Text: S.507 — 106th Congress (1999-2000)All Information (Except Text)

Text available as:

Shown Here:
Public Law No: 106-53 (08/17/1999)

 
[106th Congress Public Law 53]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]


<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ053.106]


[[Page 113 STAT. 269]]

Public Law 106-53
106th Congress

                                 An Act


 
  To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
 resources, to authorize the <<NOTE: Aug. 17, 1999 -  [S. 507]>> United 
    States Army Corps of Engineers to construct various projects for 
 improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, and for other 
                                purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999. Inter- governmental relations.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF <<NOTE: 33 USC 2201 note.>> CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of <<NOTE: 33 USC 2201 note.>> Secretary.

                    TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Small flood control projects.
Sec. 103. Small bank stabilization projects.
Sec. 104. Small navigation projects.
Sec. 105. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
           environment.
Sec. 106. Small aquatic ecosystem restoration projects.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Small flood control authority.
Sec. 202. Use of non-Federal funds for compiling and disseminating 
           information on floods and flood damage.
Sec. 203. Contributions by States and political subdivisions.
Sec. 204. Sediment decontamination technology.
Sec. 205. Control of aquatic plants.
Sec. 206. Use of continuing contracts for construction of certain 
           projects.
Sec. 207. Water resources development studies for the Pacific region.
Sec. 208. Everglades and south Florida ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 209. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 210. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 211. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 212. Flood mitigation and riverine restoration program.
Sec. 213. Shore management program.
Sec. 214. Shore damage prevention or mitigation.
Sec. 215. Shore protection.
Sec. 216. Flood prevention coordination.
Sec. 217. Disposal of dredged material on beaches.
Sec. 218. Annual passes for recreation.
Sec. 219. Nonstructural flood control projects.
Sec. 220. Lakes program.
Sec. 221. Enhancement of fish and wildlife resources.
Sec. 222. Purchase of American-made equipment and products.
Sec. 223. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
           interests.
Sec. 224. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 225. Recreation user fees.
Sec. 226. Small storm damage reduction projects.

[[Page 113 STAT. 270]]

Sec. 227. Use of private enterprises.

                  TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway wildlife mitigation, Alabama and 
           Mississippi.
Sec. 302. Ouzinkie Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 303. St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, Alaska.
Sec. 304. Loggy Bayou, Red River below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, 
           Oklahoma, and Texas.
Sec. 305. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 306. San Lorenzo River, California.
Sec. 307. Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 308. Delaware River mainstem and channel deepening, Delaware, New 
           Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
Sec. 309. Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sec. 310. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 311. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 312. Lee County, Captiva Island segment, Florida, periodic beach 
           nourishment.
Sec. 313. Fort Pierce, Florida.
Sec. 314. Nassau County, Florida.
Sec. 315. Miami Harbor channel, Florida.
Sec. 316. St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida.
Sec. 317. Milo Creek, Idaho.
Sec. 318. Lake Michigan, Illinois.
Sec. 319. Springfield, Illinois.
Sec. 320. Ogden Dunes, Indiana.
Sec. 321. Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana.
Sec. 322. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 323. Dubuque, Iowa.
Sec. 324. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 325. Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
Sec. 326. Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Louisiana.
Sec. 327. Twelve-Mile Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 328. West bank of the Mississippi River (east of Harvey Canal), 
           Louisiana.
Sec. 329. Tolchester Channel S-Turn, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sec. 330. Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan.
Sec. 331. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 332. Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri.
Sec. 333. Meramec River Basin, Valley Park Levee, Missouri.
Sec. 334. Missouri River mitigation project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and 
           Nebraska.
Sec. 335. Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska.
Sec. 336. Absecon Island, New Jersey.
Sec. 337. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Port Jersey, New 
           Jersey.
Sec. 338. Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 339. Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, New York and New 
           Jersey.
Sec. 340. New York City watershed.
Sec. 341. New York State canal system.
Sec. 342. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, New York.
Sec. 343. Broken Bow Lake, Red River Basin, Oklahoma.
Sec. 344. Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
           Oregon.
Sec. 345. Curwensville Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 346. Delaware River, Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Sec. 347. Mussers Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 348. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 349. Nine Mile Run, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 350. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 351. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 352. Fox Point hurricane barrier, Providence, Rhode Island.
Sec. 353. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.
Sec. 354. Clear Creek, Texas.
Sec. 355. Cypress Creek, Texas.
Sec. 356. Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 357. Upper Jordan River, Utah.
Sec. 358. Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.
Sec. 359. Columbia River channel, Washington and Oregon.
Sec. 360. Greenbrier River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 361. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 362. Moorefield, West Virginia.
Sec. 363. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 364. Project reauthorizations.

[[Page 113 STAT. 271]]

Sec. 365. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 366. American and Sacramento Rivers, California.
Sec. 367. Martin, Kentucky.
Sec. 368. Southern West Virginia pilot program.
Sec. 369. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Jackson, Alabama.
Sec. 370. Tropicana Wash and Flamingo Wash, Nevada.
Sec. 371. Comite River, Louisiana.
Sec. 372. St. Marys River, Michigan.
Sec. 373. Charlevoix, Michigan.
Sec. 374. White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 375. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma, water conveyance facilities.

                            TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 401. Deep draft harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 402. Boydsville, Arkansas.
Sec. 403. Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 404. Del Norte County, California.
Sec. 405. Frazier Creek, Tulare County, California.
Sec. 406. Mare Island Strait, California.
Sec. 407. Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, California.
Sec. 408. Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.
Sec. 409. Whitewater River basin, California.
Sec. 410. Destin-Noriega Point, Florida.
Sec. 411. Little Econlackhatchee River basin, Florida.
Sec. 412. Port Everglades, Broward County, Florida.
Sec. 413. Lake Allatoona, Etowah River, and Little River watershed, 
           Georgia.
Sec. 414. Boise, Idaho.
Sec. 415. Goose Creek watershed, Oakley, Idaho.
Sec. 416. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 417. Snake River, Lewiston, Idaho.
Sec. 418. Snake River and Payette River, Idaho.
Sec. 419. Upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and 
           Wisconsin.
Sec. 420. Cameron Parish west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.
Sec. 421. Coastal Louisiana.
Sec. 422. Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana.
Sec. 423. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway ecosystem, Chef Menteur to Sabine 
           River, Louisiana.
Sec. 424. Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts.
Sec. 425. Westport, Massachusetts.
Sec. 426. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 427. St. Clair Shores, Michigan.
Sec. 428. Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan, and Toledo Harbor, Ohio.
Sec. 429. Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi.
Sec. 430. Tunica Lake weir, Mississippi.
Sec. 431. Yellowstone River, Montana.
Sec. 432. Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.
Sec. 433. Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Sec. 434. Cayuga Creek, New York.
Sec. 435. Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont.
Sec. 436. Oswego River basin, New York.
Sec. 437. White Oak River, North Carolina.
Sec. 438. Arcola Creek watershed, Madison, Ohio.
Sec. 439. Cleveland harbor, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sec. 440. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio.
Sec. 441. Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan.
Sec. 442. Schuylkill River, Norristown, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 443. South Carolina coastal areas.
Sec. 444. Santee Delta focus area, South Carolina.
Sec. 445. Waccamaw River, South Carolina.
Sec. 446. Day County, South Dakota.
Sec. 447. Niobrara River and Missouri River, South Dakota.
Sec. 448. Corpus Christi, Texas.
Sec. 449. Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney Fork Cut), Texas.
Sec. 450. Mouth of Colorado River, Texas.
Sec. 451. Santa Clara River, Utah.
Sec. 452. Mount St. Helens, Washington.
Sec. 453. Kanawha River, Fayette County, West Virginia.
Sec. 454. West Virginia ports.
Sec. 455. John Glenn Great Lakes basin program.
Sec. 456. Great Lakes navigational system.
Sec. 457. Nutrient loading resulting from dredged material disposal.

[[Page 113 STAT. 272]]

Sec. 458. Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers levees and streambanks 
           protection.
Sec. 459. Upper Mississippi River comprehensive plan.
Sec. 460. Susquehanna River and Upper Chesapeake Bay.

                    TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 501. Corps assumption of NRCS projects.
Sec. 502. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 503. Contaminated sediment dredging technology.
Sec. 504. Dam safety.
Sec. 505. Great Lakes remedial action plans.
Sec. 506. Projects for improvement of the environment.
Sec. 507. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 508. Measurements of Lake Michigan diversions, Illinois.
Sec. 509. Upper Mississippi River environmental management program.
Sec. 510. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 511. Water control management.
Sec. 512. Beneficial use of dredged material.
Sec. 513. Design and construction assistance.
Sec. 514. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 515. Irrigation diversion protection and fisheries enhancement 
           assistance.
Sec. 516. Innovative technologies for watershed restoration.
Sec. 517. Expedited consideration of certain projects.
Sec. 518. Dog River, Alabama.
Sec. 519. Levees in Elba and Geneva, Alabama.
Sec. 520. Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah.
Sec. 521. Beaver Lake, Arkansas, water supply storage reallocation.
Sec. 522. Beaver Lake trout production facility, Arkansas.
Sec. 523. Chino dairy preserve, California.
Sec. 524. Orange and San Diego Counties, California.
Sec. 525. Rush Creek, Novato, California.
Sec. 526. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 527. Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida.
Sec. 528. Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, Georgia.
Sec. 529. Comprehensive flood impact response modeling system, 
           Coralville Reservoir and Iowa River watershed, Iowa.
Sec. 530. Additional construction assistance in Illinois.
Sec. 531. Kanopolis Lake, Kansas.
Sec. 532. Southern and Eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 533. Southeast Louisiana.
Sec. 534. Snug Harbor, Maryland.
Sec. 535. Welch Point, Elk River, Cecil County, and Chesapeake City, 
           Maryland.
Sec. 536. Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts.
Sec. 537. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 538. Beaver Branch of Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
Sec. 539. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River water levels, New York.
Sec. 540. New York-New Jersey Harbor, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 541. Sea Gate Reach, Coney Island, New York, New York.
Sec. 542. Woodlawn, New York.
Sec. 543. Floodplain mapping, New York.
Sec. 544. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ottawa County, Ohio.
Sec. 545. Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
Sec. 546. Skinner Butte Park, Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 547. Willamette River basin, Oregon.
Sec. 548. Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 549. Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 550. Point Marion Lock and Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 551. Seven Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 552. Southeastern Pennsylvania.
Sec. 553. Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna, Pennsylvania, watershed 
           management and restoration study.
Sec. 554. Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 555. Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota, study.
Sec. 556. North Padre Island storm damage reduction and environmental 
           restoration project.
Sec. 557. Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 558. Mississippi River Commission.
Sec. 559. Coastal aquatic habitat management.
Sec. 560. Abandoned and inactive noncoal mine restoration.
Sec. 561. Beneficial use of waste tire rubber.
Sec. 562. Site designation.
Sec. 563. Land conveyances.

[[Page 113 STAT. 273]]

Sec. 564. McNary Pool, Washington.
Sec. 565. Namings.
Sec. 566. Folsom Dam and Reservoir additional storage and additional 
           flood control studies.
Sec. 567. Wallops Island, Virginia.
Sec. 568. Detroit River, Michigan.
Sec. 569. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 570. Alaska.
Sec. 571. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 572. Sacramento Metropolitan Area watershed restoration, 
           California.
Sec. 573. Onondaga Lake, New York.
Sec. 574. East Lynn Lake, West Virginia.
Sec. 575. Eel River, California.
Sec. 576. North Little Rock, Arkansas.
Sec. 577. Upper Mississippi River, Mississippi Place, St. Paul, 
           Minnesota.
Sec. 578. Dredging of salt ponds in the State of Rhode Island.
Sec. 579. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 580. Cumberland, Maryland, flood project mitigation.
Sec. 581. City of Miami Beach, Florida.
Sec. 582. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake Rivers 
           salmon survival.
Sec. 583. Larkspur Ferry Channel, California.
Sec. 584. Holes Creek flood control project, Ohio.
Sec. 585. San Jacinto disposal area, Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 586. Water monitoring station.
Sec. 587. Overflow management facility, Rhode Island.
Sec. 588. Lower Chena River, Alaska.
Sec. 589. Numana Dam Fish passage, Nevada.
Sec. 590. Embrey Dam, Virginia.
Sec. 591. Environmental remediation, Front Royal, Virginia.
Sec. 592. Mississippi.
Sec. 593. Central New Mexico.
Sec. 594. Ohio.
Sec. 595. Rural Nevada and Montana.
Sec. 596. Phoenix, Arizona.
Sec. 597. National Harbor, Maryland.

TITLE VI--CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND STATE 
        OF SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION

Sec. 601. Definitions.
Sec. 602. Terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration.
Sec. 603. South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust 
           Fund.
Sec. 604. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
           Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.
Sec. 605. Transfer of Federal land to State of South Dakota.
Sec. 606. Transfer of Corps of Engineers land for Indian tribes.
Sec. 607. Administration.
Sec. 608. Study.
Sec. 609. Authorization of appropriations.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2201 note.>> DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Army.

                    TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--The following projects for water 
resources development and conservation and other purposes are authorized 
to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the 
plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the respective 
reports designated in this subsection:
            (1) Nome harbor improvements, alaska.--The project for 
        navigation, Nome Harbor improvements, Alaska: Report of the

[[Page 113 STAT. 274]]

        Chief of Engineers dated June 8, 1999, as amended by the Chief 
        of Engineers on August 2, 1999, at a total cost of $25,651,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $20,192,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $5,459,000.
            (2) Sand point harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
        Sand Point Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated October 13, 1998, at a total cost of $11,760,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $6,964,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $4,796,000.
            (3) Seward harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
        Seward Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        June 8, 1999, at a total cost of $12,240,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $4,089,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $8,151,000.
            (4) Rio salado (salt river), phoenix and tempe, arizona.--
        The project for flood control and environmental restoration, Rio 
        Salado (Salt River), Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated August 20, 1998, at a total cost of 
        $88,048,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $56,355,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $31,693,000.
            (5) Tucson drainage area, arizona.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, environmental restoration, and recreation, 
        Tucson drainage area, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated May 20, 1998, at a total cost of $29,900,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $16,768,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $13,132,000.
            (6) American and sacramento rivers, california.--
                    (A) In general.--The Folsom Dam Modification portion 
                of the Folsom Modification Plan described in the United 
                States Army Corps of Engineers Supplemental Information 
                Report for the American River Watershed Project, 
                California, dated March 1996, as modified by the report 
                entitled ``Folsom Dam Modification Report, New Outlets 
                Plan'', dated March 1998, prepared by the Sacramento 
                Area Flood Control Agency, at an estimated cost of 
                $150,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $97,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $52,500,000. The Secretary shall coordinate with the 
                Secretary of the Interior with respect to the design and 
                construction of modifications at Folsom Dam authorized 
                by this paragraph.
                    (B) Reoperation measures.--Upon completion of the 
                improvements to Folsom Dam authorized by subparagraph 
                (A), the variable space allocated to flood control 
                within the Reservoir shall be reduced from the current 
                operating range of 400,000-670,000 acre-feet to 400,000-
                600,000 acre-feet.
                    (C) Makeup of water shortages caused by flood 
                control operation.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
                enter into, or modify, such agreements with the 
                Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency regarding the 
                operation of Folsom Dam and reservoir as may be 
                necessary in order that, notwithstanding any prior 
                agreement or provision of law, 100 percent of the water 
                needed to make up for any water shortage caused by 
                variable flood control operation during any year at 
                Folsom Dam and resulting in

[[Page 113 STAT. 275]]

                a significant impact on recreation at Folsom Reservoir 
                shall be replaced, to the extent the water is available 
                for purchase, by the Secretary of the Interior.
                    (D) Significant impact on recreation.--For the 
                purposes of this paragraph, a significant impact on 
                recreation is defined as any impact that results in a 
                lake elevation at Folsom Reservoir below 435 feet above 
                sea level starting on May 15 and ending on September 15 
                of any given year.
                    (E) Updated flood management plan.--The Secretary, 
                in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall 
                update the flood management plan for Folsom Dam 
                authorized by section 9159(f)(2) of the Department of 
                Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 1946), to 
                reflect the operational capabilities created by the 
                modification authorized by subparagraph (A) and improved 
                weather forecasts based on the Advanced Hydrologic 
                Prediction System of the National Weather Service.
            (7) Oakland harbor, california.--The project for navigation, 
        Oakland Harbor, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of $252,290,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $128,081,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $124,209,000.
            (8) South sacramento county streams, california.--The 
        project for flood control, environmental restoration and 
        recreation, South Sacramento County streams, California: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost 
        of $65,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $41,200,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $24,300,000.
            (9) Upper guadalupe river, california.--Construction of the 
        locally preferred plan for flood damage reduction and 
        recreation, Upper Guadalupe River, California, described as the 
        Bypass Channel Plan of the Chief of Engineers dated August 19, 
        1998, at a total cost of $140,328,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $44,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $96,328,000.
            (10) Yuba river basin, california.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, California: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers dated November 25, 1998, at a total cost of 
        $26,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,350,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,250,000.
            (11) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-
        broadkill beach, delaware.--The project for hurricane and storm 
        damage reduction, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New 
        Jersey-Broadkill Beach, Delaware: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated August 17, 1998, at a total cost of $9,049,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $5,674,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,375,000, and at an estimated average 
        annual cost of $538,200 for periodic nourishment over the 50-
        year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost 
        of $349,800 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
        $188,400.
            (12) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-port 
        mahon, delaware.--The project for ecosystem restoration, 
        Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Port Mahon, 
        Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated

[[Page 113 STAT. 276]]

        September 28, 1998, at a total cost of $7,644,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $4,969,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $2,675,000, and at an estimated average annual 
        cost of $234,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
        of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
        $152,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $82,000.
            (13) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-
        roosevelt inlet-lewes beach, delaware.--The project for 
        navigation mitigation and hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Roosevelt Inlet-
        Lewes Beach, Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        February 3, 1999, at a total cost of $3,393,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $2,620,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $773,000, and at an estimated average annual 
        cost of $196,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
        of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
        $152,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $44,000.
            (14) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-villas 
        and vicinity, new jersey.--The project for shore protection and 
        ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New 
        Jersey-Villas and vicinity, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of $7,520,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $4,888,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $2,632,000.
            (15) Delaware coast from cape henelopen to fenwick island, 
        bethany beach/south bethany beach, delaware.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, Delaware Coast from Cape 
        Henelopen to Fenwick Island, Bethany Beach/South Bethany Beach, 
        Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, 
        at a total cost of $22,205,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $14,433,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,772,000, 
        and at an estimated average annual cost of $1,584,000 for 
        periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated annual Federal cost of $1,030,000 and an estimated 
        annual non-Federal cost of $554,000.
            (16) Hillsboro and okeechobee aquifer, florida.--The project 
        for aquifer storage and recovery described in the Corps of 
        Engineers Central and Southern Florida Water Supply Study, 
        Florida, dated April 1989, and in House Document 369, dated July 
        30, 1968, at a total cost of $27,000,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $13,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $13,500,000.
            (17) Jacksonville harbor, florida.--The project for 
        navigation, Jacksonville Harbor, Florida: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of $26,116,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $9,129,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $16,987,000.
            (18) Tampa harbor-big bend channel, florida.--The project 
        for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated October 13, 1998, at a total 
        cost of $12,356,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $6,235,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,121,000.

[[Page 113 STAT. 277]]

            (19) Brunswick harbor, georgia.--The project for navigation, 
        Brunswick Harbor, Georgia: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of $50,717,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $32,966,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $17,751,000.
            (20) Beargrass creek, kentucky.--The project for flood 
        control, Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated May 12, 1998, at a total cost of $11,171,300, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $7,261,500 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,909,800.
            (21) Amite river and tributaries, louisiana, east baton 
        rouge parish watershed.--The project for flood damage reduction 
        and recreation, Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East 
        Baton Rouge Parish Watershed: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated December 23, 1996, at a total cost of $112,900,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $73,400,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $39,500,000.
            (22) Baltimore harbor anchorages and channels, maryland and 
        virginia.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for navigation, 
                Baltimore Harbor Anchorages and Channels, Maryland and 
                Virginia, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 8, 
                1998, at a total cost of $28,426,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $18,994,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
                cost of $9,432,000.
                    (B) Credit or reimbursement.--If a project 
                cooperation agreement is entered into, the non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit toward, or reimbursement 
                of, the Federal share of project costs for construction 
                work performed by the non-Federal interest before 
                execution of the project cooperation agreement if the 
                Secretary finds the work to be integral to the project.
                    (C) Study of modifications.--During the 
                preconstruction engineering and design phase of the 
                project, the Secretary shall conduct a study to 
                determine the feasibility of undertaking further 
                modifications to the Dundalk Marine Terminal access 
                channels, consisting of--
                          (i) deepening and widening the Dundalk access 
                      channels to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 500 
                      feet;
                          (ii) widening the flares of the access 
                      channels; and
                          (iii) providing a new flare on the west side 
                      of the entrance to the east access channel.
                    (D) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Report.--
                          (i) In general.--Not later than March 1, 2000, 
                      the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on 
                      the study under subparagraph (C).
                          (ii) Contents.--The report shall include a 
                      determination of--
                                    (I) the feasibility of performing 
                                the project modifications described in 
                                subparagraph (C); and
                                    (II) the appropriateness of 
                                crediting or reimbursing the Federal 
                                share of the cost of the work performed 
                                by the non-Federal interest on the 
                                project modifications.

[[Page 113 STAT. 278]]

            (23) Red lake river at crookston, minnesota.--The project 
        for flood control, Red Lake River at Crookston, Minnesota: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 20, 1998, at a 
        total cost of $8,950,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $5,720,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,230,000.
            (24) Turkey creek basin, kansas city, missouri, and kansas 
        city, kansas.--The project for flood damage reduction, Turkey 
        Creek Basin, Kansas City, Missouri, and Kansas City, Kansas: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a 
        total cost of $42,875,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $25,596,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,279,000.
            (25) Lower cape may meadows, cape may point, new jersey.--
        The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem restoration, 
        shore protection, and hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated April 5, 1999, at a total cost of 
        $15,952,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,118,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,834,000, and at an estimated 
        average annual cost of $1,114,000 for periodic nourishment over 
        the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual 
        Federal cost of $897,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal 
        cost of $217,000.
            (26) Townsends inlet to cape may inlet, new jersey.--The 
        project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, shore 
        protection, and ecosystem restoration, Townsends Inlet to Cape 
        May Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        September 28, 1998, at a total cost of $56,503,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $36,727,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $19,776,000, and at an estimated average annual 
        cost of $2,000,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year 
        life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
        $1,300,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $700,000.
            (27) Guanajibo river, puerto rico.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for flood control, 
                Guanajibo River, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of 
                Engineers dated February 27, 1996, at a total cost of 
                $27,031,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $20,273,250 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $6,757,750.
                    (B) Cost sharing.--Cost sharing for the project 
                shall be determined in accordance with section 103(a) of 
                the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                2213(a)), as in effect on October 11, 1996.
            (28) Rio grande de manati, barceloneta, puerto rico.--The 
        project for flood control, Rio Grande De Manati, Barceloneta, 
        Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 22, 
        1999, at a total cost of $13,491,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $8,785,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $4,706,000.
            (29) Rio nigua, salinas, puerto rico.--The project for flood 
        control, Rio Nigua, Salinas, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated April 15, 1997, at a total cost of $13,702,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $7,645,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $6,057,000.
            (30) Salt creek, graham, texas.--The project for flood 
        control, environmental restoration, and recreation, Salt Creek,

[[Page 113 STAT. 279]]

        Graham, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 
        1998, at a total cost of $10,080,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $6,560,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,520,000.

    (b) Projects Subject to a Final Report.--The following projects for 
water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in 
a final report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of the 
Chief is completed not later than December 31, 1999:
            (1) Heritage harbor, wrangell, alaska.--The project for 
        navigation, Heritage Harbor, Wrangell, Alaska, at a total cost 
        of $24,556,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $14,447,000 
        and estimated non-Federal cost of $10,109,000.
            (2) Arroyo pasajero, california.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, Arroyo Pasajero, California, at a total cost 
        of $260,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $170,100,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000.
            (3) Hamilton airfield, california.--The project for 
        environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, California, at a 
        total cost of $55,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $41,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,800,000.
            (4) Success dam, tule river basin, california.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction and water supply, Success Dam, Tule 
        River basin, California, at a total cost of $17,900,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $11,635,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $6,265,000.
            (5) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey: oakwood 
        beach, new jersey.--The project for shore protection, Delaware 
        Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey: Oakwood Beach, New 
        Jersey, at a total cost of $3,360,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $2,184,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,176,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $81,000 
        for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, 
        with an estimated annual Federal cost of $53,000 and an 
        estimated annual non-Federal cost of $28,000.
            (6) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey: reeds 
        beach and pierces point, new jersey.--The project for shore 
        protection and ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay coastline, 
        Delaware and New Jersey: Reeds Beach and Pierces Point, New 
        Jersey, at a total cost of $4,057,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $2,637,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,420,000.
            (7) Little talbot island, duval county, florida.--The 
        project for hurricane and storm damage prevention and shore 
        protection, Little Talbot Island, Duval County, Florida, at a 
        total cost of $5,915,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $3,839,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,076,000.
            (8) Ponce de leon inlet, florida.--The project for 
        navigation and related purposes, Ponce de Leon Inlet, Volusia 
        County, Florida, at a total cost of $5,454,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $2,988,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $2,466,000.
            (9) Savannah harbor expansion, georgia.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the 
                project for navigation, Savannah Harbor expansion,

[[Page 113 STAT. 280]]

                Georgia, including implementation of the mitigation 
                plan, with such modifications as the Secretary considers 
                appropriate, at a total cost of $230,174,000 (of which 
                amount a portion is authorized for implementation of the 
                mitigation plan), with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $145,160,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $85,014,000.
                    (B) Conditions.--The project authorized by 
                subparagraph (A) may be carried out only after--
                          (i) the Secretary, in consultation with 
                      affected Federal, State of Georgia, State of South 
                      Carolina, regional, and local entities, reviews 
                      and approves an environmental impact statement for 
                      the project that includes--
                                    (I) an analysis of the impacts of 
                                project depth alternatives ranging from 
                                42 feet through 48 feet; and
                                    (II) a selected plan for navigation 
                                and an associated mitigation plan as 
                                required under section 906(a) of the 
                                Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
                                (33 U.S.C. 2283(a)); and
                          (ii) the Secretary of the Interior, the 
                      Secretary of Commerce, the Administrator of the 
                      Environmental Protection Agency, and the Secretary 
                      approve the selected plan and determine that the 
                      associated mitigation plan adequately addresses 
                      the potential environmental impacts of the 
                      project.
                    (C) Mitigation requirements.--The mitigation plan 
                shall be implemented before or concurrently with 
                construction of the project.
            (10) Des plaines river, illinois.--The project for flood 
        control, Des Plaines River, Illinois, at a total cost of 
        $48,800,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $31,700,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $17,100,000.
            (11) Reelfoot lake, kentucky and tennessee.--The project for 
        ecosystem restoration, Reelfoot Lake, Kentucky and Tennessee, at 
        a total cost of $35,287,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $23,601,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,686,000.
            (12) Brigantine inlet to great egg harbor, brigantine 
        island, new jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
        reduction and shore protection, Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg 
        Harbor, Brigantine Island, New Jersey, at a total cost of 
        $4,970,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,230,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $1,740,000, and at an estimated 
        average annual cost of $465,000 for periodic nourishment over 
        the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual 
        Federal cost of $302,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal 
        cost of $163,000.
            (13) Columbia river channel, oregon and washington.--The 
        project for navigation, Columbia River Channel, Oregon and 
        Washington, at a total cost of $183,623,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $106,132,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $77,491,000.
            (14) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, environmental restoration, and recreation, 
        Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas, at a total cost of

[[Page 113 STAT. 281]]

        $20,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,000,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,300,000.
            (15) Howard hanson dam, washington.--The project for water 
        supply and ecosystem restoration, Howard Hanson Dam, Washington, 
        at a total cost of $75,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $36,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $38,700,000.

SEC. 102. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
            (1) Eyak river, cordova, alaska.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Eyak River, Cordova, Alaska.
            (2) Salcha river and piledriver slough, fairbanks, alaska.--
        Project for flood damage reduction to protect against surface 
        water flooding, lower Salcha River and Piledriver Slough from 
        its headwaters at the mouth of the Salcha River to the Chena 
        Lakes Flood Control Project, Fairbanks, Alaska.
            (3) Lancaster, california.--Project for flood control, 
        Lancaster, California, westside stormwater retention facility.
            (4) Magpie creek, california.--Project for flood control, 
        Magpie Creek, California, located within the boundaries of 
        McClellan Air Force Base.
            (5) Gateway triangle area, florida.--Project for flood 
        control, Gateway Triangle area, Collier County, Florida.
            (6) Plant city, florida.--Project for flood control, Plant 
        City, Florida.
            (7) Stone island, lake monroe, florida.--Project for flood 
        control, Stone Island, Lake Monroe, Florida.
            (8) Ohio river, illinois.--Project for flood control, Ohio 
        River, Illinois.
            (9) Hamilton dam, michigan.--Project for flood control, 
        Hamilton Dam, Michigan.
            (10) Repaupo creek and delaware river, gloucester county, 
        new jersey.--Project for tidegate and levee improvements for 
        Repaupo Creek and the Delaware River, Gloucester County, New 
        Jersey.
            (11) Irondequoit creek, new york.--Project for flood 
        control, Irondequoit Creek watershed, New York.
            (12) Owasco lake seawall, new york.--Project for flood 
        control, Owasco Lake seawall, New York.
            (13) Port clinton, ohio.--Project for flood control, Port 
        Clinton, Ohio.
            (14) Abington township, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
        control, Baeder and Wanamaker Roads, Abington Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (15) Port indian, west norriton township, montgomery county, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Port Indian, West 
        Norriton Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
            (16) Port providence, upper providence township, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Port Providence, Upper 
        Providence Township, Pennsylvania.
            (17) Springfield township, montgomery county, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Springfield Township, 
        Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.

[[Page 113 STAT. 282]]

            (18) Tawney run creek, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
        control, Tawney Run Creek, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
            (19) Wissahickon watershed, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
        control, Wissahickon watershed, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
            (20) Tioga county, pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, 
        Tioga River and Cowanesque River and their tributaries, Tioga 
        County, Pennsylvania.
            (21) First creek, knoxville, tennessee.--Project for flood 
        control, First Creek, Knoxville, Tennessee.
            (22) Metro center levee, cumberland river, nashville, 
        tennessee.--Project for flood control, Metro Center Levee, 
        Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.

    (b) Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.--
            (1) Maximum federal expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
        Federal funds that may be expended for the project for flood 
        control, Festus and Crystal City, Missouri, is $10,000,000.
            (2) Revision of project cooperation agreement.--The 
        Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for the 
        project described in paragraph (1) to take into account the 
        change in the Federal participation in the project under 
        paragraph (1).

SEC. 103. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
feasible, may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Arctic ocean, barrow, alaska.--Project for storm damage 
        reduction and coastal erosion, Barrow, Alaska.
            (2) Saint joseph river, indiana.--Project for streambank 
        erosion control, Saint Joseph River, Indiana.
            (3) Saginaw river, bay city, michigan.--Project for 
        streambank erosion control, Saginaw River, Bay City, Michigan.
            (4) Big timber creek, new jersey.--Project for streambank 
        erosion control, Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
            (5) Lake shore road, athol springs, new york.--Project for 
        streambank erosion control, Lake Shore Road, Athol Springs, New 
        York.
            (6) Marist college, poughkeepsie, new york.--Project for 
        streambank erosion control, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New 
        York.
            (7) Monroe county, ohio.--Project for streambank erosion 
        control, Monroe County, Ohio.
            (8) Green valley, west virginia.--Project for streambank 
        erosion control, Green Valley, West Virginia.

    (b) Yellowstone River, Billings, Montana.--The streambank protection 
project at Coulson Park, along the Yellowstone River, Billings, Montana, 
shall be eligible for assistance under section 14 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r).

SEC. 104. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577).

