[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7776 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 7776
To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United
States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and
related resources, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 16, 2022
Mr. DeFazio (for himself, Mr. Graves of Missouri, Mrs. Napolitano, and
Mr. Rouzer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United
States, to provide for the conservation and development of water and
related resources, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources
Development Act of 2022''.
(b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act is as
follows:
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Secretary defined.
TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 101. Federal breakwaters and jetties.
Sec. 102. Emergency response to natural disasters.
Sec. 103. Shoreline and riverine restoration.
Sec. 104. Tidal river, bay, and estuarine flood risk reduction.
Sec. 105. Removal of man-made obstruction to aquatic ecosystem
restoration projects.
Sec. 106. National coastal mapping study.
Sec. 107. Public recreational amenities in ecosystem restoration
projects.
Sec. 108. Preliminary analysis.
Sec. 109. Technical assistance.
Sec. 110. Corps of Engineers support for underserved communities;
outreach.
Sec. 111. Project planning assistance.
Sec. 112. Managed aquifer recharge study and working group.
Sec. 113. Flood easement database.
Sec. 114. Assessment of Corps of Engineers levees.
Sec. 115. Technical assistance for levee inspections.
Sec. 116. Assessment of Corps of Engineers dams.
Sec. 117. National low-head dam inventory.
Sec. 118. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 119. Tribal liaison.
Sec. 120. Tribal assistance.
Sec. 121. Cost sharing provisions for the territories and Indian
Tribes.
Sec. 122. Sense of Congress on COVID-19 impacts to coastal and inland
navigation.
Sec. 123. Assessment of regional confined aquatic disposal facilities.
Sec. 124. Strategic plan on beneficial use of dredged material.
Sec. 125. Funding to review mitigation banking proposals from non-
Federal public entities.
Sec. 126. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 127. Reserve component training at water resources development
projects.
Sec. 128. Payment of pay and allowances of certain officers from
appropriation for improvements.
Sec. 129. Civil works research, development, testing, and evaluation.
Sec. 130. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 131. Washington Aqueduct.
TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS
Sec. 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies.
Sec. 202. Expedited completion.
Sec. 203. Expedited modifications of existing feasibility studies.
Sec. 204. Corps of Engineers reservoir sedimentation assessment.
Sec. 205. Assessment of impacts from changing operation and maintenance
responsibilities.
Sec. 206. Report and recommendations on dredge capacity.
Sec. 207. Maintenance dredging data.
Sec. 208. Report to Congress on economic valuation of preservation of
open space, recreational areas, and habitat
associated with project lands.
Sec. 209. Disposition study on Salinas Dam and Reservoir, California.
Sec. 210. Excess lands report for Whittier Narrows Dam, California.
Sec. 211. Colebrook River Reservoir, Connecticut.
Sec. 212. Comprehensive central and southern Florida study.
Sec. 213. Report on South Florida ecosystem restoration plan
implementation.
Sec. 214. Review of recreational hazards at Buford Dam, Lake Sidney
Lanier, Georgia.
Sec. 215. Port Fourchon Belle Pass Channel, Louisiana.
Sec. 216. Hydraulic evaluation of Upper Mississippi River and Illinois
River.
Sec. 217. Rend Lake, Carlyle Lake, and Lake Shelbyville, Illinois.
Sec. 218. Disposition study on hydropower in the Willamette Valley,
Oregon.
Sec. 219. Houston Ship Channel Expansion Channel Improvement Project,
Texas.
Sec. 220. Sabine-Neches waterway navigation improvement project, Texas.
Sec. 221. Norfolk Harbor and Channels, Virginia.
Sec. 222. Coastal Virginia, Virginia.
Sec. 223. Western infrastructure study.
Sec. 224. Report on socially and economically disadvantaged small
business concerns.
Sec. 225. Report on solar energy opportunities.
Sec. 226. Assessment of coastal flooding mitigation modeling and
testing capacity.
Sec. 227. Report to Congress on easements related to water resources
development projects.
Sec. 228. Assessment of forest, rangeland, and watershed restoration
services on lands owned by the Corps of
Engineers.
Sec. 229. Report on status of development of electronic system.
Sec. 230. GAO studies on mitigation.
Sec. 231. Study on waterborne statistics.
TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS
Sec. 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects.
Sec. 302. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 303. Forecast-informed reservoir operations.
Sec. 304. Lakes program.
Sec. 305. Invasive species.
Sec. 306. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 307. Los Angeles County, California.
Sec. 308. Deauthorization of designated portions of the Los Angeles
County Drainage Area, California.
Sec. 309. San Francisco Bay, California.
Sec. 310. Columbia River basin.
Sec. 311. Port Everglades, Florida.
Sec. 312. South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force.
Sec. 313. Chicago shoreline protection.
Sec. 314. Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin project, Brandon
Road, Will County, Illinois.
Sec. 315. Southeast Des Moines levee system, Iowa.
Sec. 316. Lower Mississippi River comprehensive management study.
Sec. 317. Lower Missouri River streambank erosion control evaluation
and demonstration projects.
Sec. 318. Missouri River interception-rearing complexes.
Sec. 319. Missouri River mitigation project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa,
and Nebraska.
Sec. 320. Northern Missouri.
Sec. 321. Israel River, Lancaster, New Hampshire.
Sec. 322. Middle Rio Grande flood protection, Bernalillo to Belen, New
Mexico.
Sec. 323. Southwestern Oregon.
Sec. 324. Wolf River Harbor, Tennessee.
Sec. 325. Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, Texas.
Sec. 326. Water level management pilot project on the Upper Mississippi
River and Illinois Waterway System.
Sec. 327. Upper Mississippi River protection.
Sec. 328. Treatment of certain benefits and costs.
Sec. 329. Debris removal.
Sec. 330. General reauthorizations.
Sec. 331. Conveyances.
Sec. 332. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 333. Additional assistance for critical projects.
TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE
Sec. 401. Project authorizations.
SEC. 2. SECRETARY DEFINED.
In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the
Army.
TITLE I--GENERAL PROVISIONS
SEC. 101. FEDERAL BREAKWATERS AND JETTIES.
(a) In General.--In carrying out repair or maintenance activity of
a Federal jetty or breakwater associated with an authorized navigation
project, the Secretary shall, notwithstanding the authorized dimensions
of the jetty or breakwater, ensure that such repair or maintenance
activity is sufficient to meet the authorized purpose of such project,
including ensuring that any harbor or inland harbor associated with the
project is protected from projected changes in wave action or height
(including changes that result from relative sea-level change over the
useful life of the project).
(b) Classification of Activity.--The Secretary may not classify any
repair or maintenance activity of a Federal jetty or breakwater carried
out under subsection (a) as major rehabilitation of such jetty or
breakwater--
(1) if the Secretary determines that--
(A) projected changes in wave action or height,
including changes that result from relative sea-level
change, will diminish the functionality of the jetty or
breakwater to meet the authorized purpose of the
project; and
(B) such repair or maintenance activity is
necessary to restore such functionality; or
(2) if--
(A) the Secretary has not carried out regular and
routine Federal maintenance activity at the jetty or
breakwater; and
(B) the structural integrity of the jetty or
breakwater is degraded as a result of a lack of such
regular and routine Federal maintenance activity.
SEC. 102. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TO NATURAL DISASTERS.
Section 5(a)(1) of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C.
701n(a)(1)), is amended by striking ``in the repair and restoration of
any federally authorized hurricane or shore protective structure'' and
all that follows through ``non-Federal sponsor.'' and inserting ``in
the repair and restoration of any federally authorized hurricane or
shore protective structure or project damaged or destroyed by wind,
wave, or water action of other than an ordinary nature to the pre-storm
level of protection, to the design level of protection, or,
notwithstanding the authorized dimensions of the structure or project,
to a level sufficient to meet the authorized purpose of such structure
or project, whichever provides greater protection, when, in the
discretion of the Chief of Engineers, such repair and restoration is
warranted for the adequate functioning of the structure or project for
hurricane or shore protection, including to ensure the structure or
project is functioning adequately to protect against projected changes
in wave action or height or storm surge (including changes that result
from relative sea-level change over the useful life of the structure or
project), subject to the condition that the Chief of Engineers may
include modifications to the structure or project to address major
deficiencies or implement nonstructural alternatives to the repair or
restoration of the structure if requested by the non-Federal
sponsor.''.
SEC. 103. SHORELINE AND RIVERINE RESTORATION.
(a) In General.--Section 212 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332) is amended--
(1) in the section heading, by striking ``flood mitigation
and riverine restoration program'' and inserting ``shoreline
and riverine protection and restoration'';
(2) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ``undertake a program for the
purpose of conducting'' and inserting ``carry out'';
(B) by striking ``to reduce flood hazards'' and
inserting ``to reduce flood and hurricane and storm
damage hazards (including erosion)''; and
(C) by inserting ``and shorelines'' after
``rivers'';
(3) in subsection (b)--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) by striking ``In carrying out the
program, the'' and inserting ``The'';
(ii) by inserting ``and hurricane and
storm'' after ``flood''; and
(iii) by inserting ``erosion mitigation,''
after ``reduction,'';
(B) in paragraph (3), by striking ``flood damages''
and inserting ``flood and hurricane and storm damages,
including the use of natural features and nature-based
features, as defined in section 1184(a) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C.
2289a(a))''; and
(C) in paragraph (4)--
(i) by inserting ``and hurricane and
storm'' after ``flood'';
(ii) by inserting ``, shoreline,'' after
``riverine''; and
(iii) by inserting ``and coastal barriers''
after ``floodplains'';
(4) in subsection (c)--
(A) in paragraph (2)--
(i) in the paragraph heading, by striking
``flood control''; and
(ii) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or
hurricane and storm damage reduction'' after
``flood control''; and
(B) in paragraph (3)--
(i) in the paragraph heading, by inserting
``or hurricane and storm damage reduction''
after ``flood control''; and
(ii) by inserting ``or hurricane and storm
damage reduction'' after ``flood control'';
(5) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows:
``(d) Project Justification.--Notwithstanding any other provision
of law or requirement for economic justification established under
section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), the
Secretary may implement a project under this section if the Secretary
determines that the project--
``(1) will significantly reduce potential flood, hurricane
and storm, or erosion damages;
``(2) will improve the quality of the environment; and
``(3) is justified considering all costs and beneficial
outputs of the project.'';
(6) in subsection (e)--
(A) in paragraph (32), by striking ``; and'' and
inserting a semicolon;
(B) in paragraph (33), by striking the period at
the end and inserting ``; and''; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
``(34) City of Southport, North Carolina.''; and
(7) by striking subsections (f) through (i) and inserting
the following:
``(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000, to remain available
until expended.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 269) is amended
by striking the item relating to section 212 and inserting the
following:
``Sec. 212. Shoreline and riverine protection and restoration.''.
SEC. 104. TIDAL RIVER, BAY, AND ESTUARINE FLOOD RISK REDUCTION.
At the request of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary is
authorized, as part of an authorized feasibility study for a project
for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, to investigate measures
to reduce the risk of flooding associated with tidally influenced
portions of rivers, bays, and estuaries that are hydrologically
connected to the coastal water body and located within the geographic
scope of the study.
SEC. 105. REMOVAL OF MAN-MADE OBSTRUCTION TO AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM
RESTORATION PROJECTS.
(a) In General.--In carrying out an aquatic ecosystem restoration
project, at the request of a non-Federal interest and with the consent
of the owner of a man-made obstruction, the Secretary shall determine
whether the removal of such obstruction from the aquatic environment
within the geographic scope of the project is necessary to meet the
aquatic ecosystem restoration goals of the project.
(b) Removal Costs.--If the Secretary determines under subsection
(a) that removal of an obstruction is necessary, the Secretary shall
consider the removal of such obstruction to be a project feature and
the cost of such removal shall be shared between the Secretary and non-
Federal interest as a construction cost.
(c) Applicability.--The requirements of subsection (a) shall apply
to any project for ecosystem restoration authorized on or after June
10, 2014.
SEC. 106. NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING STUDY.
(a) In General.--The Secretary, acting through the Director of the
Engineer Research and Development Center, is authorized to carry out a
study of coastal geographic land changes, with recurring national
coastal mapping technology, along the coastal zone of the United States
to support Corps of Engineers missions.
(b) Study.--In carrying out the study under subsection (a), the
Secretary shall identify--
(1) new or advanced geospatial information and remote
sensing tools for coastal mapping;
(2) best practices for coastal change mapping; and
(3) how to most effectively--
(A) collect and analyze such advanced geospatial
information;
(B) disseminate such geospatial information to
relevant offices of the Corps of Engineers, other
Federal agencies, States, Tribes, and local
governments; and
(C) make such geospatial information available to
other stakeholders.
(c) Demonstration Project.--
(1) Project area.--In carrying out the study under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall carry out a demonstration
project in the coastal region covering the North Carolina
coastal waters, connected bays, estuaries, rivers, streams, and
creeks, to their tidally influenced extent inland.
(2) Scope.--In carrying out the demonstration project, the
Secretary shall--
(A) identify potential hazards, such as debris,
sedimentation, dredging effects, and flood areas;
(B) identify best practices described in subsection
(b)(2), including best practices relating to
geographical coverage and frequency of mapping;
(C) evaluate and demonstrate relevant mapping
technologies to identify which are the most effective
for regional mapping of the transitional areas between
the open coast and inland waters; and
(D) demonstrate remote sensing tools for coastal
mapping.
(d) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary
shall coordinate with other Federal and State agencies that are
responsible for authoritative data and academic institutions and other
entities with relevant expertise.
(e) Panel.--
(1) Establishment.--In carrying out this section, the
Secretary shall establish a panel of senior leaders from the
Corps of Engineers and other Federal agencies that are
stakeholders in the coastal mapping program carried out through
the Engineer Research and Development Center.
(2) Duties.--The panel established under this subsection
shall--
(A) coordinate the collection of data under the
study carried out under this section;
(B) coordinate the use of geospatial information
and remote sensing tools, and the application of the
best practices identified under the study, by Federal
agencies; and
(C) identify technical topics and challenges that
require multiagency collaborative research and
development.
(f) Use of Existing Information.--In carrying out this section, the
Secretary shall consider any relevant information developed under
section 516(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33
U.S.C. 2326b(g)).
(g) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report
that describes--
(1) the results of the study carried out under this
section; and
(2) any geographical areas recommended for additional
study.
(h) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000, to remain available
until expended.
SEC. 107. PUBLIC RECREATIONAL AMENITIES IN ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION
PROJECTS.
At the request of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary is
authorized to study the incorporation of public recreational amenities,
including facilities for hiking, biking, walking, and waterborne
recreation, into a project for ecosystem restoration, including a
project carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), if the incorporation of such
amenities would be consistent with the ecosystem restoration purposes
of the project.
SEC. 108. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
(a) In General.--Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282c) is amended by striking
subsections (e) and (f) and inserting the following:
``(e) Preliminary Analysis.--
``(1) In general.--At the request of a non-Federal
interest, the Secretary shall, prior to executing a cost
sharing agreement for a feasibility study described in
subsection (a), carry out a preliminary analysis of the water
resources problem that is the subject of the feasibility study
in order to identify potential alternatives to address such
problem.
``(2) Considerations.--In carrying out a preliminary
analysis under this subsection, the Secretary shall include in
such analysis--
``(A) a preliminary analysis of the Federal
interest, costs, benefits, and environmental impacts of
the project;
``(B) an estimate of the costs of, and duration
for, preparing the feasibility study; and
``(C) for a flood risk management or hurricane and
storm risk reduction project, at the request of the
non-Federal interest, the identification of any
opportunities to incorporate natural features or
nature-based features into the project.
``(3) Deadline.--The Secretary shall complete a preliminary
analysis carried out under this subsection by not later than
180 days after the date on which funds are made available to
the Secretary to carry out the preliminary analysis.
``(4) Cost share.--The cost of a preliminary analysis
carried out under this subsection--
``(A) shall be at Federal expense; and
``(B) shall not exceed $200,000.
``(5) Treatment.--
``(A) Timing.--The period during which a
preliminary analysis is carried out under this
subsection shall not be included for the purposes of
the deadline to complete a final feasibility report
under subsection (a)(1).
``(B) Cost.--The cost of a preliminary analysis
carried out under this subsection shall not be included
for the purposes of the maximum Federal cost under
subsection (a)(2).''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 905(a)(2) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(a)(2)) is amended by striking
``a preliminary analysis'' and inserting ``an analysis''.
SEC. 109. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.
(a) Planning Assistance to States.--Section 22 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1)--
(A) by inserting ``local government,'' after
``State or group of States,''; and
(B) by inserting ``local government,'' after ``such
State, interest,'';
(2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``$15,000,000'' and
inserting ``$30,000,000''; and
(3) in subsection (f)--
(A) by striking ``The cost-share for assistance''
and inserting the following:
``(1) Tribes and territories.--The cost-share for
assistance''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
``(2) Economically disadvantaged communities.--
Notwithstanding subsection (b)(1) and the limitation in section
1156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as
applicable pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection, the
Secretary is authorized to waive the collection of fees for any
local government to which assistance is provided under
subsection (a) that the Secretary determines is an economically
disadvantaged community, as defined by the Secretary under
section 160 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
U.S.C. 2201 note).''.
(b) Watershed Planning and Technical Assistance.--In providing
assistance under section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of
1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16) or pursuant to section 206 of the Flood
Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a), the Secretary shall, upon
request, provide such assistance at a watershed scale.
SEC. 110. CORPS OF ENGINEERS SUPPORT FOR UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES;
OUTREACH.
(a) In General.--It is the policy of the United States for the
Corps of Engineers to strive to understand and accommodate and, in
coordination with non-Federal interests, seek to address the water
resources development needs of all communities in the United States,
including Indian Tribes and urban and rural economically disadvantaged
communities (as defined by the Secretary under section 160 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note)).
(b) Outreach and Access.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall develop, support, and
implement public awareness, education, and regular outreach and
engagement efforts for potential non-Federal interests with
respect to the water resources development authorities of the
Secretary, with particular emphasis on--
(A) technical service programs, including the
authorities under--
(i) section 206 of the Flood Control Act of
1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a);
(ii) section 22 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-16);
and
(iii) section 203 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2000 (33 U.S.C. 2269); and
(B) continuing authority programs, as such term is
defined in section 7001(c)(1)(D) of the Water Resources
Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d).
(2) Implementation.--In carrying out this subsection, the
Secretary shall--
(A) develop and make publicly available (including
on a publicly available website), technical assistance
materials, guidance, and other information with respect
to the water resources development authorities of the
Secretary;
(B) establish and make publicly available
(including on a publicly available website), an
appropriate point of contact at each district and
division office of the Corps of Engineers for inquiries
from potential non-Federal interests relating to the
water resources development authorities of the
Secretary;
(C) conduct regular outreach and engagement,
including through hosting seminars and community
information sessions, with local elected officials,
community organizations, and previous and potential
non-Federal interests, on opportunities to address
local water resources challenges through the water
resources development authorities of the Secretary;
(D) issue guidance for, and provide technical
assistance through technical service programs to, non-
Federal interests to assist such interests in pursuing
technical services and developing proposals for water
resources development projects; and
(E) provide, at the request of a non-Federal
interest, assistance with researching and identifying
existing project authorizations or authorities to
address local water resources challenges.
(3) Prioritization.--In carrying out this subsection, the
Secretary shall prioritize awareness, education, and outreach
and engagement efforts for urban and rural economically
disadvantaged communities and Indian Tribes.
SEC. 111. PROJECT PLANNING ASSISTANCE.
