All Information (Except Text) for S.3317 - Equal Employment Opportunity Restoration Act of 2012112th Congress (2011-2012)
|Sponsor:||Sen. Franken, Al [D-MN] (Introduced 06/20/2012)|
|Committees:||Senate - Judiciary|
|Latest Action:||Senate - 06/20/2012 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (All Actions)|
This bill has the status Introduced
Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:
There is 1 version of this bill. View text
Click the check-box to add or remove the section, click the text link to scroll to that section.
Titles Actions Overview All Actions Cosponsors Committees Related Bills Subjects Latest Summary All Summaries
Short Titles - Senate
Short Titles as Introduced
Equal Employment Opportunity Restoration Act of 2012
Official Titles - Senate
Official Titles as Introduced
A bill to restore the effective use of group actions for claims arising under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, section 1977 of the Revised Statutes, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, and for other purposes.
Actions Overview (1)
|06/20/2012||Introduced in Senate|
06/20/2012 Introduced in Senate
All Actions (2)
|06/20/2012||Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.|
Action By: Senate
|06/20/2012||Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4370-4372)|
Action By: Senate
06/20/2012 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
06/20/2012 Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4370-4372)
|Sen. Leahy, Patrick J. [D-VT]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Harkin, Tom [D-IA]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Mikulski, Barbara A. [D-MD]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Boxer, Barbara [D-CA]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Akaka, Daniel K. [D-HI]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Coons, Christopher A. [D-DE]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Inouye, Daniel K. [D-HI]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Kerry, John F. [D-MA]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Bingaman, Jeff [D-NM]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Brown, Sherrod [D-OH]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Gillibrand, Kirsten E. [D-NY]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Udall, Tom [D-NM]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Cantwell, Maria [D-WA]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Udall, Mark [D-CO]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Lautenberg, Frank R. [D-NJ]*||06/20/2012|
|Sen. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ]||07/09/2012|
|Committee / Subcommittee||Date||Activity||Reports|
|Senate Judiciary||06/20/2012||Referred to|
Subject — Policy Area:
One Policy Area term, which best describes an entire measure, is assigned to every public bill or resolution.
Latest Summary (1)
Introduced in Senate (06/20/2012)
Equal Employment Opportunity Restoration Act of 2012 - Amends the federal judicial code to permit one or more members of a group seeking relief for discriminatory employment practices under specified provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, equal rights laws under the Revised Statutes, or the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 to sue on behalf of all members of the group if the representative party shows, by a reasonable inference, that: (1) members of the group are so numerous that their joinder is impracticable; (2) claims of the representative party are typical of the claims of the group the representative party seeks to represent and the representative party and the representative party's counsel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the group; and (3) members of the group are, or have been, subject to an employment practice that has adversely affected or is adversely affecting a significant portion of the group's members. (Thus establishing a new standard for employees bringing group actions for certain employment discrimination, notwithstanding the Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, which required "convincing proof of a companywide discriminatory pay and promotion policy" as a prerequisite to class certification.)
Permits a representative party to challenge a subjective employment practice covered by any of the above-referenced employment statutes in a group action filed under this Act to the same extent as the party may challenge any other employment practice covered by such a statute in such an action.
Defines a "subjective employment practice" as: (1) an employer's policy of leaving personnel decisions to the unguided discretion of supervisors, managers, and other employees with authority to make such personnel decisions; or (2) an employment practice combining such a subjective employment practice with other types of personnel decisions.
Prohibits the fact that individual supervisors, managers, or other employees with authority to make personnel decisions may exercise discretion in different ways in applying a subjective employment practice under such a statute from precluding a representative party from filing a corresponding group action.
Allows a representative party to elect to proceed in a group action under this Act or in a class action under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.