[[Page 113 STAT. 283]]

            (1) Grand marais, arkansas.--Project for navigation, Grand 
        Marais, Arkansas.
            (2) Fields landing channel, humboldt harbor, california.--
        Project for navigation, Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt Harbor, 
        California.
            (3) San mateo (pillar point harbor), california.--Project 
        for navigation, San Mateo (Pillar Point Harbor), California.
            (4) Agana marina, guam.--Project for navigation, Agana 
        Marina, Guam.
            (5) Agat marina, guam.--Project for navigation, Agat Marina, 
        Guam.
            (6) Apra harbor fuel piers, guam.--Project for navigation, 
        Apra Harbor Fuel Piers, Guam.
            (7) Apra harbor pier f-6, guam.--Project for navigation, 
        Apra Harbor Pier F-6, Guam.
            (8) Apra harbor seawall, guam.--Project for navigation 
        including a seawall, Apra Harbor, Guam.
            (9) Guam harbor, guam.--Project for navigation, Guam Harbor, 
        Guam.
            (10) Illinois river near chautauqua park, illinois.--Project 
        for navigation, Illinois River near Chautauqua Park, Illinois.
            (11) Whiting shoreline waterfront, whiting, indiana.--
        Project for navigation, Whiting shoreline waterfront, Whiting, 
        Indiana.
            (12) Union river, ellsworth, maine.--Project for navigation, 
        Union River, Ellsworth, Maine.
            (13) Naraguagus river, machias, maine.--Project for 
        navigation, Naraguagus River, Machias, Maine.
            (14) Detroit river, michigan.--Project for navigation, 
        Detroit River, Michigan, including dredging and removal of a 
        reef.
            (15) Fortescue inlet, delaware bay, new jersey.--Project for 
        navigation, Fortescue Inlet, Delaware Bay, New Jersey.
            (16) Braddock bay, greece, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Braddock Bay, Greece, New York.
            (17) Buffalo and lasalle park, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Buffalo and LaSalle Park, New York.
            (18) Sturgeon point, new york.--Project for navigation, 
        Sturgeon Point, New York.
            (19) Fairport harbor, ohio.--Project for navigation, 
        Fairport Harbor, Ohio, including a recreation channel.
SEC. 105. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
                        ENVIRONMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 1135(a) of the 
Water Reseources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a):
            (1) Illinois river in the vicinity of havana, illinois.--
        Project for improvement of the quality of the environment, 
        Illinois River in the vicinity of Havana, Illinois.
            (2) Knitting mill creek, virginia.--Project for improvement 
        of the quality of the environment, Knitting Mill Creek, 
        Virginia.

[[Page 113 STAT. 284]]

    (b) Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California.--Under authority of 
section 1135(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a(a)), the Secretary shall carry out a project to construct a 
turbine bypass at Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California, in accordance 
with the project modification report and environmental assessment dated 
September 1996.

SEC. 106. SMALL AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the following projects 
under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Contra costa county, bay delta, california.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Contra Costa County, Bay Delta, 
        California.
            (2) Indian river, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration and lagoon restoration, Indian River, Florida.
            (3) Little wekiva river, florida.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration and erosion control, Little Wekiva River, 
        Florida.
            (4) Cook county, illinois.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration and lagoon restoration and protection, Cook County, 
        Illinois.
            (5) Grand batture island, mississippi.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Grand Batture Island, Mississippi.
            (6) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and reef restoration 
        along the Gulf Coast, Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, 
        Mississippi.
            (7) Mississippi river and river des peres, st. louis, 
        missouri.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
        recreation, Mississippi River and River Des Peres, St. Louis, 
        Missouri.
            (8) Hudson river, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Hudson River, New York.
            (9) Oneida lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Oneida Lake, Oneida County, New York.
            (10) Otsego lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Otsego Lake, Otsego County, New York.
            (11) North fork of yellow creek, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, North Fork of Yellow Creek, Ohio.
            (12) Wheeling creek watershed, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Wheeling Creek watershed, Ohio.
            (13) Springfield millrace, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Springfield Millrace, Oregon.
            (14) Upper amazon creek, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Upper Amazon Creek, Oregon.
            (15) Lake ontelaunee reservoir, berks county, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
        distilling pond facilities, Lake Ontelaunee Reservoir, Berks 
        County, Pennsylvania.
            (16) Blackstone river basin, rhode island and 
        massachusetts.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
        fish passage facilities, Blackstone River Basin, Rhode Island 
        and Massachusetts.

[[Page 113 STAT. 285]]

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL AUTHORITY.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``construction of 
        small projects'' and inserting ``implementation of small 
        structural and nonstructural projects''; and
            (2) in the third sentence, by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$7,000,000''.
SEC. 202. USE OF NON-FEDERAL FUNDS FOR COMPILING AND DISSEMINATING 
                        INFORMATION ON FLOODS AND FLOOD DAMAGE.

    Section 206(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a(b)) 
is amended in the third sentence by inserting before the period at the 
end the following: ``, but the Secretary of the Army may accept funds 
voluntarily contributed by such entities for the purpose of expanding 
the scope of the services requested by the entities''.

SEC. 203. CONTRIBUTIONS BY STATES AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS.

    Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), is amended 
by inserting ``or environmental restoration'' after ``flood control''.

SEC. 204. SEDIMENT DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.

    Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2239 note; Public Law 102-580) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Practical end-use products.--Technologies selected for 
        demonstration at the pilot scale shall be intended to result in 
        practical end-use products.
            ``(5) Assistance by the secretary.--The Secretary shall 
        assist the project to ensure expeditious completion by providing 
        sufficient quantities of contaminated dredged material to 
        conduct the full-scale demonstrations to stated capacity.'';
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking the first sentence and 
        inserting the following: <<NOTE: Appropriation 
        authorization.>> ``There is authorized to be appropriated to 
        carry out this section $22,000,000 to complete technology 
        testing, technology commercialization, and the development of 
        full scale processing facilities within the New York/New Jersey 
        Harbor.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(e) Support.--In carrying out the program under this section, the 
Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, cooperative agreements, and 
grants with colleges and universities and other non-Federal entities.''.

SEC. 205. CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANTS.

    Section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610) is 
amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by striking 
        ``water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, 
        melaleuca, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from'' and 
        inserting ``noxious aquatic plant growths from'';

[[Page 113 STAT. 286]]

            (2) in the first sentence of subsection (b), by striking 
        ``$12,000,000'' and inserting ``$15,000,000''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(c) Support.--In carrying out the program under this section, the 
Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, cooperative agreements, and 
grants with colleges and universities and other non-Federal entities.''.
SEC. 206. USE <<NOTE: 33 USC 2331.>> OF CONTINUING CONTRACTS FOR 
                        CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary shall not implement a fully allocated funding policy with 
respect to a water resource project if initiation of construction has 
occurred but sufficient funds are not available to complete the project.
    (b) Continuing Contracts.--The Secretary shall enter into a 
continuing contract for a project described in subsection (a).
    (c) Initiation of Construction Clarified.--For the purposes of this 
section, initiation of construction for a project occurs on the date of 
enactment of an Act that appropriates funds for the project from 1 of 
the following appropriation accounts:
            (1) Construction, General.
            (2) Operation and Maintenance, General.
            (3) Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries.
SEC. 207. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR THE PACIFIC 
                        REGION.

    Section 444 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3747) is amended by striking ``interest of navigation'' and 
inserting ``interests of water resources development including 
navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental restoration''.
SEC. 208. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) Extension of Program.--Section 528(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B) (110 Stat. 3769), by striking 
        ``1999'' and inserting ``2003''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C)(i) (110 Stat. 3769), by striking 
        ``1999'' and inserting ``2003''.

    (b) Credit and Reimbursement of Past and Future Activities.--Section 
528(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3768) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Credit and reimbursement of past and future 
                activities.--The Secretary may provide credit to or 
                reimburse the non-Federal project sponsor (using funds 
                authorized by subparagraph (C)) for the reasonable costs 
                of any work that has been performed or will be performed 
                in connection with a study or activity meeting the 
                requirements of subparagraph (A) if--
                          ``(i) the Secretary determines that--
                                    ``(I) the work performed by the non-
                                Federal project sponsor will 
                                substantially expedite completion of a 
                                critical restoration project; and
                                    ``(II) the work is necessary for a 
                                critical restoration project; and

[[Page 113 STAT. 287]]

                          ``(ii) the credit or reimbursement is granted 
                      pursuant to a project-specific agreement that 
                      prescribes the terms and conditions of the credit 
                      or reimbursement.''.

    (c) Caloosahatchee River Basin, Florida.--Section 528(e)(4) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3770) is amended in 
the first sentence by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``if the Secretary determines that the acquisition is 
compatible with and an integral component of the Everglades and South 
Florida ecosystem restoration, including potential acquisition of land 
or interests in land in the Caloosahatchee River basin or other areas''.
    (d) In-Kind Work.--Section 528(e)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3770) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Regardless'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) Land acquisition.--Regardless''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) In-kind work.--
                    ``(A) In general.--During the preconstruction, 
                engineering, and design phase and the construction phase 
                of the Central and Southern Florida Project, the 
                Secretary shall allow credit against the non-Federal 
                share of the cost of activities described in subsection 
                (b) for work performed by non-Federal interests at the 
                request of the Secretary in furtherance of the design of 
                features included in the comprehensive plan under that 
                subsection.
                    ``(B) Audits.--In-kind work to be credited under 
                subparagraph (A) shall be subject to audit.''.

SEC. 209. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2326) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``cooperative agreement 
        in accordance with the requirements of section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970'' and inserting ``binding agreement with the 
        Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out 
under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 210. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``Non-Federal'' and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) In general.--Non-Federal''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Form.--Before October 1, 2003, the Federal share of 
        the cost of a project under this section may be provided in the 
        form of reimbursements of project costs.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by striking ``Construction'' and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) In general.--Construction''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:

[[Page 113 STAT. 288]]

            ``(2) Nonprofit entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of 
        the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any 
        project carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest 
        may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected 
        local government.''.
SEC. 211. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

    Section 503 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3756) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (10) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(10) Regional Atlanta watershed, Atlanta, Georgia, and 
        Lake Lanier, Forsyth and Hall Counties, Georgia.''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(14) Clear Lake watershed, California.
            ``(15) Fresno Slough watershed, California.
            ``(16) Hayward Marsh, Southern San Francisco Bay watershed, 
        California.
            ``(17) Kaweah River watershed, California.
            ``(18) Lake Tahoe watershed, California and Nevada.
            ``(19) Malibu Creek watershed, California.
            ``(20) Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida.
            ``(21) Illinois River watershed, Illinois.
            ``(22) Truckee River basin, Nevada.
            ``(23) Walker River basin, Nevada.
            ``(24) Bronx River watershed, New York.
            ``(25) Catawba River watershed, North Carolina.
            ``(26) Columbia Slough watershed, Oregon.
            ``(27) Cabin Creek basin, West Virginia.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:

    ``(e) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 212. FLOOD MITIGATION AND RIVERINE RESTORATION <<NOTE: 33 USC 
            2332.>> PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may undertake a program for the 
purpose of conducting projects to reduce flood hazards and restore the 
natural functions and values of rivers throughout the United States.
    (b) Studies and Projects.--
            (1) Authority.--In carrying out the program, the Secretary 
        may conduct studies to identify appropriate flood damage 
        reduction, conservation, and restoration measures and may design 
        and implement projects described in subsection (a).
            (2) Consultation and coordination.--The studies and projects 
        carried out under this section shall be conducted, to the 
        maximum extent practicable, in consultation and coordination 
        with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and other 
        appropriate Federal agencies, and in consultation and 
        coordination with appropriate State and local agencies and 
        tribes.
            (3) Nonstructural approaches.--The studies and projects 
        shall emphasize, to the maximum extent practicable

[[Page 113 STAT. 289]]

        and appropriate, nonstructural approaches to preventing or 
        reducing flood damages.
            (4) Participation.--The studies and projects shall be 
        conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, in cooperation 
        with State and local agencies and tribes to ensure the 
        coordination of local flood damage reduction or riverine and 
        wetland restoration studies with projects that conserve, 
        restore, and manage hydrologic and hydraulic regimes and restore 
        the natural functions and values of floodplains.

    (c) Cost-Sharing Requirements.--
            (1) Studies.--Studies conducted under this section shall be 
        subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 105 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).
            (2) Environmental restoration and nonstructural flood 
        control projects.--
                    (A) In general.--The non-Federal interests shall pay 
                35 percent of the cost of any environmental restoration 
                or nonstructural flood control project carried out under 
                this section.
                    (B) Items provided by non-federal interests.--The 
                non-Federal interests shall provide all land, easements, 
                rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and 
                relocations necessary for such projects.
                    (C) Credit.--The value of such land, easements, 
                rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and 
                relocations shall be credited toward the payment 
                required under this paragraph.
            (3) Structural flood control projects.--Any structural flood 
        control projects carried out under this section shall be subject 
        to cost sharing in accordance with section 103(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)).
            (4) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal interests 
        shall be responsible for all costs associated with operating, 
        maintaining, replacing, repairing, and rehabilitating all 
        projects carried out under this section.

    (d) Project Justification.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
        or requirement for economic justification established under 
        section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), 
        the Secretary may implement a project under this section if the 
        Secretary determines that the project--
                    (A) will significantly reduce potential flood 
                damages;
                    (B) will improve the quality of the environment; and
                    (C) is justified considering all costs and 
                beneficial outputs of the project.
            (2) Establishment of selection and rating criteria and 
        policies.--
                    (A) In general.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 
                180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary, in cooperation with State and local agencies 
                and tribes, shall--
                          (i) develop, and submit to the Committee on 
                      Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
                      Representatives and the Committee on Environment 
                      and Public Works of the Senate, criteria for 
                      selecting and rating projects to be carried out 
                      under this section; and

[[Page 113 STAT. 290]]

                          (ii) establish policies and procedures for 
                      carrying out the studies and projects undertaken 
                      under this section.
                    (B) Criteria.--The criteria referred to in 
                subparagraph (A)(i) shall include, as a priority, the 
                extent to which the appropriate State government 
                supports the project.

    (e) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall examine appropriate locations, including--
            (1) Pima County, Arizona, at Paseo De Las Iglesias and 
        Rillito River;
            (2) Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California;
            (3) Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, California;
            (4) Murrieta Creek, California;
            (5) Napa River Valley watershed, California, at Yountville, 
        St. Helena, Calistoga, and American Canyon;
            (6) Santa Clara basin, California, at Upper Guadalupe River 
        and Tributaries, San Francisquito Creek, and Upper Penitencia 
        Creek;
            (7) Pond Creek, Kentucky;
            (8) Red River of the North, Minnesota, North Dakota, and 
        South Dakota;
            (9) Connecticut River, New Hampshire;
            (10) Pine Mount Creek, New Jersey;
            (11) Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico;
            (12) Upper Delaware River, New York;
            (13) Briar Creek, North Carolina;
            (14) Chagrin River, Ohio;
            (15) Mill Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio;
            (16) Tillamook County, Oregon;
            (17) Willamette River basin, Oregon;
            (18) Blair County, Pennsylvania, at Altoona and Frankstown 
        Township;
            (19) Delaware River, Pennsylvania;
            (20) Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania;
            (21) Providence County, Rhode Island;
            (22) Shenandoah River, Virginia; and
            (23) Lincoln Creek, Wisconsin.

    (f) Program Review.--
            (1) In general.--The program established under this section 
        shall be subject to an independent review to evaluate the 
        efficacy of the program in achieving the dual goals of flood 
        hazard mitigation and riverine restoration.
            (2) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than April 15, 
        2003, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate a report on the findings of the review 
        conducted under this subsection with any recommendations 
        concerning continuation of the program.

    (g) Maximum Federal Cost per Project.--Not more than $30,000,000 may 
be expended by the United States on any single project under this 
section.
    (h) Procedure.--
            (1) All projects.--The Secretary shall not implement any 
        project under this section until--

[[Page 113 STAT. 291]]

                    (A) the <<NOTE: Notification.>> Secretary submits to 
                the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
                Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
                Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a written 
                notification describing the project and the 
                determinations made under subsection (d)(1); and
                    (B) 21 calendar days have elapsed after the date on 
                which the notification was received by the committees.
            (2) Projects exceeding $15,000,000.--
                    (A) Limitation on appropriations.--No appropriation 
                shall be made to construct any project under this 
                section the total Federal cost of construction of which 
                exceeds $15,000,000 if the project has not been approved 
                by resolutions adopted by the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
                Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
                Public Works of the Senate.
                    (B) Report.--For the purpose of securing 
                consideration of approval under this paragraph, the 
                Secretary shall submit a report on the proposed project, 
                including all relevant data and information on all 
                costs.

    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) In general.--There are authorized to be appropriated to 
        carry out this section--
                    (A) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2001;
                    (B) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2002; and
                    (C) $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2003 
                through 2005.
            (2)  Full funding.--All studies and projects carried out 
        under this section from Army Civil Works appropriations shall be 
        fully funded within the program funding levels provided in this 
        subsection.

SEC. 213. <<NOTE: 33 USC 426e note.>> SHORE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Review.--The Secretary shall review the implementation of the 
Corps of Engineers shore management program, with particular attention 
to--
            (1) inconsistencies in implementation among the divisions 
        and districts of the Corps of Engineers; and
            (2) complaints by or potential inequities regarding property 
        owners in the Savannah District, including an accounting of the 
        number and disposition of complaints in the Savannah District 
        during the 5-year period preceding the date of enactment of this 
        Act.

    (b) Report.--As expeditiously as practicable, but not later than 1 
year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate a report describing the results of the review under subsection 
(a).

SEC. 214. SHORE DAMAGE PREVENTION OR MITIGATION.

    Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) is 
amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting 
                ``(a) In General.--The Secretary''; and

[[Page 113 STAT. 292]]

                    (B) by inserting after ``navigation works'' the 
                following: ``and shore damage attributable to the 
                Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the Gulf Intracoastal 
                Waterway'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``The costs'' and 
        inserting the following:

    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The costs'';
            (3) in the third sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``No such'' and inserting the 
                following:

    ``(c) Requirement for Specific Authorization.--No such''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$5,000,000''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(d) Coordination.--The Secretary shall--
            ``(1) coordinate the implementation of the measures under 
        this section with other Federal and non-Federal shore protection 
        projects in the same geographic area; and
            ``(2) to the extent practicable, combine mitigation projects 
        with other shore protection projects in the same area into a 
        comprehensive regional project.''.

SEC. 215. SHORE PROTECTION.

    (a) Periodic Nourishment.--Section 103(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(d)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Costs of constructing'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) Construction.--Costs of constructing''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Periodic nourishment.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of a project 
                authorized for construction after December 31, 1999, or 
                for which a feasibility study is completed after that 
                date, the non-Federal cost of the periodic nourishment 
                of the project, or any measure for shore protection or 
                beach erosion control for the project, that is carried 
                out--
                          ``(i) after January 1, 2001, shall be 40 
                      percent;
                          ``(ii) after January 1, 2002, shall be 45 
                      percent; and
                          ``(iii) after January 1, 2003, shall be 50 
                      percent.
                    ``(B) Benefits to privately owned shores.--All costs 
                assigned to benefits of periodic nourishment projects or 
                measures to privately owned shores (where use of such 
                shores is limited to private interests) or to prevention 
                of losses of private land shall be borne by the non-
                Federal interest.
                    ``(C) Benefits to federally owned shores.--All costs 
                assigned to the protection of federally owned shores for 
                periodic nourishment measures shall be borne by the 
                United States.''.

    (b) Outer Continental Shelf.--
            (1) Use of sand from outer continental shelf.--Section 
        8(k)(2)(B) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
        1337(k)(2)(B)) is amended in the second sentence by striking 
        ``an agency of the Federal Government'' and inserting ``a 
        Federal, State, or local government agency''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 293]]

            (2) Reimbursement of local interests.--Any amounts paid by 
        non-Federal interests for beach erosion control, hurricane 
        protection, shore protection, or storm damage reduction projects 
        as a result of an assessment under section 8(k) of the Outer 
        Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)) shall be fully 
        reimbursed.

    (c) Report <<NOTE: 33 USC 426e note.>> on Shores of the United 
States.--
            (1) In general.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 3 years 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        report to Congress on the state of the shores of the United 
        States.
            (2) Contents.--The report shall include--
                    (A) a description of--
                          (i) the extent of, and economic and 
                      environmental effects caused by, erosion and 
                      accretion along the shores of the United States; 
                      and
                          (ii) the causes of such erosion and accretion;
                    (B) a description of resources committed by Federal, 
                State, and local governments to restore and renourish 
                shores;
                    (C) a description of the systematic movement of sand 
                along the shores of the United States; and
                    (D) recommendations regarding--
                          (i) appropriate levels of Federal and non-
                      Federal participation in shore protection; and
                          (ii) use of a systems approach to sand 
                      management.
            (3) Use of specific location data.--In developing the 
        report, the Secretary shall use data from specific locations on 
        the coasts of the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, Great Lakes, 
        and Gulf of Mexico.

    (d) National <<NOTE: 33 USC 426i-2.>> Coastal Data Bank.--
            (1) Establishment of data <<NOTE: Deadline.>> bank.--Not 
        later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
        Secretary shall establish a national coastal data bank 
        containing data on the geophysical and climatological 
        characteristics of the shores of the United States.
            (2) Content.--To the extent practicable, the national 
        coastal data bank shall include data regarding current and 
        predicted shore positions, information on federally authorized 
        shore protection projects, and data on the movement of sand 
        along the shores of the United States, including impediments to 
        such movement caused by natural and manmade features.
            (3) Access.--The national coastal data bank shall be made 
        readily accessible to the public.

SEC. 216. FLOOD PREVENTION COORDINATION.

    Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
        (c) and (d), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:

    ``(b) Flood Prevention Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate 
with the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the 
heads of other Federal agencies to ensure that flood control projects 
and plans are complementary and integrated to the extent practicable and 
appropriate.''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 294]]

SEC. 217. DISPOSAL OF DREDGED MATERIAL ON BEACHES.

    (a) In General.--Section 145 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is amended in the first sentence by striking 
``50'' and inserting ``35''.
    (b) Great Lakes <<NOTE: 33 USC 426j note.>> Basin.--The Secretary 
shall work with the State of Ohio, other Great Lakes States, and 
political subdivisions of the States to fully implement and maximize 
beneficial reuse of dredged material as provided under section 145 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).

    (c) Bolivar Peninsula, Jefferson, Chambers, and Galveston Counties, 
Texas.--The Secretary may design and construct a shore protection 
project between the south jetty of the Sabine Pass Channel and the north 
jetty of the Galveston Harbor Entrance Channel in Jefferson, Chambers, 
and Galveston Counties, Texas, including beneficial use of dredged 
material from Federal navigation projects as provided under section 145 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).
    (d) Galveston Beach, Galveston County, Texas.--The Secretary may 
design and construct a shore protection project between the Galveston 
South Jetty and San Luis Pass, Galveston County, Texas, using innovative 
nourishment techniques, including beneficial use of dredged material 
from Federal navigation projects as provided under section 145 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).
    (e) Rollover Pass, Galveston County, Texas.--The Secretary may place 
dredged material from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway on the beaches 
along Rollover Pass, Galveston County, Texas, to stabilize beach erosion 
as provided under section 145 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).

SEC. 218. ANNUAL PASSES FOR RECREATION.

    Section 208(c)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (16 
U.S.C. 460d-3 note; 110 Stat. 3681) is amended by striking ``later of 
December 31, 1999, or the date of transmittal of the report under 
paragraph (3)'' and inserting ``December 31, 2003''.

SEC. 219. NONSTRUCTURAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    (a) Analysis of Benefits.--Section 308 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2318) is amended--
            (1) in the heading of subsection (a), by inserting 
        ``Exclusion of Elements From'' before ``Benefit-Cost'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as 
        subsections (c) through (f), respectively;
            (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:

    ``(b) Flood Damage Reduction Benefits.--
            ``(1) In general.--In calculating the benefits of a proposed 
        project for nonstructural flood damage reduction, the Secretary 
        shall calculate the benefits of the nonstructural project using 
        methods similar to those used for calculating the benefits of 
        structural projects, including similar treatment in calculating 
        the benefits from losses avoided.
            ``(2) Avoidance of double counting.--In carrying out 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary should avoid double counting of 
        benefits.''; and
            (4) in subsection (d), by striking ``subsection (b)'' and 
        inserting ``subsection (c)''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 295]]

    (b) Reevaluation <<NOTE: 33 USC 2318 note.>> of Flood Control 
Projects.--At the request of a non-Federal interest for a flood control 
project, the Secretary shall conduct a reevaluation of a project 
authorized before the date of enactment of this Act to consider 
nonstructural alternatives in light of the amendments made by subsection 
(a).

    (c) Cost Sharing.--Section 103(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The non-Federal'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--The non-Federal''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Non-federal contribution in excess of 35 percent.--At 
        any time during construction of a project, if the Secretary 
        determines that the costs of land, easements, rights-of-way, 
        dredged material disposal areas, and relocations for the 
        project, in combination with other costs contributed by the non-
        Federal interests, will exceed 35 percent, any additional costs 
        for the project (not to exceed 65 percent of the total costs of 
        the project) shall be a Federal responsibility and shall be 
        contributed during construction as part of the Federal share.''.

SEC. 220. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (14), by inserting ``and nutrient 
        monitoring'' after ``growth'';
            (2) in paragraph (15), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (3) in paragraph (16), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(17) Clear Lake, Lake County, California, removal of silt 
        and aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
        sedimentation and high nutrient concentration;
            ``(18) Flints Pond, Hollis, Hillsborough County, New 
        Hampshire, removal of silt and aquatic growth and measures to 
        address excessive sedimentation; and
            ``(19) Osgood Pond, Milford, Hillsborough County, New 
        Hampshire, removal of silt and aquatic growth and measures to 
        address excessive sedimentation.''.

SEC. 221. ENHANCEMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES.

    Section 906(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2283(e)) is amended by inserting after the second sentence the 
following: ``Not more than 80 percent of the non-Federal share of such 
first costs may be satisfied through in-kind contributions, including 
facilities, supplies, and services that are necessary to carry out the 
enhancement project.''.
SEC. 222. PURCHASE <<NOTE: 33 USC 2201 note.>> OF AMERICAN-MADE 
                        EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--It is the sense of Congress that, to the extent 
practicable, all equipment and products purchased with funds made 
available under this Act should be American made.
    (b) Notice to Recipients of Assistance.--In providing financial 
assistance under this Act, the Secretary, to the greatest extent 
practicable, shall provide to each recipient of the assistance a notice 
describing the statement made in subsection (a).

[[Page 113 STAT. 296]]

SEC. 223. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
                        INTERESTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 211(d) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Any non-Federal interest 
        that has received from the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b) 
        or (c)'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) Studies and design activities under subsection 
                (b).--
                          ``(i) In general.--A non-Federal interest may 
                      carry out construction for which studies and 
                      design documents are prepared under subsection (b) 
                      only if the Secretary approves the project for 
                      construction.
                          ``(ii) Criteria for approval.--The Secretary 
                      shall approve a project for construction if the 
                      Secretary determines that the project is 
                      technically sound, economically justified, and 
                      environmentally acceptable and meets the 
                      requirements for obtaining the appropriate permits 
                      required under the authority of the Secretary.
                          ``(iii) No unreasonable withholding of 
                      approval.--The Secretary shall not unreasonably 
                      withhold approval of a project for construction.
                          ``(iv) No effect on regulatory authority.--
                      Nothing in this subparagraph affects any 
                      regulatory authority of the Secretary.
                    ``(B) Studies and design activities under subsection 
                (c).--Any non-Federal interest that has received from 
                the Secretary under subsection (c)''; and
            (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (2), by inserting 
        ``(other than paragraph (1)(A))'' after ``this subsection''.

    (b) Reimbursement.--
            (1) In general.--Section 211(e)(1) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)(1)) is amended--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
                inserting after ``constructed pursuant to this section'' 
                the following: ``and provide credit for the non-Federal 
                share of the project'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) if the construction work is substantially in 
                accordance with plans prepared under subsection (b).''.
            (2) Special rules.--Section 211(e)(2)(A) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)(2)(A)) 
        is amended--
                    (A) in the subparagraph heading, by inserting ``or 
                credit'' after ``Reimbursement'';
                    (B) by striking ``subject to amounts being made 
                available in advance in appropriations Acts'' and 
                inserting ``subject to the availability of 
                appropriations''; and
                    (C) by inserting after ``the cost of such work'' the 
                following: ``, or provide credit (depending on the 
                request of the non-Federal interest) for the non-Federal 
                share of such work,''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 297]]

            (3) Schedule and manner of reimbursements.--Section 211(e) 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-
        13(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Schedule and manner of reimbursement.--
                    ``(A) Budgeting.--The Secretary shall budget and 
                request appropriations for reimbursements under this 
                section on a schedule that is consistent with a Federal 
                construction schedule.
                    ``(B) Commencement of reimbursements.--
                Reimbursements under this section may commence on 
                approval of a project by the Secretary.
                    ``(C) Credit.--At the request of a non-Federal 
                interest, the Secretary may reimburse the non-Federal 
                interest by providing credit toward future non-Federal 
                costs of the project.
                    ``(D) Scheduling.--Nothing in this paragraph affects 
                the discretion of the President to schedule new 
                construction starts.''.

SEC. 224. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

    Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1272) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``50'' and 
                inserting ``35''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``$20,000,000'' 
                and inserting ``$50,000,000'';
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``non-Federal 
        responsibility'' and inserting ``shared as a cost of 
        construction''; and
            (3) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Passaic River and Newark Bay, New Jersey.
            ``(7) Snake Creek, Bixby, Oklahoma.
            ``(8) Willamette River, Oregon.''.

SEC. 225. <<NOTE: 16 USC 460l-6a note.>> RECREATION USER FEES.

    (a) Withholding of Amounts.--
            (1) In general.--During fiscal years 1999 through 2002, the 
        Secretary may withhold from the special account established 
        under section 4(i)(1)(A) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund 
        Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(i)(1)(A)) 100 percent of the 
        amount of receipts above a baseline of $34,000,000 per each 
        fiscal year received from fees imposed at recreation sites under 
        the administrative jurisdiction of the Department of the Army 
        under section 4(b) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(b)).
            (2) Use.--The amounts withheld shall be retained by the 
        Secretary and shall be available, without further Act of 
        appropriation, for expenditure by the Secretary in accordance 
        with subsection (b).
            (3) Availability.--The amounts withheld shall remain 
        available until September 30, 2005.

    (b) Use of Amounts Withheld.--In order to increase the quality of 
the visitor experience at public recreational areas and to enhance the 
protection of resources, the amounts withheld under subsection (a) may 
be used only for--
            (1) repair and maintenance projects (including projects 
        relating to health and safety);
            (2) interpretation;

[[Page 113 STAT. 298]]

            (3) signage;
            (4) habitat or facility enhancement;
            (5) resource preservation;
            (6) annual operation (including fee collection);
            (7) maintenance; and
            (8) law enforcement related to public use.

    (c) Availability.--Each amount withheld by the Secretary shall be 
available for expenditure, without further Act of appropriation, at the 
specific project from which the amount, above baseline, is collected.

SEC. 226. SMALL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

    Section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), is amended 
by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting ``$3,000,000''.

SEC. 227. <<NOTE: 31 USC 501 note.>> USE OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall comply with the requirements of 
the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (31 U.S.C. 501 note; 
Public Law 105-270).
    (b) Compliance With Other Law.--
            (1) Inventory and review.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall inventory and review all activities that are not 
        inherently governmental in nature in accordance with the Federal 
        Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998.
            (2) Architectural and engineering services.--Any review and 
        conversion by the Secretary to performance by private enterprise 
        of an architectural or engineering service (including a 
        surveying or mapping service) shall be carried out in accordance 
        with title IX of the Federal Property and Administrative 
        Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 541 et seq.).

                  TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, 
                        ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI.

    The Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation Project, 
Alabama and Mississippi, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4138), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to complete the project at a cost of 
$93,530,000, in accordance with the post authorization change report 
dated August 17, 1998.

SEC. 302. OUZINKIE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project for navigation, Ouzinkie 
Harbor, Alaska, shall be $8,500,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in the project under subsection (a).

SEC. 303. ST. PAUL HARBOR, ST. PAUL, ALASKA.

    The project for navigation, St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, Alaska, 
authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is modified to include the construction of 
additional features for a small boat harbor with an entrance

[[Page 113 STAT. 299]]

channel and maneuvering area dredged to a 20-foot depth and appropriate 
wave protection features at an additional estimated total cost of 
$12,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $7,700,000.
SEC. 304. LOGGY BAYOU, RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, ARKANSAS, 
                        LOUISIANA, OKLAHOMA, AND TEXAS.

    The project for flood control on the Red River below Denison Dam, 
Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas, authorized by section 10 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 647), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of expanding 
the project to include mile 0.0 to mile 7.8 of Loggy Bayou between the 
Red River and Flat River.

SEC. 305. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Sacramento River, 
California, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to 
provide for the control of the floods of the Mississippi River and of 
the Sacramento River, California, and for other purposes'', approved 
March 1, 1917 (39 Stat. 949), and modified by section 102 of the Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), section 
301(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3110), and title I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
Act, 1999 (112 Stat. 1841), is further modified to authorize the 
Secretary--
            (1) to carry out the portion of the project at Glenn-Colusa, 
        California, at a total cost of $26,000,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $20,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,000,000; and
            (2) to carry out bank stabilization work in the riverbed 
        gradient facility, particularly in the vicinity of River Mile 
        208, if the Secretary determines that such work is necessary to 
        protect the overall integrity of the project, on the condition 
        that additional environmental review of the project is 
        conducted.

SEC. 306. SAN LORENZO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, San Lorenzo River, California, 
authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3663), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
include as a part of the project streambank erosion control measures to 
be undertaken substantially in accordance with the report entitled 
``Bank Stabilization Concept, Laurel Street Extension'', dated April 23, 
1998, at a total cost of $4,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$3,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,700,000.

