January 8, 2014 - Issue: Vol. 160, No. 4 — Daily Edition113th Congress (2013 - 2014) - 2nd Session
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION; Congressional Record Vol. 160, No. 4
(Senate - January 08, 2014)
Text available as:
Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.
[Page S88] From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION Mr. McCONNELL. Yesterday the majority leader rejected my offer for both sides to offer amendments to the unemployment insurance bill--the way things used to work around here; we had a bill called up, and we had amendments. This is, sadly, typical of the way things are these days in this institution. If the majority leader just accepted my offer, we could actually be debating and amending this bill instead of wasting time. How does the majority leader expect to achieve consensus when one side doesn't have the chance to offer any input at all? That is the way the Senate used to operate. Look. If the majority leader wants this bill to pass the Senate, then there is a very good likelihood he is going to have to find a way to pay for it. I will be offering one idea on that front; that is, paying for a longer extension by dropping the mandate that forces Americans to buy insurance they don't want. But if they don't like that idea, there are others. One is a bipartisan idea endorsed by the President that ensures individuals can't draw both Social Security disability benefits and unemployment benefits at the same time. Senators Coburn and Portman both have versions of that. There is another plan offered by Senator Ayotte that would cut down on fraud in refundable tax credits. There are plans for job creation that will be offered by Senators Paul, Thune, and Inhofe. These plans take a different approach than the government-led one we see from our Democratic friends. They rely on unlocking the potential of the private sector to actually increase employment. Why don't we have a vote on them in the Senate? I am sure there are many Democratic ideas out there as well, but we won't get the chance to debate any of them as long as the majority leader keeps blocking us from offering amendments. This obstructionism by the Democratic majority is against the traditions of this body, and it needs to end because if Democrats truly want to get anything done this year, they are going to have to learn how to work with us. I yield the floor. ____________________