There are 3 versions of this bill. View text

Click the check-box to add or remove the section, click the text link to scroll to that section.
Titles Actions Overview All Actions Cosponsors Committees Related Bills Subjects Latest Summary All Summaries

Titles (1)

Official Titles

Official Titles - Senate

Official Titles as Introduced

A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that no funds should be cut off or reduced for American Troops in the field which would result in undermining their safety or their ability to complete their assigned mission.


Actions Overview (2)

Date
03/15/2007Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Yea-Nay Vote. 82 - 16. Record Vote Number: 77.(text: CR S3188)
03/15/2007Introduced in Senate

All Actions (6)

Date Chamber
03/16/2007HouseReferred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
03/16/2007-12:05pmHouseReceived in the House.
03/15/2007SenateMessage on Senate action sent to the House.
03/15/2007SenateResolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Yea-Nay Vote. 82 - 16. Record Vote Number: 77. (text: CR S3188)
03/15/2007SenateMeasure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S3188)
03/15/2007SenateSubmitted in the Senate. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3226-3227)

Committees (1)

Committees, subcommittees and links to reports associated with this bill are listed here, as well as the nature and date of committee activity and Congressional report number.

Committee / Subcommittee Date Activity Reports
House Armed Services03/16/2007 Referred to

A related bill may be a companion measure, an identical bill, a procedurally-related measure, or one with text similarities. Bill relationships are identified by the House, the Senate, or CRS, and refer only to same-congress measures.


Latest Summary (2)

There are 2 summaries for S.Con.Res.20. View summaries

Shown Here:
Passed Senate without amendment (03/15/2007)

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)

Expresses the sense of Congress that Congress should not take any action that will endanger U.S. military forces in the field, including the elimination or reduction of funds for troops in the field, as such action would undermine their safety or harm their effectiveness in pursuing assigned missions.