Section 118 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
U.S.C. 2201 note)--
(1) in subsection (b)(2)--
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``publish''
and inserting ``annually publish''; and
(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``select'' and
inserting ``, subject to the availability of
appropriations, annually select''; and
(2) in subsection (c)(2), in the matter preceding
subparagraph (A), by striking ``projects'' and inserting
``projects annually''.
SEC. 112. MANAGED AQUIFER RECHARGE STUDY AND WORKING GROUP.
(a) Study.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall, in consultation with
applicable non-Federal interests, conduct a study at Federal
expense to determine the feasibility of carrying out managed
aquifer recharge projects to address drought, water resiliency,
and aquifer depletion.
(2) Requirements.--In carrying out the study under this
subsection, the Secretary shall--
(A) assess and identify opportunities to support
non-Federal interests, including Tribal communities, in
carrying out managed aquifer recharge projects;
(B) identify opportunities to carry out managed
aquifer recharge projects in areas that are
experiencing, or have recently experienced, prolonged
drought conditions, aquifer depletion, or water supply
scarcity; and
(C) assess preliminarily local hydrogeologic
conditions relevant to carrying out managed aquifer
recharge projects.
(3) Coordination.--In carrying out the study under this
subsection, the Secretary shall coordinate, as appropriate,
with the heads of other Federal agencies, States, regional
governmental agencies, units of local government, experts in
managed aquifer recharge, and Tribes.
(b) Working Group.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment, the Secretary shall establish a managed aquifer
recharge working group within the Corps of Engineers.
(2) Composition.--In establishing the working group under
paragraph (1), the Secretary shall ensure that members of the
working group have expertise working with--
(A) projects providing water supply storage to meet
regional water supply demand, particularly in regions
experiencing drought;
(B) protection of groundwater supply, including
promoting infiltration and increased recharge in
groundwater basins, and groundwater quality;
(C) aquifer storage, recharge, and recovery wells;
(D) dams that provide recharge enhancement
benefits;
(E) groundwater hydrology; and
(F) conjunctive use water systems.
(3) Duties.--The working group established under this
subsection shall--
(A) advise and assist in the development and
execution of the feasibility study under subsection
(a);
(B) coordinate Corps of Engineers expertise on
managed aquifer recharge;
(C) share Corps of Engineers-wide communications on
the successes and failures, questions and answers, and
conclusions and recommendations with respect to managed
aquifer recharge projects;
(D) assist Corps of Engineers offices at the
headquarter, division, and district levels with raising
awareness to non-Federal interests on the potential
benefits of carrying out managed aquifer recharge
projects; and
(E) develop the report required to be submitted
under subsection (c).
(c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on
managed aquifer recharge that includes--
(1) the results of the study conducted under subsection
(a), including data collected under such study and any
recommendations on managed aquifer recharge opportunities for
non-Federal interests, States, local governments, and Tribes;
(2) a status update on the implementation of the
recommendations included in the report of the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers Institute for Water Resources entitled ``Managed
Aquifer Recharge and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Water
Security through Resilience'', published in April, 2020 (2020-
WP-01); and
(3) an evaluation of the benefits of creating a new or
modifying an existing planning center of expertise for managed
aquifer recharge, and identify potential locations for such a
center of expertise, if feasible.
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Managed aquifer recharge.--The term ``managed aquifer
recharge'' means the intentional banking and treatment of water
in aquifers for storage and future use.
(2) Managed aquifer recharge project.--The term ``managed
aquifer recharge project'' means a project to incorporate
managed aquifer recharge features into a water resources
development project.
SEC. 113. FLOOD EASEMENT DATABASE.
(a) In General.--Not later than one year after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish and maintain a
database containing an inventory of--
(1) all floodplain and flowage easements held by the Corps
of Engineers; and
(2) other federally held floodplain and flowage easements
with respect to which other Federal agencies submit information
to the Secretary.
(b) Contents.--The Secretary shall include in the database
established under subsection (a)--
(1) with respect to each floodplain and flowage easement
included in the database--
(A) the location of the land subject to the
easement (including geographic information system
information);
(B) a brief description of such land, including the
acreage and ecosystem type covered by the easement;
(C) the Federal agency that holds the easement;
(D) any conditions of the easement, including--
(i) the amount of flooding, timing of
flooding, or area of flooding covered by the
easement;
(ii) any conservation requirements; and
(iii) any restoration requirements;
(E) the date on which the easement was acquired;
and
(F) whether the easement is permanent or temporary,
and if the easement is temporary, the date on which the
easement expires; and
(2) any other information that the Secretary determines
appropriate.
(c) Availability of Information.--The Secretary shall make the full
database established under subsection (a) available to the public in
searchable form, including on the internet.
(d) Other Federal Easements.--The Secretary shall request
information from other Federal agencies to incorporate other federally
held floodplain and flowage easements into the database established
under subsection (a).
SEC. 114. ASSESSMENT OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS LEVEES.
(a) In General.--The Secretary shall, at Federal expense,
periodically conduct an assessment of levees constructed by the
Secretary or for which the Secretary has financial or operational
responsibility, to identify opportunities for the modification
(including realignment or incorporation of natural and nature-based
features) of levee systems to--
(1) increase the flood risk reduction benefits of such
systems;
(2) achieve greater flood resiliency; and
(3) restore hydrological and ecological connections with
adjacent floodplains.
(b) Assessment.--
(1) Considerations.--In conducting an assessment under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider and identify, with
respect to each levee--
(A) an estimate of the number of structures and
population at risk and protected by the levee that
would be adversely impacted if the levee fails or water
levels exceed the height of the levee (which may be the
applicable estimate included in the levee database
established under section 9004 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303), if
available);
(B) the number of times the non-Federal interest
has received emergency flood-fighting or repair
assistance under section 5 of the Act of August 18,
1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), for the levee, and the total
expenditures on post-flood repairs over the life of the
levee;
(C) the functionality of the levee with regard to
higher precipitation levels, including due to changing
climatic conditions and extreme weather events; and
(D) the potential costs and benefits (including
environmental benefits) from modifying the applicable
levee system to restore connections with adjacent
floodplains.
(2) Prioritization.--In conducting an assessment under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall prioritize levees--
(A) associated with an area that has been subject
to flooding in two or more events in any 10-year
period; and
(B) for which the non-Federal interest has received
emergency flood-fighting or repair assistance under
section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C.
701n), with respect to such flood events.
(3) Coordination.--In conducting an assessment under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall coordinate with any non-
Federal interest that has financial or operational
responsibility for a levee being assessed.
(c) Flood Plain Management Services.--In conducting an assessment
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider information on
floods and flood damages compiled under section 206 of the Flood
Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a).
(d) Report to Congress.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this section, and periodically thereafter, the
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a
report on the results of the assessment conducted under
subsection (a).
(2) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall include in each report
submitted under paragraph (1)--
(A) identification of any levee for which the
Secretary has conducted an assessment under subsection
(a);
(B) a description of any opportunities identified
under such subsection for the modification (including
realignment or incorporation of natural and nature-
based features) of a levee system, including the
potential benefits of such modification for the
purposes identified under such subsection; and
(C) a summary of the information considered and
identified under subsection (b)(1).
(e) Incorporation of Information.--The Secretary shall include in
the levee database established under section 9004 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303) the information
included in each report submitted under subsection (d).
(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available
until expended.
SEC. 115. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR LEVEE INSPECTIONS.
In any instance where the Secretary requires, as a condition of
eligibility for Federal assistance under section 5 of the Act of August
18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), that a non-Federal sponsor of a flood
control project constructed by the Secretary undertake an electronic
inspection of the portion of such project that is under normal
circumstances submerged, the Secretary shall provide credit or
reimbursement to the non-Federal sponsor of the cost of carrying out
such inspection against the non-Federal share of the cost of repair or
restoration of such project carried out under such section.
SEC. 116. ASSESSMENT OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS DAMS.
(a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of dams
constructed by the Secretary or for which the Secretary has financial
or operational responsibility, to identify--
(1) any dam that is meeting its authorized purposes and
that may be a priority for rehabilitation, environmental
performance enhancements, or retrofits to add or replace power
generation (at a powered or non-powered dam), and the
recommendations of the Secretary for addressing each such dam;
and
(2) any dam that does not meet its authorized purposes, has
been abandoned or inadequately maintained, or has otherwise
reached the end of its useful life, and the recommendations of
the Secretary for addressing each such dam, which may include a
recommendation to remove the dam.
(b) National Dam Inventory and Assessment.--The Secretary shall
include in the inventory of dams required by section 6 of the National
Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467d) any information and
recommendations resulting from the assessment of dams conducted under
subsection (a).
(c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of
this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on
the results of the assessment of dams conducted under subsection (a).
SEC. 117. NATIONAL LOW-HEAD DAM INVENTORY.
(a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the heads of
appropriate Federal and State agencies, shall--
(1) establish and maintain a database containing an
inventory of low-head dams in the United States that includes--
(A) the location (including global information
system information), ownership, description, current
use condition, height, and length of each low-head dam;
(B) any information on public safety conditions,
including signage, at each low-head dam;
(C) public safety information on the dangers of
low-head dams; and
(D) any other relevant information concerning low-
head dams; and
(2) include in the inventory of dams required by section 6
of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467d) the
information described in paragraph (1).
(b) Inclusion of Information.--In carrying out this section, the
Secretary shall include in the database information described in
subsection (a)(1) that is provided to the Secretary by Federal and
State agencies pursuant to subsection (a).
(c) Public Availability.--The Secretary shall make the database
established under subsection (a) publicly available, including on a
publicly available website.
(d) Low-Head Dam Defined.--In this section, the term ``low-head
dam'' means a man-made structure, built in a river or stream channel,
that is designed and built such that water flows continuously over all,
or nearly all, of the crest from bank to bank.
SEC. 118. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.
Section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33
U.S.C. 2269) is amended--
(1) in subsection (b)--
(A) in paragraph (2)--
(i) in subparagraph (B), by striking
``and'' at the end;
(ii) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as
subparagraph (D); and
(iii) by inserting after subparagraph (B)
the following:
``(C) technical assistance to an Indian tribe,
including--
``(i) assistance for planning to ameliorate
flood hazards, to avoid repetitive flooding
impacts, to anticipate, prepare, and adapt to
changing climatic conditions and extreme
weather events, and to withstand, respond to,
and recover rapidly from disruption due to
flood hazards; and
``(ii) the provision of, and integration
into planning of, hydrologic, economic, and
environmental data and analyses; and''; and
(B) in paragraph (4), by striking ``$18,500,000''
each place it appears and inserting ``$23,500,000'';
(2) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following:
``(6) Technical assistance.--The Federal share of the cost
of activities described in subsection (b)(2)(C) shall be 100
percent.''; and
(3) in subsection (e), by striking ``2024'' and inserting
``2026''.
SEC. 119. TRIBAL LIAISON.
(a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment
of this Act, for each Corps of Engineers district that contains a
Tribal community, the Secretary shall establish a permanent position of
Tribal Liaison to--
(1) serve as a direct line of communication between the
Secretary and the applicable Tribal communities; and
(2) ensure consistency in government-to-government
relations.
(b) Duties.--Each Tribal Liaison shall make recommendations to the
Secretary regarding, and be responsible for--
(1) removing barriers to access to, and participation in,
Corps of Engineers programs for Tribal communities, including
by improving implementation of section 103(m) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m));
(2) improving outreach to, and engagement with, Tribal
communities about relevant Corps of Engineers programs and
services;
(3) identifying and engaging with Tribal communities
suffering from water resources challenges;
(4) improving, expanding, and facilitating government-to-
government consultation between Tribal communities and the
Corps of Engineers;
(5) coordinating and implementing all relevant Tribal
consultation policies and associated guidelines, including the
requirements of section 112 of the Water Resources Development
Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2356);
(6) training and tools to facilitate the ability of Corps
of Engineers staff to effectively engage with Tribal
communities in a culturally competent manner, especially in
regards to lands of ancestral, historic, or cultural
significance to a Tribal community, including burial sites; and
(7) such other issues identified by the Secretary.
(c) Uniformity.--Not later than 120 days after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall finalize guidelines for--
(1) the duties of Tribal Liaisons under subsection (b); and
(2) required qualifications for Tribal Liaisons, including
experience and expertise relating to Tribal communities and
water resource issues, and the ability to carry out such
duties.
(d) Funding.--Funding for the position of Tribal Liaison shall be
allocated from the budget line item provided for the expenses necessary
for the supervision and general administration of the civil works
program, and filling the position shall not be dependent on any
increase in this budget line item.
(e) Tribal Community Defined.--In this section, the term ``Tribal
community'' means a community of people who are recognized and defined
under Federal law as indigenous people of the United States.
SEC. 120. TRIBAL ASSISTANCE.
(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Bonneville dam.--The term ``Bonneville Dam'' means the
Bonneville Dam, Columbia River, Oregon, authorized by the first
section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1038), and the
first section and section 2(a) of the Act of August 20, 1937
(16 U.S.C. 832, 832(a)).
(2) Dalles dam.--The term ``Dalles Dam'' means the Dalles
Dam, Columbia River, Washington and Oregon, authorized by
section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 179).
(3) John day dam.--The term ``John Day Dam'' means the John
Day Dam, Columbia River, Washington and Oregon, authorized by
section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 179).
(4) Village development plan.--The term ``village
development plan'' means the village development plan required
by section 1133(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of
2018 (132 Stat. 3782).
(b) Clarification of Existing Authority.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the
heads of relevant Federal agencies, the Confederated Tribes of
the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes
and Bands of the Yakama Nation, the Nez Perce Tribe, and the
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, shall
revise and carry out the village development plan for the
Dalles Dam to provide replacement villages for each Indian
village submerged as a result of the construction of the
Bonneville Dam and the John Day Dam.
(2) Examination.--Before revising and carrying out the
village development plan under paragraph (1), the Secretary
shall conduct an examination and assessment of the extent to
which Indian villages, housing sites, and related structures
were displaced by the construction of the Bonneville Dam and
the John Day Dam.
(3) Requirements.--In revising the village development plan
under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall include, at a
minimum--
(A) an evaluation of sites on both sides of the
Columbia River;
(B) an assessment of suitable private, State, and
Federal lands; and
(C) an estimated cost and tentative schedule for
the construction of each replacement village.
(c) Provision of Assistance on Federal Land.--In carrying out
subsection (b)(1), the Secretary may construct housing or provide
related assistance on land owned by the United States.
(d) Acquisition and Disposal of Land.--
(1) In general.--In carrying out subsection (b)(1), the
Secretary may acquire land or interests in land for the purpose
of providing housing and related assistance.
(2) Advance acquisition.--The Secretary may acquire land or
interests in land under paragraph (1) before completing all
required documentation and receiving all required clearances
for the construction of housing or related improvements on the
land.
(3) Disposal of unsuitable land.--In the event the
Secretary determines that land or an interest in land acquired
by the Secretary under paragraph (2) is unsuitable for the
purpose for which it was acquired, the Secretary is authorized
to dispose of the land or interest in land by sale and credit
the proceeds to the appropriation, fund, or account used to
purchase the land or interest in land.
(e) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1178(c) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1675; 132 Stat. 3781) is repealed.
SEC. 121. COST SHARING PROVISIONS FOR THE TERRITORIES AND INDIAN
TRIBES.
Section 1156(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
U.S.C. 2310(a)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and
inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) for any organization that--
``(A) is composed primarily of people who are--
``(i) recognized and defined under Federal
law as indigenous people of the United States;
and
``(ii) from a specific community; and
``(B) assists in the social, cultural, and
educational development of such people in that
community.''.
SEC. 122. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COVID-19 IMPACTS TO COASTAL AND INLAND
NAVIGATION.
It is the sense of Congress that, for fiscal years 2023 and 2024,
the Secretary should, to the maximum extent practicable, seek to
maintain the eligibility of a donor port, energy transfer port, or
medium-sized donor port, as defined in section 2106(a) of the Water
Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2238c(a)), that
received funding under section 2106 of such Act in fiscal year 2020,
but that the Secretary determines would no longer be eligible for such
funding as a result of a demonstrable impact on the calculations
required by the definitions of a donor port, energy transfer port, or
medium-sized donor port contained in such section due to a reduction in
domestic cargo shipments related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
SEC. 123. ASSESSMENT OF REGIONAL CONFINED AQUATIC DISPOSAL FACILITIES.
(a) Authority.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct assessments
of the availability of confined aquatic disposal facilities for the
disposal of contaminated dredged material.
(b) Information and Comment.--In conducting an assessment under
this section, the Secretary shall--
(1) solicit information from stakeholders on potential
projects that may require disposal of contaminated sediments in
a confined aquatic disposal facility;
(2) solicit information from the applicable division of the
Corps of Engineers on the need for confined aquatic disposal
facilities; and
(3) provide an opportunity for public comment.
(c) North Atlantic Division Region Assessment.--In carrying out
subsection (a), the Secretary shall prioritize conducting an assessment
of the availability of confined aquatic disposal facilities in the
North Atlantic Division region for the disposal of contaminated dredged
material in such region.
(d) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on
the results of any assessments conducted under this section, including
any recommendations of the Secretary for the construction of new
confined aquatic disposal facilities or expanded capacity for confined
aquatic disposal facilities.
(e) Definition.--In this section, the term ``North Atlantic
Division region'' means the area located within the boundaries of the
North Atlantic Division of the Corps of Engineers.
SEC. 124. STRATEGIC PLAN ON BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL.
(a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a
strategic plan that identifies opportunities and challenges relating to
furthering the policy of the United States to maximize the beneficial
use of suitable dredged material obtained from the construction or
operation and maintenance of water resources development projects, as
described in section 125(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act
of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2326g).
(b) Consultation.--In developing the strategic plan under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
(1) consult with relevant Federal agencies involved in the
beneficial use of dredged material;
(2) solicit and consider input from State and local
governments and Indian Tribes, while seeking to ensure a
geographic diversity of input from the various Corps of
Engineers divisions; and
(3) consider input received from other stakeholders
involved in beneficial use of dredged material.
(c) Inclusion.--The Secretary shall include in the strategic plan
developed under subsection (a)--
(1) identification of any specific barriers and conflicts
that the Secretary determines impede the maximization of
beneficial use of dredged material at the Federal, State, and
local level, and any recommendations of the Secretary to
address such barriers and conflicts; and
(2) identification of specific measures to improve
interagency and Federal, State, local, and Tribal
communications and coordination to improve implementation of
section 125(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020
(33 U.S.C. 2326g).
SEC. 125. FUNDING TO REVIEW MITIGATION BANKING PROPOSALS FROM NON-
FEDERAL PUBLIC ENTITIES.
Section 214 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (33
U.S.C. 2352) is amended--
(1) in the section heading, by inserting ``and review
proposals'' after ``permits'';
(2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f) and
inserting after subsection (d) the following:
``(e) Funding To Review Mitigation Bank Proposals.--
``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the terms
`mitigation bank' and `mitigation bank instrument' have the
meanings given those terms in section 230.91 of title 40, Code
of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).
``(2) Proposal review.--The Secretary, after public notice,
may accept and expend funds contributed by a non-Federal public
entity to expedite the review of a proposal for a mitigation
bank for which the non-Federal public entity is the sponsor,
without regard to whether the entity plans to sell a portion of
the credits generated by a mitigation bank instrument of the
entity to other public or private entities, if the entity
enters into an agreement with the Secretary that requires the
entity to use for a public purpose any funds obtained from the
sale of such credits.
