[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 98 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 98
To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a vetting
process for prospective applicants for high-cost universal service
program funding.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
January 15, 2025
Mrs. Capito (for herself, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Curtis) introduced the
following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a vetting
process for prospective applicants for high-cost universal service
program funding.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Broadband Protection Act of
2025''.
SEC. 2. VETTING PROCESS FOR PROSPECTIVE HIGH-COST UNIVERSAL SERVICE
FUND APPLICANTS.
Section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) is
amended by adding at the end the following:
``(m) Vetting of High-Cost Fund Recipients.--
``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection--
``(A) the term `covered funding' means any new
offer of high-cost universal service program funding,
including funding provided through a reverse
competitive bidding mechanism provided under this
section, for the deployment of a broadband-capable
network and the provision of supported services over
the network; and
``(B) the term `new covered funding award' means an
award of covered funding that is made based on an
application submitted to the Commission on or after the
date on which rules are promulgated under paragraph
(2).
``(2) Commission rulemaking.--Not later than 180 days after
the date of enactment of this subsection, the Commission shall
initiate a rulemaking proceeding to establish a vetting process
for applicants for, and other recipients of, a new covered
funding award.
``(3) Contents.--
``(A) In general.--In promulgating rules under
paragraph (2), the Commission shall provide that,
consistent with principles of technology neutrality,
the Commission will only award covered funding to
applicants that can demonstrate that they meet the
qualifications in subparagraph (B).
``(B) Qualifications described.--An applicant for a
new covered funding award shall include in the initial
application a proposal containing sufficient detail and
documentation for the Commission to ascertain that the
applicant possesses the technical, financial, and
operational capabilities, and has a reasonable business
plan, to deploy the proposed network and deliver
services with the relevant performance characteristics
and requirements defined by the Commission and as
pledged by the applicant.
``(C) Evaluation of proposal.--The Commission shall
evaluate a proposal described in subparagraph (B)
against--
``(i) reasonable and well-established
technical, financial, and operational
standards, including the technical standards
adopted by the Commission in orders of the
Commission relating to Establishing the Digital
Opportunity Data Collection (WC Docket No. 19-
195) (or orders of the Commission relating to
modernizing any successor collection) for
purposes of entities that must report broadband
availability coverage; and
``(ii) the applicant's history of complying
with requirements in Commission and other
government broadband deployment funding
programs.
``(D) Penalties for pre-authorization defaults.--In
adopting rules for any new covered funding award, the
Commission shall set a penalty for pre-authorization
defaults of at least $9,000 per violation and may not
limit the base forfeiture to an amount less than 30
percent of the applicant's total support, unless the
Commission demonstrates the need for lower penalties in
a particular instance.''.
<all>