, including—
“(4) A summary of the technical risks associated with the program, as determined by the military department concerned, including identification of any critical technologies that need to be matured.
“(5) A summary of the independent technical risk assessment conducted or approved under section 2448b of this title, including identification of any critical technologies that need to be matured.
“(b) Report on milestone B.—Not later than 15 days after granting Milestone B approval for a major defense acquisition program, the milestone decision authority for the program shall provide to the congressional defense committees and, in the case of intelligence or intelligence-related activities, the congressional intelligence committees a brief summary report that contains the following elements:
“(1) The program cost and fielding targets established by the Secretary of Defense under section 2448a(a) of this title.
“(2) The estimated cost and schedule for the program established by the military department concerned, including—
“(3) The independent estimated cost for the program established pursuant to section 2334(a)(6) of this title, and any independent estimated schedule for the program, including—
“(4) A summary of the technical risks associated with the program, as determined by the military department concerned, including identification of any critical technologies that have not been successfully demonstrated in a relevant environment.
“(c) Report on milestone C.—Not later than 15 days after granting Milestone C approval for a major defense acquisition program, the milestone decision authority for the program shall provide to the congressional defense committees and, in the case of intelligence or intelligence-related activities, the congressional intelligence committees a brief summary report that contains the following:
“(1) The estimated cost and schedule for the program established by the military department concerned, including—
“(2) The independent estimated cost for the program established pursuant to section 2334(a)(6) of this title, and any independent estimated schedule for the program, including—
“(d) Additional information.—At the request of any of the congressional defense committees or, in the case of intelligence or intelligence-related activities, the congressional intelligence committees, the milestone decision authority shall submit to the committee further information or underlying documentation for the information in a report submitted under subsection (a), (b), or (c), including the independent cost and schedule estimates and the independent technical risk assessments referred to in those subsections.
(a) Rights relating to item or process developed exclusively at private expense.—Subsection (a)(2)(C)(iii) of section 2320 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after “or process data” the following: “, including such data pertaining to a major system component”.
(b) Rights relating to interface or major system interface.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 2320 of such title is further amended—
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (E), (F), and (G) as subparagraphs (F), (I), and (J), respectively;
(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking “Except as provided in subparagraphs (C) and (D),” and inserting “Except as provided in subparagraphs (C), (D), and (E),”;
(5) in subparagraph (F), as redesignated by paragraph (1), by striking “In the case of” and inserting “Except as provided in subparagraphs (G) and (H), in the case of”;
(6) by inserting after subparagraph (F), as so redesignated, the following new subparagraphs (G) and (H):
“(G) Notwithstanding subparagraph (F), the United States shall have government purpose rights in technical data pertaining to an interface between an item or process and other items or processes that was developed in part with Federal funds and in part at private expense, except in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines, on the basis of criteria established in the regulations, that negotiation of different rights in such technical data would be in the best interest of the United States.
“(H) Notwithstanding subparagraph (F), the United States shall have government purpose rights in technical data pertaining to a major system interface developed in part with Federal funds and in part at private expense and used in a modular open system approach pursuant to section 2446a of this title.”; and
(c) Amendment relating to negotiated rights for item or process developed with mixed funding.—Section (a)(2)(F) of section 2320 of such title, as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section, is further amended by striking the period at the end of the first sentence in the matter preceding clause (i) and all that follows through “establishment of any such negotiated rights shall” and inserting “and shall be based on negotiations between the United States and the contractor, except in any case in which the Secretary of Defense determines, on the basis of criteria established in the regulations, that negotiations would not be practicable. The establishment of such rights shall”.
(d) Amendment relating to deferred ordering.—Subsection (b)(9) of section 2320 of such title is amended—
(1) by striking “at any time” and inserting “, until the date occurring six years after acceptance of the last item (other than technical data) under a contract or the date of contract termination, whichever is later,”;
(e) Definitions.—Section 2320 of such title is further amended—
(f) Amendments to add certain headings for readability.—Section 2320(a) of such title is further amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2), by inserting after “(A)” the following: Development exclusively with Federal funds.—;
Section 15(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(a)) is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Small business procurements.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this Act, small business concerns shall receive any award or contract if such award or contract is, in the determination of the Administrator and the contracting agency, in the interest of—
“(2) INDUSTRY CATEGORY DEFINED.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—In this subsection, the term ‘industry category’ means a discrete group of similar goods and services, as determined by the Administrator in accordance with the North American Industry Classification System codes used to establish small business size standards, except that the Administrator shall limit an industry category to a greater extent than provided under the North American Industry Classification codes if the Administrator receives evidence indicating that further segmentation of the industry category is warranted—
“(B) EXCEPTION FOR GEOGRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS.—The Administrator may not further segment an industry category based on geographic requirements unless—
“(i) the Government typically designates the geographic area where work for contracts for goods or services is to be performed;
“(3) DETERMINATIONS WITH RESPECT TO AWARDS OR CONTRACTS.—Determinations made pursuant to paragraph (1) may be made for individual awards or contracts, any part of an award or contract or task order, or for classes of awards or contracts or task orders.
“(4) INCREASING PRIME CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS.—
“(A) DESCRIPTION OF COVERED PROPOSED PROCUREMENTS.—The requirements of this paragraph shall apply to a proposed procurement that includes in its statement of work goods or services currently being supplied or performed by a small business concern and, as determined by the Administrator—
“(i) is in a quantity or of an estimated dollar value which makes the participation of a small business concern as a prime contractor unlikely;
“(B) NOTICE TO PROCUREMENT CENTER REPRESENTATIVES.—With respect to proposed procurements described in subparagraph (A), at least 30 days before issuing a solicitation and concurrent with other processing steps required before issuing the solicitation, the contracting agency shall provide a copy of the proposed procurement to the procurement center representative of the contracting agency (as described in subsection (l)) along with a statement explaining—
“(i) why the proposed procurement cannot be divided into reasonably small lots (not less than economic production runs) to permit offers on quantities less than the total requirement;
“(ii) why delivery schedules cannot be established on a realistic basis that will encourage the participation of small business concerns in a manner consistent with the actual requirements of the Government;
“(iii) why the proposed procurement cannot be offered to increase the likelihood of the participation of small business concerns;
“(C) ALTERNATIVES TO INCREASE PRIME CONTRACTING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS.—If the procurement center representative believes that the proposed procurement will make the participation of small business concerns as prime contractors unlikely, the procurement center representative, within 15 days after receiving the statement described in subparagraph (B), shall recommend to the contracting agency alternative procurement methods for increasing prime contracting opportunities for small business concerns.
“(5) CONTRACTS FOR SALE OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY.—With respect to a contract for the sale of Government property, small business concerns shall receive any such contract if, in the determination of the Administrator and the disposal agency, the award of such contract is in the interest of assuring that a fair proportion of the total sales of Government property be made to small business concerns.
(a) In general.—Section 15(h)(2)(E) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(h)(2)(E)) is amended—
(1) in clause (i)—
(B) by adding at the end the following new subclauses:
“(V) that were purchased by another entity after the initial contract was awarded and as a result of the purchase, would no longer be deemed to be small business concerns for purposes of the initial contract; and
“(VI) that were awarded using a procurement method that restricted competition to small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, small business concerns owned and controlled by women, or a subset of any such concerns;”;
(2) in clause (ii)—
(B) by adding at the end the following new subclauses:
“(VI) that were purchased by another entity after the initial contract was awarded and as a result of the purchase, would no longer be deemed to be small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans for purposes of the initial contract; and
“(VII) that were awarded using a procurement method that restricted competition to qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, small business concerns owned and controlled by women, or a subset of any such concerns;”;
(3) in clause (iii)—
(B) by adding at the end the following new subclauses:
“(VII) that were purchased by another entity after the initial contract was awarded and as a result of the purchase, would no longer be deemed to be qualified HUBZone small business concerns for purposes of the initial contract; and
“(VIII) that were awarded using a procurement method that restricted competition to small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, small business concerns owned and controlled by women, or a subset of any such concerns;”;
(4) in clause (iv)—
(B) by adding at the end the following new subclauses:
(8) in clause (viii)—
(C) by adding at the end the following new subclauses:
“(IX) that were purchased by another entity after the initial contract was awarded and as a result of the purchase, would no longer be deemed to be small business concerns owned and controlled by women for purposes of the initial contract; and
“(X) that were awarded using a procurement method that restricted competition to small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, or a subset of any such concerns; and”.
(b) Effective date.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall be required to report on the information required by sections 15(h)(2)(E)(i)(V), 15(h)(2)(E)(ii)(VI), 15(h)(2)(E)(iii)(VII), 15(h)(2)(E)(iv)(VII), 15(h)(2)(E)(v)(VI), 15(h)(2)(E)(vi)(VI), 15(h)(2)(E)(vii)(VI), and 15(h)(2)(E)(viii)(IX) only beginning on the date that the Federal Procurement Data System, System for Award Management or any new or successor system is able to report such data.
Section 15(h)(3) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(h)(3)) is amended to read as follows:
“(3) PROCUREMENT DATA.—
“(A) FEDERAL PROCUREMENT DATA SYSTEM.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—To assist in the implementation of this section, the Administrator shall have access to information collected through the Federal Procurement Data System, Federal Subcontracting Reporting System, or any new or successor system.
“(ii) GSA REPORT.—On the date that the Administrator makes available the report required by paragraph (2), the Administrator of the General Services Administration shall submit a report to the President and Congress, and to make available on a public Web site, a report in the same form and manner, and including the same information, as the report under paragraph (2). Such report shall include all procurements made for the period covered by the report and may not exclude any contract awarded.
“(B) AGENCY PROCUREMENT DATA SOURCES.—To assist in the implementation of this section, the head of each contracting agency shall provide, upon request of the Administrator, procurement information collected through agency data collection sources in existence at the time of the request. Contracting agencies shall not be required to establish new data collection systems to provide such data.”.
(a) In general.—Section 15(j)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(j)(1)) is amended by striking “greater than $2,500 but not greater than $100,000” and inserting “greater than the micro-purchase threshold, but not greater than the simplified acquisition threshold”.
(b) Technical amendment.—Section 3(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(m)) is amended to read as follows:
“(m) Definitions pertaining to contracting.—In this Act:
“(1) PRIME CONTRACT.—The term ‘prime contract’ has the meaning given such term in section 8701(4) of title 41, United States Code.
“(2) PRIME CONTRACTOR.—The term ‘prime contractor’ has the meaning given such term in section 8701(5) of title 41, United States Code.
“(3) SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD.—The term ‘simplified acquisition threshold’ has the meaning given such term in section 134 of title 41, United States Code.
Section 15(l) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(l)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(9) SCOPE OF REVIEW.—The Administrator—
“(A) may not limit the scope of review by the Procurement Center Representative for any solicitation of a contract or task order without regard to whether the contract or task order or part of the contract or task order is set aside for small business concerns, whether 1 or more contract or task order awards are reserved for small business concerns under a multiple award contract, or whether or not the solicitation would result in a bundled or consolidated contract (as defined in subsection (s)) or a bundled or consolidated task order; and
“(B) may, unless the contracting agency requests a review, limit the scope of review by the Procurement Center Representative for any solicitation of a contract or task order if such procurement is conducted pursuant to section 22 of the Foreign Military Sales Act (22 U.S.C. 2762), is a humanitarian operation as defined in section 401(e) of title 10, United States Code, or is for a contingency operation, as defined in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.”.
Section 4(h) of the Small Business Act (as added by section 865 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92)) is amended to read as follows:
“(h) Commercial Market Representatives.—
“(1) DUTIES.—The principal duties of a Commercial Market Representative employed by the Administrator and reporting to the senior official appointed by the Administrator with responsibilities under sections 8, 15, 31, and 36 (or the designee of such official) shall be to advance the policies established in section 8(d)(1) relating to subcontracting. Such duties shall include—
“(A) helping prime contractors to find small business concerns that are capable of performing subcontracts;
“(B) for contractors awarded contracts containing the clause described in section 8(d)(3), providing—
“(i) counseling on the contractor’s responsibility to maximize subcontracting opportunities for small business concerns;
“(2) CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Consistent with the requirements of subparagraph (B), a commercial market representative referred to in section 15(q)(3) shall have a Level I Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (or any successor certification) or the equivalent Department of Defense certification, except that a commercial market representative who was serving on or before the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 may continue to serve as a commercial market representative for a period of 5 years beginning on such date without such a certification.
Section 15(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(k)), as amended by section 870 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92), is amended—
(2) by striking “sections 8 and 15” each place such term appears and inserting “sections 8, 15, 31, 36, and 44”;
(5) by inserting after paragraph (17) the following new paragraph:
“(18) shall review summary data provided by purchase card issuers of purchases made by the agency greater than the micro-purchase threshold, and less than the simplified acquisition threshold to ensure that the purchases have been made in compliance with the provisions of this Act and have been properly recorded in the Federal Procurement Data System, if the method of payment is a purchase card issued by the Department of Defense pursuant to section 2784 of title 10, United States Code, or by the head of an executive agency pursuant to section 1909 of title 41, United States Code;”; and
(a) Requirements for the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.—Section 15(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(k)(8)), as amended by this Act, is further amended by inserting after paragraph (18) (as inserted by section 1813 of this Act) the following:
“(19) shall provide assistance to a small business concern awarded a contract or subcontract under this Act or under title 10 or title 41, United States Code, in finding resources for education and training on compliance with contracting regulations (including the Federal Acquisition Regulation) after award of such a contract or subcontract; and”.
(b) Requirements under the Mentor-Protege Program of the Department of Defense.—Section 831(e)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat. 1607; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(3) by inserting at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(D) the assistance the mentor firm will provide to the protege firm in understanding contract regulations of the Federal Government and the Department of Defense (including the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement) after award of a subcontract under this section, if applicable.”.
(c) Resources for small business concerns.—Section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(t) Post-Award compliance resources.—The Administrator shall provide to small business development centers and entities participating in the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program under chapter 142 of title 10, United States Code, and shall make available on the website of the Administration, a list of resources for small business concerns seeking education and assistance on compliance with contracting regulations (including the Federal Acquisition Regulation) after award of a contract or subcontract.”.
(d) Requirements for procurement center representatives.—Section 15(l)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(l)(2)) is amended—
(e) Requirements under the mentor-Protege program of the Small Business Administration.—Section 45(b)(3) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657r(b)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
Section 4(g) of the Small Business Act (as added by section 865 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92)) is amended to read as follows:
“(g) Business Opportunity Specialists.—
“(1) DUTIES.—The exclusive duties of a Business Opportunity Specialist employed by the Administrator and reporting to the senior official appointed by the Administrator with responsibilities under sections 8, 15, 31, and 36 (or the designee of such official) shall be to implement sections 7, 8, and 45 and to complete other duties related to contracting programs under this Act. Such duties shall include—
“(A) with respect to small business concerns eligible to receive contracts and subcontracts pursuant to section 8(a)—
“(i) providing guidance, counseling, and referrals for assistance with technical, management, financial, or other matters that will improve the competitive viability of such concerns;
“(iii) providing comprehensive assessments of such concerns, including identifying the strengths and weaknesses of such concerns;
“(2) CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Consistent with the requirements of subparagraph (B), a Business Opportunity Specialist described under section 7(j)(10)(D) shall have a Level I Federal Acquisition Certification in Contracting (or any successor certification) or the equivalent Department of Defense certification, except that a Business Opportunity Specialist who was serving on or before January 3, 2013, may continue to serve as a Business Opportunity Specialist for a period of 5 years beginning on such date without such a certification.
(a) Transparency in subcontracting goals.—Section 8(d)(9) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(9)) is amended—
(b) Review of subcontracting plans.—Section 15(k) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(k)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (19) (as inserted by section 1814 of this Act) the following:
(c) Good faith compliance.—Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this title, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall provide examples of activities that would be considered a failure to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements imposed on an entity (other than a small business concern as defined under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) that is awarded a prime contract containing the clauses required under paragraph (4) or (5) of section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)).
Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)), as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(18) PILOT PROGRAM PROVIDING PAST PERFORMANCE RATINGS FOR OTHER SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTORS.—
“(A) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Administrator shall establish a pilot program for a small business concern without a past performance rating as a prime contractor performing as a first tier subcontractor for a covered contract (as defined in paragraph 13(A)) to request a past performance rating in the system used by the Federal Government to monitor or record contractor past performance.
“(B) APPLICATION.—A small business concern described in subparagraph (A) shall submit an application to the appropriate official for a past performance rating. Such application shall include written evidence of the past performance factors for which the small business concern seeks a rating and a suggested rating.
“(C) DETERMINATION.—The appropriate official shall submit the application from the small business concern to the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization for the covered contract and to the prime contractor for review. The Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization and the prime contractor shall, not later than 30 days after receipt of the application, submit to the appropriate official a response regarding the application.
“(i) AGREEMENT ON RATING.—If the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization and the prime contractor agree on a past performance rating, or if either the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization or the prime contractor fail to respond and the responding individual agrees with the rating of the applicant small business concern, the appropriate official shall enter the agreed-upon past performance rating in the system described in subparagraph (A).
“(ii) DISAGREEMENT ON RATING.—If the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization and the prime contractor fail to respond within 30 days or if they disagree about the rating, or if either the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization or the prime contractor fail to respond and the responding individual disagrees with the rating of the applicant small business concern, the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization or the prime contractor shall submit a notice contesting the application to the appropriate official. The appropriate official shall follow the requirements of subparagraph (D).
“(D) PROCEDURE FOR RATING.—Not later than 14 calendar days after receipt of a notice under subparagraph (C)(ii), the appropriate official shall submit such notice to the applicant small business concern. Such concern may submit comments, rebuttals, or additional information relating to the past performance of such concern not later 14 calendar days after receipt of such notice. The appropriate official shall enter into the system described in subparagraph (A) a rating that is neither favorable nor unfavorable along with the initial application from the small business concern, the responses of the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization and the prime contractor, and any additional information provided by the small business concern. A copy of the information submitted shall be provided to the contracting officer (or designee of such officer) for the covered contract.
“(E) USE OF INFORMATION.—A small business subcontractor may use a past performance rating given under this paragraph to establish its past performance for a prime contract.
“(F) DURATION.—The pilot program established under this paragraph shall terminate 3 years after the date on which the first small business concern receives a past performance rating for performance as a first tier subcontractor.
“(G) REPORT.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall begin an assessment of the pilot program 1 year after the establishment of such program. Not later than 6 months after beginning such assessment, the Comptroller General shall submit a report to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives, which shall include—
“(i) the number of small business concerns that have received past performance ratings under the pilot program;
“(ii) the number of applications in which the contracting officer (or designee) or the prime contractor contested the application of the small business concern;
“(iii) any suggestions or recommendations the Comptroller General or the small business concerns participating in the program have to address disputes between the small business concern, the contracting officer (or designee), and the prime contractor on past performance ratings;
Section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991 (Public Law 101–510; 104 Stat. 1607; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note) is amended—
(1) in subsection (d)—
(C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph:
“(2) (A) the Administrator of the Small Business Administration does not have a current finding of affiliation between the mentor firm and protege firm; or
(3) in subsection (f)(6)—
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(D) women’s business centers described in section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656).”.
Section 45(b)(4) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657r(b)(4)) is amended by striking subparagraph (A) and redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively.
Section 29(g) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(g)) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C) and inserting the following:
“(B) RESPONSIBILITIES.—The responsibilities of the Assistant Administrator shall be to administer the programs and services of the Office of Women’s Business Ownership.
“(C) DUTIES.—The Assistant Administrator shall perform the following functions with respect to the Office of Women’s Business Ownership:
“(i) Recommend the annual administrative and program budgets of the Office and eligible entities receiving a grant under the Women’s Business Center Program.
“(ii) Review the annual budgets submitted by each eligible entity receiving a grant under the Women’s Business Center Program.
“(iii) Select applicants to receive grants to operate a women’s business center after reviewing information required by this section, including the budget of each applicant.
“(iv) Collaborate with other Federal departments and agencies, State and local governments, not-for-profit organizations, and for-profit enterprises to maximize utilization of taxpayer dollars and reduce (or eliminate) any duplication among the programs overseen by the Office of Women’s Business Ownership and those of other entities that provide similar services to women entrepreneurs.
(2) by adding at the end the following:
“(3) MISSION.—The mission of the Office of Women's Business Ownership shall be to assist women entrepreneurs to start, grow, and compete in global markets by providing quality support with access to capital, access to markets, job creation, growth, and counseling by—
“(A) fostering participation of women entrepreneurs in the economy by overseeing a network of women's business centers throughout States and territories;
“(4) ACCREDITATION PROGRAM.—
“(A) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this paragraph, the Administrator shall establish standards for an accreditation program for accrediting eligible entities receiving a grant under this section.
“(B) TRANSITION PROVISION.—Before the date on which standards are established under subparagraph (A), the Administrator may not terminate a grant under this section absent evidence of fraud or other criminal misconduct by the recipient.
“(C) CONTRACTING AUTHORITY.—The Administrator may provide financial assistance, by contract or otherwise, to a relevant national women’s business center representative association to provide assistance in establishing the standards required under subparagraph (A) or for carrying out an accreditation program pursuant to such standards.”.
(a) Definitions.—Section 29(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(a)) is amended—
(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
“(2) the term ‘eligible entity’ means—
“(A) an organization described in section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of such Code;
“(B) a State, regional, or local economic development organization, so long as the organization certifies that grant funds received under this section will not be commingled with other funds;
“(C) an institution of higher education, unless such institution is currently receiving a grant under section 21;
(4) by adding at the end the following:
“(5) the term ‘women's business center’ means the location at which counseling and training on the management, operations (including manufacturing, services, and retail), access to capital, international trade, Government procurement opportunities, and any other matter is needed to start, maintain, or expand a small business concern owned and controlled by women.”.
(b) Authority.—Section 29(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(b)) is amended—
(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly;
(2) by striking “The Administration” and all that follows through “5-year projects” and inserting the following:
(4) by adding at the end the following:
“(3) AMOUNT OF GRANTS.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The amount of a grant provided under this subsection to an eligible entity per project year shall be not more than $185,000 (as such amount is annually adjusted by the Administrator to reflect the change in inflation).
“(B) ADDITIONAL GRANTS.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), with respect to an eligible entity that has received $185,000 in grants under this subsection in a project year, the Administrator may award an additional grant under this subsection of up to $65,000 during such project year if the Administrator determines that the eligible entity—
“(4) NOTICE AND COMMENT REQUIRED.—The Administrator may only make a change to the standards by which an eligible entity obtains or maintains grants under this section, the standards for accreditation, or any other requirement for the operation of a women’s business center if the Administrator first provides notice and the opportunity for public comment, as set forth in section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, without regard to any exceptions provided for under such section.”.
(c) Conditions of participation.—Section 29(c) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(c)) is amended—
(2) in paragraph (3)—
(3) in paragraph (4)—
(4) by adding at end the following:
“(5) SEPARATION OF PROJECT AND FUNDS.—An eligible entity shall—
“(6) EXAMINATION OF ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—
“(A) REQUIRED SITE VISIT.—Each applicant, prior to receiving a grant under this section, shall have a site visit by an employee of the Administration, in order to ensure that the applicant has sufficient resources to provide the services for which the grant is being provided.
“(7) REMEDIATION OF PROBLEMS.—
“(A) PLAN OF ACTION.—If a review of an eligible entity under paragraph (6)(B) identifies any problems, the eligible entity shall, within 45 calendar days of receiving such review, provide the Assistant Administrator with a plan of action, including specific milestones, for correcting such problems.
“(B) PLAN OF ACTION REVIEW BY THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR.—The Assistant Administrator shall review each plan of action submitted under subparagraph (A) within 30 calendar days of receiving such plan and—
“(i) if the Assistant Administrator determines that such plan will bring the eligible entity into compliance with all the terms of the grant agreement, approve such plan;
“(ii) if the Assistant Administrator determines that such plan is inadequate to remedy the problems identified in the annual review to which the plan of action relates, the Assistant Administrator shall set forth such reasons in writing and provide such determination to the eligible entity within 15 calendar days of such determination.
“(C) AMENDMENT TO PLAN OF ACTION.—An eligible entity receiving a determination under subparagraph (B)(ii) shall have 30 calendar days from the receipt of the determination to amend the plan of action to satisfy the problems identified by the Assistant Administrator and resubmit such plan to the Assistant Administrator.
“(D) AMENDED PLAN REVIEW BY THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR.—Within 15 calendar days of the receipt of an amended plan of action under subparagraph (C), the Assistant Administrator shall either approve or reject such plan and provide such approval or rejection in writing to the eligible entity.
“(E) APPEAL OF ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR DETERMINATION.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—If the Assistant Administrator rejects an amended plan under subparagraph (D), the eligible entity shall have the opportunity to appeal such decision to the Administrator, who may delegate such appeal to an appropriate officer of the Administration.
“(ii) OPPORTUNITY FOR EXPLANATION.—Any appeal described under clause (i) shall provide an opportunity for the eligible entity to provide, in writing, an explanation of why the eligible entity’s plan remedies the problems identified in the annual review.
“(8) TERMINATION OF GRANT.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall require that, if an eligible entity fails to comply with a plan of action approved by the Assistant Administrator under paragraph (7)(B)(i) or an amended plan of action approved by the Assistant Administrator under paragraph (7)(D) or approved on appeal under paragraph (7)(E), the Assistant Administrator shall terminate the grant provided to the eligible entity under this section.
(d) Submission of 5-year plan.—Section 29(e) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(e)) is amended—
(e) Applications and criteria for initial grant.—Subsection (f) of section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656) is amended to read as follows:
“(f) Applications and criteria for initial grant.—
“(1) APPLICATION.—Each eligible entity desiring a grant under subsection (b) shall submit to the Administrator an application that contains—
“(A) a certification that the eligible entity—
“(B) information demonstrating that the eligible entity has the ability and resources to meet the needs of the market to be served by the women's business center, including the ability to obtain the non-Federal contribution required under subsection (c);
“(C) information relating to the assistance to be provided by the women's business center in the area in which the women's business center is located;
“(2) REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR INITIAL GRANTS.—
“(A) REVIEW AND SELECTION OF ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall review applications to determine whether the applicant can meet obligations to perform the activities required by a grant under this section, including—
“(II) the amount of time needed for the applicant to commence operations should it be awarded a grant;
“(III) the capacity of the applicant to meet the accreditation standards established by the Administrator in a timely manner;
“(IV) the ability of the applicant to sustain operations for more than 5 years (including its ability to obtain sufficient non-Federal funds for that period);
“(ii) SELECTION CRITERIA.—
“(I) GUIDANCE.—The Administrator shall issue guidance (after providing an opportunity for notice and comment) to specify the criteria for review and selection of applicants under this subsection.
“(II) MODIFICATIONS PROHIBITED AFTER ANNOUNCEMENT.—With respect to a public announcement of any opportunity to be awarded a grant under this section made by the Administrator pursuant to subsection (l)(1), the Administrator may not modify guidance issued pursuant to subclause (I) with respect to such opportunity unless required to do so by an Act of Congress or an order of a Federal court.
“(III) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this clause may be construed as prohibiting the Administrator from modifying the guidance issued pursuant to subclause (I) (after providing an opportunity for notice and comment) as such guidance applies to an opportunity to be awarded a grant under this section that the Administrator has not yet publicly announced pursuant to subsection (l)(1).
(f) Notification requirements under the Women’s Business Center Program.—Section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656) is amended by inserting after subsection (k) the following:
“(l) Notification requirements under the Women’s Business Center Program.—The Administrator shall provide—
“(1) a public announcement of any opportunity to be awarded grants under this section, and such announcement shall include the standards by which such award will be made, including the guidance issued pursuant to subsection (f)(2)(A)(ii);
“(2) the opportunity for any applicant for a grant under this section that failed to obtain such a grant a debriefing with the Assistant Administrator to review the reasons for the applicant’s failure; and
“(3) with respect to any site visit or evaluation of an eligible entity receiving a grant under this section that is carried out by an officer or employee of the Administration (other than the Inspector General), a copy of the site visit report or evaluation, as applicable, within 30 calendar days of the completion of such vision or evaluation.”.
(g) Continued funding for centers.—Section 29(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(m)) is amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:
“(3) APPLICATION AND APPROVAL FOR CONTINUATION GRANTS.—
“(A) SOLICITATION OF APPLICATIONS.—The Administrator shall solicit applications and award continuation grants under this subsection for the first fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this paragraph, and every third fiscal year thereafter.
“(B) CONTENTS OF APPLICATION.—Each eligible entity desiring a grant under this subsection shall submit to the Administrator an application that contains—
“(i) a certification that the applicant—
“(ii) information demonstrating that the applicant has the ability and resources to meet the needs of the market to be served by the women's business center for which a grant under this subsection is sought, including the ability to obtain the non-Federal contribution required under paragraph (4)(C);
“(iii) information relating to assistance to be provided by the women's business center in the geographic area served by the women's business center for which a grant under this subsection is sought;
“(iv) information demonstrating that the applicant has worked with resource partners of the Administration and other entities;
“(C) REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR GRANTS.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator—
“(I) shall review each application submitted under subparagraph (B), based on the information described in such subparagraph and the criteria set forth under clause (ii) of this subparagraph; and
“(II) as part of the final selection process, may, at the discretion of the Administrator, conduct a site visit to each women's business center for which a grant under this subsection is sought, in particular to evaluate the women's business center using the selection criteria described in clause (ii)(II).
“(ii) SELECTION CRITERIA.—
“(I) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall evaluate applicants for grants under this subsection in accordance with selection criteria that are—
“(II) REQUIRED CRITERIA.—The selection criteria for a grant under this subsection shall include—
“(dd) the percentage of individuals in the community served by the applicant who are socially or economically disadvantaged;
“(iii) CONDITIONS FOR CONTINUED FUNDING.—In determining whether to make a grant under this subsection, the Administrator—
“(D) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 60 calendar days after the date of each deadline to submit applications under this paragraph, the Administrator shall approve or deny each submitted application and notify the applicant for each such application of the approval or denial.
(h) Technical and conforming amendments.—Section 29 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656) is amended—
(1) in subsection (h)(2), by striking “to award a contract (as a sustainability grant) under subsection (l) or”;
(2) in subsection (j)(1), by striking “The Administration” and inserting “Not later than November 1 of each year, the Administrator”;
(3) in subsection (k)—
(C) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:
“(B) EXCEPTIONS.—Of the amount made available under this subsection for a fiscal year, the following amounts shall be available for selection panel costs, costs associated with maintaining an accreditation program, and post-award conference costs:
(i) Effect on existing grants.—
(1) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—A nonprofit organization receiving a grant under section 29(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(m)), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this title, shall continue to receive the grant under the terms and conditions in effect for the grant on the day before the date of enactment of this title, except that the nonprofit organization may not apply for a continuation of the grant under section 29(m)(5) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(m)(5)), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this title.
(2) LENGTH OF CONTINUATION GRANT.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration may award a grant under section 29(m) of the Small Business Act to a nonprofit organization receiving a grant under section 29(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(m)), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this title, for the period—
Section 29(c) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 656(c)), as amended by this Act, is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “As a condition” and inserting “Subject to paragraph (6), as a condition”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
“(9) WAIVER OF NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—
“(A) IN GENERAL.—Upon request by an eligible entity, and in accordance with this paragraph, the Administrator may waive, in whole or in part, the requirement to obtain non-Federal funds under this subsection for counseling and training activities of the eligible entity carried out using a grant under this section for a fiscal year. The Administrator may not waive the requirement for an eligible entity to obtain non-Federal funds under this paragraph for more than a total of 2 consecutive fiscal years.
“(10) SOLICITATION.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, eligible entity may—
“(11) EXCESS NON-FEDERAL DOLLARS.—The amount of non-Federal dollars obtained by an eligible entity that is above the amount that is required to be obtained by the eligible entity under this subsection shall not be subject to the requirements of part 200 of title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor thereto, if such amount of non-Federal dollars—
Section 20 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 note) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following: “(g) SCORE program.—There are authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator to carry out the SCORE program authorized by section 8(b)(1) such sums as are necessary for the Administrator to make grants or enter into cooperative agreements in a total amount that does not exceed $10,500,000 in each of fiscal years 2017 and 2018.”.
Section 8 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637) is amended—
(1) in subsection (b)(1)(B), by striking “a Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE)” and inserting “the SCORE program described in subsection (c)”; and
(2) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following: “(c) SCORE program.— “(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection: “(2) MANAGEMENT AND VOLUNTEERS.— “(A) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator shall provide a grant to the SCORE Association to manage the SCORE program. “(B) VOLUNTEERS.—A volunteer participating in the SCORE program shall— “(3) PLANS AND GOALS.—The Administrator, in consultation with the SCORE Association, shall ensure that the SCORE program and each chapter of the SCORE program develop and implement plans and goals to more effectively and efficiently provide services to individuals in rural areas, economically disadvantaged communities, and other traditionally underserved communities, including plans for electronic initiatives, web-based initiatives, chapter expansion, partnerships, and the development of new skills by volunteers participating in the SCORE program. “(4) ANNUAL REPORT.—The SCORE Association shall submit to the Administrator an annual report that contains— “(5) PRIVACY REQUIREMENTS.— “(A) IN GENERAL.—Neither the Administrator nor the SCORE Association may disclose the name, address, or telephone number of any individual or small business concern receiving assistance from the SCORE Association without the consent of such individual or small business concern, unless—
(a) In general.—Section 8(c) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(c)), as amended by section 1852, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(6) ONLINE COMPONENT.—In carrying out this subsection, the SCORE Association shall make use of online counseling, including by developing and implementing webinars and an electronic mentoring platform to expand access to services provided under this subsection and to further support entrepreneurs.”.
(b) Online component report.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—At the end of fiscal year 2018, the SCORE Association shall issue a report to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate on the effectiveness of the online counseling and webinars required as part of the SCORE program, including—
(A) how the SCORE Association determines electronic mentoring and webinar needs, develops training for electronic mentoring, establishes webinar criteria curricula, and evaluates webinar and electronic mentoring results;
(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this subsection, the terms “SCORE Association” and “SCORE program” have the meaning given those terms, respectively, under section 8(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(c)(1)).
(a) Study.—The SCORE Association shall carry out a study on the future role of the SCORE program and develop a strategic plan for how the SCORE program will evolve to meet the needs of small business concerns and potential future small business concerns over the course of the 5 years following the date of enactment of this Act, with markers and specific objectives for year 1, year 3, and year 5.
(b) Report.—Not later than the end of the 6-month period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the SCORE Association shall issue a report to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate containing—
(c) Definitions.—For purposes of this section, the terms “SCORE Association” and “SCORE program” have the meaning given those terms, respectively, under section 8(c)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(c)(1)).
(a) Small business act.—The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended—
(1) in section 7(m)(3)(A)(i)(VIII) (15 U.S.C. 636(m)(3)(A)(i)(VIII)), by striking “Service Corps of Retired Executives” and inserting “SCORE program”; and
(2) in section 22 (15 U.S.C. 649)—
(b) Other laws.—
(1) Section 621 of the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (15 U.S.C. 657p) is amended—
(A) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following:
“(4) the term ‘SCORE program’ means the SCORE program authorized by section 8(b)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(b)(1)(B));”; and
(2) Section 337(d)(2)(A) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6307(d)(2)(A)) is amended by striking “Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE)” and inserting “SCORE program”.
(a) Regulatory changes and training materials.—Section 15 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644), as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(u) Regulatory changes and training materials.—Not less than annually, the Administrator shall provide to the Defense Acquisition University (established under section 1746 of title 10, United States Code), the Federal Acquisition Institute (established under section 1201 of title 41, United States Code), the individual responsible for mandatory training and education of the acquisition workforce of each agency (described under section 1703(f)(1)(C) of title 41, United States Code), small business development centers, and entities participating in the Procurement Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program under chapter 142 of title 10, United States Code—
(b) Training to be updated.—Upon receipt of information from the Administrator of the Small Business Administration pursuant to section 15(u) of the Small Business Act, the Defense Acquisition University (as under section 1746 of title 10, United States Code) and the Federal Acquisition Institute (established under section 1201 of title 41, United States Code) shall periodically update the training provided to the acquisition workforce.
Section 4106(f) of title 41, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (3).
(a) Amendment to definition of agricultural enterprises.—Paragraph (1) of section 18(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 647(b)(1)) is amended by striking “businesses” and inserting “small business concerns”.
(b) Equal treatment of small farms.—Paragraph (1) of section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(1)) is amended by striking “operation: Provided,” and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting “operation.”.
(c) Updated size standards.—Size standards established under subsection (a) are subject to the rolling review procedures established under section 1344(a) of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 632 note).
(a) Small business definition of small business concern consolidated.—Section 3(q) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)) is amended—
(1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
“(2) SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY SERVICE-DISABLED VETERANS.—The term ‘small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans’ means any of the following:
“(A) A small business concern—
“(B) A small business concern—
“(C) (i) During the time period described in clause (ii), a small business concern that was a small business concern described in subparagraph (A) or (B) immediately prior to the death of a service-disabled veteran who was the owner of the concern, the death of whom causes the concern to be less than 51 percent owned by one or more service-disabled veterans, if— “(I) the surviving spouse of the deceased veteran acquires such veteran’s ownership interest in such concern;
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
“(6) ESOP.—The term ‘ESOP’ has the meaning given the term ‘employee stock ownership plan’ in section 4975(e)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 4975(e)(7)).
(b) Veterans affairs definition of small business concern consolidated.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 8127 of title 38, United States Code, is amended—
(A) by striking subsection (h) and redesignating subsections (i) through (l) as subsections (h) through (k), respectively; and
(B) in subsection (k), as so redesignated—
(i) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
“(2) The term ‘small business concern owned and controlled by veterans’ has the meaning given that term under section 3(q)(3) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(3)).”; and
(ii) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(3) The term ‘small business concern owned and controlled by veterans with service-connected disabilities’ has the meaning given the term ‘small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans’ under section 3(q)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(q)(2)).”.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Such section is further amended—
(A) in subsection (b), by inserting “or a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans with service-connected disabilities” after “a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans”;
(B) in subsection (c), by inserting “or a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans with service-connected disabilities” after “a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans”;
(c) Technical correction.—Section 8(d)(3) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(3)), is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
(d) Regulations relating to database of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.—
(1) REQUIREMENT TO USE CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS.—Section 8127(f)(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking “verified” and inserting “verified, using regulations issued by the Administrator of the Small Business Administration with respect to the status of the concern as a small business concern and the ownership and control of such concern,”.
(e) Delayed effective date.—The amendments made by subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d) shall take effect on the date on which the Administrator of the Small Business Administration and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs jointly issue regulations implementing such sections.
(f) Appeals of inclusion in database.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 8127(f) of title 38, United States Code, as amended by this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
“(8) (A) If the Secretary does not verify a concern for inclusion in the database under this subsection based on the status of the concern as a small business concern or the ownership or control of the concern, the concern may appeal the denial of verification to the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Small Business Administration (as established under section 5(i) of the Small Business Act). The decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall be considered a final agency action.
“(B) (i) If an interested party challenges the inclusion in the database of a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans or a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans with service-connected disabilities based on the status of the concern as a small business concern or the ownership or control of the concern, the challenge shall be heard by the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Small Business Administration as described in subparagraph (A). The decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall be considered final agency action.
“(C) For each fiscal year, the Secretary shall reimburse the Administrator of the Small Business Administration in an amount necessary to cover any cost incurred by the Office of Hearings and Appeals of the Small Business Administration for actions taken by the Office under this paragraph. The Administrator is authorized to accept such reimbursement. The amount of any such reimbursement shall be determined jointly by the Secretary and the Administrator and shall be provided from fees collected by the Secretary under multiple-award schedule contracts. Any disagreement about the amount shall be resolved by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.”.
The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall submit to the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives the information described in section 11302(c)(3)(B)(ii) of title 40, United States Code, within 10 days of transmittal to the Director.
(a) Clarification as to jurisdiction.—Section 5(i)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 634(i)(1)(B)) is amended to read as follows:
“(B) JURISDICTION.—
“(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in clause (ii), the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall hear appeals of agency actions under or pursuant to this Act, the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), title 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and such other matters as the Administrator may determine appropriate.
(b) New procedures for petitions for reconsideration.—Section 3(a)(9) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)(9)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(E) PROCEDURES.—The Office of Hearings and Appeals shall begin accepting petitions for reconsideration described in subparagraph (A) upon the effective date of the procedures implementing this paragraph. Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraph (B), petitions for reconsideration of size standards revised, modified, or established in a Federal Register final rule published between November 25, 2015 and the effective date of such procedures shall be considered timely if filed within 30 days of such effective date.”.
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this title, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall issue guidance pertaining to the amendments made by this Act to the Small Business Act by this title. The Administrator shall provide notice and opportunity for comment on such guidance for a period of not less than 60 days.
Section 21 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking “and providing access to business analysts who can refer small business concerns to available experts:” and inserting “providing access to business analysts who can refer small business concerns to available experts; and, to the extent practicable, providing assistance in furtherance of the Small Business Development Center Cyber Strategy developed under section 1871(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017:”; and
Section 21(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(8) CYBER SECURITY ASSISTANCE.—The Department of Homeland Security, and any other Federal department or agency in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security, may provide assistance to small business development centers, through the dissemination of cybersecurity risk information and other homeland security information, to help small business concerns in developing or enhancing cyber security infrastructure, cyber threat awareness, and cyber training programs for employees.”.
Section 227 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 148) is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (k) the following: “(l) Cybersecurity outreach.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may provide assistance to small business development centers, through the dissemination of cybersecurity risk information and other homeland security information, to help small business concerns in developing or enhancing cyber security infrastructure, cyber threat awareness, and cyber training programs for employees.
(a) Review of current cyber security resources.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of current cyber security resources at the Federal level aimed at assisting small business concerns with developing or enhancing cyber security infrastructure, cyber threat awareness, or cyber training programs for employees.
(2) CONTENT.—The review required under paragraph (1) shall include the following:
(3) REPORT.—The Comptroller General shall issue a report to the Congress, the Small Business Administrator, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and any association recognized under section 21(a)(3)(A) of the Small Business Act containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the review required under paragraph (1).
(b) Small business development center cyber strategy.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the issuance of the report under subsection (a)(3), the Small Business Administrator and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall work collaboratively to develop a Small Business Development Center Cyber Strategy.
(2) CONSULTATION.—In developing the strategy under this subsection, the Small Business Administrator and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with entities representing the concerns of small business development centers, including any association recognized under section 21(a)(3)(A) of the Small Business Act.
(3) CONTENT.—The strategy required under paragraph (1) shall include, at minimum, the following:
(A) Plans for incorporating small business development centers (hereinafter in this section referred to as “SBDCs”) into existing cyber programs to enhance services and streamline cyber assistance to small business concerns.
(B) To the extent practicable, methods for the provision of counsel and assistance to improve a small business concern’s cyber security infrastructure, cyber threat awareness, and cyber training programs for employees, including—
(i) working to ensure individuals are aware of best practices in the areas of cyber security, cyber threat awareness, and cyber training;
(ii) working with individuals to develop cost-effective plans for implementing best practices in these areas;
(4) DELIVERY OF STRATEGY.—Not later than 180 days after the issuance of the report under subsection (a)(3), the Small Business Development Center Cyber Strategy shall be issued to the Committees on Homeland Security and Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate.
No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out sections 1868 through 1869B or the amendments made by such sections.
This subtitle may be cited as the “Small Business Development Centers Improvement Act of 2016”.
The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 48. Use of authorized entrepreneurial development programs.
“(a) Expanded support for entrepreneurs.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator shall only use the programs authorized in sections 7(j), 7(m), 8(a), 8(b)(1), 21, 22, 29, and 32 of this Act, and sections 358 and 389 of the Small Business Investment Act to deliver entrepreneurial development services, entrepreneurial education, support for the development and maintenance of clusters, or business training.
“(b) Annual report.—Beginning on the first December 1 after the date of enactment of this subsection, the Administrator shall annually report to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate on all entrepreneurial development activities undertaken in the current fiscal year. This report shall include—
Section 21 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(a) In general.—Section 21(a)(3)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)(3)(A)) is amended—
(b) Annual report on data collection.—Section 21 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648), as amended by section 1873 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(p) Annual Report on data collection.—The Administrator shall report annually to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate on any data collection activities related to the Small Business Development Center program.”.
(c) Working group to improve data collection.—
(1) ESTABLISHMENT AND STUDY.—The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall establish a Data Collection Working Group consisting of members from entrepreneurial development grant recipients associations and organizations and Administration officials, to carry out a study to determine the best way to capture data collection and create or revise existing systems dedicated to data collection.
(2) REPORT.—Not later than the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Data Collection Working Group shall issue a report to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate containing the findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under paragraph (1), including—
Section 21(a)(3) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)(3)(C)), as amended by section 1874, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“(D) Fees from private partnerships and cosponsorships.—Participation in private partnerships and cosponsorships with the Administration shall not limit small business development centers from collecting fees or other income related to the operation of such private partnerships and cosponsorships.”.
Subclause (I) of section 21(a)(4)(C)(v) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)(4)(C)(v)) is amended to read as follows:
Section 21(a)(7)(A) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648(a)(7)(A)) is amended by inserting after “under this section” the following: “to any State, local or Federal agency, or third party”.
(a) In general.—Section 21 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648), as amended by section 1874, is further amended—
(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking “any women's business center operating pursuant to section 29,”;
(2) by adding at the end the following: “(q) Limitation on award of grants.—Except for not-for-profit institutions of higher education, and notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator may not award grants (including contracts and cooperative agreements) under this section to any entity other than those that received grants (including contracts and cooperative agreements) under this section prior to the date of the enactment of this subsection, and that seek to renew such grants (including contracts and cooperative agreements) after such date.”.
(b) Rule of Construction.—The amendments made by this section may not be construed as prohibiting a women’s business center from receiving a subgrant from an entity receiving a grant under section 21 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 648).
This division may be cited as the “Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017”.
(a) Expiration of authorizations after three years.—Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—
(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of—
Titles XXI through XXVII and title XXIX shall take effect on the later of—
(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation | Amount |
| Alaska | Fort Wainwright | $47,000,000 |
| California | Concord | $12,600,000 |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $13,100,000 |
| Georgia | Fort Gordon | $129,600,000 |
| Fort Stewart | $14,800,000 | |
| Hawaii | Fort Shafter | $40,000,000 |
| Missouri | Fort Leonard Wood | $6,900,000 |
| Texas | Fort Hood | $7,600,000 |
| Utah | Camp Williams | $7,400,000 |
| Virginia | Fort Belvoir | $23,000,000 |
(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out the military construction project for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Amount |
| Cuba | Guantanamo Bay | $33,000,000 |
| Germany | East Camp Grafenwoehr | $22,000,000 |
| Garmisch | $9,600,000 | |
| Wiesbaden Army Airfield | $19,200,000 |
(a) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
| State/Country | Installation | Units | Amount |
| Korea | Camp Humphreys | Family Housing New Construction | $297,000,000 |
| Camp Walker | Family Housing New Construction | $54,554,000 |
(b) Planning and design.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2103(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $2,618,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2016, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 986) for Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, for construction of an aircraft maintenance hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct an aircraft washing apron.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (126 Stat. 2119) and extended by section 2107 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1148), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Kansas | Fort Riley | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Complex | $12,200,000 |
| Virginia | Fort Belvoir | Secure Admin/Operations Facility | $172,200,000 |
| Italy | Camp Ederle | Barracks | $36,000,000 |
| Japan | Sagami | Vehicle Maintenance Shop | $18,000,000 |
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 985), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (127 Stat. 986) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Maryland | Fort Detrick | Entry Control Point | $2,500,000 |
| Kwajalein Atoll | Kwajalein | Pier | $63,000,000 |
| Japan | Kyotango City | Company Operations Complex | $33,000,000 |
(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Arizona | Yuma | $48,355,000 |
| California | Coronado | $104,501,000 |
| Lemoore | $26,723,000 | |
| Miramar | $193,600,000 | |
| Seal Beach | $21,007,000 | |
| Florida | Eglin Air Force Base | $20,489,000 |
| Mayport | $66,000,000 | |
| Pensacola | $53,000,000 | |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $89,185,000 |
| Hawaii | Barking Sands | $43,384,000 |
| Kaneohe Bay | $72,565,000 | |
| Maine | Kittery | $47,892,000 |
| Maryland | Patuxent River | $40,576,000 |
| Nevada | Fallon | $13,523,000 |
| North Carolina | Camp Lejeune | $18,482,000 |
| Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station | $12,515,000 | |
| South Carolina | Beaufort | $83,490,000 |
| Parris Island | $29,882,000 | |
| Washington | Bangor | $113,415,000 |
| Bremerton | $6,704,000 | |
| Whidbey Island | $75,976,000 |
(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Japan | Kadena Air Base | $26,489,000 |
| Sasebo | $16,420,000 | |
| Spain | Rota | $23,607,000 |
| Worldwide Unspecified | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | $41,380,000 |
(a) Construction and acquisition.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Units | Amount |
| Mariana Islands | Guam | Replace Andersen Housing PH 1 | $78,815,000 |
(b) Planning and design.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,149,000.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $11,047,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2016, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2201 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 989) for Pearl City, Hawaii, for construction of a water transmission line at that location, the Secretary of the Navy may construct a 591-meter (1,940-foot) long 16-inch diameter water transmission line as part of the network required to provide the main water supply to Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (126 Stat. 2122) and extended by section 2206 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1151), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| California | Camp Pendleton | Comm. Information Systems Ops Complex | $78,897,000 |
| Greece | Souda Bay | Intermodal Access Road | $4,630,000 |
| South Carolina | Beaufort | Recycling/Hazardous Waste Facility | $3,743,000 |
| Worldwide Unspecified | Various Worldwide Locations | BAMS Operational Facilities | $34,048,000 |
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 985), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (127 Stat. 989), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Hawaii | Kaneohe Bay | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Upgrades | $31,820,000 |
| Pearl City | Water Transmission Line | $30,100,000 | |
| Illinois | Great Lakes | Unaccompanied Housing | $35,851,000 |
| Maine | Bangor | NCTAMS VLF Commercial Power Connection | $13,800,000 |
| Nevada | Fallon | Wastewater Treatment Plant | $11,334,000 |
| Virginia | Quantico | Academic Instruction Facility TECOM Schools | $25,731,000 |
| Quantico | Fuller Road Improvements | $9,013,000 |
(a) Report on Status.—
(1) REPORT.—Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit a report to the congressional defense committees regarding the status of the implementation of the “net negative” policy regarding the total number of acres of the real property controlled by the Department of the Navy on Guam, as described in subsection (b).
(2) CONTENTS.—The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following information:
(A) A description of the real property controlled by the Navy on Guam which the Navy has transferred to the control of Guam after January 20, 2011, or which the Navy plans to transfer to the control of Guam, as well as a description of the specific legal authority under which the Navy has transferred or will transfer each such property.
(B) The methodology and process the Navy will use to determine the total number of acres of real property that the Navy will transfer or has transferred to the control of Guam as part of the “net negative” policy, and the date on which the Navy will transfer or has transferred control of any such property.
(C) A description of the real property controlled by the Navy on Guam which the Navy plans to retain under its control and the reasons for retaining such property, including a detailed explanation of the reasons for retaining any such property which has not been developed or for which no development has been proposed under the current installation master plans for major military installations (as described in section 2864 of title 10, United States Code).
(3) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY.—In preparing and submitting the report under this subsection, the Secretary may not take into account any real property which has been identified prior to January 20, 2011, as property to be transferred to the Government of Guam under the Guam Excess Lands Act (Public Law 103–339) or the Guam Land Use Plan (GLUP) 1977, or pursuant to base realignment and closure authorized under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note), whether or not the Navy transferred control of any such property to Guam at any time.
(b) Policy described.—The “net negative” policy described in this section is the policy of the Secretary of the Navy, as expressed in the statement released by Under Secretary of the Navy on January 20, 2011, that the relocation of Marines to Guam occurring during 2011 will not cause the total number of acres of real property controlled by the Navy on Guam upon the completion of such relocation to exceed the total number of acres of real property controlled by the Navy on Guam prior to such relocation.
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alaska | Clear Air Force Station | $20,000,000 |
| Eielson Air Force Base | $213,300,000 | |
| Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson | $29,000,000 | |
| Arizona | Luke Air Force Base | $20,000,000 |
| California | Edwards Air Force Base | $24,000,000 |
| Colorado | Buckley Air Force Base | $13,500,000 |
| Delaware | Dover Air Force Base | $39,000,000 |
| Florida | Eglin Air Force Base | $88,600,000 |
| Patrick Air Force Base | $13,500,000 | |
| Georgia | Moody Air Force Base | $30,900,000 |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $80,658,000 |
| Kansas | McConnell Air Force Base | $19,800,000 |
| Louisiana | Barksdale Air Force Base | $21,000,000 |
| Maryland | Joint Base Andrews | $66,500,000 |
| Massachusetts | Hanscom Air Force Base | $30,965,000 |
| Montana | Malmstrom Air Force Base | $14,600,000 |
| Nevada | Nellis Air Force Base | $10,600,000 |
| New Mexico | Cannon Air Force Base | $21,000,000 |
| Holloman Air Force Base | $10,600,000 | |
| Kirtland Air Force Base | $7,300,000 | |
| Ohio | Wright-Patterson Air Force Base | $12,600,000 |
| Oklahoma | Altus Air Force Base | $11,600,000 |
| Tinker Air Force Base | $43,000,000 | |
| South Carolina | Joint Base Charleston | $17,000,000 |
| Texas | Joint Base San Antonio | $67,300,000 |
| Utah | Hill Air Force Base | $44,500,000 |
| Virginia | Joint Base Langley-Eustis | $59,200,000 |
| Washington | Fairchild Air Force Base | $27,000,000 |
| Wyoming | F.E. Warren Air Force Base | $5,550,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Australia | Darwin | $30,400,000 |
| Germany | Ramstein Air Base | $13,437,000 |
| Spangdahlem Air Base | $43,465,000 | |
| Japan | Kadena Air Base | $19,815,000 |
| Yokota Air Base | $32,020,000 | |
| Mariana Islands | Unspecified Location | $9,000,000 |
| Turkey | Incirlik Air Base | $13,449,000 |
| United Arab Emirates | Al Dhafra | $35,400,000 |
| United Kingdom | Croughton RAF | $16,500,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,368,000.
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a) and available for military family housing functions as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $56,984,000.
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2016, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force, as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1152) for Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, for construction of a Tactical Response Force Alert Facility at the installation, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct an emergency power generator system consistent with the Air Force’s construction guidelines.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (126 Stat. 2126) and extended by section 2309 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1155), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 985), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301 of that Act (127 Stat. 992), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
The Secretary of the Air Force may not use any of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 2304 to acquire property or interests in property at an unspecified location in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, as specified in the funding table set forth in section 2301(b) and the funding table in section 4601, until the congressional defense committees have received from the Secretary a report providing the following information:
(2) The total cost, scope, and location of the military construction projects and the acquisition of property or interests in property required to support the Secretary’s proposed divert activities and exercises in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(3) An analysis of any alternative locations that the Secretary considered acquiring, including other locations or interests within the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands or the Freely Associated States. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “Freely Associated States” means the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau.
(a) Inside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects inside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alaska | Clear Air Force Station | $155,000,000 |
| Fort Greely | $9,560,000 | |
| Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson | $4,900,000 | |
| Arizona | Fort Huachuca | $4,493,000 |
| California | Coronado | $175,412,000 |
| Travis Air Force Base | $26,500,000 | |
| Delaware | Dover Air Force Base | $44,115,000 |
| Florida | Patrick Air Force Base | $10,100,000 |
| Georgia | Fort Benning | $4,820,000 |
| Fort Gordon | $25,000,000 | |
| Maine | Portsmouth | $27,100,000 |
| Maryland | Bethesda Naval Hospital | $510,000,000 |
| Fort Meade | $38,000,000 | |
| North Carolina | Camp Lejeune | $31,000,000 |
| Fort Bragg | $86,593,000 | |
| South Carolina | Joint Base Charleston | $17,000,000 |
| Texas | Red River Army Depot | $44,700,000 |
| Sheppard Air Force Base | $91,910,000 | |
| Virginia | Pentagon | $20,216,000 |
(b) Outside the united states.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for military construction projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Diego Garcia | Diego Garcia | $30,000,000 |
| Germany | Kaiserslautern | $45,221,000 |
| Japan | Ikakuni | $6,664,000 |
| Kadena Air Base | $161,224,000 | |
| Yokota Air Base | $113,731,000 | |
| Kwajalein | Kwajalein Atoll | $85,500,000 |
| United Kingdom | Royal Air Force Croughton | $71,424,000 |
| Royal Air Force Lakenheath | $13,500,000 | |
| Wake Island | Wake Island | $11,670,000 |
(a) Inside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, in the amount set forth in the table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| California | Edwards Air Force Base | $8,400,000 |
| Naval Base San Diego | $4,230,000 | |
| Fort Hunter Liggett | $5,400,000 | |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $5,000,000 |
| Schriever Air Force Base | $3,295,000 | |
| Florida | SUBASE Kings Bay NAS Jacksonville | $3,230,000 |
| Guam | NAVBASE Guam | $8,540,000 |
| Hawaii | NSAH Wahiawa Kunia Oahu | $14,890,000 |
| Ohio | Wright Patterson Air Force Base | $14,400,000 |
| Utah | Dugway Proving Ground | $7,500,000 |
| Tooele Army Depot | $8,200,000 | |
| Various Locations | Various Locations | $28,088,000 |
(b) Outside the United States.—Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects outside the United States as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Cuba | Guantanamo Bay | $6,080,000 |
| Diego Garcia | NSF Diego Garcia | $17,010,000 |
| Japan | Kadena Air Base | $4,007,000 |
| Misawa Air Base | $5,315,000 | |
| Spain | Rota | $3,710,000 |
| Various Locations | Various Locations | $2,705,000 |
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2016, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
(b) Limitation on total cost of construction projects.—Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title 10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law, the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2401 of this Act may not exceed the total amount authorized to be appropriated under subsection (a), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
In the case of the authorization in the table in section 2401(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 996), for Royal Air Force Lakenheath, United Kingdom, for construction of a high school, the Secretary of Defense may construct a combined middle/high school.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (126 Stat. 2127), as amended by section 2406(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1160), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 985), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2401 of that Act (127 Stat. 995), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017 or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| California | Brawley | SOF Desert Warfare Training Center | $23,095,000 |
| Germany | Kaiserslautern | Replace Kaiserslautern Elementary School | $49,907,000 |
| Ramstein Air Base | Replace Ramstein High School | $98,762,000 | |
| Hawaii | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | DISA Pacific Facility Upgrade | $2,615,000 |
| Massachusetts | Hanscom Air Force Base | Replace Hanscom Primary School | $36,213,000 |
| United Kindgom | RAF Lakenheath | Replace Lakenheath High School | $69,638,000 |
| Virginia | MCB Quantico | Replace Quantico Middle/High School | $40,586,000 |
| Pentagon | PFPA Support Operations Center | $14,800,000 | |
| Pentagon | Raven Rock Administrative Facility Upgrade | $32,000,000 | |
| Pentagon | Boundary Channel Access Control Point | $6,700,000 |
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2016, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501 as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $16,500,000 |
| Hawaii | Hilo | $31,000,000 |
| Iowa | Davenport | $23,000,000 |
| Kansas | Fort Leavenworth | $29,000,000 |
| New Hampshire | Hooksett | $11,000,000 |
| Rochester | $8,900,000 | |
| Oklahoma | Ardmore | $22,000,000 |
| Pennsylvania | Fort Indiantown Gap | $20,000,000 |
| York | $9,300,000 | |
| Rhode Island | East Greenwich | $20,000,000 |
| Utah | Camp Williams | $37,000,000 |
| Wyoming | Camp Guernsey | $31,000,000 |
| Laramie | $21,000,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Arizona | Phoenix | $30,000,000 |
| California | Barstow | $29,000,000 |
| Camp Parks | $19,000,000 | |
| Fort Hunter Liggett | $21,500,000 | |
| Virginia | Dublin | $6,000,000 |
| Washington | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | $27,500,000 |
| Wisconsin | Fort McCoy | $11,400,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Louisiana | New Orleans | $11,207,000 |
| New York | Brooklyn | $1,964,000 |
| Syracuse | $13,229,000 | |
| Texas | Galveston | $8,414,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Connecticut | Bradley IAP | $6,300,000 |
| Florida | Jacksonville IAP | $9,000,000 |
| Hawaii | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | $11,000,000 |
| Iowa | Sioux Gateway Airport | $12,600,000 |
| Maryland | Joint Base Andrews | $5,000,000 |
| Minnesota | Duluth IAP | $7,600,000 |
| New Hampshire | Pease International Trade Port | $1,500,000 |
| North Carolina | Charlotte/Douglas IAP | $50,600,000 |
| Ohio | Toledo Express Airport | $6,000,000 |
| South Carolina | McEntire ANGS | $8,400,000 |
| Texas | Ellington Field | $4,500,000 |
| Vermont | Burlington IAP | $4,500,000 |
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606 and available for the National Guard and Reserve as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Guam | Anderson Air Force Base | $5,200,000 |
| Massachusetts | Westover Air Reserve Base | $9,200,000 |
| North Carolina | Seymour Johnson Air Force Base | $97,950,000 |
| Pennsylvania | Pittsburgh IAP | $85,000,000 |
| Utah | Hill Air Force Base | $3,050,000 |
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2016, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1001) for Bullville, New York, for construction of a new Army Reserve Center at that location, the Secretary of the Army may add to or alter the existing Army Reserve Center at Bullville, New York.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2603 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3689) for Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for construction of a Reserve Training Center at that location, the Secretary of the Navy may acquire approximately 8.5 acres (370,260 square feet) of adjacent land, obtain necessary interest in land, and construct road improvements and associated supporting facilities to provide required access to the Reserve Training Center.
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2602 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1163) for MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, for construction of an Army Reserve Center/Aviation Support Facility at that location, the Secretary of the Army may relocate and construct replacement skeet and grenade launcher ranges necessary to clear the site for the new Army Reserve facilities.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2118), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2603 of that Act (126 Stat. 2135) and extended by section 2614 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1166), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
(a) Extension.—Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 985), the authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2602, 2603, 2604, and 2605 of that Act (127 Stat. 1001, 1002), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2017, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2018, whichever is later.
(b) Table.—The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| California | Camp Parks | Army Reserve Center | $17,500,000 |
| March Air Force Base | NOSC Moreno Valley Reserve Training Center | $11,086,000 | |
| Florida | Homestead ARB | Entry Control Complex | $9,800,000 |
| Maryland | Fort Meade | 175th Network Warfare Squadron Facility | $4,000,000 |
| Martin State Airport | Cyber/ISR Facility | $8,000,000 | |
| New York | Bullville | Army Reserve Center | $14,500,000 |
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2016, for base realignment and closure activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 2906 of such Act (as amended by section 2711 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2140)), as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize an additional Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round. Nothing in the previous sentence shall be construed to affect the authority of the Secretary of Defense to comply with any requirement under law, or with any request of a congressional defense committee, to conduct an analysis, study, or report of the infrastructure needs of the Department of Defense, including the infrastructure inventory required to be prepared under section 2815(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1175).
(a) Increase in threshold.—Section 2805(d) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking “$4,000,000” each place it appears in paragraph (1)(A), (1)(B), and (2) and inserting “$6,000,000”.
(b) Notice requirements.—Section 2805(d) of such title is amended—
(2) by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:
“(3) If the Secretary concerned makes a decision to carry out an unspecified minor military construction project to which this subsection applies, the Secretary concerned shall notify in writing the appropriate committees of Congress of that decision, of the justification for the project, and of the estimated cost of the project. The project may then be carried out only after the end of the 21-day period beginning on the date the notification is received by the committees or, if earlier, the end of the 14-day period beginning on the date on which a copy of the notification is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section 480 of this title.”.
Subsection (e) of section 2811 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
(a) Extension of authority.—Subsection (h) of section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2802 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. XXXX), is amended—
Section 2804(f) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1171; 10 U.S.C. 2350j note) is amended by striking “September 30, 2020” and inserting “September 30, 2025”.
(a) Contents of notifications.—
(1) CONTENTS.—Section 2914(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking the period at the end of the first sentence and inserting the following: “, and shall include in the notification the justification and current cost estimate for the project, the expected savings to investment ratio and simple payback estimates, and the project’s measurement and validation plan and costs.”.
(b) Annual report.—Section 2914 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(c) Annual report.—Not later than 90 days after the end of each fiscal year (beginning with fiscal year 2017), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the status of the projects carried out under this section (including completed projects), and shall include in the report with respect to each such project the following information:
“(2) The original cost estimate and expected savings to investment ratio and simple payback estimates, and the original measurement and validation plan and costs.
Section 2803(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1169; 10 U.S.C. 2358 note) is amended by adding by adding at the end the following:
It is the sense of Congress that, when practical and cost-effective, the Department of Defense should seek ways to maximize the number of veterans employed on military construction projects (as defined in section 2801 of title 10, United States Code).
(a) Notification requirement.—Subsection (f) of section 2687a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
“(f) Congressional oversight of payment in-kind and in-kind contributions for overseas projects.— (1) In the event the Secretary of Defense accepts a military construction project to be built for Department of Defense personnel outside the United States as a payment-in-kind or an in-kind contribution required by a bilateral agreement with a host country, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a written notification at least 30 days before the initiation date for any such military construction project.
