[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 887 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 887
To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of
a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 6, 2025
Mr. Lee (for himself and Mr. Curtis) introduced the following bill;
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of
a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Basin Fund Preservation Act''.
SEC. 2. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TO ADDRESS POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF A
CERTAIN RECORD OF DECISION ON THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER
BASIN FUND.
(a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the
Commissioner of Reclamation, and the Secretary of Energy, acting
through the Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration, in
consultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group,
shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to explore and address
the impact that the record of decision entitled the ``Supplement to the
2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Record
of Decision'' and dated July 2024 (referred to in this section as the
``record of decision'') has on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund
(referred to in this section as the ``Fund'').
(b) Required Plan.--The memorandum of understanding entered into
under subsection (a) shall, using information derived from existing
hydropower contracts, include the establishment of a plan to--
(1) address the effects that the record of decision may
have on Fund obligations including routine operations,
maintenance, and replacement of critical infrastructure;
(2) address the impact that the record of decision has on
hydropower production at Glen Canyon Dam, including costs to
replace hydropower resources and grid reliability; and
(3) identify impacts that the record of decision has had on
species listed as a threatened species or an endangered species
under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C. 1533).
(c) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this Act preempts any rights or
obligations under subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title
5, United States Code (commonly known as the ``Administrative Procedure
Act'').
<all>