[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4370 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 4370
To require further consideration of economic cost in review of listing
petitions under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for other
purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 6, 2021
Mr. Pfluger (for himself, Mr. Newhouse, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Rouzer, Ms.
Herrell, Mr. Mann, and Ms. Cheney) introduced the following bill; which
was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To require further consideration of economic cost in review of listing
petitions under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Listing Reform Act''.
SEC. 2. CONSIDERATION OF ECONOMIC COST IN REVIEW OF LISTING PETITIONS
UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973.
(a) Consideration Of Significant, Cumulative Economic Effects
Required.--Section 4(b)(3) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)) is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A)--
(A) by striking ``To the maximum extent
practicable, within 90 days after'' and inserting ``(i)
After''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
``(ii) The Secretary may prioritize the consideration of
petitions under this subparagraph other than in the order in
which the petitions are received, except the Secretary may not
give general priority to petitions to add species to such a
list over petitions to remove a species from such a list.'';
and
(2) in subparagraph (B)--
(A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking
``Within 12 months'' and inserting ``As expeditiously
as practicable''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
``(iv)(I) In the case of a petition to add a
species to a list of threatened species, the petitioned
action may be warranted but is precluded due to the
likelihood of significant, cumulative economic effects
that would result from listing or, to the extent it can
be determined, from the likely resulting designation of
critical habitat of the species. The Secretary may not
reconsider such finding unless--
``(aa) the Secretary determines there is
endangerment of extinction of the species; or
``(bb) the Secretary receives a new
petition to add such species to such list that
includes a written qualitative and quantitative
analyses reexamining the incremental and
significant, cumulative economic effects of
likely actions to protect the petitioned
species and its potential habitat upon each
State and locality that is affected by the
petitioned species listing and that, in the
opinion of the Secretary, credibly concludes
that alternative actions are possible other
than those resulting in significant, cumulative
economic effects.
``(II) In this clause the term `significant,
cumulative economic effects' includes economic effects
on--
``(aa) public land and, to the maximum
extent practicable, private land and property
values;
``(bb) the provision of water, power, or
other public services;
``(cc) employment; and
``(dd) revenues available for State and
local governments.''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 4(b)(1) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(1)) is amended by inserting
``(except as provided in clause (iv) of paragraph (3)(B))'' after
``solely''.
<all>