EXECUTIVE SESSION
(Senate - January 10, 2018)

Text available as:

Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF.

        
[Congressional Record Volume 164, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 10, 2018)]
[Pages S113-S124]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                           EXECUTIVE SESSION

                                 ______
                                 

                           EXECUTIVE CALENDAR

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under the previous order, the 
Senate will proceed to executive session to resume consideration of the 
following nomination, which the clerk will report.
  The legislative clerk read the nomination of Thomas Lee Robinson 
Parker, of Tennessee, to be United States District Judge for the 
Western District of Tennessee.


                   Recognition of the Majority Leader

  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The majority leader is recognized.


                               Tax Reform

  Mr. McCONNELL. Mr. President, we have been talking all week about the 
ways our historic tax reform law is immediately helping middle-class 
families. It has been less than a month since Congress passed and the 
President signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, but already more than 1 
million Americans are on track to receive special bonuses, permanent 
raises, and other benefits, and their employers are attributing these 
changes directly to tax reform.
  In fact, 100,000 employees of American Airlines are each receiving a 
$1,000 tax reform bonus; U.S. Bank is raising its minimum wage to $15 
and is also giving $1,000 bonuses to 60,000 employees; 29,000 employees 
of Nationwide Insurance are also receiving bonuses, and 33,000 are 
getting an increase in their retirement match. These are just a few of 
the 100-plus companies that have already announced new benefits for 
American workers as a direct result of tax reform. These are only the 
immediate benefits.
  Mainstream economists agree that in the months and years to come, the 
permanent changes we made in the way we tax businesses will make our 
economy more vibrant and more competitive. That means greater 
investment and higher wages for American workers. Of course, all this 
is in addition to the direct effects the tax cuts themselves will soon 
have on family budgets.
  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will reduce income tax rates and 
significantly expand key deductions. We took money out of Washington 
and put it right back in the pockets of middle-class Americans. 
Starting as early as February, the IRS will withhold less from 
paychecks, and workers will get to deposit more of their hard-earned 
money right into their own bank accounts. In 2018 alone, for a typical 
family of four earning just over 70,000, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 
could mean a tax savings of more than $2,000.
  Nearly every day, reports come out about a new way this historic tax 
reform bill is helping Americans. Here is a subject that is 
particularly relevant around many kitchen tables this winter: utility 
bills. All around the country, utility companies that will benefit from 
our new tax cuts are already discussing plans to pass their savings on 
to customers.

[[Page S114]]

  Major power companies in Illinois, Maryland, and Massachusetts are 
already proposing plans to give their customers tens of millions of 
dollars in relief by lowering the rates they charge for energy. And get 
this: According to CNBC, a South Carolina electric and gas utility is 
planning to give a cash payment directly to its customers, averaging 
$1,000 per household. More are following suit. In Montana, Louisiana, 
and Indiana, regulators are already working with utilities to determine 
how households will benefit from the tax savings. In my own State of 
Kentucky, the Public Service Commission directed a number of the 
electric, gas, and water companies to track their savings and make 
plans to cut rates for consumers.
  As any mother or father who has to balance a checkbook and pay bills 
every month can attest, this is welcome news for middle-class families. 
These reductions will be especially helpful to the most vulnerable in 
our society.
  According to data from the Department of Health and Human Services, 
energy costs eat up a significantly higher percentage of household 
income for poor families than for other families. In other words, for a 
software engineer in Silicon Valley, a lower heating or air 
conditioning bill may go unnoticed, but for workers who clean that 
office overnight, this relief will make a real difference.
  A drop in utility bills effectively amounts to progressive tax 
relief. This is just another example of how the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act 
is rapidly proving to be a serious asset to poor and middle-class 
families--precisely the people whom my Democratic friends in the House 
and Senate loudly claimed would get nothing at all from this bill.
  It has been 3 weeks--3 weeks--lower utility bills, 1 million special 
tax reform bonuses and pay raises, and this is only the beginning.
  A Republican majority in the House and a Republican majority in the 
Senate and President Trump listened to the facts instead of the 
political spin. I am proud that we passed this historic bill and gave 
families across America the tax relief they have waited decades to 
receive.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cotton). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.


                   Recognition of the Minority Leader

  The Democratic leader is recognized.


                         Funding the Government

  Mr. SCHUMER. Mr. President, we have barely over a week to negotiate a 
broad package of must-pass items, including an extension of government 
funding, a deal to lift the spending caps for both defense and urgent 
domestic priorities, a healthcare package, disaster aid, an agreement 
to protect the Dreamers, and to provide additional border security.
  The path forward on some of these issues is very clear. There are 
significant bipartisan majorities that would vote to extend CHIP, or 
the Children's Health Insurance Program, and community health centers. 
There seems to be a growing consensus on how we can pass the 702 FISA 
Court program.
  I am also confident that we could assemble a disaster aid package 
that addresses the needs of all of the States and Territories--Texas, 
Florida, Louisiana, California, the Western States that have been 
plagued by fires, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands--as well as 
modifying what the Forest Service does so they don't spend all of their 
money simply fighting forest fires and not do the job they are intended 
to do, which is to prevent future forest fires by careful forestry 
programs.
  Even where the path is murkier, the outlines of a deal exist. If we 
don't lift the spending caps in short order, the sharp ax of 
sequestration will fall on the military side of the budget and on the 
domestic side of the budget. That is a scenario everyone wants to 
avoid.
  The majority leader continues to insist that we should raise the 
budget caps unequally, sparing our military but not critical domestic 
programs that create jobs, grow our economy, and help the middle class. 
We Democrats believe we absolutely must provide the resources our men 
and women overseas need to protect our country. We believe that 
strongly, but we also know that there are many important issues here at 
home--combating the opioid crisis, improving veterans' healthcare, 
shoring up pensions for millions of hard-working Americans who are 
approaching retirement, and dealing with rural development and rural 
broadband. These items are all crucial to the middle class.
  The deadly scourge of opioid addiction has contributed to the first 
consecutive-year decline in life expectancy in the great United States 
of America since the early 1960s. That is an astounding and alarming 
fact that should rouse everyone in this Chamber to action. It is not 
occurring in most of our Western country allies.
  Some of our veterans have been waiting in line for healthcare at 
veterans hospitals for over a year. These men and women served our 
country bravely. We have a solemn responsibility to serve them when 
they come home, and we are not living up to that responsibility right 
now.
  Over a million Americans paid into pension plans with the expectation 
that they could retire with basic dignity. For so many of them--
teamsters, miners, food workers--pensions have fallen short, and a 
lifetime of careful savings may be ripped away from pensioners at the 
last moment. We could make progress on each of these issues through a 
budget that lifts the spending caps equally for defense and nondefense.
  The Republican majority, which conveniently forgot its long history 
of opposing deficits when passing a $1.5 trillion tax bill, cannot, in 
good conscience, turn around and complain about deficits here. So let's 
make the investments we all know are essential in both our military and 
in our middle class.
  Even on the most challenging issue we face, the fate of the Dreamers, 
there appears to be a path forward. Yesterday's immigration meeting at 
the White House was encouraging for two reasons. First, practically 
everyone at the table--including some of the most conservative voices 
on immigration, like the Senator from Iowa--agreed that we must resolve 
the future of Dreamers by passing DACA protections into law. That is a 
very positive development.
  Second, President Trump appeared to endorse a narrow deal to protect 
the Dreamers, leaving the thornier issues for a later debate on 
comprehensive immigration reform--a debate that, personally, I would 
welcome, the sooner the better.
  But first, we have to do this narrow deal. President Trump also 
backed off his demand that a DACA deal include an expensive and 
ineffective border wall across the entire length of the southern 
border. Of course, the devil is in the details. We Democrats have 
repeated time and again that we are ready, willing, and eager to 
support an effective, practical border security measure in a deal that 
enshrines DACA into law. The President yesterday seemed to agree with 
that. We agree with that. For these reasons, the meeting was 
encouraging.
  Last night, a Federal judge ruled against the Trump administration's 
handling of the termination of the DACA Program. Let me be very clear. 
The ruling last night in no way diminishes the urgency of resolving the 
DACA issue. On this we agree with the White House, which says the 
ruling doesn't do anything to reduce Congress's obligation to address 
this problem now. A court case, of course, is no guarantee of lasting 
security. A higher court can quickly overturn it. Unsurprisingly, the 
Department of Justice responded to the ruling last night by saying that 
it ``will continue to vigorously defend [this] position, and looks 
forward to vindicating its position in further legislation.'' So the 
fact remains that the only way to guarantee the legal status for 
Dreamers is to pass DACA protections into law and to do it now. For 
that reason, a resolution to the DACA issue must be part of a global 
deal on the budget.
  We cannot tolerate delay. Delay is a tactic employed by those who do 
not wish to see a deal. Let me just say, promises that maybe in the 
future we will do it--particularly on immigration--have vanished by the 
wayside.

