[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1212 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 1212
Affirming the constitutional right to travel freely and voluntarily
within the United States, District of Columbia, Tribal lands, and the
territories of the United States.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 28, 2022
Mr. Raskin submitted the following resolution; which was referred to
the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Affirming the constitutional right to travel freely and voluntarily
within the United States, District of Columbia, Tribal lands, and the
territories of the United States.
Whereas the right to travel freely and voluntarily among the several States is
one of the chief privileges and immunities guaranteed to all citizens of
the United States by the 14th Amendment and one of the fundamental
rights guaranteed to all persons under the 14th Amendment's Equal
Protection Clause;
Whereas section 5 of the 14th Amendment empowers Congress to enforce, by
appropriate legislation, its provisions;
Whereas the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that ``a citizen of one State who
travels in other States, intending to return home at the end of his
journey, is entitled to enjoy the `Privileges and Immunities of Citizens
in the several States' that he visits'' (Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489, 501
(1999) (citing Corfield v. Coryell, 6 F. Cas. 546 (No. 3,230)
(C.C.E.D.Pa.1823); Edwards v. California, 314 U.S. 160 (1941); United
States v. Guest, 383 U.S. 745 (1966))); and
Whereas the Supreme Court long ago decided that one of the privileges or
immunities that the Constitution guarantees is the ``fundamental'' right
to travel from one State to another to seek and obtain services lawful
in the latter State, including medical services, on terms of substantial
equality with the residents of that State (Toomer v. Witsell, 334 U.S.
385, 396 (1948); Hicklin v. Orbeck, 437 U.S. 518, 525 (1978); Doe v.
Bolton, 410 U.S. 179, 200 (1973) (citing Ward v. Maryland, 79 U.S. 418
(1870)); Chalker v. Birmingham & N.W.R. Co., 249 U.S. 522, 527 (1919);
Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 52, 53 (1920)): Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives
that--
(1) every person has the right to travel freely within the
United States, the District of Columbia, Tribal lands, and the
territories of the United States as a fundamental privilege and
immunity of citizenship in the United States;
(2) no person should be held criminally liable or civilly
liable in any way by any State or by the United States
Government for voluntarily traveling within the United States,
the District of Columbia, Tribal lands, and the territories of
the United States for the purposes of seeking or obtaining
health care services in a destination jurisdiction, or for
providing or facilitating such travel, or providing health care
services in any jurisdiction to out-of-state patients, where
the health care services so obtained are lawful in the
jurisdiction where they are delivered; and
(3) any person whose constitutional right to travel is
violated under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom, or usage, of any State or territory or the District of
Columbia, may seek redress under section 1979 of the Revised
Statutes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1983).
<all>