AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED; Congressional Record Vol. 164, No. 29
(Senate - February 14, 2018)

Text available as:

Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.


[Pages S969-S970]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                    AMENDMENTS SUBMITTED AND PROPOSED

       SA 1957. Mr. FLAKE (for himself and Ms. Heitkamp) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     2579, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 
     premium tax credit with respect to unsubsidized COBRA 
     continuation coverage; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1958. Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mr. Rounds, Mr. King, 
     Ms. Collins, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Graham, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Flake, 
     Mr. Coons, Mr. Gardner, Ms. Heitkamp, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. 
     Shaheen, Mr. Alexander, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Isakson, and Mr. 
     Warner) proposed an amendment to the bill H.R. 2579, supra.
       SA 1959. Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mrs. Ernst, Mr. Tillis, 
     Mr. Lankford, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
     Alexander, and Mr. Isakson) proposed an amendment to the bill 
     H.R. 2579, supra.
       SA 1960. Mr. HATCH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1961. Mr. HATCH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1962. Mr. HATCH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1963. Mr. HATCH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1964. Mr. HATCH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1965. Mr. PAUL submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1966. Mr. PAUL submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1967. Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. Bennet) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1968. Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. 
     Cortez Masto, Mr. Reed, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Markey, Ms. Smith, and 
     Ms. Klobuchar) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed 
     by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie 
     on the table.
       SA 1969. Mr. KENNEDY submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1970. Mr. GRAHAM submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1971. Mr. GRAHAM submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1972. Mr. GRAHAM submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1973. Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. Rounds) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1974. Ms. SMITH submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1975. Mrs. McCASKILL (for herself, Mr. Tester, and Ms. 
     Heitkamp) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by 
     her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on 
     the table.
       SA 1976. Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Mr. Wyden) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the 
     bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1977. Ms. DUCKWORTH submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1978. Ms. DUCKWORTH submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1979. Ms. DUCKWORTH submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1980. Ms. DUCKWORTH submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.

[[Page S970]]

       SA 1981. Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Mr. Markey) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the 
     bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1982. Mr. PORTMAN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed to amendment SA 1959 proposed by Mr. Grassley (for 
     himself, Mrs. Ernst, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Cotton, 
     Mr. Perdue, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Alexander, and Mr. Isakson) to 
     the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 1983. Mr. WYDEN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1984. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1985. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1986. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1987. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1988. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1989. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1990. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1991. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1992. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1993. Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. Paul) submitted an 
     amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1994. Mr. WYDEN submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1995. Ms. HEITKAMP submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1996. Ms. HEITKAMP submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1997. Ms. HEITKAMP submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1998. Ms. HEITKAMP submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 1999. Ms. KLOBUCHAR submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2000. Ms. KLOBUCHAR submitted an amendment intended to 
     be proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2001. Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. Heitkamp) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the 
     bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2002. Mr. MARKEY submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2003. Mr. MARKEY submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2004. Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself and Ms. Hassan) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the 
     bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2005. Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Mr. Leahy, and Ms. 
     Hassan) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her 
     to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 2006. Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself and Ms. Hassan) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the 
     bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2007. Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Ms. Cortez Masto, and 
     Mr. Leahy) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by 
     her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on 
     the table.
       SA 2008. Mrs. MURRAY submitted an amendment intended to be 
     proposed by her to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was 
     ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2009. Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself, Mr. Leahy, and Mrs. 
     Murray) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her 
     to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 2010. Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. King, Ms. Collins, 
     Mr. Manchin, Mr. Graham, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Flake, Mr. Coons, Mr. 
     Gardner, Ms. Heitkamp, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. 
     Alexander, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Isakson, and Mr. Warner) 
     submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the 
     bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2011. Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. Udall) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2012. Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Mr. Udall, and Mr. 
     Carper) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him 
     to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 2013. Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. Udall) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2014. Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. Udall) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2015. Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Ms. Heitkamp, and Mr. 
     Udall) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him 
     to the bill H.R. 2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the 
     table.
       SA 2016. Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. Udall) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.
       SA 2017. Mr. FLAKE (for himself and Mr. Graham) submitted 
     an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 
     2579, supra; which was ordered to lie on the table.

                          ____________________