[[Page S115]]

Unless DACA is on a must-pass deal--a must-pass bill--in terms of a 
global agreement, people are rightfully skeptical that it will ever 
happen. Somehow, somewhere, someone will say: I can't do it.
  Let's not forget that the House has been a graveyard even for 
immigration proposals that have had bipartisan consensus here in the 
Senate. So it must be on a must-pass bill. Otherwise, we are not going 
to get it.
  Congressional negotiators and the valiant group here in the Senate 
led by Senators Durbin and Graham are focused on this issue right now. 
The meeting they had yesterday--I talked to both Senators Durbin and 
Graham last night and this morning--provides a clearer picture of the 
parameters of the deal. The iron is hot. We should strike now. Delay 
will snuff out the hope of getting an agreement that both sides can 
live with. Let us press forward. Each side is going to have to give.

  I am confident, though, that both sides can come to an agreement on 
border security. I am convinced now both sides want to find a consensus 
on DACA. Some will support a deal enthusiastically, others reluctantly, 
but, nonetheless, an agreement is within reach. We ought to get it done 
through the Senate, through the House, and onto the President's desk 
for signature now. So let's get the job done.
  I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oregon.


                        Issues Before the Senate

  Mr. MERKLEY. Mr. President, here we are at the start of a new year. 
Last year, the Republican majority decided to dedicate the year to 
government by and for the powerful and the privileged, but how about 
this year, 2018? We pay attention to our Constitution, which starts 
with that vision of government, not for the powerful, not for the rich, 
not for the privileged, not for the well connected, not for the wealthy 
but for the people of the United States. It is a vision where power is 
distributed, and power comes up from each individual citizen to create 
policies for their general welfare.
  Last year, we saw this complete dedication to trying to wipe out 
healthcare for 20 million to 30 million Americans in order to provide 
tax benefits for the richest. How big were those tax benefits? Well, if 
you add up the provisions that are dedicated to the powerful 
corporations and those benefits for the wealthiest 10 percent, and most 
of that goes to the wealthiest 1 percent, those provisions stack up to 
over $2 trillion--$2 trillion.
  It is very hard to get your hands around $2 trillion. Those are not 
numbers we use in ordinary conversation. Let's take that down to the 
amount of money per man, woman, and child--per citizen in America. 
Well, that is about $6,000--$6,000 taken from the community funds for 
every man, woman, and child in America to deliver to the wealthiest 
Americans. That was government by the Republican majority in 2017. It 
was not ``We the People'' but we the powerful and we the privileged.
  How about we have a new year's resolution that pays attention to the 
vision of our Constitution, to that vision of government of, by, and 
for the people?
  Ben Franklin once wrote in his ``Poor Richard's Almanac'':

       Be at war with your vices,
       At peace with your neighbors,
       And let every New Year find you a better man.

  Every new year is a chance to recreate and reenvision where we are 
headed. Certainly, it is a big vice to use this Chamber, in 
contravention of our Constitution, to pursue policies for the powerful 
and privileged rather than for the people. So let's set that vice aside 
and have a bipartisan year, dedicated to making a foundation for 
families to thrive and jobs and education and healthcare and a 
healthier planet.
  Right now, we should have an immediate new year's checklist of things 
to get done, and that checklist starts with the budget. We have just 9 
days until funding runs out for the Federal Government, and we all know 
from experience what that means--parks shut down, medical research 
stops, passports don't get processed, and businesses can't check in on 
their I-9 applications for employees. That is the type of conduct that 
happens in banana republics--basically, in countries that don't have a 
competent system of government. It should not happen in the United 
States of America.
  We are deep into the financial year, which started on October 1. 
October passed. November passed. December passed. We are well into 
January and still the majority leadership of this body is unable to put 
together a process that addresses just key, fundamental issues. Why is 
that? Because they were so distracted by delivering trillions of 
dollars to the richest of Americans and trying to destroy healthcare 
for millions of Americans that they didn't tend to the fundamentals 
that need to be tended to. Let's take care of those things now.
  The Children's Health Insurance Program. Here we are. It expired on 
September 30 of last year. Nine million children across America depend 
on this insurance. This insurance was crafted in a bipartisan manner. 
It was forged in an agreement between Senator Hatch, a Republican, and 
Senator Kennedy, a Democrat, who had very different visions of America 
but who could agree that families who didn't qualify for Medicaid and 
weren't affluent enough to buy insurance for their children could still 
have insurance for their children. These are the working poor of 
America, the struggling workers of America.
  It was forged in a bipartisan manner, but this year my Republican 
colleagues decided to make these children a bargaining chip for their 
effort to get more for the privileged and the powerful. That has to 
end.
  When children do not have insurance, they don't get that dental 
benefit to take care of those cavities. They don't get that medical 
exam. They don't get those inoculations, those vaccinations. They don't 
get treatment when they are injured because their parents can't afford 
to take them to the doctor. They don't get treatment when they are sick 
for the same reason. Let's take care of children's healthcare.
  This is not a partisan issue. It was forged in a bipartisan manner, 
and it should be so today.
  What also expired on September 30 of last year was the legislation 
authorizing support for our community health clinics. Community health 
clinics are the front door to healthcare for millions of Americans. It 
is that friendly place in your rural community, in your urban 
neighborhood, where you can go through the front door and get 
assistance.
  Talking about millions of Americans who go through those front doors, 
there are more than 1,400 clinics across the country. These are popular 
in rural areas. They are popular in urban areas. They are popular in 
red States. They are popular in blue States. There is nothing partisan 
about it, but the leadership of this body has no interest, has seen no 
urgency in reauthorizing the ability for those health centers to stay 
open.
  In Oregon we saw, as a result of the Affordable Care Act, 30 more 
health clinics established. We saw a lot more resources go into both 
mental illness and into drug abuse during a period in which the opioid 
crisis joined the meth crisis and afflicted both rural and urban areas. 
Lots of folks come to this floor and say: We have to take on opioids. 
It is not just on the left-hand side of the aisle, but it is also on 
the right-hand side of the aisle. People base virtually their entire 
campaigns on taking on opioids. Yet the Republican leadership says this 
isn't important. Let me tell you, this is important, and we need to get 
it done.
  Then let's turn to the Dream Act. Dreamers are those children raised 
in our communities, now 16 through their midtwenties. They are 
productive members of our communities. They have gone through our high 
schools or are in high school now. They are in college. They are 
working. They are contributing. They know no other country than ours.
  Across both sides of the aisle we hear folks say: We want to take 
care of them and establish a structure for this, a legal structure for 
the Dreamers.
  The President yesterday hosted a bipartisan conversation at the White 
House to say: Let's get this done. He expressed his support. In fact, 
everyone in the room expressed support for getting this done.
  Each one of these--the budget, the children's healthcare, the health 
centers, the Dream Act--are bipartisan efforts. These are things that 
should have been addressed long ago if my Republican colleagues instead 
weren't so

[[Page S116]]

obsessed with decimating healthcare for millions of Americans and 
ripping off the National Treasury to deliver benefits to the wealthiest 
Americans.
  Let's get this done for our Dreamers. More than 100 a day are losing 
their status, which means they can no longer legally work in our 
country. It matters. It is urgent. It is productive for our 
communities. It is bipartisan. Let's get it done.
  How about disaster relief? We certainly saw a powerful punch against 
our States from the raging forest fires in the West to the hurricanes 
in the South and Southeast. Hurricanes have hit Texas and Florida and 
Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands--massive destruction. Fires have 
scourged States from Montana to Idaho, to Washington, to Oregon, to 
California. Those fires burned well into the winter months of November 
and December.
  These afflictions hit Democrats and Republicans, red States and blue 
States. Why don't we get this done? These are basic, bipartisan, let's-
get-it-done agendas. Let's get it done now.
  Let's make sure, when we are addressing the impact of those storms in 
the South and those hurricanes--Harvey, Irma, and Maria--we 
simultaneously recognize the destructive impact forest fires have had 
that have been scourging the West. They have destroyed a lot of the 
infrastructure in the forest that needs to be replaced. They have 
affected a lot of communities that need economic help recovering.
  Certainly, it made us recognize that we have millions of acres of 
forests that can become much more fire resilient if they are thinned, 
if we get rid of the fuel buildup on the floor of the forests. When 
they become more resilient, they stop the forest fires.
  Thinning is a win-win. It produces a steady supply of sawlogs for the 
mill and stops forest fires when they are raging. There was a forest 
fire headed right for Sisters, OR, and it hit an area that had been 
thinned. Guess what. It stopped. The trees were farther apart. The 
fuels were removed from the floor of the forest.
  Now we have created a real fire hazard with our clear-cut strategy of 
years past--the forestry grows very close together, often replanted. 
Trees are all the same height. It is very easy for the fire to get into 
the canopy, and once in the canopy, every tree is touching the next 
tree. It rages on, and there is no break.
  But a natural forest is very different. We can more effectively 
replicate the fire-resistant nature of a natural forest by thinning 
these overgrown, second-growth forests. We can then create that supply 
of saw logs, keep our mills open, keep our people working, and 
strengthen our economies in rural America. We can do it by funding this 
reduction, these thinning programs in acreage that has already gone 
through the environmental process. In Oregon, we have 1.6 million acres 
already approved for thinning, if we can pass the funds to get it done.
  So let's take this on in 2018. Let's dedicate 2018 to that vision in 
our Constitution of ``we the people.'' Let's stop passing legislation 
targeted specifically to help out the richest at the expense of 
everyone else in America. Let's turn over a new leaf from campaigns and 
policies and legislation by and for the privileged and the powerful to 
honor the vision of our Constitution, the vision of our Nation, a 
Nation of laws which distributes power that produces policies by and 
for the people of the United States of America, for making families 
stronger, for building those foundations of jobs and healthcare and 
education and a healthy planet.
  Thank you, Mr. President.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The majority whip.


