H.R.4561 - SAFE TECH Act115th Congress (2017-2018)
|Sponsor:||Rep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12] (Introduced 12/06/2017)|
|Committees:||House - Homeland Security | Senate - Commerce, Science, and Transportation|
|Committee Reports:||H. Rept. 115-498|
|Latest Action:||Senate - 01/10/2018 Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (All Actions)|
This bill has the status Passed House
Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:
- Passed House
Text: H.R.4561 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)All Information (Except Text)
Text available as:
Referred in Senate (01/10/2018)
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
To provide for third party testing of transportation security screening technology, and for other purposes.
This Act may be cited as the “Security Assessment Feasibility for Equipment Testing and Evaluation of Capabilities for our Homeland Act” or the “SAFE TECH Act”.
In this Act:
(1) ADMINISTRATION.—The term “Administration” means the Transportation Security Administration.
(2) ADMINISTRATOR.—The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Transportation Security Administration.
(a) In general.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland Security, shall develop a program to enable a vendor of transportation security screening technology to obtain testing, including as an alternative to the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, by an appropriate third party, as determined by the Administrator, in consultation with the Under Secretary, of such technology before procurement or development of such technology.
(1) IN GENERAL.—The third party testing program authorized under subsection (a) shall include detection testing to evaluate the performance of a security screening technology relating to the probability of detection, the probability of false alarm, and other indicators that such technology is able to meet the Administration’s mission needs for detection of—
(A) explosives; and
(B) prohibited items.
(2) COORDINATION WITH FINAL PROCESSES.—To the extent practicable, and without compromising the integrity of the Administration’s testing process under paragraph (9) of section 114(f) of title 49, United States Code, or the Department of Homeland Security’s oversight of such testing process, or increasing costs to the Administration, the Administrator shall coordinate the third party detection testing under paragraph (1) with any associated subsequent final Department of Homeland Security testing.
(A) share with appropriate international partners detection testing information and standards; and
(B) coordinate with such appropriate international partners to align such testing information and standards to maximize the capability to detect explosives and other threats.
(c) Alternative testing factors.—Third party testing under subsection (a) may include as an alternative, at the discretion of the Administrator, the testing at the TSA Systems Integration Facility of the Administration, including testing for—
(1) health and safety factors;
(2) operator interface;
(3) human factors;
(4) environmental factors;
(6) reliability, maintainability, and availability factors; and
(1) establish a framework for the third party testing under this section to determine if the security screening technology that is the subject of such testing satisfies the Administration’s requirements before such technology may enter or re-enter, as applicable, operational testing at an airport or other transportation facility; and
(2) use phased implementation to allow the Administration and the third party concerned to establish best practices.
(e) Prioritization of third party testing.—The Administrator may prioritize, when appropriate, the field testing of security screening technology and equipment by third parties.
(1) UNITED STATES OWNERSHIP.—An entity providing third party testing under the program developed pursuant to subsection (a) shall be owned and controlled by a citizen of the United States.
(2) WAIVER.—The Administrator may waive the requirement specified in paragraph (1) with respect to an entity that is a United States subsidiary of a parent company that has implemented a foreign ownership, control, or influence mitigation plan that has been approved by the Defense Security Service of the Department of Defense prior to seeking to engage in third party testing. The Administrator has complete discretion to reject any proposal from a company to provide testing under subsection (a) that requires a waiver under this paragraph.
(3) CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.—The Administrator shall ensure, to the extent possible, that an entity providing third party testing under this section does not have a contractual, business, or other pecuniary interest (exclusive of any such testing) in—
(A) the security screening technology subject to such testing; or the
(B) vendor of such technology.
(a) In general.—The Administrator, in coordination with the European Civil Aviation Conference, shall continue development of a validation process for the reciprocal recognition of security validation processes for recognition of security screening technologies or certification authorities for deployment.
(b) Requirement.—The validation process under subsection (a) shall ensure that the certification process of each participating international security partner or recognized certification authority complies with Administration standards.
Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a study on the third party testing program developed under this Act. Such study shall include a review of the following:
(1) Any efficiencies or gains in effectiveness achieved in the Administration’s operations as a result of such program.
(2) The degree to which the Administration conducts timely and regular oversight of entities engaged in such testing.
(A) The introduction of innovative detection technologies into security screening operations.
(B) The availability of testing for technologies developed by small to medium sized businesses.
(i) National security.
(ii) Conflicts of interest between entities carrying out such testing and entities with such technologies to be tested.
(iii) Waste, fraud, and abuse.
Passed the House of Representatives January 9, 2018.
|Attest:||karen l. haas,|