SEC. 307. TERMINUS DAM, KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Transfer of Title to Additional Land.--If the non-Federal 
interests for the project for flood control and water supply, Terminus 
Dam, Kaweah River, California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), transfer to 
the Secretary without consideration title to perimeter lands acquired 
for the project by the non-Federal interests, the Secretary may accept 
the transfer of that title.
    (b) Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--Nothing in this section 
changes, modifies, or otherwise affects the responsibility of the non-
Federal interests to provide land, easements, rights-

[[Page 113 STAT. 300]]

of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for 
the Terminus Dam project and to perform operation and maintenance for 
the project.
    (c) Operation and Maintenance.--On request by the non-Federal 
interests, the Secretary shall carry out operation, maintenance, repair, 
replacement, and rehabilitation of the project if the non-Federal 
interests enter into a binding agreement with the Secretary to reimburse 
the Secretary for 100 percent of the costs of such operation, 
maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation, and any other 
expenses incurred by the Corps of Engineers under this section.
    (d) Hold Harmless.--The non-Federal interests shall hold the United 
States harmless for ownership, operation, and maintenance of lands and 
facilities of the Terminus Dam project title to which is transferred to 
the Secretary under this section.
SEC. 308. DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM AND CHANNEL DEEPENING, DELAWARE, 
                        NEW JERSEY, AND PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for navigation, Delaware River Mainstem and Channel 
Deepening, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, authorized by section 
101(6) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802), 
is modified as follows:
            (1) Credit for engineering and design and construction 
        management work.--The Secretary may provide the non-Federal 
        interests credit, toward cash contributions required for 
        construction and subsequent to construction, for the costs of 
        engineering and design and construction management work that is 
        performed by the non-Federal interests and that the Secretary 
        determines is necessary to implement the project. Any such 
        credit shall reduce the Philadelphia District's private sector 
        performance goals for engineering work by the amount of the 
        credit.
            (2) Credit for costs of construction.--The Secretary may 
        provide the non-Federal interests credit, toward cash 
        contributions required during construction and subsequent to 
        construction, for the costs of construction performed by the 
        non-Federal interests on behalf of the Secretary and that the 
        Secretary determines is necessary to implement the project.
            (3) Payment of disposal or tipping fees.--The Secretary may 
        enter into an agreement with a non-Federal interest for the 
        payment of disposal or tipping fees for dredged material from a 
        Federal project, other than for the construction or operation 
        and maintenance of the new deepening project as described in the 
        Limited Reevaluation Report dated May 1997, if the non-Federal 
        interest has supplied the corresponding disposal capacity.
            (4) Disposal area management plan.--The Secretary may enter 
        into an agreement with a non-Federal interest under which--
                    (A) the non-Federal interest may carry out or cause 
                to have carried out on behalf of the Secretary a 
                disposal area management program for dredged material 
                disposal areas necessary to construct, operate, and 
                maintain the project; and
                    (B) the Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal 
                interest for the costs of carrying out the program.

[[Page 113 STAT. 301]]

SEC. 309. POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    The project for flood control, Potomac River, Washington, District 
of Columbia, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 
Stat. 1574, chapter 688), and modified by section 301(a)(4) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3707), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a Federal cost of 
$5,965,000, in accordance with the post authorization change report 
dated June 29, 1998.

SEC. 310. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) Study.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 120 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation with the 
non-Federal interest, shall complete a study of any damage to the 
project for shore protection, Brevard County, Florida, authorized by 
section 101(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3667), to determine whether the damage is the result of a Federal 
navigation project.

    (b) Conditions.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall use 
the services of an independent coastal expert, who shall consider all 
relevant studies completed by the Corps of Engineers and the local 
sponsor of the project.
    (c) Mitigation of Damage.--After completion of the study, the 
Secretary shall mitigate any damage to the shore protection project that 
is the result of a Federal navigation project. The costs of the 
mitigation shall be allocated to the Federal navigation project as 
operation and maintenance costs.

SEC. 311. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Broward County and Hillsboro 
Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1965 (79 Stat. 1090), is modified to authorize the Secretary, on 
execution of a contract to construct the project, to reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the Federal share of the cost of preconstruction 
planning and design for the project, if the Secretary determines that 
the work is compatible with and integral to the project.
SEC. 312. LEE COUNTY, CAPTIVA ISLAND SEGMENT, FLORIDA, PERIODIC 
                        BEACH NOURISHMENT.

    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lee County, 
Captiva Island segment, Florida, authorized by section 506(b)(3)(A) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3758), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to enter into an agreement with the 
non-Federal interest to carry out the project in accordance with section 
206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-1).
    (b) Decision Document.--The design memorandum approved in 1996 shall 
be the decision document supporting continued Federal participation in 
cost sharing of the project.

SEC. 313. FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection and harbor 
mitigation, Fort Pierce, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1092) and section 506(a)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is modified to 
incorporate 1 additional mile into the project in accordance with a 
final approved general reevaluation report, at a total cost for initial 
nourishment for the entire project of

[[Page 113 STAT. 302]]

$9,128,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,073,500 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $2,054,500, at an average annual cost of 
$556,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, 
with an estimated annual Federal cost of $431,000 and an estimated 
annual non-Federal cost of $125,000.
    (b) Periodic Beach Nourishment.--Periodic beach nourishment is 
authorized for the project in accordance with section 506(a)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757).

SEC. 314. NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The project for beach erosion control, Nassau County (Amelia 
Island), Florida, authorized by section 3(a)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $17,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $13,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $3,700,000, at an average annual cost of $1,177,000 for periodic 
nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated 
annual Federal cost of $807,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost 
of $370,000.

SEC. 315. MIAMI HARBOR CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606), is modified to include construction of 
artificial reefs and related environmental mitigation required by 
Federal, State, and local environmental permitting agencies for the 
project, if the Secretary determines that the project as modified is 
technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified.

SEC. 316. ST. AUGUSTINE, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection and storm damage reduction, St. 
Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida, authorized by section 501(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4133) is modified 
to include navigation mitigation as a project purpose and to be carried 
out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the general 
reevaluation report dated November 18, 1998, at a total cost of 
$17,208,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,852,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $3,356,000, and at an estimated average 
annual cost of $1,360,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $1,095,000 and 
an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $265,000.

SEC. 317. MILO CREEK, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal interests for 65 
percent of the reasonable costs of flood control for the South Division 
Street Segment, Milo Creek Flood Control Project, Idaho, to be 
constructed by the State of Idaho as described in the provision entitled 
``Add Alternative I'' in the Milo Creek Phase II plans and 
specifications dated April 1999.

SEC. 318. LAKE MICHIGAN, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The project for storm damage reduction and shore 
protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the 
Illinois-Indiana State line, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664),

[[Page 113 STAT. 303]]

is modified to provide for reimbursement for additional project work 
undertaken by the non-Federal interest.
    (b) Credit or Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall credit or 
reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of project 
costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in designing, constructing, 
or reconstructing reach 2F (700 feet south of Fullerton Avenue and 500 
feet north of Fullerton Avenue), reach 3M (Meigs Field), and segments 7 
and 8 of reach 4 (43rd Street to 57th Street), if the non-Federal 
interest carries out the work in accordance with plans approved by the 
Secretary, at an estimated total cost of $83,300,000.
    (c) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal 
interest for the Federal share of project costs incurred by the non-
Federal interest in reconstructing the revetment structures protecting 
Solidarity Drive in Chicago, Illinois, before the signing of the project 
cooperation agreement, at an estimated total cost of $7,600,000.

SEC. 319. SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS.

    Section 417 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3743) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
        Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of assistance provided 
under this section before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 
subsection shall be 50 percent.''.

SEC. 320. OGDEN DUNES, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of beach erosion in 
and around the town of Ogden Dunes, Indiana, to determine whether the 
damage is the result of a Federal navigation project.
    (b) Mitigation of Damage.--If the Secretary determines that the 
damage described in subsection (a) is the result of a Federal navigation 
project, the Secretary shall take appropriate measures to mitigate the 
damage.
    (c) Cost.--The cost of the mitigation shall be allocated to the 
Federal navigation project as an operation and maintenance cost.

SEC. 321. SAINT JOSEPH RIVER, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA.

    (a) Maximum Total Expenditure.--The maximum total expenditure for 
the project for streambank erosion, recreation, and pedestrian access 
features, Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana, shall be $7,800,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in the project under subsection (a).

SEC. 322. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of the 
White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An 
Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and other purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 
(49 Stat. 1586, chapter 688), as modified by section 323 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to undertake the

[[Page 113 STAT. 304]]

riverfront alterations described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront 
Concept Plan, dated February 1994, for the Canal Development (Upper 
Canal feature) and the Beveridge Paper feature, at a total cost not to 
exceed $25,000,000, of which $12,500,000 is the estimated Federal cost 
and $12,500,000 is the estimated non-Federal cost, except that no such 
alterations may be undertaken unless the Secretary determines that the 
alterations authorized by this section, in combination with the 
alterations undertaken under section 323 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716), are economically justified.

SEC. 323. DUBUQUE, IOWA.

    The project for navigation, Dubuque, Iowa, authorized by section 101 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482), is modified to 
authorize the development of a wetland demonstration area of 
approximately 1.5 acres to be developed and operated by the Dubuque 
County Historical Society or a successor nonprofit organization.

SEC. 324. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane-flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1077), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to conduct a study to determine 
        the feasibility of constructing a pump adjacent to each of the 4 
        proposed drainage structures for the Saint Charles Parish 
        feature of the project; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the pumps, with 
        a Federal cost of 65 percent, if the Secretary determines that 
        the project as modified is technically sound, environmentally 
        acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 325. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane protection Larose to Golden Meadow, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1077), is modified to authorize the Secretary to convert the 
Golden Meadow floodgate into a navigation lock if the Secretary 
determines that the conversion is technically feasible, environmentally 
acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 326. LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY LEVEE, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary may credit against the non-Federal share work 
performed in the project area of the Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, 
Mississippi River, Louisiana, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4117).

SEC. 327. TWELVE-MILE BAYOU, CADDO PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    The Red River Below Denison Dam project, authorized by section 10 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 647), is modified to incorporate 
the Twelve-Mile Bayou and levee from its confluence with the Red River 
and levee approximately 26 miles upstream to the vicinity of Black 
Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana.
SEC. 328. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY 
                        CANAL), LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The project to prevent flood damage and for 
hurricane damage reduction, west bank of the Mississippi River (east of 
Harvey Canal), Louisiana, authorized by section 401(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4128)

[[Page 113 STAT. 305]]

and section 101(a)(17) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3665), is modified to direct the Secretary to continue 
Federal operation and maintenance of the portion of the project included 
in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated May 1, 1995, referred to 
as ``Algiers Channel''.
    (b) Combination of Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out work 
authorized as part of the Westwego to Harvey Canal project, the East of 
Harvey Canal project, and the Lake Cataouatche modifications as a single 
project, to be known as the ``West Bank and Vicinity, New Orleans, 
Louisiana, Hurricane Protection Project'', with a combined total cost of 
$280,300,000.

SEC. 329. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL S-TURN, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 
297), is modified to direct the Secretary to straighten the Tolchester 
Channel S-turn as part of project maintenance.

SEC. 330. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

    The project for navigation Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, 
Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) and modified by section 330 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717), is further modified 
to provide that the amount to be paid by non-Federal interests under 
section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2211(a)) and section 330(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 shall not include any interest payments.

SEC. 331. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for environmental infrastructure, Jackson County, 
Mississippi, authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835) and modified by section 504 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is further 
modified to direct the Secretary to provide a credit, not to exceed 
$5,000,000, toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for 
the costs incurred by the Jackson County Board of Supervisors since 
February 8, 1994, in constructing the project, if the Secretary 
determines that the work is compatible with and integral to the project.

SEC. 332. BOIS BRULE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, MISSOURI.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be allocated for the project for flood control, Bois 
Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri, authorized under section 
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is $15,000,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in Federal participation 
in the project under subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section affects any cost-sharing 
requirement applicable to the project referred to in subsection (a) 
under title I of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2211 et seq.).

[[Page 113 STAT. 306]]

SEC. 333. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK LEVEE, MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control, Meramec River Basin, Valley Park 
Levee, Missouri, authorized by section 2(h) of the Act entitled ``An Act 
to deauthorize several projects within the jurisdiction of the Army 
Corps of Engineers'' (Public Law 97-128; 95 Stat. 1682) and modified by 
section 1128 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4246), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a maximum Federal expenditure of $35,000,000, if the 
Secretary determines that the project as modified is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
SEC. 334. MISSOURI RIVER MITIGATION PROJECT, MISSOURI, KANSAS, 
                        IOWA, AND NEBRASKA.

    (a) In General.--The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife 
losses, Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, 
Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, authorized by section 601(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143) is modified 
to increase by 118,650 acres the amount of land and interests in land to 
be acquired for the project.
    (b) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with the 
        States of Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, shall conduct a 
        study to determine the cost of restoring, under the authority of 
        the Missouri River fish and wildlife mitigation project, a total 
        of 118,650 acres of lost Missouri River fish and wildlife 
        habitat.
            (2) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 180 days 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        report to Congress on the results of the study.

SEC. 335. WOOD RIVER, GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA.

    The project for flood control, Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska, 
authorized by section 101(a)(19) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of the 
Corps of Engineers dated June 29, 1998, at a total cost of $17,039,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $9,730,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $7,309,000.

SEC. 336. ABSECON ISLAND, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for storm damage reduction and shore protection, 
Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet, Absecon Island, New Jersey, 
authorized by section 101(b)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), is modified to provide that if, after October 
12, 1996, the non-Federal interests carry out any work associated with 
the project that is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and 
approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may provide the non-Federal 
interests credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
in an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of the work, without 
interest.
SEC. 337. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, PORT JERSEY, NEW 
                        JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, New York Harbor and 
Adjacent Channels, New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098), is 
further modified to authorize the Secretary

[[Page 113 STAT. 307]]

to construct the portion of the project that is located between Military 
Ocean Terminal Bayonne and Global Terminal in Bayonne, New Jersey, at a 
total cost of $103,267,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$76,909,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $26,358,000.
    (b) Limitation.--No funds may be obligated to carry out work under 
the modification under subsection (a) until completion of a final report 
by the Chief of Engineers finding that the work is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 338. ARTHUR KILL, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Arthur Kill, New York 
and New Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098) and modified by section 
301(b)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3711), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of 
Engineers dated July 23, 1999, at a total cost of $315,700,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $183,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $132,500,000.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary may provide non-Federal interests--
            (1) credit toward cash contributions required prior to and 
        during construction and subsequent to construction for planning, 
        engineering, and design and construction management work that is 
        performed by non-Federal interests and that the Secretary 
        determines is necessary to implement the project; and
            (2) credit toward cash contributions required during 
        construction and subsequent to construction for the costs of 
        construction carried out by the non-Federal interest on behalf 
        of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is necessary 
        to implement the project.
SEC. 339. KILL VAN KULL AND NEWARK BAY CHANNELS, NEW YORK AND NEW 
                        JERSEY.

    The project for navigation, Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, 
New York and New Jersey, authorized by chapter IV of title I of the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 313), section 202(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4095), and 
section 301(b)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3711), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to provide 
the non-Federal interests credit toward cash contributions required--
            (1) before, during, and after construction for planning, 
        engineering and design, and construction management work that is 
        performed by the non-Federal interests and that the Secretary 
        determines is necessary to implement the project; and
            (2) during and after construction for the costs of the 
        construction that the non-Federal interests carry out on behalf 
        of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is necessary 
        to implement the project.

SEC. 340. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.

    Section 552 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3779) is amended--

[[Page 113 STAT. 308]]

            (1) in subsection (d), by striking ``for the project to be 
        carried out with such assistance'' and inserting ``, or a public 
        entity designated by the State director, to carry out the 
        project with the assistance, subject to the project's meeting 
        the certification requirement of subsection (c)(1)''; and
            (2) in subsection (i), by striking ``$22,500,000'' and 
        inserting ``$42,500,000''.

SEC. 341. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    Section 553(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``$8,000,000'' and inserting 
``$18,000,000''.

SEC. 342. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NEW YORK.

    The project for combined beach erosion control and hurricane 
protection, Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, Long Island, New York, 
authorized by section 101(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 
Stat. 483) and modified by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974, and the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986, is further modified to direct the Secretary, in 
coordination with the heads of other Federal departments and agencies, 
to complete all procedures and reviews expeditiously and to adopt and 
submit to Congress, not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, a mutually acceptable shore erosion plan for the Fire 
Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the project.

SEC. 343. BROKEN BOW LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLAHOMA.

    The project for flood control and water supply, Broken Bow Lake, Red 
River Basin, Oklahoma, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 309) and modified by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1187), section 102(v) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4808), and section 338 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3720), is further 
modified to require the Secretary to make seasonal adjustments to the 
top of the conservation pool at the project, if the Secretary determines 
that the adjustments will be undertaken at no cost to the United States 
and will adequately protect affected water and related resources, as 
follows:
            (1) Maintain an elevation of 599.5 from November 1 through 
        March 31.
            (2) Increase elevation gradually from 599.5 to 602.5 during 
        April and May.
            (3) Maintain an elevation of 602.5 from June 1 to September 
        30.
            (4) Decrease elevation gradually from 602.5 to 599.5 during 
        October.
SEC. 344. WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, 
                        OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The project for environmental restoration, 
Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon, 
authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the Feature 
Memorandum dated July 31, 1998, at a total cost of $64,741,000, if the 
Secretary determines that the project as modified is technically sound 
and environmentally acceptable.

[[Page 113 STAT. 309]]

    (b) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 90 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report that--
            (1) states the reasons for the increase in the cost of the 
        project;
            (2) outlines the steps that the Corps of Engineers is taking 
        to control project costs, including the application of value 
        engineering and other appropriate measures; and
            (3) includes a cost estimate for, and recommendations on the 
        advisability of, adding fish screens to the project.

SEC. 345. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 562 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3784) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
        following:

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(b) Recreation Facilities.--The Secretary--
            ``(1) may provide design and construction assistance for 
        recreational facilities at Curwensville Lake; and
            ``(2) may require the non-Federal interest to provide not 
        more than 25 percent of the cost of designing and constructing 
        the recreational facilities.''.

SEC. 346. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE.

    The project for navigation, Delaware River, Philadelphia to 
Wilmington, Pennsylvania and Delaware, authorized by section 3(a)(12) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to extend the channel of the 
Delaware River at Camden, New Jersey, to within 150 feet of the existing 
bulkhead and to relocate the 40-foot deep Federal navigation channel, 
eastward within Philadelphia Harbor, from the Ben Franklin Bridge to the 
Walt Whitman Bridge, into deep water, if the Secretary determines that 
the project as modified is technically sound, economically acceptable, 
and economically justified.

SEC. 347. MUSSERS DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 209 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4830) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (e); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).

SEC. 348. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 564(c)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3785) is amended by striking ``$2,700,000'' and inserting 
``$4,000,000''.

SEC. 349. NINE MILE RUN, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    If the Secretary determines that the documentation is integral to 
the project, the Secretary shall credit against the non-Federal share 
such costs, not to exceed $1,000,000, as are incurred by the non-Federal 
interests in preparing the environmental restoration report, planning 
and design-phase scientific and engineering technical services 
documentation, and other preconstruction documentation for the habitat 
restoration project, Nine Mile Run, Pennsylvania.

[[Page 113 STAT. 310]]

SEC. 350. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Recreation Partnership Initiative.--Section 519(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2328 note; 110 Stat. 3765) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) Engineering and design services.--The Secretary may 
        perform engineering and design services for project 
        infrastructure expected to be associated with the development of 
        the site at Raystown Lake, Hesston, Pennsylvania.''.

    (b) Construction Assistance.--
            (1) In general.--Consistent with the master plan described 
        in section 318 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
        (106 Stat. 4848), the Secretary may provide a grant to Juniata 
        College for the construction of facilities and structures at 
        Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania, to interpret and understand 
        environmental conditions and trends. As a condition of the 
        receipt of financial assistance, officials at Juniata College 
        shall coordinate the construction with the Baltimore District of 
        the Army Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated to carry out this subsection $5,000,000.

SEC. 351. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 313(g)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846; 110 Stat. 3723) is 
amended by striking ``$80,000,000'' and inserting ``$180,000,000''.
    (b) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Section 313(g) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
            ``(4) Corps of engineers expenses.--10 percent of the 
        amounts appropriated to carry out this section for each of 
        fiscal years 2000 through 2002 may be used by the Corps of 
        Engineers district offices to administer and implement projects 
        under this section at 100 percent Federal expense.''.
SEC. 352. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND.

    The project for hurricane-flood protection, Fox Point, Providence, 
Rhode Island, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 306), is modified to direct the Secretary to undertake the 
necessary repairs to the barrier, as identified in the Condition Survey 
and Technical Assessment dated April 1998, with Supplement dated August 
1998, at a total cost of $3,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$1,950,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,050,000.

SEC. 353. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--The project for rediversion, Cooper River, 
Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, authorized by section 101 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731) and modified by title I of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1992 (105 Stat. 
517), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to pay to the State 
of South Carolina not more than $3,750,000 if the Secretary and the 
State enter into a binding agreement for the State to perform all future 
operation of the

[[Page 113 STAT. 311]]

fish lift at St. Stephen, South Carolina, including performance of 
studies to assess the efficacy of the fish lift.
    (b) Contents of Agreement.--The agreement under subsection (a) shall 
specify--
            (1) the terms and conditions under which payment will be 
        made; and
            (2) the rights of, and remedies available to, the Federal 
        Government to recover all or a portion of the payment if the 
        State suspends or terminates operation of the fish lift or fails 
        to operate the fish lift in a manner satisfactory to the 
        Secretary.

    (c) Maintenance.--Maintenance of the fish lift shall remain a 
Federal responsibility.

SEC. 354. CLEAR CREEK, TEXAS.

    Section 575 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by inserting ``or nonstructural actions'' after 
                ``flood control works constructed''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``or nonstructural actions'' after 
                ``construction of the project''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) the project for flood control, Clear Creek, Texas, 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 
        Stat. 742).''.

SEC. 355. CYPRESS CREEK, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cypress Creek, 
Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
carry out a nonstructural flood control project at a total cost of 
$5,000,000.
    (b) Reimbursement for Work.--The Secretary may reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the Cypress Creek project for work done by the non-
Federal interest on the nonstructural flood control project in an amount 
equal to the estimate of the Federal share, without interest, of the 
cost of the work--
            (1) if, after authorization and before initiation of 
        construction of the nonstructural project, the Secretary 
        approves the plans for construction of the nonstructural project 
        by the non-Federal interest; and
            (2) if the Secretary finds, after a review of studies and 
        design documents prepared to carry out the nonstructural 
        project, that construction of the nonstructural project is 
        economically justified and environmentally acceptable.

SEC. 356. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, DALLAS, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, 
Texas, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 
Stat. 1091) and modified by section 351 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3724), is further modified to add 
environmental restoration and recreation as project purposes.

[[Page 113 STAT. 312]]

SEC. 357. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UTAH.

    The project for flood control, Upper Jordan River, Utah, authorized 
by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4610) and modified by section 301(a)(14) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3709), is further modified 
to direct the Secretary to carry out the locally preferred project, 
entitled ``Upper Jordan River Flood Control Project, Salt Lake County, 
Utah--Supplemental Information'' and identified in the document of Salt 
Lake County, Utah, dated July 30, 1998, at a total cost of $12,870,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $8,580,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $4,290,000, if the Secretary determines that the project 
as modified is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
economically justified.

SEC. 358. ELIZABETH RIVER, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after September 30, 
1999, the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, shall not be obligated to make 
the annual cash contribution required under paragraph 1(9) of the Local 
Cooperation Agreement dated December 12, 1978, between the Government 
and the city for the project for navigation, southern branch of the 
Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.

SEC. 359. COLUMBIA RIVER CHANNEL, WASHINGTON AND OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Columbia River between 
Vancouver, Washington, and The Dalles, Oregon, authorized by the first 
section of the Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 637, chapter 595), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct an alternate barge 
channel to traverse the high span of the Interstate Route 5 bridge 
between Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, Washington, to a depth of 17 
feet, with a width of approximately 200 feet through the high span of 
the bridge and a width of approximately 300 feet upstream of the bridge.
    (b) Distance Upstream.--The channel shall continue upstream of the 
bridge approximately 2,500 feet to about river mile 107, then to a point 
of convergence with the main barge channel at about river mile 108.
    (c) Distance Downstream.--
            (1) Southern edge.--The southern edge of the channel shall 
        continue downstream of the bridge approximately 1,500 feet to 
        river mile 106+10, then turn northwest to tie into the edge of 
        the Upper Vancouver Turning Basin.
            (2) Northern edge.--The northern edge of the channel shall 
        continue downstream of the bridge to the Upper Vancouver Turning 
        Basin.

SEC. 360. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790) is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting 
``$47,000,000''.

SEC. 361. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4810) is amended by striking ``take such measures as are 
technologically feasible'' and inserting ``implement Plan C/G, as 
defined in the Evaluation Report of the District Engineer dated December 
1996,''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 313]]

SEC. 362. MOOREFIELD, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Effective <<NOTE: Effective date.>> October 1, 1999, the project for 
flood control, Moorefield, West Virginia, authorized by section 
101(a)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 
4610), is modified to provide that the non-Federal interest shall not be 
required to pay the unpaid balance, including interest, of the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project.

SEC. 363. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

    Section 581 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790) is amended by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may design and construct--
            ``(1) flood control measures in the Cheat and Tygart River 
        basins, West Virginia, at a level of protection that is 
        sufficient to prevent any future losses to communities in the 
        basins from flooding such as occurred in January 1996, but not 
        less than a 100-year level of protection; and
            ``(2) structural and nonstructural flood control, streambank 
        protection, stormwater management, and channel clearing and 
        modification measures in the lower Allegheny, lower Monongahela, 
        West Branch Susquehanna, and Juniata River basins, Pennsylvania, 
        at a level of protection that is sufficient to prevent any 
        future losses to communities in the basins from flooding such as 
        occurred in January 1996, but not less than a 100-year level of 
        flood protection with respect to measures that incorporate 
        levees or floodwalls.''.

SEC. 364. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    Each of the following projects is authorized to be carried out by 
the Secretary, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified, as appropriate:
            (1) Indian river county, florida.--The project for shore 
        protection, Indian River County, Florida, authorized by section 
        501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
        4134) and deauthorized under section 1001(b)(1) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(1)).
            (2) Lido key beach, sarasota, florida.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for shore protection, 
                Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida, authorized by section 
                101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819) 
                and deauthorized under section 1001(b) of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), 
                at a total cost of $5,200,000, with an estimated Federal 
                cost of $3,380,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $1,820,000.
                    (B) Periodic nourishment.--The Secretary may carry 
                out periodic nourishment for the project for a 50-year 
                period at an estimated average annual cost of $602,000, 
                with an estimated annual Federal cost of $391,000 and an 
                estimated annual non-Federal cost of $211,000.
            (3) Cass river, michigan (vassar).--The project for flood 
        protection, Cass River, Michigan (Vassar), authorized by section 
        203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 311) and

[[Page 113 STAT. 314]]

        deauthorized under section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
            (4) Saginaw river, michigan (shiawassee flats).--The project 
        for flood control, Saginaw River, Michigan (Shiawassee Flats), 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 
        Stat. 311) and deauthorized under section 1001(b)(2) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
            (5) Park river, grafton, north dakota.--The project for 
        flood control, Park River, Grafton, North Dakota, authorized by 
        section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 4121) and deauthorized under section 1001(a) of that 
        Act (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)), at a total cost of $28,100,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $18,265,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $9,835,000.
            (6) Memphis harbor, memphis, tennessee.--The project for 
        navigation, Memphis Harbor, Memphis, Tennessee, authorized by 
        section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 4145) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(a) of 
        that Act (33 U.S.C 579a(a)), is authorized to be carried out by 
        the Secretary.

SEC. 365. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects or portions of projects are 
not authorized after the date of enactment of this Act:
            (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
        (72 Stat. 297), consisting of a 2.4-acre anchorage area, 9 feet 
        deep, and an adjacent 0.6-acre anchorage area, 6 feet deep, 
        located on the west side of Johnsons River.
            (2) Clinton harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the project 
        for navigation, Clinton Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by 
        section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13, chapter 19), 
        and House Document 240, 76th Congress, 1st Session, lying 
        upstream of a line designated by the points N158,592.12, 
        E660,193.92 and N158,444.58, E660,220.95.
            (3) Bass harbor, maine.--The following portions of the 
        project for navigation, Bass Harbor, Maine, authorized on May 7, 
        1962, under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
        U.S.C. 577):
                    (A) Beginning at a bend in the project, N149040.00, 
                E538505.00, thence running easterly about 50.00 feet 
                along the northern limit of the project to a point 
                N149061.55, E538550.11, thence running southerly about 
                642.08 feet to a point, N148477.64, E538817.18, thence 
                running southwesterly about 156.27 feet to a point on 
                the westerly limit of the project, N148348.50, 
                E538737.02, thence running northerly about 149.00 feet 
                along the westerly limit of the project to a bend in the 
                project, N148489.22, E538768.09, thence running 
                northwesterly about 610.39 feet along the westerly limit 
                of the project to the point of origin.
                    (B) Beginning at a point on the westerly limit of 
                the project, N148118.55, E538689.05, thence running 
                southeasterly about 91.92 feet to a point, N148041.43, 
                E538739.07, thence running southerly about 65.00 feet to

[[Page 113 STAT. 315]]

                a point, N147977.86, E538725.51, thence running 
                southwesterly about 91.92 feet to a point on the 
                westerly limit of the project, N147927.84, E538648.39, 
                thence running northerly about 195.00 feet along the 
                westerly limit of the project to the point of origin.
            (4) Boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for navigation, 
        Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of July 25, 1912 
        (37 Stat. 201, chapter 253).
            (5) Bucksport harbor, maine.--The portion of the project for 
        navigation, Bucksport Harbor, Maine, authorized by the first 
        section of the Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 331, chapter 
        1079), consisting of a 16-foot deep channel beginning at a point 
        N268.748.16, E423.390.76, thence running north 47 degrees 02 
        minutes 23 seconds east 51.76 feet to a point N268.783.44, 
        E423.428.64, thence running north 67 degrees 54 minutes 32 
        seconds west 1513.94 feet to a point N269.352.81, E422.025.84, 
        thence running south 47 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds west 
        126.15 feet to a point N269.266.84, E421.933.52, thence running 
        south 70 degrees 24 minutes 28 seconds east 1546.79 feet to the 
        point of origin.
            (6) Carvers harbor, vinalhaven, maine.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Maine, 
        authorized by the Act of June 3, 1896 (commonly known as the 
        ``River and Harbor Appropriations Act of 1896'') (29 Stat. 202, 
        chapter 314), consisting of the 16-foot anchorage beginning at a 
        point with coordinates N137,502.04, E895,156.83, thence running 
        south 6 degrees 34 minutes 57.6 seconds west 277.660 feet to a 
        point N137,226.21, E895,125.00, thence running north 53 degrees, 
        5 minutes 42.4 seconds west 127.746 feet to a point N137,302.92, 
        E895022.85, thence running north 33 degrees 56 minutes 9.8 
        seconds east 239.999 feet to the point of origin.
            (7) East boothbay harbor, maine.--Section 364 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1996 is amended by striking 
        paragraph (9) (110 Stat. 3734) and inserting the following:
            ``(9) East boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for 
        navigation, East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the first 
        section of the Act entitled `An Act making appropriations for 
        the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public 
        works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes', approved 
        June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 631, chapter 382).''.
            (8) Searsport harbor, searsport, maine.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Searsport Harbor, Searsport, Maine, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 
        (76 Stat. 1173), consisting of the 35-foot turning basin 
        beginning at a point with coordinates N225,008.38, E395,464.26, 
        thence running north 43 degrees 49 minutes 53.4 seconds east 
        362.001 feet to a point N225,269.52, E395,714.96, thence running 
        south 71 degrees 27 minutes 33.0 seconds east 1,309.201 feet to 
        a point N224,853.22, E396,956.21, thence running north 84 
        degrees 3 minutes 45.7 seconds west 1,499.997 feet to the point 
        of origin.
            (9) Wells harbor, maine.--The following portions of the 
        project for navigation, Wells Harbor, Maine, authorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480):

[[Page 113 STAT. 316]]

                    (A) The portion of the 6-foot channel the boundaries 
                of which begin at a point with coordinates N177,992.00, 
                E394,831.00, thence running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 
                14.8 seconds west 10.38 feet to a point N177,990.91, 
                E394,820.68, thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 
                47.7 seconds west 991.76 feet to a point N177,020.04, 
                E394,618.21, thence running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 
                45.7 seconds east 10.00 feet to a point N177,018.00, 
                E394,628.00, thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 
                22.8 seconds east 994.93 feet to the point of origin.
                    (B) The portion of the 6-foot anchorage the 
                boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
                N177,778.07, E394,336.96, thence running south 51 
                degrees 58 minutes 32.7 seconds west 15.49 feet to a 
                point N177,768.53, E394,324.76, thence running south 11 
                degrees 46 minutes 26.5 seconds west 672.87 feet to a 
                point N177,109.82, E394,187.46, thence running south 78 
                degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east 10.00 feet to a 
                point N177,107.78, E394,197.25, thence running north 11 
                degrees 46 minutes 25.4 seconds east 684.70 feet to the 
                point of origin.
                    (C) The portion of the 10-foot settling basin the 
                boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
                N177,107.78, E394,197.25, thence running north 78 
                degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds west 10.00 feet to a 
                point N177,109.82, E394,187.46, thence running south 11 
                degrees 46 minutes 15.7 seconds west 300.00 feet to a 
                point N176,816.13, E394,126.26, thence running south 78 
                degrees 12 minutes 21.4 seconds east 9.98 feet to a 
                point N176,814.09, E394,136.03, thence running north 11 
                degrees 46 minutes 29.1 seconds east 300.00 feet to the 
                point of origin.
                    (D) The portion of the 10-foot settling basin the 
                boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
                N177,018.00, E394,628.00, thence running north 78 
                degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds west 10.00 feet to a 
                point N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running south 11 
                degrees 46 minutes 44.0 seconds west 300.00 feet to a 
                point N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running south 78 
                degrees 12 minutes 30.3 seconds east 10.03 feet to a 
                point N176,724.31, E394,566.79, thence running north 11 
                degrees 46 minutes 22.4 seconds east 300.00 feet to the 
                point of origin.
            (10) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 
        (62 Stat. 1172) lying southeasterly of a line commencing at a 
        point N199,286.41, E844,394.91, thence running north 66 degrees 
        52 minutes 3.31 seconds east 472.95 feet to a point N199,472.21, 
        E844,829.83, thence running north 43 degrees 9 minutes 28.3 
        seconds east 262.64 feet to a point N199,633.80, E845,009.48, 
        thence running north 21 degrees 40 minutes 11.26 seconds east 
        808.38 feet to a point N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running 
        north 32 degrees 25 minutes 29.01 seconds east 160.76 feet to a 
        point N200,550.75, E845,394.18, thence running north 24 degrees 
        56 minutes 42.29 seconds east 1,410.29 feet to a point 
        N201,829.48, E845,988.97.