(c) Repeal.—Section 2803 of the Carl Levin and Howard “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3696) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended by subsections (a) and (b) of that section shall be restored as if such section had not been enacted into law.
(b) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “military installation” has the meaning given that term in section 2801(c)(4) of title 10, United States Code, but does not include an installation located outside of the United States.
(2) The term “unaccompanied alien child” has the meaning given such term in section 462(g)(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(g)(2)).
(a) Allotment of space and provision of services authorized.—Chapter 152 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2566 the following new section:
Ҥ 2567. Space and services: provision to WIC offices
“(a) Allotment of space and provision of services authorized.—Upon application by a WIC office, the Secretary of a military department may allot space on a military installation under the jurisdiction of the Secretary to the WIC office without charge for rent or services if the Secretary determines that—
“(b) Definitions.—In this section:
“(2) The term ‘WIC office’ means a local agency (as defined in subsection (b)(6) of section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786)) that participates in the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children under such section.”.
(b) Clerical amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 152 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2566 the following new item:
(a) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that, prior to acquiring real property in a State for use of the Department of Defense (including through purchase, lease, or any other arrangement), the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the military department concerned should consult with the chief executive of the State and representatives of units of local government with jurisdiction over the property, with the goal of resolving potential conflicts regarding the use of the property before such conflicts arise.
It is the sense of Congress that the reference to a system for the collection or treatment of wastewater in the definition of “utility system” in section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, which authorizes the Department of Defense to convey utility systems, includes stormwater systems and components.
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report that includes an update of the July 2011 assessment on the condition and capacity of elementary and secondary public schools on military installations, including consideration for—
(a) Petition to acquire surplus property.—2687a of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection: “(g) Petition process for disposal of overseas surplus real property.— (1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish a process by which a foreign government may request the transfer of surplus real property or improvements under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense in the foreign country. “(2) Upon the receipt of a petition under this subsection, the Secretary shall determine within 90 days whether the property or improvement subject to the petition is surplus. If surplus, the Secretary shall seek to enter into an agreement with the foreign government within one year for the disposal of the property.
(b) Additional use of Department of Defense Overseas Military Facility Investment Recovery Account.—Section 2687a(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
(c) Reporting requirement.—Section 2687a(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) Revision.—Notwithstanding section 2821(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (division B of Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3701), the Secretary of Defense may proceed with a public infrastructure project on Guam which is described in subsection (b) if—
(1) the project was identified in the report prepared by the Secretary of Defense under section 2822(d)(2) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1017); and
(c) Repeal of superseded law.—Section 2821 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (division B of Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1177) is repealed.
(a) Conveyances authorized.—
(1) CONVEYANCE TO UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convey to the University of Alaska (in this section referred to as the “University”) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 1,158 acres near the Gulkana Village, Alaska, which were purchased by the Secretary of the Air Force from Ahtna, Incorporated, in January 1989, contain a High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program facility, and comprise a portion of the property more particularly described in subsection (b), for the purpose of permitting the University to use the conveyed property for public purposes.
(2) CONVEYANCE TO ALASKA NATIVE CORPORATION.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convey to the Ahtna, Incorporated, (in this section referred to as “Ahtna”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 4,259 acres near Gulkana Village, Alaska, which were purchased by the Secretary of the Air Force from Ahtna, Incorporated, in January 1989 and comprise the portion of the property more particularly described in subsection (b) that does not contain the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program facility. The property to be conveyed under this paragraph does not include any of the property authorized for conveyance to the University under paragraph (1).
(b) Property described.—Subject to the property exclusions specified in subsection (c), the real property authorized for conveyance under subsection (a) consists of portions of sections within township 7 north, range 1 east; township 7 north, range 2 east; township 8 north, range 1 east; and township 8 north, range 2 east; Copper River Meridian, Chitina Recording District, Third Judicial District, State of Alaska, as follows:
(1) Township 7 north, range 1 east:
(c) Exclusion of certain property.—The real property authorized for conveyance under subsection (a) may not include the following:
(1) Public easements reserved pursuant to section 17(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1616(b)), as described in the Warranty Deed from Ahtna, Incorporated, to the United States, dated March 1, 1990, recorded in Book 31, pages 665 through 668 in the Chitina Recording District, Third Judicial District, Alaska.
(d) Consideration.—
(1) CONVEYANCE TO UNIVERSITY.—As consideration for the conveyance of property under subsection (a)(1), the University shall provide the United States with consideration in an amount that is acceptable to the Secretary of the Air Force, whether in the form of cash payment, in-kind consideration, or a combination thereof.
(2) CONVEYANCE TO AHTNA.—As consideration for the conveyance of property under subsection (a)(2), Ahtna shall provide the United States with consideration in an amount that is acceptable to the Secretary, whether in the form of cash payment, in-kind consideration, a land exchange under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq), or a combination thereof.
(3) TREATMENT OF CASH CONSIDERATION RECEIVED.—Any cash payment received by the Secretary as consideration for a conveyance under subsection (a) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established under subsection (b) of section 572 of title 40, United States Code, and shall be available in accordance with paragraph (5)(B) of such subsection.
(e) Reversionary interest.—If the Secretary of the Air Force determines at any time that the real property conveyed under subsection (a)(1) is not being used by the University in accordance with the purposes of the conveyance specified in such subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the land, including any improvements thereto, shall revert, at the option of the Secretary, to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto such land. A determination by the Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(f) Payment of costs of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall require the recipient of real property under this section to cover all costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance of that property, including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the recipient.
(g) Conveyance agreement.—The conveyance of property under this section shall be accomplished using a quit claim deed or other legal instrument and upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary of the Air Force and the recipient of the property, including such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Air Force may convey, without consideration, to the Town of Galena, Alaska (in this section referred to as the “Town”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to public land, including improvements thereon, at the former Campion Air Force Station, Alaska, as further described in subsection (b), for the purpose of permitting the Town to use the conveyed property for public purposes. The conveyance under this subsection is subject to valid existing rights.
(b) Description of property.—The land to be conveyed under subsection (a) consists of up to approximately 1,300 acres of the remaining land withdrawn under Public Land Order No. 843 of June 24, 1952, and Public Land Order No. 1405 of April 4, 1957, for use by the Secretary of the Air Force as the former Campion Air Force Station. The portions of the former Air Force Station that are not authorized to be conveyed under subsection (a) are those portions that are subject to environmental land use restrictions or are currently undergoing environmental remediation by the Secretary of the Air Force.
(c) Map and legal description.—As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Air Force, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall finalize a map and the legal description of the land to be conveyed under subsection (a). The Secretary of the Air Force may correct any minor errors in the map or the legal description. The map and legal description shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the Bureau of Land Management.
(d) Reversionary interest.—If the Secretary of the Air Force determines at any time that the land conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purposes of the conveyance specified in such subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the land, including any improvements thereto, shall revert, at the option of the Secretary, to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto such land. A determination by the Secretary under this subsection shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(e) Conveyance agreement.—The conveyance of land under this section shall be accomplished using a quit claim deed or other legal instrument and upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary of the Air Force, after consulting with the Secretary of the Interior, and the Town, including such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary of the Air Force, after consulting with the Secretary of the Interior, considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
(f) Payment of costs of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Air Force shall require the Town to cover all costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary of the Air Force and by the Secretary of the Interior, or to reimburse the appropriate Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under this section, including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the appropriate Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Town.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary of the Air Force or by the Secretary of the Interior to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the appropriate Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(a) Exchange of property interests authorized.—
(1) INTERESTS TO BE CONVEYED.—The Secretary of the Navy (hereafter referred to as the “Secretary”) may convey to the San Diego Unified Port District (hereafter referred to as the “District”) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon and, without limitation, any leasehold interests of the United States therein, consisting of approximately 0.33 acres and identified as Parcel No. 4 on District Drawing No. 018–107 (April 2013). This parcel contains 48 parking spaces central to the mission conducted on the site of the Navy’s leasehold interest at 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego, California.
(2) INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED.—In exchange for the property interests described in paragraph (1), the Secretary may accept from the District property interests of equal value and similar utility, as determined by the Secretary, located within immediate proximity to the property described in paragraph (1), that provide the rights to an equivalent number of parking spaces of equal value (subject to subsection (c)(1)).
(b) Encumbrances.—
(1) NO ACCEPTANCE OF PROPERTY WITH ENCUMBRANCES PRECLUDING USE AS PARKING SPACES.—In an exchange of property interests under subsection (a), the Secretary may not accept any property under subsection (a)(2) unless the property is free of encumbrances that would preclude the Department of the Navy from using the property for parking spaces, as determined under paragraph (2).
(2) DETERMINATION OF FREEDOM FROM ENCUMBRANCES.—For purposes of paragraph (1), a property shall be considered to be free of encumbrances that would preclude the Department of the Navy from using the property for parking spaces if—
(A) the District guarantees and certifies that the property is free of such encumbrances under its own authority to preclude the use of the property for parking spaces; and
(B) the District obtains guarantees and certifications from appropriate entities of the State and units of local government that the property is free of any such encumbrances that may be in place pursuant to the Tidelands Trust, the North Embarcadero Visionary Plan, the Downtown Community Plan, or any other law, regulation, plan or document.
(c) Equalization.—
(1) TRANSFER OF RIGHTS TO ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES.—If the value of the property interests described in subsection (a)(1) is greater than the value of the property interests and rights to parking spaces described in subsection (a)(2), the values shall be equalized by the transfer to the Secretary of rights to additional parking spaces.
(2) NO AUTHORIZATION OF CASH EQUALIZATION PAYMENTS FROM SECRETARY.—If the value of the property interests and parking rights described in subsection (a)(2) are greater than the value of the property interests described in subsection (a)(1), the Secretary may not make a cash equalization payment to equalize the values.
(d) Payment of costs of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall require the District to cover all costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the exchange of property interests under this section, including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, real estate due diligence such as appraisals and any other administrative costs related to the exchange of property interests. If amounts are collected from the District in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the exchange of property interests, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the District.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the exchange of property interests. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(e) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the property interests to be exchanged under this section shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary.
(f) Conveyance agreement.—The exchange of property interests under this section shall be accomplished using a lease, lease amendment, or other legal instrument and upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary and the District, including such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
(a) Release of Exceptions, Limitations, and Conditions in Deeds.—With respect to approximately 126 acres of real property in Okaloosa County, Florida, more particularly described in subsection (b), which were conveyed by the United States to the Air Force Enlisted Mens’ Widows and Dependents Home Foundation, Incorporated (“Air Force Enlisted Village”), the Secretary of the Air Force may release any and all exceptions, limitations, and conditions specified by the United States in the deeds conveying such real property.
(b) Property described.—The real property subject to subsection (a) was part of Eglin Air Force, Florida, and consists of all parcels conveyed in exchange for fair market value cash payment by the Air Force Enlisted Village pursuant to section 809(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1979 (Public Law 95–356; 92 Stat. 587), as amended by section 2826 of the Military Construction Authorization Act, 1989 (Public Law 100–456; 102 Stat. 2123) and section 2861 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 112 Stat. 2223).
(c) Instrument of release and description of property.—The Secretary may execute and record in the appropriate office a deed of release, amended deed, or other appropriate instrument reflecting the release of exceptions, limitations, and conditions under subsection (a).
(d) Payment of administrative costs.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary may require the Air Force Enlisted Village to pay for any costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the release under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other administrative costs related to the release. If amounts paid to the Secretary in advance exceed the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Air Force Enlisted Village.
(a) Exchange authorized.—The Secretary of the Army may convey to the City of Copperas Cove, Texas (in this section referred to as the “City”), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 437 acres at Fort Hood, Texas, for the purpose of permitting the City to improve arterial transportation routes in the vicinity of Fort Hood and to promote economic development in the area of the City and Fort Hood.
(b) Consideration.—As consideration for the conveyance under subsection (a), the City shall convey to the Secretary of the Army all right, title, and interest of the City in and to one or more parcels of real property that are acceptable to the Secretary. The fair market value of the real property acquired by the Secretary under this subsection shall be at least equal to the fair market value of the real property conveyed under subsection (a), as determined by appraisals acceptable to the Secretary.
(c) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the real property to be exchanged under this section shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army.
(d) Payment of costs of conveyances.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Army shall require the City to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyances under this section, including survey costs related to the conveyances. If amounts are collected from the City in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyances, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received under paragraph (1) as reimbursement for costs incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyances under this section shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyances. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(a) Conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Army (in this section referred to as the “Secretary”) may convey, without consideration, to the Laredo Community College (in this section referred to as the “LCC”) all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the approximately 725 sq. ft. Historic Building, P-36 Warehouse, including any improvements thereon, at Colbern United States Army Reserve Center, Laredo, TX, for the purposes of educational use and historic preservation.
(b) Payment of costs of conveyance.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary shall require the LCC to cover costs (except costs for environmental remediation of the property) to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation, and any other administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the LCC in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the LCC.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover those costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account
(c) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary.
(d) Reversionary interest.—
(1) REVERSION.—If the Secretary determines at any time that the property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in subsection (a), all right, title, and interest in and to such property, including any improvements thereto, shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to and become the property of the United States, and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto such property. A determination by the Secretary under this paragraph shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(2) PAYMENT OF CONSIDERATION IN LIEU OF REVERSION.—In lieu of exercising the right of reversion retained under paragraph (1) with respect to the property conveyed under subsection (a), the Secretary may require the LCC to pay to the United States an amount equal to the fair market value of the property conveyed, as determined by the Secretary.
(3) TREATMENT OF CASH CONSIDERATION.—Any cash payment received by the United States under paragraph (2) shall be deposited in the special account in the Treasury established under subsection (b) of section 572 of title 40, United States Code, and shall be available in accordance with paragraph (5)(B) of such subsection.
(e) Additional terms.—The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
(f) Compliance with environmental laws.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect or limit the application of, or any obligation to comply with, any environmental law, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601).
(a) Land conveyance authorized.—The Secretary of the Interior may convey, without consideration, to the State of Utah all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of public land in St. George, Utah, comprising approximately 70 acres, as described in Public Land Order 6840 published in the Federal Register on March 29, 1991 (56 Fed. Reg. 13081), and containing the St. George National Guard Armory for the purpose of permitting the Utah National Guard to use the conveyed land for military purposes.
(b) Termination of Prior Administrative Action.—The Public Land Order described in subsection (a), which provided for a 20-year withdrawal of the public land described in the Public Land Order, is withdrawn upon conveyance of the land under this section.
(c) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the property to be conveyed under this section shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior.
(d) Conveyance agreement.—The conveyance under this section shall be accomplished using a quit claim deed or other legal instrument and upon terms and conditions mutually satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior and the State of Utah, including such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
(a) Release authorized.—The Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Maritime Administrator and in consultation with the Administrator of General Services, may, upon receipt of full consideration as provided in subsection (b), release all remaining right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements thereon, in Richland, Washington, consisting as of the date of the enactment of this Act of approximately 71.5 acres and containing personal and real property, to the Port of Benton (hereafter in this section referred to as the “Port”).
(b) Consideration.—
(1) CONSIDERATION REQUIRED.—As consideration for the release under subsection (a), the Port shall provide an amount that is acceptable to the Secretary of Transportation, whether by cash payment, in-kind consideration as described under paragraph (2), or a combination thereof, at such time as the Secretary may require. The Secretary may determine the level of acceptable consideration under this paragraph on the basis of the value of the restrictions released under subsection (a), but only if the value of such restrictions is determined without regard to any improvements made by the Port.
(2) IN-KIND CONSIDERATION.—In-kind consideration provided by the Port under paragraph (1) may include the acquisition, construction, provision, improvement, maintenance, repair, or restoration (including environmental restoration), or combination thereof, of any facility or infrastructure under the jurisdiction of any office of the Federal government.
(c) Payment of cost of release.—
(1) PAYMENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Transportation shall require the Port to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse the Secretary for such costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out the release under subsection (a), including survey costs, costs for environmental documentation related to the release, and any other administrative costs related to the release. If amounts are collected from the Port in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the release, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Port.
(2) TREATMENT OF AMOUNTS RECEIVED.—Amounts received as reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying out the release under subsection (a) or, if the period of availability of obligations for that appropriation has expired, to the appropriations of fund that is currently available to the Secretary for the same purpose. Amounts so credited shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(d) Description of property.—The exact acreage and legal description of the real property which is the subject of the release under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary of Transportation.
(e) Additional terms and conditions.—The Secretary of Transportation may require such additional terms and conditions in connection with the release under subsection (a) as the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of General Services, considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
Section 5(d)(1) of the Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge Act of 1992 (Public Law 102–402; 16 U.S.C. 668dd note) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
“(C) (i) Notwithstanding clause (i) of subparagraph (A), the restriction attached to any deed to any real property designated for disposal under this section that prohibits the use of the property for residential or industrial purposes may be modified or removed if it is determined, through a risk assessment performed pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.), that the property is protective for the proposed use.
(a) Release of restrictions.—Subject to subsection (b), the United States, acting through the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, shall release the city of St. Marys, Georgia, from all restrictions, conditions, and limitations on the use, encumbrance, conveyance, and closure of the St. Marys Airport, to the extent such restrictions, conditions, and limitations are enforceable by the Administrator.
(b) Requirements for release of restrictions.—The Administrator shall execute the release under subsection (a) once all of the following occurs:
(1) The Secretary of the Navy transfers to the Georgia Department of Transportation the amounts described in subsection (c) and requires as an enforceable condition on such transfer that all funds transferred shall be used only for airport development (as defined in section 47102 of title 49, United States Code) of a general aviation airport in Georgia, consistent with planning efforts conducted by the Administrator and the Georgia Department of Transportation.
(2) The city of St. Marys, for consideration as provided for in this section, grants to the United States, under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary, a restrictive use easement in the real property used for the St. Marys Airport, as determined acceptable by the Secretary, under such terms and conditions as the Secretary considers necessary to protect the interests of the United States and prohibiting the future use of such property for all aviation-related purposes and any other purposes deemed by the Secretary to be incompatible with the operations, functions, and missions of Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, Georgia.
(3) The Secretary obtains an appraisal to determine the fair market value of the real property used for the St. Marys Airport in the manner described in subsection (c)(1).
(4) The Administrator fulfills the obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) in connection with the release under subsection (a). In carrying out such obligations—
(A) the Administrator shall not assume or consider any potential or proposed future redevelopment of the current St. Marys airport property;
(B) any potential new general aviation airport in Georgia shall be deemed to be not connected with the release noted in subsection (a) nor the closure of St. Marys Airport; and
(C) any environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) for a potential general aviation airport in Georgia shall be considered through an environmental review process separate and apart from the environmental review made a condition of release by this section.
(c) Transfer of amounts described.—The amounts described in this subsection are the following:
(1) An amount equal to the fair market value of the real property of the St. Marys Airport, as determined by the Secretary and concurred in by the Administrator, based on an appraisal report and title documentation that—
(2) An amount equal to the unamortized portion of any Federal development grants (including grants available under a State block grant program established pursuant to section 47128 of title 49, United States Code), other than used for the acquisition of land, paid to the city of St. Marys for use as the St. Marys Airport.
(3) An amount equal to the airport revenues remaining in the airport account for the St. Marys Airport as of the date of the enactment of this Act and as otherwise due to or received by the city of St. Marys after such date of enactment pursuant to sections 47107(b) and 47133 of title 49, United States Code.
(d) Authorization for transfer of funds.—Using funds available to the Department of the Navy for operation and maintenance, the Secretary may pay the amounts described in subsection (c) to the Georgia Department of Transportation, conditioned as described in subsection (b)(1).
(e) Additional requirements.—
(1) SURVEY.—The exact acreage and legal description of St. Marys Airport shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary and concurred in by the Administrator.
(2) PLANNING OF GENERAL AVIATION AIRPORT.—Any planning effort for the development of a new general aviation airport in southeast Georgia using the amounts described in subsection (c) shall be conducted in coordination with the Secretary, and shall ensure that any such airport does not encroach on the operations, functions, and missions of Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, Georgia.
The Secretary of Defense may not transfer administrative jurisdiction over the parcel of Federal land depicted as “Parcel D” on the map entitled “Organ Mountains Area - Fillmore Canyon” and dated April 19, 2016 from the Department of Defense to the Secretary of the Interior.
(a) Elimination of termination date and authorization for transfer of administrative jurisdiction.—Subsection (a) of section 3015 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 892) is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Permanent withdrawal and reservation; effect of transfer on withdrawal.—The withdrawal and reservation of lands by section 3011 shall terminate only as follows:
“(1) Upon an election by the Secretary of the military department concerned to relinquish any or all of the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011.
“(2) Upon a transfer by the Secretary of the Interior, under section 3016 and upon request by the Secretary of the military department concerned, of administrative jurisdiction over the land to the Secretary of the military department concerned. Such a transfer may consist of a portion of the land, in which case the termination of the withdrawal and reservation applies only with respect to the land so transferred.”.
(b) Transfer process and management and use of lands.—The Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65) is further amended—
(2) by striking sections 3016 through 3021 and inserting the following new sections:
“(a) Transfer authorized.—The Secretary of the Interior shall, upon the request of the Secretary concerned, transfer to the Secretary concerned administrative jurisdiction over the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011, or a portion of the land as the Secretary concerned may request.
“(b) Valid existing rights.—The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall be subject to any valid existing rights.
“(c) Time for conveyance.—The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under subsection (a) shall occur pursuant to a schedule agreed upon by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary concerned.
“(d) Map and legal description.—
“(1) PREPARATION AND PUBLICATION.—The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register a legal description of the public land to be transferred under subsection (a).
“(2) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary of the Interior shall file with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives—
“(3) AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION.—Copies of the legal description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall be available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of—
“(4) FORCE OF LAW.—The legal description and map filed under paragraph (2) shall have the same force and effect as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary of the Interior may correct clerical and typographical errors in the legal description or map.
“(5) REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS.—Any transfer entered into pursuant to subsection (a) shall be made without reimbursement, except that the Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for any costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior to prepare the legal description and map under this subsection.
“SEC. 3017. Administration of transferred land.
“(a) Treatment and use of transferred land.—Upon the transfer of administrative jurisdiction of land under section 3016—
“(b) Withdrawal of mineral estate.—Subject to valid existing rights, land for which the administrative jurisdiction is transferred under section 3016 is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws, for as long as the land is under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned.
“(c) Integrated natural resources management plan.—Not later than one year after the transfer of land under section 3016, the Secretary concerned, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall prepare an integrated natural resources management plan pursuant to the Sikes Act (16 U.S.C. 670a et seq.) for the transferred land.
“(d) Relation to general provisions.—Sections 3018 through 3026 do not apply to lands transferred under section 3016 or to the management of such land.
“(e) Transfers between armed forces.—Nothing in this subtitle shall be construed as limiting the authority to transfer administrative jurisdiction over the land transferred under section 3016 to another armed force pursuant to section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, and the provisions of this section shall continue to apply to any such lands.
“SEC. 3018. General applicability; definitions.
“(a) Applicability.—Sections 3014 through 3028 apply to the lands withdrawn and reserved by section 3011 except—
“(b) Rules of construction.—Nothing in this subtitle assigns management of real property under the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary concerned to the Secretary of the Interior.
“(c) Definitions.—In this subtitle:
“(1) INDIAN TRIBE.—The term ‘Indian tribe’ has the meaning given the term in section 102 of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 479a).
“SEC. 3019. Access restrictions.
“(a) Authority to impose restrictions.—If the Secretary concerned determines that military operations, public safety, or national security require the closure to the public of any road, trail, or other portion of land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011, the Secretary may take such action as the Secretary determines to be necessary to implement and maintain the closure.
“(b) Limitation.—Any closure under subsection (a) shall be limited to the minimum area and duration that the Secretary concerned determines are required for the purposes of the closure.
“(c) Consultation required.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), before a closure is implemented under this section, the Secretary concerned shall consult with the Secretary of the Interior.
“(2) INDIAN TRIBE.—Subject to paragraph (3), if a closure proposed under this section may affect access to or use of sacred sites or resources considered to be important by an Indian tribe, the Secretary concerned shall consult, at the earliest practicable date, with the affected Indian tribe.
“(a) Other uses authorized.—In addition to the purposes described in section 3011, the Secretary concerned may authorize the use of land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011 for defense-related purposes.
“(b) Notice to secretary of the interior.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary concerned shall promptly notify the Secretary of the Interior if the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011 is used for additional defense-related purposes.
“SEC. 3021. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression.
“(a) Required activities.—Consistent with any applicable land management plan, the Secretary concerned shall take necessary precautions to prevent, and actions to suppress, brush and range fires occurring as a result of military activities on the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011, including fires that occur on other land that spread from the withdrawn and reserved land.
“(b) Cooperation of secretary of the interior.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—At the request of the Secretary concerned, the Secretary of the Interior shall provide assistance in the suppression of fires under subsection (a). The Secretary concerned shall reimburse the Secretary of the Interior for the costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior in providing such assistance.
“SEC. 3022. Ongoing decontamination.
“(a) Program of decontamination required.—During the period of a withdrawal and reservation of land by section 3011, the Secretary concerned shall maintain, to the extent funds are available to carry out this subsection, a program of decontamination of contamination caused by defense-related uses on the withdrawn land. The decontamination program shall be carried out consistent with applicable Federal and State law.
“(a) No reservation of water rights.—Nothing in this subtitle—
“SEC. 3024. Hunting, fishing, and trapping.
“(a) In general.—Section 2671 of title 10, United States Code, shall apply to all hunting, fishing, and trapping on the land—
“(b) Desert national wildlife refuge.—Hunting, fishing, and trapping within the Desert National Wildlife Refuge shall be conducted in accordance with the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.), the Recreation Use of Wildlife Areas Act of 1969 (16 U.S.C. 460k et seq.), and other laws applicable to the National Wildlife Refuge System.
“(a) Notice of intention to relinquish.—If, during the period of withdrawal and reservation made by section 3011, the Secretary concerned decides to relinquish any or all of the land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011, the Secretary concerned shall submit to the Secretary of the Interior notice of the intention to relinquish the land.
“(b) Determination of contamination.—The Secretary concerned shall include in the notice submitted under subsection (a) a written determination concerning whether and to what extent the land that is to be relinquished is contaminated with explosive materials or toxic or hazardous substances.
“(c) Public notice.—The Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register the notice of intention to relinquish the land under this section, including the determination concerning the contaminated state of the land.
“(d) Decontamination of land to be relinquished.—
“(1) DECONTAMINATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary concerned shall decontaminate land subject to a notice of intention under subsection (a) to the extent that funds are appropriated for that purpose, if—
“(A) the land subject to the notice of intention is contaminated, as determined by the Secretary concerned; and
“(2) ALTERNATIVES TO RELINQUISHMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior shall not be required to accept the land proposed for relinquishment under subsection (a), if—
“(3) STATUS OF CONTAMINATED LAND PROPOSED TO BE RELINQUISHED.—If, because of the contaminated state of the land, the Secretary of the Interior declines to accept land withdrawn and reserved by section 3011 that has been proposed for relinquishment—
“(e) Revocation authority.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary of the Interior determines that it is in the public interest to accept the land proposed for relinquishment under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior may order the revocation of a withdrawal and reservation made by section 3011.
“SEC. 3026. Effect of termination of military use.
“(a) Notice and effect.—Upon a determination by the Secretary concerned that there is no longer a military need for all or portions of the land for which administrative jurisdiction was transferred under section 3016, the Secretary concerned shall notify the Secretary of the Interior of such determination. Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d), the Secretary concerned shall transfer administrative jurisdiction over the land subject to such a notice back to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior.
“(b) Contamination.—Before transmitting a notice under subsection (a), the Secretary concerned shall prepare a written determination concerning whether and to what extent the land to be transferred is contaminated with explosive materials or toxic or hazardous substances. A copy of the determination shall be transmitted with the notice. Copies of the notice and the determination shall be published in the Federal Register.
“(c) Decontamination.—The Secretary concerned shall decontaminate any contaminated land that is the subject of a notice under subsection (a) if—
“(d) No required acceptance.—The Secretary of the Interior is not required to accept land proposed for transfer under subsection (a) if the Secretary of the Interior is unable to make the determinations under subsection (c)(1) or if Congress does not appropriate a sufficient amount of funds for the decontamination of the land.
(c) Conforming and clerical amendments.—
(1) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 3014 of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 890) is amended by striking subsections (b), (d), and (f).
(2) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections at the beginning of the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999 (title XXX of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 885) is amended by striking the items relating to sections 3016 through 3023 and inserting the following new items:
“Sec. 3016. Transfer process.
“Sec. 3017. Administration of transferred land.
“Sec. 3018. General applicability; definitions.
“Sec. 3019. Access restrictions.
“Sec. 3020. Changes in use.
“Sec. 3021. Brush and range fire prevention and suppression.
“Sec. 3022. Ongoing decontamination.
“Sec. 3023. Water rights.
“Sec. 3024. Hunting, fishing, and trapping.
“Sec. 3025. Relinquishment.
“Sec. 3026. Effect of termination of military use.
“Sec. 3027. Use of mineral materials.
“Sec. 3028. Immunity of United States.”.
Section 2979 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (division B of Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1044) is amended by striking “on March 31, 2039.” and inserting the following:
“only as follows:“(1) If the Secretary of the Navy makes an election to terminate the withdrawal and reservation of the public land.
“(2) If the Secretary of the Interior, upon request by the Secretary of the Navy, transfers administrative jurisdiction over the public land to the Secretary of the Navy. A transfer under this paragraph may consist of a portion of the land, in which case the termination of the withdrawal and reservation applies only with respect to the land so transferred.”.
(a) Authority to establish and operate Center.—Chapter 449 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
“§ 4781. Cyber Center for Education and Innovation–Home of the National Cryptologic Museum
“(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of Defense may establish at a publicly accessible location at Fort George G. Meade the ‘Cyber Center for Education and Innovation–Home of the National Cryptologic Museum’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Center’). The Center may be used for the identification, curation, storage, and public viewing of materials relating to the activities of the National Security Agency, its predecessor or successor organizations, and the history of cryptology. The Center may contain meeting, conference, and classroom facilities that will be used to support such education, training, public outreach, and other purposes as the Secretary considers appropriate.
“(b) Design, Construction, and Operation.—The Secretary may enter into an agreement with the National Cryptologic Museum Foundation (in this section referred to as the ‘Foundation’), a nonprofit organization, for the design, construction, and operation of the Center.
“(c) Acceptance authority.—
“(1) ACCEPTANCE OF FACILITY.—If the Foundation constructs the Center pursuant to an agreement with the Foundation under subsection (b), upon satisfactory completion of the Center’s construction or any phase thereof, as determined by the Secretary, and upon full satisfaction by the Foundation of any other obligations pursuant to such agreement, the Secretary may accept the Center (or any phase thereof) from the Foundation, and all right, title, and interest in the Center or such phase shall vest in the United States.
“(2) ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICES.—Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, the Secretary may accept services from the Foundation in connection with the design, construction, and operation of the Center. For purposes of this section and any other provision of law, employees or personnel of the Foundation shall not be considered to be employees of the United States.
“(d) Fees and User Charges.—
“(1) AUTHORITY TO ASSESS FEES AND USER CHARGES.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the Director may assess fees and user charges sufficient to cover the cost of the use of Center facilities and property, including rental, user, conference, and concession fees, except that the Director may not assess fees for general admission to the National Cryptologic Museum.
“(e) Fund.—
“(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Upon the Secretary’s acceptance of the Center under subsection (c)(1), there is established in the Treasury a fund to be known as the ‘Cyber Center for Education and Innovation–Home of the National Cryptologic Museum Fund’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Fund’).
“(2) CONTENTS.—The Fund shall consist of the following amounts:
Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is amended by striking “Aviation Center” and inserting “National Museum”.
(a) Authorization of support.—Subject to appropriation, the Secretary of Defense may provide financial support for military service memorials and museums in the acquisition, installation, and maintenance of exhibits, facilities, and programs that highlight the role of women in the military.
(b) Agreement with nonprofit organizations.—
(1) AUTHORIZATION OF AGREEMENT.—Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary may carry out subsection (a) by entering into contracts with nonprofit organizations under which such an organization shall carry out the activities described in such subsection.
(2) REPORT REQUIRED PRIOR TO AGREEMENT.—The Secretary may not enter into a contract under paragraph (1) until the congressional defense committees have received a report from the Secretary that describes how the use of such a contract will help educate and inform the public on the history and mission of the military, or support training and leadership development of military personnel, and is in the best interests of the Department of Defense.
(a) In general.—The boundary of the Petersburg National Battlefield is modified to include the land and interests in land as generally depicted on the map titled “Petersburg National Battlefield Proposed Boundary Expansion”, numbered 325/80,080, and dated March 2016. The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.
(b) Acquisition of properties.—
(1) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this section as the “Secretary”) is authorized to acquire the land and interests in land, described in subsection (a), from willing sellers only, by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, exchange, or transfer.
(2) NO USE OF CONDEMNATION.—The Secretary may not acquire by condemnation any land or interest in land under this Act or for the purposes of this Act.
(3) NO BUFFER ZONE CREATED.—Nothing in this Act, the acquisition of the land or an interest in land authorized under subsection (a), or the management plan for the Petersburg National Battlefield (including the acquired land) shall be construed to create buffer zones outside the Petersburg National Battlefield. That activities or uses can be seen, heard, or detected from the acquired land shall not preclude, limit, control, regulate, or determine the conduct or management of activities or uses outside of the Petersburg National Battlefield.
(c) Administration.—The Secretary shall administer any land or interests in land acquired under subsection (b) as part of the Petersburg National Battlefield in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
(d) Administrative jurisdiction transfer.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—There is transferred—
(2) MAP.—The land to be exchanged is depicted on the map titled “Petersburg National Battlefield Proposed Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction”, numbered 325/80,801A, dated March 2016. The map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.
(3) CONDITIONS OF TRANSFER.—The transfer of administrative jurisdiction under paragraph (1) shall be subject to the following conditions:
(A) NO REIMBURSEMENT OR CONSIDERATION.—The transfer shall occur without reimbursement or consideration.
(B) MANAGEMENT.—The land transferred to the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be included within the boundary of the Petersburg National Battlefield and administered as part of that park in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the land transferred to the Secretary of the Army shall be excluded from the boundary of the Petersburg National Battlefield.
Section 101(a) of the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470a(a)) is amended as follows:
(1) In paragraph (2)—
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(G) notifying the Committee on Natural Resources of the United States House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate if the property is owned by the Federal Government when the property is being considered for inclusion on the National Register, for designation as a National Historic Landmark, or for nomination to the World Heritage List.”.
(3) By inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
“(7) If the head of the agency managing any Federal property objects to such inclusion or designation for reasons of national security, such as any impact the inclusion or designation would have on use of the property for military training or readiness purposes, that Federal property shall be neither included on the National Register nor designated as a National Historic Landmark until the objection is withdrawn.”.
(4) By adding after paragraph (9) (as so redesignated by paragraph (2) of this section) the following:
“(10) The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to allow for expedited removal of Federal property listed on the National Register of Historic Places if the managing agency of that Federal property submits to the Secretary a written request to remove the Federal property from the National Register of Historic Places for reasons of national security, such as any impact the inclusion or designation would have on use of the property for military training or readiness purposes.”.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds the following:
(1) World War II was one of the most important events in the history of the Nation, a time of moral clarity and common purpose that remains today as an inspiration to all people in the United States.
(2) The role of aviation was a critical factor in the success of winning World War II and defeating the enemies worldwide.
(3) The bravery, courage, dedication, and heroism of World War II aviators and support personnel was an important element in the winning of World War II.
(b) Conditions on recognition of America’s National World War II Aviation Museum.—The Secretary of the Air Force, Secretary of the Navy, and Secretary of the Army shall—
(c) Elements of certification.—The Secretary of the Air Force, Secretary of the Navy, and Secretary of the Army shall provide the certification under subsection (b)(2) only if each certifies that each of the following is correct:
(a) Establishment.—There is hereby established within the Department of the Interior a grant program for the preservation of our nation’s most historic battleships.
(b) Use of Grants.—Amounts received through grants under this section shall be used for the preservation of our nation’s most historic battleships in a manner that is self-sustaining and has an educational component.
(c) Criteria for eligibility.—To be eligible for a grant under this section, an entity shall—
(2) match the amount of the grant, on a 1-to-1 basis, with non-Federal assets from non-Federal sources, which may include cash or durable goods and materials fairly valued as determined by the Secretary;
(d) Most historic battleship defined.—In this section, the term “most historic battleship” means a battleship that is—
(e) Savings provision.—The authorities contained in this section shall be in addition to, and shall not be construed to supercede or modify those contained in the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470–470x–6).
Section 2867 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (division B of Public Law 104–201; 110 Stat. 2806), as amended by section 8135(a) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1997 (section 101(b) of division A of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997 (Public Law 104–208; 110 Stat. 3009–118)), and as amended by section 2862 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (division B of Public Law 112–81; 125 Stat. 1701) is further amended—
(a) Transfer authorized.—The Omar Bradley Foundation, Pennsylvania, may transfer, without consideration, to the child of General of the Army Omar Nelson Bradley and his first wife Mary Elizabeth Quayle Bradley, namely Elizabeth Bradley, such items of the Omar Bradley estate under the control of the Foundation as the Secretary of the Army determines to be without historic value to the Army.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) FEDERAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN.—The term “Federal resource management plan” means—
(A) a land use plan prepared by the Bureau of Land Management for public lands pursuant to section 202 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712); or
(B) a land and resource management plan prepared by the Forest Service for National Forest System lands pursuant to section 6 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1604).
(b) Purpose.—The purpose of this section is—
(c) Delay in making Endangered Species Act of 1973 finding.—
(1) DELAY REQUIRED.—In the case of any State with a State management plan, the Secretary of the Interior may not make a finding under clause (i), (ii), or (iii) of section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)(B)) with respect to the Greater Sage Grouse in that State before September 30, 2026.
(2) EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS.—The delay imposed by paragraph (1) is, and shall remain, effective without regard to any other statute, regulation, court order, legal settlement, or any other provision of law or in equity.
(3) EFFECT ON CONSERVATION STATUS.—Until the date specified in paragraph (1), the conservation status of the Greater Sage Grouse shall remain not warranted for listing under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
(d) Coordination of Federal land management and State management plans.—
(1) PROHIBITION ON WITHDRAWALS AND MODIFICATIONS OF FEDERAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANS.—In order to foster coordination between a State management plan and Federal resource management plans that affect the Greater Sage Grouse, upon notification by the Governor of a State with a State management plan, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture, as applicable, may not exercise authority under section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1714) to make, modify, or extend any withdrawal, nor amend or otherwise modify any Federal resource management plan applicable to Federal land in the State, in a manner inconsistent with the State management plan for a period, to be specified by the Governor in the notification, of at least five years beginning on the date of the notification.
(2) RETROACTIVE EFFECT.—In the case of any State that provides notification under paragraph (1), if any withdrawal was made, modified, or extended or if any amendment or modification of a Federal resource management plan applicable to Federal lands in the State was issued during the three-year period preceding the date of the notification and the withdrawal, amendment, or modification altered management of the Greater Sage Grouse or its habitat, implementation and operation of the withdrawal, amendment, or modification shall be stayed to the extent that the withdrawal, amendment, or modification is inconsistent with the State management plan. The Federal resource management plan, as in effect immediately before the amendment or modification, shall apply instead with respect to management of the Greater Sage Grouse and its habitat, to the extent consistent with the State management plan.
(e) Relation to National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.—With regard to any major Federal action consistent with a State management plan, any findings, analyses, or conclusions regarding the Greater Sage Grouse or its habitat under section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) shall not have a preclusive effect on the approval or implementation of the major Federal action in that State.
(f) Reporting requirement.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter through 2026, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall jointly submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives a report on the Secretaries’ implementation and effectiveness of systems to monitor the status of Greater Sage Grouse on Federal lands under their jurisdiction.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENTS.—The terms “Candidate Conservation Agreement” and “Candidate and Conservation Agreement With Assurances” have the meaning given those terms in—
(2) RANGE-WIDE PLAN.—The term “Range-Wide Plan” means the Lesser Prairie-Chicken Range-Wide Conservation Plan of the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, as endorsed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service on October 23, 2013, and published for comment on January 29, 2014 (79 Fed. Reg. 4652).
(b) Prohibition on treatment as threatened or endangered species.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any prior action by the Secretary, the lesser prairie-chicken shall not be treated as a threatened species or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) before December 31, 2022.
(2) PROHIBITION ON PROPOSAL.—Effective beginning on January 1, 2023, the lesser prairie-chicken may not be treated as a threatened species or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) unless the Secretary publishes a determination, based on the totality of the scientific evidence, that conservation (as that term is used in that Act) under the Range-Wide Plan and the agreements, programs, and efforts referred to in subsection (c) have not achieved the conservation goals established by the Range-Wide Plan.
(c) Monitoring of progress of conservation programs.—The Secretary shall monitor and annually submit to Congress a report on progress in conservation of the lesser prairie-chicken under the Range-Wide Plan and all related—
Notwithstanding the final rule of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service entitled “Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for the American Burying Beetle” (54 Fed. Reg. 29652 (July 13, 1989)), the American burying beetle shall not be listed as a threatened species or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
(a) Report on documentation.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, shall submit a report to Congress on the process by which the Corps of Engineers acquired the properties described in subsection (b), and shall include in the report the specific legal documentation pursuant to which the properties were acquired.
(b) Properties described.—The properties described in this subsection are each of the properties described in paragraph (2) of section 501(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–303; 110 Stat. 3752).
The Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Amount |
| Djibouti | Camp Lemonier | $37,409,000 |
| Iceland | Keflavik | $19,600,000 |
The Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out the military construction projects for the installations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation | Amount |
| Bulgaria | Graf Ignatievo | $13,400,000 |
| Djibouti | Chabelley Airfield | $10,500,000 |
| Estonia | Amari Air Base | $6,500,000 |
| Germany | Spangdahlem Air Base | $18,700,000 |
| Lithuania | Siauliai | $3,000,000 |
| Poland | Powidz Air Base | $4,100,000 |
| Lask Air Base | $4,100,000 | |
| Romania | Campia Turzii | $18,500,000 |
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2016, for the military construction projects outside the United States authorized by this title as specified in the funding table in section 4602 and 4603.
(a) Findings.—Congress finds that—
(1) the testing and development of military weapons systems and the training of military forces are critical to ensuring the national security of the United States;
(2) the Utah Test and Training Range is a unique and irreplaceable national asset at the core of the test and training mission of the Department of Defense;
(3) continued access to the special use airspace and land that comprise the Utah Test and Training Range, under the terms and conditions described in this title is a national security priority;
(b) Definitions.—In this title:
(1) BLM LAND.—The term “BLM land” means the Bureau of Land Management land in the State comprising approximately 625,643 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled “Utah Test and Training Range Enhancement/West Desert Land Exchange” and dated February 12, 2016.
(a) Memorandum of agreement.—
(1) DRAFT.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Secretary of the Air Force shall complete a draft of the memorandum of agreement required under paragraph (2).
(B) PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.—During the 30-day period beginning on the date on which the draft memorandum of agreement is completed under subparagraph (A), there shall be an opportunity for public comment on the draft memorandum of agreement, including an opportunity for the Utah Test and Training Range Community Resource Group established under section 3013(a) to provide comments on the draft memorandum of agreement.
(2) REQUIREMENT; DEADLINE.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Secretary of the Air Force shall enter into a memorandum of agreement that provides for the continued management of the BLM land by the Secretary, in a manner that provides for the limited use of the BLM land by the Secretary of the Air Force, consistent with this title.
(3) MANAGEMENT BY SECRETARY.—The memorandum of agreement under paragraph (2) shall provide that the Secretary (acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management) shall continue to manage the BLM land—
(B) for multiple use and sustained yield goals and activities as required under sections 102(a)(7) and 202(c)(1) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701(a)(7), 1712(c)(1)) and defined in section 103 of that Act (43 U.S.C. 1702), including all principal or major uses on Federal land recognized pursuant to the definition of the term in section 103 of that Act (43 U.S.C. 1702);
(C) in accordance with section 202 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712); and
(D) subject to use by the Secretary of the Air Force provided under section 3012 for—
(i) the preservation of the Utah Test and Training Range against current and future encroachments that the Secretary of the Air Force finds to be incompatible with current and future test and training requirements;
(c) Land use plans.—Any land use plan in existence on the date of enactment of this Act that applies to the BLM land shall continue to apply to the BLM land.
(d) Maintain current uses.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection (a)(3)(D), the memorandum of agreement entered into under subsection (a) and the land use plans described in subsection (c) shall not diminish any major or principle use that is recognized pursuant to section 103(l) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1702(l)), except to the extent authorized in subsection (a).
(e) Grazing.—
(1) NEW GRAZING LEASES AND PERMITS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall issue and administer any new grazing lease or permit on the BLM land, in accordance with applicable law (including regulations) and other authorities applicable to livestock grazing on Bureau of Land Management land.
(B) NON-FEDERAL LAND LEVELS.—The Secretary (acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management) shall continue to issue and administer livestock grazing leases and permits on the non-Federal land described in section 3022(3), subject to the requirements described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (2).
(f) Memorandum of understanding on emergency access and response.—Nothing in this section precludes the continuation of the memorandum of understanding that is between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Air Force with respect to emergency access and response, as in existence as of the date of enactment of this Act.
(g) Withdrawal.—Subject to valid existing rights, the BLM land is withdrawn from all forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws, the mineral leasing laws, and the geothermal leasing laws.
(h) Limitation on future rights-of-Way or use permits.—The Secretary may not issue any new use permits or rights-of-way on the BLM land for any purposes that the Secretary of the Air Force determines to be incompatible with current or projected military requirements, with consideration given to the rangeland improvements under section 3015(h).
(a) In general.—If the Secretary of the Air Force determines that military operations (including operations relating to the fulfillment of the mission of the Utah Test and Training Range), public safety, or national security require the temporary closure to public use of any road, trail, or other portion of the BLM land, the Secretary of the Air Force may take such action as the Secretary of the Air Force determines necessary to carry out the temporary closure.
(b) Limitations.—Any temporary closure under subsection (a)—
(1) shall be limited to the minimum areas and periods during which the Secretary of the Air Force determines are required to carry out a closure under this section;
(2) shall not occur on a State or Federal holiday, unless notice is provided in accordance with subsection (c)(1)(B);
(3) shall not occur on a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, unless notice is provided in accordance with subsection (c)(1)(B); and
(c) Notice.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary of the Air Force shall—
(d) Maximum annual closures.—The total cumulative hours of temporary closures authorized under this section with respect to the BLM land shall not exceed 100 hours annually.
(e) Prohibition on certain temporary closures.—The northernmost area identified as “Newfoundland's” on the map shall not be subject to any temporary closure between August 21 and February 28, in accordance with the lawful hunting methods and seasons of the State of Utah.
(f) Emergency ground response.—A temporary closure of a portion of the BLM land shall not affect the conduct of emergency response activities on the BLM land during the temporary closure.
(g) Law enforcement and security.—The Secretary and the Secretary of the Air Force may enter into cooperative agreements with State and local law enforcement officials with respect to lawful procedures and protocols to be used in promoting public safety and operation security on or near the BLM land during noticed test and training periods.
(a) Establishment.—Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, there shall be established the Utah Test and Training Range Community Resource Group (referred to in this section as the “Community Group”) to provide regular and continuing input to the Secretary and the Secretary of the Air Force on matters involving public access to, use of, and overall management of the BLM land.
(b) Membership.—
(c) Conditions and terms of appointment.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Each member of the Community Group shall serve voluntarily and without remuneration.
(2) TERM OF APPOINTMENT.—
(B) ORIGINAL MEMBERS.—Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the Chairperson shall select ½ of the original members of the Community Group to serve for a term of 4 years and the ½ to serve for a term of 2 years to ensure the replacement of members shall be staggered from year to year.
(d) Meetings.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Community Group shall meet not less than once per year, and at such other frequencies as determined by five or more of the members of the Community Group.
(2) RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMMUNITY GROUP.—The Community Group shall be responsible for determining appropriate schedules for, details of, and actions for meetings of the Community Group.
(e) Coordination with recommendations of Community Group.—The Secretary and the Secretary of the Air Force, consistent with existing laws (including regulations), shall take under consideration recommendations from the Community Group.
The United States (including all departments, agencies, officers, and employees of the United States) shall be held harmless and shall not be liable for any injury or damage to any individual or property suffered in the course of any mining, mineral, or geothermal activity, or any other authorized nondefense-related activity, conducted on the BLM land.
(a) Effect on weapon impact area.—Nothing in this subtitle expands the boundaries of the weapon impact area of the Utah Test and Training Range.
(c) Effect on existing rights and agreements.—
(1) KNOLLS SPECIAL RECREATION MANAGEMENT AREA; BLM COMMUNITY PITS CENTRAL GRAYBACK AND SOUTH GRAYBACK.—Except as provided in section 3012, nothing in this subtitle limits or alters any existing right or right of access to—
(2) NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAILS AND OTHER HISTORICAL LANDMARKS.—Except as provided in section 3012, nothing in this subtitle limits or alters any existing right or right of access to a component of the National Trails System or other Federal or State historic landmarks within the BLM land, including the California National Historic Trail, the Pony Express National Historic Trail, or the GAPA Launch Site and Blockhouse.
(3) CLOSURE OF INTERSTATE 80.—Nothing in this subtitle authorizes any additional authority or right to the Secretary or the Secretary of the Air Force to temporarily close Interstate 80.
(4) EFFECT ON LIMITATION ON AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANS.—Nothing in this subtitle affects the limitation established under section 2815(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 852).
(5) EFFECT ON MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.—Nothing in this subtitle affects the memorandum of understanding entered into by the Air Force, the Bureau of Land Management, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources relating to the reestablishment of bighorn sheep in the Newfoundland Mountains and signed by the parties to the memorandum of understanding during the period beginning on January 24, 2000, and ending on February 4, 2000.
(d) Effect on water rights.—
(1) NO RESERVATION CREATED.—Nothing in this subtitle—
(2) PREVIOUSLY ACQUIRED AND RESERVED WATER RIGHTS.—Nothing in this subtitle affects—
(3) NO EFFECT ON MCCARRAN AMENDMENT.—Nothing in this subtitle diminishes, enhances, or otherwise affects in any way the rights, duties, and obligations of the United States, the State of Utah, the counties in which the BLM land is situated, and the residents and stakeholders in those counties under section 208 of the Act of July 10, 1952 (commonly known as the “McCarran Amendment”) (43 U.S.C. 666).
(e) Effect on federally recognized Indian tribes.—
(f) Effect on payments in lieu of taxes.—
(1) ELIGIBILITY OF BLM LAND AND NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The BLM land and the non-Federal land described in section 3022(3) shall remain eligible as entitlement land under section 6901 of title 31, United States Code.
(2) NO PREJUDICE TO COUNTY PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES RIGHTS.—Nothing in this subtitle diminishes, enhances, or otherwise affects any other right or entitlement of the counties in which the BLM land is situated to payments in lieu of taxes based on the BLM land, under section 6901 of title 31, United States Code.
(g) Wildlife guzzlers.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Bureau of Land Management and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources shall continue the management of wildlife guzzlers in existence as of the date of enactment of this Act on the BLM land.
(h) Rangeland improvements.—The Secretary shall continue to manage, in a manner that promotes and facilitates grazing—
(a) Findings.—Congress finds that—
(1) the State owns approximately 68,057 acres of land and approximately 10,280 acres of mineral interests located within the Utah Test and Training Range in Box Elder, Tooele, and Juab Counties, Utah;
(2) the State owns approximately 2,353 acres of land and approximately 3,560 acres of mineral interests located wholly or partially within the Cedar Mountains Wilderness in Tooele County, Utah;
(3) the parcels of State land described in paragraphs (1) and (2)—
(4) continued State ownership and development of State trust land within the Utah Test and Training Range and the Cedar Mountains Wilderness is incompatible with—
(5) it is in the public interest of the United States to acquire in a timely manner all State trust land within the Utah Test and Training Range and the Cedar Mountains Wilderness, in exchange for the conveyance of the Federal land to the State, in accordance with the terms and conditions described in this subtitle.
In this subtitle:
(1) EXCHANGE MAP.—The term “Exchange Map” means the map prepared by the Bureau of Land Management entitled “Utah Test and Training Range Enhancement/West Desert Land Exchange” and dated February 12, 2016.
(2) FEDERAL LAND.—The term “Federal land” means the Bureau of Land Management land located in Box Elder, Millard, Juab, Tooele, and Beaver Counties, Utah, that is identified on the Exchange Map as “BLM Lands Proposed for Transfer to State Trust Lands”.
(a) In general.—If the State offers to convey to the United States title to the non-Federal land, the Secretary shall—
(b) Valid existing rights.—The exchange authorized under subsection (a) shall be subject to valid existing rights.
(c) Title approval.—Title to the Federal land and non-Federal land to be exchanged under this section shall be in a format acceptable to the Secretary and the State.
(d) Appraisals.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The value of the Federal land and the non-Federal land to be exchanged under this section shall be determined by appraisals conducted by one or more independent appraisers retained by the State, with the consent of the Secretary.
(2) APPLICABLE LAW.—The appraisals under paragraph (1) shall be conducted in accordance with nationally recognized appraisal standards, including, as appropriate, the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions.
(3) MINERAL LAND.—
(A) MINERAL REPORTS.—The appraisals under paragraph (1) shall take into account mineral and technical reports provided by the Secretary and the State in the evaluation of mineral deposits in the Federal land and non-Federal land.
(B) MINING CLAIMS.—An appraisal of any parcel of Federal land that is encumbered by a mining or millsite claim located under sections 2318 through 2352 of the Revised Statutes (commonly known as the “Mining Law of 1872”) (30 U.S.C. 21 et seq.) shall take into account the encumbrance created by the claim for purposes of determining the value of the parcel of the Federal land.
(4) APPROVAL.—The appraisals conducted under paragraph (1) shall be submitted to the Secretary and the State for approval.
(5) DISPUTE RESOLUTION.—If, by the date that is 90 days after the date of submission of an appraisal for review and approval under this subsection, the Secretary or the State do not agree to accept the findings of the appraisals with respect to one or more parcels of Federal land or non-Federal land, the dispute shall be resolved in accordance with section 206(d)(2) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716(d)(2)).
(e) Conveyance of title.—The land exchange authorized under this subtitle shall be completed by the later of—
(f) Public inspection and notice.—
(1) PUBLIC INSPECTION.—At least 30 days before the date of conveyance of the Federal land and non-Federal land, all final appraisals and appraisal reviews for land to be exchanged under this section shall be available for public review at the office of the State Director of the Bureau of Land Management in the State of Utah.
(g) Equal value exchange.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The value of the Federal land and non-Federal land to be exchanged under this section—
(2) EQUALIZATION.—
(A) SURPLUS OF FEDERAL LAND.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—If the value of the Federal land exceeds the value of the non-Federal land, the value of the Federal land and non-Federal land shall be equalized by the State conveying to the United States—
(I) State trust land parcel 1, as described in the assessment entitled “Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment UT–100–06–EA”, numbered UTU–82090, and dated March 2008; or
(II) State trust land located within any of the wilderness areas or national conservation areas in Washington County, Utah, established under subtitle O of title I of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 1075) that has an appraised value equal to the difference between—
(B) SURPLUS OF NON-FEDERAL LAND.—If the value of the non-Federal land exceeds the value of the Federal land, the value of the Federal land and the non-Federal land shall be equalized by the Secretary making a cash equalization payment to the State, in accordance with section 206(b) of the Federal Land Policy Management (43 U.S.C. 1716(b)).
(a) Non-Federal land within Utah test and training range.—On conveyance to the United States under this subtitle, the non-Federal land located within the Utah Test and Training Range shall be managed in accordance with the memorandum of agreement entered into under section 3011(a).
(b) Non-Federal land within Cedar Mountains Wilderness.—On conveyance to the United States under this subtitle, the non-Federal land located within the Cedar Mountains Wilderness shall, in accordance with section 206(c) of the Federal Land Policy Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716(c)), be added to, and administered as part of, the Cedar Mountains Wilderness.
(a) Costs.—Except as provided in subsection (b), the costs of remedial actions relating to hazardous materials on land acquired under this subtitle shall be paid by those entities responsible for the costs under applicable law.
(b) Remediation of prior testing and training activity.—The Department of Defense shall bear all costs of evaluation, management, and remediation caused by the previous testing of military weapons systems and the training of military forces on non-Federal land to be conveyed to the United States under this subtitle.
(a) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY.—The term “highway right-of-way” means a right-of-way across Federal land for all county roads in the Counties of Box Elder, Tooele, and Juab, in the State of Utah, according to official transportation map and centerline descriptions of each county in existence as of March 1, 2015.
(2) MAP.—The term “official transportation map and centerline description” means—
(A) the map entitled “Official Transportation Map of Box Elder County, Utah” and dated March 1, 2015, and accompanying centerline description of each road on file with the Clerk of Box Elder County as of March 1, 2015;
(b) Recognition of existence and validity of rights-of-Way.—Congress recognizes the existence and validity of each of the highway rights-of-way identified on the official transportation maps and centerline descriptions.
(c) Conveyance of an easement across Federal land.—
(1) BOX ELDER COUNTY, UTAH.—The Secretary shall convey, without consideration, to Box Elder County, Utah, and the State of Utah as joint tenants with undivided interests, easements for motorized travel rights-of-way across Federal land for all highways shown and described in the official transportation map and centerline description of the county described in subsection (a)(2)(A).
(2) JUAB COUNTY, UTAH.—The Secretary shall convey, without consideration, to Juab County, Utah, and the State of Utah as joint tenants with undivided interests, easements for motorized travel rights-of-way across Federal land for all highways shown and described in the official transportation map and centerline description of the county described in subsection (a)(2)(B).
(3) TOOELE COUNTY, UTAH.—The Secretary shall convey, without consideration, to Tooele County, Utah, and the State of Utah as joint tenants with undivided interests, easements for motorized travel rights-of-way across Federal land for all highways shown and described in the official transportation map and centerline description of the county described in subsection (a)(2)(C).
(d) Description of Federal land subject to easement.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—All easements under subsection (c) shall include—
(e) Retention of maps and centerline descriptions.—The maps and centerline descriptions referred to in clauses (i) and (ii) of subsection (d)(2)(A) shall be on file in the appropriate office of the Secretary.
(f) Exclusion of certain class D roads from road easement conveyances.—Notwithstanding the highway rights-of-way identified on the official transportation maps and centerline descriptions, this section does not apply to any class D road located within the boundaries of—
(1) Cedar Mountain Wilderness Area designated by section 384(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (Public Law 109–163; 119 Stat. 3217; 16 U.S.C. 1132 note); or
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2017 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows:
(a) Authorization of appropriations.—Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2017 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(b) Authorization of new plant projects.—From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out, for defense environmental cleanup activities, the following new plant project:
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2017 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2017 for nuclear energy as specified in the funding table in section 4701.
(a) In general.—The Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 4732 the following new section:
“SEC. 4733. Independent acquisition project reviews of capital assets acquisition projects.
“(a) Reviews.—The appropriate head shall ensure that an independent entity conducts reviews of each capital assets acquisition project as the project moves toward the approval of each of critical decision 0, critical decision 1, and critical decision 2 in the acquisition process.
“(b) Pre-critical decision 1 reviews.—In addition to any other matters, with respect to each review of a capital assets acquisition project under subsection (a) that has not reached critical decision 1 approval in the acquisition process, such review shall include—
“(c) Independent entities.—The appropriate head shall ensure that each review of a capital assets acquisition project under subsection (a) is conducted by an independent entity with the appropriate expertise with respect to the project and the stage in the acquisition process of the project.
“(d) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘acquisition process’ means the acquisition process for a project, as defined in Department of Energy Order 413.3B (relating to project management and project management for the acquisition of capital assets), or a successor order.
(a) Prohibition.—Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Energy may be obligated or expended to plan or carry out research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium.
(b) Exception.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for defense nuclear nonproliferation, as specified in the funding table in division D, not more than $5,000,000 shall be made available to the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors for initial planning and early research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium.
(c) Budget matters.—Section 3118 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1196) is amended—
(1) by striking paragraph (2) of subsection (c) and inserting the following new paragraph:
“(2) BUDGET REQUESTS.—If the Secretaries determine under paragraph (1) that research and development of an advanced naval nuclear fuel system based on low-enriched uranium should continue, the Secretaries shall ensure that each budget of the President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2018 and each fiscal year thereafter in which such research and development is carried out includes in the budget line item for the ‘Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation’ account amounts necessary to carry out the conceptual plan under subsection (b).”; and
(a) In general.—Except as provided by subsection (c), using funds described in subsection (b), the Secretary of Energy shall carry out construction and project support activities relating to the MOX facility.
(b) Funds described.—The funds described in this subsection are the following:
(c) Waiver.—The Secretary may waive the requirement in subsection (a) to carry out construction and project support activities relating to the MOX facility if—
(1) the Secretary submits to the congressional defense committees—
(A) an updated performance baseline for construction and project support activities relating to the MOX facility as required by section 3119(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1197);
(B) notification that the Secretary has sought to enter into consultations with any relevant State or government of a foreign country necessary to pursue an alternative option for carrying out the plutonium disposition program, including a comprehensive description of the status of such consultations and a detailed plan and schedule for concluding such consultations;
(C) the commitment of the Secretary to remove plutonium from South Carolina and ensure a sustainable future for the Savannah River Site; and
(D) either—
(i) notification that the prime contractor of the MOX facility has not submitted a proposal, during the three-month period following the date on which the Secretary requests such a proposal, for a fixed-price contract for completing construction and project support activities for the MOX facility; or
(ii) certification that such proposal is materially deficient or non-responsive, or that an alternative option for carrying out the plutonium disposition program exists and the total lifecycle cost of such alternative option would be less than approximately half of the estimated remaining total lifecycle cost of the mixed-oxide fuel program; and
(a) Update to order.—Not later than August 31, 2016, the Secretary of Energy shall update Department of Energy Order 470.3B relating to the design basis threat for protecting nuclear weapons, special nuclear material, and other critical assets in the custody of the Department of Energy.
(b) Sense of Congress.—It is the sense of Congress that—
(1) the intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)) should promulgate regular, biannual updates to the Nuclear Security Threat Capabilities Assessment to better inform nuclear security postures within the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy;
(a) Prohibition.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—None of the funds described in paragraph (2) may be obligated or expended to enter into a contract with, or otherwise provide assistance to, the Russian Federation.
(b) Waiver.—The Secretary of Energy, without delegation, may waive the prohibition in subsection (a)(1) only—
(c) Definitions.—In this section:
(2) The term “Department of Energy defense nuclear facility” has the meaning given that term in section 318 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286g).
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the National Nuclear Security Administration for defense-related Federal salaries and expenses, not more than 90 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Energy submits to the congressional defense committees and the congressional intelligence committees the following:
(1) The updated plan on the designing and building of prototypes of nuclear weapons that is required to be developed by not later than the same time as the budget of the President for fiscal year 2018 pursuant to paragraphs (2) and (3)(B) of section 4509(a) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2660(a)(2)).
Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for defense environmental cleanup for program direction, not more than 90 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary of Energy submits to Congress the future-years defense environmental cleanup plan required to be submitted during 2017 under section 4402A of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2582A).
(a) Limitation on maximum amount for dismantlement.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for any of fiscal years 2017 through 2021 for the National Nuclear Security Administration, not more than $56,000,000 may be obligated or expended in each such fiscal year to carry out the nuclear weapons dismantlement and disposition activities of the Administration.
(b) Limitation on acceleration of dismantlement activities.—Except as provided by subsection (d), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for any of fiscal years 2017 through 2021 for the National Nuclear Security Administration may be obligated or expended to accelerate the nuclear weapons dismantlement activities of the Administration to a rate that exceeds the rate described in the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan schedule.
(c) Limitation on dismantlement of certain cruise missile warheads.—Except as provided by subsection (d), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for any of fiscal years 2017 through 2021 for the National Nuclear Security Administration may be obligated or expended to dismantle or dispose a W84 nuclear weapon.
(d) Exception.—The limitations in subsection (b) and (c) shall not apply to the following:
(1) The dismantlement of a nuclear weapon not covered by the Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan schedule if the Administrator for Nuclear Security certifies, in writing, to the congressional defense committees that—
(2) The dismantlement of a nuclear weapon if the President certifies, in writing, to the congressional defense committees that—
(A) such dismantlement is being carried out pursuant to a nuclear arms reduction treaty or similar international agreement that requires such dismantlement; and
(B) such treaty or similar international agreement—
(ii) was approved—
(I) with the advice and consent of the Senate pursuant to Article II, section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution after the date of the enactment of this Act; or
(II) by an Act of Congress, as described in section 303(b) of the Arms Control and Disarmament Act (22 U.S.C. 2573(b)).
(e) Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan schedule defined.—In this section, the term “Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan schedule” means the schedule described in table 2–7 of the annex of the report titled “Fiscal Year 2016 Stockpile Stewardship and Management Plan” submitted in March 2015 by the Administrator for Nuclear Security to the congressional defense committees under section 4203(b)(2) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523(b)(2)).
(a) Annual certification.—During the five-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than February 1 of each year, the Secretary of Energy shall certify to the congressional defense committees the following, with respect to the year covered by the certification:
(1) The covered contractors have certified to the Administrator for Nuclear Security that the covered contractors are aware of the contents of each container shipped by the covered contractors to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, New Mexico, in sufficient detail to ensure that the container is handled properly to prevent the release of radiation or contamination.
