[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. CON. RES. 8
Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 3, 2025
Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Ms. Hassan, Mrs. Capito, Ms. Collins, Mr.
Cramer, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Daines, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Justice, Mr. King, Ms.
Murkowski, Mr. Ricketts, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Sheehy, Mr. Wicker, Mr.
Young, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Hoeven, Ms. Lummis, and Mr. Risch) submitted
the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act.
Whereas the United States enjoys broadcasting and sound recording industries
that are the envy of the world due to the mutually beneficial
relationship that has existed among these industries for many decades;
Whereas, for nearly a century, Congress has rejected repeated calls by the
recording industry to impose a performance fee on local radio stations
for simply playing music on the radio, as such a fee would upset the
mutually beneficial relationship between local radio and the recording
industry;
Whereas local radio stations provide free publicity and promotion to the
recording industry and performers of music in the form of radio airplay,
interviews with performers, introduction of new performers, concert
promotions, and publicity that promotes the sale of music, concert
tickets, ring tones, music videos, and associated merchandise;
Whereas committees in the Senate and the House of Representatives have
previously reported that ``the sale of many sound recordings and the
careers of many performers have benefitted considerably from airplay and
other promotional activities provided by both noncommercial and
advertiser-supported, free over-the-air broadcasting'';
Whereas local radio broadcasters provide tens of thousands of hours of essential
local news and weather information during times of national emergencies
and natural disasters, as well as public affairs programming, sports,
and hundreds of millions of dollars worth of time for public service
announcements and local fundraising efforts for worthy charitable
causes, all of which are jeopardized if local radio stations are forced
to divert revenues to pay for a new performance fee;
Whereas there are many thousands of local radio stations that will suffer severe
economic hardship if any new performance fee is imposed, as will many
other small businesses that play music, including bars, restaurants,
retail establishments, sports and other entertainment venues, shopping
centers, and transportation facilities; and
Whereas the hardship that would result from a new performance fee would hurt
businesses in the United States and ultimately the consumers in the
United States who rely on local radio for news, weather, and
entertainment, and such a performance fee is not justified when the
current system has produced the most prolific and innovative
broadcasting, music, and sound recording industries in the world: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),
That Congress should not impose any new performance fee, tax, royalty,
or other charge--
(1) relating to the public performance of sound recordings
on a local radio station for broadcasting sound recordings over
the air; or
(2) on any business for the public performance of sound
recordings on a local radio station broadcast over the air.
<all>