H.R.2315 - Mobile Workforce State Income Tax Simplification Act of 2015114th Congress (2015-2016)
|Sponsor:||Rep. Bishop, Mike [R-MI-8] (Introduced 05/14/2015)|
|Committees:||House - Judiciary|
|Committee Reports:||H. Rept. 114-780|
|Latest Action:||09/22/2016 Received in the Senate. (All Actions)|
This bill has the status Passed House
Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:
- Passed House
Text: H.R.2315 — 114th Congress (2015-2016)All Bill Information (Except Text)
Received in Senate (09/22/2016)
To limit the authority of States to tax certain income of employees for employment duties performed in other States.
This Act may be cited as the “Mobile Workforce State Income Tax Simplification Act of 2015”.
(1) the State of the employee’s residence; and
(2) the State within which the employee is present and performing employment duties for more than 30 days during the calendar year in which the wages or other remuneration is earned.
(b) Wages or other remuneration.—Wages or other remuneration earned in any calendar year shall not be subject to State income tax withholding and reporting requirements unless the employee is subject to income tax in such State under subsection (a). Income tax withholding and reporting requirements under subsection (a)(2) shall apply to wages or other remuneration earned as of the commencement date of employment duties in the State during the calendar year.
(A) the employer’s actual knowledge of fraud by the employee in making the determination; or
(B) collusion between the employer and the employee to evade tax;
(2) except as provided in paragraph (3), if records are maintained by an employer in the regular course of business that record the location of an employee, such records shall not preclude an employer’s ability to rely on an employee’s determination under paragraph (1); and
(3) notwithstanding paragraph (2), if an employer, at its sole discretion, maintains a time and attendance system that tracks where the employee performs duties on a daily basis, data from the time and attendance system shall be used instead of the employee’s determination under paragraph (1).
(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), an employee is considered present and performing employment duties within a State for a day if the employee performs more of the employee’s employment duties within such State than in any other State during a day.
(B) If an employee performs employment duties in a resident State and in only one nonresident State during one day, such employee shall be considered to have performed more of the employee’s employment duties in the nonresident State than in the resident State for such day.
(C) For purposes of this paragraph, the portion of the day during which the employee is in transit shall not be considered in determining the location of an employee’s performance of employment duties.
(2) EMPLOYEE.—The term “employee” has the same meaning given to it by the State in which the employment duties are performed, except that the term “employee” shall not include a professional athlete, professional entertainer, or certain public figures.
(3) PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE.—The term “professional athlete” means a person who performs services in a professional athletic event, provided that the wages or other remuneration are paid to such person for performing services in his or her capacity as a professional athlete.
(4) PROFESSIONAL ENTERTAINER.—The term “professional entertainer” means a person who performs services in the professional performing arts for wages or other remuneration on a per-event basis, provided that the wages or other remuneration are paid to such person for performing services in his or her capacity as a professional entertainer.
(5) CERTAIN PUBLIC FIGURES.—The term “certain public figures” means persons of prominence who perform services for wages or other remuneration on a per-event basis, provided that the wages or other remuneration are paid to such person for services provided at a discrete event, in the nature of a speech, public appearance, or similar event.
(6) EMPLOYER.—The term “employer” has the meaning given such term in section 3401(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 3401(d)), unless such term is defined by the State in which the employee’s employment duties are performed, in which case the State’s definition shall prevail.
(7) STATE.—The term “State” means any of the several States.
(A) the employee is required on a contemporaneous basis to record his work location for every day worked outside of the State in which the employee’s employment duties are primarily performed; and
(B) the system is designed to allow the employer to allocate the employee’s wages for income tax purposes among all States in which the employee performs employment duties for such employer.
(9) WAGES OR OTHER REMUNERATION.—The term “wages or other remuneration” may be limited by the State in which the employment duties are performed.
(a) Effective date.—This Act shall take effect on January 1 of the 2d year that begins after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(b) Applicability.—This Act shall not apply to any tax obligation that accrues before the effective date of this Act.
Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 2016.
|Attest:||karen l. haas,|