H.J.Res.87 - Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the final rule of the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act".114th Congress (2015-2016)
|Sponsor:||Rep. Byrne, Bradley [R-AL-1] (Introduced 04/15/2016)|
|Committees:||House - Education and the Workforce|
|Committee Reports:||H. Rept. 114-739|
|Latest Action:||House - 09/12/2016 Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 575. (All Actions)|
This bill has the status Introduced
Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:
Summary: H.J.Res.87 — 114th Congress (2015-2016)All Information (Except Text)
Reported to House without amendment (09/12/2016)
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
This joint resolution disapproves the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to "Interpretation of the 'Advice' Exemption in Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act."
The joint resolution declares that such rule shall have no force or effect.
(Under section 203 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, an employer must report any agreement or arrangement with a third party consultant to persuade employees as to their collective bargaining rights or to obtain certain information concerning the activities of employees or a labor organization in connection with a labor dispute involving the employer. The consultant, also, is required to report concerning such an agreement or arrangement with an employer. Statutory exceptions to these reporting requirements are set forth in LMRDA section 203[c], which provides, in part, that employers and consultants are not required to file a report by reason of the consultant's giving or agreeing to give "advice" to the employer.)