[[Page 113 STAT. 317]]

            (11) Green harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Green Harbor, Massachusetts, undertaken 
        pursuant to section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
        U.S.C. 577), consisting of the 6-foot deep channel beginning at 
        a point along the west limit of the existing project, north 
        395990.43, east 831079.16, thence running northwesterly about 
        752.85 feet to a point, north 396722.80, east 830904.76, thence 
        running northwesterly about 222.79 feet to a point along the 
        west limit of the existing project, north 396844.34, east 
        830718.04, thence running southwesterly about 33.72 feet along 
        the west limit of the existing project to a point, north 
        396810.80, east 830714.57, thence running southeasterly about 
        195.42 feet along the west limit of the existing project to a 
        point, north 396704.19, east 830878.35, thence running about 
        544.66 feet along the west limit of the existing project to a 
        point, north 396174.35, east 831004.52, thence running 
        southeasterly about 198.49 feet along the west limit of the 
        existing project to the point of beginning.
            (12) New bedford and fairhaven harbor, massachusetts.--The 
        following portions of the project for navigation, New Bedford 
        and Fairhaven Harbor, Massachusetts:
                    (A) A portion of the 25-foot spur channel leading to 
                the west of Fish Island, authorized by section 3 of the 
                Act of March 3, 1909 (35 Stat. 816, chapter 264), 
                beginning at a point with coordinates N232,173.77, 
                E758,791.32, thence running south 27 degrees 36 minutes 
                52.8 seconds west 38.2 feet to a point N232,139.91, 
                E758,773.61, thence running south 87 degrees 35 minutes 
                31.6 seconds west 196.84 feet to a point N232,131.64, 
                E758,576.94, thence running north 47 degrees 47 minutes 
                48.4 seconds west 502.72 feet to a point N232,469.35, 
                E758,204.54, thence running north 10 degrees 10 minutes 
                20.3 seconds west 438.88 feet to a point N232,901.33, 
                E758,127.03, thence running north 79 degrees 49 minutes 
                43.1 seconds east 121.69 feet to a point N232,922.82, 
                E758,246.81, thence running south 04 degrees 29 minutes 
                17.6 seconds east 52.52 feet to a point N232,870.46, 
                E758,250.92, thence running south 23 degrees 56 minutes 
                11.2 seconds east 49.15 feet to a point N323,825.54, 
                E758,270.86, thence running south 79 degrees 49 minutes 
                27.0 seconds west 88.19 feet to a point N232,809.96, 
                E758,184.06, thence running south 10 degrees 10 minutes 
                25.7 seconds east 314.83 feet to a point N232,500.08, 
                E758,239.67, thence running south 56 degrees 33 minutes 
                56.1 seconds east 583.07 feet to a point N232,178.82, 
                E758,726.25, thence running south 85 degrees 33 minutes 
                16.0 seconds east to the point of origin.
                    (B) A portion of the 30-foot west maneuvering basin, 
                authorized by the first section of the Act of July 3, 
                1930 (46 Stat. 918, chapter 847), beginning at a point 
                with coordinates N232,139.91, E758,773.61, thence 
                running north 81 degrees 49 minutes 30.1 seconds east 
                160.76 feet to a point N232,162.77, E758.932.74, thence 
                running north 85 degrees 33 minutes 16.0 seconds west 
                141.85 feet to a point N232,173.77, E758,791.32, thence 
                running south 27 degrees 36 minutes 52.8 seconds west to 
                the point of origin.

[[Page 113 STAT. 318]]

    (b) Anchorage Area, Clinton Harbor, Connecticut.--The portion of the 
Clinton Harbor, Connecticut, navigation project referred to in 
subsection (a)(2) beginning at a point with coordinates N158,444.58, 
E660,220.95, thence running north 79 degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds east 
833.31 feet to a point N158,594.72, E661,040.67, thence running south 80 
degrees 51 minutes 53 seconds east 181.21 feet to a point N158,565.95, 
E661,219.58, thence running north 57 degrees 38 minutes 04 seconds west 
126.02 feet to a point N158,633.41, E660,113.14, thence running south 79 
degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds west 911.61 feet to a point N158,469.17, 
E660,216.44, thence running south 10 degrees 22 minutes 46 seconds east 
25 feet returning to a point N158,444.58, E660,220.95, is redesignated 
as an anchorage area.
    (c) Wells Harbor, Maine.--
            (1) Project modification.--The Wells Harbor, Maine, 
        navigation project referred to in subsection (a)(9) is modified 
        to authorize the Secretary to realign the channel and anchorage 
        areas based on a harbor design capacity of 150 craft.
            (2) Redesignations.--
                    (A) 6-foot anchorage.--The following portions of the 
                Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation project referred to in 
                subsection (a)(9) shall be redesignated as part of the 
                6-foot anchorage:
                          (i) The portion of the 6-foot channel the 
                      boundaries of which begin at a point with 
                      coordinates N177,990.91, E394,820.68, thence 
                      running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 40.8 seconds 
                      west 94.65 feet to a point N177,980.98, 
                      E394,726.55, thence running south 11 degrees 46 
                      minutes 22.4 seconds west 962.83 feet to a point 
                      N177,038.40, E394,530.10, thence running south 78 
                      degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east 90.00 feet to 
                      a point N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running 
                      north 11 degrees 46 minutes 47.7 seconds east 
                      991.76 feet to the point of origin.
                          (ii) The portion of the 10-foot inner harbor 
                      settling basin the boundaries of which begin at a 
                      point with coordinates N177,020.04, E394,618.21, 
                      thence running north 78 degrees 13 minutes 30.5 
                      seconds west 160.00 feet to a point N177,052.69, 
                      E394,461.58, thence running south 11 degrees 46 
                      minutes 45.4 seconds west 299.99 feet to a point 
                      N176,759.02, E394,400.34, thence running south 78 
                      degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds east 160 feet to a 
                      point N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running 
                      north 11 degrees 46 minutes 44.0 seconds east 
                      300.00 feet to the point of origin.
                    (B) 6-foot channel.--The following portion of the 
                Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation project referred to in 
                subsection (a)(9) shall be redesignated as part of the 
                6-foot channel: the portion of the 6-foot anchorage the 
                boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
                N178,102.26, E394,751.83, thence running south 51 
                degrees 59 minutes 42.1 seconds west 526.51 feet to a 
                point N177,778.07, E394,336.96, thence running south 11 
                degrees 46 minutes 26.6 seconds west 511.83 feet to a 
                point N177,277.01, E394,232.52, thence running south 78 
                degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds east 80.00 feet to a 
                point N177,260.68, E394,310.84, thence running north 11 
                degrees 46 minutes

[[Page 113 STAT. 319]]

                24.8 seconds east 482.54 feet to a point N177,733.07, 
                E394,409.30, thence running north 51 degrees 59 minutes 
                41.0 seconds east 402.63 feet to a point N177,980.98, 
                E394,726.55, thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 
                27.6 seconds east 123.89 feet to the point of origin.
            (3) Realignment.--The 6-foot anchorage area described in 
        paragraph (2)(B) shall be realigned to include the area located 
        south of the inner harbor settling basin in existence on the 
        date of enactment of this Act beginning at a point with 
        coordinates N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running north 78 
        degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds west 160.00 feet to a point 
        N176,759.02, E394,400.34, thence running south 11 degrees 47 
        minutes 03.8 seconds west 45 feet to a point N176,714.97, 
        E394,391.15, thence running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 
        seconds 160.00 feet to a point N176,682.31, E394,547.78, thence 
        running north 11 degrees 47 minutes 03.8 seconds east 45 feet to 
        the point of origin.
            (4) Relocation.--The Secretary may relocate the settling 
        basin feature of the Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation project 
        referred to in subsection (a)(9) to the outer harbor between the 
        jetties.
            (5) Additional actions.--In carrying out the operation and 
        the maintenance of the Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation project 
        referred to in subsection (a)(9), the Secretary shall undertake 
        each of the actions of the Corps of Engineers specified in 
        section IV(B) of the memorandum of agreement relating to the 
        project dated January 20, 1998, including the actions specified 
        in section IV(B) that the parties agreed to ask the Corps of 
        Engineers to undertake.
            (6) Conservation easement.--The Secretary of the Interior, 
        acting through the Director of the United States Fish and 
        Wildlife Service, may accept a conveyance of the right, but not 
        the obligation, to enforce a conservation easement to be held by 
        the State of Maine over certain land owned by the town of Wells, 
        Maine, that is adjacent to the Rachel Carson National Wildlife 
        Refuge.

    (d) Anchorage Area, Green Harbor, Massachusetts.--The portion of the 
Green Harbor, Massachusetts, navigation project referred to in 
subsection (a)(11) consisting of a 6-foot deep channel that lies 
northerly of a line the coordinates of which are North 394825.00, East 
831660.00 and North 394779.28, East 831570.64 is redesignated as an 
anchorage area.

SEC. 366. AMERICAN AND SACRAMENTO RIVERS, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, American 
and Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662-3663), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to include the following improvements 
as part of the overall project:
            (1) Raising the left bank of the non-Federal levee upstream 
        of the Mayhew Drain for a distance of 4,500 feet by an average 
        of 2.5 feet.
            (2) Raising the right bank of the American River levee from 
        1,500 feet upstream to 4,000 feet downstream of the Howe Avenue 
        bridge by an average of 1 foot.
            (3) Modifying the south levee of the Natomas Cross Canal for 
        a distance of 5 miles to ensure that the south levee is

[[Page 113 STAT. 320]]

        consistent with the level of protection provided by the 
        authorized levee along the east bank of the Sacramento River.
            (4) Modifying the north levee of the Natomas Cross Canal for 
        a distance of 5 miles to ensure that the height of the levee is 
        equivalent to the height of the south levee as authorized by 
        paragraph (3).
            (5) Installing gates to the existing Mayhew Drain culvert 
        and pumps to prevent backup of floodwater on the Folsom 
        Boulevard side of the gates.
            (6) Installing a slurry wall in the north levee of the 
        American River from the east levee of the Natomas east Main 
        Drain upstream for a distance of approximately 1.2 miles.
            (7) Installing a slurry wall in the north levee of the 
        American River from 300 feet west of Jacob Lane north for a 
        distance of approximately 1 mile to the end of the existing 
        levee.

    (b) Cost Limitations.--Section 101(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662) is amended by striking ``at a 
total cost of'' and all that follows through ``$14,225,000,'' and 
inserting the following: ``at a total cost of $91,900,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $68,925,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $22,975,000,''.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--For the purposes of section 103 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), the modifications 
authorized by this section shall be subject to the same cost sharing in 
effect for the project for flood damage reduction, American and 
Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662).

SEC. 367. MARTIN, KENTUCKY.

    The project for flood control, Martin, Kentucky, authorized by 
section 202(a) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is modified to authorize the Secretary to take all 
necessary measures to prevent future losses that would occur as a result 
of a flood equal in magnitude to a 100-year frequency event.

SEC. 368. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4856) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out the pilot program under this section 
$40,000,000 for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1992. Such 
sums shall remain available until expended.''.
SEC. 369. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, JACKSON, ALABAMA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Black Warrior and 
Tombigbee Rivers, vicinity of Jackson, Alabama, authorized by section 
106 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1987 (100 
Stat. 3341-199), is modified to authorize the Secretary to acquire land 
for mitigation of the habitat losses attributable to the project, 
including the navigation channel, dredged material disposal areas, and 
other areas directly affected by construction of the project.
    (b) Construction Before Acquisition of Mitigation Land.--
Notwithstanding section 906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283), the Secretary may construct the

[[Page 113 STAT. 321]]

project before acquisition of the mitigation land if the Secretary takes 
such actions as are necessary to ensure that any required mitigation 
land will be acquired not later than 2 years after initiation of 
construction of the new channel and that the acquisition will fully 
mitigate any adverse environmental impacts resulting from the project.

SEC. 370. TROPICANA WASH AND FLAMINGO WASH, NEVADA.

    Any Federal costs associated with the Tropicana Wash and Flamingo 
Wash, Nevada, authorized by section 101(13) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), incurred by the non-Federal 
interest to accelerate or modify construction of the project, in 
cooperation with the Corps of Engineers, shall be eligible for 
reimbursement by the Secretary.

SEC. 371. COMITE RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    The Comite River Diversion Project for flood control, authorized as 
part of the project for flood control, Amite River and Tributaries, 
Louisiana, by section 101(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4802) and modified by section 301(b)(5) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3709), is further modified 
to authorize the Secretary to include the costs of highway relocations 
to be cost shared as a project construction feature.

SEC. 372. ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The project for navigation, St. Marys River, Michigan, is modified 
to direct the Secretary to provide an additional foot of overdraft 
between Point Louise Turn and the Locks, Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, 
consistent with the channels upstream of Point Louise Turn. The 
modification shall be carried out as operation and maintenance to 
improve navigation safety.

SEC. 373. CHARLEVOIX, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall review and, if consistent with authorized 
project purposes, reimburse the city of Charlevoix, Michigan, for the 
Federal share of costs associated with construction of the new revetment 
connection to the Federal navigation project at Charlevoix Harbor, 
Michigan.

SEC. 374. WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the project for flood 
control, power generation, and other purposes at the White River Basin, 
Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 4 of the Act of June 28, 
1938 (52 Stat. 1218, chapter 795), and modified by House Document 917, 
76th Congress, 3d Session, and House Document 290, 77th Congress, 1st 
Session, approved August 18, 1941, and House Document 499, 83d Congress, 
2d Session, approved September 3, 1954, and by section 304 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711) is further modified 
to authorize the Secretary to provide minimum flows necessary to sustain 
tail water trout fisheries by reallocating the following amounts of 
project storage: Beaver Lake, 1.5 feet; Table Rock, 2 feet; Bull Shoals 
Lake, 5 feet; Norfork Lake, 3.5 feet; and Greers Ferry Lake, 3 feet.
    (b) Report.--
            (1) In general.--No funds may be obligated to carry out work 
        on the modification under subsection (a) until completion

[[Page 113 STAT. 322]]

        of a final report by the Chief of Engineers finding that the 
        work is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
        economically justified.
            (2) Timing.--The Secretary shall submit the report to 
        Congress not later than July 30, 2000.
            (3) Contents.--The report shall include determinations 
        concerning whether--
                    (A) the modification under subsection (a) adversely 
                affects other authorized project purposes; and
                    (B) Federal costs will be incurred in connection 
                with the modification.
SEC. 375. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA, WATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES.

    For the project for construction of the water conveyances authorized 
by the first section of Public Law 88-253 (77 Stat. 841), the 
requirements for the Waurika Project Master Conservancy District to 
repay the $2,900,000 in costs (including interest) resulting from the 
October 1991 settlement of the claim before the United States Claims 
Court, and to make a payment of $595,000 of the final cost representing 
a portion of the difference between the 1978 estimate of cost and the 
actual cost determined after completion of the project in 1991, are 
waived.

                            TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 401. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2211 note.>> DEEP DRAFT HARBOR COST SHARING.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall undertake a study of non-
Federal cost-sharing requirements for the construction and operation and 
maintenance of deep draft harbor projects to determine whether--
            (1) cost sharing adversely affects United States port 
        development or domestic and international trade; and
            (2) any revision of the cost-sharing requirements would 
        benefit United States domestic and international trade.

    (b) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Recommendations.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than May 30, 2001, the Secretary 
        shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
        the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives any 
        recommendations that the Secretary may have in light of the 
        study under subsection (a).
            (2) Considerations.--In making recommendations, the 
        Secretary shall consider--
                    (A) the potential economic, environmental, and 
                budgetary impacts of any proposed revision of the cost-
                sharing requirements; and
                    (B) the effect that any such revision would have on 
                regional port competition.

SEC. 402. BOYDSVILLE, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
the reservoir and associated improvements to provide for flood control, 
recreation, water quality, and fish and wildlife purposes in the 
vicinity of Boydsville, Arkansas.

[[Page 113 STAT. 323]]

SEC. 403. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
constructing water intake facilities at Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas.

SEC. 404. DEL NORTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
designating a permanent disposal site for dredged material from Federal 
navigation projects in Del Norte County, California.

SEC. 405. FRAZIER CREEK, TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine--
            (1) the feasibility of restoring Frazier Creek, Tulare 
        County, California; and
            (2) the Federal interest in flood control, environmental 
        restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife resources, 
        recreation, and water quality of the creek.

SEC. 406. MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a general reevaluation 
to determine the Federal interest in reconfiguring the Mare Island 
Strait channel.
    (b) Considerations.--In determining the Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall consider the benefits of economic activity associated 
with potential future uses of the channel and any other benefits that 
could be realized by increasing the width and depth of the channel to 
accommodate both current and potential future uses of the channel.

SEC. 407. STRAWBERRY CREEK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine--
            (1) the feasibility of restoring Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, 
        California; and
            (2) the Federal interest in environmental restoration, 
        conservation of fish and wildlife resources, recreation, and 
        water quality of the creek.

SEC. 408. SWEETWATER RESERVOIR, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the potential water quality 
problems and pollution abatement measures in the watershed in and around 
Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.

SEC. 409. WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall complete a study to determine the feasibility of 
a flood damage reduction project in the Whitewater River basin (also 
known as ``Thousand Palms''), California.

SEC. 410. DESTIN-NORIEGA POINT, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility 
of--
            (1) restoring Noriega Point, Florida, to serve as a 
        breakwater for Destin Harbor; and
            (2) including Noriega Point as part of the East Pass, 
        Florida, navigation project.

SEC. 411. LITTLE ECONLACKHATCHEE RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of pollution abatement measures 
in the Little Econlackhatchee River basin, Florida.

[[Page 113 STAT. 324]]

SEC. 412. PORT EVERGLADES, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
constructing a sand bypassing project at the Port Everglades Inlet, 
Florida.
SEC. 413. LAKE ALLATOONA, ETOWAH RIVER, AND LITTLE RIVER 
                        WATERSHED, GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, may carry out the 
following water-related environmental restoration and resource 
protection investigations into restoring Lake Allatoona, the Etowah 
River, and the Little River watershed, Georgia:
            (1) Lake allatoona/etowah river shoreline restoration 
        investigation.--Feasibility phase investigation to identify and 
        recommend to Congress structural and nonstructural measures to 
        alleviate shore erosion and sedimentation problems along the 
        shores of Lake Allatoona and the Etowah River.
            (2) Little river environmental restoration investigation.--
        Feasibility phase investigation to evaluate environmental 
        problems and recommend environmental restoration measures 
        (including appropriate environmental structural and 
        nonstructural measures) for the Little River watershed, Georgia.

    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated for the period beginning with fiscal year 2000--
            (1) $850,000 to carry out subsection (a)(1); and
            (2) $500,000 to carry out subsection (a)(2).

SEC. 414. BOISE, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking flood control on the Boise River in Boise, Idaho.

SEC. 415. GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED, OAKLEY, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking flood damage reduction, water conservation, ground water 
recharge, ecosystem restoration, and related activities along the Goose 
Creek watershed near Oakley, Idaho.

SEC. 416. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
restoring and repairing the Lava Rock Little Wood River Containment 
System to prevent flooding in the city of Gooding, Idaho.

SEC. 417. SNAKE RIVER, LEWISTON, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking bank stabilization and flood control on the Snake River at 
Lewiston, Idaho.

SEC. 418. SNAKE RIVER AND PAYETTE RIVER, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a flood control project along the Snake River and Payette 
River, in the vicinity of Payette, Idaho.
SEC. 419. UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ILLINOIS AND 
                        WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the upper 
Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and Wisconsin, upstream of 
the confluence with Salt Creek at Riverside, Illinois, to determine the 
feasibility of improvements in the interests of

[[Page 113 STAT. 325]]

flood damage reduction, environmental restoration and protection, water 
quality, recreation, and related purposes.
    (b) Special Rule.--In conducting the study, the Secretary may not 
exclude from consideration and evaluation flood damage reduction 
measures based on restrictive policies regarding the frequency of 
flooding, the drainage area, and the amount of runoff.
    (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In carrying out this 
section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with appropriate Federal and State agencies; and
            (2) make maximum use of data in existence on the date of 
        enactment of this Act and ongoing programs and efforts of 
        Federal agencies and States.

SEC. 420. CAMERON PARISH WEST OF CALCASIEU RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a storm damage reduction and ecosystem restoration project 
for Cameron Parish west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.

SEC. 421. COASTAL LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
using dredged material from maintenance activities at Federal navigation 
projects in coastal Louisiana to benefit coastal areas in the State.

SEC. 422. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LOUISIANA.

    In carrying out a study of the storm damage reduction benefits to 
Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana, the Secretary shall include benefits 
that a storm damage reduction project for Grand Isle and vicinity, 
Louisiana, may have on the mainland coast of Louisiana as project 
benefits attributable to the Grand Isle project.
SEC. 423. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY ECOSYSTEM, CHEF MENTEUR TO 
                        SABINE RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration and protection 
measures along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Chef Menteur to 
Sabine River, Louisiana.
    (b) Matters To Be Addressed.--The study shall address saltwater 
intrusion, tidal scour, erosion, compaction, subsidence, wind and wave 
action, bank failure, and other problems relating to ecosystem 
restoration and protection.

SEC. 424. MUDDY RIVER, BROOKLINE AND BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the January 1999 study 
commissioned by the Boston Parks and Recreation Department, Boston, 
Massachusetts, and entitled ``The Emerald Necklace Environmental 
Improvement Master Plan, Phase I Muddy River Flood Control, Water 
Quality and Habitat Enhancement'', to determine whether the plans 
outlined in the study for flood control, water quality, habitat 
enhancements, and other improvements to the Muddy River in Brookline and 
Boston, Massachusetts, are cost-effective, technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and in the Federal interest.
    (b) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than June 30, 2000, the 
Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
evaluation.

[[Page 113 STAT. 326]]

SEC. 425. WESTPORT, MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of undertaking a navigation project for the town of 
Westport, Massachusetts.
    (b) Considerations.--In determining the benefits of the project, the 
Secretary shall include the benefits derived from using dredged material 
for shore protection and storm damage reduction.

SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    (a) Plan.--The Secretary, in coordination with State and local 
governments and appropriate Federal and provincial authorities of 
Canada, shall develop a comprehensive management plan for St. Clair 
River and Lake St. Clair.
    (b) Elements.--The plan shall include the following elements:
            (1) Identification of the causes and sources of 
        environmental degradation.
            (2) Continuous monitoring of organic, biological, metallic, 
        and chemical contamination levels.
            (3) Timely dissemination of information of contamination 
        levels to public authorities, other interested parties, and the 
        public.

    (c) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 1 year after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report that includes the plan developed under subsection (a) and 
recommendations for potential restoration measures.

    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $400,000.

SEC. 427. ST. CLAIR SHORES, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
constructing a flood control project at St. Clair Shores, Michigan.
SEC. 428. WOODTICK PENINSULA, MICHIGAN, AND TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
using dredged material from Toledo Harbor, Ohio, to provide erosion 
reduction, navigation, and ecosystem restoration at Woodtick Peninsula, 
Michigan.

SEC. 429. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine an 
alternative plan for dredged material management for the Pascagoula 
River portion of the project for navigation, Pascagoula Harbor, 
Mississippi, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4094).
    (b) Contents.--The study under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) include an analysis of the feasibility of expanding the 
        Singing River Island Disposal Area or constructing a new dredged 
        material disposal facility; and
            (2) identify methods of managing and reducing sediment 
        transport into the Federal navigation channel.

SEC. 430. TUNICA LAKE WEIR, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of constructing an outlet weir at Tunica Lake, Tunica 
County, Mississippi, and Lee County, Arkansas, for the purpose of 
stabilizing water levels in the lake.

[[Page 113 STAT. 327]]

    (b) Economic Analysis.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
shall include as part of the economic analysis the benefits derived from 
recreation uses at Tunica Lake and economic benefits associated with 
restoration of fish and wildlife habitat.

SEC. 431. YELLOWSTONE RIVER, MONTANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study of the 
Yellowstone River from Gardiner, Montana, to the confluence of the 
Missouri River to determine the hydrologic, biological, and 
socioeconomic cumulative impacts on the river.
    (b) Consultation and Coordination.--The Secretary shall conduct the 
study in consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 
the United States Geological Survey, and the Natural Resources 
Conservation Service and with the full participation of the State of 
Montana and tribal and local entities, and provide for public 
participation.
    (c) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 5 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report on the results of the study.

SEC. 432. LAS VEGAS VALLEY, NEVADA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study 
of water resources in the Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.
    (b) Objectives.--The study shall identify problems and opportunities 
related to ecosystem restoration, water quality (particularly the 
quality of surface runoff), and flood control.

SEC. 433. SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for flood damage reduction in the Southwest 
Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

SEC. 434. CAYUGA CREEK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for flood control for Cayuga Creek, New York.

SEC. 435. LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NEW YORK AND VERMONT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
restoring Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont, to improve water 
quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and navigation.

SEC. 436. OSWEGO RIVER BASIN, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
establishing a flood forecasting system in the Oswego River basin, New 
York.

SEC. 437. WHITE OAK RIVER, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether there is a 
Federal interest in a project for water quality, environmental 
restoration and protection, and related purposes on the White Oak River, 
North Carolina.

SEC. 438. ARCOLA CREEK WATERSHED, MADISON, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project to provide environmental restoration and 
protection for the Arcola Creek watershed, Madison, Ohio.

[[Page 113 STAT. 328]]

SEC. 439. CLEVELAND HARBOR, CLEVELAND, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking repairs and related navigation improvements at Dike 14, 
Cleveland, Ohio.

SEC. 440. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking navigation improvements on the Toussaint River, Carroll 
Township, Ohio.

SEC. 441. WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OHIO, INDIANA, AND MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to develop 
measures to improve flood control, navigation, water quality, 
recreation, and fish and wildlife habitat in a comprehensive manner in 
the western Lake Erie basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan, including 
watersheds of the Maumee, Ottawa, and Portage Rivers.
    (b) Cooperation.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall--
            (1) cooperate with interested Federal, State, and local 
        agencies and nongovernmental organizations; and
            (2) consider all relevant programs of the agencies.

    (c) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 1 year after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report on the results of the study, including findings and 
recommendations.

SEC. 442. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for flood control for the Schuylkill River, 
Norristown, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 443. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL AREAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall review pertinent reports and 
conduct other studies and field investigations to determine the best 
available science and methods for management of contaminated dredged 
material and sediments in the coastal areas of South Carolina.
    (b) Focus.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
place particular focus on areas where the Corps of Engineers maintains 
deep draft navigation projects, such as Charleston Harbor, Georgetown 
Harbor, and Port Royal, South Carolina.
    (c) Cooperation.--The studies shall be conducted in cooperation with 
the appropriate Federal and State environmental agencies.

SEC. 444. SANTEE DELTA FOCUS AREA, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete a comprehensive 
study of the ecosystem in the Santee Delta focus area, South Carolina, 
to determine the feasibility of undertaking a project to enhance wetland 
habitat and public recreational opportunities in the area.

SEC. 445. WACCAMAW RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a flood control project for the Waccamaw River in Horry 
County, South Carolina.

SEC. 446. DAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct--

[[Page 113 STAT. 329]]

            (1) an investigation of flooding and other water resources 
        problems between the James River and Big Sioux watersheds, South 
        Dakota; and
            (2) an assessment of flood damage reduction needs of the 
        area.

SEC. 447. NIOBRARA RIVER AND MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Niobrara River watershed 
and the operations of Fort Randall Dam and Gavins Point Dam on the 
Missouri River, South Dakota, to determine the feasibility of 
alleviating the bank erosion, sedimentation, and related problems in the 
lower Niobrara River and the Missouri River below Fort Randall Dam.

SEC. 448. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall include, as part of the study authorized by a 
resolution of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the 
House of Representatives dated August 1, 1990, a review of two 175-foot-
wide barge shelves on either side of the navigation channel at the Port 
of Corpus Christi, Texas.

SEC. 449. MITCHELL'S CUT CHANNEL (CANEY FORK CUT), TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for navigation, Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney Fork 
Cut), Texas.

SEC. 450. MOUTH OF COLORADO RIVER, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for navigation at the mouth of the Colorado River, 
Texas, to provide a minimum draft navigation channel extending from the 
Colorado River through Parkers Cut (also known as ``Tiger Island Cut''), 
or an acceptable alternative, to Matagorda Bay.

SEC. 451. SANTA CLARA RIVER, UTAH.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of undertaking measures to alleviate damage caused by 
flooding, bank erosion, and sedimentation along the watershed of the 
Santa Clara River, Utah, above the Gunlock Reservoir.
    (b) Contents.--The study shall include an analysis of watershed 
conditions and water quality, as related to flooding and bank erosion, 
along the Santa Clara River in the vicinity of Gunlock, Utah.

SEC. 452. MOUNT ST. HELENS, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration improvements 
throughout the Cowlitz and Toutle River basins, Washington, including 
the 6,000 acres of wetland, riverine, riparian, and upland habitats lost 
or altered due to the eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980 and 
subsequent emergency actions.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall--
            (1) work in close coordination with local governments, 
        watershed entities, the State of Washington, and other Federal 
        agencies; and
            (2) place special emphasis on--

[[Page 113 STAT. 330]]

                    (A) conservation and restoration strategies to 
                benefit species that are listed or proposed for listing 
                as threatened or endangered species under the Endangered 
                Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
                    (B) other watershed restoration objectives.

SEC. 453. KANAWHA RIVER, FAYETTE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
developing a public port along the Kanawha River in Fayette County, West 
Virginia, at a site known as ``Longacre''.

SEC. 454. WEST VIRGINIA PORTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
expanding public port development in West Virginia along the Ohio River 
and the navigable portion of the Kanawha River from its mouth to river 
mile 91.0.

SEC. 455. <<NOTE: 42 USC 1962d-21.>> JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN 
            PROGRAM.

    (a) Strategic Plans.--
            (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive 
        study of the Great Lakes region to ensure the future use, 
        management, and protection of water resources and related 
        resources of the Great Lakes basin.
            (2) Report.--
                    (A) In <<NOTE: Deadline.>> general.--As 
                expeditiously as possible, but not later than 3 years 
                after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 
                years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the 
                Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
                House of Representatives and the Committee on 
                Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
                outlining a strategic plan for Corps of Engineers 
                programs and proposed Corps of Engineers projects in the 
                Great Lakes basin.
                    (B) Contents.--The plan shall include--
                          (i) details of projects in the Great Lakes 
                      region relating to--
                                    (I) navigation improvements, 
                                maintenance, and operations for 
                                commercial and recreational vessels;
                                    (II) environmental restoration 
                                activities;
                                    (III) water level maintenance 
                                activities;
                                    (IV) technical and planning 
                                assistance to States and remedial action 
                                planning committees;
                                    (V) sediment transport analysis, 
                                sediment management planning, and 
                                activities to support prevention of 
                                excess sediment loadings;
                                    (VI) flood damage reduction and 
                                shoreline erosion prevention; and
                                    (VII) all other relevant activities 
                                of the Corps of Engineers; and
                          (ii) an analysis of factors limiting use of 
                      programs and authorities of the Corps of Engineers 
                      in existence on the date of enactment of this Act 
                      in the Great Lakes basin, including the need for 
                      new or modified authorities.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for the 
        period of fiscal years 2000 through 2003.