``(3) Effect on other entities.--To the maximum extent
practicable, the Secretary shall ensure that expediting the
review of a proposal for a mitigation bank through the use of
funds accepted and expended under this subsection does not
adversely affect the timeline for review (in the Corps of
Engineers district in which the mitigation bank is to be
located) of such proposals of other entities that have not
contributed funds under this subsection.
``(4) Effect on review.--In carrying out this subsection,
the Secretary shall ensure that the use of funds accepted under
paragraph (1) will not impact impartial decision making with
respect to proposals for mitigation banks, either substantively
or procedurally.
``(5) Public availability.--
``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall ensure that
all final decisions regarding proposals for mitigation
banks carried out using funds authorized under this
subsection are made available to the public in a common
format, including on the internet, and in a manner that
distinguishes final decisions under this subsection
from other final actions of the Secretary.
``(B) Decision document.--The Secretary shall--
``(i) use a standard decision document for
reviewing all proposals using funds accepted
under this subsection; and
``(ii) make the standard decision document,
along with all final decisions regarding
proposals for mitigation banks, available to
the public, including on the internet.''; and
(3) in paragraph (1) of subsection (f), as so
redesignated--
(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``; and'' and
inserting a semicolon; and
(B) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as
subparagraph (D) and inserting after subparagraph (B)
the following:
``(C) a comprehensive list of the proposals for
mitigation banks reviewed and approved using funds
accepted under subsection (e) during the previous
fiscal year; and''.
SEC. 126. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.
(a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, other Federal and
State agencies, and the applicable non-Federal interest, shall
coordinate efforts to remove or remediate contaminated sediments
associated with the following water resources development projects:
(1) The project for ecosystem restoration, South Fork of
the South Branch of the Chicago River, Bubbly Creek, Illinois,
authorized by section 401(5) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2740).
(2) The project for ecosystem restoration and recreation,
Willamette River, Oregon, authorized by section 1401(7) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130 Stat. 1714).
(3) The project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Mahoning
River, Ohio, being carried out under section 206 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
(4) The project for navigation, South Branch of the Chicago
River, Cook County, Illinois, in the vicinity of Collateral
Channel.
(b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this section, the Secretary and the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency shall jointly submit to the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a
report on efforts to remove or remediate contaminated sediments
associated with the projects identified in subsection (a), including,
if applicable, any specific recommendations for actions or agreements
necessary to undertake such work.
SEC. 127. RESERVE COMPONENT TRAINING AT WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS.
In carrying out military training activities or otherwise
fulfilling military training requirements, units or members of a
reserve component of the Armed Forces may perform services and furnish
supplies in support of a water resources development project or program
of the Corps of Engineers without reimbursement.
SEC. 128. PAYMENT OF PAY AND ALLOWANCES OF CERTAIN OFFICERS FROM
APPROPRIATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS.
Section 36 of the Act of August 10, 1956 (33 U.S.C. 583a), is
amended--
(1) by striking ``Regular officers of the Corps of
Engineers of the Army, and reserve officers of the Army who are
assigned to the Corps of Engineers,'' and inserting the
following:
``(a) In General.--The personnel described in subsection (b)''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(b) Personnel Described.--The personnel referred to in subsection
(a) are the following:
``(1) Regular officers of the Corps of Engineers of the
Army.
``(2) The following members of the Army who are assigned to
the Corps of Engineers:
``(A) Reserve component officers.
``(B) Warrant officers (whether regular or reserve
component).
``(C) Enlisted members (whether regular or reserve
component).''.
SEC. 129. CIVIL WORKS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TESTING, AND EVALUATION.
(a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out basic,
applied, and advanced research needs as required to aid in the
planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of water
resources development projects and to support the missions and
authorities of the Corps of Engineers.
(b) Demonstration Projects.--In carrying out subsection (a), the
Secretary is authorized to test and apply technology, tools,
techniques, and materials developed pursuant to such subsection at
authorized water resources development projects, in consultation with
the non-Federal interests for such projects.
(c) Other Transactional Authority.--
(1) Authority.--In carrying out subsection (a), and
pursuant to the authority under section 4022 of title 10,
United States Code, the Secretary is authorized to enter into a
transaction to carry out prototype projects to support basic,
applied, and advanced research needs that are directly relevant
to the civil works missions and authorities of the Corps of
Engineers.
(2) Notification.--Not later than 30 days before the
Secretary enters into a transaction under paragraph (1), the
Secretary shall notify the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate of--
(A) the dollar amount of the transaction; and
(B) the entity carrying out the prototype project
that is the subject of the transaction.
(3) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
Works of the Senate a report describing the use of the
authority under this subsection.
(4) Termination of authority.--The authority provided under
this subsection shall terminate 5 years after the date of
enactment of this Act.
(d) Coordination and Consultation.--In carrying out this section,
the Secretary may coordinate and consult with Federal agencies, State
and local agencies, Indian Tribes, universities, consortiums, councils,
and other relevant entities that will aid in the planning, design,
construction, operation, and maintenance of water resources development
projects.
(e) Establishment of Account.--The Secretary, in consultation with
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall establish a
separate appropriations account for administering funds made available
to carry out this section.
(f) Sense of Congress on Focus Areas.--It is the sense of Congress
that the Secretary should prioritize using amounts made available to
carry out this section for the research, development, testing, and
evaluation of technology, tools, techniques, and materials that will--
(1) advance the use of natural features and nature-based
features, as defined in section 1184(a) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a));
(2) improve the reliability and accuracy of technologies
related to water supply;
(3) improve the management of reservoirs owned and operated
by the Corps of Engineers; and
(4) lead to future cost savings and advance project
delivery timelines.
SEC. 130. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.
Notwithstanding section 4141 of title 10, United States Code, the
Secretary may provide assistance through contracts, cooperative
agreements, and grants to--
(1) the University of Missouri to conduct economic analyses
and other academic research to improve water management,
enhance flood resiliency, and preserve water resources for the
State of Missouri, the Lower Missouri River Basin, and Upper
Mississippi River Basin; and
(2) Oregon State University to conduct a study on the
associated impacts of wildfire on water resource ecology, water
supply, quality, and distribution in the Willamette River Basin
and to develop a water resource assessment and management
platform for the Willamette River Basin.
SEC. 131. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT.
(a) Capital Improvement Authority.--The Secretary may carry out
capital improvements for the Washington Aqueduct that the Secretary
determines necessary for the safe, effective, and efficient operation
of the Aqueduct.
(b) Borrowing Authority.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraphs (2) through (4) and
subsection (c), the Secretary is authorized to borrow from the
Treasury of the United States such amounts as are sufficient to
cover any obligations that will be incurred by the Secretary in
carrying out capital improvements for the Washington Aqueduct
under subsection (a).
(2) Limitation.--The amount borrowed by the Secretary under
paragraph (1) may not exceed $40,000,000 in any fiscal year.
(3) Agreement.--Amounts borrowed under paragraph (1) may
only be used to carry out capital improvements with respect to
which the Secretary has entered into an agreement with each
customer.
(4) Terms of borrowing.--
(A) In general.--Subject to subsection (c), the
Secretary of the Treasury shall provide amounts
borrowed under paragraph (1) under such terms and
conditions as the Secretary of Treasury determines to
be necessary and in the public interest.
(B) Term.--The term of any loan made under
paragraph (1) shall be for a period of not less than 20
years.
(C) Prepayment.--There shall be no penalty for the
prepayment of any amounts borrowed under paragraph (1).
(c) Contracts With Customers.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary may not borrow any amounts
under subsection (b) until such time as the Secretary has
entered into a contract with each customer under which the
customer commits to pay a pro rata share (based on water
purchase) of the principal and interest owed to the Secretary
of the Treasury under subsection (b).
(2) Prepayment.--Any customer may pay, in advance, the pro
rata share of the principal and interest owed by the customer,
or any portion thereof, without penalty.
(3) Risk of default.--A customer that enters into a
contract under this subsection shall, as a condition of the
contract, commit to pay any additional amount necessary to
fully offset the risk of default on the contract.
(4) Obligations.--Each contract entered into under
paragraph (1) shall include such terms and conditions as the
Secretary of the Treasury may require so that the total value
to the Government of all contracts entered into under paragraph
(1) is estimated to be equal to the obligations of the
Secretary for carrying out capital improvements for the
Washington Aqueduct.
(5) Other conditions.--Each contract entered into under
paragraph (1) shall--
(A) include other conditions consistent with this
section that the Secretary and the Secretary of the
Treasury determine to be appropriate; and
(B) provide the United States priority in regard to
income from fees assessed to operate and maintain the
Washington Aqueduct.
(d) Customer Defined.--In this section, the term ``customer''
means--
(1) the District of Columbia;
(2) Arlington County, Virginia; and
(3) Fairfax County, Virginia.
TITLE II--STUDIES AND REPORTS
SEC. 201. AUTHORIZATION OF PROPOSED FEASIBILITY STUDIES.
(a) New Projects.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct a
feasibility study for the following projects for water resources
development and conservation and other purposes, as identified in the
reports titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources
Development'' submitted to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or
otherwise reviewed by Congress:
(1) Dudleyville, arizona.--Project for flood risk
management, Dudleyville, Arizona.
(2) Conn creek dam, california.--Project for flood risk
management, Conn Creek Dam, California.
(3) City of huntington beach, california.--Project for
hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, including sea level
rise, and shoreline stabilization, City of Huntington Beach,
California.
(4) Napa river, california.--Project for navigation,
Federal Channel of Napa River, California.
(5) Petaluma river wetlands, california.--Project for
ecosystem restoration, City of Petaluma, California.
(6) City of rialto, california.--Project for ecosystem
restoration and flood risk management, City of Rialto and
vicinity, California.
(7) North richmond, california.--Project for hurricane and
storm damage risk reduction, including sea level rise, and
ecosystem restoration, North Richmond, California.
(8) Upper yuba river basin, california.--Project for flood
risk management, Upper Yuba River, California.
(9) Stratford, connecticut.--Project for hurricane and
storm damage risk reduction and flood risk management,
Stratford, Connecticut.
(10) Woodbridge, connecticut.--Project for flood risk
management, Woodbridge, Connecticut.
(11) Federal triangle area, washington, district of
columbia.--Project for flood risk management, Federal Triangle
Area, Washington, District of Columbia, including construction
of improvements to interior drainage.
(12) Potomac and anacostia rivers, washington, district of
columbia.--Project for recreational access, including enclosed
swimming areas, Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, District of
Columbia.
(13) Washington metropolitan area, washington, district of
columbia, maryland, and virginia.--Project for water supply,
including the identification of a secondary water source and
additional water storage capability for the Washington
Metropolitan Area, Washington, District of Columbia, Maryland,
and Virginia.
(14) Duval county, florida.--Project for periodic beach
nourishment for the project for hurricane and storm damage risk
reduction, Duval County shoreline, Florida, authorized by the
River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1092; 90 Stat. 2933),
for an additional period of 50 years, Duval County shoreline,
Florida.
(15) Town of longboat key, florida.--Project for whole
island hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Town of
Longboat Key, Florida.
(16) Lake runnymede, florida.--Project for ecosystem
restoration, Lake Runnymede, Florida.
(17) Tampa back bay, florida.--Project for flood risk
management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction,
including the use of natural features and nature-based features
for protection and recreation, Tampa Back Bay, Florida.
(18) Port tampa bay and mckay bay, florida.--Project for
hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Port Tampa Bay,
Florida, including McKay Bay.
(19) Lake tohopekaliga, florida.--Project for ecosystem
restoration and flood risk management, Lake Tohopekaliga,
Florida.
(20) City of albany, georgia.--Project for flood risk
management, City of Albany, Georgia.
(21) City of east point, georgia.--Project for flood risk
management, City of East Point, Georgia.
(22) Flint river basin headwaters, clayton county,
georgia.--Project for flood risk management and ecosystem
restoration, Flint River Basin Headwaters, Clayton County,
Georgia.
(23) Tybee island, georgia.--Project for periodic beach
nourishment for the project for hurricane and storm damage risk
reduction, Tybee Island, Georgia, authorized by section 201 of
the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5), for an
additional period of 50 years, Tybee Island, Georgia.
(24) Waikiki, hawaii.--Project for ecosystem restoration
and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Waikiki, Hawaii.
(25) Assawompset pond complex, massachusetts.--Project for
ecosystem restoration, flood risk management, and water supply,
Assawompset Pond Complex, Massachusetts.
(26) Charles river, massachusetts.--Project for flood risk
management and ecosystem restoration, Charles River,
Massachusetts.
(27) Chelsea creek and mill creek, massachusetts.--Project
for flood risk management and ecosystem restoration, including
bank stabilization, City of Chelsea, Massachusetts.
(28) Connecticut river streambank erosion, massachusetts,
vermont, and new hampshire.--Project for streambank erosion,
Connecticut River, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire.
(29) Deerfield river, massachusetts.--Project for flood
risk management and ecosystem restoration, Deerfield River,
Massachusetts.
(30) Town of north attleborough, massachusetts.--Project
for ecosystem restoration and flood risk management between
Whiting's and Falls ponds, North Attleborough, Massachusetts.
(31) Town of hull, massachusetts.--Project for flood risk
management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, Hull,
Massachusetts.
(32) City of revere, massachusetts.--Project for flood risk
management and marsh ecosystem restoration, City of Revere,
Massachusetts.
(33) Lower east side, detroit, michigan.--Project for flood
risk management, Lower East Side Detroit, Michigan.
(34) Elijah root dam, michigan.--Project for dam removal,
by carrying out a disposition study under section 216 of the
Flood Control Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 549a), Elijah Root Dam,
Michigan.
(35) Grosse pointe shores and grosse pointe farms,
michigan.--Project for ecosystem restoration and flood risk
management, Grosse Pointe Shores and Grosse Pointe Farms,
Michigan.
(36) Southeast michigan, michigan.--Project for flood risk
management, Wayne, Oakland, and Macomb counties, Michigan.
(37) Tittabawassee river watershed, michigan.--Project for
flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and related
conservation benefits, Tittabawassee River, Chippewa River,
Pine River, and Tobacco River, Midland County, Michigan.
(38) Southwest mississippi, mississippi.--Project for
ecosystem restoration and flood risk management, Wilkinson,
Adams, Warren, Claiborne, and Jefferson counties, Mississippi.
(39) Camden and gloucester counties, new jersey.--Project
for tidal and riverine flood risk management, Camden and
Gloucester counties, New Jersey.
(40) Edgewater, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
management, Edgewater, New Jersey.
(41) Maurice river, new jersey.--Project for navigation and
for beneficial use of dredged materials for hurricane and storm
damage risk reduction and ecosystem restoration, Maurice River,
New Jersey.
(42) Northern new jersey inland flooding, new jersey.--
Project for inland flood risk management in Hudson, Essex,
Union, Bergen, Hunterdon, Morris, Somerset, Warren, Passaic,
and Sussex counties, New Jersey.
(43) Riser ditch, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
management, including channel improvements, and other related
water resource needs related to Riser Ditch in the communities
of South Hackensack, Hasbrouck Heights, Little Ferry, Teterboro
and Moonachie, New Jersey.
(44) Rockaway river, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
management and ecosystem restoration, including bank
stabilization, Rockaway River, New Jersey.
(45) Tenakill brook, new jersey.--Project for flood risk
management, Tenakill Brook, New Jersey.
(46) Verona, cedar grove, and west caldwell, new jersey.--
Project for flood risk management along the Peckman River Basin
in the townships of Verona (and surrounding area), Cedar Grove,
and West Caldwell, New Jersey.
(47) Whippany river watershed, new jersey.--Project for
flood risk management, Morris County, New Jersey.
(48) Lake farmington dam, new mexico.--Project for water
supply, Lake Farmington Dam, New Mexico.
(49) Mcclure dam, new mexico.--Project for dam safety
improvements and flood risk management, McClure Dam, City of
Santa Fe, New Mexico.
(50) Brooklyn navy yard, new york.--Project for flood risk
management and hurricane and storm damage risk reduction,
Brooklyn Navy Yard, New York.
(51) Upper east river and flushing bay, new york.--Project
for ecosystem restoration, Upper East River and Flushing Bay,
New York.
(52) Hutchinson river, new york.--Project for flood risk
management and ecosystem restoration, Hutchinson River, New
York.
(53) Mohawk river basin, new york.--Project for flood risk
management, navigation, and environmental restoration, Mohawk
River Basin, New York.
(54) Newtown creek, new york.--Project for ecosystem
restoration, Newtown Creek, New York.
(55) Saw mill river, new york.--Project for flood risk
management and ecosystem restoration to address areas in the
City of Yonkers and the Village of Hastings-on-Hudson within
the 100-year flood zone, Saw Mill River, New York.
(56) Mineral ridge dam, ohio.--Project for dam safety
improvements and rehabilitation, Mineral Ridge Dam, Ohio.
(57) Brodhead creek watershed, pennsylvania.--Project for
ecosystem restoration and flood risk management, Brodhead Creek
Watershed, Pennsylvania.
(58) Chartiers creek watershed, pennsylvania.--Project for
flood risk management, Chartiers Creek Watershed, Pennsylvania.
(59) Coplay creek, pennsylvania.--Project for flood risk
management, Coplay Creek, Pennsylvania.
(60) Berkeley county, south carolina.--Project for
ecosystem restoration and flood risk management, Berkeley
County, South Carolina.
(61) Big sioux river, south dakota.--Project for flood risk
management, City of Watertown and vicinity, South Dakota.
(62) Tennessee-tombigbee river basins, tennessee.--Project
to deter, impede, or restrict the dispersal of aquatic nuisance
species in the Tennessee-Tombigbee River Basins, Tennessee.
(63) El paso county, texas.--Project for flood risk
management for economically disadvantaged communities, as
defined by the Secretary pursuant to section 160 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note), along
the United States-Mexico border, El Paso County, Texas.
(64) Gulf intracoastal waterway-channel to palacios,
texas.--Project for navigation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway-
Channel to Palacios, Texas.
(65) Sikes lake, texas.--Project for ecosystem restoration
and flood risk management, Sikes Lake, Texas.
(66) Southwest border region, texas.--Project for flood
risk management for economically disadvantaged communities, as
defined by the Secretary pursuant to section 160 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note), along
the United States-Mexico border in Webb, Zapata, and Starr
counties, Texas.
(67) Lower clear creek and dickinson bayou, texas.--Project
for flood risk management, Lower Clear Creek and Dickinson
Bayou, Texas.
(68) Cedar island, virginia.--Project for ecosystem
restoration, hurricane and storm damage risk reduction, and
navigation, Cedar Island, Virginia.
(69) Ballinger creek, washington.--Project for ecosystem
restoration, City of Shoreline, Washington.
(70) City of north bend, washington.--Project for water
supply, City of North Bend, Washington.
(71) Taneum creek, washington.--Project for ecosystem
restoration, Taneum Creek, Washington.
(72) City of huntington, west virginia.--Project for flood
risk management, Huntington, West Virginia.
(b) Project Modifications.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct
a feasibility study for the following project modifications:
(1) Shingle creek and kissimmee river, florida.--
Modifications to the project for ecosystem restoration and
water storage, Shingle Creek and Kissimmee River, Florida,
authorized by section 201(a)(5) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2670), for flood risk
management.
(2) Jacksonville harbor, florida.--Modifications to the
project for navigation, Jacksonville Harbor, Florida,
authorized by section 7002 of the Water Resources Reform and
Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1364), for outer channel
improvements.
(3) Cedar river, cedar rapids, iowa.--Modifications to the
project for flood risk management, Cedar River, Cedar Rapids,
Iowa, authorized by section 7002(2) of the Water Resources
Reform and Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1366), consistent
with the City of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Cedar River Flood Control
System Master Plan.
