[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 927 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 927
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of
higher education from requiring ideological oaths or similar
statements, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 4, 2025
Mr. Crenshaw introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and Workforce
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit institutions of
higher education from requiring ideological oaths or similar
statements, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PROHIBITION RELATING TO IDEOLOGICAL OATHS AND SIMILAR
STATEMENTS.
Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C.
1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(30)(A) The institution will not--
``(i) compel, require, induce, or solicit a student
enrolled at the institution, an employee or contractor
of the institution, or an applicant for admission to or
employment or contracting at the institution to--
``(I) endorse an ideology that promotes the
differential treatment of an individual or
group of individuals based on race, color, or
ethnicity; or
``(II) provide a statement indicating the
person's--
``(aa) race, color, ethnicity, or
national origin, except to the minimum
extent needed record any necessary
demographic information;
``(bb) views on, experience with,
or past or planned contributions to
efforts involving diversity, equity,
and inclusion, marginalized groups,
antiracism, social justice,
intersectionality, or related concepts;
or
``(cc) views on or experience with
race, color, ethnicity, national
origin, or other immutable
characteristics; or
``(ii) provide preferential consideration to a
student enrolled at the institution, an employee or
contractor of the institution, or an applicant for
admission to or employment or contracting at the
institution on the basis of the person's unsolicited
statement in support of an ideology described in clause
(i)(I).
``(B) Nothing in this paragraph may be construed--
``(i) to restrict academic research or coursework;
``(ii) to prevent a person from providing to an
institution of higher education the information
described in subparagraph (A) on the person's own
initiative separate from any specific requirement or
request from the institution; or
``(iii) to prevent an institution from requiring an
applicant for admission to or employment or contracting
at the institution to--
``(I) disclose or discuss the content of
the applicant's research or artistic creations;
``(II) certify compliance with State and
Federal antidiscrimination law; or
``(III) discuss pedagogical approaches or
experience with students with learning
disabilities.''.
<all>