                          Funding Our Military

  Mr. CORNYN. Mr. President, I admit I wasn't here during the entirety 
of the comments from our friend, and I saw his to-do list. The only 
thing missing from that to-do list was to fund our military--or at 
least I didn't see it on there. In all fairness, maybe he mentioned 
that in his comments.
  We now have 9 days to reach an agreement to keep the government 
funded, to keep the lights on, to keep paying the salaries of our 
government employees, and, of course, to fund our military, which ought 
to be our No. 1 priority. If we think about things that government must 
do, funding our national defense is the only thing that we can do and 
that government can do. There are a lot of other things that government 
does that are optional or maybe things we would like to do, but funding 
our military is the No. 1 priority--or should be.
  As the Senate majority leader mentioned earlier this week, our 
Democratic colleagues persist in the notion that we should only 
increase defense spending if we increase nondefense spending by the 
same amount. The parity that the minority leader and the other 
Democrats call for doesn't make any sense, though. It is apples and 
oranges. They act as though all government spending is exactly alike 
and enjoys or should enjoy the same priority, and that is just not 
true. We know that from our own family budgets or from a small 
business. There are things we must do, things we want to do, and things 
we will do if there is money left over. But our friends across the 
aisle, who are obstructing our ability to get to negotiated budget caps 
and fund our military, act as though all of that is the same, that must 
do, want to do, and what you will do if you have money left over--that 
those are all exactly the same, and that is just not the case. It is 
not the case in our family budgets, in our small business budgets, nor 
is it the case for the Federal budget. Not everything is a priority. 
But we do know that the No. 1 priority must be the safety and security 
of the American people by making sure our military is adequately 
funded.
  The Budget Control Act signed into law in 2011 was what I would call 
a necessary evil. The Budget Control Act provided that we would have a 
bipartisan, bicameral negotiation and try to come up with a grand 
bargain.
  That was what President Obama liked to talk about a lot--the grand 
bargain. But some people suggested that was kind of like a unicorn, 
something that people describe but no one has ever seen--a grand 
bargain. I wish it weren't true.
  The Budget Control Act said that in the absence of a grand bargain, 
we would have budget caps or sequestration imposed on discretionary 
spending above certain levels. It proposed separate budget caps for 
defense and nondefense, and if the budget caps are exceeded, there is 
an automatic enforcement mechanism called sequestration which imposes 
across-the-board cuts, which I mentioned a moment ago.
  The purpose of this sequestration--or these across-the-board cuts--is 
to do something in the absence of us doing what we should do; in other 
words, we should take it upon ourselves to figure out what the 
appropriate spending levels should be for defense and nondefense, and 
then we should act to appropriate that money. But this is basically a 
fail-safe mechanism, which operates as a result of our failure to deal 
with this in a proactive way, and it has hit our defense spending much, 
much harder than domestic spending.
  As we know, neither our defense spending nor tax cuts are the cause 
of our deficits and debt. It is the 70 percent of spending that happens 
in the Federal Government on autopilot. It is the entitlements that 
have been going up well in excess of 5 percent a year and are causing 
instability and unpredictability in those important programs, such as 
Medicare and Social Security, but at the same time racking up huge 
deficits and debt that future generations are going to have to pay 
back. Somebody is going to have to pay it back, and it won't be the 
present generation because we won't be around then. It is simply 
immoral to continue to see this happen without trying to deal with it.

  But back on the matter of the Pentagon, as one op-ed writer put it in 
the Washington Post last month--he said:

       The Pentagon and the welfare state have been locked in 
     brutal combat for decades, and the Pentagon has gotten 
     clobbered. . . . Welfare programs--Social Security, Medicare, 
     food stamps and other benefits--dwarf defense spending.

  In the 1950s and 1960s, defense spending was roughly 8 to 10 percent 
of our economy. In 2016, it was just 3 percent. That is a huge change.
  James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, said 
that in his 50 years in the intelligence community, he had never seen a 
more diverse array of threats confronting the United States around the 
world--never in his

[[Page S117]]

50 years of experience. So we are simply asking our military and our 
national security personnel to do too much with too little.
  It is no surprise that Secretary of Defense James Mattis said last 
June that ``for all the heartache caused by the loss of our troops 
during [our] wars [abroad], no enemy in this field has done more to 
harm the readiness of our military than sequestration.''
  More recently, General Mattis said that so far our continuing 
resolutions have not done even greater damage to our readiness thanks 
to certain additional or supplemental funding that we voted on. But at 
the same time, he soberly cautioned that there could be real impact--
and it won't be positive, it will be negative--if the problem persists 
and if the Department of Defense doesn't have a real budget sometime 
this month.
  His remarks echo that of practically every service chief. Together, 
their views mean we have to act. I don't know who else we would listen 
to if we are not going to listen to the Secretary of Defense and our 
service chiefs when it comes to national security because that is their 
job, and we ought to take their advice and heed their counsel.
  Cuts in defense spending have real consequences. Much less money is 
available for training and necessary maintenance, for example. The 
length of deployments for our troops grows, and our soldiers are 
stretched thin. Our military is forced to operate beyond its normal 
capabilities.
  The former Air Force Chief of Staff recently described the Air Force 
as the smallest, oldest equipped, and least ready force across the full 
spectrum of operations in our service history. Those are chilling 
remarks--or should be. More than half of all Marine Corps fixed and 
rotary-wing aircraft were unable to fly by the end of 2016. I have no 
doubt that we can turn that around very quickly if Congress were to 
step up to its responsibilities and adequately fund the military, but 
that is the status quo unless we act. The Navy fleet currently stands 
at 275 of the 350 ship requirement. Of our 58 Army brigade combat 
teams, only 3--3 out of 58--are ready for combat.
  Our enemies shouldn't take any comfort in these numbers because, as I 
said, the United States always pulls together and Congress always acts 
when they see a national emergency. But it shouldn't take an emergency 
for us to do our job and to make sure that our military is adequately 
funded and is ready to fight. As General Brooks in Seoul, South Korea, 
said, their motto is ``ready to fight tonight.'' That is the kind of 
world we live in.
  Last summer was the perfect example of why, when we draw attention to 
these numbers, we are not just blowing smoke. Operational accidents in 
the South Pacific exposed our readiness failures in a dramatic fashion 
and in a tragic fashion. Ten sailors died when the USS John S. McCain 
collided with a 600-foot merchant vessel off the coast of Singapore. 
Seven sailors died when the Fitzgerald collided with another vessel off 
the coast of Japan. And the USS Lake Champlain collided with a boat 
near Korea--although thankfully that time no lives were lost. This 
ought to be a wake-up call to all of us.
  Many have drawn credible correlations between these accidents that 
have taken the lives of our military servicemembers and our readiness 
failures, citing studies like the 2015 independent investigation by the 
Government Accountability Office. That study determined that the Navy's 
mandate to keep ships afloat in the Pacific was shortchanging crew 
training and degrading the condition of our ships--in other words, 
additional readiness failures.
  These accidents, by the way, are happening at the same time our 
national security threats are not going away, as General Clapper's 
comments would indicate.
  We have seen North Korea continue to improve its nuclear and long-
range ballistic missile capabilities beyond the estimates of our 
intelligence community--much faster--and detonate what is widely 
considered to be a hydrogen bomb recently.
  We have seen large-scale protests in Iran--and I hope they continue--
exposing the instability of a regime that continues to use its proxies 
to advance its aims throughout the broader Middle East; in other words, 
the No. 1 state sponsor of international terrorism--Iran. We ought to 
encourage the people of Iran to continue to rise up in protest and to 
change the regime there into one that does not prey on its neighbors in 
the region.
  We have seen a growing China--something that more and more people are 
realizing is a threat. I know that when we deal with countries like 
China, frequently we deal with them in the commercial context where we 
see a business that hires people and we see investments here in the 
United States. But what we need to recognize is that they don't do 
business the way the United States does business. Sitting at the top of 
every company in China, in the board room of every Chinese company, is 
the Communist Party. They operate on an all-of-government basis. And it 
is not just the government; it is also what we would consider the 
private sector. But, in truth, there is no private sector in China; it 
is all an arm of the government. It is posing a rising threat to 
American wages and labor as they erode our industrial base by stealing 
our technology. And because of loopholes in the Committee on Foreign 
Investment in the United States--the so-called CFIUS process--they are 
now able to tailor financial arrangements through joint ventures and 
others in a way to capture our dual-purpose, cutting-edge technology. 
They then copy it in China and erode our defense industrial base here 
in the United States, along with the jobs that go with it. So it is a 
very real and present threat to American wages and workers. It is a 
threat to our intellectual property edge and the innovation that we are 
the best in the world at, but they are all too eager to steal it, copy 
it, and to harm the jobs and the investment in those businesses here in 
the United States.