[[Page 113 STAT. 331]]

    (b) Great Lakes Biohydrological Information.--
            (1) Inventory.--
                    (A) In general.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 
                90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary shall request each Federal agency that may 
                possess information relevant to the Great Lakes 
                biohydrological system to provide an inventory of all 
                such information in the possession of the agency.
                    (B) Relevant information.--For the purpose of 
                subparagraph (A), relevant information includes 
                information on--
                          (i) ground and surface water hydrology;
                          (ii) natural and altered tributary dynamics;
                          (iii) biological aspects of the system 
                      influenced by and influencing water quantity and 
                      water movement;
                          (iv) meteorological projections and the 
                      impacts of weather conditions on Great Lakes water 
                      levels; and
                          (v) other Great Lakes biohydrological system 
                      data relevant to sustainable water use management.
            (2) Report.--
                    (A) In general.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 
                18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary, in consultation with the States, Indian 
                tribes, and Federal agencies, and after requesting 
                information from the provinces and the federal 
                government of Canada, shall--
                          (i) compile the inventories of information;
                          (ii) analyze the information for consistency 
                      and gaps; and
                          (iii) submit to Congress, the International 
                      Joint Commission, and the Great Lakes States a 
                      report that includes recommendations on ways to 
                      improve the information base on the 
                      biohydrological dynamics of the Great Lakes 
                      ecosystem as a whole, so as to support 
                      environmentally sound decisions regarding 
                      diversions and consumptive uses of Great Lakes 
                      water.
                    (B) Recommendations.--The recommendations in the 
                report under subparagraph (A) shall include 
                recommendations relating to the resources and funds 
                necessary for implementing improvement of the 
                information base.
                    (C) Considerations.--In developing the report under 
                subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in cooperation with the 
                Secretary of State, the Secretary of Transportation, and 
                the heads of other agencies as appropriate, shall 
                consider and report on the status of the issues 
                described and recommendations made in--
                          (i) the Report of the International Joint 
                      Commission to the Governments of the United States 
                      and Canada under the 1977 reference issued in 
                      1985; and
                          (ii) the 1993 Report of the International 
                      Joint Commission to the Governments of Canada and 
                      the United States on Methods of Alleviating 
                      Adverse Consequences of Fluctuating Water Levels 
                      in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Basin.

    (c) Great <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Lakes Recreational Boating.--Not later 
than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, 
using information and studies in existence on the date of enactment of 
this Act to the extent practicable, and in cooperation with the

[[Page 113 STAT. 332]]

Great Lakes States, shall submit to Congress a report detailing the 
economic benefits of recreational boating in the Great Lakes basin, 
particularly at harbors benefiting from operation and maintenance 
projects of the Corps of Engineers.

    (d) Cooperation.--In undertaking activities under this section, the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) encourage public participation; and
            (2) cooperate, and, as appropriate, collaborate, with Great 
        Lakes States, tribal governments, and Canadian federal, 
        provincial, and tribal governments.

    (e) Water Use Activities and Policies.--The Secretary may provide 
technical assistance to the Great Lakes States to develop interstate 
guidelines to improve the consistency and efficiency of State-level 
water use activities and policies in the Great Lakes basin.
    (f) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary may seek and accept funds from non-
Federal entities to be used to pay up to 25 percent of the cost of 
carrying out subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e).

SEC. 456. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEM.

    In consultation with the St. Lawrence Seaway Development 
Corporation, the Secretary shall review the Great Lakes Connecting 
Channel and Harbors Report dated March 1985 to determine the feasibility 
of undertaking any modification of the recommendations made in the 
report to improve commercial navigation on the Great Lakes navigation 
system, including locks, dams, harbors, ports, channels, and other 
related features.
SEC. 457. NUTRIENT <<NOTE: 33 USC 1267 note.>> LOADING RESULTING 
                        FROM DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of nutrient loading 
that occurs as a result of discharges of dredged material into open-
water sites in the Chesapeake Bay.
    (b) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 18 months after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report on the results of the study.
SEC. 458. UPPER MISSISSIPPI AND ILLINOIS RIVERS LEVEES AND 
                        STREAMBANKS PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of erosion damage to levees and 
other flood control structures on the upper Mississippi and Illinois 
Rivers and the impact of increased barge and pleasure craft traffic on 
deterioration of the levees and other flood control structures.

SEC. 459. <<NOTE: 33 USC 652 note.>> UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER 
            COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary shall develop a plan to address 
water resource and related land resource problems and opportunities in 
the upper Mississippi and Illinois River basins, from Cairo, Illinois, 
to the headwaters of the Mississippi River, in the interest of systemic 
flood damage reduction by means of--
            (1) structural and nonstructural flood control and 
        floodplain management strategies;
            (2) continued maintenance of the navigation project;
            (3) management of bank caving and erosion;
            (4) watershed nutrient and sediment management;
            (5) habitat management;

[[Page 113 STAT. 333]]

            (6) recreation needs; and
            (7) other related purposes.

    (b) Contents.--The plan under subsection (a) shall--
            (1) contain recommendations on management plans and actions 
        to be carried out by the responsible Federal and non-Federal 
        entities;
            (2) specifically address recommendations to authorize 
        construction of a systemic flood control project for the upper 
        Mississippi River; and
            (3) include recommendations for Federal action where 
        appropriate and recommendations for follow-on studies for 
        problem areas for which data or current technology does not 
        allow immediate solutions.

    (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In carrying out this 
section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) consult with appropriate Federal and State agencies; and
            (2) make maximum use of data in existence on the date of 
        enactment of this Act and ongoing programs and efforts of 
        Federal agencies and States in developing the plan under 
        subsection (a).

    (d) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Development.--Development of the plan under subsection 
        (a) shall be at Federal expense.
            (2) Feasibility studies.--Feasibility studies resulting from 
        development of the plan shall be subject to cost sharing under 
        section 105 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2215).

    (e) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 3 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the 
Senate a report that includes the plan under subsection (a).

SEC. 460. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of controlling 
and managing waterborne debris in the interest of navigation, flood 
control, environmental restoration, and other purposes in the 
Susquehanna River Basin, New York, Pennsylvania, and Maryland, and the 
upper Chesapeake Bay, Maryland.
    (b) Evaluation of Technologies and Practices.--The study shall 
include an evaluation of technologies and practices currently available, 
in use, or in development in the United States for debris removal 
programs at various dams and harbors and recommendations for applying 
those techniques and practices in the Susquehanna River and the upper 
Chesapeake Bay.
    (c) Cooperation.--The study shall be conducted in cooperation with 
State agencies and other Federal agencies, the Susquehanna River Basin 
Commission, and owners of major dams.

                    TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 501. CORPS ASSUMPTION OF NRCS PROJECTS.

    (a) Llagas Creek, California.--The Secretary may complete the 
remaining reaches of the Natural Resources Conservation Service flood 
control project at Llagas Creek, California, undertaken

[[Page 113 STAT. 334]]

pursuant to section 5 of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention 
Act (16 U.S.C. 1005), substantially in accordance with the Natural 
Resources Conservation Service watershed plan for Llagas Creek, 
Department of Agriculture, and in accordance with the requirements of 
local cooperation as specified in section 4 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 
1004), at a total cost of $45,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$21,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,200,000.
    (b) Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, Illinois.--
            (1) In general.--The Thornton Reservoir project, an element 
        of the project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow Plan, 
        Illinois, authorized by section 3(a)(5) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to 
        authorize the Secretary to include additional permanent flood 
        control storage attributable to the Natural Resources 
        Conservation Service Thornton Reservoir (Structure 84), Little 
        Calumet River Watershed, Illinois, approved under the Watershed 
        Protection and Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).
            (2) Limitation.--No funds may be obligated to carry out work 
        under the modification under paragraph (1) until completion and 
        approval by the Secretary of a final report by the Chief of 
        Engineers finding that the work is technically sound, 
        environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
            (3) Cost sharing.--Costs for the Thornton Reservoir project 
        shall be shared in accordance with section 103 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
            (4) Transitional storage.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
        cooperate with non-Federal interests to provide, on a 
        transitional basis, flood control storage for the Natural 
        Resources Conservation Service Thornton Reservoir (Structure 84) 
        project in the west lobe of the Thornton quarry.
            (5) Credit toward non-federal share.--The Secretary may 
        credit toward the non-Federal share of the costs of the Thornton 
        Reservoir project all design and construction costs incurred by 
        the non-Federal interests before the date of signing of the 
        project cooperation agreement.
            (6) Reevaluation report.--The Secretary shall determine the 
        credits authorized by paragraph (5) that are integral to the 
        Thornton Reservoir project and the current total project costs 
        based on a limited reevaluation report.

SEC. 502. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

    (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757) is amended by striking 
paragraphs (5) and (6) and inserting the following:
            ``(5) $25,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(2);
            ``(6) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(9);
            ``(7) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(16); and
            ``(8) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(17).''.

    (b) Additional Assistance.--Section 219 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 is amended by adding at the end the following:

[[Page 113 STAT. 335]]

    ``(f) Additional Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
under subsection (a) and assistance for construction for the following:
            ``(1) Atlanta, georgia.--The project described in subsection 
        (c)(2), modified to include $25,000,000 for watershed 
        restoration and development in the regional Atlanta watershed, 
        including Big Creek and Rock Creek.
            ``(2) Paterson, passaic county, and passaic valley, new 
        jersey.--The project described in subsection (c)(9), modified to 
        include $20,000,000 for drainage facilities to alleviate 
        flooding problems on Getty Avenue in the vicinity of St. 
        Joseph's Hospital for the city of Paterson, New Jersey, and 
        Passaic County, New Jersey, and innovative facilities to manage 
        and treat additional flows in the Passaic Valley, Passaic River 
        basin, New Jersey.
            ``(3) Nashua, new hampshire.--$20,000,000 for a project to 
        eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
        Nashua, New Hampshire.
            ``(4) Fall river and new bedford, massachusetts.--
        $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows in the cities of Fall River and New Bedford, 
        Massachusetts.
            ``(5) Findlay township, pennsylvania.--$11,000,000 for water 
        and wastewater infrastructure in Findlay Township, Allegheny 
        County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(6) Dillsburg borough authority, pennsylvania.--$2,000,000 
        for water and wastewater infrastructure in Franklin Township, 
        York County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(7) Hampden township, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 for water, 
        sewer, and storm sewer improvements in Hampden Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(8) Towamencin township, pennsylvania.--$1,500,000 for 
        sanitary sewer and water and wastewater infrastructure in 
        Towamencin Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(9) Dauphin county, pennsylvania.--$2,000,000 for a 
        project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows and 
        water system rehabilitation for the city of Harrisburg, Dauphin 
        County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(10) Eastern shore and southwest virginia.--$20,000,000 
        for water supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in the 
        counties of Accomac, Northampton, Lee, Norton, Wise, Scott, 
        Russell, Dickenson, Buchanan, and Tazewell, Virginia.
            ``(11) Northeast pennsylvania.--$20,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure in the counties of Lackawanna, Lycoming, 
        Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, Wayne, Sullivan, Bradford, and 
        Monroe, Pennsylvania, including assistance for the 
        Mountoursville Regional Sewer Authority, Lycoming County, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(12) Calumet region, indiana.--$10,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure projects in the counties of Lake and 
        Porter, Indiana.
            ``(13) Clinton county, pennsylvania.--$1,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure in Clinton County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(14) Patton township, pennsylvania.--$1,400,000 for water 
        related infrastructure in Patton Township, Pennsylvania.

[[Page 113 STAT. 336]]

            ``(15) North fayette township, allegheny county, 
        pennsylvania.--$500,000 for water related infrastructure in 
        North Fayette Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(16) Springdale borough, pennsylvania.--$500,000 for water 
        related infrastructure in Springdale Borough, Pennsylvania.
            ``(17) Robinson township, pennsylvania.--$1,200,000 for 
        water related infrastructure in Robinson Township, Pennsylvania.
            ``(18) Upper allen township, pennsylvania.--$3,400,000 for 
        water related infrastructure in Upper Allen Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            ``(19) Jefferson township, greene county, pennsylvania.--
        $1,000,000 for water related infrastructure in Jefferson 
        Township, Greene County, Pennsylvania.
            ``(20) Lumberton, north carolina.--$1,700,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure projects in Lumberton, North Carolina.
            ``(21) Baton rouge, louisiana.--$10,000,000 for water 
        related infrastructure for the parishes of East Baton Rouge, 
        Ascension, and Livingston, Louisiana.
            ``(22) East san joaquin county, california.--$25,000,000 for 
        ground water recharge and conjunctive use projects in Stockton 
        East Water District, California.
            ``(23) Sacramento area, california.--$25,000,000 for 
        regional water conservation and recycling projects in Placer and 
        El Dorado Counties and the San Juan Suburban Water District, 
        California.
            ``(24) Cumberland county, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water 
        supply projects in Cumberland County, Tennessee.
            ``(25) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--
        $5,000,000 for water supply treatment and distribution projects 
        in the counties of Calhoun, Clarendon, Colleton, Dorchester, 
        Orangeberg, and Sumter, South Carolina.
            ``(26) Bridgeport, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a project 
        to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
        Bridgeport, Connecticut.
            ``(27) Hartford, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a project to 
        eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
        Hartford, Connecticut.
            ``(28) New haven, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a project to 
        eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of New 
        Haven, Connecticut.
            ``(29) Oakland county, michigan.--$20,000,000 for a project 
        to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the cities 
        of Berkley, Ferndale, Madison Heights, Royal Oak, Birmingham, 
        Hazel Park, Oak Park, Southfield, Clawson, Huntington Woods, 
        Pleasant Ridge, and Troy, and the village of Beverly Hills, and 
        the Charter Township of Royal Oak, Michigan.
            ``(30) Desoto county, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for a 
        wastewater treatment project in the county of DeSoto, 
        Mississippi.
            ``(31) Kansas city, missouri.--$15,000,000 for a project to 
        eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
        Kansas City, Missouri.

[[Page 113 STAT. 337]]

            ``(32) St. louis, missouri.--$15,000,000 for a project to 
        eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of St. 
        Louis, Missouri.
            ``(33) Elizabeth, new jersey.--$20,000,000 for a project to 
        eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
        Elizabeth, New Jersey.
            ``(34) North hudson, new jersey.--$10,000,000 for a project 
        to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
        North Hudson, New Jersey.
            ``(35) Inner harbor project, new york, new york.--
        $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows for the inner harbor project, New York, New York.
            ``(36) Outer harbor project, new york, new york.--
        $15,000,000 for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer 
        overflows for the outer harbor project, New York, New York.
            ``(37) Lebanon, new hampshire.--$8,000,000 for a project to 
        eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
        Lebanon, New Hampshire.
            ``(38) Astoria, oregon.--$5,000,000 for a project to 
        eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
        Astoria, Oregon.
            ``(39) Cache county, utah.--$5,000,000 for a wastewater 
        infrastructure project for Cache County, Utah.
            ``(40) Lawton, oklahoma.--$5,000,000 for a wastewater 
        infrastructure project for the city of Lawton, Oklahoma.
            ``(41) Lancaster, california.--$1,500,000 for a project to 
        provide water facilities for the Fox Field Industrial Corridor, 
        Lancaster, California.
            ``(42) San ramon valley, california.--$15,000,000 for a 
        project for recycled water for San Ramon Valley, California.
            ``(43) Harbor/south bay, california.--$15,000,000 for an 
        industrial water reuse project for the Harbor/South Bay area, 
        California.''.

SEC. 503. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2314 note.>> CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT DREDGING 
            TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) Review of Innovative Dredging Technologies.--
            (1) In <<NOTE: Deadline.>> general.--Not later than June 1, 
        2001, the Secretary shall complete a review of innovative 
        dredging technologies designed to minimize or eliminate 
        contamination of a water column upon removal of contaminated 
        sediments.
            (2) Testing.--
                    (A) Selection of technology.--After completion of 
                the review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 
                select, from among the technologies reviewed, the 
                technology that the Secretary determines will best 
                increase the effectiveness of removing contaminated 
                sediments and significantly reduce contamination of the 
                water column.
                    (B) Agreement.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 
                December 31, 2001, the Secretary shall enter into an 
                agreement with a public or private entity to test the 
                selected technology in the vicinity of Peoria Lakes, 
                Illinois.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated to carry out this subsection $2,000,000.

    (b) Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Technologies.--Section 8 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 2314) is 
amended--

[[Page 113 STAT. 338]]

            (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
        (c) and (d), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:

    ``(b) Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Technologies for Management 
of Contaminated Sediments.--
            ``(1) Test projects.--The Secretary shall approve an 
        appropriate number of projects to test, under actual field 
        conditions, innovative technologies for environmentally sound 
        management of contaminated sediments.
            ``(2) Demonstration projects.--The Secretary may approve an 
        appropriate number of projects to demonstrate innovative 
        technologies that have been pilot tested under paragraph (1).
            ``(3) Conduct of projects.--Each pilot project under 
        paragraph (1) and demonstration project under paragraph (2) 
        shall be conducted by a university with proven expertise in the 
        research and development of contaminated sediment treatment 
        technologies and innovative applications using waste materials.
            ``(4) Location.--At least 1 of the projects under this 
        subsection shall be conducted in New England by the University 
        of New Hampshire.''.

SEC. 504. DAM SAFETY.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to enhance dam 
safety at the following locations:
            (1) Healdsburg Veteran's Memorial Dam, California.
            (2) Kehly Run Dam, Pennsylvania.
            (3) Sweet Arrow Lake Dam, Pennsylvania.

    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $6,000,000.

SEC. 505. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS.

    Section 401(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1268 note; 104 Stat. 4644; 110 Stat. 3763) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Non-Federal'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--Non-Federal''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Contributions by entities.--Nonprofit public 
                or private entities may contribute all or a portion of 
                the non-Federal share.''.

SEC. 506. PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

    Section 1135(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a(c)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``If the Secretary'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--If the Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Control of sea lamprey.--Congress finds that--
                    ``(A) the Great Lakes navigation system has been 
                instrumental in the spread of sea lamprey and the 
                associated impacts on its fishery; and
                    ``(B) the use of the authority under this subsection 
                for control of sea lamprey at any Great Lakes basin 
                location is appropriate.''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 339]]

SEC. 507. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    Section 509(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3759) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) Acadiana Navigation Channel, Louisiana.
            ``(13) Contraband Bayou, Louisiana, as part of the Calcasieu 
        River and Pass Ship Channel.
            ``(14) Lake Wallula Navigation Channel, Washington.
            ``(15) Wadley Pass (also known as `McGriff Pass'), Suwanee 
        River, Florida.''.

SEC. 508. <<NOTE: 42 USC 1962d-20 note.>> MEASUREMENTS OF LAKE MICHIGAN 
            DIVERSIONS, ILLINOIS.

    Section 1142(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4253) is amended by striking ``$250,000 per fiscal year for each 
fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1986,'' and inserting 
``$1,250,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 through 2003''.
SEC. 509. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 
                        PROGRAM.

    (a) Authorized Activities.--Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended by striking 
``(e)(1)'' and all that follows through the end of paragraph (1) and 
inserting the following:
    ``(e) Program Authority.--
            ``(1) Authority.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
                with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of 
                Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, may 
                undertake, as identified in the master plan--
                          ``(i) a program for the planning, 
                      construction, and evaluation of measures for fish 
                      and wildlife habitat rehabilitation and 
                      enhancement; and
                          ``(ii) implementation of a long-term resource 
                      monitoring, computerized data inventory and 
                      analysis, and applied research program.
                    ``(B) Advisory committee.--In carrying out 
                subparagraph (A)(i), the Secretary shall establish an 
                independent technical advisory committee to review 
                projects, monitoring plans, and habitat and natural 
                resource needs assessments.''.

    (b) Reports.--Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and 
inserting the following:
            ``(2) Reports.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than December 
        31, 2004, and not later than December 31 of every sixth year 
        thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of 
        the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, 
        Missouri, and Wisconsin, shall submit to Congress a report 
        that--
                    ``(A) contains an evaluation of the programs 
                described in paragraph (1);
                    ``(B) describes the accomplishments of each of the 
                programs;
                    ``(C) provides updates of a systemic habitat needs 
                assessment; and
                    ``(D) identifies any needed adjustments in the 
                authorization of the programs.''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 340]]

    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 1103(e) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) by striking ``(1)(A)'' and inserting 
                ``(1)(A)(i)''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Secretary not to exceed'' and all 
                that follows before the period at the end and inserting 
                ``Secretary $22,750,000 for fiscal year 1999 and each 
                fiscal year thereafter'';
            (2) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) by striking ``(1)(B)'' and inserting 
                ``(1)(A)(ii)''; and
                    (B) by striking ``Secretary not to exceed'' and all 
                that follows before the period at the end and inserting 
                ``Secretary $10,420,000 for fiscal year 1999 and each 
                fiscal year thereafter''; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:
            ``(5) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1)(A)(i) $350,000 for 
        each of fiscal years 1999 through 2009.''.

    (d) Transfer of Amounts.--Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended by striking 
paragraph (6) and inserting the following:
            ``(6) Transfer of amounts.--For fiscal year 1999 and each 
        fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
        Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, may transfer not to exceed 
        20 percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out clause (i) 
        or (ii) of paragraph (1)(A) to the amounts appropriated to carry 
        out the other of those clauses.''.

    (e) Cost Sharing.--Section 1103(e)(7)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(7)(A)) is amended by inserting 
before the period at the end the following: ``and, in the case of any 
project requiring non-Federal cost sharing, the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project shall be 35 percent''.
    (f) Habitat Needs Assessment.--Section 1103(h)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(h)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(2) The Secretary'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(2) Determination.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) Requirements.--The Secretary shall--
                          ``(i) complete the ongoing habitat needs 
                      assessment conducted under this paragraph not 
                      later than September 30, 2000; and
                          ``(ii) include in each report under subsection 
                      (e)(2) the most recent habitat needs assessment 
                      conducted under this paragraph.''.

    (g) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1103 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)(7)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``(1)(A)'' and 
                inserting ``(1)(A)(i)''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``paragraphs 
                (1)(B) and (1)(C)'' and inserting ``paragraph 
                (1)(A)(ii)''; and
            (2) in subsection (f)(2)--

[[Page 113 STAT. 341]]

                    (A) by striking ``(2)(A)'' and inserting ``(2)''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (B).

SEC. 510. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

    Section 404(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4863) is amended in the first sentence--
            (1) by striking ``is'' and inserting ``are''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``1997'' the following: ``, and an 
        additional total of $2,500,000 for fiscal years thereafter''.

SEC. 511. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2201 note.>> WATER CONTROL MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--In evaluating potential improvements for water 
control management activities and consolidation of water control 
management centers, the Secretary may consider a regionalized water 
control management plan but may not implement such a plan until the date 
on which a report is submitted under subsection (b).
    (b) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 180 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on 
Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works and the Committee on Appropriations of the 
Senate a report containing--
            (1) a description of the primary objectives of streamlining 
        water control management activities;
            (2) a description of the benefits provided by streamlining 
        water control management activities through consolidation of 
        centers for those activities;
            (3) a determination whether the benefits to users of 
        establishing regional water control management centers will be 
        retained in each district office of the Corps of Engineers that 
        does not have a regional center;
            (4) a determination whether users of regional centers will 
        receive a higher level of benefits from streamlining water 
        control management activities; and
            (5) a list of the members of Congress who represent a 
        district that includes a water control management center that is 
        to be eliminated under a proposed regionalized plan.

SEC. 512. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    The Secretary may carry out the following projects under section 204 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326):
            (1) Bodega bay, california.--A project to make beneficial 
        use of dredged material from a Federal navigation project in 
        Bodega Bay, California.
            (2) Sabine refuge, louisiana.--A project to make beneficial 
        use of dredged material from Federal navigation projects in the 
        vicinity of Sabine Refuge, Louisiana.
            (3) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--A 
        project to make beneficial use of dredged material from a 
        Federal navigation project in Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson 
        Counties, Mississippi.
            (4) Rose city marsh, orange county, texas.--A project to 
        make beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal 
        navigation project in Rose City Marsh, Orange County, Texas.

[[Page 113 STAT. 342]]

            (5) Bessie heights marsh, orange county, texas.--A project 
        to make beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal 
        navigation project in Bessie Heights Marsh, Orange County, 
        Texas.

SEC. 513. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE.

    Section 507 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3758) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 
following:
            ``(2) Expansion and improvement of Long Pine Run Dam, 
        Pennsylvania, and associated water infrastructure, in accordance 
        with subsections (b) through (e) of section 313 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845), at a total 
        cost of $20,000,000.''.
SEC. 514. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT 
                        PROJECT.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Middle mississippi river.--The term ``middle Mississippi 
        River'' means the reach of the Mississippi River from the mouth 
        of the Ohio River (river mile 0, upper Mississippi River) to the 
        mouth of the Missouri River (river mile 195).
            (2) Missouri river.--The term ``Missouri River'' means the 
        main stem and floodplain of the Missouri River (including 
        reservoirs) from its confluence with the Mississippi River at 
        St. Louis, Missouri, to its headwaters near Three Forks, 
        Montana.
            (3) Project.--The term ``project'' means the project 
        authorized by this section.

    (b) Protection and Enhancement Activities.--
            (1) Plan.--
                    (A) Development.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 
                180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary shall develop a plan for a project to protect 
                and enhance fish and wildlife habitat of the Missouri 
                River and the middle Mississippi River.
                    (B) Activities.--
                          (i) In general.--The plan shall provide for 
                      such activities as are necessary to protect and 
                      enhance fish and wildlife habitat without 
                      adversely affecting--
                                    (I) the water-related needs of the 
                                region surrounding the Missouri River 
                                and the middle Mississippi River, 
                                including flood control, navigation, 
                                recreation, and enhancement of water 
                                supply; and
                                    (II) private property rights.
                          (ii) Required activities.--The plan shall 
                      include--
                                    (I) modification and improvement of 
                                navigation training structures to 
                                protect and enhance fish and wildlife 
                                habitat;
                                    (II) modification and creation of 
                                side channels to protect and enhance 
                                fish and wildlife habitat;
                                    (III) restoration and creation of 
                                island fish and wildlife habitat;
                                    (IV) creation of riverine fish and 
                                wildlife habitat;

[[Page 113 STAT. 343]]

                                    (V) establishment of criteria for 
                                prioritizing the type and sequencing of 
                                activities based on cost-effectiveness 
                                and likelihood of success; and
                                    (VI) physical and biological 
                                monitoring for evaluating the success of 
                                the project, to be performed by the 
                                River Studies Center of the United 
                                States Geological Survey in Columbia, 
                                Missouri.
            (2) Implementation of activities.--
                    (A) In general.--Using funds made available to carry 
                out this section, the Secretary shall carry out the 
                activities described in the plan.
                    (B) Use of existing authority for unconstructed 
                features of the project.--Using funds made available to 
                the Secretary under other law, the Secretary shall 
                design and construct any feature of the project that may 
                be carried out using the authority of the Secretary to 
                modify an authorized project, if the Secretary 
                determines that the design and construction will--
                          (i) accelerate the completion of activities to 
                      protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat of 
                      the Missouri River or the middle Mississippi 
                      River; and
                          (ii) be compatible with the project purposes 
                      described in this section.

    (c) Integration of Other Activities.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the activities described in 
        subsection (b), the Secretary shall integrate the activities 
        with other Federal, State, and tribal activities.
            (2) New authority.--Nothing in this section confers any new 
        regulatory authority on any Federal or non-Federal entity that 
        carries out any activity authorized by this section.

    (d) Public Participation.--In developing and carrying out the plan 
and the activities described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall 
provide for public review and comment in accordance with applicable 
Federal law, including--
            (1) providing advance notice of meetings;
            (2) providing adequate opportunity for public input and 
        comment;
            (3) maintaining appropriate records; and
            (4) compiling a record of the proceedings of meetings.

    (e) Compliance With Applicable Law.--In carrying out the plan and 
the activities described in subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary shall 
comply with any applicable Federal law, including the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (f) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        the project shall be 35 percent.
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 1 
        activity described in subsection (b) shall not exceed 
        $5,000,000.
            (3) Operation and maintenance.--The operation and 
        maintenance of the project shall be a non-Federal 
        responsibility.

    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to pay the Federal share of the cost of carrying out this 
section $30,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2000 and 2001.

[[Page 113 STAT. 344]]

SEC. 515. IRRIGATION <<NOTE: 33 USC 2333.>> DIVERSION PROTECTION 
                        AND FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical planning and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests and may conduct other site-
specific studies to formulate and evaluate fish screens, fish passages 
devices, and other measures to decrease the incidence of juvenile and 
adult fish inadvertently entering irrigation systems.
    (b) Cooperation.--Measures under subsection (a)--
            (1) shall be developed in cooperation with Federal and State 
        resource agencies; and
            (2) shall not impair the continued withdrawal of water for 
        irrigation purposes.

    (c) Priority.--In providing assistance under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall give priority based on--
            (1) the objectives of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
        U.S.C. 1531 et seq.);
            (2) cost-effectiveness; and
            (3) the potential for reducing fish mortality.

    (d) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        measures under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
            (2) In-kind contributions.--Not more than 50 percent of the 
        non-Federal contribution may be made through the provision of 
        services, materials, supplies, or other in-kind contributions.

    (e) No Construction Activity.--This section does not authorize any 
construction activity.
    (f) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 2 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
report on--
            (1) fish mortality caused by irrigation water intake 
        devices;
            (2) appropriate measures to reduce fish mortality;
            (3) the extent to which those measures are currently being 
        employed in arid States;
            (4) the construction costs associated with those measures; 
        and
            (5) the appropriate Federal role, if any, to encourage the 
        use of those measures.
SEC. 516. INNOVATIVE <<NOTE: 33 USC 2334.>> TECHNOLOGIES FOR 
                        WATERSHED RESTORATION.

    The Secretary shall examine using, and, if appropriate, encourage 
the use of, innovative treatment technologies, including membrane 
technologies, for watershed and environmental restoration and protection 
projects involving water quality.

SEC. 517. EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports for the 
following projects and, if justified, proceed directly to project 
preconstruction, engineering, and design:
            (1) Sluice Creek, Guilford, Connecticut, and Lighthouse 
        Point Park, New Haven, Connecticut.
            (2) Alafia Channel, Tampa Harbor, Florida, project for 
        navigation.
            (3) Little Calumet River, Indiana.
            (4) Ohio River Greenway, Indiana, project for environmental 
        restoration and recreation.

[[Page 113 STAT. 345]]

            (5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, 
        project for waterfront and riverine preservation, restoration, 
        and enhancement modifications.
            (6) Extension of locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on the upper 
        Mississippi River and the La Grange and Peoria locks on the 
        Illinois River, project to provide lock chambers 110 feet in 
        width and 1,200 feet in length.

SEC. 518. DOG RIVER, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary shall provide $1,500,000 for environmental restoration 
for a pilot project, in cooperation with non-Federal interests, to 
restore natural water depths in the Dog River, Alabama.

SEC. 519. LEVEES IN ELBA AND GENEVA, ALABAMA.

    (a) Elba, Alabama.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and rehabilitate a 
        levee in the city of Elba, Alabama, at a total cost of 
        $12,900,000.
            (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        repair and rehabilitation under paragraph (1) shall be 35 
        percent.

    (b) Geneva, Alabama.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and rehabilitate a 
        levee in the city of Geneva, Alabama, at a total cost of 
        $16,600,000.
            (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        repair and rehabilitation under paragraph (1) shall be 35 
        percent.

SEC. 520. NAVAJO RESERVATION, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH.

    (a) In General.--In cooperation with other appropriate Federal and 
local agencies, the Secretary shall undertake a survey of, and provide 
technical, planning, and design assistance for, watershed management, 
restoration, and development on the Navajo Indian Reservation, Arizona, 
New Mexico, and Utah.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of activities 
carried out under this section shall be 75 percent. Funds made available 
under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 
U.S.C. 450 et seq.) may be used by the Navajo Nation in meeting the non-
Federal share of the cost of the activities.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.
SEC. 521. BEAVER LAKE, ARKANSAS, WATER SUPPLY STORAGE 
                        REALLOCATION.

    The Secretary shall reallocate approximately 31,000 additional acre-
feet at Beaver Lake, Arkansas, to water supply storage at no cost to the 
Beaver Water District or the Carroll-Boone Water District, except that 
at no time shall the bottom of the conservation pool be at an elevation 
that is less than 1,076 feet, NGVD.

SEC. 522. BEAVER LAKE TROUT PRODUCTION FACILITY, ARKANSAS.

    Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in conjunction with the State of 
Arkansas, shall prepare a plan for the mitigation of effects of the 
Beaver Dam project on Beaver Lake, including the benefits of and 
schedule

[[Page 113 STAT. 346]]

for construction of the Beaver Lake trout production facility and 
related facilities.

