AUTHORIZING USE OF ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION HALL BY JOINT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE ON INAUGURAL CEREMONIES
(House of Representatives - February 03, 2016)

Text available as:

Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.

        
[Congressional Record Volume 162, Number 20 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Pages H539-H540]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




AUTHORIZING USE OF ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION HALL BY JOINT CONGRESSIONAL 
                   COMMITTEE ON INAUGURAL CEREMONIES

  Mrs. MILLER of Michigan. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to take 
from the Speaker's table the concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 29) to 
authorize the use of the Rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the Capitol 
by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in 
connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for the 
inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect of the 
United States, and ask for its immediate consideration in the House.
  The Clerk read the title of the concurrent resolution.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentlewoman from Michigan?

[[Page H540]]

  There was no objection.
  The text of the concurrent resolution is as follows:

                            S. Con. Res. 29

       Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 
     concurring),

     SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA AND EMANCIPATION HALL OF THE 
                   CAPITOL.

        The rotunda and Emancipation Hall of the United States 
     Capitol are authorized to be used on January 20, 2017, by the 
     Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies in 
     connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted for 
     the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice 
     President-elect of the United States.

  The concurrent resolution was concurred in.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

                          ____________________