  Of course, when it comes to China, there is the threat to human 
rights in nondemocratic nations like Venezuela and Zimbabwe, which 
China often has no qualms supporting.
  With this diverse array of dangers, we simply can't afford to 
straitjacket our military by arbitrarily cutting the amount of money we 
appropriate to fund it. But that is what is going to happen unless we 
act--and act quickly. The current continuing resolution expires on the 
19th of this month.
  The truth is, even if we are able to come up with negotiated budget 
caps for defense and nondefense spending, we are probably going to have 
to have a short-term continuing resolution to give the Appropriations 
Committees time to put that into bill text. In other words, we can't 
just snap our fingers once the decision has been made. It is going to 
take some time to actually put it on paper.
  The bottom line is, if we want to return to having the strong 
military that we have always had, if we want to continue to lead in the 
world, if we want to continue to be a force for peace and stability, we 
have to maintain our military strength. That was the lesson we had to 
learn again during the last administration when we saw America retreat 
from its leadership in the world.
  There are countries, tyrants, bullies, and dictators all too willing 
to fill the void left by American retreat, and one way we retreat is 
when we don't fund the readiness of our military, when we are not 
``ready to fight tonight,'' as General Brooks has said, and we need to 
start with ending this cycle of continuing resolutions and defense 
sequestration.
  So I come to the floor today to call on my colleagues from all across 
this Chamber, but specifically across the aisle, to quit holding our 
military hostage to other unrelated demands, and I urge this body to 
come together in agreement on new budget caps as soon as possible.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Sullivan). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak as in 
morning business.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

[[Page S118]]

  



                   CHIP and Community Health Centers

  Mrs. MURRAY. Mr. President, I come to the floor today to talk about 
an issue that is critical to patients and families in my home State of 
Washington and across the country. Today, parents are wondering if they 
will be able to get the healthcare their kids need, and communities are 
wondering if they will be able to provide it.
  That is unacceptable.
  Congress has to swiftly and fully restore the Children's Health 
Insurance Program, or CHIP, and funding for other services families 
need, like community health centers, which have been waiting more than 
100 days for a long-term solution. They should do so without making 
deep cuts to successful prevention programs in the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention that tackle avoidable conditions like heart 
disease and diabetes.
  Democrats have wanted to get this done for months. By focusing on 
pushing through partisan tax reform at the end of the year, Republicans 
instead put massive corporations and the wealthiest ahead of making 
sure our children and their families have the healthcare they need. I 
hope they are now ready to give these issues their full and immediate 
attention. In case they aren't, I want to make sure they know exactly 
what this is about.
  It is about children like Stella. Stella lives in Washington State. 
She is 5 years old. She has two brothers. She has a love of the 
outdoors, especially swimming and kayaking. She has a typical 
kindergartner's boundless energy and excitement. But Stella was born 
with spina bifida, an issue with how her spinal cord was formed. In the 
past year of dealing with that condition, Stella's family went through 
5 catheters a day, almost 2,000 in total. They went on 10 different 
occasions to have MRI scans. They went to get her new leg braces. Given 
the cost of all that, they went through their $5,000 deductible in the 
first 5 weeks of the year. That is right. It took just 5 weeks. 
Additionally, this year Stella is also scheduled to have bladder and 
kidney surgery.
  As one can imagine, the expenses are really adding up. Even with both 
parents working, covering Stella's healthcare needs would be an 
unimaginable task. Fortunately, Stella does qualify for health 
insurance through CHIP. CHIP has helped her family afford the treatment 
she needs, including physical therapy.
  Stella's story is just one of many examples of families who rely on 
this program. There are 60,000 children in Washington State who are now 
insured through CHIP. Nine million families nationwide rely on it to 
help address the healthcare needs of their children. Yet Congress has 
taken over 102 days and counting to restore it. There is no excuse for 
this inaction.
  Families who rely on the CHIP Program are not alone in needing our 
immediate attention. Thanks to CHIP and Medicaid, the uninsured rate 
among children is now at an all-time low. Jeopardizing this 
accomplishment by letting CHIP twist in the wind is simply 
unacceptable. This Republican-controlled Congress has also failed to 
renew other investments that our families rely on for the care they 
need--programs such as community health centers, which serve 25 million 
patients, particularly in our rural and poorer communities; the 
National Health Service Corps, which brings doctors and other 
healthcare providers to underserved areas through scholarships and loan 
repayment; and the Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education 
Program, which brings primary care and dental residencies to 
communities in need. Leaving these programs without long-term 
extensions a minute longer is utterly irresponsible because this lack 
of certainty for them is already bringing a negative impact on our 
communities.
  For example, the Northeast Washington Health Programs serve some of 
most the rural areas in my State, including Ferry County, which has 
fewer than four people per square mile. They are struggling to hire 
needed medical staff and managers because of this uncertainty that is 
now there. Ferry County cannot wait.
  The Community Health Association of Spokane runs 12 health center 
sites and sees more than 70,000 patients a year. They recently began 
offering very much needed opioid addiction treatment. If Congress does 
not reauthorize the community health center funding, those efforts will 
be jeopardized and expansions will be halted. Spokane cannot wait.
  Yakima Neighborhood Health Services served over 22,000 patients in 
2016. Almost all of those patients were below 200 percent of the 
Federal poverty line.
  If Congress does not act soon, three different clinics, including a 
clinic in one of the poorest cities in Washington, will be at risk. 
Yakima cannot wait.
  I have heard additional stories of similar hardships from across my 
State. North Olympic Healthcare Network has had to put expansions on 
behavioral healthcare on hold. Another health center in Washington may 
have to reconsider building a new children's dental residency program. 
A center serving Whatcom County may have to cancel a project for 
medical, dental, and behavioral healthcare facilities as well.
  Across the country there are a lot of examples for community health 
centers just like the ones I mentioned. Healthcare that people of all 
ages and backgrounds rely on is being put in jeopardy, all because 
Republicans prioritized tax cuts for those at the top before the health 
needs of millions of people at the end of last year.
  It is far past time to show these families that we are willing to 
work to get this done. We need to give them the peace of mind that they 
can get the healthcare they need. They deserve that.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. NELSON. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Ernst). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.
  (The remarks of Mr. NELSON pertaining to the introduction of S. 2292 
are printed in today's Record under ``Statements on Introduced Bills 
and Joint Resolutions.'')
  Mr. NELSON. I yield the floor.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Mexico.
  Mr. HEINRICH. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent to speak as in 
morning business.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                                  DACA

  Mr. HEINRICH. Madam President, I rise today to stand up for the 
hundreds of thousands of young immigrants known as Dreamers, whose 
lives President Trump has thrown into terrifying uncertainty.
  Immigrant communities have long helped write the economic, social, 
and cultural story of my home State of New Mexico and, for that matter, 
the entire Nation. That is certainly true for Dreamers, undocumented 
immigrants who arrived in the United States as children and are vital 
members of communities across New Mexico.
  Over the years, I have had the privilege of meeting many of New 
Mexico's estimated 7,000 Dreamers. I have met with students who grew up 
here and are now striving to become doctors, scientists, teachers, and 
even serve in our military. These young people are our children's 
classmates. They are our next-door neighbors. They are our colleagues. 
They are family members, and many are truly rising stars. In fact, I 
would argue that these Dreamers are the future of a great America.
  Every day these young people add to the strength of our economy, to 
the vitality of our country. More than 97 percent of DACA recipients 
are in school or in the workforce.
  The DACA Program allowed them to work legally, to get driver's 
licenses, to go to college, to serve in our military and give back to 
their communities. DACA helped almost 70 percent of recipients secure a 
job with better pay, and better pay leads to real investments in our 
communities and our economy.
  After their DACA applications were approved, nearly two-thirds of 
recipients reported buying their first car, and almost one in six 
reported buying a new home. DACA recipients also paid billions of 
dollars in Federal, State, and local taxes. Why on Earth would

[[Page S119]]