(b) Covered contractors defined.—In this section, the term “covered contractors” means each management and operating contractor of a national security laboratory or nuclear weapons production facility (as such terms are defined in section 4002 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501) that ships materials to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, New Mexico.
(a) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Energy for the Office of the Secretary of Energy, not more than 50 percent may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Secretary submits to the appropriate congressional committees the report under subsection (b).
(b) Report.—Not later than 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the full report, and any related materials, titled “U.S. Nuclear Deterrence in the Coming Decades”, dated August 15, 2014.
It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Energy should ensure that each laboratory operating contractor or plant or site manager of a National Nuclear Security Administration facility adopt generally accepted and consistent accounting practices for laboratory, plant, or site directed research and development.
(a) In general.—The Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 4509 the following new section:
“SEC. 4510. Protection of certain nuclear facilities from unmanned aircraft.
“(a) Authority.—The Secretary of Energy may take such actions described in subsection (b)(1) that are necessary to mitigate the threat of an unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft that poses an imminent threat (as defined by the Secretary of Energy, in coordination with the Secretary of Transportation) to the safety or security of a covered facility.
“(c) Forfeiture.— (1) Any unmanned aircraft system or unmanned aircraft described in subsection (a) shall be subject to seizure and forfeiture to the United States.
“(d) Regulations.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of Energy and the Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe regulations and issue guidance in the respective areas of each Secretary to carry out this section.
“(e) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘covered facility’ means any facility that—
“(2) The terms ‘unmanned aircraft’ and ‘unmanned aircraft system’ have the meaning given those terms in section 331 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–95; 49 U.S.C. 40101 note).”.
Section 4506(b)(1)(B) of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2657) is amended to read as follows:
Section 3241A(f) of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2441a(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
(a) Reports on plan to protect against inadvertent release of restricted data and formerly restricted data.—Section 4522 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2672) is amended—
(b) GAO report on program on scientific engagement for nonproliferation.—Section 3122 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 50 U.S.C. 2571 note), as amended by section 3125 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (Public Law 113–66; 127 Stat. 1063), is further amended—
(a) Assessment.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct an independent assessment of the technology development efforts of the defense environmental cleanup program of the Department of Energy.
(b) Elements.—The assessment under subsection (a) shall include the following:
(1) A review of the technology development efforts of the defense environmental cleanup program of the Department of Energy, including an assessment of the process by which the Secretary identifies and chooses technologies to pursue under the program.
(a) Updated plan.—
(1) TRANSMISSION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive and detailed update to the plan developed under section 3133(a) of the Carl Levin and Howard P. “Buck” McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3896) with respect to verification and monitoring relating to the potential proliferation of nuclear weapons, components of such weapons, and fissile material.
(b) Limitation.—Of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2017 for the Department of Defense for supporting the Executive Office of the President, $10,000,000 may not be obligated or expended until the date on which the President transmits to the appropriate congressional committees the updated plan under subsection (a)(1).
(c) Briefing.—Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate (and any other appropriate congressional committee upon request) an interim briefing on the updated plan under subsection (a)(1).
(d) Appropriate congressional committees defined.—In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means the following:
(2) The Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.
(3) The Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate.
(a) Briefing.—Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, and the Secretary of State shall provide a briefing to the appropriate congressional committees on the feasibility and potential benefits of a dialogue between the United States and France on the use of low-enriched uranium in naval reactors.
(b) Appropriate congressional committees.—In this section, the term “appropriate congressional committees” means—
(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017, $31,000,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).
This title may be cited as the “Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act”.
Section 951 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16271) is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Mission.—The Secretary shall conduct programs of civilian nuclear research, development, demonstration, and commercial application, including activities in this subtitle. Such programs shall take into consideration the following objectives:
“(1) Providing research infrastructure to promote scientific progress and enable users from academia, the National Laboratories, and the private sector to make scientific discoveries relevant for nuclear, chemical, and materials science engineering.
“(2) Maintaining National Laboratory and university nuclear energy research and development programs, including their infrastructure.
“(b) Definitions.—In this subtitle:
“(1) ADVANCED NUCLEAR REACTOR.—The term ‘advanced nuclear reactor’ means—
“(2) FAST NEUTRON.—The term ‘fast neutron’ means a neutron with kinetic energy above 100 kiloelectron volts.
“(3) NATIONAL LABORATORY.—The term ‘National Laboratory’ has the meaning given that term in paragraph (3) of section 2, except that with respect to subparagraphs (G), (H), and (N) of such paragraph, for purposes of this subtitle the term includes only the civilian activities thereof.
Section 952 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16272) is amended—
Section 953(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16273(a)) is amended by striking “, acting through the Director of the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology,”.
Section 954(d)(4) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16274(d)(4)) is amended by striking “as part of a taking into consideration effort that emphasizes” and inserting “that emphasize”.
Section 955 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16275) is amended—
(2) by adding at the end the following: “(c) Versatile neutron source.— “(1) MISSION NEED.—Not later than December 31, 2016, the Secretary shall determine the mission need for a versatile reactor-based fast neutron source, which shall operate as a national user facility. During this process, the Secretary shall consult with the private sector, universities, National Laboratories, and relevant Federal agencies to ensure that this user facility will meet the research needs of the largest possible majority of prospective users. “(2) ESTABLISHMENT.—Upon the determination of mission need made under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, as expeditiously as possible, provide to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a detailed plan for the establishment of the user facility. “(3) FACILITY REQUIREMENTS.— “(A) CAPABILITIES.—The Secretary shall ensure that this user facility will provide, at a minimum, the following capabilities: “(B) CONSIDERATIONS.—In carrying out the plan provided under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall consider the following: “(ii) Providing a source of fast neutrons at a neutron flux, higher than that at which current research facilities operate, sufficient to enable research for an optimal base of prospective users.
Section 956 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16276) is amended by striking “, acting through the Director of the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology,”.
Section 957 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16277) is amended to read as follows:
“SEC. 957. High-performance computation and supportive research.
“(a) Modeling and simulation.—The Secretary shall carry out a program to enhance the Nation’s capabilities to develop new reactor technologies through high-performance computation modeling and simulation techniques. This program shall coordinate with relevant Federal agencies through the National Strategic Computing Initiative created under Executive Order No. 13702 (July 29, 2015) while taking into account the following objectives:
“(1) Utilizing expertise from the private sector, universities, and National Laboratories to develop computational software and capabilities that prospective users may access to accelerate research and development of advanced nuclear reactor systems and reactor systems for space exploration.
“(2) Developing computational tools to simulate and predict nuclear phenomena that may be validated through physical experimentation.
Subtitle E of title IX of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16271 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“SEC. 958. Enabling nuclear energy innovation.
“(a) National reactor innovation center.—The Secretary shall carry out a program to enable the testing and demonstration of reactor concepts to be proposed and funded by the private sector. The Secretary shall leverage the technical expertise of relevant Federal agencies and National Laboratories in order to minimize the time required to enable construction and operation of privately funded experimental reactors at National Laboratories or other Department-owned sites. Such reactors shall operate to meet the following objectives:
“(b) Reporting requirement.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of the Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the National Laboratories, relevant Federal agencies, and other stakeholders, shall transmit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report assessing the Department’s capabilities to authorize, host, and oversee privately funded experimental advanced nuclear reactors as described under subsection (a). The report shall address the following:
“(1) The Department’s oversight capabilities, including options to leverage expertise from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and National Laboratories.
“(3) The efficacy of the Department’s available contractual mechanisms to partner with the private sector and Federal agencies, including cooperative research and development agreements, strategic partnership projects, and agreements for commercializing technology.
(a) In general.—Subtitle E of title IX of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16271 et seq.) is further amended by adding at the end the following:
“Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act, the Department shall transmit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 2 alternative 10-year budget plans for civilian nuclear energy research and development by the Department. The first shall assume constant annual funding for 10 years at the appropriated level for the Department’s civilian nuclear energy research and development for fiscal year 2016. The second shall be an unconstrained budget. The two plans shall include—
“(1) a prioritized list of the Department’s programs, projects, and activities to best support the development of advanced nuclear reactor technologies;
(b) Report on Fusion Innovation.—Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this title, the Secretary of the Department of Energy shall transmit to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report that will identify engineering designs for innovative fusion energy systems that have the potential to demonstrate net energy production not later than 15 years after the start of construction. In this report, the Secretary will identify budgetary requirements that would be necessary for the Department to carry out a fusion innovation initiative to accelerate research and development of these designs.
The table of contents for the Energy Policy Act of 2005 is amended by striking the item relating to section 957 and inserting the following:
(a) Amount.—There are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy $14,950,000 for fiscal year 2017 for the purpose of carrying out activities under chapter 641 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the naval petroleum reserves.
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2017, to be available without fiscal year limitation if so provided in appropriations Acts, for the use of the Department of Transportation for Maritime Administration programs associated with maintaining the United States merchant marine, as follows:
(1) For expenses necessary for operations of the United States Merchant Marine Academy, $99,902,000.
(4) For expenses necessary to dispose of vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, $20,000,000, to remain available until expended.
(5) For expenses to maintain and preserve a United States-flag merchant marine to serve the national security needs of the United States under chapter 531 of title 46, United States Code, $299,997,000.
Section 53106(d) of title 46, United States Code, is amended—
(a) Authority.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Section 53102 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: “(g) Authority to extend maximum service age for vessel.—The Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Secretary of Transportation, may, for a particular participating fleet vessel, extend the maximum age restrictions under section 53101(5)(A)(ii) and section 53106(c)(3) for a period of up to 5 years if the Secretaries jointly determine that it is in the national interest to do so.”.
(a) Short title correction.—The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–120) is amended by striking “Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015” each place it appears (including in quoted material) and inserting “Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2016”.
(c) Provisions relating to the Pribilof Islands.—
(1) SHORT TITLE CORRECTION.—Section 521 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–120), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by striking “2015” and inserting “2016”.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 105(e)(1) of the Pribilof Islands Transition Act (16 U.S.C. 1161 note; Public Law 106–562) is amended by striking “2015” and inserting “2016”.
(3) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 522(b)(2) of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2016 (Public Law 114–120), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by striking “subsection (a)” and inserting “paragraph (1)”.
(d) Title 14, United States Code.—
(e) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect as if included in the enactment of Public Law 114–120.
Section 11 of the Merchant Ship Sales Act of 1946 (50 U.S.C. 4405) is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: “Vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet, including vessels loaned to State Maritime Academies, shall be considered public vessels of the United States.”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following: “(g) Vessel status.—A vessel in the National Defense Reserve Fleet determined by the Maritime Administration to be of insufficient value to remain in the National Defense Reserve Fleet shall remain a vessel within the meaning of that term in section 3 of title 1 and subject to the rights and responsibilities of a vessel under admiralty law at least until such time as the vessel is delivered to a dismantling facility or is disposed of otherwise from the National Defense Reserve Fleet.”.
(a) In general.—Subject to the availability of appropriations for fiscal year 2017 and each fiscal year thereafter, the Maritime Administrator shall seek to contract for construction of a national security multi-mission vessel for the National Defense Reserve Fleet for—
(b) Construction and documentation requirements.—A vessel constructed under this section shall—
(c) Design standards and construction practices.—Subject to subsection (b), construction of a vessel under this section shall use commercial design standards and commercial construction practices that are consistent with the best interests of the Federal Government.
(d) General agent requirement.—The Maritime Administrator shall enter into a contract or other agreement with the Secretary of the Navy under which the Navy shall act as general agent for the Maritime Administration for purposes of construction of a vessel under this section.
(e) Contracts with other Federal entities.—The Maritime Administrator may contract on a reimbursable basis with other Federal entities for goods and services in connection with this section and other associated future activities.
(f) Contractors.—Any contractor selected by the Maritime Administration through its general agent to construct the vessel under (a) shall be an entity established under the laws of the United States or of a State, commonwealth, or territory of the United States, that during the five-year period preceding the date of the enactment of this Act, either directly or through a subsidiary, completed the construction of a vessel in excess of 10,000 gross tons and documented under section 12103 of title 46, United States Code.
(a) In general.—Section 51301 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(c) Superintendent.—The immediate command of the United States Merchant Marine Academy shall be in the Superintendent of the Academy, subject to the direction of the Maritime Administrator under the general supervision of the Secretary of Transportation. The Secretary of Transportation shall appoint the Superintendent from the senior ranks of the United States merchant marine, maritime industry, or from the retired list of flag-rank Navy or Coast Guard officers who have significant afloat command experience. Due to the unique mission of the Academy, it is highly desirable that the Superintendent be a graduate of the Academy and have attained an unlimited merchant mariner officer’s license.
“(d) Commandant of midshipmen.—Subject to the direction of the Superintendent, the Commandant is the immediate commander of the Regiment of Midshipmen and is responsible for the instruction of all midshipmen in maritime professionalism, ethics, leadership, and military bearing necessary for future service as a licensed officer in the merchant marine and a commissioned officer in the uniformed services. The Commandant shall be appointed from the senior ranks of the United States merchant marine, maritime industry, or from the retired list of flag-rank Navy or Coast Guard officers who possess significant merchant marine experience. It is highly desirable that the Commandant have attained an unlimited merchant mariner officer’s license and is a graduate of United States Merchant Marine Academy.”.
Section 308704(a)(1)(C) of title 54, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Section 55122 of title 46, United States Code, is amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following: “(b) Drydocks for construction of certain naval vessels.— “(1) IN GENERAL.—In the application of subsection (a)(1)(C) to a floating drydock used for the construction of naval vessels in a United States shipyard, ‘December 19, 2017’ shall be substituted for the date referred to in that subsection if the Secretary of the Navy determines that— “(2) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—No later than 30 days after making a determination under paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Navy shall notify the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate of such a determinations.”.
(a) In general.—Section 70105 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(r) Expedited issuance for separating service members.—The Secretary shall, using authority available under other provisions of law—
“(1) seek to expedite processing of applications for transportation security cards under this section for members of the Armed Forces who are separating from active duty service with a discharge other than a dishonorable discharge;
“(2) in consultation with the Secretary of Defense—
“(A) enhance efforts of the Department of Homeland Security in assisting members of the Armed Forces who are separating from active duty service with receiving a transportation security card, including by—
“(i) including under the Transition Assistance Program under section 1144 of title 10—
“(II) a form by which such a member may grant the member’s permission for government agencies to disclose to the Department of Homeland Security findings of background investigations of such member, for consideration by the Department in processing the member’s application for a transportation security card;
(b) Reports.—Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for each of the subsequent 2 years, the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit a report to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate describing and assessing the efforts of such department to implement the amendment made by this section.
Section 4301 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(d) For purposes of any Federal law except the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any vessel, including a foreign vessel, being repaired or dismantled is deemed to be a recreational vessel, as defined under section 2101(25), during such repair or dismantling, if that vessel—
This title may be cited as the “Vessel Incidental Discharge Act”.
In this title:
(1) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
(2) AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES.—The term “aquatic nuisance species” means a nonindigenous species (including a pathogen) that threatens the diversity or abundance of native species or the ecological stability of navigable waters or commercial, agricultural, aquacultural, or recreational activities dependent on such waters.
(3) BALLAST WATER.—
(4) BALLAST WATER PERFORMANCE STANDARD.—The term “ballast water performance standard” means the numerical ballast water discharge standard set forth in section 151.2030 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, or section 151.1511 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, as applicable, or a revised numerical ballast water performance standard established under subsection (a)(1)(B), (b), or (c) of section 3604 of this title.
(5) BALLAST WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY OR TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY.—The term “ballast water treatment technology” or “treatment technology” means any mechanical, physical, chemical, or biological process used, alone or in combination, to remove, render harmless, or avoid the uptake or discharge of, aquatic nuisance species within ballast water.
(6) BIOCIDE.—The term “biocide” means a substance or organism, including a virus or fungus, that is introduced into or produced by a ballast water treatment technology to reduce or eliminate aquatic nuisance species as part of the process used to comply with a ballast water performance standard under this title.
(7) DISCHARGE INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF A VESSEL.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The term “discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel” means—
(i) a discharge into navigable waters from a vessel of—
(I) (aa) ballast water, graywater, bilge water, cooling water, oil water separator effluent, anti-fouling hull coating leachate, boiler or economizer blowdown, byproducts from cathodic protection, controllable pitch propeller and thruster hydraulic fluid, distillation and reverse osmosis brine, elevator pit effluent, firemain system effluent, freshwater layup effluent, gas turbine wash water, motor gasoline and compensating effluent, refrigeration and air condensate effluent, seawater pumping biofouling prevention substances, boat engine wet exhaust, sonar dome effluent, exhaust gas scrubber washwater, or stern tube packing gland effluent; or
(B) EXCLUSIONS.—The term “discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel” does not include—
(i) a discharge into navigable waters from a vessel of—
(II) oil or a hazardous substance, as those terms are defined in section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1321);
(III) sewage, as defined in section 312(a)(6) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1322(a)(6)); or
(IV) graywater referred to in section 312(a)(6) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1322(a)(6));
(8) GEOGRAPHICALLY LIMITED AREA.—The term “geographically limited area” means an area—
(9) MANUFACTURER.—The term “manufacturer” means a person engaged in the manufacture, assemblage, or importation of ballast water treatment technology.
(a) Requirements.—
(1) BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the requirements set forth in the final rule, Standards for Living Organisms in Ships’ Ballast Water Discharged in U.S. Waters (77 Fed. Reg. 17254 (March 23, 2012), as corrected at 77 Fed. Reg. 33969 (June 8, 2012)), shall be the management requirements for a ballast water discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel until the Secretary revises the ballast water performance standard under subsection (b) or adopts a more stringent State standard under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.
(B) ADOPTION OF MORE STRINGENT STATE STANDARD.—If the Secretary makes a determination in favor of a State petition under section 3609, the Secretary shall adopt the more stringent ballast water performance standard specified in the statute or regulation that is the subject of that State petition in lieu of the ballast water performance standard in the final rule described under subparagraph (A).
(2) INITIAL MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCHARGES OTHER THAN BALLAST WATER.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, shall issue a final rule establishing best management practices for discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel other than ballast water.
(b) Revised ballast water performance standard; 7–Year review.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the feasibility review under paragraph (2), not later than January 1, 2022, the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, shall issue a final rule revising the ballast water performance standard under subsection (a)(1) so that a ballast water discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel will contain—
(A) less than 1 living organism per 10 cubic meters that is 50 or more micrometers in minimum dimension;
(B) less than 1 living organism per 10 milliliters that is less than 50 micrometers in minimum dimension and more than 10 micrometers in minimum dimension;
(2) FEASIBILITY REVIEW.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 1, 2020, the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, shall complete a review to determine the feasibility of achieving the revised ballast water performance standard under paragraph (1).
(B) CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF BALLAST WATER PERFORMANCE STANDARD.—In conducting a review under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall consider whether revising the ballast water performance standard will result in a scientifically demonstrable and substantial reduction in the risk of introduction or establishment of aquatic nuisance species, taking into account—
(i) improvements in the scientific understanding of biological and ecological processes that lead to the introduction or establishment of aquatic nuisance species;
(ii) improvements in ballast water treatment technology, including—
(I) the capability of such treatment technology to achieve a revised ballast water performance standard;
(iii) improvements in the capabilities to detect, quantify, and assess the viability of aquatic nuisance species at the concentrations under consideration;
(C) LOWER REVISED PERFORMANCE STANDARD.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, determines, on the basis of the feasibility review and after an opportunity for a public hearing, that no ballast water treatment technology can be certified under section 3605 to comply with the revised ballast water performance standard under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall require the use of the treatment technology that achieves the performance levels of the best treatment technology available.
(ii) IMPLEMENTATION DEADLINE.—If the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, determines that the treatment technology under clause (i) cannot be implemented before the implementation deadline under paragraph (3) with respect to a class of vessels, the Secretary shall extend the implementation deadline for that class of vessels for not more than 36 months.
(D) HIGHER REVISED PERFORMANCE STANDARD.—
(i) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, determines that ballast water treatment technology exists that exceeds the revised ballast water performance standard under paragraph (1) with respect to a class of vessels, the Secretary shall revise the ballast water performance standard for that class of vessels to incorporate the higher performance standard.
(ii) IMPLEMENTATION DEADLINE.—If the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, determines that the treatment technology under clause (i) can be implemented before the implementation deadline under paragraph (3) with respect to a class of vessels, the Secretary shall accelerate the implementation deadline for that class of vessels. If the implementation deadline under paragraph (3) is accelerated, the Secretary shall provide not less than 24 months notice before the accelerated deadline takes effect.
(3) IMPLEMENTATION DEADLINE.—The revised ballast water performance standard under paragraph (1) shall apply to a vessel beginning on the date of the first drydocking of the vessel on or after January 1, 2022, but not later than December 31, 2024.
(4) REVISED PERFORMANCE STANDARD COMPLIANCE DEADLINES.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may establish a compliance deadline for compliance by a vessel (or a class, type, or size of vessel) with a revised ballast water performance standard under this subsection.
(B) PROCESS FOR GRANTING EXTENSIONS.—In issuing regulations under this subsection, the Secretary shall establish a process for an owner or operator to submit a petition to the Secretary for an extension of a compliance deadline with respect to the vessel of the owner or operator.
(C) PERIOD OF EXTENSIONS.—An extension issued under subparagraph (B) may—
(D) FACTORS.—In issuing a compliance deadline or reviewing a petition under this paragraph, the Secretary shall consider, with respect to the ability of an owner or operator to meet a compliance deadline, the following factors:
(c) Future revisions of vessel incidental discharge standards; decennial reviews.—
(1) REVISED BALLAST WATER PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, shall complete a review, 10 years after the issuance of a final rule under subsection (b) and every 10 years thereafter, to determine whether further revision of the ballast water performance standard would result in a scientifically demonstrable and substantial reduction in the risk of the introduction or establishment of aquatic nuisance species.
(2) REVISED STANDARDS FOR DISCHARGES OTHER THAN BALLAST WATER.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, may include in a decennial review under this subsection best management practices for discharges covered by subsection (a)(2). The Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking to revise 1 or more best management practices for such discharges after a decennial review if the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, determines that revising 1 or more of such practices would substantially reduce the impacts on navigable waters of discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel other than ballast water.
(3) CONSIDERATIONS.—In conducting a review under paragraph (1), the Secretary, the Administrator, and the heads of other appropriate Federal agencies as determined by the Secretary, shall consider the criteria under subsection (b)(2)(B).
(4) REVISION AFTER DECENNIAL REVIEW.—The Secretary shall initiate a rulemaking to revise the current ballast water performance standard after a decennial review if the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, determines that revising the current ballast water performance standard would result in a scientifically demonstrable and substantial reduction in the risk of the introduction or establishment of aquatic nuisance species.
(a) Certification required.—Beginning 60 days after the date that the requirements for testing protocols are issued under subsection (i), no manufacturer of a ballast water treatment technology shall sell, offer for sale, or introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce, or import into the United States for sale or resale, a ballast water treatment technology for a vessel unless the treatment technology has been certified under this section.
(b) Certification process.—
(1) EVALUATION.—Upon application of a manufacturer, the Secretary shall evaluate a ballast water treatment technology with respect to—
(c) Certification conditions.—
(d) Period for use of installed treatment equipment.—Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this title or any other provision of law, the Secretary shall allow a vessel on which a system is installed and operated to meet a ballast water performance standard under this title to continue to use that system, notwithstanding any revision of a ballast water performance standard occurring after the system is ordered or installed until the expiration of the service life of the system, as determined by the Secretary, so long as the system—
(e) Certificates of type approval for the treatment technology.—
(1) ISSUANCE.—If the Secretary approves a ballast water treatment technology for certification under subsection (b), the Secretary shall issue a certificate of type approval for the treatment technology to the manufacturer in such form and manner as the Secretary determines appropriate.
(f) Inspections.—An owner or operator who receives a copy of a certificate under subsection (e)(3) shall retain a copy of the certificate onboard the vessel and make the copy of the certificate available for inspection at all times while the owner or operator is utilizing the treatment technology.
(g) Biocides.—The Secretary may not approve a ballast water treatment technology under subsection (b) if—
(1) it uses a biocide or generates a biocide that is a pesticide, as defined in section 2 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (7 U.S.C. 136), unless the biocide is registered under that Act or the Secretary, in consultation with Administrator, has approved the use of the biocide in such treatment technology; or
(2) it uses or generates a biocide the discharge of which causes or contributes to a violation of a water quality standard under section 303 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1313).
(h) Prohibition.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the use of a ballast water treatment technology by an owner or operator of a vessel shall not satisfy the requirements of this title unless it has been approved by the Secretary under subsection (b).
(2) EXCEPTIONS.—
(A) COAST GUARD SHIPBOARD TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION PROGRAM.—An owner or operator may use a ballast water treatment technology that has not been certified by the Secretary to comply with the requirements of this section if the technology is being evaluated under the Coast Guard Shipboard Technology Evaluation Program.
(B) BALLAST WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES CERTIFIED BY FOREIGN ENTITIES.—An owner or operator may use a ballast water treatment technology that has not been certified by the Secretary to comply with the requirements of this section if the technology has been certified by a foreign entity and the certification demonstrates performance and safety of the treatment technology equivalent to the requirements of this section, as determined by the Secretary.
(a) In general.—No permit shall be required or prohibition enforced under any other provision of law for, nor shall any standards regarding a discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel under this title apply to—
(1) a discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel if the vessel is less than 79 feet in length and engaged in commercial service (as defined in section 2101(5) of title 46, United States Code);
(2) a discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel if the vessel is a fishing vessel, including a fish processing vessel and a fish tender vessel (as defined in section 2101 of title 46, United States Code);
(3) a discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel if the vessel is a recreational vessel (as defined in section 2101(25) of title 46, United States Code);
(4) the placement, release, or discharge of equipment, devices, or other material from a vessel for the sole purpose of conducting research on the aquatic environment or its natural resources in accordance with generally recognized scientific methods, principles, or techniques;
(5) any discharge into navigable waters from a vessel authorized by an on-scene coordinator in accordance with part 300 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, or part 153 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations;
(b) Ballast water discharges.—No permit shall be required or prohibition enforced under any other provision of law for, nor shall any ballast water performance standards under this title apply to—
(1) a ballast water discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel determined by the Secretary to—
(B) take up and discharge ballast water exclusively within 1 Captain of the Port Zone established by the Coast Guard, unless the Secretary determines such discharge poses a substantial risk of introduction or establishment of an aquatic nuisance species;
(c) Vessels with permanent ballast water.—No permit shall be required or prohibition enforced under any other provision of law for, nor shall any ballast water performance standard under this title apply to, a vessel that carries all of its permanent ballast water in sealed tanks that are not subject to discharge.
(a) In general.—The Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator, may promulgate regulations establishing 1 or more compliance programs as an alternative to ballast water management regulations issued under section 3604 for a vessel that—
(a) In general.—An interested person may file a petition for review of a final regulation promulgated under this title in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
(a) In general.—No State or political subdivision thereof may adopt or enforce any statute or regulation of the State or political subdivision with respect to a discharge incidental to the normal operation of a vessel after the date of enactment of this Act.
(b) Savings clause.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), a State or political subdivision thereof may enforce a statute or regulation of the State or political subdivision with respect to ballast water discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel that specifies a ballast water performance standard that is more stringent than the ballast water performance standard under section 3604(a)(1)(A) and is in effect on the date of enactment of this Act if the Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator and any other Federal department or agency the Secretary considers appropriate, makes a determination that—
(1) compliance with any performance standard specified in the statute or regulation can in fact be achieved and detected;
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this title shall be the exclusive statutory authority for regulation by the Federal Government of discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel to which this title applies. Except as provided under section 3604(a)(1)(A), any regulation in effect on the date immediately preceding the effective date of this Act relating to any permitting requirement for or prohibition on discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel to which this title applies shall be deemed to be a regulation issued pursuant to the authority of this title and shall remain in full force and effect unless or until superseded by new regulations issued hereunder.
(a) In general.—Whenever a funding table in this division specifies a dollar amount authorized for a project, program, or activity, the obligation and expenditure of the specified dollar amount for the project, program, or activity is hereby authorized, subject to the availability of appropriations.
(b) Merit-based decisions.—A decision to commit, obligate, or expend funds with or to a specific entity on the basis of a dollar amount authorized pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
(c) Relationship to transfer and programming authority.—An amount specified in the funding tables in this division may be transferred or reprogrammed under a transfer or reprogramming authority provided by another provision of this Act or by other law. The transfer or reprogramming of an amount specified in such funding tables shall not count against a ceiling on such transfers or reprogrammings under section 1001 or section 1522 of this Act or any other provision of law, unless such transfer or reprogramming would move funds between appropriation accounts.
| SEC. 4101. PROCUREMENT(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | ||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| FIXED WING | |||||||
| 001 | UTILITY F/W AIRCRAFT | 57,529 | 57,529 | ||||
| 003 | MQ–1 UAV | 55,388 | 84,988 | ||||
| Ground Mounted Airspace Deconfliction Radar | [29,600] | ||||||
| ROTARY | |||||||
| 006 | AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN | 803,084 | 803,084 | ||||
| 007 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 185,160 | 185,160 | ||||
| 008 | UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) | 755,146 | 755,146 | ||||
| 009 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 174,107 | 174,107 | ||||
| 010 | UH–60 BLACK HAWK A AND L MODELS | 46,173 | 46,173 | ||||
| 011 | CH–47 HELICOPTER | 556,257 | 556,257 | ||||
| 012 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 8,707 | 8,707 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 013 | MQ–1 PAYLOAD (MIP) | 43,735 | 43,735 | ||||
| 015 | MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) | 94,527 | 94,527 | ||||
| 016 | AH–64 MODS | 137,883 | 137,883 | ||||
| 017 | CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) | 102,943 | 102,943 | ||||
| 018 | GRCS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 4,055 | 4,055 | ||||
| 019 | ARL SEMA MODS (MIP) | 6,793 | 6,793 | ||||
| 020 | EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 13,197 | 13,197 | ||||
| 021 | UTILITY/CARGO AIRPLANE MODS | 17,526 | 17,526 | ||||
| 022 | UTILITY HELICOPTER MODS | 10,807 | 10,807 | ||||
| 023 | NETWORK AND MISSION PLAN | 74,752 | 74,752 | ||||
| 024 | COMMS, NAV SURVEILLANCE | 69,960 | 69,960 | ||||
| 025 | GATM ROLLUP | 45,302 | 45,302 | ||||
| 026 | RQ–7 UAV MODS | 71,169 | 71,169 | ||||
| 027 | UAS MODS | 21,804 | 26,224 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [4,420] | ||||||
| GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS | |||||||
| 028 | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT | 67,377 | 67,377 | ||||
| 029 | SURVIVABILITY CM | 9,565 | 9,565 | ||||
| 030 | CMWS | 41,626 | 41,626 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 032 | AVIONICS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 7,007 | 7,007 | ||||
| 033 | COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT | 48,234 | 48,234 | ||||
| 034 | AIRCREW INTEGRATED SYSTEMS | 30,297 | 30,297 | ||||
| 035 | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL | 50,405 | 50,405 | ||||
| 036 | INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 1,217 | 1,217 | ||||
| 037 | LAUNCHER, 2.75 ROCKET | 3,055 | 3,055 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 3,614,787 | 3,648,807 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 001 | LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) | 126,470 | 126,470 | ||||
| 002 | MSE MISSILE | 423,201 | 423,201 | ||||
| 003 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 19,319 | 19,319 | ||||
| AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 004 | HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY | 42,013 | 42,013 | ||||
| 005 | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MSLS (JAGM) | 64,751 | 64,751 | ||||
| 006 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 37,100 | 37,100 | ||||
| ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS | |||||||
| 007 | JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY | 73,508 | 89,075 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [15,567] | ||||||
| 008 | TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY | 64,922 | 145,574 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [80,652] | ||||||
| 009 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 19,949 | 19,949 | ||||
| 010 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 172,088 | 248,079 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [75,991] | ||||||
| 011 | MLRS REDUCED RANGE PRACTICE ROCKETS (RRPR) | 18,004 | 18,004 | ||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 013 | PATRIOT MODS | 197,107 | 197,107 | ||||
| 014 | ATACMS MODS | 150,043 | 150,043 | ||||
| 015 | GMLRS MOD | 395 | 395 | ||||
| 017 | AVENGER MODS | 33,606 | 33,606 | ||||
| 018 | ITAS/TOW MODS | 383 | 383 | ||||
| 019 | MLRS MODS | 34,704 | 34,704 | ||||
| 020 | HIMARS MODIFICATIONS | 1,847 | 1,847 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 021 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 34,487 | 34,487 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 022 | AIR DEFENSE TARGETS | 4,915 | 4,915 | ||||
| 024 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT | 1,154 | 1,154 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 1,519,966 | 1,692,176 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | |||||||
| TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | STRYKER VEHICLE | 71,680 | 71,680 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 002 | STRYKER (MOD) | 74,348 | 74,348 | ||||
| 003 | STRYKER UPGRADE | 444,561 | 444,561 | ||||
| 005 | BRADLEY PROGRAM (MOD) | 276,433 | 276,433 | ||||
| 006 | HOWITZER, MED SP FT 155MM M109A6 (MOD) | 63,138 | 63,138 | ||||
| 007 | PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) | 469,305 | 594,489 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [125,184] | ||||||
| 008 | IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) | 91,963 | 91,963 | ||||
| 009 | ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) | 3,465 | 9,415 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [5,950] | ||||||
| 010 | ASSAULT BREACHER VEHICLE | 2,928 | 2,928 | ||||
| 011 | M88 FOV MODS | 8,685 | 8,685 | ||||
| 012 | JOINT ASSAULT BRIDGE | 64,752 | 64,752 | ||||
| 013 | M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) | 480,166 | 480,166 | ||||
| 014 | ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM | 172,200 | |||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [172,200] | ||||||
| WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 016 | INTEGRATED AIR BURST WEAPON SYSTEM FAMILY | 9,764 | 9,764 | ||||
| 017 | MORTAR SYSTEMS | 8,332 | 8,332 | ||||
| 018 | XM320 GRENADE LAUNCHER MODULE (GLM) | 3,062 | 3,062 | ||||
| 019 | COMPACT SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM | 992 | 992 | ||||
| 020 | CARBINE | 40,493 | 40,493 | ||||
| 021 | COMMON REMOTELY OPERATED WEAPONS STATION | 25,164 | 25,164 | ||||
| MOD OF WEAPONS AND OTHER COMBAT VEH | |||||||
| 022 | MK–19 GRENADE MACHINE GUN MODS | 4,959 | 4,959 | ||||
| 023 | M777 MODS | 11,913 | 11,913 | ||||
| 024 | M4 CARBINE MODS | 29,752 | 29,752 | ||||
| 025 | M2 50 CAL MACHINE GUN MODS | 48,582 | 48,582 | ||||
| 026 | M249 SAW MACHINE GUN MODS | 1,179 | 1,179 | ||||
| 027 | M240 MEDIUM MACHINE GUN MODS | 1,784 | 1,784 | ||||
| 028 | SNIPER RIFLES MODIFICATIONS | 971 | 971 | ||||
| 029 | M119 MODIFICATIONS | 6,045 | 6,045 | ||||
| 030 | MORTAR MODIFICATION | 12,118 | 12,118 | ||||
| 031 | MODIFICATIONS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) | 3,157 | 3,157 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 032 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (WOCV-WTCV) | 2,331 | 2,331 | ||||
| 035 | SMALL ARMS EQUIPMENT (SOLDIER ENH PROG) | 3,155 | 3,155 | ||||
| 036 | BRADLEY PROGRAM | 72,800 | |||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [72,800] | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | 2,265,177 | 2,641,311 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | |||||||
| SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES | 40,296 | 40,296 | ||||
| 002 | CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES | 39,237 | 48,879 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [9,642] | ||||||
| 003 | CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES | 5,193 | 5,193 | ||||
| 004 | CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES | 46,693 | 52,691 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [5,998] | ||||||
| 005 | CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES | 7,000 | 8,077 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [1,077] | ||||||
| 006 | CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES | 7,753 | 34,987 | ||||
| Program reduction | [–1,300] | ||||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [28,534] | ||||||
| 007 | CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES | 47,000 | 47,000 | ||||
| 008 | CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES | 118,178 | 115,501 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [7,423] | ||||||
| Unobligated balances | [–10,100] | ||||||
| MORTAR AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 009 | 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 69,784 | 69,784 | ||||
| 010 | 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 36,125 | 38,802 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [2,677] | ||||||
| 011 | 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 69,133 | 69,133 | ||||
| TANK AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 012 | CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES | 120,668 | 129,667 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [8,999] | ||||||
| ARTILLERY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 013 | ARTILLERY CARTRIDGES, 75MM & 105MM, ALL TYPES | 64,800 | 64,800 | ||||
| 014 | ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES | 109,515 | 129,863 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [20,348] | ||||||
| 015 | PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 | 39,200 | 39,340 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [140] | ||||||
| 016 | ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL | 70,881 | 95,536 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [24,655] | ||||||
| MINES | |||||||
| 017 | MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES | 16,866 | |||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [16,866] | ||||||
| NETWORKED MUNITIONS | |||||||
| 018 | SPIDER NETWORK MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 10,353 | |||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [10,353] | ||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 019 | SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 38,000 | 101,210 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [63,210] | ||||||
| 020 | ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES | 87,213 | 87,213 | ||||
| OTHER AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 021 | CAD/PAD, ALL TYPES | 4,914 | 4,914 | ||||
| 022 | DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 6,380 | 12,753 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [6,373] | ||||||
| 023 | GRENADES, ALL TYPES | 22,760 | 26,903 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [4,143] | ||||||
| 024 | SIGNALS, ALL TYPES | 10,666 | 12,518 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [1,852] | ||||||
| 025 | SIMULATORS, ALL TYPES | 7,412 | 7,412 | ||||
| MISCELLANEOUS | |||||||
| 026 | AMMO COMPONENTS, ALL TYPES | 12,726 | 12,726 | ||||
| 027 | NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES | 6,100 | 6,873 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [773] | ||||||
| 028 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION (AMMO) | 10,006 | 10,006 | ||||
| 029 | AMMUNITION PECULIAR EQUIPMENT | 17,275 | 13,575 | ||||
| Program reduction- excess carryover | [–3,700] | ||||||
| 030 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION (AMMO) | 14,951 | 14,951 | ||||
| PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 032 | INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 222,269 | 242,269 | ||||
| Program increase | [20,000] | ||||||
| 033 | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS DEMILITARIZATION | 157,383 | 157,383 | ||||
| 034 | ARMS INITIATIVE | 3,646 | 3,646 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | 1,513,157 | 1,731,120 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | TACTICAL TRAILERS/DOLLY SETS | 3,733 | 3,733 | ||||
| 002 | SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: | 3,716 | 7,896 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [4,180] | ||||||
| 003 | HI MOB MULTI-PURP WHLD VEH (HMMWV) | 50,000 | |||||
| HMMWV M997A3 ambulance recapitalization for Active Component | [50,000] | ||||||
| 004 | GROUND MOBILITY VEHICLES (GMV) | 4,907 | 4,907 | ||||
| 006 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 587,514 | 587,514 | ||||
| 007 | TRUCK, DUMP, 20T (CCE) | 3,927 | 3,927 | ||||
| 008 | FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) | 53,293 | 200,769 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [147,476] | ||||||
| 009 | FIRETRUCKS & ASSOCIATED FIREFIGHTING EQUIP | 7,460 | 7,460 | ||||
| 010 | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) | 39,564 | 45,686 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [6,122] | ||||||
| 011 | PLS ESP | 11,856 | 118,214 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [106,358] | ||||||
| 012 | HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV | 76,561 | |||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [76,561] | ||||||
| 013 | TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS | 49,751 | 76,870 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [27,119] | ||||||
| 014 | MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP | 64,000 | 57,456 | ||||
| Program reduction | [–10,000] | ||||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [3,456] | ||||||
| 015 | MINE-RESISTANT AMBUSH-PROTECTED (MRAP) MODS | 10,611 | 10,611 | ||||
| NON-TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 016 | HEAVY ARMORED SEDAN | 394 | 394 | ||||
| 018 | NONTACTICAL VEHICLES, OTHER | 1,755 | 1,755 | ||||
| COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 019 | WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK | 427,598 | 434,170 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [6,572] | ||||||
| 020 | SIGNAL MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 58,250 | 58,250 | ||||
| 021 | JOINT INCIDENT SITE COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITY | 5,749 | 5,749 | ||||
| 022 | JCSE EQUIPMENT (USREDCOM) | 5,068 | 5,068 | ||||
| COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 023 | DEFENSE ENTERPRISE WIDEBAND SATCOM SYSTEMS | 143,805 | 143,805 | ||||
| 024 | TRANSPORTABLE TACTICAL COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS | 36,580 | 36,580 | ||||
| 025 | SHF TERM | 1,985 | 25,985 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [24,000] | ||||||
| 027 | SMART-T (SPACE) | 9,165 | 9,165 | ||||
| COMM—C3 SYSTEM | |||||||
| 031 | ARMY GLOBAL CMD & CONTROL SYS (AGCCS) | 2,530 | 2,530 | ||||
| COMM—COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 033 | HANDHELD MANPACK SMALL FORM FIT (HMS) | 273,645 | 273,645 | ||||
| 034 | MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) | 25,017 | 25,017 | ||||
| 035 | RADIO TERMINAL SET, MIDS LVT(2) | 12,326 | 12,326 | ||||
| 037 | TRACTOR DESK | 2,034 | 2,034 | ||||
| 038 | TRACTOR RIDE | 2,334 | 2,334 | ||||
| 039 | SPIDER APLA REMOTE CONTROL UNIT | 1,985 | 1,985 | ||||
| 040 | SPIDER FAMILY OF NETWORKED MUNITIONS INCR | 10,796 | 10,796 | ||||
| 042 | TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS AND PROTECTIVE SYSTEM | 3,607 | 3,607 | ||||
| 043 | UNIFIED COMMAND SUITE | 14,295 | 14,295 | ||||
| 045 | FAMILY OF MED COMM FOR COMBAT CASUALTY CARE | 19,893 | 19,893 | ||||
| COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM | |||||||
| 047 | CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE | 1,388 | 1,388 | ||||
| 048 | ARMY CA/MISO GPF EQUIPMENT | 5,494 | 5,494 | ||||
| INFORMATION SECURITY | |||||||
| 049 | FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS | 2,978 | 2,978 | ||||
| 051 | COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) | 131,356 | 133,284 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [1,928] | ||||||
| 052 | DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS | 15,132 | 15,132 | ||||
| COMM—LONG HAUL COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 053 | BASE SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS | 27,452 | 27,452 | ||||
| COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 054 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 122,055 | 122,055 | ||||
| 055 | EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 4,286 | 4,286 | ||||
| 056 | INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM | 131,794 | 131,794 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) | |||||||
| 059 | JTT/CIBS-M | 5,337 | 5,337 | ||||
| 062 | DCGS-A (MIP) | 242,514 | 242,514 | ||||
| 063 | JOINT TACTICAL GROUND STATION (JTAGS) | 4,417 | 4,417 | ||||
| 064 | TROJAN (MIP) | 17,455 | 17,615 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [160] | ||||||
| 065 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (INTEL SPT) (MIP) | 44,965 | 44,965 | ||||
| 066 | CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) | 7,658 | 7,658 | ||||
| 067 | CLOSE ACCESS TARGET RECONNAISSANCE (CATR) | 7,970 | 7,970 | ||||
| 068 | MACHINE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRANSLATION SYSTEM-M | 545 | 545 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) | |||||||
| 070 | LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR | 74,038 | 99,930 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [25,892] | ||||||
| 071 | EW PLANNING & MANAGEMENT TOOLS (EWPMT) | 3,235 | 3,235 | ||||
| 072 | AIR VIGILANCE (AV) | 733 | 733 | ||||
| 074 | FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE | 1,740 | 1,740 | ||||
| 075 | COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES | 455 | 455 | ||||
| 076 | CI MODERNIZATION | 176 | 176 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) | |||||||
| 077 | SENTINEL MODS | 40,171 | 40,171 | ||||
| 078 | NIGHT VISION DEVICES | 163,029 | 163,029 | ||||
| 079 | SMALL TACTICAL OPTICAL RIFLE MOUNTED MLRF | 15,885 | 15,885 | ||||
| 080 | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS | 48,427 | 52,697 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [4,270] | ||||||
| 081 | FAMILY OF WEAPON SIGHTS (FWS) | 55,536 | 55,536 | ||||
| 082 | ARTILLERY ACCURACY EQUIP | 4,187 | 4,187 | ||||
| 085 | JOINT BATTLE COMMAND—PLATFORM (JBC-P) | 137,501 | 137,501 | ||||
| 086 | JOINT EFFECTS TARGETING SYSTEM (JETS) | 50,726 | 50,726 | ||||
| 087 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIP (LLDR) | 28,058 | 28,058 | ||||
| 088 | COMPUTER BALLISTICS: LHMBC XM32 | 5,924 | 5,924 | ||||
| 089 | MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM | 22,331 | 22,621 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [290] | ||||||
| 090 | COUNTERFIRE RADARS | 314,509 | 281,509 | ||||
| Unit cost savings | [–33,000] | ||||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 091 | FIRE SUPPORT C2 FAMILY | 8,660 | 8,660 | ||||
| 092 | AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS | 54,376 | 124,334 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [69,958] | ||||||
| 093 | IAMD BATTLE COMMAND SYSTEM | 204,969 | 204,969 | ||||
| 094 | LIFE CYCLE SOFTWARE SUPPORT (LCSS) | 4,718 | 4,718 | ||||
| 095 | NETWORK MANAGEMENT INITIALIZATION AND SERVICE | 11,063 | 11,063 | ||||
| 096 | MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM (MCS) | 151,318 | 151,318 | ||||
| 097 | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM-ARMY (GCSS-A) | 155,660 | 155,660 | ||||
| 098 | INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPP | 4,214 | 4,214 | ||||
| 099 | RECONNAISSANCE AND SURVEYING INSTRUMENT SET | 16,185 | 16,185 | ||||
| 100 | MOD OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (ENFIRE) | 1,565 | 1,565 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION | |||||||
| 101 | ARMY TRAINING MODERNIZATION | 17,693 | 17,693 | ||||
| 102 | AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP | 107,960 | 107,960 | ||||
| 103 | GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEMS FAM | 6,416 | 6,416 | ||||
| 104 | HIGH PERF COMPUTING MOD PGM (HPCMP) | 58,614 | 58,614 | ||||
| 105 | CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM | 986 | 986 | ||||
| 106 | RESERVE COMPONENT AUTOMATION SYS (RCAS) | 23,828 | 23,828 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) | |||||||
| 107 | TACTICAL DIGITAL MEDIA | 1,191 | 1,191 | ||||
| 108 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) | 1,995 | 2,091 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [96] | ||||||
| ELECT EQUIP—SUPPORT | |||||||
| 109 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (C-E) | 403 | 403 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 110A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 4,436 | 4,436 | ||||
| CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 111 | PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS | 2,966 | 2,966 | ||||
| 112 | FAMILY OF NON-LETHAL EQUIPMENT (FNLE) | 9,795 | 9,795 | ||||
| 114 | CBRN DEFENSE | 17,922 | 19,763 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [1,841] | ||||||
| BRIDGING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 115 | TACTICAL BRIDGING | 13,553 | 39,553 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [26,000] | ||||||
| 116 | TACTICAL BRIDGE, FLOAT-RIBBON | 25,244 | 25,244 | ||||
| 117 | BRIDGE SUPPLEMENTAL SET | 983 | 983 | ||||
| 118 | COMMON BRIDGE TRANSPORTER (CBT) RECAP | 25,176 | 25,176 | ||||
| ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 119 | GRND STANDOFF MINE DETECTN SYSM (GSTAMIDS) | 39,350 | 39,350 | ||||
| 120 | AREA MINE DETECTION SYSTEM (AMDS) | 10,500 | 10,500 | ||||
| 121 | HUSKY MOUNTED DETECTION SYSTEM (HMDS) | 274 | 274 | ||||
| 122 | ROBOTIC COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM (RCSS) | 2,951 | 2,951 | ||||
| 123 | EOD ROBOTICS SYSTEMS RECAPITALIZATION | 1,949 | 1,949 | ||||
| 124 | ROBOTICS AND APPLIQUE SYSTEMS | 5,203 | 5,471 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [268] | ||||||
| 125 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQPMT (EOD EQPMT) | 5,570 | 5,570 | ||||
| 126 | REMOTE DEMOLITION SYSTEMS | 6,238 | 6,238 | ||||
| 127 | < $5M, COUNTERMINE EQUIPMENT | 836 | 836 | ||||
| 128 | FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS | 3,171 | 3,451 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [280] | ||||||
| COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 129 | HEATERS AND ECU'S | 18,707 | 19,601 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [894] | ||||||
| 130 | SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT | 2,112 | 2,112 | ||||
| 131 | PERSONNEL RECOVERY SUPPORT SYSTEM (PRSS) | 10,856 | 10,856 | ||||
| 132 | GROUND SOLDIER SYSTEM | 32,419 | 32,419 | ||||
| 133 | MOBILE SOLDIER POWER | 30,014 | 30,014 | ||||
| 135 | FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT | 12,544 | 15,209 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [2,665] | ||||||
| 136 | CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM | 18,509 | 18,509 | ||||
| 137 | FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS | 29,384 | 39,173 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [9,789] | ||||||
| 138 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) | 300 | |||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [300] | ||||||
| PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 139 | QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT | 4,487 | 9,287 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [4,800] | ||||||
| 140 | DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER | 42,656 | 63,476 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [20,820] | ||||||
| MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 141 | COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL | 59,761 | 65,524 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [5,763] | ||||||
| MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 142 | MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS | 35,694 | 33,803 | ||||
| Program reduction | [–3,500] | ||||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [1,609] | ||||||
| 143 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) | 2,716 | 2,861 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [145] | ||||||
| CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 144 | GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) | 1,742 | 4,789 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [3,047] | ||||||
| 145 | SCRAPERS, EARTHMOVING | 26,233 | 26,233 | ||||
| 147 | HYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR | 1,123 | 1,123 | ||||
| 148 | TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED | 4,426 | |||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [4,426] | ||||||
| 149 | ALL TERRAIN CRANES | 65,285 | 65,285 | ||||
| 151 | HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) | 1,743 | 4,643 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [2,900] | ||||||
| 152 | ENHANCED RAPID AIRFIELD CONSTRUCTION CAPAP | 2,779 | 2,779 | ||||
| 154 | CONST EQUIP ESP | 26,712 | 23,212 | ||||
| Program reduction | [–3,500] | ||||||
| 155 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) | 6,649 | 6,745 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [96] | ||||||
| RAIL FLOAT CONTAINERIZATION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 156 | ARMY WATERCRAFT ESP | 21,860 | 16,860 | ||||
| Program reduction | [–5,000] | ||||||
| 157 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (FLOAT/RAIL) | 1,967 | 1,967 | ||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 158 | GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP | 113,266 | 125,727 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–7,500] | ||||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [19,961] | ||||||
| 159 | TACTICAL ELECTRIC POWER RECAPITALIZATION | 7,867 | 7,867 | ||||
| MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 160 | FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS | 2,307 | 3,153 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [846] | ||||||
| TRAINING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 161 | COMBAT TRAINING CENTERS SUPPORT | 75,359 | 75,359 | ||||
| 162 | TRAINING DEVICES, NONSYSTEM | 253,050 | 253,050 | ||||
| 163 | CLOSE COMBAT TACTICAL TRAINER | 48,271 | 48,271 | ||||
| 164 | AVIATION COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||||
| 165 | GAMING TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ARMY TRAINING | 11,543 | 11,543 | ||||
| TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) | |||||||
| 166 | CALIBRATION SETS EQUIPMENT | 4,963 | 4,963 | ||||
| 167 | INTEGRATED FAMILY OF TEST EQUIPMENT (IFTE) | 29,781 | 29,781 | ||||
| 168 | TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) | 6,342 | 7,482 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [1,140] | ||||||
| OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 169 | M25 STABILIZED BINOCULAR | 3,149 | 3,149 | ||||
| 170 | RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 18,003 | 18,003 | ||||
| 171 | PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEMS (OPA3) | 44,082 | 44,082 | ||||
| 172 | BASE LEVEL COMMON EQUIPMENT | 2,168 | 2,168 | ||||
| 173 | MODIFICATION OF IN-SVC EQUIPMENT (OPA–3) | 67,367 | 67,367 | ||||
| 174 | PRODUCTION BASE SUPPORT (OTH) | 1,528 | 1,528 | ||||
| 175 | SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR USER TESTING | 8,289 | 8,289 | ||||
| 177 | TRACTOR YARD | 6,888 | 6,888 | ||||
| OPA2 | |||||||
| 179 | INITIAL SPARES—C&E | 27,243 | 27,243 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 5,873,949 | 6,473,477 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| COMBAT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 003 | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV | 890,650 | 890,650 | ||||
| 004 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 80,908 | 80,908 | ||||
| 005 | JSF STOVL | 2,037,768 | 2,037,768 | ||||
| 006 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 233,648 | 233,648 | ||||
| 007 | CH–53K (HEAVY LIFT) | 348,615 | 348,615 | ||||
| 008 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 88,365 | 88,365 | ||||
| 009 | V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) | 1,264,134 | 1,264,134 | ||||
| 010 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 19,674 | 19,674 | ||||
| 011 | H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) | 759,778 | 759,778 | ||||
| 012 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 57,232 | 57,232 | ||||
| 014 | MH–60R (MYP) | 61,177 | 26,177 | ||||
| Line shutdown costs—early to need | [–35,000] | ||||||
| 016 | P–8A POSEIDON | 1,940,238 | 1,940,238 | ||||
| 017 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 123,140 | 123,140 | ||||
| 018 | E–2D ADV HAWKEYE | 916,483 | 916,483 | ||||
| 019 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 125,042 | 125,042 | ||||
| TRAINER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 020 | JPATS | 5,849 | 5,849 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 021 | KC–130J | 128,870 | 128,870 | ||||
| 022 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 24,848 | 24,848 | ||||
| 023 | MQ–4 TRITON | 409,005 | 409,005 | ||||
| 024 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 55,652 | 55,652 | ||||
| 025 | MQ–8 UAV | 72,435 | 72,435 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 029 | AEA SYSTEMS | 51,900 | 51,900 | ||||
| 030 | AV–8 SERIES | 60,818 | 60,818 | ||||
| 031 | ADVERSARY | 5,191 | 5,191 | ||||
| 032 | F–18 SERIES | 1,023,492 | 986,192 | ||||
| Unobligated balances | [–37,300] | ||||||
| 034 | H–53 SERIES | 46,095 | 46,095 | ||||
| 035 | SH–60 SERIES | 108,328 | 108,328 | ||||
| 036 | H–1 SERIES | 46,333 | 46,333 | ||||
| 037 | EP–3 SERIES | 14,681 | 14,681 | ||||
| 038 | P–3 SERIES | 2,781 | 2,781 | ||||
| 039 | E–2 SERIES | 32,949 | 32,949 | ||||
| 040 | TRAINER A/C SERIES | 13,199 | 13,199 | ||||
| 041 | C–2A | 19,066 | 19,066 | ||||
| 042 | C–130 SERIES | 61,788 | 61,788 | ||||
| 043 | FEWSG | 618 | 618 | ||||
| 044 | CARGO/TRANSPORT A/C SERIES | 9,822 | 9,822 | ||||
| 045 | E–6 SERIES | 222,077 | 222,077 | ||||
| 046 | EXECUTIVE HELICOPTERS SERIES | 66,835 | 66,835 | ||||
| 047 | SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT | 16,497 | 16,497 | ||||
| 048 | T–45 SERIES | 114,887 | 114,887 | ||||
| 049 | POWER PLANT CHANGES | 16,893 | 16,893 | ||||
| 050 | JPATS SERIES | 17,401 | 17,401 | ||||
| 051 | COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT | 143,773 | 143,773 | ||||
| 052 | COMMON AVIONICS CHANGES | 164,839 | 164,839 | ||||
| 053 | COMMON DEFENSIVE WEAPON SYSTEM | 4,403 | 4,403 | ||||
| 054 | ID SYSTEMS | 45,768 | 45,768 | ||||
| 055 | P–8 SERIES | 18,836 | 18,836 | ||||
| 056 | MAGTF EW FOR AVIATION | 5,676 | 5,676 | ||||
| 057 | MQ–8 SERIES | 19,003 | 19,003 | ||||
| 058 | RQ–7 SERIES | 3,534 | 3,534 | ||||
| 059 | V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY | 141,545 | 141,545 | ||||
| 060 | F–35 STOVL SERIES | 34,928 | 34,928 | ||||
| 061 | F–35 CV SERIES | 26,004 | 26,004 | ||||
| 062 | QRC | 5,476 | 5,476 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 063 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 1,407,626 | 1,407,626 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 064 | COMMON GROUND EQUIPMENT | 390,103 | 390,103 | ||||
| 065 | AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 23,194 | 23,194 | ||||
| 066 | WAR CONSUMABLES | 40,613 | 40,613 | ||||
| 067 | OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | 860 | 860 | ||||
| 068 | SPECIAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 36,282 | 36,282 | ||||
| 069 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 1,523 | 1,523 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 14,109,148 | 14,036,848 | |||||
| WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| MODIFICATION OF MISSILES | |||||||
| 001 | TRIDENT II MODS | 1,103,086 | 1,103,086 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 002 | MISSILE INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 6,776 | 6,776 | ||||
| STRATEGIC MISSILES | |||||||
| 003 | TOMAHAWK | 186,905 | 186,905 | ||||
| TACTICAL MISSILES | |||||||
| 004 | AMRAAM | 204,697 | 204,697 | ||||
| 005 | SIDEWINDER | 70,912 | 70,912 | ||||
| 006 | JSOW | 2,232 | 2,232 | ||||
| 007 | STANDARD MISSILE | 501,212 | 501,212 | ||||
| 008 | RAM | 71,557 | 71,557 | ||||
| 009 | JOINT AIR GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 26,200 | 26,200 | ||||
| 012 | STAND OFF PRECISION GUIDED MUNITIONS (SOPGM) | 3,316 | 3,316 | ||||
| 013 | AERIAL TARGETS | 137,484 | 137,484 | ||||
| 014 | OTHER MISSILE SUPPORT | 3,248 | 3,248 | ||||
| 015 | LRASM | 29,643 | 29,643 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF MISSILES | |||||||
