[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1219 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 1219
Honoring the life and legacy of Father Stan, a prominent human rights
activist who died while in custody of the Indian state on July 5, 2021,
and encouraging India to pursue an independent investigation into his
arrest, incarceration, and death.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 5, 2022
Mr. Vargas (for himself, Mr. McGovern, and Mr. Carson) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign
Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Honoring the life and legacy of Father Stan, a prominent human rights
activist who died while in custody of the Indian state on July 5, 2021,
and encouraging India to pursue an independent investigation into his
arrest, incarceration, and death.
Whereas Father Stanislaus Lourduswamy, known as Father Stan, was born on April
26, 1937, in a village called Viragalur in the Tiruchirappalli District
in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, and, inspired by the work of
Jesuit priests from an early age, studied theology starting in 1957;
Whereas Father Stan spent his Jesuit regency in 1965 to 1967 at St. Xavier's
High School Lupungutu, Chaibasa, in west Singhbhum, now in the central
Indian state of Jharkhand, and there came to love and appreciate the
culture and values of India's Adivasi (Hindi: ``Original Inhabitants'')
community, as well as understood the problems they faced and
exploitation they endured;
Whereas, in 1971, Father Stan completed his master's degree in sociology in the
Philippines, where he met and was influenced by Brazilian Catholic
Archbishop Helder Camara's work with the poor, and was subsequently put
in charge of the Catholic Relief Services charity in the Jesuit
Jamshedpur Province, now in the Indian state of Jharkhand;
Whereas Father Stan served as the director of the Indian Social Institute,
India's leading Jesuit institution, in the southern Indian city of
Bengaluru, from 1975 to 1990, where he trained young people from
marginalized communities across the Indian subcontinent alongside
educationist Duarte Baretto;
Whereas, through ideas of social justice and liberation theology, Father Stan
and the Indian Social Institute trained a generation of young leaders
among communities including Dalits, indigenous communities (Adivasis),
fishing communities, agrarian communities, and labor movements;
Whereas, after finishing his work with the Indian Social Institute in 1991,
Father Stan moved to Chaibasa, in Jharkhand, where he worked for the
Jharkhand Organisation for Human Rights, and worked tirelessly with the
Adivasi people to protect their lands and homes from unfair
expropriation by the state and mining corporations;
Whereas, in 2006, with the support of the Jesuit society and intellectuals and
activists such as Xavier Dias and Ramdayal Munda, Father Stan set up
Bagaicha, a research, documentation, and Adivasi training center near
the city of Ranchi;
Whereas Father Stan played a key role in one of the most significant Adivasi
movements in contemporary India, the Pathalgadi movement, which used
Adivasi traditions of stone carving (for instance, for gravestones) to
spread information among Adivasi communities regarding rights guaranteed
to them under the Indian Constitution;
Whereas, during these decades in Jharkhand, Father Stan advocated for and raised
awareness regarding the implementation of provisions of the Indian
Constitution like the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) or the
PESA Act, which instituted self-governance for people dwelling in
Adivasi lands;
Whereas Father Stan also worked on ensuring the implementation of the Forest
Rights Act of 2006, which recognized the rights of forest-dwelling
communities to forest resources;
Whereas Father Stan also worked on ensuring the implementation of the Land
Acquisition Act of 2013, which guaranteed the right to fair
compensation, transparency in acquisition, and required the assent of
the community via its self-governance group called the gram sabha;
Whereas, on noticing widespread arrests of Adivasi youth for peaceful protests
against land acquisition starting in 2014 to 2015, in 2017 Father Stan
formed the Persecuted Prisoners Solidarity Committee, to expose the
illegal imprisonment of Adivasi activists, and filed a case against the
state of Jharkhand on behalf of at least 3,000 Adivasi youths
languishing in jail;
Whereas, over the course of his long career fighting for the underprivileged,
Father Stan authored over 70 books and booklets regarding the
socioeconomic and cultural circumstances of the Adivasis in Jharkhand,
their rights to development, and the violence perpetrated against them
by agents of the Indian state;
Whereas Father Stan published a 2015 Bagaicha report on 102 Adivasi, Dalit, and
``backward caste'' youths illegally imprisoned titled ``Deprived Rights
Over Natural Resources, Impoverished Adivasis Get Prison: A Study of
Undertrials in Jharkhand'';
Whereas, in 2017, the state of Jharkhand charged Father Stan with ``sedition''
for a Facebook post written in support of the Pathalgadi movement;
Whereas Father Stan was subsequently released, following the change in
government in Jharkhand in 2019;
Whereas, in August 2018 and June 2019, Pune police conducted raids on Father
Stan's one-room home in Bagaicha in a case regarding clashes near Bhima
Koregaon in the western Indian state of Maharashtra, and subjected
Father Stan to hours of intense interrogation;
Whereas, as an octogenarian and a person suffering from Parkinson's disease, and
in the midst of a global pandemic, Father Stan declined to travel to
Mumbai from Ranchi for further interrogation and on October 9, 2020,
India's National Investigation Agency placed Father Stan under arrest;
Whereas Father Stan was incarcerated in Taloja prison from October 9, 2020 until
May 28, 2021, which provoked a gradual deterioration in his health;
Whereas, after being ill-treated in prison to the extent of being denied a
sipper and a straw to sip water from, and in spite of repeated attempts
to secure bail by Father Stan's defense team, bail was consistently
denied to him, even after he contracted COVID-19;
Whereas the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders Mary
Lawlor, along with the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to
the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental
health and the Special Rapporteur on minority issues stated in a letter
to the Government of India that the digital evidence compiled by the
forensic reports rendered ``the ongoing detention of the 15 accused [in
the Bhima Koregaon case, including Father Stan] as arbitrary and
unlawful'';
Whereas forensic analysts revealed that unidentified hackers fabricated evidence
on the computers of at least 2 activists arrested in Pune, India, in
2018, both of whom have languished in jail and, along with 13 others,
face terrorism charges;
Whereas researchers at security firm SentinelOne and nonprofits Citizen Lab and
Amnesty International have since linked that evidence fabrication to a
broader hacking operation that targeted hundreds of Indian activists;
Whereas SentinelOne's researchers revealed ties between the hackers and the
Indian police agency in the city of Pune that arrested multiple
activists based on the fabricated evidence, including Farther Stan;
Whereas Father Stan, while still in custody of the Indian state, passed away at
the age of 84 on July 5, 2021, at Holy Family Hospital, Mumbai; and
Whereas July 5, 2022, marks the one-year anniversary of Father Stan's passing
away: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) encourages India to pursue an independent investigation
into the arrest, incarceration, and death of Father Stan, a
prominent human rights activist who died while in custody on
July 5, 2021;
(2) makes it clear to the Indian Government and all
governments around the world that the mistreatment and
incarceration of individuals advocating for human rights cannot
persist;
(3) monitors the status of, and supports, the Adivasi,
Dalit, and minority communities in India, as well as other
indigenous communities around the world;
(4) expresses concern at the misuse of antiterror laws to
target human rights defenders and political opponents and
applauds a recent ruling by India's top court to suspend a
controversial colonial-era sedition law and urges India's
Parliament to make the suspension permanent; and
(5) makes it clear to the Indian Government and all
governments around the world that freedom of expression is a
fundamental human right, as written in Article 19 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and adopted by the United
Nations General Assembly in 1948, that enshrines the rights and
freedoms of all human beings.
<all>