we kick out these contributors to our economy and our country?
  The economic impact of removing nearly 700,000 workers from the U.S. 
workforce would be staggering. It would cost our economy nearly half a 
trillion dollars in GDP loss over the next decade. But passing the 
Dream Act could add an estimated $281 billion to the U.S. economy over 
the next 10 years. That, to me, sounds like putting America first.
  I stand with these Dreamers, and I always have. One of my first 
actions when I was in the House of Representatives was to sign on as an 
original cosponsor of the Dream Act, which would create a pathway to 
legal status and citizenship for Dreamers who pursue higher education 
or serve our Nation in uniform. This commonsense, compassionate, and 
responsible policy is long overdue for a generation of young Americans.
  Since President Trump made the heartless decision to end DACA, I have 
held his administration accountable for their mishandling of renewal 
applications for DACA recipients. My office has assisted Dreamers in 
New Mexico through the DACA renewal process and is actively 
participating in meetings with communities and local advocacy groups 
throughout the State.
  I introduced legislation to safeguard Dreamers' private information, 
such as addresses and telephone numbers, so the Trump administration 
can't use those to target them or their families for deportation.
  When my office learned that the Department of Homeland Security had 
arbitrarily rejected hundreds of renewal applications that arrived late 
because they were delayed by the Postal Service, I pressed the 
administration to take immediate action to reverse its decision. I am 
pleased to say that Dreamers whose applications were rejected due to 
Postal Service delays were allowed to resubmit their renewals for DACA. 
In fact, just last week, the first two DACA recipients in New Mexico, 
who brought this to my attention with the help of Catholic Charities, 
were told that they could move forward with their DACA renewal 
applications.
  President Trump's decision means that until Congress passes the Dream 
Act, these young members of our communities still face deep uncertainty 
about whether they will be able to stay in school, keep working and 
contributing to our economy, and remain in the Nation that they call 
home.
  Congress must pass the Dream Act now. Threatening to deport these 
young people who grew up in America and want to contribute to their 
Nation will not fix our broken immigration system. Making the American 
people foot the bill to build an unnecessary and wasteful border wall--
which families in New Mexico's border communities have told me they do 
not want nor do they need--will not fix our broken immigration system.
  President Trump and congressional Republicans wasted an entire year 
trying to take away American's healthcare and then rushing through tax 
breaks for the superwealthy in the final weeks of the year. By 
squandering an entire year, they pushed Dreamers aside and put their 
lives in jeopardy.
  I voted to fund the government through the holidays in hopes that 
Congress could finally reach an agreement to pass the Dream Act. We 
also urgently need to reauthorize the Children's Health Insurance 
Program, fix wildfire disaster funding, provide disaster relief for 
Puerto Rico, which is still recovering from Hurricane Maria. Taking 
care of these long-neglected and bipartisan priorities is the bare 
minimum of governance. Republican leaders in Congress need to take this 
opportunity seriously, especially if they expect our support.
  I will be fighting every step of the way to pass the Dream Act, and I 
encourage all of my colleagues to do the same.
  Since President Trump shamefully pulled the rug out from under 
Dreamers when he hastily ended the DACA Program, I have spent time 
meeting with Dreamers in New Mexico, as well as here in Washington. You 
cannot hear their stories without realizing how morally bankrupt the 
administration's current policy is. It is impossible for me to convey 
the desperation and the fear they are feeling every day that passes 
without our passing the Dream Act.
  Now is the time to give these young Americans a permanent place in 
this great Nation. Enough is enough. Their patience has worn thin with 
the President and congressional Republicans using them as political 
bargaining chips. It is immoral to play politics with the lives of 
these young Americans.
  I will say it again. Congress absolutely must pass the Dream Act, and 
we have an opportunity to do it now.
  We should not stop once we pass the Dream Act. Leaders in Congress 
have waited far too long to finally address our Nation's overall broken 
immigration system. I still continue to believe that our Nation 
urgently needs Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform, which 
includes a visa program that meets the needs of our economy. It is a 
tough but fair path to earn citizenship for the estimated 11 million 
people in our country who are undocumented and a plan that ensures 
community safety and security at our borders.
  When I think about immigration, I always wonder how different my own 
life would be if America had turned my father away when he immigrated 
here as a young boy. Our Nation's enduring spirit has been built by the 
hard work and the dreams of so many striving young immigrants like my 
father in the 1930s and like so many Dreamers today. No Member of 
Congress should be able to rest until Dreamers are able to rest easy, 
knowing they will be able to stay and to contribute to literally the 
only Nation they have ever called home.
  Thank you.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                         Funding the Government

  Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, just last week we began the second 
session of the 115th Congress. We are now safely into 2018, and we 
should be talking about what we can accomplish for the American people 
in the new year. We simply face a long list of unfinished business from 
2017--last year--and, unfortunately, we have a very short window in 
which to get it done.
  We are 4 months into fiscal year 2018, and we still don't have a 
budget deal. I am vice chairman of the Appropriations Committee. We 
should have had this done long before now. Our agencies are operating 
under last year's funding levels. They have little flexibility to 
handle the problems they face today.
  We still haven't reauthorized the Children's Health Insurance 
Program, what we call CHIP, so that puts the healthcare of 9 million 
children at risk. These are American children.
  Nearly 800,000 Dreamers live under uncertainty and fear of 
deportation, living in the country they have known most of their lives. 
I don't know how anybody, Republican or Democrat, could call this 
acceptable.
  Now, I know the Republicans control the House, they control the 
Senate, and they control the White House. They are in charge. They have 
to show responsibility and show leadership on these issues, but instead 
of addressing these issues, last year the Republican leadership spent 
time rolling back sensible regulations designed to protect the American 
consumer, designed to protect our environment, and designed to protect 
people from harassment in the workplace. They rolled those all back, 
and then they passed a massive tax cut for big corporations and the 
wealthiest of Americans.
  We Democrats have been calling for bipartisan budget talks since 
June--7 months ago. We have passed three continuing resolutions since 
September of last year to give us more time to strike a deal on the 
budget and Dreamers and CHIP and disaster funding. These are just to 
name a few, but they are enormously important to the people who are 
experiencing the disasters or who have children who need healthcare or 
who are Dreamers. Yet, on the 102nd day of the fiscal year, there are 
only 9 days until the next fiscal cliff, and we don't have a budget 
deal.
  President Trump said months ago that the country could use a good 
government shutdown. I don't agree with

[[Page S120]]

him, but I am beginning to think that is exactly what his party is 
angling for--a manufactured crisis to distract from the fact that they 
are not doing their job.
  The Washington Post seemed to confirm this last December, when it 
reported the President privately told people that a government shutdown 
would be good for him politically. In all of my years in the Senate--I 
have been here under Republican and Democratic Presidents alike--I have 
never heard such damaging rhetoric come from the President of the 
United States.
  Nobody wants a government shutdown--nobody. It is devastating to 
people not only throughout the government but to people throughout the 
whole country. However, that seems to be what they are vying for.
  For months, I have been calling for a bipartisan budget deal that is 
based on parity--equal increases for defense and nondefense programs--
that would provide relief from sequestration. I agree with the 
Republicans and Democrats who say military readiness has suffered under 
sequestration but so has our Nation's economy, so has our educational 
system, so has our infrastructure, and so has our care for our 
veterans.

  If we want to combat the problems caused by sequestration, we have to 
raise the caps on both sides of the ledger. Fixing one side of the 
equation will not address the needs of our Nation and, even worse, will 
actually shortchange our military.
  If we don't invest in our economy, if we don't invest in the 
education of our youth, the military will not have expert, qualified 
soldiers, the men and women on whom they rely. If we don't invest in 
our diplomacy, our Nation and the world become less safe. If we don't 
improve our cyber security defenses and our physical infrastructure, we 
become soft targets for those who would do us harm, both in this 
country and outside this country. If we don't care for our veterans, we 
are not going to have young men and women who are willing to serve.
  This week, the majority leader came to the floor making the case for 
increased defense spending. He asked us to listen to our nonpartisan 
military leaders about what they think is needed to keep this country 
safe. I couldn't agree more.
  To that end, I have two letters signed by a combined 560 retired 
admirals, generals, and other former military members. I ask unanimous 
consent to have these letters printed in the Record following my 
remarks.
  I have no idea what these admirals', generals', and others' political 
parties are, but they make the case that we have to increase our 
investment in domestic priorities--including education and childcare, 
as well as diplomacy--if we are going to keep our country safe and 
support our military. Secretary of Defense Mattis said even more 
bluntly: If we do not fully fund the State Department, we should be 
prepared to buy more ammunition for our military.
  The wisdom of our military leaders notwithstanding, Republicans 
appear to be dug in. They claim equal increases for both defense and 
nondefense programs would add too much to our deficit and burden our 
children. It is one over the other. It is hard to have somebody say 
that with a straight face in the wake of the President signing a tax 
bill to add $1.5 trillion to our Nation's debt and to benefit primarily 
large corporations and the wealthiest Americans. You can't make the 
argument that we can't afford to take care of our domestic needs. It is 
simply not credible.
  Budget negotiations are not the only place where Republicans haven't 
engaged in a productive way. President Trump's decision to end the DACA 
Program has put nearly 800,000 Dreamers in this country in an untenable 
position. The decision was as cruel as it was senseless. It may make a 
tweet that people look at, but if you are one of those Dreamers and you 
are on your way to school and are expecting a scholarship to college 
and you don't know if you are going to be in this country tomorrow, 
that is not a tweet.
  The President should have worked with Congress. He should have found 
a permanent legislative solution while keeping DACA protections in 
place. I believe he terminated the program under false pretenses, 
yielding to xenophobic voices in his administration, and last night a 
Federal judge issued an order that said just that: Terminating DACA was 
not required under the law--far from it. But a court order that only 
temporarily halts the administration from dismantling DACA provides 
little comfort to Dreamers. They live each and every day uncertain of 
the future and with fear of deportation.
  Now, I have heard Members of the Senate trying to decide at what time 
we are going to finish voting for the week. Their big fear is this: Are 
we going to make our flight home?
  Dreamers have to worry if their flight is going to be out of this 
country and back to a country they don't even know. They worry if they 
will have to leave the country they know and love.
  Dreamers are Americans in every way, except on paper. They were 
brought here as children, through no fault of their own. They are law-
abiding members of our community. They attend school. They serve as 
doctors and teachers. They defend our homeland as brave men and women 
in uniform.
  This is a crisis of the President's own making. Now, Congress needs 
to pick up the pieces. I hope, after the meeting yesterday, we will be 
allowed to pick up the pieces. We have spent months trying to find a 
path forward, but you can't find one if the administration keeps moving 
the goalposts.
  We need to address the fate of the Dreamers now. You can take a poll 
in this country. The American people want us to. Also, look at the 
broad bipartisan support on display yesterday at the White House. 
Republicans and Democrats want to fix the mess that the President 
created. A solution should be within our grasp.
  The White House has made unreasonable demands, such as $18 billion of 
American tax dollars to build a wall on the southern border, in 
exchange for Dreamers. The $18 billion wall is last century's solution. 
It does nothing for this century.
  If they really believe Mexico is going to pay for it, I have a 
solution. Open a bank account and, as Mexico sends us money, then use 
it to build a wall. Don't ask the American taxpayers, who are strapped 
at home, to pay for something the President says the Mexicans will pay 
for. Open an account, find out if they are telling the truth, let the 
money come into the account, and then build it.
  But, worse, don't use the Dreamers as negotiable commodities. They 
are not commodities. They are human beings. They are people who deserve 
to have their dreams. Let's pass a bill--we could do it this week--
protecting Dreamers now. Republicans control the House, the Senate, and 
the White House. This is their government.
  We have a week and a half before the next continuing resolution 
expires. We have a lot to do. Let's get serious. Let's get to work. I 
am willing to work here every day, every night, right through the 
weekend. Let's get it done. We are not doing it for us. We are doing it 
for all the American people. Let's do it for all the American people--
not for special interests, not for one party. Let's do it for all the 
American people. It could be done, if we want to.
  There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in 
the Record, as follows:

