[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6565 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 6565
To establish an alternative use of certain Federal education funds when
in-person instruction is not available.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 2, 2022
Mr. Jacobs of New York (for himself, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Carter of
Georgia, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Timmons, Mr. Curtis, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Owens,
Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Weber
of Texas, and Ms. Van Duyne) introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on Education and Labor
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To establish an alternative use of certain Federal education funds when
in-person instruction is not available.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Kids in Classes Act''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Research indicates that children living in the poorest
20 percent of neighborhoods in the United States will
experience the most negative and long-lasting effects of school
closures.
(2) Researchers predict that 1 year of school closures will
cost ninth graders in the poorest communities a 25-percent
decrease in their post-educational earning potential, even if
that year of closure is followed by 3 years of normal
schooling. By contrast, the same researchers predict no
substantial losses for students from the richest 20 percent of
neighborhoods.
(3) Long periods of school closures during the COVID-19
pandemic deprive low-income students and students of color the
equalizing force of education.
(4) School closures will widen educational inequality and
the learning gaps created by these closures will persist as
students progress through high school, putting their future
prospects at risk.
(5) Data shows that closed classrooms were
disproportionately composed of disadvantaged students, as well
as students with low mathematics scores, students with limited
English proficiency, or students who qualify for a free or
reduced priced lunch.
(6) School shutdowns contribute to disproportionate
learning loss for disadvantaged students, compounding existing
gaps.
SEC. 3. USE OF TITLE I FUNDS IF IN-PERSON INSTRUCTION IS NOT AVAILABLE.
(a) Title I Funds To Follow Eligible Children.--Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, a State educational agency shall not receive
grant funds provided under title I of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.), unless the State has
provided for the allocation of those funds directly to the parent or
guardian of an eligible child for qualified educational expenses
(including curriculum and curricular materials, books or instructional
materials, technological educational materials, online educational
materials, tutoring or educational classes outside the home, private
school tuition, testing fees, diagnostic tools, and educational
therapies for students with disabilities) for the purposes of ensuring
that funding under such title follows eligible children.
(b) Eligible Child.--In this section the term ``eligible child''
means a child who attends a public elementary school or secondary
school that--
(1) receives funds provided under title I of the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311 et seq.);
and
(2) fails for more than 3 days during a school year, for
reasons related to public health emergency or collective
bargaining action, to make available in-person instruction for
all students who wish to attend.
<all>