[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 34 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 34
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal
Government should drop all charges against Edward Snowden.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 13, 2025
Ms. Greene of Georgia (for herself and Mr. Massie) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary, and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal
Government should drop all charges against Edward Snowden.
Whereas, during a Senate hearing on March 12, 2013, James Clapper, then-Director
of National Intelligence, was questioned by Senator Ron Wyden, and was
asked whether the National Security Agency ``collect[ed] any type of
data at all on millions, or hundreds of millions of Americans'', to
which Clapper replied ``No, sir'', and added ``not wittingly'', a
response he later admitted was ``clearly erroneous'';
Whereas, in June 2013, Edward Snowden disclosed to a selective group of
journalists National Security Agency documents exposing that bulk
collection of Americans' telephone records from telecommunications
providers by the intelligence community was occurring;
Whereas, on June 21, 2013, the Department of Justice unsealed charges against
Edward Snowden for violating sections 793(d) and 798(a)(3) of the
Espionage Act and theft of government property under section 641 of
title 18, United States Code;
Whereas, on January 23, 2014, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board's
report on the National Security Agency's telephone records program found
``no instance in which the program directly contributed to the discovery
of a previously unknown terrorist plot or the disruption of a terrorist
attack'' and that the program significantly threatened and violated the
constitutional rights of the American people;
Whereas, on May 7, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit ruled that section 215 of the Patriot Act did not authorize the
bulk collection of telephone records and therefore such collection was
unlawful;
Whereas, on September 2, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit ruled the National Security Agency's telephone records bulk
collection program illegal and possibly unconstitutional under the
Fourth Amendment;
Whereas the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found the
telephone records bulk collection program did not play a pivotal role in
any terrorism investigations;
Whereas those involved in the collection of Americans' telephone records have
yet to be held accountable for their illegal actions, further increasing
the danger of continued government overreach and abuse of civil
liberties; and
Whereas the United States Government must protect whistleblowers who expose
illegal and unconstitutional acts of abuse within our government: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives
that--
(1) the National Security Agency's bulk collection
telephone records program was illegal and unconstitutional;
(2) Edward Snowden's disclosure of this program to
journalists was in the public interest; and
(3) the Federal Government should drop all charges against
Edward Snowden.
<all>