[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1235 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 1235
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that certain
welfare programs discourage marriage and hurt the institution of the
family in the United States.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 16, 2024
Mr. Grothman (for himself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Allen, Mr.
Weber of Texas, and Mr. Lamborn) submitted the following resolution;
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that certain
welfare programs discourage marriage and hurt the institution of the
family in the United States.
Whereas the Federal Government funds 126 separate programs that have a stated
purpose of fighting poverty, including 27 cash or general assistance
programs, 21 of which are food-aid programs, and 33 of which are housing
programs;
Whereas means-tested programs such as child-care vouchers, section 8 housing
choice vouchers, Medicaid, and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
determine eligibility and allotment of benefits by counting individuals
related by blood, marriage, or adoption as members of the family unit,
thereby excluding non-parent cohabiters' income from consideration and
discouraging cohabiters from marrying for fear of a loss of benefits;
Whereas means-tested programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants,
and Children, school meals, and the Low Income Home Energy Assistance
Program determine eligibility and allocation of benefits by counting all
members living within a household, which discourages single parents from
raising children in a two-parent home;
Whereas tax credits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit also penalize marriage,
as one member of an unmarried couple can receive the full benefit when
claiming the couple's child, but a married couple with the same income
may be pushed out of the eligibility range for the full benefit;
Whereas Pell Grant and Federal student loan eligibility and allocation is
determined through the information reported on the Free Application for
Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), including the individual's expected family
contribution, which discourages marriage for fear that the combined
income of a married couple would result in a smaller financial aid
award;
Whereas the combined penalty associated with all these programs, should a single
parent of two children choose to get married, can result in as much as
$14,544 annually in decreased benefits;
Whereas the War on Poverty has promoted this decline in marriage by penalizing
low-income parents who choose to marry by reducing their means-tested
benefits;
Whereas, before the start of the failed War on Poverty program in 1964, only 7
percent of children in the United States were born out of wedlock, a
number that now stands at over 40 percent; and
Whereas removing one parent, usually the male, from his or her child can have a
harmful effect on the child's life: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) affirms that strong marriages contribute to healthy
communities and thriving children;
(2) recognizes that certain welfare programs discourage
marriage and hurt the institution of the family in the United
States;
(3) believes that the Federal Government should treat
everyone equally and that it is wrong to discriminate against
parents who choose to get married;
(4) supports action to review government programs, tax
credits, or policies that put financial penalties on married
couples as opposed to their unmarried peers; and
(5) supports action to reform benefits or end programs to
eliminate these penalties.
<all>