There are 3 versions of this bill. View text

Click the check-box to add or remove the section, click the text link to scroll to that section.
Titles Actions Overview All Actions Cosponsors Committees Related Bills Subjects Latest Summary All Summaries

Titles (7)

Popular Titles

Contract with America bill (Identified by CRS)
Regulatory Overhaul bill (Identified by CRS)

Short Titles

Short Titles - House of Representatives

Short Titles as Passed House

Risk Assessment and Cost-Benefit Act of 1995

Short Titles as Passed House for portions of this bill
  • Risk Assessment and Communication Act of 1995

Short Titles as Introduced

Risk Assessment and Cost-Benefit Act of 1995

Short Titles as Introduced for portions of this bill
  • Risk Assessment and Communication Act of 1995

Official Titles

Official Titles - House of Representatives

Official Title as Introduced

To provide regulatory reform and to focus national economic resources on the greatest risks to human health, safety, and the environment through scientifically objective and unbiased risk assessments and through the consideration of costs and benefits in major rules, and for other purposes.


Actions Overview (2)

Date
02/28/1995Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 286 - 141 (Roll no. 183).
02/23/1995Introduced in House

All Actions (56)

Date Chamber
03/02/1995SenateReceived in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.
02/28/1995-7:42pmHouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
02/28/1995-7:42pmHouseOn passage Passed by recorded vote: 286 - 141 (Roll no. 183).
02/28/1995-7:33pmHouseOn motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 174 - 250 (Roll no. 182).
02/28/1995-7:14pmHouseThe previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
02/28/1995-7:03pmHouseFloor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Doggett motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion require that a new section be included in the bill regarding peer review programs and prohibitions of conflicts of interest.
02/28/1995-7:03pmHouseMr. Doggett moved to recommit with instructions to Science, Space and Technology.
02/28/1995-7:02pmHouseThe House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
02/28/1995-7:01pmHouseThe previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
02/28/1995-7:00pmHouseThe House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1022.
02/28/1995-7:00pmHouseH.Amdt.228 On agreeing to the Walker amendment (A011) Agreed to by voice vote.
02/28/1995-7:00pmHouseH.Amdt.229 On agreeing to the Brown (CA) amendment (A012) Failed by recorded vote: 157 - 263 (Roll no. 181).
02/28/1995-6:37pmHouseH.Amdt.229 Amendment (A012) offered by Mr. Brown (CA) to the Walker amendment (A011).
02/28/1995-6:32pmHouseH.Amdt.228 Amendment (A011) offered by Mr. Walker.
02/28/1995-6:32pmHouseH.Amdt.227 On agreeing to the Boehlert amendment (A010) Failed by recorded vote: 181 - 238 (Roll no. 180).
02/28/1995-5:08pmHouseH.Amdt.227 Amendment (A010) offered by Mr. Boehlert.
02/28/1995-5:08pmHouseH.Amdt.226 On agreeing to the Hayes amendment (A009) Agreed to by voice vote.
02/28/1995-5:06pmHouseH.Amdt.226 Amendment (A009) offered by Mr. Hayes.
02/28/1995-5:05pmHouseH.Amdt.225 On agreeing to the Barton amendment (A008) Failed by recorded vote: 206 - 220 (Roll no. 179).
02/28/1995-3:20pmHouseH.Amdt.225 Amendment (A008) offered by Mr. Barton.
02/28/1995-3:19pmHouseH.Amdt.224 On agreeing to the Markey amendment (A007) Failed by recorded vote: 177 - 247 (Roll no. 178).
02/28/1995-2:05pmHouseH.Amdt.224 Amendment (A007) offered by Mr. Markey.
02/28/1995-2:05pmHouseH.Amdt.223 On agreeing to the Smith (MI) amendment (A006) Agreed to by voice vote.
02/28/1995-2:00pmHouseH.Amdt.223 Amendment (A006) offered by Mr. Smith (MI).
02/28/1995-1:58pmHouseH.Amdt.222 On agreeing to the Roemer amendment (A005) Failed by recorded vote: 192 - 231 (Roll no. 177).
02/28/1995-11:52amHouseH.Amdt.222 Amendment (A005) offered by Mr. Roemer.
02/28/1995-11:52amHouseH.Amdt.221 On agreeing to the Oxley amendment (A004) Agreed to by voice vote.
02/28/1995-11:49amHouseH.Amdt.221 Amendment (A004) offered by Mr. Oxley.
02/28/1995-11:49amHouseH.Amdt.220 On agreeing to the Traficant amendment (A003) Agreed to by voice vote.
02/28/1995-11:46amHouseH.Amdt.220 Amendment (A003) offered by Mr. Traficant.
02/28/1995-11:45amHouseThe House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
02/28/1995-11:45amHouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2321-2373)
02/27/1995-9:22pmHouseCommittee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1022 as unfinished business.
02/27/1995-9:21pmHouseOn motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
02/27/1995-9:21pmHouseMr. Walker moved that the Committee rise.
02/27/1995-9:21pmHouseH.Amdt.219 On agreeing to the Crapo amendment (A002) Agreed to by voice vote.
02/27/1995-8:56pmHouseH.Amdt.219 Amendment (A002) offered by Mr. Crapo.
02/27/1995-8:55pmHouseH.Amdt.218 On agreeing to the Brown (CA) amendment (A001) Failed by recorded vote: 174 - 246 (Roll no. 176).
02/27/1995-8:30pmHouseMr. Brown (OH) asked unanimous consent that the time for general debate on the Brown (CA) amendment, and all amendments thereto, conclude at 8:30 p.m. Agreed to without objection.
02/27/1995-6:20pmHouseH.Amdt.218 Amendment (A001) in the nature of a substitute offered by Mr. Brown (CA).
02/27/1995-6:18pmHouseThe House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
02/27/1995-6:17pmHouseConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2243-2288)
02/27/1995-6:16pmHouseRule H. Res. 96 passed House.
02/27/1995-5:55pmHouseCommittee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1022 as unfinished business.
02/27/1995-3:42pmHouseGENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with two hours of general debate.
02/27/1995-3:41pmHouseThe Speaker designated the Honorable Doc Hastings to act as Chairman of the Committee.
02/27/1995-3:40pmHouseThe House resolved into Committee of the Whole on the state of the Union pursuant to the order of the House on Friday, Feb. 24, 1995.
02/27/1995-3:40pmHouseConsidered by previous order of the House.
02/27/1995-3:39pmHouseConsideration initiated by previous order of the House.
02/24/1995-2:10pmHouseRules Committee Resolution H. Res. 96 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1022 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is open to amendments. The bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule for a period not to exceed ten hours.
02/24/1995HouseReferred to the Subcommittee on National Economic Growth, Natural Resources and Regulatory Affairs.
Action By: Committee on Government Reform and Oversight
02/23/1995HouseReferred to House Government Reform
02/23/1995HouseReferred to House Commerce
02/23/1995HouseReferred to House Science
02/23/1995HouseReferred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Commerce, and Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
02/23/1995HouseIntroduced in House