| 016 | ESSM | 52,935 | 52,935 | ||||
| 018 | HARM MODS | 178,213 | 178,213 | ||||
| 019 | STANDARD MISSILES MODS | 8,164 | 8,164 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 020 | WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 1,964 | 1,964 | ||||
| 021 | FLEET SATELLITE COMM FOLLOW-ON | 36,723 | 36,723 | ||||
| ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 022 | ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 59,096 | 59,096 | ||||
| TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP | |||||||
| 023 | SSTD | 5,910 | 5,910 | ||||
| 024 | MK–48 TORPEDO | 44,537 | 44,537 | ||||
| 025 | ASW TARGETS | 9,302 | 9,302 | ||||
| MOD OF TORPEDOES AND RELATED EQUIP | |||||||
| 026 | MK–54 TORPEDO MODS | 98,092 | 98,092 | ||||
| 027 | MK–48 TORPEDO ADCAP MODS | 46,139 | 46,139 | ||||
| 028 | QUICKSTRIKE MINE | 1,236 | 1,236 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 029 | TORPEDO SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 60,061 | 60,061 | ||||
| 030 | ASW RANGE SUPPORT | 3,706 | 3,706 | ||||
| DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | |||||||
| 031 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 3,804 | 3,804 | ||||
| GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS | |||||||
| 032 | SMALL ARMS AND WEAPONS | 18,002 | 18,002 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF GUNS AND GUN MOUNTS | |||||||
| 033 | CIWS MODS | 50,900 | 50,900 | ||||
| 034 | COAST GUARD WEAPONS | 25,295 | 25,295 | ||||
| 035 | GUN MOUNT MODS | 77,003 | 77,003 | ||||
| 036 | LCS MODULE WEAPONS | 2,776 | 2,776 | ||||
| 038 | AIRBORNE MINE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS | 15,753 | 15,753 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 040 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 62,383 | 62,383 | ||||
| TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 3,209,262 | 3,209,262 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | |||||||
| NAVY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 91,659 | 91,659 | ||||
| 002 | AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 65,759 | 65,759 | ||||
| 003 | MACHINE GUN AMMUNITION | 8,152 | 8,152 | ||||
| 004 | PRACTICE BOMBS | 41,873 | 41,873 | ||||
| 005 | CARTRIDGES & CART ACTUATED DEVICES | 54,002 | 54,002 | ||||
| 006 | AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES | 57,034 | 57,034 | ||||
| 007 | JATOS | 2,735 | 2,735 | ||||
| 009 | 5 INCH/54 GUN AMMUNITION | 19,220 | 19,220 | ||||
| 010 | INTERMEDIATE CALIBER GUN AMMUNITION | 30,196 | 30,196 | ||||
| 011 | OTHER SHIP GUN AMMUNITION | 39,009 | 39,009 | ||||
| 012 | SMALL ARMS & LANDING PARTY AMMO | 46,727 | 46,727 | ||||
| 013 | PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION | 9,806 | 9,806 | ||||
| 014 | AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 2,900 | 2,900 | ||||
| MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 015 | SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION | 27,958 | 27,958 | ||||
| 017 | 40 MM, ALL TYPES | 14,758 | 14,758 | ||||
| 018 | 60MM, ALL TYPES | 992 | 992 | ||||
| 020 | 120MM, ALL TYPES | 16,757 | 16,757 | ||||
| 021 | GRENADES, ALL TYPES | 972 | 972 | ||||
| 022 | ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 14,186 | 14,186 | ||||
| 023 | ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES | 68,656 | 68,656 | ||||
| 024 | DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 1,700 | 1,700 | ||||
| 025 | FUZE, ALL TYPES | 26,088 | 26,088 | ||||
| 027 | AMMO MODERNIZATION | 14,660 | 14,660 | ||||
| 028 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 8,569 | 8,569 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | 664,368 | 664,368 | |||||
| SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY | |||||||
| FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE SHIPS | |||||||
| 001 | OHIO REPLACEMENT SUBMARINE ADVANCE PROCUREMENT | 773,138 | 0 | ||||
| Transfer to Title XIV National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund | [–773,138] | ||||||
| OTHER WARSHIPS | |||||||
| 002 | CARRIER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM | 1,291,783 | 1,291,783 | ||||
| 003 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 1,370,784 | 1,370,784 | ||||
| 004 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUBMARINE | 3,187,985 | 3,187,985 | ||||
| 005 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 1,767,234 | 1,767,234 | ||||
| 006 | CVN REFUELING OVERHAULS | 1,743,220 | 1,743,220 | ||||
| 007 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 248,599 | 248,599 | ||||
| 008 | DDG 1000 | 271,756 | 271,756 | ||||
| 009 | DDG–51 | 3,211,292 | 3,211,292 | ||||
| 011 | LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP | 1,125,625 | 1,125,625 | ||||
| AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS | |||||||
| 016 | LHA REPLACEMENT | 1,623,024 | 1,623,024 | ||||
| AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST | |||||||
| 020 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 73,079 | 73,079 | ||||
| 022 | MOORED TRAINING SHIP | 624,527 | 624,527 | ||||
| 025 | OUTFITTING | 666,158 | 666,158 | ||||
| 026 | SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR | 128,067 | 128,067 | ||||
| 027 | SERVICE CRAFT | 65,192 | 65,192 | ||||
| 028 | LCAC SLEP | 1,774 | 1,774 | ||||
| 029 | YP CRAFT MAINTENANCE/ROH/SLEP | 21,363 | 21,363 | ||||
| 030 | COMPLETION OF PY SHIPBUILDING PROGRAMS | 160,274 | 160,274 | ||||
| TOTAL SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY | 18,354,874 | 17,581,736 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| SHIP PROPULSION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 003 | SURFACE POWER EQUIPMENT | 15,514 | 15,514 | ||||
| 004 | HYBRID ELECTRIC DRIVE (HED) | 40,132 | 40,132 | ||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 005 | SURFACE COMBATANT HM&E | 29,974 | 29,974 | ||||
| NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 006 | OTHER NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT | 63,942 | 63,942 | ||||
| OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 008 | SUB PERISCOPE, IMAGING AND SUPT EQUIP PROG | 136,421 | 136,421 | ||||
| 009 | DDG MOD | 367,766 | 367,766 | ||||
| 010 | FIREFIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 14,743 | 14,743 | ||||
| 011 | COMMAND AND CONTROL SWITCHBOARD | 2,140 | 2,140 | ||||
| 012 | LHA/LHD MIDLIFE | 24,939 | 24,939 | ||||
| 014 | POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | 20,191 | 20,191 | ||||
| 015 | SUBMARINE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 8,995 | 8,995 | ||||
| 016 | VIRGINIA CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 66,838 | 66,838 | ||||
| 017 | LCS CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 54,823 | 54,823 | ||||
| 018 | SUBMARINE BATTERIES | 23,359 | 23,359 | ||||
| 019 | LPD CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 40,321 | 40,321 | ||||
| 020 | DDG 1000 CLASS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 33,404 | 33,404 | ||||
| 021 | STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP | 15,836 | 15,836 | ||||
| 022 | DSSP EQUIPMENT | 806 | 806 | ||||
| 024 | LCAC | 3,090 | 3,090 | ||||
| 025 | UNDERWATER EOD PROGRAMS | 24,350 | 24,350 | ||||
| 026 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 88,719 | 88,719 | ||||
| 027 | CHEMICAL WARFARE DETECTORS | 2,873 | 2,873 | ||||
| 028 | SUBMARINE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 6,043 | 6,043 | ||||
| REACTOR PLANT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 030 | REACTOR COMPONENTS | 342,158 | 342,158 | ||||
| OCEAN ENGINEERING | |||||||
| 031 | DIVING AND SALVAGE EQUIPMENT | 8,973 | 8,973 | ||||
| SMALL BOATS | |||||||
| 032 | STANDARD BOATS | 43,684 | 43,684 | ||||
| PRODUCTION FACILITIES EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 034 | OPERATING FORCES IPE | 75,421 | 75,421 | ||||
| OTHER SHIP SUPPORT | |||||||
| 035 | NUCLEAR ALTERATIONS | 172,718 | 172,718 | ||||
| 036 | LCS COMMON MISSION MODULES EQUIPMENT | 27,840 | 17,840 | ||||
| RMMV program restructure | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 037 | LCS MCM MISSION MODULES | 57,146 | 20,746 | ||||
| RMMV program restructure | [–36,400] | ||||||
| 038 | LCS ASW MISSION MODULES | 31,952 | 21,952 | ||||
| Early to need | [–10,000] | ||||||
| 039 | LCS SUW MISSION MODULES | 22,466 | 22,466 | ||||
| LOGISTIC SUPPORT | |||||||
| 041 | LSD MIDLIFE | 10,813 | 10,813 | ||||
| SHIP SONARS | |||||||
| 042 | SPQ–9B RADAR | 14,363 | 14,363 | ||||
| 043 | AN/SQQ–89 SURF ASW COMBAT SYSTEM | 90,029 | 90,029 | ||||
| 045 | SSN ACOUSTIC EQUIPMENT | 248,765 | 248,765 | ||||
| 046 | UNDERSEA WARFARE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 7,163 | 7,163 | ||||
| ASW ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 048 | SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE SYSTEM | 21,291 | 21,291 | ||||
| 049 | SSTD | 6,893 | 6,893 | ||||
| 050 | FIXED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 145,701 | 145,701 | ||||
| 051 | SURTASS | 36,136 | 36,136 | ||||
| ELECTRONIC WARFARE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 053 | AN/SLQ–32 | 274,892 | 274,892 | ||||
| RECONNAISSANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 054 | SHIPBOARD IW EXPLOIT | 170,733 | 170,733 | ||||
| 055 | AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) | 958 | 958 | ||||
| OTHER SHIP ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 057 | COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY | 22,034 | 22,034 | ||||
| 059 | NAVAL TACTICAL COMMAND SUPPORT SYSTEM (NTCSS) | 12,336 | 12,336 | ||||
| 060 | ATDLS | 30,105 | 30,105 | ||||
| 061 | NAVY COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NCCS) | 4,556 | 4,556 | ||||
| 062 | MINESWEEPING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT | 56,675 | 56,675 | ||||
| 063 | SHALLOW WATER MCM | 8,875 | 8,875 | ||||
| 064 | NAVSTAR GPS RECEIVERS (SPACE) | 12,752 | 12,752 | ||||
| 065 | AMERICAN FORCES RADIO AND TV SERVICE | 4,577 | 4,577 | ||||
| 066 | STRATEGIC PLATFORM SUPPORT EQUIP | 8,972 | 8,972 | ||||
| AVIATION ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 069 | ASHORE ATC EQUIPMENT | 75,068 | 75,068 | ||||
| 070 | AFLOAT ATC EQUIPMENT | 33,484 | 33,484 | ||||
| 076 | ID SYSTEMS | 22,177 | 22,177 | ||||
| 077 | NAVAL MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 14,273 | 14,273 | ||||
| OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 080 | TACTICAL/MOBILE C4I SYSTEMS | 27,927 | 27,927 | ||||
| 081 | DCGS-N | 12,676 | 12,676 | ||||
| 082 | CANES | 212,030 | 212,030 | ||||
| 083 | RADIAC | 8,092 | 8,092 | ||||
| 084 | CANES-INTELL | 36,013 | 36,013 | ||||
| 085 | GPETE | 6,428 | 6,428 | ||||
| 087 | INTEG COMBAT SYSTEM TEST FACILITY | 8,376 | 8,376 | ||||
| 088 | EMI CONTROL INSTRUMENTATION | 3,971 | 3,971 | ||||
| 089 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 58,721 | 58,721 | ||||
| SHIPBOARD COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 090 | SHIPBOARD TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS | 17,366 | 17,366 | ||||
| 091 | SHIP COMMUNICATIONS AUTOMATION | 102,479 | 102,479 | ||||
| 092 | COMMUNICATIONS ITEMS UNDER $5M | 10,403 | 10,403 | ||||
| SUBMARINE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 093 | SUBMARINE BROADCAST SUPPORT | 34,151 | 34,151 | ||||
| 094 | SUBMARINE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT | 64,529 | 64,529 | ||||
| SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 095 | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 14,414 | 14,414 | ||||
| 096 | NAVY MULTIBAND TERMINAL (NMT) | 38,365 | 38,365 | ||||
| SHORE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 097 | JCS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT | 4,156 | 4,156 | ||||
| CRYPTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 099 | INFO SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) | 85,694 | 85,694 | ||||
| 100 | MIO INTEL EXPLOITATION TEAM | 920 | 920 | ||||
| CRYPTOLOGIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 101 | CRYPTOLOGIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP | 21,098 | 21,098 | ||||
| OTHER ELECTRONIC SUPPORT | |||||||
| 102 | COAST GUARD EQUIPMENT | 32,291 | 32,291 | ||||
| SONOBUOYS | |||||||
| 103 | SONOBUOYS—ALL TYPES | 162,588 | 162,588 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 104 | WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 58,116 | 58,116 | ||||
| 105 | AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 120,324 | 120,324 | ||||
| 106 | METEOROLOGICAL EQUIPMENT | 29,253 | 29,253 | ||||
| 107 | DCRS/DPL | 632 | 632 | ||||
| 108 | AIRBORNE MINE COUNTERMEASURES | 29,097 | 29,097 | ||||
| 109 | AVIATION SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 39,099 | 39,099 | ||||
| SHIP GUN SYSTEM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 110 | SHIP GUN SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT | 6,191 | 6,191 | ||||
| SHIP MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 111 | SHIP MISSILE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 320,446 | 310,946 | ||||
| Program execution | [–9,500] | ||||||
| 112 | TOMAHAWK SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 71,046 | 71,046 | ||||
| FBM SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 113 | STRATEGIC MISSILE SYSTEMS EQUIP | 215,138 | 215,138 | ||||
| ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 114 | SSN COMBAT CONTROL SYSTEMS | 130,715 | 130,715 | ||||
| 115 | ASW SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 26,431 | 26,431 | ||||
| OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 116 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP | 11,821 | 11,821 | ||||
| 117 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 6,243 | 6,243 | ||||
| OTHER EXPENDABLE ORDNANCE | |||||||
| 118 | SUBMARINE TRAINING DEVICE MODS | 48,020 | 48,020 | ||||
| 120 | SURFACE TRAINING EQUIPMENT | 97,514 | 97,514 | ||||
| CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 121 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 8,853 | 8,853 | ||||
| 122 | GENERAL PURPOSE TRUCKS | 4,928 | 4,928 | ||||
| 123 | CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE EQUIP | 18,527 | 18,527 | ||||
| 124 | FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 13,569 | 13,569 | ||||
| 125 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 14,917 | 14,917 | ||||
| 126 | AMPHIBIOUS EQUIPMENT | 7,676 | 7,676 | ||||
| 127 | POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT | 2,321 | 2,321 | ||||
| 128 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION | 12,459 | 12,459 | ||||
| 129 | PHYSICAL SECURITY VEHICLES | 1,095 | 1,095 | ||||
| SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 131 | SUPPLY EQUIPMENT | 16,023 | 16,023 | ||||
| 133 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 5,115 | 5,115 | ||||
| 134 | SPECIAL PURPOSE SUPPLY SYSTEMS | 295,471 | 295,471 | ||||
| TRAINING DEVICES | |||||||
| 136 | TRAINING AND EDUCATION EQUIPMENT | 9,504 | 9,504 | ||||
| COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 137 | COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 37,180 | 37,180 | ||||
| 139 | MEDICAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 4,128 | 4,128 | ||||
| 141 | NAVAL MIP SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 1,925 | 1,925 | ||||
| 142 | OPERATING FORCES SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 4,777 | 4,777 | ||||
| 143 | C4ISR EQUIPMENT | 9,073 | 9,073 | ||||
| 144 | ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 21,107 | 21,107 | ||||
| 145 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 100,906 | 100,906 | ||||
| 146 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 67,544 | 67,544 | ||||
| OTHER | |||||||
| 150 | NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE SERVICE | 98,216 | 98,216 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 150A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 9,915 | 9,915 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 151 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 199,660 | 199,660 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 6,338,861 | 6,272,961 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | AAV7A1 PIP | 73,785 | 73,785 | ||||
| 002 | LAV PIP | 53,423 | 53,423 | ||||
| ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS | |||||||
| 003 | EXPEDITIONARY FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 3,360 | 3,360 | ||||
| 004 | 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER | 3,318 | 3,318 | ||||
| 005 | HIGH MOBILITY ARTILLERY ROCKET SYSTEM | 33,725 | 33,725 | ||||
| 006 | WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION | 8,181 | 8,181 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 007 | MODIFICATION KITS | 15,250 | 15,250 | ||||
| GUIDED MISSILES | |||||||
| 009 | GROUND BASED AIR DEFENSE | 9,170 | 9,170 | ||||
| 010 | JAVELIN | 1,009 | 1,009 | ||||
| 011 | FOLLOW ON TO SMAW | 24,666 | 24,666 | ||||
| 012 | ANTI-ARMOR WEAPONS SYSTEM-HEAVY (AAWS-H) | 17,080 | 17,080 | ||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 015 | COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (C | 47,312 | 47,312 | ||||
| REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 016 | REPAIR AND TEST EQUIPMENT | 16,469 | 16,469 | ||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 019 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) | 7,433 | 7,433 | ||||
| 020 | AIR OPERATIONS C2 SYSTEMS | 15,917 | 15,917 | ||||
| RADAR + EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 021 | RADAR SYSTEMS | 17,772 | 17,772 | ||||
| 022 | GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) | 123,758 | 123,758 | ||||
| 023 | RQ–21 UAS | 80,217 | 80,217 | ||||
| INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 024 | GCSS-MC | 1,089 | 1,089 | ||||
| 025 | FIRE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 13,258 | 13,258 | ||||
| 026 | INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 56,379 | 56,379 | ||||
| 029 | RQ–11 UAV | 1,976 | 1,976 | ||||
| 031 | DCGS-MC | 1,149 | 1,149 | ||||
| 032 | UAS PAYLOADS | 2,971 | 2,971 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 034 | NEXT GENERATION ENTERPRISE NETWORK (NGEN) | 76,302 | 76,302 | ||||
| 035 | COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES | 41,802 | 41,802 | ||||
| 036 | COMMAND POST SYSTEMS | 90,924 | 90,924 | ||||
| 037 | RADIO SYSTEMS | 43,714 | 43,714 | ||||
| 038 | COMM SWITCHING & CONTROL SYSTEMS | 66,383 | 66,383 | ||||
| 039 | COMM & ELEC INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT | 30,229 | 30,229 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 039A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 2,738 | 2,738 | ||||
| ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 041 | COMMERCIAL CARGO VEHICLES | 88,312 | 88,312 | ||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 043 | MOTOR TRANSPORT MODIFICATIONS | 13,292 | 13,292 | ||||
| 045 | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE | 113,230 | 113,230 | ||||
| 046 | FAMILY OF TACTICAL TRAILERS | 2,691 | 2,691 | ||||
| ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 048 | ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL EQUIP ASSORT | 18 | 18 | ||||
| 050 | TACTICAL FUEL SYSTEMS | 78 | 78 | ||||
| 051 | POWER EQUIPMENT ASSORTED | 17,973 | 17,973 | ||||
| 052 | AMPHIBIOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 7,371 | 7,371 | ||||
| 053 | EOD SYSTEMS | 14,021 | 14,021 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 054 | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 31,523 | 31,523 | ||||
| GENERAL PROPERTY | |||||||
| 058 | TRAINING DEVICES | 33,658 | 33,658 | ||||
| 060 | FAMILY OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | 21,315 | 21,315 | ||||
| 061 | FAMILY OF INTERNALLY TRANSPORTABLE VEH (ITV) | 9,654 | 9,654 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT | |||||||
| 062 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 6,026 | 6,026 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 064 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 22,848 | 22,848 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | 1,362,769 | 1,362,769 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL FORCES | |||||||
| 001 | F–35 | 4,401,894 | 4,401,894 | ||||
| 002 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 404,500 | 404,500 | ||||
| TACTICAL AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 003 | KC–46A TANKER | 2,884,591 | 2,884,591 | ||||
| OTHER AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 004 | C–130J | 145,655 | 145,655 | ||||
| 006 | HC–130J | 317,576 | 317,576 | ||||
| 007 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||
| 008 | MC–130J | 548,358 | 548,358 | ||||
| 009 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||||
| HELICOPTERS | |||||||
| 010 | UH–1N REPLACEMENT | 18,337 | 18,337 | ||||
| MISSION SUPPORT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 012 | CIVIL AIR PATROL A/C | 2,637 | 2,637 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 013 | TARGET DRONES | 114,656 | 114,656 | ||||
| 014 | RQ–4 | 12,966 | 12,966 | ||||
| 015 | MQ–9 | 122,522 | 122,522 | ||||
| STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 016 | B–2A | 46,729 | 46,729 | ||||
| 017 | B–1B | 116,319 | 116,319 | ||||
| 018 | B–52 | 109,020 | 109,020 | ||||
| TACTICAL AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 020 | A–10 | 1,289 | 1,289 | ||||
| 021 | F–15 | 105,685 | 105,685 | ||||
| 022 | F–16 | 97,331 | 97,331 | ||||
| 023 | F–22A | 163,008 | 163,008 | ||||
| 024 | F–35 MODIFICATIONS | 175,811 | 175,811 | ||||
| 025 | INCREMENT 3.2B | 76,410 | 76,410 | ||||
| 026 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 027 | C–5 | 24,192 | 24,192 | ||||
| 029 | C–17A | 21,555 | 21,555 | ||||
| 030 | C–21 | 5,439 | 5,439 | ||||
| 031 | C–32A | 35,235 | 35,235 | ||||
| 032 | C–37A | 5,004 | 5,004 | ||||
| TRAINER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 033 | GLIDER MODS | 394 | 394 | ||||
| 034 | T–6 | 12,765 | 12,765 | ||||
| 035 | T–1 | 25,073 | 25,073 | ||||
| 036 | T–38 | 45,090 | 45,090 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 037 | U–2 MODS | 36,074 | 36,074 | ||||
| 038 | KC–10A (ATCA) | 4,570 | 4,570 | ||||
| 039 | C–12 | 1,995 | 1,995 | ||||
| 040 | VC–25A MOD | 102,670 | 102,670 | ||||
| 041 | C–40 | 13,984 | 13,984 | ||||
| 042 | C–130 | 9,168 | 81,668 | ||||
| 8–Bladed Propellers | [16,000] | ||||||
| Electronic Propeller Control Systems | [13,500] | ||||||
| In-flight Propeller Balancing System Certification | [1,500] | ||||||
| T56 3.5 Engine Upgrade Kits | [41,500] | ||||||
| 043 | C–130J MODS | 89,424 | 89,424 | ||||
| 044 | C–135 | 64,161 | 64,161 | ||||
| 045 | COMPASS CALL MODS | 130,257 | 59,857 | ||||
| Program restructure | [–70,400] | ||||||
| 046 | RC–135 | 211,438 | 211,438 | ||||
| 047 | E–3 | 82,786 | 82,786 | ||||
| 048 | E–4 | 53,348 | 53,348 | ||||
| 049 | E–8 | 6,244 | 6,244 | ||||
| 050 | AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 223,427 | 223,427 | ||||
| 051 | FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS | 4,673 | 4,673 | ||||
| 052 | H–1 | 9,007 | 9,007 | ||||
| 054 | H–60 | 91,357 | 91,357 | ||||
| 055 | RQ–4 MODS | 32,045 | 32,045 | ||||
| 056 | HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS | 30,767 | 30,767 | ||||
| 057 | OTHER AIRCRAFT | 33,886 | 33,886 | ||||
| 059 | MQ–9 MODS | 141,929 | 141,929 | ||||
| 060 | CV–22 MODS | 63,395 | 63,395 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 061 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 686,491 | 673,291 | ||||
| Compass Call program restructure | [–13,200] | ||||||
| COMMON SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 062 | AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT SUPPORT EQUIP | 121,935 | 121,935 | ||||
| POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT | |||||||
| 063 | B–2A | 154 | 154 | ||||
| 064 | B–2A | 43,330 | 43,330 | ||||
| 065 | B–52 | 28,125 | 28,125 | ||||
| 066 | C–17A | 23,559 | 23,559 | ||||
| 069 | F–15 | 2,980 | 2,980 | ||||
| 070 | F–16 | 15,155 | 39,955 | ||||
| Additional mission trainers | [24,800] | ||||||
| 071 | F–22A | 48,505 | 48,505 | ||||
| 074 | RQ–4 POST PRODUCTION CHARGES | 99 | 99 | ||||
| INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | |||||||
| 075 | INDUSTRIAL RESPONSIVENESS | 14,126 | 14,126 | ||||
| WAR CONSUMABLES | |||||||
| 076 | WAR CONSUMABLES | 120,036 | 120,036 | ||||
| OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | |||||||
| 077 | OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | 1,252,824 | 1,252,824 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 077A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 16,952 | 16,952 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 13,922,917 | 13,936,617 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT—BALLISTIC | |||||||
| 001 | MISSILE REPLACEMENT EQ-BALLISTIC | 70,247 | 70,247 | ||||
| TACTICAL | |||||||
| 002 | JOINT AIR-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE | 431,645 | 431,645 | ||||
| 003 | LRASM0 | 59,511 | 59,511 | ||||
| 004 | SIDEWINDER (AIM–9X) | 127,438 | 127,438 | ||||
| 005 | AMRAAM | 350,144 | 350,144 | ||||
| 006 | PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE | 33,955 | 33,955 | ||||
| 007 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB | 92,361 | 92,361 | ||||
| INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | |||||||
| 008 | INDUSTR'L PREPAREDNS/POL PREVENTION | 977 | 977 | ||||
| CLASS IV | |||||||
| 009 | ICBM FUZE MOD | 17,095 | 17,095 | ||||
| 010 | MM III MODIFICATIONS | 68,692 | 68,692 | ||||
| 011 | AGM–65D MAVERICK | 282 | 282 | ||||
| 013 | AIR LAUNCH CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) | 21,762 | 21,762 | ||||
| 014 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB | 15,349 | 15,349 | ||||
| MISSILE SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 015 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 81,607 | 81,607 | ||||
| SPECIAL PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 030 | SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAMS | 46,125 | 46,125 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 030A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,009,431 | 1,009,431 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 2,426,621 | 2,426,621 | |||||
| SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| SPACE PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 001 | ADVANCED EHF | 645,569 | 645,569 | ||||
| 002 | AF SATELLITE COMM SYSTEM | 42,375 | 42,375 | ||||
| 003 | COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS | 26,984 | 26,984 | ||||
| 004 | FAMILY OF BEYOND LINE-OF-SIGHT TERMINALS | 88,963 | 88,963 | ||||
| 005 | WIDEBAND GAPFILLER SATELLITES(SPACE) | 86,272 | 116,272 | ||||
| Pilot Program | [30,000] | ||||||
| 006 | GPS III SPACE SEGMENT | 34,059 | 34,059 | ||||
| 007 | GLOBAL POSTIONING (SPACE) | 2,169 | 2,169 | ||||
| 008 | SPACEBORNE EQUIP (COMSEC) | 46,708 | 46,708 | ||||
| 009 | GLOBAL POSITIONING (SPACE) | 13,171 | 10,271 | ||||
| Excess to Need | [–2,900] | ||||||
| 010 | MILSATCOM | 41,799 | 41,799 | ||||
| 011 | EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH CAPABILITY | 768,586 | 768,586 | ||||
| 012 | EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEH(SPACE) | 737,853 | 737,853 | ||||
| 013 | SBIR HIGH (SPACE) | 362,504 | 362,504 | ||||
| 014 | NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM | 4,395 | 4,395 | ||||
| 015 | SPACE MODS | 8,642 | 8,642 | ||||
| 016 | SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM SPACE | 123,088 | 123,088 | ||||
| SSPARES | |||||||
| 017 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 22,606 | 22,606 | ||||
| TOTAL SPACE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 3,055,743 | 3,082,843 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 001 | ROCKETS | 18,734 | 18,734 | ||||
| CARTRIDGES | |||||||
| 002 | CARTRIDGES | 220,237 | 220,237 | ||||
| BOMBS | |||||||
| 003 | PRACTICE BOMBS | 97,106 | 97,106 | ||||
| 004 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 581,561 | 581,561 | ||||
| 005 | MASSIVE ORDNANCE PENETRATOR (MOP) | 3,600 | 3,600 | ||||
| 006 | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 303,988 | 303,988 | ||||
| OTHER ITEMS | |||||||
| 007 | CAD/PAD | 38,890 | 38,890 | ||||
| 008 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL (EOD) | 5,714 | 5,714 | ||||
| 009 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 740 | 740 | ||||
| 010 | MODIFICATIONS | 573 | 573 | ||||
| 011 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 5,156 | 5,156 | ||||
| FLARES | |||||||
| 012 | FLARES | 134,709 | 134,709 | ||||
| FUZES | |||||||
| 013 | FUZES | 229,252 | 229,252 | ||||
| SMALL ARMS | |||||||
| 014 | SMALL ARMS | 37,459 | 37,459 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | 1,677,719 | 1,677,719 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 14,437 | 14,437 | ||||
| CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | |||||||
| 002 | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE | 24,812 | 24,812 | ||||
| 003 | CAP VEHICLES | 984 | 984 | ||||
| 004 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 11,191 | 11,191 | ||||
| SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 005 | SECURITY AND TACTICAL VEHICLES | 5,361 | 5,361 | ||||
| 006 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 4,623 | 4,623 | ||||
| FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 007 | FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES | 12,451 | 7,451 | ||||
| Program reduction | [–5,000] | ||||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 008 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 18,114 | 18,114 | ||||
| BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 009 | RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP | 2,310 | 2,310 | ||||
| 010 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 46,868 | 46,868 | ||||
| COMM SECURITY EQUIPMENT(COMSEC) | |||||||
| 012 | COMSEC EQUIPMENT | 72,359 | 72,359 | ||||
| INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 014 | INTELLIGENCE TRAINING EQUIPMENT | 6,982 | 6,982 | ||||
| 015 | INTELLIGENCE COMM EQUIPMENT | 30,504 | 30,504 | ||||
| ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 016 | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS | 55,803 | 55,803 | ||||
| 017 | NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM | 2,673 | 2,673 | ||||
| 018 | BATTLE CONTROL SYSTEM—FIXED | 5,677 | 5,677 | ||||
| 019 | THEATER AIR CONTROL SYS IMPROVEMENTS | 1,163 | 1,163 | ||||
| 020 | WEATHER OBSERVATION FORECAST | 21,667 | 21,667 | ||||
| 021 | STRATEGIC COMMAND AND CONTROL | 39,803 | 39,803 | ||||
| 022 | CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN COMPLEX | 24,618 | 24,618 | ||||
| 023 | MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 15,868 | 15,868 | ||||
| 025 | INTEGRATED STRAT PLAN & ANALY NETWORK (ISPAN) | 9,331 | 9,331 | ||||
| SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS | |||||||
| 026 | GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 41,779 | 41,779 | ||||
| 027 | AF GLOBAL COMMAND & CONTROL SYS | 15,729 | 15,729 | ||||
| 028 | MOBILITY COMMAND AND CONTROL | 9,814 | 9,814 | ||||
| 029 | AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM | 99,460 | 99,460 | ||||
| 030 | COMBAT TRAINING RANGES | 34,850 | 34,850 | ||||
| 031 | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMM N | 198,925 | 198,925 | ||||
| 032 | WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE (WAS) | 6,943 | 6,943 | ||||
| 033 | C3 COUNTERMEASURES | 19,580 | 19,580 | ||||
| 034 | GCSS-AF FOS | 1,743 | 1,743 | ||||
| 036 | THEATER BATTLE MGT C2 SYSTEM | 9,659 | 9,659 | ||||
| 037 | AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CTR-WPN SYS | 15,474 | 15,474 | ||||
| 038 | AIR OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) 10.2 | 30,623 | 30,623 | ||||
| AIR FORCE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 039 | INFORMATION TRANSPORT SYSTEMS | 40,043 | 40,043 | ||||
| 040 | AFNET | 146,897 | 146,897 | ||||
| 041 | JOINT COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ELEMENT (JCSE) | 5,182 | 5,182 | ||||
| 042 | USCENTCOM | 13,418 | 13,418 | ||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BASE | |||||||
| 052 | TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT | 109,836 | 109,836 | ||||
| 053 | RADIO EQUIPMENT | 16,266 | 16,266 | ||||
| 054 | CCTV/AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT | 7,449 | 7,449 | ||||
| 055 | BASE COMM INFRASTRUCTURE | 109,215 | 109,215 | ||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 056 | COMM ELECT MODS | 65,700 | 65,700 | ||||
| PERSONAL SAFETY & RESCUE EQUIP | |||||||
| 058 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 54,416 | 54,416 | ||||
| DEPOT PLANT+MTRLS HANDLING EQ | |||||||
| 059 | MECHANIZED MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIP | 7,344 | 7,344 | ||||
| BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 060 | BASE PROCURED EQUIPMENT | 6,852 | 11,852 | ||||
| Program increase | [5,000] | ||||||
| 063 | MOBILITY EQUIPMENT | 8,146 | 8,146 | ||||
| 064 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 28,427 | 28,427 | ||||
| SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS | |||||||
| 066 | DARP RC135 | 25,287 | 25,287 | ||||
| 067 | DCGS-AF | 169,201 | 169,201 | ||||
| 069 | SPECIAL UPDATE PROGRAM | 576,710 | 576,710 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 070A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 15,119,705 | 15,119,705 | ||||
| SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 072 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 15,784 | 15,784 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 17,438,056 | 17,438,056 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS | |||||||
| 037 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, OSD | 29,211 | 29,211 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, NSA | |||||||
| 036 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM (ISSP) | 4,399 | 4,399 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS | |||||||
| 040 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, WHS | 24,979 | 24,979 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA | |||||||
| 006 | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY | 21,347 | 21,347 | ||||
| 007 | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 50,597 | 50,597 | ||||
| 008 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 10,420 | 10,420 | ||||
| 009 | NET CENTRIC ENTERPRISE SERVICES (NCES) | 1,634 | 1,634 | ||||
| 010 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK | 87,235 | 87,235 | ||||
| 011 | CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE | 4,528 | 4,528 | ||||
| 012 | WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATION AGENCY | 36,846 | 36,846 | ||||
| 013 | SENIOR LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE | 599,391 | 599,391 | ||||
| 015 | JOINT REGIONAL SECURITY STACKS (JRSS) | 150,221 | 150,221 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DLA | |||||||
| 017 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 2,055 | 2,055 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DSS | |||||||
| 020 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 1,057 | 1,057 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCAA | |||||||
| 001 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 2,964 | 2,964 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS | |||||||
| 038 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT, TJS | 7,988 | 7,988 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY | |||||||
| 023 | THAAD | 369,608 | 369,608 | ||||
| 024 | AEGIS BMD | 463,801 | 528,801 | ||||
| Increasing BMD capability for Aegis Ships | [65,000] | ||||||
| 025 | BMDS AN/TPY–2 RADARS | 5,503 | 5,503 | ||||
| 026 | ARROW UPPER TIER | 120,000 | |||||
| Increase for Arrow 3 Coproduction subject to Title XVI | [120,000] | ||||||
| 027 | DAVID'S SLING | 150,000 | |||||
| Increase for DSWS Coproduction subject to Title XVI | [150,000] | ||||||
| 028 | AEGIS ASHORE PHASE III | 57,493 | 82,493 | ||||
| Classified adjustment | [25,000] | ||||||
| 029 | IRON DOME | 42,000 | 62,000 | ||||
| Increase for Coproduction of Iron Dome Tamir Interceptors subject to Title XVI | [20,000] | ||||||
| 030 | AEGIS BMD HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | 50,098 | 50,098 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DHRA | |||||||
| 003 | PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION | 14,232 | 14,232 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | |||||||
| 021 | VEHICLES | 200 | 200 | ||||
| 022 | OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 6,437 | 6,437 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DODEA | |||||||
| 019 | AUTOMATION/EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT & LOGISTICS | 288 | 288 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DCMA | |||||||
| 002 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 92 | 92 | ||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DMACT | |||||||
| 018 | MAJOR EQUIPMENT | 8,060 | 8,060 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 040A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 568,864 | 568,864 | ||||
| AVIATION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 042 | ROTARY WING UPGRADES AND SUSTAINMENT | 150,396 | 168,996 | ||||
| Program increase | [18,600] | ||||||
| 043 | UNMANNED ISR | 21,190 | 21,190 | ||||
| 045 | NON-STANDARD AVIATION | 4,905 | 4,905 | ||||
| 046 | U–28 | 3,970 | 3,970 | ||||
| 047 | MH–47 CHINOOK | 25,022 | 25,022 | ||||
| 049 | CV–22 MODIFICATION | 19,008 | 19,008 | ||||
| 051 | MQ–9 UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE | 10,598 | 10,598 | ||||
| 053 | PRECISION STRIKE PACKAGE | 213,122 | 213,122 | ||||
| 054 | AC/MC–130J | 73,548 | 85,648 | ||||
| A-kits for 105mm integration | [12,100] | ||||||
| 055 | C–130 MODIFICATIONS | 32,970 | 32,970 | ||||
| SHIPBUILDING | |||||||
| 056 | UNDERWATER SYSTEMS | 37,098 | 37,098 | ||||
| AMMUNITION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 057 | ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M | 105,267 | 105,267 | ||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 058 | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | 79,963 | 79,963 | ||||
| 059 | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 13,432 | 13,432 | ||||
| 060 | OTHER ITEMS <$5M | 66,436 | 66,436 | ||||
| 061 | COMBATANT CRAFT SYSTEMS | 55,820 | 55,820 | ||||
| 062 | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 107,432 | 107,432 | ||||
| 063 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 67,849 | 67,849 | ||||
| 064 | WARRIOR SYSTEMS <$5M | 245,781 | 245,781 | ||||
| 065 | COMBAT MISSION REQUIREMENTS | 19,566 | 19,566 | ||||
| 066 | GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES | 3,437 | 3,437 | ||||
| 067 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 17,299 | 17,299 | ||||
| 069 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 219,945 | 219,945 | ||||
| CBDP | |||||||
| 070 | CHEMICAL BIOLOGICAL SITUATIONAL AWARENESS | 148,203 | 148,203 | ||||
| 071 | CB PROTECTION & HAZARD MITIGATION | 161,113 | 161,113 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | 4,524,918 | 4,935,618 | |||||
| JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | |||||||
| JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | |||||||
| 001 | JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | 99,300 | 0 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–99,300] | ||||||
| TOTAL JOINT URGENT OPERATIONAL NEEDS FUND | 99,300 | <bold>0</bold> | |||||
| NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 007 | MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT | 250,000 | |||||
| Program increase | [250,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT | 250,000 | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT | 101,971,592 | 103,062,309 | |||||
| SEC. 4102. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | ||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 015 | MULTI SENSOR ABN RECON (MIP) | 21,400 | 21,400 | ||||
| 020 | EMARSS SEMA MODS (MIP) | 42,700 | 42,700 | ||||
| 026 | RQ–7 UAV MODS | 1,775 | 1,775 | ||||
| 027 | UAS MODS | 4,420 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–4,420] | ||||||
| GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS | |||||||
| 030 | CMWS | 56,115 | 56,115 | ||||
| 031 | CIRCM | 108,721 | 108,721 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 235,131 | 230,711 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 004 | HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY | 305,830 | 305,830 | ||||
| ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS | |||||||
| 007 | JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY | 15,567 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–15,567] | ||||||
| 008 | TOW 2 SYSTEM SUMMARY | 80,652 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–80,652] | ||||||
| 010 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 75,991 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–75,991] | ||||||
| 012 | LETHAL MINIATURE AERIAL MISSILE SYSTEM (LMAMS | 4,777 | 4,777 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 482,817 | 310,607 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | |||||||
| MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 007 | PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) | 125,184 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–125,184] | ||||||
| 009 | ASSAULT BRIDGE (MOD) | 5,950 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–5,950] | ||||||
| 014 | ABRAMS UPGRADE PROGRAM | 0 | |||||
| Army requested realignment (ERI) | [172,200] | ||||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–172,200] | ||||||
| WEAPONS & OTHER COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 017 | MORTAR SYSTEMS | 22,410 | 22,410 | ||||
| SUPPORT EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 036 | BRADLEY PROGRAM | 0 | |||||
| Army requested realignment (ERI) | [72,800] | ||||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–72,800] | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | 153,544 | 22,410 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | |||||||
| SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 002 | CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES | 9,642 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–9,642] | ||||||
| 004 | CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES | 6,607 | 609 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–5,998] | ||||||
| 005 | CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES | 1,077 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–1,077] | ||||||
| 006 | CTG, 25MM, ALL TYPES | 28,534 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–28,534] | ||||||
| 007 | CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||||
| 008 | CTG, 40MM, ALL TYPES | 7,423 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–7,423] | ||||||
| MORTAR AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 009 | 60MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||
| 010 | 81MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 2,677 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–2,677] | ||||||
| TANK AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 012 | CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES | 8,999 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–8,999] | ||||||
| ARTILLERY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 014 | ARTILLERY PROJECTILE, 155MM, ALL TYPES | 30,348 | 10,000 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–20,348] | ||||||
| 015 | PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 | 140 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–140] | ||||||
| 016 | ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL | 29,655 | 5,000 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–24,655] | ||||||
| MINES | |||||||
| 017 | MINES & CLEARING CHARGES, ALL TYPES | 16,866 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–16,866] | ||||||
| NETWORKED MUNITIONS | |||||||
| 018 | SPIDER NETWORK MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 10,353 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–10,353] | ||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 019 | SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 63,210 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–63,210] | ||||||
| 020 | ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES | 42,851 | 42,851 | ||||
| OTHER AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 022 | DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 6,373 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–6,373] | ||||||
| 023 | GRENADES, ALL TYPES | 4,143 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–4,143] | ||||||
| 024 | SIGNALS, ALL TYPES | 1,852 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–1,852] | ||||||
| MISCELLANEOUS | |||||||
| 027 | NON-LETHAL AMMUNITION, ALL TYPES | 773 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–773] | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | 301,523 | 88,460 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 002 | SEMITRAILERS, FLATBED: | 4,180 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–4,180] | ||||||
| 008 | FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) | 147,476 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–147,476] | ||||||
| 010 | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES (FHTV) | 6,122 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–6,122] | ||||||
| 011 | PLS ESP | 106,358 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–106,358] | ||||||
| 012 | HVY EXPANDED MOBILE TACTICAL TRUCK EXT SERV | 203,766 | 127,205 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–76,561] | ||||||
| 013 | TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLE PROTECTION KITS | 101,154 | 74,035 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–27,119] | ||||||
| 014 | MODIFICATION OF IN SVC EQUIP | 155,456 | 152,000 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–3,456] | ||||||
| COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 019 | WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK | 9,572 | 3,000 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–6,572] | ||||||
| COMM—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 025 | SHF TERM | 24,000 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–24,000] | ||||||
| COMM—INTELLIGENCE COMM | |||||||
| 047 | CI AUTOMATION ARCHITECTURE | 1,550 | 1,550 | ||||
| INFORMATION SECURITY | |||||||
| 051 | COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY (COMSEC) | 1,928 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–1,928] | ||||||
| COMM—BASE COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 056 | INSTALLATION INFO INFRASTRUCTURE MOD PROGRAM | 20,510 | 20,510 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACT INT REL ACT (TIARA) | |||||||
| 062 | DCGS-A (MIP) | 33,032 | 33,032 | ||||
| 064 | TROJAN (MIP) | 3,305 | 3,145 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–160] | ||||||
| 066 | CI HUMINT AUTO REPRTING AND COLL(CHARCS) | 7,233 | 7,233 | ||||
| 069 | BIOMETRIC TACTICAL COLLECTION DEVICES (MIP) | 5,670 | 5,670 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) | |||||||
| 070 | LIGHTWEIGHT COUNTER MORTAR RADAR | 25,892 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–25,892] | ||||||
| 074 | FAMILY OF PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIE | 11,610 | 11,610 | ||||
| 075 | COUNTERINTELLIGENCE/SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES | 23,890 | 23,890 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) | |||||||
| 080 | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS | 4,270 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–4,270] | ||||||
| 089 | MORTAR FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM | 2,572 | 2,282 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–290] | ||||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL C2 SYSTEMS | |||||||
| 092 | AIR & MSL DEFENSE PLANNING & CONTROL SYS | 69,958 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–69,958] | ||||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUTOMATION | |||||||
| 102 | AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING EQUIP | 9,900 | 9,900 | ||||
| ELECT EQUIP—AUDIO VISUAL SYS (A/V) | |||||||
| 108 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (SURVEYING EQUIPMENT) | 96 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–96] | ||||||
| CHEMICAL DEFENSIVE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 114 | CBRN DEFENSE | 1,841 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–1,841] | ||||||
| BRIDGING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 115 | TACTICAL BRIDGING | 26,000 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–26,000] | ||||||
| ENGINEER (NON-CONSTRUCTION) EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 124 | ROBOTICS AND APPLIQUE SYSTEMS | 268 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–268] | ||||||
| 128 | FAMILY OF BOATS AND MOTORS | 280 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–280] | ||||||
| COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 129 | HEATERS AND ECU'S | 894 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–894] | ||||||
| 134 | FORCE PROVIDER | 53,800 | 53,800 | ||||
| 135 | FIELD FEEDING EQUIPMENT | 2,665 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–2,665] | ||||||
| 136 | CARGO AERIAL DEL & PERSONNEL PARACHUTE SYSTEM | 2,400 | 2,400 | ||||
| 137 | FAMILY OF ENGR COMBAT AND CONSTRUCTION SETS | 9,789 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–9,789] | ||||||
| 138 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5M (ENG SPT) | 300 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–300] | ||||||
| PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 139 | QUALITY SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT | 4,800 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–4,800] | ||||||
| 140 | DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, PETROLEUM & WATER | 78,240 | 57,420 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–20,820] | ||||||
| MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 141 | COMBAT SUPPORT MEDICAL | 5,763 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–5,763] | ||||||
| MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 142 | MOBILE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS | 1,609 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–1,609] | ||||||
| 143 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (MAINT EQ) | 145 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–145] | ||||||
| CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 144 | GRADER, ROAD MTZD, HVY, 6X4 (CCE) | 3,047 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–3,047] | ||||||
| 148 | TRACTOR, FULL TRACKED | 4,426 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–4,426] | ||||||
| 151 | HIGH MOBILITY ENGINEER EXCAVATOR (HMEE) | 2,900 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–2,900] | ||||||
| 155 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5.0M (CONST EQUIP) | 96 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–96] | ||||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 158 | GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP | 21,861 | 1,900 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–19,961] | ||||||
| MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 160 | FAMILY OF FORKLIFTS | 846 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–846] | ||||||
| TEST MEASURE AND DIG EQUIPMENT (TMD) | |||||||
| 168 | TEST EQUIPMENT MODERNIZATION (TEMOD) | 1,140 | 0 | ||||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–1,140] | ||||||
| OTHER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 170 | RAPID EQUIPPING SOLDIER SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 8,500 | 8,500 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 1,211,110 | 599,082 | |||||
| JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND | |||||||
| NETWORK ATTACK | |||||||
| 001 | RAPID ACQUISITION AND THREAT RESPONSE | 232,200 | 207,200 | ||||
| Program decrease | [–25,000] | ||||||
| STAFF AND INFRASTRUCTURE | |||||||
| 002 | MISSION ENABLERS | 62,800 | 62,800 | ||||
| TOTAL JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND | 295,000 | 270,000 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| COMBAT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 002 | F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET | 184,912 | 184,912 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 026 | STUASL0 UAV | 70,000 | 70,000 | ||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 037 | EP–3 SERIES | 7,505 | 7,505 | ||||
| 047 | SPECIAL PROJECT AIRCRAFT | 14,869 | 14,869 | ||||
| 051 | COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT | 70,780 | 70,780 | ||||
| 059 | V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY | 8,740 | 8,740 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 063 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 1,500 | 1,500 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIP & FACILITIES | |||||||
| 065 | AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES | 524 | 524 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 358,830 | 358,830 | |||||
| WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| TACTICAL MISSILES | |||||||
| 010 | HELLFIRE | 8,600 | 8,600 | ||||
| TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 8,600 | 8,600 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | |||||||
| NAVY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 40,366 | 40,366 | ||||
| 002 | AIRBORNE ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 8,860 | 8,860 | ||||
| 006 | AIR EXPENDABLE COUNTERMEASURES | 7,060 | 7,060 | ||||
| 013 | PYROTECHNIC AND DEMOLITION | 1,122 | 1,122 | ||||
| 014 | AMMUNITION LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 3,495 | 3,495 | ||||
| MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 015 | SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION | 1,205 | 1,205 | ||||
| 017 | 40 MM, ALL TYPES | 539 | 539 | ||||
| 018 | 60MM, ALL TYPES | 909 | 909 | ||||
| 020 | 120MM, ALL TYPES | 530 | 530 | ||||
| 022 | ROCKETS, ALL TYPES | 469 | 469 | ||||
| 023 | ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES | 1,196 | 1,196 | ||||
| 024 | DEMOLITION MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 261 | 261 | ||||
| 025 | FUZE, ALL TYPES | 217 | 217 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | 66,229 | 66,229 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| OTHER SHORE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 081 | DCGS-N | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||||
| OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 116 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||||
| CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 124 | FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | 630 | 630 | ||||
| SUPPLY SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 133 | FIRST DESTINATION TRANSPORTATION | 25 | 25 | ||||
| COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 137 | COMMAND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 10,562 | 10,562 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 150A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,660 | 1,660 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 64,877 | 64,877 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS | |||||||
| 006 | WEAPONS AND COMBAT VEHICLES UNDER $5 MILLION | 572 | 572 | ||||
| GUIDED MISSILES | |||||||
| 010 | JAVELIN | 1,606 | 1,606 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (TEL) | |||||||
| 018 | MODIFICATION KITS | 2,600 | 2,600 | ||||
| COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 019 | ITEMS UNDER $5 MILLION (COMM & ELEC) | 2,200 | 2,200 | ||||
| INTELL/COMM EQUIPMENT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 026 | INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 20,981 | 20,981 | ||||
| 029 | RQ–11 UAV | 3,817 | 3,817 | ||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 035 | COMMON COMPUTER RESOURCES | 2,600 | 2,600 | ||||
| 037 | RADIO SYSTEMS | 9,563 | 9,563 | ||||
| ENGINEER AND OTHER EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 053 | EOD SYSTEMS | 75,000 | 75,000 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | 118,939 | 118,939 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| OTHER AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 004 | C–130J | 73,000 | 73,000 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 015 | MQ–9 | 273,600 | 273,600 | ||||
| STRATEGIC AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 019 | LARGE AIRCRAFT INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES | 135,801 | 135,801 | ||||
| TACTICAL AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 020 | A–10 | 23,850 | 23,850 | ||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 047 | E–3 | 6,600 | 6,600 | ||||
| 056 | HC/MC–130 MODIFICATIONS | 13,550 | 13,550 | ||||
| 057 | OTHER AIRCRAFT | 7,500 | 7,500 | ||||
| 059 | MQ–9 MODS | 112,068 | 112,068 | ||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 061 | INITIAL SPARES/REPAIR PARTS | 25,600 | 0 | ||||
| Compass Call Program Restructure | [–25,600] | ||||||
| OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | |||||||
| 077 | OTHER PRODUCTION CHARGES | 8,400 | 8,400 | ||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 679,969 | 654,369 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL | |||||||
| 006 | PREDATOR HELLFIRE MISSILE | 145,125 | 145,125 | ||||
| CLASS IV | |||||||
| 011 | AGM–65D MAVERICK | 9,720 | 9,720 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 154,845 | 154,845 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| CARTRIDGES | |||||||
| 002 | CARTRIDGES | 9,830 | 9,830 | ||||
| BOMBS | |||||||
| 004 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 7,921 | 7,921 | ||||
| 006 | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 140,126 | 140,126 | ||||
| FLARES | |||||||
| 012 | FLARES | 6,531 | 6,531 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | 164,408 | 164,408 | |||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | |||||||
| 001 | PASSENGER CARRYING VEHICLES | 2,003 | 2,003 | ||||
| CARGO AND UTILITY VEHICLES | |||||||
| 002 | MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE | 9,066 | 9,066 | ||||
| 004 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 12,264 | 12,264 | ||||
| SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES | |||||||
| 006 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 16,789 | 16,789 | ||||
| FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 007 | FIRE FIGHTING/CRASH RESCUE VEHICLES | 48,590 | 48,590 | ||||
| MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 008 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 2,366 | 2,366 | ||||
| BASE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT | |||||||
| 009 | RUNWAY SNOW REMOV & CLEANING EQUIP | 6,468 | 6,468 | ||||
| 010 | ITEMS LESS THAN $5 MILLION | 9,271 | 9,271 | ||||
| ELECTRONICS PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 016 | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL & LANDING SYS | 42,650 | 42,650 | ||||
| SPCL COMM-ELECTRONICS PROJECTS | |||||||
| 029 | AIR FORCE PHYSICAL SECURITY SYSTEM | 7,500 | 7,500 | ||||
| 033 | C3 COUNTERMEASURES | 620 | 620 | ||||
| ORGANIZATION AND BASE | |||||||
| 052 | TACTICAL C-E EQUIPMENT | 8,100 | 8,100 | ||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 056 | COMM ELECT MODS | 3,800 | 3,800 | ||||
| BASE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 061 | ENGINEERING AND EOD EQUIPMENT | 53,900 | 53,900 | ||||
| SPECIAL SUPPORT PROJECTS | |||||||
| 067 | DCGS-AF | 800 | 800 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 070A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,472,094 | 3,472,094 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 3,696,281 | 3,696,281 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA | |||||||
| 007 | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 1,900 | 1,900 | ||||
| CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 040A | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 32,482 | 32,482 | ||||
| AVIATION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 041 | MC–12 | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| 043 | UNMANNED ISR | 11,880 | 11,880 | ||||
| 046 | U–28 | 38,283 | 38,283 | ||||
| AMMUNITION PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 057 | ORDNANCE ITEMS <$5M | 52,504 | 52,504 | ||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT PROGRAMS | |||||||
| 058 | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | 22,000 | 22,000 | ||||
| 060 | OTHER ITEMS <$5M | 11,580 | 11,580 | ||||
| 062 | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 13,549 | 13,549 | ||||
| 063 | TACTICAL VEHICLES | 3,200 | 3,200 | ||||
| 069 | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 42,056 | 42,056 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | 234,434 | 234,434 | |||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT | 8,226,537 | 7,043,082 | |||||
| SEC. 4103. PROCUREMENT FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS FOR BASE REQUIREMENTS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||||
| Line | Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | ||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| FIXED WING | |||||||
| 003 | MQ–1 UAV | 95,100 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [95,100] | ||||||
| ROTARY | |||||||
| 005 | HELICOPTER, LIGHT UTILITY (LUH) | 110,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement (ARI) | [110,000] | ||||||
| 006 | AH–64 APACHE BLOCK IIIA REMAN | 78,040 | 268,040 | ||||
| Army unfunded requirement (ARI) | [190,000] | ||||||
| 007 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 72,900 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement (ARI) | [72,900] | ||||||
| 008 | UH–60 BLACKHAWK M MODEL (MYP) | 440,200 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement (ARI) | [440,200] | ||||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 017 | CH–47 CARGO HELICOPTER MODS (MYP) | 102,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement (ARI) | [102,000] | ||||||
| GROUND SUPPORT AVIONICS | |||||||
| 028 | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY EQUIPMENT | 22,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement-modernized warning system (ARI) | [22,000] | ||||||
| 029 | SURVIVABILITY CM | 28,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement-assured PNT (ARI) | [28,000] | ||||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 78,040 | 1,138,240 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSILE SYSTEM | |||||||
| 004 | HELLFIRE SYS SUMMARY | 150,000 | 150,000 | ||||
| ANTI-TANK/ASSAULT MISSILE SYS | |||||||
| 007 | JAVELIN (AAWS-M) SYSTEM SUMMARY | 104,200 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [104,200] | ||||||
| 010 | GUIDED MLRS ROCKET (GMLRS) | 76,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [76,000] | ||||||
| MODIFICATIONS | |||||||
| 014 | ATACMS MODS | 15,900 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [15,900] | ||||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 150,000 | 346,100 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | |||||||
| MODIFICATION OF TRACKED COMBAT VEHICLES | |||||||
| 008 | IMPROVED RECOVERY VEHICLE (M88A2 HERCULES) | 72,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [72,000] | ||||||
| 013 | M1 ABRAMS TANK (MOD) | 140,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement—Industrial base risk mitigation | [60,000] | ||||||
| Army unfunded requirement—Vehicle APS | [80,000] | ||||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 036A | UNDISTRIBUTED | 55,100 | |||||
| Additional funding to support increase in Army end strength | [55,100] | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF W&TCV, ARMY | 267,100 | ||||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | |||||||
| SMALL/MEDIUM CAL AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | CTG, 5.56MM, ALL TYPES | 4,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [4,000] | ||||||
| 002 | CTG, 7.62MM, ALL TYPES | 14,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [14,000] | ||||||
| 003 | CTG, HANDGUN, ALL TYPES | 9,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [9,000] | ||||||
| 004 | CTG, .50 CAL, ALL TYPES | 21,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [21,000] | ||||||
| 005 | CTG, 20MM, ALL TYPES | 14,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [14,000] | ||||||
| 007 | CTG, 30MM, ALL TYPES | 8,200 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [8,200] | ||||||
| MORTAR AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 011 | 120MM MORTAR, ALL TYPES | 30,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [30,000] | ||||||
| TANK AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 012 | CARTRIDGES, TANK, 105MM AND 120MM, ALL TYPES | 35,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [35,000] | ||||||
| ARTILLERY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 015 | PROJ 155MM EXTENDED RANGE M982 | 23,500 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [23,500] | ||||||
| 016 | ARTILLERY PROPELLANTS, FUZES AND PRIMERS, ALL | 10,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [10,000] | ||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 019 | SHOULDER LAUNCHED MUNITIONS, ALL TYPES | 30,000 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [30,000] | ||||||
| 020 | ROCKET, HYDRA 70, ALL TYPES | 42,500 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement | [27,500] | ||||||
| Army unfunded requirement- guided hydra rockets | [15,000] | ||||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 034A | UNDISTRIBUTED | 46,500 | |||||
| Additional funding to support increase in Army end strength | [46,500] | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, ARMY | 287,700 | ||||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | |||||||
| TACTICAL VEHICLES | |||||||
| 008 | FAMILY OF MEDIUM TACTICAL VEH (FMTV) | 152,000 | 152,000 | ||||
| COMM—JOINT COMMUNICATIONS | |||||||
| 019 | WIN-T—GROUND FORCES TACTICAL NETWORK | 80,000 | |||||
| BBA Restoration—2BCTs - Increment 2 | [80,000] | ||||||
| ELECT EQUIP—TACTICAL SURV. (TAC SURV) | |||||||
| 080 | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION FAMILY OF SYSTEMS | 8,400 | |||||
| Army unfunded requirement- CRAM Upgrades and MODS | [8,400] | ||||||
| GENERATORS | |||||||
| 158 | GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIP | 9,900 | 9,900 | ||||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||||||
| 180 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 18,400 | |||||
| Additional funding to support increase in Army end strength | [18,400] | ||||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, ARMY | 161,900 | 268,700 | |||||
| JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND | |||||||
| NETWORK ATTACK | |||||||
| 001 | RAPID ACQUISITION AND THREAT RESPONSE | 113,272 | 113,272 | ||||
| TOTAL JOINT IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE DEFEAT FUND | 113,272 | 113,272 | |||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| COMBAT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 002 | F/A–18E/F (FIGHTER) HORNET | 1,400,000 | |||||
| Navy unfunded requirement | [1,400,000] | ||||||
| 003 | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER CV | 540,000 | |||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement | [270,000] | ||||||
| Navy unfunded requirement | [270,000] | ||||||
| 005 | JSF STOVL | 254,200 | |||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement | [254,200] | ||||||
| 009 | V–22 (MEDIUM LIFT) | 150,000 | |||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement | [150,000] | ||||||
| 011 | H–1 UPGRADES (UH–1Y/AH–1Z) | 57,000 | |||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- AH–1Zs | [57,000] | ||||||
| AIRLIFT AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 019A | C–40A | 415,000 | |||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement | [207,500] | ||||||
| Navy unfunded requirement | [207,500] | ||||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 023 | MQ–4 TRITON | 95,000 | |||||
| Additional system—ISR shortfalls | [95,000] | ||||||
| 025 | MQ–8 UAV | 47,500 | |||||
| Scope Increase | [47,500] | ||||||
| MODIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 034 | H–53 SERIES | 16,100 | |||||
| Accelerate readiness improvement | [2,800] | ||||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- degraded visual environment | [13,300] | ||||||
| 035 | SH–60 SERIES | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||
| 036 | H–1 SERIES | 3,740 | 27,140 | ||||
| Accelerate readiness improvement | [23,400] | ||||||
| 051 | COMMON ECM EQUIPMENT | 27,460 | 27,460 | ||||
| 059 | V–22 (TILT/ROTOR ACFT) OSPREY | 39,300 | |||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- SPMAGTF- C4 UUNS | [39,300] | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | |||||||
| 063 | SPARES AND REPAIR PARTS | 140,300 | |||||
| KC–130J spares | [36,000] | ||||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- F35 B spares | [91,000] | ||||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- F35 C spares | [13,300] | ||||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 34,200 | 3,212,000 | |||||
| WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| STRATEGIC MISSILES | |||||||
| 003 | TOMAHAWK | 76,000 | |||||
| Scope Increase | [76,000] | ||||||
| TACTICAL MISSILES | |||||||
| 005 | SIDEWINDER | 33,000 | |||||
| Navy unfunded requirement | [33,000] | ||||||
| 015A | LCS OVER-THE-HORIZON MISSILE | 18,100 | |||||
| Navy unfunded requirement | [18,100] | ||||||
| TOTAL WEAPONS PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 127,100 | ||||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | |||||||
| NAVY AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 001 | GENERAL PURPOSE BOMBS | 58,000 | |||||
| Navy unfunded requirement—JDAM components | [58,000] | ||||||
| MARINE CORPS AMMUNITION | |||||||
| 023 | ARTILLERY, ALL TYPES | 19,200 | |||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- GMLRS AW munitions | [19,200] | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMO, NAVY & MC | 77,200 | ||||||
| SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY | |||||||
| OTHER WARSHIPS | |||||||
| 003 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 263,000 | |||||
| Advance Procurement for CVN–81 | [263,000] | ||||||
| 005 | ADVANCE PROCUREMENT (CY) | 85,000 | |||||
| Long-lead Time Materiel Orders | [85,000] | ||||||
| 009 | DDG–51 | 433,000 | |||||
| Scope Increase | [433,000] | ||||||
| 011 | LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP | 384,700 | |||||
| Scope Increase | [384,700] | ||||||
| AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS | |||||||
| 012A | AMPHIBIOUS SHIP REPLACEMENT LX(R) | 856,000 | |||||
| Procurement of LX (R) | [856,000] | ||||||
| AUXILIARIES, CRAFT AND PRIOR YR PROGRAM COST | |||||||
| 026 | SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR | 165,000 | |||||
| Scope Increase | [165,000] | ||||||
| 028 | LCAC SLEP | 80,300 | |||||
| Scope Increase | [80,300] | ||||||
| TOTAL SHIPBUILDING AND CONVERSION, NAVY | 2,267,000 | ||||||
| OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | |||||||
| OTHER SHIPBOARD EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 009 | DDG MOD | 65,000 | |||||
| Scope Increase | [65,000] | ||||||
| SMALL BOATS | |||||||
| 032 | STANDARD BOATS | 20,000 | |||||
| Program Acceleration | [20,000] | ||||||
| OTHER SHIP SUPPORT | |||||||
| 039A | LCS LAUNCHER | 24,900 | |||||
| Navy unfunded requirement | [24,900] | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 104 | WEAPONS RANGE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 9,000 | |||||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Barking Sands Tactical Underwater Range | [9,000] | ||||||
| OTHER ORDNANCE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | |||||||
| 116 | EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL EQUIP | 59,329 | 59,329 | ||||
| TOTAL OTHER PROCUREMENT, NAVY | 59,329 | 178,229 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | |||||||
| ARTILLERY AND OTHER WEAPONS | |||||||
| 004 | 155MM LIGHTWEIGHT TOWED HOWITZER | 14,000 | |||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- chrome tubes | [14,000] | ||||||
| OTHER SUPPORT (NON-TEL) | |||||||
| 036 | COMMAND POST SYSTEMS | 40,800 | |||||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- SPMAGTF—C4 UUNS | [40,800] | ||||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, MARINE CORPS | 54,800 | ||||||
| AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL FORCES | |||||||
| 001 | F–35 | 690,500 | |||||
| Air Force unfunded requirement | [690,500] | ||||||
| OTHER AIRLIFT | |||||||
| 004 | C–130J | 271,500 | |||||
| Scope Increase | [271,500] | ||||||
| HELICOPTERS | |||||||
| 010 | UUH–1N REPLACEMENT | 80,000 | |||||
| Program increase to address urgent need | [80,000] | ||||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 015 | MQ–9 | 179,430 | 179,430 | ||||
| 015A | EC–130H | 103,000 | |||||
| Scope increase | [103,000] | ||||||
| TACTICAL AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 020 | A–10 | 218,500 | |||||
| A–10 wing upgrades | [120,000] | ||||||
| Air Force unfunded requirement- A–10 antijam GPS | [10,300] | ||||||
| Air Force unfunded requirement- A–10 situation awareness upgrade kits | [23,200] | ||||||
| Air Force unfunded requirement- ASE radar warning receiver upgrades | [65,000] | ||||||
| 021 | F–15 | 60,400 | |||||
| Air Force unfunded requirement- ASE radar warning receiver upgrades | [60,400] | ||||||
| 022 | F–16 | 187,500 | |||||
| Air Force unfunded requirement- antijam GPS | [5,000] | ||||||
| Air Force unfunded requirement- missile warning system | [12,000] | ||||||
| Air Force unfunded requirement- radar warning receiver upgrades | [170,500] | ||||||
| OTHER AIRCRAFT | |||||||
| 049 | E–8 | 17,500 | |||||
| Additional 2 PME-DMS kits | [17,500] | ||||||
| 054 | H–60 | 70,700 | |||||
| Air Force unfunded requirement- ASE radar warning receivers | [70,700] | ||||||
| TOTAL AIRCRAFT PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 179,430 | 1,879,030 | |||||
| MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| TACTICAL | |||||||
| 007 | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB | 167,800 | 167,800 | ||||
| CLASS IV | |||||||
| 011 | AGM–65D MAVERICK | 16,900 | 16,900 | ||||
| TOTAL MISSILE PROCUREMENT, AIR FORCE | 184,700 | 184,700 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | |||||||
| ROCKETS | |||||||
| 001 | ROCKETS | 60,000 | 60,000 | ||||
| BOMBS | |||||||
| 006 | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 263,000 | 263,000 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT OF AMMUNITION, AIR FORCE | 323,000 | 323,000 | |||||
| PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||||||
| MAJOR EQUIPMENT, DISA | |||||||
| 007 | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| 016 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS NETWORK | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE | 4,000 | 4,000 | |||||
| TOTAL PROCUREMENT | 1,287,871 | 10,728,171 | |||||
| SEC. 4201. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Line | ProgramElement | Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 001 | 0601101A | IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH | 12,381 | 12,381 | |
| 002 | 0601102A | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 253,116 | 253,116 | |
| 003 | 0601103A | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 69,166 | 69,166 | |
| 004 | 0601104A | UNIVERSITY AND INDUSTRY RESEARCH CENTERS | 94,280 | 94,280 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 428,943 | 428,943 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 005 | 0602105A | MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY | 31,533 | 31,533 | |
| 006 | 0602120A | SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SURVIVABILITY | 36,109 | 36,109 | |
| 007 | 0602122A | TRACTOR HIP | 6,995 | 6,995 | |
| 008 | 0602211A | AVIATION TECHNOLOGY | 65,914 | 65,914 | |
| 009 | 0602270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY | 25,466 | 25,466 | |
| 010 | 0602303A | MISSILE TECHNOLOGY | 44,313 | 44,313 | |
| 011 | 0602307A | ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 28,803 | 28,803 | |
| 012 | 0602308A | ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND SIMULATION | 27,688 | 27,688 | |
| 013 | 0602601A | COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY | 67,959 | 67,959 | |
| 014 | 0602618A | BALLISTICS TECHNOLOGY | 85,436 | 85,436 | |
| 015 | 0602622A | CHEMICAL, SMOKE AND EQUIPMENT DEFEATING TECHNOLOGY | 3,923 | 3,923 | |
| 016 | 0602623A | JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM | 5,545 | 5,545 | |
| 017 | 0602624A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY | 53,581 | 53,581 | |
| 018 | 0602705A | ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES | 56,322 | 56,322 | |
| 019 | 0602709A | NIGHT VISION TECHNOLOGY | 36,079 | 36,079 | |
| 020 | 0602712A | COUNTERMINE SYSTEMS | 26,497 | 26,497 | |
| 021 | 0602716A | HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY | 23,671 | 23,671 | |
| 022 | 0602720A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY | 22,151 | 22,151 | |
| 023 | 0602782A | COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY | 37,803 | 37,803 | |
| 024 | 0602783A | COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY | 13,811 | 13,811 | |
| 025 | 0602784A | MILITARY ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY | 67,416 | 67,416 | |
| 026 | 0602785A | MANPOWER/PERSONNEL/TRAINING TECHNOLOGY | 26,045 | 26,045 | |
| 027 | 0602786A | WARFIGHTER TECHNOLOGY | 37,403 | 42,403 | |
| Program Increase | [5,000] | ||||
| 028 | 0602787A | MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 77,111 | 77,111 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 907,574 | 912,574 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 029 | 0603001A | WARFIGHTER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 38,831 | 38,831 | |
| 030 | 0603002A | MEDICAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 68,365 | 68,365 | |
| 031 | 0603003A | AVIATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 94,280 | 94,280 | |
| 032 | 0603004A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 68,714 | 68,714 | |
| 033 | 0603005A | COMBAT VEHICLE AND AUTOMOTIVE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 122,132 | 122,132 | |
| 034 | 0603006A | SPACE APPLICATION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 3,904 | 3,904 | |
| 035 | 0603007A | MANPOWER, PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 14,417 | 14,417 | |
| 037 | 0603009A | TRACTOR HIKE | 8,074 | 21,374 | |
| See classified annex | [13,300] | ||||
| 038 | 0603015A | NEXT GENERATION TRAINING & SIMULATION SYSTEMS | 18,969 | 18,969 | |
| 039 | 0603020A | TRACTOR ROSE | 11,910 | 11,910 | |
| 040 | 0603125A | COMBATING TERRORISM—TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 27,686 | 27,686 | |
| 041 | 0603130A | TRACTOR NAIL | 2,340 | 2,340 | |
| 042 | 0603131A | TRACTOR EGGS | 2,470 | 2,470 | |
| 043 | 0603270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY | 27,893 | 27,893 | |
| 044 | 0603313A | MISSILE AND ROCKET ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 52,190 | 52,190 | |
| 045 | 0603322A | TRACTOR CAGE | 11,107 | 11,107 | |
| 046 | 0603461A | HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 177,190 | 179,190 | |
| Program increase | [2,000] | ||||
| 047 | 0603606A | LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 17,451 | 17,451 | |
| 048 | 0603607A | JOINT SERVICE SMALL ARMS PROGRAM | 5,839 | 5,839 | |
| 049 | 0603710A | NIGHT VISION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 44,468 | 44,468 | |
| 050 | 0603728A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 11,137 | 11,137 | |
| 051 | 0603734A | MILITARY ENGINEERING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 20,684 | 20,684 | |
| 052 | 0603772A | ADVANCED TACTICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SENSOR TECHNOLOGY | 44,239 | 44,239 | |
| 053 | 0603794A | C3 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 35,775 | 35,775 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 930,065 | 945,365 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 054 | 0603305A | ARMY MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 9,433 | 9,433 | |
| 055 | 0603308A | ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 23,056 | 23,056 | |
| 056 | 0603619A | LANDMINE WARFARE AND BARRIER—ADV DEV | 72,117 | 72,117 | |
| 057 | 0603627A | SMOKE, OBSCURANT AND TARGET DEFEATING SYS-ADV DEV | 28,244 | 28,244 | |
| 058 | 0603639A | TANK AND MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION | 40,096 | 40,096 | |
| 059 | 0603747A | SOLDIER SUPPORT AND SURVIVABILITY | 10,506 | 10,506 | |
| 060 | 0603766A | TACTICAL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—ADV DEV | 15,730 | 15,730 | |
| 061 | 0603774A | NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 10,321 | 10,321 | |
| 062 | 0603779A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY—DEM/VAL | 7,785 | 7,785 | |
| 063 | 0603790A | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2,300 | 2,300 | |
| 064 | 0603801A | AVIATION—ADV DEV | 10,014 | 10,014 | |
| 065 | 0603804A | LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ADV DEV | 20,834 | 20,834 | |
| 066 | 0603807A | MEDICAL SYSTEMS—ADV DEV | 33,503 | 41,003 | |
| Program increase | [7,500] | ||||
| 067 | 0603827A | SOLDIER SYSTEMS—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 31,120 | 31,120 | |
| 068 | 0604100A | ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES | 6,608 | 6,608 | |
| 069 | 0604114A | LOWER TIER AIR MISSILE DEFENSE (LTAMD) SENSOR | 35,132 | 35,132 | |
| 070 | 0604115A | TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES | 70,047 | 70,047 | |
| 071 | 0604120A | ASSURED POSITIONING, NAVIGATION AND TIMING (PNT) | 83,279 | 83,279 | |
| 073 | 0305251A | CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS FORCES AND FORCE SUPPORT | 40,510 | 40,510 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 550,635 | 558,135 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 074 | 0604201A | AIRCRAFT AVIONICS | 83,248 | 83,248 | |
| 075 | 0604270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 34,642 | 34,642 | |
| 077 | 0604290A | MID-TIER NETWORKING VEHICULAR RADIO (MNVR) | 12,172 | 12,172 | |
| 078 | 0604321A | ALL SOURCE ANALYSIS SYSTEM | 3,958 | 3,958 | |
| 079 | 0604328A | TRACTOR CAGE | 12,525 | 12,525 | |
| 080 | 0604601A | INFANTRY SUPPORT WEAPONS | 66,943 | 66,943 | |
| 082 | 0604611A | JAVELIN | 20,011 | 20,011 | |
| 083 | 0604622A | FAMILY OF HEAVY TACTICAL VEHICLES | 11,429 | 11,429 | |
| 084 | 0604633A | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL | 3,421 | 3,421 | |
| 085 | 0604641A | TACTICAL UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLE (TUGV) | 39,282 | 39,282 | |
| 086 | 0604642A | LIGHT TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES | 494 | 494 | |
| 087 | 0604645A | ARMORED SYSTEMS MODERNIZATION (ASM)—ENG DEV | 9,678 | 9,678 | |
| 088 | 0604710A | NIGHT VISION SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 84,519 | 84,519 | |
| 089 | 0604713A | COMBAT FEEDING, CLOTHING, AND EQUIPMENT | 2,054 | 2,054 | |
| 090 | 0604715A | NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV | 30,774 | 30,774 | |
| 091 | 0604741A | AIR DEFENSE COMMAND, CONTROL AND INTELLIGENCE—ENG DEV | 53,332 | 61,332 | |
| Program increase- all digital radar technology for CRAM | [8,000] | ||||
| 092 | 0604742A | CONSTRUCTIVE SIMULATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 17,887 | 17,887 | |
| 093 | 0604746A | AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT | 8,813 | 8,813 | |
| 094 | 0604760A | DISTRIBUTIVE INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS (DIS)—ENG DEV | 10,487 | 10,487 | |
| 095 | 0604780A | COMBINED ARMS TACTICAL TRAINER (CATT) CORE | 15,068 | 15,068 | |
| 096 | 0604798A | BRIGADE ANALYSIS, INTEGRATION AND EVALUATION | 89,716 | 89,716 | |
| 097 | 0604802A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS—ENG DEV | 80,365 | 80,365 | |
| 098 | 0604804A | LOGISTICS AND ENGINEER EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV | 75,098 | 86,198 | |
| Program Increase- next generation signature management | [11,100] | ||||
| 099 | 0604805A | COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS—ENG DEV | 4,245 | 4,245 | |
| 100 | 0604807A | MEDICAL MATERIEL/MEDICAL BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT—ENG DEV | 41,124 | 41,124 | |
| 101 | 0604808A | LANDMINE WARFARE/BARRIER—ENG DEV | 39,630 | 39,630 | |
| 102 | 0604818A | ARMY TACTICAL COMMAND & CONTROL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE | 205,590 | 205,590 | |
| 103 | 0604820A | RADAR DEVELOPMENT | 15,983 | 15,983 | |
| 104 | 0604822A | GENERAL FUND ENTERPRISE BUSINESS SYSTEM (GFEBS) | 6,805 | 6,805 | |
| 105 | 0604823A | FIREFINDER | 9,235 | 9,235 | |
| 106 | 0604827A | SOLDIER SYSTEMS—WARRIOR DEM/VAL | 12,393 | 12,393 | |
| 107 | 0604854A | ARTILLERY SYSTEMS—EMD | 1,756 | 1,756 | |
| 108 | 0605013A | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 74,236 | 74,236 | |
| 109 | 0605018A | INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM-ARMY (IPPS-A) | 155,584 | 155,584 | |
| 110 | 0605028A | ARMORED MULTI-PURPOSE VEHICLE (AMPV) | 184,221 | 184,221 | |
| 111 | 0605029A | INTEGRATED GROUND SECURITY SURVEILLANCE RESPONSE CAPABILITY (IGSSR-C) | 4,980 | 4,980 | |
| 112 | 0605030A | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) | 15,041 | 15,041 | |
| 113 | 0605031A | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK (JTN) | 16,014 | 16,014 | |
| 114 | 0605032A | TRACTOR TIRE | 27,254 | 27,254 | |
| 115 | 0605033A | GROUND-BASED OPERATIONAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM—EXPEDITIONARY (GBOSS-E) | 5,032 | 5,032 | |
| 116 | 0605034A | TACTICAL SECURITY SYSTEM (TSS) | 2,904 | 2,904 | |
| 117 | 0605035A | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 96,977 | 96,977 | |
| 118 | 0605036A | COMBATING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (CWMD) | 2,089 | 2,089 | |
| 119 | 0605041A | DEFENSIVE CYBER TOOL DEVELOPMENT | 33,836 | 33,836 | |
| 120 | 0605042A | TACTICAL NETWORK RADIO SYSTEMS (LOW-TIER) | 18,824 | 18,824 | |
| 121 | 0605047A | CONTRACT WRITING SYSTEM | 20,663 | 20,663 | |
| 122 | 0605051A | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 41,133 | 41,133 | |
| 123 | 0605052A | INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2—BLOCK 1 | 83,995 | 83,995 | |
| 125 | 0605380A | AMF JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM (JTRS) | 5,028 | 5,028 | |
| 126 | 0605450A | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 42,972 | 42,972 | |
| 128 | 0605457A | ARMY INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AIAMD) | 252,811 | 252,811 | |
| 131 | 0605766A | NATIONAL CAPABILITIES INTEGRATION (MIP) | 4,955 | 4,955 | |
| 132 | 0605812A | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH | 11,530 | 11,530 | |
| 133 | 0605830A | AVIATION GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT | 2,142 | 2,142 | |
| 134 | 0210609A | PALADIN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT (PIM) | 41,498 | 41,498 | |
| 135 | 0303032A | TROJAN—RH12 | 4,273 | 4,273 | |
| 136 | 0304270A | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 14,425 | 14,425 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 2,265,094 | 2,284,194 | |||
| RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 137 | 0604256A | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 25,675 | 25,675 | |
| 138 | 0604258A | TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 19,122 | 19,122 | |
| 139 | 0604759A | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 84,777 | 84,777 | |
| 140 | 0605103A | RAND ARROYO CENTER | 20,658 | 20,658 | |
| 141 | 0605301A | ARMY KWAJALEIN ATOLL | 236,648 | 236,648 | |
| 142 | 0605326A | CONCEPTS EXPERIMENTATION PROGRAM | 25,596 | 25,596 | |
| 144 | 0605601A | ARMY TEST RANGES AND FACILITIES | 293,748 | 293,748 | |
| 145 | 0605602A | ARMY TECHNICAL TEST INSTRUMENTATION AND TARGETS | 52,404 | 52,404 | |
| 146 | 0605604A | SURVIVABILITY/LETHALITY ANALYSIS | 38,571 | 38,571 | |
| 147 | 0605606A | AIRCRAFT CERTIFICATION | 4,665 | 4,665 | |
| 148 | 0605702A | METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT TO RDT&E ACTIVITIES | 6,925 | 6,925 | |
| 149 | 0605706A | MATERIEL SYSTEMS ANALYSIS | 21,677 | 21,677 | |
| 150 | 0605709A | EXPLOITATION OF FOREIGN ITEMS | 12,415 | 12,415 | |
| 151 | 0605712A | SUPPORT OF OPERATIONAL TESTING | 49,684 | 49,684 | |
| 152 | 0605716A | ARMY EVALUATION CENTER | 55,905 | 55,905 | |
| 153 | 0605718A | ARMY MODELING & SIM X-CMD COLLABORATION & INTEG | 7,959 | 7,959 | |
| 154 | 0605801A | PROGRAMWIDE ACTIVITIES | 51,822 | 51,822 | |
| 155 | 0605803A | TECHNICAL INFORMATION ACTIVITIES | 33,323 | 33,323 | |
| 156 | 0605805A | MUNITIONS STANDARDIZATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY | 40,545 | 40,545 | |
| 157 | 0605857A | ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TECHNOLOGY MGMT SUPPORT | 2,130 | 2,130 | |
| 158 | 0605898A | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 49,885 | 49,885 | |
| 159 | 0303260A | DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION INITIATIVE | 2,000 | 2,000 | |
| SUBTOTAL RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 1,136,134 | 1,136,134 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 161 | 0603778A | MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 9,663 | 9,663 | |
| 162 | 0603813A | TRACTOR PULL | 3,960 | 3,960 | |
| 163 | 0605024A | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 3,638 | 3,638 | |
| 164 | 0607131A | WEAPONS AND MUNITIONS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 14,517 | 14,517 | |
| 165 | 0607133A | TRACTOR SMOKE | 4,479 | 4,479 | |
| 166 | 0607134A | LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES (LRPF) | 39,275 | 39,275 | |
| 167 | 0607135A | APACHE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 66,441 | 66,441 | |
| 168 | 0607136A | BLACKHAWK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 46,765 | 46,765 | |
| 169 | 0607137A | CHINOOK PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 91,848 | 91,848 | |
| 170 | 0607138A | FIXED WING PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 796 | 796 | |
| 171 | 0607139A | IMPROVED TURBINE ENGINE PROGRAM | 126,105 | 126,105 | |
| 172 | 0607140A | EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FROM NIE | 2,369 | 2,369 | |
| 173 | 0607141A | LOGISTICS AUTOMATION | 4,563 | 4,563 | |
| 174 | 0607665A | FAMILY OF BIOMETRICS | 12,098 | 12,098 | |
| 175 | 0607865A | PATRIOT PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT | 49,482 | 49,482 | |
| 176 | 0202429A | AEROSTAT JOINT PROJECT—COCOM EXERCISE | 45,482 | 2,482 | |
| Program reduction | [–43,000] | ||||
| 178 | 0203728A | JOINT AUTOMATED DEEP OPERATION COORDINATION SYSTEM (JADOCS) | 30,455 | 30,455 | |
| 179 | 0203735A | COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 316,857 | 316,857 | |
| 180 | 0203740A | MANEUVER CONTROL SYSTEM | 4,031 | 4,031 | |
| 181 | 0203744A | AIRCRAFT MODIFICATIONS/PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 35,793 | 35,793 | |
| 182 | 0203752A | AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 259 | 259 | |
| 183 | 0203758A | DIGITIZATION | 6,483 | 6,483 | |
| 184 | 0203801A | MISSILE/AIR DEFENSE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 5,122 | 5,122 | |
| 185 | 0203802A | OTHER MISSILE PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 7,491 | 7,491 | |
| 186 | 0203808A | TRACTOR CARD | 20,333 | 20,333 | |
| 188 | 0205410A | MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT | 124 | 124 | |
| 190 | 0205456A | LOWER TIER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE (AMD) SYSTEM | 69,417 | 69,417 | |
| 191 | 0205778A | GUIDED MULTIPLE-LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (GMLRS) | 22,044 | 22,044 | |
| 192 | 0208053A | JOINT TACTICAL GROUND SYSTEM | 12,649 | 12,649 | |
| 194 | 0303028A | SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES | 11,619 | 11,619 | |
| 195 | 0303140A | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 38,280 | 38,280 | |
| 196 | 0303141A | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 27,223 | 27,223 | |
| 197 | 0303142A | SATCOM GROUND ENVIRONMENT (SPACE) | 18,815 | 18,815 | |
| 198 | 0303150A | WWMCCS/GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 4,718 | 4,718 | |
| 202 | 0305204A | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 8,218 | 8,218 | |
| 203 | 0305206A | AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 11,799 | 11,799 | |
| 204 | 0305208A | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 32,284 | 32,284 | |
| 205 | 0305219A | MQ–1C GRAY EAGLE UAS | 13,470 | 13,470 | |
| 206 | 0305232A | RQ–11 UAV | 1,613 | 1,613 | |
| 207 | 0305233A | RQ–7 UAV | 4,597 | 4,597 | |
| 209 | 0310349A | WIN-T INCREMENT 2—INITIAL NETWORKING | 4,867 | 4,867 | |
| 210 | 0708045A | END ITEM INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES | 62,287 | 62,287 | |
| 210A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 4,625 | 4,625 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 1,296,954 | 1,253,954 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | 7,515,399 | 7,519,299 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 001 | 0601103N | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 101,714 | 121,714 | |
| Program increase | [20,000] | ||||
| 002 | 0601152N | IN-HOUSE LABORATORY INDEPENDENT RESEARCH | 18,508 | 18,508 | |
| 003 | 0601153N | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 422,748 | 422,748 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 542,970 | 562,970 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 004 | 0602114N | POWER PROJECTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 41,371 | 41,371 | |
| 005 | 0602123N | FORCE PROTECTION APPLIED RESEARCH | 158,745 | 158,745 | |
| 006 | 0602131M | MARINE CORPS LANDING FORCE TECHNOLOGY | 51,590 | 51,590 | |
| 007 | 0602235N | COMMON PICTURE APPLIED RESEARCH | 41,185 | 41,185 | |
| 008 | 0602236N | WARFIGHTER SUSTAINMENT APPLIED RESEARCH | 45,467 | 45,467 | |
| 009 | 0602271N | ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS APPLIED RESEARCH | 118,941 | 118,941 | |
| 010 | 0602435N | OCEAN WARFIGHTING ENVIRONMENT APPLIED RESEARCH | 42,618 | 74,618 | |
| Service Life Extension Program—AGOR | [32,000] | ||||
| 011 | 0602651M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS APPLIED RESEARCH | 6,327 | 6,327 | |
| 012 | 0602747N | UNDERSEA WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH | 126,313 | 126,313 | |
| 013 | 0602750N | FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES APPLIED RESEARCH | 165,103 | 165,103 | |
| 014 | 0602782N | MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE APPLIED RESEARCH | 33,916 | 33,916 | |
| 015 | 0602898N | SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT—ONR HEADQUARTERS | 29,575 | 29,575 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 861,151 | 893,151 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 016 | 0603114N | POWER PROJECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 96,406 | 106,406 | |
| Program increase for common mount | [10,000] | ||||
| 017 | 0603123N | FORCE PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 48,438 | 48,438 | |
| 018 | 0603271N | ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 26,421 | 26,421 | |
| 019 | 0603640M | USMC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION (ATD) | 140,416 | 140,416 | |
| 020 | 0603651M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 13,117 | 13,117 | |
| 021 | 0603673N | FUTURE NAVAL CAPABILITIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 249,092 | 249,092 | |
| 022 | 0603680N | MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 56,712 | 56,712 | |
| 023 | 0603729N | WARFIGHTER PROTECTION ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 4,789 | 4,789 | |
| 024 | 0603747N | UNDERSEA WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 25,880 | 25,880 | |
| 025 | 0603758N | NAVY WARFIGHTING EXPERIMENTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS | 60,550 | 65,550 | |
| Program Increase | [5,000] | ||||
| 026 | 0603782N | MINE AND EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 15,167 | 15,167 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 736,988 | 751,988 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 027 | 0603207N | AIR/OCEAN TACTICAL APPLICATIONS | 48,536 | 48,536 | |
| 028 | 0603216N | AVIATION SURVIVABILITY | 5,239 | 5,239 | |
| 030 | 0603251N | AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS | 1,519 | 1,519 | |
| 031 | 0603254N | ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 7,041 | 7,041 | |
| 032 | 0603261N | TACTICAL AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE | 3,274 | 3,274 | |
| 033 | 0603382N | ADVANCED COMBAT SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY | 57,034 | 72,034 | |
| Program Increase | [15,000] | ||||
| 034 | 0603502N | SURFACE AND SHALLOW WATER MINE COUNTERMEASURES | 165,775 | 165,775 | |
| 035 | 0603506N | SURFACE SHIP TORPEDO DEFENSE | 87,066 | 87,066 | |
| 036 | 0603512N | CARRIER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 7,605 | 7,605 | |
| 037 | 0603525N | PILOT FISH | 132,068 | 132,068 | |
| 038 | 0603527N | RETRACT LARCH | 14,546 | 14,546 | |
| 039 | 0603536N | RETRACT JUNIPER | 115,435 | 115,435 | |
| 040 | 0603542N | RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL | 702 | 702 | |
| 041 | 0603553N | SURFACE ASW | 1,081 | 1,081 | |
| 042 | 0603561N | ADVANCED SUBMARINE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 100,565 | 100,565 | |
| 043 | 0603562N | SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEMS | 8,782 | 8,782 | |
| 044 | 0603563N | SHIP CONCEPT ADVANCED DESIGN | 14,590 | 14,590 | |
| 045 | 0603564N | SHIP PRELIMINARY DESIGN & FEASIBILITY STUDIES | 15,805 | 15,805 | |
| 046 | 0603570N | ADVANCED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS | 453,313 | 453,313 | |
| 047 | 0603573N | ADVANCED SURFACE MACHINERY SYSTEMS | 36,655 | 36,655 | |
| 048 | 0603576N | CHALK EAGLE | 367,016 | 367,016 | |
| 049 | 0603581N | LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP (LCS) | 51,630 | 51,630 | |
| 050 | 0603582N | COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION | 23,530 | 23,530 | |
| 051 | 0603595N | OHIO REPLACEMENT | 700,811 | 700,811 | |
| 052 | 0603596N | LCS MISSION MODULES | 160,058 | 129,158 | |
| Program Restructure | [–30,900] | ||||
| 053 | 0603597N | AUTOMATED TEST AND ANALYSIS | 8,000 | ||
| Program increase | [8,000] | ||||
| 054 | 0603599N | FRIGATE DEVELOPMENT | 84,900 | 84,900 | |
| 055 | 0603609N | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS | 8,342 | 8,342 | |
| 056 | 0603611M | MARINE CORPS ASSAULT VEHICLES | 158,682 | 158,682 | |
| 057 | 0603635M | MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORT SYSTEM | 1,303 | 1,303 | |
| 058 | 0603654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 46,911 | 46,911 | |
| 060 | 0603713N | OCEAN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 4,556 | 4,556 | |
| 061 | 0603721N | ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION | 20,343 | 20,343 | |
| 062 | 0603724N | NAVY ENERGY PROGRAM | 52,479 | 52,479 | |
| 063 | 0603725N | FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT | 5,458 | 5,458 | |
| 064 | 0603734N | CHALK CORAL | 245,860 | 245,860 | |
| 065 | 0603739N | NAVY LOGISTIC PRODUCTIVITY | 3,089 | 3,089 | |
| 066 | 0603746N | RETRACT MAPLE | 323,526 | 323,526 | |
| 067 | 0603748N | LINK PLUMERIA | 318,497 | 318,497 | |
| 068 | 0603751N | RETRACT ELM | 52,834 | 52,834 | |
| 069 | 0603764N | LINK EVERGREEN | 48,116 | 48,116 | |
| 070 | 0603787N | SPECIAL PROCESSES | 13,619 | 13,619 | |
| 071 | 0603790N | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 9,867 | 9,867 | |
| 072 | 0603795N | LAND ATTACK TECHNOLOGY | 6,015 | 6,015 | |
| 073 | 0603851M | JOINT NON-LETHAL WEAPONS TESTING | 27,904 | 27,904 | |
| 074 | 0603860N | JOINT PRECISION APPROACH AND LANDING SYSTEMS—DEM/VAL | 104,144 | 104,144 | |
| 075 | 0603925N | DIRECTED ENERGY AND ELECTRIC WEAPON SYSTEMS | 32,700 | 32,700 | |
| 076 | 0604112N | GERALD R. FORD CLASS NUCLEAR AIRCRAFT CARRIER (CVN 78—80) | 70,528 | 70,528 | |
| 077 | 0604122N | REMOTE MINEHUNTING SYSTEM (RMS) | 3,001 | 3,001 | |
| 078 | 0604272N | TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) | 34,920 | 34,920 | |
| 080 | 0604292N | MH-XX | 1,620 | 1,620 | |
| 081 | 0604454N | LX (R) | 6,354 | 6,354 | |
| 082 | 0604536N | ADVANCED UNDERSEA PROTOTYPING | 78,589 | 78,589 | |
| 084 | 0604659N | PRECISION STRIKE WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM | 9,910 | 9,910 | |
| 085 | 0604707N | SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING SUPPORT | 23,971 | 23,971 | |
| 086 | 0604786N | OFFENSIVE ANTI-SURFACE WARFARE WEAPON DEVELOPMENT | 252,409 | 252,409 | |
| 087 | 0605812M | JOINT LIGHT TACTICAL VEHICLE (JLTV) ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PH | 23,197 | 23,197 | |
| 088 | 0303354N | ASW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT—MIP | 9,110 | 9,110 | |
| 089 | 0304270N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT—MIP | 437 | 437 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 4,662,867 | 4,654,967 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 090 | 0603208N | TRAINING SYSTEM AIRCRAFT | 19,938 | 19,938 | |
| 091 | 0604212N | OTHER HELO DEVELOPMENT | 6,268 | 6,268 | |
| 092 | 0604214N | AV–8B AIRCRAFT—ENG DEV | 33,664 | 33,664 | |
| 093 | 0604215N | STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT | 1,300 | 1,300 | |
| 094 | 0604216N | MULTI-MISSION HELICOPTER UPGRADE DEVELOPMENT | 5,275 | 5,275 | |
| 095 | 0604218N | AIR/OCEAN EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING | 3,875 | 3,875 | |
| 096 | 0604221N | P–3 MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 1,909 | 1,909 | |
| 097 | 0604230N | WARFARE SUPPORT SYSTEM | 13,237 | 13,237 | |
| 098 | 0604231N | TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM | 36,323 | 36,323 | |
| 099 | 0604234N | ADVANCED HAWKEYE | 363,792 | 363,792 | |
| 100 | 0604245N | H–1 UPGRADES | 27,441 | 27,441 | |
| 101 | 0604261N | ACOUSTIC SEARCH SENSORS | 34,525 | 34,525 | |
| 102 | 0604262N | V–22A | 174,423 | 174,423 | |
| 103 | 0604264N | AIR CREW SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 13,577 | 13,577 | |
| 104 | 0604269N | EA–18 | 116,761 | 116,761 | |
| 105 | 0604270N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 48,766 | 48,766 | |
| 106 | 0604273N | EXECUTIVE HELO DEVELOPMENT | 338,357 | 338,357 | |
| 107 | 0604274N | NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) | 577,822 | 577,822 | |
| 108 | 0604280N | JOINT TACTICAL RADIO SYSTEM—NAVY (JTRS-NAVY) | 2,365 | 2,365 | |
| 109 | 0604282N | NEXT GENERATION JAMMER (NGJ) INCREMENT II | 52,065 | 52,065 | |
| 110 | 0604307N | SURFACE COMBATANT COMBAT SYSTEM ENGINEERING | 282,764 | 282,764 | |
| 111 | 0604311N | LPD–17 CLASS SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 580 | 580 | |
| 112 | 0604329N | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB) | 97,622 | 97,622 | |
| 113 | 0604366N | STANDARD MISSILE IMPROVEMENTS | 120,561 | 120,561 | |
| 114 | 0604373N | AIRBORNE MCM | 45,622 | 45,622 | |
| 116 | 0604378N | NAVAL INTEGRATED FIRE CONTROL—COUNTER AIR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 25,750 | 25,750 | |
| 118 | 0604501N | ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS | 85,868 | 85,868 | |
| 119 | 0604503N | SSN–688 AND TRIDENT MODERNIZATION | 117,476 | 117,476 | |
| 120 | 0604504N | AIR CONTROL | 47,404 | 47,404 | |
| 121 | 0604512N | SHIPBOARD AVIATION SYSTEMS | 112,158 | 112,158 | |
| 122 | 0604518N | COMBAT INFORMATION CENTER CONVERSION | 6,283 | 6,283 | |
| 123 | 0604522N | AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE RADAR (AMDR) SYSTEM | 144,395 | 144,395 | |
| 124 | 0604558N | NEW DESIGN SSN | 113,013 | 113,013 | |
| 125 | 0604562N | SUBMARINE TACTICAL WARFARE SYSTEM | 43,160 | 43,160 | |
| 126 | 0604567N | SHIP CONTRACT DESIGN/ LIVE FIRE T&E | 65,002 | 85,002 | |
| CVN Design | [20,000] | ||||
| 127 | 0604574N | NAVY TACTICAL COMPUTER RESOURCES | 3,098 | 3,098 | |
| 128 | 0604580N | VIRGINIA PAYLOAD MODULE (VPM) | 97,920 | 97,920 | |
| 129 | 0604601N | MINE DEVELOPMENT | 10,490 | 10,490 | |
| 130 | 0604610N | LIGHTWEIGHT TORPEDO DEVELOPMENT | 20,178 | 20,178 | |
| 131 | 0604654N | JOINT SERVICE EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 7,369 | 7,369 | |
| 132 | 0604703N | PERSONNEL, TRAINING, SIMULATION, AND HUMAN FACTORS | 4,995 | 4,995 | |
| 133 | 0604727N | JOINT STANDOFF WEAPON SYSTEMS | 412 | 412 | |
| 134 | 0604755N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (DETECT & CONTROL) | 134,619 | 134,619 | |
| 135 | 0604756N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: HARD KILL) | 114,475 | 105,475 | |
| Program Execution | [–9,000] | ||||
| 136 | 0604757N | SHIP SELF DEFENSE (ENGAGE: SOFT KILL/EW) | 114,211 | 114,211 | |
| 137 | 0604761N | INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING | 11,029 | 11,029 | |
| 138 | 0604771N | MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT | 9,220 | 9,220 | |
| 139 | 0604777N | NAVIGATION/ID SYSTEM | 42,723 | 42,723 | |
| 140 | 0604800M | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD | 531,426 | 531,426 | |
| 141 | 0604800N | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF)—EMD | 528,716 | 528,716 | |
| 142 | 0604810M | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER FOLLOW ON DEVELOPMENT—MARINE CORPS | 74,227 | 74,227 | |
| 143 | 0604810N | JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER FOLLOW ON DEVELOPMENT—NAVY | 63,387 | 63,387 | |
| 144 | 0605013M | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 4,856 | 4,856 | |
| 145 | 0605013N | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 97,066 | 97,066 | |
| 146 | 0605024N | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 2,500 | 2,500 | |
| 147 | 0605212N | CH–53K RDTE | 404,810 | 404,810 | |
| 148 | 0605215N | MISSION PLANNING | 33,570 | 33,570 | |
| 149 | 0605217N | COMMON AVIONICS | 51,599 | 51,599 | |
| 150 | 0605220N | SHIP TO SHORE CONNECTOR (SSC) | 11,088 | 11,088 | |
| 151 | 0605327N | T-AO (X) | 1,095 | 1,095 | |
| 152 | 0605414N | MQ-XX | 89,000 | 77,000 | |
| Excess Obligation | [–12,000] | ||||
| 153 | 0605450N | JOINT AIR-TO-GROUND MISSILE (JAGM) | 17,880 | 17,880 | |
| 154 | 0605500N | MULTI-MISSION MARITIME AIRCRAFT (MMA) | 59,126 | 59,126 | |
| 155 | 0605504N | MULTI-MISSION MARITIME (MMA) INCREMENT III | 182,220 | 182,220 | |
| 156 | 0204202N | DDG–1000 | 45,642 | 45,642 | |
| 159 | 0304231N | TACTICAL COMMAND SYSTEM—MIP | 676 | 676 | |
| 160 | 0304785N | TACTICAL CRYPTOLOGIC SYSTEMS | 36,747 | 36,747 | |
| 161 | 0305124N | SPECIAL APPLICATIONS PROGRAM | 35,002 | 35,002 | |
| 162 | 0306250M | CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 4,942 | 4,942 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 6,025,655 | 6,024,655 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 163 | 0604256N | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 16,633 | 16,633 | |
| 164 | 0604258N | TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 36,662 | 36,662 | |
| 165 | 0604759N | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 42,109 | 42,109 | |
| 166 | 0605126N | JOINT THEATER AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION | 2,998 | 2,998 | |
| 167 | 0605152N | STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—NAVY | 3,931 | 3,931 | |
| 168 | 0605154N | CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES | 46,634 | 46,634 | |
| 169 | 0605285N | NEXT GENERATION FIGHTER | 1,200 | 1,200 | |
| 171 | 0605804N | TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES | 903 | 903 | |
| 172 | 0605853N | MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL & INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 87,077 | 87,077 | |
| 173 | 0605856N | STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT | 3,597 | 3,597 | |
| 174 | 0605861N | RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT | 62,811 | 62,811 | |
| 175 | 0605863N | RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT | 106,093 | 106,093 | |
| 176 | 0605864N | TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 349,146 | 349,146 | |
| 177 | 0605865N | OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY | 18,160 | 18,160 | |
| 178 | 0605866N | NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW) SUPPORT | 9,658 | 9,658 | |
| 179 | 0605867N | SEW SURVEILLANCE/RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT | 6,500 | 6,500 | |
| 180 | 0605873M | MARINE CORPS PROGRAM WIDE SUPPORT | 22,247 | 22,247 | |
| 181 | 0605898N | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 16,254 | 16,254 | |
| 182 | 0606355N | WARFARE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT | 21,123 | 21,123 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 853,736 | 853,736 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 188 | 0607658N | COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT CAPABILITY (CEC) | 84,501 | 84,501 | |
| 189 | 0607700N | DEPLOYABLE JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL | 2,970 | 2,970 | |
| 190 | 0101221N | STRATEGIC SUB & WEAPONS SYSTEM SUPPORT | 136,556 | 136,556 | |
| 191 | 0101224N | SSBN SECURITY TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 33,845 | 33,845 | |
| 192 | 0101226N | SUBMARINE ACOUSTIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 9,329 | 9,329 | |
| 193 | 0101402N | NAVY STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS | 17,218 | 17,218 | |
| 195 | 0204136N | F/A–18 SQUADRONS | 189,125 | 189,125 | |
| 196 | 0204163N | FLEET TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TACTICAL) | 48,225 | 48,225 | |
| 197 | 0204228N | SURFACE SUPPORT | 21,156 | 21,156 | |
| 198 | 0204229N | TOMAHAWK AND TOMAHAWK MISSION PLANNING CENTER (TMPC) | 71,355 | 71,355 | |
| 199 | 0204311N | INTEGRATED SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 58,542 | 58,542 | |
| 200 | 0204413N | AMPHIBIOUS TACTICAL SUPPORT UNITS (DISPLACEMENT CRAFT) | 13,929 | 13,929 | |
| 201 | 0204460M | GROUND/AIR TASK ORIENTED RADAR (G/ATOR) | 83,538 | 83,538 | |
| 202 | 0204571N | CONSOLIDATED TRAINING SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 38,593 | 38,593 | |
| 203 | 0204574N | CRYPTOLOGIC DIRECT SUPPORT | 1,122 | 1,122 | |
| 204 | 0204575N | ELECTRONIC WARFARE (EW) READINESS SUPPORT | 99,998 | 99,998 | |
| 205 | 0205601N | HARM IMPROVEMENT | 48,635 | 48,635 | |
| 206 | 0205604N | TACTICAL DATA LINKS | 124,785 | 124,785 | |
| 207 | 0205620N | SURFACE ASW COMBAT SYSTEM INTEGRATION | 24,583 | 24,583 | |
| 208 | 0205632N | MK–48 ADCAP | 39,134 | 39,134 | |
| 209 | 0205633N | AVIATION IMPROVEMENTS | 120,861 | 120,861 | |
| 210 | 0205675N | OPERATIONAL NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS | 101,786 | 101,786 | |
| 211 | 0206313M | MARINE CORPS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 82,159 | 82,159 | |
| 212 | 0206335M | COMMON AVIATION COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM (CAC2S) | 11,850 | 11,850 | |
| 213 | 0206623M | MARINE CORPS GROUND COMBAT/SUPPORTING ARMS SYSTEMS | 47,877 | 47,877 | |
| 214 | 0206624M | MARINE CORPS COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT | 13,194 | 13,194 | |
| 215 | 0206625M | USMC INTELLIGENCE/ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS (MIP) | 17,171 | 17,171 | |
| 216 | 0206629M | AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT VEHICLE | 38,020 | 38,020 | |
| 217 | 0207161N | TACTICAL AIM MISSILES | 56,285 | 56,285 | |
| 218 | 0207163N | ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) | 40,350 | 40,350 | |
| 219 | 0219902M | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM—MARINE CORPS (GCSS-MC) | 9,128 | 9,128 | |
| 223 | 0303109N | SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (SPACE) | 37,372 | 37,372 | |
| 224 | 0303138N | CONSOLIDATED AFLOAT NETWORK ENTERPRISE SERVICES (CANES) | 23,541 | 23,541 | |
| 225 | 0303140N | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 38,510 | 38,510 | |
| 228 | 0305192N | MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (MIP) ACTIVITIES | 6,019 | 6,019 | |
| 229 | 0305204N | TACTICAL UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES | 8,436 | 8,436 | |
| 230 | 0305205N | UAS INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY | 36,509 | 36,509 | |
| 231 | 0305208M | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 2,100 | 2,100 | |
| 232 | 0305208N | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 44,571 | 44,571 | |
| 233 | 0305220N | MQ–4C TRITON | 111,729 | 111,729 | |
| 234 | 0305231N | MQ–8 UAV | 26,518 | 26,518 | |
| 235 | 0305232M | RQ–11 UAV | 418 | 418 | |
| 236 | 0305233N | RQ–7 UAV | 716 | 716 | |
| 237 | 0305234N | SMALL (LEVEL 0) TACTICAL UAS (STUASL0) | 5,071 | 5,071 | |
| 238 | 0305239M | RQ–21A | 9,497 | 9,497 | |
| 239 | 0305241N | MULTI-INTELLIGENCE SENSOR DEVELOPMENT | 77,965 | 77,965 | |
| 240 | 0305242M | UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS) PAYLOADS (MIP) | 11,181 | 11,181 | |
| 241 | 0305421N | RQ–4 MODERNIZATION | 181,266 | 181,266 | |
| 242 | 0308601N | MODELING AND SIMULATION SUPPORT | 4,709 | 4,709 | |
| 243 | 0702207N | DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) | 49,322 | 54,322 | |
| MH–60 Fleet Mid-Life Upgrades | [5,000] | ||||
| 245 | 0708730N | MARITIME TECHNOLOGY (MARITECH) | 3,204 | 3,204 | |
| 245A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,228,460 | 1,228,460 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 3,592,934 | 3,597,934 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | 17,276,301 | 17,339,401 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 001 | 0601102F | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 340,812 | 340,812 | |
| 002 | 0601103F | UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 145,044 | 145,044 | |
| 003 | 0601108F | HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 14,168 | 14,168 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 500,024 | 500,024 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 004 | 0602102F | MATERIALS | 126,152 | 131,152 | |
| Precision measuring tools | [5,000] | ||||
| 005 | 0602201F | AEROSPACE VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES | 122,831 | 127,831 | |
| Reusable Hypersonic vehicle structures development | [5,000] | ||||
| 006 | 0602202F | HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS APPLIED RESEARCH | 111,647 | 116,647 | |
| Human-Machine Teaming | [5,000] | ||||
| 007 | 0602203F | AEROSPACE PROPULSION | 185,671 | 185,671 | |
| 008 | 0602204F | AEROSPACE SENSORS | 155,174 | 155,174 | |
| 009 | 0602601F | SPACE TECHNOLOGY | 117,915 | 117,915 | |
| 010 | 0602602F | CONVENTIONAL MUNITIONS | 109,649 | 109,649 | |
| 011 | 0602605F | DIRECTED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY | 127,163 | 127,163 | |
| 012 | 0602788F | DOMINANT INFORMATION SCIENCES AND METHODS | 161,650 | 161,650 | |
| 013 | 0602890F | HIGH ENERGY LASER RESEARCH | 42,300 | 42,300 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 1,260,152 | 1,275,152 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 014 | 0603112F | ADVANCED MATERIALS FOR WEAPON SYSTEMS | 35,137 | 45,137 | |
| Metals Affordability Initiative | [10,000] | ||||
| 015 | 0603199F | SUSTAINMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (S&T) | 20,636 | 20,636 | |
| 016 | 0603203F | ADVANCED AEROSPACE SENSORS | 40,945 | 40,945 | |
| 017 | 0603211F | AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY DEV/DEMO | 130,950 | 130,950 | |
| 018 | 0603216F | AEROSPACE PROPULSION AND POWER TECHNOLOGY | 94,594 | 99,594 | |
| Silicon Carbide for aerospace power application | [5,000] | ||||
| 019 | 0603270F | ELECTRONIC COMBAT TECHNOLOGY | 58,250 | 58,250 | |
| 020 | 0603401F | ADVANCED SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGY | 61,593 | 61,593 | |
| 021 | 0603444F | MAUI SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM (MSSS) | 11,681 | 11,681 | |
| 022 | 0603456F | HUMAN EFFECTIVENESS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 26,492 | 26,492 | |
| 023 | 0603601F | CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 102,009 | 102,009 | |
| 024 | 0603605F | ADVANCED WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 39,064 | 39,064 | |
| 025 | 0603680F | MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 46,344 | 46,344 | |
| 026 | 0603788F | BATTLESPACE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 58,110 | 58,110 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 725,805 | 740,805 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 027 | 0603260F | INTELLIGENCE ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 5,598 | 5,598 | |
| 028 | 0603438F | SPACE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY | 7,534 | 7,534 | |
| 029 | 0603742F | COMBAT IDENTIFICATION TECHNOLOGY | 24,418 | 24,418 | |
| 030 | 0603790F | NATO RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 4,333 | 4,333 | |
| 032 | 0603830F | SPACE SECURITY AND DEFENSE PROGRAM | 32,399 | 32,399 | |
| 033 | 0603851F | INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE—DEM/VAL | 108,663 | 108,663 | |
| 035 | 0604015F | LONG RANGE STRIKE—BOMBER | 1,358,309 | 1,358,309 | |
| 036 | 0604257F | ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND SENSORS | 34,818 | 34,818 | |
| 037 | 0604317F | TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 3,368 | 3,368 | |
| 038 | 0604327F | HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET DEFEAT SYSTEM (HDBTDS) PROGRAM | 74,308 | 74,308 | |
| 039 | 0604422F | WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON | 118,953 | 113,953 | |
| Transfer Cloud Characterization and Theater Weather Imagery to NRO | [–5,000] | ||||
| 040 | 0604425F | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS | 9,901 | 9,901 | |
| 041 | 0604776F | DEPLOYMENT & DISTRIBUTION ENTERPRISE R&D | 25,890 | 25,890 | |
| 042 | 0604857F | OPERATIONALLY RESPONSIVE SPACE | 7,921 | 27,921 | |
| Responsive Launch and Reconstitution | [20,000] | ||||
| 043 | 0604858F | TECH TRANSITION PROGRAM | 347,304 | 347,304 | |
| 044 | 0605230F | GROUND BASED STRATEGIC DETERRENT | 113,919 | 113,919 | |
| 046 | 0207110F | NEXT GENERATION AIR DOMINANCE | 20,595 | 15,595 | |
| Program reduction | [–5,000] | ||||
| 047 | 0207455F | THREE DIMENSIONAL LONG-RANGE RADAR (3DELRR) | 49,491 | 39,491 | |
| Excess funding to need | [–10,000] | ||||
| 048 | 0305164F | NAVSTAR GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (USER EQUIPMENT) (SPACE) | 278,147 | 278,147 | |
| 049 | 0305236F | COMMON DATA LINK EXECUTIVE AGENT (CDL EA) | 42,338 | 42,338 | |
| 050 | 0306250F | CYBER OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 158,002 | 158,002 | |
| 051 | 0306415F | ENABLED CYBER ACTIVITIES | 15,842 | 15,842 | |
| 052 | 0901410F | CONTRACTING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM | 5,782 | 5,782 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 2,847,833 | 2,847,833 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 054 | 0604270F | ELECTRONIC WARFARE DEVELOPMENT | 12,476 | 12,476 | |
| 055 | 0604281F | TACTICAL DATA NETWORKS ENTERPRISE | 82,380 | 82,380 | |
| 056 | 0604287F | PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT | 8,458 | 8,458 | |
| 057 | 0604329F | SMALL DIAMETER BOMB (SDB)—EMD | 54,838 | 54,838 | |
| 058 | 0604421F | COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS | 34,394 | 34,394 | |
| 059 | 0604425F | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS SYSTEMS | 23,945 | 23,945 | |
| 060 | 0604426F | SPACE FENCE | 168,364 | 168,364 | |
| 061 | 0604429F | AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC ATTACK | 9,187 | 9,187 | |
| 062 | 0604441F | SPACE BASED INFRARED SYSTEM (SBIRS) HIGH EMD | 181,966 | 181,966 | |
| 063 | 0604602F | ARMAMENT/ORDNANCE DEVELOPMENT | 20,312 | 20,312 | |
| 064 | 0604604F | SUBMUNITIONS | 2,503 | 2,503 | |
| 065 | 0604617F | AGILE COMBAT SUPPORT | 53,680 | 53,680 | |
| 066 | 0604618F | JOINT DIRECT ATTACK MUNITION | 9,901 | 9,901 | |
| 067 | 0604706F | LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS | 7,520 | 7,520 | |
| 068 | 0604735F | COMBAT TRAINING RANGES | 77,409 | 77,409 | |
| 069 | 0604800F | F–35—EMD | 450,467 | 450,467 | |
| 070 | 0604853F | EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM (SPACE)—EMD | 296,572 | 100,000 | |
| Launch System Investment (launch vehicle, upper stage, strap-on motor, or related infrastructure) | [100,000] | ||||
| Next Generation Launch System Investment | [–296,572] | ||||
| 070A | 0604XXXF | ROCKET PROPULSION SYSTEM | 220,000 | ||
| Rocket Propulsion System Replacement of RD–180 | [220,000] | ||||
| 071 | 0604932F | LONG RANGE STANDOFF WEAPON | 95,604 | 95,604 | |
| 072 | 0604933F | ICBM FUZE MODERNIZATION | 189,751 | 189,751 | |
| 073 | 0605030F | JOINT TACTICAL NETWORK CENTER (JTNC) | 1,131 | 1,131 | |
| 074 | 0605213F | F–22 MODERNIZATION INCREMENT 3.2B | 70,290 | 70,290 | |
| 075 | 0605214F | GROUND ATTACK WEAPONS FUZE DEVELOPMENT | 937 | 937 | |
| 076 | 0605221F | KC–46 | 261,724 | 121,724 | |
| Scope Reduction | [–140,000] | ||||
| 077 | 0605223F | ADVANCED PILOT TRAINING | 12,377 | 12,377 | |
| 078 | 0605229F | CSAR HH–60 RECAPITALIZATION | 319,331 | 319,331 | |
| 080 | 0605431F | ADVANCED EHF MILSATCOM (SPACE) | 259,131 | 259,131 | |
| 081 | 0605432F | POLAR MILSATCOM (SPACE) | 50,815 | 50,815 | |
| 082 | 0605433F | WIDEBAND GLOBAL SATCOM (SPACE) | 41,632 | 41,632 | |
| 083 | 0605458F | AIR & SPACE OPS CENTER 10.2 RDT&E | 28,911 | 28,911 | |
| 084 | 0605931F | B–2 DEFENSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | 315,615 | 288,957 | |
| Scope Reduction | [–26,658] | ||||
| 085 | 0101125F | NUCLEAR WEAPONS MODERNIZATION | 137,909 | 137,909 | |
| 086 | 0207171F | F–15 EPAWSS | 256,669 | 256,669 | |
| 087 | 0207701F | FULL COMBAT MISSION TRAINING | 12,051 | 12,051 | |
| 088 | 0305176F | COMBAT SURVIVOR EVADER LOCATOR | 29,253 | 29,253 | |
| 089 | 0307581F | JSTARS RECAP | 128,019 | 128,019 | |
| 090 | 0401319F | PRESIDENTIAL AIRCRAFT REPLACEMENT (PAR) | 351,220 | 351,220 | |
| 091 | 0701212F | AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEMS | 19,062 | 19,062 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 4,075,804 | 3,932,574 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 092 | 0604256F | THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT | 21,630 | 21,630 | |
| 093 | 0604759F | MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT | 66,385 | 66,385 | |
| 094 | 0605101F | RAND PROJECT AIR FORCE | 34,641 | 34,641 | |
| 096 | 0605712F | INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION | 11,529 | 11,529 | |
| 097 | 0605807F | TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 661,417 | 661,417 | |
| 098 | 0605860F | ROCKET SYSTEMS LAUNCH PROGRAM (SPACE) | 11,198 | 11,198 | |
| 099 | 0605864F | SPACE TEST PROGRAM (STP) | 27,070 | 27,070 | |
| 100 | 0605976F | FACILITIES RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 134,111 | 134,111 | |
| 101 | 0605978F | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT—TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT | 28,091 | 28,091 | |
| 102 | 0606017F | REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS AND MATURATION | 29,100 | 29,100 | |
| 103 | 0606116F | SPACE TEST AND TRAINING RANGE DEVELOPMENT | 18,528 | 18,528 | |
| 104 | 0606392F | SPACE AND MISSILE CENTER (SMC) CIVILIAN WORKFORCE | 176,666 | 176,666 | |
| 105 | 0308602F | ENTEPRISE INFORMATION SERVICES (EIS) | 4,410 | 4,410 | |
| 106 | 0702806F | ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 14,613 | 14,613 | |
| 107 | 0804731F | GENERAL SKILL TRAINING | 1,404 | 1,404 | |
| 109 | 1001004F | INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES | 4,784 | 4,784 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 1,245,577 | 1,245,577 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 110 | 0603423F | GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM III—OPERATIONAL CONTROL SEGMENT | 393,268 | 393,268 | |
| 111 | 0604233F | SPECIALIZED UNDERGRADUATE FLIGHT TRAINING | 15,427 | 15,427 | |
| 112 | 0604445F | WIDE AREA SURVEILLANCE | 46,695 | 46,695 | |
| 115 | 0605018F | AF INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM (AF-IPPS) | 10,368 | 10,368 | |
| 116 | 0605024F | ANTI-TAMPER TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE AGENCY | 31,952 | 31,952 | |
| 117 | 0605117F | FOREIGN MATERIEL ACQUISITION AND EXPLOITATION | 42,960 | 42,960 | |
| 118 | 0605278F | HC/MC–130 RECAP RDT&E | 13,987 | 13,987 | |
| 119 | 0101113F | B–52 SQUADRONS | 78,267 | 78,267 | |
| 120 | 0101122F | AIR-LAUNCHED CRUISE MISSILE (ALCM) | 453 | 453 | |
| 121 | 0101126F | B–1B SQUADRONS | 5,830 | 5,830 | |
| 122 | 0101127F | B–2 SQUADRONS | 152,458 | 152,458 | |
| 123 | 0101213F | MINUTEMAN SQUADRONS | 182,958 | 182,958 | |
| 124 | 0101313F | STRAT WAR PLANNING SYSTEM—USSTRATCOM | 39,148 | 39,148 | |
| 126 | 0101316F | WORLDWIDE JOINT STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS | 6,042 | 6,042 | |
| 128 | 0102110F | UH–1N REPLACEMENT PROGRAM | 14,116 | 14,116 | |
| 129 | 0102326F | REGION/SECTOR OPERATION CONTROL CENTER MODERNIZATION PROGRAM | 10,868 | 10,868 | |
| 130 | 0105921F | SERVICE SUPPORT TO STRATCOM—SPACE ACTIVITIES | 8,674 | 8,674 | |
| 131 | 0205219F | MQ–9 UAV | 151,373 | 200,373 | |
| Auto take-off and landing capability | [35,000] | ||||
| Tactical Datalink Integration | [14,000] | ||||
| 133 | 0207131F | A–10 SQUADRONS | 14,853 | 14,853 | |
| 134 | 0207133F | F–16 SQUADRONS | 132,795 | 132,795 | |
| 135 | 0207134F | F–15E SQUADRONS | 356,717 | 356,717 | |
| 136 | 0207136F | MANNED DESTRUCTIVE SUPPRESSION | 14,773 | 14,773 | |
| 137 | 0207138F | F–22A SQUADRONS | 387,564 | 387,564 | |
| 138 | 0207142F | F–35 SQUADRONS | 153,045 | 153,045 | |
| 139 | 0207161F | TACTICAL AIM MISSILES | 52,898 | 52,898 | |
| 140 | 0207163F | ADVANCED MEDIUM RANGE AIR-TO-AIR MISSILE (AMRAAM) | 62,470 | 62,470 | |
| 143 | 0207227F | COMBAT RESCUE—PARARESCUE | 362 | 362 | |
| 144 | 0207247F | AF TENCAP | 28,413 | 31,613 | |
| Restore FY16 level | [3,200] | ||||
| 145 | 0207249F | PRECISION ATTACK SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT | 649 | 649 | |
| 146 | 0207253F | COMPASS CALL | 13,723 | 50,823 | |
| Program Restructure | [37,100] | ||||
| 147 | 0207268F | AIRCRAFT ENGINE COMPONENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 109,859 | 109,859 | |
| 148 | 0207325F | JOINT AIR-TO-SURFACE STANDOFF MISSILE (JASSM) | 30,002 | 30,002 | |
| 149 | 0207410F | AIR & SPACE OPERATIONS CENTER (AOC) | 37,621 | 37,621 | |
| 150 | 0207412F | CONTROL AND REPORTING CENTER (CRC) | 13,292 | 13,292 | |
| 151 | 0207417F | AIRBORNE WARNING AND CONTROL SYSTEM (AWACS) | 86,644 | 86,644 | |
| 152 | 0207418F | TACTICAL AIRBORNE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 2,442 | 2,442 | |
| 154 | 0207431F | COMBAT AIR INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM ACTIVITIES | 10,911 | 15,911 | |
| Geospatial software development | [5,000] | ||||
| 155 | 0207444F | TACTICAL AIR CONTROL PARTY-MOD | 11,843 | 11,843 | |
| 156 | 0207448F | C2ISR TACTICAL DATA LINK | 1,515 | 1,515 | |
| 157 | 0207452F | DCAPES | 14,979 | 14,979 | |
| 158 | 0207590F | SEEK EAGLE | 25,308 | 25,308 | |
| 159 | 0207601F | USAF MODELING AND SIMULATION | 16,666 | 16,666 | |
| 160 | 0207605F | WARGAMING AND SIMULATION CENTERS | 4,245 | 4,245 | |
| 161 | 0207697F | DISTRIBUTED TRAINING AND EXERCISES | 3,886 | 3,886 | |
| 162 | 0208006F | MISSION PLANNING SYSTEMS | 71,785 | 71,785 | |
| 164 | 0208087F | AF OFFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 25,025 | 25,025 | |
| 165 | 0208088F | AF DEFENSIVE CYBERSPACE OPERATIONS | 29,439 | 29,439 | |
| 168 | 0301017F | GLOBAL SENSOR INTEGRATED ON NETWORK (GSIN) | 3,470 | 3,470 | |
| 169 | 0301112F | NUCLEAR PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM (NPES) | 4,060 | 4,060 | |
| 175 | 0301400F | SPACE SUPERIORITY INTELLIGENCE | 13,880 | 13,880 | |
| 176 | 0302015F | E–4B NATIONAL AIRBORNE OPERATIONS CENTER (NAOC) | 30,948 | 30,948 | |
| 177 | 0303001F | FAMILY OF ADVANCED BLOS TERMINALS (FAB-T) | 42,378 | 42,378 | |
| 178 | 0303131F | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) | 47,471 | 47,471 | |
| 179 | 0303140F | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 46,388 | 46,388 | |
| 180 | 0303141F | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 52 | 52 | |
| 181 | 0303142F | GLOBAL FORCE MANAGEMENT—DATA INITIATIVE | 2,099 | 2,099 | |
| 184 | 0304260F | AIRBORNE SIGINT ENTERPRISE | 90,762 | 90,762 | |
| 187 | 0305099F | GLOBAL AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT (GATM) | 4,354 | 4,354 | |
| 188 | 0305110F | SATELLITE CONTROL NETWORK (SPACE) | 15,624 | 15,624 | |
| 189 | 0305111F | WEATHER SERVICE | 19,974 | 22,974 | |
| Commercial Weather Pilot Program | [3,000] | ||||
| 190 | 0305114F | AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL, APPROACH, AND LANDING SYSTEM (ATCALS) | 9,770 | 9,770 | |
| 191 | 0305116F | AERIAL TARGETS | 3,051 | 3,051 | |
| 194 | 0305128F | SECURITY AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES | 405 | 405 | |
| 195 | 0305145F | ARMS CONTROL IMPLEMENTATION | 4,844 | 4,844 | |
| 196 | 0305146F | DEFENSE JOINT COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES | 339 | 339 | |
| 199 | 0305173F | SPACE AND MISSILE TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER | 3,989 | 3,989 | |
| 200 | 0305174F | SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 3,070 | 3,070 | |
| 201 | 0305179F | INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICE (IBS) | 8,833 | 8,833 | |
| 202 | 0305182F | SPACELIFT RANGE SYSTEM (SPACE) | 11,867 | 11,867 | |
| 203 | 0305202F | DRAGON U–2 | 37,217 | 37,217 | |
| 205 | 0305206F | AIRBORNE RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 3,841 | 18,841 | |
| Wide area motion imagery | [15,000] | ||||
| 206 | 0305207F | MANNED RECONNAISSANCE SYSTEMS | 20,975 | 20,975 | |
| 207 | 0305208F | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 18,902 | 18,902 | |
| 208 | 0305220F | RQ–4 UAV | 256,307 | 256,307 | |
| 209 | 0305221F | NETWORK-CENTRIC COLLABORATIVE TARGETING | 22,610 | 16,310 | |
| Program reduction | [–6,300] | ||||
| 211 | 0305238F | NATO AGS | 38,904 | 38,904 | |
| 212 | 0305240F | SUPPORT TO DCGS ENTERPRISE | 23,084 | 23,084 | |
| 213 | 0305258F | ADVANCED EVALUATION PROGRAM | 116,143 | 116,143 | |
| 214 | 0305265F | GPS III SPACE SEGMENT | 141,888 | 141,888 | |
| 215 | 0305600F | INTERNATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ARCHITECTURES | 2,360 | 2,360 | |
| 216 | 0305614F | JSPOC MISSION SYSTEM | 72,889 | 72,889 | |
| 217 | 0305881F | RAPID CYBER ACQUISITION | 4,280 | 4,280 | |
| 218 | 0305906F | NCMC—TW/AA SYSTEM | 4,951 | 4,951 | |
| 219 | 0305913F | NUDET DETECTION SYSTEM (SPACE) | 21,093 | 21,093 | |
| 220 | 0305940F | SPACE SITUATION AWARENESS OPERATIONS | 35,002 | 35,002 | |
| 222 | 0308699F | SHARED EARLY WARNING (SEW) | 6,366 | 6,366 | |
| 223 | 0401115F | C–130 AIRLIFT SQUADRON | 15,599 | 15,599 | |
| 224 | 0401119F | C–5 AIRLIFT SQUADRONS (IF) | 66,146 | 66,146 | |
| 225 | 0401130F | C–17 AIRCRAFT (IF) | 12,430 | 12,430 | |
| 226 | 0401132F | C–130J PROGRAM | 16,776 | 16,776 | |
| 227 | 0401134F | LARGE AIRCRAFT IR COUNTERMEASURES (LAIRCM) | 5,166 | 5,166 | |
| 229 | 0401314F | OPERATIONAL SUPPORT AIRLIFT | 13,817 | 13,817 | |
| 230 | 0401318F | CV–22 | 16,702 | 16,702 | |
| 231 | 0408011F | SPECIAL TACTICS / COMBAT CONTROL | 7,164 | 7,164 | |
| 232 | 0702207F | DEPOT MAINTENANCE (NON-IF) | 1,518 | 1,518 | |
| 233 | 0708610F | LOGISTICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (LOGIT) | 61,676 | 61,676 | |
| 234 | 0708611F | SUPPORT SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 9,128 | 9,128 | |
| 235 | 0804743F | OTHER FLIGHT TRAINING | 1,653 | 1,653 | |
| 236 | 0808716F | OTHER PERSONNEL ACTIVITIES | 57 | 57 | |
| 237 | 0901202F | JOINT PERSONNEL RECOVERY AGENCY | 3,663 | 3,663 | |
| 238 | 0901218F | CIVILIAN COMPENSATION PROGRAM | 3,735 | 3,735 | |
| 239 | 0901220F | PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION | 5,157 | 5,157 | |
| 240 | 0901226F | AIR FORCE STUDIES AND ANALYSIS AGENCY | 1,523 | 1,523 | |
| 242 | 0901538F | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 10,581 | 10,581 | |
| 242A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 13,091,557 | 13,091,557 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 17,457,056 | 17,563,056 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | 28,112,251 | 28,105,021 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | |||||
| BASIC RESEARCH | |||||
| 001 | 0601000BR | DTRA BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE | 35,436 | 35,436 | |
| 002 | 0601101E | DEFENSE RESEARCH SCIENCES | 362,297 | 352,297 | |
| Program reduction | [–10,000] | ||||
| 003 | 0601110D8Z | BASIC RESEARCH INITIATIVES | 36,654 | 36,654 | |
| 004 | 0601117E | BASIC OPERATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SCIENCE | 57,791 | 57,791 | |
| 005 | 0601120D8Z | NATIONAL DEFENSE EDUCATION PROGRAM | 69,345 | 79,345 | |
| K–12 STEM program increase | [10,000] | ||||
| 006 | 0601228D8Z | HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES/MINORITY INSTITUTIONS | 23,572 | 33,572 | |
| Program increase | [10,000] | ||||
| 007 | 0601384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 44,800 | 44,800 | |
| SUBTOTAL BASIC RESEARCH | 629,895 | 639,895 | |||
| APPLIED RESEARCH | |||||
| 008 | 0602000D8Z | JOINT MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY | 17,745 | 17,745 | |
| 009 | 0602115E | BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY | 115,213 | 105,213 | |
| Program reduction | [–10,000] | ||||
| 010 | 0602230D8Z | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION | 30,000 | 0 | |
| Program decrease | [–30,000] | ||||
| 011 | 0602234D8Z | LINCOLN LABORATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM | 48,269 | 48,269 | |
| 012 | 0602251D8Z | APPLIED RESEARCH FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF S&T PRIORITIES | 42,206 | 42,206 | |
| 013 | 0602303E | INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY | 353,635 | 348,635 | |
| Program reduction | [–5,000] | ||||
| 014 | 0602383E | BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DEFENSE | 21,250 | 21,250 | |
| 015 | 0602384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 188,715 | 188,715 | |
| 016 | 0602668D8Z | CYBER SECURITY RESEARCH | 12,183 | 12,183 | |
| 017 | 0602702E | TACTICAL TECHNOLOGY | 313,843 | 313,843 | |
| 018 | 0602715E | MATERIALS AND BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY | 220,456 | 210,456 | |
| Program reduction | [–10,000] | ||||
| 019 | 0602716E | ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY | 221,911 | 221,911 | |
| 020 | 0602718BR | WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT TECHNOLOGIES | 154,857 | 154,857 | |
| 021 | 0602751D8Z | SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE (SEI) APPLIED RESEARCH | 8,420 | 8,420 | |
| 022 | 1160401BB | SOF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 37,820 | 37,820 | |
| SUBTOTAL APPLIED RESEARCH | 1,786,523 | 1,731,523 | |||
| ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 023 | 0603000D8Z | JOINT MUNITIONS ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 23,902 | 23,902 | |
| 025 | 0603122D8Z | COMBATING TERRORISM TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT | 73,002 | 100,002 | |
| Additional EOD equipment for Conventional Units | [12,000] | ||||
| Program increase for DOD CT and C-UAS | [15,000] | ||||
| 026 | 0603133D8Z | FOREIGN COMPARATIVE TESTING | 19,343 | 29,343 | |
| Anti-tunnel defense systems | [10,000] | ||||
| 027 | 0603160BR | COUNTERPROLIFERATION INITIATIVES—PROLIFERATION PREVENTION AND DEFEAT | 266,444 | 266,444 | |
| 028 | 0603176C | ADVANCED CONCEPTS AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT | 17,880 | 17,880 | |
| 030 | 0603178C | WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY | 71,843 | 71,843 | |
| 031 | 0603179C | ADVANCED C4ISR | 3,626 | 3,626 | |
| 032 | 0603180C | ADVANCED RESEARCH | 23,433 | 23,433 | |
| 033 | 0603225D8Z | JOINT DOD-DOE MUNITIONS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 17,256 | 17,256 | |
| 035 | 0603274C | SPECIAL PROGRAM—MDA TECHNOLOGY | 83,745 | 108,745 | |
| Classified Annex | [25,000] | ||||
| 036 | 0603286E | ADVANCED AEROSPACE SYSTEMS | 182,327 | 177,327 | |
| Program reduction | [–5,000] | ||||
| 037 | 0603287E | SPACE PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY | 175,240 | 165,240 | |
| Program reduction | [–10,000] | ||||
| 038 | 0603288D8Z | ANALYTIC ASSESSMENTS | 12,048 | 12,048 | |
| 039 | 0603289D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTS | 57,020 | 57,020 | |
| 041 | 0603375D8Z | TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION | 39,923 | 19,923 | |
| Program decrease | [–20,000] | ||||
| 042 | 0603384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 127,941 | 127,941 | |
| 043 | 0603527D8Z | RETRACT LARCH | 181,977 | 181,977 | |
| 044 | 0603618D8Z | JOINT ELECTRONIC ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY | 22,030 | 22,030 | |
| 045 | 0603648D8Z | JOINT CAPABILITY TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 148,184 | 158,184 | |
| Social Medial Analysis Cell | [10,000] | ||||
| 046 | 0603662D8Z | NETWORKED COMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITIES | 9,331 | 9,331 | |
| 047 | 0603680D8Z | DEFENSE-WIDE MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 158,398 | 148,398 | |
| Program decrease | [–10,000] | ||||
| 048 | 0603680S | MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM | 31,259 | 31,259 | |
| 049 | 0603699D8Z | EMERGING CAPABILITIES TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 49,895 | 49,895 | |
| 050 | 0603712S | GENERIC LOGISTICS R&D TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATIONS | 11,011 | 11,011 | |
| 052 | 0603716D8Z | STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH PROGRAM | 65,078 | 65,078 | |
| 053 | 0603720S | MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT | 97,826 | 97,826 | |
| 054 | 0603727D8Z | JOINT WARFIGHTING PROGRAM | 7,848 | 7,848 | |
| 055 | 0603739E | ADVANCED ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES | 49,807 | 49,807 | |
| 056 | 0603760E | COMMAND, CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS | 155,081 | 155,081 | |
| 057 | 0603766E | NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY | 428,894 | 428,894 | |
| 058 | 0603767E | SENSOR TECHNOLOGY | 241,288 | 241,288 | |
| 060 | 0603781D8Z | SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE | 14,264 | 14,264 | |
| 061 | 0603826D8Z | QUICK REACTION SPECIAL PROJECTS | 74,943 | 72,943 | |
| QRSP | [–2,000] | ||||
| 063 | 0603833D8Z | ENGINEERING SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 17,659 | 17,659 | |
| 064 | 0603941D8Z | TEST & EVALUATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 87,135 | 87,135 | |
| 065 | 0604055D8Z | OPERATIONAL ENERGY CAPABILITY IMPROVEMENT | 37,329 | 37,329 | |
| 066 | 0303310D8Z | CWMD SYSTEMS | 44,836 | 21,236 | |
| Constellation program reduction | [–23,600] | ||||
| 067 | 1160402BB | SOF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 61,620 | 61,620 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 3,190,666 | 3,192,066 | |||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 068 | 0603161D8Z | NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E ADC&P | 28,498 | 28,498 | |
| 069 | 0603600D8Z | WALKOFF | 89,643 | 89,643 | |
| 071 | 0603821D8Z | ACQUISITION ENTERPRISE DATA & INFORMATION SERVICES | 2,136 | 2,136 | |
| 072 | 0603851D8Z | ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNICAL CERTIFICATION PROGRAM | 52,491 | 52,491 | |
| 073 | 0603881C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT | 206,834 | 206,834 | |
| 074 | 0603882C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT | 862,080 | 862,080 | |
| 075 | 0603884BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—DEM/VAL | 138,187 | 138,187 | |
| 076 | 0603884C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS | 230,077 | 230,077 | |
| 077 | 0603890C | BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS | 401,594 | 401,594 | |
| 078 | 0603891C | SPECIAL PROGRAMS—MDA | 321,607 | 321,607 | |
| 079 | 0603892C | AEGIS BMD | 959,066 | 959,066 | |
| 080 | 0603893C | SPACE TRACKING & SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM | 32,129 | 32,129 | |
| 081 | 0603895C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM SPACE PROGRAMS | 20,690 | 20,690 | |
| 082 | 0603896C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI | 439,617 | 439,617 | |
| 083 | 0603898C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE JOINT WARFIGHTER SUPPORT | 47,776 | 47,776 | |
| 084 | 0603904C | MISSILE DEFENSE INTEGRATION & OPERATIONS CENTER (MDIOC) | 54,750 | 54,750 | |
| 085 | 0603906C | REGARDING TRENCH | 8,785 | 8,785 | |
| 086 | 0603907C | SEA BASED X-BAND RADAR (SBX) | 68,787 | 68,787 | |
| 087 | 0603913C | ISRAELI COOPERATIVE PROGRAMS | 103,835 | 293,835 | |
| Directed Energy Cooperation through MDA | [25,000] | ||||
| Increase for Cooperative Development Programs subject to Title XVI | [165,000] | ||||
| 088 | 0603914C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST | 293,441 | 293,441 | |
| 089 | 0603915C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TARGETS | 563,576 | 563,576 | |
| 090 | 0603920D8Z | HUMANITARIAN DEMINING | 10,007 | 10,007 | |
| 091 | 0603923D8Z | COALITION WARFARE | 10,126 | 10,126 | |
| 092 | 0604016D8Z | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CORROSION PROGRAM | 3,893 | 3,893 | |
| 093 | 0604115C | TECHNOLOGY MATURATION INITIATIVES | 90,266 | 105,266 | |
| Directed Energy Acceleration—Low Power Laser Demonstrator - to reclaim schdule slippage | [15,000] | ||||
| 094 | 0604132D8Z | MISSILE DEFEAT PROJECT | 45,000 | 45,000 | |
| 095 | 0604250D8Z | ADVANCED INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES | 844,870 | 804,870 | |
| SCO | [–40,000] | ||||
| 097 | 0604400D8Z | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) UNMANNED SYSTEM COMMON DEVELOPMENT | 3,320 | 3,320 | |
| 099 | 0604682D8Z | WARGAMING AND SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC ANALYSIS (SSA) | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
| 102 | 0604826J | JOINT C5 CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION AND INTEROPERABILITY ASSESSMENTS | 23,642 | 23,642 | |
| 104 | 0604873C | LONG RANGE DISCRIMINATION RADAR (LRDR) | 162,012 | 162,012 | |
| 105 | 0604874C | IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS | 274,148 | 274,148 | |
| 106 | 0604876C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TERMINAL DEFENSE SEGMENT TEST | 63,444 | 63,444 | |
| 107 | 0604878C | AEGIS BMD TEST | 95,012 | 95,012 | |
| 108 | 0604879C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSOR TEST | 83,250 | 83,250 | |
| 109 | 0604880C | LAND-BASED SM–3 (LBSM3) | 43,293 | 43,293 | |
| 110 | 0604881C | AEGIS SM–3 BLOCK IIA CO-DEVELOPMENT | 106,038 | 106,038 | |
| 111 | 0604887C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE SEGMENT TEST | 56,481 | 56,481 | |
| 112 | 0604894C | MULTI-OBJECT KILL VEHICLE | 71,513 | 71,513 | |
| 114 | 0303191D8Z | JOINT ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY (JET) PROGRAM | 2,636 | 2,636 | |
| 115 | 0305103C | CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE | 969 | 969 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | 6,919,519 | 7,089,519 | |||
| 115A | 0604XXXD | WEATHER SYSTEM FOLLOW-ON | 5,000 | ||
| Transfer Cloud Characterization and Theater Weather Imagery from USAF | [5,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 170,000 | ||||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 116 | 0604161D8Z | NUCLEAR AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL SECURITY EQUIPMENT RDT&E SDD | 10,324 | 10,324 | |
| 117 | 0604165D8Z | PROMPT GLOBAL STRIKE CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 181,303 | 186,303 | |
| Examination of Army land-attack and anti-ship capability | [5,000] | ||||
| 118 | 0604384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM—EMD | 266,231 | 266,231 | |
| 119 | 0604764K | ADVANCED IT SERVICES JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE (AITS-JPO) | 15,000 | ||
| Commercial IT Eval Program | [15,000] | ||||
| 120 | 0604771D8Z | JOINT TACTICAL INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (JTIDS) | 16,288 | 16,288 | |
| 121 | 0605000BR | WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DEFEAT CAPABILITIES | 4,568 | 4,568 | |
| 122 | 0605013BL | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 11,505 | 11,505 | |
| 123 | 0605021SE | HOMELAND PERSONNEL SECURITY INITIATIVE | 1,658 | 1,658 | |
| 124 | 0605022D8Z | DEFENSE EXPORTABILITY PROGRAM | 2,920 | 2,920 | |
| 126 | 0605070S | DOD ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 12,631 | 12,631 | |
| 128 | 0605080S | DEFENSE AGENCY INTIATIVES (DAI)—FINANCIAL SYSTEM | 26,657 | 26,657 | |
| 129 | 0605090S | DEFENSE RETIRED AND ANNUITANT PAY SYSTEM (DRAS) | 4,949 | 4,949 | |
| 130 | 0605140D8Z | TRUSTED FOUNDRY | 69,000 | 69,000 | |
| 131 | 0605210D8Z | DEFENSE-WIDE ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT CAPABILITIES | 9,881 | 9,881 | |
| 132 | 0303141K | GLOBAL COMBAT SUPPORT SYSTEM | 7,600 | 7,600 | |
| 133 | 0305304D8Z | DOD ENTERPRISE ENERGY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (EEIM) | 2,703 | 2,703 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION | 628,218 | 648,218 | |||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 134 | 0604774D8Z | DEFENSE READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM (DRRS) | 4,678 | 4,678 | |
| 135 | 0604875D8Z | JOINT SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT | 4,499 | 4,499 | |
| 136 | 0604940D8Z | CENTRAL TEST AND EVALUATION INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT (CTEIP) | 219,199 | 219,199 | |
| 137 | 0604942D8Z | ASSESSMENTS AND EVALUATIONS | 28,706 | 28,706 | |
| 138 | 0605001E | MISSION SUPPORT | 69,244 | 69,244 | |
| 139 | 0605100D8Z | JOINT MISSION ENVIRONMENT TEST CAPABILITY (JMETC) | 87,080 | 87,080 | |
| 140 | 0605104D8Z | TECHNICAL STUDIES, SUPPORT AND ANALYSIS | 23,069 | 23,069 | |
| 142 | 0605126J | JOINT INTEGRATED AIR AND MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION (JIAMDO) | 32,759 | 32,759 | |
| 144 | 0605142D8Z | SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 32,429 | 32,429 | |
| 145 | 0605151D8Z | STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT—OSD | 3,797 | 3,797 | |
| 146 | 0605161D8Z | NUCLEAR MATTERS-PHYSICAL SECURITY | 5,302 | 5,302 | |
| 147 | 0605170D8Z | SUPPORT TO NETWORKS AND INFORMATION INTEGRATION | 7,246 | 7,246 | |
| 148 | 0605200D8Z | GENERAL SUPPORT TO USD (INTELLIGENCE) | 1,874 | 1,874 | |
| 149 | 0605384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM | 85,754 | 85,754 | |
| 158 | 0605790D8Z | SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR)/ SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 2,187 | 2,187 | |
| 159 | 0605798D8Z | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS | 22,650 | 22,650 | |
| 160 | 0605801KA | DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) | 43,834 | 43,834 | |
| 161 | 0605803SE | R&D IN SUPPORT OF DOD ENLISTMENT, TESTING AND EVALUATION | 22,240 | 22,240 | |
| 162 | 0605804D8Z | DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION | 19,541 | 23,541 | |
| DASD(DT&E) | [4,000] | ||||
| 163 | 0605898E | MANAGEMENT HQ—R&D | 4,759 | 4,759 | |
| 164 | 0605998KA | MANAGEMENT HQ—DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER (DTIC) | 4,400 | 4,400 | |
| 165 | 0606100D8Z | BUDGET AND PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS | 4,014 | 4,014 | |
| 166 | 0203345D8Z | DEFENSE OPERATIONS SECURITY INITIATIVE (DOSI) | 2,072 | 2,072 | |
| 167 | 0204571J | JOINT STAFF ANALYTICAL SUPPORT | 7,464 | 7,464 | |
| 170 | 0303166J | SUPPORT TO INFORMATION OPERATIONS (IO) CAPABILITIES | 857 | 857 | |
| 171 | 0303260D8Z | DEFENSE MILITARY DECEPTION PROGRAM OFFICE (DMDPO) | 916 | 916 | |
| 172 | 0305172K | COMBINED ADVANCED APPLICATIONS | 15,336 | 15,336 | |
| 173 | 0305193D8Z | CYBER INTELLIGENCE | 18,523 | 18,523 | |
| 175 | 0804767D8Z | COCOM EXERCISE ENGAGEMENT AND TRAINING TRANSFORMATION (CE2T2)—MHA | 34,384 | 34,384 | |
| 176 | 0901598C | MANAGEMENT HQ—MDA | 31,160 | 56,160 | |
| Cyber Improvements Acceleration | [25,000] | ||||
| 179 | 0903235D8W | JOINT SERVICE PROVIDER (JSP) | 827 | 827 | |
| 180A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 56,799 | 56,799 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 897,599 | 926,599 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 181 | 0604130V | ENTERPRISE SECURITY SYSTEM (ESS) | 4,241 | 4,241 | |
| 182 | 0605127T | REGIONAL INTERNATIONAL OUTREACH (RIO) AND PARTNERSHIP FOR PEACE INFORMATION MANA | 1,424 | 1,424 | |
| 183 | 0605147T | OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE SHARED INFORMATION SYSTEM (OHASIS) | 287 | 287 | |
| 184 | 0607210D8Z | INDUSTRIAL BASE ANALYSIS AND SUSTAINMENT SUPPORT | 16,195 | 16,195 | |
| 185 | 0607310D8Z | CWMD SYSTEMS: OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 4,194 | 4,194 | |
| 186 | 0607327T | GLOBAL THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (G-TSCMIS) | 7,861 | 7,861 | |
| 187 | 0607384BP | CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE (OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT) | 33,361 | 33,361 | |
| 189 | 0208043J | PLANNING AND DECISION AID SYSTEM (PDAS) | 3,038 | 3,038 | |
| 190 | 0208045K | C4I INTEROPERABILITY | 57,501 | 57,501 | |
| 192 | 0301144K | JOINT/ALLIED COALITION INFORMATION SHARING | 5,935 | 5,935 | |
| 196 | 0302016K | NATIONAL MILITARY COMMAND SYSTEM-WIDE SUPPORT | 575 | 575 | |
| 197 | 0302019K | DEFENSE INFO INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION | 18,041 | 18,041 | |