                                               Mission: Readiness,


                                 Council for a Strong America,

                                                     May 30, 2017.
       Members of Congress: As retired admirals and generals, we 
     know from our experience that no matter how much we spend to 
     build our military and procure the latest and greatest 
     technology, we will never be a secure nation if we do not 
     have qualified and skilled men and women to fill the ranks of 
     our Armed Forces. Therefore, investing in education for our 
     youngest children, which is the foundation of our future 
     national security, is essential. Accordingly, we urge 
     Congress to prioritize investments in early childhood 
     programs, including funding for Head Start, the Child Care 
     and Development Block Grant (CCDBG), and Preschool 
     Development Grants in FY18 Labor, Health and Human Services, 
     Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill.
       Mission: Readiness is the national security organization of 
     retired top military leaders that recognize the strength of 
     our military depends on our people. The stunning fact is that 
     today, 71 percent of young adults ages 17 to 24 cannot 
     qualify for military service because they are too poorly 
     educated, medically or physically unfit, or have a 
     disqualifying record of crime or drug abuse. if these issues 
     are not addressed, the Nation risks a shortage of qualified 
     recruits--one that will leave the country vulnerable for 
     years to come.

[[Page S121]]

       Mounting research shows that the early years of life have 
     an incredible impact on educational attainment, behaviors and 
     health. High-quality early interventions can help vulnerable 
     children succeed in school, stay on the right side of the law 
     and achieve a healthy weight in the long-term. These outcomes 
     open the doors for many career paths, including military 
     service.
       Long-term studies of early education programs show 
     impressive differences in children's educational outcomes. A 
     recent analysis of Head Start outcomes, comparing siblings 
     who did versus did not attend the program, found participants 
     showing increased probability of graduating from high school, 
     attending college, and receiving a postsecondary credential. 
     High-quality state preschool programs have also demonstrated 
     lasting effects on students' elementary-school performance. 
     New Jersey's preschool program, for example, found that 
     children in the program were three-quarters of a year ahead 
     in math and two-thirds of a year ahead in literacy in the 
     fourth and fifth grades.
       While Congress faces tough spending choices ahead to secure 
     and protect our Nation, we know that the backbone of our 
     military is, and will always be, our women and men in 
     uniform. As a matter of national security, in order to grow 
     the pool of eligible recruits, Congress must prioritize 
     investments in early childhood programs, including funding 
     for Head Start, the Child Care and Development Block Grant 
     (CCDBG), and Preschool Development Grants.
       Signed by a combined 424 retired admirals, generals, and 
     other former military members.
                                  ____

                                                February 27, 2017.
     Hon. Paul Ryan,
     Speaker of the House,
     House of Representatives.
     Hon. Nancy Pelosi,
     Minority Leader,
     House of Representatives.
     Hon. Mitch McConnell,
     Majority Leader,
     U.S. Senate.
     Hon. Chuck Schumer,
     Minority Leader,
     U.S. Senate.
       Dear Speaker Ryan, Minority Leader Pelosi, Majority Leader 
     McConnell, and Minority Leader Schumer: As you and your 
     colleagues address the federal budget for Fiscal Year 2018, 
     we write as retired three and four star flag and general 
     officers from all branches of the armed services to share our 
     strong conviction that elevating and strengthening diplomacy 
     and development alongside defense are critical to keeping 
     America safe.
       We know from our service in uniform that many of the crises 
     our nation faces do not have military solutions alone--from 
     confronting violent extremist groups like ISIS in the Middle 
     East and North Africa to preventing pandemics like Ebola and 
     stabilizing weak and fragile states that can lead to greater 
     instability. There are 65 million displaced people today, the 
     most since World War II, with consequences including refugee 
     flows that are threatening America's strategic allies in 
     Israel, Jordan, Turkey, and Europe.
       The State Department, USAID, Millennium Challenge 
     Corporation, Peace Corps and other development agencies are 
     critical to preventing conflict and reducing the need to put 
     our men and women in uniform in harm's way. As Secretary 
     James Mattis said while Commander of U.S. Central Command, 
     ``If you don't fully fund the State Department, then I need 
     to buy more ammunition.'' The military will lead the fight 
     against terrorism on the battlefield, but it needs strong 
     civilian partners in the battle against the drivers of 
     extremism--lack of opportunity, insecurity, injustice, and 
     hopelessness.
       We recognize that America's strategic investments in 
     diplomacy and development--like all of U.S. investments--must 
     be effective and accountable. Significant reforms have been 
     undertaken since 9/11, many of which have been embodied in 
     recent legislation in Congress with strong bipartisan 
     support--on human trafficking, the rights of women and girls, 
     trade and energy in Africa, wildlife trafficking, water, food 
     security, and transparency and accountability.
       We urge you to ensure that resources for the International 
     Affairs Budget keep pace with the growing global threats and 
     opportunities we face. Now is not the time to retreat.
       cc: Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
       cc: Secretary of Defense James Mattis.
       cc: National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster.
       Signed by a combined 121 retired admirals, generals, and 
     other former military members.

  Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, my colleague from Vermont, Senator Bernie 
Sanders, wrote what I feel was a terrific op-ed about why we should not 
and do not need to close down the government, why we can do our work 
and why we should, and that people rely on us, too.
  Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the op-ed be printed in 
the Record.
  There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in 
the Record, as follows:

                [From the Washington Post, Jan. 8, 2018]

                 It's on Republicans To Stop a Shutdown

                          (By Bernie Sanders)

       I do not know why President Trump and the Republican 
     Party--which controls the White House, the Senate and the 
     House--are so willing to shut down the government. Maybe they 
     think it will be good for them politically. Maybe they 
     believe the chaos created by a government shutdown would be a 
     welcome distraction from the ongoing Russia investigation 
     being conducted by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. 
     Whatever the motives of the Republican leadership, one thing 
     is clear: A government shutdown would be disastrous for the 
     American people.
       A shutdown would harm tens of millions of working-class 
     families who would be unable to access vital services. It 
     would disrupt the lives of hundreds of thousands of federal 
     employees who would not receive the paychecks they expected. 
     It would endanger members of the U.S. military who are 
     putting their lives on the line defending our nation.
       Congress has a responsibility to the American people to 
     prevent a shutdown and work in a bipartisan manner to reach a 
     fair budget agreement that addresses the very serious 
     problems facing the working people of our country.
       Unfortunately, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-
     Ky.) ratcheted up threats of a government shutdown last week 
     by insisting on ending the long-standing, bipartisan 
     agreement over parity for defense and non-defense spending. 
     This principle of parity is enormously important for working 
     families and is something that cannot be terminated. If we do 
     not act, funding for education, child care, health care, 
     nutrition assistance, affordable housing and other important 
     domestic programs will be at a 40-year low as a percentage of 
     our economy.
       As the middle class continues to shrink, cuts to non-
     defense spending would cause even worse economic pain to 
     working families, the elderly, children, the sick and the 
     most vulnerable. Meanwhile, as Trump and the Republicans 
     demand an unbelievable $100 billion increase in military 
     spending over the next two years, the Defense Department has 
     been inoculated from budget cuts over the past several years 
     because of the Overseas Contingency Operations loophole--a 
     special account not subject to spending caps established by 
     Congress in 2011.
       Providing parity in these budget negotiations means, among 
     other things, fully funding--without offsets--the Children's 
     Health Insurance Program for 9 million kids and community 
     health centers for 27 million Americans. It means increased 
     funding for the Social Security Administration and the 
     Veterans Administration so they can provide guaranteed 
     benefits to seniors and veterans who have earned them. It 
     means keeping our obligations to more than 1.5 million 
     workers and retirees who are about to lose a large part of 
     the pensions they were promised. It means addressing the 
     crisis of student debt, expanding child care, improving our 
     crumbling infrastructure in rural America and protecting our 
     national parks. It means providing help in the national 
     struggle against opioid and heroin addiction.
       Furthermore, as part of the budget negotiations, we must 
     also provide adequate disaster relief to Texas, Florida, 
     Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, as well as assistance to 
     the Western states recovering from terrible wildfires.
       Finally, Trump added even more fuel to the fire when he 
     decided to use 800,000 ``dreamers'' as a bargaining chip for 
     an $18 billion wall that the overwhelming majority of 
     Americans do not want. These dreamers are young people who 
     have lived in this country for almost their entire lives. 
     They go to school. They work. They serve in the U.S. 
     military. The United States is their home; they know no 
     other. For Trump and the Republican leadership to allow their 
     legal status to expire, and to subject them to deportation, 
     would be one of the cruelest acts in modern American history. 
     It must not be allowed to happen.
       This is not just my viewpoint. It's what the American 
     people want. A recent Quinnipiac University poll showed that 
     77 percent of the American people, including a large majority 
     of Republicans, support providing legal protections for the 
     dreamers. The Republican Congress must act. A clean Dream Act 
     must be signed into law as part of any budget agreement.
       The American people are increasingly disgusted with a 
     government that protects the interests of the wealthy and the 
     powerful, while ignoring the needs of the vulnerable. The 
     U.S. government must do more than provide huge tax breaks to 
     billionaires, callously deport young people, greatly expand 
     military spending, end net neutrality, deny the reality of 
     climate change and threaten to cut Social Security, Medicare, 
     Medicaid, education and nutrition programs. We must pass a 
     budget agreement that addresses the needs of Americans and 
     not just billionaire campaign contributors.

