There is 1 version of this bill. View text

Click the check-box to add or remove the section, click the text link to scroll to that section.
Titles Actions Overview All Actions Cosponsors Committees Related Bills Subjects Latest Summary All Summaries

Titles (2)

Short Titles

Short Titles - Senate

Short Titles as Introduced

Fair Employment Reinstatement Act

Official Titles

Official Titles - Senate

Official Titles as Introduced

A bill to amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to clarify the burden of proof for unlawful employment practices in disparate impact cases, and for other purposes.

Actions Overview (1)

Date Actions Overview
06/23/1989Introduced in Senate

All Actions (2)

Date All Actions
09/26/1989Committee on Labor and Human Resources requested executive comment from Department of Labor.
06/23/1989Read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources.
Action By: Senate

Cosponsors (12)

Committees (1)

Committees, subcommittees and links to reports associated with this bill are listed here, as well as the nature and date of committee activity and Congressional report number.

Committee / Subcommittee Date Activity Reports
Senate Labor and Human Resources06/23/1989 Referred to

A related bill may be a companion measure, an identical bill, a procedurally-related measure, or one with text similarities. Bill relationships are identified by the House, the Senate, or CRS, and refer only to same-congress measures.

Subjects (3)

Latest Summary (1)

There is one summary for S.1261. View summaries

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (06/23/1989)

Fair Employment Reinstatement Act - Amends the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to declare that an unlawful employment practice is established when a complaining party demonstrates that an employment practice, or a group of employment practices, results in a disparate impact on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and the respondent fails to demonstrate that such practice or practices are required by business necessity.

Provides that: (1) if the complaining party shows that a group of practices results in disparate impact, the party need not show which practice or practices result in the disparate impact; and (2) if the respondent demonstrates that a specific practice does not contribute to the disparate impact, the respondent need not show that such practice is required by business necessity.

Defines "required by business necessity" to mean essential to effective job performance.