[Pages H2850-H2852]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




             GLOBAL INVESTMENT IN AMERICAN JOBS ACT OF 2025

  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the 
bill (H.R. 1679) to direct the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination 
with the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, to 
conduct an interagency review of and report to Congress on ways to 
increase the global competitiveness of the United States in attracting 
foreign direct investment.
  The Clerk read the title of the bill.
  The text of the bill is as follows:

                               H.R. 1679

       Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 
     the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

       This Act may be cited as the ``Global Investment in 
     American Jobs Act of 2025''.

     SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

       It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) the ability of the United States to attract foreign 
     direct investment from responsible private-sector entities 
     based in trusted countries is directly linked to the long-
     term economic prosperity, global competitiveness, and 
     security of the United States;
       (2) it is a top national priority to enhance the global 
     competitiveness, economic prosperity, and security of the 
     United States by--
       (A) removing unnecessary barriers to foreign direct 
     investment from responsible private-sector entities based in 
     trusted countries and the jobs that such investment creates 
     throughout the United States;
       (B) promoting policies to ensure the United States remains 
     the premier global destination to invest, hire, innovate, 
     provide services, and manufacture products;
       (C) promoting policies to ensure the United States remains 
     the global leader in developing and deploying cutting-edge 
     technologies, such as self-driving vehicle technology, 
     artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, quantum 
     computing, blockchain; and
       (D) promoting policies that maintain and expand resilient 
     supply chains and reduce the dependence of the United States 
     on supply chains from China;
       (3) maintaining the United States commitment to an open 
     investment policy with private-sector entities based in 
     trusted countries encourages other countries to reciprocate 
     and enable the United States to open new markets abroad for 
     United States companies and their products;
       (4) while foreign direct investment by responsible private-
     sector entities based in trusted countries can enhance the 
     United States economic strength, policies regarding foreign 
     direct investment should reflect security interests and 
     should not disadvantage domestic investors or companies;
       (5) United States efforts to attract foreign direct 
     investment from responsible private-sector entities based in 
     trusted countries should be consistent with efforts to 
     maintain and improve domestic standard of living;
       (6) as digital information becomes increasingly important 
     to the United States economy and the development of new 
     technologies and services that will be crucial to the 
     country's competitiveness in the 21st century global economy, 
     barriers including data localization and infringement of 
     intellectual property rights must be further addressed; and
       (7) foreign direct investment by companies or other 
     entities owned, directed, supported, or influenced by the 
     Chinese Communist Party is a threat to U.S. security and 
     merits an aggressive policy framework to protect U.S. 
     interests, jobs, intellectual property, and security.

     SEC. 3. FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT REVIEW.

       (a) Review.--The Secretary of Commerce and the Comptroller 
     General of the Government Accountability Office, in 
     consultation with the Federal Interagency Investment Working 
     Group established by Executive Order 13577 and in 
     consultation with the heads of other relevant Federal 
     departments

[[Page H2851]]

