Limit your search

1-4 of 4
  • H.Amdt.299   — 112th Congress (2011-2012)

    Description: None
    Sponsor: Rep. Weiner, Anthony D. [D-NY-9] (Offered 05/24/2011)
    Latest Action: 05/25/11 Mr. Guthrie raised a point of order against the Weiner amendment (A004). Mr. Guthrie stated that the amendment violated clause 10 of rule XXI by increasing mandatory spending. The Chair sustained the point of order.
  • H.Amdt.298   — 112th Congress (2011-2012)

    Description: Amendment prohibits the use of funds in the bill to pay for elective abortions or to be given to organizations that discriminate against pro-life health care providers.
    Sponsor: Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5] (Offered 05/24/2011)
    Latest Action: 05/25/11 On agreeing to the Foxx amendment (A003) Agreed to by recorded vote: 234 - 182 (Roll no. 338). (consideration: CR H3431)
  • H.Amdt.297   — 112th Congress (2011-2012)

    Description: Amendment sought to require a GAO study which highlights the impact that elimination of funding would have on the number of physicians that would be trained if funding were not rescinded.
    Sponsor: Rep. Cardoza, Dennis A. [D-CA-18] (Offered 05/24/2011)
    Latest Action: 05/24/11 On agreeing to the Cardoza amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 182 - 232 (Roll no. 337).
  • H.Amdt.296   — 112th Congress (2011-2012)

    Description: Amendment sought to require a GAO study of the number of primary care physicians that would be trained as a result of the funding provided in the health care overhaul law compared to the number of physicians that would be trained should funding be eliminated or rescinded.
    Sponsor: Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-21] (Offered 05/24/2011)
    Latest Action: 05/24/11 On agreeing to the Tonko amendment (A001) Failed by recorded vote: 186 - 231 (Roll no. 336).