SEC. 523. CHINO DAIRY PRESERVE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
heads of other Federal agencies, shall provide technical assistance to 
State and local agencies in the study, design, and implementation of 
measures for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration and 
protection in the Santa Ana River watershed, California, with particular 
emphasis on structural and nonstructural measures in the vicinity of the 
Chino Dairy Preserve.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of activities 
assisted under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a feasibility 
study to determine the most cost-effective plan for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration and protection in the vicinity 
of the Chino Dairy Preserve, Santa Ana River watershed, Orange County 
and San Bernardino County, California.

SEC. 524. ORANGE AND SAN DIEGO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with local 
governments, may prepare special area management plans for Orange and 
San Diego Counties, California, to demonstrate the effectiveness of 
using the plans to provide information regarding aquatic resources.
    (b) Use of Plans.--The Secretary may--
            (1) use plans described in subsection (a) in making 
        regulatory decisions; and
            (2) issue permits consistent with the plans.

SEC. 525. RUSH CREEK, NOVATO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood control under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) at Rush 
Creek, Novato, California, if the Secretary determines that the project 
is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified.

SEC. 526. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary may--
            (1) modify the cooperative agreement with the Santa Cruz 
        Port District, California, to reflect unanticipated additional 
        dredging effort; and
            (2) extend the agreement for 10 years.

SEC. 527. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

    (a) Computer Model.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may apply the computer model 
        developed under the St. Johns River basin feasibility study to 
        assist non-Federal interests in developing strategies for 
        improving water quality in the Lower St. Johns River basin, 
        Florida.
            (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        activities assisted under paragraph (1) shall be 50 percent.

    (b) Topographic Survey.--The Secretary may provide 1-foot contour 
topographic survey maps of the Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida, to 
non-Federal interests for analyzing environmental data and establishing 
benchmarks for subbasins.

[[Page 113 STAT. 347]]

SEC. 528. MAYO'S BAR LOCK AND DAM, COOSA RIVER, ROME, GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical assistance 
(including planning, engineering, and design assistance) for the 
reconstruction of the Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, 
Georgia.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
activities assisted under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
SEC. 529. COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD IMPACT RESPONSE MODELING SYSTEM, 
                        CORALVILLE RESERVOIR AND IOWA RIVER 
                        WATERSHED, IOWA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the University 
of Iowa, shall conduct a study and develop a comprehensive flood impact 
response modeling system for Coralville Reservoir and the Iowa River 
watershed, Iowa.
    (b) Study.--The study shall include--
            (1) an evaluation of the combined hydrologic, geomorphic, 
        environmental, economic, social, and recreational impacts of 
        operating strategies within the watershed;
            (2) creation of an integrated, dynamic flood impact model; 
        and
            (3) the development of a rapid response system to be used 
        during flood and emergency situations.

    (c) Report <<NOTE: Deadline.>> to Congress.--Not later than 5 years 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a 
report to Congress on the results of the study and modeling system and 
such recommendations as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.

    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

SEC. 530. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE IN ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary may carry out the project for Georgetown, Illinois, 
and the project for Olney, Illinois, referred to in House Report Number 
104-741, accompanying the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 
(Public Law 104-182).

SEC. 531. KANOPOLIS LAKE, KANSAS.

    (a) Water Storage.--The Secretary shall offer to the State of Kansas 
the right to purchase water storage in Kanopolis Lake, Kansas, at the 
average of--
            (1) the cost calculated in accordance with the terms of the 
        memorandum of understanding entitled ``Memorandum of 
        Understanding Between the State of Kansas and the U.S. 
        Department of the Army Concerning the Purchase of Municipal and 
        Industrial Water Supply Storage'', dated December 11, 1985; and
            (2) the cost calculated in accordance with procedures 
        established as of the date of enactment of this Act by the 
        Secretary to determine the cost of water storage at other 
        projects under the Secretary's jurisdiction.

    (b) Effective Date.--For the purposes of this section, the effective 
date of the memorandum of understanding referred to in subsection (a)(1) 
shall be deemed to be the date of enactment of this Act.

[[Page 113 STAT. 348]]

SEC. 532. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3773) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``and surface'' and inserting 
                ``surface''; and
                    (B) by striking ``development.'' and inserting 
                ``development, and small stream flooding, local storm 
                water drainage, and related problems.'';
            (2) in subsection (d)(1), by adding at the end the 
        following: ``Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the Flood Control 
        Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project undertaken 
        under this section, with the consent of the affected local 
        government, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
        entity.''; and
            (3) in subsection (h), by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 533. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA.

    Section 533(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3775) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' and inserting 
``$250,000,000''.

SEC. 534. SNUG HARBOR, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Director of 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency, may--
            (1) provide technical assistance to the residents of Snug 
        Harbor, in the vicinity of Berlin, Maryland, for the purpose of 
        flood damage reduction;
            (2) conduct a study of a project consisting of nonstructural 
        measures for flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Snug 
        Harbor, Maryland, taking into account the relationship of both 
        the Ocean City Inlet and Assateague Island to the flooding; and
            (3) after completion of the study, carry out the project 
        under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
        701s).

    (b) FEMA Assistance.--The Director, in coordination with the 
Secretary and under the authorities of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), may 
provide technical assistance and nonstructural measures for flood damage 
mitigation in the vicinity of Snug Harbor, Maryland.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        assistance under this section shall not exceed $3,000,000.
            (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        assistance under this section shall be determined in accordance 
        with title I of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2211 et seq.) or the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 
        and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as 
        appropriate.
SEC. 535. WELCH POINT, ELK RIVER, CECIL COUNTY, AND CHESAPEAKE 
                        CITY, MARYLAND.

    (a) Spillage of Dredged Materials.--The Secretary shall carry out a 
study to determine whether the spillage of dredged materials that were 
removed as part of the project for navigation,

[[Page 113 STAT. 349]]

Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and 
Maryland, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 
(49 Stat. 1030, chapter 831), is a significant impediment to vessels 
transiting the Elk River near Welch Point, Maryland. If the Secretary 
determines that the spillage is an impediment to navigation, the 
Secretary may conduct such dredging as may be required to permit 
navigation on the river.
    (b) Damage to Water Supply.--The Secretary shall carry out a study 
to determine whether additional compensation is required to fully 
compensate the city of Chesapeake, Maryland, for damage to the city's 
water supply resulting from dredging of the Chesapeake and Delaware 
Canal project. If the Secretary determines that such additional 
compensation is required, the Secretary may provide the compensation to 
the city of Chesapeake.
SEC. 536. CAPE COD CANAL RAILROAD BRIDGE, BUZZARDS BAY, 
                        MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) Alternative Transportation.--The Secretary may provide up to 
$300,000 for meeting the need for alternative transportation that may 
arise as a result of the operation, maintenance, repair, and 
rehabilitation of the Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance Contract Renegotiation.--
Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 60 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall enter into negotiation with the owner 
of the railroad right-of-way for the Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge for 
the purpose of establishing the rights and responsibilities for the 
operation and maintenance of the Bridge. The Secretary may include in 
any new contract the termination of the prior contract numbered ER-W175-
ENG-1.

SEC. 537. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    (a) Demonstration Project.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
local officials, shall conduct a demonstration project to improve water 
quality in the vicinity of St. Louis, Missouri.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $1,700,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 538. BEAVER BRANCH OF BIG TIMBER CREEK, NEW JERSEY.

    At the request of the State of New Jersey or a political subdivision 
of the State, using authority under law in effect on the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary may--
            (1) compile and disseminate information on floods and flood 
        damage, including identification of areas subject to inundation 
        by floods; and
            (2) provide technical assistance regarding floodplain 
        management for the Beaver Branch of Big Timber Creek, New 
        Jersey.
SEC. 539. LAKE ONTARIO AND ST. LAWRENCE RIVER WATER LEVELS, NEW 
                        YORK.

    On request, the Secretary may provide technical assistance to the 
International Joint Commission and the St. Lawrence River Board of 
Control in undertaking studies on the effects of fluctuating water 
levels on the natural environment, recreational boating, property 
flooding, and erosion along the shorelines of Lake Ontario and the St. 
Lawrence River in New York. The Commission and

[[Page 113 STAT. 350]]

the Board are encouraged to conduct such studies in a comprehensive and 
thorough manner before implementing any change to Water Regulation Plan 
1958-D.
SEC. 540. NEW <<NOTE: 33 USC 2326b note.>> YORK-NEW JERSEY HARBOR, 
                        NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to analyze the 
economic and environmental benefits and costs of potential sediment 
management and contaminant reduction measures.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
may enter into cooperative agreements with non-Federal interests to 
investigate, develop, and support measures for sediment management and 
reduction of sources of contaminant that affect navigation in the Port 
of New York-New Jersey and the environmental conditions of the New York-
New Jersey Harbor estuary.

SEC. 541. SEA GATE REACH, CONEY ISLAND, NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary may construct a project for shoreline protection that 
includes a beachfill with revetment and T-groin for the Sea Gate Reach 
on Coney Island, New York, as identified in the March 1998 report 
prepared for the Corps of Engineers, New York District, entitled ``Field 
Data Gathering, Project Performance Analysis and Design Alternative 
Solutions to Improve Sandfill Retention'', at a total cost of 
$9,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,850,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $3,150,000.

SEC. 542. WOODLAWN, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide planning, design, and 
other technical assistance to non-Federal interests for identifying and 
mitigating sources of contamination at Woodlawn Beach in Woodlawn, New 
York.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of assistance 
provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.

SEC. 543. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a 
project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation 
areas in the State of New York.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately show the flood 
inundation of each property by flood risk in the floodplain. The maps 
shall be produced in a high resolution format and shall be made 
available to all flood prone areas in the State of New York in an 
electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps developed 
under the project for flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the Secretary 
may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the non-Federal 
interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.

[[Page 113 STAT. 351]]

SEC. 544. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OTTAWA COUNTY, OHIO.

    The Secretary may provide technical assistance for the removal of 
military ordnance from the Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ottawa 
County, Ohio.

SEC. 545. SARDIS RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall accept from the State of 
Oklahoma or an agent of the State an amount, determined under subsection 
(b), as prepayment of 100 percent of the water supply cost obligation of 
the State under Contract No. DACW56-74-JC-0314 for water supply storage 
at Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
    (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be paid by the State of 
Oklahoma under subsection (a) shall be subject to adjustment in 
accordance with accepted discount purchase methods for Federal 
Government properties as determined by an independent accounting firm 
designated by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. The 
cost of the determination shall be paid for by the State of Oklahoma or 
an agent of the State.
    (c) Effect.--Nothing in this section affects any of the rights or 
obligations of the parties to the contract referred to in subsection 
(a).

SEC. 546. SKINNER BUTTE PARK, EUGENE, OREGON.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the south bank of 
the Willamette River, in the area of Skinner Butte Park from Ferry 
Street Bridge to the Valley River footbridge, to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project to stabilize the river bank, and 
to restore and enhance riverine habitat, using a combination of 
structural and bioengineering techniques.
    (b) Federal Participation.--If, on completion of the study, the 
Secretary determines that the project is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified, the Secretary 
may participate with non-Federal interests in the project.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 35 percent.
    (d) Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal interest shall provide 
        land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged 
        material disposal areas necessary for construction of the 
        project.
            (2) Credit toward non-federal share.--The value of the land, 
        easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material 
        disposal areas provided by the non-Federal interests shall be 
        credited toward the non-Federal share.

    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 547. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, and the heads of other appropriate Federal agencies 
shall, using authorities under law in effect on the date of enactment of 
this Act, assist the State of Oregon in developing and implementing a 
comprehensive basin-wide strategy in the Willamette River basin, Oregon, 
for coordinated and integrated management of land and water resources to 
improve water quality,

[[Page 113 STAT. 352]]

reduce flood hazards, ensure sustainable economic activity, and restore 
habitat for native fish and wildlife.
    (b) Technical Assistance, Staff, and Financial Support.--The heads 
of the Federal agencies may provide technical assistance, staff, and 
financial support for development of the basin-wide management strategy.
    (c) Flexibility.--The heads of the Federal agencies shall exercise 
flexibility to reduce barriers to efficient and effective implementation 
of the basin-wide management strategy.

SEC. 548. BRADFORD AND SULLIVAN COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may provide assistance for water-related environmental 
infrastructure and resource protection and development projects in 
Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania, using the funds and 
authorities provided in title I of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 1999 (Public Law 105-245), under the heading 
``Construction, General'' (112 Stat. 1840) for similar projects in 
Lackawanna, Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, and Monroe Counties, 
Pennsylvania.

SEC. 549. ERIE HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may reimburse the appropriate non-Federal interest not 
more than $78,366 for architectural and engineering costs incurred in 
connection with the Erie Harbor basin navigation project, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 550. POINT MARION LOCK AND DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Point Marion Lock and 
Dam, borough of Point Marion, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 301(a) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110), is 
modified to direct the Secretary, in the operation and maintenance of 
the project, to mitigate damages to the shoreline, at a total cost of 
$2,000,000.
    (b) Allocation.--The cost of the mitigation shall be allocated as an 
operation and maintenance cost of a Federal navigation project.

SEC. 551. SEVEN POINTS' HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may, at full Federal expense, 
construct a breakwater at the entrance to Seven Points' Harbor, 
Pennsylvania.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance Costs.--All operation and maintenance 
costs associated with the facility constructed under this section shall 
be the responsibility of the lessee of the marina complex at Seven 
Points' Harbor.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $850,000.

SEC. 552. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 566(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3786) is amended by inserting ``environmental restoration,'' after 
``water supply and related facilities,''.
SEC. 553. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA-LACKAWANNA, PENNSYLVANIA, WATERSHED 
                        MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of a comprehensive floodplain management and watershed 
restoration project for the Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna Watershed, 
Pennsylvania.

[[Page 113 STAT. 353]]

    (b) Geographic Information System.--In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall use a geographic information system.
    (c) Plans.--The study shall formulate plans for comprehensive 
floodplain management and environmental restoration.
    (d) Credit Toward Non-Federal Share.--Non-Federal interests may 
receive credit toward the non-Federal share for in-kind services and 
materials that contribute to the study. The Secretary may credit non-
Corps Federal assistance provided to the non-Federal interest toward the 
non-Federal share of the costs of the study to the maximum extent 
authorized by law.

SEC. 554. AGUADILLA HARBOR, PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether erosion and 
additional storm damage risks that exist in the vicinity of Aguadilla 
Harbor, Puerto Rico, are the result of a Federal navigation project. If 
the Secretary determines that such erosion and additional storm damage 
risks are the result of the project, the Secretary shall take 
appropriate measures to mitigate the erosion and storm damage.

SEC. 555. OAHE DAM TO LAKE SHARPE, SOUTH DAKOTA, STUDY.

    Section 441 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3747) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) Investigation.--'' before ``The 
        Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(b) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than September 30, 
1999, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of 
the investigation under this section. The report shall include the 
examination of financing options for regular maintenance and 
preservation of the lake. The report shall be prepared in coordination 
and cooperation with the Natural Resources Conservation Service, other 
Federal agencies, and State and local officials.''.
SEC. 556. NORTH PADRE ISLAND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION AND 
                        ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROJECT.

    The Secretary is directed to carry out a project for ecosystem 
restoration and storm damage reduction at North Padre Island, Corpus 
Christi Bay, Texas, at a total estimated cost of $30,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $10,500,000, if the Secretary determines that the work is technically 
sound and environmentally acceptable. The Secretary shall make such a 
determination not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act.

SEC. 557. NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    The projects described in the following reports are authorized to be 
carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, 
and subject to the conditions, recommended in the reports, and subject 
to a favorable report of the Chief of Engineers:
            (1) Parkersburg, west virginia.--Report of the Corps of 
        Engineers entitled ``Parkersburg/Vienna Riverfront Park 
        Feasibility Study'', dated June 1998, at a total cost of 
        $8,400,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,200,000, and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $4,200,000.
            (2) Weirton, west virginia.--Report of the Corps of 
        Engineers entitled ``Feasibility Master Plan for Weirton Port 
        and Industrial Center, West Virginia Public Port Authority'', 
        dated

[[Page 113 STAT. 354]]

        December 1997, at a total cost of $18,000,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $9,000,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $9,000,000.
            (3) Erickson/wood county, west virginia.--Report of the 
        Corps of Engineers entitled ``Feasibility Master Plan for 
        Erickson/Wood County Port District, West Virginia Public Port 
        Authority'', dated July 7, 1997, at a total cost of $28,000,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $14,000,000, and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $14,000,000.

SEC. 558. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION.

    Section 8 of the Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702h; 45 Stat. 537, 
chapter 569) (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1928''), is 
amended by striking ``$7,500'' and inserting ``$21,500''.

SEC. 559. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2335.>> COASTAL AQUATIC HABITAT MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with the Secretaries of 
Agriculture and the Interior, the Administrators of the Environmental 
Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration, other appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, 
and affected private entities, in the development of a management 
strategy to address problems associated with toxic microorganisms and 
the resulting degradation of ecosystems in the tidal and nontidal 
wetlands and waters of the United States.
    (b) Assistance.--As part of the management strategy, the Secretary 
may provide planning, design, and other technical assistance to each 
participating State in the development and implementation of 
nonregulatory measures to mitigate environmental problems and restore 
aquatic resources.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of measures 
undertaken under this section shall not exceed 65 percent.
    (d) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of operation 
and maintenance costs for projects constructed with assistance provided 
under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $7,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 560. ABANDONED <<NOTE: 33 USC 2336.>> AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE 
            RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to Federal and non-Federal interests for carrying out 
projects to address water quality problems caused by drainage and 
related activities from abandoned and inactive noncoal mines.
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) may 
be in support of projects for the purposes of--
            (1) managing drainage from abandoned and inactive noncoal 
        mines;
            (2) restoring and protecting streams, rivers, wetlands, 
        other waterbodies, and riparian areas degraded by drainage from 
        abandoned and inactive noncoal mines; and
            (3) demonstrating management practices and innovative and 
        alternative treatment technologies to minimize or eliminate 
        adverse environmental effects associated with drainage from 
        abandoned and inactive noncoal mines.

    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent, except that

[[Page 113 STAT. 355]]

the Federal share with respect to projects located on land owned by the 
United States shall be 100 percent.
    (d) Effect on Authority of Secretary of the Interior.--Nothing in 
this section affects the authority of the Secretary of the Interior 
under title IV of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 
(30 U.S.C. 1231 et seq.).
    (e) Technology Database for Reclamation of Abandoned Mines.--The 
Secretary may provide assistance to non-Federal and nonprofit entities 
to develop, manage, and maintain a database of conventional and 
innovative, cost-effective technologies for reclamation of abandoned and 
inactive noncoal mine sites. Such assistance shall be provided through 
the Rehabilitation of Abandoned Mine Sites Program managed by the 
Sacramento District Office of the Corps of Engineers.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 561. <<NOTE: 33 USC 2314 note.>> BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE TIRE 
            RUBBER.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall, when appropriate, encourage 
the beneficial use of waste tire rubber (including crumb rubber and 
baled tire products) recycled from tires.
    (b) Included Beneficial Uses.--Beneficial uses under subsection (a) 
may include marine pilings, underwater framing, floating docks with 
built-in flotation, utility poles, and other uses associated with 
transportation and infrastructure projects receiving Federal funds.
    (c) Use of Waste Tire Rubber.--The Secretary shall encourage the 
use, when appropriate, of waste tire rubber (including crumb rubber) in 
projects described in subsection (b).

SEC. 562. SITE DESIGNATION.

    Section 102(c)(4) of the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended in the third 
sentence by striking ``January 1, 2000'' and inserting ``January 1, 
2003''.

SEC. 563. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Toronto Lake and El Dorado Lake, Kansas.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
        Kansas, by quitclaim deed and without consideration, all right, 
        title, and interest of the United States in and to the 2 parcels 
        of land described in paragraph (2) on which correctional 
        facilities operated by the Kansas Department of Corrections are 
        situated.
            (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) are--
                    (A) the parcel located in Butler County, Kansas, 
                adjacent to the El Dorado Lake Project, consisting of 
                approximately 32.98 acres; and
                    (B) the parcel located in Woodson County, Kansas, 
                adjacent to the Toronto Lake Project, consisting of 
                approximately 51.98 acres.
            (3) Conditions.--
                    (A) Use of land.--A conveyance of a parcel under 
                paragraph (1) shall be subject to the condition that all 
                right, title, and interest in and to the parcel shall 
                revert to the United States if the parcel is used for a 
                purpose other than that of a correctional facility.

[[Page 113 STAT. 356]]

                    (B) Costs.--The Secretary may require such 
                additional terms, conditions, reservations, and 
                restrictions in connection with the conveyance as the 
                Secretary determines are necessary to protect the 
                interests of the United States, including a requirement 
                that the State pay all reasonable administrative costs 
                associated with the conveyance.

    (b) Pike County, Missouri.--
            (1) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), at 
        such time as Holnam Inc. conveys all right, title, and interest 
        in and to the parcel of land described in paragraph (2)(A) to 
        the United States, the Secretary shall convey all right, title, 
        and interest in the parcel of land described in paragraph (2)(B) 
        to Holnam Inc.
            (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) are the following:
                    (A) Non-federal land.--152.45 acres with existing 
                flowage easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, 
                described as a portion of Government Tract Number FM-9 
                and all of Government Tract Numbers FM-11, FM-10, FM-12, 
                FM-13, and FM-16, owned and administered by Holnam Inc.
                    (B) Federal land.--152.61 acres situated in Pike 
                County, Missouri, known as Government Tract Numbers FM-
                17 and a portion of FM-18, administered by the Corps of 
                Engineers.
            (3) Conditions.--The exchange of land under paragraph (1) 
        shall be subject to the following conditions:
                    (A) Deeds.--
                          (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of the 
                      land described in paragraph (2)(A) to the 
                      Secretary shall be by a warranty deed acceptable 
                      to the Secretary.
                          (ii) Federal land.--The instrument of 
                      conveyance used to convey the land described in 
                      paragraph (2)(B) to Holnam Inc. shall contain such 
                      reservations, terms, and conditions as the 
                      Secretary considers necessary to allow the United 
                      States to operate and maintain the Mississippi 
                      River 9-Foot Navigation Project.
                    (B) Removal of improvements.--Holnam Inc. may remove 
                any improvements on the land described in paragraph 
                (2)(A). The Secretary may require Holnam Inc. to remove 
                any improvements on the land described in paragraph 
                (2)(A). In either case, Holnam Inc. shall hold the 
                United States harmless from liability, and the United 
                States shall not incur cost associated with the removal 
                or relocation of any of the improvements.
                    (C) Time limit for exchange.--The land exchange 
                under paragraph (1) shall be completed not later than 2 
                years after the date of enactment of this Act.
                    (D) Legal description.--The Secretary shall provide 
                the legal description of the land described in paragraph 
                (2). The legal description shall be used in the 
                instruments of conveyance of the land.
                    (E) Administrative costs.--The Secretary shall 
                require Holnam Inc. to pay reasonable administrative 
                costs associated with the exchange.

[[Page 113 STAT. 357]]

            (4) Value of properties.--If the appraised fair market 
        value, as determined by the Secretary, of the land conveyed to 
        Holnam Inc. by the Secretary under paragraph (1) exceeds the 
        appraised fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, of 
        the land conveyed to the United States by Holnam Inc. under 
        paragraph (1), Holnam Inc. shall make a payment equal to the 
        excess in cash or a cash equivalent to the United States.

    (c) Candy Lake Project, Osage County, Oklahoma.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                    (A) Fair market value.--The term ``fair market 
                value'' means the amount for which a willing buyer would 
                purchase and a willing seller would sell a parcel of 
                land, as determined by a qualified, independent land 
                appraiser.
                    (B) Previous owner of land.--The term ``previous 
                owner of land'' means a person (including a corporation) 
                that conveyed, or a descendant of a deceased individual 
                who conveyed, land to the Corps of Engineers for use in 
                the Candy Lake project in Osage County, Oklahoma.
            (2) Conveyances.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall convey all 
                right, title, and interest of the United States in and 
                to the land acquired by the United States for the Candy 
                Lake project in Osage County, Oklahoma.
                    (B) Previous owners of land.--
                          (i) In general.--The Secretary shall give a 
                      previous owner of land the first option to 
                      purchase the land described in subparagraph (A).
                          (ii) Application.--
                                    (I) In general.--A previous owner of 
                                land that desires to purchase the land 
                                described in paragraph (1) that was 
                                owned by the previous owner of land, or 
                                by the individual from whom the previous 
                                owner of land is descended, shall file 
                                an application to purchase the land with 
                                the Secretary not later than 180 days 
                                after the official date of notice to the 
                                previous owner of land under paragraph 
                                (3).
                                    (II) First to file has first 
                                option.--If more than 1 application is 
                                filed to purchase a parcel of land 
                                described in subparagraph (A), the first 
                                option to purchase the parcel of land 
                                shall be determined in the order in 
                                which applications for the parcel of 
                                land were filed.
                          (iii) Identification of previous owners of 
                      land.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
                      enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, to the 
                      extent practicable, identify each previous owner 
                      of land.
                          (iv) Consideration.--Consideration for land 
                      conveyed under this subsection shall be the fair 
                      market value of the land.
                    (C) Disposal.--Any land described in subparagraph 
                (A) for which an application to purchase the land has 
                not been filed under subparagraph (B)(ii) within the 
                applicable time period shall be disposed of in 
                accordance with law.

[[Page 113 STAT. 358]]

                    (D) Extinguishment of easements.--All flowage 
                easements acquired by the United States for use in the 
                Candy Lake project in Osage County, Oklahoma, are 
                extinguished.
            (3) Notice.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall notify--
                          (i) each person identified as a previous owner 
                      of land under paragraph (2)(B)(iii), not later 
                      than 90 days after identification, by United 
                      States mail; and
                          (ii) <<NOTE: Federal Register, 
                      publication.>> the general public, not later than 
                      90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
                      by publication in the Federal Register.
                    (B) Contents of notice.--Notice under this paragraph 
                shall include--
                          (i) a copy of this subsection;
                          (ii) information sufficient to separately 
                      identify each parcel of land subject to this 
                      subsection; and
                          (iii) specification of the fair market value 
                      of each parcel of land subject to this subsection.
                    (C) Official date of notice.--The official date of 
                notice under this subsection shall be the later of--
                          (i) the date on which actual notice is mailed; 
                      or
                          (ii) the date of publication of the notice in 
                      the Federal Register.

    (d) Lake Hugo, Oklahoma, Area Land Conveyance.--
            (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey at fair market 
        value to Choctaw County Industrial Authority, Oklahoma, the 
        parcels of land described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Land description.--
                    (A) In general.--The parcel of land to be conveyed 
                under paragraph (1) is the parcel lying above elevation 
                445.2 feet (NGVD) located in the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ and 
                the S\1/2\SW\1/4\ of Section 13 and the N\1/2\NW\1/4\ of 
                Section 24, T 6 S, R 18 E, of the Indian Meridian, in 
                Choctaw County, Oklahoma, the parcel also being part of 
                the Sawyer Bluff Public Use Area and including parts of 
                Hugo Lake Tracts 134 and 139, and more particularly 
                described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east 
                line of Section 13, the point being 100.00 feet north of 
                the southeast corner of S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 
                13; thence S 01/ 36' 24" 100.00 to a Corps of Engineers 
                brass-capped monument at the southeast corner of S\1/
                2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13; thence S 88/ 16' 57" W, 
                along the south line of the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of 
                Section 13, 2649.493 feet, more or less, to a Corps of 
                Engineers brass-capped monument on the centerline of 
                Section 13; thence S 01/ 20' 53" E, along the centerline 
                of Section 13, 1316.632 feet to a Corps of Engineers 
                brass-capped monument; thence S 00/ 41' 35" E, along the 
                centerline of Section 24, 1000.00 feet, more or less, to 
                a point lying 50.00 feet north and 300.00 feet, more or 
                less, east of Road B of the Sawyer Bluff Public Use 
                Area; thence westerly and northwesterly, parallel to 
                Road B, to the approximate location of the 445.2-foot 
                contour; thence meandering northerly along the 445.2-
                foot contour to a point approximately 100.00 feet west 
                and 100.00 feet north of the southwest corner of the 
                S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13;

[[Page 113 STAT. 359]]

                thence east, paralleling the south line of the S\1/
                2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13, 2649.493 feet, more or 
                less, to the point of beginning.
                    (B) Survey.--The exact description and acreage of 
                the parcel shall be determined by a metes and bounds 
                survey provided by the Choctaw County Industrial 
                Authority.

    (e) Conveyance of Property in Marshall County, Oklahoma.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
        Oklahoma all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to real property located in Marshall County, Oklahoma, and 
        included in the Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), Oklahoma and Texas, 
        project, consisting of approximately 1,580 acres and leased to 
        the State of Oklahoma for public park and recreation purposes.
            (2) Consideration.--Consideration for the conveyance under 
        paragraph (1) shall be the fair market value of the real 
        property, as determined by the Secretary. All costs associated 
        with the conveyance under paragraph (1) shall be paid by the 
        State of Oklahoma.
            (3) Description.--The exact acreage and legal description of 
        the real property to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be 
        determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost 
        of the survey shall be paid by the State of Oklahoma.
            (4) Environmental compliance.--Before making the conveyance 
        under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
                    (A) conduct an environmental baseline survey to 
                determine whether there are levels of contamination for 
                which the United States would be responsible under the 
                Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
                Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.); and
                    (B) ensure that the conveyance complies with the 
                National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
                4321 et seq.).
            (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under 
        paragraph (1) shall be subject to such other terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 
        interests of the United States, including reservation by the 
        United States of a flowage easement over all portions of the 
        real property to be conveyed that are at or below elevation 
        645.0 NGVD.

    (f) Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma.--
            (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transfer to the 
        Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma, all right, title, 
        and interest of the United States in and to the land described 
        in paragraph (3) for use as a cemetery.
            (2) Reversion.--If the land to be transferred under this 
        subsection ever ceases to be used as a not-for-profit cemetery 
        or for another public purpose, the land shall revert to the 
        United States.
            (3) Description.--The land to be conveyed under this 
        subsection is the approximately 10 acres of land located in 
        Leflore County, Oklahoma, and described as follows:

[[Page 113 STAT. 360]]

                          indian basin meridian

               Section 23, Township 5 North, Range 23 East

            SW SE SW NW
            NW NE NW SW
            N\1/2\ SW SW NW.
            (4) Consideration.--The conveyance under this subsection 
        shall be without consideration. All costs associated with the 
        conveyance shall be paid by the Summerfield Cemetery 
        Association, Oklahoma.
            (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under this 
        subsection shall be subject to such other terms and conditions 
        as the Secretary considers necessary to protect the interests of 
        the United States.

    (g) Dexter, Oregon.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Dexter 
        Sanitary District all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 5 
        acres located at Dexter Lake, Oregon, under lease to the Dexter 
        Sanitary District.
            (2) Consideration.--Land to be conveyed under this 
        subsection shall be conveyed without consideration. If the land 
        is no longer held in public ownership or no longer used for 
        wastewater treatment purposes, title to the land shall revert to 
        the Secretary.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance by the United 
        States shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the 
        Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
            (4) Surveys.--The exact acreage and description of the land 
        to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be determined by such 
        surveys as the Secretary considers necessary. The cost of the 
        surveys shall be borne by the Dexter Sanitary District.

    (h) Charleston, South Carolina.--The Secretary may convey the 
property of the Corps of Engineers known as the ``Equipment and Storage 
Yard'', located on Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, in as-
is condition for fair market value, with all proceeds from the 
conveyance to be applied by the Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, 
to offset a portion of the costs of moving or leasing an office facility 
in the city of Charleston, South Carolina.
    (i) Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina.--
            (1) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall convey to the State of South 
        Carolina all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to the parcels of land described in paragraph (2)(A) that 
        are being managed, as of the date of enactment of this Act, by 
        the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources for fish and 
        wildlife mitigation purposes for the Richard B. Russell Dam and 
        Lake, South Carolina, project authorized by section 203 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420) and modified by 
        section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 4140).
            (2) Land description.--
                    (A) In general.--The parcels of land to be conveyed 
                are described in Exhibits A, F, and H of Army Lease

[[Page 113 STAT. 361]]

                No. DACW21-1-93-0910 and associated supplemental 
                agreements or are designated in red in Exhibit A of Army 
                License No. DACW21-3-85-1904, excluding all designated 
                parcels in the license that are below elevation 346 feet 
                mean sea level or that are less than 300 feet measured 
                horizontally from the top of the power pool.
                    (B) Management of excluded parcels.--Management of 
                the excluded parcels shall continue in accordance with 
                the terms of Army License No. DACW21-3-85-1904 until the 
                Secretary and the State enter into an agreement under 
                paragraph (6).
                    (C) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal description 
                of the land shall be determined by a survey satisfactory 
                to the Secretary, with the cost of the survey borne by 
                the State.
            (3) Costs of conveyance.--The State shall be responsible for 
        all costs, including real estate transaction and environmental 
        compliance costs, associated with the conveyance.
            (4) Perpetual status.--
                    (A) In general.--All land conveyed under this 
                subsection shall be retained in public ownership and 
                shall be managed in perpetuity for fish and wildlife 
                mitigation purposes in accordance with a plan approved 
                by the Secretary.
                    (B) Reversion.--If any parcel of land is not managed 
                for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in accordance 
                with the plan, title to the parcel shall revert to the 
                United States.
            (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require such additional terms and conditions in connection with 
        the conveyance under this subsection as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
            (6) Fish and wildlife mitigation agreement.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary may pay the State of 
                South Carolina not more than $4,850,000, subject to the 
                Secretary and the State entering into a binding 
                agreement for the State to manage for fish and wildlife 
                mitigation purposes in perpetuity the parcels of land 
                conveyed under this subsection and excluded parcels 
                designated in Exhibit A of Army License No. DACW21-3-85-
                1904.
                    (B) Failure of performance.--The agreement shall 
                specify the terms and conditions under which payment 
                will be made and the rights of, and remedies available 
                to, the Federal Government to recover all or a portion 
                of the payment if the State fails to manage any parcel 
                in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.

