There is 1 version of this bill. View text

Click the check-box to add or remove the section, click the text link to scroll to that section.
Titles Actions Overview All Actions Cosponsors Committees Related Bills Subjects Latest Summary All Summaries

Titles (3)

Short Titles

Short Titles - Senate

Short Titles as Introduced

Clean Air, Strong Economies Act

Official Titles

Official Titles - Senate

Official Titles as Introduced

A bill to improve the establishment of any lower ground-level ozone standards, and for other purposes.

Actions Overview (1)

Date Actions Overview
03/17/2015Introduced in Senate

All Actions (2)

Date All Actions
06/03/2015Committee on Environment and Public Works. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 114-47.
03/17/2015Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Action By: Senate

Cosponsors (27)

Committees (1)

Committees, subcommittees and links to reports associated with this bill are listed here, as well as the nature and date of committee activity and Congressional report number.

Committee / Subcommittee Date Activity Related Documents
Senate Environment and Public Works03/17/2015 Referred to
06/03/2015 Hearings by

A related bill may be a companion measure, an identical bill, a procedurally-related measure, or one with text similarities. Bill relationships are identified by the House, the Senate, or CRS, and refer only to same-congress measures.

Latest Summary (1)

There is one summary for S.751. View summaries

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (03/17/2015)

Clean Air, Strong Economies Act or the Case Act

This bill prohibits the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from lowering its national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone until at least 85% of counties that are in nonattainment areas (counties that are exceeding the limit) have attained the standard.

In promulgating a primary or secondary NAAQS for ozone, the EPA must:

  • only consider a county to be a nonattainment area on the basis of direct air quality monitoring (rather than modeling);
  • take into consideration feasibility and cost; and
  • include in the regulatory impact analysis for the proposed and final rule at least one analysis that does not include any calculation of benefits resulting from reducing emissions of any pollutant other than ozone.