[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6037 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 6037
To amend title 28, United States Code, with regard to counsel for
persons proceeding in forma pauperis.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 28, 2020
Mr. Sarbanes (for himself, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms.
Bass, Ms. Scanlon, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend title 28, United States Code, with regard to counsel for
persons proceeding in forma pauperis.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Access to Legal Counsel Act of
2020''.
SEC. 2. COUNSEL IN CASES WHERE PERSONS ARE PROCEEDING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS.
Subsection (e) of section 1915 of title 28, United States Code, is
amended to read as follows:
``(e)(1) If a person appears without counsel, the court shall
inform the person of their right to request counsel if unable to afford
counsel. Upon granting such request, the court may appoint counsel for
that person.
``(2) In evaluating whether to grant the request, a court shall
consider all of the following on the record to the degree they are
known to the court:
``(A) The person's ability to articulate claims,
investigate facts, respond to dispositive motions, and
otherwise participate, including:
``(i) any mental disabilities, limitations on
physical liberty, or language barriers;
``(ii) the person's education and literacy level;
and
``(iii) any assistance the person has received to
date, including the sufficiency of that assistance and
whether it will be available in the future.
``(B) The degree of factual investigation required.
``(C) The complexity of the legal and factual questions.
``(D) The degree to which the claims turn on credibility
determinations, including the need for cross-examination.
``(E) Whether the person has asserted any colorable claims.
That fact that attorneys have declined to take the case shall
not be an considered an indication of a lack of colorable
claims.
``(F) The need for expert testimony.
``(G) The court's willingness to aid the person in
presenting claims by, for example, explaining how to introduce
and move for the admission of evidence.
``(H) Whether any opposing party is represented by counsel.
``(I) Any other factors the court considers relevant, other
than that pro se pleadings are construed more liberally by the
court.
``(3) The court may not deny a request on the grounds that it has
not yet ruled on dispositive motions, such as a motion to dismiss or
for summary judgment.
``(4) The court should consider whether to provisionally appoint
counsel for limited purposes, such as responding to a particular
motion, amending the complaint, representing a person at mediation,
conducting discovery, or investigating the claims for purposes of
providing a recommendation to the court as to whether a full
appointment is warranted.
``(5) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) through (4), whenever the
court determines that the interests of justice so require,
representation may be provided for any financially eligible person who
is seeking relief under section 2241, 2254, or 2255.''.
<all>