Array
(
[actionDate] => 2011-11-18
[displayText] => Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Rules. H. Rept. 112-278, Part II.
[externalActionCode] => 5000
[description] => Introduced
[chamberOfAction] => House
)
Passed House
Array
(
[actionDate] => 2011-12-07
[displayText] => Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 241 - 184 (Roll no. 901).
[externalActionCode] => 8000
[description] => Passed House
[chamberOfAction] => House
)
1.
H.Amdt.900 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:
Amendment sought to exempt any rule relating to veterans or veterans affairs from the provisions of the bill. Sponsor:Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4] (Offered 12/07/2011)
Latest Action: 12/07/11 On agreeing to the Moore amendment (A007) Failed by recorded vote: 183 - 240 (Roll no. 899). (All Actions)
1.
H.Amdt.900 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:Amendment sought to exempt any rule relating to veterans or veterans affairs from the provisions of the bill.Sponsor:Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4] (Offered 12/07/2011)Latest Action:12/07/11 On agreeing to the Moore amendment (A007) Failed by recorded vote: 183 - 240 (Roll no. 899). (All Actions)
2.
H.Amdt.899 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:
Amendment sought to exempt all rules promulgated by the Department of Homeland Security from the provisions of the bill. Sponsor:Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18] (Offered 12/07/2011)
Latest Action: 12/07/11 On agreeing to the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment (A006) Failed by recorded vote: 177 - 242 (Roll no. 898). (All Actions)
2.
H.Amdt.899 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:Amendment sought to exempt all rules promulgated by the Department of Homeland Security from the provisions of the bill.Sponsor:Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18] (Offered 12/07/2011)Latest Action:12/07/11 On agreeing to the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment (A006) Failed by recorded vote: 177 - 242 (Roll no. 898). (All Actions)
3.
H.Amdt.898 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:
Amendment sought to exempt any rule relating to food safety, workplace safety, air quality, consumer product safety, or water quality from the provisions of the bill. Sponsor:Rep. McCarthy, Carolyn [D-NY-4] (Offered 12/07/2011)
Latest Action: 12/07/11 On agreeing to the McCarthy (NY) amendment (A005) Failed by recorded vote: 177 - 246 (Roll no. 897). (All Actions)
3.
H.Amdt.898 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:Amendment sought to exempt any rule relating to food safety, workplace safety, air quality, consumer product safety, or water quality from the provisions of the bill.Sponsor:Rep. McCarthy, Carolyn [D-NY-4] (Offered 12/07/2011)Latest Action:12/07/11 On agreeing to the McCarthy (NY) amendment (A005) Failed by recorded vote: 177 - 246 (Roll no. 897). (All Actions)
4.
H.Amdt.897 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:
Page 42, line 23, strike "$100,000,000" and insert "$50,000,000". Sponsor:Rep. McKinley, David B. [R-WV-1] (Offered 12/07/2011)
Latest Action: 12/07/11 By unanimous consent, the McKinley amendment was withdrawn. (consideration: CR H8228) (All Actions)
4.
H.Amdt.897 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description: Page 42, line 23, strike "$100,000,000" and insert "$50,000,000".Sponsor:Rep. McKinley, David B. [R-WV-1] (Offered 12/07/2011)Latest Action:12/07/11 By unanimous consent, the McKinley amendment was withdrawn. (consideration: CR H8228) (All Actions)
5.
H.Amdt.896 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:
Amendment sought to require a cost benefit analysis to be included with reports to Congress and to require agencies to submit criteria for cost benefit analyses to Congress within 12 months of enactment. Sponsor:Rep. Schrader, Kurt [D-OR-5] (Offered 12/07/2011)
Latest Action: 12/07/11 On agreeing to the Schrader amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 183 - 238 (Roll no. 896). (All Actions)
5.
H.Amdt.896 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:Amendment sought to require a cost benefit analysis to be included with reports to Congress and to require agencies to submit criteria for cost benefit analyses to Congress within 12 months of enactment.Sponsor:Rep. Schrader, Kurt [D-OR-5] (Offered 12/07/2011)Latest Action:12/07/11 On agreeing to the Schrader amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 183 - 238 (Roll no. 896). (All Actions)
6.
H.Amdt.895 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:
Amendment sought to exempt from the provisions of the bill any rule that the Office of Management and Budget determines would result in net job creation. Sponsor:Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. [D-GA-4] (Offered 12/07/2011)
Latest Action: 12/07/11 On agreeing to the Johnson (GA) amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 187 - 236 (Roll no. 895). (All Actions)
6.
H.Amdt.895 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:Amendment sought to exempt from the provisions of the bill any rule that the Office of Management and Budget determines would result in net job creation.Sponsor:Rep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. [D-GA-4] (Offered 12/07/2011)Latest Action:12/07/11 On agreeing to the Johnson (GA) amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 187 - 236 (Roll no. 895). (All Actions)
7.
H.Amdt.894 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:
Amendment requires the agency submitting the report on a proposed Federal rule to include an assessment, as part of the cost-benefit analysis submitted to the Comptroller General and each House of Congress, of anticipated jobs gained or lost as a result of implementation, and to specify whether those jobs will come from the public or private sector. Sponsor:Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-32] (Offered 12/07/2011)
Latest Action: 12/07/11 On agreeing to the Sessions amendment (A001) Agreed to by voice vote. (All Actions)
7.
H.Amdt.894 — 112th Congress (2011-2012)Description:Amendment requires the agency submitting the report on a proposed Federal rule to include an assessment, as part of the cost-benefit analysis submitted to the Comptroller General and each House of Congress, of anticipated jobs gained or lost as a result of implementation, and to specify whether those jobs will come from the public or private sector.Sponsor:Rep. Sessions, Pete [R-TX-32] (Offered 12/07/2011)Latest Action:12/07/11 On agreeing to the Sessions amendment (A001) Agreed to by voice vote. (All Actions)