(4) Yabucoa harbor, puerto rico.--Modification to the
project for navigation, Yabucoa Harbor, Puerto Rico, authorized
by section 3 of the Act of August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49
Stat. 1048), for assumption of operations and maintenance.
(5) Salem river, salem county, new jersey.--Modifications
to the project for navigation, Salem River, Salem County, New
Jersey, authorized by section 1 of the Act of March 2, 1907
(chapter 2509, 34 Stat. 1080), to increase the authorized
depth.
(6) Everett harbor and snohomish river, washington.--
Modifications to the project for navigation, Everett Harbor and
Snohomish River, Washington, authorized by section 101 of the
River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 732), for the Boat
Launch Connector Channel.
(7) Hiram m. chittenden locks, lake washington ship canal,
washington.--Modifications to the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks
(also known as Ballard Locks), Lake Washington Ship Canal,
Washington, authorized by the Act of June 25, 1910 (chapter
382, 36 Stat. 666), for the construction of fish ladder
improvements, including efforts to address elevated temperature
and low dissolved oxygen levels in the Canal.
(8) Port townsend, washington.--Modifications to the
project for navigation, Port Townsend, Washington, authorized
by section 110 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat.
169), for the Boat Haven Marina Breakwater.
SEC. 202. EXPEDITED COMPLETION.
(a) Feasibility Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite the
completion of a feasibility study for each of the following projects,
and if the Secretary determines that the project is justified in a
completed report, may proceed directly to preconstruction planning,
engineering, and design of the project:
(1) Project for navigation, Branford Harbor and Stony Creek
Channel, Connecticut.
(2) Project for navigation, Guilford Harbor and Sluice
Channel, Connecticut.
(3) Project for ecosystem restoration, Western Everglades,
Florida.
(4) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction,
Miami, Dade County, Florida.
(5) Project for ecosystem restoration, recreation, and
other purposes, Illinois River, Chicago River, Calumet River,
Grand Calumet River, Little Calumet River, and other waterways
in the vicinity of Chicago, Illinois, authorized by section
201(a)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134
Stat. 2670).
(6) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction,
Chicago Shoreline, Illinois, authorized by section 101(a)(12)
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664;
128 Stat. 1372).
(7) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction,
South Central Coastal Louisiana, Louisiana.
(8) Modifications to the project for navigation, Baltimore
Harbor and Channels-Seagirt Loop Deepening, Maryland, including
to a depth of 50 feet.
(9) Project for New York and New Jersey Harbor Channel
Deepening Improvements, New York and New Jersey.
(10) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction,
South Shore of Staten Island, New York.
(11) Project for flood risk management, Rio Grande de
Loiza, Puerto Rico.
(12) Project for flood risk management, Rio Guanajibo,
Puerto Rico.
(13) Project for flood risk management, Rio Nigua, Salinas,
Puerto Rico.
(14) Project for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction,
Charleston Peninsula, South Carolina.
(15) Project for navigation, Tacoma Harbor, Washington.
(b) Post-Authorization Change Reports.--The Secretary shall
expedite completion of a post-authorization change report for the
following projects:
(1) Project for ecosystem restoration, Central and Southern
Florida, Indian River Lagoon, Florida, authorized by section
1001(14) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121
Stat. 1051).
(2) Project for water supply and ecosystem restoration,
Howard A. Hanson Dam, Washington, authorized by section
101(b)(15) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113
Stat. 281).
(c) Great Lakes Coastal Resiliency Study.--The Secretary shall
expedite the completion of the comprehensive assessment of water
resources needs for the Great Lakes System under section 729 of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2267a), as required
by section 1219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132
Stat. 3811; 134 Stat. 2683).
(d) Maintenance of Navigation Channels.--The Secretary shall
expedite the completion of a determination of the feasibility of
improvements proposed by a non-Federal interest under section
204(f)(1)(A)(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
U.S.C. 2232(f)(1)(A)(i)), for the following:
(1) Deepening and widening of the navigation project for
Coos Bay, Oregon, authorized by the Act of March 3, 1879
(chapter 181, 20 Stat. 370).
(2) Improvements to segment 1B of the navigation project
for Houston Ship Channel Expansion Channel Improvement Project,
Harris, Chambers, and Galveston Counties, Texas, authorized by
section 401(1)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of
2020 (134 Stat. 2734).
SEC. 203. EXPEDITED MODIFICATIONS OF EXISTING FEASIBILITY STUDIES.
The Secretary shall expedite the completion of the following
feasibility studies, as modified by this section, and if the Secretary
determines that a project that is the subject of the feasibility study
is justified in the completed report, may proceed directly to
preconstruction planning, engineering, and design of the project:
(1) Mare island strait, california.--The study for
navigation, Mare Island Strait channel, authorized by section
406 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat.
323), is modified to authorize the Secretary to consider the
economic and national security benefits from recent proposals
for utilization of the channel for Department of Defense
shipbuilding and vessel repair.
(2) Lake pontchartrain & vicinity, louisiana.--The study
for flood risk management and hurricane and storm damage risk
reduction, Lake Pontchartrain & Vicinity, Louisiana, authorized
by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat.
1077), is modified to authorize the Secretary to investigate
increasing the scope of the project to provide protection
against a 200-year storm event.
(3) Blackstone river valley, rhode island and
massachusetts.--
(A) In general.--The study for ecosystem
restoration, Blackstone River Valley, Rhode Island and
Massachusetts, authorized by section 569 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3788), is
modified to authorize the Secretary to conduct a study
for water supply, water flow, and wetland restoration
and protection within the scope of the study.
(B) Incorporation of existing data.--In carrying
out the study described in subparagraph (A), the
Secretary shall use, to the extent practicable, any
existing data for the project prepared under the
authority of section 206 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330).
(4) Lower saddle river, new jersey.--The study for flood
control, Lower Saddle River, New Jersey, authorized by section
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100
Stat. 4119), is modified to authorize the Secretary to review
the previously authorized study and take into consideration
changes in hydraulic and hydrologic circumstances and local
economic development since the study was initially authorized.
SEC. 204. CORPS OF ENGINEERS RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION ASSESSMENT.
(a) In General.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall conduct
an assessment of sediment in reservoirs owned and operated by the
Secretary.
(b) Contents.--For each reservoir for which the Secretary carries
out an assessment under subsection (a), the Secretary shall include in
the assessment--
(1) an estimation of the volume of sediment in the
reservoir;
(2) an evaluation of the effects of such sediment on
reservoir storage capacity, including a quantification of lost
reservoir storage capacity due to the sediment and an
evaluation of how such lost reservoir storage capacity affects
the allocated storage space for authorized purposes within the
reservoir (including, where applicable, allocations for dead
storage, inactive storage, active conservation, joint use, and
flood surcharge);
(3) the identification of any additional effects of
sediment on the operations of the reservoir or the ability of
the reservoir to meet its authorized purposes;
(4) the identification of any potential effects of the
sediment over the ten-year period beginning on the date of
enactment of this Act on the areas immediately upstream and
downstream of the reservoir;
(5) the identification of any existing sediment monitoring
and management plans associated with the reservoir;
(6) for any reservoir that does not have a sediment
monitoring and management plan--
(A) an identification of whether a sediment
management plan for the reservoir is under development;
or
(B) an assessment of whether a sediment management
plan for the reservoir would be useful in the long-term
operation and maintenance of the reservoir for its
authorized purposes; and
(7) any opportunities for beneficial use of the sediment in
the vicinity of the reservoir.
(c) Report to Congress; Public Availability.--Not later than 2
years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
submit to Congress, and make publicly available (including on a
publicly available website), a report describing the results of the
assessment carried out under subsection (a).
(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available
until expended.
SEC. 205. ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS FROM CHANGING OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITIES.
(a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out an assessment of the
consequences of amending section 101(b) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(b)) to authorize the operation
and maintenance of navigation projects for a harbor or inland harbor
constructed by the Secretary at 100 percent Federal cost to a depth of
55 feet.
(b) Contents.--In carrying out the assessment under subsection (a),
the Secretary shall--
(1) describe all existing Federal navigation projects that
are authorized or constructed to a depth of 55 feet or greater;
(2) describe any Federal navigation project that is likely
to seek authorization or modification to a depth of 55 feet or
greater during the 10-year period beginning on the date of
enactment of this section;
(3) estimate--
(A) the potential annual increase in Federal costs
that would result from authorizing operation and
maintenance of a navigation project to a depth of 55
feet at Federal expense; and
(B) the potential cumulative increase in such
Federal costs during the 10-year period beginning on
the date of enactment of this section; and
(4) assess the potential effect of authorizing operation
and maintenance of a navigation project to a depth of 55 feet
at Federal expense on other Federal navigation operation and
maintenance activities, including the potential impact on
activities at donor ports, energy transfer ports, emerging
harbor projects, and projects carried out in the Great Lakes
Navigation System, as such terms are defined in section
102(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
U.S.C. 2238 note).
(c) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment
of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make
publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a
report describing the results of the assessment carried out under
subsection (a).
SEC. 206. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DREDGE CAPACITY.
(a) In General.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make
publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a
report that includes--
(1) a quantification of the expected hopper and pipeline
dredging needs of authorized water resources development
projects for the 10 years after the date of enactment of this
Act, including--
(A) the dredging needs to--
(i) construct deepenings or widenings at
authorized but not constructed projects and the
associated operations and maintenance needs of
such projects; and
(ii) operate and maintain existing Federal
navigation channels;
(B) the amount of dredging to be carried out by the
Corps of Engineers for other Federal agencies;
(C) the dredging needs associated with authorized
hurricane and storm damage risk reduction projects
(including periodic renourishment); and
(D) the dredging needs associated with projects for
the beneficial use of dredged material authorized by
section 1122 of the Water Resources Development Act of
2016 (33 U.S.C. 2326 note);
(2) an identification of the Federal appropriations for
dredging projects and expenditures from the Harbor Maintenance
Trust Fund for fiscal year 2015 and each fiscal year
thereafter;
(3) an identification of the dredging capacity of the
domestic hopper and pipeline dredge fleet, including publicly
owned and privately owned vessels, in each of the 10 years
preceding the date of enactment of this Act;
(4) an analysis of the ability of the domestic hopper and
pipeline dredge fleet to meet the expected dredging needs
identified under paragraph (1), including an analysis of such
ability in each of the following regions--
(A) the east coast region;
(B) the west coast region, including the States of
Alaska and Hawaii;
(C) the gulf coast region; and
(D) the Great Lakes region;
(5) an identification of the dredging capacity of domestic
hopper and pipeline dredge vessels that are under contract for
construction and intended to be used at water resources
development projects;
(6) an identification of any hopper or pipeline dredge
vessel expected to be retired or become unavailable during the
10-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this
section;
(7) an identification of the potential costs of using
either public or private dredging to carry out authorized water
resources development projects; and
(8) any recommendations of the Secretary for adding
additional domestic hopper and pipeline dredging capacity,
including adding public and private dredging vessels to the
domestic hopper and pipeline dredge fleet to efficiently
service water resources development projects.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the Corps
of Engineers should add additional dredging capacity if the addition of
such capacity would--
(1) enable the Corps of Engineers to carry out water
resources development projects in an efficient and cost-
effective manner; and
(2) be in the best interests of the United States.
SEC. 207. MAINTENANCE DREDGING DATA.
Section 1133(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016
(33 U.S.C. 2326f(b)(3)) is amended by inserting ``, including a
separate line item for all Federal costs associated with the disposal
of dredged material'' before the semicolon.
SEC. 208. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON ECONOMIC VALUATION OF PRESERVATION OF
OPEN SPACE, RECREATIONAL AREAS, AND HABITAT ASSOCIATED
WITH PROJECT LANDS.
(a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a review of the
existing statutory, regulatory, and policy requirements related to the
determination of the economic value of lands that--
(1) may be provided by the non-Federal interest, as
necessary, for the construction of a project for flood risk
reduction or hurricane and storm risk reduction in accordance
with section 103(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(i));
(2) are being maintained for open space, recreational
areas, or preservation of fish and wildlife habitat; and
(3) will continue to be so maintained as part of the
project.
(b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall issue to the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a
report containing the results of the review conducted under subsection
(a), including--
(1) a summary of the existing statutory, regulatory, and
policy requirements described in such subsection;
(2) a description of the requirements and process the
Secretary uses to place an economic value on the lands
described in such subsection;
(3) an assessment of whether such requirements and process
affect the ability of a non-Federal interest to provide such
lands for the construction of a project described in such
subsection;
(4) an assessment of whether such requirements and process
directly or indirectly encourage the selection of developed
lands for the construction of a project, or have the potential
to affect the total cost of a project; and
(5) the identification of alternative measures for
determining the economic value of such lands that could provide
incentives for the preservation of open space, recreational
areas, and habitat in association with the construction of a
project.
SEC. 209. DISPOSITION STUDY ON SALINAS DAM AND RESERVOIR, CALIFORNIA.
In carrying out the disposition study for the project for Salinas
Dam (Santa Margarita Lake), California, pursuant to section 202(d) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2675), the
Secretary shall--
(1) ensure that the County of San Luis Obispo is provided
right of first refusal for any potential conveyance of the
project; and
(2) ensure that the study addresses any potential repairs
or modifications to the project necessary to meet Federal dam
safety requirements prior to transferring the project.
SEC. 210. EXCESS LANDS REPORT FOR WHITTIER NARROWS DAM, CALIFORNIA.
(a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment
of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report
that identifies any real property associated with the Whittier Narrows
Dam element of the Los Angeles County Drainage Area project that the
Secretary determines--
(1) is not needed to carry out the authorized purposes of
the Whittier Narrows Dam element of such project; and
(2) could be transferred to the City of Pico Rivera,
California, for the replacement of recreational facilities
located in such city that were adversely impacted by dam safety
construction activities associated with the Whittier Narrows
Dam element of such project.
(b) Los Angeles County Drainage Area Project Defined.--In this
section, the term ``Los Angeles County Drainage Area project'' means
the project for flood control, Los Angeles County Drainage Area,
California, authorized by section 101(b) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611; 130 Stat. 1690).
SEC. 211. COLEBROOK RIVER RESERVOIR, CONNECTICUT.
(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a
report that summarizes the benefits, costs, and other effects of
terminating the contract described in subsection (b) between the United
States and the Metropolitan District, Hartford, Connecticut, relating
to reservoir water storage space, including--
(1) a description of entities that currently use (or have
expressed an interest in using) the water provided pursuant to
the contract;
(2) an accounting of the current annual costs, including
annual operations and maintenance costs, owed by the
Metropolitan District to use the water provided pursuant to the
contract;
(3) an accounting of any unrecovered capital or operation
and maintenance costs incurred by the Federal Government in
constructing or maintaining the reservoir to accommodate water
supply storage as an authorized purpose of the reservoir;
(4) an accounting of any potential transfer or increase in
costs to the Federal Government, to the Metropolitan District,
or to any water users that could result from the termination of
the contract; and
(5) any additional information that the Secretary
determines appropriate for consideration of termination of the
contract.
(b) Contract.--The contract referred to in subsection (a) is the
contract between the United States and the Metropolitan District,
Hartford, Connecticut, for the use of water supply storage space in the
Colebrook River Reservoir, entered into on February 11, 1965, and
modified on October 28, 1975, and titled Contract DA-19-016-CIVENG-65-
203.
SEC. 212. COMPREHENSIVE CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA STUDY.
(a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out a
feasibility study for resiliency and comprehensive improvements or
modifications to existing water resources development projects in the
central and southern Florida area, for the purposes of flood risk
management, water supply, ecosystem restoration (including preventing
saltwater intrusion), recreation, and related purposes.
(b) Requirements.--In carrying out the feasibility study under
subsection (a), the Secretary--
(1) is authorized to--
(A) review the report of the Chief of Engineers on
central and southern Florida, published as House
Document 643, 80th Congress, 2nd Session, and other
related reports of the Secretary; and
(B) recommend cost-effective structural and
nonstructural projects for implementation that provide
a systemwide approach for the purposes described in
subsection (a); and
(2) shall ensure the study and any projects recommended
under paragraph (2) will not interfere with the efforts
undertaken to carry out the Comprehensive Everglades
Restoration Plan pursuant to section 601 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680; 132 Stat. 3786).
SEC. 213. REPORT ON SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION.
(a) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that provides an
update on--
(1) Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan projects, as
authorized by or pursuant to section 601 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680; 121 U.S.C. 1269; 132
U.S.C. 3786);
(2) the review of the Lake Okeechobee Regulation Schedule
pursuant to section 1106 of the Water Resources Development Act
of 2018 (132 Stat. 3773) and section 210 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2020 (134 U.S.C. 2682); and
(3) any additional water resources development projects and
studies included in the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration
Plan Integrated Delivery Schedule prepared in accordance with
part 385 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations.
(b) Contents.--The Secretary shall include in the report submitted
under subsection (a) the status of each authorized water resources
development project or study described in such subsection, including--
(1) an estimated implementation or completion date of the
project or study; and
(2) the estimated costs to complete implementation or
construction, as applicable, of the project or study.
SEC. 214. REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL HAZARDS AT BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY
LANIER, GEORGIA.
The Secretary shall--
(1) carry out a review of potential threats to human life
and safety from use of designated recreational areas at the
Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, Georgia, authorized by section
1 of the Act of July 24, 1946 (chapter 595, 60 Stat. 635); and
(2) install such technologies and other measures, including
sirens, strobe lights, and signage, that the Secretary, based
on the review carried out under paragraph (1), determines
necessary for alerting the public of hazardous water conditions
or to otherwise minimize or eliminate any identified threats to
human life and safety.
SEC. 215. PORT FOURCHON BELLE PASS CHANNEL, LOUISIANA.
With respect to the project for navigation, Port Fourchon Belle
Pass Channel, Louisiana, authorized by section 403(a)(4) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2743), the Secretary is
authorized to--
(1) undertake a feasibility study to modify the project to
include the dredged material disposal plan recommended in the
document published by the Secretary in April 2020, titled
``Review Assessment of Port Fourchon Belle Pass Channel
Deepening Project Section 203 Feasibility Study (January 2019,
revised January 2020)''; or
(2) review under section 203 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231) any further
feasibility study undertaken by the non-Federal interest to
modify the project to include a dredged material disposal plan.
SEC. 216. HYDRAULIC EVALUATION OF UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS
RIVER.
(a) Study.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Administrator
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall, at Federal expense,
periodically carry out a study to--
(1) evaluate the flow frequency probabilities of the Upper
Mississippi River and the Illinois River; and
(2) develop updated water surface profiles for such rivers.
(b) Area of Evaluation.--In carrying out subsection (a), the
Secretary shall conduct analysis along the mainstem of the Mississippi
River from upstream of the Minnesota River confluence near Anoka,
Minnesota, to just upstream of the Ohio River confluence near Cairo,
Illinois, and along the Illinois River from Dresden Island Lock and Dam
to the confluence with the Mississippi River, near Grafton, Illinois.
(c) Reports.--Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of
this Act, and not less frequently than every 20 years thereafter, the
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report containing the
results of a study carried out under subsection (a).
(d) Public Availability.--Any information developed under
subsection (a) shall be made publicly available, including on a
publicly available website.
SEC. 217. REND LAKE, CARLYLE LAKE, AND LAKE SHELBYVILLE, ILLINOIS.
