There is 1 version of this bill. View text

Click the check-box to add or remove the section, click the text link to scroll to that section.
Titles Actions Overview All Actions Cosponsors Committees Related Bills Subjects Latest Summary All Summaries

Titles (1)

Official Titles

Official Titles - Senate

Official Titles as Introduced

A resolution to authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of John Jenkel v. Daniel K. Akaka, et al.


Actions Overview (2)

Date Actions Overview
04/02/2003Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S4729-4730; text of measure as passed Senate: CR S4730)
04/02/2003Introduced in Senate

All Actions (1)

Date All Actions
04/02/2003Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4729-4730; text of measure as passed Senate: CR S4730)

Cosponsors (1)

* = Original cosponsor
CosponsorDate Cosponsored
Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [D-SD]* 04/02/2003

Committees (0)

As of 10/22/2020 text has not been received for S.Res.103 - A resolution to authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of John Jenkel v. Daniel K. Akaka, et al.

Bills are generally sent to the Library of Congress from GPO, the Government Publishing Office, a day or two after they are introduced on the floor of the House or Senate. Delays can occur when there are a large number of bills to prepare or when a very large bill has to be printed.


No related bill information was received for S.Res.103.


Subjects (6)


Latest Summary (2)

There are 2 summaries for S.Res.103. View summaries

Shown Here:
Passed Senate without amendment (04/02/2003)

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced in the Senate on April 2, 2003. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Authorizes the Senate Legal Counsel to represent the Members of the Senate who are defendants in the case of John Jenkel v. Daniel K. Akaka, et al.