[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 567 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 567
Expressing that any attempt by foreign entities to censor or penalize
constitutionally protected speech of United States persons shall be
opposed.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
December 17, 2025
Mr. Lee submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
Committee on Foreign Relations
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing that any attempt by foreign entities to censor or penalize
constitutionally protected speech of United States persons shall be
opposed.
Whereas freedom of speech is a fundamental, constitutional right of every United
States person;
Whereas freedom of speech is a hallmark of American exceptionalism;
Whereas freedom of speech is necessary to ensure that truth can always be
spoken, lies can always be exposed, and important questions can always
be asked, and that the strong can always be challenged and the
vulnerable can always be heard;
Whereas no person is fit to govern the thoughts or beliefs of another;
Whereas public forums, including social media platforms, give people the
opportunity to exercise their right to free speech;
Whereas undue foreign influence threatens the constitutionally protected right
to freedom of speech;
Whereas the Digital Services Act of the European Union requires large platforms
to remove certain speech based on the incorrect assertion that
politicians are entitled to govern the thoughts and beliefs of other
persons;
Whereas the European Union is attempting to force United States entities to use
products and technology to censor and undermine free speech occurring in
the United States;
Whereas the European Union is threatening steep penalties under the Digital
Services Act if United States entities do not implement the censorship
regime required under the Act;
Whereas, on August 12, 2024, the European Union threatened Elon Musk with
penalties under the Digital Services Act for conducting an interview
with President Trump on X, insinuating that the conversation between
United States citizens on United States soil would produce ``harmful
content'' that would ``spillover'' from the United States;
Whereas, on December 5, 2025, the European Union announced a $140,000,000 fine
against X under the Digital Services Act;
Whereas the European Union is actively investigating and discouraging the use of
Community Notes-style policies employed by social media companies to
avoid censorship and institutional bias, instead pushing for aggressive
content censorship models;
Whereas the Digital Services Act authorizes fines of up to 6 percent of a
company's global revenue for not complying with efforts to target speech
by United States persons;
Whereas the actions of the European Union under the Digital Services Act
conflict with the sovereign duty of the United States Government to
protect the constitutional rights of United States persons; and
Whereas such actions by the European Union, if left unchecked, may cause a
chilling effect on free speech in the United States: Now, therefore, be
it
Resolved, That the Senate--
(1) reaffirms its commitment to protecting the commercial
interests and free speech rights of United States persons;
(2) recognizes that the Digital Services Act is
incompatible with the free speech tradition of the United
States and the commitments that technology companies have made
to hosting a diversity of opinions;
(3) disapproves of any attempt by a foreign entity to
export censorship or limit the exercise of free speech by
United States persons;
(4) disapproves of any attempt by a foreign entity to levy
fines or other penalties against United States persons
participating in constitutionally protected activities;
(5) disapproves of the attempts by the European Union to
force United States entities to develop or use products and
technology in ways that undermine free speech or foster
censorship;
(6) commits to oppose any implementation of disapproved
activities; and
(7) urges the Trump administration to ensure swift and firm
rejoinders to any implementation of disapproved activities.
<all>