[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 25 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 25
Expunging the January 13, 2021, impeachment of President Donald John
Trump.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 9, 2025
Ms. Greene of Georgia (for herself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Weber
of Texas, Mr. Collins, Mr. Crane, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. Moylan, Mr.
Nehls, Mrs. Luna, and Mr. Van Drew) submitted the following resolution;
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expunging the January 13, 2021, impeachment of President Donald John
Trump.
Whereas the Constitution provides that the House of Representatives ``shall have
the sole Power of Impeachment'' and that the President ``shall be
removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason,
Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors'';
Whereas, on January 13, 2021, the House of Representatives passed H. Res. 24,
Agreeing to Article I of the Resolution Impeaching Donald John Trump,
President of the United States, for high Crimes and Misdemeanors, by a
vote of 232 Yeas, 197 Nays, and 4 Not Voting;
Whereas Article I of the Resolution, entitled ``Incitement of Insurrection'',
contains a subjective account of that which transpired at the Capitol on
January 6, 2021;
Whereas Article I of the Resolution omits any discussion of the circumstances,
unusual voting patterns, and voting anomalies of the 2020 Presidential
election itself;
Whereas prior to considering and voting on the Impeachment Resolution,
Democratic leadership in the House made no effort to understand the
rationale behind the widespread mistrust harbored by American voters in
the wake of the 2020 Presidential election;
Whereas President Trump won 18 of the 19 bellwether counties across the country
that have predicted the winner of every Presidential election since
1980;
Whereas President Trump received approximately 10,100,000 more votes than in the
2016 Presidential election, making President Trump the first incumbent
President in 132 years, since Grover Cleveland's failed bid for
reelection in 1888, to have increased his vote from his initial election
and seemingly still not won reelection in the subsequent cycle;
Whereas Secretaries of State and State boards of election across the country
changed State election laws sua sponte in the name of ``health and
safety'' in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic;
Whereas public officials in numerous States issued guidance to counties that
local election officials were precluded from performing on-the-spot
signature analysis, ensuring absentee ballots could not be rejected
because an election official believed the voter's signature on a ballot
envelope did not match the signature on file;
Whereas four Democratic lawmakers (Senators Warren, Klobuchar, Wyden, and
Representative Pocan), formerly enthusiastic proponents of voting
machine integrity, went so far as to send a 2019 letter to voting system
companies, providing real examples of voting machine problems (such as
switching votes, rejecting paper ballots, vulnerability to cyberattack)
yet, following the 2020 Presidential election, any individual who raised
the same concerns was dismissed by Democrats and pundits in the
mainstream media as spreading ``misinformation'' and as being nothing
more than a ``conspiracy theorist'';
Whereas recount efforts following the 2020 Presidential election were
vociferously opposed by Governors and Secretaries of State in key swing
States like Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia;
Whereas public officials in key swing States ignored, and took great steps to
resist, calls for accountability and transparency in election
administration and the counting and recounting of ballots in their
respective States, further sowing the seed of doubt in the electorate as
to the legitimacy and fairness in the final result;
Whereas rather than setting forth facts and evidence supporting the need to
impeach a President a matter of days before he leaves office, Article I
of the Resolution cites two quotes from President Trump's January 6,
2021, speech on the Ellipse that lack any context, and are viewed in a
light most unfavorable to the President;
Whereas Article I of the Resolution grasps at the fact that President Trump
stated ``we won this election, and we won it by a landslide'', as well
as ``if you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country
anymore'', as undeniable evidence that ``high Crimes and Misdemeanors''
were committed, and that President Trump engaged in ``insurrection or
rebellion against the United States'';
Whereas Article I of the Resolution conveniently fails to mention the fact that
President Trump explicitly stated, ``I know that everyone here will soon
be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically
make your voices heard'';
Whereas the consideration of the Resolution by the House of Representatives
failed to follow any meaningful legislative process whatsoever;
Whereas not a single evidentiary hearing on the Resolution was held, no
witnesses were heard, and no process or opportunity to respond was
provided to President Trump;
Whereas no Members of Congress were provided an opportunity to review or amend
the Resolution before it came before the full House of Representatives
for consideration;
Whereas the Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives is the only
committee that published an official Committee Report for the
Resolution, that being the Report accompanying H. Res. 41, the rule
providing for floor consideration of the Resolution;
Whereas, while a ``Majority Staff Report'' was released by Democrats on the
House Committee on the Judiciary, the Committee did not issue an
official Committee Report, via regular order, for H. Res. 24, the
Resolution itself;
Whereas failing to issue a Committee Report for H. Res. 24 conveniently
precluded House Judiciary Committee Republicans a forum in which they
may have showcased their dissenting views on the Resolution;
Whereas to assert that a lone Committee Report accompanying a procedural rule
for floor consideration provided sufficient due process to the Trump
administration or the American people via their elected representatives,
and to assert that voting Yea on the Resolution was justified, runs
contrary to the Oath of Office taken by all Members of the House of
Representatives;
Whereas neither the Committee Report issued by the Committee on Rules of the
House of Representatives, nor the text of the Impeachment Resolution
itself, contain any mention of the text of section 3 of article I of the
Constitution, which provides that ``Judgment in Cases of Impeachment
shall not extend further than to removal from Office'';
Whereas a plain reading of the text of section 3 of article I of the
Constitution demonstrates that an official tried, and convicted, in the
Senate must first occupy the ``Office'' from which he is to be removed,
let alone forever be disqualified from ``hold[ing] any office . . .
under the United States'';
Whereas in frantically passing the Impeachment Resolution on January 13, 2021,
only 2 days after it was introduced in a frenzy of hysteria, House
Democrats, and 10 House Republicans, left the Senate only one week to
conduct a complete trial and convict President Trump before he left
office;
Whereas doing so left the Senate virtually no chance to comport with section 3
of article I of the Constitution;
Whereas unsurprisingly, 31 days passed before the Senate held a vote and failed
to convict President Trump, 23 days after he had left office; and
Whereas as further indication of the partisan political motivations behind the
Resolution, once the Article of Impeachment was passed by the House of
Representatives and transmitted to the Senate, the Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court refused to serve as the presiding officer for the trial,
as required by section 3 of article I of the Constitution, and instead
the Senate President pro tempore, Senator Pat Leahy, a Democrat from
Vermont, and a reliably partisan politician, served as the presiding
officer, perfecting the entirety of the process as nothing more than an
unconstitutional exercise in futility, moot, and fantastical political
theater: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the January 13, 2021, impeachment of President
Donald John Trump is expunged, as if such article had never passed the
full House of Representatives, as the facts and circumstances upon
which such article was based met the burden of proving neither that
President Trump committed ``high Crimes and Misdemeanors'', as set
forth in section 4 of article II of the Constitution, nor that
President Trump engaged in ``insurrection or rebellion against the
United States'', such that he is forever precluded from ``hold[ing] any
office . . . under the United States'' pursuant to section 3 of the
14th Amendment to the Constitution.
<all>