[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2352 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>






119th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2352

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to place reasonable 
     limits on contributions to Super PACs which make independent 
                 expenditures, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2025

  Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania (for herself, Mr. Khanna, Mr. McGovern, Ms. 
   Jayapal, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Deluzio, and Mrs. Ramirez) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to place reasonable 
     limits on contributions to Super PACs which make independent 
                 expenditures, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Abolish Super PACs Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds as follows:
            (1) Contribution limits to political action committees 
        (PACs), including those that make independent expenditures, 
        help secure elections by limiting both the risk of corruption 
        and the risk that significant contributions will create the 
        appearance of corruption.
            (2) Since contribution limits on super PACs were lifted in 
        2010, the number, influence, and wealth of super PACs have 
        exploded. Obtaining millions or billions of dollars in 
        contributions to super PACs is now critical to the success of 
        Federal candidates' campaigns.
            (3) As the influence of super PACs grows, so does the 
        likelihood that they will serve as a conduit for corrupt 
        agreements between contributor and candidate, whose 
        communications are not subject to coordination limitations.
            (4) Between 2008 and 2020, the amount of independent 
        expenditures increased more than 700 percent, and in 2024, more 
        than $4.48 billion in independent expenditures were spent on 
        United States elections. The money for these expenditures 
        largely came from contributions to 2,459 registered super PACs.
            (5) In 2012, the first modern elections for Federal office 
        held without contribution limits to super PACs, the top 1 
        percent of all individual super PAC contributors contributed 
        76.76 percent of all individual super PAC contributions, and 
        that percentage rose to 96.94 percent in 2024. Recent elections 
        have been influenced by individual contributors who gave more 
        than $100 million to super PACs.
            (6) As bribery laws have long recognized, unlawful quid pro 
        quo exchanges can occur where the bribe is funneled into a 
        third party, such as a super PAC. See, e.g., section 201 of 
        title 18, United States Code; U.S. v. Menendez, 291 F. Supp. 
        606, 621-23 (D. N.J. 2018). Law enforcement in several States 
        have prosecuted cases that involve bribes directed to super 
        PACs. However, bribery is notoriously difficult to prosecute, 
        and these laws do not adequately protect American voters from 
        corruption.
            (7) Without reasonable limitations on contributions, super 
        PACs create an appearance of corruption. A bipartisan majority 
        of Americans believe that large super PAC contributions are 
        made in exchange for political favors, and that corruption is 
        pervasive in the Federal Government. This is, as the Supreme 
        Court recognized in Buckley v. Valeo, ``disastrous'' to 
        ``confidence in the system of representative government'' 424 
        U.S. 1, 27 (1976).
            (8) Placing limits on super PAC contributions will also 
        lessen the risk of foreign interference in United States 
        elections, making it more difficult for foreign entities to 
        funnel contributions to super PACs via third-party 
        contributors.
            (9) SpeechNow.org v. FEC, 599 F.3d 686 (D.C. Cir. 2010), 
        the appellate court case that voided existing contribution 
        limits to super PACs, wrongly treated contributions as 
        expenditures and wrongly assumed that because uncoordinated 
        independent expenditures cannot give rise to quid pro quo 
        corruption, that contributions to independent expenditure 
        committees similarly cannot give rise to corruption. But they 
        can and do.
            (10) In the 14 years since SpeechNow unleashed billions of 
        dollars in unregulated contributions, super PACs have obtained 
        unprecedented wealth and value to candidate campaigns and can 
        facilitate vast, nearly untraceable corrupt transactions.
            (11) Because Super PACs have become uniquely important to 
        candidate campaigns and can accept millions and even hundreds 
        of millions of dollars from single entities, candidates and 
        contributors have reason and opportunity to guide corrupt 
        contributions into super PACs, establishing a significant risk 
        of corruption and creating an appearance of corruption that 
        undermines the public's faith in their representatives and our 
        political system.
            (12) Reasonable limits on contributions to super PACs are 
        lawful and necessary to protect American democracy and American 
        voters.
    (b) Purpose.--It is the purpose of this Act--
            (1) to limit the risk of corrupt agreements between 
        candidates and contributors by placing reasonable limits on 
        contributions to political action committees that make 
        independent expenditures;
            (2) to limit the appearance of corruption created by 
        uncapped contributions to political action committees that make 
        independent expenditures; and
            (3) to restore the public's faith in our elections.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE 
              COMMITTEES.

    (a) Limitations.--Section 315(a)(1)(C) of the Federal Election 
Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30116(a)(1)(C)) is amended by striking 
``to any other political committee'' and inserting ``to an independent 
expenditure committee or any other political committee''.
    (b) Definition.--Section 301 of such Act (52 U.S.C. 30101) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(27) Independent expenditure committee.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `independent 
                expenditure committee' means a political committee 
                which--
                            ``(i) makes independent expenditures 
                        aggregating $5,000 or more during a calendar 
                        year; or
                            ``(ii) makes contributions to other 
                        independent expenditure committees aggregating 
                        $5,000 or more during a calendar year.
                    ``(B) Treatment of separate accounts.--The term 
                `independent expenditure committee' includes an account 
                of a political committee which is established for the 
                purpose of making independent expenditures or 
                contributions to other committees making independent 
                expenditures.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to contributions and independent expenditures made 
during the first calendar year which begins after the date of the 
enactment of this Act and each succeeding calendar year.
                                 <all>