     and agencies, shall conduct an interagency review of the 
     global competitiveness of the United States in attracting 
     foreign direct investment from responsible private-sector 
     entities based in trusted countries and addressing key 
     foreign trade barriers that firms in advanced technology 
     sectors face in the global digital economy.
       (b) Specific Matters To Be Included.--The review conducted 
     pursuant to subsection (a) shall include a review of the 
     following:
       (1) The current economic impact of foreign direct 
     investment in the United States, with particular focus on 
     manufacturing, services, trade (with an emphasis on digital 
     trade), and U.S. jobs.
       (2) Trends in global cross-border investment and data flows 
     and the underlying factors for such trends.
       (3) Federal Government policies that facilitate foreign 
     direct investment attraction and retention from responsible 
     private-sector entities based in trusted countries.
       (4) Foreign direct investment as compared to direct 
     investment by domestic entities.
       (5) Foreign direct investment that takes the form of 
     greenfield investment as compared to foreign direct 
     investment relating to merger and acquisition activity.
       (6) The unique challenges posed by foreign direct 
     investment, particularly acquisitions, in the United States 
     by State-owned or State-backed enterprises, especially from 
     State-directed economies, including companies or other 
     entities owned, directed, supported, or influenced by the 
     Chinese Communist Party.
       (7) Specific information on the prevalence of investments 
     made by State-owned or State-backed enterprises, especially 
     from State-directed economies, including companies or other 
     entities owned, directed, supported, or influenced by the 
     Chinese Communist Party, with a particular focus on 
     investments relating to manufacturing, services, trade (with 
     an emphasis on digital trade), and jobs.
       (8) How other trusted countries are dealing with the 
     challenge of State-directed and State-supported investment 
     and whether there are opportunities to work with like-minded 
     nations to address such challenge.
       (9) Ongoing Federal Government efforts to improve the 
     investment climate and facilitate greater levels of foreign 
     direct investment in the United States from responsible 
     private-sector entities based in trusted countries.
       (10) Innovative and noteworthy initiatives by State and 
     local government to attract foreign investment from 
     responsible private-sector entities based in trusted 
     countries.
       (11) Initiatives by other countries to identify best 
     practices for increasing global competitiveness in attracting 
     foreign direct investment from responsible private-sector 
     entities based in trusted countries.
       (12) The impact that protectionist policies by other 
     countries, including forced data localization rules, forced 
     localization of production, industrial subsidies, and the 
     infringement of intellectual property rights, have on the 
     advanced technology economy of the United States and the 
     ability for United States located firms to develop innovative 
     technologies.
       (13) Other barriers to the ability of the United States to 
     compete globally in an increasingly connected and digital 
     global economy, including, the use of technical barriers to 
     trade, country-specific standards for technology products and 
     digital services.
       (14) The adequacy of efforts by the Federal Government to 
     encourage and facilitate foreign direct investment in the 
     United States.
       (15) Efforts by the Chinese Communist Party to circumvent 
     existing laws to gain access to U.S. markets, foreign direct 
     investment responsible private-sector entities based in 
     trusted countries, or intellectual property.
       (c) Limitation.--The review conducted pursuant to 
     subsection (a) shall not address laws or policies relating to 
     the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
       (d) Public Comment.--Before--
       (1) conducting the review pursuant to subsection (a), the 
     Secretary shall publish notice of the review in the Federal 
     Register and shall provide an opportunity for public comment 
     on the matters to be covered by the review; and
       (2) the submission of the report pursuant to subsection 
     (e), the Secretary shall publish the proposed findings and 
     recommendations in the Federal Register and shall provide an 
     opportunity for public comment.
       (e) Report to Congress.--Not later than one year after the 
     date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in 
     coordination with the Federal Interagency Investment Working 
     Group and the heads of other relevant Federal departments and 
     agencies, shall submit to Congress a report on the findings 
     of the review required pursuant to subsection (a) and include 
     recommendations for increasing the global competitiveness of 
     the United States in attracting foreign direct investment 
     from responsible private-sector entities based in trusted 
     countries in a manner that strengthens or maintains the 
     security, labor, consumer, financial, or environmental 
     protections of the United States.
       (f) Definitions.--In this Act:
       (1) Responsible private-sector entity.--The term 
     ``responsible private-sector entity'' means an entity that 
     the Secretary of Commerce determines is--
       (A) not organized under the laws of a foreign adversary; 
     and
       (B) not owned, controlled, or otherwise subject to the 
     influence of, a foreign adversary.
       (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
     of Commerce.
       (3) Trusted country.--The term ``trusted country'' means a 
     country that is not determined by the Secretary of Commerce 
     to be a of the United States.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from 
Florida (Mr. Bilirakis) and the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) 
each will control 20 minutes.
  The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida.


                             General Leave

  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members 
may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks 
and include extraneous material on this particular bill.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Florida?
  There was no objection.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may 
consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 1679, the Global 
Investment in American Jobs Act of 2025. This is being led by the 
gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Evans), my good friend and a very 
effective Member of Congress.
  This bill directs the Secretary of Commerce and the Comptroller 
General to conduct a review and report on ways to increase and attract 
foreign direct investment, or FDI, from trusted countries.
  The United States is currently a global leader in deployment of 
emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, autonomous 
vehicles, blockchain, and many more. To maintain that leadership, we 
must continue to foster an environment that encourages our allies and 
trusted global partners to invest here at home.
  By removing barriers and showing the world that the U.S. is the 
premier destination for investment, innovation, manufacturing, and 
deployment, the U.S. will cement itself as the global leader of the new 
age of technological advancements.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in favor of this 
particular bill, H.R. 1679.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise to speak in support of H.R. 1679, the Global 
Investment in American Jobs Act. This legislation will encourage 
foreign direct investment to support high-quality American jobs.
  Foreign direct investment from nonadversarial Nations can be used to 
grow critical sectors important for our economic success and national 
security including by creating new jobs in our Nation's manufacturing 
sector.
  Once the envy of the world, our manufacturing base has faced steady 
headwinds for the last several decades. Our Nation's share of global 
manufacturing activity declined from 28 percent in 2002 to just over 17 
percent in 2020.
  Investment in America's small and medium manufacturers, the bedrock 
of our industrial might, has also declined over the last 20 years by 
more than $200 billion. In that same two-decade period, our domestic 
manufacturing base has shed more than 4 million jobs.
  It is time to reverse these trends by revitalizing our Nation's 
manufacturing industry and bringing jobs back home. The work we did 
under the Biden administration, passing the bipartisan infrastructure 
law, Inflation Reduction Act, and the CHIPS and Science Act, is already 
helping to turn the tide.
  I am concerned that actions by the Trump administration are putting 
this great success at risk. The attempts to claw back these historic 
investments in our manufacturing sector, unstable and erratic tariff 
policies, and mass elimination of trusted Federal programs and partners 
put American businesses at a disadvantage.
  All of these actions by the Trump administration are detrimental to 
our ability to compete globally. I encourage my Republican colleagues 
to stand up for American businesses, large and small, against the 
chaotic actions of this administration.
  Foreign direct investment can be part of the solution to revitalize 
American manufacturing and job creation. Over a third of all foreign 
direct investments are in domestic manufacturing, exceeding a total of 
$120 billion a year.

