H.R.1553 - Financial Institutions Examination Fairness and Reform Act113th Congress (2013-2014)
|Sponsor:||Rep. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV-2] (Introduced 04/15/2013)|
|Committees:||House - Financial Services|
|Latest Action:||04/15/2013 Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. (All Actions)|
This bill has the status Introduced
Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:
Text: H.R.1553 — 113th Congress (2013-2014)All Bill Information (Except Text)
There is one version of the bill.
Text available as:
Introduced in House (04/15/2013)
To improve the examination of depository institutions, and for other purposes.
Mrs. Capito (for herself, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Carney, Mr. Huizenga of Michigan, Mr. Lucas, Mr. Pittenger, Mr. Barr, Ms. Moore, Mr. Ross, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Hurt, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Grimm, Mr. Stivers, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Garrett, Mr. Fincher, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Royce, Mr. Posey, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Duffy, and Mr. Neugebauer) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services
To improve the examination of depository institutions, and for other purposes.
This Act may be cited as the “Financial Institutions Examination Fairness and Reform Act”.
The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
“(A) the exit interview for an examination of the institution; or
“(B) the provision of additional information by the institution relating to the examination.
“(2) EXIT INTERVIEW.—If a financial institution is not subject to a resident examiner program, the exit interview shall occur not later than the end of the 9-month period beginning on the commencement of the examination, except that such period may be extended by the Federal financial institutions regulatory agency by providing written notice to the institution and the Office of Examination Ombudsman describing with particularity the reasons that a longer period is needed to complete the examination.
“(b) Examination materials.—Upon the request of a financial institution, the Federal financial institutions regulatory agency shall include with the final report an appendix listing all examination or other factual information relied upon by the agency in support of a material supervisory determination.”.
(a) In general.—The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 is further amended by adding after section 1012 the following:
“(1) a commercial loan shall not be placed in non-accrual status solely because the collateral for such loan has deteriorated in value;
“(2) a modified or restructured commercial loan shall be removed from non-accrual status if the borrower demonstrates the ability to perform on such loan over a maximum period of 6 months, except that with respect to loans on a quarterly, semiannual, or longer repayment schedule such period shall be a maximum of 3 consecutive repayment periods;
“(3) a new appraisal on a performing commercial loan shall not be required unless an advance of new funds is involved;
“(4) in classifying a commercial loan in which there has been deterioration in collateral value, the amount to be classified shall be the portion of the deficiency relating to the decline in collateral value and repayment capacity of the borrower.
“(b) Well capitalized institutions.—The Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies may not require a financial institution that is well capitalized to raise additional capital in lieu of an action prohibited under subsection (a).
“(c) Consistent loan classifications.—The Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies shall develop and apply identical definitions and reporting requirements for non-accrual loans.”.
(1) in clause (ii), by striking “and” at the end; and
(2) by inserting after clause (iii) the following:
“(iv) any issue specifically listed in an exam report as a matter requiring attention by the institution’s management or board of directors; and”.
(a) In general.—The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 is further amended by adding after section 1013 the following:
“(a) Establishment.—There is established in the Council an Office of Examination Ombudsman.
“(b) Head of office.—There is established the position of the Ombudsman, who shall serve as the head of the Office of Examination Ombudsman, and who shall be hired separately by the Council and shall be independent from any member agency of the Council.
“(c) Staffing.—The Ombudsman is authorized to hire staff to support the activities of the Office of Examination Ombudsman.
“(1) receive and, at the Ombudsman’s discretion, investigate complaints from financial institutions, their representatives, or another entity acting on behalf of such institutions, concerning examinations, examination practices, or examination reports;
“(2) hold meetings, at least once every three months and in locations designed to encourage participation from all sections of the United States, with financial institutions, their representatives, or another entity acting on behalf of such institutions, to discuss examination procedures, examination practices, or examination policies;
“(3) review examination procedures of the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies to ensure that the written examination policies of those agencies are being followed in practice and adhere to the standards for consistency established by the Council;
“(4) conduct a continuing and regular program of examination quality assurance for all examination types conducted by the Federal financial institutions regulatory agencies;
“(5) process any supervisory appeal initiated under section 1015 or section 309(e) of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994; and
“(6) report annually to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, and the Council, on the reviews carried out pursuant to paragraphs (3) and (4), including compliance with the requirements set forth in section 1012 regarding timeliness of examination reports, and the Council’s recommendations for improvements in examination procedures, practices, and policies.