Cosponsors (1)

* = Original cosponsor
CosponsorDate Cosponsored
Rep. Bliley, Tom [R-VA-7]* 02/23/1995

Committees (4)

Committees, subcommittees and links to reports associated with this bill are listed here, as well as the nature and date of committee activity and Congressional report number.

Committee / Subcommittee Date Activity Reports
House Science02/23/1995 Referred to
House Commerce02/23/1995 Referred to
House Government Reform02/23/1995 Referred to
House Government Reform Subcommittee on National Economic Growth, Natural Resources and Regulatory Affairs02/24/1995 Referred to
Senate Governmental Affairs03/02/1995 Referred to

A related bill may be a companion measure, an identical bill, a procedurally-related measure, or one with text similarities. Bill relationships are identified by the House, the Senate, or CRS, and refer only to same-congress measures.


Subjects (80)


Latest Summary (2)

There are 2 summaries for H.R.1022. View summaries

Shown Here:
Passed House amended (02/28/1995)

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Title I: Risk Assessment and Communication

Title II: Analysis of Risk Reduction Benefits and Costs

Title III: Peer Review

Title IV: Judicial Review

Title V: Plan

Title VI: Priorities

Risk Assessment and Cost-Benefit Act of 1995 - Declares that this Act shall not apply to: (1) an emergency situation, in which case the agency head shall comply with this Act within as reasonable a time as is practical; (2) activities necessary to maintain military readiness; (3) any individual food, drug, or other product label, or any risk characterization appearing on any such label, if the individual product label is required by law to be approved by a Federal department or agency prior to use; and (4) Federal agency approval of State programs or plans.

(Sec. 4) Provides that nothing in this Act shall, without Federal funding and further Federal agency action, create any new obligation or burden on any State or local government or otherwise impose any financial burden on any State or local government in the absence of Federal funding, except with respect to routine information requests.

(Sec. 6) Requires covered Federal agencies to make existing databases and information developed under this Act available to other Federal agencies, subject to applicable confidentiality requirements, for the purpose of meeting the requirements of this Act.

Title I: Risk Assessment and Communication - Risk Assessment and Communication Act of 1995 - Applies this title generally to all significant risk assessment and risk characterization documents, except: (1) screening analyses; (2) health, safety, or environmental inspections; (3) facility siting or operation restrictions on permits to discharge dredged or fill material into navigable waters under the Clean Water Act; or (4) the sale or lease of Federal resources or regulatory activities that directly result in collection of Federal receipts.