[[Page H2852]]

  This bill will help ensure we keep that flow of investment strong and 
that such investments support quality, good-paying jobs right here at 
home. It must be coupled with Federal trade policies coming from the 
White House and this Congress that encourages stability in the 
marketplace, protects our relationships with close trading partners, 
and lowers costs for American families.
  Mr. Speaker, I commend Representatives Kelly and Evans for their 
leadership on this issue. I urge my colleagues to support this 
legislation.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to 
the gentleman from the State of Colorado (Mr. Evans), a true public 
servant.
  Mr. EVANS of Colorado. Mr. Speaker, today I rise in strong support of 
my bipartisan bill, the Global Investment in American Jobs Act.
  Mr. Speaker, this is a critical piece of legislation that will help 
bolster American competitiveness in the face of increasing economic 
aggression from the Chinese Communist Party, all while helping to 
create jobs in my home State of Colorado and all across the Nation.
  First and foremost, I extend my gratitude to the gentlewoman from 
Illinois (Ms. Kelly) for helping to introduce this bill with me. I am 
proud to work with her in a bipartisan fashion to advance this bill 
first through the Energy and Commerce Committee and now onto the House 
floor.
  In Colorado alone, there are more than 126,000 workers that are the 
direct result of foreign direct investment. Of these workers, 31 
percent work in manufacturing roles. These jobs, like other good, blue-
collar jobs in my district, provide stable, good-paying careers to 
constituents to help provide for their families. Oftentimes, these jobs 
are obtainable to folks with a high school degree after a quick and 
affordable career technical education course.
  My bill tasks the Secretary of Commerce with conducting an 
interagency review to help create a more favorable environment for 
foreign direct investment, ultimately boosting our economy and 
benefiting American workers.

  International companies are beginning to recognize what most of us 
have known for decades. The American worker is among the most talented 
in the world. Whether it is energy, technology, or chemicals, Americans 
produce some of the highest quality products in the cleanest, most 
efficient, and socially responsible ways possible.
  With the resurgence in America's manufacturing industry, global 
investors are now clamoring to pump money into emerging industries in 
the U.S. Congress needs to ensure that we as a Nation are striking the 
right approach in courting international companies and facilitating 
responsible investments.
  This legislation doesn't just help create good-paying jobs. It also 
helps to ensure that America remains competitive with the Chinese 
Communist Party by retaining our technological advantage in research 
and development.
  International employers in the U.S. account for more than $80 billion 
in research and development. With this bill, Congress can take a major 
step in seeing this number increase over the coming years.
  This isn't just something that we should consider doing. It is 
necessary. In the face of increasingly unscrupulous tactics from the 
Chinese Communist Party such as rampant intellectual property theft, 
corporate espionage, the use of slave labor, and environmentally 
reckless energy practices, it is imperative for the United States to 
leverage every available tool to bolster American industry, such as 
this bill.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting the Global 
Investment in American Jobs Act to maintain Americans' competitive 
edge, invest in our domestic talent, bring more jobs home, and drive 
innovation to usher in the next era of manufacturing dominance in the 
United States.
  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, I know in my district that foreign direct 
investment is important in creating jobs. I would certainly say that 
nationally this is an important piece of legislation. For that reason, 
I urge my colleagues to support it.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  Mr. BILIRAKIS. Mr. Speaker, in closing, I encourage a ``yes'' vote on 
this particular bill.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the 
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Bilirakis) that the House suspend the rules 
and pass the bill, H.R. 1679.
  The question was taken; and (two-thirds being in the affirmative) the 
rules were suspended and the bill was passed.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________