[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1435 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 1435
Raising concern about the proposed constitutional reforms in Mexico.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 10, 2024
Mr. Stanton (for himself and Ms. Salazar) submitted the following
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Raising concern about the proposed constitutional reforms in Mexico.
Whereas the United States and Mexico are committed to strengthening bilateral
and regional cooperation that benefits the people of the United States
and Mexico;
Whereas the United States and Mexico are top trade partners, trading more than
$750,000,000,000 worth of goods in 2023;
Whereas United States companies directly invested $130,300,000,000 into Mexico
in 2022, and nearly 5,000,000 United States jobs depend on trade with
Mexico;
Whereas the United States, Mexico, and Canada will participate in the first
review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) in 2026;
Whereas Mexican President Lopez Obrador proposed constitutional reforms on
February 5, 2024, including a range of proposals to modify the Mexican
judiciary;
Whereas some of these reforms were approved by a Chamber of Deputies committee
vote on August 26, 2024, and could receive a vote by Mexico's Congress
of the Union in September 2024;
Whereas Mexican Federal judges initiated a widespread and indefinite strike on
August 21, 2024, in response to proposed judicial reforms;
Whereas Mexico's National Association of Circuit and District Judges, the Inter-
American Dialogue, the Mexican Bar Association, the Global Enterprise
Council, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Independence of
Judges and Lawyers, the United States Chamber of Commerce, and thousands
of striking Mexican Federal court employees and magistrates have voiced
concerns with the proposed reforms;
Whereas, under proposed judicial reforms, all Federal judges, including Supreme
Court Justices, would be directly elected, independent oversight of the
judiciary would end, and judicial qualification standards would be
reduced; and
Whereas broader constitutional reforms would--
(1) eliminate autonomous oversight of social development policy and
education; the energy, hydrocarbon, and telecommunications industries; and
enforcement of antitrust and transparency laws;
(2) reduce the size, oversight capacity, and sanctions authority of
Mexico's National Electoral Institute; and
(3) impose a prohibition on genetically modified corn: Now, therefore,
be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) raises concern that the proposed constitutional reforms
would have a long-term negative impact on Mexico's democratic
institutions, separation of powers, judicial independence and
transparency, and security, while undermining its electoral
system, National Guard, and oversight agencies;
(2) expresses deep concern that the proposed constitutional
reforms may contradict commitments made in the United States-
Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement, jeopardizing critical economic
and security interests shared by the United States and Mexico;
(3) underscores that several aspects of the reform package
undermine United States-Mexico joint efforts to strengthen the
rule of law, counter organized crime, and address the scourge
of fentanyl and human and arms trafficking among broader
bilateral priorities; and
(4) reaffirms its commitment to a robust, mutually
respectful relationship between the sovereign countries of the
United States and Mexico.
<all>