H.R.2374 - Retail Investor Protection Act113th Congress (2013-2014)
|Sponsor:||Rep. Wagner, Ann [R-MO-2] (Introduced 06/14/2013)|
|Committees:||House - Financial Services; Education and the Workforce | Senate - Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs|
|Committee Reports:||H. Rept. 113-228,Part 1; H. Rept. 113-228,Part 2|
|Latest Action:||10/30/2013 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (All Actions)|
|Roll Call Votes:||There have been 3 roll call votes|
This bill has the status Passed House
Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:
- Passed House
Summary: H.R.2374 — 113th Congress (2013-2014)All Bill Information (Except Text)
Passed House amended (10/29/2013)
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on September 25, 2013. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Retail Investor Protection Act - Prohibits the Secretary of Labor from prescribing any regulation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) defining the circumstances under which an individual is considered a fiduciary until 60 days after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issues a final rule governing standards of conduct for brokers and dealers under specified law.
(Sec. 3) Amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit the SEC from promulgating a rule establishing an investment advisor standard of conduct as the standard of conduct of brokers and dealers before it has ascertained: (1) if retail customers are systematically harmed or disadvantaged owing to the operation of brokers or dealers under different standards of conduct than those that apply to investment advisors under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and (2) whether adoption of a uniform fiduciary standard of care for brokers or dealers and investment advisors would adversely impact retail investor access or availability to personalized investment advice and recommendations.
Requires the SEC: (1) to publish in the Federal Register formal findings that such rules would reduce retail customer confusion regarding standards of conduct applicable to brokers, dealers, and investment advisors; and (2) in proposing such rules, to consider the differences in the registration, supervision, and examination requirements applicable to brokers, dealers, and investment advisors.