    (j) Clarkston, Washington.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Port of 
        Clarkston, Washington, all right, title, and interest of the 
        United States in and to a portion of the land described in the 
        Department of the Army Lease No. DACW68-1-97-22, consisting of 
        approximately 31 acres, the exact boundaries of which shall be 
        determined by the Secretary and the Port of Clarkston.
            (2) Additional land.--The Secretary may convey to the Port 
        of Clarkston, Washington, such additional land located

[[Page 113 STAT. 362]]

        in the vicinity of Clarkston, Washington, as the Secretary 
        determines to be excess to the needs of the Columbia River 
        Project and appropriate for conveyance.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyances made under 
        paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be subject to such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary considers necessary to protect the 
        interests of the United States, including a requirement that the 
        Port of Clarkston pay all administrative costs associated with 
        the conveyances, including the cost of land surveys and 
        appraisals and costs associated with compliance with applicable 
        environmental laws (including regulations).
            (4) Use of land.--The Port of Clarkston shall be required to 
        pay the fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, of 
        any land conveyed under paragraphs (1) and (2) that is not 
        retained in public ownership and used for public park or 
        recreation purposes, except that the Secretary shall have a 
        right of reverter to reclaim possession and title to any such 
        land.

    (k) Matewan, West Virginia.--
            (1) In general.--The United States shall convey by quitclaim 
        deed to the town of Matewan, West Virginia, all right, title, 
        and interest of the United States in and to 4 parcels of land 
        that the Secretary determines to be excess to the structural 
        project for flood control constructed by the Corps of Engineers 
        along the Tug Fork River under section 202 of the Energy and 
        Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339).
            (2) Property description.--The parcels of land referred to 
        in paragraph (1) are as follows:
                    (A) A certain parcel of land in the State of West 
                Virginia, Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more 
                particularly bounded and described as follows:
                          Beginning at a point on the southerly right-
                      of-way line of a 40-foot-wide street right-of-way 
                      (known as McCoy Alley), having an approximate 
                      coordinate value of N228,695, E1,662,397, in the 
                      line common to the land designated as U.S.A. Tract 
                      No. 834, and the land designated as U.S.A. Tract 
                      No. 837, said point being South 51/52' East 81.8 
                      feet from an iron pin and cap marked M-12 on the 
                      boundary of the Matewan Area Structural Project, 
                      on the north right-of-way line of said street, at 
                      a corner common to designated U.S.A. Tracts Nos. 
                      834 and 836; thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
                      said street, with the line common to the land of 
                      said Tract No. 834, and the land of said Tract No. 
                      837.
                          South 14/37' West 46 feet to the corner common 
                      to the land of said Tract No. 834, and the land of 
                      said Tract No. 837; thence, leaving the land of 
                      said Tract No. 837, severing the lands of said 
                      Project.
                          South 14/37' West 46 feet.
                          South 68/07' East 239 feet.
                          North 26/05' East 95 feet to a point on the 
                      southerly right-of-way line of said street; 
                      thence, with the right-of-way of said street, 
                      continuing to sever the lands of said Project.

[[Page 113 STAT. 363]]

                          South 63/55' East 206 feet; thence, leaving 
                      the right-of-way of said street, continuing to 
                      sever the lands of said Project.
                          South 26/16' West 63 feet; thence, with a 
                      curve to the left having a radius of 70 feet, a 
                      delta of 33/58', an arc length of 41 feet, the 
                      chord bearing.
                          South 09/17' West 41 feet; thence, leaving 
                      said curve, continuing to sever the lands of said 
                      Project.
                          South 07/42' East 31 feet to a point on the 
                      right-of-way line of the floodwall; thence, with 
                      the right-of-way of said floodwall, continuing to 
                      sever the lands of said Project.
                          South 77/04' West 71 feet.
                          North 77/10' West 46 feet.
                          North 67/07' West 254 feet.
                          North 67/54' West 507 feet.
                          North 57/49' West 66 feet to the intersection 
                      of the right-of-way line of said floodwall with 
                      the southerly right-of-way line of said street; 
                      thence, leaving the right-of-way of said floodwall 
                      and with the southerly right-of-way of said 
                      street, continuing to sever the lands of said 
                      Project.
                          North 83/01' East 171 feet.
                          North 89/42' East 74 feet.
                          South 83/39' East 168 feet.
                          South 83/38' East 41 feet.
                          South 77/26' East 28 feet to the point of 
                      beginning, containing 2.59 acres, more or less.
                The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph 
                are referenced to the West Virginia State Plane 
                Coordinate System, South Zone.
                    (B) A certain parcel of land in the State of West 
                Virginia, Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more 
                particularly bounded and described as follows:
                          Beginning at an iron pin and cap designated 
                      Corner No. M2-2 on the southerly right-of-way line 
                      of the Norfolk and Western Railroad, having an 
                      approximate coordinate value of N228,755 
                      E1,661,242, and being at the intersection of the 
                      right-of-way line of the floodwall with the 
                      boundary of the Matewan Area Structural Project; 
                      thence, leaving the right-of-way of said floodwall 
                      and with said Project boundary, and the southerly 
                      right-of-way of said Railroad.
                          North 59/45' East 34 feet.
                          North 69/50' East 44 feet.
                          North 58/11' East 79 feet.
                          North 66/13' East 102 feet.
                          North 69/43' East 98 feet.
                          North 77/39' East 18 feet.
                          North 72/39' East 13 feet to a point at the 
                      intersection of said Project boundary, and the 
                      southerly right-of-way of said Railroad, with the 
                      westerly right-of-way line of State Route 49/10; 
                      thence, leaving said Project boundary, and the 
                      southerly right-of-way of said Railroad, and with 
                      the westerly right-of-way of said road.

[[Page 113 STAT. 364]]

                          South 03/21' East 100 feet to a point at the 
                      intersection of the westerly right-of-way of said 
                      road with the right-of-way of said floodwall; 
                      thence, leaving the right-of-way of said road, and 
                      with the right-of-way line of said floodwall.
                          South 79/30' West 69 feet.
                          South 78/28' West 222 feet.
                          South 80/11' West 65 feet.
                          North 38/40' West 14 feet to the point of 
                      beginning, containing 0.53 acre, more or less.
                The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph 
                are referenced to the West Virginia State Plane 
                Coordinate System, South Zone.
                    (C) A certain parcel of land in the State of West 
                Virginia, Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more 
                particularly bounded and described as follows:
                          Beginning at a point on the southerly right-
                      of-way line of the Norfolk and Western Railroad, 
                      having an approximate coordinate value of N228,936 
                      E1,661,672, and being at the intersection of the 
                      easterly right-of-way line of State Route 49/10 
                      with the boundary of the Matewan Area Structural 
                      Project; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said 
                      road, and with said Project boundary, and the 
                      southerly right-of-way of said Railroad.
                          North 77/49' East 89 feet to an iron pin and 
                      cap designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-4.
                          North 79/30' East 74 feet to an iron pin and 
                      cap designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-5-1; thence, 
                      leaving the southerly right-of-way of said 
                      Railroad, and continuing with the boundary of said 
                      Project.
                          South 06/33' East 102 to an iron pipe and cap 
                      designated U.S.A. Corner No. M-6-1 on the 
                      northerly right-of-way line of State Route 49/28; 
                      thence, leaving the boundary of said Project, and 
                      with the right-of-way of said road, severing the 
                      lands of said Project.
                          North 80/59' West 171 feet to a point at the 
                      intersection of the northerly right-of-way line of 
                      said State Route 49/28 with the easterly right-of-
                      way line of said State Route 49/10; thence, 
                      leaving the right-of-way of said State Route 49/28 
                      and with the right-of-way of said State Route 49/
                      10.
                          North 03/21' West 42 feet to the point of 
                      beginning, containing 0.27 acre, more or less.
                The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph 
                are referenced to the West Virginia State Plane 
                Coordinate System, South Zone.
                    (D) A certain parcel of land in the State of West 
                Virginia, Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more 
                particularly bounded and described as follows:
                          Beginning at a point at the intersection of 
                      the easterly right-of-way line of State Route 49/
                      10 with the right-of-way line of the floodwall, 
                      having an approximate coordinate value of N228,826 
                      E1,661,679; thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
                      said floodwall, and with the right-of-way of said 
                      State Route 49/10.

[[Page 113 STAT. 365]]

                          North 03/21' West 23 feet to a point at the 
                      intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of 
                      said State Route 49/10 with the southerly right-
                      of-way line of State Route 49/28; thence, leaving 
                      the right-of-way of said State Route 49/10 and 
                      with the right-of-way of said State Route 49/28.
                          South 80/59' East 168 feet.
                          North 82/28' East 45 feet to an iron pin and 
                      cap designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-8-1 on the 
                      boundary of the Western Area Structural Project; 
                      thence, leaving the right-of-way of said State 
                      Route 49/28, and with said Project boundary.
                          South 08/28' East 88 feet to an iron pin and 
                      cap designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-9-1 point on 
                      the northerly right-of-way line of a street (known 
                      as McCoy Alley); thence, leaving said Project 
                      boundary and with the northerly right-of-way of 
                      said street.
                          South 83/01' West 38 feet to a point on the 
                      right-of-way line of said floodwall; thence, 
                      leaving the right-of-way of said street, and with 
                      the right-of-way of said floodwall.
                          North 57/49' West 180 feet.
                          South 79/30' West 34 feet to a point of 
                      beginning, containing 0.24 acre, more or less.
                The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph 
                are referenced to the West Virginia State Plane 
                Coordinate System, South Zone.

    (l) McNary <<NOTE: 16 USC 668dd note.>> National Wildlife Refuge.--
            (1) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction.--Administrative 
        jurisdiction over the McNary National Wildlife Refuge is 
        transferred from the Secretary to the Secretary of the Interior.
            (2) Land exchange with the port of walla walla, 
        washington.--
                    (A) In general.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 
                1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
                Secretary of the Interior may exchange approximately 188 
                acres of land located south of Highway 12 and comprising 
                a portion of the McNary National Wildlife Refuge for 
                approximately 122 acres of land owned by the Port of 
                Walla Walla, Washington, and located at the confluence 
                of the Snake River and the Columbia River.
                    (B) Terms and conditions.--The land exchange under 
                subparagraph (A) shall be carried out in accordance with 
                such terms and conditions as the Secretary of the 
                Interior determines to be necessary to protect the 
                interests of the United States, including a requirement 
                that the Port pay--
                          (i) reasonable administrative costs (not to 
                      exceed $50,000) associated with the exchange; and
                          (ii) any excess (as determined by the 
                      Secretary of the Interior) of the fair market 
                      value of the parcel conveyed by the Secretary of 
                      the Interior over the fair market value of the 
                      parcel conveyed by the Port.
                    (C) Use of funds.--The Secretary of the Interior may 
                retain any funds received under subparagraph (B)(ii) 
                and, without further Act of appropriation, may use the 
                funds

[[Page 113 STAT. 366]]

                to acquire replacement habitat for the Mid-Columbia 
                River National Wildlife Refuge Complex.
            (3) Management.--The McNary National Wildlife Refuge and 
        land conveyed by the Port of Walla Walla, Washington, under 
        paragraph (2) shall be managed in accordance with applicable 
        laws, including section 120(h) of the Comprehensive 
        Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 
        (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)) and the National Environmental Policy Act of 
        1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

SEC. 564. MCNARY POOL, WASHINGTON.

    (a) Extinguishment of Reversionary Interests and Use Restrictions.--
With respect to each deed listed in subsection (b)--
            (1) the reversionary interests and the use restrictions 
        relating to port or industrial purposes are extinguished;
            (2) the human habitation or other building structure use 
        restriction is extinguished in each area where the elevation is 
        above the standard project flood elevation; and
            (3) the use of fill material to raise low areas above the 
        standard project flood elevation is authorized, except in any 
        low area constituting wetland for which a permit under section 
        404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) 
        would be required.

    (b) Affected Deeds.--The deeds with the following county auditor's 
file numbers are referred to in subsection (a):
            (1) Auditor's File Numbers 521608 and 529071 of Benton 
        County, Washington.
            (2) Auditor's File Numbers 262980, 263334, 318437, and 
        404398 of Franklin County, Washington.
            (3) Auditor's File Numbers 411133, 447417, 447418, 462156, 
        563333, and 569593 of Walla Walla County, Washington.
            (4) Auditor's File Number 285215 of Umatilla County, Oregon, 
        executed by the United States.

    (c) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects the 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes.

SEC. 565. NAMINGS.

    (a) Francis Bland Floodway Ditch, Arkansas.--
            (1) Designation.--8-Mile Creek in Paragould, Arkansas, shall 
        be known and designated as the ``Francis Bland Floodway Ditch''.
            (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the creek referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed 
        to be a reference to the ``Francis Bland Floodway Ditch''.

    (b) Lawrence Blackwell Memorial Bridge, Arkansas.--
            (1) Designation.--The bridge over lock and dam numbered 4 on 
        the Arkansas River, Arkansas, constructed as part of the project 
        for navigation on the Arkansas River and tributaries, shall be 
        known and designated as the ``Lawrence Blackwell Memorial 
        Bridge''.
            (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the bridge referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 
        deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence Blackwell Memorial 
        Bridge''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 367]]

    (c) John H. Chafee National Wildlife Refuge.--Title II of Public Law 
100-610 (16 U.S.C. 668dd note; 102 Stat. 3176) is amended--
            (1) in the title heading, by striking ``PETTAQUAMSCUTT 
        COVE'' and inserting ``JOHN H. CHAFEE'';
            (2) in section 201--
                    (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) John H. Chafee has been a steadfast champion for the 
        conservation of fish, wildlife, and natural resources throughout 
        a distinguished career of public service to the people of Rhode 
        Island and the United States.'';
            (3) in section 202, by striking ``Pettaquamscutt Cove'' and 
        inserting ``John H. Chafee''; and
            (4) in section 203(1), by striking ``Pettaquamscutt Cove'' 
        and inserting ``John H. Chafee''.
SEC. 566. FOLSOM DAM AND RESERVOIR ADDITIONAL STORAGE AND 
                        ADDITIONAL FLOOD CONTROL STUDIES.

    (a) Folsom Flood Control Studies.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        State of California and local water resources agencies, shall 
        undertake a study of increasing surcharge flood control storage 
        at the Folsom Dam and Reservoir.
            (2) Limitations.--The study of the Folsom Dam and Reservoir 
        undertaken under paragraph (1) shall assume that there is to be 
        no increase in conservation storage at the Folsom Reservoir.
            (3) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than March 1, 
        2000, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
        results of the study under this subsection.

    (b) American and Sacramento Rivers Flood Control Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall undertake a study of 
        all levees on the American River and on the Sacramento River 
        downstream and immediately upstream of the confluence of such 
        Rivers to access opportunities to increase potential flood 
        protection through levee modifications.
            (2) Deadline for completion.--Not later than March 1, 2000, 
        the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results 
        of the study undertaken under this subsection.

SEC. 567. WALLOPS ISLAND, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Emergency Action.--The Secretary shall take emergency action to 
protect Wallops Island, Virginia, from damaging coastal storms, by 
improving and extending the existing seawall, replenishing and 
renourishing the beach, and constructing protective dunes.
    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary may seek reimbursement from other 
Federal agencies whose resources are protected by the emergency action 
taken under subsection (a).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $8,000,000.

[[Page 113 STAT. 368]]

SEC. 568. DETROIT RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    (a) Greenway Corridor Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of a project for shoreline protection, frontal 
erosion, and associated purposes in the Detroit River shoreline area 
from the Belle Isle Bridge to the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit, 
Michigan.
    (b) Potential Modifications.--As part of the study, the Secretary 
shall review potential project modifications to any Corps of Engineers 
project within the Detroit River shoreline area.
    (c) Repair and Rehabilitation.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and rehabilitate 
        the seawalls on the Detroit River in Detroit, Michigan, if the 
        Secretary determines that such work is technically sound, 
        environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1) $1,000,000 for the 
        period beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 569. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.

    (a) Definition of Northeastern Minnesota.--In this section, the term 
``northeastern Minnesota'' means the counties of Cook, Lake, St. Louis, 
Koochiching, Itasca, Cass, Crow Wing, Aitkin, Carlton, Pine, Kanabec, 
Mille Lacs, Morrison, Benton, Sherburne, Isanti, and Chisago, Minnesota.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
northeastern Minnesota.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in the 
form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in northeastern Minnesota, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs 
                under each local cooperation agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share

[[Page 113 STAT. 369]]

                may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for the reasonable costs 
                of design work completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a local cooperation agreement with 
                the Secretary for a project. The credit for the design 
                work shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than December 31, 2001, 
the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
pilot program carried out under this section, including recommendations 
concerning whether the program should be implemented on a national 
basis.

    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 570. ALASKA.

    (a) Definition of Native Corporation.--In this section, the term 
``Native Corporation'' has the meaning given the term in section 3 of 
the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602).
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Alaska.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in the 
form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Alaska, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
related facilities, water supply and related facilities, and surface 
water resource protection and development.

[[Page 113 STAT. 370]]

    (d) Ownership Requirements.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned 
or is owned by a Native Corporation.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project 
                costs under each local cooperation agreement entered 
                into under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The 
                Federal share may be in the form of grants or 
                reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for the reasonable costs 
                of design work completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a local cooperation agreement with 
                the Secretary for a project. The credit for the design 
                work shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal share of 
                the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than December 31, 2001, 
the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
pilot program

[[Page 113 STAT. 371]]

carried out under this section, including a recommendation concerning 
whether the program should be implemented on a national basis.

    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 571. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Definition of Central West Virginia.--In this section, the term 
``central West Virginia'' means the counties of Mason, Jackson, Putnam, 
Kanawha, Roane, Wirt, Calhoun, Clay, Nicholas, Braxton, Gilmer, Lewis, 
Upshur, Randolph, Pendleton, Hardy, Hampshire, Morgan, Berkeley, and 
Jefferson, West Virginia.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
central West Virginia.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in the 
form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in central West Virginia, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
and surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project 
                costs under each local cooperation agreement entered 
                into under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The 
                Federal share may be in the form of grants or 
                reimbursements of project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for the reasonable costs 
                of design work completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a local cooperation agreement with 
                the Secretary for a project. The credit for the design 
                work shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.

[[Page 113 STAT. 372]]

                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable 
                interest incurred in providing the non-Federal share of 
                the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than December 31, 2001, 
the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
pilot program carried out under this section, including a recommendation 
concerning whether the program should be implemented on a national 
basis.

    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.
SEC. 572. SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AREA WATERSHED RESTORATION, 
                        CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Limitation.--The Secretary may undertake studies to determine 
the extent of ground water contamination and the feasibility of 
prevention and cleanup of such contamination resulting from the acts of 
a Federal department or agency--
            (1) at or in the vicinity of McClellan Air Force Base, 
        Mather Air Force Base, or Sacramento Army Depot, California; or
            (2) at any place in the Sacramento metropolitan area 
        watershed where the Federal Government would be a responsible 
        party under any Federal environmental law.

    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 573. ONONDAGA LAKE, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) plan, design, and construct projects that are consistent 
        with the Onondaga Lake Management Plan and comply with the 
        amended consent judgment and the project labor agreement for the 
        environmental restoration, conservation, and management of 
        Onondaga Lake, New York; and
            (2) provide, in coordination with the Administrator of the 
        Environmental Protection Agency, financial assistance,

[[Page 113 STAT. 373]]

        including grants to the State of New York and political 
        subdivisions of the State, for the development and 
        implementation of projects to restore, conserve, and manage the 
        lake.

    (b) Partnership.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
        shall establish and lead a partnership with appropriate Federal 
        agencies (including the Environmental Protection Agency) and the 
        State of New York and political subdivisions of the State for 
        the purpose of development and implementation of the projects.
            (2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
                    (A) In general.--The partnership shall coordinate 
                the actions taken under this section with actions to 
                restore and conserve Onondaga Lake taken under other 
                provisions of Federal or State law.
                    (B) No effect on other law.--Except as provided in 
                subsection (g), this section does not alter, modify, or 
                affect any other provision of Federal or State law.
            (3) Termination.--Unless the Secretary and the Governor of 
        the State of New York agree otherwise, the partnership 
        established under this subsection shall terminate not later than 
        the date that is 15 years after the date of enactment of this 
        Act.

    (c) Revisions to the Onondaga Lake Management Plan.--
            (1) In general.--In consultation with the partnership 
        established under subsection (b) and after providing for public 
        review and comment, the Secretary and the Administrator of the 
        Environmental Protection Agency shall approve revisions to the 
        Onondaga Lake Management Plan if the Governor of the State of 
        New York concurs in the approval.
            (2) No effect on modification of amended consent judgment.--
        Paragraph (1) has no effect on the conditions under which the 
        amended consent judgment referred to in subsection (a)(1) may be 
        modified.

    (d) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        a project constructed under subsection (a) shall be not less 
        than 30 percent of the total cost of the project and may be 
        provided through the provision of in-kind services.
            (2) Administration and management.--The Secretary's 
        administration and management of the project shall be at full 
        Federal expense.

    (e) No Effect on Liability.--The provision of financial assistance 
under this section shall not relieve from liability any person that 
would otherwise be liable under Federal or State law for damages, 
response costs, natural resource damages, restitution, equitable relief, 
or any other relief.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
    (g) Repeal.--Title IV of the Great Lakes Critical Programs Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 3010) and section 411 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4648) are repealed effective on the date that is 
1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.

[[Page 113 STAT. 374]]

SEC. 574. EAST LYNN LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall defer any decision relating to the leasing of 
mineral resources underlying East Lynn Lake, West Virginia, project 
lands to the Federal entity vested with such leasing authority.

SEC. 575. EEL RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
whether flooding in the city of Ferndale, California, is the result of 
the Federal flood control project on the Eel River.
    (b) Mitigation Measures.--If the Secretary determines that the 
flooding is the result of the project, the Secretary shall take 
appropriate measures (including dredging of the Salt River and 
construction of sediment ponds at the confluence of Francis, Reas, and 
Williams Creeks) to mitigate the flooding.

SEC. 576. NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary--
            (1) shall review a report prepared by the non-Federal 
        interest concerning flood protection for the Dark Hollow area of 
        North Little Rock, Arkansas; and
            (2) if the Secretary determines that the report meets the 
        evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers and 
        that the project is economically justified, technically sound, 
        and environmentally acceptable, may carry out the project.
SEC. 577. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSISSIPPI PLACE, ST. PAUL, 
                        MINNESOTA.

    (a) In <<NOTE: Contracts.>> General.--The Secretary may enter into a 
cooperative agreement to participate in a project for the planning, 
design, and construction of infrastructure and other improvements at 
Mississippi Place, St. Paul, Minnesota.

    (b) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
        project shall be 50 percent. The Federal share may be provided 
        in the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
            (2) Credit for non-federal work.--The non-Federal interest 
        shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
        the project for reasonable costs incurred by the non-Federal 
        interest as a result of participation in the planning, design, 
        and construction of the project.
            (3) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit toward the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project for land, easements, rights-of-
        way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal interest with 
        respect to the project.
            (4) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for the project shall be 100 
        percent.

    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 578. DREDGING OF SALT PONDS IN THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary may acquire for the State of Rhode Island a dredge and 
associated equipment with the capacity to dredge approximately 100 cubic 
yards per hour for use by the State in dredging salt ponds in the State.

[[Page 113 STAT. 375]]

SEC. 579. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW 
                        YORK.

    Section 567(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3787) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) The Chemung River watershed, New York, at an estimated 
        Federal cost of $5,000,000.''.

SEC. 580. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND, FLOOD PROJECT MITIGATION.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control and other purposes, 
Cumberland, Maryland, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 
1936 (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1936'') (49 Stat. 
1574, chapter 688), is modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake, 
as a separate part of the project, restoration of the historic 
Chesapeake and Ohio Canal substantially in accordance with the 
Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historic Park, Cumberland, Maryland, 
Rewatering Design Analysis, dated February 1998, at a total cost of 
$15,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,750,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $5,250,000.
    (b) In-Kind Services.--The non-Federal interest for the restoration 
project under subsection (a)--
            (1) may provide all or a portion of the non-Federal share of 
        project costs in the form of in-kind services; and
            (2) shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs for design and construction work performed by the 
        non-Federal interest before execution of a project cooperation 
        agreement and for land, easements, and rights-of-way required 
        for the restoration and acquired by the non-Federal interest 
        before execution of such an agreement.

    (c) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation and maintenance of the 
restoration project under subsection (a) shall be the full 
responsibility of the National Park Service.

SEC. 581. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA.

    Section 5(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
426h), is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: ``, 
including the city of Miami Beach, Florida''.
SEC. 582. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE 
                        RIVERS SALMON SURVIVAL.

    Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (16 
U.S.C. 3301 note; Public Law 104-303) is amended by striking subsection 
(a) and all that follows and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Salmon Survival Activities.--
            ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of 
        Commerce and the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary shall 
        accelerate ongoing research and development activities, and may 
        carry out or participate in additional research and development 
        activities, for the purpose of developing innovative methods and 
        technologies for improving the survival of salmon, especially 
        salmon in the Columbia/Snake River Basin.
            ``(2) Accelerated activities.--Accelerated research and 
        development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include 
        research and development related to--
                    ``(A) impacts from water resources projects and 
                other impacts on salmon life cycles;
                    ``(B) juvenile and adult salmon passage;
                    ``(C) light and sound guidance systems;

[[Page 113 STAT. 376]]

                    ``(D) surface-oriented collector systems;
                    ``(E) transportation mechanisms; and
                    ``(F) dissolved gas monitoring and abatement.
            ``(3) Additional activities.--Additional research and 
        development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include 
        research and development related to--
                    ``(A) studies of juvenile salmon survival in 
                spawning and rearing areas;
                    ``(B) estuary and near-ocean juvenile and adult 
                salmon survival;
                    ``(C) impacts on salmon life cycles from sources 
                other than water resources projects;
                    ``(D) cryopreservation of fish gametes and formation 
                of a germ plasma repository for threatened and 
                endangered populations of native fish; and
                    ``(E) other innovative technologies and actions 
                intended to improve fish survival, including the 
                survival of resident fish.
            ``(4) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate any 
        activities carried out under this subsection with appropriate 
        Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian tribes, and 
        the Northwest Power Planning Council.
            ``(5) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 3 years 
        after the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1999, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on 
        the research and development activities carried out under this 
        subsection, including any recommendations of the Secretary 
        concerning the research and development activities.
            ``(6) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out research and 
        development activities under paragraph (3).

    ``(b) Advanced Turbine Development.--
            ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of 
        Energy, the Secretary shall accelerate efforts toward developing 
        and installing in Corps of Engineers-operated dams innovative, 
        efficient, and environmentally safe hydropower turbines, 
        including design of fish-friendly turbines, for use on the 
        Columbia/Snake River hydrosystem.
            ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $35,000,000 to carry out this subsection.

    ``(c) Management of Predation on Columbia/Snake River System Native 
Fishes.--
            ``(1) Nesting avian predators.--In conjunction with the 
        Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the Interior, and 
        consistent with a management plan to be developed by the United 
        States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Secretary shall carry out 
        methods to reduce nesting populations of avian predators on 
        dredge spoil islands in the Columbia River under the 
        jurisdiction of the Secretary.
            ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out research and 
        development activities under this subsection.

    ``(d) Implementation.--Nothing in this section affects the authority 
of the Secretary to implement the results of the research and 
development carried out under this section or any other law.''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 377]]

SEC. 583. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall work with the Secretary of Transportation on a 
proposed solution to carry out the project to maintain the Larkspur 
Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California, authorized by section 601(d) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148).

SEC. 584. HOLES CREEK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
non-Federal share of project costs for the project for flood control, 
Holes Creek, Ohio, shall not exceed the sum of--
            (1) the total amount projected as the non-Federal share as 
        of September 30, 1996, in the Project Cooperation Agreement 
        executed on that date; and
            (2) 100 percent of the amount of any increases in the cost 
        of the locally preferred plan over the cost estimated in the 
        Project Cooperation Agreement.

    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal 
interest any amount paid by the non-Federal interest in excess of the 
non-Federal share.

SEC. 585. <<NOTE: 33 USC 59hh.>> SAN JACINTO DISPOSAL AREA, GALVESTON, 
            TEXAS.

    Section 108 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
1994 (107 Stat. 1320), is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by inserting 
        ``all or any part of'' after ``absolute title to'';
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:

    ``(b) Compensation for Conveyance.--
            ``(1) In general.--Upon receipt of compensation from the 
        city of Galveston, the Secretary shall convey the parcel, or any 
        part of the parcel, as described in subsection (a).
            ``(2) Full parcel.--If the full 605-acre parcel is conveyed, 
        the compensation shall be--
                    ``(A) conveyance to the Department of the Army of 
                fee simple absolute title to a parcel of land containing 
                approximately 564 acres on Pelican Island, Texas, in the 
                Eneas Smith Survey, A-190, Pelican Island, city of 
                Galveston, Galveston County, Texas, adjacent to property 
                currently owned by the United States, with the fair 
                market value of the parcel being determined in 
                accordance with subsection (d); and
                    ``(B) payment to the United States of an amount 
                equal to the difference between the fair market value of 
                the parcel to be conveyed under subsection (a) and the 
                fair market value of the parcel to be conveyed under 
                subparagraph (A).
            ``(3) Partial parcel.--If the conveyance is 125 acres or 
        less, compensation shall be an amount equal to the fair market 
        value of the parcel to be conveyed, with the fair market value 
        of the parcel being determined in accordance with subsection 
        (d).''; and
            (3) in the second sentence of subsection (c)--
                    (A) by inserting ``, or any part of the parcel,'' 
                after ``parcel''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, if any,'' after ``LCA''.

[[Page 113 STAT. 378]]

SEC. 586. WATER MONITORING STATION.

    Section 584(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3791) is amended by striking ``$50,000'' and inserting 
``$100,000''.

SEC. 587. OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT FACILITY, RHODE ISLAND.

    Section 585 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3791) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``river'' and inserting 
        ``sewer''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``$30,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$60,000,000''.

SEC. 588. LOWER CHENA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary may expend up to $500,000 in fiscal year 2000 to 
complete the dredging project initiated on the Lower Chena River, 
Alaska.

SEC. 589. NUMANA DAM FISH PASSAGE, NEVADA.

    After the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
complete planning, design, and construction of the Numana Dam Fish 
Passage Project, currently being evaluated under section 1135 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), under section 
906(b) of that Act (33 U.S.C. 2283(b)).

SEC. 590. EMBREY DAM, VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall remove the Embrey Dam on the 
Rappahannock River at Fredericksburg, Virginia, at full Federal expense.
    (b) Use of Existing Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite the 
feasibility study and preconstruction, engineering, and design of the 
project by using, to the maximum extent practicable, existing studies 
prepared by the State and non-Federal interests.
    (c) Authorization.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 591. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION, FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Participation of Secretary.--
            (1) Authorization.--The Secretary shall participate with 
        other Federal departments and agencies in environmental 
        restoration and remediation activities (including the demolition 
        of contaminated buildings) at the Avtex Fibers facility in Front 
        Royal, Virginia, at full Federal expense.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
        be appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000.

    (b) Participation of Secretary of Defense.--
            (1) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall make 
        available $5,000,000 for environmental restoration and 
        remediation activities (including the demolition of contaminated 
        buildings) at the Avtex Fibers facility in Front Royal, 
        Virginia.
            (2) Source of funds.--The amount made available under 
        paragraph (1) shall be derived from amounts in the Environmental 
        Restoration Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, established by 
        section 2703 of title 10, United States Code.

[[Page 113 STAT. 379]]

SEC. 592. MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Mississippi.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in the 
form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Mississippi, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
related facilities, elimination or control of combined sewer overflows, 
water supply and related facilities, environmental restoration, and 
surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (d) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs 
                under each local cooperation agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for the reasonable costs 
                of design work completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a local cooperation agreement with 
                the Secretary for a project. The credit for the design 
                work shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project

[[Page 113 STAT. 380]]

                on publicly owned or controlled land), but not to exceed 
                25 percent of total project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than December 31, 2001, 
the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
pilot program carried out under this section, including recommendations 
concerning whether the program should be implemented on a national 
basis.