(a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a
report that summarizes the benefits, costs, and other effects of
terminating the contracts described in subsection (b) between the
United States and the State of Illinois, relating to reservoir water
storage space, including--
(1) a description of entities that currently use (or have
expressed an interest in using) the water provided pursuant to
the contracts;
(2) an accounting of the current annual costs, including
annual operations and maintenance costs, owed by the State of
Illinois to use the water provided pursuant to the contracts;
(3) an accounting of any unrecovered capital or operation
and maintenance costs incurred by the Federal Government in
constructing or maintaining the reservoirs to accommodate water
supply storage as an authorized purpose of the reservoirs;
(4) an accounting of any potential transfer or increase in
costs to the Federal Government, to the State of Illinois, or
to any water users that could result from the termination of
the contracts; and
(5) any additional information that the Secretary
determines appropriate for consideration of termination of the
contracts.
(b) Contracts.--The contracts referred to in subsection (a) are the
following contracts between the United States and the State of
Illinois:
(1) Contract DACW43-88-C-0088, entered into on September
23, 1988, for utilization of storage space for water supply in
Rend Lake, Illinois.
(2) Contract DA-23-065-CIVENG-65-493, entered into on April
28, 1965, for utilization of storage space for water supply in
Rend Lake, Illinois.
(3) Contract DACW43-83-C-0008, entered into on July 6,
1983, for utilization of storage space in Carlyle Lake,
Illinois.
(4) Contract DACW43-83-C-0009, entered into on July 6,
1983, for utilization of storage space in Lake Shelbyville,
Illinois.
SEC. 218. DISPOSITION STUDY ON HYDROPOWER IN THE WILLAMETTE VALLEY,
OREGON.
(a) Disposition Study.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall carry out a
disposition study to determine the Federal interest in, and
identify the effects of, deauthorizing hydropower as an
authorized purpose, in whole or in part, of the Willamette
Valley hydropower project.
(2) Contents.--In carrying out the disposition study under
paragraph (1), the Secretary shall review the effects of
deauthorizing hydropower on--
(A) Willamette Valley hydropower project
operations;
(B) other authorized purposes of such project;
(C) cost apportionments;
(D) dam safety;
(E) compliance with the requirements of the
Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
(F) the operations of the remaining dams within the
Willamette Valley hydropower project.
(3) Recommendations.--If the Secretary, through the
disposition study authorized by paragraph (1), determines that
hydropower should be removed as an authorized purpose of any
part of the Willamette Valley hydropower project, the Secretary
shall also investigate and recommend any necessary structural
or operational changes at such project that are necessary to
achieve an appropriate balance among the remaining authorized
purposes of such project or changes to such purposes.
(b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Willamette Valley
hydropower project'' means the system of dams and reservoir projects
authorized to generate hydropower and the power features that operate
in conjunction with the main regulating dam facilities, including the
Big Cliff, Dexter, and Foster re-regulating dams in the Willamette
River Basin, Oregon, as authorized by section 4 of the Flood Control
Act of 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1222; 62 Stat. 1178; 64 Stat. 177;
68 Stat. 1264; 74 Stat. 499; 100 Stat. 4144).
(c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of
this Act, the Secretary shall issue a report to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate that
describes--
(1) the results of the disposition study on deauthorizing
hydropower as a purpose of the Willamette Valley hydropower
project; and
(2) any recommendations required under subsection (a)(3).
SEC. 219. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL EXPANSION CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
TEXAS.
The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a feasibility study
for modifications of the project for navigation, Houston Ship Channel
Expansion Channel Improvement Project, Harris, Chambers, and Galveston
counties, Texas, authorized by section 401 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2734), to incorporate into the
project the construction of barge lanes immediately adjacent to either
side of the Houston Ship Channel from Bolivar Roads to Morgan's Point
to a depth of 12 feet.
SEC. 220. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, TEXAS.
The Secretary shall expedite the review and coordination of the
feasibility study for the project for navigation, Sabine-Neches
Waterway, Texas, under section 203(b) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231(b)).
SEC. 221. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VIRGINIA.
The Secretary shall expedite the completion of a feasibility study
for the modification of the project for navigation, Norfolk Harbor and
Channels, Virginia, authorized by section 201 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4090; 132 Stat. 3840) to incorporate
Anchorage F into the project.
SEC. 222. COASTAL VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA.
(a) In General.--In carrying out the feasibility study for the
project for flood risk management, ecosystem restoration, and
navigation, Coastal Virginia, authorized by section 1201(9) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3802), the Secretary
is authorized to enter into a written agreement with any Federal agency
that owns or operates property in the area of the project to accept and
expend funds from such Federal agency to include in the study an
analysis with respect to property owned or operated by such Federal
agency.
(b) Information.--The Secretary shall use any relevant information
obtained from a Federal agency described in subsection (a) to carry out
the feasibility study described in such subsection.
SEC. 223. WESTERN INFRASTRUCTURE STUDY.
(a) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a
comprehensive study to evaluate the effectiveness of carrying out
additional measures, including measures that use natural features or
nature-based features, at or upstream of covered reservoirs, for the
purposes of--
(1) sustaining operations in response to changing
hydrological and climatic conditions;
(2) mitigating the risk of drought or floods, including the
loss of storage capacity due to sediment accumulation;
(3) increasing water supply; or
(4) aquatic ecosystem restoration.
(b) Study Focus.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the
Secretary shall include all covered reservoirs located in the South
Pacific Division of the Corps of Engineers.
(c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--
(1) Consultation.--In conducting the study under subsection
(a), the Secretary shall consult with applicable--
(A) Federal, State, and local agencies;
(B) Indian Tribes;
(C) non-Federal interests; and
(D) stakeholders, as determined appropriate by the
Secretary.
(2) Use of existing data and prior studies.--In conducting
the study under subsection (a), the Secretary shall, to the
maximum extent practicable and where appropriate--
(A) use existing data provided to the Secretary by
entities described in paragraph (1); and
(B) incorporate--
(i) relevant information from prior studies
and projects carried out by the Secretary; and
(ii) the relevant technical data and
scientific approaches with respect to changing
hydrological and climatic conditions.
(d) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that describes--
(1) the results of the study; and
(2) any recommendations for additional study in specific
geographic areas.
(e) Savings Provision.--Nothing in this section provides authority
to the Secretary to change the authorized purposes of any covered
reservoir.
(f) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Covered reservoir.--The term ``covered reservoir''
means a reservoir owned and operated by the Secretary or for
which the Secretary has flood control responsibilities under
section 7 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C. 709).
(2) Natural feature and nature-based feature.--The terms
``natural feature'' and ``nature-based feature'' have the
meanings given such terms in section 1184(a) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2016 (33 U.S.C. 2289a(a)).
SEC. 224. REPORT ON SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SMALL
BUSINESS CONCERNS.
(a) In General.--Not later than one year after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and make
publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a
report that describes and documents the use of contracts and
subcontracts with Small Disadvantaged Businesses in carrying out the
water resources development authorities of the Secretary.
(b) Information.--The Secretary shall include in the report under
subsection (a) information on the distribution of funds to Small
Disadvantaged Businesses on a disaggregated basis.
(c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Small Disadvantaged
Business'' has the meaning given that term in section 124.1001 of title
13, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations).
SEC. 225. REPORT ON SOLAR ENERGY OPPORTUNITIES.
(a) Assessment.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary, at Federal expense, shall
conduct an assessment, in consultation with the Secretary of
Energy, of opportunities to install and maintain photovoltaic
solar panels (including floating solar panels) at covered
projects.
(2) Contents.--The assessment conducted under paragraph (1)
shall--
(A) include a description of the economic,
environmental, and technical viability of installing
and maintaining, or contracting with third parties to
install and maintain, photovoltaic solar panels at
covered projects;
(B) identify covered projects with a high potential
for the installation and maintenance of photovoltaic
solar panels and whether such installation and
maintenance would require additional authorization;
(C) account for potential impacts of photovoltaic
solar panels at covered projects and the authorized
purposes of such projects, including potential impacts
on flood risk reduction, recreation, water supply, and
fish and wildlife; and
(D) account for the availability of electric grid
infrastructure close to covered projects, including
underutilized transmission infrastructure.
(b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress, and make
publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a
report containing the results of the assessment conducted under
subsection (a).
(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to the Secretary $10,000,000 to carry out this section.
(d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``covered project''
means--
(1) any property under the control of the Corps of
Engineers; and
(2) any water resources development project constructed by
the Secretary or over which the Secretary has financial or
operational responsibility.
SEC. 226. ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL FLOODING MITIGATION MODELING AND
TESTING CAPACITY.
(a) In General.--The Secretary, acting through the Director of the
Engineer Research and Development Center, shall carry out an assessment
of the current capacity of the Corps of Engineers to model coastal
flood mitigation systems and test the effectiveness of such systems in
preventing flood damage resulting from coastal storm surges.
(b) Considerations.--In carrying out the assessment under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
(1) identify the capacity of the Corps of Engineers to--
(A) carry out the testing of the performance and
reliability of coastal flood mitigation systems; or
(B) collaborate with private industries to carry
out such testing;
(2) identify any limitations or deficiencies at Corps of
Engineers facilities that are capable of testing the
performance and reliability of coastal flood mitigation
systems;
(3) assess any benefits that would result from addressing
the limitations or deficiencies identified under paragraph (2);
and
(4) provide recommendations for addressing such limitations
or deficiencies.
(c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and
make publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a
report describing the results of the assessment carried out under
subsection (a).
SEC. 227. REPORT TO CONGRESS ON EASEMENTS RELATED TO WATER RESOURCES
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.
(a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a review of the
existing statutory, regulatory, and policy requirements and procedures
related to the use, in relation to the construction of a project for
flood risk management, hurricane and storm risk reduction, or
environmental restoration, of covered easements that may be provided to
the Secretary by non-Federal interests.
(b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report
containing the results of the review conducted under subsection (a),
including--
(1) the findings of the Secretary relating to--
(A) the minimum rights in property that are
necessary to construct, operate, or maintain projects
for flood risk management, hurricane and storm risk
reduction, or environmental restoration;
(B) whether increased use of covered easements in
relation to such projects could promote greater
participation from cooperating landowners in addressing
local flooding or environmental restoration challenges;
(C) whether such increased use could result in cost
savings in the implementation of the projects, without
any reduction in project benefits; and
(D) whether such increased use is in the best
interest of the United States; and
(2) any recommendations of the Secretary relating to
whether existing requirements or procedures related to such use
of covered easements should be revised to reflect the results
of the review.
(c) Definition.--In this section, the term ``covered easement''
means an easement or other similar interest in real property that--
(1) reserves for the Secretary rights in the property that
are necessary to construct, operate, or maintain a water
resources development project;
(2) provides for appropriate public use of the property,
and retains the right of continued use of the property by the
owner of the property, to the extent such uses are consistent
with purposes of the covered easement;
(3) provides access to the property for oversight and
inspection by the Secretary;
(4) is permanently recorded; and
(5) is enforceable under Federal and State law.
SEC. 228. ASSESSMENT OF FOREST, RANGELAND, AND WATERSHED RESTORATION
SERVICES ON LANDS OWNED BY THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS.
(a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out an assessment of
forest, rangeland, and watershed restoration services on lands owned by
the Corps of Engineers, including an assessment of whether the
provision of such services on such lands by non-Federal interests
through good neighbor agreements would be in the best interests of the
United States.
(b) Considerations.--In carrying out the assessment under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall--
(1) describe the forest, rangeland, and watershed
restoration services provided by the Secretary on lands owned
by the Corps of Engineers;
(2) assess whether such services, including efforts to
reduce hazardous fuels and to restore and improve forest,
rangeland, and watershed health (including the health of fish
and wildlife habitats) would be enhanced by authorizing the
Secretary to enter into a good neighbor agreement with a non-
Federal interest;
(3) describe the process for ensuring that Federal
requirements for land management plans for forests on lands
owned by the Corps of Engineers remain in effect under good
neighbor agreements;
(4) assess whether Congress should authorize the Secretary
to enter into a good neighbor agreement with a non-Federal
interest to provide forest, rangeland, and watershed
restoration services on lands owned by the Corps of Engineers,
including by assessing any interest expressed by a non-Federal
interest to enter into such an agreement;
(5) consider whether implementation of a good neighbor
agreement on lands owned by the Corps of Engineers would
benefit State and local governments and Indian Tribes that are
located in the same geographic area as such lands; and
(6) consult with the heads of other Federal agencies
authorized to enter into good neighbor agreements with non-
Federal interests.
(c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and
make publicly available (including on a publicly available website), a
report describing the results of the assessment carried out under
subsection (a).
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Forest, rangeland, and watershed restoration
services.--The term ``forest, rangeland, and watershed
restoration services'' has the meaning given such term in
section 8206 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (16 U.S.C. 2113a).
(2) Good neighbor agreement.--The term ``good neighbor
agreement'' means a cooperative agreement or contract
(including a sole source contract) entered into between the
Secretary and a non-Federal interest to carry out forest,
rangeland, and watershed restoration services.
(3) Lands owned by the corps of engineers.--The term
``lands owned by the Corps of Engineers'' means any land owned
by the Corps of Engineers, but does not include--
(A) a component of the National Wilderness
Preservation System;
(B) land on which the removal of vegetation is
prohibited or restricted by law or Presidential
proclamation;
(C) a wilderness study area; or
(D) any other land with respect to which the
Secretary determines that forest, rangeland, and
watershed restoration services should remain the
responsibility of the Secretary.
SEC. 229. REPORT ON STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEM.
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this section,
the Secretary shall provide to the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the status of
the implementation of section 2040 of the Water Resources Development
Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2345).
SEC. 230. GAO STUDIES ON MITIGATION.
(a) Study on Mitigation for Water Resources Development Projects.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United
States shall conduct, and submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
Works of the Senate, a report on the results of a study on
projects and activities to mitigate fish and wildlife losses
resulting from the construction, or operation and maintenance,
of an authorized water resources development project.
(2) Requirements.--In conducting the study under paragraph
(1), the Comptroller General shall--
(A) investigate the extent to which--
(i) mitigation projects and activities
(including the acquisition of lands or
interests in lands) restore the natural
hydrologic conditions, restore native
vegetation, and otherwise support native fish
and wildlife species, as required under section
906 of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283);
(ii) mitigation projects or activities
(including the acquisition of lands or
interests in lands) are undertaken before, or
concurrent with, the construction of the
project;
(iii) mitigation projects or activities
(including the acquisition of lands or
interests in lands) are completed;
(iv) ongoing mitigation projects or
activities are undertaken to mitigate for fish
and wildlife losses from the operation and
maintenance of a project (including periodic
review and updating of such projects or
activities);
(v) the Secretary includes mitigation plans
(as required under subsection (d) of such
section 906) in any project study, as such term
is defined in section 2034(l) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C.
2343);
(vi) processing and approval of mitigation
projects and activities (including the
acquisition of lands or interests in lands)
affects the timeline of completion of projects;
and
(vii) mitigation projects and activities
(including the acquisition of lands or
interests in lands) affect the total cost of
projects;
(B) review any reports submitted to Congress in
accordance with section 2036(b) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1094) on the status
of construction of projects that require mitigation;
and
(C) consult with independent scientists,
economists, and other stakeholders with expertise and
experience.
(b) Study on the Compensatory Mitigation.--
(1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United
States shall conduct, and submit to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public
Works of the Senate, a report on the results of a study on
performance metrics for, compliance with, and adequacy in
addressing project impacts of, potential mechanisms for
fulfilling compensatory mitigation obligations pursuant to the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).
(2) Requirements.--The Comptroller General shall include in
the study under paragraph (1) an analysis of--
(A) the primary mechanisms for fulfilling
compensatory mitigation obligations, including--
(i) mitigation banks;
(ii) in-lieu fee programs; and
(iii) direct mitigation by permittees;
(B) the timeliness of initiation and successful
completion of compensatory mitigation activities in
relation to when the permitted activity occurs;
(C) the timeliness of processing and approval of
compensatory mitigation activities;
(D) the costs of carrying out compensatory
mitigation activities borne by the Federal government,
permittee, or any other involved entity;
(E) Federal and State agency oversight and short
and long-term monitoring of the compensatory mitigation
activities;
(F) whether the compensatory mitigation activity
successfully replaces any lost or adversely affected
habitat with habitat having similar functions of equal
or greater ecological value; and
(G) the continued, long-term success of the
compensatory mitigation activities over a 5-, 10-, 20-,
and 50-year period.
(3) Update.--In conjunction with the study under paragraph
(1), the Comptroller General shall review and update the
findings and recommendations, including a review of Federal
agency compliance with such recommendations, in the report of
the Comptroller General entitled, ``Corps of Engineers Does Not
Have an Effective Oversight Approach to Ensure That
Compensatory Mitigation Is Occurring'' and dated September 2005
(GAO-05-898).
SEC. 231. STUDY ON WATERBORNE STATISTICS.
(a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States
shall carry out a review of the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center
of the Corps of Engineers that includes--
(1) an assessment of ways in which the Waterborne Commerce
Statistics Center can improve the collection of information
relating to all commercial maritime activity within the
jurisdiction of a port, including the collection and reporting
of records of fish landings; and
(2) recommendations to improve the collection of such
information from non-Federal entities, taking into
consideration--
(A) the cost, efficiency, and accuracy of
collecting such information; and
(B) the protection of proprietary information.
(b) Report.--Upon completion of the review carried out under
subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a
report containing the results of such review.
TITLE III--DEAUTHORIZATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS
SEC. 301. DEAUTHORIZATION OF INACTIVE PROJECTS.
(a) Purposes; Proposed Deauthorization List; Submission of Final
List.--Section 301 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
U.S.C. 579-2) is amended by striking subsections (a) through (c) and
inserting the following:
``(a) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are--
``(1) to identify water resources development projects, and
separable elements of projects, authorized by Congress that are
no longer viable for construction due to--
``(A) a lack of local support;
``(B) a lack of available Federal or non-Federal
resources; or
``(C) an authorizing purpose that is no longer
relevant or feasible;
``(2) to create an expedited and definitive process for
Congress to deauthorize water resources development projects
and separable elements that are no longer viable for
construction; and
``(3) to allow the continued authorization of water
resources development projects and separable elements that are
viable for construction.
``(b) Proposed Deauthorization List.--
``(1) Preliminary list of projects.--
``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall develop a
preliminary list of each water resources development
project, or separable element of a project, authorized
for construction before November 8, 2007, for which--
``(i) planning, design, or construction was
not initiated before the date of enactment of
this Act; or
``(ii) planning, design, or construction
was initiated before the date of enactment of
this Act, but for which no funds, Federal or
non-Federal, were obligated for planning,
design, or construction of the project or
separable element of the project during the
current fiscal year or any of the 10 preceding
fiscal years.
``(B) Use of comprehensive construction backlog and
operation and maintenance report.--The Secretary may
develop the preliminary list from the comprehensive
construction backlog and operation and maintenance
reports developed pursuant to section 1001(b)(2) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C.
579a).
``(2) Preparation of proposed deauthorization list.--
``(A) Proposed list and estimated deauthorization
amount.--The Secretary shall--
``(i) prepare a proposed list of projects
for deauthorization comprised of a subset of
projects and separable elements identified on
the preliminary list developed under paragraph
(1) that are projects or separable elements
described in subsection (a)(1), as determined
by the Secretary; and
``(ii) include with such proposed list an
estimate, in the aggregate, of the Federal cost
to complete such projects.
``(B) Determination of federal cost to complete.--
For purposes of subparagraph (A), the Federal cost to
complete shall take into account any allowances
authorized by section 902 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280), as applied to
the most recent project schedule and cost estimate.