| 198 | 0303126K | LONG-HAUL COMMUNICATIONS—DCS | 13,994 | 18,994 | |
| Secure cellular communications for senior leaders | [5,000] | ||||
| 199 | 0303131K | MINIMUM ESSENTIAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK (MEECN) | 12,206 | 12,206 | |
| 200 | 0303135G | PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE (PKI) | 34,314 | 34,314 | |
| 201 | 0303136G | KEY MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE (KMI) | 36,602 | 36,602 | |
| 202 | 0303140D8Z | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 8,876 | 8,876 | |
| 203 | 0303140G | INFORMATION SYSTEMS SECURITY PROGRAM | 159,068 | 161,068 | |
| SHARKSEER Program Increase | [2,000] | ||||
| 204 | 0303150K | GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM | 24,438 | 24,438 | |
| 205 | 0303153K | DEFENSE SPECTRUM ORGANIZATION | 13,197 | 13,197 | |
| 207 | 0303228K | JOINT INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (JIE) | 2,789 | 2,789 | |
| 209 | 0303430K | FEDERAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | 75,000 | 75,000 | |
| 210 | 0303610K | TELEPORT PROGRAM | 657 | 657 | |
| 215 | 0305103K | CYBER SECURITY INITIATIVE | 1,553 | 1,553 | |
| 220 | 0305186D8Z | POLICY R&D PROGRAMS | 6,204 | 4,204 | |
| Program decrease | [–2,000] | ||||
| 221 | 0305199D8Z | NET CENTRICITY | 17,971 | 17,971 | |
| 223 | 0305208BB | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 5,415 | 5,415 | |
| 226 | 0305208K | DISTRIBUTED COMMON GROUND/SURFACE SYSTEMS | 3,030 | 3,030 | |
| 229 | 0305327V | INSIDER THREAT | 5,034 | 5,034 | |
| 230 | 0305387D8Z | HOMELAND DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM | 2,037 | 2,037 | |
| 236 | 0307577D8Z | INTELLIGENCE MISSION DATA (IMD) | 13,800 | 13,800 | |
| 238 | 0708012S | PACIFIC DISASTER CENTERS | 1,754 | 1,754 | |
| 239 | 0708047S | DEFENSE PROPERTY ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM | 2,154 | 2,154 | |
| 240 | 0902298J | MANAGEMENT HQ—OJCS | 826 | 826 | |
| 241 | 1105219BB | MQ–9 UAV | 17,804 | 17,804 | |
| 244 | 1160403BB | AVIATION SYSTEMS | 159,143 | 147,043 | |
| AC–130 Precision Strike | [–12,100] | ||||
| 245 | 1160405BB | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 7,958 | 7,958 | |
| 246 | 1160408BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS | 64,895 | 64,895 | |
| 247 | 1160431BB | WARRIOR SYSTEMS | 44,885 | 44,885 | |
| 248 | 1160432BB | SPECIAL PROGRAMS | 1,949 | 1,949 | |
| 249 | 1160434BB | UNMANNED ISR | 22,117 | 22,117 | |
| 250 | 1160480BB | SOF TACTICAL VEHICLES | 3,316 | 3,316 | |
| 251 | 1160483BB | MARITIME SYSTEMS | 54,577 | 54,577 | |
| 252 | 1160489BB | GLOBAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES | 3,841 | 3,841 | |
| 253 | 1160490BB | OPERATIONAL ENHANCEMENTS INTELLIGENCE | 11,834 | 11,834 | |
| 253A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,270,515 | 3,270,515 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 4,256,406 | 4,249,306 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | 18,308,826 | 18,477,126 | |||
| OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE | |||||
| MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | |||||
| 001 | 0605118OTE | OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION | 78,047 | 88,047 | |
| DOT&E Cybersecurity Exercises | [10,000] | ||||
| 002 | 0605131OTE | LIVE FIRE TEST AND EVALUATION | 48,316 | 48,316 | |
| 003 | 0605814OTE | OPERATIONAL TEST ACTIVITIES AND ANALYSES | 52,631 | 52,631 | |
| SUBTOTAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT | 178,994 | 188,994 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATIONAL TEST & EVAL, DEFENSE | 178,994 | 188,994 | |||
| TOTAL RDT&E | 71,391,771 | 71,629,841 | |||
| SEC. 4202. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Line | ProgramElement | Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 055 | 0603308A | ARMY SPACE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | 9,375 | 9,375 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 9,375 | 9,375 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 117 | 0605035A | COMMON INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (CIRCM) | 10,900 | 10,900 | |
| 122 | 0605051A | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 73,110 | 73,110 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 84,010 | 84,010 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 208 | 0307665A | BIOMETRICS ENABLED INTELLIGENCE | 7,104 | 7,104 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 7,104 | 7,104 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | 100,489 | 100,489 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 038 | 0603527N | RETRACT LARCH | 3,907 | 3,907 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 3,907 | 3,907 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 245A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 36,426 | 36,426 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 36,426 | 36,426 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | 40,333 | 40,333 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | |||||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 058 | 0604421F | COUNTERSPACE SYSTEMS | 425 | 425 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 425 | 425 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 200 | 0305174F | SPACE INNOVATION, INTEGRATION AND RAPID TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT | 4,715 | 4,715 | |
| 242A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 27,765 | 27,765 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 32,480 | 32,480 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, AF | 32,905 | 32,905 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | |||||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 253A | 9999999999 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 162,419 | 162,419 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT | 162,419 | 162,419 | |||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | 162,419 | 162,419 | |||
| TOTAL RDT&E | 336,146 | 336,146 | |||
| SEC. 4203. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS FOR BASE REQUIREMENTS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||||
| Line | ProgramElement | Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | |||||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 090 | 0604715A | NON-SYSTEM TRAINING DEVICES—ENG DEV | 33 | 33 | |
| 122 | 0605051A | AIRCRAFT SURVIVABILITY DEVELOPMENT | 10,000 | ||
| Army unfunded requirement- modernized warning system | [10,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 33 | 10,033 | |||
| OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | |||||
| 161 | 0603778A | MLRS PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 16,000 | ||
| Army unfunded requirement- GMLRS M-code upgrade | [16,000] | ||||
| 166 | 0607134A | LONG RANGE PRECISION FIRES (LRPF) | 27,700 | ||
| Army unfunded requirement | [27,700] | ||||
| 179 | 0203735A | COMBAT VEHICLE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS | 10,000 | ||
| Army unfunded requirement- Vehicle APS | [10,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATIONAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | 53,700 | ||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, ARMY | 33 | 63,733 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 078 | 0604272N | TACTICAL AIR DIRECTIONAL INFRARED COUNTERMEASURES (TADIRCM) | 37,990 | 37,990 | |
| 081 | 0604454N | LX (R) | 19,000 | ||
| LX (R) Design | [19,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 37,990 | 56,990 | |||
| SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | |||||
| 102 | 0604262N | V–22A | 11,400 | ||
| Accelerate Readiness Improvement- Swashplate actuator re-design | [11,400] | ||||
| 118 | 0604501N | ADVANCED ABOVE WATER SENSORS | 20,000 | ||
| Aegis Radar Solid State Improvements | [20,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION | 31,400 | ||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, NAVY | 37,990 | 88,390 | |||
| RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | |||||
| ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | |||||
| 074 | 0603882C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE MIDCOURSE DEFENSE SEGMENT | 65,000 | ||
| Ground System Communications Modernization & Upgrades to Enable Full RKV Capabilities | [65,000] | ||||
| 076 | 0603884C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SENSORS | 45,000 | ||
| Electronic Protection Acceleration for Sensors | [25,000] | ||||
| RFPs for Hawaii & East Coast Radars | [20,000] | ||||
| 077 | 0603890C | BMD ENABLING PROGRAMS | 10,000 | ||
| Modeling and Simulation Improvements | [10,000] | ||||
| 079 | 0603892C | AEGIS BMD | 10,000 | ||
| Aegis BMD Integration with AMDR | [10,000] | ||||
| 082 | 0603896C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL, BATTLE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATI | 30,000 | ||
| C2BMC Acceleration | [20,000] | ||||
| Post-Intercept Assessment Acceleration | [10,000] | ||||
| 088 | 0603914C | BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE TEST | 10,000 | ||
| Test Infrastructure | [10,000] | ||||
| 105 | 0604874C | IMPROVED HOMELAND DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS | 75,000 | ||
| Modernized Booster Acceleration | [50,000] | ||||
| RKV risk reduction | [25,000] | ||||
| 112 | 0604894C | MULTI-OBJECT KILL VEHICLE | 55,000 | ||
| MOKV Technology Maturation | [55,000] | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES | 300,000 | ||||
| SUBTOTAL ADVANCED COMPONENT DEVELOPMENT & PROTOTYPES | 300,000 | ||||
| TOTAL RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST & EVAL, DW | 300,000 | ||||
| TOTAL RDT&E | 38,023 | 452,123 | |||
| SEC. 4301. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Line | Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 791,450 | 791,450 | |
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 68,373 | 68,373 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 438,823 | 438,823 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 660,258 | 660,258 | |
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 863,928 | 1,198,828 | |
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [334,900] | |||
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 1,360,597 | 1,360,597 | |
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 3,086,443 | 3,094,443 | |
| Additional cyber protection teams | [3,000] | |||
| Public-private cyber training partnership | [5,000] | |||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 439,488 | 439,488 | |
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,013,452 | 1,026,052 | |
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [12,600] | |||
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 7,816,343 | 7,831,343 | |
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [15,000] | |||
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 2,234,546 | 2,234,546 | |
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 452,105 | 452,105 | |
| 130 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS | 155,658 | 155,658 | |
| 170 | COMBATANT COMMANDS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 441,143 | 441,143 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 19,822,607 | 20,193,107 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 180 | STRATEGIC MOBILITY | 336,329 | 336,329 | |
| 190 | ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS | 390,848 | 574,848 | |
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [184,000] | |||
| 200 | INDUSTRIAL PREPAREDNESS | 7,401 | 7,401 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 734,578 | 918,578 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 210 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 131,942 | 131,942 | |
| 220 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 47,846 | 47,846 | |
| 230 | ONE STATION UNIT TRAINING | 45,419 | 45,419 | |
| 240 | SENIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS | 482,747 | 482,747 | |
| 250 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 921,025 | 927,525 | |
| Defense Foreign Language Program | [6,500] | |||
| 260 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 902,845 | 902,845 | |
| 270 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 216,583 | 216,583 | |
| 280 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 607,534 | 607,534 | |
| 290 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 550,599 | 550,599 | |
| 300 | EXAMINING | 187,263 | 187,263 | |
| 310 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 189,556 | 189,556 | |
| 320 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 182,835 | 182,835 | |
| 330 | JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS | 171,167 | 171,167 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 4,637,361 | 4,643,861 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 350 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 230,739 | 350,739 | |
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements from OCO | [120,000] | |||
| 360 | CENTRAL SUPPLY ACTIVITIES | 850,060 | 850,060 | |
| 370 | LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 778,757 | 778,757 | |
| 380 | AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT | 370,010 | 370,010 | |
| 390 | ADMINISTRATION | 451,556 | 451,556 | |
| 400 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 1,888,123 | 1,888,123 | |
| 410 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 276,403 | 276,403 | |
| 420 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 369,443 | 369,443 | |
| 430 | OTHER SERVICE SUPPORT | 1,096,074 | 1,096,074 | |
| 440 | ARMY CLAIMS ACTIVITIES | 207,800 | 207,800 | |
| 450 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 240,641 | 240,641 | |
| 460 | FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT READINESS | 250,612 | 250,612 | |
| 470 | INTERNATIONAL MILITARY HEADQUARTERS | 416,587 | 416,587 | |
| 480 | MISC. SUPPORT OF OTHER NATIONS | 36,666 | 36,666 | |
| 530 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,151,023 | 1,151,023 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 8,614,494 | 8,734,494 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 540 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –654,600 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–56,100] | |||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–229,900] | |||
| Historical unobligated balances | [–376,300] | |||
| Prohibition on Per Diem Allowance Reduction | [7,700] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –654,600 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | 33,809,040 | 33,835,440 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 11,435 | 11,435 | |
| 020 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 491,772 | 491,772 | |
| 030 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 116,163 | 116,163 | |
| 040 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 563,524 | 563,524 | |
| 050 | AVIATION ASSETS | 91,162 | 91,162 | |
| 060 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 347,459 | 347,659 | |
| Defense Language Program | [200] | |||
| 070 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 101,926 | 101,926 | |
| 080 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 56,219 | 56,219 | |
| 090 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 573,843 | 573,843 | |
| 100 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 214,955 | 214,955 | |
| 110 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 37,620 | 37,620 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 2,606,078 | 2,606,278 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 120 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 11,027 | 11,027 | |
| 130 | ADMINISTRATION | 16,749 | 16,749 | |
| 140 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 17,825 | 17,825 | |
| 150 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 6,177 | 6,177 | |
| 160 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 54,475 | 54,475 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 106,253 | 106,253 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 180 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –6,800 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–6,800] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –6,800 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | 2,712,331 | 2,705,731 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 708,251 | 708,251 | |
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 197,251 | 197,251 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 792,271 | 792,271 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 80,341 | 80,341 | |
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 37,138 | 37,138 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 887,625 | 887,625 | |
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 696,267 | 696,467 | |
| Defense Language Program | [200] | |||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 61,240 | 61,240 | |
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 219,948 | 219,948 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,040,012 | 1,040,012 | |
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 676,715 | 676,715 | |
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 1,021,144 | 1,021,144 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 6,418,203 | 6,418,403 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 130 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 6,396 | 6,396 | |
| 140 | ADMINISTRATION | 68,528 | 71,052 | |
| National Guard State Partnership Program | [2,524] | |||
| 150 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 76,524 | 76,524 | |
| 160 | MANPOWER MANAGEMENT | 7,712 | 7,712 | |
| 170 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 245,046 | 245,046 | |
| 180 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 2,961 | 2,961 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 407,167 | 409,691 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 190 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –29,000 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–29,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –29,000 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | 6,825,370 | 6,799,094 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 4,094,765 | 4,094,765 | |
| 020 | FLEET AIR TRAINING | 1,722,473 | 1,722,473 | |
| 030 | AVIATION TECHNICAL DATA & ENGINEERING SERVICES | 52,670 | 52,670 | |
| 040 | AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT | 97,584 | 97,584 | |
| 050 | AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 446,733 | 446,733 | |
| 060 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,007,681 | 1,007,681 | |
| 070 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 38,248 | 38,248 | |
| 080 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 564,720 | 564,720 | |
| 090 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 3,513,083 | 3,513,083 | |
| 100 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 743,765 | 743,765 | |
| 110 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 5,168,273 | 5,177,773 | |
| Ship Repair Capability in the Western Pacific | [9,500] | |||
| 120 | SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,575,578 | 1,575,578 | |
| 130 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | 558,727 | 558,727 | |
| 140 | ELECTRONIC WARFARE | 105,680 | 105,680 | |
| 150 | SPACE SYSTEMS AND SURVEILLANCE | 180,406 | 180,406 | |
| 160 | WARFARE TACTICS | 470,032 | 470,032 | |
| 170 | OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | 346,703 | 346,703 | |
| 180 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 1,158,688 | 1,158,688 | |
| 190 | EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 113,692 | 113,692 | |
| 200 | DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 2,509 | 2,509 | |
| 210 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS | 91,019 | 91,019 | |
| 220 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 74,780 | 74,780 | |
| 230 | CRUISE MISSILE | 106,030 | 106,030 | |
| 240 | FLEET BALLISTIC MISSILE | 1,233,805 | 1,241,305 | |
| Engineering and Technical Services, Project 934 | [7,500] | |||
| 250 | IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 163,025 | 163,025 | |
| 260 | WEAPONS MAINTENANCE | 553,269 | 551,469 | |
| Heavy Weight Torpedo Program Execution | [–1,500] | |||
| Light Weight Torpedo Program Execution | [–300] | |||
| 270 | OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 350,010 | 350,010 | |
| 280 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION | 790,685 | 790,685 | |
| 290 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 1,642,742 | 1,642,742 | |
| 300 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 4,206,136 | 4,206,136 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 31,173,511 | 31,188,711 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 310 | SHIP PREPOSITIONING AND SURGE | 893,517 | 893,517 | |
| 320 | READY RESERVE FORCE | 274,524 | 274,524 | |
| 330 | AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS | 6,727 | 6,727 | |
| 340 | SHIP ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS | 288,154 | 288,154 | |
| 350 | EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS | 95,720 | 95,720 | |
| 360 | INDUSTRIAL READINESS | 2,109 | 2,109 | |
| 370 | COAST GUARD SUPPORT | 21,114 | 21,114 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 1,581,865 | 1,581,865 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 380 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 143,815 | 143,815 | |
| 390 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 8,519 | 8,519 | |
| 400 | RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS | 143,445 | 143,445 | |
| 410 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 699,214 | 699,214 | |
| 420 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 5,310 | 5,310 | |
| 430 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 172,852 | 174,052 | |
| Naval Sea Cadets | [1,200] | |||
| 440 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 222,728 | 222,728 | |
| 450 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 225,647 | 225,647 | |
| 460 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 130,569 | 130,569 | |
| 470 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 73,730 | 73,730 | |
| 480 | JUNIOR ROTC | 50,400 | 50,400 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 1,876,229 | 1,877,429 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 490 | ADMINISTRATION | 917,453 | 917,453 | |
| 500 | EXTERNAL RELATIONS | 14,570 | 14,570 | |
| 510 | CIVILIAN MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 124,070 | 124,070 | |
| 520 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 369,767 | 369,767 | |
| 530 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 285,927 | 285,927 | |
| 540 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 319,908 | 319,908 | |
| 570 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 171,659 | 171,659 | |
| 590 | PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN | 270,863 | 270,863 | |
| 600 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 1,112,766 | 1,112,766 | |
| 610 | HULL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL SUPPORT | 49,078 | 49,078 | |
| 620 | COMBAT/WEAPONS SYSTEMS | 24,989 | 24,989 | |
| 630 | SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS | 72,966 | 72,966 | |
| 640 | NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE | 595,711 | 595,711 | |
| 700 | INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS AND AGENCIES | 4,809 | 4,809 | |
| 730 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 517,440 | 517,440 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 4,851,976 | 4,851,976 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 740 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –585,600 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–390,500] | |||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–26,400] | |||
| Historical unobligated balances | [–174,100] | |||
| Prohibition on Per Diem Allowance Reduction | [5,400] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –585,600 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | 39,483,581 | 38,914,381 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATIONAL FORCES | 674,613 | 674,613 | |
| 020 | FIELD LOGISTICS | 947,424 | 947,424 | |
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 206,783 | 206,783 | |
| 040 | MARITIME PREPOSITIONING | 85,276 | 85,276 | |
| 050 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 632,673 | 632,673 | |
| 060 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 2,136,626 | 2,136,626 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 4,683,395 | 4,683,395 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 070 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 15,946 | 15,946 | |
| 080 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 935 | 935 | |
| 090 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 99,305 | 99,305 | |
| 100 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 45,495 | 45,995 | |
| MOS-to-Degree Program | [500] | |||
| 110 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 369,979 | 369,979 | |
| 120 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 165,566 | 165,566 | |
| 130 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 35,133 | 35,133 | |
| 140 | JUNIOR ROTC | 23,622 | 23,622 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 755,981 | 756,481 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 150 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 34,534 | 34,534 | |
| 160 | ADMINISTRATION | 355,932 | 355,932 | |
| 180 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 76,896 | 76,896 | |
| 200 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 47,520 | 47,520 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 514,882 | 514,882 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 210 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –37,700 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–4,900] | |||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–1,500] | |||
| Historical unobligated balances | [–33,100] | |||
| Prohibition on Per Diem Allowance Reduction | [1,800] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –37,700 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | 5,954,258 | 5,917,058 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 526,190 | 526,190 | |
| 020 | INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE | 6,714 | 6,714 | |
| 030 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 86,209 | 86,209 | |
| 040 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 389 | 389 | |
| 050 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 10,189 | 10,189 | |
| 070 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 560 | 560 | |
| 090 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | 13,173 | 13,173 | |
| 100 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 109,053 | 109,053 | |
| 120 | ENTERPRISE INFORMATION | 27,226 | 27,226 | |
| 130 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 27,571 | 27,571 | |
| 140 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 99,166 | 99,166 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 906,440 | 906,440 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 150 | ADMINISTRATION | 1,351 | 1,351 | |
| 160 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 13,251 | 13,251 | |
| 170 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 3,445 | 3,445 | |
| 180 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 3,169 | 3,169 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 21,216 | 21,216 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 200 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –26,600 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–26,600] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –26,600 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | 927,656 | 901,056 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATING FORCES | 94,154 | 94,154 | |
| 020 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 18,594 | 18,594 | |
| 030 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 25,470 | 25,470 | |
| 040 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 111,550 | 111,550 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 249,768 | 249,768 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 050 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 902 | 902 | |
| 060 | ADMINISTRATION | 11,130 | 11,130 | |
| 070 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 8,833 | 8,833 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 20,865 | 20,865 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 090 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –800 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–800] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –800 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | 270,633 | 269,833 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 3,294,124 | 3,294,124 | |
| 020 | COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES | 1,682,045 | 1,682,045 | |
| 030 | AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) | 1,730,757 | 1,730,757 | |
| 040 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 7,042,988 | 6,986,488 | |
| Compass Call Program Restructure | [–56,500] | |||
| 050 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 1,657,019 | 1,657,019 | |
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 2,787,216 | 2,787,216 | |
| 070 | GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING | 887,831 | 887,831 | |
| 080 | OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS | 1,070,178 | 1,070,178 | |
| 100 | LAUNCH FACILITIES | 208,582 | 208,582 | |
| 110 | SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 362,250 | 362,250 | |
| 120 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 907,245 | 907,245 | |
| 130 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS CORE OPERATIONS | 199,171 | 199,171 | |
| 135 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 930,757 | 930,757 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 22,760,163 | 22,703,663 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 140 | AIRLIFT OPERATIONS | 1,703,059 | 1,703,059 | |
| 150 | MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS | 138,899 | 138,899 | |
| 160 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,553,439 | 1,553,439 | |
| 170 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 258,328 | 258,328 | |
| 180 | BASE SUPPORT | 722,756 | 722,756 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 4,376,481 | 4,376,481 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 190 | OFFICER ACQUISITION | 120,886 | 120,886 | |
| 200 | RECRUIT TRAINING | 23,782 | 23,782 | |
| 210 | RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (ROTC) | 77,692 | 77,692 | |
| 220 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 236,254 | 236,254 | |
| 230 | BASE SUPPORT | 819,915 | 819,915 | |
| 240 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 387,446 | 387,446 | |
| 250 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 725,134 | 725,134 | |
| 260 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 264,213 | 264,213 | |
| 270 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 86,681 | 86,681 | |
| 280 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 305,004 | 305,004 | |
| 290 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 104,754 | 104,754 | |
| 300 | EXAMINING | 3,944 | 3,944 | |
| 310 | OFF-DUTY AND VOLUNTARY EDUCATION | 184,841 | 184,841 | |
| 320 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 173,583 | 173,583 | |
| 330 | JUNIOR ROTC | 58,877 | 58,877 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 3,573,006 | 3,573,006 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 340 | LOGISTICS OPERATIONS | 1,107,846 | 1,107,846 | |
| 350 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES | 924,185 | 924,185 | |
| 360 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 48,778 | 48,778 | |
| 370 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 321,013 | 321,013 | |
| 380 | BASE SUPPORT | 1,115,910 | 1,115,910 | |
| 390 | ADMINISTRATION | 811,650 | 811,650 | |
| 400 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 269,809 | 269,809 | |
| 410 | OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 961,304 | 961,304 | |
| 420 | CIVIL AIR PATROL | 25,735 | 30,500 | |
| Civil Air Patrol O&M Support | [4,765] | |||
| 450 | INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 90,573 | 90,573 | |
| 460 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,131,603 | 1,131,603 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 6,808,406 | 6,813,171 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 470 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –765,900 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–368,000] | |||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–116,700] | |||
| Historical unobligated balances | [–288,000] | |||
| Prohibition on Per Diem Allowance Reduction | [6,800] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –765,900 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | 37,518,056 | 36,700,421 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 1,707,882 | 1,707,882 | |
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 230,016 | 230,016 | |
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 541,743 | 541,743 | |
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 113,470 | 113,470 | |
| 050 | BASE SUPPORT | 384,832 | 384,832 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 2,977,943 | 2,977,943 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 060 | ADMINISTRATION | 54,939 | 54,939 | |
| 070 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 14,754 | 14,754 | |
| 080 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERS MGMT (ARPC) | 12,707 | 12,707 | |
| 090 | OTHER PERS SUPPORT (DISABILITY COMP) | 7,210 | 7,210 | |
| 100 | AUDIOVISUAL | 376 | 376 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 89,986 | 89,986 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 110 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –59,700 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–59,700] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –59,700 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | 3,067,929 | 3,008,229 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS | 3,282,238 | 3,282,238 | |
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 723,062 | 723,062 | |
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,824,329 | 1,824,329 | |
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 245,840 | 245,840 | |
| 050 | BASE SUPPORT | 575,548 | 575,548 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 6,651,017 | 6,651,017 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 060 | ADMINISTRATION | 23,715 | 26,239 | |
| National Guard State Partnership Program | [2,524] | |||
| 070 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 28,846 | 28,846 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | 52,561 | 55,085 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 080 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –117,700 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–117,700] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –117,700 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | 6,703,578 | 6,588,402 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 506,113 | 506,113 | |
| 020 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | 524,439 | 519,439 | |
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | |||
| 030 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES | 4,898,159 | 4,898,159 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 5,928,711 | 5,923,711 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 040 | DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY | 138,658 | 138,658 | |
| 050 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 85,701 | 85,701 | |
| 070 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 365,349 | 365,349 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 589,708 | 589,708 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 080 | CIVIL MILITARY PROGRAMS | 160,480 | 180,480 | |
| STARBASE | [20,000] | |||
| 100 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY | 630,925 | 630,925 | |
| 110 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY | 1,356,380 | 1,356,380 | |
| 120 | DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY | 683,620 | 683,620 | |
| 130 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY | 1,439,891 | 1,439,891 | |
| 150 | DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY | 24,984 | 24,984 | |
| 160 | DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY | 357,964 | 357,964 | |
| 170 | DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY | 223,422 | 213,422 | |
| Program decrease | [–10,000] | |||
| 180 | DEFENSE PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING AGENCY | 112,681 | 112,681 | |
| 190 | DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | 496,754 | 496,754 | |
| 200 | DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICE | 538,711 | 538,711 | |
| 230 | DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | 35,417 | 35,417 | |
| 240 | DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY | 448,146 | 448,146 | |
| 260 | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY | 2,671,143 | 2,701,143 | |
| Impact Aid | [30,000] | |||
| 270 | MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY | 446,975 | 446,975 | |
| 290 | OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT | 155,399 | 155,399 | |
| 300 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | 1,481,643 | 1,406,713 | |
| Alcohol Abuse Prevention Program | [1,000] | |||
| BRAC 2017 Round Planning and Analyses | [–3,530] | |||
| CWMD Sustainment: Constellation program reduction | [–3,800] | |||
| Program decrease | [–84,428] | |||
| Readiness environmental protection initiative | [15,828] | |||
| 310 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/ADMIN & SVC-WIDE ACTIVITIES | 89,429 | 70,829 | |
| SOCOM MH–60 Block Upgrades / MH–60M Replacement | [–18,600] | |||
| 320 | WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES | 629,874 | 619,874 | |
| Program decrease | [–10,000] | |||
| 330 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 14,069,333 | 14,071,333 | |
| Classified adjustment | [2,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 26,053,171 | 25,991,641 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 340 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –293,900 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–17,800] | |||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–34,300] | |||
| Historical unobligated balances | [–248,100] | |||
| Prohibition on Per Diem Allowance Reduction | [6,300] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –293,900 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | 32,571,590 | 32,211,160 | ||
| MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | ||||
| 010 | US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES, DEFENSE | 14,194 | 14,194 | |
| 020 | OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER AND CIVIC AID | 105,125 | 105,125 | |
| 030 | COOPERATIVE THREAT REDUCTION | 325,604 | 325,604 | |
| 050 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, ARMY | 170,167 | 170,167 | |
| 060 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY | 281,762 | 281,762 | |
| 070 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE | 371,521 | 371,521 | |
| 080 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE | 9,009 | 9,009 | |
| 090 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION FORMERLY USED SITES | 197,084 | 197,084 | |
| SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 1,474,466 | 1,474,466 | ||
| TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS APPROPRIATIONS | 1,474,466 | 1,474,466 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 171,318,488 | 169,325,271 | ||
| SEC. 4302. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Line | Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 406,852 | 396,052 | |
| Army requested realignment (ERI) | [–10,800] | |||
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 1,643,456 | 1,713,556 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [70,100] | |||
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 556,066 | 156,366 | |
| Army requested realignment (ERI) | [–132,000] | |||
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [67,200] | |||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–334,900] | |||
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 58,620 | 90,120 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [31,500] | |||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,502,845 | 1,676,345 | |
| Army requested realignment (ERI) | [–2,000] | |||
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [175,500] | |||
| 080 | LAND FORCES SYSTEMS READINESS | 348,174 | 358,174 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [10,000] | |||
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 40,000 | 25,000 | |
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–15,000] | |||
| 140 | ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES | 5,979,678 | 7,060,278 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [1,093,200] | |||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–12,600] | |||
| 150 | COMMANDERS EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| 160 | RESET | 1,092,542 | 1,092,542 | |
| 170 | COMBATANT COMMANDS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 79,568 | 79,568 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 11,712,801 | 12,653,001 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 190 | ARMY PREPOSITIONED STOCKS | 350,200 | 130,000 | |
| Army requested realignment (ERI) | [–220,200] | |||
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 350,200 | 130,000 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 350 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 540,400 | 559,500 | |
| Army requested realignment (ERI) | [120,000] | |||
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [203,100] | |||
| Realign APS Unit Set Requirements to Base | [–304,000] | |||
| 380 | AMMUNITION MANAGEMENT | 13,974 | 49,074 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [35,100] | |||
| 420 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 105,508 | 105,508 | |
| 450 | REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT | 165,678 | 263,178 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [97,500] | |||
| 530 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 835,551 | 849,851 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [14,300] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 1,661,111 | 1,827,111 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 540 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –6,083,330 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–138,600] | |||
| Historical unobligated balances | [–188,500] | |||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–5,756,230] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –6,083,330 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | 13,724,112 | 8,526,782 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 6,252 | 9,252 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [3,000] | |||
| 040 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 2,075 | 3,075 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [1,000] | |||
| 060 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,140 | 1,440 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [300] | |||
| 090 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 14,653 | 15,153 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [500] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 24,120 | 28,920 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 180 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –11,394 | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–11,394] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –11,394 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | 24,120 | 17,526 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 10,564 | 16,564 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [6,000] | |||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 748 | 748 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 5,751 | 7,451 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [1,700] | |||
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 200 | 200 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 27,183 | 30,983 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [3,800] | |||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 2,741 | 2,741 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 18,800 | 18,800 | |
| 120 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONAL HEADQUARTERS | 920 | 920 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 66,907 | 78,407 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 190 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –30,892 | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–30,892] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –30,892 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | 66,907 | 47,515 | ||
| AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND | ||||
| MINISTRY OF DEFENSE | ||||
| 010 | SUSTAINMENT | 2,173,341 | 2,173,341 | |
| 020 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 48,262 | 48,262 | |
| 030 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 76,216 | 176,047 | |
| Maintain security forces at fiscal year 2016 levels | [99,831] | |||
| 040 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 220,139 | 281,555 | |
| Maintain security forces at fiscal year 2016 levels | [61,416] | |||
| SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF DEFENSE | 2,517,958 | 2,679,205 | ||
| MINISTRY OF INTERIOR | ||||
| 050 | SUSTAINMENT | 860,441 | 880,300 | |
| Maintain security forces at fiscal year 2016 levels | [19,859] | |||
| 060 | INFRASTRUCTURE | 20,837 | 20,837 | |
| 070 | EQUIPMENT AND TRANSPORTATION | 8,153 | 116,573 | |
| Maintain security forces at fiscal year 2016 levels | [108,420] | |||
| 080 | TRAINING AND OPERATIONS | 41,326 | 65,342 | |
| Maintain security forces at fiscal year 2016 levels | [24,016] | |||
| SUBTOTAL MINISTRY OF INTERIOR | 930,757 | 1,083,052 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 110 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –1,482,289 | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–1,482,289] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –1,482,289 | |||
| TOTAL AFGHANISTAN SECURITY FORCES FUND | 3,448,715 | 2,279,968 | ||
| IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | ||||
| IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | ||||
| 010 | IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | 630,000 | 680,000 | |
| Support to Kurdish and Sunni tribal security forces for operations in Mosul, Iraq | [50,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | 630,000 | 680,000 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 020 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –267,913 | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–267,913] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –267,913 | |||
| TOTAL IRAQ TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | 630,000 | 412,087 | ||
| SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | ||||
| SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | ||||
| 010 | SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | 250,000 | 250,000 | |
| SUBTOTAL SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | 250,000 | 250,000 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 020 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –98,497 | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–98,497] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –98,497 | |||
| TOTAL SYRIA TRAIN AND EQUIP FUND | 250,000 | 151,503 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 360,621 | 360,621 | |
| 040 | AIR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY SUPPORT | 4,603 | 4,603 | |
| 050 | AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 159,049 | 159,049 | |
| 060 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 113,994 | 113,994 | |
| 070 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 1,840 | 1,840 | |
| 080 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 35,529 | 35,529 | |
| 090 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 1,073,080 | 1,073,080 | |
| 100 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 17,306 | 17,306 | |
| 110 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 2,128,431 | 2,128,431 | |
| 130 | COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS | 21,257 | 21,257 | |
| 160 | WARFARE TACTICS | 22,603 | 22,603 | |
| 170 | OPERATIONAL METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY | 22,934 | 22,934 | |
| 180 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 568,511 | 568,511 | |
| 190 | EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE | 11,358 | 11,358 | |
| 250 | IN-SERVICE WEAPONS SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 61,000 | 61,000 | |
| 260 | WEAPONS MAINTENANCE | 289,045 | 289,045 | |
| 270 | OTHER WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 8,000 | 8,000 | |
| 290 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 7,819 | 7,819 | |
| 300 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 61,493 | 61,493 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 4,968,473 | 4,968,473 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 330 | AIRCRAFT ACTIVATIONS/INACTIVATIONS | 1,530 | 1,530 | |
| 350 | EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS | 5,307 | 5,307 | |
| 370 | COAST GUARD SUPPORT | 162,692 | 162,692 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 169,529 | 169,529 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 410 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 43,365 | 43,365 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 43,365 | 43,365 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 490 | ADMINISTRATION | 3,764 | 3,764 | |
| 500 | EXTERNAL RELATIONS | 515 | 515 | |
| 520 | MILITARY MANPOWER AND PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT | 5,409 | 5,409 | |
| 530 | OTHER PERSONNEL SUPPORT | 1,578 | 1,578 | |
| 570 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 126,700 | 126,700 | |
| 600 | ACQUISITION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 9,261 | 9,261 | |
| 640 | NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE | 1,501 | 1,501 | |
| 730 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 15,780 | 15,780 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 164,508 | 164,508 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 740 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –2,226,518 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–120,300] | |||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–2,106,218] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –2,226,518 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | 5,345,875 | 3,119,357 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATIONAL FORCES | 403,489 | 469,789 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [66,300] | |||
| 020 | FIELD LOGISTICS | 266,094 | 266,094 | |
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 147,000 | 147,000 | |
| 060 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 18,576 | 18,576 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 835,159 | 901,459 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 110 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 31,750 | 31,750 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 31,750 | 31,750 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 150 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 73,800 | 89,800 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [16,000] | |||
| 200 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 3,650 | 3,650 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 77,450 | 93,450 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 210 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –413,593 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–9,100] | |||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–404,493] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –413,593 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | 944,359 | 613,066 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 030 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 16,500 | 16,500 | |
| 050 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 2,522 | 2,522 | |
| 100 | COMBAT SUPPORT FORCES | 7,243 | 7,243 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 26,265 | 26,265 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 200 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –10,448 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–100] | |||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–10,348] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –10,448 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | 26,265 | 15,817 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATING FORCES | 2,500 | 2,500 | |
| 040 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 804 | 804 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 3,304 | 3,304 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 090 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –1,302 | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–1,302] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –1,302 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | 3,304 | 2,002 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | PRIMARY COMBAT FORCES | 1,339,461 | 1,370,361 | |
| Enahncing readiness levels of DCA aircraft | [10,000] | |||
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [20,900] | |||
| 020 | COMBAT ENHANCEMENT FORCES | 1,096,021 | 1,116,921 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [20,900] | |||
| 030 | AIR OPERATIONS TRAINING (OJT, MAINTAIN SKILLS) | 152,278 | 152,278 | |
| 040 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 1,061,506 | 1,087,106 | |
| Compass Call Program Restructure | [25,600] | |||
| 050 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 56,700 | 56,700 | |
| 060 | BASE SUPPORT | 941,714 | 941,714 | |
| 070 | GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING | 30,219 | 30,219 | |
| 080 | OTHER COMBAT OPS SPT PROGRAMS | 207,696 | 217,696 | |
| Promoting additional DCA burden sharing | [5,000] | |||
| Supporting DCA dispersal CONOP development | [5,000] | |||
| 100 | LAUNCH FACILITIES | 869 | 869 | |
| 110 | SPACE CONTROL SYSTEMS | 5,008 | 5,008 | |
| 120 | COMBATANT COMMANDERS DIRECT MISSION SUPPORT | 100,081 | 100,081 | |
| 135 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 79,893 | 79,893 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 5,071,446 | 5,158,846 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 140 | AIRLIFT OPERATIONS | 2,774,729 | 2,872,429 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [97,700] | |||
| 150 | MOBILIZATION PREPAREDNESS | 108,163 | 108,163 | |
| 160 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 891,102 | 891,102 | |
| 180 | BASE SUPPORT | 3,686 | 3,686 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 3,777,680 | 3,875,380 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 230 | BASE SUPPORT | 52,740 | 52,740 | |
| 240 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 4,500 | 4,500 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 57,240 | 57,240 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 340 | LOGISTICS OPERATIONS | 86,716 | 86,716 | |
| 380 | BASE SUPPORT | 59,133 | 59,133 | |
| 400 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 165,348 | 165,348 | |
| 410 | OTHER SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 141,883 | 141,883 | |
| 450 | INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT | 61 | 61 | |
| 460 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 15,323 | 15,323 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 468,464 | 468,464 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 470 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –3,868,111 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–101,600] | |||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–3,766,511] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –3,868,111 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | 9,374,830 | 5,691,819 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 51,086 | 51,086 | |
| 050 | BASE SUPPORT | 6,500 | 6,500 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 57,586 | 57,586 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 110 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –22,788 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–100] | |||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–22,688] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –22,788 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | 57,586 | 34,798 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 020 | MISSION SUPPORT OPERATIONS | 3,400 | 3,400 | |
| 050 | BASE SUPPORT | 16,600 | 16,600 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 080 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –7,880 | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–7,880] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –7,880 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | 20,000 | 12,120 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF | 10,000 | ||
| Enhancing exercise of DCA aircraft | [10,000] | |||
| 030 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES | 2,636,307 | 2,805,907 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [169,600] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 2,636,307 | 2,815,907 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 100 | DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY | 13,436 | 13,436 | |
| 110 | DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY | 13,564 | 13,564 | |
| 130 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY | 32,879 | 32,879 | |
| 150 | DEFENSE LEGAL SERVICES AGENCY | 111,986 | 111,986 | |
| 170 | DEFENSE MEDIA ACTIVITY | 13,317 | 13,317 | |
| 190 | DEFENSE SECURITY COOPERATION AGENCY | 1,412,000 | 1,412,000 | |
| 260 | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY | 67,000 | 67,000 | |
| 300 | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE | 31,106 | 31,106 | |
| 320 | WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES | 3,137 | 3,137 | |
| 330 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 1,609,397 | 1,610,397 | |
| Operational support for deployed end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [1,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 3,307,822 | 3,308,822 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 340 | UNDISTRIBUTED | –2,419,878 | ||
| Excessive standard price for fuel | [–6,800] | |||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–2,413,078] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –2,419,878 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | 5,944,129 | 3,704,851 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 39,860,202 | 24,629,211 | ||
| SEC. 4303. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS FOR BASE REQUIREMENTS (In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||
| Line | Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 317,093 | 367,093 | |
| Army unfunded requirement—Improve training from BN+ to BCT- | [50,000] | |||
| 020 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 5,904 | 5,904 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 38,614 | 38,614 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 8,361 | 8,361 | |
| 050 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 279,072 | 279,072 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 106,424 | 206,924 | |
| Army unfunded requirement—Meet air readiness targets | [68,000] | |||
| Increase to support ARI—Eleventh CAB | [32,500] | |||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 253,533 | 253,533 | |
| 090 | LAND FORCES DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 350,000 | 350,000 | |
| 100 | BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 22,100 | ||
| Increase to support ARI—Eleventh CAB | [22,100] | |||
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 922,000 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [494,900] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [427,100] | |||
| 140 | ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES | 11,200 | 11,200 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 1,370,201 | 2,464,801 | ||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 250 | SPECIALIZED SKILL TRAINING | 3,565 | 3,565 | |
| 260 | FLIGHT TRAINING | 42,934 | ||
| Army unfunded requirement—Ensure AVN restructure initiative execution | [5,405] | |||
| Army unfunded requirement—Increase student workload for additional warrant officers | [31,125] | |||
| Army unfunded requirement—Train full ARPINT load of 990 | [6,404] | |||
| 270 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION | 9,021 | 40,621 | |
| Military Training and PME | [31,600] | |||
| 280 | TRAINING SUPPORT | 2,434 | 2,434 | |
| 290 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 356,500 | ||
| Recruiting and Advertising Add | [356,500] | |||
| 320 | CIVILIAN EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 1,254 | 1,254 | |
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 16,274 | 447,308 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 350 | SERVICEWIDE TRANSPORTATION | 200,000 | 265,000 | |
| Army unfunded requirement—Restore cricital shortfalls | [65,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWIDE ACTIVITIES | 200,000 | 265,000 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 540 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 704,300 | ||
| Additional funding to support increase in Army end strength | [704,300] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 704,300 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY | 1,586,475 | 3,881,409 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MODULAR SUPPORT BRIGADES | 708 | 708 | |
| 020 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 8,570 | 28,570 | |
| Army unfunded requirement—Improve training from PLT to CO proficiency | [20,000] | |||
| 030 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 375 | 375 | |
| 040 | LAND FORCES OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 13 | 13 | |
| 050 | AVIATION ASSETS | 608 | 608 | |
| 060 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 4,285 | 4,285 | |
| 100 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 97,500 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [57,100] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [40,400] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 14,559 | 132,059 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 180 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 103,400 | ||
| Additional funding to support increase in Army Reserve end strength | [103,400] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 103,400 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARMY RES | 14,559 | 235,459 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MANEUVER UNITS | 5,585 | 5,585 | |
| 030 | ECHELONS ABOVE BRIGADE | 28,956 | 28,956 | |
| 040 | THEATER LEVEL ASSETS | 10,272 | 10,272 | |
| 060 | AVIATION ASSETS | 5,621 | 51,621 | |
| Increase to support ARI | [46,000] | |||
| 070 | FORCE READINESS OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 9,694 | 9,694 | |
| 110 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 121,000 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [16,800] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [104,200] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 60,128 | 227,128 | ||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | ||||
| 190 | UNDISTRIBUTED | 159,100 | ||
| Additional funding to support increase in Army National Guard end strength | [159,100] | |||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | 159,100 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ARNG | 60,128 | 386,228 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | MISSION AND OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS | 500,000 | 556,520 | |
| Carrier Air Wing Restoration | [56,520] | |||
| 020 | FLEET AIR TRAINING | 23,020 | ||
| Carrier Air Wing Restoration | [23,020] | |||
| 050 | AIR SYSTEMS SUPPORT | 6,500 | ||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement—accelerate readiness - H–1 | [5,300] | |||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement—accelerate readiness - MV–22B | [1,200] | |||
| 060 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 36,000 | ||
| Carrier Air Wing Restoration | [6,000] | |||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Improve Afloat Readiness | [30,000] | |||
| 080 | AVIATION LOGISTICS | 33,500 | ||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement—accelerate readiness - KC–130J | [6,800] | |||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement—accelerate readiness - MV–22B | [10,700] | |||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Improve Afloat Readiness | [16,000] | |||
| 090 | MISSION AND OTHER SHIP OPERATIONS | 348,200 | ||
| Cruiser Modernization | [90,200] | |||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Improve Afloat Readiness | [158,000] | |||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Restore 3 CG Deployments | [41,000] | |||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Reverse PONCE (LPD–15) Inactivation | [59,000] | |||
| 100 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 19,700 | ||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Restore Fleet Training | [19,700] | |||
| 110 | SHIP DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 775,000 | 1,084,100 | |
| Cruiser Modernization | [71,100] | |||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Ship Depot Wholeness | [238,000] | |||
| 120 | SHIP DEPOT OPERATIONS SUPPORT | 79,000 | ||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Increase Alfoat Readiness | [79,000] | |||
| 290 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 19,270 | 408,470 | |
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [113,600] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [275,600] | |||
| 300 | BASE OPERATING SUPPORT | 158,032 | 158,032 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 1,452,302 | 2,753,042 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 350 | EXPEDITIONARY HEALTH SERVICES SYSTEMS | 3,597 | 3,597 | |
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 3,597 | 3,597 | ||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 540 | SERVICEWIDE COMMUNICATIONS | 25,617 | 25,617 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 25,617 | 25,617 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY | 1,481,516 | 2,782,256 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 010 | OPERATIONAL FORCES | 300,000 | 322,000 | |
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- enhanced combat helmets | [22,000] | |||
| 020 | FIELD LOGISTICS | 21,450 | ||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- rifle combat optic modernization | [13,200] | |||
| Marine Corps unfunded requirement- SPMAGTF—C4 UUNS | [8,250] | |||
| 050 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 145,600 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [31,400] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [114,200] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 300,000 | 489,050 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MARINE CORPS | 300,000 | 489,050 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 030 | AIRCRAFT DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 4,000 | ||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Improve Afloat Readiness | [4,000] | |||
| 070 | SHIP OPERATIONS SUPPORT & TRAINING | 300 | ||
| Navy unfunded requirement—Restore Fleet Training | [300] | |||
| 130 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 7,800 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [2,100] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [5,700] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 12,100 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, NAVY RES | 12,100 | |||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 030 | SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION AND MODERNIZATION | 7,700 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [4,300] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [3,400] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 7,700 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, MC RESERVE | 7,700 | |||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 040 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 124,000 | 447,576 | |
| Air Force unfunded requirement—Weapons System Sustainment | [323,576] | |||
| 050 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 407,900 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [142,900] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [265,000] | |||
| 070 | GLOBAL C3I AND EARLY WARNING | 40,000 | ||
| Air Force unfunded requirement—Ground Based Radars | [40,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 124,000 | 895,476 | ||
| MOBILIZATION | ||||
| 160 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 66,424 | ||
| Air Force unfunded requirement—Weapons System Sustainment | [66,424] | |||
| 170 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 63,600 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [22,300] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [41,300] | |||
| SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION | 130,024 | |||
| TRAINING AND RECRUITING | ||||
| 220 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 58,200 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [20,400] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [37,800] | |||
| SUBTOTAL TRAINING AND RECRUITING | 58,200 | |||
| ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 370 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 79,000 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [27,700] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [51,300] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADMIN & SRVWD ACTIVITIES | 79,000 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AIR FORCE | 124,000 | 1,162,700 | ||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 20,500 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [7,100] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [13,400] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 20,500 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, AF RESERVE | 20,500 | |||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 030 | DEPOT MAINTENANCE | 40,000 | ||
| Air Force unfunded requirement—Weapons System Sustainment | [40,000] | |||
| 040 | FACILITIES SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION & MODERNIZATION | 64,500 | ||
| Increase Restoration & Modernization funding | [18,900] | |||
| Restore Sustainment shortfalls | [45,600] | |||
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 104,500 | |||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 070 | RECRUITING AND ADVERTISING | 67,000 | ||
| Air Force unfunded requirement | [67,000] | |||
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICE-WIDE ACTIVITIES | 67,000 | |||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, ANG | 171,500 | |||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | ||||
| OPERATING FORCES | ||||
| 030 | SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND/OPERATING FORCES | 14,344 | 14,344 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATING FORCES | 14,344 | 14,344 | ||
| ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | ||||
| 130 | DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AGENCY | 14,700 | 14,700 | |
| 330 | CLASSIFIED PROGRAMS | 9,000 | 9,000 | |
| SUBTOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SERVICEWIDE ACTIVITIES | 23,700 | 23,700 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, DEFENSE-WIDE | 38,044 | 38,044 | ||
| TOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 3,604,722 | 9,186,946 | ||
| SEC. 4401. MILITARY PERSONNEL(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| Military Personnel Appropriations | 128,902,332 | 128,482,914 | |
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–200,400] | ||
| Historical unobligated balances | [–248,700] | ||
| National Guard State Partnership Program, Air Force, Special Training | [841] | ||
| National Guard State Partnership Program, Army, Special Training | [841] | ||
| Prohibition on Per Diem Allowance Reduction | [28,000] | ||
| Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions | 6,366,908 | 6,366,908 | |
| SEC. 4402. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| Military Personnel Appropriations | 3,499,293 | 2,199,572 | |
| Maintain end strength of 9,800 in Afghanistan | [130,300] | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–1,430,021] | ||
| SEC. 4403. MILITARY PERSONNEL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS FOR BASE REQUIREMENTS.(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| Military Personnel Appropriations | 62,965 | 2,572,715 | |
| Fund active Air Force end strength to 321k | [145,000] | ||
| Fund active Army end strength to 480k | [1,123,500] | ||
| Fund active Marine Corps end strengthto 185k | [300,000] | ||
| Fund active Navy end strength | [65,300] | ||
| Fund Army National Guard end strength to 350k | [303,700] | ||
| Fund Army Reserves end strength to 205k | [166,650] | ||
| Marine Corps—Bonus Pay/PCS Resotral/Foreign Language Bonus | [75,600] | ||
| Military Personnel Pay Raise | [330,000] | ||
| Medicare-Eligible Retiree Health Fund Contributions | 49,900 | ||
| Increase associated with additional end strength | [49,900] | ||
| SEC. 4501. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | |||
| INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS | |||
| SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY | 56,469 | 56,469 | |
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | 56,469 | 56,469 | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | |||
| FUEL COSTS | |||
| SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS | 63,967 | 63,967 | |
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, AIR FORCE | 63,967 | 63,967 | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||
| ENERGY MANAGEMENT—DEF | |||
| SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT—DEF | 37,132 | 37,132 | |
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | 37,132 | 37,132 | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | |||