    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 593. CENTRAL NEW MEXICO.

    (a) Definition of Central New Mexico.--In this section, the term 
``central New Mexico'' means the counties of Bernalillo, Sandoval, and 
Valencia, New Mexico.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
central New Mexico.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in the 
form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in central New Mexico, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply, conservation, and 
related facilities, stormwater retention and remediation, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--

[[Page 113 STAT. 381]]

                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs 
                under each local cooperation agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for the reasonable costs 
                of design work completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a local cooperation agreement with 
                the Secretary for a project. The credit for the design 
                work shall not exceed 6 percent of the total 
                construction costs of the project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project's costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward the 
                non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than December 31, 2001, 
the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
pilot program carried out under this section, including recommendations 
concerning whether the program should be implemented on a national 
basis.

    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 594. OHIO.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Ohio.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in the 
form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Ohio, including projects for--
            (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
            (2) combined sewer overflow, water supply, storage, 
        treatment, and related facilities;
            (3) mine drainage;

[[Page 113 STAT. 382]]

            (4) environmental restoration; and
            (5) surface water resource protection and development.

    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (d) Project Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a project cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each project cooperation agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall provide for the 
        following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities development plan or resource 
                protection plan, including appropriate plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs 
                under each project cooperation agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.
                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for the reasonable costs 
                of design work completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a project cooperation agreement 
                with the Secretary.
                    (C) Credit for certain financing costs.--In case of 
                a delay in the reimbursement of the non-Federal share of 
                the costs of a project, the non-Federal interest shall 
                receive credit for reasonable interest and other 
                associated financing costs necessary for the non-Federal 
                interest to provide the non-Federal share of the project 
                costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations provided by the non-Federal interest toward 
                the non-Federal share of project costs (including costs 
                associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
                placement of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
                land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project 
                costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed under an agreement entered into under this 
                subsection shall be 100 percent.

    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.

[[Page 113 STAT. 383]]

    (f) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than December 31, 2001, 
the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
program carried out under this section, including recommendations 
concerning whether the program should be implemented on a national 
basis.

    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $60,000,000.

SEC. 595. RURAL NEVADA AND MONTANA.

    (a) Definition of Rural Nevada.--In this section, the term ``rural 
Nevada'' means--
            (1) the counties of Lincoln, White Pine, Nye, Eureka, Elko, 
        Humboldt, Pershing, Churchill, Storey, Lyon, Carson, Douglas, 
        Mineral, Esmeralda, and Lander, Nevada;
            (2) the portions of Washoe County, Nevada, that are located 
        outside the cities of Reno and Sparks; and
            (3) the portions of Clark County, Nevada, that are located 
        outside the cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, and Henderson 
        and the unincorporated portion of the county in the Las Vegas 
        Valley.

    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a program 
for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in rural 
Nevada and Montana.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in the 
form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in rural Nevada and Montana, including projects for--
            (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
            (2) water supply and related facilities;
            (3) environmental restoration; and
            (4) surface water resource protection and development.

    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional structures 
                as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
                operation of the project by the non-Federal interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs 
                under each local cooperation agreement entered into 
                under this subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal 
                share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
                project costs.

[[Page 113 STAT. 384]]

                    (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal 
                interest shall receive credit for the reasonable costs 
                of design work completed by the non-Federal interest 
                before entering into a local cooperation agreement with 
                the Secretary for a project.
                    (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
                project that is the subject of an agreement under this 
                section, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
                for reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of the project costs.
                    (D) Land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
                credit for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations provided by the non-Federal interest toward 
                the non-Federal share of project costs (including all 
                reasonable costs associated with obtaining permits 
                necessary for the construction, operation, and 
                maintenance of the project on publicly owned or 
                controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total 
                project costs.
                    (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                share of operation and maintenance costs for projects 
                constructed with assistance provided under this section 
                shall be 100 percent.

    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than December 31, 2001, 
the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the 
program carried out under this section, including recommendations 
concerning whether the program should be implemented on a national 
basis.

    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section for the period beginning with 
fiscal year 2001--
            (1) $25,000,000 for rural Nevada; and
            (2) $25,000,000 for Montana;

to remain available until expended.

SEC. 596. PHOENIX, ARIZONA.

    Section 1608 of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-6) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:

    ``(a) The Secretary, in cooperation with the city of Phoenix, 
Arizona, shall participate in the planning, design, and construction of 
the Phoenix Metropolitan Water Reclamation and Reuse Project to utilize 
fully wastewater from the regional wastewater treatment plant for direct 
municipal, industrial, agricultural and environmental purposes, 
groundwater recharge and indirect potable reuse in the Phoenix 
metropolitan area.'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking the first sentence; and
            (3) by striking subsection (c).

[[Page 113 STAT. 385]]

SEC. 597. NATIONAL HARBOR, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The first section of Public Law 99-215 (99 Stat. 
1724) is amended in the first sentence of subsection (a)(2) by striking 
``solely'' and inserting ``for transportation or''.
    (b) Revision <<NOTE: Deadline.>> of Quitclaim Deed.--Not later than 
30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall--
            (1) with the consent of the grantee, withdraw and revise any 
        terms or conditions in the quitclaim deed of December 16, 1986, 
        between the United States and the Maryland-National Capital Park 
        and Planning Commission that limit the authority of the 
        Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission to use 
        the property for transportation purposes; and
            (2) prepare, execute, and record a deed that is consistent 
        with this section and the amendment made by subsection (a).

    (c) Effect on Environmental Law.--Nothing in this section abrogates 
any requirement of any environmental law.

TITLE VI--CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND STATE 
        OF SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION

SEC. 601. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the South 
        Dakota Cultural Resources Advisory Commission established by 
        section 605(j).
            (2) Restoration.--The term ``restoration'' means mitigation 
        of the habitat of wildlife.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Army.
            (4) Terrestrial wildlife habitat.--The term ``terrestrial 
        wildlife habitat'' means a habitat for a wildlife species 
        (including game and nongame species) that existed or exists on 
        an upland habitat (including a prairie grassland, woodland, 
        bottom land forest, scrub, or shrub) or an emergent wetland 
        habitat.
            (5) Wildlife.--The term ``wildlife'' has the meaning given 
        the term in section 8 of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act 
        (16 U.S.C. 666b).

SEC. 602. TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION.

    (a) Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Plans.--
            (1) In general.--In accordance with this subsection and in 
        consultation with the Secretary and the Secretary of the 
        Interior, the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux 
        Tribe, and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall, as a condition of 
        the receipt of funds under this title, each develop a plan for 
        the restoration of terrestrial wildlife habitat loss that 
        occurred as a result of flooding related to the Big Bend and 
        Oahe projects carried out as part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri 
        River Basin program.

[[Page 113 STAT. 386]]

            (2) Submission of plan to secretary.--On completion of a 
        plan for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, the State of 
        South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and the Lower 
        Brule Sioux Tribe shall submit the plan to the Secretary.
            (3) Review by secretary and submission to committees.--The 
        Secretary shall review the plan and submit the plan, with any 
        comments, to the appropriate committees of the Senate and the 
        House of Representatives.
            (4) Funding for carrying out plans.--
                    (A) State of south dakota.--
                          (i) Notification.--On receipt of the plan for 
                      terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted 
                      by the State of South Dakota, each of the 
                      committees referred to in paragraph (3) shall 
                      notify the Secretary of the receipt of the plan.
                          (ii) Availability of funds.--On notification 
                      in accordance with clause (i), the Secretary shall 
                      make available to the State of South Dakota funds 
                      from the South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat 
                      Restoration Trust Fund established under section 
                      603, to be used to carry out the plan for 
                      terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted 
                      by the State and only after the Trust Fund is 
                      fully capitalized.
                    (B) Cheyenne river sioux tribe and lower brule sioux 
                tribe.--
                          (i) Notification.--On receipt of the plan for 
                      terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted 
                      by the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
                      Brule Sioux Tribe, each of the committees referred 
                      to in paragraph (3) shall notify the Secretary of 
                      the Treasury of the receipt of each of the plans.
                          (ii) Availability of funds.--On notification 
                      in accordance with clause (i), the Secretary of 
                      the Treasury shall make available to the Cheyenne 
                      River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
                      funds from the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 
                      Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust 
                      Fund and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial 
                      Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund, 
                      respectively, established under section 604, to be 
                      used to carry out the plan for terrestrial 
                      wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the 
                      Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule 
                      Sioux Tribe, respectively, and only after the 
                      Trust Fund is fully capitalized.
                    (C) Transition period.--
                          (i) In general.--During the period described 
                      in clause (ii), the Secretary shall--
                                    (I) fund the terrestrial wildlife 
                                habitat restoration programs being 
                                carried out on the date of enactment of 
                                this Act on Oahe and Big Bend project 
                                land and the plans established under 
                                this section at a level that does not 
                                exceed the highest amount of funding 
                                that was provided for the programs 
                                during a previous fiscal year; and
                                    (II) fund the activities described 
                                in sections 603(d)(3) and 604(d)(3).

[[Page 113 STAT. 387]]

                          (ii) Period.--Clause (i) shall apply during 
                      the period--
                                    (I) beginning on the date of 
                                enactment of this Act; and
                                    (II) ending on the date on which 
                                funds are made available for use from 
                                the South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife 
                                Habitat Restoration Trust Fund under 
                                section 603(d)(3)(A)(i) and the Cheyenne 
                                River Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife 
                                Habitat Restoration Trust Fund and the 
                                Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial 
                                Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund 
                                under section 604(d)(3)(A)(i).

    (b) Programs for the Purchase of Wildlife Habitat Leases.--
            (1) In general.--The State of South Dakota may use funds 
        made available under section 603(d)(3)(A)(iii) to develop a 
        program for the purchase of wildlife habitat leases that meets 
        the requirements of this subsection.
            (2) Development of a plan.--
                    (A) In general.--If the State of South Dakota, the 
                Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower Brule Sioux 
                Tribe elects to conduct a program under this subsection, 
                the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux 
                Tribe, or the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe (in consultation 
                with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the 
                Secretary and with an opportunity for public comment) 
                shall develop a plan to lease land for the protection 
                and development of wildlife habitat, including habitat 
                for threatened and endangered species, associated with 
                the Missouri River ecosystem.
                    (B) Use for program.--The plan shall be used by the 
                State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 
                or the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe in carrying out the 
                program carried out under paragraph (1).
            (3) Conditions of leases.--Each lease covered under a 
        program carried out under paragraph (1) shall specify that the 
        owner of the property that is subject to the lease shall 
        provide--
                    (A) public access for sportsmen during hunting 
                season; and
                    (B) public access for other outdoor uses covered 
                under the lease, as negotiated by the landowner and the 
                State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 
                or the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe.
            (4) Use of assistance.--
                    (A) State of south dakota.--If the State of South 
                Dakota conducts a program under this subsection, the 
                State may use funds made available under section 
                603(d)(3)(A)(iii) to--
                          (i) acquire easements, rights-of-way, or 
                      leases for management and protection of wildlife 
                      habitat, including habitat for threatened and 
                      endangered species, and public access to wildlife 
                      on private property in the State of South Dakota;
                          (ii) create public access to Federal or State 
                      land through the purchase of easements or rights-
                      of-way that traverse such private property; or

[[Page 113 STAT. 388]]

                          (iii) lease land for the creation or 
                      restoration of a wetland on such private property.
                    (B) Cheyenne river sioux tribe and lower brule sioux 
                tribe.--If the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe or the Lower 
                Brule Sioux Tribe conducts a program under this 
                subsection, the Tribe may use funds made available under 
                section 604(d)(3)(A)(iii) for the purposes described in 
                subparagraph (A).

    (c) Federal Obligation for Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Mitigation 
for the Big Bend and Oahe Projects in South Dakota.--The establishment 
of the trust funds under sections 603 and 604 and the development and 
implementation of plans for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration 
developed by the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 
and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe in accordance with this section shall be 
considered to satisfy the Federal obligation under the Fish and Wildlife 
Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) for terrestrial wildlife 
habitat mitigation for the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River 
Sioux Tribe, and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe for the Big Bend and Oahe 
projects carried out as part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
program.
SEC. 603. SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION 
                        TRUST FUND.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established in the Treasury of the 
United States a fund to be known as the ``South Dakota Terrestrial 
Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund'' (referred to in this section 
as the ``Fund'').
    (b) Funding.--For the fiscal year during which this Act is enacted 
and each fiscal year thereafter until the aggregate amount deposited in 
the Fund under this subsection is equal to at least $108,000,000, the 
Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer $10,000,000 from the general 
fund of the Treasury to the Fund.
    (c) Investments.--
            (1) In general.--At the request of the Secretary, the 
        Secretary of the Treasury shall invest the amounts deposited 
        under subsection (b) only in interest-bearing obligations of the 
        United States or in obligations guaranteed by the United States 
        as to both principal and interest.
            (2) Interest rate.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
        invest amounts in the fund in obligations that carry the highest 
        rate of interest among available obligations of the required 
        maturity.

    (d) Payments.--
            (1) In general.--All amounts credited as interest under 
        subsection (c) shall be available, without fiscal year 
        limitation, to the State of South Dakota for use in accordance 
        with paragraph (3) after the Fund has been fully capitalized.
            (2) Withdrawal and transfer of funds.--Subject to section 
        602(a)(4)(A), the Secretary shall withdraw amounts credited as 
        interest under paragraph (1) and transfer the amounts to the 
        State of South Dakota for use as State funds in accordance with 
        paragraph (3) after the Fund has been fully capitalized.
            (3) Use of transferred funds.--

[[Page 113 STAT. 389]]

                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the 
                State of South Dakota shall use the amounts transferred 
                under paragraph (2) only to--
                          (i) fully fund the annually scheduled work 
                      described in the terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                      restoration plan of the State developed under 
                      section 602(a); and
                          (ii) with any remaining funds--
                                    (I) protect archaeological, 
                                historical, and cultural sites located 
                                along the Missouri River on land 
                                transferred to the State;
                                    (II) fund all costs associated with 
                                the ownership, management, operation, 
                                administration, maintenance, and 
                                development of recreation areas and 
                                other lands that are transferred to the 
                                State of South Dakota by the Secretary;
                                    (III) purchase and administer 
                                wildlife habitat leases under section 
                                602(b);
                                    (IV) carry out other activities 
                                described in section 602; and
                                    (V) develop and maintain public 
                                access to, and protect, wildlife habitat 
                                and recreation areas along the Missouri 
                                River.
                    (B) Prohibition.--The amounts transferred under 
                paragraph (2) shall not be used for the purchase of land 
                in fee title.

    (e) Transfers and Withdrawals.--Except as provided in subsection 
(d), the Secretary may not transfer or withdraw any amount deposited 
under subsection (b).
    (f) 
Administrative <<NOTE: Appropriation authorization.>> Expenses.--There 
are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury such 
sums as are necessary to pay the administrative expenses of the Fund.
SEC. 604. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE AND LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE 
                        TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION 
                        TRUST FUNDS.

    (a) Establishment.--There are established in the Treasury of the 
United States 2 funds to be known as the ``Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 
Terrestrial Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund'' and the ``Lower Brule 
Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund'' (each 
of which is referred to in this section as a ``Fund'').
    (b) Funding.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), for the fiscal 
        year during which this Act is enacted and each fiscal year 
        thereafter until the aggregate amount deposited in the Funds 
        under this subsection is equal to at least $57,400,000, the 
        Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer $5,000,000 from the 
        general fund of the Treasury to the Funds.
            (2) Allocation.--Of the total amount of funds deposited in 
        the Funds for a fiscal year, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
        deposit--
                    (A) 74 percent of the funds into the Cheyenne River 
                Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund; 
                and
                    (B) 26 percent of the funds into the Lower Brule 
                Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration 
                Trust Fund.

    (c) Investments.--

[[Page 113 STAT. 390]]

            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
        the amounts deposited under subsection (b) only in interest-
        bearing obligations of the United States or in obligations 
        guaranteed as to both principal and interest by the United 
        States.
            (2) Interest rate.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall 
        invest amounts in the Funds in obligations that carry the 
        highest rate of interest among available obligations of the 
        required maturity.

    (d) Payments.--
            (1) In general.--All amounts credited as interest under 
        subsection (c) shall be available after the Trust Funds are 
        fully capitalized, without fiscal year limitation, to the 
        Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe for 
        their use in accordance with paragraph (3).
            (2) Withdrawal and transfer of funds.--Subject to section 
        602(a)(4)(B), the Secretary of the Treasury shall withdraw 
        amounts credited as interest under paragraph (1) and transfer 
        the amounts to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
        Brule Sioux Tribe for use in accordance with paragraph (3).
            (3) Use of transferred funds.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the 
                Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux 
                Tribe shall use the amounts transferred under paragraph 
                (2) only to--
                          (i) fully fund the annually scheduled work 
                      described in the terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                      restoration plan of the respective Tribe developed 
                      under section 602(a); and
                          (ii) with any remaining funds--
                                    (I) protect archaeological, 
                                historical, and cultural sites located 
                                along the Missouri River on land 
                                transferred to the respective Tribe;
                                    (II) fund all costs associated with 
                                the ownership, management, operation, 
                                administration, maintenance, and 
                                development of recreation areas and 
                                other lands that are transferred to the 
                                respective Tribe by the Secretary;
                                    (III) purchase and administer 
                                wildlife habitat leases under section 
                                602(b);
                                    (IV) carry out other activities 
                                described in section 602; and
                                    (V) develop and maintain public 
                                access to, and protect, wildlife habitat 
                                and recreation areas along the Missouri 
                                River.
                    (B) Prohibition.--The amounts transferred under 
                paragraph (2) shall not be used for the purchase of land 
                in fee title.

    (e) Transfers and Withdrawals.--Except as provided in subsection 
(d), the Secretary of the Treasury may not transfer or withdraw any 
amount deposited under subsection (b).
    (f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury such sums as are necessary 
to pay the administrative expenses of the Fund.

SEC. 605. TRANSFER OF FEDERAL LAND TO STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) In General.--

[[Page 113 STAT. 391]]

            (1) Transfer.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall transfer to the 
                Department of Game, Fish and Parks of the State of South 
                Dakota (referred to in this section as the 
                ``Department'') the land and recreation areas described 
                in subsections (b) and (c) for fish and wildlife 
                purposes, or public recreation uses, in perpetuity.
                    (B) Permits, rights-of-way, and easements.--All 
                permits, rights-of-way, and easements granted by the 
                Secretary to the Oglala Sioux Tribe for land on the west 
                side of the Missouri River between the Oahe Dam and 
                Highway 14, and all permits, rights-of-way, and 
                easements on any other land administered by the 
                Secretary and used by the Oglala Sioux Rural Water 
                Supply System, are granted to the Oglala Sioux Tribe in 
                perpetuity to be held in trust under section 3(e) of the 
                Mni Wiconi Project Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 2568).
            (2) Uses.--The Department shall maintain and develop the 
        land outside the recreation areas for fish and wildlife purposes 
        in accordance with--
                    (A) fish and wildlife purposes in effect on the date 
                of enactment of this Act; or
                    (B) a plan developed under section 602.
            (3) Corps of engineers.--The transfer shall not interfere 
        with the Corps of Engineers operation of a project under this 
        section for an authorized purpose of the project under the Act 
        of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 U.S.C. 701-1 
        et seq.), or other applicable law.
            (4) Secretary.--The Secretary shall retain the right to 
        inundate with water the land transferred to the Department under 
        this section or draw down a project reservoir, as necessary to 
        carry out an authorized purpose of a project.

    (b) Land Transferred.--The land described in this subsection is land 
that--
            (1) is located above the top of the exclusive flood pool of 
        the Oahe, Big Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavin's Point projects of 
        the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program;
            (2) was acquired by the Secretary for the implementation of 
        the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program;
            (3) is located outside the external boundaries of a 
        reservation of an Indian Tribe; and
            (4) is located within the State of South Dakota.

    (c) Recreation Areas Transferred.--A recreation area described in 
this section includes the land and facilities within a recreation area 
that--
            (1) the Secretary determines, at the time of the transfer, 
        is a recreation area classified for recreation use by the Corps 
        of Engineers on the date of enactment of this Act;
            (2) is located outside the external boundaries of a 
        reservation of an Indian Tribe;
            (3) is located within the State of South Dakota;
            (4) is not the recreation area known as ``Cottonwood'', 
        ``Training Dike'', or ``Tailwaters''; and
            (5) is located below Gavin's Point Dam in the State of South 
        Dakota in accordance with boundary agreements and reciprocal 
        fishing agreements between the State of South Dakota and the 
        State of Nebraska in effect on the date of

[[Page 113 STAT. 392]]

        enactment of this Act, which agreements shall continue to be 
        honored by the State of South Dakota as the agreements apply to 
        any land or recreation areas transferred under this title to the 
        State of South Dakota below Gavin's Point Dam and on the waters 
        of the Missouri River.

    (d) Map.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Department, shall prepare a map of the land and recreation areas 
        transferred under this section.
            (2) Land.--The map shall identify--
                    (A) land reasonably expected to be required for 
                project purposes during the 20-year period beginning on 
                the date of enactment of this Act; and
                    (B) dams and related structures;
        which shall be retained by the Secretary.
            (3) Availability.--The map shall be on file in the 
        appropriate offices of the Secretary.

    (e) Schedule for Transfer.--
            (1) In general.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 1 year 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 
        Army and the Secretary of the Department shall jointly develop a 
        schedule for transferring the land and recreation areas under 
        this section.
            (2) Transfer deadline.--All land and recreation areas shall 
        be transferred not later than 1 year after the full 
        capitalization of the Trust Fund described in section 603.

    (f) Transfer Conditions.--The land and recreation areas described in 
subsections (b) and (c) shall be transferred in fee title to the 
Department on the following conditions:
            (1) Responsibility for damage.--The Secretary shall not be 
        responsible for any damage to the land caused by flooding, 
        sloughing, erosion, or other changes to the land caused by the 
        operation of any project of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
        program (except as otherwise provided by Federal law).
            (2) Easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
        agreements.--The Department shall maintain all easements, 
        rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing agreements that are in 
        effect as of the date of the transfer.

    (g) Hunting and Fishing.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in this section, nothing 
        in this title affects jurisdiction over the waters of the 
        Missouri River below the water's edge and outside the exterior 
        boundaries of an Indian reservation in South Dakota.
            (2) Jurisdiction.--
                    (A) Transferred land.--On transfer of the land under 
                this section to the State of South Dakota, jurisdiction 
                over the land shall be the same as that over other land 
                owned by the State of South Dakota.
                    (B) Land between the missouri river water's edge and 
                the level of the exclusive flood pool.--Jurisdiction 
                over land between the Missouri River water's edge and 
                the level of the exclusive flood pool outside Indian 
                reservations in the State of South Dakota shall be the 
                same as that exercised by the State on other land owned 
                by the State, and that jurisdiction shall follow the 
                fluctuations of the water's edge.

[[Page 113 STAT. 393]]

                    (C) Federal land.--Jurisdiction over land and water 
                owned by the Federal Government within the boundaries of 
                the State of South Dakota that are not affected by this 
                title shall remain unchanged.
            (3) Easements and access.--The Secretary shall provide the 
        State of South Dakota with easements and access on land and 
        water below the level of the exclusive flood pool outside Indian 
        reservations in the State of South Dakota for recreational and 
        other purposes (including for boat docks, boat ramps, and 
        related structures), so long as the easements would not prevent 
        the Corps of Engineers from carrying out its mission under the 
        Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
        public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for 
        other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (commonly known as 
        the ``Flood Control Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 887).

    (h) Applicability of Law.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
this Act, the following provisions of law shall apply to land 
transferred under this section:
            (1) The National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et 
        seq.), including sections 106 and 304 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 
        470f, 470w-3).
            (2) The Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 
        U.S.C. 470aa et seq.), including sections 4, 6, 7, and 9 of that 
        Act (16 U.S.C. 470cc, 470ee, 470ff, 470hh).
            (3) The Native American Graves Protection Act and 
        Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), including subsections 
        (a) and (d) of section 3 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 3003).

    (i) Impact Aid.--The land transferred under subsection (a) shall be 
deemed to continue to be owned by the United States for purposes of 
section 8002 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 7702).
SEC. 606. TRANSFER OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS LAND FOR INDIAN TRIBES.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Transfer.--The Secretary of the Army shall transfer to 
        the Secretary of the Interior the land and recreation areas 
        described in subsections (b) and (c) for the use of the Indian 
        Tribes in perpetuity.
            (2) Corps of engineers.--The transfer shall not interfere 
        with the Corps of Engineers operation of a project under this 
        section for an authorized purpose of the project under the Act 
        of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 U.S.C. 701-1 
        et seq.), or other applicable law.
            (3) Secretary of the army.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
        retain the right to inundate with water the land transferred to 
        the Secretary of the Interior under this section or draw down a 
        project reservoir, as necessary to carry out an authorized 
        purpose of a project.
            (4) Trust.--The Secretary of the Interior shall hold in 
        trust for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule 
        Sioux Tribe the land transferred under this section that is 
        located within the external boundaries of the reservation of the 
        Indian Tribes.

    (b) Land Transferred.--The land described in this subsection is land 
that--

[[Page 113 STAT. 394]]

            (1) is located above the top of the exclusive flood pool of 
        the Big Bend and Oahe projects of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River 
        Basin program;
            (2) was acquired by the Secretary of the Army for the 
        implementation of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program; 
        and
            (3) is located within the external boundaries of the 
        reservation of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
        Brule Sioux Tribe.

    (c) Recreation Areas Transferred.--A recreation area described in 
this section includes the land and facilities within a recreation area 
that--
            (1) the Secretary determines, at the time of the transfer, 
        is a recreation area classified for recreation
use by the Corps of Engineers on the date of enactment of this Act;
            (2) is located within the external boundaries of a 
        reservation of an Indian Tribe; and
            (3) is located within the State of South Dakota.

    (d) Map.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        governing bodies of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
        Brule Sioux Tribe, shall prepare a map of the land transferred 
        under this section.
            (2) Land.--The map shall identify--
                    (A) land reasonably expected to be required for 
                project purposes during the 20-year period beginning on 
                the date of enactment of this Act; and
                    (B) dams and related structures;
        which shall be retained by the Secretary.
            (3) Availability.--The map shall be on file in the 
        appropriate offices of the Secretary.

    (e) Schedule for Transfer.--
            (1) In general.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 1 year 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the 
        Chairmen of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule 
        Sioux Tribe shall jointly develop a schedule for transferring 
        the land and recreation areas under this section.
            (2) Transfer deadline.--All land and recreation areas shall 
        be transferred not later than 1 year after the full 
        capitalization of the State and tribal Trust Fund described in 
        section 604.

    (f) Transfer Conditions.--The land and recreation areas described in 
subsections (b) and (c) shall be transferred to, and held in trust by, 
the Secretary of the Interior on the following conditions:
            (1) Responsibility for damage.--The Secretary shall not be 
        responsible for any damage to the land caused by flooding, 
        sloughing, erosion, or other changes to the land caused by the 
        operation of any project of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
        program (except as otherwise provided by Federal law).
            (2) Hunting and fishing.--
                    (A) In general.--Except as provided in this section, 
                nothing in this title affects jurisdiction over the 
                waters of the Missouri River below the water's edge and 
                within the exterior boundaries of the Cheyenne River 
                Sioux and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe reservations.
                    (B) Jurisdiction.--

[[Page 113 STAT. 395]]

                          (i) In general.--On transfer of the land to 
                      the respective tribes under this section, 
                      jurisdiction over the land and on land between the 
                      water's edge and the level of the exclusive flood 
                      pool within the respective Tribe's reservation 
                      boundaries shall be the same as that over land 
                      held in trust by the Secretary of the Interior on 
                      the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation and the Lower 
                      Brule Sioux Reservation, and that jurisdiction 
                      shall follow the fluctuations of the water's edge.
                          (ii) Jurisdiction unaffected.--Jurisdiction 
                      over land and water owned by the Federal 
                      Government and held in trust for the Cheyenne 
                      River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe that 
                      is not affected by this title shall remain 
                      unchanged.
                    (C) Easements and access.--The Secretary shall 
                provide the Tribes with such easements and access on 
                land and water below the level of the exclusive flood 
                pool inside the respective Indian reservations for 
                recreational and other purposes (including for boat 
                docks, boat ramps, and related structures), so long as 
                the easements would not prevent the Corps of Engineers 
                from carrying out its mission under the Act entitled 
                ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public 
                works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for 
                other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (commonly 
                known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 
                887).
            (3) Easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
        agreements.--
                    (A) Maintenance.--The Secretary of the Interior 
                shall maintain all easements, rights-of-way, leases, and 
                cost-sharing agreements that are in effect as of the 
                date of the transfer.
                    (B) Payments to county.--The Secretary of the 
                Interior shall pay any affected county 100 percent of 
                the receipts from the easements, rights-of-way, leases, 
                and cost-sharing agreements described in subparagraph 
                (A).

    (g) Exterior Indian Reservation Boundaries.--Nothing in this section 
diminishes, changes, or otherwise affects the exterior boundaries of a 
reservation of an Indian Tribe.

SEC. 607. ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Nothing in this title diminishes or affects--
            (1) any water right of an Indian Tribe;
            (2) any other right of an Indian Tribe, except as 
        specifically provided in another provision of this title;
            (3) any treaty right that is in effect on the date of 
        enactment of this Act;
            (4) any external boundary of an Indian reservation of an 
        Indian Tribe;
            (5) any authority of the State of South Dakota that relates 
        to the protection, regulation, or management of fish, 
        terrestrial wildlife, and cultural and archaeological resources, 
        except as specifically provided in this title; or
            (6) any authority of the Secretary, the Secretary of the 
        Interior, or the head of any other Federal agency under a law in 
        effect on the date of enactment of this Act, including--

[[Page 113 STAT. 396]]

                    (A) the National Historic Preservation Act (16 
                U.S.C. 470 et seq.);
                    (B) the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 
                1979 (16 U.S.C. 470aa et seq.);
                    (C) the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 
                U.S.C. 661 et seq.);
                    (D) the Act entitled ``An Act for the protection of 
                the bald eagle'', approved June 8, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668 
                et seq.);
                    (E) the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et 
                seq.);
                    (F) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
                1531 et seq.);
                    (G) the Native American Graves Protection and 
                Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.);
                    (H) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
                (commonly known as the ``Clean Water Act'') (33 U.S.C. 
                1251 et seq.);
                    (I) the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et 
                seq.); and
                    (J) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
                (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

    (b) Federal Liability for Damage.--Nothing in this title relieves 
the Federal Government of liability for damage to private property 
caused by the operation of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program.
    (c) Flood Control.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
title, the Secretary shall retain the authority to operate the Pick-
Sloan Missouri River Basin program for purposes of meeting the 
requirements of the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665; 
33 U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.).

SEC. 608. STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall arrange for the United States 
Geological Survey, in consultation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs and 
other appropriate Federal agencies, to complete, not later than October 
31, 1999, a comprehensive study of the potential impacts of the transfer 
of land under sections 605(b) and 606(b), including potential impacts on 
South Dakota Sioux Tribes having water claims within the Missouri River 
Basin, on water flows in the Missouri River.
    (b) No Transfer Pending Determination.--No transfer of land under 
section 605(b) or 606(b) shall occur until the Secretary determines, 
based on the study, that the transfer of land under either section will 
not significantly reduce the amount of water flow to the downstream 
States of the Missouri River.
    (c) State Water Rights.--The results of the study shall not affect, 
and shall not be taken into consideration in, any proceeding to quantify 
the water rights of any State.
    (d) Indian Water Rights.--The results of the study shall not affect, 
and shall not be taken into consideration in, any proceeding to quantify 
the water rights of any Indian Tribe or tribal nation.

SEC. 609. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Secretary.--There are authorized to be appropriated to the 
Secretary such sums as are necessary--
            (1) to pay the administrative expenses incurred by the 
        Secretary in carrying out this title;

[[Page 113 STAT. 397]]

            (2) to fund the implementation of terrestrial wildlife 
        habitat restoration plans under section 602(a) and other 
        activities under sections 603(d)(3) and 604(d)(3); and
            (3) to fund the annual expenses (not to exceed the Federal 
        cost as of the date of enactment of this Act) of operating 
        recreation areas to be transferred under sections 605(c) and 
        606(c) or leased by the State of South Dakota or Indian Tribes, 
        until such time as the trust funds under sections 603 and 604 
        are fully capitalized.

    (b) Secretary of the Interior.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior such sums as are necessary 
to pay the administrative expenses incurred by the Secretary of the 
Interior in carrying out this title.

    Approved August 17, 1999.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 507 (H.R. 1480):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: Nos. 106-106, Pt. 1 accompanying H.R. 1480 (Comm. on 
Transportation and Infrastructure) and 106-298 (Comm. of Conference).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 106-34 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 145 (1999):
            Apr. 19, considered and passed Senate.
            July 22, considered and passed House, amended, in lieu of 
                H.R. 1480.
            Aug. 5, Senate and House agreed to conference report.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 35 (1999):
            Aug. 17, Presidential statement.

                                  <all>