[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 244 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 244
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that mandates
imposed on manufacturers requiring inclusion of unproven and unreliable
technology in firearms is costly and punitive, and the prohibition of
firearms without such features is an infringement on the rights of
citizens under the Second Amendment.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 22, 2023
Mr. LaMalfa (for himself, Mr. Van Drew, and Mr. Lamborn) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that mandates
imposed on manufacturers requiring inclusion of unproven and unreliable
technology in firearms is costly and punitive, and the prohibition of
firearms without such features is an infringement on the rights of
citizens under the Second Amendment.
Whereas California has implemented and amended a law requiring firearms
manufacturers to micro laser engrave a gun's make, model, and serial
number on an internal part of each semiautomatic pistol so that, in
theory, the information is imprinted on the cartridge casing when the
firearm is fired;
Whereas other States and the District of Columbia are considering similar
mandates;
Whereas, based on the current state of this nascent technology, it is impossible
to microstamp a firearm cartridge and have the required identifying
information legibly and reliably imprinted on the cartridge casing when
fired;
Whereas the scientific literature concludes there is no existing microstamping
technology that will reliably, consistently, and legibly imprint the
required identifying information from the tip of the firing pin of a
semiautomatic pistol onto the cartridge casing it fires;
Whereas one study found that the impressions were not decipherable nearly 50
percent of the time;
Whereas the holder of the patent for the technology was a coauthor of peer-
reviewed study that concluded, ``legitimate questions exist related to
both the technical aspects, production costs, and database management
associated with microstamping that should be addressed before wide scale
implementation is legislatively mandated'';
Whereas a subsequent study noted the use of expensive scanning electron
microscope (SEM) technology still failed to solve the problems
associated with microstamping;
Whereas the microstamping process is costly and time-consuming, and threatens
the employment of thousands in the firearms industry;
Whereas the passage of legislation requiring its use would raise the cost of
legal firearms by hundreds of dollars per gun for both law-abiding
citizens seeking to exercise their Second Amendment right and for United
States law enforcement personnel; and
Whereas manufacturers have publicly stated it is impossible for any manufacturer
to comply with the provisions of the California law which are invalid,
that cannot be enforced, and that will not contribute to improving
public safety: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives
that--
(1) mandates imposed on manufacturers requiring inclusion
of unproven and unreliable microstamping technology in firearms
is costly and punitive; and
(2) the prohibition of firearms without such features is an
infringement on the rights of citizens under the Second
Amendment.
<all>