“(e) Confidentiality.—The Ombudsman shall keep confidential all meetings, discussions, and information provided by financial institutions.”.
(1) in paragraph (2), by striking “and” at the end;
(2) in paragraph (3), by adding “and” at the end; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
“(4) the term ‘Ombudsman’ means the Ombudsman established under section 1014(a).”.
The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 is further amended by adding after section 1014 the following:
“(a) In general.—A financial institution shall have the right to appeal a material supervisory determination contained in a final report of examination.
“(1) TIMING.—A financial institution seeking an appeal under this section shall file a written notice with the Ombudsman within 60 days after receiving the final report or examination that is the subject of such appeal.
“(2) IDENTIFICATION OF DETERMINATION.—The written notice shall identify the material supervisory determination that is the subject of the appeal, and a statement of the reasons why the institution believes that the determination is incorrect or should otherwise be modified.
“(3) INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED TO INSTITUTION.—Any information relied upon by the agency in the final report that is not in the possession of the financial institution may be requested by the financial institution and shall be delivered promptly by the agency to the financial institution.
“(1) IN GENERAL.—The Ombudsman shall determine the merits of the appeal on the record, after an opportunity for a hearing before an independent administrative law judge.
“(A) take place not later than 60 days after the notice of the appeal was received by the Ombudsman; and
“(A) the administrative law judge shall recommend to the Ombudsman what determination should be made; and
“(B) in making such recommendation, the administrative law judge shall not defer to the opinions of the examiner or agency, but shall independently determine the appropriateness of the agency’s decision based upon the relevant statutes, regulations, and other appropriate guidance.
“(1) be made not later than 60 days after the record has been closed; and
“(2) be final agency action and shall bind the agency whose supervisory determination was the subject of the appeal and the financial institution making the appeal.
“(e) Report.—The Ombudsman shall report annually to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate on actions taken on appeals under this section, including the types of issues that financial institutions have appealed and the results of those appeals. In no case shall such a report contain information about individual financial institutions or any confidential or privileged information shared by financial institutions.
“(1) retaliate against a financial institution, including service providers, or any institution-affiliated party, for exercising appellate rights under this section; or
“(2) delay or deny any agency action that would benefit a financial institution or any institution-affiliated party on the basis that an appeal under this section is pending under this section.”.
(a) Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994.—Section 309 of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4806), is amended—
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting after “appropriate Federal banking agency” the following: “, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection,”;
(A) in paragraph (2), by striking “the appellant from retaliation by agency examiners” and inserting “the insured depository institution or insured credit union from retaliation by the agencies referred to in subsection (a)”; and
(B) by adding at the end the following flush-left text:“For purposes of this subsection and subsection (e), retaliation includes delaying consideration of, or withholding approval of, any request, notice, or application that otherwise would have been approved, but for the exercise of the institution’s or credit union’s rights under this section.”; and
(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking “and” at the end;
(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and
(C) by adding at the end the following:
“(D) ensure that appropriate safeguards exist for protecting the insured depository institution or insured credit union from retaliation by any agency referred to in subsection (a) for exercising its rights under this subsection.”.
(b) Federal Deposit Insurance Act.—Section 18(x) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(x)) is amended by inserting “the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection,” before “any Federal banking agency” each place such term appears.
(c) Federal Credit Union Act.—Section 205(j) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1785(j)) is amended by inserting “the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection,” before “the Administration” each place such term appears.
(d) Technical corrections.—The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) is amended—
(1) in section 1003(1), by striking “the Office of Thrift Supervision,”; and
(2) in section 1005, by striking “One-fifth” and inserting “One-fourth”.