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | 1,214,045 | 1,214,045 | |
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DECA | 1,214,045 | 1,214,045 | |
| NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND | |||
| POST DELIVERY AND OUTFITTING | |||
| NATIONAL DEF SEALIFT VESSEL | 85,000 | ||
| National Security Multi-Mission Vehicle | [85,000] | ||
| TOTAL NATIONAL DEFENSE SEALIFT FUND | 85,000 | ||
| NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND | |||
| DEVELOPMENT | 773,138 | ||
| Realignment of funds to the National Sea-Based Deterrence Fund | [773,138] | ||
| TOTAL NATIONAL SEA-BASED DETERRENCE FUND | 773,138 | ||
| CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION | |||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 147,282 | 147,282 | |
| RDT&E | 388,609 | 388,609 | |
| PROCUREMENT | 15,132 | 15,132 | |
| TOTAL CHEM AGENTS & MUNITIONS DESTRUCTION | 551,023 | 551,023 | |
| DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | |||
| DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE | 730,087 | 760,087 | |
| SOUTHCOM Operational Support | [30,000] | ||
| DRUG DEMAND REDUCTION PROGRAM | 114,713 | 114,713 | |
| TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | 844,800 | 874,800 | |
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | |||
| OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE | 318,882 | 318,882 | |
| RDT&E | 3,153 | 3,153 | |
| TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 322,035 | 322,035 | |
| DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | |||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | |||
| IN-HOUSE CARE | 9,240,160 | 9,240,160 | |
| PRIVATE SECTOR CARE | 15,738,759 | 15,738,759 | |
| CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT | 2,367,759 | 2,367,759 | |
| INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | 1,743,749 | 1,743,749 | |
| MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES | 311,380 | 311,380 | |
| EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 743,231 | 743,231 | |
| BASE OPERATIONS/COMMUNICATIONS | 2,086,352 | 2,086,352 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 32,231,390 | 32,231,390 | |
| RDT&E | |||
| RESEARCH | 9,097 | 9,097 | |
| EXPLORATRY DEVELOPMENT | 58,517 | 58,517 | |
| ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT | 221,226 | 221,226 | |
| DEMONSTRATION/VALIDATION | 96,602 | 96,602 | |
| ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | 364,057 | 364,057 | |
| MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT | 58,410 | 58,410 | |
| CAPABILITIES ENHANCEMENT | 14,998 | 14,998 | |
| SUBTOTAL RDT&E | 822,907 | 822,907 | |
| PROCUREMENT | |||
| INITIAL OUTFITTING | 20,611 | 20,611 | |
| REPLACEMENT & MODERNIZATION | 360,727 | 360,727 | |
| JOINT OPERATIONAL MEDICINE INFORMATION SYSTEM | 2,413 | 2,413 | |
| DOD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODERNIZATION | 29,468 | 29,468 | |
| SUBTOTAL PROCUREMENT | 413,219 | 413,219 | |
| UNDISTRIBUTED | –419,500 | ||
| Foreign Currency adjustments | [–20,400] | ||
| Historical unobligated balances | [–399,100] | ||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –419,500 | ||
| TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | 33,467,516 | 33,048,016 | |
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 36,556,987 | 37,025,625 | |
| SEC. 4502. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | |||
| INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS | |||
| SUPPLY MANAGEMENT—ARMY | 46,833 | 46,833 | |
| UNDISTRIBUTED | –18,452 | ||
| Reduction to sustain minimal readiness levels | [–18,452] | ||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, ARMY | 46,833 | 28,381 | |
| WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | |||
| SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT—DEF | |||
| DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DLA) | 93,800 | 93,800 | |
| UNDISTRIBUTED | –36,956 | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–36,956] | ||
| TOTAL WORKING CAPITAL FUND, DEFENSE-WIDE | 93,800 | 56,844 | |
| DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | |||
| DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE | 191,533 | 191,533 | |
| TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | 191,533 | 191,533 | |
| OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | |||
| OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE | 22,062 | 22,062 | |
| TOTAL OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL | 22,062 | 22,062 | |
| DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | |||
| OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | |||
| IN-HOUSE CARE | 95,366 | 95,366 | |
| PRIVATE SECTOR CARE | 233,073 | 233,073 | |
| CONSOLIDATED HEALTH SUPPORT | 3,325 | 3,325 | |
| SUBTOTAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE | 331,764 | 331,764 | |
| UNDISTRIBUTED | |||
| UNDISTRIBUTED | –130,711 | ||
| Prorated OCO allocation in support of base readiness requirements | [–130,711] | ||
| SUBTOTAL UNDISTRIBUTED | –130,711 | ||
| TOTAL DEFENSE HEALTH PROGRAM | 331,764 | 201,053 | |
| UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE | |||
| UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE | 150,000 | ||
| Program increase | [150,000] | ||
| TOTAL UKRAINE SECURITY ASSISTANCE | 150,000 | ||
| COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND | |||
| COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND | 1,000,000 | 750,000 | |
| Program decrease | [–250,000] | ||
| TOTAL COUNTERTERRORISM PARTNERSHIPS FUND | 1,000,000 | 750,000 | |
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 1,685,992 | 1,399,873 | |
| SEC. 4503. OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS FOR BASE REQUIREMENTS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Item | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | |||
| DRUG INTERDICTION AND COUNTER-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEFENSE | 23,800 | 23,800 | |
| TOTAL DRUG INTERDICTION & CTR-DRUG ACTIVITIES, DEF | 23,800 | 23,800 | |
| TOTAL OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS | 23,800 | 23,800 | |
| SEC. 4601. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||
| Account | State/Country and Installation | Project Title | FY 2017 Request | House Agreement | ||
| Alaska | ||||||
| Army | Fort Wainwright | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar | 47,000 | 47,000 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Army | Concord | Access Control Point | 12,600 | 12,600 | ||
| Colorado | ||||||
| Army | Fort Carson | Automated Infantry Platoon Battle Course | 8,100 | 8,100 | ||
| Army | Fort Carson | Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||
| Georgia | ||||||
| Army | Fort Gordon | Access Control Point | 0 | 29,000 | ||
| Army | Fort Gordon | Company Operations Facility | 0 | 10,600 | ||
| Army | Fort Gordon | CYBER Protection Team Ops Facility | 90,000 | 90,000 | ||
| Army | Fort Stewart | Automated Qualification/Training Range | 14,800 | 14,800 | ||
| Germany | ||||||
| Army | East Camp Grafenwoehr | Training Support Center | 22,000 | 22,000 | ||
| Army | Garmisch | Dining Facility | 9,600 | 9,600 | ||
| Army | Wiesbaden Army Airfield | Controlled Humidity Warehouse | 16,500 | 16,500 | ||
| Army | Wiesbaden Army Airfield | Hazardous Material Storage Building | 2,700 | 2,700 | ||
| Guantanamo Bay, Cuba | ||||||
| Army | Guantanamo Bay | Guantanamo Bay Naval Station Migration Complex | 33,000 | 33,000 | ||
| Hawaii | ||||||
| Army | Fort Shafter | Command and Control Facility, Incr 2 | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||
| Missouri | ||||||
| Army | Fort Leonard Wood | Fire Station | 0 | 6,900 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| Army | Fort Hood | Automated Infantry Platoon Battle Course | 7,600 | 7,600 | ||
| Utah | ||||||
| Army | Camp Williams | Live Fire Exercise Shoothouse | 7,400 | 7,400 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Army | Fort Belvoir | Secure Admin/Operations Facility, Incr 2 | 64,000 | 64,000 | ||
| Army | Fort Belvoir | Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 0 | 23,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Host Nation Support FY17 | 18,000 | 18,000 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Minor Construction FY17 | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design FY17 | 80,159 | 80,159 | ||
| Military Construction, Army Total | 503,459 | 572,959 | ||||
| Arizona | ||||||
| Navy | Yuma | VMX–22 Maintenance Hangar | 48,355 | 48,355 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Navy | Coronado | Coastal Campus Entry Control Point | 13,044 | 13,044 | ||
| Navy | Coronado | Coastal Campus Utilities Infrastructure | 81,104 | 81,104 | ||
| Navy | Coronado | Grace Hopper Data Center Power Upgrades | 10,353 | 10,353 | ||
| Navy | Lemoore | F–35C Engine Repair Facility | 26,723 | 26,723 | ||
| Navy | Miramar | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar, Incr 1 | 0 | 79,399 | ||
| Navy | Miramar | Communications Complex & Infrastructure Upgrade | 0 | 34,700 | ||
| Navy | Miramar | F–35 Aircraft Parking Apron | 0 | 40,000 | ||
| Navy | San Diego | Energy Security Hospital Microgrid | 6,183 | 0 | ||
| Navy | Seal Beach | Missile Magazines | 21,007 | 21,007 | ||
| Florida | ||||||
| Navy | Eglin AFB | WMD Field Training Facilities | 20,489 | 20,489 | ||
| Navy | Mayport | Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant | 0 | 66,000 | ||
| Navy | Pensacola | A-School Dormitory | 0 | 53,000 | ||
| Guam | ||||||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Hardening of Guam POL Infrastructure | 26,975 | 26,975 | ||
| Navy | Joint Region Marianas | Power Upgrade—Harmon | 62,210 | 62,210 | ||
| Hawaii | ||||||
| Navy | Barking Sands | Upgrade Power Plant & Electrical Distrib Sys | 43,384 | 43,384 | ||
| Navy | Kaneohe Bay | Regimental Consolidated Comm/Elec Facility | 72,565 | 72,565 | ||
| Japan | ||||||
| Navy | Kadena AB | Aircraft Maintenance Complex | 26,489 | 26,489 | ||
| Navy | Sasebo | Shore Power (Juliet Pier) | 16,420 | 16,420 | ||
| Maine | ||||||
| Navy | Kittery | Unaccompanied Housing | 17,773 | 17,773 | ||
| Navy | Kittery | Utility Improvements for Nuclear Platforms | 30,119 | 30,119 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| Navy | Patuxent River | UCLASS RDT&E Hangar | 40,576 | 40,576 | ||
| Nevada | ||||||
| Navy | Fallon | Air Wing Simulator Facility | 13,523 | 13,523 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| Navy | Camp Lejeune | Range Facilities Safety Improvements | 18,482 | 18,482 | ||
| Navy | Cherry Point | Central Heating Plant Conversion | 12,515 | 12,515 | ||
| South Carolina | ||||||
| Navy | Beaufort | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar | 83,490 | 83,490 | ||
| Navy | Parris Island | Recruit Reconditioning Center & Barracks | 29,882 | 29,882 | ||
| Spain | ||||||
| Navy | Rota | Communication Station | 23,607 | 23,607 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Navy | Norfolk | Chambers Field Magazine Recap PH I | 0 | 27,000 | ||
| Washington | ||||||
| Navy | Bangor | SEAWOLF Class Service Pier | 0 | 73,000 | ||
| Navy | Bangor | Service Pier Electrical Upgrades | 18,939 | 18,939 | ||
| Navy | Bangor | Submarine Refit Maint Support Facility | 21,476 | 21,476 | ||
| Navy | Bremerton | Nuclear Repair Facility | 6,704 | 6,704 | ||
| Navy | Whidbey Island | EA–18G Maintenance Hangar | 45,501 | 45,501 | ||
| Navy | Whidbey Island | Triton Mission Control Facility | 30,475 | 30,475 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 88,230 | 88,230 | ||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 29,790 | 29,790 | ||
| Navy | Various Worldwide Locations | Triton Forward Operating Base Hangar | 41,380 | 41,380 | ||
| Military Construction, Navy Total | 1,027,763 | 1,394,679 | ||||
| Alaska | ||||||
| AF | Clear AFS | Fire Station | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| AF | Eielson AFB | F–35A ADAL Field Training Detachment Fac | 22,100 | 22,100 | ||
| AF | Eielson AFB | F–35A Aircraft Weather Shelter (Sqd 2) | 82,300 | 0 | ||
| AF | Eielson AFB | F–35A Aircraft Weather Shelters (Sqd 1) | 79,500 | 79,500 | ||
| AF | Eielson AFB | F–35A Earth Covered Magazines | 11,300 | 11,300 | ||
| AF | Eielson AFB | F–35A Hangar/Propulsion MX/Dispatch | 44,900 | 44,900 | ||
| AF | Eielson AFB | F–35A Hangar/Squad Ops/AMU Sq #2 | 42,700 | 42,700 | ||
| AF | Eielson AFB | F–35A Missile Maintenance Facility | 12,800 | 12,800 | ||
| AF | Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson | Add/Alter AWACS Alert Hangar | 29,000 | 29,000 | ||
| Arizona | ||||||
| AF | Luke AFB | F–35A Squad Ops/Aircraft Maint Unit #5 | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| Australia | ||||||
| AF | Darwin | APR—Aircraft MX Support Facility | 1,800 | 1,800 | ||
| AF | Darwin | APR—Expand Parking Apron | 28,600 | 28,600 | ||
| California | ||||||
| AF | Edwards AFB | Flightline Fire Station | 24,000 | 24,000 | ||
| Colorado | ||||||
| AF | Buckley AFB | Small Arms Range Complex | 13,500 | 13,500 | ||
| Delaware | ||||||
| AF | Dover AFB | Aircraft Maintenance Hangar | 39,000 | 39,000 | ||
| Florida | ||||||
| AF | Eglin AFB | Advanced Munitions Technology Complex | 75,000 | 75,000 | ||
| AF | Eglin AFB | Flightline Fire Station | 13,600 | 13,600 | ||
| AF | Patrick AFB | Fire/Crash Rescue Station | 13,500 | 13,500 | ||
| Georgia | ||||||
| AF | Moody AFB | Personnel Recovery 4-Bay Hangar/Helo Mx Unit | 30,900 | 30,900 | ||
| Germany | ||||||
| AF | Ramstein AB | 37 AS Squadron Operations/Aircraft Maint Unit | 13,437 | 13,437 | ||
| AF | Spangdahlem AB | EIC—Site Development and Infrastructure | 43,465 | 43,465 | ||
| Guam | ||||||
| AF | Joint Region Marianas | APR—Munitions Storage Igloos, Ph 2 | 35,300 | 35,300 | ||
| AF | Joint Region Marianas | APR—SATCOM C4I Facility | 14,200 | 14,200 | ||
| AF | Joint Region Marianas | Block 40 Maintenance Hangar | 31,158 | 31,158 | ||
| Japan | ||||||
| AF | Kadena AB | APR—Replace Munitions Structures | 19,815 | 19,815 | ||
| AF | Yokota AB | C–130J Corrosion Control Hangar | 23,777 | 23,777 | ||
| AF | Yokota AB | Construct Combat Arms Training & Maint Fac | 8,243 | 8,243 | ||
| Kansas | ||||||
| AF | McConnell AFB | Air Traffic Control Tower | 11,200 | 11,200 | ||
| AF | McConnell AFB | KC–46A ADAL Taxiway Delta | 5,600 | 5,600 | ||
| AF | McConnell AFB | KC–46A Alter Flight Simulator Bldgs | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| Louisiana | ||||||
| AF | Barksdale AFB | Consolidated Communication Facility | 21,000 | 21,000 | ||
| Mariana Islands | ||||||
| AF | Unspecified Location | APR—Land Acquisition | 9,000 | 9,000 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| AF | Joint Base Andrews | 21 Points Enclosed Firing Range | 13,000 | 13,000 | ||
| AF | Joint Base Andrews | Consolidated Communications Center | 0 | 50,000 | ||
| AF | Joint Base Andrews | PAR Relocate JADOC Satellite Site | 3,500 | 3,500 | ||
| Massachusetts | ||||||
| AF | Hanscom AFB | Construct Vandenberg Gate Complex | 0 | 10,965 | ||
| AF | Hanscom AFB | System Management Engineering Facility | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| Montana | ||||||
| AF | Malmstrom AFB | Missile Maintenance Facility | 14,600 | 14,600 | ||
| Nevada | ||||||
| AF | Nellis AFB | F–35A POL Fill Stand Addition | 10,600 | 10,600 | ||
| New Mexico | ||||||
| AF | Cannon AFB | North Fitness Center | 21,000 | 21,000 | ||
| AF | Holloman AFB | Hazardous Cargo Pad and Taxiway | 10,600 | 10,600 | ||
| AF | Kirtland AFB | Combat Rescue Helicopter (CRH) Simulator | 7,300 | 7,300 | ||
| Ohio | ||||||
| AF | Wright-Patterson AFB | Relocated Entry Control Facility 26A | 12,600 | 12,600 | ||
| Oklahoma | ||||||
| AF | Altus AFB | KC–46A FTU/FTC Simulator Facility Ph 2 | 11,600 | 11,600 | ||
| AF | Tinker AFB | E–3G Mission and Flight Simulator Training Facility | 0 | 26,000 | ||
| AF | Tinker AFB | KC–46A Depot System Integration Laboratory | 17,000 | 17,000 | ||
| South Carolina | ||||||
| AF | Joint Base Charleston | Fire & Rescue Station | 0 | 17,000 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| AF | Joint Base San Antonio | BMT Recruit Dormitory 6 | 67,300 | 67,300 | ||
| Turkey | ||||||
| AF | Incirlik AB | Airfield Fire/Crash Rescue Station | 13,449 | 13,449 | ||
| United Arab Emirates | ||||||
| AF | Al Dhafra | Large Aircraft Maintenance Hangar | 35,400 | 35,400 | ||
| United Kingdom | ||||||
| AF | RAF Croughton | JIAC Consolidation—Ph 3 | 53,082 | 0 | ||
| AF | RAF Croughton | Main Gate Complex | 16,500 | 16,500 | ||
| Utah | ||||||
| AF | Hill AFB | 649 MUNS Munitions Storage Magazines | 6,600 | 6,600 | ||
| AF | Hill AFB | 649 MUNS Precision Guided Missile MX Facility | 8,700 | 8,700 | ||
| AF | Hill AFB | 649 MUNS Stamp/Maint & Inspection Facility | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||
| AF | Hill AFB | Composite Aircraft Antenna Calibration Fac | 7,100 | 7,100 | ||
| AF | Hill AFB | F–35A Munitions Maintenance Complex | 10,100 | 10,100 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| AF | Joint Base Langley-Eustis | Air Force Targeting Center | 45,000 | 45,000 | ||
| AF | Joint Base Langley-Eustis | Fuel System Maintenance Dock | 14,200 | 14,200 | ||
| Washington | ||||||
| AF | Fairchild AFB | Pipeline Dorm, USAF SERE School (150 RM) | 27,000 | 27,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| AF | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 143,582 | 163,582 | ||
| AF | Various Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Military Construction | 30,000 | 63,082 | ||
| Wyoming | ||||||
| AF | F. E. Warren AFB | Missile Transfer Facility Bldg 4331 | 5,550 | 5,550 | ||
| Military Construction, Air Force Total | 1,481,058 | 1,502,723 | ||||
| Alaska | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Clear AFS | Long Range Discrim Radar Sys Complex Ph1, Incr 1 | 155,000 | 100,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Greely | Missile Defense Complex Switchgear Facility | 9,560 | 9,560 | ||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson | Construct Truck Offload Facility | 4,900 | 4,900 | ||
| Arizona | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Huachuca | JITC Building 52110 Renovation | 4,493 | 4,493 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Coronado | SOF Human Performance Training Center | 15,578 | 15,578 | ||
| Def-Wide | Coronado | SOF Seal Team Ops Facility | 47,290 | 47,290 | ||
| Def-Wide | Coronado | SOF Seal Team Ops Facility | 47,290 | 47,290 | ||
| Def-Wide | Coronado | SOF Special RECON Team ONE Operations Fac | 20,949 | 20,949 | ||
| Def-Wide | Coronado | SOF Training Detachment ONE Ops Facility | 44,305 | 44,305 | ||
| Def-Wide | Travis AFB | Replace Hydrant Fuel System | 26,500 | 26,500 | ||
| Delaware | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Dover AFB | Welch ES/Dover MS Replacement | 44,115 | 44,115 | ||
| Diego Garcia | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Diego Garcia | Improve Wharf Refueling Capability | 30,000 | 30,000 | ||
| Florida | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Patrick AFB | Replace Fuel Tanks | 10,100 | 10,100 | ||
| Georgia | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Fort Benning | SOF Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hangar | 4,820 | 4,820 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Gordon | Medical Clinic Replacement | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||
| Germany | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Kaiserlautern AB | Sembach Elementary/Middle School Replacement | 45,221 | 45,221 | ||
| Def-Wide | Rhine Ordnance Barracks | Medical Center Replacement Incr 6 | 58,063 | 58,063 | ||
| Japan | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Iwakuni | Construct Truck Offload & Loading Facilities | 6,664 | 6,664 | ||
| Def-Wide | Kadena AB | Kadena Elementary School Replacement | 84,918 | 84,918 | ||
| Def-Wide | Kadena AB | Medical Materiel Warehouse | 20,881 | 20,881 | ||
| Def-Wide | Kadena AB | SOF Maintenance Hangar | 42,823 | 42,823 | ||
| Def-Wide | Kadena AB | SOF Simulator Facility (MC–130) | 12,602 | 12,602 | ||
| Def-Wide | Yokota AB | Airfield Apron | 41,294 | 41,294 | ||
| Def-Wide | Yokota AB | Hangar/AMU | 39,466 | 39,466 | ||
| Def-Wide | Yokota AB | Operations and Warehouse Facilities | 26,710 | 26,710 | ||
| Def-Wide | Yokota AB | Simulator Facility | 6,261 | 6,261 | ||
| Kwajalein | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Kwajalein Atoll | Replace Fuel Storage Tanks | 85,500 | 85,500 | ||
| Maine | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Kittery | Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement | 27,100 | 27,100 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Bethesda Naval Hospital | MEDCEN Addition/Alteration Incr 1 | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Meade | Access Control Facility | 21,000 | 21,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Meade | NSAW Campus Feeders Phase 3 | 17,000 | 17,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Meade | NSAW Recapitalize Building #2 Incr 2 | 195,000 | 145,000 | ||
| Missouri | ||||||
| Def-Wide | St. Louis | Land Acquisition-Next NGA West (N2W) Campus | 801 | 0 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Camp Lejeune | Dental Clinic Replacement | 31,000 | 31,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Combat Medic Training Facility | 10,905 | 10,905 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Parachute Rigging Facility | 21,420 | 21,420 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Special Tactics Facility (PH3) | 30,670 | 30,670 | ||
| Def-Wide | Fort Bragg | SOF Tactical Equipment Maintenance Facility | 23,598 | 23,598 | ||
| South Carolina | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Joint Base Charleston | Construct Hydrant Fuel System | 17,000 | 17,000 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Red River Army Depot | Construct Warehouse & Open Storage | 44,700 | 44,700 | ||
| Def-Wide | Sheppard AFB | Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement | 91,910 | 91,910 | ||
| United Kingdom | ||||||
| Def-Wide | RAF Croughton | Croughton Elem/Middle/High School Replacement | 71,424 | 71,424 | ||
| Def-Wide | RAF Lakenheath | Construct Hydrant Fuel System | 13,500 | 13,500 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Pentagon | Pentagon Metro Entrance Facility | 12,111 | 12,111 | ||
| Def-Wide | Pentagon | Upgrade IT Facilities Infrastructure—RRMC | 8,105 | 8,105 | ||
| Wake Island | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Wake Island | Test Support Facility | 11,670 | 11,670 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Contingency Construction | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | ECIP Design | 10,000 | 0 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Energy Conservation Investment Program | 150,000 | 150,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Exercise Related Minor Construction | 8,631 | 8,631 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design, Defense Wide | 13,450 | 23,450 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design, DODEA | 23,585 | 23,585 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design, NGA | 71,647 | 36,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design, NSA | 24,000 | 24,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design, WHS | 3,427 | 3,427 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction, DHA | 8,500 | 8,500 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction, DODEA | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction, Defense Wide | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction, SOCOM | 5,994 | 5,994 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor MILCON, NSA | 3,913 | 3,913 | ||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Worldwide Unspecified Minor Construction, MDA | 2,414 | 2,414 | ||
| Def-Wide | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design, DLA | 27,660 | 27,660 | ||
| Def-Wide | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design, SOCOM | 27,653 | 27,653 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified Locations | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design, MDA | 0 | 15,000 | ||
| Military Construction, Defense-Wide Total | 2,056,091 | 1,929,643 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| NATO | NATO Security Investment Program | NATO Security Investment Program | 177,932 | 177,932 | ||
| NATO Security Investment Program Total | 177,932 | 177,932 | ||||
| Colorado | ||||||
| Army NG | Fort Carson | National Guard Readiness Center | 0 | 16,500 | ||
| Hawaii | ||||||
| Army NG | Hilo | Combined Support Maintenance Shop | 31,000 | 31,000 | ||
| Iowa | ||||||
| Army NG | Davenport | National Guard Readiness Center | 23,000 | 23,000 | ||
| Kansas | ||||||
| Army NG | Fort Leavenworth | National Guard Readiness Center | 29,000 | 29,000 | ||
| New Hampshire | ||||||
| Army NG | Hooksett | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 11,000 | 11,000 | ||
| Army NG | Rochester | National Guard Vehicle Maintenance Shop | 8,900 | 8,900 | ||
| Oklahoma | ||||||
| Army NG | Ardmore | National Guard Readiness Center | 22,000 | 22,000 | ||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||
| Army NG | Fort Indiantown Gap | Access Control Buildings | 0 | 20,000 | ||
| Army NG | York | National Guard Readiness Center | 9,300 | 9,300 | ||
| Rhode Island | ||||||
| Army NG | East Greenwich | National Guard/Reserve Center Building (JFHQ) | 20,000 | 20,000 | ||
| Utah | ||||||
| Army NG | Camp Williams | National Guard Readiness Center | 37,000 | 37,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army NG | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 8,729 | 8,729 | ||
| Army NG | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 12,001 | 12,001 | ||
| Wyoming | ||||||
| Army NG | Camp Guernsey | General Instruction Building | 0 | 31,000 | ||
| Army NG | Laramie | National Guard Readiness Center | 21,000 | 21,000 | ||
| Military Construction, Army National Guard Total | 232,930 | 300,430 | ||||
| Arizona | ||||||
| Army Res | Phoenix | Army Reserve Center | 0 | 30,000 | ||
| California | ||||||
| Army Res | Camp Parks | Transient Training Barracks | 19,000 | 19,000 | ||
| Army Res | Fort Hunter Liggett | Emergency Services Center | 21,500 | 21,500 | ||
| Army Res | Barstow | Equipment Concentration Site | 0 | 29,000 | ||
| Virginia | ||||||
| Army Res | Dublin | Organizational Maintenance Shop/AMSA | 6,000 | 6,000 | ||
| Washington | ||||||
| Army Res | Joint Base Lewis–McChord | Army Reserve Center | 0 | 27,500 | ||
| Wisconsin | ||||||
| Army Res | Fort McCoy | AT/MOB Dining Facility | 11,400 | 11,400 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 7,500 | 7,500 | ||
| Army Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 2,830 | 2,830 | ||
| Military Construction, Army Reserve Total | 68,230 | 154,730 | ||||
| Louisiana | ||||||
| N/MC Res | New Orleans | Joint Reserve Intelligence Center | 11,207 | 11,207 | ||
| New York | ||||||
| N/MC Res | Brooklyn | Electric Feeder Ductbank | 1,964 | 1,964 | ||
| N/MC Res | Syracuse | Marine Corps Reserve Center | 13,229 | 13,229 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| N/MC Res | Galveston | Reserve Center Annex | 8,414 | 8,414 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| N/MC Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | MCNR Planning & Design | 3,783 | 3,783 | ||
| Military Construction, Naval Reserve Total | 38,597 | 38,597 | ||||
| Connecticut | ||||||
| Air NG | Bradley IAP | Construct Small Air Terminal | 6,300 | 6,300 | ||
| Florida | ||||||
| Air NG | Jacksonville IAP | Replace Fire Crash/Rescue Station | 9,000 | 9,000 | ||
| Hawaii | ||||||
| Air NG | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | F–22 Composite Repair Facility | 11,000 | 11,000 | ||
| Iowa | ||||||
| Air NG | Sioux Gateway Airport | Construct Consolidated Support Functions | 12,600 | 12,600 | ||
| Maryland | ||||||
| Air NG | Joint Base Andrews | Munitions Load Crew Trng/Corrosion Cnrtl Facility | 0 | 5,000 | ||
| Minnesota | ||||||
| Air NG | Duluth IAP | Load Crew Training/Weapon Shops | 7,600 | 7,600 | ||
| New Hampshire | ||||||
| Air NG | Pease International Trade Port | KC–46A Install Fuselage Trainer Bldg 251 | 1,500 | 1,500 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| Air NG | Charlotte/Douglas IAP | C–17 Corrosion Control/Fuel Cell Hangar | 29,600 | 29,600 | ||
| Air NG | Charlotte/Douglas IAP | C–17 Type III Hydrant Refueling System | 21,000 | 21,000 | ||
| Ohio | ||||||
| Air NG | Toledo Express Airport | Indoor Small Arms Range | 0 | 6,000 | ||
| South Carolina | ||||||
| Air NG | McEntire ANGS | Replace Operations and Training Facility | 8,400 | 8,400 | ||
| Texas | ||||||
| Air NG | Ellington Field | Consolidate Crew Readiness Facility | 4,500 | 4,500 | ||
| Vermont | ||||||
| Air NG | Burlington IAP | F–35 Beddown 4-Bay Flight Simulator | 4,500 | 4,500 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Air NG | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 17,495 | 29,495 | ||
| Air NG | Various Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 10,462 | 10,462 | ||
| Military Construction, Air National Guard Total | 143,957 | 166,957 | ||||
| Guam | ||||||
| AF Res | Andersen AFB | Reserve Medical Training Facility | 0 | 5,200 | ||
| Massachusetts | ||||||
| AF Res | Westover ARB | Indoor Small Arms Range | 0 | 9,200 | ||
| North Carolina | ||||||
| AF Res | Seymour Johnson AFB | KC–46A ADAL Bldg for AGE/Fuselage Training | 5,700 | 5,700 | ||
| AF Res | Seymour Johnson AFB | KC–46A ADAL Squadron Operations Facilities | 2,250 | 2,250 | ||
| AF Res | Seymour Johnson AFB | KC–46A Two-Bay Corrosion/Fuel Cell Hangar | 90,000 | 90,000 | ||
| Pennsylvania | ||||||
| AF Res | Pittsburgh IAP | C–17 ADAL Fuel Hydrant System | 22,800 | 22,800 | ||
| AF Res | Pittsburgh IAP | C–17 Const/OverlayTaxiway and Apron | 8,200 | 8,200 | ||
| AF Res | Pittsburgh IAP | C–17 Construct Two-Bay Corrosion/Fuel Hangar | 54,000 | 54,000 | ||
| Utah | ||||||
| AF Res | Hill AFB | ADAL Life Support Facility | 0 | 3,050 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| AF Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 4,500 | 4,500 | ||
| AF Res | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Unspecified Minor Construction | 1,500 | 1,500 | ||
| Military Construction, Air Force Reserve Total | 188,950 | 206,400 | ||||
| Korea | ||||||
| FH Con Army | Camp Humphreys | Family Housing New Construction, Incr 1 | 143,563 | 100,000 | ||
| FH Con Army | Camp Walker | Family Housing New Construction | 54,554 | 54,554 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FH Con Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 2,618 | 2,618 | ||
| Family Housing Construction, Army Total | 200,735 | 157,172 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 10,178 | 10,178 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privitization Support | 19,146 | 19,146 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 131,761 | 131,761 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 60,745 | 60,745 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 40,344 | 40,344 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 400 | 400 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 7,993 | 7,993 | ||
| FH Ops Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 55,428 | 55,428 | ||
| Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Army Total | 325,995 | 325,995 | ||||
| Mariana Islands | ||||||
| FH Con Navy | Guam | Replace Andersen Housing PH I | 78,815 | 78,815 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FH Con Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Construction Improvements | 11,047 | 11,047 | ||
| FH Con Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 4,149 | 4,149 | ||
| Family Housing Construction, Navy And Marine Corps Total | 94,011 | 94,011 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 17,457 | 17,457 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privatization Support | 26,320 | 26,320 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 54,689 | 54,689 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 81,254 | 81,254 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 51,291 | 51,291 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 364 | 364 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 12,855 | 12,855 | ||
| FH Ops Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 56,685 | 56,685 | ||
| Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Navy And Marine Corps Total | 300,915 | 300,915 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FH Con AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Construction Improvements | 56,984 | 56,984 | ||
| FH Con AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning & Design | 4,368 | 4,368 | ||
| Family Housing Construction, Air Force Total | 61,352 | 61,352 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 31,690 | 31,690 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Housing Privatization Support | 41,809 | 41,809 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 20,530 | 20,530 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 85,469 | 85,469 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 42,919 | 42,919 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Miscellaneous | 1,745 | 1,745 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 13,026 | 13,026 | ||
| FH Ops AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 37,241 | 37,241 | ||
| Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Air Force Total | 274,429 | 274,429 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 399 | 399 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 20 | 20 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Furnishings | 500 | 500 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 11,044 | 11,044 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Leasing | 40,984 | 40,984 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 800 | 800 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Maintenance | 349 | 349 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Management | 388 | 388 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Services | 32 | 32 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 174 | 174 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 367 | 367 | ||
| FH Ops DW | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Utilities | 4,100 | 4,100 | ||
| Family Housing Operation And Maintenance, Defense-Wide Total | 59,157 | 59,157 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| FHIF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Program Expenses | 3,258 | 3,258 | ||
| DoD Family Housing Improvement Fund Total | 3,258 | 3,258 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| BRAC | Base Realignment & Closure, Army | Base Realignment and Closure | 14,499 | 24,499 | ||
| Base Realignment and Closure—Army Total | 14,499 | 24,499 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| BRAC | Base Realignment & Closure, Navy | Base Realignment & Closure | 110,606 | 125,606 | ||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–100: Planning, Design and Management | 4,604 | 4,604 | ||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–101: Various Locations | 10,461 | 10,461 | ||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–138: NAS Brunswick, ME | 557 | 557 | ||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–157: MCSA Kansas City, MO | 100 | 100 | ||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–172: NWS Seal Beach, Concord, CA | 4,648 | 4,648 | ||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DON–84: JRB Willow Grove & Cambria Reg AP | 3,397 | 3,397 | ||
| Base Realignment and Closure—Navy Total | 134,373 | 149,373 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| BRAC | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | DoD BRAC Activities—Air Force | 56,365 | 56,365 | ||
| Base Realignment and Closure—Air Force Total | 56,365 | 56,365 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| PYS | Worldwide | Air Force | 0 | –29,300 | ||
| PYS | Worldwide | Army | 0 | –25,000 | ||
| PYS | Worldwide | Defense-Wide | 0 | –60,577 | ||
| PYS | Worldwide | Navy | 0 | –87,699 | ||
| PYS | Worldwide | HAP | 0 | –25,000 | ||
| PYS | Worldwide | NSIP | 0 | –30,000 | ||
| Prior Year Savings Total | 0 | –257,576 | ||||
| Total, Military Construction | 7,444,056 | 7,694,000 | ||||
| SEC. 4602. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||
| Account | State/Country and Installation | Project Title | FY 2017 Request | House Agreement | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Army | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | ERI: Planning and Design | 18,900 | 18,900 | ||
| Military Construction, Army Total | 18,900 | 18,900 | ||||
| Iceland | ||||||
| Navy | Keflavik | ERI: P–8A Aircraft Rinse Rack | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||
| Navy | Keflavik | ERI: P–8A Hangar Upgrade | 14,600 | 14,600 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | ERI: Planning and Design | 1,800 | 1,800 | ||
| Military Construction, Navy Total | 21,400 | 21,400 | ||||
| Bulgaria | ||||||
| AF | Graf Ignatievo | ERI: Construct Sq Ops/Operational Alert Fac | 3,800 | 3,800 | ||
| AF | Graf Ignatievo | ERI: Fighter Ramp Extension | 7,000 | 7,000 | ||
| AF | Graf Ignatievo | ERI: Upgrade Munitions Storage Area | 2,600 | 2,600 | ||
| Djibouti | ||||||
| AF | Chabelley Airfield | OCO: Construct Chabelley Access Road | 3,600 | 3,600 | ||
| AF | Chabelley Airfield | OCO: Construct Parking Apron and Taxiway | 6,900 | 6,900 | ||
| Estonia | ||||||
| AF | Amari AB | ERI: Construct Bulk Fuel Storage | 6,500 | 6,500 | ||
| Germany | ||||||
| AF | Spangdahlem AB | ERI: Construct High Cap Trim Pad & Hush House | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||
| AF | Spangdahlem AB | ERI: F/A–22 Low Observable/Comp Repair Fac | 12,000 | 12,000 | ||
| AF | Spangdahlem AB | ERI: F/A–22 Upgrade Infrastructure/Comm/Util | 1,600 | 1,600 | ||
| AF | Spangdahlem AB | ERI: Upgrade Hardened Aircraft Shelters | 2,700 | 2,700 | ||
| AF | Spangdahlem AB | ERI: Upgrade Munitions Storage Doors | 1,400 | 1,400 | ||
| Lithuania | ||||||
| AF | Siauliai | ERI: Munitions Storage | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| Poland | ||||||
| AF | Lask AB | ERI: Construct Squadron Operations Facility | 4,100 | 4,100 | ||
| AF | Powidz AB | ERI: Construct Squadron Operations Facility | 4,100 | 4,100 | ||
| Romania | ||||||
| AF | Campia Turzii | ERI: Construct Munitions Storage Area | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||
| AF | Campia Turzii | ERI: Construct Squadron Operations Facility | 3,400 | 3,400 | ||
| AF | Campia Turzii | ERI: Construct Two-Bay Hangar | 6,100 | 6,100 | ||
| AF | Campia Turzii | ERI: Extend Parking Aprons | 6,000 | 6,000 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | CTP: Planning and Design | 9,000 | 8,551 | ||
| AF | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | OCO: Planning and Design | 940 | 940 | ||
| Military Construction, Air Force Total | 88,740 | 88,291 | ||||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Def-Wide | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | ERI: Unspecified Minor Construction | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||
| Military Construction, Defense-Wide Total | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||
| Total, Military Construction | 134,040 | 133,591 | ||||
| SEC. 4603. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS FOR BASE REQUIREMENTS(In Thousands of Dollars) | ||||||
| Account | State/Country and Installation | Project Title | FY 2017 Request | House Agreement | ||
| Djibouti | ||||||
| Navy | Camp Lemonier | OCO: Medical/Dental Facility | 37,409 | 37,409 | ||
| Worldwide Unspecified | ||||||
| Navy | Unspecified Worldwide Locations | Planning and Design | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||
| Military Construction, Navy Total | 38,409 | 38,409 | ||||
| Total, Military Construction | 38,409 | 38,409 | ||||
| SEC. 4701. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS(In Thousands of Dollars) | |||
| Program | FY 2017 Request | House Authorized | |
| Discretionary Summary By Appropriation | |||
| Energy And Water Development, And Related Agencies | |||
| Appropriation Summary: | |||
| Energy Programs | |||
| Nuclear Energy | 151,876 | 136,616 | |
| Atomic Energy Defense Activities | |||
| National nuclear security administration: | |||
| Weapons activities | 9,243,147 | 9,559,147 | |
| Defense nuclear nonproliferation | 1,807,916 | 1,901,916 | |
| Naval reactors | 1,420,120 | 1,420,120 | |
| Federal salaries and expenses | 412,817 | 372,817 | |
| Total, National nuclear security administration | 12,884,000 | 13,254,000 | |
| Environmental and other defense activities: | |||
| Defense environmental cleanup | 5,382,050 | 5,289,950 | |
| Other defense activities | 791,552 | 800,552 | |
| Total, Environmental & other defense activities | 6,173,602 | 6,090,502 | |
| Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities | 19,057,602 | 19,344,502 | |
| Total, Discretionary Funding | 19,209,478 | 19,481,118 | |
| Nuclear Energy | |||
| Idaho sitewide safeguards and security | 129,303 | 129,303 | |
| Idaho operations and maintenance | 7,313 | 7,313 | |
| Consent Based Siting | 15,260 | 0 | |
| Denial of funds for defense-only repository | [–15,260] | ||
| Total, Nuclear Energy | 151,876 | 136,616 | |
| Weapons Activities | |||
| Directed stockpile work | |||
| Life extension programs | |||
| B61 Life extension program | 616,079 | 616,079 | |
| W76 Life extension program | 222,880 | 222,880 | |
| W88 Alt 370 | 281,129 | 281,129 | |
| W80–4 Life extension program | 220,253 | 241,253 | |
| Mitigation of schedule risk | [21,000] | ||
| Total, Life extension programs | 1,340,341 | 1,361,341 | |
| Stockpile systems | |||
| B61 Stockpile systems | 57,313 | 57,313 | |
| W76 Stockpile systems | 38,604 | 38,604 | |
| W78 Stockpile systems | 56,413 | 56,413 | |
| W80 Stockpile systems | 64,631 | 64,631 | |
| B83 Stockpile systems | 41,659 | 41,659 | |
| W87 Stockpile systems | 81,982 | 81,982 | |
| W88 Stockpile systems | 103,074 | 103,074 | |
| Total, Stockpile systems | 443,676 | 443,676 | |
| Weapons dismantlement and disposition | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 68,984 | 54,984 | |
| Denial of dismantlement acceleration | [–14,000] | ||
| Stockpile services | |||
| Production support | 457,043 | 457,043 | |
| Research and development support | 34,187 | 34,187 | |
| R&D certification and safety | 156,481 | 202,481 | |
| Stockpile Responsiveness Program and technology maturation efforts | [46,000] | ||
| Management, technology, and production | 251,978 | 251,978 | |
| Total, Stockpile services | 899,689 | 945,689 | |
| Nuclear material commodities | |||
| Uranium sustainment | 20,988 | 20,988 | |
| Plutonium sustainment | 184,970 | 190,970 | |
| Mitigation of schedule risk for meeting statutory pit production requirements | [6,000] | ||
| Tritium sustainment | 109,787 | 109,787 | |
| Domestic uranium enrichment | 50,000 | 50,000 | |
| Strategic materials sustainment | 212,092 | 212,092 | |
| Total, Nuclear material commodities | 577,837 | 583,837 | |
| Total, Directed stockpile work | 3,330,527 | 3,389,527 | |
| Research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E) | |||
| Science | |||
| Advanced certification | 58,000 | 58,000 | |
| Primary assessment technologies | 99,000 | 111,000 | |
| Support to Prototype Nuclear Weapons for Intelligence Estimates program | [12,000] | ||
| Dynamic materials properties | 106,000 | 106,000 | |
| Advanced radiography | 50,500 | 50,500 | |
| Secondary assessment technologies | 76,000 | 76,000 | |
| Academic alliances and partnerships | 52,484 | 52,484 | |
| Total, Science | 441,984 | 453,984 | |
| Engineering | |||
| Enhanced surety | 37,196 | 53,196 | |
| Stockpile Responsiveness Program and technology maturation efforts | [16,000] | ||
| Weapon systems engineering assessment technology | 16,958 | 16,958 | |
| Nuclear survivability | 43,105 | 47,105 | |
| Improve planning and coordination on strategic radiation-hardened microsystems | [4,000] | ||
| Enhanced surveillance | 42,228 | 42,228 | |
| Total, Engineering | 139,487 | 159,487 | |
| Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield | |||
| Ignition | 75,432 | 70,432 | |
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | ||
| Support of other stockpile programs | 23,363 | 23,363 | |
| Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support | 68,696 | 68,696 | |
| Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion | 5,616 | 5,616 | |
| Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas | 9,492 | 9,492 | |
| Facility operations and target production | 340,360 | 336,360 | |
| Program decrease | [–4,000] | ||
| Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield | 522,959 | 513,959 | |
| Advanced simulation and computing | 663,184 | 656,184 | |
| Program decrease | [–7,000] | ||
| Advanced manufacturing | |||
| Additive manufacturing | 12,000 | 12,000 | |
| Component manufacturing development | 46,583 | 77,583 | |
| Stockpile Responsiveness Program and technology maturation efforts | [31,000] | ||
| Processing technology development | 28,522 | 28,522 | |
| Total, Advanced manufacturing | 87,105 | 118,105 | |
| Total, RDT&E | 1,854,719 | 1,901,719 | |
| Infrastructure and operations (formerly RTBF) | |||
| Operating | |||
| Operations of facilities | |||
| Kansas City Plant | 101,000 | 101,000 | |
| Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | 70,500 | 70,500 | |
| Los Alamos National Laboratory | 196,500 | 196,500 | |
| Nevada Test Site | 92,500 | 92,500 | |
| Pantex | 55,000 | 55,000 | |
| Sandia National Laboratory | 118,000 | 118,000 | |
| Savannah River Site | 83,500 | 83,500 | |
| Y–12 National security complex | 107,000 | 107,000 | |
| Total, Operations of facilities | 824,000 | 824,000 | |
| Safety and environmental operations | 110,000 | 110,000 | |
| Maintenance and repair of facilities | 294,000 | 324,000 | |
| Address high-priority preventative maintenance | [30,000] | ||
| Recapitalization: | |||
| Infrastructure and safety | 554,643 | 674,643 | |
| Address high-priority deferred maintenance | [120,000] | ||
| Capability based investment | 112,639 | 112,639 | |
| Total, Recapitalization | 667,282 | 787,282 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 17–D–640, U1a Complex Enhancements Project, NNSS | 11,500 | 11,500 | |
| 17–D–630 Electrical Infrastructure Upgrades, LLNL | 25,000 | 25,000 | |
| 16–D–515 Albuquerque complex upgrades project | 15,047 | 15,047 | |
| 15–D–613 Emergency Operations Center, Y–12 | 2,000 | 2,000 | |
| 15–D–302, TA–55 Reinvestment project, Phase 3, LANL | 21,455 | 21,455 | |
| 07–D–220-04 Transuranic liquid waste facility, LANL | 17,053 | 17,053 | |
| 06–D–141 PED/Construction, UPF Y–12, Oak Ridge, TN | 575,000 | 575,000 | |
| 04–D–125—04 RLUOB equipment installation | 159,615 | 159,615 | |
| Total, Construction | 826,670 | 826,670 | |
| Total, Infrastructure and operations | 2,721,952 | 2,871,952 | |
| Secure transportation asset | |||
| Operations and equipment | 179,132 | 179,132 | |
| Program direction | 103,600 | 103,600 | |
| Total, Secure transportation asset | 282,732 | 282,732 | |
| Defense nuclear security | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 657,133 | 717,133 | |
| Support to physical security infrastructure recapitalization and CSTART | [60,000] | ||
| Construction: | |||
| 14–D–710 Device assembly facility argus installation project, NV | 13,000 | 13,000 | |
| Total, Defense nuclear security | 670,133 | 730,133 | |
| Information technology and cybersecurity | 176,592 | 176,592 | |
| Legacy contractor pensions | 248,492 | 248,492 | |
| Rescission of prior year balances | –42,000 | –42,000 | |
| Total, Weapons Activities | 9,243,147 | 9,559,147 | |
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | |||
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs | |||
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D | |||
| Global material security | 337,108 | 332,108 | |
| Program decrease | [–5,000] | ||
| Material management and minimization | 341,094 | 341,094 | |
| Nonproliferation and arms control | 124,703 | 124,703 | |
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation R&D | 393,922 | 417,922 | |
| Acceleration of low-yield detection experiments | [4,000] | ||
| Nuclear detection technology and new challenges such as 3D printing | [20,000] | ||
| Low Enriched Uranium R&D for Naval Reactors | 0 | 5,000 | |
| Low Enriched Uranium R&D for Naval Reactors | [5,000] | ||
| Nonproliferation Construction: | |||
| 99–D–143 Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility, SRS | 270,000 | 340,000 | |
| Increase to support construction | [70,000] | ||
| Total, Nonproliferation construction | 270,000 | 340,000 | |
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs | 1,466,827 | 1,560,827 | |
| Legacy contractor pensions | 83,208 | 83,208 | |
| Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response program | 271,881 | 271,881 | |
| Rescission of prior year balances | –14,000 | –14,000 | |
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | 1,807,916 | 1,901,916 | |
| Naval Reactors | |||
| Naval reactors operations and infrastructure | 449,682 | 449,682 | |
| Naval reactors development | 437,338 | 437,338 | |
| Ohio replacement reactor systems development | 213,700 | 213,700 | |
| S8G Prototype refueling | 124,000 | 124,000 | |
| Program direction | 47,100 | 47,100 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 17–D–911, BL Fire System Upgrade | 1,400 | 1,400 | |
| 15–D–904 NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3 | 700 | 700 | |
| 15–D–902 KS Engineroom team trainer facility | 33,300 | 33,300 | |
| 14–D–901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF | 100,000 | 100,000 | |
| 10-D–903, Security upgrades, KAPL | 12,900 | 12,900 | |
| Total, Construction | 148,300 | 148,300 | |
| Total, Naval Reactors | 1,420,120 | 1,420,120 | |
| Federal Salaries And Expenses | |||
| Program direction | 412,817 | 372,817 | |
| Program decrease | [–40,000] | ||
| Total, Office Of The Administrator | 412,817 | 372,817 | |
| Defense Environmental Cleanup | |||
| Closure sites: | |||
| Closure sites administration | 9,389 | 9,389 | |
| Hanford site: | |||
| River corridor and other cleanup operations | 69,755 | 114,755 | |
| Acceleration of priority programs | [45,000] | ||
| Central plateau remediation | 620,869 | 628,869 | |
| Acceleration of priority programs | [8,000] | ||
| Richland community and regulatory support | 14,701 | 14,701 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 15–D–401 Containerized sludge removal annex, RL | 11,486 | 11,486 | |
| Total, Hanford site | 716,811 | 769,811 | |
| Idaho National Laboratory: | |||
| Idaho cleanup and waste disposition | 359,088 | 359,088 | |
| Idaho community and regulatory support | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| Total, Idaho National Laboratory | 362,088 | 362,088 | |
| Los Alamos National Laboratory | |||
| EMLA cleanup activities | 185,606 | 185,606 | |
| EMLA community and regulatory support | 3,394 | 3,394 | |
| Total, Los Alamos National Laboratory | 189,000 | 189,000 | |
| NNSA sites | |||
| Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | 1,396 | 1,396 | |
| Separations Process Research Unit | 3,685 | 3,685 | |
| Nevada | 62,176 | 62,176 | |
| Sandia National Laboratories | 4,130 | 4,130 | |
| Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites | 71,387 | 71,387 | |
| Oak Ridge Reservation: | |||
| OR Nuclear facility D & D | |||
| OR Nuclear facility D & D | 93,851 | 93,851 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 14–D–403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility | 5,100 | 5,100 | |
| Total, OR Nuclear facility D & D | 98,951 | 98,951 | |
| U233 Disposition Program | 37,311 | 37,311 | |
| OR cleanup and disposition | 54,557 | 54,557 | |
| OR reservation community and regulatory support | 4,400 | 4,400 | |
| Oak Ridge technology development | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| Total, Oak Ridge Reservation | 198,219 | 198,219 | |
| Office of River Protection: | |||
| Waste treatment and immobilization plant | |||
| WTP operations | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| 15–D–409 Low activity waste pretreatment system, ORP | 73,000 | 73,000 | |
| 01–D–416 A-D/ORP-0060 / Major construction | 690,000 | 690,000 | |
| Total, Waste treatment and immobilization plant | 766,000 | 766,000 | |
| Tank farm activities | |||
| Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 721,456 | 721,456 | |
| Total, Tank farm activities | 721,456 | 721,456 | |
| Total, Office of River protection | 1,487,456 | 1,487,456 | |
| Savannah River sites: | |||
| Nuclear Material Management | 311,062 | 311,062 | |
| Environmental Cleanup | 152,504 | 152,504 | |
| SR community and regulatory support | 11,249 | 11,249 | |
| Radioactive liquid tank waste: | |||
| Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 645,332 | 645,332 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 15–D–402—Saltstone Disposal Unit #6, SRS | 7,577 | 7,577 | |
| 17–D–401—Saltstone Disposal Unit #7 | 9,729 | 9,729 | |
| 05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River Site | 160,000 | 160,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 177,306 | 177,306 | |
| Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste | 822,638 | 822,638 | |
| Total, Savannah River site | 1,297,453 | 1,297,453 | |
| Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 257,188 | 257,188 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 15–D–411 Safety significant confinement ventilation system, WIPP | 2,532 | 2,532 | |
| 15–D–412 Exhaust shaft, WIPP | 2,533 | 2,533 | |
| Total, Construction | 5,065 | 5,065 | |
| Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | 262,253 | 262,253 | |
| Program direction | 290,050 | 290,050 | |
| Program support | 14,979 | 14,979 | |
| Safeguards and Security | 255,973 | 255,973 | |
| Technology development | 30,000 | 40,000 | |
| NAS study on technology development, acceleration of priority efforts | [10,000] | ||
| Infrastructure recapitalization | 41,892 | 41,892 | |
| Defense Uranium enrichment D&D | 155,100 | 0 | |
| Ahead of need | [–155,100] | ||
| Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup | 5,382,050 | 5,289,950 | |
| Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup | 5,382,050 | 5,289,950 | |
| Other Defense Activities | |||
| Environment, health, safety and security | |||
| Environment, health, safety and security | 130,693 | 130,693 | |
| Program direction | 66,519 | 66,519 | |
| Total, Environment, Health, safety and security | 197,212 | 197,212 | |
| Independent enterprise assessments | |||
| Independent enterprise assessments | 24,580 | 24,580 | |
| Program direction | 51,893 | 51,893 | |
| Total, Independent enterprise assessments | 76,473 | 76,473 | |
| Specialized security activities | 237,912 | 246,912 | |
| IT infrastructure and red teaming | [9,000] | ||
| Office of Legacy Management | |||
| Legacy management | 140,306 | 140,306 | |
| Program direction | 14,014 | 14,014 | |
| Total, Office of Legacy Management | 154,320 | 154,320 | |
| Defense-related activities | |||
| Defense related administrative support | |||
| Chief financial officer | 23,642 | 23,642 | |
| Chief information officer | 93,074 | 93,074 | |
| Project management oversight and assessments | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| Total, Defense related administrative support | 119,716 | 119,716 | |
| Office of hearings and appeals | 5,919 | 5,919 | |
| Subtotal, Other defense activities | 791,552 | 800,552 | |
| Total, Other Defense Activities | 791,552 | 800,552 | |
This division may be cited as the “Military Justice Act of 2016”.
Paragraph (3) of section 802(a) of title 10, United States Code (article 2(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“(3) (A) While on inactive-duty training and during any of the periods specified in subparagraph (B)—
Subsection (c) of section 806 of title 10, United States Code (article 6 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“(c) (1) No person who, with respect to a case, serves in a capacity specified in paragraph (2) may later serve as a staff judge advocate or legal officer to any reviewing or convening authority upon the same case.
The first sentence of section 806a(a) of title 10, United States Code (article 6a(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “military judge” and all that follows through the end of the sentence and inserting “military appellate judge, military judge, or military magistrate to perform the duties of the position involved.”.
(a) Designation of representative.—Subsection (c) of section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended in the first sentence by striking “the military judge” and all that follows through the end of the sentence and inserting the following: “the legal guardians of the victim or the representatives of the victim’s estate, family members, or any other person designated as suitable by the military judge, may assume the rights of the victim under this section.”.
(c) Interview of victim.—Such section (article) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(f) Counsel for accused interview of victim of alleged offense.— (1) Upon notice by counsel for the Government to counsel for the accused of the name of an alleged victim of an offense under this chapter who counsel for the Government intends to call as a witness at a proceeding under this chapter, counsel for the accused shall make any request to interview the victim through the Special Victim’s Counsel or other counsel for the victim, if applicable.
Section 810 of title 10, United States Code (article 10 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 810. Art. 10. Restraint of person charged
“(a) In general.— (1) Subject to paragraph (2), any person subject to this chapter who is charged with an offense under this chapter may be ordered into arrest or confinement as the circumstances require.
“(b) Notification to accused and related procedures.— (1) When a person subject to this chapter is ordered into arrest or confinement before trial, immediate steps shall be taken—
“(2) To facilitate compliance with paragraph (1), the President shall prescribe regulations setting forth procedures relating to referral for trial, including procedures for prompt forwarding of the charges and specifications and, if applicable, the preliminary hearing report submitted under section 832 of this title (article 32).”.
Section 812 of title 10, United States Code (article 12 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Section 816 of title 10, United States Code (article 16 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 816. Art 16. Courts-martial classified
“(b) General courts-martial.—General courts-martial are of the following three types:
“(1) A general court-martial consisting of a military judge and eight members, subject to sections 825(d)(3) and 829 of this title (articles 25(d)(3) and 29).
“(2) In a capital case, a general court-martial consisting of a military judge and the number of members determined under section 825a of this title (article 25a), subject to sections 825(d)(3) and 829 of this title (articles 25(d)(3) and 29).
“(3) A general court-martial consisting of a military judge alone, if, before the court is assembled, the accused, knowing the identity of the military judge and after consultation with defense counsel, requests, orally on the record or in writing, a court composed of a military judge alone and the military judge approves the request.
“(c) Special courts-martial.—Special courts-martial are of the following two types:
“(1) A special court-martial, consisting of a military judge and four members, subject to sections 825(d)(3) and 829 of this title (articles 25(d)(3) and 29).
“(2) A special court-martial consisting of a military judge alone—
“(A) if the case is so referred by the convening authority, subject to section 819 of this title (article 19) and such limitations as the President may prescribe by regulation; or
“(B) if the case is referred under paragraph (1) and, before the court is assembled, the accused, knowing the identity of the military judge and after consultation with defense counsel, requests, orally on the record or in writing, a court composed of a military judge alone and the military judge approves the request.
Section 818 of title 10, United States Code (article 18 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1) in subsection (b), by striking “section 816(1)(B) of this title (article 16(1)(B))” and inserting “section 816(b)(3) of this title (article 16(b)(3))”; and
Section 819 of title 10, United States Code (article 19 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(3) by adding after subsection (a), as designated by paragraph (1), the following new subsections: “(b) Additional limitation.—Neither a bad-conduct discharge, nor confinement for more than six months, nor forfeiture of pay for more than six months may be adjudged if charges and specifications are referred to a special court-martial consisting of a military judge alone under section 816(c)(2)(A) of this title (article 16(c)(2)(A)). “(c) Military magistrate.—If charges and specifications are referred to a special court-martial consisting of a military judge alone under section 816(c)(2)(A) of this title (article 16(c)(2)(A)), the military judge, with the consent of the parties, may designate a military magistrate to preside over the special court-martial.”.
Section 820 of title 10, United States Code (article 20 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
Section 822(a)(6) of title 10, United States Code (article 22(a)(6) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “in chief”.
(a) Who may serve on courts-martial.—Subsection (c) of section 825 of title 10, United States Code (article 25 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“(c) (1) Any enlisted member on active duty is eligible to serve on a general or special court-martial for the trial of any other enlisted member.
“(2) Before a court-martial with a military judge and members is assembled for trial, an enlisted member who is an accused may personally request, orally on the record or in writing, that—
“(3) Except as provided in paragraph (4), after such a request, the accused may not be tried by a general or special court-martial if the membership of the court-martial is inconsistent with the request.
“(4) If, because of physical conditions or military exigencies, a sufficient number of eligible officers or enlisted members, as the case may be, are not available to carry out paragraph (2), the trial may nevertheless be held. In that event, the convening authority shall make a detailed written statement of the reasons for nonavailability. The statement shall be appended to the record.”.
Section 825a of title 10, United States Code (article 25a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 825a. Art. 25a. Number of court-martial members in capital cases
“(a) In general.—In a case in which the accused may be sentenced to death, the number of members shall be 12.
(a) Special courts-martial.—Subsection (a) of section 826 of title 10, United States Code (article 26 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(b) Qualifications.—Subsection (b) of such section (article) is amended by striking “qualified for duty” and inserting “qualified, by reason of education, training, experience, and judicial temperament, for duty”.
(c) Detail and assignment.—Subsection (c) of such section (article) is amended to read as follows:
“(c) (1) In accordance with regulations prescribed under subsection (a), a military judge of a general or special court-martial shall be designated for detail by the Judge Advocate General of the armed force of which the military judge is a member.
“(2) Neither the convening authority nor any member of the staff of the convening authority shall prepare or review any report concerning the effectiveness, fitness, or efficiency of the military judge so detailed, which relates to the military judge’s performance of duty as a military judge.
(d) Detail to a different armed force.—Such section (article) is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
Section 827 of title 10, United States Code (article 27 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1) in the first sentence of paragraph (2) of subsection (a), by striking “No person” and all that follows through “trial counsel,” the first place it appears and inserting the following: “No person who, with respect to a case, has served as a preliminary hearing officer, court member, military judge, military magistrate, or appellate judge, may later serve as trial counsel,”;
(2) in the first sentence of subsection (b), by striking “Trial counsel or defense counsel” and inserting “Trial counsel, defense counsel, or assistant defense counsel”; and
(3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following new subsections: “(c) (1) Defense counsel and assistant defense counsel detailed for a special court-martial shall have the qualifications set forth in subsection (b). “(d) To the greatest extent practicable, in any capital case, at least one defense counsel shall, as determined by the Judge Advocate General, be learned in the law applicable to such cases. If necessary, this counsel may be a civilian and, if so, may be compensated in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.”.
Section 829 of title 10, United States Code (article 29 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 829. Art. 29. Assembly and impaneling of members; detail of new members and military judges
“(a) Assembly.—The military judge shall announce the assembly of a general or special court-martial with members. After such a court-martial is assembled, no member may be absent, unless the member is excused—
“(b) Impaneling.— (1) Under rules prescribed by the President, the military judge of a general or special court-martial with members shall—
“(c) Alternate members.—In addition to members under subsection (b), the military judge shall impanel alternate members, if the convening authority authorizes alternate members.
“(d) Detail of new members.— (1) If, after members are impaneled, the membership of the court-martial is reduced to—
the trial may not proceed unless the convening authority details new members and, from among the members so detailed, the military judge impanels new members sufficient in number to provide the membership specified in paragraph (2).
“(e) Detail of new military judge.—If the military judge is unable to proceed with the trial because of disability or otherwise, a new military judge shall be detailed to the court-martial.
“(f) Evidence.— (1) In the case of new members under subsection (d), the trial may proceed with the new members present after the evidence previously introduced is read or, in the case of audiotape, videotape, or similar recording, is played, in the presence of the new members, the military judge, the accused, and counsel for both sides.
“(2) In the case of a new military judge under subsection (e), the trial shall proceed as if no evidence had been introduced, unless the evidence previously introduced is read or, in the case of audiotape, videotape, or similar recording, is played, in the presence of the new military judge, the accused, and counsel for both sides.”.
Subchapter V of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 826 (article 26 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) the following new section (article):
Section 830 of title 10, United States Code (article 30 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 830. Art. 30. Charges and specifications
“(b) Required content.—The writing under subsection (a) shall state that—
(a) In general.—Section 832 of title 10, United States Code (article 32 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking the section heading and subsections (a), (b), and (c), and inserting the following:
Ҥ 832. Art. 32. Preliminary hearing required before referral to general court-martial
“(a) In general.— (1) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a preliminary hearing shall be held before referral of charges and specifications for trial by general court-martial. The preliminary hearing shall be conducted by an impartial hearing officer, detailed by the convening authority in accordance with subsection (b).
“(2) The issues for determination at a preliminary hearing are limited to the following:
“(B) Whether or not there is probable cause to believe that the accused committed the offense charged.
“(b) Hearing officer.— (1) A preliminary hearing under this section shall be conducted by an impartial hearing officer, who—
“(c) Report to convening authority.—After a preliminary hearing under this section, the hearing officer shall submit to the convening authority a written report (accompanied by a recording of the preliminary hearing under subsection (e)) that includes the following:
“(1) For each specification, a statement of the reasoning and conclusions of the hearing officer with respect to determinations under subsection (a)(2), including a summary of relevant witness testimony and documentary evidence presented at the hearing and any observations of the hearing officer concerning the testimony of witnesses and the availability and admissibility of evidence at trial.
(b) Sundry amendments.—Subsection (d) of such section (article) is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking “subsection (a)” in the first sentence and inserting “this section”;
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking “in defense” and all that follows through the end and inserting “that is relevant to the issues for determination under subsection (a)(2).”;
Section 833 of title 10, United States Code (article 33 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 833. Art 33. Disposition guidance
“ The President shall direct the Secretary of Defense to issue, in consultation with the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, non-binding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under sections 830 and 834 of this title (articles 30 and 34). Such guidance shall take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Government with respect to disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law.”.
Section 834 of title 10, United States Code (article 34 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 834. Art. 34. Advice to convening authority before referral for trial
“(a) General court-martial.—
“(1) STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE ADVICE REQUIRED BEFORE REFERRAL.—Before referral of charges and specifications to a general court-martial for trial, the convening authority shall submit the matter to the staff judge advocate for advice, which the staff judge advocate shall provide to the convening authority in writing. The convening authority may not refer a specification under a charge to a general court-martial unless the staff judge advocate advises the convening authority in writing that—
“(2) STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE RECOMMENDATION AS TO DISPOSITION.—Together with the written advice provided under paragraph (1), the staff judge advocate shall provide a written recommendation to the convening authority as to the disposition that should be made of the specification in the interest of justice and discipline.
“(3) STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE ADVICE AND RECOMMENDATION TO ACCOMPANY REFERRAL.—When a convening authority makes a referral for trial by general court-martial, the written advice of the staff judge advocate under paragraph (1) and the written recommendation of the staff judge advocate under paragraph (2) with respect to each specification shall accompany the referral.
“(b) Special court-martial; convening authority consultation with judge advocate.—Before referral of charges and specifications to a special court-martial for trial, the convening authority shall consult a judge advocate on relevant legal issues.
Section 835 of title 10, United States Code (article 35 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 835. Art. 35. Service of charges; commencement of trial
“(a) In general.—Trial counsel detailed for a court-martial under section 827 of this title (article 27) shall cause to be served upon the accused a copy of the charges and specifications referred for trial.
“(b) Commencement of trial.— (1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), no trial or other proceeding of a general court-martial or a special court-martial (including any session under section 839(a) of this title (article 39(a)) may be held over the objection of the accused—
“(2) An objection under paragraph (1) may be raised only at the first session of the trial or other proceeding and only if the first session occurs before the end of the applicable period under paragraph (1)(A) or (1)(B). If the first session occurs before the end of the applicable period, the military judge shall, at that session, inquire as to whether the defense objects under this subsection.
Subsection (e) of section 838 of title 10, United States Code (article 38 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “, under the direction” and all that follows through “(article 27),”.
Section 839 of title 10, United States Code (article 39 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
Section 840 of title 10, United States Code (article 40 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “court-martial without a military judge” and inserting “summary court-martial”.
Section 841 of title 10, United States Code (article 41 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(a) Increase in period for child abuse offenses.—Subsection (b)(2)(A) of section 843 of title 10, United States Code (article 43 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “five years” and inserting “ten years”.
(b) Increase in period for fraudulent enlistment or appointment offenses.—Such section (article) is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(h) Fraudulent enlistment or appointment.—A person charged with fraudulent enlistment or fraudulent appointment under section 904a(1) of this title (article 104a(1)) may be tried by court-martial if the sworn charges and specifications are received by an officer exercising summary court-martial jurisdiction with respect to that person, as follows:
(c) DNA evidence.—Such section (article), as amended by subsection (b), is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(i) DNA Evidence.—If DNA testing implicates an identified person in the commission of an offense punishable by confinement for more than one year, no statute of limitations that would otherwise preclude prosecution of the offense shall preclude such prosecution until a period of time following the implication of the person by DNA testing has elapsed that is equal to the otherwise applicable limitation period.”.