(Sec. 104) Requires each covered Federal agency head to apply specified principles in order to assure that significant risk assessment documents and all of their components distinguish scientific findings from other considerations and are, to the extent feasible, scientifically objective, unbiased, and inclusive of all relevant data and rely, to the extent available and practicable, on scientific findings.

(Sec. 105) Specifies the requirements that each significant risk characterization document is required to meet.

(Sec. 106) Prohibits any covered Federal agency from automatically incorporating or adopting any recommendation or classification made by a non-United States-based entity concerning the health effects value of a substance without an opportunity for notice and comment.

Specifies as a non-United States-based entity: (1) any foreign government and its agencies; (2) the United Nations or any of its subsidiary organizations; (3) any other international governmental body or international standards-making organization; or (4) any other organization or private entity without a place of business in the United States or its territories.

Requires compliance with this title by any risk assessment document or risk characterization document adopted by a covered Federal agency on the basis of such a recommendation or classification.

(Sec. 107) Directs the President to: (1) issue guidelines for Federal agencies consistent with specified risk assessment and characterization principles; and (2) provide a format for summarizing risk assessment results. Requires such guidelines to include guidance on such subjects such as the evaluation of benign tumors and the use of different types of dose-response models. Requires the President to periodically review and revise such guidelines as appropriate.

(Sec. 108) Directs each covered Federal agency head to do the following for periodic reports to the Congress: (1) regularly and systematically evaluate risk assessment research and training needs of the agency; and (2) develop a strategy and schedule for carrying out research and training to meet certain such needs.

(Sec. 109) Requires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to provide for a study using comparative risk analysis to rank health, safety, and environmental risks and to provide a common basis for evaluating strategies for reducing or preventing those risks. Requires the Director to submit to the Congress a report of the National Research Council with recommendations regarding the use of comparative risk analysis and ways to improve the use of comparative risk analysis for decision-making in appropriate Federal agencies.

(Sec. 110) Limits covered Federal agencies to: (1) the Environmental Protection Agency; (2) the Occupational Safety and Health Administration; (3) the Food and Drug Administration; (4) the Consumer Product Safety Commission; (5) the Department of Transportation; (6) the Department of Energy; (7) the Department of Agriculture; (8) the Department of the Interior; (9) the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; (10) the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; (11) the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; (12) the Mine Safety and Health Administration; and (13) other Federal agencies determined by the President, acting through the OMB Director.

Title II: Analysis of Risk Reduction Benefits and Costs - Requires the President to require each Federal agency to prepare specified analyses for each new major rule within a program designed to protect human health, safety, or the environment.

(Sec. 202) Requires that certain certifications be made in order for a final rule subject to this title to be promulgated.

(Sec. 203) Directs OMB to issue guidance consistent with this title: (1) to assist the agencies, the public, and the regulated community in the implementation of this title, including any new requirements or procedures needed to supplement prior agency practice; and (2) to govern the development and preparation of analyses of risk reduction benefits and costs.

(Sec. 204) Provides that for purposes of this title, any determination by a Federal agency to approve or reject any proposed or final environmental clean-up plan for a facility the costs of which are likely to exceed $5 million shall be treated as a major rule generally subject to this title.

Title III: Peer Review - Requires each Federal agency head to develop a systematic program for independent and external peer review for regulatory programs designed to protect human health, safety, or the environment in connection with any risk assessment or cost analysis forming the basis of any rule likely to result in an annual increase in costs of $100 million or more. Exempts from such requirement: (1) any rule or other action taken by an agency to authorize or approve any individual substance or product; and (2) any data or method which has been previously subjected to peer review or any component of any analysis or assessment previously subjected to peer review.

Authorizes the OMB Director to order that peer review be provided for any major risk assessment or cost assessment likely to have a significant impact on public policy decisions.

Directs the President to appoint National Peer Review Panels to review annually for a report to the Congress the risk and cost assessment practices of each Federal agency for programs designed to protect human health, safety, or the environment.

Title IV: Judicial Review - Provides for judicial review under this Act.

Title V: Plan - Requires each covered Federal agency to publish a plan to review and, where appropriate, revise significant risk assessment or characterization documents if the agency head determines that application of the appropriate specified principles for risk assessment and risk characterization and communication would be likely to alter significantly the results of the prior risk assessment or characterization. Provides for public participation and consultation in plan development.

Title VI: Priorities - Directs the President, in order to assist in the public policy and regulation of risks to public health, to identify specified opportunities to reflect priorities within existing Federal regulatory programs designed to protect human health in a cost-effective and cost-reasonable manner.

(Sec. 601) Requires the President to issue biennial reports to the Congress recommending priorities for modifications to, elimination of, or strategies for existing Federal regulatory programs designed to protect public health. Requires an agency to consider the priorities set forth in the report, and priorities developed and submitted by State, local, and tribal governments, when preparing a budget or strategic plan for any such regulatory program.