[Page S2969]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CBO COST ESTIMATE--S. 556
Ms. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, in compliance with paragraph 11(a) of
rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the Committee on Energy
and Natural Resources has obtained from the Congressional Budget Office
an estimate of the costs of S. 556, Sportsmen's Act of 2015, as
reported from the committee. The full estimate is available on CBO's
Web site, www.cbo.gov.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the summary of the cost
estimate be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate
S. 556--Sportsmen's Act of 2015
(May 18, 2016)
Summary: S. 556 would amend existing laws and establish new
laws related to the management of federal lands. It would
authorize the sale of certain federal land and permit the
proceeds from those sales to be spent. The bill also would
establish a fund to carry out deferred maintenance projects
on lands administered by the National Park Service (NPS) and
would permanently authorize the transfer of funds to the Land
and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF).
CBO estimates that enacting the bill would increase both
direct spending and offsetting receipts (which are treated as
reductions in direct spending) by $65 million and $80 million
respectively over the 2017-2026 period; therefore, pay-as-
you-go procedures apply. Enacting S. 556 would not affect
revenues. Based on information from the affected agencies,
CBO also estimates that implementing the legislation would
cost $486 million over the 2017-2021 period, assuming
appropriation of the amounts authorized to be deposited into
the NPS Maintenance and Revitalization Fund.
CBO estimates that enacting S. 556 would not increase net
direct spending or on-budget deficits in any of the four
consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2027.
S. 556 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector
mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) and would benefit state, local, and tribal agencies by
authorizing federal grants to support conservation, historic
preservation, and recreational activities. Any costs would be
incurred by those entities, including matching contributions,
would be incurred voluntarily.
____________________