[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 90 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. CON. RES. 90
Condemning the Biden administration for its ban on the issuance of
liquefied natural gas export permits.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 6, 2024
Mr. Williams of New York (for himself, Mr. Donalds, Mr. Bean of
Florida, Ms. Granger, Mr. Scott Franklin of Florida, Mr. Ellzey, Ms.
Boebert, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Van Orden, Mr. Weber of Texas, and Ms. De La
Cruz) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred
to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the
Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such
provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Condemning the Biden administration for its ban on the issuance of
liquefied natural gas export permits.
Whereas, on January 26, 2024, the Biden administration announced it is
indefinitely pausing the issuance of permits for liquefied natural gas
(LNG) exports to projects under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15
U.S.C. 717b);
Whereas the administration's indefinite pause on LNG export permitting, with no
clear plans or timelines for reinstating the permitting process, is
effectively a ban on the issuance of LNG export permits;
Whereas the administration's ban on the issuance of LNG export permits will
apply to United States partners across the globe, including critical
allies in Europe;
Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administration, over 50 percent of
LNG exported from the United States is exported to the United Kingdom,
France, Germany, Spain, and the Netherlands, and that the new export
projects to these countries will be banned by the administration's
action;
Whereas the export of LNG is a critical component of United States partnerships
and projection of influence in Europe;
Whereas preventing Russian domination of the European continent is a key
strategic goal of the United States;
Whereas the Russian Federation has used natural gas exports to gain leverage
over United States European allies, including through constructing major
pipeline networks to Europe, such as Nord Stream and Yamal-Europe;
Whereas a ban on the issuance of permits for United States LNG exports to Europe
would disrupt United States economic and security partnerships with
European allies;
Whereas European dependency on Russian natural gas is only encouraged by the
administration's ban on LNG export permitting;
Whereas the export of LNG is a significant part of the United States energy
industry, creating quality jobs for working class Americans;
Whereas the extraction, processing, and shipping of LNG is a critical part of
local economies across the United States;
Whereas banning LNG export permitting under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (15
U.S.C. 717b) would negatively impact the United States economy;
Whereas the adoption of LNG in the United States energy sector has been the
leading factor in the United States reducing its carbon dioxide
emissions by 20 percent between 2005 and 2021;
Whereas countries that the United States exports LNG to derive substantial
portions of their energy from sources that emit more carbon dioxide than
the burning of LNG;
Whereas United States exports of LNG to other countries offer a low emission
energy source for partners across the globe; and
Whereas, according to researchers from the National Energy Technology
Laboratory, Russian-produced natural gas shipped by pipeline to Europe
has approximately 41 percent higher life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions
than United States LNG shipped to the same destination: Now, therefore,
be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That--
(1) exports of liquefied natural gas are critical to United
States foreign policy, economic, and environmental goals;
(2) the Biden administration's politicization of energy
policy sows further distrust in the standing of the United
States in the world;
(3) Congress condemns the administration's current ban on
the issuance of liquefied natural gas export permits; and
(4) Congress urges the administration to reverse its
decision and to return to permitting liquefied natural gas
export projects for the sake of national security and economic
prosperity.
<all>