All Information (Except Text) for S.751 - CASE Act114th Congress (2015-2016)
|Sponsor:||Sen. Thune, John [R-SD] (Introduced 03/17/2015)|
|Committees:||Senate - Environment and Public Works|
|Latest Action:||Senate - 06/03/2015 Committee on Environment and Public Works. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 114-47. (All Actions)|
This bill has the status Introduced
Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:
There is 1 version of this bill. View text
Click the check-box to add or remove the section, click the text link to scroll to that section.
Titles Actions Overview All Actions Cosponsors Committees Related Bills Subjects Latest Summary All Summaries
Actions Overview (1)
|03/17/2015||Introduced in Senate|
03/17/2015 Introduced in Senate
All Actions (2)
|06/03/2015||Committee on Environment and Public Works. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 114-47.|
|03/17/2015||Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.|
Action By: Senate
06/03/2015 Committee on Environment and Public Works. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 114-47.
03/17/2015 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
|Committee / Subcommittee||Date||Activity||Reports|
|Senate Environment and Public Works||03/17/2015||Referred to|
Subject — Policy Area:
One Policy Area term, which best describes an entire measure, is assigned to every public bill or resolution.
Latest Summary (1)
Introduced in Senate (03/17/2015)
Clean Air, Strong Economies Act or the Case Act
This bill prohibits the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from lowering its national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone until at least 85% of counties that are in nonattainment areas (counties that are exceeding the limit) have attained the standard.
In promulgating a primary or secondary NAAQS for ozone, the EPA must:
- only consider a county to be a nonattainment area on the basis of direct air quality monitoring (rather than modeling);
- take into consideration feasibility and cost; and
- include in the regulatory impact analysis for the proposed and final rule at least one analysis that does not include any calculation of benefits resulting from reducing emissions of any pollutant other than ozone.