``(3) Public comment and consultation.--
``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall solicit
comments from the public and the Governors of each
applicable State on the proposed deauthorization list
prepared under paragraph (2)(A).
``(B) Comment period.--The public comment period
shall be 90 days.
``(4) Preparation of final deauthorization list.--
``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall prepare a
final deauthorization list by--
``(i) considering any comments received
under paragraph (3); and
``(ii) revising the proposed
deauthorization list prepared under paragraph
(2)(A) as the Secretary determines necessary to
respond to such comments.
``(B) Appendix.--The Secretary shall include as
part of the final deauthorization list an appendix
that--
``(i) identifies each project or separable
element on the proposed deauthorization list
that is not included on the final
deauthorization list; and
``(ii) describes the reasons why the
project or separable element is not included on
the final deauthorization list.
``(c) Submission of Final Deauthorization List to Congress for
Congressional Review; Publication.--
``(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of
the close of the comment period under subsection (b)(3), the
Secretary shall--
``(A) submit the final deauthorization list and
appendix prepared under subsection (b)(4) to the
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the
House of Representatives and the Committee on
Environment and Public Works of the Senate; and
``(B) publish the final deauthorization list and
appendix in the Federal Register.
``(2) Exclusions.--The Secretary shall not include in the
final deauthorization list submitted under paragraph (1) any
project or separable element with respect to which Federal
funds for planning, design, or construction are obligated after
the development of the preliminary list under subsection
(b)(1)(A) but prior to the submission of the final
deauthorization list under paragraph (1)(A) of this
subsection.''.
(b) Repeal.--Section 301(d) of the Water Resources Development Act
of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 579-2(b)) is repealed.
SEC. 302. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.
Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
U.S.C. 2267a) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the
end;
(B) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the
end and inserting a semicolon; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
``(7) sea level rise;
``(8) coastal storm damage reduction; and
``(9) streambank and shoreline protection.''; and
(2) in subsection (d)--
(A) in paragraph (9), by striking ``and'' at the
end;
(B) in paragraph (10), by striking the period at
the end and inserting a semicolon; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
``(11) New York-New Jersey Watershed Basin, which
encompasses all the watersheds that flow into the New York-New
Jersey Harbor and their associated estuaries, including the
Hudson, Mohawk, Raritan, Passaic, Hackensack, and Bronx River
Watersheds and the Hudson River Estuary;
``(12) Mississippi River Watershed; and
``(13) Chattahoochee River Basin, Alabama, Florida, and
Georgia.''.
SEC. 303. FORECAST-INFORMED RESERVOIR OPERATIONS.
(a) Additional Utilization of Forecast-Informed Reservoir
Operations.--Section 1222(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of
2018 (132 Stat. 3811; 134 Stat. 2661) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``the Upper Missouri
River Basin and the North Platte River Basin'' and inserting
``the Upper Missouri River Basin, the North Platte River Basin,
and the Apalachicola Chattahoochee Flint River Basin''; and
(2) in paragraph (2)--
(A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``the Upper
Missouri River Basin or the North Platte River Basin''
and inserting ``the Upper Missouri River Basin, the
North Platte River Basin, or the Apalachicola
Chattahoochee Flint River Basin''; and
(B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``the Upper
Missouri River Basin or the North Platte River Basin''
and inserting ``the Upper Missouri River Basin, the
North Platte River Basin, or the Apalachicola
Chattahoochee Flint River Basin''.
(b) Completion of Reports.--The Secretary shall expedite completion
of the reports authorized by section 1222 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3811; 134 Stat. 2661).
SEC. 304. LAKES PROGRAM.
Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100
Stat. 4148; 104 Stat. 4646; 110 Stat. 3758; 113 Stat. 295; 121 Stat.
1076; 134 Stat. 2703) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (29), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (30), by striking the period at the end
and inserting a semicolon; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(31) Salisbury Pond, Worcester, Massachusetts;
``(32) Baisley Pond, New York;
``(33) Legacy Park, Decatur, Georgia; and
``(34) White Rock Lake, Dallas, Texas.''.
SEC. 305. INVASIVE SPECIES.
(a) Aquatic Invasive Species Research.--Section 1108(a) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (33 U.S.C. 2263a(a)) is amended
by inserting ``, hydrilla'' after ``elodea''.
(b) Harmful Algal Bloom Demonstration Program.--Section 128(c) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 610 note) is
amended to read as follows:
``(c) Focus Areas.--In carrying out the demonstration program under
subsection (a), the Secretary shall undertake program activities
related to harmful algal blooms in--
``(1) the Great Lakes;
``(2) the tidal and inland waters of the State of New
Jersey, including Lake Hopatcong, New Jersey;
``(3) the coastal and tidal waters of the State of
Louisiana;
``(4) the waterways of the counties that comprise the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California;
``(5) the Allegheny Reservoir Watershed, New York;
``(6) Lake Okeechobee, Florida;
``(7) Lake Sidney Lanier, Georgia;
``(8) Rio Grande River Basin, Colorado, New Mexico, and
Texas;
``(9) Detroit Lake, Oregon; and
``(10) Ten Mile Lake, Oregon.''.
(c) Update on Invasive Species Policy Guidance.--Section 501(b) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33 U.S.C. 610 note) is
amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and
inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.''.
SEC. 306. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.
(a) New York Harbor, New York and New Jersey.--The New York Harbor
collection and removal of drift project authorized by section 2 of the
Act of March 4, 1915 (38 Stat. 1051; 88 Stat. 39; 104 Stat. 4615), and
deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and
Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), is authorized to be carried
out by the Secretary.
(b) Guanajibo River, Puerto Rico.--The project for flood control,
Guanajibo River, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 101 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), and deauthorized
pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development
Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), is authorized to be carried out by the
Secretary.
(c) Rio Nigua, Salinas, Puerto Rico.--The project for flood
control, Rio Nigua, Salinas, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 101 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 278), and
deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and
Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), is authorized to be carried
out by the Secretary.
(d) Rio Grande De Loiza, Puerto Rico.--The project for flood
control, Rio Grande De Loiza, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 101 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), and
deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and
Development Act of 2014 (128 Stat. 1345), is authorized to be carried
out by the Secretary.
SEC. 307. LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
(a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in
Los Angeles County, California.
(b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development
projects in Los Angeles County, California, including projects for
wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and related
facilities, environmental restoration, and surface water resource
protection and development.
(c) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
(d) Partnership Agreements.--
(1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this
section to a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall enter
into a partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with the non-Federal
interest with respect to the project to be carried out with
such assistance.
(2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project
entered into under this subsection shall provide for the
following:
(A) Development by the Secretary, in consultation
with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a
facilities or resource protection and development plan,
including appropriate engineering plans and
specifications.
(B) Establishment of such legal and institutional
structures as are necessary to ensure the effective
long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal
interest.
(3) Cost sharing.--
(A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a
project under this section--
(i) shall be 75 percent; and
(ii) may be provided in the form of grants
or reimbursements of project costs.
(B) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the
funding of the Federal share of a project that is the
subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable
interest incurred in providing the non-Federal share of
the project cost.
(C) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
way.--Notwithstanding section 221(a)(4)(G) of the Flood
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)(G)), the
non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land,
easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the
non-Federal share of project cost (including all
reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits
necessary for the construction, operation, and
maintenance of the project on publicly owned or
controlled land), but the credit may not exceed 25
percent of total project costs.
(D) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal
share of operation and maintenance costs for projects
constructed with assistance provided under this section
shall be 100 percent.
(e) Authorization of Appropriations.--
(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated
$50,000,000 to carry out this section.
(2) Corps of engineers expenses.--Not more than 10 percent
of the amounts made available to carry out this section may be
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer
projects under this section at Federal expense.
SEC. 308. DEAUTHORIZATION OF DESIGNATED PORTIONS OF THE LOS ANGELES
COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIFORNIA.
(a) In General.--The portion of the project for flood risk
management, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, California, authorized by
section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1936 (49 Stat. 1589; 50 Stat.
167; 52 Stat. 1215; 55 Stat. 647; 64 Stat. 177), consisting of the
debris basins described in subsection (b), is no longer authorized
beginning on the date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of
this Act.
(b) Debris Basins Described.--The debris basins referred to in
subsection (a) are the following debris basins operated and maintained
by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District: Auburn Debris Basin,
Bailey Debris Basin, Big Dalton Debris Basin, Blanchard Canyon Debris
Basin, Blue Gum Canyon Debris Basin, Brand Canyon Debris Basin, Carter
Debris Basin, Childs Canyon Debris Basin, Dunsmuir Canyon Debris Basin,
Eagle Canyon Debris Basin, Eaton Walsh Debris Basin, Elmwood Canyon
Debris Basin, Emerald East Debris Basin, Emerald West Debris Retention
Inlet, Hay Debris Basin, Hillcrest Debris Basin, La Tuna Canyon Debris
Basin, Little Dalton Debris Basin, Live Oak Debris Retention Inlet,
Lopez Debris Retention Inlet, Lower Sunset Canyon Debris Basin,
Marshall Canyon Debris Retention Inlet, Santa Anita Debris Basin,
Sawpit Debris Basin, Schoolhouse Canyon Debris Basin, Shields Canyon
Debris Basin, Sierra Madre Villa Debris Basin, Snover Canyon Debris
Basin, Stough Canyon Debris Basin, Wilson Canyon Debris Basin, and
Winery Canyon Debris Basin.
SEC. 309. SAN FRANCISCO BAY, CALIFORNIA.
(a) Technical Amendment.--Section 203(a)(1)(A) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2675) is amended by
striking ``ocean shoreline'' and inserting ``bay and ocean
shorelines''.
(b) Implementation.--In carrying out a study under section 142 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2930; 100 Stat.
4158), pursuant to section 203(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2020 (as amended by this section), the Secretary
shall not differentiate between damages related to high tide flooding
and coastal storm flooding for the purposes of determining the Federal
interest or cost share.
SEC. 310. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN.
(a) Study of Flood Risk Management Activities.--
(1) In general.--Using funds made available to carry out
this section, the Secretary is authorized, at Federal expense,
to carry out a study to determine the feasibility of a project
for flood risk management and related purposes in the Columbia
River basin and to report to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the
Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate with
recommendations thereon, including recommendations for a
project to potentially reduce the reliance on Canada for flood
risk management in the basin.
(2) Coordination.--The Secretary shall carry out the
activities described in this subsection in coordination with
other Federal and State agencies and Indian Tribes.
(b) Funds for Columbia River Treaty Obligations.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to expend
funds appropriated for the purpose of satisfying United States
obligations under the Columbia River Treaty to compensate
Canada for operating Canadian storage on behalf of the United
States under such Treaty.
(2) Notification.--If the U.S. entity calls upon Canada to
operate Canadian reservoir storage for flood risk management on
behalf of the United States, which operation may incur an
obligation to compensate Canada under the Columbia River
Treaty--
(A) the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on
Transportation and Infrastructure and Appropriations of
the House of Representatives and the Committees on
Environment and Public Works and Appropriations of the
Senate, by not later than 30 days after the initiation
of the call, a written notice of the action and a
justification, including a description of the
circumstances necessitating the call;
(B) upon a determination by the United States of
the amount of compensation that shall be paid to
Canada, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on
Transportation and Infrastructure and Appropriations of
the House of Representatives and the Committees on
Environment and Public Works and Appropriations of the
Senate a written notice specifying such amount and an
explanation of how such amount was derived, which
notification shall not delay or impede the flood risk
management mission of the U.S. entity; and
(C) the Secretary shall make no payment to Canada
for the call under the Columbia River Treaty until such
time as funds appropriated for the purpose of
compensating Canada under such Treaty are available.
(3) Definitions.--In this section:
(A) Columbia river basin.--The term ``Columbia
River basin'' means the entire United States portion of
the Columbia River watershed.
(B) Columbia river treaty.--The term ``Columbia
River Treaty'' means the Treaty relating to cooperative
development of the water resources of the Columbia
River Basin, signed at Washington January 17, 1961, and
entered into force September 16, 1964.
(C) U.S. entity.--The term ``U.S. entity'' means
the entity designated by the United States under
Article XIV of the Columbia River Treaty.
SEC. 311. PORT EVERGLADES, FLORIDA.
Section 1401(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 (130
Stat. 1709) is amended, in row 4 (relating to the project for
navigation, Port Everglades, Florida)--
(1) by striking ``$229,770,000'' and inserting
``$561,455,000'';
(2) by striking ``$107,233,000'' and inserting
``$361,302,000''; and
(3) by striking ``$337,003,000'' and inserting
``$922,757,000''.
SEC. 312. SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION TASK FORCE.
Section 528(f)(1)(J) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
(110 Stat. 3771) is amended by striking ``2 representatives of the
State of Florida,'' and inserting ``3 representatives of the State of
Florida, including at least 1 representative of the Florida Department
of Environmental Protection and 1 representative of the Florida Fish
and Wildlife Conservation Commission,''.
SEC. 313. CHICAGO SHORELINE PROTECTION.
The project for storm damage reduction and shoreline erosion
protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the
Illinois-Indiana State line, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), is modified
to authorize the Secretary to provide 65 percent of the cost of the
locally preferred plan, as described in the Report of the Chief of
Engineers dated April 14, 1994, for the construction of the following
segments of the project:
(1) Shoreline revetment at Morgan Shoal.
(2) Shoreline revetment at Promontory Point.
SEC. 314. GREAT LAKES AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER INTERBASIN PROJECT, BRANDON
ROAD, WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
Section 402(a)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020
(134 Stat. 2742) is amended by striking ``80 percent'' and inserting
``90 percent''.
SEC. 315. SOUTHEAST DES MOINES LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA.
(a) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) City.--The term ``City'' means the city of Des Moines,
Iowa.
(2) Flood protection project.--The term ``Flood Protection
Project'' means the project on the Des Moines River for local
flood protection of Des Moines, Iowa, authorized by the Act of
December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 896).
(3) Red rock dam project.--The term ``Red Rock Dam
Project'' means the project for the Red Rock Dam on the Des
Moines River for flood control and other purposes, authorized
by the Act of December 22, 1944 (chapter 665, 58 Stat. 896).
(b) Project Modifications.--The Red Rock Dam Project and the Flood
Protection Project shall be modified as follows, subject to a new or
amended agreement between the Secretary and the City, in accordance
with section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b):
(1) That portion of the Red Rock Dam Project consisting of
the segment of levee from Station 15+88.8W to Station 77+43.7W
shall be transferred to the Flood Protection Project.
(2) The relocated levee improvement constructed by the
City, from Station 77+43.7W to approximately Station 20+00,
shall be included in the Flood Protection Project.
(c) Federal Easement Conveyances.--
(1) Flood protection easements.--The Secretary is
authorized to convey, without consideration, to the City the
following easements to become part of the Flood Protection
Project in accordance with subsection (b):
(A) Easements identified as Tracts 3215E-1, 3235E,
and 3227E.
(B) Easements identified as Partial Tracts 3216E-2,
3216E-3, 3217E-1, and 3217E-2.
(2) Additional easements.--The Secretary is authorized to
convey, without consideration, to the City or to the Des Moines
Metropolitan Wastewater Reclamation Authority the following
easements:
(A) Easements identified as Tracts 3200E, 3202E-1,
3202E-2, 3202E-4, 3203E-2, 3215E-3, 3216E-1, and 3216E-
5.
(B) Easements identified as Partial Tracts 3216E-2,
3216E-3, 3217E-1, and 3217E-2.
(3) Costs.--An entity to which a conveyance is made under
this subsection shall be responsible for all administrative
costs associated with the conveyance.
SEC. 316. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT STUDY.
Section 213 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (134
Stat. 2684) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(j) Cost-Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the
comprehensive study carried out under subsection (a), and any
feasibility study carried out under subsection (e), shall be 100
percent.''.
SEC. 317. LOWER MISSOURI RIVER STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL EVALUATION
AND DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS.
(a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out
streambank erosion control evaluation and demonstration projects in the
Lower Missouri River through contracts with non-Federal interests,
including projects for streambank protection and stabilization.
(b) Area.--The Secretary shall carry out demonstration projects
under this section on the reach of the Missouri River between Sioux
City, Iowa, and the confluence of the Missouri River and the
Mississippi River.
(c) Requirements.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary
shall--
(1) conduct an evaluation of the extent of streambank
erosion on the Lower Missouri River; and
(2) develop new methods and techniques for streambank
protection, research soil stability, and identify the causes of
erosion.
(d) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of enactment of
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Environment of the Senate a report describing the results of the
demonstration projects carried out under this section, including any
recommendations for methods to prevent and correct streambank erosion.
(e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000, to remain available
until expended.
(f) Sunset.--The authority of the Secretary to enter into contracts
under subsection (a) shall expire on the date that is 5 years after the
date of enactment of this Act.
SEC. 318. MISSOURI RIVER INTERCEPTION-REARING COMPLEXES.
(a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 129 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2020 (134 Stat. 2643), and subject to subsection
(b), the Secretary is authorized to carry out the construction of an
interception-rearing complex at each of Plowboy Bend A (River Mile:
174.5 to 173.2) and Pelican Bend B (River Mile: 15.8 to 13.4) on the
Missouri River.
(b) Analysis and Mitigation of Risk.--
(1) Analysis.--Prior to construction of the interception-
rearing complexes under subsection (a), the Secretary shall
perform an analysis to identify whether the interception-
rearing complexes will--
(A) contribute to an increased risk of flooding to
adjacent lands and properties, including local levees;
(B) affect the navigation channel, including
crossflows, velocity, channel depth, and channel width;
(C) affect the harvesting of sand;
(D) affect ports and harbors; or
(E) contribute to bank erosion on adjacent private
lands.
(2) Mitigation.--The Secretary may not construct an
interception-rearing complex under subsection (a) until the
Secretary successfully mitigates any effects described in
paragraph (1) with respect to such interception-rearing
complex.
(c) Study.--Not later than 1 year after completion of the
construction of the interception-rearing complexes under subsection
(a), the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report describing the
extent to which the construction of such interception-rearing complexes
affected the population recovery of pallid sturgeon in the Missouri
River.
SEC. 319. MISSOURI RIVER MITIGATION PROJECT, MISSOURI, KANSAS, IOWA,
AND NEBRASKA.
Section 334 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113
Stat. 306) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(c) Use of Other Funds.--Any acres acquired using Federal funds
for purposes described in subsection (a) shall be considered toward the
total number of acres required under such subsection, regardless of the
source of the Federal funds.''.
SEC. 320. NORTHERN MISSOURI.
(a) Northern Missouri Defined.--In this section, the term
``Northern Missouri'' means the counties of Buchanan, Marion, Platte,
and Clay, Missouri.
(b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in
Northern Missouri.
(c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development
projects in Northern Missouri, including projects for wastewater
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities,
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and
development.
(d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
(e) Partnership Agreements.--
(1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this
section to a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall enter
into a partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with the non-Federal
interest with respect to the project to be carried out with
such assistance.
(2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project
entered into under this subsection shall provide for the
following:
(A) Development by the Secretary, in consultation
with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a
facilities or resource protection and development plan,
including appropriate engineering plans and
specifications.
(B) Establishment of such legal and institutional
structures as are necessary to ensure the effective
long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal
interest.
(3) Cost sharing.--
(A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a
project carried out under this section--
(i) shall be 75 percent; and
(ii) may be provided in the form of grants
or reimbursements of project costs.
(B) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the
funding of the Federal share of a project that is the
subject of a partnership agreement under this section,
the non-Federal interest shall receive credit for
reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
Federal share of the project cost.
