[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5832 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5832
To direct the Secretary of the Army and the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget to issue regulations and submit a report to
Congress on cost-benefit ratios, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 10, 2020
Mr. Katko (for himself, Mr. Brindisi, and Mr. Upton) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To direct the Secretary of the Army and the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget to issue regulations and submit a report to
Congress on cost-benefit ratios, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Safer Harbors for Our Recreation
Economy Act'' or the ``SHORE Act''.
SEC. 2. RECREATION-BASED BENEFITS AND COSTS REGULATIONS.
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act,
the Secretary of the Army and the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget shall issue such regulations as are necessary to account for
recreation-based benefits and costs (including local and regional
economic benefits) in the benefit-cost analysis procedures of such
entities for harbor maintenance, intracoastal waterways, and inland
waterways projects.
SEC. 3. BENEFIT-COST PROCEDURE REPORT.
Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary of the Army and the Director of the Office of Management and
Budget shall submit to Congress a report containing--
(1) an examination of the procedure for harbor maintenance
projects of the Office of Management and Budget and the Corps
of Engineers for including or not including recreation-based
benefits and costs (including local and regional economic
benefits) in the benefit-cost procedures of the such entities;
(2) a review of the calculation of economic benefits used
in a benefit-cost calculation, by district, for a non-
commercial harbor that is used for recreational purposes; and
(3) recommendations and guidance on the creation of a
uniform recreation-based economic benefit calculation to
improve the comprehensive benefit-cost analysis procedures of
the Office of Management and Budget and the Corps of Engineers.
<all>