[[Page S122]]

  

  Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. BARRASSO. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.


                               Tax Reform

  Mr. BARRASSO. Madam President, when we were debating the tax relief 
law at the end of last year, it was a very familiar debate in many 
ways.
  Republicans came to the floor with facts and figures on how much 
extra money people were going to see in their pockets and their 
paychecks. Democrats came to the floor with the same old tired line 
that you always hear them talk about--the millionaires and 
billionaires.
  Republicans pointed out economic studies that showed that workers 
right now pay more than 70 percent of the cost of corporate taxes. We 
talked about a study by the Tax Foundation that predicted that if we 
passed the tax relief bill, the average family would actually see a 
gain of about $2,600 a year in their after-tax income. It was partly 
because of getting the tax cut and partly because their employers would 
then pass on much of the tax cut in higher wages. Democrats didn't 
believe it. They said that only rich people would benefit and that 
businesses would never share their tax savings with the workers. The 
Democratic leader said that ``tax cuts like these benefit the wealthy 
and the powerful to the exclusion of the middle class.''
  Here we are. It is the month after we passed the tax relief bill, the 
tax reduction bill, and the tax simplification bill, and the question 
is, Who was right? The very day the tax bill passed in Congress, AT&T 
came out and said it was giving its workers a bonus. It said that 
200,000 hard-working employees were going to get an extra $1,000 each 
directly because of the new tax relief, tax reduction, tax cut bill. 
The Tax Foundation predicted that they would eventually get an extra 
$2,600, and these people are already getting $1,000 each on day one.
  That has opened the floodgates to other companies doing the exact 
same thing and employees around the country experiencing the exact same 
thing. Businesses started sharing the tax savings with rank-and-file, 
middle-class workers, and it started on day one--not just the wealthy 
and the powerful, as Senator Schumer has predicted. Over 120 companies 
have said they are raising wages, giving out bonuses, and investing in 
their workers because of the tax law. It adds up to over $980 million--
$980 million in the pockets of hard-working men and women around the 
country. How many people are seeing that? By last count, almost 1 
million hard-working Americans--over 970,000 hard-working Americans 
have already gotten the good news.
  There is more good news coming every day, with more announcements 
today. It is exactly what Republicans said would happen. It is 
happening for people who work at banks, who work at insurance 
companies, who work at airlines. It is happening for people who work at 
big companies, such as AT&T, Visa, and Comcast, but it is also 
happening for people who work at smaller companies, such as a winery in 
California and an aviation company in Texas. These are businesses and 
people in communities who are important parts of their communities and 
doing important jobs. The employees work hard, and now they are getting 
a share of the relief the Republicans had predicted they would get all 
along. And they are not just getting cash bonuses. There is a bank in 
Massachusetts called Berkshire Hills Bancorp. They announced last week 
that the people working there will be getting a $1,000 bonus and will 
also see the minimum wage raised to $15 an hour.
  More is being invested in employee development and training programs. 
When you invest more in employee development and training programs, 
that means people are going to have additional skills that make them 
even more productive, better at their jobs, and qualify for even higher 
wages.
  This bank in Massachusetts is also contributing an extra $2 million 
to its charitable efforts, including scholarships. That helps improve 
the communities where the workers live and where they raise their 
families.
  Democrats said it is not going to happen. It has happened. It is 
happening every day. They said that businesses would keep the money for 
themselves. That is not what we are seeing all across the country.
  Ms. Warren, the senior Senator from Massachusetts, went on PBS. The 
senior Senator from Massachusetts said that the idea that tax relief 
would lead to higher wages was, in her words, ``the big lie that 
Republicans have been selling'' for decades. She said that tax relief 
was ``an insult to working families across America.''
  I would point out to Senator Warren that many of the people who work 
at this bank are in her home State of Massachusetts. People have gotten 
wage increases. People have gotten additional money spent on training 
so they can become more valuable and make even more money. People have 
seen the minimum wage in that business go up. The workers getting these 
bonuses and raises in their pay are her constituents. Does she think 
these people are feeling insulted? Does she believe they have been 
insulted by getting a $1,000 bonus and getting an increase in their 
salaries and having investments in terms of additional training? Is 
that an insult to those people? I don't think so. I bet they are 
feeling pretty glad to be supported and valued by their employer.

  There is another business in Nevada, South Point Casino. Workers 
there are receiving $1 million total in bonuses. Previously, this 
business had actually planned to increase the share of health insurance 
costs that its employees would have to pay because health insurance 
costs have gone up.
  Health insurance prices have skyrocketed ever since ObamaCare was 
passed. Companies have struggled with how to deal with these rising 
costs. Many have tried to pass these on to the employees.
  This company in Nevada has said that because of the Republican tax 
relief law, they are canceling their plans to raise insurance costs--
canceling their plans to raise the costs. That is more money in 
employees' pockets. The owner of the business said: ``We want to be 
sure that our extended family is taken care of.'' That is the way these 
people think of the people who work for them--as part of their extended 
family. That is how employers are responding to tax relief all around 
the country, and that is what we said would happen.
  We also predicted that one way businesses might deal with lower taxes 
would be to cut prices for consumers, let people who use their services 
or buy their products keep more of their hard-earned money. Americans 
are starting to see that prediction come true in the form of lower 
utility bills. Gas, electric, and water utilities across the country 
are getting ready to cut their rates because the taxes are going down 
under the law. Customers of the power company in Baltimore are going to 
receive millions of dollars in the form of lower rates. It has been a 
cold winter on the east coast, and a lower electric bill is going to be 
good news for a lot of people in that area. Customers are also likely 
to see the same thing in Missouri, South Carolina, and Louisiana.
  These are the kinds of effects we are seeing all across the country, 
in various ways. It is all good news for consumers, all good news for 
people at home as a result of the tax reduction, tax relief, tax cuts 
passed by Republicans and signed by President Trump.
  Americans are getting the benefits of tax relief. They are getting 
the benefit of regulatory relief and the pro-growth policies of 
Republicans in Congress and the Trump administration. People are seeing 
it in their daily lives. The polling company Gallup said that as soon 
as Donald Trump was elected President, economic confidence in this 
country soared. That is what the polls found. It has stayed positive 
almost without interruption ever since. It is the exact opposite of 
what polls were showing during the previous 8 years, in the previous 
administration. That was during the so-called economic recovery.
  Why are people so optimistic now? It is because you can't open a 
newspaper or turn on a television without seeing more good news about 
the economy. New employment numbers came out last Friday. CNN had a 
headline: ``U.S.

[[Page S123]]

economy added 2 million jobs in 2017.'' The Washington Post's headline 
was ``Trump's first-year jobs numbers were very, very good.'' Bloomberg 
reported that the Christmas shopping season was ``probably the best one 
in a decade.'' People are feeling confident. They are seeing higher 
wages, they are seeing cash bonuses, and soon they will start seeing 
the tax cut in their paychecks.
  The American people know that Republicans have kept our promise. We 
are cutting regulations, cutting taxes, putting more money back in 
their pockets. That is what hard-working Americans have asked us to do, 
and that is what we are going to continue to do.
  I yield the floor.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Tillis). The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mrs. ERNST. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mrs. ERNST. Mr. President, I rise to discuss the positive impact the 
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will have on Iowa farmers.
  Of course, our Iowa agricultural economy is really important, and 
those men and women who are serving as farmers, ranchers, and growers 
in the State of Iowa mean the world to me, coming from a farm my family 
had in Southwest Iowa.
  We all understand this has been a very challenging time for farmers 
in our rural communities. The community I come from in Southwest Iowa 
has just 10,000 people in our county. Many of them have faced the 
challenges of the economic downturn. Since their peaks in 2012, corn 
prices have declined by 60 percent and soybean prices have declined by 
47 percent. My neighbors are hurting, folks. Farm income has nearly 
been cut in half since 2013.
  A lot of our producers are hurting, especially our young and 
beginning farmers who have gotten their start just in maybe the last 10 
years or so, but, fortunately for our farmers, our ranchers, and our 
growers, tax relief is on its way. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will 
provide sweeping tax cuts for farmers and rural communities, allowing 
our producers to keep more of those hard-earned dollars.
  About 95 percent of farms are organized as passthrough businesses, 
such as sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S corps. These 
businesses are taxed under individual tax rules and will benefit from 
lower tax rates for every income bracket. On top of that, they will see 
significant relief through a new 20-percent deduction on passthrough 
business income. The law also provides relief from the costly 
individual mandate which forced many farmers to choose between buying 
an expensive ObamaCare plan through their State exchange or being 
fined.