(C) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
way.--Notwithstanding section 221(a)(4)(G) of the Flood
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)(G)), the
non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land,
easements, and rights-of-way, and relocations toward
the non-Federal share of project cost (including all
reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits
necessary for the construction, operation, and
maintenance of the project on publicly owned or
controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25
percent of total project costs.
(D) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal
share of operation and maintenance costs for projects
constructed with assistance provided under this section
shall be 100 percent.
(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--
(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated
$50,000,000 to carry out this section.
(2) Corps of engineers expenses.--Not more than 10 percent
of the amounts made available to carry out this section may be
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer
projects under this section at Federal expense.
SEC. 321. ISRAEL RIVER, LANCASTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.
The project for flood control, Israel River, Lancaster, New
Hampshire, carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is no longer authorized beginning on the date of
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 322. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NEW
MEXICO.
The non-Federal share of the cost of the project for flood risk
management, Middle Rio Grande, Bernalillo to Belen, New Mexico,
authorized by section 401(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of
2020 (134 Stat. 2735), shall be 25 percent.
SEC. 323. SOUTHWESTERN OREGON.
(a) Southwestern Oregon Defined.--In this section, the term
``Southwestern Oregon'' means the counties of Benton, Coos, Curry,
Douglas, Lane, Linn, and Josephine, Oregon.
(b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in
Southwestern Oregon.
(c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under this section may
be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development
projects in Southwestern Oregon, including projects for wastewater
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities,
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and
development.
(d) Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide assistance
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned.
(e) Partnership Agreements.--
(1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this
section to a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall enter
into a partnership agreement under section 221 of the Flood
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) with the non-Federal
interest with respect to the project to be carried out with
such assistance.
(2) Requirements.--Each partnership agreement for a project
entered into under this subsection shall provide for the
following:
(A) Development by the Secretary, in consultation
with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a
facilities or resource protection and development plan,
including appropriate engineering plans and
specifications.
(B) Establishment of such legal and institutional
structures as are necessary to ensure the effective
long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal
interest.
(3) Cost sharing.--
(A) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of a
project carried out under this section--
(i) shall be 75 percent; and
(ii) may be provided in the form of grants
or reimbursements of project costs.
(B) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the
funding of the Federal share of a project that is the
subject of a partnership agreement under this section,
the non-Federal interest shall receive credit for
reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
Federal share of the project cost.
(C) Credit for land, easements, and rights-of-
way.--Notwithstanding section 221(a)(4)(G) of the Flood
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)(G)), the
non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land,
easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the
non-Federal share of project cost (including all
reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits
necessary for the construction, operation, and
maintenance of the project on publicly owned or
controlled land), but such credit may not exceed 25
percent of total project costs.
(D) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal
share of operation and maintenance costs for projects
constructed with assistance provided under this section
shall be 100 percent.
(f) Authorization of Appropriations.--
(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated
$50,000,000 to carry out this section.
(2) Corps of engineers expense.--Not more than 10 percent
of the amounts made available to carry out this section may be
used by the Corps of Engineers district offices to administer
projects under this section at Federal expense.
SEC. 324. WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TENNESSEE.
Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the project for
navigation, Wolf River Harbor, Tennessee, authorized by the Act of
August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49 Stat. 1034), is modified to reduce, in
part, the authorized dimensions of the project, such that the remaining
authorized dimensions are as follows:
(1) A 250-foot-wide, 9-foot-depth channel with a center
line beginning at an approximate point of 35.139634, -90.062343
and extending approximately 1,300 feet to an approximate point
of 35.142077, -90.059107.
(2) A 200-foot-wide, 9-foot-depth channel with a center
line beginning at an approximate point of 35.142077, -90.059107
and extending approximately 1,800 feet to an approximate point
of 35.1467861, -90.057003.
(3) A 250-foot-wide, 9-foot-depth channel with a center
line beginning at an approximate point of 35.148791, -90.05642
and extending approximately 5,550 feet to an approximate point
of 35.160848, -90.050566.
SEC. 325. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TEXAS.
The Secretary is authorized to provide, pursuant to section 206 of
the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a), information and advice
to non-Federal interests on the removal of sediment obstructing inflow
channels to the Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, authorized pursuant to
the project for Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries, Texas, under section
3a of the Act of August 11, 1939 (chapter 699, 53 Stat. 1414; 68 Stat.
1258).
SEC. 326. WATER LEVEL MANAGEMENT PILOT PROJECT ON THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI
RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATERWAY SYSTEM.
(a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out a pilot project on
water level management, as part of the operations and maintenance of
the 9-foot channel projects of the Upper Mississippi River and Illinois
Waterway System, to help redress the degrading influences of prolonged
inundation or sedimentation on such projects, and to improve the
quality and quantity of habitat available for fish and wildlife.
(b) Conditions on Drawdowns.--In carrying out the pilot project
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall carry out routine and
systemic water level drawdowns of the pools created by the Upper
Mississippi River and Illinois Waterway System locks and dams,
including drawdowns during the growing season, when--
(1) hydrologic conditions allow the Secretary to carry out
a drawdown within applicable dam operating plans; or
(2) hydrologic conditions allow the Secretary to carry out
a drawdown and sufficient funds are available to the Secretary
to carry out any additional activities that may be required to
ensure that the drawdown does not adversely affect navigation.
(c) Coordination and Notification.--
(1) Coordination.--The Secretary shall use existing
coordination and consultation processes to regularly consult
with other relevant Federal agencies and States regarding the
planning and assessment of water level management actions
implemented under this section.
(2) Notification.--Prior to carrying out any water level
management plan pursuant to this section, the Secretary shall
provide notice to the public and to navigation interests and
other interested stakeholders.
(d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Upper Mississippi
River and Illinois Waterway System'' has the meaning given that term in
section 8001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C.
652 note).
SEC. 327. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER PROTECTION.
Section 2010 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of
2014 (128 Stat. 1270; 132 Stat. 3812) is amended by adding at the end
the following:
``(f) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not recommend
deauthorization of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam pursuant to
the disposition study carried out under subsection (d) unless the
Secretary identifies a willing and capable non-Federal public entity to
assume ownership of the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam.
``(g) Modification.--The Secretary is authorized to investigate the
feasibility of modifying, prior to deauthorizing, the Upper St. Anthony
Falls Lock and Dam to add ecosystem restoration, including the
prevention and control of invasive species, water supply, and
recreation as authorized purposes.''.
SEC. 328. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN BENEFITS AND COSTS.
Section 152(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (33
U.S.C. 2213a(a)) is amended by striking ``a flood risk management
project that incidentally generates seismic safety benefits in
regions'' and inserting ``a flood risk management or coastal storm risk
management project in a region''.
SEC. 329. DEBRIS REMOVAL.
Section 3 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), is amended
by striking ``or recreation'' and inserting ``ecosystem restoration, or
recreation''.
SEC. 330. GENERAL REAUTHORIZATIONS.
(a) Levee Safety Initiative.--Section 9005(g)(2)(E)(i) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3303a(g)(2)(E)(i)) is
amended by striking ``2023'' and inserting ``2026''.
(b) Transfer of Excess Credit.--Section 1020 of the Water Resources
Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2223) is amended--
(1) in subsection (d), by striking ``10 years after the
date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``on December 31,
2026''; and
(2) in subsection (e), by striking ``10 years after the
date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``on December 31,
2026''.
(c) Rehabilitation of Existing Levees.--Section 3017(e) of the
Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 3303a
note) is amended by striking ``the date that is 10 years after the date
of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``December 31, 2026''.
(d) Invasive Species in Alpine Lakes Pilot Project.--Section 507(c)
of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020 (16 U.S.C. 4701 note) is
amended by striking ``2024'' and inserting ``2026''.
(e) Environmental Banks.--Section 309(e) of the Coastal Wetlands
Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 3957(e)) is amended
by striking ``10'' and inserting ``12''.
SEC. 331. CONVEYANCES.
(a) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
(1) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage
and the legal description of any real property or easement to
be conveyed under this section shall be determined by a survey
that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
(2) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply
to any conveyance under this section.
(3) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance
is made under this section shall be responsible for all
reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate
transaction and environmental documentation costs, associated
with the conveyance.
(4) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made
under this section shall hold the United States harmless from
any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or
after the date of the conveyance, on the real property
conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any
liability with respect to activities carried out, before such
date, on the real property conveyed.
(5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may
require that any conveyance under this section be subject to
such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers
necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the
United States.
(b) Rogers County, Oklahoma.--
(1) Conveyance authorized.--The Secretary is authorized to
convey to the City of Tulsa-Rogers County Port Authority, all
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the
real property described in paragraph (2).
(2) Property.--The property to be conveyed under this
subsection is the approximately 19 acres of Federal land
located on the following 3 parcels in Rogers County, Oklahoma:
(A) Parcel 1 consists of U.S. tract 119 (partial),
U.S. tract 123, U.S. tract 120, U.S. tract 125, and
U.S. tract 118 (partial).
(B) Parcel 2 consists of U.S. tract 124 (partial)
and U.S. tract 128 (partial).
(C) Parcel 3 consists of U.S. tract 128 (partial).
(3) Reservation of rights.--The Secretary shall reserve and
retain from any conveyance under this subsection such
easements, rights-of-way, and other interests that the
Secretary determines to be necessary and appropriate to ensure
the continued operation of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River
navigation project (including Newt Graham Lock and Dam 18)
authorized under the comprehensive plan for the Arkansas River
Basin by the Act of June 28, 1938 (chapter 795, 52 Stat. 1218;
60 Stat. 634; 60 Stat. 647; 101 Stat. 1329-112; 117 Stat.
1842).
(4) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and
conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect
the interests of the United States.
(5) Consideration.--The City of Tulsa-Rogers County Port
Authority shall pay to the Secretary an amount that is not less
than the fair market value of the property conveyed under this
subsection, as determined by the Secretary.
(c) Regional Corps of Engineers Office, Corpus Christi, Texas.--
(1) Conveyance authorized.--At such time as new facilities
are available to be used as the office for the Galveston
District of the Corps of Engineers, the Secretary shall convey
to the Port of Corpus Christi, all right, title, and interest
of the United States in and to the property described in
paragraph (2).
(2) Description of property.--The property referred to in
paragraph (1) is the land known as ``Tract 100'' and ``Tract
101'', including improvements on that land, in Corpus Christi,
Texas, and described as follows:
(A) Tract 100.--The 1.89 acres, more or less, as
conveyed by the Nueces County Navigation District No. 1
of Nueces County, Texas, to the United States by
instrument dated October 16, 1928, and recorded at
Volume 193, pages 1 and 2, in the Deed Records of
Nueces County, Texas.
(B) Tract 101.--The 0.53 acres as conveyed by the
City of Corpus Christi, Nueces County, Texas, to the
United States by instrument dated September 24, 1971,
and recorded at Volume 318, pages 523 and 524, in the
Deed Records of Nueces County, Texas.
(C) Improvements.--
(i) Main Building (RPUID AO-C-3516),
constructed January 9, 1974.
(ii) Garage, vehicle with 5 bays (RPUID AO-
C-3517), constructed January 9, 1985.
(iii) Bulkhead, Upper (RPUID AO-C-2658),
constructed January 1, 1941.
(iv) Bulkhead, Lower (RPUID AO-C-3520),
constructed January 1, 1933.
(v) Bulkhead Fence (RPUID AO-C-3521),
constructed January 9, 1985.
(vi) Bulkhead Fence (RPUID AO-C-3522),
constructed January 9, 1985.
(3) Deed.--The Secretary shall convey the property under
this subsection by quitclaim deed under such terms and
conditions as the Secretary determines appropriate to protect
the interests of the United States.
(4) Consideration.--The Port of Corpus Christi shall pay to
the Secretary an amount that is not less than the fair market
value of the property (including improvements) conveyed under
this subsection, as determined by the Secretary.
SEC. 332. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
(a) New Projects.--Section 219(f) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1258)
is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(274) Chandler, arizona.--$18,750,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the city of Chandler, Arizona.
``(275) Pinal county, arizona.--$40,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in Pinal County, Arizona.
``(276) Tempe, arizona.--$37,500,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation and
groundwater recharge, for the City of Tempe, Arizona.
``(277) Bell gardens, california.--$12,500,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling and
water supply, in the city of Bell Gardens, California.
``(278) Calimesa, california.--$3,500,000 for stormwater
management and water supply infrastructure, including
groundwater recharge and water recycling, in the city of
Calimesa, California.
``(279) Compton creek, california.--$6,165,000 for
stormwater management infrastructure in the vicinity of Compton
Creek, city of Compton, California.
``(280) Downey, california.--$100,000,000 for water
infrastructure, including water supply, in the city of Downey,
California.
``(281) Lomita, california.--$4,716,600 for stormwater
management infrastructure in the city of Lomita, California.
``(282) East san diego county, california.--$70,000,000 for
water and wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling
and water supply, in East County, San Diego County, California.
``(283) Eastern los angeles county, california.--
$25,000,000 for the planning, design, and construction of water
and wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling and
water supply, for the cities of Azusa, Baldwin Park, Covina,
Duarte, El Monte, Glendora, Industry, Irwindale, La Puente, La
Verne, Monrovia, San Dimas, and West Covina, and for Avocado
Heights, Bassett, and Valinda, California.
``(284) Escondido creek, california.--$34,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
in the vicinity of Escondido Creek, city of Escondido,
California.
``(285) Fontana, california.--$16,000,000 for stormwater
management infrastructure in the city of Fontana, California.
``(286) Healdsburg, california.--$23,500,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling and water
supply, in the city of Healdsburg, California.
``(287) Inland empire, california.--$60,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in
Riverside County and San Bernardino County, California.
``(288) Marin county, california.--$28,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in Marin
County, California.
``(289) Maywood, california.--$10,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure in the city of Maywood, California.
``(290) Monterey peninsula, california.--$20,000,000 for
water and wastewater infrastructure and water supply, on the
Monterey Peninsula, California.
``(291) North richmond, california.--$45,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including coastal flooding
resilience measures for such infrastructure, in North Richmond,
California.
``(292) Ontario, california.--$40,700,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling and water
supply, in the city of Ontario, California.
``(293) Paramount, california.--$20,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the city of Paramount, California.
``(294) Petaluma, california.--$13,700,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water recycling, in the
city of Petaluma, California.
``(295) Rialto, california.--$27,500,000 for wastewater
infrastructure in the city of Rialto, California.
``(296) Rincon reservation, california.--$38,000,000 for
water and wastewater infrastructure on the Rincon Band of
Luiseno Indians reservation, California.
``(297) Sacramento-san joaquin delta, california.--
$50,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including
stormwater management, and water supply, in Contra Costa
County, San Joaquin County, Solano County, Sacramento County,
and Yolo County, California.
``(298) South san francisco, california.--$270,000,000 for
water and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater
management and water recycling, at the San Francisco
International Airport, California.
``(299) San joaquin and stanislaus, california.--
$200,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including
stormwater management, and water supply, in San Joaquin County
and Stanislaus County, California.
``(300) Santa rosa, california.--$19,400,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, in the city of Santa Rosa,
California.
``(301) Sierra madre, california.--$20,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure and water supply, including
earthquake resilience measures for such infrastructure and
water supply, in the city of Sierra Madre, California.
``(302) Smith river, california.--$25,000,000 for
wastewater infrastructure in Howonquet Village and Resort and
Tolowa Dee-ni' Nation, Smith River, California.
``(303) Torrance, california.--$100,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including groundwater recharge and
water supply, in the city of Torrance, California.
``(304) Western contra costa county, california.--
$15,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, in the cities of
Pinole, San Pablo, and Richmond, and in El Sobrante,
California.
``(305) Hebron, connecticut.--$3,700,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the town of Hebron, Connecticut.
``(306) New london, connecticut.--$16,000,000 for
wastewater infrastructure in the town of Bozrah and the City of
Norwich, Connecticut.
``(307) Windham, connecticut.--$18,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the town of Windham, Connecticut.
``(308) New castle, delaware.--$35,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
New Castle County, Delaware.
``(309) Washington, district of columbia.--$1,000,000 for
water and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater
management, in Washington, District of Columbia.
``(310) Longboat key, florida.--$12,750,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the town of Longboat Key, Florida.
``(311) Martin, st. lucie, and palm beach counties,
florida.--$100,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure,
including stormwater management, to improve water quality in
the St. Lucie River, Indian River Lagoon, and Lake Worth Lagoon
in Martin County, St. Lucie County, and Palm Beach County,
Florida.
``(312) Polk county, florida.--$10,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Polk
County, Florida.
``(313) Okeechobee county, florida.--$20,000,000 for
wastewater infrastructure in Okeechobee County, Florida.
``(314) Orange county, florida.--$50,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation and
water supply, in Orange County, Florida.
``(315) Guam.--$10,000,000 for water and wastewater
infrastructure, in Guam.
``(316) County of hawai`i, hawaii.--$20,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
in the County of Hawai`i, Hawaii.
``(317) Honolulu, hawaii.--$20,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii.
``(318) Kaua`i, hawaii.--$20,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the County of Kaua`i, Hawaii.
``(319) Maui, hawaii.--$20,000,000 for water and wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the County
of Maui, Hawaii.
``(320) Dixmoor, illinois.--$15,000,000 for water and water
supply infrastructure in the village of Dixmoor, Illinois.
``(321) Forest park, illinois.--$10,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the village
of Forest Park, Illinois.
``(322) Lake county, illinois.--$10,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Lake
County, Illinois.
``(323) Lemont, illinois.--$3,135,000 for water
infrastructure in the village of Lemont, Illinois.
``(324) Lockport, illinois.--$6,550,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of
Lockport, Illinois.
``(325) Montgomery and christian counties, illinois.--
$30,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure, including
water supply, in Montgomery County and Christian County,
Illinois.
``(326) Will county, illinois.--$30,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
Will County, Illinois.
``(327) Orleans parish, louisiana.--$100,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure in Orleans Parish, Louisiana.
``(328) Fitchburg, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
(including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Fitchburg,
Massachusetts.
``(329) Haverhill, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
(including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Haverhill,
Massachusetts.
``(330) Lawrence, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
(including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Lawrence,
Massachusetts.
``(331) Lowell, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
(including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Lowell,
Massachusetts.
``(332) Methuen, massachusetts.--$20,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
(including combined sewer overflows), in the city of Methuen,
Massachusetts.
``(333) Boonsboro, maryland.--$5,000,000 for water
infrastructure, including water supply, in the town of
Boonsboro, Maryland.
``(334) Brunswick, maryland.--$15,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the city of Brunswick, Maryland.
``(335) Cascade charter township, michigan.--$7,200,000 for
water and wastewater infrastructure in Cascade Charter
Township, Michigan.
``(336) Macomb county, michigan.--$40,000,000 for
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
Macomb County, Michigan.
``(337) Northfield, minnesota.--$33,450,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the city of Northfield, Minnesota.
``(338) Centertown, missouri.--$15,900,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the village of Centertown,
Missouri.
``(339) St. louis, missouri.--$45,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the city of St. Louis, Missouri.
``(340) St. louis county, missouri.--$45,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure in St. Louis County, Missouri.
``(341) Meridian, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the city of Meridian, Mississippi.
``(342) Oxford, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the City of Oxford, Mississippi.
``(343) Manchester, new hampshire.--$20,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
(including combined sewer overflows), in the city of
Manchester, New Hampshire.
``(344) Bayonne, new jersey.--$825,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management (including
combined sewer overflows), in the city of Bayonne, New Jersey.
``(345) Camden, new jersey.--$119,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, city of
Camden, New Jersey.
