[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6084 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 6084
To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to
strengthen the pleading standards for certain claims, and for other
purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
November 18, 2025
Mr. Fine introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee
on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to
strengthen the pleading standards for certain claims, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``ERISA Litigation Reform Act''.
SEC. 2. PLEADING STANDARD.
Section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(29 U.S.C. 1132) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(n) For the purpose of any civil action under this section
alleging that a fiduciary caused a plan to engage in a transaction that
violates subparagraph (C) or (D) of section 406(a)(1), a plaintiff has
the burden of plausibly alleging and proving that the transaction is
not exempt under section 408(b)(2).
``(o) For the purpose of any civil action under this section
alleging that a fiduciary caused a plan to engage in a transaction that
violates section 406 with respect to the purchase or sale of qualified
employer securities, a plaintiff has the burden of plausibly alleging
and proving that the transaction is not exempt under section 408(e).
``(p)(1) For the purpose of any civil action under this section
against a plan or its fiduciaries, all discovery and other proceedings
shall be stayed during the pendency of a motion brought under Rule 12
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or pending any reply to an
answer under Rule 7(a)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
unless the court finds, upon the motion of any party, that
particularized discovery is necessary to preserve evidence or to
prevent undue prejudice to that party.
``(2) During the pendency of any stay of discovery pursuant to this
subsection, unless otherwise ordered by the court or if doing so is
contrary to the party's document preservation obligations under the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party to the action with actual
knowledge of the allegations contained in the complaint shall treat all
documents, data compilations (including electronically recorded or
stored data), and tangible objects that are in the possession, custody,
or control of such person and that the person would reasonably believe
are relevant to the allegations, as if they were the subject of a
continuing request for production of documents from an opposing party
under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A party's document
preservation obligations under this paragraph extend to all documents
held by custodians (such as recordkeepers) that are in the possession,
custody, or control of the plan or the party.
``(3) A party aggrieved by the willful failure of an opposing party
to comply with paragraph (2) may apply to the court for an order
awarding appropriate sanctions.
``(4) Upon a proper showing, a court may stay discovery proceedings
in any civil action in a State court as necessary in aid of its
jurisdiction, or to protect or effectuate its judgments, in an action
subject to a stay of discovery pursuant to this subsection.''.
<all>