  Now, just a couple of years ago, I remember a very intense 
conversation I had with a beginning farmer in Northeast Iowa. When he 
was purchasing his insurance through the State exchange, the cost had 
more than doubled. He was shaking he was so upset about it, and he 
explained to me the additional cost of that individual policy was his 
truck payment. There was no room in his budget for the additional cost 
of that insurance policy so he had to make that choice: Do I purchase 
through the individual exchange or do I make my truck payment? 
Fortunately, within this bill, we have that relief. He can make that 
choice, and the choice is his on whether he makes that truck payment 
and forgoes the insurance or whether now he can do without that type of 
insurance and not be fined because he was too poor to afford it.
  In addition, the bill dramatically expands section 179 expensing and 
allows 5 years of 100 bonus depreciation. Both of these changes will 
foster much needed investment in farms throughout Iowa.
  The law also preserves a number of important tax provisions for 
farmers, including the interest deduction, cash accounting, and the use 
of like-kind exchanges for property.
  Last, but certainly not least, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act doubles the 
Federal estate tax exemption while preserving the stepped-up basis. The 
death tax can have a devastating impact on family farms. Over 90 
percent of farm assets cannot be sold easily without losing value. 
Especially as we continue to experience a downturn in that ag economy, 
family farmers are sometimes left with no choice but to sell land or 
the equipment they use to farm that land when they are forced to pay 
that tax.
  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is a big step in the right direction for 
agriculture. I am thankful to the President for his leadership and to 
my colleagues in the Senate and the House for helping get this long-
needed bill done. On behalf of agriculture, thank you.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. BOOZMAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. BOOZMAN. Mr. President, I rise to highlight the positive impacts 
our historic tax reform law will have on the agricultural community.
  Agriculture is Arkansas' largest industry by far, adding $16 billion 
to our economy every year and accounting for approximately one in every 
six jobs. We are the top rice-producing State in the Nation, No. 2 in 
the Nation in broiler chicken production, and the third largest 
producer of catfish in the United States. We could also clothe and 
shelter ourselves from fiber grown in Arkansas, as we are the third in 
the Nation in cotton production and the fifth largest softwood lumber-
producing State. You could keep going down the list, and you would find 
Arkansas as one of the Nation's top 10 producers of a number of 
agricultural commodities.
  Clearly, ensuring that Washington helps create an economic 
environment that allows the agricultural industry to thrive is 
extremely important to my home State of Arkansas. When President Trump 
signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act into law, his signature provided much 
needed tax relief to America's farmers. More than 94 percent of farms 
are organized as passthrough businesses, which means they are impacted 
by the same tax provisions as individual filers. Lower tax rates across 
the board and a 20-percent deduction from their taxable income means 
immediate savings, which can be reinvested to help grow their 
operations.
  Ninety seven percent of the farms in Arkansas are family owned, and 
the vast majority of them will now be exempt from the estate tax--the 
death tax. This is a big deal. It will help keep those farms and 
ranches in the family for generations to come.
  Finally, farmers and ranchers will be able to expense 100 percent of 
their capital investments, such as equipment, over the next 4 years. In 
his address to the Farm Bureau earlier this week, the President called 
this the ``sleeper'' in the bill. He is right. People don't realize and 
there hasn't been enough talk about how beneficial this provision will 
be for our family-run agricultural operations. The substance of the 
President's Farm Bureau speech tilted heavily toward our efforts to 
bring stability and predictability to the economy.
  As we have witnessed over the course of the previous administration, 
uncertainty is devastating to our economy. There are few industries 
that are inherently more affected by uncertainty than agriculture. This 
is why we have taken steps to eliminate some of the punitive, needless 
regulations that create uncertainty for our farmers and our ranchers.
  It is also why my colleagues and I on the Agriculture Committee, 
under the steadfast leadership of Chairman Roberts, are working hard to 
reauthorize the farm bill. Programs are authorized by the farm bill 
that are absolutely vital to farmers, ranchers, and consumers. These 
programs will provide more certainty in rural America to address the 
challenges ahead. Finally, it is why we took great care to ensure that 
the agricultural industry will see the benefits of tax reform. 
Establishing a tax code that works for our farmers and ranchers, as 
opposed to against them, is vital to their ability to plan for the 
future and invigorate our rural communities.
  I am proud of our efforts to pass this landmark tax reform law, and I 
am

[[Page S124]]

confident it will have lasting, positive effects for our economy.
  With that, I yield back.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. ISAKSON. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order 
for the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Cotton). Without objection, it is so 
ordered.


                      Nomination of Michael Brown

  Mr. ISAKSON. Mr. President, I am honored and privileged to come to 
the floor of the Senate today to talk about Michael Brown, appointed by 
President Donald Trump to be a district judge on the U.S. District 
Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
  Mr. Brown is an outstanding citizen of our State. He is married to a 
wonderful lady and has three wonderful children. He is a graduate of 
Marist School, a graduate of Georgetown University, and a graduate of 
the University of Georgia Law School, magna cum laude, in 1994.
  He has a record of practicing law in the private sector that is 
unparalleled, having worked for both King & Spalding and also Alston & 
Bird.
  King & Spalding produced many of the judges on the bench of the 
United States of America with distinguished records, not the least of 
which is the Attorney General under President Jimmy Carter, Griffin 
Bell, an outstanding Attorney General from our State. They also 
produced Sam Nunn, an outstanding Member of the Senate. They produced 
many judges in our State. Many were also produced from the firm where 
he practices now, which is Alston & Bird.
  It is a privilege for me to talk about Michael for many reasons. Most 
importantly, he comes with a background of experience in the private 
sector. He has been recommended by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as one 
of the great lawyers in the United States of America in business 
matters. One of the things our courts need is a tempered balance of 
business and consumers. There is no question that someone who is not a 
voice for business as a judge but has experience in business as a judge 
will make a tremendous difference. I know he will in the Northern 
District of Georgia.
  I thank the President for nominating Michael and making this 
appointment. To the Members of the Senate, I urge you to join me in 
voting for Michael Brown for the Northern District of Georgia to be our 
next judge there. He will be a great judge on the bench. It will be a 
great decision for us, and it will continue the growth and improvement 
of outstanding jurists confirmed by this Senate in this year 2018.
  I yield back.
  I suggest the absence of a quorum.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
  The senior assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
  Mr. BURR. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for 
the quorum call be rescinded.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  Mr. BURR. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to begin the series 
of votes.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
  The question is, Will the Senate advise and consent to the Parker 
nomination?
  Mr. BURR. I ask for the yeas and nays.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second?
  There appears to be a sufficient second.
  The clerk will call the roll.
  Mr. CORNYN. The following Senator is necessarily absent: the Senator 
from Arizona (Mr. McCain).
  Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Booker) 
is necessarily absent.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Are there any other Senators in the Chamber 
desiring to vote?
  The result was announced--yeas 98, nays 0, as follows:

                       [Rollcall Vote No. 5 Ex.]

                                YEAS--98

     Alexander
     Baldwin
     Barrasso
     Bennet
     Blumenthal
     Blunt
     Boozman
     Brown
     Burr
     Cantwell
     Capito
     Cardin
     Carper
     Casey
     Cassidy
     Cochran
     Collins
     Coons
     Corker
     Cornyn
     Cortez Masto
     Cotton
     Crapo
     Cruz
     Daines
     Donnelly
     Duckworth
     Durbin
     Enzi
     Ernst
     Feinstein
     Fischer
     Flake
     Gardner
     Gillibrand
     Graham
     Grassley
     Harris
     Hassan
     Hatch
     Heinrich
     Heitkamp
     Heller
     Hirono
     Hoeven
     Inhofe
     Isakson
     Johnson
     Jones
     Kaine
     Kennedy
     King
     Klobuchar
     Lankford
     Leahy
     Lee
     Manchin
     Markey
     McCaskill
     McConnell
     Menendez
     Merkley
     Moran
     Murkowski
     Murphy
     Murray
     Nelson
     Paul
     Perdue
     Peters
     Portman
     Reed
     Risch
     Roberts
     Rounds
     Rubio
     Sanders
     Sasse
     Schatz
     Schumer
     Scott
     Shaheen
     Shelby
     Smith
     Stabenow
     Sullivan
     Tester
     Thune
     Tillis
     Toomey
     Udall
     Van Hollen
     Warner
     Warren
     Whitehouse
     Wicker
     Wyden
     Young

                             NOT VOTING--2

     Booker
     McCain
       
  The nomination was confirmed.
  The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the motion to 
reconsider is considered made and laid upon the table and the President 
will be immediately notified of the Senate's action.

                          ____________________