``(346) Essex and sussex counties, new jersey.--$60,000,000
for water and wastewater infrastructure, including water
supply, in Essex County and Sussex County, New Jersey.
``(347) Flemington, new jersey.--$4,500,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the
Borough of Flemington, New Jersey.
``(348) Jefferson, new jersey.--$90,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Jefferson
Township, New Jersey.
``(349) Kearny, new jersey.--$69,900,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management (including
combined sewer overflows), in the town of Kearny, New Jersey.
``(350) Long hill, new jersey.--$7,500,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Long Hill
Township, New Jersey.
``(351) Morris county, new jersey.--$30,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure in Morris County, New Jersey.
``(352) Passaic, new jersey.--$1,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the Passaic
County, New Jersey.
``(353) Phillipsburg, new jersey.--$2,600,000 for
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the town of Phillipsburg, New Jersey.
``(354) Rahway, new jersey.--$3,250,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the city of Rahway, New Jersey.
``(355) Roselle, new jersey.--$5,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the Borough
of Roselle, New Jersey.
``(356) South orange village, new jersey.--$7,500,000 for
water infrastructure, including water supply, in the Township
of South Orange Village, New Jersey.
``(357) Summit, new jersey.--$1,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of
Summit, New Jersey.
``(358) Warren, new jersey.--$4,550,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in Warren
Township, New Jersey.
``(359) Espanola, new mexico.--$21,995,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the city of Espanola, New Mexico.
``(360) Farmington, new mexico.--$15,500,000 for water
infrastructure, including water supply, in the city of
Farmington, New Mexico.
``(361) Mora county, new mexico.--$2,874,000 for wastewater
infrastructure in Mora County, New Mexico.
``(362) Santa fe, new mexico.--$20,700,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water reclamation, in the
city of Santa Fe, New Mexico.
``(363) Clarkstown, new york.--$14,600,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, town of
Clarkstown, New York.
``(364) Genesee, new york.--$85,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management and
water supply, in Genesee County, New York.
``(365) Queens, new york.--$119,200,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management
(including combined sewer overflows), in Queens, New York.
``(366) Yorktown, new york.--$40,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the town of
Yorktown, New York.
``(367) Brunswick, ohio.--$4,510,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of
Brunswick, Ohio.
``(368) Brookings, oregon.--$2,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure in the City and Port of Brookings, Oregon.
``(369) Monroe, oregon.--$6,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the city of Monroe, Oregon.
``(370) Newport, oregon.--$60,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
of Newport, Oregon.
``(371) Lane county, oregon.--$25,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water supply and storage,
distribution, and treatment systems, in Lane County, Oregon.
``(372) Palmyra, pennsylvania.--$36,300,000 for wastewater
infrastructure in Palmyra Township, Pennsylvania.
``(373) Pike county, pennsylvania.--$10,000,000 for water
and stormwater management infrastructure, including water
supply, in Pike County, Pennsylvania.
``(374) Pittsburgh, pennsylvania.--$20,000,000 for
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the city of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
``(375) Pocono, pennsylvania.--$22,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in Pocono Township, Pennsylvania.
``(376) Westfall, pennsylvania.--$16,880,000 for wastewater
infrastructure in Westfall Township, Pennsylvania.
``(377) Whitehall, pennsylvania.--$6,000,000 for stormwater
management infrastructure in Whitehall Township and South
Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania.
``(378) Beaufort, south carolina.--$7,462,000 for
stormwater management infrastructure in Beaufort County, South
Carolina.
``(379) Charleston, south carolina.--$25,583,000 for
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the city of Charleston, South Carolina.
``(380) Mount pleasant, south carolina.--$7,822,000 for
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the town of Mount Pleasant, South Carolina.
``(381) Portland, tennessee.--$1,850,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in the city
of Portland, Tennessee.
``(382) Smith county, tennessee.--$19,500,000 for
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
Smith County, Tennessee.
``(383) Trousdale, macon, and sumner counties, tennessee.--
$178,000,000 for water and wastewater infrastructure in
Trousdale County, Macon County, and Sumner County, Tennessee.
``(384) Virgin islands.--$1,584,000 for wastewater
infrastructure in the United States Virgin Islands.
``(385) Bonney lake, washington.--$3,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure in the city of Bonney Lake,
Washington.
``(386) Burien, washington.--$5,000,000 for stormwater
management infrastructure in the city of Burien, Washington.
``(387) Ellensburg, washington.--$3,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of
Ellensburg, Washington.
``(388) North bend, washington.--$30,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management, in the city of
North Bend, Washington.
``(389) Port angeles, washington.--$7,500,000 for
wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management, in
the City and Port of Port Angeles, Washington.
``(390) Snohomish, washington.--$56,000,000 for water and
wastewater infrastructure, including water supply, in Snohomish
County, Washington.
``(391) Western washington state.--$200,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater management,
water supply, and conservation, in Chelan County, King County,
Kittitas County, Pierce County, Snohomish County, Skagit
County, and Whatcom County, Washington.
``(392) Milwaukee, wisconsin.--$4,500,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management (including
combined sewer overflows), in the city of Milwaukee,
Wisconsin.''.
(b) Project Modifications.--
(1) Consistency with reports.--Congress finds that the
project modifications described in this subsection are in
accordance with the reports submitted to Congress by the
Secretary under section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d), titled ``Report to
Congress on Future Water Resources Development'', or have
otherwise been reviewed by Congress.
(2) Modifications.--
(A) Sacramento area, california.--Section
219(f)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1840;
134 Stat. 2718) is amended by striking ``Suburban''.
(B) Los angeles county, california.--Section
219(f)(93) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1840;
121 Stat. 1259) is amended--
(i) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and
inserting ``$103,000,000'';
(ii) by striking ``wastewater and water
related infrastructure,'' and inserting ``water
and wastewater infrastructure, including
stormwater management,''; and
(iii) by inserting ``Dominguez Channel,
Santa Clarita Valley,'' after ``La Habra
Heights,''.
(C) Boulder county, colorado.--Section 219(f)(109)
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is
amended by striking ``$10,000,000 for water supply
infrastructure'' and inserting ``$20,000,000 for water
and wastewater infrastructure, including stormwater
management and water supply''.
(D) Charlotte county, florida.--Section 219(f)(121)
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1261) is amended
by striking ``$3,000,000 for'' and inserting
``$33,000,000 for wastewater and''.
(E) Miami-dade county, florida.--Section
219(f)(128) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1261) is
amended by striking ``$6,250,000 for'' and inserting
``$190,250,000 for wastewater infrastructure,
including''.
(F) Albany, georgia.--Section 219(f)(130) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1261) is amended by
striking ``$4,000,000 for a storm drainage system,''
and inserting ``$109,000,000 for wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management
(including combined sewer overflows),''.
(G) Atlanta, georgia.--Section 219(e)(5) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334) is amended by
striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$75,000,000''.
(H) East point, georgia.--Section 219(f)(136) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1261) is amended by
striking ``$5,000,000 for'' and inserting ``$15,000,000
for stormwater management and other''.
(I) Cook county, illinois.--Section 219(f)(54) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat. 2763A-220) is amended by
striking ``$35,000,000 for'' and inserting
``$100,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including
stormwater management, and other''.
(J) Calumet region, indiana.--Section 219(f)(12)(A)
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 117 Stat. 1843) is amended
by striking ``$100,000,000'' and inserting
``$125,000,000''.
(K) Baton rouge, louisiana.--Section 219(f)(21) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4835; 113 Stat. 336) is amended by striking
``$35,000,000'' and inserting ``$90,000,000''.
(L) South central planning and development
commission, louisiana.--Section 219(f)(153) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1262) is amended by
striking ``$2,500,000'' and inserting ``$12,500,000''.
(M) St. charles, st. bernard, plaquemines, st. john
the baptist, st. james, and assumption parishes,
louisiana.--
(i) St. charles, st. bernard, and
plaquemines parishes, louisiana.--Section
219(c)(33) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 114
Stat. 2763A-219) is amended by striking ``Water
and wastewater infrastructure'' and inserting
``Water supply and wastewater infrastructure,
including stormwater infrastructure''.
(ii) St. john the baptist, st. james, and
assumption parishes, louisiana.--Section
219(c)(34) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 114
Stat. 2763A-219) is amended--
(I) in the paragraph heading, by
striking ``Baptist and st. james'' and
inserting ``Baptist, st. james, and
assumption''; and
(II) by striking ``Baptist and St.
James'' and inserting ``Baptist, St.
James, and Assumption''.
(iii) Authorization of appropriations for
construction assistance.--Section 219(e) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 121
Stat. 1192) is amended--
(I) by striking the ``and'' at the
end of paragraph (16);
(II) by striking the period at the
end of paragraph (17) and inserting a
semicolon; and
(III) by adding at the end the
following:
``(18) $70,000,000 for the project described in subsection
(c)(33); and
``(19) $36,000,000 for the project described in subsection
(c)(34).''.
(N) Michigan combined sewer overflows.--Section
219(f)(157) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 121 Stat. 1262) is
amended by striking ``correction of combined sewer
overflows'' and inserting ``water and wastewater
infrastructure, including stormwater management
(including correction of combined sewer overflows)''.
(O) Allegheny county, pennsylvania.--Section
219(f)(66)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1992 (106 Stat 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat 2763A-221)
is amended by striking ``$20,000,000 for'' and
inserting ``$30,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure,
including stormwater management, and other''.
(P) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--
Section 219(f)(25) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1992 (106 Stat 4835; 113 Stat. 336; 114 Stat
2763A-220; 117 Stat. 1838; 130 Stat. 1677; 132 Stat.
3818; 134 Stat. 2719) is amended by striking
``$110,000,000'' and inserting ``$165,000,000''.
(Q) Eastern shore and southwest virginia.--Section
219(f)(10)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1992 (106 Stat 4835; 113 Stat. 336) is amended by
striking ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$52,000,000''.
(3) Effect on authorization.--Notwithstanding the operation
of section 6001(e) of the Water Resources Reform and
Development Act of 2014 (as in effect on the day before the
date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of
2016), any project included on a list published by the
Secretary pursuant to such section the authorization for which
is amended by this subsection remains authorized to be carried
out by the Secretary.
SEC. 333. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.
(a) Consistency With Reports.--Congress finds that the project
modifications described in this section are in accordance with the
reports submitted to Congress by the Secretary under section 7001 of
the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C.
2282d), titled ``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources
Development'', or have otherwise been reviewed by Congress.
(b) Projects.--
(1) Chesapeake bay.--Section 510(a)(2) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3759; 121 Stat.
1202; 128 Stat. 1317) is amended--
(A) by inserting ``infrastructure and'' before
``resource protection'';
(B) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and (F) as
subparagraphs (G) and (H), respectively; and
(C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the
following:
``(E) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
``(F) water supply and related facilities;''.
(2) New york city watershed.--Section 552(a)(2) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3780) is
amended--
(A) by striking ``design and construction
assistance'' and inserting ``design, repair,
replacement, and construction assistance''; and
(B) by striking ``treatment, and distribution
facilities'' and inserting ``treatment, stormwater
management, and water distribution facilities''.
(3) Southeastern pennsylvania.--Section 566 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3786; 113 Stat.
352) is amended--
(A) by striking the section heading and inserting
``southeastern pennsylvania and lower delaware river
basin.'';
(B) in subsection (a), by inserting ``and the Lower
Delaware River Basin'' after ``southeastern
Pennsylvania'';
(C) in subsection (b), by striking ``southeastern
Pennsylvania, including projects for waste water
treatment and related facilities,'' and inserting
``southeastern Pennsylvania and the Lower Delaware
River Basin, including projects for wastewater
treatment and related facilities (including sewer
overflow infrastructure improvements and other
stormwater management),'';
(D) by amending subsection (g) to read as follows:
``(g) Areas Defined.--In this section:
``(1) Southeastern pennsylvania.--The term `southeastern
Pennsylvania' means Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and
Montgomery Counties, Pennsylvania.
``(2) Lower delaware river basin.--The term `Lower Delaware
River Basin' means the Schuylkill Valley, Upper Estuary, Lower
Estuary, and Delaware Bay sub-watersheds of the Delaware River
Basin in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the States of New
Jersey and Delaware.''; and
(E) in subsection (h), by striking ``to carry out
this section $25,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000
to provide assistance under this section to non-Federal
interests in southeastern Pennsylvania, and $20,000,000
to provide assistance under this section to non-Federal
interests in the Lower Delaware River Basin''.
(4) Florida keys water quality improvements, florida.--
Section 109 of division B of appendix D of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106-554, 114 Stat. 2763A-
222; 121 Stat. 1217) is amended in subsection (f) by striking
``$100,000,000'' and inserting ``$200,000,000''.
(5) Northeastern minnesota.--Section 569(h) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 368; 121 Stat.
1232) is amended by striking ``$54,000,000'' and inserting
``$80,000,000''.
(6) Mississippi.--Section 592 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 379; 117 Stat. 1837; 121
Stat. 1233; 123 Stat. 2851) is amended--
(A) in subsection (b), by striking ``and surface
water resource protection and development'' and
inserting ``surface water resource protection and
development, stormwater management, and drainage
systems''; and
(B) in subsection (g), by striking ``$200,000,000''
and inserting ``$300,000,000''.
(7) Lake tahoe basin restoration, nevada and california.--
Section 108(g) of division C of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-447; 118 Stat. 2942) is amended by
striking ``$25,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''.
(8) Central new mexico.--Section 593 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 380) is amended--
(A) in subsection (c), by inserting ``water
reuse,'' after ``conservation,''; and
(B) in subsection (h), by striking ``$50,000,000''
and inserting ``$100,000,000''.
(9) South central pennsylvania.--Section 313(g)(1) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845; 109
Stat. 407; 110 Stat. 3723; 113 Stat. 310; 117 Stat. 142; 121
Stat. 1146; 134 Stat. 2719) is amended by striking
``$400,000,000'' and inserting ``$410,000,000''.
(10) Ohio and north dakota.--Section 594 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 381; 119 Stat.
2261; 121 Stat. 1140; 121 Stat. 1944) is amended in subsection
(h), by striking ``$240,000,000'' and inserting
``$250,000,000''.
(11) Texas.--Section 5138 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1250) is amended in
subsection (g) by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting
``$80,000,000''.
(12) Lake champlain, vermont and new york.--Section 542 of
the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2671;
121 Stat. 1150; 134 Stat. 2652) is amended--
(A) in subsection (b)(2)(C), by striking
``planning'' and inserting ``clean water infrastructure
planning, design, and construction''; and
(B) in subsection (g), by striking ``$32,000,000''
and inserting ``$50,000,000''.
(13) Western rural water.--Section 595 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 117 Stat.
139; 117 Stat. 142; 117 Stat. 1836; 118 Stat. 440; 121 Stat.
1219; 123 Stat. 2851; 128 Stat. 1316; 130 Stat. 1681; 134 Stat.
2719) is amended--
(A) in subsection (i)(1), by striking
``$435,000,000'' and inserting ``$800,000,000''; and
(B) in subsection (i)(2), by striking
``$150,000,000'' and inserting ``$200,000,000''.
(c) Effect on Authorization.--Notwithstanding the operation of
section 6001(e) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of
2014 (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the Water
Resources Development Act of 2016), any project included on a list
published by the Secretary pursuant to such section the authorization
for which is amended by this section remains authorized to be carried
out by the Secretary.
TITLE IV--WATER RESOURCES INFRASTRUCTURE
SEC. 401. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.
The following projects for water resources development and
conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled
``Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development'' submitted
to Congress pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and
Development Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 2282d) or otherwise reviewed by
Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the
conditions, described in the respective reports or decision documents
designated in this section:
(1) Navigation.--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Date of
Report of
A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs
Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. AK Elim Subsistence March 12, Federal: $74,905,000
Harbor Study, 2021 Non-Federal: $1,896,000
Elim Total: $76,801,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CA Port of Long Beach October 14, Federal: $71,985,500
Deep Draft 2021 Non-Federal: $73,447,500
Navigation, Los Total: $145,433,000
Angeles County
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. GA Brunswick Harbor March 11, Federal: $10,774,500
Modifications, 2022 Non-Federal: $3,594,500
Glynn County Total: $14,369,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Flood risk management.--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Date of
Report of
A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs
Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. AL Selma Flood Risk October 7, Federal: $15,533,100
Management and 2021 Non-Federal: $8,363,900
Bank Total: $23,897,000
Stabilization
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. AL Valley Creek Flood October 29, Federal: $17,725,000
Risk Management, 2021 Non-Federal: $9,586,000
Bessemer and Total: $27,311,000
Birmingham
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. CA Lower Cache Creek, June 21, 2021 Federal: $215,152,000
Yolo County, Non-Federal: $115,851,000
Woodland and Total: $331,003,000
Vicinity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. NE Papillion Creek January 24, Federal: $91,491,400
and Tributaries 2022 Non-Federal: $52,156,300
Lakes Total: $143,647,700
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. OR Portland Metro August 20, Federal: $77,111,100
Levee System 2021 Non-Federal: $41,521,300
Total: $118,632,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Hurricane and storm damage risk reduction.--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Date of
Report of
A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs
Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CT Fairfield and New January 19, Federal: $92,937,000
Haven Counties 2021 Non-Federal: $50,043,000
Coastal Storm Total: $142,980,000
Risk Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. FL Florida Keys, September 24, Federal: $1,513,531,000
Monroe County, 2021 Non-Federal: $814,978,000
Coastal Storm Total: $2,328,509,000
Risk Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. FL Pinellas County, October 29, Initial Federal: $8,627,000
Treasure Island 2021 Initial Non-Federal:
and Long Key $5,332,000
Segments, Coastal Total: $13,959,000
Storm Risk Renourishment Federal:
Management $92,000,000
Renourishment Non-Federal:
$101,690,000
Renourishment Total:
$193,690,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. LA Upper Barataria January 28, Federal: $1,005,001,000
Basin Hurricane 2022 Non-Federal: $541,155,000
and Storm Damage Total: $1,546,156,000
Risk Reduction
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. PR San Juan September 16, Federal: $245,418,000
Metropolitan Area 2021 Non-Federal: $131,333,000
Coastal Storm Total: $376,751,000
Risk Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. SC Folly Beach, October 26, Initial Federal:
Coastal Storm 2021 $45,490,000
Risk Management Initial Non-Federal:
$5,054,000
Total: $50,544,000
Renourishment Federal:
$164,424,000
Renourishment Non-Federal:
$26,767,000
Renourishment Total:
$191,191,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Flood risk management and ecosystem restoration.--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Date of
Report of
A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs
Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. TX Coastal Texas September 16, Federal: $19,237,894,000
Protection and 2021 Non-Federal:
Restoration $11,668,393,000
Total: $30,906,287,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Ecosystem restoration.--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Date of
Report of
A. State B. Name Chief of D. Estimated Costs
Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CA Prado Basin April 22, Federal: $33,976,000
Ecosystem 2021 Non-Federal: $18,294,000
Restoration, San Total: $52,270,000
Bernardino,
Riverside and
Orange Counties
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(6) Modifications and other projects.--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Date of
A. State B. Name Decision D. Estimated Costs
Document
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. DC Washington, DC, July 22, 2021 Federal: $17,740,000
and Vicinity Non-Federal: $0
Flood Risk Total: $17,740,000
Management
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. LA Lake Pontchartrain December 16, Federal: $807,000,000
and Vicinity 2021 Non-Federal: $434,000,000
Total: $1,241,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. LA West Bank and December 17, Federal: $431,000,000
Vicinity 2021 Non-Federal: $232,000,000
Total: $663,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
<all>