(d) Conforming amendments.—Such section (article) is further amended in subsection (b)(2)(B) by striking clauses (i) through (v) and inserting the following:
“(i) Any offense in violation of section 920, 920a, 920b, 920c, or 930 of this title (article 120, 120a, 120b, 120c, or 130), unless the offense is covered by subsection (a).
Subsection (c) of section 844 of title 10, United States Code (article 44 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“(c) (1) A court-martial with a military judge alone is a trial in the sense of this section (article) if, without fault of the accused—
the case is dismissed or terminated by the convening authority or on motion of the prosecution for failure of available evidence or witnesses.
“(2) A court-martial with a military judge and members is a trial in the sense of this section (article) if, without fault of the accused—
“(A) after the members, having taken an oath as members under section 842 of this title (article 42) and after completion of challenges under section 841 of this title (article 41), are impaneled; and
the case is dismissed or terminated by the convening authority or on motion of the prosecution for failure of available evidence or witnesses.”.
(a) Authority to punish.—Subsection (a) of section 848 of title 10, United States Code (article 48 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Authority to punish.— (1) With respect to any proceeding under this chapter, a judicial officer specified in paragraph (2) may punish for contempt any person who—
“(2) A judicial officer referred to in paragraph (1) is any of the following:
“(A) Any judge of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and any judge of a Court of Criminal Appeals under section 866 of this title (article 66).
(b) Review.—Such section (article) is further amended—
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection (c):
Section 849 of title 10, United States Code (article 49 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“(a) In general.— (1) Subject to paragraph (2), a convening authority or a military judge may order depositions at the request of any party.
“(2) A deposition may be ordered under paragraph (1) only if the requesting party demonstrates that, due to exceptional circumstances, it is in the interest of justice that the testimony of a prospective witness be preserved for use at a court-martial, military commission, court of inquiry, or other military court or board.
“(3) A party who requests a deposition under this section shall give to every other party reasonable written notice of the time and place for the deposition.
“(b) Representation by counsel.—Representation of the parties with respect to a deposition shall be by counsel detailed in the same manner as trial counsel and defense counsel are detailed under section 827 of this title (article 27). In addition, the accused shall have the right to be represented by civilian or military counsel in the same manner as such counsel are provided for in section 838(b) of this title (article 38(b)).
“(c) Admissibility and use as evidence.—A deposition order under subsection (a) does not control the admissibility of the deposition in a court-martial or other proceeding under this chapter. Except as provided by subsection (d), a party may use all or part of a deposition as provided by the rules of evidence.
(a) In general.—Section 850 of title 10, United States Code (article 50 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
Section 850a(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 50a(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “, or the president of a court-martial without a military judge,”.
Section 851 of title 10, United States Code (article 51 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking “, and by members of a court-martial without a military judge upon questions of challenge,” in the first sentence;
Section 852 of title 10, United States Code (article 52 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 852. Art. 52. Votes required for conviction, sentencing, and other matters
“(a) In general.—No person may be convicted of an offense in a general or special court-martial, other than—
“(b) Level of concurrence required.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (a) and in paragraph (2), all matters to be decided by members of a general or special court-martial shall be determined by a majority vote, but a reconsideration of a finding of guilty or reconsideration of a sentence, with a view toward decreasing the sentence, may be made by any lesser vote which indicates that the reconsideration is not opposed by the number of votes required for that finding or sentence.
“(2) SENTENCING.—A sentence of death requires (A) a unanimous finding of guilty of an offense in this chapter expressly made punishable by death and (B) a unanimous determination by the members that the sentence for that offense shall include death. All other sentences imposed by members shall be determined by the concurrence of at least three-fourths of the members present when the vote is taken.”.
Subchapter VII of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 853 (article 53 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) the following:
Ҥ 853a. Art. 53a. Plea agreements
“(a) In general.— (1) At any time before the announcement of findings under section 853 of this title (article 53), the convening authority and the accused may enter into a plea agreement with respect to such matters as—
“(b) Acceptance of plea agreement.—Subject to subsection (c), the military judge of a general or special court-martial shall accept a plea agreement submitted by the parties, except that the military judge may reject a plea agreement that proposes a sentence if the military judge determines that the proposed sentence is plainly unreasonable.
“(c) Limitation on acceptance of plea agreements.—The military judge of a general or special court-martial shall reject a plea agreement that—
“(d) Limited conditions for acceptance of plea agreement for sentence below mandatory minimum for certain offenses.—With respect to an offense referred to in section 856(b)(2) of this title (article 56(b)(2))—
“(1) the military judge may accept a plea agreement that provides for a sentence of bad conduct discharge; and
“(2) upon recommendation of the trial counsel, in exchange for substantial assistance by the accused in the investigation or prosecution of another person who has committed an offense, the military judge may accept a plea agreement that provides for a sentence that is less than the mandatory minimum sentence for the offense charged.
Section 854 of title 10, United States Code (article 54 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following: “(a) General and special courts-martial.—Each general or special court-martial shall keep a separate record of the proceedings in each case brought before it. The record shall be certified by a court-reporter, except that in the case of death, disability, or absence of a court reporter, the record shall be certified by an official selected as the President may prescribe by regulation.”;
(2) in subsection (b)—
(3) by striking subsection (c) and inserting the following:
(a) In general.—Section 856 of title 10, United States Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Sentence maximums.—The punishment which a court-martial may direct for an offense may not exceed such limits as the President may prescribe for that offense.
“(b) Sentence minimums for certain offenses.— (1) Except as provided in subsection (d) of section 853a of this title (article 53a), punishment for any offense specified in paragraph (2) shall include dismissal or dishonorable discharge, as applicable.
“(c) Imposition of sentence.—
“(1) IN GENERAL.—In sentencing an accused under section 853 of this title (article 53), a court-martial shall impose punishment that is sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to promote justice and to maintain good order and discipline in the armed forces, taking into consideration—
“(A) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the accused;
“(2) OFFENSE BASED SENTENCING IN GENERAL AND SPECIAL COURTS-MARTIAL.—In announcing the sentence under section 853 of this title (article 53) in a general or special court-martial, the court-martial shall, with respect to each offense of which the accused is found guilty, specify the term of confinement, if any, and the amount of the fine, if any. If the accused is sentenced to confinement for more than one offense, the court-martial shall specify whether the terms of confinement are to run consecutively or concurrently.
“(3) SENTENCE OF CONFINEMENT FOR LIFE WITHOUT ELIGIBILITY FOR PAROLE.— (A) If an offense is subject to a sentence of confinement for life, a court-martial may impose a sentence of confinement for life without eligibility for parole.
“(B) An accused who is sentenced to confinement for life without eligibility for parole shall be confined for the remainder of the accused’s life unless—
(a) Mandatory Punishments.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 856 of title 10, United States Code (article 56 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 6701, is further amended by striking “shall include dismissal or dishonorable discharge, as applicable.” and inserting the following: shall include, at a minimum—
(b) Application of amendment.—Subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of section 856(b) of title 10, United States Code (article 56(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a), shall apply to offenses specified in paragraph (2) of such section committed on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(a) In general.—Section 857 of title 10, United States Code (article 57 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 857. Art. 57. Effective date of sentences
“(a) Execution of sentences.—A court-martial sentence shall be executed and take effect as follows:
“(1) FORFEITURE AND REDUCTION.—A forfeiture of pay or allowances shall be applicable to pay and allowances accruing on and after the date on which the sentence takes effect. Any forfeiture of pay or allowances or reduction in grade that is included in a sentence of a court-martial takes effect on the earlier of—
“(2) CONFINEMENT.—Any period of confinement included in a sentence of a court-martial begins to run from the date the sentence is adjudged by the court-martial, but periods during which the sentence to confinement is suspended or deferred shall be excluded in computing the service of the term of confinement.
“(3) APPROVAL OF SENTENCE OF DEATH.—If the sentence of the court-martial extends to death, that part of the sentence providing for death may not be executed until approved by the President. In such a case, the President may commute, remit, or suspend the sentence, or any part thereof, as the President sees fit. That part of the sentence providing for death may not be suspended.
“(4) APPROVAL OF DISMISSAL.—If in the case of a commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman, the sentence of a court-martial extends to dismissal, that part of the sentence providing for dismissal may not be executed until approved by the Secretary concerned or such Under Secretary or Assistant Secretary as may be designated by the Secretary concerned. In such a case, the Secretary, Under Secretary, or Assistant Secretary, as the case may be, may commute, remit, or suspend the sentence, or any part of the sentence, as the Secretary sees fit. In time of war or national emergency he may commute a sentence of dismissal to reduction to any enlisted grade. A person so reduced may be required to serve for the duration of the war or emergency and six months thereafter.
“(5) COMPLETION OF APPELLATE REVIEW.—If a sentence extends to death, dismissal, or a dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, that part of the sentence extending to death, dismissal, or a dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge may be executed, in accordance with service regulations, after completion of appellate review (and, with respect to death or dismissal, approval under paragraph (3) or (4), as appropriate).
“(b) Deferral of sentences.— (1) On application by an accused, the convening authority or, if the accused is no longer under his jurisdiction, the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction over the command to which the accused is currently assigned, may, in his or her sole discretion, defer the effective date of a sentence of confinement, reduction, or forfeiture. The deferment shall terminate upon entry of judgment or, in the case of a summary court-martial, when the convening authority acts on the sentence. The deferment may be rescinded at any time by the officer who granted it or, if the accused is no longer under his jurisdiction, by the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction over the command to which the accused is currently assigned.
“(2) In any case in which a court-martial sentences a person referred to in paragraph (3) to confinement, the convening authority may defer the service of the sentence to confinement, without the consent of that person, until after the person has been permanently released to the armed forces by a State or foreign country referred to in that paragraph.
“(3) Paragraph (2) applies to a person subject to this chapter who—
“(c) Appellate review.— (1) Appellate review is complete under this section when—
“(B) a review under section 866 of this title (article 66) is completed by a Court of Criminal Appeals and— “(i) the time for the accused to file a petition for review by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has expired and the accused has not filed a timely petition for such review and the case is not otherwise under review by that Court;
(b) Conforming amendments.— (1) Subchapter VIII of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 857a (article 57a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
(2) Subchapter IX of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking section 871 (article 71 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice).
Section 858a of title 10, United States Code (article 58a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1) in subsection (a)—
(A) by striking “Unless otherwise provided in regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary concerned, a” and inserting “A”;
Section 860 of title 10, United States Code (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 860. Art. 60. Post-trial processing in general and special courts-martial
“(a) Statement of trial results.— (1) The military judge of a general or special court-martial shall enter into the record of trial a document entitled ‘Statement of Trial Results’, which shall set forth—
“(b) Post-trial motions.—In accordance with regulations prescribed by the President, the military judge in a general or special court-martial shall address all post-trial motions and other post-trial matters that—
Subchapter IX of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 860 (article 60 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 6801, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 860a. Art. 60a. Limited authority to act on sentence in specified post-trial circumstances
“(a) In general.— (1) The convening authority of a general or special court-martial described in paragraph (2)—
“(2) The courts-martial referred to in paragraph (1) are the following:
“(A) A general or special court-martial in which the maximum sentence of confinement established under subsection (a) of section 856 of this title (article 56) for any offense of which the accused is found guilty is more than two years.
“(B) A general or special court-martial in which the total of the sentences of confinement imposed, running consecutively, is more than six months.
“(b) Reduction, commutation, and suspension of sentences generally.— (1) Except as provided in subsection (c) or (d), the convening authority may not reduce, commute, or suspend any of the following sentences:
“(c) Suspension of certain sentences upon recommendation of military judge.— (1) Upon recommendation of the military judge, as included in the Statement of Trial Results, together with an explanation of the facts supporting the recommendation, the convening authority may suspend—
“(d) Reduction of sentence for substantial assistance by accused.— (1) Upon a recommendation by the trial counsel, if the accused, after sentencing and before entry of judgment, provides substantial assistance in the investigation or prosecution of another person, the convening authority may reduce, commute, or suspend a sentence, in whole or in part, including any mandatory minimum sentence.
“(2) Upon a recommendation by a trial counsel, designated in accordance with rules prescribed by the President, if the accused, after entry of judgment, provides substantial assistance in the investigation or prosecution of another person, a convening authority, designated under such regulations, may reduce, commute, or suspend a sentence, in whole or in part, including any mandatory minimum sentence.
“(e) Submissions by accused and victim.— (1) In accordance with rules prescribed by the President, in determining whether to act under this section, the convening authority shall consider matters submitted in writing by the accused or any victim of an offense. Such rules shall include—
“(f) Decision of convening authority.— (1) The decision of the convening authority under this section shall be forwarded to the military judge, with copies provided to the accused and to any victim of the offense.
“(2) If, under this section, the convening authority reduces, commutes, or suspends the sentence, the decision of the convening authority shall include a written explanation of the reasons for such action.
“(3) If, under subsection (d)(2), the convening authority reduces, commutes, or suspends the sentence, the decision of the convening authority shall be forwarded to the chief trial judge for appropriate modification of the entry of judgment, which shall be transmitted to the Judge Advocate General for appropriate action.”.
Subchapter IX of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 860a (article 60a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 6802, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 860b. Art. 60b. Post-trial actions in summary courts-martial and certain general and special courts-martial
“(a) In general.— (1) In a court-martial not specified in subsection (a)(2) of section 860a of this title (article 60a), the convening authority may—
“(B) change a finding of guilty to a charge or specification to a finding of guilty to a lesser included offense;
“(2) In a summary court-martial, the convening authority shall approve the sentence or take other action on the sentence under paragraph (1).
“(3) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the convening authority may act under this section only before entry of judgment.
“(4) The convening authority may act under this section after entry of judgment in a general or special court-martial in the same manner as the convening authority may act under subsection (d)(2) of section 860a of this title (article 60a). Such action shall be forwarded to the chief trial judge, who shall ensure appropriate modification to the entry of judgment and shall transmit the entry of judgment to the Judge Advocate General for appropriate action.
“(b) Limitations on rehearings.—The convening authority may not order a rehearing under this section—
“(c) Submissions by accused and victim.—In accordance with rules prescribed by the President, in determining whether to act under this section, the convening authority shall consider matters submitted in writing by the accused or any victim of the offense. Such rules shall include the matter required by subsection (e) of section 860a of this title (article 60a).
Subchapter IX of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 860b (article 60b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 903, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 860c. Art. 60c. Entry of judgment
“(a) Entry of judgment of general or special court-martial.— (1) In accordance with rules prescribed by the President, in a general or special court-martial, the military judge shall enter into the record of trial the judgment of the court. The judgment of the court shall consist of the following:
“(b) Summary court-martial judgment.—The findings and sentence of a summary court-martial, as modified by any post-trial action by the convening authority under section 860b of this title (article 60b), constitutes the judgment of the court-martial and shall be recorded and distributed under rules prescribed by the President.”.
Section 861 of title 10, United States Code (article 61 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 861. Art. 61. Waiver of right to appeal; withdrawal of appeal
“(a) Waiver of right to appeal.—After entry of judgment in a general or special court-martial, under procedures prescribed by the Secretary concerned, the accused may waive the right to appellate review in each case subject to such review under section 866 (article 66). Such a waiver shall be—
“(b) Withdrawal of appeal.—In a general or special court-martial, the accused may withdraw an appeal at any time.
Section 862 of title 10, United States Code (article 62 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1) in paragraph (1) of subsection (a)—
(3) by adding at the end the following: “(d) The United States may appeal a ruling or order of a military magistrate in the same manner as had the ruling or order been made by a military judge, except that the issue shall first be presented to the military judge who designated the military magistrate or to a military judge detailed to hear the issue.
Section 863 of title 10, United States Code (article 63 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(4) by adding at the end the following new subsections: “(b) If the sentence adjudged by the first court-martial was in accordance with a plea agreement under section 853a of this title (article 53a) and the accused at the rehearing does not comply with the agreement, or if a plea of guilty was entered for an offense at the first court-martial and a plea of not guilty was entered at the rehearing, the sentence as to those charges or specifications may include any punishment not in excess of that which could have been adjudged at the first court-martial. “(c) If, after appeal by the Government under section 856(d) of this title (article 56(d)), the sentence adjudged is set aside and a rehearing on sentence is ordered by the Court of Criminal Appeals or Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, the court-martial may impose any sentence that is in accordance with the order or ruling setting aside the adjudged sentence.”.
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 864 of title 10, United States Code (article 64 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking the first two sentences and inserting the following:
“(a) In general.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, each summary court-martial in which there is a finding of guilty shall be reviewed by a judge advocate. A judge advocate may not review a case under this subsection if the judge advocate has acted in the same case as an accuser, preliminary hearing officer, member of the court, military judge, or counsel or has otherwise acted on behalf of the prosecution or defense.”.
Section 865 of title 10, United States Code (article 65 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 865. Art. 65. Transmittal and review of records
“(a) Transmittal of records.— (1) If the judgment of a general or special court-martial entered under section 860c of this title (article 60c) includes a finding of guilty, the record shall be transmitted to the Judge Advocate General.
“(b) Review by judge advocate general.—
“(1) BY WHOM.—A review conducted under this subsection may be conducted by an attorney within the Office of the Judge Advocate General or another attorney designated under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned.
“(2) REVIEW OF CASES NOT ELIGIBLE FOR APPELLATE REVIEW BY A COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS.—
“(A) A review under subparagraph (B) shall be completed in each general and special court-martial that is not eligible for appellate review under paragraph (1) or (2) of section 866(b) of this title (article 66(b)).
“(3) REVIEW WHEN APPELLATE REVIEW BY A COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS IS WAIVED OR WITHDRAWN.—
“(c) Remedy.— (1) If after a review of a record under subsection (b), the attorney conducting the review believes corrective action may be required, the record shall be forwarded to the Judge Advocate General, who may set aside the findings or sentence, in whole or in part.
“(2) In setting aside findings or sentence, the Judge Advocate General may order a rehearing, except that a rehearing may not be ordered in violation of section 844 of this title (article 44).
(a) Appellate military judges.—Subsection (a) of section 866 of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (article 66 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(b) Revision of appellate procedures.—Such section (article) is further amended—
(1) by redesignating subsections (e), (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (f), (g), (h), and (i), respectively; and
(2) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d) and inserting the following new subsections: “(b) Review.— (1) The Judge Advocate General shall refer to a Court of Criminal Appeals the record in any of the following cases of trial by court-martial: “(A) A case in which the judgment entered into the record under section 860c of this title (article 60c) includes a sentence of death, dismissal of a commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman, dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for more than six months. “(2) A Court of Criminal Appeals shall have jurisdiction to review the judgment of a court-martial, entered into the record under section 860c of this title (article 60c), in a case in which the accused filed an application for review with the Court under section 869(d)(1)(B) of this title (article 69(d)(1)(B)) and the application has been granted by the Court. “(c) Duties.— (1) In a case referred to it, the Court of Criminal Appeals may act only with respect to the findings and sentence as entered into the record under section 860c of this title (article 60c). It may affirm only such findings of guilty, and the sentence or such part or amount of the sentence, as it finds correct in law and fact and determines, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved. In considering the record, it may weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact, recognizing that the trial court saw and heard the witnesses. “(2) In any case before the Court of Criminal Appeals under paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (b), the Court may provide appropriate relief if the accused demonstrates error or excessive delay in the processing of the court-martial after the judgment was entered into the record under section 860c of this title (article 60c). “(3) In review of a sentence to death or to life in prison without eligibility for parole determined by the members in a capital case under section 853 of this title (article 53), the Court of Criminal Appeals must consider whether the sentence is otherwise appropriate, under rules prescribed by the President. “(4) If the Court of Criminal Appeals sets aside the findings and sentence, it may, except where the setting aside is based on lack of sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings, order a rehearing. If it sets aside the findings and sentence and does not order a rehearing, it shall order that the charges be dismissed. “(d) Consideration of appeal of sentence by the United States.— (1) In considering a sentence on appeal, other than as provided in section 856(d) of this title (article 56(d)), the Court of Criminal Appeals may consider—
“(e) Limits of authority.— (1) (A) If the Court of Criminal Appeals sets aside the findings, the Court—
(c) Action when rehearing impracticable after rehearing order.—Subsection (f) of such section (article), as redesignated by subsection (b)(1), is amended—
(a) Jag notification.—Subsection (a)(2) of section 867 of title 10, United States Code (article 67 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by inserting after “the Judge Advocate General” the following: “, after appropriate notification to the other Judge Advocates General and to the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps,”.
(b) Basis for review.—Subsection (c) of such section (article) is amended—
(5) in paragraph (1), as designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, by striking “only with respect to” and all that follows through the end of the sentence and inserting the following:
The second sentence of subsection (a) of section 867a of title 10, United States Code (article 67a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by inserting before “Court of Appeals” the following: “United States”.
Section 869 of title 10, United States Code (article 69 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 869. Art. 69. Review by Judge Advocate General
“(a) In general.—Upon application by the accused and subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d), the Judge Advocate General may modify or set aside, in whole or in part, the findings and sentence in a court-martial that is not reviewed under section 866 of this title (article 66).
“(b) Timing.—To qualify for consideration, an application under subsection (a) must be submitted to the Judge Advocate General not later than one year after the date of completion of review under section 864 or 865 of this title (article 64 or 65), as the case may be. The Judge Advocate General may, for good cause shown, extend the period for submission of an application, but may not consider an application submitted more than three years after such completion date.
“(c) Scope.— (1) (A) In a case reviewed under section 864 or section 865(b) of this title (article 64 or 65(b)), the Judge Advocate General may set aside the findings or sentence, in whole or in part on the grounds of newly discovered evidence, fraud on the court, lack of jurisdiction over the accused or the offense, error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused, or the appropriateness of the sentence. “(B) In setting aside findings or sentence, the Judge Advocate General may order a rehearing, except that a rehearing may not be ordered in violation of section 844 of this title (Article 44).
“(2) In a case reviewed under section 865(b) of this title (article 65(b)), review under this section is limited to the issue of whether the waiver or withdrawal of an appeal was invalid under the law. If the Judge Advocate General determines that the waiver or withdrawal of an appeal was invalid, the Judge Advocate General shall order appropriate corrective action under rules prescribed by the President.
“(d) Court of criminal appeals.— (1) A Court of Criminal Appeals may review the action taken by the Judge Advocate General under subsection (c)—
“(2) The Court of Criminal Appeals may grant an application under paragraph (1)(B) only if—
“(A) the application demonstrates a substantial basis for concluding that the action on review under subsection (c) constituted prejudicial error; and
“(B) the application is filed not later than the earlier of—
“(i) 60 days after the date on which the accused is notified of the decision of the Judge Advocate General; or
“(ii) 60 days after the date on which a copy of the decision of the Judge Advocate General is deposited in the United States mails for delivery by first-class certified mail to the accused at an address provided by the accused or, if no such address has been provided by the accused, at the latest address listed for the accused in his official service record.
Section 870 of title 10, United States Code (article 70 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(f) To the greatest extent practicable, in any capital case, at least one defense counsel under subsection (c) shall, as determined by the Judge Advocate General, be learned in the law applicable to such cases. If necessary, this counsel may be a civilian and, if so, may be compensated in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.”.
(a) In general.—Subsection (a) of section 872 of title 10, United States Code (article 72) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by inserting after the first sentence the following new sentence: “The special court-martial convening authority may detail a judge advocate, who is certified under section 827(b) of this title (article 27(b)), to conduct the hearing.”.
The first sentence of section 873 of title 10, United States Code (article 73 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “two years after approval by the convening authority of a court-martial sentence,” and inserting “three years after the date of the entry of judgment under section 860c of this title (article 60c),”.
Section 875 of title 10, United States Code (article 75 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
Sections of subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), are transferred within subchapter X and redesignated as follows:
(1) ENLISTMENT AND SEPARATION.—Sections 883 and 884 (articles 83 and 84) are transferred so as to appear (in that order) after section 904 (article 104) and are redesignated as sections 904a and 904b (articles 104a and 104b), respectively.
(2) RESISTANCE, FLIGHT, BREACH OF ARREST, AND ESCAPE.—Section 895 (article 95) is transferred so as to appear after section 887 (article 87) and is redesignated as section 887a (article 87a).
(3) NONCOMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURAL RULES.—Section 898 (article 98) is transferred so as to appear after section 931 (article 131) and is redesignated as section 931f (article 131f).
(4) CAPTURED OR ABANDONED PROPERTY.—Section 903 (article 103) is transferred so as to appear after section 908 (article 108) and is redesignated as section 908a (article 108a).
(6) MISCONDUCT AS PRISONER.—Section 905 (article 105) is transferred so as to appear after section 897 (article 97) and is redesignated as section 898 (article 98).
(7) SPIES; ESPIONAGE.—Sections 906 and 906a (articles 106 and 106a) are transferred so as to appear (in that order) after section 902 (article 102) and are redesignated as sections 903 and 903a (articles 103 and 103a), respectively.
(8) MISBEHAVIOR OF SENTINEL.—Section 913 (article 113) is transferred so as to appear after section 894 (article 94) and is redesignated as section 895 (article 95).
(9) DRUNKEN OR RECKLESS OPERATION OF A VEHICLE, AIRCRAFT, OR VESSEL.—Section 911 (article 111) is transferred so as to appear after section 912a (article 912a) and is redesignated as section 913 (article 113).
(11) STALKING.—Section 920a (article 120a) is transferred so as to appear after section 929a (article 129a), as redesignated by paragraph (10), and is redesignated as section 930 (article 130).
(12) FORGERY.—Section 923 (article 123) is transferred so as to appear after section 904b (article 104b), as transferred and redesignated by paragraph (1), and is redesignated as section 905 (article 105).
Section 879 of title 10, United States Code (article 79 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Section 882 of title 10, United States Code (article 82 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 882. Art. 82. Soliciting commission of offenses
“(a) Soliciting commission of offenses generally.—Any person subject to this chapter who solicits or advises another to commit an offense under this chapter (other than an offense specified in subsection (b)) shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
“(b) Soliciting desertion, mutiny, sedition, or misbehavior before the enemy.—Any person subject to this chapter who solicits or advises another to violate section 885 of this title (article 85), section 894 of this title (article 94), or section 899 of this title (article 99)—
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 882 (article 82 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 6903, the following new section (article):
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 883 (article 83 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6904, the following new section (article):
Section 887 of title 10, United States Code (article 87 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 887a (article 87a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as transferred and redesignated by section 6901(2), the following new section (article):
Ҥ 887b. Art. 87b. Offenses against correctional custody and restriction
“(a) Escape from correctional custody.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(3) who escapes from the physical restraint before being released from the physical restraint by proper authority;
“(b) Breach of correctional custody.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(3) who goes beyond the limits of the restraint before being released from the correctional custody or relieved of the restraint by proper authority;
Section 889 of title 10, United States Code (article 89 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 889. Art. 89. Disrespect toward superior commissioned officer; assault of superior commissioned officer
“(a) Disrespect.—Any person subject to this chapter who behaves with disrespect toward that person’s superior commissioned officer shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
“(b) Assault.—Any person subject to this chapter who strikes that person’s superior commissioned officer or draws or lifts up any weapon or offers any violence against that officer while the officer is in the execution of the officer’s office shall be punished—
Section 890 of title 10, United States Code (article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 890. Art. 90. Willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer
“Any person subject to this chapter who willfully disobeys a lawful command of that person’s superior commissioned officer shall be punished—
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 893 (article 93 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the following new section (article):
Ҥ 893a. Art. 93a. Prohibited activities with military recruit or trainee by person in position of special trust
“(a) Abuse of training leadership position.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(2) who is in a training leadership position with respect to a specially protected junior member of the armed forces; and
“(3) who engages in prohibited sexual activity with such specially protected junior member of the armed forces;
“(b) Abuse of position as military recruiter.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(1) who is a military recruiter and engages in prohibited sexual activity with an applicant for military service; or
“(2) who is a military recruiter and engages in prohibited sexual activity with a specially protected junior member of the armed forces who is enlisted under a delayed entry program;
“(c) Consent.—Consent is not a defense for any conduct at issue in a prosecution under this section (article).
“(d) Definitions.—In this section (article):
“(1) SPECIALLY PROTECTED JUNIOR MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES.—The term ‘specially protected junior member of the armed forces’ means—
“(A) a member of the armed forces who is assigned to, or is awaiting assignment to, basic training or other initial active duty for training, including a member who is enlisted under a delayed entry program;
“(2) TRAINING LEADERSHIP POSITION.—The term ‘training leadership position’ means, with respect to a specially protected junior member of the armed forces, any of the following:
“(A) Any drill instructor position or other leadership position in a basic training program, an officer candidate school, a reserve officers’ training corps unit, a training program for entry into the armed forces, or any program that, by regulation prescribed by the Secretary concerned, is identified as a training program for initial career qualification.
“(3) APPLICANT FOR MILITARY SERVICE.—The term ‘applicant for military service’ means a person who, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, is an applicant for original enlistment or appointment in the armed forces.
Section 895 of title 10, United States Code (article 95 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as transferred and redesignated by section 6901(8), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 895. Art. 95. Offenses by sentinel or lookout
“(a) Drunk or sleeping on post, or leaving post before being relieved.—Any sentinel or lookout who is drunk on post, who sleeps on post, or who leaves post before being regularly relieved, shall be punished—
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 895 (article 95 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 6911, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 895a. Art. 95a. Disrespect toward sentinel or lookout
“(a) Disrespectful language toward sentinel or lookout.—Any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that another person is a sentinel or lookout, uses wrongful and disrespectful language that is directed toward and within the hearing of the sentinel or lookout, who is in the execution of duties as a sentinel or lookout, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
“(b) Disrespectful behavior toward sentinel or lookout.—Any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that another person is a sentinel or lookout, behaves in a wrongful and disrespectful manner that is directed toward and within the sight of the sentinel or lookout, who is in the execution of duties as a sentinel or lookout, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.
Section 896 of title 10, United States Code (article 96 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Section 903 of title 10, United States Code (article 103 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as transferred and redesignated by section 6901(7), is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first sentence the following: “or such other punishment as a court-martial or a military commission may direct”.
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 903b (article 103b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as redesignated by section 6901(5), the following new section (article):
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 905 (article 105 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as transferred and redesignated by section 6901(12), the following new section (article):
Ҥ 905a. Art. 105a. False or unauthorized pass offenses
“(a) Wrongful making, altering, etc.—Any person subject to this chapter who, wrongfully and falsely, makes, alters, counterfeits, or tampers with a military or official pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
“(b) Wrongful sale, etc.—Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully sells, gives, lends, or disposes of a false or unauthorized military or official pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card, knowing that the pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card is false or unauthorized, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
“(c) Wrongful use or possession.—Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully uses or possesses a false or unauthorized military or official pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card, knowing that the pass, permit, discharge certificate, or identification card is false or unauthorized, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 905a (article 105a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6916, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 906. Art. 106. Impersonation of officer, noncommissioned or petty officer, or agent or official
“(a) In general.—Any person subject to this chapter who, wrongfully and willfully, impersonates—
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.“(b) Impersonation with intent to defraud.—Any person subject to this chapter who, wrongfully, willfully, and with intent to defraud, impersonates any person referred to in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
“(c) Impersonation of government official without intent to defraud.—Any person subject to this chapter who, wrongfully, willfully, and without intent to defraud, impersonates an official of a government by committing an act that exercises or asserts the authority of the office that the person claims to have shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 906 (article 106 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6917, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 906a. Art. 106a. Wearing unauthorized insignia, decoration, badge, ribbon, device, or lapel button
“Any person subject to this chapter—
“(1) who is not authorized to wear an insignia, decoration, badge, ribbon, device, or lapel button; and
“(2) who wrongfully wears such insignia, decoration, badge, ribbon, device, or lapel button upon the person’s uniform or civilian clothing;
Section 907 of title 10, United States Code (article 107 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 907. Art. 107. False official statements; false swearing
“(a) False official statements.—Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to deceive—
“(1) signs any false record, return, regulation, order, or other official document, knowing it to be false; or
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 907 (article 107 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 6919, the following new section (article):
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 909 (article 109 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the following new section (article):
Ҥ 909a. Art. 109a. Mail matter: wrongful taking, opening, etc.
“(a) Taking.—Any person subject to this chapter who, with the intent to obstruct the correspondence of, or to pry into the business or secrets of, any person or organization, wrongfully takes mail matter before the mail matter is delivered to or received by the addressee shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Section 910 of title 10, United States Code (article 110 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 910 (article 110 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 6922, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 911. Art. 111. Leaving scene of vehicle accident
“(a) Driver.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(b) Senior passenger.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(1) who is a passenger in a vehicle that is involved in an accident that results in personal injury or property damage;
“(2) who is the superior commissioned or noncommissioned officer of the driver of the vehicle or is the commander of the vehicle; and
Section 912 of title 10, United States Code (article 112 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 912. Art. 112. Drunkenness and other incapacitation offenses
“(a) Drunk on duty.—Any person subject to this chapter who is drunk on duty shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Subsection (b)(3) of section 913 of title 10, United States Code (article 113 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as transferred and redesignated by section 6901(9), is amended—
Section 914 of title 10, United States Code (article 114 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 914. Art. 114. Endangerment offenses
“(a) Reckless endangerment.—Any person subject to this chapter who engages in conduct that—
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.“(b) Dueling.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(2) who, having knowledge of a challenge sent or about to be sent, fails to report the facts promptly to the proper authority;
Section 915 of title 10, United States Code (article 115 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 915. Art. 115. Communicating threats
“(a) Communicating threats generally.—Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully communicates a threat to injure the person, property, or reputation of another shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
“(b) Communicating threat to use explosive, etc.—Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully communicates a threat to injure the person or property of another by use of (1) an explosive, (2) a weapon of mass destruction, (3) a biological or chemical agent, substance, or weapon, or (4) a hazardous material, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
“(c) Communicating false threat concerning use of explosive, etc.—Any person subject to this chapter who maliciously communicates a false threat concerning injury to the person or property of another by use of (1) an explosive, (2) a weapon of mass destruction, (3) a biological or chemical agent, substance, or weapon, or (4) a hazardous material, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct. As used in the preceding sentence, the term ‘false threat’ means a threat that, at the time the threat is communicated, is known to be false by the person communicating the threat.”.
Section 918(4) of title 10, United States Code (article 118(4) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking “forcible sodomy,”.
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 919a (article 119a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the following new section (article):
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 920 (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the following new section (article):
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 921 (article 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the following new section (article):
Ҥ 921a. Art. 121a. Fraudulent use of credit cards, debit cards, and other access devices
“(a) In general.—Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to defraud, uses—
“(3) a credit card, debit card, or other access device without the authorization of a person whose authorization is required for such use;
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 921a (article 121a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6931, the following new section (article):
Section 922 of title 10, United States Code (article 122 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“Any person subject to this chapter who takes anything of value from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by means of force or violence or fear of immediate or future injury to his person or property or to the person or property of a relative or member of his family or of anyone in his company at the time of the robbery, is guilty of robbery and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 922 (article 122 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as amended by section 6933, the following new section (article):
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 922a (article 122a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6934, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 923. Art. 123. Offenses concerning government computers
“(a) In general.—Any person subject to this chapter who—
“(1) knowingly accesses a Government computer, with an unauthorized purpose, and by doing so obtains classified information, with reason to believe such information could be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, and intentionally communicates, delivers, transmits, or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted such information to any person not entitled to receive it;
“(2) intentionally accesses a Government computer, with an unauthorized purpose, and thereby obtains classified or other protected information from any such Government computer; or
“(3) knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a Government computer;
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 924 (article 124 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as transferred and redesignated by section 6901(14), the following new section (article):
“(a) Asking, accepting, or receiving thing of value.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(2) who wrongfully asks, accepts, or receives a thing of value with the intent to have the person’s decision or action influenced with respect to an official matter in which the United States is interested;
“(b) Promising, offering, or giving thing of value.—Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully promises, offers, or gives a thing of value to another person, who occupies an official position or who has official duties, with the intent to influence the decision or action of the other person with respect to an official matter in which the United States is interested, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 924a (article 124a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6936, the following new section (article):
“(a) Asking, accepting, or receiving thing of value.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(2) who wrongfully asks, accepts, or receives a thing of value as compensation for or in recognition of services rendered or to be rendered by the person with respect to an official matter in which the United States is interested;
“(b) Promising, offering, or giving thing of value.—Any person subject to this chapter who wrongfully promises, offers, or gives a thing of value to another person, who occupies an official position or who has official duties, as compensation for or in recognition of services rendered or to be rendered by the other person with respect to an official matter in which the United States is interested, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.
Section 925 of title 10, United States Code (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Section 926 of title 10, United States Code (article 126 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 926. Art. 126. Arson; burning property with intent to defraud
“(a) Aggravated arson.—Any person subject to this chapter who, willfully and maliciously, burns or sets on fire an inhabited dwelling, or any other structure, movable or immovable, wherein, to the knowledge of that person, there is at the time a human being, is guilty of aggravated arson and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Section 928 of title 10, United States Code (article 128 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
“(a) Assault.—Any person subject to this chapter who, unlawfully and with force or violence—
is guilty of assault and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.“(b) Aggravated assault.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(2) who, in committing an assault, inflicts substantial bodily harm, or grievous bodily harm on another person;
Section 929 of title 10, United States Code (article 129 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), and section 929a of such title (article 129a), as redesignated by section 6901(10), are amended to read as follows:
Section 930 of title 10, United States Code (article 130 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as transferred and redesignated by section 6901(11), is amended to read as follows:
“(a) In general.—Any person subject to this chapter—
“(1) who wrongfully engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear death or bodily harm, including sexual assault, to himself or herself, to a member of his or her immediate family, or to his or her intimate partner;
“(2) who has knowledge, or should have knowledge, that the specific person will be placed in reasonable fear of death or bodily harm, including sexual assault, to himself or herself, to a member of his or her immediate family, or to his or her intimate partner; and
“(3) whose conduct induces reasonable fear in the specific person of death or bodily harm, including sexual assault, to himself or herself, to a member of his or her immediate family, or to his or her intimate partner;
“(b) Definitions.—In this section:
“(1) The term ‘conduct’ means conduct of any kind, including use of surveillance, the mails, an interactive computer service, an electronic communication service, or an electronic communication system.
“(2) The term ‘course of conduct’ means—
“(4) The term ‘immediate family’, in the case of a specific person, means—
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 931 (article 131 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the following new section (article):
Ҥ 931a. Art. 131a. Subornation of perjury
“(a) In general.—Any person subject to this chapter who induces and procures another person—
shall, if the conditions specified in subsection (b) are satisfied, be punished as a court-martial may direct.Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 931a (article 131a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6943, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 931b. Art. 131b. Obstructing justice
“Any person subject to this chapter who engages in conduct in the case of a certain person against whom the accused had reason to believe there were or would be criminal or disciplinary proceedings pending, with intent to influence, impede, or otherwise obstruct the due administration of justice shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 931b (article 131b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6944, the following new section (article):
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 931c (article 131c of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6945, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 931d. Art. 131d. Wrongful refusal to testify
“Any person subject to this chapter who, in the presence of a court-martial, a board of officers, a military commission, a court of inquiry, preliminary hearing, or an officer taking a deposition, of or for the United States, wrongfully refuses to qualify as a witness or to answer a question after having been directed to do so by the person presiding shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 931d (article 131d of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6946, the following new section (article):
Ҥ 931e. Art. 131e. Prevention of authorized seizure of property
“Any person subject to this chapter who, knowing that one or more persons authorized to make searches and seizures are seizing, are about to seize, or are endeavoring to seize property, destroys, removes, or otherwise disposes of the property with intent to prevent the seizure thereof shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.
Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 931f (article 131f of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as transferred and redesignated by section 6901(3), the following new section (article):
Ҥ 931g. Art. 131g. Wrongful interference with adverse administrative proceeding
“Any person subject to this chapter who, having reason to believe that an adverse administrative proceeding is pending against any person subject to this chapter, wrongfully acts with the intent—
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”.Subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 931g (article 131g of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by section 6948, the following new section (article):
“Any person subject to this chapter who, with the intent to retaliate against any person for reporting or planning to report a criminal offense, or with the intent to discourage any person from reporting a criminal offense—
“(2) wrongfully withholds or threatens to withhold a favorable personnel action with respect to any person;
Section 934 of title 10, United States Code (article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: “As used in the preceding sentence, the term ‘crimes and offenses not capital’ includes any conduct engaged in outside the United States, as defined in section 5 of title 18, that would constitute a crime or offense not capital if the conduct had been engaged in within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, as defined in section 7 of title 18.”.
The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter X of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Section 935(c) of title 10, United States Code (article 135(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(3) in paragraph (2), as so designated, by striking “subject to this chapter or employed by the Department of Defense” and inserting “who is (A) subject to this chapter, (B) employed by the Department of Defense, or (C) with respect to the Coast Guard, employed by the department in which the Coast Guard is operating when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, and”.
Section 936 of title 10, United States Code (article 136 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by striking the last five words in the section heading.
Section 937 of title 10, United States Code (article 137 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by striking “(a)(1) The sections of this title (articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice)” and inserting “(a) Enlisted members.—(1) The sections (articles) of this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice)”;
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new subsections: “(b) Officers.— (1) The sections (articles) of this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) specified in paragraph (2) shall be carefully explained to each officer at the time of (or within six months after)—
“(c) Training for certain officers.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, officers with the authority to convene courts-martial or to impose non-judicial punishment shall receive periodic training regarding the purposes and administration of this chapter. Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, officers assigned to duty in a combatant command, who have such authority, shall receive additional specialized training regarding the purposes and administration of this chapter. “(d) Availability and maintenance of text.—The text of this chapter (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) and the text of the regulations prescribed by the President under this chapter shall be—
(a) In general.—Subchapter XI of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new section (article):
Ҥ 940a. Art. 140a. Case management; data collection and accessibility
“The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe uniform standards and criteria for conduct of each of the following functions at all stages of the military justice system, including pretrial, trial, post-trial, and appellate processes, using, insofar as practicable, the best practices of Federal and State courts:
“(1) Collection and analysis of data concerning substantive offenses and procedural matters in a manner that facilitates case management and decision making within the military justice system, and that enhances the quality of periodic reviews under section 946 of this title (article 146).
(a) Short title.—This section may be cited as the “Return of Certain Lands At Fort Wingate to The Original Inhabitants Act”.
(b) Division and treatment of lands of former Fort Wingate Depot Activity, New Mexico, to benefit the Zuni Tribe and Navajo Nation.—
(1) IMMEDIATE TRUST ON BEHALF OF ZUNI TRIBE; EXCEPTION.—Subject to valid existing rights and to easements reserved pursuant to subsection (c), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the lands of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity depicted in dark blue on the map titled “The Fort Wingate Depot Activity Negotiated Property Division April 2016” (in this section referred to as the “Map”) and transferred to the Secretary of the Interior are to be held in trust by the Secretary of the Interior for the Zuni Tribe as part of the Zuni Reservation, unless the Zuni Tribe otherwise elects under clause (ii) of paragraph (3)(C) to have the parcel conveyed to it in Restricted Fee Status.
(2) IMMEDIATE TRUST ON BEHALF OF THE NAVAJO NATION; EXCEPTION.—Subject to valid existing rights and to easements reserved pursuant to subsection (c), all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the lands of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity depicted in dark green on the Map and transferred to the Secretary of the Interior are to be held in trust by the Secretary of the Interior for the Navajo Nation as part of the Navajo Reservation, unless the Navajo Nation otherwise elects under clause (ii) of paragraph (3)(C) to have the parcel conveyed to it in Restricted Fee Status.
(3) SUBSEQUENT TRANSFER AND TRUST; RESTRICTED FEE STATUS ALTERNATIVE.—
(A) TRANSFER UPON COMPLETION OF REMEDIATION.—Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Army, with the concurrence of the New Mexico Environment Department, notifies the Secretary of the Interior that remediation of a parcel of land of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity has been completed consistent with subsection (d), the Secretary of the Army shall transfer administrative jurisdiction over the parcel to the Secretary of the Interior.
(B) NOTIFICATION OF TRANSFER.—Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of the Army transfers administrative jurisdiction over a parcel of land of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Interior shall notify the Zuni Tribe and Navajo Nation of the transfer of administrative jurisdiction over the parcel.
(C) TRUST OR RESTRICTED FEE STATUS.—
(i) TRUST.—Except as provided in clause (ii), the Secretary of the Interior shall hold each parcel of land of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity transferred under subparagraph (A) in trust—
(ii) RESTRICTED FEE STATUS.—In lieu of having a parcel of land held in trust under clause (i), the Zuni Tribe, with respect to land depicted in blue on the Map, and the Navajo Nation, with respect to land depicted in green on the Map, may elect to have the Secretary of the Interior convey the parcel or any portion of the parcel to it in restricted fee status.
(iii) NOTIFICATION OF ELECTION.—Not later than 45 days after the date on which the Zuni Tribe or the Navajo Nation receives notice under subparagraph (B) of the transfer of administrative jurisdiction over a parcel of land of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity, the Zuni Tribe or the Navajo Nation shall notify the Secretary of the Interior of an election under clause (ii) for conveyance of the parcel or any portion of the parcel in restricted fee status.
(iv) CONVEYANCE.—As soon as practicable after receipt of a notice from the Zuni Tribe or the Navajo Nation under clause (iii), but in no case later than 6 months after receipt of the notice, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey, in restricted fee status, the parcel of land of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity covered by the notice to the Zuni Tribe or the Navajo Nation, as the case may be.
(v) RESTRICTED FEE STATUS DEFINED.—For purposes of this section only, the term “restricted fee status”, with respect to land conveyed under clause (iv), means that the land so conveyed—
(II) shall be part of the Indian tribe’s Reservation and expressly made subject to the jurisdiction of the Indian Tribe;
(4) SURVEY AND BOUNDARY REQUIREMENTS.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall—
(B) CONSULTATION.—Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior shall consult with the Zuni Tribe and the Navajo Nation to determine their priorities regarding the order in which parcels should be surveyed and, to the greatest extent feasible, the Secretary shall follow these priorities.
(5) RELATION TO CERTAIN REGULATIONS.—Part 151 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, shall not apply to taking lands of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity into trust under paragraph (1), (2), or (3).
(6) FORT WINGATE LAUNCH COMPLEX LAND STATUS.—Upon certification by the Secretary of Defense that the area generally depicted as “Fort Wingate Launch Complex” on the Map is no longer required for military purposes and can be transferred to the Secretary of the Interior—
(c) Retention of necessary easements and access.—
(1) TREATMENT OF EXISTING EASEMENTS, PERMIT RIGHTS, AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—The lands of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity held in trust or conveyed in restricted fee status pursuant to subsection (b) shall be held in trust with easements, permit rights, and rights-of-way, and access associated with such easements, permit rights, and rights-of-way, of any applicable utility service provider in existence or for which an application is pending for existing facilities at the time of the conveyance or change to trust status, including the right to upgrade applicable utility services recognized and preserved, in perpetuity and without the right of revocation (except as provided in subparagraph (B)).
(B) TERMINATION.—An easement, permit right, or right-of-way recognized and preserved under subparagraph (A) shall terminate only—
(C) ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS.—The Secretary of the Interior shall grant to a utility service provider, without consideration, such additional easements across lands held in trust or conveyed in restricted fee status pursuant to subsection (b) as the Secretary considers necessary to accommodate the relocation or reconnection of a utility service existing on the date of enactment of this section.
(2) ACCESS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE ACTIONS.—The lands of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity held in trust or conveyed in restricted fee status pursuant to subsection (b) shall be subject to reserved access by the United States as the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior determine are reasonably required to permit access to lands of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity for administrative and environmental response purposes. The Secretary of the Army shall provide to the governments of the Zuni Tribe and the Navajo Nation written copies of all access reservations under this subsection.
(3) SHARED ACCESS.—
(A) PARCEL 1 SHARED CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS ACCESS.—In the case of the lands of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity depicted as Parcel 1 on the Map, the lands shall be held in trust subject to a shared easement for cultural and religious purposes only. Both the Zuni Tribe and the Navajo Nation shall have unhindered access to their respective cultural and religious sites within Parcel 1. Within 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section, the Zuni Tribe and the Navajo Nation shall exchange detailed information to document the existence of cultural and religious sites within Parcel 1 for the purpose of carrying out this subparagraph. The information shall also be provided to the Secretary of the Interior.
(B) OTHER SHARED ACCESS.—Subject to the written consent of both the Zuni Tribe and the Navajo Nation, the Secretary of the Interior may facilitate shared access to other lands held in trust or restricted fee status pursuant to subsection (b), including, but not limited to, religious and cultural sites.
(4) I–40 FRONTAGE ROAD ENTRANCE.—The access road for the Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity, which originates at the frontage road for Interstate 40 and leads to the parcel of the Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity depicted as ‘‘administration area’’ on the Map, shall be held in common by the Zuni Tribe and Navajo Nation to provide for equal access to Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity.
(5) COMPATIBILITY WITH DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.—The lands of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity held in trust or conveyed in restricted fee status pursuant to subsection (b) shall be subject to reservations by the United States as the Secretary of Defense determines are reasonably required to permit access to lands of the Fort Wingate launch complex for administrative, test operations, and launch operations purposes. The Secretary of Defense shall provide the governments of the Zuni Tribe and the Navajo Nation written copies of all reservations under this paragraph.
(d) Environmental remediation.—Nothing in this section shall be construed as alleviating, altering, or affecting the responsibility of the United States for cleanup and remediation of Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.
(e) Prohibition on gaming.—Any real property of the Former Fort Wingate Depot Activity and all other real property subject to this section shall not be eligible, or used, for any gaming activity carried out under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).
Section 946 of title 10, United States Code (article 146 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended to read as follows:
Ҥ 946. Art. 146. Military Justice Review Panel
“(a) Establishment.—The Secretary of Defense shall establish a panel to conduct independent periodic reviews and assessments of the operation of this chapter. The panel shall be known as the ‘Military Justice Review Panel’, in this section referred to as the ‘Panel’.
“(b) Members.— (1) The Panel shall be composed of thirteen members.
“(2) Each of the following shall select one member of the Panel:
“(3) The Secretary of Defense shall select the remaining members of the Panel, taking into consideration recommendations made by each of the following:
“(c) Qualifications of members.—The members of the Panel shall be appointed from among private United States citizens with expertise in criminal law, as well as appropriate and diverse experience in investigation, prosecution, defense, victim representation, or adjudication with respect to courts-martial, Federal civilian courts, or State courts.
“(e) Term; vacancies.—Each member shall be appointed for a term of eight years, and no member may serve more than one term. Any vacancy shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment.
“(f) Reviews and reports.—
“(1) INITIAL REVIEW OF RECENT AMENDMENTS TO UCMJ.—During fiscal year 2020, the Panel shall conduct an initial review and assessment of the implementation of the amendments made to this chapter during the preceding five years. In conducting the initial review and assessment, the Panel may review such other aspects of the operation of this chapter as the Panel considers appropriate.
“(2) PERIODIC COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS.—During fiscal year 2024 and every eight years thereafter, the Panel shall conduct a comprehensive review and assessment of the operation of this chapter.
“(3) PERIODIC INTERIM REVIEWS.—During fiscal year 2028 and every eight years thereafter, the Panel shall conduct an interim review and assessment of such other aspects of the operation of this chapter as the Panel considers appropriate. In addition, at the request of the Secretary of Defense, the Panel may, at any time, review and assess other specific matters relating to the operation of this chapter.
“(4) REPORTS.—Not later than December 31 of each year during which the Panel conducts a review and assessment under this subsection, the Panel shall submit a report on the results, including the Panel’s findings and recommendations, through the Secretary of Defense to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives.
“(g) Hearings.—The Panel may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as the Panel considers appropriate to carry out its duties under this section.
“(h) Information from federal agencies.—Upon request of the chair of the Panel, a department or agency of the Federal Government shall provide information that the Panel considers necessary to carry out its duties under this section.
“(i) Administrative matters.—
“(1) MEMBERS TO SERVE WITHOUT PAY.—Members of the Panel shall serve without pay, but shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Panel.
Subchapter XII of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), is amended by adding at the end the following new section (article):
Ҥ 946a. Art. 146a. Annual reports
“(a) Court of appeals for the armed forces.—Not later than December 31 of each year, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces shall submit a report that, with respect to the previous fiscal year, provides information on the number and status of pending cases and such other matters as the Court considers appropriate regarding the operation of this chapter.
“(b) Service reports.—Not later than December 31 of each year, the Judge Advocates General and the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps shall each submit a report, with respect to the preceding fiscal year, containing the following:
“(2) Information on the appellate review process, including—
“(B) descriptions of the circumstances surrounding cases in which general or special court-martial convictions were (i) reversed because of command influence or denial of the right to speedy review or (ii) otherwise remitted because of loss of records of trial or other administrative deficiencies; and
“(3) (A) An explanation of measures implemented by the armed force involved to ensure the ability of judge advocates—
“(4) The independent views of each Judge Advocate General and of the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps as to the sufficiency of resources available within the respective armed forces, including total workforce, funding, training, and officer and enlisted grade structure, to capably perform military justice functions.
The tables of sections for the specified subchapters of chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), are amended as follows:
(1) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II is amended by striking the item relating to section 810 and inserting the following new item:
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter II, as amended by paragraph (1), is amended by striking the item relating to section 812 and inserting the following new item:
“812. 12. Prohibition of confinement of armed forces members with enemy prisoners and certain others.”.
(3) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter V is amended by striking the item relating to section 825a and inserting the following new item:
“825. 25a. Number of court-martial members in capital cases.”.
(4) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter V, as amended by paragraph (3), is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 826 the following new item:
“826a. 26a. Military magistrates.”.
(5) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter V, as amended by paragraphs (3) and (4), is amended by striking the item relating to section 829 and inserting the following new item:
“829. 29. Assembly and impaneling of members; detail of new members and military judges.”.
(6) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VI is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 830 the following new item:
“830. 30a. Proceedings conducted before referral.”.
(7) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VI, as amended by paragraph (6), is amended by striking the item relating to section 832 and inserting the following new item:
“832. 32. Preliminary hearing required before referral to general court-martial.”.
(8) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VI, as amended by paragraphs (6) and (7), is amended by striking the item relating to section 833 and inserting the following new item:
“833. 33. Disposition guidance.”.
(9) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VI, as amended by paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), is amended by striking the item relating to section 834 and inserting the following new item:
“834. 34. Advice to convening authority before referral for trial.”.
(10) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VI, as amended by paragraphs (6), (7), (8), and (9), is amended by striking the item relating to section 835 and inserting the following new item:
“835. 35. Service of charges; commencement of trial.”.
(11) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VII is amended by striking the item relating to section 847 and inserting the following new item:
“8470. 47. Refusal of person not subject to chapter to appear, testify, or produce evidence.”.
(12) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VII, as amended by paragraph (11), is amended by striking the item relating to section 848 and inserting the following new item:
“848. 48. Contempt.”.
(13) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VII, as amended by paragraphs (11) and (12), is amended by striking the item relating to section 850 and inserting the following new item:
“850. 50. Admissibility of sworn testimony from records of courts of inquiry.”.
(14) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VII, as amended by paragraphs (11), (12), and (13), is amended by striking the item relating to section 852 and inserting the following new item:
“852. 52. Votes required for conviction, sentencing, and other matters.”.
(15) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VII, as amended by paragraphs (11), (12), (13), and (14), is amended by striking the item relating to section 853 and inserting the following new item:
“853. 53. Findings and sentencing.”.
(16) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VIII is amended by striking the item relating to section 856 and inserting the following new item:
“856. 56. Sentencing.”.
(17) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter VIII, as amended by paragraph (16), is amended by striking the items relating to section 856a and 857a.
(18) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IX is amended by striking the item relating to section 860 and inserting the following new item:
“860. 60. Post-trial processing in general and special courts-martial.”.
(19) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IX is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 860, as amended by paragraph (18), the following new items:
“860a. 60a. Limited authority to act on sentence in specified post-trial circumstances.
“860b. 60b. Post-trial actions in summary courts-martial and certain general and special courts-martial.
“860c. 60c. Entry of judgment.”.
(20) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IX, as amended by paragraphs (18) and (19), is amended by striking the item relating to section 861 and inserting the following new item:
“861. 61. Waiver of right to appeal; withdrawal of appeal.”.
(21) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IX, as amended by paragraphs (18), (19), and (20), is amended by striking the item relating to section 864 and inserting the following new item:
“864. 64. Judge advocate review of finding of guilty in summary court-martial.”.
(22) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IX, as amended by paragraphs (18), (19), (20), and (21), is amended by striking the item relating to section 865 and inserting the following new item:
“865. 65. Transmittal and review of records.”.
(23) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IX, as amended by paragraphs (18), (19), (20), (21), and (22), is amended by striking the item relating to section 866 and inserting the following new item:
“866. 66. Courts of Criminal Appeals.”.
(24) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IX, as amended by paragraphs (18), (19), (20), and (21), (22), and (23), is amended by striking the item relating to section 869 and inserting the following new item:
“869. 69. Review by Judge Advocate General.”.
(25) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter IX, as amended by paragraphs (18), (19), (20), (21), (22), (23), and (24), is amended by striking the item relating to section 871 and inserting the following new item:
“871. 71. [Repealed.]”.
(26) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter XI is amended by striking the item relating to section 936 and inserting the following new item:
“936. 136. Authority to administer oaths.”.
(27) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter XI, as amended by paragraph (26), is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 940 the following new item:
“940a. 140a. Case management; data collection and accessibility.”.
(28) The table of sections at the beginning of subchapter XII is amended by striking the item relating to section 946 and inserting the following new items:
“946. 146. Military Justice Review Panel.
“946a. 146a. Annual reports.”.
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this division, the amendments made by this division shall take effect on the first day of the first calendar month that begins two years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) The amendments made by this division shall not apply to any case in which charges are referred to trial by court-martial before the effective date of such amendments. Proceedings in any such case shall be held in the same manner and with the same effect as if such amendments had not been enacted.
This title may be cited as the “Guam World War II Loyalty Recognition Act”.
(a) Recognition of the Suffering of the Residents of Guam.—The United States recognizes that, as described by the Guam War Claims Review Commission, the residents of Guam, on account of their United States nationality, suffered unspeakable harm as a result of the occupation of Guam by Imperial Japanese military forces during World War II, by being subjected to death, rape, severe personal injury, personal injury, forced labor, forced march, or internment.
(b) Recognition of the Loyalty of the Residents of Guam.—The United States forever will be grateful to the residents of Guam for their steadfast loyalty to the United States, as demonstrated by the countless acts of courage they performed despite the threat of death or great bodily harm they faced at the hands of the Imperial Japanese military forces that occupied Guam during World War II.
(a) Establishment of fund.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall establish in the Treasury of the United States a special fund (in this title referred to as the “Claims Fund”) for the payment of claims submitted by compensable Guam victims and survivors of compensable Guam decedents in accordance with sections 7304 and 7305.
(b) Composition of fund.—The Claims Fund established under subsection (a) shall be composed of amounts deposited into the Claims Fund under subsection (c) and any other payments made available for the payment of claims under this title.
(c) Payment of certain duties, taxes, and fees collected from Guam deposited into fund.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 30 of the Organic Act of Guam (48 U.S.C. 1421h), the excess of—
shall be deposited into the Claims Fund.
(d) Limitation on payments made from fund.—
(e) Deductions from fund for administrative expenses.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall deduct from any amounts deposited into the Claims Fund an amount equal to 5 percent of such amounts as reimbursement to the Federal Government for expenses incurred by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission and by the Department of the Treasury in the administration of this title. The amounts so deducted shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.
(a) Payments for Death, Personal Injury, Forced Labor, Forced March, and Internment.—After the Secretary of the Treasury receives the certification from the Chairman of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission as required under section 7305(b)(8), the Secretary of the Treasury shall make payments, subject to the availably of appropriations, to compensable Guam victims and survivors of a compensable Guam decedents as follows:
(1) COMPENSABLE GUAM VICTIM.—Before making any payments under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall make payments to compensable Guam victims as follows:
(2) SURVIVORS OF COMPENSABLE GUAM DECEDENTS.—In the case of a compensable Guam decedent, the Secretary shall pay $25,000 for distribution to survivors of the decedent in accordance with subsection (b). The Secretary shall make payments under this paragraph only after all payments are made under paragraph (1).
(b) Distribution of Survivor Payments.—A payment made under subsection (a)(2) to the survivors of a compensable Guam decedent shall be distributed as follows:
(1) In the case of a decedent whose spouse is living as of the date of the enactment of this Act, but who had no living children as of such date, the payment shall be made to such spouse.
(2) In the case of a decedent whose spouse is living as of the date of the enactment of this Act and who had one or more living children as of such date, 50 percent of the payment shall be made to the spouse and 50 percent shall be made to such children, to be divided among such children to the greatest extent possible into equal shares.
(3) In the case of a decedent whose spouse is not living as of the date of the enactment of this Act and who had one or more living children as of such date, the payment shall be made to such children, to be divided among such children to the greatest extent possible into equal shares.
(c) Definitions.—For purposes of this title:
(1) COMPENSABLE GUAM DECEDENT.—The term “compensable Guam decedent” means an individual determined under section 7305 to have been a resident of Guam who died as a result of the attack and occupation of Guam by Imperial Japanese military forces during World War II, or incident to the liberation of Guam by United States military forces, and whose death would have been compensable under the Guam Meritorious Claims Act of 1945 (Public Law 79–224) if a timely claim had been filed under the terms of such Act.
(2) COMPENSABLE GUAM VICTIM.—The term “compensable Guam victim” means an individual who is not deceased as of the date of the enactment of this Act and who is determined under section 7305 to have suffered, as a result of the attack and occupation of Guam by Imperial Japanese military forces during World War II, or incident to the liberation of Guam by United States military forces, any of the following:
(3) DEFINITIONS OF SEVERE PERSONAL INJURIES AND PERSONAL INJURIES.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission shall promulgate regulations to specify the injuries that constitute a severe personal injury or a personal injury for purposes of subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, of paragraph (2).
(a) Authority of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission shall adjudicate claims and determine the eligibility of individuals for payments under section 7304.
(2) RULES AND REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chairman of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission shall publish in the Federal Register such rules and regulations as may be necessary to enable the Commission to carry out the functions of the Commission under this title.
(b) Claims Submitted for Payments.—
(1) SUBMITTAL OF CLAIM.—For purposes of subsection (a)(1) and subject to paragraph (2), the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission may not determine an individual is eligible for a payment under section 7304 unless the individual submits to the Commission a claim in such manner and form and containing such information as the Commission specifies.
(2) FILING PERIOD FOR CLAIMS AND NOTICE.—
(A) FILING PERIOD.—An individual filing a claim for a payment under section 7304 shall file such claim not later than one year after the date on which the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission publishes the notice described in subparagraph (B).
(3) ADJUDICATORY DECISIONS.—The decision of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission on each claim filed under this title shall—
(4) DEDUCTIONS IN PAYMENT.—The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission shall deduct, from a payment made to a compensable Guam victim or survivors of a compensable Guam decedent under this section, amounts paid to such victim or survivors under the Guam Meritorious Claims Act of 1945 (Public Law 79–224) before the date of the enactment of this Act.
(5) INTEREST.—No interest shall be paid on payments made by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission under section 7304.
(6) LIMITED COMPENSATION FOR PROVISION OF REPRESENTATIONAL SERVICES.—
(A) LIMIT ON COMPENSATION.—Any agreement under which an individual who provided representational services to an individual who filed a claim for a payment under this title that provides for compensation to the individual who provided such services in an amount that is more than one percent of the total amount of such payment shall be unlawful and void.
(7) APPEALS AND FINALITY.—Objections and appeals of decisions of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission shall be to the Commission, and upon rehearing, the decision in each claim shall be final, and not subject to further review by any court or agency.
(8) CERTIFICATIONS FOR PAYMENT.—After a decision approving a claim becomes final, the Chairman of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission shall certify such decision to the Secretary of the Treasury for authorization of a payment under section 7304.
(9) TREATMENT OF AFFIDAVITS.—For purposes of section 7304 and subject to paragraph (2), the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission shall treat a claim that is accompanied by an affidavit of an individual that attests to all of the material facts required for establishing the eligibility of such individual for payment under such section as establishing a prima facie case of the eligibility of the individual for such payment without the need for further documentation, except as the Commission may otherwise require. Such material facts shall include, with respect to a claim for a payment made under section 7304(a), a detailed description of the injury or other circumstance supporting the claim involved, including the level of payment sought.
(10) RELEASE OF RELATED CLAIMS.—Acceptance of a payment under section 7304 by an individual for a claim related to a compensable Guam decedent or a compensable Guam victim shall be in full satisfaction of all claims related to such decedent or victim, respectively, arising under the Guam Meritorious Claims Act of 1945 (Public Law 79–224), the implementing regulations issued by the United States Navy pursuant to such Act (Public Law 79–224), or this title.
(a) Establishment.—Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary of the Interior shall establish a grant program under which the Secretary shall award grants for research, educational, and media activities for purposes of appropriately illuminating and interpreting the causes and circumstances of the occupation of Guam during World War II and other similar occupations during the war that—
(a) Guam World War II Claims Payments and Adjudication.—For the purposes of carrying out sections 7304 and 7305, there is authorized to be appropriated for any fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of this act, an amount equal to the amount deposited into the Claims Fund in a fiscal year under section 7303. Not more than 5 percent of funds make available under this subsection shall be used for administrative costs. Amounts appropriated under this section may remain available until expended.
Clerk.
| |||||
AMENDMENT | |||||